Zoneomics Logo
search icon

Sultan City Zoning Code

Division III

Site Development Regulations

§ 16.20.010 Conflict with other laws and other legal documents.

Where other laws, codes (not including the previously adopted zoning code), or private restrictive covenants in recorded deeds, or any other legally binding agreements impose greater requirements, regulations, or restrictions than those contained herein, those other laws, codes, or covenants shall control, regardless of whether such laws or documents have been passed or created prior to or subsequently to the effective date of this zoning code.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.020 Permitted and prohibited uses.

A. 
Permitted Uses. No building or structure shall be erected, converted, enlarged, reconstructed, or structurally altered, nor shall any building or structure or land be used, designed, or arranged for any purpose other than is permitted in the zoning district in which the building or structure or land is located; provided that such regulations shall not prohibit the continuance of an existing use in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16.26 SMC.
B. 
Prohibited New Uses. To promote consistency with the Growth Management Act,[1] the following activities are expressly prohibited as a new use in the city; provided that this subsection B shall not prohibit the continuance of an existing use in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16.26 SMC:
1. 
Agricultural uses, as defined in SMC § 16.04.010.21;
2. 
Gun clubs, skeet shoots, and target ranges;
3. 
Quarrying or mining operations, or the removal and processing of sand, gravel, rock, peat, black soil and other natural deposits.
[1]
Editor's Note: See RCW 36.70A.010 et seq.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.030 Minimum requirements.

The regulations set forth in this zoning code shall be considered to be minimum requirements for the purpose of promoting the general public health, safety and welfare of the people of the City of Sultan.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.035 Compliance with FEMA bi-op provisions required for certain development applications.

In response to federal requirements expressed through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) biological opinion (bi-op) as a federal condition of maintaining eligibility for community participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), certain developments as described in this section must undertake appropriate environmental analysis and document compliance with the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA)[1] as follows:
A. 
Development subject to FEMA bi-op provisions is as the term "development" is defined in the 2010 FEMA Region X "Floodplain Management and the Endangered Species Act, A Model Ordinance April, 2011," Section 2, Definitions.
B. 
Properties in the areas listed below are required to address the standards of the FEMA bi-op. Terms are as defined in the FEMA Region X "Floodplain Management and the Endangered Species Act, A Model Ordinance April, 2011," Section 2, Definitions.
1. 
Floodway;
2. 
Channel migration zone plus 50 feet;
3. 
Riparian habitat zone (riparian buffer zone);
4. 
Other portions of the 100-year floodplain determined to be in the protected area.
C. 
Development applications for development within the protected area shall be accompanied by studies, reports, findings, and conclusions by qualified professional specialists as appropriate and necessary to document that the proposed development in the FEMA designated floodway, the channel migration zone plus 50 feet (as identified according to Ecology 2003), and the riparian buffer zone (as described by the Department of Natural Resources 2007 stream typing system and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's 1997 stream buffer guidelines) does not adversely affect water quality, water quantity, flood volumes, flood velocities, spawning substrate, and/or floodplain refugia for listed salmonids. (As required by the Biological Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Element 3 - Floodplain Management Criteria, Item A.2.)
D. 
Development applications for development within the FEMA designated 100-year floodplain but outside of the riparian buffer zone shall avoid, rectify, or compensate for any loss of floodplain storage. (As required by the Biological Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Element 3 - Floodplain Management Criteria, Item A.3.b.)
E. 
Indirect adverse effects of development in the floodplain to stormwater, riparian vegetation, bank stability, channel migration, hyporheic zones, wetlands, etc., must be mitigated such that equivalent or better salmon habitat protection is provided. (As required by the Biological Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Element 3 - Floodplain Management Criteria, Item A.3.b.)
F. 
Development applications for development within the FEMA designated 100-year floodplain as provided in subsection D of this section shall use low impact development methods (generally requiring infiltration of all on-site stormwater), such as those methods described in the Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound (Puget Sound Action Team and WSU/Pierce County Extension 2002) to minimize or avoid stormwater effects. (As required by the Biological Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Element 3 - Floodplain Management Criteria, Item A.3.b.)
G. 
Any improvements or repairs to existing structures that result in a greater than 10% increase of the structure footprint must mitigate for any adverse effects to endangered species or their habitat as described in subsections D and E of this section. (As required by the Biological Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Element 3 - Floodplain Management Criteria, Item A.)
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)
[1]
Editor's Note: See 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.

§ 16.20.040 Permits in conflict with these regulations.

