Muskego City Zoning Code
ARTICLE IX
Planned Development Districts
§ 400-79 Purpose and intent.
A.
This district is intended to allow for greater freedom, imagination, and flexibility in the development of land while ensuring substantial compliance with the intent of the normal district regulations of this chapter. To this intent it allows diversification and variation in the relationship of uses, structures, open spaces, and heights of structures in developments conceived and planned as comprehensive and cohesive unified projects. It is further intended to encourage more rational and economic development with relationship to public services and to encourage the preservation of open land.
B.
Permitted. The unified and planned development of a site, in single or corporate ownership at the time of development, may be permitted in a PD Planned Development Overlay District, without the customary division into individual lots, or without specific compliance with the district regulations as applicable to individual lots, subject to the regulations as hereinafter provided in this article.[1]
§ 400-80 District requirements.
A.
Size allowed. For the purpose of this chapter all planned development projects shall be classified as follows and be limited to parent parcels of not less than the size indicated:
Minimum Size of District (square feet) | ||
|---|---|---|
Residential | 200,000 | |
Commercial | 200,000 | |
Industrial | No minimum | |
Mixed | 200,000 |
B.
C.
D.
Application of regulations.
(1)
Uses and structures. In addition to the uses permitted in the underlying district any other use may be permitted as herein designated above consistent with the criteria established in the basis for approval below.
(2)
Individual uses and structures in a planned development project district need not comply with the specific building location, height, building size, lot size, and open space requirements of the underlying basic district, provided that the spirit and intent of such requirements are complied with in the total development plan for such project consistent with the criteria as established in the basis for approval below.
(3)
Applicable underlying zoning districts. The PD Planned Development Overlay District may be applied to all zoning districts.
(4)
Density. For specific project density computation, the allowable maximum unit density shall be determined by dividing the gross area of the planned development (exclusive of existing public right-of-way or public open space easement) by the square feet per family as required by the district intended. In the case of mixed-use developments, a separate density calculation shall be computed for each defined use in the development. (Example: On an eighty-acre planned development, 40 acres are intended for RM-1 uses and 40 acres are intended for RS-1 uses; the density computations would be run separately as follows: 1,742,400 square feet divided by 5,000 square feet per unit for RM-1 and 1,742,400 square feet divided by 30,000 square feet per unit for RS-1.)
(5)
Density bonus. The total allowable maximum density in a planned development may increase no more than 10% above the amount of units calculated in Subsection D(4) above upon recommendation of the Plan Commission that the increased density is justified in terms of the relationship to open areas, service demand, and the total quality and character of the project. In no case, however, shall the provisions of § 400-82 be waived.
§ 400-81 Application procedure.
A.
Petition. Petition may be made to the Common Council by the owner or agent of property proposed for such development to amend the Zoning Map by the overlaying of a PD District in order to permit the application of the provisions of this article to such development. Such petition shall be accompanied by a fee, as from time to time established by resolution of the Common Council, and the following information:
(1)
A statement describing the general character of intended development along with such other pertinent information as may be necessary to a determination that the contemplated arrangement or use makes it desirable to apply regulations and requirements differing from those ordinarily applicable under this chapter.
(2)
A general development plan of the project showing the intended use or uses of land, the dimensions and location of proposed structures and of areas to be reserved for vehicular and pedestrian circulation, parking, public uses such as schools, and playgrounds, parks, landscaping, and other open spaces and architectural drawings and sketches illustrating the design and character of the proposed uses and the physical relationship of the uses.
B.
Referral to Plan Commission. Such petition shall be referred to the Plan Commission and processed as any other petition for zoning change. Upon completion of necessary study and investigation the Plan Commission shall make its recommendation to the Common Council as to the appropriateness and desirability of the proposed zoning change, the suitability of the building, site and development plans, and any additional conditions which it may feel necessary or appropriate. The Plan Commission can make its recommendation before or after the scheduled public hearing date.[1]
D.
Where a proposed development includes uses permitted only as conditional grants pursuant to Article XIV, compliance with the procedural and general requirements set forth as the basis for approval under this article shall supplant the requirement for separate processing of a petition for conditional use grant pursuant to Article XIV.
E.
At the time the PD planned unit development is presented to the City Plan Commission for final approval, the developer shall pay to the City the costs incurred by the City for planning and engineering fees, including but not limited to costs for checking plans, field checking and consultations.
§ 400-82 Determination; basis for approval.
A.
Basis for approval. The Plan Commission in making its recommendations and the Common Council in making its determination shall give consideration and satisfy themselves as to the following:
(1)
That the proponents of the proposed development have demonstrated that they intend to start construction within a reasonable period following the approval of the project and requested overlay of the PD District, that the project appears economically sound, that adequate financing is possible, and that the development will be carried out according to a reasonable construction schedule satisfactory to the City.
(2)
That the proposed development is consistent in all respects with the spirit and intent of this chapter, is in conformity with the general plans for community development, and would not be contrary to the general welfare and economic prosperity of the City or of the immediate neighborhood, that the specific development plans have been prepared with competent professional advice and guidance, and that the benefits and improved design of the resultant development justify the variation from the normal requirements of this chapter through the application of the PD Planned Development Overlay District.
(3)
In the case of proposed residential developments:
(a)
That such development will create an attractive residential environment of sustained desirability and economic stability, compatible with the character established for the area by the community Comprehensive Plan, and where the economic impact of the development in terms of income levels, property values, and service demands is at least as beneficial to the community as that which could be anticipated under the base zoning.
(b)
The population composition of the development will not alter adversely the impact upon school or other municipal service requirements as anticipated under the existing basic zoning and Comprehensive Plan.
(c)
That the project will not create traffic or parking demand incompatible with that anticipated under the Comprehensive Plan.
(d)
That the total average residential density of the project will be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, except as may be modified by this article.
(e)
That the aggregate open space of the development will be no less than would have resulted from the application of open space requirements of the underlying districts.
(f)
That adequate guarantee is provided for permanent retention as open space area of the residual open land area resulting from the application of these regulations, either by private reservation for the use of the residents within the development or by dedication to the public.
[1]
In the case of a PD Planned Development District, private preservation of the open space area shall be guaranteed and shall be protected against building and development by conveying to the municipality as part of the conditions for project approval an open space easement over such open area restricting the area against any future building or use except as is consistent with that of providing landscaped open space for the esthetic and recreational benefit of the surrounding residences. Buildings or uses for noncommercial recreational or cultural purposes compatible with the open space objective may be permitted only where specifically authorized as part of the project plan or subsequently with the express approval of the Common Council following approval of building, site and operation plans by the Plan Commission.
[2]
The care and maintenance of such open space reservations shall be ensured either by establishment of an appropriate management organization for the project or by agreement with the municipality for establishment of a special service district for the project area where the municipality shall provide the necessary maintenance service and levy the cost thereof as a special assessment on the tax bills of properties within the project area. In any case the Common Council shall have the right to carry out and levy an assessment for the cost of any maintenance which it feels necessary if it is not otherwise taken care of to the satisfaction of the Common Council. The manner of assuring maintenance and assessing such cost to individual properties shall be determined prior to the approval of the final project plans and shall be included in the title to each property.
[3]
Ownership and tax liability of private open space reservation shall be established in a manner acceptable to the municipality and made a part of the conditions of the plan approval.
(4)
In the case of proposed PD planned development overlays for commercial developments:
(a)
That the economic practicality of the proposed development can be justified on the basis of purchasing potential, competitive relationship and demonstrated tenant interest.
(b)
That the proposed development will be adequately served by off-street parking and truck service facilities.
(c)
That the locations for entrances and exits have been designed to prevent unnecessary interference with the safe and efficient movement of traffic on surrounding streets, and that the development will not create an effect upon the general traffic pattern of the area incompatible with that anticipated under the Comprehensive Plan.
(d)
That the architectural design, landscaping, control of lighting, and general site development will result in an attractive and harmonious service area compatible with and not creating an effect upon the property values of the surrounding neighborhood incompatible with that anticipated under the Comprehensive Plan.
(5)
In the case of PD planned development overlays for mixed-use developments:
(a)
That the proposed mixture of uses produces a unified composite which is compatible within itself and which as a total developmental entity is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and consistent with the general objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
(b)
That the various types of uses conform to the general requirements as herein set forth applicable to projects of such use character.
(c)
The allowable maximum residential density may be computed by dividing the gross area of the planned development by the square feet per family as required by the district intended (this is inclusive of the area of the other proposed uses in the development). Example: Planned development on 12 acres of land with eight acres for multifamily residential and four acres for commercial still equals approximately 104 units (12 acres divided by 5,000 square feet per unit) upon recommendation of the Plan Commission that the increased density is justified in terms of the relationship to the denser area, the commercial area, open areas, service demand, and the total quality and character of the project.
(d)
The total allowable maximum density may increase no more than 10% above the amount of units calculated above upon recommendation of the Plan Commission that the increased density is justified in terms of the relationship to open areas, service demand, and the total quality and character of the project.
B.
Determination.
(1)
The Common Council after due consideration may deny the petition, approve the petition as submitted or approve the petition subject to additional conditions.
