Variances. On appeal from an order, requirement, decision, interpretation or determination made by the Building Inspector, acting in his/her capacity as Zoning Enforcement Officer, or on referral of an applicant to the Board of Appeals by an approving agency acting pursuant to this chapter, the Board of Appeals is authorized, after public notice and hearing, to vary or modify the strict letter of this chapter, where its literal interpretation would cause practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships, as defined in this section, in such manner as to observe the spirit of this chapter, secure public safety and welfare and to do substantial justice. Variances, once granted, shall be construed to run with the particular site or lot and not with the applicant. Any such appeal shall be taken within 60 days after the date of the filing of the order, requirement, decision, interpretation or determination of the Building Inspector by filing an application in the office of the Zoning Board of Appeals and with the Building Inspector.
(1) Bulk variances. Where, because of practical difficulty, an applicant requests a variance of the bulk requirements of this chapter, the Board of Appeals may grant a variance in the application of the provisions of this chapter in the specific case, provided that, as a condition to the grant of any such variance, the Board of Appeals shall make a specific finding that the application of the requirements of this chapter to the land in question creates such practical difficulty. In making this determination, the Board of Appeals shall make the following findings:
(a) That the variance is not substantial in relation to the requirement and to other factors set forth below.
(b) That the effect of any increased population density which may thus be produced upon available services and facilities is not significant.
(c) That a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood or a substantial detriment to adjoining properties will not be created.
(d) That the difficulty cannot be alleviated by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue other than a variance or that a lesser variance cannot alleviate the difficulty.
(e) That, in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and considering all of the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by allowing the variance.
(f) That the variance would not cause adverse aesthetic, environmental or ecological impacts on the property or on surrounding areas and would not harm the general health, safety or welfare.
(g) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the bulk variance.
[Added 1-25-1999 by L.L. No. 1-1999]
(2) Use variances. To alleviate unnecessary hardship as hereafter described, the Board of Appeals may grant a variance of the application of the provisions of this chapter in a specific case to allow a use otherwise prohibited in the zoning district in which the property is located, provided that, as a condition to the grant of any such variance, the Board of Appeals shall make the following findings:
(a) After considering all permitted uses, specially permitted uses and conditional uses allowed in the zoning district and based on documented dollars-and-cents evidence submitted in the record by the applicant that the property in question cannot reasonably be used or yield a reasonable return if used only for a purpose allowed in that district.
(b) That the plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances affecting the property which is the subject of the application and not to general conditions in the neighborhood or to personal hardship, plight or desires of the property owners.
(c) That the use to be authorized by the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.
(d) That the use to be authorized by the variance is in reasonable harmony with the intent of this chapter.
(e) That the unnecessary hardship claimed as a ground for the variance has not been created by the owner or by a predecessor in title; purchase of the lands subject to the restriction sought to be varied may constitute a self-created hardship.
(f) That within the intent and purpose of this chapter, the variance, if granted, is the minimum variance necessary to afford relief. To this end, the Board of Appeals may permit a lesser variance than that applied for.
(3) Burden of proof. The applicant shall prove that strict application of the zoning law creates practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship. In the event that said practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship is proven, the Board of Appeals shall show that the subject zoning provision serves a legitimate public purpose. The burden shall then shift to the applicant to demonstrate that granting the variance will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare.