Port Orchard, WA Zoning Ordinance

§ 20.160.010 Authority.

The city adopts this chapter under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C.120 and the SEPA Rules, Chapter 197-11 WAC. This chapter contains the city's SEPA procedures and policies. The SEPA Rules, Chapter 197-11 WAC, must be used in conjunction with this chapter.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.020 Definitions adopted by reference.

This part contains the basic requirements that apply to the SEPA process. The city adopts the following sections of Chapter 197-11 WAC by reference:

WAC 197-11-040	Definitions.
WAC 197-11-220	SEPA/GMA definitions.
WAC 197-11-700	Definitions.
WAC 197-11-702	Act.
WAC 197-11-704	Action.
WAC 197-11-706	Addendum.
WAC 197-11-708	Adoption.
WAC 197-11-710	Affected tribe.
WAC 197-11-712	Affecting.
WAC 197-11-714	Agency.
WAC 197-11-716	Applicant.
WAC 197-11-718	Built environment.
WAC 197-11-720	Categorical exemption.
WAC 197-11-721	Consolidated appeal.
WAC 197-11-724	Consulted agency.
WAC 197-11-726	Cost-benefit analysis.
WAC 197-11-728	County/city.
WAC 197-11-730	Decision-maker.
WAC 197-11-732	Department.
WAC 197-11-734	Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).
WAC 197-11-736	Determination of significance (DS).
WAC 197-11-738	EIS.
WAC 197-11-740	Environment.
WAC 197-11-742	Environmental checklist.
WAC 197-11-744	Environmental document.
WAC 197-11-746	Environmental review.
WAC 197-11-750	Expanded scoping.
WAC 197-11-752	Impacts.
WAC 197-11-754	Incorporation by reference.
WAC 197-11-756	Lands covered by water.
WAC 197-11-758	Lead agency.
WAC 197-11-760	License.
WAC 197-11-762	Local agency.
WAC 197-11-764	Major action.
WAC 197-11-766	Mitigated DNS.
WAC 197-11-768	Mitigation.
WAC 197-11-770	Natural environment.
WAC 197-11-772	NEPA.
WAC 197-11-774	Nonproject.
WAC 197-11-775	Open record hearing.
WAC 197-11-776	Phased review.
WAC 197-11-778	Preparation.
WAC 197-11-780	Private project.
WAC 197-11-782	Probable.
WAC 197-11-784	Proposal.
WAC 197-11-786	Reasonable alternative.
WAC 197-11-788	Responsible official.
WAC 197-11-790	SEPA.
WAC 197-11-792	Scope.
WAC 197-11-793	Scoping.
WAC 197-11-794	Significant.
WAC 197-11-796	State agency.
WAC 197-11-797	Threshold determination.
WAC 197-11-799	Underlying government action.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.030 Additional definitions.

In addition to those definitions contained within WAC 197-11-700 through 197-11-799 and 197-11-220, when used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context indicates otherwise:

(1)

"Department"

means any division, unit or department of the city.

(2)

"Ordinance" or "chapter"

means the ordinance, resolution or other procedure used by the city to adopt regulatory requirements.

(3)

"Early notice"

means the city's response to an applicant stating whether it considers issuance of a determination of significance likely for the applicant's proposal (mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS) procedures).

(4)

"Director"

means the community development director or designee.

(5)

"Site-specific proposal"

means a proposal meeting the criteria of WAC 197-11-704(2)(a) for an action involving a decision on a specific project, such as a construction or management activity located in a defined geographic area.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.040 Process.

The city adopts the following sections of Chapter 197-11 WAC by reference:

WAC 197-11-050	Lead agency.
WAC 197-11-055	Timing of the SEPA process.
WAC 197-11-060	Content of environmental review.
WAC 197-11-070	Limitations on actions during SEPA process.
WAC 197-11-080	Incomplete or unavailable information.
WAC 197-11-090	Supporting documents.
WAC 197-11-100	Information required of applicants.
WAC 197-11-158	GMA project review – Reliance on existing plans, laws and regulations.
WAC 197-11-164	Planned actions – Definitions and criteria.
WAC 197-11-168	Ordinances or resolutions designating planned actions.
WAC 197-11-172	Planned actions – Project review.
WAC 197-11-210	SEPA/GMA integration.
WAC 197-11-228	Overall SEPA/GMA integration procedures.
WAC 197-11-230	Timing of an integrated GMA/SEPA process.
WAC 197-11-232	SEPA/GMA integration procedures for preliminary planning, environmental analysis, and expanded scoping.
WAC 197-11-235	Documents.
WAC 197-11-238	Monitoring.
WAC 197-11-250	SEPA/Model Toxics Control Act integration.
WAC 197-11-253	SEPA lead agency for MTCA actions.
WAC 197-11-256	Preliminary evaluation.
WAC 197-11-259	Determination of nonsignificance and EIS for MTCA remedial actions.
WAC 197-11-265	Early scoping for MTCA remedial actions.
WAC 197-11-268	MTCA interim actions.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.050 Designation of responsible official.

(1)

For those proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the responsible official shall be the director.

(2)

For all proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the responsible official shall make the threshold determination, supervise scoping and preparation of any required environmental impact statement (EIS) and perform any other functions assigned to the "lead agency" or "responsible official" by those sections of the SEPA rules that were adopted by reference in this chapter.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.060 Lead agency determination and responsibilities.

(1)

The SEPA responsible official shall determine the lead agency for any application for or initiation of a proposal that involves a nonexempt action, as provided in WAC 197-11-050, unless the lead agency has been previously determined or if another agency is in the process of determining the lead agency.

(2)

When the city is the lead agency for a proposal, the SEPA responsible official shall supervise compliance with the necessary threshold determination requirements, and if an EIS is necessary, shall supervise preparation of the EIS.

(3)

When the city is not the lead agency for a proposal, all departments of the city shall use and consider, as appropriate, either the DNS or the final EIS of the lead agency in making decisions on the proposal. No city department shall prepare or require preparation of a DNS or EIS in addition to that prepared by the lead agency, unless required under WAC 197-11-600. In some cases, the city may conduct supplemental environmental review under WAC 197-11-600.

(4)

If the city or any of its departments receives a lead agency determination made by any other agency that appears inconsistent with the criteria of WAC 197-11-253 or 197-11-922 through 197-11-940, it may object to the determination. Any objection must be made to the agency originally making the determination and resolved within 15 days of receipt of the determination, or the city must petition the Department of Ecology for lead agency determination under WAC 197-11-946 within the 15-day time period. Any such petition on behalf of the city may be initiated by the director.

(5)

Departments of the city are authorized to make agreements as to lead agency status or shared lead agency duties for a proposal under WAC 197-11-942 and 197-11-944; provided, that the responsible official and any department that will incur responsibilities as the result of such agreement approve the agreement.

(6)

Any department making a lead agency determination for a private project shall require sufficient information from the applicant to identify which other agencies have jurisdiction over the proposal.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.070 Transfer of lead agency status to a state agency.

For any proposal for a private project where the city would be the lead agency and for which one or more state agencies have jurisdiction, the city's responsible official may elect to transfer the lead agency duties to a state agency. The state agency with jurisdiction appearing first on the priority listing in WAC 197-11-936 shall be the lead agency and the city shall be an agency with jurisdiction. To transfer lead agency duties, the city's responsible official must transmit a notice of the transfer together with any relevant information available on the proposal to the appropriate state agency with jurisdiction. The responsible official of the city shall also give notice of the transfer to the private applicant and any other agencies with jurisdiction over the proposal.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.080 Categorical exemptions – Adoption by reference.

The city adopts the following rules for categorical exemptions from Chapter 197-11 WAC:

WAC 197-11-300	Purpose of this part.
WAC 197-11-305	Categorical exemptions.
WAC 197-11-800	Categorical exemptions.
WAC 197-11-880	Emergencies.
WAC 197-11-890	Petitioning DOE to change exemptions.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 008-25 § 18 (Exh. Q))

§ 20.160.090 Categorical exemptions – Determination.

(1)

Each department within the city that receives an application for a license or, in the case of governmental proposals, the department initiating the proposal, shall determine whether the license, permit and/or proposal is exempt. The department's determination that a proposal is exempt shall be final and is not subject to administrative review. If a proposal is exempt, none of the procedural requirements of this chapter apply to the proposal. The city shall not require completion of an environmental checklist for an exempt proposal.

(2)

In determining whether or not a proposal is exempt, the department shall make certain that the proposal is properly defined and shall identify the governmental licenses required (WAC 197-11-070). If a proposal includes exempt and nonexempt actions, the department shall determine the lead agency, even if the license application that triggers the department's consideration is exempt.

(3)

If a proposal includes both exempt and nonexempt actions, the city may authorize exempt actions prior to compliance with the procedural requirements of this chapter, except that:

(a)

The city shall not give authorization for:

(i)

Any nonexempt action;

(ii)

Any action that would have an adverse environmental impact; or

(iii)

Any action that would limit the choice of alternatives.

(b)

The department may withhold approval of an exempt action that would lead to modification of the physical environment, when such modification would serve no purpose if the nonexempt action(s) were not approved; and

(c)

A department may withhold approval of exempt actions that would lead to substantial financial expenditures by a private applicant when the expenditures would serve no purpose if the nonexempt actions were not approved.

(4)

Threshold Levels for Categorical Exemptions. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(c) and (1)(d), cities may adopt raised levels of threshold exemptions for certain types of actions, except as provided in WAC 197-11-305 and 197-11-800(1)(a). As authorized pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(c) and (1)(d), the following threshold exemptions are adopted:

(a)

The construction or location of nine or fewer single-family residential units.

(b)

The construction or location of nine or fewer multifamily residential units.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 008-25 § 18 (Exh. Q))

§ 20.160.100 Integration of SEPA with project permits and land use decisions.

Under Chapter 36.70B RCW, the procedure for review and processing of project permit applications shall be combined with the environmental review process, both procedural and substantive.

The process under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and this chapter shall integrate the following procedures, insofar as possible, with any applicable process for decision-making on permit and land use applications:

(1)

Staff review of the application under city codes and regulations and the environmental review and determination thereon;

(2)

The staff report on the application, and the report or documentation concerning environmental review;

(3)

Hearings and other public processes, including required public notices, required by city code or regulation, and hearings and other public processes, including public notices and appeals, required or conducted under SEPA;

(4)

Such other review processes as determined by the director.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 008-25 § 18 (Exh. Q))

§ 20.160.110 Threshold determinations.

