A. Purpose: It may be necessary or advisable, from time to time, to amend the master plan and associated maps, charts and text. This section explains the method for amending the master plan. Requests to change a regulatory zone affecting a parcel of land, or a portion of a parcel, are processed under this section.
B. Quarterly Consideration:
1. Timing Of Amendments: Pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes 278.210, each element of the master plan may be amended by the city council no more than four (4) times per calendar year. Applications may be filed with the planning and redevelopment department at any time before the specified deadline date. For the purposes of this section, the restriction on the number of times that the master plan may be amended does not restrict the number of applications that may be submitted, but only refers to the number of times each component of the master plan may be modified by the city council. The restriction on the number of times the master plan may be amended does not apply to minor amendments to the master plan as defined in subsection M of this section.
2. Initiation Of Amendments: An owner of real property within the city, or that owner's authorized representative, may, upon proof of ownership, apply for a master plan amendment for that landowner's property. Such amendments also may be initiated by the planning commission, city staff and the city council. The planning and redevelopment director may initiate a minor amendment as defined in Nevada Revised Statutes 278.225. Advisory boards established by the city council may petition the planning commission or city council to initiate an amendment.
3. Application: When the owner of the affected property initiates an amendment to the master plan land use plan and zoning map, an application for such amendment shall be obtained from the planning and redevelopment department and by paying the application filing fee. Before any application is made, the applicant is encouraged to confer with the planning and redevelopment director to discuss, in general, the procedures and requirements for an amendment request pursuant to these regulations. If no planning commission exists, the city council shall consider the application pursuant to this section.
4. Completeness: No master plan amendment shall be processed until the information necessary to review and decide upon the proposed master plan amendment is deemed complete by the planning and redevelopment director.
C. Neighborhood Meeting Notice: Pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes 278.210, the applicant shall conduct a neighborhood meeting, to be held prior to a public hearing before the planning commission (or city council if no planning commission exists), for any proposed master plan amendments that concern only particular parcels. The applicant shall provide, at the applicant's sole expense, notice of this neighborhood meeting as follows:
1. A neighborhood meeting shall be held no less than ten (10) days and no more than thirty (30) days prior to a scheduled public hearing for a proposed master plan amendment.
2. The neighborhood meeting shall be for the sole purpose of providing information on the proposed amendment and shall be conducted by the applicant.
3. The applicant shall prepare and deliver notice of this neighborhood meeting pursuant to subsection D1 of this section. Property owner address labels are produced by the city, as described under subsections D4 and D7 of this section, and supplied to the applicant. A notice shall also be sent to the planning and redevelopment department, in order to verify the ten (10) day requirement. Alternatively, the applicant may pay separate neighborhood noticing fees, and the city will prepare and deliver notice.
D. Public Hearing Notice: The planning commission and/or city council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed amendment. Public hearing notice for all master plan amendments shall be given by the city in accordance with the provisions of this section, when payment of noticing fees is received.
1. Notice Of Property Owners By Mail: A notice setting forth the time, place, purpose of hearing, map or physical description of the land involved, existing and proposed land use designations, and a brief summary of the proposed change shall be sent by mail, at least ten (10) days before the meeting to the following persons:
a. All owners of real property that are the subject of the master plan amendment;
b. Advisory boards created by the city council for the subject area;
c. All owners of real property within seven hundred fifty feet (750') of the subject property;
d. All tenants of any mobile home park that is located within seven hundred fifty feet (750') of the subject property;
e. All general improvement districts (GID) for the subject area; and
f. The commander or administrator of a military installation that is within three thousand feet (3,000') of the subject property.
2. Posted Notice: The planning and redevelopment director or designee shall post a sign on the subject property in accordance with subsection 9-4-2C of this title.
3. Notice Of Property Owners By Electronic Means: If requested by a party pursuant to subsection D1 of this section and if receipt can be verified, an electronic notice must be provided at least ten (10) days before the meeting, setting forth the time, place, purpose of hearing, and map or physical description of the land involved.
4. Number Of Notices: If the number of notices sent pursuant to this section does not identify thirty (30) or more separate property owners, the city shall send out additional notices to achieve a total of at least thirty (30) separate property owners.
5. Notice In The Newspaper: A notice setting forth the date, time and place of the public hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in Clark County not less than ten (10) days prior to the public hearing date, pursuant to subsection 9-4-2A of this title.
6. Additional Property: When the planning commission deems it necessary or expedient, the commission may consider other property for a change or amendment in addition to the property described in the application; provided, that such additional property is included in the hearing notices.
7. Compliance With Noticing Requirements: Owners of all real property to be noticed pursuant to this section shall be those owners identified on the latest county assessor's ownership maps and records.