Permits for the construction of buildings, or for the use of land or buildings that have been issued permits within three years from the adoption of this zoning code, and that are in violation with the regulations of this code shall be declared void, unless evidence is shown to establish that substantial expenditures have been made (see definition of "substantial expenditures"). Investment in real property shall not be construed as an expenditure toward construction. Unless actual construction work, including grading and excavation, is underway within three years after the adoption of this code, and construction is completed within six years from the adoption of this code, such permit(s) shall become void.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.045 New septic system reasonable use exception – Future sewer connection required.

A. 
The purpose of this section is to allow reasonable use of the property where sewer infrastructure is not yet in place, while ensuring connection to sewer as soon as practicable.
B. 
Where a property owner proposes to build one new single-family home on an existing lot zoned for single-family residences and existing city sewer main is more than 300 feet from the downstream boundary of the subject property, the property owner may apply for approval to construct and use an on-site sewage system, subject to approval by Snohomish County health district. Such request must be submitted to and approved by the community development director. If the downstream boundary of the property is within 300 feet of the existing city sewer main, extension of the city sewer main will be required as a condition of the development permit and the extension shall be completed, connected and approved prior to occupancy of the structure.
C. 
If denial of the request to build an on-site sewage system would deny all reasonable use of the property, development may be allowed which is consistent with the general intent of this title and the public interest; provided that the director finds that:
1. 
This title would otherwise deny all reasonable use of the property;
2. 
The proposed on-site sewage system does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety or welfare on or off the property;
3. 
The property owner agrees to payment of:
a. 
The estimated cost for the collector sewer across the entire front of the property, as recommended by the city engineer;
b. 
The current sewer facilities charge; and
c. 
The estimated project cost for 100 feet of the sewer main or interceptor needed to reach the property, as recommended by the city engineer;
4. 
The property owner must also construct the necessary connection stub from the residence to allow future connection to the sewer line when sewer becomes available;
5. 
The residence must be connected to the sewer line within 90 days of notice that the connection can be made.
D. 
Any decision of the director regarding this reasonable use exception shall be final unless appealed.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1347-21 § 11; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.047 New water well reasonable use exception – Future water connection required.

A. 
The purpose of this section is to allow reasonable use of the property where water infrastructure is not yet in place, while ensuring connection to the city water system as soon as practicable.
B. 
Where a property owner proposes to build one new single-family home on an existing lot zoned for single-family residences and existing city water main is more than 300 feet from the downstream boundary of the subject property, the property owner may apply for approval to an on-site well to serve the single residence, subject to approval by Snohomish County health district. Such request must be submitted to and approved by the community development director. If the downstream boundary of the property is within 300 feet of the existing city water main, extension of the city water main will be required as a condition of the development permit and the extension shall be completed, connected and approved prior to occupancy of the structure.
C. 
If denial of the request to build an on-site water system would deny all reasonable use of the property, development may be allowed which is consistent with the general intent of this title and the public interest; provided that the director finds that:
1. 
This title would otherwise deny all reasonable use of the property;
2. 
The proposed on-site well does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety or welfare on or off the property;
3. 
The property owner agrees to payment of:
a. 
The estimated cost for the city water main system across the entire front of the property, as recommended by the city engineer;
b. 
The current water system facilities charge; and
c. 
The estimated project cost for 100 feet of the water main or interceptor needed to reach the property, as recommended by the city engineer.
4. 
The property owner must also construct the necessary connection stub from the residence to allow future connection to the water line when water becomes available;
5. 
The residence must be connected to the water main within 90 days of notice that the connection can be made.
D. 
Any decision of the director regarding this reasonable use exception shall be final unless appealed.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1347-21 § 12; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.050 Construction begun prior to adoption of zoning code.

Nothing in this zoning code shall be deemed to require any change in plans, construction, or designated use of any building or structure upon which actual construction was lawfully begun prior to the adoption of this code and upon which actual construction has been diligently carried on; and provided further that such building or structure shall be completed within three years from the date of passage of this code.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.060 Substandard lots.

Any lot in a single ownership, whose ownership was of record at the time of the adoption of this zoning code, that does not meet the requirements for yards or other open space, may be utilized for single residence purposes; provided the requirements for such yard, width, depth, or open space is within 75% of that required by the terms of this code. The purpose of this provision is to permit utilization of recorded lots that lack adequate width or depth, as long as reasonable living standards can be provided.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.070 Erection of more than one principal structure on a lot.

More than one structure containing a permitted or permissible principal use may be erected on a single lot; provided that yard, area, and other requirements of the zoning code shall be met for each structure as though it were on an individual lot or as may be otherwise specified in this code.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.080 Permitted building area.

