Whenever in any zoning district, a use is neither specifically permitted or denied, the use shall be considered prohibited. It is recognized; however, that in the development of the Zoning Ordinance that 1) not all uses of land and/or water can be listed, nor can all future uses be anticipated; 2) a "use" may have been inadvertently omitted from the list of those specified as permitted, conditional, or interim in each of the various districts designated; or 3) ambiguity may arise concerning the appropriate classification of a particular use within the meaning and intent of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the phrase "plus such other uses deemed to be similar and not more obnoxious or detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare" shall be unmentioned, but included in the respective lists of "permitted uses," "conditional uses," or "interim uses" in each district. In such cases the Planning Commission or City Council, on their own initiative or upon request by the Zoning Administrator, may conduct a study to determine if the use is acceptable and if so, what zoning district would be most appropriate and the determination as to the conditions and standards relating to the development of such a use be included. The City Council, Planning Commission, or property owner shall, if appropriate, initiate an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to provide for the particular use under consideration or shall find that the use is not compatible for development within the City.