(2)
The approval of a petition and consequent amending of the Zoning Map by overlay of the PD District shall be based on and include as conditions thereto the building, site and operation (BSO) plans for the development as well as all other commitments offered or required with regard to project value, character or other factor pertinent to assuring that the project will be developed basically as presented in the official submittal plans as approved by the Common Council and shall be mapped and recorded as provided for conditional uses under Article XIV of this chapter. Such plans, however, need not necessarily be completely detailed at the time of overlay zoning, provided they are of sufficient detail to satisfy the Plan Commission and Common Council as to the general character, scope, and appearance of the proposed development. Such preliminary plan shall at least designate the pattern of proposed streets, the basic pattern of land use, and the size and arrangement of lots and illustrate a "typical" example of the development proposed. The approval of such preliminary plan shall be conditioned upon the subsequent submittal and approval of more specific and detailed plans as the development progresses.
(3)
Any subsequent change or addition to the plans or use shall first be submitted for approval to the Common Council, and if in the opinion of the Common Council upon recommendation of the Plan Commission such change or addition constitutes a substantial alteration of the original plan, a public hearing before the Common Council shall be required and notice thereof given pursuant to Article II of this chapter.
(4)
The provisions of Article XIV governing termination of the conditional grant shall apply to such group project development.
(5)
Application for a planned development. In order to fulfill the requirements of the planned development provisions, the City Planning Division may utilize additional policies and procedures along with required checklists, letters of intent, necessary inspections, follow-ups, bonding requirements, and other legal assurances that the provisions of planned development are carried out systematically and on a uniform basis.
§ 400-83 Planned Development Districts repealed.
The revision of this Zoning Ordinance in 2006 repealed a few past-approved PDs due to no development occurring in those areas. The PDs found in § 400-84 and below are the districts that continue to operate as approved.
§ 400-84 Planned Development Districts and requirements.
A.
Approved Planned Development Districts shall be found below in this article and shall state the development requirements and parameters as approved by the Common Council.
B.
The actual text description outlining the parameters for each planned development shall be approved with the rezoning ordinance if all are known. Zoning Code text descriptions may be approved at a later time with the final plat and/or developer's agreement by resolution of the Common Council if needed in order to account for all aspects and parameters of an individual planned development. (Note: When a rezoning of a PD is approved before the final plat and developer's agreement approvals for a development, the rezoning ordinance will state that "The ordinance is in full force and effect from and after passage and publication subject to approval of the final plat, subdivider's agreement and the Zoning Ordinance language that specifically outlines the parameters of the PD.") The language that outlines the specifics of the PD will be passed by resolution of the Common Council concurrent with the final plat and developer's agreement approvals.
C.
Amendments to existing PD text descriptions shall be approved by ordinance of the Common Council concurrent with the determination of nonsubstantial change resolutions.
§ 400-85 PD-1 Parkland.
A.
The Parkland Planned Development consists of approximately 55 acres containing 117 single-family parcels and six outlots. The development is made of three plats, Parkland Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Subdivisions all generally located in the NW 1/4 of Section 10 and the SW 1/4 of Section 3 west of Lannon Drive. The Parkland No. 1 development consists of 45 single-family parcels and two outlots, the Parkland No. 2 development consists of 43 single-family parcels and three outlots, and the Parkland No. 3 development consists of 29 single-family parcels and one outlot. All developments were constructed in one phase each and are serviced by City sewer and water. The six total outlots for the development are for open space preservation and stormwater management.
(1)
The planned development was originally created as part of a larger planned development known as "Parkland Plaza." The original planned development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District and B-4/PD Highway Business District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The majority of the commercial portion of the original Parkland Plaza PD was dissolved as the commercial entities were closed and razed. The remaining areas are the Freedom Square PD and the Parkland PD. Each facet of the original planned development is incorporated into separate distinct PDs upon final plat, condominium plat, or building, site and operation plan approvals.
(2)
The Parkland planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be reduced to 25 feet, side offsets reduced to six and eight feet and rear offsets to 20 feet. (In case a parcel has multiple street setbacks the setback on one street corner can be 15 feet with the rear offsets being eight feet and 20 feet.)
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Parkland proposal.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 10-26-1964.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: November 1964.
(3)
Plan Commission Parkland No. 1 final plat approval: 10-20-1970.
(4)
Common Council Parkland No. 1 final plat approval: 12-8-1970, Resolution No. 256-1970.
(5)
Plan Commission Parkland No. 2 final plat approval: 9-7-1971.
(6)
Common Council Parkland No. 2 final plat approval: per Resolution No. 177-1971.
(7)
Plan Commission Parkland No. 3 final plat approval: 3-7-1972.
(8)
Common Council Parkland No. 3 final plat approval: 3-14-1972, Resolution No. 029-1972.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-86 PD-2 Freedom Square.
A.
The Freedom Square Planned Development consists of approximately eight acres on three parcels. Freedom Square is a condominium complex that is generally located north of Janesville Road off of Briargate Lane between Lannon Drive and Parkland Drive. The planned development contains a total of 60 units with two twelve-family structures, four eight-family structures, and one four-family structure along with associated drainage facilities, accessory structures, parking, landscaping, and accessways. The development was developed in a number of phases and is all serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created as part of a larger planned development known as "Parkland Plaza." The Parkland Plaza was the first PD created in the City of Muskego. The original planned development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District and B-4/PD Highway Business District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The majority of the commercial portion of the original Parkland Plaza PD was dissolved as the commercial entities were closed and razed. The remaining areas are the Freedom Square PD and the Parkland PD. Each facet of the original planned development is incorporated into separate distinct PDs upon final plat, condominium plat, or building, site and operation (BSO) plan approvals.
(2)
The Freedom Square planned development was originally created under the zoning of B-4/PD Highway Business District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also allowed various structure placements for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying code subject to Plan Commission BSO approvals.
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for multifamily residential development consistent with the Freedom Square proposal.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-87 PD-3 Durham Meadows.
A.
The Durham Meadows Planned Development contains approximately 50 acres with 236 total living units consisting of 62 parcels for two-family structures (124 units), one parcel containing eight four-family structures (32 units), seven parcels containing 10 eight-family structures (80 units), and one outlot. The development is located along Durham Drive and Janesville Road just southwest of the Janesville Road/Woodland Place intersection. The development is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by sewer and water. The Durham Meadows subdivision was originally approved with various certified survey maps (CSMs), apartment complexes, and condo plats succeeded by the final plat creating the now Durham Meadows Planned Development. The multiple-family developments were approved with the appropriate accessways and accessory structures. The one outlot in the development is for the preservation of open space.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSA/PD Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced to 25 feet, all side offsets to be reduced to 10 feet, and rear offsets to be 30 feet (reduced to 10 feet for garages). The development is maximized on the amounts of units allowed as all open space and square footage has been used.
(2)
Various developer's agreements are approved with the final plat, CSMs, and building, site and operation plans for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-9-1972 per Ordinance No. 221.
(2)
Plan Commission rezoning amendment approval: 11-21-1995 per Resolution No. 182-1985.
(3)
Common Council rezoning amendment approval: 11-28-1995 per Resolution No. 226-1992.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 7-18-1972.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 7-25-1972 per Resolution No. 155-1972.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District for the multifamily parcels and RM-2 District for the two-family parcels subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District for the multifamily parcels and RM-2 District for the two-family parcels subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District for the multifamily parcels and RM-2 District for the two-family parcels subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-88 PD-4 Hale Park Meadows.
A.
The Hale Park Meadows Planned Development consists of approximately 90 acres containing 166 single-family parcels, 14 two-family parcels (Lots 1-5 of Block 1, Lots 1-2 of Block 2, and Lots 1-6 of Block 3) and six outlots (totaling 194 units). The development was made of one plat and is generally located off of the north side of Tess Corners Drive between Woods Road and Janesville Road. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water. The six outlots for the development are for open space preservation, stormwater management, and dedication to the City for park purposes.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also allowed a mixed-use development to allow two-family structures on certain parcels. The PD changed various requirements of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced to 25 feet, side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear offsets increased to 30 feet (reduced to 10 feet for garages).
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Hale Park proposal. A subdivider's agreement was approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
C.
E.
Permitted accessory uses.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
§ 400-89 PD-5 Pioneer Centre.
A.
The Pioneer Centre Planned Development contains approximately 9.25 acres with two parcels for multifamily residential use located off the east side of Pioneer Drive just north of the Pioneer Drive/Racine Avenue intersection. The northern parcel contains a complex that includes two structures with 12 one-bedroom units each (total of 24 units). The complex was approved with accessory structures, landscaping, and appropriate access and parking. The southern parcel contains a condominium complex that includes two two-unit structures, six four-unit structures, and three six-unit structures (total of 46 units). The apartment complex was approved with accessory structures, landscaping, and appropriate access and parking. Both developments also have pools explicitly for the use of the tenants. (The condominium development was also approved with a commons building.) Overall, the planned development contains a total of 70 units in 13 structures. The development is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The originally approved PD allowed no more than 70 living units. The PD also allowed various structure placements for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying code subject to Plan Commission building, site and operation plan (BSO) approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 5-2-1972.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-11-1972 per Ordinance No. 226.
(3)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 9-19-1972.
(4)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 4-3-1973 per Resolution No. 041-1973.
(5)
Plan Commission Phase II BSO approval: 10-21-1975 per Resolution No. 113-1975.
(6)
Plan Commission Phase II BSO approval: 11-18-1975 per Resolution No. 124-1975.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-90 PD-6 Tudor Oaks.