This part contains the rules for deciding whether a proposal has a "probable, significant, adverse environmental impact" requiring an environmental impact statement to be prepared. This part also contains rules for evaluating the impacts of proposals not requiring an EIS. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented in this part:

WAC 197-11-310	Threshold determination required.
WAC 197-11-315	Environmental checklist.
WAC 197-11-330	Threshold determination process.
WAC 197-11-335	Additional information.
WAC 197-11-340	Determination of significance (DS).
WAC 197-11-350	Mitigated DNS.
WAC 197-11-355	Optional DNS process.
WAC 197-11-360	Determination of significance (DS) (initiation of scoping).
WAC 197-11-390	Effect of threshold determination.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 008-25 § 18 (Exh. Q))

§ 20.160.120 Environmental checklist.

(1)

Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, a completed environmental checklist (or a copy), in the form provided in WAC 197-11-960, shall be filed at the same time as an application for a permit, license, certificate or other approval not specifically exempted in this chapter, except that a checklist is not needed if the city and applicant agree that an EIS is required, SEPA compliance has been completed, or SEPA compliance has been initiated by another agency. The city shall use the environmental checklist to determine the lead agency, and if the city is the lead agency, for determining the responsible official and for making the threshold determinations.

(2)

For private proposals, the city will require the applicant to complete the environmental checklist, providing assistance as necessary. For city proposals, the department initiating the proposal shall complete the environmental checklist for that proposal.

(3)

The city may require that it, and not the private applicant, will complete all or part of the environmental checklist for a private proposal, if either of the following occurs:

(a)

The city has technical information on a question or questions that are unavailable to the private applicant; or

(b)

The applicant has provided inaccurate information on previous proposals or on proposals currently under consideration.

(4)

For projects submitted as planned actions under WAC 197-11-164, the city shall use its existing environmental checklist form or may modify the environmental checklist form as provided in WAC 197-11-315. The modified environmental checklist form may be prepared and adopted along with or as part of a planned action ordinance; or developed after the ordinance is adopted. In either case, a proposed modified environmental checklist form must be sent to the Department of Ecology to allow at least a 30-day review prior to use.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 008-25 § 18 (Exh. Q))

§ 20.160.130 Timing.

For those project permit applications that are not subject to Chapter 36.70B RCW, the following will apply:

(1)

The city will attempt to issue a threshold determination on a completed application within 90 days after the application and supporting documentation are complete.

(2)

A complete application for a threshold determination consists of the following information:

(a)

A description of the proposed action;

(b)

Site information, including site plans, vicinity maps and other information required for a land use certification or other application;

(c)

The environmental checklist;

(d)

Additional information/environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-335). The environmental checklist covers 16 subjects. If, after review of the environmental checklist, it is determined that there is insufficient information to make a threshold determination, additional information will be required using any one or more of the following:

(i)

The applicant will provide more information on subjects in the checklist;

(ii)

The city makes its own further study;

(iii)

The city will consult with other agencies, requesting information on the proposal's probable or potential impacts which lie within the other agency's jurisdiction or expertise.

(3)

It is the policy of the city that adequate information must be provided before a threshold decision can be made. The city will not commence processing environmental checklists which are not complete.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 008-25 § 18 (Exh. Q))

§ 20.160.140 Mitigated DNS.

(1)

As provided in this section and in WAC 197-11-350, the responsible official may issue a DNS based on conditions attached to the proposal by the responsible official or on changes to, or clarifications of, the proposal made by the applicant.

(2)

An applicant may request in writing early notice of whether a DS is likely under WAC 197-11-350. The request must:

(a)

Follow submission of a permit application and environmental checklist for a nonexempt proposal for which the department is lead agency; and

(b)

Precede the city's actual threshold determination for the proposal.

(3)

The responsible official should respond to the request for early notice within 30 working days. The response shall:

(a)

Be written;

(b)

State whether the city currently considers issuance of a DS likely and if so, indicate the general or specific area(s) of concern that is/are leading the city to consider a DS; and

(c)

State that the applicant may change or clarify the proposal to mitigate the indicated impacts, revising the environmental checklist and/or permit application as necessary to reflect the changes or clarifications.

(4)

As much as possible, the city should assist the applicant with identification of impacts to the extent necessary to formulate mitigation measures.

(5)

When an applicant submits a changed or clarified proposal, along with a revised or amended environmental checklist, the city shall base its threshold determination on the changed or clarified proposal and should make the determination within 15 days of receiving the changed or clarified proposal.

(a)

If the city indicated specific mitigation measures in its response to the request for early notice, and the applicant changed or clarified the proposal to include those specific mitigation measures, the city shall issue and circulate a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2).

(b)

If the city indicated areas of concern, but did not indicate specific mitigation measures that would allow it to issue a DNS, the city shall make the threshold determination, issuing a DNS or DS as appropriate.

(c)

The applicant's proposed mitigation measures (clarifications, changes or conditions) must be in writing and must be specific. For example, proposals to "control noise" or "prevent stormwater runoff" are inadequate, whereas proposals to "muffle machinery to X decibel" or "construct 200-foot stormwater retention pond at Y location" are adequate.

(d)

Mitigation measures which justify issuance of a mitigated DNS may be incorporated in the DNS by reference to agency staff reports, studies or other documents.

(6)

A mitigated DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), requiring a 14-day comment period and public notice.

(7)

Mitigation measures incorporated in the mitigated DNS shall be deemed conditions of approval of the permit decision and may be enforced in the same manner as any term or condition of the permit, or enforced in any manner specifically prescribed by the city.

(8)

If the city's tentative decision on a permit or approval does not include mitigation measures that were incorporated in a mitigated DNS for the proposal, the city should evaluate the threshold determination to assure consistency with WAC 197-11-340(3)(a) (withdrawal of DNS).

(9)

The city's written response under subsection (3) of this section shall not be construed as a determination of significance. In addition, preliminary discussion of clarifications or changes to a proposal, as opposed to a written request for early notice, shall not bind the city to consider the clarifications or changes in its threshold determination.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.150 Environmental impact statement.

This part contains the rules for preparing environmental impact statements. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented by this part:

WAC 197-11-400	Purpose of EIS.
WAC 197-11-402	General requirements.
WAC 197-11-405	EIS types.
WAC 197-11-406	EIS timing.
WAC 197-11-408	Scoping.
WAC 197-11-410	Expanded scoping (optional).
WAC 197-11-420	EIS preparation.
WAC 197-11-425	Style and size.
WAC 197-11-430	Format.
WAC 197-11-435	Cover letter or memo.
WAC 197-11-440	EIS contents.
WAC 197-11-442	Contents of EIS on nonproject proposals.
WAC 197-11-443	EIS contents when prior nonproject EIS.
WAC 197-11-444	Relationship of EIS to other considerations.
WAC 197-11-450	Cost-benefit analysis.
WAC 197-11-455	Issuance of DEIS.
WAC 197-11-460	Issuance of FEIS.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.160 Preparation of EIS – Additional considerations.

(1)

Preparation of draft and final EISs (DEIS and FEIS) and draft and final supplemental EISs (SEIS) is the responsibility of the director and/or the responsible official. Before the city issues an EIS, the responsible official shall be satisfied that it complies with this chapter and Chapter 197-11 WAC. Draft, final, and supplemental EIS costs shall be allocated as set forth in POMC § 20.160.270.

(2)

The DEIS and FEIS or draft and final SEIS shall be prepared by the city staff, the applicant, or by a consultant selected by the city. If the responsible official requires an EIS for a proposal and determines that someone other than the city will prepare the EIS, the responsible official shall notify the applicant immediately after completion of the threshold determination. The responsible official shall also notify the applicant of the city's procedure for EIS preparation, including approval of the DEIS and FEIS prior to distribution.

(3)

The city may require an applicant to provide information the city does not possess, including specific investigations. However, the applicant is not required to supply information that is not required under this chapter or that is being requested from another agency. However, this does not apply to information the city may request under another ordinance or statute.

(4)

Subject to delays caused by the applicant's failure to provide information requested by the city and other delays beyond the city's control, an EIS will be completed within one year of the date of the declaration of significance, unless an appeal is filed or the city and applicant agree in writing to a different estimated time period for completion of the EIS.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.170 Additional elements to be covered by EIS.

The following additional elements are part of the environment for the purpose of EIS content, but do not add to the criteria for threshold determinations or perform any other function or purpose under this chapter: economy; social policy analysis and cost-benefit analysis.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.180 Adoption by reference.

This part contains rules for consulting, commenting and responding on all environmental documents under SEPA, including rules for public notice and hearings. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented by this part:

WAC 197-11-500	Purpose of this part.
WAC 197-11-502	Inviting comment.
WAC 197-11-504	Availability and cost of environmental documents.
WAC 197-11-508	SEPA register.
WAC 197-11-510	Public notice.
WAC 197-11-535	Public hearings and meetings.
WAC 197-11-545	Effect of no comment.
WAC 197-11-550	Specificity of comments.
WAC 197-11-560	FEIS response to comments.
WAC 197-11-570	Consulted agency costs to assist lead agency.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.190 Public notice.

(1)

Whenever the city issues a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2) or a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3), the city shall give public notice as follows:

(a)

If public notice is required for a nonexempt license, the notice shall state whether a DS or DNS has been issued and when comments are due;

(b)

If no public notice is required for the permit or approval, the city shall give notice of the DNS or DS in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 20.25 POMC, except that for nonproject actions as defined in WAC 197-11-774, the city shall give notice of the DNS or DS in accordance with the requirements of WAC 197-11-510(1)(b) and (g).

(2)

When the city issues a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3), the city shall state the scoping procedure for the proposal in the DS as required in WAC 197-11-408 and in the public notice.

(3)

Whenever the city issues a DEIS under WAC 197-11-455(5) or a SEIS under WAC 197-11-620, notice of the availability of those documents shall be given by:

(a)

Indicating the availability of the DEIS in any public notice required for a nonexempt license; and in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 20.25 POMC.

(4)

Whenever possible, the city shall integrate the public notice required under this section with existing notice procedures for the city's nonexempt permit(s) or approval(s) required for the proposal.

