Zoneomics Logo
search icon

Irving City Zoning Code

CHAPTER UDC

7 Nonconformities

7.1 Nonconforming uses and structures.

7.1.1 
Any use of property existing on October 3, 1996 that does not conform to the regulations prescribed in this ordinance shall be deemed a nonconforming use.

7.2 Discontinuation or abandonment.

7.2.1 
The lawful use of land existing on October 3, 1996, although such does not conform to the provisions of this ordinance, may be continued as a nonconforming use under the terms and provisions of this ordinance, but if such nonconforming use is discontinued, any future use of said land and premises shall be in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance.

7.3 Continuation of use.

7.3.1 
The lawful use of a building on October 3, 1996 may be continued, although such does not conform to the provisions of this ordinance, and such use may be extended throughout the entire building provided that no structural alteration, except those required by city ordinance or state law, are made therein. If no structural alterations are made, nonconforming use of the same or more restricted classification may be continued, provided, however, that in the event a nonconforming use of a building is once changed to a higher or more restricted classification, it shall not later revert to the former lower or less restricted classification.
7.3.2 
Whenever the use of any building or land has become nonconforming by virtue of a change of the use district, such use may be continued and shall be discontinued in accordance with provisions governing original nonconforming uses.
7.3.3 
Whenever the use of any building used for single-family dwelling purposes or other residential purposes has become nonconforming by virtue of a change of the use district under this ordinance, such use may be continued and such building used as a single-family dwelling or other residential purposes.
7.3.4 
Whenever any single-family dwelling building is converted to a commercial or business use as a result of rezoning under this ordinance and such commercial or business use is discontinued, such building may be reoccupied as a single-family dwelling.

7.4 Alteration of nonconforming single-family structure.

7.4.1 
An existing legal nonconforming single-family structure used for single-family residential purposes which is nonconforming due to its location within a non-single-family zoning district may be improved, expanded or enlarged by an amount no more than fifty (50) percent of the original enclosed, habitable area of the structure, or no more than five hundred (500) square feet, whichever is greater, provided that the improvement, expansion or enlargement does not violate the setback or other area requirements of section 2.4.8. R-6 single-family zoning district of this ordinance. Residential accessory structures allowed by section 2.4.8. R-6 single-family zoning district may also be constructed on the same lot or tract as the existing single-family structure, provided that the additional construction complies with all requirements of section 2.4.8. R-6 single-family zoning districts and all other ordinances and regulations of the city.
7.4.2 
An existing legal nonconforming single-family structure used for single-family residential purposes which is nonconforming due to an encroachment by an enclosed, habitable portion of the single-family structure across a required setback line may be improved, expanded or enlarged provided that the improvement, expansion or enlargement is for additional enclosed, habitable area and does not encroach further into the required setback area than does the existing structure.

7.5 Destruction of nonconforming use.

7.5.1 
If a building occupied by a nonconforming use is destroyed by fire, explosion, or other casualty, or act of God, or public enemy, it may not be constructed or rebuilt except to conform with the provisions of this ordinance; however, nothing in this ordinance shall be taken to prevent restoration of a building destroyed to the extent of not more than fifty-one (51) percent of its reasonable market value at the time of destruction, nor the continued occupancy or use of such building or part thereof, which existed at the time of such partial destruction.

7.6 Discontinuation and elimination of nonconforming uses.

7.6.1 
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this ordinance, it is the declared purpose of this ordinance that nonconforming uses be eliminated and be required to conform to the regulations prescribed in this ordinance, having due regard for the property rights of the persons affected when considered in the light of the public welfare and character of the area surrounding the designated nonconforming use and the conservation and preservation of property. Nonconforming uses shall be discontinued in the following manner:
a) 
Any nonconforming use not conducted within a building shall be discontinued within two (2) years from October 3, 1996.
b) 
Any nonconforming use conducted partly within a building and partly without a building shall be discontinued within five (5) years from October 3, 1996.
c) 
Any nonconforming use conducted wholly within a building shall be discontinued within ten (10) years from October 3, 1996.

7.7 Nonconforming carports.

7.7.1 
Any carport constructed prior to September 9, 1992, upon premises zoned or used for single-family detached residential uses and which did not meet the applicable zoning setback requirements of the district in which such carport was located on that date, shall be considered a nonconforming residential use for purposes of this section, provided that this nonconforming use status shall only be an affirmative defense to prosecutions for violations of zoning setback requirements where the owner can show by a preponderance of the evidence that the carport is not a hazard to traffic on a street or highway abutting the lot or tract upon which the carport is located. Any carport constructed after September 9, 1992, shall meet all the requirements of section 3.1 Accessory Structures.
7.7.2 
A use set forth in section 3.18 Outside Storage shall not be classified as a nonconforming use and shall not be authorized to continue as a nonconforming use.

