Process and Procedure
Applications required under this Ordinance must be submitted in a form, manner, and number as required by the Kenton County Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment (BOA), or Legislative Body.
All applicants for development plan approvals, map amendments, variances, conditional uses, administrative appeals, and changes in nonconforming uses shall arrange a pre-application meeting with the Zoning Administrator before completing and filing the required application. Pre-application meetings are encouraged for text amendments. The Zoning Administrator will review the zoning classification of the site, review the regulatory ordinances and materials, and review the procedures. PDS will assist and advise the petitioners in preparing the application and supportive documents as necessary.
Applications must be accompanied by a fee amount that has been established by the Kenton County Planning Commission, BOA, or Legislative Body.
The Zoning Administrator shall determine if the application is administratively complete. If the Zoning Administrator determines that the application is not administratively complete, staff shall notify the applicant in writing. No additional review of the application shall occur until the application is determined to be administratively complete.
In all cases, the burden is on the applicant to show that an application complies with applicable review or approval criteria.
The following table summarizes the review and approval authority of the various review bodies and permit/entitlement type in the Ordinance.
| Table 13.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYPE OF PERMIT, PROCESS OR DECISION | CROSS REFERENCE | TRC* | ZONING ADMINISTRATOR | KCPC STAFF/PDS* | BOA* | KCPC* | CITY ADMINISTRATOR | [LEGISLATIVE BODY] |
| Concept Development Plan Review | 13.02 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Final Development Plan Review | 13.02 | DM | A | |||||
| Map Amendment | 13.04 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Text Amendment | 13.05 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Administrative Appeals | 13.12 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Changes from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use | 13.06 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Variance | 13.07 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Conditional Use | 13.08 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Certification of Zoning Compliance | 13.09 | DM | <A> | |||||
| Zoning Permits | 13.10 | DM | <A> | |||||
| R = Review Body < > = Public Hearing Required | DM = Final Decision-Making Body A = Authority to Hear and Decide Appeal of DM’s Action | |||||||
*TRC Technical Review Committee; KCPC Kenton County Planning Commission; | ||||||||
| Table 13.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYPE OF PERMIT, PROCESS OR DECISION | CROSS REFERENCE | TRC* | ZONING ADMINISTRATOR | KCPC STAFF/PDS* | BOA* | KCPC* | CITY ADMINISTRATOR | [LEGISLATIVE BODY] |
| Concept Development Plan Review | 13.02 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Final Development Plan Review | 13.02 | DM | A | |||||
| Map Amendment | 13.04 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Text Amendment | 13.05 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Administrative Appeals | 13.12 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Changes from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use | 13.06 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Variance | 13.07 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Conditional Use | 13.08 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Certification of Zoning Compliance | 13.09 | DM | <A> | |||||
| Zoning Permits | 13.10 | DM | <A> | |||||
| R = Review Body < > = Public Hearing Required | DM = Final Decision-Making Body A = Authority to Hear and Decide Appeal of DM’s Action | |||||||
*TRC Technical Review Committee; KCPC Kenton County Planning Commission; | ||||||||
| Table 13.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYPE OF PERMIT, PROCESS OR DECISION | CROSS REFERENCE | TRC* | ZONING ADMINISTRATOR | KCPC STAFF/PDS* | BOA* | KCPC* | CITY ADMINISTRATOR | [LEGISLATIVE BODY] |
| Concept Development Plan Review | 13.02 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Final Development Plan Review | 13.02 | DM | A | |||||
| Map Amendment | 13.04 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Text Amendment | 13.05 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Administrative Appeals | 13.12 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Changes from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use | 13.06 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Variance | 13.07 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Conditional Use | 13.08 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Certification of Zoning Compliance | 13.09 | DM | <A> | |||||
| Zoning Permits | 13.10 | DM | <A> | |||||
| R = Review Body < > = Public Hearing Required | DM = Final Decision-Making Body A = Authority to Hear and Decide Appeal of DM’s Action | |||||||
*TRC Technical Review Committee; KCPC Kenton County Planning Commission; | ||||||||
| Table 13.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYPE OF PERMIT, PROCESS OR DECISION | CROSS REFERENCE | TRC* | ZONING ADMINISTRATOR | KCPC STAFF/PDS* | BOA* | KCPC* | CITY ADMINISTRATOR | [LEGISLATIVE BODY] |
| Concept Development Plan Review | 13.02 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Final Development Plan Review | 13.02 | DM | A | |||||
| Map Amendment | 13.04 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Text Amendment | 13.05 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Administrative Appeals | 13.12 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Changes from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use | 13.06 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Variance | 13.07 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Conditional Use | 13.08 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Certification of Zoning Compliance | 13.09 | DM | <A> | |||||
| Zoning Permits | 13.10 | DM | <A> | |||||
| R = Review Body < > = Public Hearing Required | DM = Final Decision-Making Body A = Authority to Hear and Decide Appeal of DM’s Action | |||||||
*TRC Technical Review Committee; KCPC Kenton County Planning Commission; | ||||||||
Effective on: 1/1/1901
A Development Plan review process, as set forth herein, is hereby established to ensure adherence to the standards of this Ordinance.