(5)

The city may require an applicant to complete the public notice requirements for the applicant's proposal at their expense.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 033-20 § 13; Ord. 017-23 § 1 (Exh. A))

§ 20.160.200 Designation of official to perform consulted agency responsibilities for the city.

(1)

The responsible official shall be responsible for preparation of written comments for the city in response to a consultation required prior to a threshold determination, participation in scoping, and reviewing a DEIS.

(2)

The responsible official shall be responsible for the city's compliance with WAC 197-11-440 whenever the city is a consulted agency and is authorized to develop operating procedures that will ensure that responses to consultation requests are prepared in a timely fashion and include data from all appropriate departments of the city.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.210 Using existing environmental documents.

This part contains rules for using and supplementing existing environmental documents prepared under SEPA or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the city's own environmental compliance. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC 197-11-600	When to use existing environmental documents.
WAC 197-11-610	Use of NEPA documents.
WAC 197-11-620	Supplemental environmental impact statement – Procedures.
WAC 197-11-625	Addenda – Procedures.
WAC 197-11-630	Adoption – Procedures.
WAC 197-11-635	Incorporation by reference – Procedures.
WAC 197-11-640	Combining documents.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.220 SEPA and agency decisions.

This part contains rules (and policies) for SEPA's substantive authority, such as decisions to mitigate or reject proposals as a result of SEPA. This part also contains procedures for appealing SEPA determinations to agencies or the courts. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC 197-11-650	Purpose of this part.
WAC 197-11-655	Implementation.
WAC 197-11-660	Substantive authority and mitigation.
WAC 197-11-680	Appeals.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.230 Substantive authority.

(1)

The policies and goals set forth in this chapter are supplementary to those in the existing authorization of the city.

(2)

The city may attach conditions to a permit or approval for a proposal, so long as:

(a)

Such conditions are necessary to mitigate specific probable adverse environmental impacts identified in environmental documents prepared pursuant to this chapter; and

(b)

Such conditions are in writing; and

(c)

The mitigation measures included in such conditions are reasonable and capable of being accomplished; and

(d)

The city has considered whether other local, state, or federal mitigation measures applied to the proposal are sufficient to mitigate the identified impacts; and

(e)

Such conditions are based on one or more policies in subsection (4) of this section and cited in the license or other decision document.

(3)

The city may deny a permit or approval for a proposal on the basis of SEPA so long as:

(a)

A finding is made that approving the proposal would result in probable significant adverse environmental impacts that are identified in a FEIS or final SEIS prepared pursuant to this chapter; and

(b)

A finding is made that there are no reasonable mitigation measures capable of being accomplished that are sufficient to mitigate the identified impact; and

(c)

The denial is based on one or more policies identified in writing the decision document.

(4)

The city designates and adopts by reference the following policies as the basis for the city's exercise of authority pursuant to this section:

(a)

The city shall use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of state policy, to improve and coordinate plans, functions, programs, and resources to the end that the state and its citizens may:

(i)

Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations;

(ii)

Assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive and aesthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings;

(iii)

Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences;

(iv)

Preserve important historic, cultural and natural aspects of our national heritage;

(v)

Maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice;

(vi)

Achieve a balance between population and resource use which will permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of life's amenities; and

(vii)

Enhance the quality of renewable resources and approach the maximum attainable recycling of depletable resources.

(b)

The city recognizes that each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment and that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment.

(c)

The city adopts by reference the policies in the following city codes, ordinances, resolutions and plans, as they now exist or may hereafter be amended, as a possible basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority in the conditioning or denying of proposals:

(i)

Chapter 43.21C RCW, State Environmental Policy Act.

(ii)

Chapter 5.12 POMC, Business Licenses.

(iii)

POMC Title 6, Health and Sanitation.

(iv)

POMC Title 7, Animals.

(v)

POMC Title 9, Public Peace, Morals, and Safety.

(vi)

POMC Title 10, Vehicles and Traffic.

(vii)

POMC Title 12, Streets and Sidewalks.

(viii)

Chapter 13.04 POMC, Water and Sewers.

(ix)

POMC Title 15, Buildings and Structures.

(x)

Subtitle V of this title, Division of Land.

(xi)

Subtitle III of this title, Zoning Regulations.

(xii)

Subtitle II of this title, Permitting and Development Approval.

(xiii)

The city of Port Orchard comprehensive plan.

(xiv)

The city of Port Orchard shoreline master program.

(xv)

The city's six-year road program.

(xvi)

The city's comprehensive water plan.

(xvii)

The city's comprehensive sewer plan.

(xviii)

The city's comprehensive stormwater plan.

(xix)

Chapter 20.162 POMC, Critical Areas Regulations.

(xx)

City's public works standards.

(xxi)

City's stormwater management ordinance.

(xxii)

The city's comprehensive parks plan.

(d)

The city establishes the following additional policies:

(i)

Schools. In order to ensure that adequate school facilities are available to serve new growth and development, as well as to ensure that such new growth and development provides mitigation for direct impacts on school facilities identified by the school district as a consequence of proposed development, the city may impose school mitigation fees, all as provided in RCW 82.02.020.

(ii)

Police. In order to ensure that the city's acceptable level of service for police response is not diminished as a result of new growth and development and to ensure that new growth and development provides mitigation for the direct impacts on the city's police department that are identified by the city as a consequence of proposed development, the city may impose police and emergency response mitigation fees, all as provided in RCW 82.02.020.

(iii)

Other City Services. In order to ensure that the city's acceptable level of service to citizens for all other government services and utilities is not diminished as a result of new growth and development, the city may impose mitigation fees, all as provided in RCW 82.02.020 for parks and general governmental buildings.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.240 Appeals.

The city establishes the following administrative appeal procedures under RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-110- 680:

(1)

Appealable Decisions.

(a)

Only the following decisions may be administratively appealed under this chapter: (i) final threshold determination; (ii) mitigation or failure to mitigate in the SEPA decision; (iii) final EIS; and (iv) project denials.

(b)

If the city does not provide for a hearing or appeal on the underlying action/permit, then the SEPA administrative appeal on the decisions listed in subsection (1)(a) of this section shall be the only hearing and appeal allowed on the underlying action/permit.

(2)

Notice of Decision.

(a)

In the notice of decision issued by the city pursuant to Chapter 20.24 POMC and for every decision for which an appeal is available in this section, the SEPA responsible official shall give official notice of the date and place for commencing an appeal. The notice shall include:

(i)

Notice that the SEPA issues must be appealed within the time limit set by statute or ordinance for appealing the underlying governmental action;

(ii)

The time limit for commencing the appeal of the underlying governmental action and SEPA issues, and the statute or ordinance establishing the time limit;

(iii)

Where the appeal may be filed.

(b)

Written notice shall be provided to the applicant, all parties to any administrative appeal and all persons who have requested notice of decisions concerning the project. Such notice may be appended to the permit, the decision documents, the SEPA compliance documents or may be printed separately.

(3)

Timing of Appeal. The appeal shall take place prior to the city's final decision on a proposed action. However, the SEPA open record appeal hearing may be consolidated with any other hearing on the underlying permit or action.

(4)

Number of Appeals. Only one administrative appeal to the city is allowed of the decisions listed in subsection (1) of this section.

(5)

Consolidated Appeals. If the underlying action/permit requires a hearing, any SEPA appeal shall be consolidated with the hearing or appeal of the underlying action/permit into one simultaneous hearing, with the exception of the following:

(a)

An appeal of a determination of significance (DS);

(b)

An appeal of a procedural determination made by the city when the city is a project proponent, or is funding a project, and chooses to conduct its review under SEPA, including any appeals of its procedural determinations, prior to submitting an application for a project permit. Subsequent appeals of substantive determinations by an agency with jurisdiction over the proposed project shall be allowed under the SEPA appeal procedures of the agency with jurisdiction;

(c)

An appeal of a procedural determination made by the city on a nonproject action; and

(d)

An appeal to the city council under RCW 43.21C.060.

(6)

Timing of Appeal.

(a)

SEPA Decision Issues at the Same Time as Underlying Action. An appeal of a SEPA decision that issued at the same time as the decision on a project action shall be filed within 14 days after issuance of a notice of decision under Chapter 20.24 POMC (or RCW 36.70B.130), or after notice that a decision has been made and is appealable.

(b)

SEPA Decision Allows Public Comment. For a DNS or MDNS for which public comment is required (under this chapter) the appeal period shall be extended for an additional seven days.

(c)

SEPA Threshold Decision Issues Prior to Decision on Underlying Action. An appeal of a threshold decision issued prior to a decision on a project action shall be filed within 14 days after notice that the decision has been made and is appealable.

(7)

Consideration of SEPA Responsible Official's Decision. Procedural determinations made by the SEPA responsible official shall be entitled to substantial weight by the hearing examiner or city council in an appeal.

(8)

Administrative Record. An administrative record of the appeal must be provided, and the record shall consist of the following:

(a)

Findings and conclusions;

(b)

Testimony under oath; and

(c)

A taped or written transcript. The city may require that the appellant provide an electronic transcript.

(9)

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies. The city's administrative appeal procedure must be used before anyone may initiate judicial review of any SEPA issue for which the city allows an appeal in this section.

(10)

Content of Appeal. Every appeal must be in writing, and must include the following:

(a)

The applicable appeal fee, as established by resolution of the city council;

(b)

Appellant's name, address and phone number;

(c)

A statement describing the appellant's standing, or why the appellant believes that they are aggrieved by the decision appealed from;

(d)

Identification of the application and decision which is the subject of the appeal;

(e)

Appellant's statement of grounds for appeal and the facts upon which the appeal is based with specific references to the facts in the record;

(f)

The specific relief sought;

(g)

A statement that the appellant has read the appeal and believes the content to be true, followed by the appellant's signature.

(11)

Timeliness of Appeals. On receipt of a written notice of appeal, the SEPA responsible official shall forward the appeal to the hearing examiner or city council (whichever is the hearing officer/body on the appeal), who shall determine whether the appeal is timely prior to the scheduling of any appeal hearing or consolidated open record hearing on an underlying project permit. A written decision will issue if the appeal is untimely and the appeal will not proceed.

(12)

Hearing Examiner Appeals.

