03 REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL TAKING ISSUES
Pursuant to Utah state code 63L-4, there is an underlying policy in the county favoring the serious and careful consideration of matters involving constitutional taking claims. There is a desire for fairness to the owner of private property bringing the claim in view of the uncertainty and expense involved in defending lawsuits alleging such issues. At the same time, the legitimate role of the county in lawfully regulating real property must be preserved and the public's right to require the dedication or exaction of property consistent with the constitution. Consistent with this policy, this chapter establishes procedures for the review of actions that may involve constitutional takings, as well as providing guidelines for such considerations.
(Ord. 2016-04, 4-26-2016, eff. 5-12-2016)
Any owner of private real property who claims there has been a constitutional taking of private real property by an action of the county may request a review of the final decision and action by the county.
The following are specific procedures established for such a review:
(Ord. 2016-04, 4-26-2016, eff. 5-12-2016)
The county council, or their designee, shall review the facts and information presented by the applicant to determine whether or not the action by the county constitutes a constitutional taking, as defined in this chapter. In doing so, they shall consider:
(Ord. 2016-04, 4-26-2016, eff. 5-12-2016)
After completing the review, the county council, or their designee, shall make a determination regarding the above issues and, where determined to be necessary and appropriate, shall make a recommendation to the officer, employee, board, commission or council that made the decision that gave rise to the constitutional takings claim.
(Ord. 2016-04, 4-26-2016, eff. 5-12-2016)
03 REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL TAKING ISSUES
Pursuant to Utah state code 63L-4, there is an underlying policy in the county favoring the serious and careful consideration of matters involving constitutional taking claims. There is a desire for fairness to the owner of private property bringing the claim in view of the uncertainty and expense involved in defending lawsuits alleging such issues. At the same time, the legitimate role of the county in lawfully regulating real property must be preserved and the public's right to require the dedication or exaction of property consistent with the constitution. Consistent with this policy, this chapter establishes procedures for the review of actions that may involve constitutional takings, as well as providing guidelines for such considerations.
(Ord. 2016-04, 4-26-2016, eff. 5-12-2016)
Any owner of private real property who claims there has been a constitutional taking of private real property by an action of the county may request a review of the final decision and action by the county.
The following are specific procedures established for such a review:
(Ord. 2016-04, 4-26-2016, eff. 5-12-2016)
The county council, or their designee, shall review the facts and information presented by the applicant to determine whether or not the action by the county constitutes a constitutional taking, as defined in this chapter. In doing so, they shall consider:
(Ord. 2016-04, 4-26-2016, eff. 5-12-2016)
After completing the review, the county council, or their designee, shall make a determination regarding the above issues and, where determined to be necessary and appropriate, shall make a recommendation to the officer, employee, board, commission or council that made the decision that gave rise to the constitutional takings claim.
(Ord. 2016-04, 4-26-2016, eff. 5-12-2016)