GENERAL REGULATIONS
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Nothing in this ordinance shall be deemed to prevent the strengthening or restoring, to a safe condition, of any building, structure, or part thereof, declared to be unsafe by any official charged with protecting the public safety, except for the conditions as stated in Section 9.12, B., 3., b., or 9.12, C., 2., b.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
If the landowner is not complying with all of the conditions listed on the conditional use permit, the zoning administrator shall report the fact in writing to the chairman of the board of adjustment. The report shall state specifically the manner in which the landowner is not complying with the conditions on the conditional use permit, and a copy of the report shall be furnished to the landowner at the same time it is furnished to the chairman of the board of adjustment.
The board shall hold a hearing on the report within a reasonable time, and notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be furnished to the landowner at least one week prior to the hearing. If the board of adjustments finds that the facts alleged in the report of the zoning administrator are true and that the landowner has taken no steps to comply with them between the date of the report and the date of the hearing, the board of adjustment may authorize the zoning administrator to revoke the conditional use permit and take the necessary legal action to cause the termination of the activity on the land which the conditional use permit authorizes.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Any access to above ground pools by means of a ladder or stairway shall be provided with a self-closing or self-latching door or gate, or some other device that would prevent a small child from gaining access to the pool by means of a ladder.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
All such site plans shall be reviewed by the planning commission, or its duly authorized representative, and the factual determination approving or rejecting such plans shall be made in accordance with requirements of this and other applicable sections of this ordinance, and the comprehensive plan for the city. However, no action of approving or rejecting any site plan shall be taken unless and until a review of the proposal has been made by Planning and Development Services of Kenton County staff.
All site plans approved shall be binding upon the applicants, their successors and assigns and shall limit the development to all conditions and limitations established in such plans.
Amendments to plans may be made in accordance with the procedure required by this ordinance subject to the same limitations and requirements as those under which such plans were originally approved.
After final approval, the subject area may be developed in phases, provided all of the procedures required by the planning commission, or its duly authorized representative, have been complied with.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The aforementioned information required may be combined in any suitable and convenient manner so long as the data required is clearly indicated. A separate plan or drawing for each element is not necessary, but may be provided at the option of the applicant.
The aforementioned information required may be combined in any suitable and convenient manner so long as the data required is clearly indicated.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
After consideration of the recommendations, the city's zoning administrator may authorize use of the site in accordance with the submitted plans.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Flood data within this section identify the elevation of the 100-year flood level and the width of the floodway as follows:
TABLE A DECOURSEY CREEK | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance River Mile1 | Station Point2 | Elevation of 100 Year Flood3 | Width of Floodway4 |