The purpose of the process is to provide more predictability, a streamlined process, promote flexibility, innovation, and creativity in the design of the built environment, and assure the compatibility of development with the surrounding community.
The Concept Development Plan review process shall be required for any map amendment to any multi-family and any Planned Unit Development. In addition to the Concept Development Plan review process, a Final Development Plan review process is required for any construction within a PUD Zone. For all other zoning districts not requiring Final Development Plan review, zoning permits must be acquired after approval of a Concept Development Plan.
Map amendments to any single-family residential zone shall not require Concept Development Plan approval in accordance with this Article. Map amendments submitted by the legislative body, or the Kenton County Planning Commission, are not required to submit a Concept Development Plan.
The purpose of the Final Development Plan is to clearly define all construction matters and special conditions such as construction techniques, specific building locations and design (e.g., architecture), and specific site design (e.g., parking, grading, access and circulation) for an individual lot, block, or phase of development. The Final Development Plan shall be approved by PDS staff to assure that it is in conformity with the Concept Development Plan.
See Section 13.01 B. Pre-Application Meeting. All Map Amendments/Concept Development Plan applicants must meet with the Technical Review Committee for a pre-application project review. The TRC will provide comments and initial input. The TRC will also identify submittal requirements, including the need for a Traffic Impact Study at the Pre-application meeting. Applicants may seek input from the TRC as necessary as development details are refined.
Following review by the TRC, the petitioner may submit revised copies of the proposal that address the comments and concerns. The petitioner shall refer to the specific application packet to determine the format and number of copies to be delivered to PDS staff.
Amendments to a Concept Development Plan to be considered at the public hearing must be received by PDS staff in accordance with the KCPC bylaws, to allow for the PDS staff written report to include comments and recommendations related to plans that may have been amended in response to comments provided by PDS staff or TRC, in addition to Subsection e. below.
See Section 13.01 E. Public Hearing and Notice.
An Applicant may make amendments to a Concept Development Plan pending determination by the Kenton County Planning Commission at any time prior to a vote being called for by the Kenton County Planning Commission. If, in the sole discretion of the Kenton County Planning Commission, the proposed amendment is of such a nature that additional time is needed for review, then the Kenton County Planning Commission may continue its consideration in accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the Kenton County Planning Commission.
The Kenton County Planning Commission will then hold the public hearing and review the application and required information and shall make a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions or disapproval on the map amendment/Concept Development Plan in accordance with this Ordinance, KRS, and the Rules of Procedure of the Planning Commission.
If amendments are presented by the Applicant and agreed to by the Kenton County Planning Commission at the public hearing, then revised plans indicating all amendments approved by the Kenton County Planning Commission shall be filed with PDS staff after the public hearing but prior to legislative body action.
The legislative body shall take final action on a Map Amendment/Concept Development Plan, including any amendments accepted by the Kenton County Planning Commission, in accordance with the timeframe and process outlined for Map Amendments, in Section 13.04, Map Amendments.
Concept Development Plans shall be reviewed by PDS staff and recommendations made by the Planning Commission upon written findings that the Plan complies with the following:
Changes to an approved Concept Development Plan which has already received approval by the Legislative Body shall be subject to this Section. PDS staff shall determine whether a change to an approved Concept Development Plan is a Major Amendment or Minor Amendment.
All changes that do not meet the thresholds established below for Major Amendments shall be considered Minor Amendments. Minor Amendments may be administratively approved as part of the Final Development Plan or Zoning Permit without a public hearing.
A change shall be deemed a Major Amendment if PDS staff determines the change results in any of the following:
If PDS staff determines a change to an approved Concept Development Plan is a Major Amendment, then the applicant shall be required to file a new application of an amendment to the Concept Development Plan, which shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 13.02, E., Approval Process. for the initial approval of the Concept Development Plan.
Final Development Plans shall be reviewed by PDS staff. After review, PDS staff shall recommend favorable, favorable with conditions, or unfavorable on the Final Development Plan, including written findings that the Plan complies with the applicable articles and sections of the zoning ordinance and any conditions placed upon the approved Concept Development Plan, and all improvements identified or agreed upon resulting from the TIS are shown. The Legislative Body shall approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the Final Development Plan. All approved Final Development Plans shall be binding upon the applicants, their successors and assigns, and the development shall be limited to all conditions and limitations established in such plans.
