Conditions. The Zoning Board of Appeals or the City Council on appeal may impose such conditions and restrictions upon the premises benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established in this section.
Note: The Wisconsin Supreme Court, in state ex rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment (Case No. 02-1618, March 19, 2004), decided that there are two types of standards to be applied when considering variance requests, a "use" variance standard and an "area" variance standard. When considering an "area" variance, the test is the existence of an unnecessary hardship, whether compliance with the strict letter of the restrictions governing area, setbacks, frontage, height, bulk or density would unreasonably prevent the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or would render conformity with such restrictions unnecessarily burdensome. When considering a "use" variance, to grant a variance it must be demonstrated that no reasonable use of the property would be possible without the variance.
[Amended at time of adoption of Code (see Ch. 1, General Provisions, Art. II)]