The Planning Division shall initiate the review of all planning applications. As part of the review, the Planning Division shall determine the application's consistency with the General Plan and applicable development and design standards and other requirements contained within this Chapter. Based on this Chapter, the Planning Division shall determine the decision making authority and the review process. Steps in the review process are subject to minor variation as may be found to be appropriate by the Chief of Planning.
a. Administrative Review. Certain applications which are subject to an administrative review process, such as Tree Removal, Sign Review, and some types of minor Development Plan and minor Land Use Permit applications, as determined by the Chief of Planning, do not require public notification. Certain applications which are subject to an administrative review process, including Variance applications and some types of minor Development Plan and minor Land Use Permit applications, as determined by the Chief of Planning, are subject to notification of surrounding property owners.
1. Appealable Action Letter. Action may be taken on administrative applications by the issuance of an appealable action letter prepared by the Planning Division.
b. Non-Administrative Planning Applications. Non-administrative planning application are subject to review and action by the decision making authority at a noticed public hearing.
1. Distribution of Request for Comments. Upon submittal of the planning application, the Planning Division may distribute a request for comments letter to all agencies, districts, Town divisions or departments, and any other organization or individual who may have an interest or responsibility in any aspect of the development or land use proposed by the application. The request for comments letter shall also be mailed to all property owners, as found within the latest Contra Costa County Tax Collector data base, within a 750 foot radius of the boundaries of the property, which is the subject of the application.
2. Development Advisory Meeting. Within 30 days of the application submittal, the Town may hold a Development Advisory Meeting to allow for joint review and discussion regarding the merits of the application and its compliance with applicable policies, practices, standards, and guidelines. Representatives of agencies, districts, Town divisions or departments, and other organizations or individuals shall be invited to the meeting as determined appropriate by the Chief of Planning.
3. Review for Completeness. The Planning Division shall review each application for completeness and accuracy before it is accepted as being complete. The determination of completeness shall be based on the Town's application requirements and any other information determined to be required by the Planning Division in order confirm the proposed development or land use's compliance with the General Plan and all Town applicable policies, practices, standards, and guidelines.
4. Notice of Incomplete Application. Within 30 days of the date of the application submittal, the Town shall notify the applicant in writing as to whether the application has been found to be incomplete. If the application has been found to be incomplete, the notice shall specify the additional materials, information, or project modifications which are required to be submitted to complete the application.
5. Application Resubmittal. Upon the applicant's resubmittal of application materials, the Town shall again review the application for completeness and accuracy before it is accepted as being complete. The Town may determine that it is necessary to distribute an additional request for comments letter, and/or hold an additional Development Advisory Meeting for review of the application. Within 30 days of the date of the application resubmittal, the Town shall notify the applicant in writing as to whether the application has been found to be incomplete. If the application is found to still be incomplete, the notice of incomplete application and application resubmittal process shall be repeated until the application is deemed to be complete.
6. Expiration of Application. Unless otherwise agreed upon by the Town, if an applicant fails to make a resubmittal within ninety (90) days following the date of the notice of incomplete application, the application may be deemed withdrawn without any further action by the Town. After the expiration of an application, future Town consideration shall require the submittal of a new application and associated application fees.
7. Environmental Review. All planning applications shall be subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Consistent with the CEQA, additional materials may be required to be submitted by the applicant after the application has been deemed to be complete to allow for adequate review of any identified potential environmental impacts.
8. Design Review Board. Planning applications which request approval of a Development Plan or a Sign Review for a Master Sign Program are subject to review by the Town's Design Review Board. Planning applications including a minor Development Plan request may require review by the Design Review Board, as determined by the Chief of Planning. The Design Review Board shall review a proposed development's architectural design, site design, landscaping design, and the design and placement of proposed signage to ensure consistency with General Plan, applicable ordinances, and adopted design standards and guidelines. For non-administrative planning applications, Design Review Board actions shall be in the form of a recommendation to the Planning Commission. Planning applications requiring review by the Design Review Board shall include as part of the proposed project plans all of the information detailed within the Town's Design Review Board Submittal Requirement Checklist.
9. Historic Design Review Committee. Planning applications which request approval of a Development Plan involving a major alteration to a historically significant resource, as defined under Section 32-72, are subject to review by the Town's Historic Design Review Committee. Planning applications including a Development Plan involving a minor alteration to a historically significant resource may require review by the Historic Design Review Committee, as determined by the Chief of Planning. The Historic Design Review Committee shall review a proposed development's architectural design, site design and landscaping design to ensure consistency with the General Plan, the Town's Historic Preservation Ordinance, the Town's Design Guidelines for Heritage Resources, and other excepted common practices related to exterior alterations and new construction involving a historically significant resource. For non-administrative planning applications, Historic Design Review Committee actions shall be in the form of a recommendation to the Heritage Resource Commission. 10. Planning Commission. The Danville Planning Commission shall be the review authority for all non-administrative planning applications except that for planning applications involving a major alteration to a heritage resource, any Planning Commission action shall be in the form of a recommendation to the Heritage Resource Commission.
11. Heritage Resource Commission. The Danville Heritage Resource Commission shall be the review authority for all non-administrative planning applications involving a major alteration to a heritage resource, as detailed under Section 32-76. 12. Town Council. The Danville Town Council is the final review authority for planning applications requesting a General Plan Amendment, a Preliminary Development Plan - Rezoning, Rezoning, or Zoning Text Amendment. The Town Council shall be the review authority for any appeal of a Planning Commission or Heritage Resource Commission action.