Planned Unit Development District
Table 1: PUD Tiers | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | |
Modification Qualifier | • A project modifying a maximum of two (2) standards that do not impact density or uses | • A project modifying a standard impacting density (up to 90% change); or • A project modifying a use requirement; or • A project modifying three (3) standards | • A project modifying a standard impacting density (90% change or greater); or • A project modifying four (4) or more standards |
Public Benefit Requirements | • 2 public benefits with at least 1 being a priority benefit | • 3 public benefits with at least 1 being a priority benefit; and • At least 2 required benefits must be a Tier 2 or higher | • 5 public benefits with at least 2 being priority benefits; and • At least 1 required benefit must be a Tier 2 or higher; and • At least 2 required benefit must be a Tier 3 |
Table 2: Public Benefits | |
|---|---|
Priority Benefit | Public Benefit Description |
Tier 1 | |
Special access features or provisions to existing or planned public transit facilities. | |
Significant public art installation to be located on private property but visible from the public right-of-way and accessible to the public. | |
Rooftop activation with public use (M-2 and M-3 base zoning only). | |
Provision of EV charging for 10% of parking spaces. | |
Provision for and/or protection of green infrastructure such as planned and managed networks of open spaces (including parks) and features that use natural means such as vegetation to capture, store and infiltrate stormwater runoff (including bioswales, green roofs, and rain gardens). | |
* | Extraordinary landscaping and greenspace provisions that focus on native plantings to support pollinators, keystone species, habitat diversity or canopy coverage that is beyond any minimum requirements. |
Agreement to participate in City's building benchmarking program for commercial buildings less than 100,000 gross square feet. | |
Architectural distinction at street level (first two floors or 40 feet above grade).1 | |
Provision of expanded sidewalk infrastructure in a business district through construction of an outdoor dining area or programmed plaza on private property covering less than 50% of the width of the property. | |
Tier 2 | |
* | Preservation of existing building(s). |
* | Architectural distinction at street level and at the roofline.1 |
Provision of missing housing or dwelling unit types accounting for a minimum of 30% of the total unit mix of a project (duplexes, townhomes, villas, or apartments with 2 or more bedrooms). | |
Provision of EV charging stations for 50% of parking spaces or more. | |
* | Provision of a minimum of five (5) publicly accessible EV charging stations located along or within 500 feet walking distance of a Consumer Emphasis Area. |
Use of a shared parking agreement for access to existing underutilized parking spaces within 500 feet walking distance of development site to reduce number of newly constructed parking spaces. | |
Provision of high-efficiency mechanical system proven to have reduced greenhouse gas emissions. | |
Tier 3 | |
Fully below grade parking structure. | |
* | Provision of a minimum of 5% of the total project dwelling units for affordable housing.2 |
* | Provision of a minimum of 10% of the total project dwelling units for workforce housing.3 |
* | Provision of entertainment use as a significant use component of the development program. |
* | Contribution to an affordable CEA space through provision of below market rent, coverage of initial tenant build-out costs, or another provision deemed by the City Council to lower the barrier to entry or cost to entry for a CEA use.4 |
* | Provision of white-box CEA space to support small businesses or pop-up shops.4 |
Inclusion of a use that will diversify tax base or drive significant sales tax revenue (marijuana dispensaries and retail smoking establishments shall not qualify). | |
Inclusion of alternative energy sources. | |
Building designed to LEED Gold standard or higher. | |
Extension of city standard streetscape, sidewalks, or bicycle lanes from project site along adjacent property to complete connections to larger networks where gaps exist. | |
Notes | |
1 Architectural distinction sets a standard for excellence, elevating and enriching the built environment with exterior visual elements that are notable in shape or appearance. While architectural distinction requires enhanced and creative design, projects shall still be deemed compatible and appropriate for their context by the Architectural Review Board per Section 400.110. Architectural distinction is evaluated by the City Council and could be achieved through, but is not limited to, innovative design, culturally rooted design, substantial detailing, or distinctive massing. For example, standard block massing with high quality materials does not alone rise to the level of architectural distinction. | |
2 Affordable housing units shall be permanently available for residents with a qualifying income not exceeding 80% of the St. Louis County area median income as defined and determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Total annual rent of said units shall not exceed 30% of the maximum qualifying income. Qualifying units shall be a mix of type reflecting the total unit type distribution for the project. | |
3 Workforce housing units shall be permanently available for residents with a qualifying income not exceeding 100% of the St. Louis County area median income as defined and determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Total annual rent of said units shall not exceed 30% of the maximum qualifying income. Qualifying units shall be a mix of type reflecting the total unit type distribution for the project. | |
4 CEA spaces qualifying for public benefits shall be occupied within six months of issuance of the first occupancy or temporary occupancy permit issued for the project, unless such requirement is modified by the City Council. | |
Table 3: PUD Process | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Application | Preapplication Meetings | Review and Decision Making | ||||
Staff | Community Conference | Staff | Plan Commission | Architectural Review Board | City Council | |
PUD | O | X | R | [R] | [D], A | |
PUD major amendment | R | D | ||||
PUD minor amendment | D | |||||
Conceptual Review1 | R | R | ||||
Rezoning2 | R | [R] | [D] | |||
Site Plan Review2 | R | D | ||||
Architectural Review2 | R | D | ||||
Subdivision Plat2 | R | R | [D] | |||
Notes | ||||||
X = Required; O = Recommended; (blank) = Not Applicable/Not Required; R = Review and Recommendation; D = Review and Decision; A = Appeal Decision; [ ] = Public Hearing 1 Conceptual Review process is recommended for a new PUD but is not required 2 Application is required concurrent with PUD unless deemed not applicable to a project scope by the Director of Planning and Development Services | ||||||