After the Concept Development Plan is approved, the subject area may be developed in phases, provided all of the procedures required by local, state, and federal regulations have been complied with. Each phase may be submitted to the PDS staff at the time the applicant is ready to develop, and that phase will be reviewed against the approved Concept Development Plan. Required public amenities and infrastructure improvements shall be provided proportionally with each phase. Separate zoning permits must be obtained for each individual building after Final Development Plan approval.
If the Final Development Plan is for a specific building rather than a phased plan in the Subsection above, then the approval of the Final Development Plan shall also constitute an approved zoning permit. An approved Final Development Plan for an individual building does not replace any other local, state, or federal regulation approvals.
Final Development Plans shall be reviewed by PDS staff and make written findings that the Plan complies with the following:
Amendments to approved Final Development Plans may be approved by the Legislative Body using the same criteria in Section 13.02, E., 1. If changes to an approved Final Development Plan are considered minor, an application for Zoning Permit, (see Section 13.10 Zoning Permits), may be filed. If the Legislative Body determines a change to an approved Final Development Plan is a Major Amendment, then the applicant shall be required to file a new application of an amendment to the Concept Development Plan, which shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 13.02, E., Approval Process, for the initial approval of the Concept Development Plan.
Expiration
The legislative body may initiate a request for a public hearing by the planning commission, in accordance with the requirements of KRS Chapter 100, for the purpose of determining whether the Concept Development Plan should expire, if substantial construction is not started within one year of obtaining Final Development Plan approval.
An extension may be permitted upon approval of the legislative body if sufficient proof can be demonstrated that the Final Development Plan or construction was delayed due to circumstances beyond the applicant's control, and that prevailing conditions have not changed appreciably to render the previous approvals obsolete.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The intent of the Planned Unit Development District is to:
The PUD application shall be accompanied by all plans and documents. The PUD rezoning will follow the Development Plan Process as described in Section 13.02, Development Plan Review for Concept and Final Development Plans.
Standards are established for each PUD based on the approved narrative and development plan. In reviewing and approving intensity and dimensional standards, the City Council will consider the overall impact of the development on adjacent properties and infrastructure, the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and the quality of the development proposed and its impact on community character.
Uses permitted in a PUD may be any use that is found in Article 4, Use Regulations & Standards, subject to the approval of the City Council. While use-specific conditions outlined in Article 4 apply, other conditions required to mitigate incompatibilities and address site-specific conditions as imposed by the applicant or required by City Council shall apply and be binding.
For amendments to approved plans, see Section 13.02, E., 1., i., Amendments to Approved Concept Development Plan.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Before any map amendment is granted, the Planning Commission or City Council, must find that the amendment is in agreement with the adopted comprehensive plan, or in the absence of such a finding, that one or more of the following apply and such finding and report shall be recorded in the minutes and records of the Planning Commission or City Council.
No zoning map amendment application may be accepted if the proposed amendment would create a free-standing zone that does not meet the following minimum area standards:
| Table 13.2 | |
|---|---|
| PROPOSED ZONE | MINIMUM ZONE AREA |
| RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | |
| Residential Conventional Subdivision (R-CVS) | 1 acre |
| Residential Compact Subdivision (R-CPS) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Urban (R-U) | 10,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Multi-Family (R-MF) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| OTHER DISTRICTS | |
| Planned Unit Development (PUD) | 5 acres |
| Table 13.2 | |
|---|---|
| PROPOSED ZONE | MINIMUM ZONE AREA |
| RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | |
| Residential Conventional Subdivision (R-CVS) | 1 acre |
| Residential Compact Subdivision (R-CPS) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Urban (R-U) | 10,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Multi-Family (R-MF) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| OTHER DISTRICTS | |
| Planned Unit Development (PUD) | 5 acres |
| Table 13.2 | |
|---|---|
| PROPOSED ZONE | MINIMUM ZONE AREA |
| RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | |
| Residential Conventional Subdivision (R-CVS) | 1 acre |
| Residential Compact Subdivision (R-CPS) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Urban (R-U) | 10,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Multi-Family (R-MF) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| OTHER DISTRICTS | |
| Planned Unit Development (PUD) | 5 acres |
| Table 13.2 | |
|---|---|
| PROPOSED ZONE | MINIMUM ZONE AREA |
| RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | |
| Residential Conventional Subdivision (R-CVS) | 1 acre |
| Residential Compact Subdivision (R-CPS) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Urban (R-U) | 10,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Multi-Family (R-MF) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| OTHER DISTRICTS | |
| Planned Unit Development (PUD) | 5 acres |
Following the public hearing held by the Planning Commission on a proposed map amendment, the Commission shall, within 60 calendar days from the date of its receipt, make findings of fact and a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval of the proposed map amendment to the legislative body, including a statement setting forth the reasons and substantiation for such recommendation. The recommendation shall include a summary of the evidence and testimony presented by the proponents, opponents, and neutral parties of the proposed amendment. A tie vote shall be subject to further consideration by the Planning Commission for a period not to exceed 30 days, at the end of which, if the tie has not been broken, the application shall be forwarded to the City Council without a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval.
