Procedures and Administration
Rationale: Before any zoning interpretation is made, there must be an explicit discussion of certain purpose(s) for which the regulation was initially imposed. Each zoning regulation is intended to protect the interests of both present and future neighbors and the general public. Each standard is developed as a regulatory response to an identifiable potential negative impact. A sound interpretation of any standard cannot be ensured without careful analysis of the regulation and the end toward which it is directed. It is understood that there may be other public purposes underlying the interpretation which are not explicitly articulated. |
Rationale: There is a critical distinction between an interpretation which provides a greater degree of design freedom to achieve a permitted land use and an interpretation which permits a new or not previously permitted use or which allows a use to be enlarged or have its intensity increased beyond the degree specified in the chapter. Design freedom is to be encouraged while a lowering of the standards of this chapter is to be prohibited. |
Rationale: If an interpretation would merely allow a design solution that is slightly different from the one expressly stated or permitted, and if it would result in a same or greater degree of protection to any affected party (either the adjoining landowners, the public at large, and/or a future property owner or renter), such an interpretation may be appropriately made. Any interpretation which would result in any identifiable loss of protection for one group to the benefit of others is contrary to the spirit of this chapter. Similarly, any interpretation which would either increase the nuisance potential of any use or alter the purpose for which the regulation was adopted shall be considered counter to the legislative intent of this chapter. Any interpretation which will result in any loss of protection or increase in intensity beyond that already permitted shall only be made if the party interpreting this chapter has the power to impose additional restrictions or requirements. |
Process for Residential and Nonresidential Proposal Review for Downtown Design Overlay Zoning District | |
|---|---|
KEY: Yes: Step is required. No: Step is not required. |
Type of Proposal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Procedure | Renovation1 | Design2 | Project3 | ||||
1. | Optional meeting with Plan Commission to discuss proposal | No | Optional | Recommended | |||
2. | Submit zoning permit application to the Zoning Administrator, including: | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
a. | Color photos/drawings of existing property, with close-ups of details | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
b. | Drawings/depictions of proposed changes to the site and building exterior | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
c. | For new projects or additions equal or greater than 100 square feet, provide site plan including: | ||||||
1) | Title block with name of current property owner and applicant | No | No | Yes | |||
2) | Date of original plan graphic and date of most recent revision | No | No | Yes | |||
3) | North arrow and graphic scale | No | No | Yes | |||
4) | Property lines and right-of-way lines (with distances and bearings) | No | No | Yes | |||
5) | Easements | No | No | Yes | |||
6) | Existing and proposed buildings, structures and paved areas | No | No | Yes | |||
7) | Required building setback lines | No | No | Yes | |||
8) | Legal description of the property | No | No | Yes | |||
9) | Location, size, type and orientation of all exterior signage | No | No | Yes | |||
10) | Location, type and orientation of all exterior lighting | No | No | Yes | |||
11) | Location of all vehicle access drives, circulation areas, loading areas and parking stalls | No | No | Yes | |||
12) | Location of all outdoor storage and display areas (including trash facilities) | No | No | Yes | |||
13) | Location and purpose of all drainage facilities | No | No | Yes | |||
14) | Location of all permanent green space areas | No | No | Yes | |||
15) | Site summary data: lot area, floor area, floor area ratio, impervious surface area, impervious surface ratio | No | No | Yes | |||
d. | Landscaping plan showing the location, size and type of plants | No | No | Yes | |||
e. | Written description of proposal, including exterior materials and colors | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
f. | Written justification of proposal answering: How does the proposal comply with the design standards? | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
3. | Review and action by the Zoning Administrator/Village staff | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
4. | Review and action by the Architectural Control Board on aesthetics | No | Yes | Yes | |||
5. | Review and action by the Plan Commission on site design | No | No | Yes | |||
6. | If proposal is approved: | ||||||
a. | Record documents with Register of Deeds | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
b. | Work must start within 365 days and be complete within 730 days | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
c. | Conditions of approval run with the property | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
7. | If the proposal is denied: It may not be resubmitted for 12 months | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
NOTES: | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Only a renovation of the exterior appearance of a property. | |
2 | Only a change in the appearance of a property. | |
3 | Modification to the physical configuration of a property. | |