(a)

Jurisdiction. All administrative appeals relating to project permit applications or any type of quasi-judicial or ministerial development applications that are not appealable to the city council (pursuant to Chapter 20.24 POMC) shall be heard by the hearing examiner.

(b)

Hearing. The hearing examiner shall hold an open record public hearing on the appeal, as provided in Chapter 20.24 POMC.

(c)

Date for Issuance of Decision. The hearing examiner shall issue a decision on the appeal within the time period set forth in Chapter 20.24 POMC, unless a longer period is agreed to in writing by the applicant and hearing examiner.

(d)

Appeals of Hearing Examiner's Decision. The hearing examiner's decision on the timeliness of an appeal within their jurisdiction, and any other appeals allowed under this subsection within their jurisdiction shall be the final decision of the city. The hearing examiner's decision shall state that any appeal of the final decision shall be filed in Kitsap County superior court (pursuant to Chapter 36.70C RCW), or the shorelines hearings board, if applicable.

(13)

City Council Appeals.

(a)

Jurisdiction. The city council shall hear all administrative appeals relating to legislative actions and applications. In addition, the city council shall hear appeals relating to any other applications that are appealable to the city council (pursuant to Chapter 20.24 POMC).

(b)

Hearing. For all legislative actions and applications, the city council shall hold an open record hearing (Chapter 20.24 POMC). For any SEPA appeals relating to applications for which the city council has jurisdiction, the city council shall hold an open record hearing (Chapter 20.24 POMC).

(c)

Record on Appeal. The evidence and testimony received by the council in a SEPA appeal shall be presented in an open record hearing.

(d)

Appeals of City Council's Decision. The city council's decision on the timeliness of an appeal within its jurisdiction and any other appeals allowed under this subsection within its jurisdiction shall be the final decision of the city. The city council's decision shall state that any appeal of the final decision may be filed in Kitsap County superior court within 21 days (if applicable) or within 60 days to the Growth Management Hearings Board, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.290(2).

(14)

Judicial Appeals.

(a)

When SEPA applies to a decision, any judicial appeal of that decision potentially involves both those issues pertaining to SEPA and those which do not. This section and RCW 43.21C.075 establish the time limits for raising SEPA issues, but existing statutes of limitation control the appeal of non-SEPA issues.

(b)

Appeals of the city's final decision shall be filed in superior court (or the Growth Management Hearings Board), but appellants must follow RCW 43.21C.075(6)(c), which provides that "judicial review under Chapter 43.21C RCW shall without exception be of the governmental action together with its accompanying environmental determinations," which contemplates a single lawsuit.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 017-23 § 1 (Exh. A))

§ 20.160.250 Notice.

The form of the notice shall be substantially in the form provided by WAC 197-11-990. The notice shall be published by the city clerk or county auditor, applicant or proponent, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.260 Agency compliance.

This part contains rules for agency compliance with SEPA, including rules for charging fees under the SEPA process, designating categorical exemptions that do not apply within critical areas, listing agencies with environmental expertise, selecting the lead agency and applying these rules to current agency activities. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC 197-11-900	Purpose of this part.
WAC 197-11-902	Agency SEPA policies.
WAC 197-11-916	Application to ongoing actions.
WAC 197-11-920	Agencies with environmental expertise.
WAC 197-11-922	Lead agency rules.
WAC 197-11-924	Determining the lead agency.
WAC 197-11-926	Lead agency for governmental proposals.
WAC 197-11-928	Lead agency for public and private proposals.
WAC 197-11-930	Lead agency for private projects with one agency with jurisdiction.
WAC 197-11-932	Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from more than one agency, when one of the agencies is a county/city.
WAC 197-11-934	Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from a local agency, not a county/city, and one or more state agencies.
WAC 197-11-936	Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from more than one state agency.
WAC 197-11-938	Lead agencies for specific proposals.
WAC 197-11-940	Transfer of lead agency status to a state agency.
WAC 197-11-942	Agreements on lead agency status.
WAC 197-11-944	Agreements on division of lead agency duties.
WAC 197-11-946	DOE resolution of lead agency disputes.
WAC 197-11-948	Assumption of lead agency status.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.270 Fees.

The city shall require the fees from the applicant for the following activities, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter:

(1)

Threshold Determination. For every environmental checklist, the city will review when it is lead agency, and the city shall collect a fee from the proponent of the proposal prior to undertaking the threshold determination. The time periods provided in this chapter shall not begin to run until payment of the fee.

(2)

Environmental Impact Statement.

(a)

When the city is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an EIS and the responsible official determines that the EIS shall be prepared by employees of the city, the city may charge and collect a reasonable fee from any applicant to cover the costs incurred by the city in preparing the EIS. The responsible official shall advise the applicant of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation; the applicant shall post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs.

(b)

The responsible official may determine that the city will contract directly with a consultant for preparation of an EIS or a portion of the EIS, for activities initiated by some person or entity other than the city and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. The city may require the applicant to post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs. Such consultants shall be selected after input from the applicant, after a call for proposals. The city shall have the final decision on the selection of the consultant.

(c)

If a proposal is modified so that an EIS is no longer required, the responsible official shall refund any fees collected under subsection (2)(a) or (b) of this section which remain after incurred costs are paid.

(3)

The city may collect a reasonable fee from an applicant to cover the cost of meeting the public notice requirements of this chapter relating to the applicant's proposal.

(4)

The city shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency.

(5)

The city may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under this chapter, and for mailing the document, in a manner provided by the city's resolution on public records disclosure.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.160.280 Adoption of forms by reference.

The city adopts the following forms and sections by reference:

WAC 197-11-960	Environmental checklist.
WAC 197-11-965	Adoption notice.
WAC 197-11-970	Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).
WAC 197-11-980	Determination of significance and scoping notice (DS).
WAC 197-11-985	Notice of assumption of lead agency status.
WAC 197-11-990	Notice of action.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.164.010 Shoreline master program. [1]

The Port Orchard shoreline master program is hereby adopted by reference.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 006-18; Ord. 010-18 § 32; Ord. 012-21 § 2 (Att. 1); Ord. 042-21 § 2 (Exh. 1, 3, 4))

[1]

Editor's Note: The Shoreline Master Program is included as an attachment to this title.

§ 20.172.010 Lock boxes – Required.

Any facility that uses, stores, handles, or manufactures reportable quantities of hazardous materials as defined by Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 300 and 355 (Extremely Hazardous Substances List and Threshold Planning Quantities; Emergency Planning and Release Notification Requirements) as now authorized or hereafter amended that apply to the facility shall provide approved "lock boxes" for storage of material safety data sheets (MSDSs).

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.172.020 Lock boxes – Specifications – Location.

The lock boxes shall be weathertight and marked with the letters MSDS in blue reflective material not less than two inches high with a one-half-inch stroke on a white background. The lock boxes shall be located outside the facility and on the address side of the building when possible.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.172.030 Lock boxes – Security.

The lock box shall be secured with a lock approved by the local fire authority.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.172.040 Lock boxes – Contents.

The lock box shall also contain a 24-hour contact list of facility personnel knowledgeable about safety procedures for such materials, and the location of emergency firefighting and spill control equipment on site.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.172.050 Lock boxes – Changes to contents.

The facility operator shall update documents within the lock box as changes are made.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.172.060 Enforcement.

The fire chief of the fire authority or their designee shall enforce this chapter.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 017-23 § 1 (Exh. A))

§ 20.172.070 Violation – Penalties.

Any person, business, company or corporation violating this chapter by failing to erect a lock box as required by POMC § 20.172.010 through § 20.172.050 shall be liable for a civil fine of $500.00.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1))

§ 20.162.010 Title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the city of Port Orchard's "critical areas ordinance" or "CAO."

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.012 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to implement the goals, policies, guidelines, and requirements of the city's comprehensive plan and the Washington State Growth Management Act to protect critical areas, the environment, human life, and property from harm and degradation in accordance with the Growth Management Act through the application of best available science, as determined according to WAC 365-195-900 through 365-195-925 and RCW 36.70A.172, and in consultation with state and federal agencies and other qualified professionals.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.014 Applicability.

No person, company, agency, or applicant shall alter a critical area or buffer except as consistent with the requirements of this Title.

Except as provided for otherwise herein, the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all persons and agencies, public or private, engaging in land uses, building, and/or development activity in the city of Port Orchard that requires city approval.

(1)

Critical Areas Review. All uses, activities, and development in critical areas and their buffers, whether on public or private property, shall comply with the requirements of this chapter. These regulations apply to all uses and activities within areas or adjacent areas designated as regulated critical areas and/or their buffers that are within 300 feet of a site unless identified as exempt in Section 20.162.036. Regulated uses and activities include, but are not limited to:

(a)

Removing, excavating, disturbing, or dredging soil, sand, gravel, minerals, organic matter, or materials of any kind;

(b)

Dumping, discharging, or filling with any material;

(c)

Draining, flooding, or disturbing the water level or water table;

(d)

Driving pilings or placing obstructions;

(e)

Constructing, demolishing, or altering the size of any structure or infrastructure that results in disturbance of a critical area or the addition of any impervious surface coverage to a site that results in disturbance of a critical area;

(f)

Destroying or altering vegetation through clearing, grading, harvesting, shading, or planting vegetation that would alter the character of a critical area;

(g)

Activities that result in significant changes in water temperature and physical or chemical characteristics of water sources, including quantity and pollutants; and

(h)

Any other activity that has a potential to adversely impact or alter a critical area or established buffer not otherwise exempt from the provisions of this chapter.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.016 Relationship to other regulations.

(1)

Nothing in this chapter in any way limits, or may be construed to limit, the authority of the city under any other applicable law, nor in any way decreases the responsibility of the applicant to comply with all other applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations.

(2)

These critical areas regulations shall apply as an overlay and in addition to land use, development, building, and other regulations adopted by the city.

(3)

When any provision of any other chapter of the POMC conflicts with this chapter or when the provisions of this chapter are in conflict, that provision which provides more protection to environmentally critical areas shall apply unless specifically provided otherwise in this chapter or unless such provision conflicts with federal or state laws or regulations.

(4)

Compliance with the provisions of this chapter does not constitute compliance with other federal, state, and local regulations and permit requirements that may be required. The applicant is responsible for complying with all requirements, apart from the regulations established in this chapter.

(5)

Where critical areas occur within the city's shoreline jurisdiction as established by the city's shoreline master program (Chapter 20.164 POMC), they are regulated under the regulations and provisions of the shoreline master program.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.018 Inventory provisions.