[Amended 6-18-2015 by Ord. No. 1398]
A.
The Tudor Oaks Planned Development contains approximately 110 acres within two parcels for single-family residential and institutional uses located off the south side of McShane Drive just east of Durham Drive. The development was originally part of the Mus-Kee-Guac development. Tudor Oaks is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by sewer and water. The lands consist of one large structure with living units and nursing facilities and have approvals for associated landscaping, access, accessory structures, and parking.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to provide an institutional mixed-use environment for senior citizen living and care. The development is subject to the developers receiving Plan Commission building, site and operation plan (BSO) approval for site specifics as long as the PD does not exceed the following:
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
(3)
Planned development rezoning amendments were approved in 2015 allowing the bed count to go from 60 to 85 while reducing the amount of allowed apartments from 300 to 275.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 4-24-1973 per Ordinance No. 250.
(2)
Common Council revised PD approval: 6-25-1974 per Resolution No. 116-1974.
(3)
Common Council PD agreement approval: 4-8-1975 per Resolution No. 099-1975.
(4)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 7-2-1974 per Resolution No. 086-1974.
(5)
Plan Commission amended BSO approval: 1-17-2006 per Resolution No. 136-2005.
(6)
Plan Commission 2015 rezoning approval: 6-2-2015 per Resolution No. 028-2015.
(7)
Common Council 2015 rezoning approval: 6-15-2015 per Ordinance No. 1398.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-91 PD-7 Lake Lore Estates.
A.
The Lake Lore Planned Development consists of approximately 33 acres containing 26 single-family parcels and three outlots. The development was made of one plat and a plat redivision and is generally located off of the north side of McShane Drive north of the Tudor Oaks development. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water. The three outlots for the development are for open space preservation, stormwater management, and a well site.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSA/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks and side/rear offsets. (Each lot varies, as such, see covenants.)
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Lake Lore proposal. A subdivider's agreement was approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 4-24-1973 per Ordinance No. 250.
(2)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 7-6-1976 per Resolution No. 075-1976.
(3)
Common Council final plat approval: 8-10-1976 per Resolution No. 134-1976.
(4)
Plan Commission redivision final plat approval: 6-7-1977 per Resolution No. 075-1977.
(5)
Common Council redivision final plat approval: 6-14-1977 per Resolution No. 138-1977.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-92 PD-8 Lake Brittany Estates.
A.
The Lake Brittany Planned Development consists of approximately 82 acres containing 99 single-family parcels and two outlots. The development was made of three plats and is generally located off of the north side of McShane Drive between the Muskego border to the east and Cheviot Road to the west. The Lake Brittany final plat included 76 single-family parcels and two outlots. The Lake Brittany Addition No. 1 final plat was a redivision of outlots from the original Lake Brittany development and included 20 single-family parcels and one outlot. The Lake Brittany Addition No. 2 final plat was a redivision of an outlot from the Lake Brittany Addition No. 1 development and included three single-family parcels and one outlot. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water. The outlots for the development are for open space preservation and stormwater management.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSA/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be 35 feet, side offsets be 10 feet and rear offsets be 20 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Lake Brittany proposal. A subdivider's agreement was approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 11-27-1973 per Ordinance No. 263.
(2)
Plan Commission SW rezoning approval: 12-6-1988 per Resolution No. 107-1988.
(3)
Common Council SW rezoning approval: 5-4-1989 per Ordinance No. 644.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 6-7-1977 per Resolution No. 072-1977.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 6-14-1977 per Resolution No. 137-1977.
(6)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 7-21-1987 per Resolution No. 100-1987.
(7)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 7-28-1987 per Resolution No. 153-1987.
(8)
Plan Commission Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 12-5-1989 per Resolution No. 219-1989.
(9)
Common Council Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 12-12-1989 per Resolution No. 323-1989.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-93 PD-9 Guernsey Meadows.
A.
The Guernsey Meadows Planned Development consists of approximately 54.5 acres containing 101 single-family parcels. The development was made of two plats, Country Brook Estates and one addition, both generally located off of the south side of Janesville Road between Martin Drive and Bay Lane Drive. The Guernsey Meadows development consists of 70 single-family parcels and three outlots, and the Guernsey Meadows Addition No. 1 development consists of 31 single-family parcels and one outlot. All developments were constructed in one phase each and are serviced by City sewer and water. The four total outlots for the development are for open space preservation, City park dedication, and public utilities.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be reduced to 30 feet (25 feet in the case of multiple street setbacks on one side), side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear offsets increased to 30 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Guernsey Meadows proposal. A subdivider's agreement was approved with the final plats for each development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 2-11-1975 per Ordinance No. 297.
(2)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 9-2-1975 per Resolution No. 089-1975.
(3)
Common Council final plat approval: 9-23-1975 per Resolution No. 212-1975.
(4)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 5-17-1977 per Resolution No. 061-1977.
(5)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 1-3-1978 per Resolution No. 002-1978.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-94 PD-10 Kristin Downs.
A.
The Kristin Downs Planned Development consists of approximately 49 acres containing 83 single-family parcels and four outlots. The development is generally located south of Janesville Road and east of Pioneer Drive. The development was constructed in one phase and is serviced by City sewer and water. The four outlots are reserved for open space preservation, including stormwater management areas, well house areas, and subdivision recreation areas, including tennis courts and a pool.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be reduced to 30 feet (25 feet in the case of multiple street setbacks on one side), side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear offsets increased to 30 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Kristin Downs proposal.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 9-3-1974 per Resolution No. 127-1974.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 6-24-1975 per Ordinance No. 304.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 4-20-1976 per Resolution No. 032-1976.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 5-11-1976 per Resolution No. 059-1976.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-95 PD-11 Lake Meadows.
A.
The Lake Meadows Planned Development consists of approximately 132.5 acres containing 206 single-family parcels and one outlot. The development is located off of Kelsey Drive just east of Crowbar Drive and stretches south from Kelsey to Lake Denoon. The final plat included one outlot that was dedicated to the City for park purposes and is now zoned for a City park. The development was constructed in one phase and is serviced by the Norway Sewer Service District and a private water trust.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including reducing all front setbacks to 35 feet, reducing side offsets to 10 feet, and enlarging rear offsets to 30 feet, except for accessory structures which are allowed a ten-foot rear offset.
[Amended 3-22-2012 by Ord. No. 1351]
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Lake Meadows proposed density. A developer's agreement was approved with the final plat by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 12-5-1978 per Resolution No. 211-1978.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 12-27-1978 per Ordinance No. 357.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 3-6-1979 per Resolution No. 022-1979.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 3-27-1979 per Resolution No. 048-1979.
(5)
Common Council developer's agreement approval: 4-10-1979 per Resolution No. 068-1979.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-96 PD-12 Woodcrest Heights.
A.
The Woodcrest Heights Planned Development originally consisted of approximately 132.5 acres containing 72 single-family parcels and three outlots. The development was made of two plats, Woodcrest Heights and Woodcrest Heights Addition No. 1, generally located on the northwest corner of Racine Avenue and Woods Road. The Woodcrest Heights development consists of 82 lots and one outlot. Twenty-two lots are platted for single-family, 21 lots are platted for two-family, and Lot 18 is platted for future multifamily use. (The restrictions dictate that Lot 18 shall be a multifamily site for no more than 48 one- or two-bedroom units and that the developers reserve the right to divide Lot 18 for the purpose of multifamily use.) The Woodcrest Heights Addition No. 1 development has 38 lots all for single-family use. Both developments were constructed in one phase each and are serviced by City sewer and water. The one outlot platted as part of the original Woodcrest Heights Subdivision was dedicated to the City of Muskego at the time of recording.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to transition higher density uses (in the form of multifamily units) from the existing industrial park to the north down to single-family uses. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including allowing reduced side street setbacks for corner lots to be 25 feet, reducing all side offsets to 15 feet, and enlarging rear offsets to 25 feet.
(2)
A developer's agreement was approved with the final plat by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-16-1987 per Resolution No. 092-1987.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-12-1988 per Ordinance No. 594.
(3)
Common Council Addition No. 1 rezoning approval: 4-24-1990 per Ordinance No. 676.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 11-3-1987 per Resolution No. 166-1987.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 1-12-1988 per Resolution No. 004-1988.
(6)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 3-20-1990 per Resolution No. 046-1990.
(7)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 4-24-1990 per Resolution No. 094-1990.
C.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
§ 400-97 PD-13 Golden Country Estates.
A.
The Golden Country Estates Planned Development consists of approximately 26 acres containing 47 single-family parcels. The development was made of one plat and is generally located off of the north side of Janesville Road between Moorland Road and Woodland Place. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements of the underlying zoning, including side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear offsets increased to 25 feet. (Setbacks must be 50 feet from any parcel abutting the Janesville Road right-of-way and corner lots may have a twenty-five-foot front setback on the opposite side of the forty-foot front setback.)
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Golden Country proposal. A subdivider's agreement was approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-98 PD-14 Bay Breeze.
A.
