A. Nothwithstanding the lack of jurisdiction regarding land use regulations, SITLA, or any other agency of the State, is required to submit a development plan and schedule to the Land Use Authority prior to developing land (See Utah Code 17-267a-305). The Land Use Authority is required to respond with reasonable promptness.
B. As of 2019, when SITLA has a lessee/permittee or potential lessee/permittee ("Lessee"), in order to comply with section 305, SITLA requires the lessee to apply for a conditional use permit, whether one is required or not, and even though a conditional use permit would not be legally valid on the state owned land. As a matter of policy, Kane County treats this requirement from SITLA as a request for the county to review the project and provide recommendations to SITLA on how the potential project should be regulated. The county will also use this opportunity to provide the information as anticipated by Utah Code 17-27a-305(8).
C. When the State or any agency of the State submits a development plan and schedule to the county, or when a lessee of SITLA lands applies for a conditional use permit or submits a development plan and schedule on behalf of the State or any agency of the State, the county will process the request as follows:
1. SITLA, or a lessee or private entity partner that is a partner or contractee of SITLA, shall submit an official application and any additional materials requested by the Land Use Administrator. The information must include sufficient detail to enable the Land Use Administrator to assess the elements set forth in subsection C2a. The information must include whether there are any existing county roads or public rights-of-way on the state owned land, or if there are existing roads or trails on the state owned land which do not have a vested public right-of-way but have been used regularly by the public.
2. The Land Use Administrator shall develop a report on the proposed development as follows:
a. The size, volume, scope, and extent of the report shall be completed at the discretion of the Land Use Administrator, but at a minimum the report shall address the elements listed under Utah Code 17-27a-305(8)(ii), namely:
(1) Compliance with applicable land use ordinances;
(2) The demand for public facilities caused by the proposed development;
(3) The amount of any applicable fee;
(4) Any credit against an impact fee; and
(5) The potential for waving an impact fee.
b. The report shall include proposed recommendations for how the proposed development should be regulated. The report shall also include recommendations for the disposition and treatment of any existing county roads or public rights-of-way and any existing roads or trails which do not have a vested public right-of-way but have been used regularly by the public.
c. For purposes of determining "compliance with applicable land use ordinances," the Land Use Administrator may review and consider any relevant regulations or requirements of Title 9 in developing the report, regardless of whether or not the regulation applies to the relevant state owned land. Nothing in this section shall be construed as an attempt to impose a zone on any state owned land as prohibited by Utah Code 63A-5b-604(8)(a). State land that is transferred to private ownership shall be zoned as set forth in subsection
9-7D-4A.
d. The Land Use Administrator may exercise discretion to consult with experts such as engineers, relevant industry experts, or other professionals and may conduct any relevant studies deemed necessary to fully evaluate the proposed project. Nothing in this section shall be determined to require the consultation with any expert or to conduct any study regarding the proposed project.
e. In any event, the Land Use Administrator shall act with reasonable promptness to complete the report and forward it to the appropriate individual or body as set forth below.
3. The County Commissioner who is assigned to the Land Use Authority shall review the proposed development and in consultation with the Land Use Administrator determine the process under which the County will issue recommendations for the proposed development.
a. The County Commissioner may elect to use any of the following methods to develop and issue the recommendations: i) request that the development be reviewed by the Land Use Authority to develop recommendations before the proposed recommendations are presented to the County Commission for consideration and approval; ii) delegate authority to the Land Use Authority to develop and approve the recommendations; iii) present the matter directly to the County Commission to develop and approve recommendations; or iv) develop and approve recommendations as an individual County Commissioner after consultation with the Land Use Administrator and/or Land Use Authority.
b. In the event the County Commissioner elects option iv) above, prior to sending the recommendations under subsection C5 below, the Land Use Administrator shall provide the proposed recommendations to the other two (2) County Commissioners. The other two (2) County Commissioners shall have three (3) business days to respond to the proposed recommendations by emailing the Land Use Administrator. If at least one County Commissioner has an objection, the Land Use Administrator shall request that the proposed recommendations be placed on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled county commission meeting for further discussion, review, potential amendment, and approval by the full Commission. If there is no objection submitted by any of the other two (2) county commissioners, or no response submitted to the Land Use Administrator within three (3) business days, the proposed recommendations shall be final.
c. The County shall act with reasonable promptness to approve and issue the recommendations.
4. Any recommendations that are developed and approved under this section shall be completely discretionary, shall be considered a legislative action not an administrative action, shall not be subject to appeal to the Appeal Authority, and shall not be subject to any other requirements of Title 9.
5. After the recommendations are approved as set forth above, the Land Use Administrator shall issue the recommendations to the State and/or SITLA. In the event that there is a lessee or a private entity that is partnering or contracting with the State and/or SITLA regarding the proposed development, the Land Use Administrator shall request that the recommendations that are accepted by the State and/or SITLA be formalized in a lease agreement or other legally binding document between the lessee or private entity partner of the proposed project and the State and/or SITLA.
D. In the event that there is a lessee or private entity partner, if the State and/or SITLA accepts all or a portion of the recommendations, the Land Use Administrator is authorized to: i) monitor the project for compliance with the recommendations that are accepted by the State and/or SITLA; ii) notify the State and/or SITLA of any failure on the part of the lessee or private entity partner to comply with the accepted recommendations; and iii) provide any assistance to the State and/or SITLA necessary to bring the lessee or private entity partner into compliance with the accepted recommendations. (Ord. O-2019-23, 11-12-2019; amd. Ord. O-2022-22, 4-26-2022; Ord. O-2022-42, 7-26-2022; Ord. O-2023-07, 4-11-2023)