The legislative body shall take final action upon a proposed Map Amendment/Concept Development Plan within 90 days of the date upon which the Planning Commission takes its final action upon such proposal.
Expiration
The legislative body may initiate a request for a public hearing by the Planning Commission, in accordance with the requirements of KRS Chapter 100, for the purpose of determining whether the zoning map amendment should revert to its original designation, if substantial construction has not been initiated within a period of one year from the date of approval of the map amendment by the legislative body.
An extension may be permitted upon approval of the legislative body if sufficient proof can be demonstrated that the construction was delayed due to circumstances beyond the applicant's control, and that prevailing conditions have not changed appreciably to render the approved map amendment obsolete.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Following the public hearing held by the Planning Commission on a proposed text amendment, the Commission shall make a recommendation as to the text of the amendment and whether the amendment shall be approved, approved with conditions, or disapproved and shall state the reasons for its recommendation. The Planning Commission shall make its recommendation within 60 days of the date of its receipt of the proposed text amendment.
It shall take an affirmative vote of a majority of the City Council to adopt a proposed text amendment.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Prior to granting a change from one nonconforming use to another, the Board of Adjustment shall find that the new nonconforming use is in the same or more restrictive classification of use as the prior nonconforming use. In the determination of the same or more restrictive classification of use, the applicant shall establish, and the Board of Adjustment shall find:
A change from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use applies to the property for which it is granted and not to the individual who applied for it. A change from one nonconfroming use runs with the land and is transferable to any future owner of land, but it cannot be transferred by the applicant to a different site.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The BOA shall deny any request for a variance arising from circumstances that are the result of willful violations of this Ordinance by the applicant subsequent to the adoption of this Ordinance from which relief is sought.
The Board of Adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with this Ordinance. Violation of such conditions, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this Ordinance.
The Board of Adjustment shall not grant a variance to permit a use of any land, building, or structure which is not permitted by this Ordinance in the zone in question, or to alter the density of dwelling unit requirements in the zone in question.
A variance applies to the property for which it is granted and not to the individual who applied for it. A variance runs with the land and is transferable to any future owner of land, but it cannot be transferred by the applicant to a different site.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
A conditional use applies to the property for which it is granted and not to the individual who applied for it. A conditional use runs with the land and is transferable to any future owner of land, but it cannot be transferred by the applicant to a different site.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
A certificate of zoning compliance is required, post construction, for all commercial, office, industrial, mixed use, and multi-family developments. A certificate of zoning compliance will be issued upon completion of a permitted activity on a lot or parcel, in conformance with this ordinance.
Upon receipt of the application, the Zoning Administrator will review the materials provided to ensure all activities onsite have occurred in conformance with the original zoning permit and the requirements of this Ordinance. A site visit may be performed to confirm compliance with specific elements of the permit.
A certificate of zoning compliance is required to issue a certificate of occupancy.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Except where a Final Development Plan constitutes a zoning permit per Section 13.02 E., 2., Final Development Plan Approval, a zoning permit demonstrating intent to comply shall be required prior to any activity occurring on a lot or parcel, including but not limited to the following:
The Zoning Administrator shall review the submitted application materials for compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance. If the application sufficiently demonstrates intent to comply with the requirements of this Ordinance, the Zoning Administrator shall issue a zoning permit for the activity to proceed. If, upon review, the Zoning Administrator cannot establish intent to comply with this Ordinance, a zoning permit for the proposed activity shall not be approved.
Failure to obtain a zoning permit or failure to comply with an approved zoning permit constitutes a zoning violation.
The zoning permit issued must comply with the provision of this Ordinance unless a variance has been granted by the Board of Adjustments.
If a permit is required for a sign, then the following requirements and procedures apply:
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Per KRS 100.257 and KRS 100.261, appeals to the Board may be taken by any person or entity claiming that there is an error in, or that they are injuriously affected or aggrieved by, an official action, order, requirement, interpretation, grant, refusal, or decision of the Zoning Administrator.
Per KRS 100.347, final actions from the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, or Legislative Body may be appealed in the following manner:
An appeal stays all proceedings related to the action appealed from, unless the Zoning Administrator from whom the appeal is taken, certifies that a stay would cause imminent peril to life or property. In such case, proceedings shall not be stayed other than by a court of record on application, or on notice to the Zoning Administrator from whom the appeal is taken.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Process and Procedure
Applications required under this Ordinance must be submitted in a form, manner, and number as required by the Kenton County Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment (BOA), or Legislative Body.