The principal buildings on any lot or parcel of land shall be erected within the area bounded by the building lines established by setback or yard requirements. Accessory buildings may be erected within any building area established for the principal building and in required yard areas as may be provided for in the zoning code.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.090 Exceptions to height regulations.

The height limitations contained in the tables of dimensional and density requirements shall not apply to spires, belfries, cupolas, chimneys, elevator machine rooms, elevator shafts, antennas, water tanks, ventilators, roof mechanical penthouses solely for air handling equipment, or other appurtenances usually required to be placed above the roof level and not intended for human occupancy; however, the heights of these structures or appurtenances thereto shall not exceed any height limits prescribed by airspace height zones. Additionally, the height requirements shall not apply to an elevator shaft as stated above; provided that said elevator shaft does not occupy more than 20% of the roof of the building on which it is located.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.100 Accessory uses and structures.

No accessory uses or structures shall be located in any required yard except as provided for below:
A. 
In zoning districts, accessory uses and structures, including ADUs, shall not be located in required front yards, but may be located in required side or rear yards, provided the building placement meets the setback requirements in the underlying zone. The conversion of existing accessory structures for the housing of persons, such as a garage apartment, may be located in any required front yard. It shall also be required that any off-street parking space or driveway be at least 20 feet in length.
B. 
Apartments accessory to commercial uses shall be permitted subject to the following requirements:
1. 
The proposed residential space shall have a significant, physical connection to the commercial building that it is accessory to.
2. 
Any proposed apartment shall be required to connect to public water and sewer service. The city shall collect a general facility charge for the impact to public services from the applicant prior to occupancy of the apartment.
3. 
One apartment is permitted for each established business so long as the site does not exceed the maximum density set in Chapter 16.12 SMC.
4. 
To establish an accessory apartment, the building must be approved by the building official as a legal, permanent structure.
C. 
In all zoning districts, rooftop air conditioning and ventilating units shall be so screened as to not be visible from the immediate public right-of-way. This requirement shall not apply to single-family detached dwelling units.
( Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1304-19B § 3; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.110 Building grades.

Any building requiring yard space shall be located at such an elevation that a sloping grade shall be maintained to cause the flow of surface water to run away from the walls of the building into an improved drainage system meeting city standards.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.120 Buildings to be moved to new lots.

Any building that has been wholly or partially erected shall not be moved and/or placed upon any premises until a permit for such removal shall have been obtained from the community development director.
When moved onto new premises, such building shall conform to all the provisions of the zoning code.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.130 Building permits required.

No building or other structure shall be erected, moved, added to or structurally altered without a permit therefor issued by the community development director's office. No building permit shall be issued except in conformity with the provisions of the zoning code, unless a written order in the form of a variance as provided by this code has been issued.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.140 Building conversions in residential zoning districts.

No development permit shall be required if an existing building zoned LDR, MDR, or HDR is converted from one use to another, so long as the proposed use is permitted in the zoning district in which the building is located and the site complies with parking and landscaping requirements for the new use. Additionally, no development permit shall be required if an existing building zoned LDR, MDR, or HDR containing rental apartments is converted to condominiums (or vice-versa), so long as either the total number of dwelling units within the building does not increase, or if they do increase, they do not exceed the density limits permitted in the zoning district in which the building is located, and all off-street parking and landscaping requirements can be met.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.145 Building conversions in commercial and mixed-use zoning districts.

No development permit shall be required if an existing building zoned NC, UC, or HOC is converted from one use to another, so long as the proposed use is permitted in the zoning district in which the building is located and the site complies with parking and landscaping requirements for the new use. Additionally, no development permit shall be required if an existing building zoned NC, UC, or HOC containing rental apartments is converted to condominiums (or vice-versa), so long as the total number of dwelling units within the building does not exceed 50% above the density requirements in the underlying zone. Additional housing units are permitted within an existing building envelope, provided the total number of dwelling units within the building does not exceed 50% above the density requirements in the underlying zone and all existing off-street parking is retained. RCW 35A.21.440.
(Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.150 Design standards and specifications.