The Bay Breeze Planned Development contains approximately 30 acres and a variety of parcels located on the south side of Janesville Road along Little Muskego Lake just east of Pioneer Drive. The development consists of 11 four-unit condominiums, five six-unit condominiums, and four larger parcels for single-family use totaling 78 dwelling units. Multiple certified survey maps and condominium plats ultimately created parcels for multifamily condo use and parcels for single-family use. The condominium complex was approved with accessory structures, landscaping, and appropriate access and parking. The development is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District and B-2/PD Local Service Center District with a Planned Development Overlay District.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees. The original development called for 74 units of condominiums to the east and a mixed-use facility to the west with an option of having 10 single-family residential units in place of the mixed-use facility if it was never constructed. The current planned development has the 74 units of multifamily condominiums and has replaced the once proposed mixed-use facility with four parcels of single-family residential. Overall, the planned development zoning is put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving a specific density, outlined in the approved developer's agreement. The PD also allowed the mixed uses of single-family and multifamily to co-exist in the same development. Setbacks and offsets of the multifamily uses were established under the original approvals, and any new buildings will require approval of the City's Plan Commission. Setbacks and offsets for the single-family uses follow the zoning restrictions of the RL-3 Lakeshore Residence District. Overall, the developer's agreement allows the following:
(a)
Seventy-four units of multifamily condominiums to the east and a mixed use facility to the west (10 units of single-family residential in place of mixed-use facility if never constructed).
(b)
No more than one boat slip per multifamily unit, and in no case can the amount of boat slips exceed 74 for the multifamily uses of the PD.
(c)
Each private boat slip shall be only available to the owners of the condominium, and no condo unit shall own more than one slip.
(d)
No more than 25 boat slips are allowed for the originally proposed mixed-use facility and these slips shall not be available for rent but for the sole use of the mixed-use facility. (Mixed-use facility and boat slip clause was amended out of the original developer's agreement and boat slips as necessary for single-family units were allowed.)
(e)
Shall the mixed-use facility not be constructed as part of the PD the developer has the right to construct a maximum of 10 single-family homes in its place. (Mixed-family use facility was amended out of the original developer's agreement and single-family units were allowed.)
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-99 PD-15 Meadow Green West.
A.
The Meadow Green West Planned Development consists of approximately 110 acres containing 176 single-family parcels. The development was made of four plats, Country Brook Estates and three additions all generally located off of the west side of Lannon Drive between Woods Road and Janesville Road. The Meadow Green West development consists of 44 single-family parcels, the Meadow Green West Addition No. 1 development consists of 39 single-family parcels, the Meadow Green West Addition No. 2 development consists of 39 single-family parcels, and the Meadow Green West Addition No. 3 development consists of 54 single-family parcels. All developments were constructed in one phase each and are serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be reduced to 35 feet and all side and rear offsets be 15 feet for the original phase and thirty-five-foot setbacks and all side and rear offsets be 10 feet for the first, second, and third additions.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Country Brook Estates proposal. A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for each development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 4-5-1988 per Resolution No. 039-1988.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 11-22-1988 per Ordinance No. 628.
(3)
Common Council Addition No. 1 rezoning approval: 6-26-1990 per Ordinance No. 686.
(4)
Common Council Addition No. 2 rezoning approval: 3-26-1991 per Ordinance No. 711.
(5)
Common Council Addition No. 3 rezoning approval: 1-28-1992 per Ordinance No. 743.
(6)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 11-15-1988 per Resolution No. 204-1988.
(7)
Common Council final plat approval: 11-22-1988 per Resolution No. 252-1988.
(8)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 6-19-1990 per Resolution No. 111-1990.
(9)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 6-26-1990 per Resolution No. 163-1990.
(10)
Plan Commission Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 10-2-1990 per Resolution No. 172-1990.
(11)
Common Council Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 3-26-1991 per Resolution No. 060-1991.
(12)
Plan Commission Addition No. 3 final plat approval: 8-20-1991 per Resolution No. 147-1991.
(13)
Common Council Addition No. 3 final plat approval: 1-28-1992 per Resolution No. 032-1992.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-100 PD-16 Breann Ridge.
A.
The Breann Ridge Planned Development contains approximately five acres with six parcels for multifamily residential use located on Jacobs Court a few blocks south of the Janesville Road/Parkland Drive intersection. The development was originally approved as a final plat allowing eight units of multifamily on each parcel. The apartment structures are now condominiums (known as Parkridge Condominiums) and the overall development totals 48 living units (eight units in six structures) with associated accessory structures, parking, landscaping, and accessways. The development is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan (a ten-percent bonus in density was granted as part of the PD rezoning). The PD also allowed various structure placements for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying code subject to Plan Commission building, site and operation plan (BSO) and Common Council condominium plat approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 4-17-1990 per Resolution No. 048a-1990.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 11-13-1990 per Ordinance No. 698.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 11-6-1990 per Resolution No. 188-1990.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 11-13-1990 per Resolution No. 260-1990.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-101 PD-17 Overlook Bay.
A.
The Overlook Bay Planned Development consists of approximately 29 acres on two parcels and is generally located on the southwest corner of Janesville Road and Racine Avenue behind the Muskego Centre planned development. The development is originally divided by certified survey map. The planned development contains a total of 152 units with 19 eight-family structures. The development was approved in two phases with 13 eight-family structures in Phase 1 and the remaining six eight-family structures in Phase 2. The multifamily condominiums are approved along with associated accessory structures, parking, landscaping, and accessways. City sewer and water support the multifamily condominiums.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also allowed various structure placements and private accessways for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying code subject to Plan Commission building, site and operation plan (BSO) approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for multifamily residential development consistent with the Overlook Bay proposal.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-102 PD-18 Lake Forest.
A.
The Lake Forest Planned Development consists of approximately 63 acres containing 170 single-family parcels and eight outlots. The development is generally located from Janesville Road to Hillendale Drive northeast of the Waukesha County Muskego Park property. The development was made of three plats, Lake Forest, Lake Forest Addition No. 1, and Lake Forest Addition No. 2. The Lake Forest development consisted of 59 lots and five outlots. The Lake Forest Addition No. 1 development consisted of 86 lots and three outlots and was a redivision of Outlot 4 from the original Lake Forest Subdivision. The Lake Forest Addition No. 2 development consisted of 25 lots and one outlot and was a redivision of Outlot 8 from the Lake Forest Addition No. 1 Subdivision.
(1)
All developments constructed are serviced by City sewer and water. The eight existing outlots are for stormwater management, open space preservation and Waukesha County park purposes.
(2)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having increased side offsets to all be 15 feet and rear offsets to be 20 feet.
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Lake Forest proposal.
(4)
A subdivider's agreement was approved with the final plat for each development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission Lake Forest rezoning approval: 4-3-1990 per Resolution No. 036-1990.
(2)
Common Council Lake Forest rezoning approval: 1-22-1991 per Ordinance No. 705.
(3)
Common Council Lake Forest Addition No. 1 and No. 2 rezoning approval: 10-22-1991 per Ordinance No. 726.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 10-16-1990 per Resolution No. 178-1990.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 1-22-1991 per Resolution No. 011-1991.
(6)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 9-3-1991 per Resolution No. 163-1991.
(7)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 10-22-1991 per Resolution No. 271-1991.
(8)
Plan Commission Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 7-7-1992 per Resolution No. 148-1992.
(9)
Common Council Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 7-14-1992 per Resolution No. 183-1992.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-103 PD-19 College Square.
A.
The College Square Planned Development contains approximately 12.1 acres with eight parcels for multifamily residential use, three parcels for single-family use, and one outlot located off of College Avenue on Regency Court and Hillendale Drive just east of Racine Avenue. The development was originally approved as part of a final plat. The planned development contains a total of 67 units with eight-family structures (64 units) and three single-family structures along with associated accessory structures, parking, landscaping, and accessways. The development is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also allowed various structure placements for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying code subject to Plan Commission building, site and operation plan (BSO) approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 3-19-1991 per Resolution No. 024-1991.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 3-12-1991 per Ordinance No. 710.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 3-19-1991 per Resolution No. 023-1991.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 3-26-1991 per Resolution No. 063-1991.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-104 PD-20 Woods Road-Deback.
A.
The Woods Road-Deback Planned Development consists of approximately 4.85 acres containing four two-family parcels. The development was recorded by certified survey map and is generally located along the north side of Woods Road immediately west of Woodside Estates and Woodcrest Heights Subdivisions. The four lots are to contain only two-unit row houses. The development is serviced by City sewer and water. The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the multifamily two-unit structures on the platted lots. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks to be 50 feet and having all side and rear offsets be 15 feet.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-105 PD-21 Country Brook Estates.
A.
The Country Brook Estates Planned Development consists of approximately 41 acres containing 54 single-family parcels. The development was made of two plats, Country Brook Estates and Country Brook Estates Addition No. 1, and is generally located off of the north side of Woods Road between Racine Avenue and Lannon Drive. The Country Brook Estates development consists of 23 lots and the Country Brook Estates Addition No. 1 development has 31 lots. Both developments were constructed in one phase each and are serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-1/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having side and rear offsets of 15 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Country Brook Estates proposal. A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for each development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 7-17-1990 per Resolution No. 125-1990.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-14-1992 per Ordinance No. 736.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 8-6-1991 per Resolution No. 135-1991.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 10-22-1991 per Resolution No. 266-1991.
(5)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 2-18-1992 per Resolution No. 029-1992.
(6)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 3-10-1992 per Resolution No. 061-1992.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-106 PD-22 Stoney Creek.