All applicants for development plan approvals, map amendments, variances, conditional uses, administrative appeals, and changes in nonconforming uses shall arrange a pre-application meeting with the Zoning Administrator before completing and filing the required application. Pre-application meetings are encouraged for text amendments. The Zoning Administrator will review the zoning classification of the site, review the regulatory ordinances and materials, and review the procedures. PDS will assist and advise the petitioners in preparing the application and supportive documents as necessary.
Applications must be accompanied by a fee amount that has been established by the Kenton County Planning Commission, BOA, or Legislative Body.
The Zoning Administrator shall determine if the application is administratively complete. If the Zoning Administrator determines that the application is not administratively complete, staff shall notify the applicant in writing. No additional review of the application shall occur until the application is determined to be administratively complete.
In all cases, the burden is on the applicant to show that an application complies with applicable review or approval criteria.
The following table summarizes the review and approval authority of the various review bodies and permit/entitlement type in the Ordinance.
| Table 13.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYPE OF PERMIT, PROCESS OR DECISION | CROSS REFERENCE | TRC* | ZONING ADMINISTRATOR | KCPC STAFF/PDS* | BOA* | KCPC* | CITY ADMINISTRATOR | [LEGISLATIVE BODY] |
| Concept Development Plan Review | 13.02 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Final Development Plan Review | 13.02 | DM | A | |||||
| Map Amendment | 13.04 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Text Amendment | 13.05 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Administrative Appeals | 13.12 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Changes from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use | 13.06 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Variance | 13.07 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Conditional Use | 13.08 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Certification of Zoning Compliance | 13.09 | DM | <A> | |||||
| Zoning Permits | 13.10 | DM | <A> | |||||
| R = Review Body < > = Public Hearing Required | DM = Final Decision-Making Body A = Authority to Hear and Decide Appeal of DM’s Action | |||||||
*TRC Technical Review Committee; KCPC Kenton County Planning Commission; | ||||||||
| Table 13.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYPE OF PERMIT, PROCESS OR DECISION | CROSS REFERENCE | TRC* | ZONING ADMINISTRATOR | KCPC STAFF/PDS* | BOA* | KCPC* | CITY ADMINISTRATOR | [LEGISLATIVE BODY] |
| Concept Development Plan Review | 13.02 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Final Development Plan Review | 13.02 | DM | A | |||||
| Map Amendment | 13.04 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Text Amendment | 13.05 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Administrative Appeals | 13.12 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Changes from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use | 13.06 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Variance | 13.07 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Conditional Use | 13.08 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Certification of Zoning Compliance | 13.09 | DM | <A> | |||||
| Zoning Permits | 13.10 | DM | <A> | |||||
| R = Review Body < > = Public Hearing Required | DM = Final Decision-Making Body A = Authority to Hear and Decide Appeal of DM’s Action | |||||||
*TRC Technical Review Committee; KCPC Kenton County Planning Commission; | ||||||||
| Table 13.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYPE OF PERMIT, PROCESS OR DECISION | CROSS REFERENCE | TRC* | ZONING ADMINISTRATOR | KCPC STAFF/PDS* | BOA* | KCPC* | CITY ADMINISTRATOR | [LEGISLATIVE BODY] |
| Concept Development Plan Review | 13.02 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Final Development Plan Review | 13.02 | DM | A | |||||
| Map Amendment | 13.04 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Text Amendment | 13.05 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Administrative Appeals | 13.12 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Changes from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use | 13.06 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Variance | 13.07 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Conditional Use | 13.08 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Certification of Zoning Compliance | 13.09 | DM | <A> | |||||
| Zoning Permits | 13.10 | DM | <A> | |||||
| R = Review Body < > = Public Hearing Required | DM = Final Decision-Making Body A = Authority to Hear and Decide Appeal of DM’s Action | |||||||
*TRC Technical Review Committee; KCPC Kenton County Planning Commission; | ||||||||
| Table 13.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYPE OF PERMIT, PROCESS OR DECISION | CROSS REFERENCE | TRC* | ZONING ADMINISTRATOR | KCPC STAFF/PDS* | BOA* | KCPC* | CITY ADMINISTRATOR | [LEGISLATIVE BODY] |
| Concept Development Plan Review | 13.02 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Final Development Plan Review | 13.02 | DM | A | |||||
| Map Amendment | 13.04 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Text Amendment | 13.05 | R | R | <R> | DM | |||
| Administrative Appeals | 13.12 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Changes from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use | 13.06 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Variance | 13.07 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Conditional Use | 13.08 | R | <DM> | |||||
| Certification of Zoning Compliance | 13.09 | DM | <A> | |||||
| Zoning Permits | 13.10 | DM | <A> | |||||
| R = Review Body < > = Public Hearing Required | DM = Final Decision-Making Body A = Authority to Hear and Decide Appeal of DM’s Action | |||||||
*TRC Technical Review Committee; KCPC Kenton County Planning Commission; | ||||||||
Effective on: 1/1/1901
A Development Plan review process, as set forth herein, is hereby established to ensure adherence to the standards of this Ordinance.