| 2,450 | A | 505 | 55 |
| 3,200 | B | 505 | 125 |
| 3,960 | C | 505 | 80 |
| 4,540 | D | 505 | 220 |
| 5,090 | E | 505 | 190 |
| 5,191 | F | 505 | 238 |
| 5,810 | G | 505 | 53 |
| 6,200 | H | 505 | 45 |
| 6,270 | I | 505 | 101 |
| 6,400 | J | 505 | 111 |
| 6,880 | K | 505 | 53 |
| 6,970 | L | 505.5 | 50 |
| 7,410 | M | 508.4 | 66 |
| 7,800 | N | 511.9 | 63 |
| 7,980 | O | 513.7 | 55 |
| 8,520 | P | 517.2 | 109 |
| 9,240 | Q | 525.7 | 45 |
| 9,480 | R | 525.9 | 59 |
| 9,600 | S | 525.9 | 44 |
| 9,750 | T | 529.6 | 190 |
| 10,380 | U | 534.7 | 77 |
| 1 As measured upstream from the Licking River, in feet 2 Coincides with river cross sections identified on the zoning map 3 Elevation computed with consideration of backwater from the Licking River 4 Measured in feet | |||
TABLE A DECOURSEY CREEK | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance River Mile1 | Station Point2 | Elevation of 100 Year Flood3 | Width of Floodway4 |
| 2,450 | A | 505 | 55 |
| 3,200 | B | 505 | 125 |
| 3,960 | C | 505 | 80 |
| 4,540 | D | 505 | 220 |
| 5,090 | E | 505 | 190 |
| 5,191 | F | 505 | 238 |
| 5,810 | G | 505 | 53 |
| 6,200 | H | 505 | 45 |
| 6,270 | I | 505 | 101 |
| 6,400 | J | 505 | 111 |
| 6,880 | K | 505 | 53 |
| 6,970 | L | 505.5 | 50 |
| 7,410 | M | 508.4 | 66 |
| 7,800 | N | 511.9 | 63 |
| 7,980 | O | 513.7 | 55 |
| 8,520 | P | 517.2 | 109 |
| 9,240 | Q | 525.7 | 45 |
| 9,480 | R | 525.9 | 59 |
| 9,600 | S | 525.9 | 44 |
| 9,750 | T | 529.6 | 190 |
| 10,380 | U | 534.7 | 77 |
| 1 As measured upstream from the Licking River, in feet 2 Coincides with river cross sections identified on the zoning map 3 Elevation computed with consideration of backwater from the Licking River 4 Measured in feet | |||
TABLE A DECOURSEY CREEK | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance River Mile1 | Station Point2 | Elevation of 100 Year Flood3 | Width of Floodway4 |
| 2,450 | A | 505 | 55 |
| 3,200 | B | 505 | 125 |
| 3,960 | C | 505 | 80 |
| 4,540 | D | 505 | 220 |
| 5,090 | E | 505 | 190 |
| 5,191 | F | 505 | 238 |
| 5,810 | G | 505 | 53 |
| 6,200 | H | 505 | 45 |
| 6,270 | I | 505 | 101 |
| 6,400 | J | 505 | 111 |
| 6,880 | K | 505 | 53 |
| 6,970 | L | 505.5 | 50 |
| 7,410 | M | 508.4 | 66 |
| 7,800 | N | 511.9 | 63 |
| 7,980 | O | 513.7 | 55 |
| 8,520 | P | 517.2 | 109 |
| 9,240 | Q | 525.7 | 45 |
| 9,480 | R | 525.9 | 59 |
| 9,600 | S | 525.9 | 44 |
| 9,750 | T | 529.6 | 190 |
| 10,380 | U | 534.7 | 77 |
| 1 As measured upstream from the Licking River, in feet 2 Coincides with river cross sections identified on the zoning map 3 Elevation computed with consideration of backwater from the Licking River 4 Measured in feet | |||
TABLE A DECOURSEY CREEK | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance River Mile1 | Station Point2 | Elevation of 100 Year Flood3 | Width of Floodway4 |
| 2,450 | A | 505 | 55 |
| 3,200 | B | 505 | 125 |
| 3,960 | C | 505 | 80 |
| 4,540 | D | 505 | 220 |
| 5,090 | E | 505 | 190 |
| 5,191 | F | 505 | 238 |
| 5,810 | G | 505 | 53 |
| 6,200 | H | 505 | 45 |
| 6,270 | I | 505 | 101 |
| 6,400 | J | 505 | 111 |
| 6,880 | K | 505 | 53 |
| 6,970 | L | 505.5 | 50 |
| 7,410 | M | 508.4 | 66 |
| 7,800 | N | 511.9 | 63 |
| 7,980 | O | 513.7 | 55 |
| 8,520 | P | 517.2 | 109 |
| 9,240 | Q | 525.7 | 45 |
| 9,480 | R | 525.9 | 59 |
| 9,600 | S | 525.9 | 44 |
| 9,750 | T | 529.6 | 190 |
| 10,380 | U | 534.7 | 77 |
| 1 As measured upstream from the Licking River, in feet 2 Coincides with river cross sections identified on the zoning map 3 Elevation computed with consideration of backwater from the Licking River 4 Measured in feet | |||
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Defendant City of Newport ("City" or "Newport") long ago gained a reputation as home to a veritable smorgasbord of vice, attracting patrons from across the nation. For decades, the small city was considered the Midwest's answer to Las Vegas, and leaders of organized crime were said to operate its gambling casinos and nightclubs.