A. 
The document entitled "City of Sultan Design Standards and Specifications" is hereby adopted by reference.
B. 
The design standards and specifications may be amended in accordance with sound engineering practices. A copy of such amendment shall be filed with the city council. Copies of the design standards and specifications and updates thereof may be secured from the city at fees fixed by the council.
C. 
All work performed under this zoning code shall conform to the design standards and specifications of the city and all other standard manuals used by the city in the administration of the code. The building official may recommend reasonable changes in the design standards for a seasonal parking facility. The hearing examiner in granting a conditional use permit for a seasonal parking facility may allow for a reasonable deviation in the design standards for a seasonal parking facility consistent with the criteria for allowing the conditional use.
D. 
Where not covered by the design standards and specifications, work and materials shall conform to current editions of the standard specifications for road and bridge construction, Washington State Department of Transportation and standard specifications for municipal construction, Washington State Chapter, APWA, where applicable.
E. 
Except where the design standards and specifications provide otherwise, signing and traffic control shall be in accordance with the current edition of the U.S. Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as amended and approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.20.160 Residential development standards for the HOC Zone.

Residential development in the HOC zone, except for STEP housing, is subject to the following standards.
A. 
These standards are intended to help Sultan realize a commercial and mixed-use corridor along US-2 that provides a diverse array of retail, service, and experiential offerings within easy access for community members and visitors.
B. 
All lots zoned as HOC are subject to a commercial buffer of 100 feet, as shown in the diagram below.
C. 
For any lot or portion of a lot within the commercial buffer, residential units must be part of a stacked, mixed-use building and cannot occupy more than 30% of the ground floor area.
1. 
Stacked configurations are encouraged to use the form-based standards for mixed-use development in Chapter 16.36.
D. 
For any lot or portion of a lot beyond the commercial buffer, residential uses may take any form allowed within the HOC Zone.
1. 
If the lot abuts US-2, the residential use must be developed as part of a mixed-use development with at least 3,000 square feet of commercial space adjacent to US-2. Uses may be stacked or in separate buildings.
2. 
Development may be phased to improve the viability of projects. For phased development, the following requirements must be met:
a. 
Phased development must be proposed and designed as phased projects at the beginning of the application process, with each phase clearly described.
b. 
Access and parking for each phase of the project must be completed with that phase. This includes all required vehicle and pedestrian access from rights-of-way.
c. 
Land set aside for later phases must be maintained in a neat and orderly fashion either as a paved area, leveled gravel lot, leveled and mown lawn, planted area, or bioswale.
i. 
Interim uses of these spaces such as community or cultural events, business pop-ups, farmers markets, or temporary art installations, are permitted and highly encouraged.
d. 
Spaces developed for commercial use during the first phases of a project must be actively marketed until occupied, verifiable with active real estate listings.
3. 
If the lot does not abut US-2, the residential use is not required to be part of a mixed-use development.
E. 
For proposed buildings or their associated parking, landscaping, access, or amenity areas that intersect the buffer, the following standards apply:
1. 
If less than 30% of the building footprint will be within the commercial buffer, the standards of subsection D will apply.
2. 
If 30% or more, or 3,000 square feet or more, of the building footprint will be within the commercial buffer, either the entire building, or the portion of the building within the buffer must conform to the standards of subsection C.
3. 
For any proposed landscaping, parking, access, or at-grade amenity areas associated with a building that is not within the buffer, but that are themselves partially or entirely within the buffer, the following will apply:
a. 
For lots abutting US-2, these areas cannot cumulatively take up more than 30% of the buildable area of the lot that is within the commercial buffer.
b. 
For lots that do not abut US-2, these areas may take up the entire area within the buffer.
c. 
These areas cannot block access or otherwise make future commercial or mixed-use development infeasible.
(Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.24.010 Purpose.

It is the purpose of this chapter to establish review and permit approval procedures for unusual or unique types of land uses, which, due to their nature, require special consideration of their impact on the neighborhood, and land uses in the vicinity. The uses approved under the provisions of this chapter may be located in zone districts listing the use as a "conditional use" under such conditions as the hearing examiner may approve.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.24.020 Uses requiring a conditional use permit.

The following are the uses that require a conditional use permit (CUP):
A. 
All uses listed in the zoning districts as "conditional uses" require a conditional use permit in order to locate and operate or expand in an appropriate zoning district within the city.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.24.030 Application – Requirements and fees.

A. 
Application for conditional use permits shall be filed with the city on forms prescribed by the community development director.
B. 
A filing fee in the amount set by the fee schedule adopted by the city council shall accompany all applications.
C. 
The hearing examiner will conduct public hearings on conditional uses and may deny, approve, or approve with conditions.
D. 
Conditional use applicants must adhere to all applicable public notification requirements.
E. 
The hearing examiner's decisions on a conditional use permit may be appealed to Snohomish County superior court by a party with standing in accordance with the procedures of Chapter 36.70C RCW, or other court of competent jurisdiction as provided by law.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1347-21 § 13; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.24.050 Criteria.