The purpose of the process is to provide more predictability, a streamlined process, promote flexibility, innovation, and creativity in the design of the built environment, and assure the compatibility of development with the surrounding community.
The Concept Development Plan review process shall be required for any map amendment to any multi-family and any Planned Unit Development. In addition to the Concept Development Plan review process, a Final Development Plan review process is required for any construction within a PUD Zone. For all other zoning districts not requiring Final Development Plan review, zoning permits must be acquired after approval of a Concept Development Plan.
Map amendments to any single-family residential zone shall not require Concept Development Plan approval in accordance with this Article. Map amendments submitted by the legislative body, or the Kenton County Planning Commission, are not required to submit a Concept Development Plan.
The purpose of the Final Development Plan is to clearly define all construction matters and special conditions such as construction techniques, specific building locations and design (e.g., architecture), and specific site design (e.g., parking, grading, access and circulation) for an individual lot, block, or phase of development. The Final Development Plan shall be approved by PDS staff to assure that it is in conformity with the Concept Development Plan.
See Section 13.01 B. Pre-Application Meeting. All Map Amendments/Concept Development Plan applicants must meet with the Technical Review Committee for a pre-application project review. The TRC will provide comments and initial input. The TRC will also identify submittal requirements, including the need for a Traffic Impact Study at the Pre-application meeting. Applicants may seek input from the TRC as necessary as development details are refined.
Following review by the TRC, the petitioner may submit revised copies of the proposal that address the comments and concerns. The petitioner shall refer to the specific application packet to determine the format and number of copies to be delivered to PDS staff.
Amendments to a Concept Development Plan to be considered at the public hearing must be received by PDS staff in accordance with the KCPC bylaws, to allow for the PDS staff written report to include comments and recommendations related to plans that may have been amended in response to comments provided by PDS staff or TRC, in addition to Subsection e. below.
See Section 13.01 E. Public Hearing and Notice.
An Applicant may make amendments to a Concept Development Plan pending determination by the Kenton County Planning Commission at any time prior to a vote being called for by the Kenton County Planning Commission. If, in the sole discretion of the Kenton County Planning Commission, the proposed amendment is of such a nature that additional time is needed for review, then the Kenton County Planning Commission may continue its consideration in accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the Kenton County Planning Commission.
The Kenton County Planning Commission will then hold the public hearing and review the application and required information and shall make a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions or disapproval on the map amendment/Concept Development Plan in accordance with this Ordinance, KRS, and the Rules of Procedure of the Planning Commission.
If amendments are presented by the Applicant and agreed to by the Kenton County Planning Commission at the public hearing, then revised plans indicating all amendments approved by the Kenton County Planning Commission shall be filed with PDS staff after the public hearing but prior to legislative body action.
The legislative body shall take final action on a Map Amendment/Concept Development Plan, including any amendments accepted by the Kenton County Planning Commission, in accordance with the timeframe and process outlined for Map Amendments, in Section 13.04, Map Amendments.
Concept Development Plans shall be reviewed by PDS staff and recommendations made by the Planning Commission upon written findings that the Plan complies with the following:
Changes to an approved Concept Development Plan which has already received approval by the Legislative Body shall be subject to this Section. PDS staff shall determine whether a change to an approved Concept Development Plan is a Major Amendment or Minor Amendment.
All changes that do not meet the thresholds established below for Major Amendments shall be considered Minor Amendments. Minor Amendments may be administratively approved as part of the Final Development Plan or Zoning Permit without a public hearing.
A change shall be deemed a Major Amendment if PDS staff determines the change results in any of the following:
If PDS staff determines a change to an approved Concept Development Plan is a Major Amendment, then the applicant shall be required to file a new application of an amendment to the Concept Development Plan, which shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 13.02, E., Approval Process. for the initial approval of the Concept Development Plan.
Final Development Plans shall be reviewed by PDS staff. After review, PDS staff shall recommend favorable, favorable with conditions, or unfavorable on the Final Development Plan, including written findings that the Plan complies with the applicable articles and sections of the zoning ordinance and any conditions placed upon the approved Concept Development Plan, and all improvements identified or agreed upon resulting from the TIS are shown. The Legislative Body shall approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the Final Development Plan. All approved Final Development Plans shall be binding upon the applicants, their successors and assigns, and the development shall be limited to all conditions and limitations established in such plans.