Procedures and Administration
Rationale: Before any zoning interpretation is made, there must be an explicit discussion of certain purpose(s) for which the regulation was initially imposed. Each zoning regulation is intended to protect the interests of both present and future neighbors and the general public. Each standard is developed as a regulatory response to an identifiable potential negative impact. A sound interpretation of any standard cannot be ensured without careful analysis of the regulation and the end toward which it is directed. It is understood that there may be other public purposes underlying the interpretation which are not explicitly articulated. |
Rationale: There is a critical distinction between an interpretation which provides a greater degree of design freedom to achieve a permitted land use and an interpretation which permits a new or not previously permitted use or which allows a use to be enlarged or have its intensity increased beyond the degree specified in the chapter. Design freedom is to be encouraged while a lowering of the standards of this chapter is to be prohibited. |
Rationale: If an interpretation would merely allow a design solution that is slightly different from the one expressly stated or permitted, and if it would result in a same or greater degree of protection to any affected party (either the adjoining landowners, the public at large, and/or a future property owner or renter), such an interpretation may be appropriately made. Any interpretation which would result in any identifiable loss of protection for one group to the benefit of others is contrary to the spirit of this chapter. Similarly, any interpretation which would either increase the nuisance potential of any use or alter the purpose for which the regulation was adopted shall be considered counter to the legislative intent of this chapter. Any interpretation which will result in any loss of protection or increase in intensity beyond that already permitted shall only be made if the party interpreting this chapter has the power to impose additional restrictions or requirements. |
Process for Residential and Nonresidential Proposal Review for Downtown Design Overlay Zoning District | |
|---|---|
KEY: Yes: Step is required. No: Step is not required. |
Type of Proposal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Procedure | Renovation1 | Design2 | Project3 | ||||
1. | Optional meeting with Plan Commission to discuss proposal | No | Optional | Recommended | |||
2. | Submit zoning permit application to the Zoning Administrator, including: | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
a. | Color photos/drawings of existing property, with close-ups of details | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
b. | Drawings/depictions of proposed changes to the site and building exterior | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
c. | For new projects or additions equal or greater than 100 square feet, provide site plan including: | ||||||
1) | Title block with name of current property owner and applicant | No | No | Yes | |||
2) | Date of original plan graphic and date of most recent revision | No | No | Yes | |||
3) | North arrow and graphic scale | No | No | Yes | |||
4) | Property lines and right-of-way lines (with distances and bearings) | No | No | Yes | |||
5) | Easements | No | No | Yes | |||
6) | Existing and proposed buildings, structures and paved areas | No | No | Yes | |||
7) | Required building setback lines | No | No | Yes | |||
8) | Legal description of the property | No | No | Yes | |||
9) | Location, size, type and orientation of all exterior signage | No | No | Yes | |||
10) | Location, type and orientation of all exterior lighting | No | No | Yes | |||
11) | Location of all vehicle access drives, circulation areas, loading areas and parking stalls | No | No | Yes | |||
12) | Location of all outdoor storage and display areas (including trash facilities) | No | No | Yes | |||
13) | Location and purpose of all drainage facilities | No | No | Yes | |||
14) | Location of all permanent green space areas | No | No | Yes | |||
15) | Site summary data: lot area, floor area, floor area ratio, impervious surface area, impervious surface ratio | No | No | Yes | |||
d. | Landscaping plan showing the location, size and type of plants | No | No | Yes | |||
e. | Written description of proposal, including exterior materials and colors | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
f. | Written justification of proposal answering: How does the proposal comply with the design standards? | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
3. | Review and action by the Zoning Administrator/Village staff | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
4. | Review and action by the Architectural Control Board on aesthetics | No | Yes | Yes | |||
5. | Review and action by the Plan Commission on site design | No | No | Yes | |||
6. | If proposal is approved: | ||||||
a. | Record documents with Register of Deeds | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
b. | Work must start within 365 days and be complete within 730 days | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
c. | Conditions of approval run with the property | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
7. | If the proposal is denied: It may not be resubmitted for 12 months | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
NOTES: | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Only a renovation of the exterior appearance of a property. | |
2 | Only a change in the appearance of a property. | |
3 | Modification to the physical configuration of a property. | |