When considering an application for a conditional use permit, the hearing examiner shall consider the applicable standards, criteria and policies established by this title as they pertain to the proposed use and may impose specific conditions precedent to establishing the use.
A. 
Before any conditional use permit may be granted, the applicant shall show that:
1. 
The proposed conditional use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed conditional use or in the zoning district in which the subject property is situated;
2. 
The proposed conditional use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the zoning district that it will occupy;
3. 
The proposed conditional use shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design as approved by the community development director;
4. 
The proposed conditional use shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive land use policy plan;
5. 
All measures have been taken to mitigate the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have in the zoning district in which the subject property is located.
B. 
Conditions imposed by the hearing examiner under this section may include:
1. 
Increased requirements, standards, criteria or policies otherwise established by this title;
2. 
Stipulation of the exact location of the use in order to minimize public safety hazards, property damage, erosion, landslides or traffic;
3. 
The installation of structural features or equipment essential to minimize public safety hazards, property damage, erosion, landslides or traffic;
4. 
Conditions deemed necessary to mitigate nuisance-generating features such as noise, odors, smoke, dust, fumes, air pollution, wastes, vibration, traffic, and physical hazards; provided the hearing examiner may not, in connection with action on a conditional use permit, reduce the requirements specified by this title pertaining to any such use;
5. 
Provisions to ensure that the conditional use shall maintain compatibility with the purpose of this title and with other existing and potential uses within the general area where the conditional use is proposed;
6. 
Requirement to post construction and maintenance bonds (or equivalent financial security) sufficient to secure to the city an amount equal to 150% of the estimated cost of construction and/or installation plus 15% of the estimated cost of maintenance of required improvements.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1347-21 § 14; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.24.060 Expiration and renewal.

A. 
A conditional use permit shall automatically expire one year after a notice of decision approving the permit is issued unless a development authorization or building permit conforming to plans for which the CUP was granted is obtained within that period of time.
B. 
A conditional use permit shall automatically expire unless substantial construction of the proposed development is completed within two years from the date a notice of decision approving the permit is issued.
C. 
The hearing examiner may authorize longer periods for a conditional use permit if appropriate for the project.
D. 
The hearing examiner may grant a single renewal of the conditional use permit if the party seeking the renewal can demonstrate extraordinary circumstances or conditions not known or foreseeable at the time the original application for a conditional use permit was granted. No public hearing is required for a renewal or minor modification of a conditional use permit.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.24.065 Transfer of ownership.

A conditional use permit runs with the land; compliance with the conditions of any such permit is the responsibility of the current owner of the property, whether that is the applicant or a successor. No permit for which a bond is required shall be considered valid at any time during which the required bond is not posted.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.24.070 Revocation of permit.

A. 
The hearing examiner may revoke or modify a conditional use permit. Such revocation or modification shall be made on any one or more of the following grounds:
1. 
That the approval was obtained by deception, fraud, or other intentional and misleading representations;
2. 
That the use for which such approval was granted has been abandoned;
3. 
That the use for which such approval was granted has at any time ceased for a period of one year or more;
4. 
That the permit granted is being exercised contrary to the terms or conditions of such approval or in violation of any statute, resolution, code, law or regulation; or
5. 
That the use for which the approval was granted was so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health or safety.
B. 
Any aggrieved party may petition the hearing examiner in writing to initiate revocation or modification proceedings.
C. 
Before a conditional use permit may be revoked or significantly modified, a public hearing shall be held. Procedures concerning notice and reporting for petition to revoke or significantly modify a conditional use permit shall be the same as required by this chapter for the initial consideration of a conditional use permit application.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.24.080 Performance bond and other security.

A performance bond or other adequate and appropriate security may be required for any elements of the proposed project which the hearing examiner determines are crucial to the protection of the public welfare. Such bond shall be in an amount equal to 125% of the cost of the installation or construction of the applicable improvements.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.24.090 Resubmittal of application.

An application for a conditional use permit, which has been denied, may not be resubmitted within six months from the date of denial.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.005 Purpose.

It is the purpose of this chapter to establish limitations on the expansion and extension of nonconforming uses and structures which adversely affect the development and perpetuation of desirable residential, commercial and industrial areas with appropriate grouping of compatible and related uses.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.010 Nonconformances – Continuance.

Unless otherwise specifically provided in the zoning code, nonconforming situations that were otherwise lawful on the effective date of this code may be continued.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.015 Construction approved prior to adoption.

