16 LAND USE PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES
The purpose of this Chapter is to delineate the procedures, requirements and approval standards that apply to land use and zoning applications and approvals. Table 19.16.010 provides an illustrative summary of the administrative and legislative decision processes in Title 19. If there are any inconsistencies between this table and the other provisions of this Title, the other provisions of the Title govern.
| Table 19.16.010: Legislative and Administrative Decision Processes. | |||||
| REFERENCE TABLE: APPLICATIONS & APPROVALS | ZONING TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS AND OTHER LEGISLATIVE ACTS | PERMITTED USE | CONDITIONAL USE | VARIANCES | SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS |
| APPLICATION INITIATION | Property owner, person authorized in writing by the property owner, Council or Planning Staff | Property owner or a person authorized in writing by the property owner | Property owner or a person authorized in writing by the property owner | Property owner or a person authorized in writing by the property owner | Property owner or a person authorized in writing by the property owner |
| NOTICE(1) | In accordance with Utah Code 10-9a | Not required | In accordance with Utah Code Chapter 10-9a | In accordance with Utah Code Chapter 10-9a | In accordance with Utah Code Chapter 10-9a(2) |
| RECOMMENDATION | Planning Commission, public input | Public agency review | Public input, Public agency review | Public input | Public input |
| FINAL DECISION | Council | Director or designee | Planning Commission | Land use hearing officer | Land use hearing officer, Planning Commission, or Director (dependent on application type) |
| APPEAL BODY | 3rd District Court | Land use hearing officer | Land use hearing officer | 3rd District Court | 3rd District Court |
TABLE 19.16.010: FOOTNOTES
1When required, notices shall be mailed ten (10) days prior to the meeting to property owners within three hundred feet (300’) of the subject property’s boundary.
2Not required for exceptions approved by the Director.
The Director is the administrator of the Zoning Ordinance with power to review and make decisions on zoning ordinance interpretations. The authority and responsibility of the Director includes the following:
| TABLE 19.16.080: GUIDELINES FOR CONSIDERING ZONING MAP & TEXT AMENDMENTS | ||
| FACTORS | MAP AMENDMENTS | TEXT AMENDMENTS |
| 1. The proposed amendment is compatible with the Adopted General Plan. | X | X |
| 2. The proposed amendment promotes the public health, safety and welfare. | X | X |
| 3. The proposed amendment is a more suitable zoning classification for the property than the current classification. | X | |
| 4. The proposed amendment is compatible with the intent and general purposes of this Ordinance. | X | X |
| 5. The proposed amendment corrects an error or omission, adds clarification to existing requirements, or reflects a change in policy. | X | X |
| 6. The proposed amendment benefits the citizens of the Municipality as a whole. | X | X |
| 7. The proposed amendment does not create a significant number of nonconformities. | X | X |
| 8. The proposed amendment is compatible with the trend of development, if any, in the general area of the property in question. | X | |
16 LAND USE PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES
The purpose of this Chapter is to delineate the procedures, requirements and approval standards that apply to land use and zoning applications and approvals. Table 19.16.010 provides an illustrative summary of the administrative and legislative decision processes in Title 19. If there are any inconsistencies between this table and the other provisions of this Title, the other provisions of the Title govern.
| Table 19.16.010: Legislative and Administrative Decision Processes. | |||||
| REFERENCE TABLE: APPLICATIONS & APPROVALS | ZONING TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS AND OTHER LEGISLATIVE ACTS | PERMITTED USE | CONDITIONAL USE | VARIANCES | SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS |
| APPLICATION INITIATION | Property owner, person authorized in writing by the property owner, Council or Planning Staff | Property owner or a person authorized in writing by the property owner | Property owner or a person authorized in writing by the property owner | Property owner or a person authorized in writing by the property owner | Property owner or a person authorized in writing by the property owner |
| NOTICE(1) | In accordance with Utah Code 10-9a | Not required | In accordance with Utah Code Chapter 10-9a | In accordance with Utah Code Chapter 10-9a | In accordance with Utah Code Chapter 10-9a(2) |
| RECOMMENDATION | Planning Commission, public input | Public agency review | Public input, Public agency review | Public input | Public input |
| FINAL DECISION | Council | Director or designee | Planning Commission | Land use hearing officer | Land use hearing officer, Planning Commission, or Director (dependent on application type) |
| APPEAL BODY | 3rd District Court | Land use hearing officer | Land use hearing officer | 3rd District Court | 3rd District Court |
TABLE 19.16.010: FOOTNOTES
1When required, notices shall be mailed ten (10) days prior to the meeting to property owners within three hundred feet (300’) of the subject property’s boundary.
2Not required for exceptions approved by the Director.
The Director is the administrator of the Zoning Ordinance with power to review and make decisions on zoning ordinance interpretations. The authority and responsibility of the Director includes the following:
| TABLE 19.16.080: GUIDELINES FOR CONSIDERING ZONING MAP & TEXT AMENDMENTS | ||
| FACTORS | MAP AMENDMENTS | TEXT AMENDMENTS |
| 1. The proposed amendment is compatible with the Adopted General Plan. | X | X |
| 2. The proposed amendment promotes the public health, safety and welfare. | X | X |
| 3. The proposed amendment is a more suitable zoning classification for the property than the current classification. | X | |
| 4. The proposed amendment is compatible with the intent and general purposes of this Ordinance. | X | X |
| 5. The proposed amendment corrects an error or omission, adds clarification to existing requirements, or reflects a change in policy. | X | X |
| 6. The proposed amendment benefits the citizens of the Municipality as a whole. | X | X |
| 7. The proposed amendment does not create a significant number of nonconformities. | X | X |
| 8. The proposed amendment is compatible with the trend of development, if any, in the general area of the property in question. | X | |