(1)

Not all critical areas in the City of Port Orchard are fully mapped. The approximate location and extent of mapped critical areas within the city are shown on the maps adopted as part of this chapter, and incorporated herein by this reference. These maps shall be used only as a general guide for the assistance of the department and the public; for a specific development or use proposal, the type, extent and boundaries shall be determined in the field by a qualified specialist or staff person according to the requirements of this chapter. In the event of a conflict between a critical area location shown on the city's maps and that of an on-site determination, the on-site determination shall apply.

(2)

Future Inventory Provisions. The city will review map inventory information of all critical areas as it becomes available or on an annual basis. Mapping will include critical areas that are identified through site-specific analysis by local, state and federal agencies, tribal governments, site-specific environmental reports and other sources.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.020 Administration.

(1)

The Community Development Director, or their authorized designee, shall administer and interpret the provisions of this chapter, except as otherwise specifically provided. The director shall determine whether building, development, platting, or alteration of vegetation, trees, or habitat is subject to this chapter. The director may also consult with other city departments and state and federal agencies as necessary to obtain additional technical and environmental review assistance. The director is authorized to adopt such administrative rules and regulations as are necessary and appropriate to implement the provisions of this chapter.

(2)

This chapter is to be administered with flexibility and attention to site-specific characteristics. It is not the intent of this chapter to make a parcel of property unusable by denying its owner reasonable economic use of the property nor to prevent the provision of public facilities and services necessary to support existing development.

(3)

The approvals granted under this chapter shall be valid for the same time period as the underlying permit (e.g., preliminary plat, building permit, etc.). If the underlying permit does not contain a specified expiration date, then approvals granted under this chapter shall be valid for a period of three years from the date of issue, unless a longer or shorter period is specified by the director or by a development agreement authorized by Chapter 36.70B RCW and consistent with POMC Chapter 20.26.

(4)

If an activity is subject to this chapter but is not subject to any established city permit or approval, the proponent shall obtain written authorization from the director prior to commencement to ensure compliance with this chapter. Such authorization shall be processed as a Type I land use decision pursuant to Chapter 20.22 POMC.

(5)

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.022 Critical areas review types.

This chapter establishes two distinct critical areas review processes that apply to activities regulated by this Title. Critical areas review shall be conducted in conjunction with the underlying permit application, except as described in subsection (1) of this section, and shall not constitute a permit action. The two review processes are as follows:

(1)

Critical Areas Review and Verification Unrelated to an Underlying Permit. An applicant may request verification of the presence, absence, or boundary of one or more wetlands or a fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas located on, or within 300 feet of, the subject property. This request may be submitted independent of a development activity application and is not subject to administrative appeal.

(a)

Submittal Requirements: Verification requests shall include all applicable critical area reports and supporting documentation, as required under Article VIII.

(b)

Validity: An approved critical area verification is valid for five (5) years from the date of issuance. Verification is limited to the delineation and/or boundary confirmation of critical areas. Wetland ratings and habitat assessments are not valid for the approved verification period.

(2)

Critical Areas Review and Verification Related to an Underlying Permit. For land disturbing activities and development activities within or adjacent to a critical area, a critical areas review shall be conducted to evaluate consistency with the standards and requirements of this Title. This review shall be performed in conjunction with an underlying permit application (such as a building permit, land disturbing activity permit, conditional use permit, etc.).

(a)

Submittal Requirements: The applicant shall submit applicable special reports and documentation, as defined in Article VIII, sufficient to evaluate compliance with all applicable critical areas regulations.

(b)

Review Process: The Department shall review the proposal in the context of the underlying permit application (e.g., Type I, II, or III) and issue a critical areas verification as part of the permit review. The verification shall confirm whether the proposed activity complies with the applicable provisions of this chapter and identify any required conditions of approval.

(c)

Integration with Permit Decision: The critical areas verification shall be incorporated into the decision on the underlying permit and shall not constitute a separate decision or permit action. Any objection to a critical areas verification shall be submitted and evaluated in accordance with the procedures applicable to the underlying permit application, as provided in POMC Chapter 20.22.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.024 Application requirements.

(1)

All applicants are encouraged to meet with the department prior to submitting an application subject to this title. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the city's zoning and applicable critical area requirements, to review any conceptual site plans prepared by the applicant and to identify potential impacts and mitigation measures. Such conference shall be for the convenience of the applicant and any recommendations shall not be binding on the applicant or the city.

(2)

Development may be prohibited in a proposed activity site based on criteria set forth in this chapter; the applicant should first determine whether this is the case before applying for permits from the department.

(3)

Application for development, reasonable use exceptions, or variances regulated by this chapter, or for review of special environmental reports, shall be made with the department by the property owner, lessee, contract purchaser, other person entitled to possession of the property, or by an authorized agent.

(4)

All site plan applications for development subject to this chapter shall include a site plan drawn to scale identifying locations of critical areas and any associated buffers, location of proposed structures and activities, including clearing and grading and general topographic information as required by the department. If the department determines that additional critical areas are found on the subject property, the applicant shall amend the site plan to identify the location of the critical area.

(5)

Critical areas review and application fees, established in the city's fee resolution, shall be paid at the time an application for a permit relating to a critical area or a special report review is filed.

(6)

Application Procedures for Regulated Uses and Activities. Any regulated use or activities containing a regulated critical area or its buffer, or within 300 feet of a critical area, shall provide the applicable special reports, as defined in Article VIII and required by the department, prior to any development authorization by the city. If an environmentally sensitive area is within 300 feet of the parcel but not on the parcel, every effort should be made to obtain the required information. These efforts may include, but are not limited to, visually assessing the feature from publicly accessible areas and utilizing available databases to obtain the required information to prepare any applicable special reports. The department may require additional reports or information to further identify potential impacts to any part of the environment which may include the following:

(a)

Erosion and sedimentation control measures and/or a stormwater or land disturbing activity permit as required by the city's stormwater management regulations.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.026 Application requirements – Mitigation sequencing.

(1)

Mitigation Sequencing. Applicants shall demonstrate that all reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to critical areas. When alteration to a critical area or modification to its buffer is proposed, such alteration shall be avoided, minimized, or compensated in the following order of preference:

(a)

Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;

(b)

Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps, such as project redesign, relocation, or timing, to avoid or reduce impacts;

(c)

Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project;

(d)

Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action;

(e)

Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and

(f)

Monitoring the impact and the compensation project and taking appropriate corrective measures when necessary. Monitoring shall occur for a minimum of five years, or until the department determines that the mitigation project has achieved success. Certain types of habitat communities require additional time for establishment and may require monitoring for 10 or more years depending on the site-specific circumstances and the scope of the mitigation project.

(2)

Mitigation measures may be required to address potential impacts that are identified through the sequencing listed above. Mitigation shall be consistent with the requirements of this chapter.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.028 General mitigation requirements.

Unless otherwise provided in this chapter, if alteration to a critical area or its buffer is unavoidable, all adverse impacts resulting from a development proposal or alteration shall be mitigated using the best available science so as to result in no net loss of critical area functions and values, as provided below.

(1)

In making a determination as to whether such a requirement will be imposed, and if so, the degree to which it would be required, the director shall consider the following:

(a)

The long-term and short-term effects of the action and the reversible or irreversible nature of the impairment to or loss of the critical area;

(b)

The location, size, and type of and benefit provided by the original and altered critical area;

(c)

The effect the proposed work may have upon any remaining critical area or associated aquatic systems;

(d)

The cost and likely success of the compensation measures in relation to the magnitude of the proposed project;

(e)

The observed or predicted trend with regard to the gains or losses of the specific type of critical area; and

(f)

The extent to which the applicant has demonstrated a good faith effort to incorporate measures to minimize and avoid impacts within the project.

(2)

Mitigation projects shall not result in adverse impacts to adjacent property owners.

(3)

Mitigation shall be in kind and on site, when possible, and sufficient to maintain the functions and values of the critical area.

(4)

Mitigation shall not be implemented until after permit approval of the director and shall be in accordance with all reports and representations made therein.

(5)

Mitigation Sequencing. When an alteration to a critical area or its buffer is proposed, an applicant shall sufficiently demonstrate mitigation sequencing as defined in POMC § 20.162.026.

(6)

Mitigation for Lost or Affected Functions. Compensatory mitigation shall address the functions affected by the proposed project or alteration to achieve functional equivalency or improvement and shall provide similar critical area or buffer functions as those lost, except when:

(a)

The lost critical area or buffer provides minimal functions as determined by a site-specific functional assessment, and the proposed compensatory mitigation action(s) will provide equal or greater functions or will provide functions shown to be limiting within a watershed through the appropriate analysis; or

(b)

Out of kind replacement of critical area type or functions will best meet watershed goals identified by the city.

(7)

Type and Location of Mitigation. Unless it is demonstrated that a higher level of ecological functioning would result from an alternative approach or required under Article III of this chapter, compensatory mitigation for ecological functions shall be either in kind and on site, or in kind and within the same subbasin, basin, watershed, or service area of a certified mitigation bank. Mitigation actions shall be conducted within the same sub-drainage basin and on the site of the alteration except when all of the following apply:

(a)

There are no reasonable on-site or in subdrainage basin opportunities (e.g., on-site options would require elimination of high functioning upland habitat), or on-site and in subdrainage basin opportunities do not have a high likelihood of success based on a determination of the natural capacity of the site to compensate for impacts. Considerations should include: anticipated mitigation ratios for the identified critical area(s), buffer conditions and proposed widths, available water to maintain anticipated hydrogeomorphic classes of wetlands, or streams when restored, proposed flood storage capacity, potential to mitigate riparian fish and wildlife impacts (such as connectivity);

(b)

Off-site mitigation has a greater likelihood of providing equal or improved critical area functions than the impacted critical area; and

(c)

Off-site locations shall be in the same sub-drainage basin unless established-watershed goals for water quality, flood storage or conveyance, habitat, or other functions have been established by the city and strongly justify location of mitigation at another site.

(8)

Mitigation Banks.

(a)

Credits from a mitigation bank may be approved for use as compensation for unavoidable impacts to critical areas when:

(i)

The bank is certified under state rules;

(ii)

The director determines that the mitigation bank provides appropriate compensation for the authorized impacts; and

(iii)

The proposed use of credits shall be consistent with terms and conditions of the bank's certification.

