Any violation of this title shall be remedied pursuant to the provisions set forth in Chapter 1.20 NBMC. (Ord. 1585 § 17, 2016: Ord. 1256 § 1 (part), 2006: Ord. 1088 § 3 (part), 1999: Ord. 1020 (part), 1997; Ord. 336 § 6.16 (A), 1970).

In case any building or structure is erected, constructed, reconstructed, altered, converted or maintained, or any building, structure, or land is used in violation of this title, the proper legal authorities of the city may institute, in addition to other remedies, any appropriate action or proceedings to prevent such unlawful erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, conversion, maintenance or use, to restrain, correct, or abate such violation, to prevent the occupancy of said building, structure, or land, or to prevent any illegal act, conduct, business or use in or about such building, structures, or land. (Ord. 1256 § 1 (part), 2006: Ord. 1020 (part), 1997; Ord. 336 § 6.16 (B), 1970).

Upon the building inspector’s awareness of any violation of any of the provisions of this title, the building inspector shall initiate proceedings to secure enforcement of the code set forth in Chapter 1.20 NBMC. (Ord. 1585 § 18, 2016: Ord. 1256 § 1 (part), 2006: Ord. 1020 (part), 1997; Ord. 336 § 6.16 (C), 1970).

Repealed by Ord. 1585. (Ord. 1256 § 1 (part), 2006: Ord. 1020 (part), 1997; Ord. 584 § 4, 1983).

Any person who deems himself aggrieved by a final decision of the hearing examiner made under this title may appeal said decision to the King County superior court at his or her own risk and expense; provided, that said appeal must be filed with the King County superior court and served upon the mayor within 10 days of the date of the decision being appealed. (Ord. 1172 § 25, 2002: Ord. 1020 (part), 1997; Ord. 782 § 1, 1988).