Additional Controls
Table 5-1: Standards for Roof-Mounted Wind Turbines | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Turbine Size | Zoning District Permitted In | Maximum Height | Minimum Setback | How Permitted |
Micro wind turbines | CN and CH | Equal to 1/2 the building height | Equal to the height of the tower from all property lines and any buildings | Conditional use permit |
Greater than 1/2 the building height | ||||
Table 5-2: Standards for Freestanding Wind Turbines | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turbine Size | Zoning District Permitted In** | Minimum Lot Size (acres) | Maximum Height* (feet) | Minimum Setback | How Permitted |
Micro wind turbines | A through DR | < 1 | 40 | Equal to the height of the tower* from all property lines and any buildings | Conditional use permit |
A through DR | 1 | 80 | |||
CN through CH | 1 | 80 | |||
A through DR | 2 | 100 | |||
CN through CH | 2 | 100 | |||
Small wind turbines | A through DR | 2 | 100 | 110% of the height of the tower* from any property line or above ground utilities | Conditional use permit |
CN through CH | 2 | 100 | |||
CN Through CH | 3 | 120 | |||
Large/utility wind turbines | A | 10 | N/A | 150% of the height of the tower* from any property line or above ground utilities | Conditional use permit |
* | The height shall be measured from ground level (grade) to the top of the tower nacelle. |
** | The size, height, and approval process from districts zoned PD shall be determined based upon the underlying uses within that district. |
Table 5-3: Standards for Freestanding Wind Turbines on Common Property | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Turbine Size | Zoning District Permitted In** | Maximum Height* | Minimum Setback | How Permitted |
Micro or small wind turbines | AG through DR | Determined per conditional use permit | 110% of the height of the tower* from any property line or above ground utilities | Conditional use permit |
* | The height shall be measured from ground level (grade) to top of the tower nacelle. |
** | The size, height, and approval process for districts zoned PD shall be determined based upon the underlying uses within that district. |
The following study regarding the adverse secondary effects associated with adult businesses was placed on file with the City Attorney for review by the Board of Aldermen following the May 5, 2004, meeting: An "Adult Use Study" prepared for the City of Kansas City, Missouri by Eric Damian Kelly, Ph.D., AICP, and Connie B. Cooper, AICP, consisting of 4 parts and 9 appendices (the "Kelly and Cooper Study"). The Board of Aldermen of the City held a public meeting on May 12, 2004, to consider proposed regulations of adult businesses in the City and heard a report from staff, including the results of a zoning analysis regarding spacing conducted by Michael Duffy, AICP; heard testimony regarding the adverse secondary effects of such businesses, including increased crime, prostitution, drug use and other illegal activities. The Board of Aldermen of the City has also established adult business license regulations with the City. |
Additional Controls
Table 5-1: Standards for Roof-Mounted Wind Turbines | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Turbine Size | Zoning District Permitted In | Maximum Height | Minimum Setback | How Permitted |
Micro wind turbines | CN and CH | Equal to 1/2 the building height | Equal to the height of the tower from all property lines and any buildings | Conditional use permit |
Greater than 1/2 the building height | ||||
Table 5-2: Standards for Freestanding Wind Turbines | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turbine Size | Zoning District Permitted In** | Minimum Lot Size (acres) | Maximum Height* (feet) | Minimum Setback | How Permitted |
Micro wind turbines | A through DR | < 1 | 40 | Equal to the height of the tower* from all property lines and any buildings | Conditional use permit |
A through DR | 1 | 80 | |||
CN through CH | 1 | 80 | |||
A through DR | 2 | 100 | |||
CN through CH | 2 | 100 | |||
Small wind turbines | A through DR | 2 | 100 | 110% of the height of the tower* from any property line or above ground utilities | Conditional use permit |
CN through CH | 2 | 100 | |||
CN Through CH | 3 | 120 | |||
Large/utility wind turbines | A | 10 | N/A | 150% of the height of the tower* from any property line or above ground utilities | Conditional use permit |
* | The height shall be measured from ground level (grade) to the top of the tower nacelle. |
** | The size, height, and approval process from districts zoned PD shall be determined based upon the underlying uses within that district. |
Table 5-3: Standards for Freestanding Wind Turbines on Common Property | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Turbine Size | Zoning District Permitted In** | Maximum Height* | Minimum Setback | How Permitted |
Micro or small wind turbines | AG through DR | Determined per conditional use permit | 110% of the height of the tower* from any property line or above ground utilities | Conditional use permit |
* | The height shall be measured from ground level (grade) to top of the tower nacelle. |
** | The size, height, and approval process for districts zoned PD shall be determined based upon the underlying uses within that district. |
The following study regarding the adverse secondary effects associated with adult businesses was placed on file with the City Attorney for review by the Board of Aldermen following the May 5, 2004, meeting: An "Adult Use Study" prepared for the City of Kansas City, Missouri by Eric Damian Kelly, Ph.D., AICP, and Connie B. Cooper, AICP, consisting of 4 parts and 9 appendices (the "Kelly and Cooper Study"). The Board of Aldermen of the City held a public meeting on May 12, 2004, to consider proposed regulations of adult businesses in the City and heard a report from staff, including the results of a zoning analysis regarding spacing conducted by Michael Duffy, AICP; heard testimony regarding the adverse secondary effects of such businesses, including increased crime, prostitution, drug use and other illegal activities. The Board of Aldermen of the City has also established adult business license regulations with the City. |