(b)

Replacement ratios for projects using bank credits shall be consistent with replacement ratios specified in the bank's certification.

(c)

Credits from a certified mitigation bank may be used to compensate for impacts located within the service area specified in the bank's certification. In some cases, the service area of the bank may include portions of more than one drainage basin for specific habitat functions.

(9)

In-Lieu Fee. Credits from an approved in-lieu fee program may be used when all of the following apply:

(a)

The approval authority determines that the use of the program would provide environmentally appropriate compensation for the proposed impacts;

(b)

The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and conditions of the approved in-lieu fee program instrument;

(c)

Projects using in-lieu fee credits shall have debits associated with the proposed impacts calculated by the applicant's qualified specialist using the credit assessment method specified in the approved instrument of the in-lieu fee program; and

(d)

The impacts are located within the service area specified in the approved in-lieu fee program instrument.

(10)

Timing of Compensatory Mitigation. It is preferred that compensation projects will be completed prior to activities that will disturb the on-site critical area. If not completed prior to disturbance, compensatory mitigation shall be completed immediately following the disturbance and prior to the issuance of final certificate of occupancy. Construction of mitigation projects shall be timed to reduce impacts to existing fisheries, wildlife, and flora. The director may authorize a one-time temporary delay in completing construction or installation of the compensatory mitigation when the applicant provides a written explanation from a qualified professional as to the rationale for the delay (i.e., seasonal planting requirements, fisheries window).

(11)

Critical Area and Buffer Enhancement as Mitigation. Impacts to critical area or buffer functions may be mitigated by enhancement of existing significantly degraded critical area or buffer, but should be used in conjunction with restoration and/or creation where possible. Applicants proposing to enhance critical areas or their buffers must include in a report how the enhancement will increase the functions of the degraded critical area or buffer and how this increase will adequately mitigate for the loss of critical area and function at the impact site. An enhancement proposal must also show whether any existing critical area functions will be reduced by the enhancement action.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.030 Application requirements – Review criteria.

(1)

Applications for any development proposal subject to the critical areas ordinance shall be reviewed by the director or designee for completeness and consistency with this chapter.

(2)

The director may withhold, condition, or deny land use, building, and/or development permits or activity approvals to ensure that the proposed action is consistent with this chapter. In evaluating a request for a development proposal regulated by this chapter, it shall be the responsibility of the director to determine the following:

(a)

The nature and type of critical area and the adequacy of any special reports required in applicable sections of this chapter;

(b)

Whether the development proposal is consistent with this chapter, by granting, denying, or conditioning projects;

(c)

Whether proposed alterations to critical areas are appropriate under the standards contained in this chapter, or whether it is necessary for the applicant to seek a variance or other exception; and

(d)

If the protection mechanisms and the mitigation and monitoring plans and bonding measures proposed by the applicant are sufficient to protect the public health, safety and welfare consistent with the purpose and regulations contained in this chapter, and if so, condition the permit or approval accordingly.

(3)

At every stage of the application process, the burden of demonstrating that any proposed development is consistent with this chapter is upon the applicant.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.032 Bonds.

Mitigation required pursuant to a development proposal must be completed prior to the City's granting of final approval of the development proposal. If the applicant demonstrates that seasonal requirements or other circumstances beyond its control prevent completion of the mitigation prior to final approval, the City may permit the applicant to post a performance bond or other security instrument in a form and amount deemed acceptable by the Director, which guarantees that all required mitigation measures will be completed no later than the time established by the department in accordance with this chapter.

(1)

All bonds and acceptable securities guaranteeing compliance with this chapter shall be set in the amount of 150 percent of the value of the project. The value of the project and subsequent bond shall be based on the engineer's estimate, subject to the City's approval, of the subject work.

(2)

Performance Bonds. Except for public agencies, applicants receiving a land use, development, or building permit or approval subject to the provisions of this chapter are required to post a cash performance bond or other acceptable security to guarantee compliance with this chapter prior to beginning any site work. The surety shall guarantee that work and materials used in construction are free from defects. All performance surety or bonds shall be reviewed and approved by the city attorney and recorded upon execution. The performance surety or bonds cannot be terminated or canceled without written approval. The director shall release the bond after documented proof that all structures and improvements have been shown to meet the requirements of this chapter and that a maintenance bond has been posted, if required.

(3)

Maintenance Bonds. Except for public agencies, an applicant shall be required to post a cash maintenance bond or other acceptable security guaranteeing that structures and improvements required by this chapter will perform satisfactorily for a minimum of three years after they have been constructed and approved. All bonds shall be on a form approved by the city attorney. Without written release, the bond cannot be canceled or terminated. The director shall release the bond after determination that the performance standards established for measuring the effectiveness and success of the project have been met.

(4)

Monitoring Bonds. For projects that require ongoing monitoring in accordance with this chapter, applicants shall provide a maintenance/monitoring bond or other security instrument in a form and amount determined sufficient by the Department to guarantee satisfactory workmanship, materials, and performance of structures and improvements allowed or required by this Title for a period up to ten (10) years, unless otherwise specified. The duration of maintenance/monitoring obligations, including financial guarantees, shall be established by the Director after consideration of the nature of the proposed mitigation and likelihood and expense of correcting mitigation failures.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.034 Notice to title.

The director shall require an applicant to file a "Critical Area and Buffer Notice to Title" on a form approved by the City with the Kitsap County Auditor for all properties included in land use and development proposals subject to the provisions of this chapter and containing critical areas and/or their buffers. Such notice shall be a covenant that runs with the land in perpetuity and include identification of the boundaries of the critical areas and/or their buffers and any permanent conditions imposed by the City. The covenant shall be recorded prior to the issuance of any permit or at the time a short plat, Unit Lot Subdivision, or final plat is recorded. This notice shall serve as an official notice to subsequent landowners that the landowner is responsible for complying with existing conditions for development or use as established by this chapter and any city, state, or federal permits or other approvals, and shall accept sole responsibility for any risk associated with the land's identified critical area.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.036 Exemptions.

(1)

An exemption means that an activity is fully exempt from critical areas review and not subject to the provisions of this chapter. An exemption from this chapter is not an endorsement to degrade a critical area; ignore risk from natural hazards; or otherwise limit the ability of the director to identify and abate such actions that may cause degradation to a critical area. All exempted activities shall use best management practices to the greatest possible extent to avoid potential impacts to critical areas. Any incidental damage to, or alteration of, a critical area or its buffer that is not a necessary and unavoidable outcome of the exempted activity shall be mitigated through restoration, rehabilitation and/or replacement at the responsible party's expense.

(2)

The proponent of the activity shall submit a written request for exemption to the director that describes the activity and states the exemption listed in this section that applies. The director shall review the request to verify that it complies with this chapter and approve or deny the exemption as a Type I administrative determination pursuant to Chapter 20.22 POMC.

(3)

The following land use, development, building activities, and associated uses shall be exempt:

(a)

Emergencies. Emergency activities are those activities necessary to prevent an immediate threat to public health, safety, or welfare, or that pose an immediate risk of damage to property and that require remedial or preventative action in a short time frame. The person or agency undertaking such action shall notify the city and the director shall determine if the action taken is within the scope of the emergency action allowed in this section. After the emergency, the person or agency shall fully restore and/or mitigate any impacts to the critical areas and buffers resulting from the action in accordance with an approved critical area report and mitigation plan.

(b)

Operation Maintenance or Repair. Operation maintenance or repair of existing structures not requiring permits or city approval, only if the activity does not further alter or increase the impact to critical areas or their buffers.

(c)

Passive Outdoor Activities. Recreation, education, and scientific research activities that do not degrade the critical area.

(d)

Forest Practices. Forest practices regulated and conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 76.09 RCW and forest practices regulations, WAC Title 222. When a proposed forest activity has been classified as a Class IV forest practice for a conversion of forest land to another use, or when a forest activity requiring a forest practices application is located within the city's corporate limits, it shall be subject to the regulations and provisions of this chapter.

(e)

Existing Infrastructure Maintenance and Repair. Maintenance, operation, or replacement of legally existing roads, utilities, infrastructure, and associated structures; provided that reconstruction of any such structures does not extend outside of any designated easement or right- of-way. Any existing infrastructure maintenance or repair that expands outside of the existing improved area is subject to the mitigation sequencing requirements of this chapter.

(f)

Activities Within an Improved Right-of-Way. Construction of new utility facilities, improvements, or upgrades to existing utility facilities that take place within existing improved rights-of-way or existing impervious surfaces that do not increase the amount of pollution-generating impervious surface.

(g)

Activities Within an Improved City Park. Construction of new utility facilities, improvements, or upgrades to existing utility facilities that take place within existing parks that do not increase the amount of pollution-generating impervious surface or substantially developed areas.

(h)

Activities within substantially developed public school facilities and grounds.

(i)

Maintenance of an existing golf course provided that work is not performed to expand the course, driving range boundary, or substantially developed areas.

(j)

Normal maintenance, and reconstruction of legally permitted structures; provided, that reconstruction may not extend beyond existing footprint.

(k)

Noxious and invasive species removal and maintenance, provided the following apply:

(i)

Undertaken by manual methods, including handheld mechanical tools and integrated pest management practices;

(ii)

Vegetation removed appears on the current Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board list and must be handled and disposed of in accordance with the best management practices appropriate for that species and approved by the City;

(iii)

Noxious and invasive vegetation removal and maintenance is limited to wetland buffers and riparian management zones only;

(iv)

An approved supplemental planting plan shall be implemented upon completion of any vegetation removal and shall be monitored according to the monitoring requirements outlined in this Chapter.

(l)

Removal of hazardous tree(s) can be completed under the following conditions:

(i)

Requires a qualified arborist or forester to evaluate the tree(s) and submit a request for hazardous tree removal;

(ii)

The request includes removal methods to avoid and minimize damage to adjacent trees and other vegetation;

(iii)

The request adequately demonstrates no adverse impacts will occur to the critical area or associated buffer and/or riparian management zone.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.038 Exceptions.