8. Amendment Not Affecting Land Use Boundaries: Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, a proposed master plan amendment that does not change the boundaries of the land use categories (i.e., regulatory zones) of the master plan land use and zoning map shall only require notice as set forth in subsection D5 of this section.
9. Amendment Reducing Density/Intensity: Notice to property owners as set forth in subsections D1 and D3 of this section shall include a ballot that an owner of property may complete and return to the city council to indicate his/her approval of, or opposition to, the proposed amendment to reduce the density or intensity with which a parcel of land may be used. The ballot must be returned prior to the date and time of the public hearing listed on the notice.
E. Planning And Redevelopment Director Review And Report: The planning and redevelopment director shall review each proposed master plan amendment in light of the approved findings of subsection F4 of this section and, as deemed necessary, distribute the application to other reviewers. Based on the results of that review, the planning and redevelopment director shall provide a report and recommendation to the planning commission. If no planning commission exists, the report and recommendation shall be provided to the city council.
F. Planning Commission Review And Recommendation: The planning commission, if one exists, shall review a master plan amendment in conformance with this section.
1. General Provisions: The planning commission shall conduct at least one public hearing with notification, for the purpose of receiving oral and written evidence relative to the application.
2. Concurrent Processing Of Applications: If a proposed project requires more than one application under the provisions of the development code, the applications may be filed at the same time and processed concurrently. If more than one review authority is involved, the planning and redevelopment director shall determine the sequence for action by the review authorities.
3. Action: The planning commission may take action to recommend approval, modification or denial of the master plan amendment request. A recommendation of approval of the master plan amendment shall be by resolution of the planning commission, carried by the affirmative votes of not less than two-thirds (2/3) of the membership. The resolution shall refer expressly to the maps, descriptive matter, or other matter intended by the planning commission to constitute the amendment. If a motion for approval fails to reach the two- thirds (2/3) affirmative votes, then the amendment request is technically denied.
4. Findings: When making its recommendation to the city council for approval, modification of an amendment or denial, the planning commission shall, at a minimum, make at least one of the following findings of fact (subsections F4a through F4e of this section), unless a military installation is required to be noticed, then in addition to findings listed below, a finding of fact (subsection F4f of this section) shall also be made:
a. Consistency With Master Plan:
(1) Approval: The proposed amendment substantially complies with the policies and action programs of the master plan.
(2) Denial: The proposed amendment does not substantially comply with the policies and action programs of the master plan.
(1) Approval: The proposed amendment will provide for land uses compatible with (existing or planned) adjacent land uses, will support the character of the neighborhood, and will not adversely impact the public health, safety or welfare.
(2) Denial: The proposed amendment would result in land uses which are incompatible with (existing or planned) adjacent land uses, does not support the character of the neighborhood, and would adversely impact the public health, safety or welfare.
c. Responds To Changed Conditions:
(1) Approval: The proposed amendment responds to character changing events, changed conditions, or further studies that have occurred since the plan was adopted by the city council, and the requested amendment represents a more desirable utilization of land.
(2) Denial: The proposed amendment does not identify and respond to character changing events, changed conditions, or further studies that have occurred since the plan was adopted by the city council, and the requested amendment does not represent a more desirable utilization of land.
(1) Approval: The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the implementation of the Mesquite master plan policies and action programs, with respect to traffic capacity or safety, site conditions, public services or facilities, or environmentally sensitive areas or resources.
(2) Denial: The proposed amendment will adversely affect the implementation of the Mesquite master plan policies and action programs, with respect to traffic capacity or safety, site conditions, public services or facilities, or environmentally sensitive areas or resources.
e. Desired Pattern Of Growth:
(1) Approval: The proposed amendment will promote the desired pattern for the orderly physical growth of the city and guides development of the city based on the projected population growth with the least amount of natural resource impairment and the efficient expenditure of funds for public services.
(2) Denial: The proposed amendment does not promote the desired pattern for the orderly physical growth of the city. The proposed amendment does not guide development of the city based on the projected population growth with the least amount of natural resource impairment and the efficient expenditure of funds for public services.
f. Effect On A Military Installation:
(1) Approval: The proposed amendment will not affect the location, purpose and mission of the military installation.
(2) Denial: The proposed amendment will affect the location, purpose and mission of the military installation.
5. Effect Of Planning Commission Denial: In the event the planning commission denies a master plan amendment application, that action is final unless appealed to the city council, in accordance with subsection 9-4-9B of this title.
6. Planning Commission Report: A report describing the amendment, discussion at the public hearing, and recommendation and vote of the planning commission shall be transmitted to the city council. If the planning commission does not recommend approval, it should state why it could not make the findings for approval in subsection F4 of this section.
G. City Council Review And Decision: The city council shall review a master plan amendment in accordance with the provisions of this section.
