Before any Level 1 or Level 2 review application may be approved, the reviewing authority must confirm there is clear and convincing documentation in the record to support a finding that the land use meets the applicable performance criteria listed in this section.
Sections 100-63, 100-64, 100-65, 100-66, 100-67 and 100-68 each contain a single criterion for which a written finding must be made by the reviewing authority. In making the finding, the reviewing authority shall consider the specific objectives or standards referenced in the section that are applicable to the proposed land use. The reviewing authority shall also note any conditions of approval that apply to the criterion. If a criterion does not reference any objective or standard that is applicable, the reviewing authority shall make a finding that the criterion is not applicable.
If a Level 2 review application is denied, the Planning Board shall provide the applicant a written explanation of the denial, including an explanation for its vote from each member opposed to the approval.
Criterion. The reviewing authority shall find that a proposed land use will have no impact on the environment that is contrary to the purposes of this chapter, if there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the following objectives have been met:
Stormwater runoff from the land use is minimized to the greatest practical extent and adequately managed to reduce the risk of relevant detrimental effects;
Significant wildlife habitat, and other important habitat as identified in the Bucksport Comprehensive Plan, as adopted, are adequately protected from any relevant detrimental effect of the land use; and
Criterion. The reviewing authority shall find that a proposed land use will have no impact on special areas that is contrary to the purposes of this chapter, if there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the following objectives have been met:
Areas for public access to water bodies, wetlands and areas developed with commercial fisheries and maritime activities are adequately protected from any relevant detrimental effect of the land use;
And areas with unique natural character identified in the Bucksport Comprehensive Plan, as adopted, are adequately protected from any relevant detrimental effect of the land use.
Criterion. The reviewing authority shall find that a proposed land use will have no impact on local areas that is contrary to the purposes of this chapter, if there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the following objectives have been met:
The land use is appropriately separated and shielded from abutting land uses and public or private ways to adequately mitigate any relevant detrimental effect;
Criterion. The reviewing authority shall find that a proposed land use will have no impact on public safety that is contrary to the purposes of this chapter, if there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the following objectives have been met:
Criterion. In addition to finding that the applicable criteria identified in §§ 100-63, 100-64, 100-65 and 100-66 have been met, before a land use may be approved, the reviewing authority must find that there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the land use has met all applicable specific use standards in Article VIII.
Criterion. In addition to finding that the applicable criteria identified in §§ 100-63, 100-64, 100-65, 100-66 and 100-67 have been met, before a land use may be approved, the reviewing authority must find that there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the land use has met all applicable dimensional standards in Article IX.
Bucksport City Zoning Code
ARTICLE X
Performance Criteria
§ 100-62 Required findings.
Before any Level 1 or Level 2 review application may be approved, the reviewing authority must confirm there is clear and convincing documentation in the record to support a finding that the land use meets the applicable performance criteria listed in this section.
Sections 100-63, 100-64, 100-65, 100-66, 100-67 and 100-68 each contain a single criterion for which a written finding must be made by the reviewing authority. In making the finding, the reviewing authority shall consider the specific objectives or standards referenced in the section that are applicable to the proposed land use. The reviewing authority shall also note any conditions of approval that apply to the criterion. If a criterion does not reference any objective or standard that is applicable, the reviewing authority shall make a finding that the criterion is not applicable.
If a Level 2 review application is denied, the Planning Board shall provide the applicant a written explanation of the denial, including an explanation for its vote from each member opposed to the approval.
Criterion. The reviewing authority shall find that a proposed land use will have no impact on the environment that is contrary to the purposes of this chapter, if there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the following objectives have been met:
Stormwater runoff from the land use is minimized to the greatest practical extent and adequately managed to reduce the risk of relevant detrimental effects;
Significant wildlife habitat, and other important habitat as identified in the Bucksport Comprehensive Plan, as adopted, are adequately protected from any relevant detrimental effect of the land use; and
Criterion. The reviewing authority shall find that a proposed land use will have no impact on special areas that is contrary to the purposes of this chapter, if there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the following objectives have been met:
Areas for public access to water bodies, wetlands and areas developed with commercial fisheries and maritime activities are adequately protected from any relevant detrimental effect of the land use;
And areas with unique natural character identified in the Bucksport Comprehensive Plan, as adopted, are adequately protected from any relevant detrimental effect of the land use.
Criterion. The reviewing authority shall find that a proposed land use will have no impact on local areas that is contrary to the purposes of this chapter, if there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the following objectives have been met:
The land use is appropriately separated and shielded from abutting land uses and public or private ways to adequately mitigate any relevant detrimental effect;
Criterion. The reviewing authority shall find that a proposed land use will have no impact on public safety that is contrary to the purposes of this chapter, if there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the following objectives have been met:
Criterion. In addition to finding that the applicable criteria identified in §§ 100-63, 100-64, 100-65 and 100-66 have been met, before a land use may be approved, the reviewing authority must find that there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the land use has met all applicable specific use standards in Article VIII.
Criterion. In addition to finding that the applicable criteria identified in §§ 100-63, 100-64, 100-65, 100-66 and 100-67 have been met, before a land use may be approved, the reviewing authority must find that there is clear and convincing documentation in the record verifying that the land use has met all applicable dimensional standards in Article IX.