An exception means that an activity is subject to the provisions of this chapter and must undergo full critical areas review but may receive special consideration and relief from certain provisions of this chapter. Exceptions applications must address mitigation sequencing. The following are identified exceptions to the provisions of this chapter:

(1)

Public Agencies. Public agencies may make an application for exception to the director for construction of items such as new roads, utilities, infrastructure, buildings, and associated facilities. The application shall include critical area identification; a critical area report, including a mitigation plan if necessary; and any other related project documents such as environmental documents pursuant to SEPA, Chapter 43.21C RCW. The decision whether to grant the public agency utility exception from provisions of this chapter shall be processed as a Type II land use decision per Chapter 20.22 POMC pursuant to the following review criteria:

(a)

There is no other practical alternative to the proposed development with less impact on the critical areas; and

(b)

The application of this chapter would unreasonably restrict the ability to provide services to the public.

(c)

The application attempts to protect and mitigate impacts to the critical area functions and values consistent with best available science; and

(d)

The application is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards of this chapter.

(2)

Reasonable Use. An applicant may apply for a reasonable use exception if it can be demonstrated that application of this chapter would deny all reasonable use of the subject property. The application shall include critical areas identification; a critical areas report including a mitigation plan, if necessary; and any other related project documents such as environmental documents and special studies. The decision whether to grant the reasonable use exception shall be processed as a Type III land use decision per Chapter 20.22 POMC pursuant to the following review criteria:

(a)

The application of this chapter would deny all reasonable use of the property;

(b)

No other reasonable use of the property has less impact on the critical area;

(c)

Any alteration is the minimum necessary to allow for reasonable use of the property; and

(d)

The inability of the applicant to derive reasonable use of the property is not the result of actions by the applicant after the effective date of this chapter or its predecessor.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.040 Critical areas variances.

(1)

Except when application of this chapter would deny all reasonable use of the property, an applicant who seeks an exception from the standards and requirements of the CAO shall pursue relief by means of a critical areas variance as provided for in this section.

(2)

A variance in the application of the regulations, standards, or use prohibitions of this chapter to a particular property may be granted by the director when it can be shown that the application meets all of the following criteria:

(a)

Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, or topography, the strict application of this chapter is found to deprive subject property of rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity; provided, however, the fact that those surrounding properties have been developed under regulations in force prior to the adoption of this chapter shall not be the sole basis for the granting of a variance;

(b)

The special circumstances referred to in subsection (2)(a) of this section are not the result of the actions of the current or previous owner(s);

(c)

The granting of the variance will not result in substantial detrimental impacts to the critical area, public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and area in which the property is situated or contrary to the goals, policies and purpose of this chapter;

(d)

The granting of the variance is the minimum necessary to accommodate the permitted use;

(e)

No other practicable or reasonable alternative exists; and

(f)

Mitigation sequencing as defined in this chapter shall be demonstrated to show that all reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to critical areas.

(3)

A variance application under this chapter shall be processed as a Type III land use decision pursuant to Chapter 20.22 POMC.

(4)

Requests for variances shall include the requirements of Article VIII of this chapter regarding critical areas reports and habitat plans, as applicable to the proposed activity or use.

(5)

The department shall review variances based on the criteria and standards referenced in this chapter and the procedures in Subtitle II of this title, Permitting and Development Approval.

(6)

The applicant for a variance is responsible for complying with all state and federal regulations that may apply to the proposed activity, whether or not a variance for CAO requirements is granted by the city. State and federal permits will be required for certain activities in critical areas, including but not limited to in-water or wetland work. All other relevant city permit and regulatory requirements shall also be met for the proposed activity.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.042 Nonconforming – Existing structures.

Existing development within a property that contains a critical area which was lawfully constructed, approved or established prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, but which does not conform to present regulations or standards, may continue as follows:

(1)

Existing Structures. A legally established structure that has been made nonconforming due to the adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter may be remodeled or reconstructed so long as all of the following provisions are met:

(a)

The property owner shall adequately demonstrate that the remodel or reconstruction shall not increase existing nonconforming uses and/or structures, and introduce any new, or expand existing, impacts to a critical area unless such impacts are fully mitigated as required under POMC § 20.162.026; and

(b)

All other standards and requirements contained in the Port Orchard Municipal Code are met.

(2)

Where mitigation is required in subsection (1)(a) of this section, the applicant shall provide mitigation measures to reduce historic impacts on the critical area.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.044 Enforcement – Violation – Penalty.

(1)

Enforcement – Violation.

(a)

No activities, uses, and development shall be conducted without a permit or written approval as required herein and without full compliance with this chapter. All activities, uses, or development not allowed or conditionally approved as provided in this chapter shall be prohibited.

(b)

Any person, party, firm, corporation, or other legal entity convicted of violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be subject to enforcement consistent with the provisions of Chapter 2.64 POMC. Any activities, uses, and development carried out contrary to the provisions of this chapter shall constitute a public nuisance and may be enjoined as provided in the POMC or by the statutes of the state of Washington. The City may levy civil penalties against any person, party, firm, corporation, or other legal entity for violation of any of the provisions of this chapter, consistent with Chapter 2.64 POMC.

(c)

The director shall have authority to enforce this chapter, issue delineation verifications, permits, and violation notices, and process violations through the use of administrative orders, notices of violation, civil infractions, stop work orders, and/or civil and criminal actions as provided for in Title 20 POMC and Chapter 2.64 POMC, provided the code enforcement officer is delegated authority for enforcement authority as provided for in Chapter 2.64 POMC.

(d)

In the event of violation, the city shall have the authority to order and establish a scope and timeline for restoration, enhancement, or creation measures to compensate for the destroyed or degraded critical area. Where noticed by the director or designee, all activities, uses or development shall remain stopped until notice authorizing work to commence is issued by the director. The director is authorized to require remediation necessary to remediate the violations, including but not limited to the preparation and submission of the applicable special reports, as defined in Article VIII and required by the department, at the expense of the owner or violator and reviewed and approved by the city. The plan shall be prepared by a qualified professional using the best available science and shall describe how the actions proposed meet the minimum requirements described in this chapter. The director may at his or her sole discretion and at the owner or violator's expense, seek a third-party review and expert advice in determining the adequacy of the plan. Inadequate plans shall be returned to the owner or violator for revision and resubmittal, at the owner or violator's expense. If work is not completed on the timeline established by the City, the city may take further enforcement actions as set out in this Title.

(e)

The enforcement provisions of this chapter apply to all activities exempted under this chapter. The director's determination that a violation exists is not limited by determinations made by other city agencies or public agencies.

(f)

Failure to comply with an administrative order of the director under this chapter shall constitute a violation subject to enforcement pursuant to this Title and Chapter 2.64 POMC.

(2)

Penalties.

(a)

In addition to the penalties set forth in this Title and in Chapter 2.64 POMC, any violation of any provision of this chapter constitutes a public nuisance under Chapter 2.64 POMC for which a monetary penalty may be assessed and abatement and/or enforcement may be required as provided therein.

(b)

In addition to or as an alternative to any other penalty provided in this chapter or by law, any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor pursuant to Chapter 2.64 POMC. Each day, or a portion thereof, during which a violation occurs shall constitute a separate violation.

(3)

Imminent and Substantial Dangers. Notwithstanding any provisions of these regulations, the director may take immediate action to prevent an imminent and substantial danger to the public health, welfare, safety or the environment by the violation of any provision of this chapter.

(4)

Other Legal or Equitable Relief. Notwithstanding the existence or use of any other remedy, the director may seek legal or equitable relief to enjoin any acts or practices or abate any conditions which constitute or will constitute a violation of the provisions of the critical areas ordinance.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.046 Liability.

(1)

The City is not liable for any damage resulting from land use, building, or development activities within environmentally critical areas. Prior to issuance of any land use, building, and/or development permit or approval, the applicant may be required to enter into an agreement with the City, in a form acceptable to the city attorney, releasing and indemnifying the City from and for any damage or liability resulting from any development activity on the subject property that is related to the physical condition of the critical area. This agreement shall be recorded with the Kitsap County recorder's office at the applicant's expense and shall run with the property.

(2)

In addition to all other applicable requirements of the POMC, the City may also require the applicant to obtain insurance coverage for damage to City or private property and/or City liability related to any such development activity.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.048 Definitions.

All words used in this chapter shall have their common definition, as used in context, unless a specific definition is set forth herein. The definitions set forth in this chapter shall control, followed by definitions in Chapter 20.12 POMC, and then the common definition.

Activities.

For the purposes of the critical areas ordinance, "activities" is defined to include land disturbing activities, . . .

Adjacent.

For the purpose of the critical areas ordinance, "adjacent" is defined as the area within 300 feet of a critical area.

"Agricultural practices"

means activities related to vegetation and soil management, such as tilling of soil, control of weeds, control of plant diseases and insect pests, soil maintenance and fertilization as well as animal husbandry.

"Alteration"

means any human-induced action that changes the existing condition of a critical area. Alterations include but are not limited to grading; filling; grubbing; dredging; draining; channelizing; cutting; pruning; limbing or topping; clearing, relocating or removing vegetation, except noxious weeds identified by the Washington Department of Agriculture or the Kitsap County cooperative extension; applying herbicides or pesticides or any hazardous or toxic substance; discharging pollutants, excepting stormwater; grazing domestic animals; paving; construction; application of gravel; modifying for surface water management purposes; or any other human activity that changes the existing vegetation, hydrology, wildlife or wildlife habitat. Alteration does not include walking, passive recreation, fishing or other similar activities.

"Anadromous fish"

means fish whose life cycle includes time spent in both fresh and salt water.

"Aquaculture practices"

means the harvest, culture or farming of food fish, shellfish, or other aquatic plants and animals including fisheries enhancement and the mechanical harvesting of shellfish and hatchery culture.

"Aquifer recharge area"

means those areas overlying aquifer(s) where natural or artificial sources of water can move downward to an aquifer(s).

"Aquifer recharge"

means the process by which water is added to an aquifer. It may occur naturally by the percolation (infiltration) of surface water, precipitation, or snowmelt from the ground surface to a depth where the earth materials are saturated with water. The aquifer recharge can be augmented by "artificial" means through the addition of surface water (e.g., land application of wastewater or stormwater) or by the injection of water into the underground environment (e.g., drainfields and drywells).

"Aquifer susceptibility"

means the ability of the natural system to transmit contaminants to and through the groundwater system.

"Aquifer vulnerability"

means the likelihood that the natural system will transmit contaminants to and through a groundwater system, based on natural geological and hydrogeological characteristics and land use practices.