A.
The Stoney Creek Planned Development contains approximately 9.87 acres and consists of a fifty-two-unit retirement community (12 one-bedroom units and 40 two-bedroom units). The development is generally located off of Tess Corners Drive 1/4 mile south of the Tess Corners Drive/Janesville Road intersection. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water. Rezoning approval in the form of a multiple-family planned development was received from the City's Common Council to allow the retirement community units to be incorporated into one large structure. A building, site and operation plan (BSO) outlining the parking, access, building elevations, landscaping, and other improvements for the site was approved by the City's Plan Commission. The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSM/PD Multiple-family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. A developer's agreement and letter of credit was approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 5-19-1992 per Resolution No. 111-1992.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 6-9-1992 per Ordinance No. 754.
(3)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 9-4-1990 per Resolution No. 158-1990.
(4)
Plan Commission BSO amendment approval: 3-6-1993 per Resolution No. 055-1993.
(5)
Plan Commission BSO Amendment No. 2 approval: 5-5-1998 per Resolution No. 077-1998.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings and BSO amendments if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings and BSO amendments if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings and BSO amendments if required.
§ 400-107 PD-23 Plum Creek.
A.
The Plum Creek Planned Development consists of approximately 70 acres containing 113 single-family parcels and five outlots. The development is serviced by City sewer and water and is generally located between Janesville Road and Woods Road just west of the Muskego Industrial Park. The development was made of two plats, Plum Creek (52 lots) and Plum Creek Addition No. 1 (61 lots and the five outlots). The Plum Creek development is generally located along western Woods Road just southeast of the Plum Creek East Subdivision and the Muskego Industrial Park. City sewer and water service both developments. The five outlots conserve the environmental areas, provide a private park for the development, and provide stormwater management. Outlot 5 was converted by the homeowners' association and developed into two lots meeting the RS-2 zoning requirements.
(1)
The lands were originally approved as RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District but later approved as RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to have reduced lot sizes while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning for the single-family parcels, including allowing reduced front setbacks to 35 feet, reduced side offsets to 10 feet, and a rear offset of 20 feet.
(2)
A developer's agreement was approved with the final plat by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council RS-2/PD rezoning approval: 11-25-1992 per Ordinance No. 771.
(2)
Plan Commission RS-3/PD rezoning approval: 2-20-2001 per Resolution No. 019-2001.
(3)
Common Council RS-3/PD rezoning approval: 3-27-2001 per Ordinance No. 1061.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 11-3-1992 per Resolution No. 238-1992.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 11-24-1992 per Resolution No. 284-1992.
(6)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 2-15-1994 per Resolution No. 033-1994.
(7)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 3-8-1994 per Resolution No. 053-1994.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-108 PD-24 Plum Creek East.
A.
The Plum Creek East Planned Development consists of approximately 33 acres containing 40 lots and three outlots. The total development allowed 108 units. The development is serviced by City sewer and water and is generally located south of Janesville Road just west of the Muskego Industrial Park.
(1)
The lands were originally approved as RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District but later approved as three separate planned developments consisting of the following:
(a)
Seven lots and 56 units (Lots 1 to 7 and Outlot 3 of Plum Creek East) were approved as per the past RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District and were allowed an eight-family unit structure per lot. Building, site and operation plan approvals were required in front of the City's Plan Commission.
(b)
Nineteen lots and 38 units (Lots 8 to 22 and Lots 37 to 40 of Plum Creek East) were approved as per the past RSA/PD Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District.
(c)
Fourteen units/lots (Lots 23 to 36 and Outlots 1 and 2 of Plum Creek East) were approved as per the RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District and were allowed single-family structures upon them.
(2)
The planned development was originally put in place to allow the developers to have varying lot sizes for the different types of uses (multifamily, two-family, and single-family). Pedestrian access and easements were also given at the time of final platting of the development. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning for the single-family parcels, including allowing reduced front setbacks to 35 feet, reduced side offsets to 10 feet, and a rear offset of 20 feet.
(3)
A developer's agreement was approved with the final plat by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission RS-2 to RS-2/PD rezoning approval: 10-19-1993 per Resolution No. 195-1993.
(2)
Common Council RS-2 to RS-2/PD rezoning approval: 2-22-1994 per Ordinance No. 830.
(3)
Plan Commission RS-2/PD to RS-3/PD, RSA/PD, and RSM/PD rezoning approval: 2-20-2001 per Resolution No. 020-2001.
(4)
Common Council RS-2/PD to RS-3/PD, RSA/PD, and RSM/PD rezoning approval: 3-27-2001 per Ordinance No. 1060.
(5)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 2-1-1994 per Resolution No. 022-1994.
(6)
Common Council final plat approval: 2-22-1994 per Resolution No. 043-1994.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right.
(1)
Any use as permitted in the RCE District (for the single-family parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(2)
Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District (for the multifamily parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(3)
Any use as permitted in the RM-2 District (for the two-family parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses.
(1)
Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District (for the single-family parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(2)
Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District (for the multifamily parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(3)
Any accessory use permitted in the RM-2 District (for the two-family parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
(1)
Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District (for the single-family parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(2)
Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District (for the multifamily parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(3)
Any conditional use permitted in the RM-2 District (for the two-family parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-109 PD-25 Muskego Centre.
A.
The Muskego Centre Planned Development consists of approximately 22 acres containing nine parcels. The development is located on the northwest corner of Janesville Road and Racine Avenue and contains a variety of commercial developments governed by Plan Commission approved building, site and operation plans (BSO). The PD is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of B-2/PD Local Service Center District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use varying building placements, varied commercial uses, and shared access points. All developments within the PD are governed by individual building, site and operation plans (BSO), and any changes requested of the underlying zoning may require zoning substantial change hearings.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for commercial development consistent with the Muskego Centre proposal.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 4-3-1990 per Resolution No. 036-1990.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 6-28-1994 per Ordinance No. 843.
(3)
Plan Commission CSM No. 1 approval: 8-7-1990 per Resolution No. 142-1990.
(4)
Common Council CSM No. 1 approval: 12-11-1990 per Resolution No. 291-1990.
(5)
Plan Commission CSM No. 2 approval: 7-19-1994 per Resolution No. 144-1994.
(6)
Common Council CSM No. 2 approval: 7-26-1994 per Resolution No. 157-1994.
(7)
Plan Commission CSM No. 3 approval: 7-19-1994 per Resolution No. 145-1994.
(8)
Common Council CSM No. 3 approval: 7-26-1994 per Resolution No. 158-1990.
(9)
Plan Commission CSM No. 4 approval: 2-15-2000 per Resolution No. 032-2000.
(10)
Common Council CSM No. 4 approval: 2-22-2000 per Resolution No. 046-2000.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in a commercial zoning district subject to BSO approval and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in a commercial zoning district subject to BSO approval and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in a commercial zoning district subject to BSO approval and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-110 PD-26 Deer Creek.
A.
The Deer Creek Planned Development consists of approximately 63 acres containing 72 single-family parcels and three outlots. The development was made of two plats, Deer Creek and Deer Creek Addition No. 1. The Deer Creek development consists of 36 lots with 10 lots on Ricco Court off of Lannon Drive just east of Tower Drive and has the remaining 26 lots on the east and west sides of Parkland Drive along Bridgeport Circle and Bridgeport Way. The Deer Creek Addition No. 1 development also has 36 lots and is just north of the original Deer Creek Subdivision. The addition has three lots west of Parkland Drive and the rest of the lots to the east of Parkland Drive along Casey Drive and Deer Creek Court. Both developments were constructed in one phase each and are serviced by City sewer and water. The three outlots conserve the delineated wetlands in the area, and Outlot 1 of Deer Creek subdivision contains the stormwater retention pond for the entire planned development.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD did not change any general requirements of the underlying zoning, so all lots follow the requirements of the City's RS-2 Suburban Residence District.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Deer Creek proposal. A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for each development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 6-27-1995 per Ordinance No. 868.
(2)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 5-16-1995 per Resolution No. 069-1995.
(3)
Common Council final plat approval: 6-27-1995 per Resolution No. 137-1995.
(4)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 10-7-1997 per Resolution No. 197-1997.
(5)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 10-14-1997 per Resolution No. 238-1997.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-111 PD-27 Regency.
A.
The Regency Senior Living Planned Development is located on approximately 21.5 acres of land on the northeast corner of Racine Avenue and Woods Road. Ten and one-half acres of the development are preserved in an open space easement with pedestrian paths. The development is strictly for senior living as the minimum age of residents at the site is 62 years of age. The development consists of six eight-unit structures, two thirty-two-unit buildings, one forty-two-unit building, one ninety-six-unit building, and various commons and garage structures. The PD is allowed up to 250 units on site (96 assisted living and 154 independent living). The facility is made up of ample access, parking, and landscaping. The planned development was originally created under the past zoning of RSM/PD/OIP Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District and an Institutional Overlay District. The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for multiple-family developments consistent with the Regency senior living proposal. A conditional use grant is on file allowing the institutional use and immediate amenities. A developer's agreement was part of the original approvals.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted by the RM-1 District and existing BSO and conditional use grant (CUG) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted by the RM-1 District and existing BSO and CUG subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted by the RM-1 District and existing BSO and CUG subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-112 PD-28 Miller.
A.