After the Concept Development Plan is approved, the subject area may be developed in phases, provided all of the procedures required by local, state, and federal regulations have been complied with. Each phase may be submitted to the PDS staff at the time the applicant is ready to develop, and that phase will be reviewed against the approved Concept Development Plan. Required public amenities and infrastructure improvements shall be provided proportionally with each phase. Separate zoning permits must be obtained for each individual building after Final Development Plan approval.
If the Final Development Plan is for a specific building rather than a phased plan in the Subsection above, then the approval of the Final Development Plan shall also constitute an approved zoning permit. An approved Final Development Plan for an individual building does not replace any other local, state, or federal regulation approvals.
Final Development Plans shall be reviewed by PDS staff and make written findings that the Plan complies with the following:
Amendments to approved Final Development Plans may be approved by the Legislative Body using the same criteria in Section 13.02, E., 1. If changes to an approved Final Development Plan are considered minor, an application for Zoning Permit, (see Section 13.10 Zoning Permits), may be filed. If the Legislative Body determines a change to an approved Final Development Plan is a Major Amendment, then the applicant shall be required to file a new application of an amendment to the Concept Development Plan, which shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 13.02, E., Approval Process, for the initial approval of the Concept Development Plan.
Expiration
The legislative body may initiate a request for a public hearing by the planning commission, in accordance with the requirements of KRS Chapter 100, for the purpose of determining whether the Concept Development Plan should expire, if substantial construction is not started within one year of obtaining Final Development Plan approval.
An extension may be permitted upon approval of the legislative body if sufficient proof can be demonstrated that the Final Development Plan or construction was delayed due to circumstances beyond the applicant's control, and that prevailing conditions have not changed appreciably to render the previous approvals obsolete.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The intent of the Planned Unit Development District is to:
The PUD application shall be accompanied by all plans and documents. The PUD rezoning will follow the Development Plan Process as described in Section 13.02, Development Plan Review for Concept and Final Development Plans.
Standards are established for each PUD based on the approved narrative and development plan. In reviewing and approving intensity and dimensional standards, the City Council will consider the overall impact of the development on adjacent properties and infrastructure, the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and the quality of the development proposed and its impact on community character.
Uses permitted in a PUD may be any use that is found in Article 4, Use Regulations & Standards, subject to the approval of the City Council. While use-specific conditions outlined in Article 4 apply, other conditions required to mitigate incompatibilities and address site-specific conditions as imposed by the applicant or required by City Council shall apply and be binding.
For amendments to approved plans, see Section 13.02, E., 1., i., Amendments to Approved Concept Development Plan.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Before any map amendment is granted, the Planning Commission or City Council, must find that the amendment is in agreement with the adopted comprehensive plan, or in the absence of such a finding, that one or more of the following apply and such finding and report shall be recorded in the minutes and records of the Planning Commission or City Council.
No zoning map amendment application may be accepted if the proposed amendment would create a free-standing zone that does not meet the following minimum area standards:
| Table 13.2 | |
|---|---|
| PROPOSED ZONE | MINIMUM ZONE AREA |
| RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | |
| Residential Conventional Subdivision (R-CVS) | 1 acre |
| Residential Compact Subdivision (R-CPS) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Urban (R-U) | 10,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Multi-Family (R-MF) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| OTHER DISTRICTS | |
| Planned Unit Development (PUD) | 5 acres |
| Table 13.2 | |
|---|---|
| PROPOSED ZONE | MINIMUM ZONE AREA |
| RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | |
| Residential Conventional Subdivision (R-CVS) | 1 acre |
| Residential Compact Subdivision (R-CPS) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Urban (R-U) | 10,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Multi-Family (R-MF) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| OTHER DISTRICTS | |
| Planned Unit Development (PUD) | 5 acres |
| Table 13.2 | |
|---|---|
| PROPOSED ZONE | MINIMUM ZONE AREA |
| RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | |
| Residential Conventional Subdivision (R-CVS) | 1 acre |
| Residential Compact Subdivision (R-CPS) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Urban (R-U) | 10,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Multi-Family (R-MF) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| OTHER DISTRICTS | |
| Planned Unit Development (PUD) | 5 acres |
| Table 13.2 | |
|---|---|
| PROPOSED ZONE | MINIMUM ZONE AREA |
| RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS | |
| Residential Conventional Subdivision (R-CVS) | 1 acre |
| Residential Compact Subdivision (R-CPS) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Urban (R-U) | 10,000 sq. ft. |
| Residential Multi-Family (R-MF) | 20,000 sq. ft. |
| OTHER DISTRICTS | |
| Planned Unit Development (PUD) | 5 acres |
Following the public hearing held by the Planning Commission on a proposed map amendment, the Commission shall, within 60 calendar days from the date of its receipt, make findings of fact and a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval of the proposed map amendment to the legislative body, including a statement setting forth the reasons and substantiation for such recommendation. The recommendation shall include a summary of the evidence and testimony presented by the proponents, opponents, and neutral parties of the proposed amendment. A tie vote shall be subject to further consideration by the Planning Commission for a period not to exceed 30 days, at the end of which, if the tie has not been broken, the application shall be forwarded to the City Council without a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval.