1. Time Period For Hearing: The clerk of the city council shall schedule a public hearing before the city council on a recommendation of approval or the appeal of a denial by the planning commission.
2. Notice Of Hearing: The public hearing shall be noticed as required by subsection D of this section.
3. Additional Criteria If Amendment Reducing Density/Intensity: Any proposed amendment that would reduce the density or intensity of uses on property (i.e., result in a "downzoning") is subject to additional approval criteria in accordance with Nevada Revised Statutes 278.260. These criteria apply if at least twenty percent (20%) of the property owners to whom notices were sent indicate an opposition to the proposed amendment on the ballot returned per subsection D9 of this section. The criteria require the city council to:
a. Consider separately the merits of each aspect of the proposed amendment to which any property owner(s) expressed opposition.
b. Make a written finding that the public interest and necessity will be promoted by the approval of the proposed amendment.
a. If no planning commission exists, final action to approve the amendment shall require a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the total membership of the city council. If a motion for approval fails to reach the two-thirds (2/3) affirmative votes, then the amendment request is technically denied. The city council shall refer to findings listed under subsection F4 of this section.
b. If the city council is considering a recommendation of approval, it may take final action to adopt the master plan amendment as recommended by the planning commission, if no modification of the planning commission's recommendation is proposed. Final action to approve the amendment shall require a simple majority vote of the total membership of the city council.
c. If the city council is considering an appeal from a denial of a master plan amendment request, it may use the record and any additional evidence relative to the application and may confirm or reverse the denial based upon its interpretation of the findings required and the evidence submitted. Final action to reverse the denial shall require a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the total membership of the city council.
d. If the city council proposes to modify the recommendation of approval from the planning commission, the proposed modification shall be referred to the planning commission for consideration, pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes 278.220. The planning commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing on the modification. The planning commission shall submit a report on the proposed modification to the city council within forty (40) days from the date of referral by the city council. Failure to report shall be deemed a recommendation of approval. Prior to making a final decision, the city council shall be required to conduct a public hearing and notice this hearing pursuant to subsection D of this section. If the planning commission does not recommend approval of the modification, approval of the proposed modification shall require a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the total membership of the city council.
e. The final action by the city council shall be final for purposes of judicial review.
H. Written Record: When taking final action on the planning commission's or planning director's recommendation, the city council shall make part of the record their affirmation, modification or rejection of the findings of fact provided in the planning commission's or planning director's final recommendation, as well as any other findings of fact that the city council deems to be relevant.
I. Appeals Of City Council Decision: Appeals of the city council's decision on master plan amendments shall be made to the courts, as provided by law.
J. One Year Wait On Denials: After the denial of a master plan amendment, no application for a master plan amendment for the same or similar amendment may be accepted for one year immediately following the denial. This section shall not apply to applications denied without prejudice, which may be refiled in less than one year's time.
K. Modification Of A Master Plan Amendment: Proposed modifications of an approved master plan amendment shall require a new application following the same procedure required for the initial application.
L. Certification Of Maps By Electronic Means: Adopted land use and zoning maps may be certified by the planning and redevelopment director as true and accurate originals and copies through an electronic signature.
M. Minor Master Plan Amendments:
1. Purpose: The purpose of the minor amendment section is to provide a process for adopting changes that do not have substantial effect on the intent of the master plan, and therefore, do not require action by the planning commission.
2. Timing Of Minor Amendments: Minor amendments are not limited to quarterly consideration per Nevada Revised Statutes 278.210(5)(b) and may be processed at any time.
3. Initiation Of Application And Findings: The planning and redevelopment director shall have the sole authority to initiate a minor amendment to the master plan by making findings that the proposed amendment is consistent with Nevada Revised Statutes and consists of one of the following findings:
a. A change in a boundary that is based on a geographical feature, including, without limitation, topography, slopes, hydrographic features, wetland delineation and floodplains, when evidence is produced that the mapped location of the geographical feature is in error;
b. A change made to reflect the alteration of the name of a jurisdiction, agency, department or district by the governing body, governing board or other governing authority of the jurisdiction, agency, department or district, as applicable, or by another entity authorized by law to make such an alteration; or
c. An update of statistical information that is based on a new or revised study.
4. Notice: Before adopting any minor amendment, the city council shall hold at least one public hearing thereon, notice of the time and place of which must be given as set forth in subsection D5 of this section.
5. Decision By City Council:
a. Action Taken: Upon the receipt of the recommendation of the city's professional staff and any written public input, the city council shall consider the minor amendment application and may approve or deny the recommendation of the city's professional staff or take such other action it deems appropriate. Final action to approve a minor amendment requires a simple majority vote of the total membership of the city council. (Ord. 434, 2-23-2010)