The Miller Planned Development contains approximately 4.5 acres with four parcels for two-family residential use located on the east side of Racine Avenue across from Thornapple Trail. The development was originally approved as a four-parcel certified survey map. Four apartment structures containing two units each (total of eight units) are approved by the City Plan Commission as part of a building, site and operation plan (BSO) with associated accessory structures, parking, landscaping, and accessways. The development is serviced by City sewer and private water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also was allowed for flexibility to the developer with respect to building placement and the upkeep of landscaped areas. The density allowed under the original PD is 20,000 square feet of land area per unit.
(2)
A subdivider's agreement and cash deposit agreement are approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 2-4-1997 per Resolution No. 019-1997.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 8-26-1997 per Ordinance No. 921.
(3)
Plan Commission CSM approval: 4-1-1997 per Resolution No. 072-1997.
(4)
Common Council CSM approval: 8-12-1997 per Resolution No. 178-1997.
(5)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 4-15-1997 per Resolution No. 077-1997.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-113 PD-29 Park Estates.
A.
The Park Estates Planned Development consists of approximately 27 acres containing 29 lots and one outlot. The total development allowed 24 single-family units and five duplex lots (10 duplex units). The development is serviced by City sewer and water and is generally located on the north side of Janesville Road just east of Hillendale Drive. The lands were originally approved as RS-1/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District for the single-family lots (Lots 1 to 12 and 18 to 29) and RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District for the two-family lots (Outlot 1 and Lots 13 to 17).
(1)
The Planned Development Overlay was put in place to allow reduced lot widths and lot sizes and to allow the use of duplex lots near the intersection of Janesville Road all in exchange for the preservation of open space while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed one requirement of the two-family parcels by allowing fifteen-foot side and rear offsets.
(2)
A developer's agreement was approved with the final plat by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 3-18-1997 per Resolution No. 054-1997.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 8-12-1997 per Ordinance No. 939.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 7-15-1997 per Resolution No. 116-1997.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 8-12-1997 per Resolution No. 183-1997.
C.
§ 400-114 PD-30 North Cape Farms.
A.
The North Cape Farms Planned Development consists of approximately 25 acres containing 24 single-family parcels and one outlot. The development was made of one plat and a certified survey map and is generally located off of the east side of North Cape Road between Durham Drive and Schaefer Road. The subdivision plat included 22 single-family parcels and one outlot while the certified survey map is for two single-family parcels. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by City sewer and water. The one outlot for the development is for open space preservation and stormwater management.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSE/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be reduced to 30 feet (25 feet in the case of multiple street setbacks on one side), side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear offsets reduced to 10 feet (50 feet along North Cape Road).
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 11-3-1998 per Resolution No. 185-1998.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-11-1999 per Ordinance No. 984.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 4-20-1999 per Resolution No. 025-1999.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 4-27-1999 per Resolution No. 078-1999.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-115 PD-31 Champions Village.
A.
The Champions Village Planned Development consisted of five plats containing approximately 110 acres with 204 single-family parcels and seven outlots. The development is located on the northeast corner area of Highway 36 and North Cape Road. The first plat, known as "Champions Village of Country Club Villages" consisted of 83 single-family parcels and two outlots. The second plat, known as "Champions Village Addition No. 1 of Country Club Villages" consisted of 38 single-family parcels and three outlots. The third plat, known as "Champions Village Addition No. 2 of Country Club Villages" consisted of 29 single-family parcels and no outlots. The fourth plat, known as "Champions Village Addition No. 3 of Country Club Villages" consisted of 37 single-family parcels and no outlots. The fifth plat, known as "The Reserve at Champions Village" consisted of 17 single-family parcels and two outlots. Each development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water. The outlots in the subdivisions are for open space preservation and stormwater maintenance. One outlot in The Reserve of Champions Village is for future development purposes.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced to 30 feet, all side offsets reduced to 10 feet, and rear offsets increased to 30 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Champions Village proposal. A subdivider's agreement was approved with the final plat for each development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval (Champions Village and Additions No. 1 and No. 2): 1-18-2000 per Resolution No. 020-2000.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval (Champions Village and Additions No. 1 and No. 2): 2-8-2000 per Ordinance No. 1013.
(3)
Common Council rezoning approval (Champions Village Addition No. 3): 1-25-2000 per Ordinance No. 1011.
(4)
Plan Commission rezoning approval (The Reserve at Champions Village): 7-17-2001 per Resolution No. 102-2001.
(5)
Common Council rezoning approval (The Reserve at Champions Village): 8-28-2001 per Ordinance No. 1076.
(6)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 8-27-1996 per Resolution No. 190-1996.
(7)
Plan Commission Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 7-6-1999 per Resolution No. 075-1999.
(8)
Common Council Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 7-13-1999 per Resolution No. 118-1999.
(9)
Plan Commission Addition No. 3 final plat approval: 1-4-2000 per Resolution No. 005-2000.
(10)
Common Council Addition No. 3 of Country Club Villages final plat approval: 1-25-2000 per Resolution No. 021-2000.
(11)
Common Council Addition No. 3 final plat reapproval: 3-28-2000 per Resolution No. 072-2000.
(12)
Plan Commission The Reserve final plat approval: 7-17-2001 per Resolution No. 102-2001.
(13)
Common Council The Reserve final plat approval: 10-9-2001 per Resolution No. 193-2001.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-116 PD-32 Quietwood Creek.
A.
The original Quietwood Creek Planned Development consisted of approximately 140.6 acres containing 142 single-family parcels, one parcel for future commercial development (approximately 28 acres) and seven outlots (for open space conservation, utility easement, and stormwater management). The development was made of one plat and is generally located between Janesville Road and Woods Road south of the eastern Martin Drive/Janesville Road intersection. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced to 30 feet and rear offsets increased to 20 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Quietwood Creek proposal. A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-20-2000 per Resolution No. 127-2000.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-25-2000 per Ordinance No. 1033.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 6-20-2000 per Resolution No. 126-2000.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 7-25-2000 per Resolution No. 157-2000.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-117 PD-33 Pleasant View.
A.
The Pleasant View Condominium Planned Development consists of approximately 11 acres and is generally located along the north side of Woods Road 1/2 mile west of the Racine Avenue/Woods Road intersection. The development was originally recorded by two certified survey maps consisting of six separate parcels and then later an approved condominium plat was received.
(1)
The development contains areas for two-family structures and preserves extensive environmental areas on the rear of the lots. The development is generally located along the north side of Woods Road 1/2 mile west of the Racine Avenue/Woods Road intersection. The overall development contains area for six two-family structures. The development is serviced by City sewer and water.
(2)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RSA/PD Attached Single-Family District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the multifamily two-unit structures in various locations on the platted lots. The PD did not change any general requirements of the underlying zoning, so all lots follow the requirements of the City's RSA Attached Single-Family Residence District.
(3)
Due to the existing environmental lands on the north end of the PD, an open space management plan was approved and recorded. Also, a developer's agreement was approved by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 8-15-2000 per Resolution No. 148-2000.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 9-26-2000 per Ordinance No. 1041.
(3)
Plan Commission condo plat approval: 12-18-2001 per Resolution No. 188-2001.
(4)
Common Council condo plat approval: 1-22-2002 per Resolution No. 016-2002.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-118 PD-34 Dreamland.
A.
The Dreamland Planned Development contains approximately 42 acres consisting of a total of six parcels. The PD was split by multiple certified survey maps and is dependent on, if required, City approvals of building, site and operation plans (BSO) and substantial change hearings when new commercial entities are proposed. The development is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water. The planned development was originally created under the zoning of B-3/PD General Business District with a Planned Development Overlay District. Developer's agreements are approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual PD guarantees. The planned development zoning is put in place to allow developers flexibility in building placement, access, and other design requirements. The flexibility allowed by the PD is dependent on City approval as new commercial entities are proposed.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers,
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 7-7-1998 per Resolution No. 054-1998.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-9-2001 per Ordinance No. 1052.
(3)
Plan Commission additional rezoning approval: 6-5-2001 per Resolution No. 084-2001.
(4)
Common Council additional rezoning approval: 7-24-2001 per Ordinance No. 1074.
(5)
Plan Commission final CSM approval: 6-5-2001 per Resolution No. 082-2001.
(6)
Common Council final CSM approval: 7-24-2001 per Resolution No. 135-2001.
(7)
Plan Commission Jewel Osco BSO approval: 2-1-2000 per Resolution No. 132C-1999.
(8)
Plan Commission Jewel Osco amended BSO approval: 6-5-2001 per Resolution No. 081-2001.
(9)
Plan Commission Kohl's BSO approval: 6-5-2001 per Resolution No. 080-2001.
(10)
Plan Commission medical clinic's BSO approval: 10-4-2011 per Resolution No. 039-2011.
(11)
Plan Commission final CSM No. 2 approval: 12-6-2011 per Resolution No. 049-2011.
(12)
Common Council final CSM No. 2 approval: 12-13-2011 per Resolution No. 181-2011.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the B-3 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings and Plan Commission approvals if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the B-3 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings and Plan Commission approvals if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the B-3 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings and Plan Commission approvals if required.
§ 400-119 PD-35 Sarah Estates.
A.