To avoid undue hardship, nothing in this title shall be deemed to require a change in plans, construction or designated use of any building for which actual construction was lawfully begun prior to effective date of this chapter.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.020 Nonconformances – Lots smaller than required minimums.

When a nonconforming lot can be used in conformity with all of the requirements applicable to the intended use, except that the lot is smaller than the required minimums set forth in the dimensional and density requirements for each zoning district, then the lot may be used as proposed just as if it were conforming.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.030 Nonconforming lots – Setbacks.

When the use proposed for a nonconforming lot is one that is conforming in all other respects, but the applicable setback requirements cannot reasonably be complied with, then the zoning official may allow variances from the applicable setback requirements if he/she finds that:
A. 
The property cannot reasonably be developed for the use proposed without such deviations;
B. 
These deviations are necessitated by the size or shape of the nonconforming lot;
C. 
The property can be developed as proposed without any significantly adverse impact on surrounding properties or the public health or safety; and
D. 
Compliance with applicable building setback requirements is not reasonably possible if a building that serves the minimal needs of the use proposed for the nonconforming lot cannot practicably be constructed and located on the lot in conformity with such setback requirements. However, financial hardship does not constitute grounds for finding that compliance is not reasonably possible.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263- 17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.040 Nonconforming lots – Applicability.

This chapter applies only to undeveloped nonconforming lots. A lot is undeveloped if it has no substantial structures upon it.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.045 Preexisting legal lots of record.

An authorized use or structure may be erected on a preexisting legal lot containing less area than that required by the designated zoning district in which it is located; provided that the front, side, and rear yard requirements are met, as well as all other applicable dimension and density standards of this title.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.050 Nonconformances – Adjoining lots.

If, on the date the zoning code becomes effective, an undeveloped nonconforming lot adjoins and has continuous frontage with one or more other undeveloped lots under the same ownership, then neither the owner of the nonconforming lot nor his successors in interest may take advantage of the provisions of this chapter. This requirement shall not apply to a nonconforming lot if a majority of the developed lots located on either side of the street where such lot is located and within 500 feet of such lot are also nonconforming. The intent of this chapter is to require nonconforming lots to be combined with other undeveloped lots to create conforming lots under the circumstances specified herein, but not to require such combination when that would be out of character with the way the neighborhood has previously been developed.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.051 Nonconforming uses.

Any preexisting lawful use of land that is made nonconforming under the terms of this zoning code may be continued so long as the use remains lawful, subject to the provisions of this chapter.
A. 
No such nonconforming use shall be enlarged or increased nor extended to occupy a greater area than was occupied immediately prior to nonconformity, unless specifically permitted by the provisions of this title or at the discretion of the community development director.
B. 
No nonconforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any other portion of the lot or parcel occupied by such use at the effective date of adoption or amendment of the ordinance codified in this title.
C. 
If any such nonconforming use is vacated or abandoned for any reason for a period of more than 12 months, any subsequent use shall conform to the regulations specified by this title for the district in which such use is located.
D. 
No existing structure devoted to a use not permitted by this title shall be structurally altered, except in changing the use of the structure to a use permitted in the zone in which it is located, unless specifically permitted by the provisions of this title or at the discretion of the community development director.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1347-21 § 15; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.055 Nonconforming agricultural uses.

Since the adoption of these zoning regulations in 1995, the code has not permitted agricultural uses, including the keeping of livestock, as a new land use in the City of Sultan. Agricultural uses that were in existence prior to 1995 are allowed to continue their operations as legal nonconforming uses so long as pasture land is provided at a ratio of 1/2 acre per domestic animal and proper fencing and sheltering are maintained in accordance with Chapter 6.08 SMC.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.060 Nonconforming structures.

