The Zoning Board of Appeals has the power to act on matters as provided in this Ordinance and Public Act 110 of 2006 (MCL 125.3601 et seq.), as amended. The specific powers of the ZBA are enumerated in the following sections of this Article.
The concurring vote of a majority of the members of the board shall be necessary to reverse an order, requirements, decision, or determination of an administrative official or body, or to decide in favor of the applicant a matter upon which the board is required to pass under an ordinance, or to effect a variation in an ordinance except that a concurring vote of 2/3 of the members of the board shall be necessary to grant a variance from uses of land permitted in an ordinance.
A member shall be disqualified from a vote in which there is a conflict of interest. Failure of a member to disclose a conflict of interest and be disqualified from a vote shall constitute misconduct in office.
11.5.3. Administrative Review. The Board shall hear and decide appeals where it is alleged by the appellant that there is error in any order, requirement, permit, decision, or refusal made by the Zoning Administrator or other duly authorized enforcing agent, in enforcing any provision of this Ordinance.
1. The Board shall hear and decide requests for interpretation of this Ordinance or the Zoning Map taking into consideration the intent and purpose of the Ordinance and the General Development Plan.
2. A record shall be kept by the ZBA of all decisions for interpretation of this Ordinance or Zoning Map and land uses which are approved under the terms of this section. The ZBA may request that the Planning Commission consider initiation of an amendment to clarify a point that has given rise to uncertainty.
Upon an appeal, the Board is authorized to grant a variance from the strict provisions of this ordinance, whereby extraordinary or exceptional conditions of such property, the strict application of the regulations enacted would result in peculiar or exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional undue hardship upon the owner of such property provided such relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of this ordinance. In granting a variance, the Board may attach thereto such conditions regarding the location, character, and other features of the proposed uses as it may deem reasonable in furtherance of the purpose of this ordinance. Further, in granting a variance, the Board shall state the grounds upon which it justifies the granting of a variance as outlined below. When granting any variance, the Board must ensure that the spirit of the ordinance is observed, public safety secured, and substantial justice done.
1. Use variance. The applicant must present evidence to show that if the zoning ordinance is applied strictly, unnecessary hardship to the applicant will result, and that all four of the following requirements are met:
a. That the property could not be reasonably used for the purposes permitted in that zone;
b. That the appeal results from unique circumstances peculiar to the property and not from general neighborhood conditions;
c. That the use requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the area; and
d. That the alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property.
2. Nonuse variances. The applicant must present evidence to show that if the zoning ordinance is applied strictly, practical difficulties will result to the applicant and:
a. That the ordinance restrictions unreasonably prevent the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose;
b. That the variance would do substantial justice to the applicant as well as to other property owners in the district, and a lesser relaxation than that requested would not give substantial relief to the owner of the property or be more consistent with justice to other property owners;
c. That the plight of the landowner is due to the unique circumstances of the property; and
d. That the alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property.