In the 1960's, public pressure began to demand that Newport be cleaned up. This pressure has continued until the present, with varying degrees of success.
A 1986 report generated by the Newport Alcoholic Beverage Control Administrator indicated that of 28 adult bars opened since 1978 (including successive bars at the same site), 21 had had at least one prostitution-related conviction, and 18 had had multiple convictions. Def. Ex. K, p. 2. The report explained that "all of the prostitution in businesses with adult entertainment involved an alcoholic beverage as the median [sic] of exchange and the solicitation of such drinks by 'mixers.'" Id. In all, 98% of prostitution arrests in Newport occurred in the vicinity of these bars. Id. Adult entertainment establishments, which constituted 12% of all businesses serving alcohol, accounted for 17% of all police runs. Def. Ex. K, p. 21.
A later review, conducted in 1990 by the Newport License Inspector, documented the continued prostitution arrests occurring at several adult dancing establishments. Def. Ex. G. Moreover, the City determined that over $ 70,000 was expended in 1990 to target, patrol and prosecute the illicit behavior occurring in and around the bars. Def. Ex. H.
Several of Newport's citizens, merchants and church groups also opposed the presence of the semi-nude dancing clubs. These groups generally believed that the adult entertainment clubs were "clouds over [the] neighborhood that keep [it] from growing in the [right] direction." See Def. Ex. I (letter to Mayor from Taylors Landing Business District). Complaints commonly expressed were that the seamy establishments deterred other merchants from locating in Newport's business district, deterred shoppers, served a poor example for the City's youth, and generally tarnished the City's image. Id.
Bright Lights, Inc., v. City of Newport, 830 F. Supp. 378, 380-81 (E. D. Ky. 1993).
Based on those findings, the court went on to hold in relevant part:
Having considered the matter carefully, the court concludes that some leeway must be afforded the reform efforts of the City Council of Newport. This body has been elected by the citizens to attempt to "clean up the image" of the City.
To do this, it must overcome the sleazy impression of Newport and Northern Kentucky that survives from "the heyday" when things ran wide open; reform candidates were literally drugged and framed for morals offenses by public officials and police officers; the members of reform citizens groups were vilified and harassed; and a "liberal" in local parlance was a person favoring the continued open and notorious violation of the gambling and morals laws.
To illustrate that the Council's perception of a need to clean up the image of the City is not paranoid, the court notes the following statements in a national magazine's satirical Chapter on Newport's big sister, the city of Cincinnati.
"The city's streets fairly shine; the odd litterer draws a scornful stare. Wide avenues, bosky side streets, the most inviting of thoroughfares. And clean. So clean. No X-rated movie theaters, no adult-book stores, no bare-breasted night joints soil these streets, all of them long ago jettisoned over to the Kentucky side of the river."
Peter Richmond, “Town Without Pity,” Gentlemen's Quarterly, July 1993, at 102, 104.
This court holds that the City of Newport has the right to secede as Cincinnati's combat zone.
The court holds that the City has "an important and substantial governmental interest" in advancing these reform goals, which interest is furthered by the ordinances in question. Barnes, 111 S. Ct. at 2461. The court further finds and holds that in the case of the City of Newport, given its unique history, the ordinances' "incidental restriction on alleged First Amendment freedoms is no greater than is essential to the furtherance of that interest." Id. (quoting O'Brien, 391 U.S. at 376-77, 88 S. Ct. at 1678-79).