Where a lawful structure exists as of the effective date of this title, which could not be built under the terms of this title by reason of restrictions on area, lot coverage, height, yards, or other characteristics of the structure, said structure may remain so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following provisions:
A. 
No such nonconforming structure may be enlarged or altered in a way which increases its degree of nonconformity. All work contemplated under this subsection shall be conditioned upon the city's prior approval of complete plans for the work submitted by the applicant.
B. 
Should such nonconforming structure be destroyed by any means to an extent exceeding 50% of its replacement cost at time of destruction, in the judgment of the city, it may not be reconstructed except in conformity with provisions of this title; provided that in residential zoning districts, structures that are nonconforming in regard to yard setbacks, but were in conformance at the time of construction, may be reconstructed to their original dimensions and location on the lot.
C. 
Should such nonconforming structure be moved for any reason or any distance whatsoever, it shall thereafter be required to conform to the regulations for the zoning district in which it is located.
D. 
When a nonconforming structure, or structure and premises in combination, is vacated or abandoned for 12 consecutive months, the structure, or structure and premises in combination, shall thereafter be required to conform to the regulations of the zoning district in which it is located. Upon request of the owner, the community development director may grant an extension of time beyond the 12 consecutive months. A request for an extension beyond the 12 months must be in written form, contain all property information, reason for request (i.e., bankruptcy, probate, sale, etc.), and projected long-term use of the property. Any property that has received any previous land use actions or decisions will be upheld.
E. 
Residential structures and uses located in any residential zoning district may be rebuilt after a fire or other natural disaster to their original dimensions and bulk but may not be changed except as provided in Chapter 16.12 SMC.
F. 
Legally nonconforming single-family dwellings, including accessory buildings, located in non residential zoning districts may be rebuilt after a fire or other natural disaster to their original dimensions and bulk but may not be changed except as provided in Chapter 16.12 SMC.
G. 
Improvements, expansions, or additions to existing single-family dwellings including accessory buildings, which are considered nonconforming, are permissible when the improvement, expansion, or addition:
1. 
Does not change the existing use, as established, from the effective date of the nonconformance;
2. 
Does not increase the land area devoted to the nonconforming use by more than 25% from the effective date of the nonconformity;
3. 
Does not create additional dwelling units that would result in 50% or more density above what is allowed in the underlying zone;
4. 
Conforms to required occupancy, setback, lot coverage, landscaping, parking, and all other development standards within the respective zone;
5. 
Meets performance standards defined in Chapter 16.30 SMC; and
6. 
Provides public improvements, as deemed necessary for the project, such as sewer, water, drainage, pedestrian circulation and vehicle circulation in addition to other concurrency provisions established under Chapter 16.70 SMC.
H. 
Conversion of an existing garage or other accessory structure into one or two accessory dwelling units is permitted, provided that any displaced off-street parking is replaced. An existing structure that does not meet current setback or lot coverage requirements may be converted into an accessory dwelling unit, provided the community development director may impose additional conditions for approval necessary to ensure public health, safety, and welfare.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1304-19A § 1; Ord. 1347-21 § 16; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.070 Nonconformances – Repair, maintenance, and construction.

A. 
Minor repairs to and routine maintenance of property where nonconforming situations exist are permitted and encouraged and may be done in any period of 12 consecutive months on ordinary repairs, or on repair or replacement of nonbearing walls, fixtures, wiring or plumbing to an extent not exceeding 25% of the current replacement value of the building. Major renovation, i.e., work estimated to cost more than 25% of the appraised valuation of the structure to be renovated, may be done only in accordance with a permit issued pursuant to the zoning code.
B. 
If a structure located on a lot where a nonconforming situation exists is damaged to an extent that the costs of repair or replacement would exceed 25% of the appraised valuation of the damaged structure, then the damaged structure may be repaired or replaced only in accordance with a permit issued pursuant to the zoning code. This section does not apply to structures used for single-family detached residential purposes, which structures may be reconstructed pursuant to a permit just as they may be enlarged or replaced.
C. 
For purposes of subsections A and B of this section:
1. 
The "cost" of renovation or repair or replacement shall mean the fair market value of the materials and services necessary to accomplish such renovation, repair, or replacement.
2. 
The "cost" of renovation or repair or replacement shall mean the total cost of all such intended work, and no person may seek to avoid the intent of subsection A or B of this section by doing such work incrementally. An itemized appraisal of the work shall be prepared by an independent professional and provided to the city by the applicant.
3. 
The "appraised valuation" shall mean either the appraised valuation for property tax purposes, updated as necessary by the increase in the consumer price index since the date of the last valuation, or the valuation determined by a professionally recognized property appraiser.
D. 
The community development director shall issue a permit authorized by this section if the director finds that, in completing the renovation, repair or replacement work:
1. 
No violation of subsection B of this section will occur;
2. 
The permittee will comply to the extent reasonably possible with all provisions of this code applicable to the existing use (except that the permittee shall not lose his or her right to continue a nonconforming use); and
3. 
Compliance with a requirement of this code is not reasonably possible if it cannot be achieved without adding additional land to the lot where the nonconforming situation is maintained or moving a substantial structure that is on a permanent foundation. Mere financial hardship caused by the cost of meeting such requirements as paved parking does not constitute grounds for finding that compliance is not reasonably possible.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1347-21 § 17; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.075 Building safety.