The legislative body shall take final action upon a proposed Map Amendment/Concept Development Plan within 90 days of the date upon which the Planning Commission takes its final action upon such proposal.
Expiration
The legislative body may initiate a request for a public hearing by the Planning Commission, in accordance with the requirements of KRS Chapter 100, for the purpose of determining whether the zoning map amendment should revert to its original designation, if substantial construction has not been initiated within a period of one year from the date of approval of the map amendment by the legislative body.
An extension may be permitted upon approval of the legislative body if sufficient proof can be demonstrated that the construction was delayed due to circumstances beyond the applicant's control, and that prevailing conditions have not changed appreciably to render the approved map amendment obsolete.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Following the public hearing held by the Planning Commission on a proposed text amendment, the Commission shall make a recommendation as to the text of the amendment and whether the amendment shall be approved, approved with conditions, or disapproved and shall state the reasons for its recommendation. The Planning Commission shall make its recommendation within 60 days of the date of its receipt of the proposed text amendment.
It shall take an affirmative vote of a majority of the City Council to adopt a proposed text amendment.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Prior to granting a change from one nonconforming use to another, the Board of Adjustment shall find that the new nonconforming use is in the same or more restrictive classification of use as the prior nonconforming use. In the determination of the same or more restrictive classification of use, the applicant shall establish, and the Board of Adjustment shall find:
A change from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use applies to the property for which it is granted and not to the individual who applied for it. A change from one nonconfroming use runs with the land and is transferable to any future owner of land, but it cannot be transferred by the applicant to a different site.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The BOA shall deny any request for a variance arising from circumstances that are the result of willful violations of this Ordinance by the applicant subsequent to the adoption of this Ordinance from which relief is sought.
The Board of Adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with this Ordinance. Violation of such conditions, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this Ordinance.
The Board of Adjustment shall not grant a variance to permit a use of any land, building, or structure which is not permitted by this Ordinance in the zone in question, or to alter the density of dwelling unit requirements in the zone in question.
A variance applies to the property for which it is granted and not to the individual who applied for it. A variance runs with the land and is transferable to any future owner of land, but it cannot be transferred by the applicant to a different site.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
A conditional use applies to the property for which it is granted and not to the individual who applied for it. A conditional use runs with the land and is transferable to any future owner of land, but it cannot be transferred by the applicant to a different site.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
A certificate of zoning compliance is required, post construction, for all commercial, office, industrial, mixed use, and multi-family developments. A certificate of zoning compliance will be issued upon completion of a permitted activity on a lot or parcel, in conformance with this ordinance.
Upon receipt of the application, the Zoning Administrator will review the materials provided to ensure all activities onsite have occurred in conformance with the original zoning permit and the requirements of this Ordinance. A site visit may be performed to confirm compliance with specific elements of the permit.
A certificate of zoning compliance is required to issue a certificate of occupancy.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Except where a Final Development Plan constitutes a zoning permit per Section 13.02 E., 2., Final Development Plan Approval, a zoning permit demonstrating intent to comply shall be required prior to any activity occurring on a lot or parcel, including but not limited to the following:
The Zoning Administrator shall review the submitted application materials for compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance. If the application sufficiently demonstrates intent to comply with the requirements of this Ordinance, the Zoning Administrator shall issue a zoning permit for the activity to proceed. If, upon review, the Zoning Administrator cannot establish intent to comply with this Ordinance, a zoning permit for the proposed activity shall not be approved.
Failure to obtain a zoning permit or failure to comply with an approved zoning permit constitutes a zoning violation.
The zoning permit issued must comply with the provision of this Ordinance unless a variance has been granted by the Board of Adjustments.
If a permit is required for a sign, then the following requirements and procedures apply:
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Per KRS 100.257 and KRS 100.261, appeals to the Board may be taken by any person or entity claiming that there is an error in, or that they are injuriously affected or aggrieved by, an official action, order, requirement, interpretation, grant, refusal, or decision of the Zoning Administrator.
Per KRS 100.347, final actions from the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, or Legislative Body may be appealed in the following manner:
An appeal stays all proceedings related to the action appealed from, unless the Zoning Administrator from whom the appeal is taken, certifies that a stay would cause imminent peril to life or property. In such case, proceedings shall not be stayed other than by a court of record on application, or on notice to the Zoning Administrator from whom the appeal is taken.
Effective on: 1/1/1901