Required Geotechnical Analysis. Development of all types, except beach front protective structures and natural means of beach protection, in coastal erosion hazard areas identified by Priest, G.R., and Allan, J.C., 2004, may not occur until an engineering geologist, certified to practice in Oregon, or geotechnical engineer registered and licensed to practice in Oregon, completes a review of the project site. To the extent the engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer deems necessary, the review shall incorporate analysis and recommendations of an Oregon-certified coastal engineer and of technical experts from other fields outside of engineering geology. The review shall be prepared at the applicant's expense. The geologist or geotechnical engineer must submit (electronically) the review to the city as a written report that, if written or last updated more than a year prior to the first building inspection, must be updated to reflect current conditions. In reviewing the submitted geotechnical report, the city may consult with, among others, the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, the Department of Land Conservation and Development, and a certified engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer. The city assumes no responsibility for the quality or accuracy of a geotechnical report.
Report Contents. Any geotechnical report must follow professional guidelines established by the Oregon State Board of Geologist Examiners, and include an explanation of the degree the hazard affects the property use in question, an explanation of the measures to be employed to minimize losses associated with the hazard, including, but not necessarily limited to, erosion control, vegetation removal, and slope stabilization, and an explanation of the hazard-associated consequences the development and the loss-minimizing measures will have on the surrounding properties.
For development activities of all types on a property in the coast erosion hazard zones, defined by Priest and Allan, 2004, except for beach front protective structures and natural means of ocean beach protection, the geotechnical report must include, but is not limited to, the following items:
1.
Site Description.
a.
The history of the site and surrounding areas, such as previous riprap or dune grading permits, erosion events, exposed trees on the beach, or other relevant local knowledge of the site.
b.
Topography, including elevations and slopes on the property.
d.
Subsurface materials – the nature of the rocks and soils.
e.
Conditions of the seaward front of the property, particularly for sites having a sea cliff.
f.
Presence of drift logs or other flotsam on or within the property.
g.
Description of streams or other drainage that might influence erosion or locally reduce the level of the beach.
h.
Proximity of nearby headlands that might block the long shore movement of beach sediments, thereby affecting the level of the beach in front of the property.
i.
Description of any shore protection structures that may exist on the property or on nearby properties.
j.
Presence of pathways or stairs from the property to the beach.
k.
Existing human impacts on the site, particularly those that might alter the resistance to wave attack.
2.
Description of the Fronting Beach.
a.
Average widths of the beach during the summer and winter.
b.
Median grain size of beach sediment.
c.
Average beach slopes during the summer and winter.
d.
Elevations above mean sea level of the beach at the seaward edge of the property during summer and winter.
e.
Presence of rip currents and rip embayment that can locally reduce the elevation of the fronting beach.
f.
Presence of rock outcrops and sea stacks, both offshore and within the beach zone.
g.
Information regarding the depth of beach sand down to bedrock at the seaward edge of the property.
3.
Analyses of Erosion and Flooding Potential.
a.
Analysis of DOGAMI beach monitoring data available for the site.
b.
Analysis of human activities affecting shoreline erosion.
c.
Analysis of possible mass wasting, including weathering processes, land sliding or slumping.
d.
Calculation of wave runup beyond mean water elevation that might result in erosion of the sea cliff or foredune (see Stockdon, 2006[2]).
e.
Evaluation of frequency that erosion-inducing processes could occur, considering the most extreme potential conditions of unusually high water levels together with severe storm wave energy.
f.
For dune-backed shoreline, use an appropriate foredune erosion (Komar et al. 1999[3]) or time-dependent erosion model (e.g., Kriebel and Dean, 1993[4]) to assess the potential distance of property erosion, and compare the results with direct evidence obtained during site visit, aerial photo analysis, or analysis of DOGAMI beach monitoring data.
g.
For bluff-backed shorelines, use a combination of published reports, such as DOGAMI bluff and dune hazard risk zone studies, aerial photo analysis, and field work, to assess the potential distance of property erosion.
h.
Description of potential for sea level rise, estimated for local area by combining local tectonic subsidence or uplift with global rates of predicted sea level rise.
i.
An estimation of the annual erosion rate at the site.
4.
Assessment of Potential Reactions to Erosion Episodes.
a.
Determination of legal restrictions of shoreline protective structures (Goal 18 prohibition, local conditional use requirements, priority for nonstructural erosion control methods).
b.
Assessment of potential reactions to erosion events, addressing the need for future erosion control measures, building relocation, or building foundation and utility repairs.
c.
An annual erosion rate for the property.
5.
Recommendations.
a.
Based on results from the above analyses, recommended setbacks, building techniques, or other mitigation to ensure an acceptable level of safety and compliance with all local requirements.
b.
A plan for preservation of vegetation and existing grade within the setback area, if appropriate.
c.
Consideration of a local variance process to reduce the building setback on the side of the property opposite the ocean, if this reduction helps to lessen the risk of erosion, bluff failure or other hazard.
d.
Methods to control and direct water drainage away from the ocean (e.g., to an approved storm water system), or, if not possible, to direct water in such a way so as to not cause erosion or visual impacts.