Nothing in this title shall be deemed to prevent the strengthening or restoring to safe condition of any nonconforming building or part thereof declared to be unsafe by order of the city to protect the public safety.
Alterations or expansion of a nonconforming use which are required by law or public agency in order to comply with public health or safety regulations are the only alterations or expansions allowed.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.080 Change in nonconforming structure or use of property.

A. 
If an intended change from a nonconforming use is to a principal use that is permissible in the zoning district where the property is located, and all of the other requirements of this code applicable to that use can be complied with, permission to make the change must be obtained in the same manner as permission to make the initial use of a vacant lot. Once conformity with this code is achieved, the property may not revert to its nonconforming status.
B. 
If an intended change from a nonconforming use is to a principal use that is permissible in the zoning district where the property is located, but all of the requirements of this code applicable to that use cannot reasonably be complied with, then the change is permissible if the city council approves an application authorizing the change. A permit may be issued if the community development director finds, in addition to any other findings that may be required by this code, that:
1. 
The intended change will not result in a violation of SMC § 16.20.020; and
2. 
All of the applicable requirements of this code will be reasonably complied with. Compliance with a requirement of this code is not reasonably possible if it cannot be achieved without adding additional land to the lot where the nonconforming situation is maintained or moving a substantial structure that is on a permanent foundation. Mere financial hardship caused by the cost of meeting such requirements as paved parking does not constitute grounds for finding that compliance is not reasonably possible, and in no case may an applicant be given permission pursuant to this section to construct a building or add to an existing building if additional nonconformities would thereby be created.
C. 
Any nonconforming use of a structure, or structure and premises, may be changed to another nonconforming use; provided that:
1. 
No structural alterations are made; and
2. 
The proposed nonconforming use is more appropriate to the zoning district than the existing nonconforming use; and
3. 
All applicable requirements, conditions and safeguards of this title are reasonably complied with.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1347-21 § 18; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.090 Abandonment and discontinuance of nonconforming uses.

A. 
If a legal nonconforming use is discontinued for a consecutive period of 12 months, then that property may thereafter be used only in conformity with the current zoning code regulations. Upon request of the owner, the community development director may grant an extension of time beyond the 12 consecutive months. A request for an extension beyond the 12 months must be in written form, contain all property information, reason for request (i.e., bankruptcy, probate, sale, etc.), and projected long-term use of the property. Any property that has received any previous land use actions or decisions will be upheld.
B. 
For purposes of determining whether a right to continue a nonconforming situation is lost pursuant to this section, all of the buildings, activities, and operations maintained on a lot are generally to be considered as a whole. For example, the failure to rent one apartment in a nonconforming apartment building for 12 months shall not result in a loss of the right to rent that apartment or space thereafter, so long as the apartment building as a whole is continuously maintained. But if a nonconforming use is maintained in conjunction with a conforming use, discontinuance of a nonconforming use for the required period shall terminate the right to maintain it thereafter.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1347-21 § 19; Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.26.100 Destruction of nonconforming uses and/or buildings.

A nonconforming use and/or building cannot be maintained if more than 50% of the assessed value of improvements on the subject property is lost by any form of destruction whether through manmade or natural causes. Then, the subject property may thereafter be used only in conformity with the current zoning code regulations.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1263-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.28.010 Purpose.

It is the purpose of this chapter to establish review and approval procedures for unusual or unique physical hardships that may be encountered when improving a site specific piece of property. The criteria for granting a variance for the dimension requirements of the zoning code are intentionally stringent, and approval of a variance does not set precedent for any other variance. No variance for an exception to the uses allowed in a particular zoning district can be approved.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.28.020 Variance process.

An application of a variance can be made to the City of Sultan on a form provided by the planning staff. Information that may be required for variance review process and decision by hearing examiner can also be provided by the planning staff.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.28.030 Variance criteria.

No application for a variance shall be granted unless the hearing examiner finds:
A. 
The variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property on behalf of which their application was filed is located; and
B. 
That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and
C. 
That such variance is necessary:
1. 
Because of special circumstances set forth in the findings relating to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located; and
2. 
Because for reasons set forth in the findings, the variance as approved would contribute significantly to the improvement of environmental conditions, either existing or potentially arising from the proposed improvement.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)

§ 16.28.040 Variance appeal.

The decision of the hearing examiner on a variance application is final. Hearing examiner's decisions may be appealed to the Snohomish County superior court by a party with standing in accordance with the procedures of Chapter 36.70C RCW, or other court of competent jurisdiction as provided by law.
(Ord. 1244-16 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 1418-25, 7/24/2025)