Newport's image affects that of all of Northern Kentucky, a community of nearly 300,000 people. That City and its community have the right to project a progressive and decent image. The nudity ordinances contribute to the enhancement of this interest and will be upheld. 830 F.Supp. at 384;
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
GENERAL REGULATIONS
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Nothing in this ordinance shall be deemed to prevent the strengthening or restoring, to a safe condition, of any building, structure, or part thereof, declared to be unsafe by any official charged with protecting the public safety, except for the conditions as stated in Section 9.12, B., 3., b., or 9.12, C., 2., b.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
If the landowner is not complying with all of the conditions listed on the conditional use permit, the zoning administrator shall report the fact in writing to the chairman of the board of adjustment. The report shall state specifically the manner in which the landowner is not complying with the conditions on the conditional use permit, and a copy of the report shall be furnished to the landowner at the same time it is furnished to the chairman of the board of adjustment.
The board shall hold a hearing on the report within a reasonable time, and notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be furnished to the landowner at least one week prior to the hearing. If the board of adjustments finds that the facts alleged in the report of the zoning administrator are true and that the landowner has taken no steps to comply with them between the date of the report and the date of the hearing, the board of adjustment may authorize the zoning administrator to revoke the conditional use permit and take the necessary legal action to cause the termination of the activity on the land which the conditional use permit authorizes.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Any access to above ground pools by means of a ladder or stairway shall be provided with a self-closing or self-latching door or gate, or some other device that would prevent a small child from gaining access to the pool by means of a ladder.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
All such site plans shall be reviewed by the planning commission, or its duly authorized representative, and the factual determination approving or rejecting such plans shall be made in accordance with requirements of this and other applicable sections of this ordinance, and the comprehensive plan for the city. However, no action of approving or rejecting any site plan shall be taken unless and until a review of the proposal has been made by Planning and Development Services of Kenton County staff.
All site plans approved shall be binding upon the applicants, their successors and assigns and shall limit the development to all conditions and limitations established in such plans.
Amendments to plans may be made in accordance with the procedure required by this ordinance subject to the same limitations and requirements as those under which such plans were originally approved.
After final approval, the subject area may be developed in phases, provided all of the procedures required by the planning commission, or its duly authorized representative, have been complied with.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The aforementioned information required may be combined in any suitable and convenient manner so long as the data required is clearly indicated. A separate plan or drawing for each element is not necessary, but may be provided at the option of the applicant.
The aforementioned information required may be combined in any suitable and convenient manner so long as the data required is clearly indicated.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
After consideration of the recommendations, the city's zoning administrator may authorize use of the site in accordance with the submitted plans.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Flood data within this section identify the elevation of the 100-year flood level and the width of the floodway as follows:
TABLE A DECOURSEY CREEK | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance River Mile1 | Station Point2 | Elevation of 100 Year Flood3 | Width of Floodway4 |
| 2,450 | A | 505 | 55 |
| 3,200 | B | 505 | 125 |
| 3,960 | C | 505 | 80 |
| 4,540 | D | 505 | 220 |
| 5,090 | E | 505 | 190 |
| 5,191 | F | 505 | 238 |
| 5,810 | G | 505 | 53 |
| 6,200 | H | 505 | 45 |
| 6,270 | I | 505 | 101 |
| 6,400 | J | 505 | 111 |
| 6,880 | K | 505 | 53 |
| 6,970 | L | 505.5 | 50 |
| 7,410 | M | 508.4 | 66 |
| 7,800 | N | 511.9 | 63 |
| 7,980 | O | 513.7 | 55 |
| 8,520 | P | 517.2 | 109 |
| 9,240 | Q | 525.7 | 45 |
| 9,480 | R | 525.9 | 59 |
| 9,600 | S | 525.9 | 44 |
| 9,750 | T | 529.6 | 190 |
| 10,380 | U | 534.7 | 77 |
| 1 As measured upstream from the Licking River, in feet 2 Coincides with river cross sections identified on the zoning map 3 Elevation computed with consideration of backwater from the Licking River 4 Measured in feet | |||
TABLE A DECOURSEY CREEK | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance River Mile1 | Station Point2 | Elevation of 100 Year Flood3 | Width of Floodway4 |
| 2,450 | A | 505 | 55 |
| 3,200 | B | 505 | 125 |
| 3,960 | C | 505 | 80 |
| 4,540 | D | 505 | 220 |
| 5,090 | E | 505 | 190 |
| 5,191 | F | 505 | 238 |
| 5,810 | G | 505 | 53 |
| 6,200 | H | 505 | 45 |
| 6,270 | I | 505 | 101 |
| 6,400 | J | 505 | 111 |
| 6,880 | K | 505 | 53 |
| 6,970 | L | 505.5 | 50 |
| 7,410 | M | 508.4 | 66 |
| 7,800 | N | 511.9 | 63 |
| 7,980 | O | 513.7 | 55 |
| 8,520 | P | 517.2 | 109 |
| 9,240 | Q | 525.7 | 45 |
| 9,480 | R | 525.9 | 59 |
| 9,600 | S | 525.9 | 44 |
| 9,750 | T | 529.6 | 190 |
| 10,380 | U | 534.7 | 77 |
| 1 As measured upstream from the Licking River, in feet 2 Coincides with river cross sections identified on the zoning map 3 Elevation computed with consideration of backwater from the Licking River 4 Measured in feet | |||
TABLE A DECOURSEY CREEK | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance River Mile1 | Station Point2 | Elevation of 100 Year Flood3 | Width of Floodway4 |
| 2,450 | A | 505 | 55 |
| 3,200 | B | 505 | 125 |
| 3,960 | C | 505 | 80 |
| 4,540 | D | 505 | 220 |
| 5,090 | E | 505 | 190 |
| 5,191 | F | 505 | 238 |
| 5,810 | G | 505 | 53 |
| 6,200 | H | 505 | 45 |
| 6,270 | I | 505 | 101 |
| 6,400 | J | 505 | 111 |
| 6,880 | K | 505 | 53 |
| 6,970 | L | 505.5 | 50 |
| 7,410 | M | 508.4 | 66 |
| 7,800 | N | 511.9 | 63 |
| 7,980 | O | 513.7 | 55 |
| 8,520 | P | 517.2 | 109 |
| 9,240 | Q | 525.7 | 45 |
| 9,480 | R | 525.9 | 59 |
| 9,600 | S | 525.9 | 44 |
| 9,750 | T | 529.6 | 190 |
| 10,380 | U | 534.7 | 77 |
| 1 As measured upstream from the Licking River, in feet 2 Coincides with river cross sections identified on the zoning map 3 Elevation computed with consideration of backwater from the Licking River 4 Measured in feet | |||
TABLE A DECOURSEY CREEK | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance River Mile1 | Station Point2 | Elevation of 100 Year Flood3 | Width of Floodway4 |
| 2,450 | A | 505 | 55 |
| 3,200 | B | 505 | 125 |
| 3,960 | C | 505 | 80 |
| 4,540 | D | 505 | 220 |
| 5,090 | E | 505 | 190 |
| 5,191 | F | 505 | 238 |
| 5,810 | G | 505 | 53 |
| 6,200 | H | 505 | 45 |
| 6,270 | I | 505 | 101 |
| 6,400 | J | 505 | 111 |
| 6,880 | K | 505 | 53 |
| 6,970 | L | 505.5 | 50 |
| 7,410 | M | 508.4 | 66 |
| 7,800 | N | 511.9 | 63 |
| 7,980 | O | 513.7 | 55 |
| 8,520 | P | 517.2 | 109 |
| 9,240 | Q | 525.7 | 45 |
| 9,480 | R | 525.9 | 59 |
| 9,600 | S | 525.9 | 44 |
| 9,750 | T | 529.6 | 190 |
| 10,380 | U | 534.7 | 77 |
| 1 As measured upstream from the Licking River, in feet 2 Coincides with river cross sections identified on the zoning map 3 Elevation computed with consideration of backwater from the Licking River 4 Measured in feet | |||
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Defendant City of Newport ("City" or "Newport") long ago gained a reputation as home to a veritable smorgasbord of vice, attracting patrons from across the nation. For decades, the small city was considered the Midwest's answer to Las Vegas, and leaders of organized crime were said to operate its gambling casinos and nightclubs.