7.8 Manufactured home placement.

7.8.1 
In the case of a mobile home community which is non-conforming to the requirements of this Ordinance.
a) 
Any mobile home or HUD-code manufactured home which is non-conforming to the front, side and/or rear setbacks may continue in place without regard to those setbacks so long as the mobile or manufactured home is not moved. This non-conforming status shall not affect any duty of the owner to comply with the requirements of International Building Codes as adopted by the City of Irving, including local amendments thereto, and any other applicable ordinance of the city.
b) 
After June 1, 1999, whenever a mobile home or HUD-code manufactured home is moved to another plot or removed from a manufactured home community and such home was located closer to front, rear or side property lines than allowed under the zoning ordinance, another mobile or manufactured home may be placed in the same location, and may observe the same setbacks as the home which last left the location.
7.8.2 
Any mobile home used or occupied for single-family residential purposes may be replaced by a HUD-code manufactured home. Should the mobile home being replaced by a HUD-code manufactured home be located outside of an approved manufactured home community, the replacement HUD-code manufactured home shall comply with all setback and area requirements of the zoning district covering the property on which the home is located, except that it shall in no case have a front setback of less than twenty-five (25) feet, a side setback of less than five (5) feet, and a rear setback of less than twenty (20) feet.

7.9 Right-of-way acquisition by a governmental agency.

7.9.1 
Definitions.
a) 
Governmental agency.
United States of America, State of Texas, County of Dallas, City of Irving, or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction in the City of Irving with the ability to exercise eminent domain powers.
b) 
Right-of-way acquisition.
The securing of right-of-way through negotiation, purchase, bargain, trade, donation, condemnation or other means, but not including the dedication of right-of-way through the platting or zoning processes.
c) 
Curative measures.
Those actions, corrections, repairs and/or improvements identified in an appraisal or similar valuation analysis prepared in the context of considering Damages to the Remainder.
d) 
Damages to the remainder.
The diminution or reduction in value of the remainder property suffered as a result of the acquisition of a portion of a property for a public purpose.
7.9.2 
In the event right-of-way acquisition by a governmental agency causes a property or its improvements to be in violation of city zoning ordinances, said property shall be exempt from said provisions to the extent said violation is caused by the right-of-way acquisition, subject to the following:
a) 
Property which undergoes a zoning change initiated by the property owner subsequent to right-of-way acquisition shall no longer be subject to this exemption and shall instead have a nonconforming status to the extent that any nonconformance with city ordinances resulted from a right-of-way acquisition by a governmental agency prior to the rezoning and shall therefore be treated as a nonconforming use pursuant to the provisions of this chapter rather than exempt as provided above. However, a zoning change initiated by the city shall not cause a property to lose the exemption provided by this section for properties affected by right-of-way acquisitions.
b) 
Nothing provided in this provision shall be construed to permit any obstruction which may create a traffic safety hazard or any other safety hazard.
c) 
Improvements required by SP, S-P-1, or S-P-2 zoning cases and located in the area acquired for right-of-way shall no longer apply subsequent to the acquisition, except that required fencing originally located on the acquired property in the area of acquisition shall be relocated to the remainder of the tract as close as practicable inside the new property line.
d) 
Compensation provided; exemption inapplicable.
1) 
If a governmental agency provides compensation to a property owner for the demolition of improvements or for other curative measures which renders the property or its improvements to be in violation of city zoning ordinances, then the property shall not be eligible for exemptions under this section.
2) 
The building official is authorized to provide notice to any affected property owner, lienholder, or certificate of occupancy holder, listing the items of noncompliance for which no exemption is being provided under this section.
3) 
The building official is authorized to file an affidavit in the Dallas County Deed Records noting such noncompliance, that the property has been compensated for said noncompliance, and that a certificate of occupancy shall not be issued until such noncompliance is cured.
4) 
Once the property and its improvements are brought into full compliance with all applicable ordinances of the city, the building official will be authorized to file an affidavit in the Dallas County Deed Records noting such compliance.
e) 
The building official is authorized to revoke a certificate of occupancy for any building or structure for which compensation has been paid to be demolished as part of a right-of-way acquisition by a governmental agency.
f) 
A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building or structure for which compensation has been paid to be demolished or for other curative measures until such time that the property and its improvements either come into full compliance with all applicable ordinances of the city or the curative measures, for which the compensation was paid, have been completed.