The Sarah Estates Planned Development consists of 26 single-family parcels and one outlot on approximately 16.4 acres. The development is located off of the north side of Woods Road between Lannon Drive and Bay Lane Drive. The one outlot is for the stormwater management of the subdivision. The development was constructed in one phase and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use reduced lot sizes and widths on a few of the lots provided that the net density is maintained within the boundaries of the final plat without specific compliance with the underlying zoning district regulations that would otherwise be applicable to each lot. The PD did not change any other requirements of the underlying zoning district.
(2)
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 2-20-2001 per Resolution No. 018-2001.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 3-13-2001 per Ordinance No. 1058.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 2-20-2001 per Resolution No. 018-2001.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 3-13-2001 per Resolution No. 055-2001.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-120 PD-36 Big Muskego Estates.
A.
The Big Muskego Estates Planned Development consists of approximately 92 acres containing 54 single-family parcels and three outlots. The development was made of one plat and is generally located off of the east side of Durham Road between Hi View Drive and North Cape Road. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by City sewer and water. The three outlots for the development are for open space preservation, stormwater management, and a City well site.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD did not change any other requirements of the underlying zoning district.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Big Muskego Estates proposal. A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 12-18-2001 per Resolution No. 187-2001.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-22-2002 per Ordinance No. 1090.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 5-6-2003 per Resolution No. 048-2003.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 6-24-2003 per Resolution No. 150-2003.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-121 PD-37 Candlewood Village.
A.
The Candlewood Village Planned Development contains approximately 48 acres with five parcels for commercial use and a few parcels for multifamily residential use all generally located south of the intersection of Moorland Road and Janesville Road. The commercial parcels must receive Plan Commission building, site and operation plan (BSO) approval and will be governed by the Moorland South Design Guide adopted by the City. The residential use parcels consist of a condominium development of 51 two-family structures (102 units) and one structure for community use. The condo development received BSO approval from the City's Plan Commission and is to follow specific design guidelines consistent with the Moorland South Design Guide adopted by the City. The development is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of B-3/RSA/PD General Business District and Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also allowed various structure placements for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying code subject to Plan Commission BSO and Common Council condominium plat approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement and letter of credit were approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-18-2002 per Resolution No. 088-2002.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-23-2002 per Ordinance No. 1109.
(3)
Plan Commission CSM No. 1 approval: 6-18-2002 per Resolution No. 084-2002.
(4)
Common Council CSM No. 1 approval: 7-23-2002 per Resolution No. 141-2002.
(5)
Plan Commission CSM No. 2 approval: 6-18-2002 per Resolution No. 085-2002.
(6)
Common Council CSM No. 2 approval: 7-23-2002 per Resolution No. 142-2002.
(7)
Plan Commission CSM No. 3 approval: 6-18-2002 per Resolution No. 086-2002.
(8)
Common Council CSM No. 3 approval: 7-23-2002 per Resolution No. 143-2002.
(9)
Plan Commission CSM No. 4 approval: 5-20-2003 per Resolution No. 059-2003.
(10)
Common Council CSM No. 4 approval: 5-27-2003 per Resolution No. 123-2003.
(11)
Plan Commission condo plat approval: 5-20-2003 per Resolution No. 054-2003.
(12)
Common Council condo plat approval: 5-20-2003 per Resolution No. 124-2003.
C.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
§ 400-122 PD-38 Stonebridge.
A.
The Stonebridge Planned Development contains approximately 48 acres with 43 single-family parcels and four outlots. The development is located north of Highway 36 west of the Champions Village Subdivision. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water. The outlots in the subdivisions are for open space preservation and stormwater management, and one outlot (Outlot 2) is to be reserved for future development purposes.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced to 30 feet, all side offsets reduced to 10 feet, and rear offsets increased to 30 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Stonebridge proposal. A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for each development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 1-7-2003 per Resolution No. 164-2002.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-28-2003 per Ordinance No. 1127.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 10-21-2003 per Resolution No. 138-2003.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 2-24-2004 per Resolution No. 037-2004.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-123 PD-39 Settlement on Woods.
A.
The Settlement on Woods Planned Development consists of 59 single-family parcels and eight outlots. The development is located off of Woods Road just west of the Muskego High School property. The eight outlots are for the protection of wetlands, stormwater management, and future conservation land protection. The development was constructed in one phase and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including reducing all front setbacks to 35 feet, reducing side offsets to 10 and 15 feet and enlarging rear offsets to 30 feet.
(2)
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 2-18-2003 per Resolution No. 008-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 2-25-2003 per Ordinance No. 1131.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 2-18-2003 per Resolution No. 008-2003.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 3-11-2003 per Resolution No. 045-2003.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-124 PD-40 Lindale.
A.
The Lindale Planned Development consists of approximately 14 acres containing nine single-family units and 48 multifamily units (total of 57 dwelling units). The development is generally located along the south side of Martin Drive just north of the Janesville Road and Martin Drive intersection. The development is constructed in two phases consisting of a final plat for the Lindale Estates single-family subdivision (nine single-family parcels and one outlot) and a condominium plat/building, site and operation plan (BSO) for the Lindale Villas multifamily condominiums (48 units in seven structures consisting of two four-unit buildings and five eight-unit buildings). City sewer and water service the entire development. The planned development was originally created as part of a larger planned development that was approved in 2003. The larger planned development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District, RSA/PD Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District, and RSM/PD Multiple-Family District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The Lindale PD is one of the areas reserved for future RS-2/PD (Lindale Estates) and RSM/PD (Lindale Villas). Each facet of the original planned development is incorporated into a separate distinct PD upon final plat, condominium plat, or building, site and operation plan approvals.
(1)
The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the calculations of the entire developed area in allowing the proposed 57 units. The PD did not change any general requirements of the underlying zoning and all lots follow the requirements of the City's RS-2 Suburban Residence District.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential and multiple-family residential development consistent with the Lindale proposal. A developer's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-17-2003 per Resolution No. 065-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-8-2003 per Ordinance No. 1144.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 10-1-2003 per Resolution No. 137-2003.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 12-9-2003 per Resolution No. 263-2003.
(5)
Plan Commission multifamily BSO approval: 8-3-2004 per Resolution No. 048a-2004.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right.
E.
Permitted accessory uses.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
§ 400-125 PD-41 Forest Glen.
A.
The Forest Glen Planned Development consists of approximately 20 acres containing 27 single-family parcels. The development is generally located north of the Janesville Road and Bay Lane Drive intersection. The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by City sewer and water. The final plat of Forest Glen encompassed five outlots. One outlot was dedicated to the City for future conservation protection, three outlots are for drainage facilities, and one outlot is reserved for future multifamily development.
(1)
The planned development was originally created as part of a larger planned development that was approved in 2003. The larger planned development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District, RSA/PD Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District, and RSM/PD Multiple-Family District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The Forest Glen PD is the area that was reserved for future RS-2/PD. Each facet of the original planned development is incorporated into a separate distinct PD upon final plat, condominium plat, or building, site and operation plan approvals.
(2)
The Forest Glen planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. (The density of the Forest Glen development is derived from the amount of single-family units allowed divided by the sum of the square footages of the 27 single-family parcels and Outlots 2 and 3.) The PD did not change any general requirements of the underlying zoning and all lots follow the requirements of the City's RS-2 Suburban Residence District.
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential development consistent with the Forest Glen proposal. A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-17-2003 per Resolution No. 065-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-8-2003 per Ordinance No. 1144.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 3-15-2005 per Resolution No. 040-2005.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 5-24-2005 per Resolution No. 101-2005.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-126 PD-42 Basse.
[Amended 6-17-2020 by Ord. No. 1446]
A.
The Basse Planned Development consists of approximately 17.5 acres. The development is located along the north side of Janesville Road between Martin Drive to the east and Bay Lane Drive to the west. The area is currently undeveloped although is platted for future multifamily development as part of a planned development district.
(1)
The planned development was originally created as part of a larger planned development that was approved in 2003. The larger planned development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District, RSA/PD Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District, and RSM/PD Multiple-Family District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The Basse PD is the area that was reserved for future RSM/PD. Each facet of the original planned development is incorporated into a separate distinct PD upon final plat, condominium plat, or building, site and operation plan (BSO) approvals. The Basse PD will be established upon future approvals of a BSO and/or condominium plat.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for multifamily residential.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-17-2003 per Resolution No. 065-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-8-2003 per Ordinance No. 1144.
(3)
Plan Commission Forest Glen final plat approval: 3-15-2005 per Resolution No. 040-2005.
(4)
Common Council Forest Glen final plat approval: 5-24-2005 per Resolution No. 101-2005.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-127 PD-43 Kenwood Place.
A.
The Kenwood Place Planned Development consists of 37 single-family parcels and one outlot on approximately 26.4 acres. The development is located off of the east side of Hillendale Drive between Tans Drive and Racine Avenue. The one outlot is for the stormwater management of the subdivision. The development was constructed in one phase and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use reduced widths on a few of the lots. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having side offsets be 15 feet and rear offsets be 20 feet for all lots and having reduced front setbacks for Lots 36 and 37 to be 30 feet.
(2)
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 2-3-2004 per Resolution No. 166-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 2-10-2004 per Ordinance No. 1160.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 6-1-2004 per Resolution No. 060-2004.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 1-25-2005 per Resolution No. 024-2005.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-128 PD-44 St. Andrew's Village.
A.