In the 1960's, public pressure began to demand that Newport be cleaned up. This pressure has continued until the present, with varying degrees of success.
A 1986 report generated by the Newport Alcoholic Beverage Control Administrator indicated that of 28 adult bars opened since 1978 (including successive bars at the same site), 21 had had at least one prostitution-related conviction, and 18 had had multiple convictions. Def. Ex. K, p. 2. The report explained that "all of the prostitution in businesses with adult entertainment involved an alcoholic beverage as the median [sic] of exchange and the solicitation of such drinks by 'mixers.'" Id. In all, 98% of prostitution arrests in Newport occurred in the vicinity of these bars. Id. Adult entertainment establishments, which constituted 12% of all businesses serving alcohol, accounted for 17% of all police runs. Def. Ex. K, p. 21.
A later review, conducted in 1990 by the Newport License Inspector, documented the continued prostitution arrests occurring at several adult dancing establishments. Def. Ex. G. Moreover, the City determined that over $ 70,000 was expended in 1990 to target, patrol and prosecute the illicit behavior occurring in and around the bars. Def. Ex. H.
Several of Newport's citizens, merchants and church groups also opposed the presence of the semi-nude dancing clubs. These groups generally believed that the adult entertainment clubs were "clouds over [the] neighborhood that keep [it] from growing in the [right] direction." See Def. Ex. I (letter to Mayor from Taylors Landing Business District). Complaints commonly expressed were that the seamy establishments deterred other merchants from locating in Newport's business district, deterred shoppers, served a poor example for the City's youth, and generally tarnished the City's image. Id.
Bright Lights, Inc., v. City of Newport, 830 F. Supp. 378, 380-81 (E. D. Ky. 1993).
Based on those findings, the court went on to hold in relevant part:
Having considered the matter carefully, the court concludes that some leeway must be afforded the reform efforts of the City Council of Newport. This body has been elected by the citizens to attempt to "clean up the image" of the City.
To do this, it must overcome the sleazy impression of Newport and Northern Kentucky that survives from "the heyday" when things ran wide open; reform candidates were literally drugged and framed for morals offenses by public officials and police officers; the members of reform citizens groups were vilified and harassed; and a "liberal" in local parlance was a person favoring the continued open and notorious violation of the gambling and morals laws.
To illustrate that the Council's perception of a need to clean up the image of the City is not paranoid, the court notes the following statements in a national magazine's satirical Chapter on Newport's big sister, the city of Cincinnati.
"The city's streets fairly shine; the odd litterer draws a scornful stare. Wide avenues, bosky side streets, the most inviting of thoroughfares. And clean. So clean. No X-rated movie theaters, no adult-book stores, no bare-breasted night joints soil these streets, all of them long ago jettisoned over to the Kentucky side of the river."
Peter Richmond, “Town Without Pity,” Gentlemen's Quarterly, July 1993, at 102, 104.
This court holds that the City of Newport has the right to secede as Cincinnati's combat zone.
The court holds that the City has "an important and substantial governmental interest" in advancing these reform goals, which interest is furthered by the ordinances in question. Barnes, 111 S. Ct. at 2461. The court further finds and holds that in the case of the City of Newport, given its unique history, the ordinances' "incidental restriction on alleged First Amendment freedoms is no greater than is essential to the furtherance of that interest." Id. (quoting O'Brien, 391 U.S. at 376-77, 88 S. Ct. at 1678-79).
Newport's image affects that of all of Northern Kentucky, a community of nearly 300,000 people. That City and its community have the right to project a progressive and decent image. The nudity ordinances contribute to the enhancement of this interest and will be upheld. 830 F.Supp. at 384;
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901