The St. Andrew's Village Condominium Planned Development consists of 48 dwelling units in 24 structures, each being a side-by-side duplex with a variety of options for facades. The development is located on the south side of Ryan Road along the Muskego Lake Country Club. The condo project is to be constructed in three phases with the first phase consisting of 26 units, the second phase of eight units, and the third phase of six units.
(1)
The structures all have the option to be one or two stories and the owners will chose the layout at the time of sale. The structures are constructed with strict architectural detailing consistent with the General Design Guide. Each structure will be constructed of running bond brick, cedar trim, hardi-plank siding, and thirty-year dimensional shingles, and elements such as soldier courses, stone sills, and tempered glass are used. Each condominium unit is provided with four off-street parking spaces and is serviced by private drives maintained by the St. Andrew's Homeowners' Association.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family attached dwelling unit development consistent with the St. Andrew's Village proposal. The adopted Parks and Conservation Plan depicts wetlands and a navigable stream on the property to be a medium value management priority and this area is preserved as part of the condo plat. Landscape plans are a part of the building, site and operation plan for each condo unit and street tree plans are also included for the development. The condominiums will be served by municipal sanitary sewer and water service and the project is subject to developer's agreements executed by the City and petitioner to address the construction of public and private improvements.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 5-18-2004 per Resolution No. 052-2004.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-25-2004 per Ordinance No. 1171.
(3)
Plan Commission BSO/condo plat approval: 5-18-2004 per Resolution No. 051-2004.
(4)
Common Council condo plat approval: 8-10-2004 per Resolution No. 132-2004.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RM-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-129 PD-45 InPro.
A.
The InPro Planned Development consists of approximately 10 acres and is generally located in the Muskego Industrial Park on the north side of Apollo Drive between Mercury Drive and Racine Avenue. The planned development was originally created under the past zoning of I-1/PD General Industrial District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow a reduced setback of 25 feet to the addition of the existing InPro structure. The PD did not change any other general requirements of the underlying zoning, so all lots follow the requirements of the City's I-1 General Industrial Zoning District. A building, site and operation plan (BSO) was approved by the City's Plan Commission.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the M-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the M-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the M-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-130 PD-46 Woodland Creek Estates.
A.
The Woodland Creek Estates Planned Development consists of 76 single-family parcels and eight outlots on approximately 72 acres. The development is located off of the west side of Racine Avenue just south of the Muskego High School property. The development was constructed in two phases [Woodland Creek Estates (60 parcels) and Woodland Creek Estates Addition No. 1 (16 parcels)] and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
Outlots within the development are reserved for stormwater management, open space preservation, and a sewer utility station. The main outlot in the Woodland Creek Estates Addition No. 1 phase was dedicated to the City to be part of the Engel Conservation Lands found adjacent to the site. The developers also reserved an easement for public access to the conservation site.
(2)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use reduced lot sizes to a minimum of 18,000 square feet and 100 feet in width. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be 35 feet and side offsets be 10 feet on one side and 15 feet on all other sides.
(3)
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 7-20-2004 per Resolution No. 062-2004.
(2)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 5-3-2005 per Resolution No. 046-2005.
(3)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-27-2004 per Ordinance No. 1174.
(4)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-24-2005 per Ordinance No. 1190.
(5)
Plan Commission final plat approvals: 2-21-2006 per Resolution No. 015-2006 and Resolution No. 016-2006.
(6)
Common Council final plat approvals: 5-9-2006 per Resolution No. 099-2006.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-131 PD-47 Belle Chasse.
A.
The Belle Chasse Planned Development consists of approximately 128 single-family parcels on approximately 107 acres. The development is located off of the west and east side of Durham Drive just south of McShane Drive. The development is to be constructed in three phases and is serviced by City sewer and water. Outlots within the development are reserved for stormwater management, open space preservation, and a sewer utility station. The planned development is created under the auspices of the RS-2 Suburban Residence Zoning District as a planned development. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to use reduced lot sizes to a minimum of 18,000 square feet and 100 feet in width. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having setbacks on corner lots be 30 feet on one front setback and 40 feet on the other front setback. A separate subdivider's agreement, letter of credit, and final plat are approved for each individual phase of the development by the City's Common Council.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 3-7-2006 per Resolution No. 003a-2006.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-9-2006 per Ordinance No. 1213.
(3)
Common Council Phase 1 agreement approvals: 8-14-2007 per Resolution No. 166-2007.
(4)
Plan Commission Phase 1 final plat approvals: 2-5-2008 per Resolution No. 003-2008.
(5)
Common Council Phase 1 final plat approvals: 2-12-2008 per Resolution No. 039-2008.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-131.1 PD-48 Ingold.
[Added 5-21-2015 by Ord. No. 1396]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not given its final approval for this development. Once all conditions are met and approval is given, Attachment A of Ordinance No. 1396 will be included in this section. Ordinance No. 1396 is on file at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
§ 400-131.2 PD-49 Aster Hills Estates.
[Added 12-8-2015 by Res. No. 125-2015]
A.
The Aster Hills Estates Planned Development consists of 53 single-family parcels on approximately 63.5 acres. The development is located off of the west side of North Cape Road just south of Durham Drive. The development is to be constructed in one phase and is serviced by City sewer and water. Outlots within the development are reserved for stormwater management, open space preservation, and for a future City park. The planned development is created under the auspices of the RS-2 Suburban Residence Zoning District as a planned development. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers to cluster lots while preserving a substantial outlot for City preservation and park purposes. Lot sizes all are 23,000+ square and at least 110 feet in width. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including having setbacks on lots be 30 feet and side setbacks of 15 feet unless noted differently on the final plat.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 10-7-2014 per Resolution No. 054-2014.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 10-14-2014 per Ordinance No. 1387.
(3)
Common Council agreement approvals: 5-26-2015 per Resolution No. 056-2015.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approvals: 11-3-2015 per Resolution No. 054-2015.
(5)
Common Council final plat approvals: 12-8-2015 per Resolution No. 120-2015.
C.
Basic regulations.
(2)
Density. Dwelling units per acre: 0.83.
(3)
Building location.
(a)
Minimum setback: 30 feet.
(b)
Side yard: 15 feet.
(c)
Rear yard: 25 feet. Rear setbacks are 25 feet with the exception of lots backing up to Durham Drive, Priegel Drive, or North Cape Road where the rear setback is 40 feet. Wetland setbacks of 15 feet or 50 feet (per the plat) affect all setbacks.
(5)
Open space. Minimum open space per residential dwelling unit: 15,000 square feet.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
§ 400-131.3 PD-50 Parkland Towne Center.
[Added 6-2-2016 by Ord. No. 1406]
A.
The Parkland Towne Center Planned Development contains approximately 10.5 acres of mixed-use development along Janesville Road to the south and Lannon Road to the west.
(1)
The development will generally contain the following:
(a)
Approximately 53,500 square feet of commercial buildings generally consisting of a structure of 30,000 square feet, a structure of 12,000 square feet, a structure of 7,500 square feet, and a structure of 4,000 square feet.
(b)
Three multifamily structures with 30 units apiece, each structure to total four stories and be approximately 21,600 square feet each in size.
(2)
All commercial and multifamily residential uses as part of the Parkland Towne Center are subject to Plan Commission building, site, and operation plan and/or conditional use grant approval following the planned development zoning approval.
(3)
The Planned Development District is approved in order to allow the below characteristics for the proposed mixed-use development:
(a)
That the development is conceptually developed per the submittal found in the approvals referenced below, subject to future City approvals of civil plans, BSOs, CSM and other approvals.
(b)
The multifamily buildings not to exceed 43 feet nine inches as measured by code.
(c)
The multifamily buildings to have up to 30 units in any one structure.
(d)
Commercial and residential buildings on the site to have varying setbacks, offsets, floor area ratios, and open space ratios.
(e)
Allow the residential density to exist as 5,000 square feet per unit as per the RM-1 Zoning District.
(f)
Lot lines to cross between developments including allowance of landlocked parcels subject to easements.
(g)
Paving, parking space, and accessways to cross property lines throughout the development.
(h)
That the approval involves the conceptual site plan approved under Plan Commission Resolution No. 031-2016 which shows a forty-foot offset for Apartment Building No. 3 on the west side.
C.
§ 400-131.4 PD-51 Glen at Pellmann Farm.
[Added 10-20-2016 by Ord. No. 1408]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not given its final approval for this development code text. Once all conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1408 is on file at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
§ 400-131.5 PD-52 Muskego Elementary School Apartments.
[Added 12-19-2018 by Ord. No. 1425]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not given its final approval for this development code text. Once all conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1425 is on file at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
§ 400-131.6 PD-53 Presbyterian Homes/Senior Housing Partners.
[Added 11-20-2019 by Ord. No. 1437]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not given its final approval for this development code text. Once all conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1437 is on file at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
§ 400-131.7 PD-54 Glen at Muskego Lakes.
[Added 8-5-2020 by Ord. No. 1447]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not given its final approval for this development code text. Once all conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1447 is on file at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
§ 400-131.8 PD-55 Mallard Ridge.
[Added 5-19-2021 by Ord. No. 1457]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not given its final approval for this development code text. Once all conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1457 is on file at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
§ 400-131.9 PD Kirkland Crossing.
[Added 8-17-2021 by Ord. No. 1461]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not given its final approval for this development code text. Once all conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1461 is on file at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)