"Aquifer"

means a saturated body of rock, sand, gravel or other geologic material that is capable of storing, transmitting and yielding water to a well.

"Bank stabilization"

means lake or stream modification including vegetation enhancement, used for the purpose of retarding erosion, protecting channels, and retaining uplands.

"Bench (geologic)"

means a relatively flat and wide landform along a valley wall.

"Best available science"

means scientifically valid information in accordance with WAC 365-195-905, as now or hereafter amended, that is used to develop and implement critical areas policies or regulations.

"Best management practices"

means conservation practices (physical, structural and/or managerial) or systems of practices and management measures that:

(1)

Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by nutrients, pathogens, bacteria, toxic substances, pesticides, oil and grease, and sediment; and

(2)

Minimize adverse impacts to surface water and groundwater flow, circulation patterns, and to the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of critical areas.

"Bog"

means a low-nutrient, acidic wetland with organic soils and characteristic bog plants, as described in Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 14-06-29, Olympia, WA, October 2014).

Conversion Option Harvest Plan (COHP).

(This definition relates to types of forest practices.) "Conversion option harvest plan (COHP)" means a plan for landowners who want to harvest their land but wish to maintain the option for conversion pursuant to WAC 222-20-050. "Conversion" to a use other than commercial timber operation shall mean a bona fide conversion to an active use which is incompatible with timber growing.

"Candidate species (state listed)"

means species under review by the Department of Fish and Wildlife for possible listing as endangered, threatened or sensitive. A species will be considered for state candidate designation if sufficient scientific evidence suggests that its status may meet criteria defined for endangered, threatened, or sensitive in WAC 232-12-297.[1] Currently listed state threatened or state sensitive species may also be designated as a state candidate species if their status is in question. State candidate species will be managed by the Department of Fish and Wildlife, as needed, to ensure the long-term survival of populations in Washington. See the current WDFW Priority Habitats and Species list for Kitsap County for all listed and candidate species.

"City Council"

means the city council of the City of Port Orchard.

"City"

means the City of Port Orchard.

"Clearing"

means the destruction, disturbance or removal of vegetation by physical, mechanical, chemical or other means.

"Compensation"

means replacement of project-induced critical area (e.g., wetland) losses of acreage or functions, including, but not limited to, restoration, creation, or enhancement.

"Creation"

means actions performed to intentionally establish a critical area at a site where it did not formerly exist.

"Critical aquifer recharge areas"

means those land areas which contain hydrogeologic conditions which facilitate aquifer recharge and/or transmitting contaminants to an underlying aquifer.

"Critical area buffer"

means an area of protection around a critical area.

"Critical area protection easement"

means an agreement conveyed through a notice to title, or shown on the face of a plat or site plan, for the purpose of perpetual or long-term conservation.

"Critical areas ordinance" or "CAO"

means this chapter.

"Critical areas"

includes the following areas and ecosystems, as provided in RCW 36.70A.030: (a) wetlands; (b) areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water; (c) fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas; (d) frequently flooded areas; and (e) geologically hazardous areas. "Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas" does not include such artificial features or constructs as irrigation delivery systems, irrigation infrastructure, irrigation canals, or drainage ditches that lie within the boundaries of and are maintained by a port district or an irrigation district or company.

"Danger trees"

means any tree of any height, dead or alive, identified by a certified arborist that presents a hazard to the public because of rot, root stem or limb damage, lean or any other observable condition created by natural process or manmade activity.

Debris.

See "refuse."

"Development proposal site"

means, for purposes of the critical areas ordinance, the legal boundaries of the parcel or parcels of land on which an applicant has applied for authority from the City of Port Orchard to carry out a development proposal.

"Development"

means the subdivision or platting of land, a use consisting of the construction, reconstruction or exterior alteration of structures, or the construction or reconstruction of residential, commercial, industrial, public, or any other building, building space, or land.

"Draining (related to wetland)"

means any human activity that diverts or reduces wetland groundwater and/or surface water sources.

"Easement" or "critical area protection easement"

for purposes of this chapter means an agreement conveyed through a deed, or shown on the face of a plat or site plan for the purpose of perpetual or long-term conservation.

"Endangered species (state listed)"

means a species native to the state of Washington that is seriously threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range within the state. Endangered species are legally designated in WAC 232-12-014.[2]

"Erosion hazard areas"

means land characterized by any of the soil types identified by the Natural Resources Conservation Service as "highly erodible land." This designation pertains to water erosion and not wind erosion. These areas may not be highly erodible until or unless the soil is disturbed by activities such as clearing or grading.

"Excavation"

means removal of earth material.

"Existing and ongoing agriculture"

means those activities conducted within the last five years on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2) or defined as agricultural practices in this chapter. For example, the operation and maintenance of existing farm and stock ponds or drainage ditches, operation and maintenance of ditches, irrigation systems including irrigation laterals, canals, or irrigation drainage ditches, changes between agricultural activities, such as rotating crops or grasses used for grazing, and normal maintenance, repair, or operation of existing serviceable structures, facilities, or improved areas; provided, that alteration of the contour of wetlands or streams by leveling or filling other than that which results from normal cultivation or draining of wetlands shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities. Activities that bring an area into agricultural use shall not be considered part of an ongoing activity.

"Exotic"

means any species of plant or animal that is not indigenous (native) to an area.

"Extraordinary hardship"

means where the strict application of this chapter and/or other programs adopted to implement the critical areas ordinance by the regulatory authority would prevent all reasonable use of the parcel.

"Farm and agricultural conservation land"

means:

(1)

Land that was previously classified under RCW 84.34.020(2) ("Farm and agricultural land") that no longer meets the criteria of said subsection (2) and that is reclassified under RCW 84.34.020(1) ("Open space land"); or

(2)

Land that is traditional farmland that is not classified under Chapter 84.33 or 84.34 RCW that has not been irrevocably devoted to a use inconsistent with agricultural uses, and that has a high potential of returning to commercial agriculture.

"Farm pond"

means an open-water habitat of less than five acres and not contiguous with a stream, river, lake or marine water created from a non-wetland site in connection with agricultural activities.

"Filling" or "fill"

means a deposit of earth or other natural or manmade material placed by artificial means, including, but not limited to, soil materials, debris, or dredged sediments.

"Floodplain"

means the floodway and associated special flood hazard areas having the potential to flood once every 100 years, or having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year.

"Floodway"

means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot.

"Forage fish"

means anchovy, herring, sand lance and smelt.

"Frequently flooded areas"

means all City of Port Orchard lands, shorelands and waters which are within the 100-year floodplain (floodway) as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in flood insurance rate and boundary maps (FIRM).

"Geologic hazard areas"

means areas that, because of their susceptibility to erosion, sliding, earthquake, or other geological events, are not suited to siting commercial, residential or industrial development consistent with public health or safety concerns.

"Geologist"

means a person who is licensed in the state of Washington and meets all experience and training requirements in accordance with Chapter 308-15 WAC, as now or hereafter amended.

"Geotechnical report and geological report"

means a study of potential site development impacts related to retention of natural vegetation, soil characteristics, geology, drainage, groundwater discharge, and engineering recommendations relating to slope and structural stability. The geotechnical report shall be prepared by or in conjunction with a licensed geotechnical engineer meeting the minimum qualifications as defined by this chapter. Geological reports may contain the above information with the exception of engineering recommendations, and may be prepared by a geologist (see Article VIII of this chapter, Special Reports, for minimum qualifications).

"Habitat management plan"

means a report prepared by a professional wildlife biologist or fisheries biologist which discusses and evaluates critical fish and wildlife habitat functions and evaluates the measures necessary to maintain, enhance and improve habitat conservation on a proposed development site.

"Habitat of local importance"

"Habitat"

means the specific areas or environments in which a particular type of plant or animal lives. An organism's primary and secondary habitat provides all the basic requirements for life of the organism.

"Hazardous substance(s)"

means any liquid, solid, gas or sludge, including any materials, substance, product, commodity or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits any of the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste, including waste oil and petroleum products.

"Hazardous tree"

means a tree that poses a threat to life, property, or public safety.

"Hydric soils"

means a soil that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part.

"Hydrologist" or "hydrogeologist"

means a person who has a Bachelor of Science degree in geologic sciences with an emphasis in hydrogeology or related field from an accredited college or university and has a minimum of five years' experience in groundwater investigations, modeling and remediation.

"Hydrophytes"

means those plants capable of growing in water or on a substrate that is at least periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of excessive water content.

"Infiltration rate"

means a general description of how quickly or slowly water travels through a particular soil type.

"Investigation"

means work necessary for land use application submittals such as surveys, soil logs, percolation tests or other related activities.

"Landslide hazard areas"

means areas potentially subject to risk of mass movement due to a combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors.

"Liquefaction"

means a process in which a water-saturated soil, upon shaking, suddenly loses strength and behaves as a fluid (see Article III of this chapter, Wetlands).

"Lot"

means a fractional part of legally divided lands having fixed boundaries, being of sufficient area and dimension to meet minimum zoning requirements for width and area. The term shall include tracts or parcels. For purposes of this code, adjoining lots under common ownership, which were created without subdivision or short subdivision approval from applicable city or county governments, shall be considered as one lot and subject to the regulations contained herein. The terms of this section shall apply regardless of whether the individual adjoining lot meets current zoning requirements.

"Low impact activities"

means activities that do not require a development permit and/or do not result in any alteration of hydrology or adversely impact the environment.

"Major new development"

means any new development, as defined below, within or within 300 feet of a critical area:

(1)

Subdivisions of land;

(2)

Clearing, grading or filling one acre or greater in area;

(3)

Any new commercial development in excess of 750 square feet in area authorized in the City of Port Orchard Unified Development Code;

(4)

Development requiring conditional use or special use permits required under the City of Port Orchard Unified Development Code;

(5)

Planned residential developments authorized under the City of Port Orchard Unified Development Code;

(6)

Any structure footprint in excess of 4,000 square feet in area, except for single-family residences;

(7)

Any residential development except as exempted in POMC § 20.162.036.

"Minor new development"

means any new development, as defined below, within or within 300 feet of a critical area:

(1)

Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or the elements;

(2)

Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements;

(3)

Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities, construction of an agricultural building less than 3,000 square feet in size used exclusively for agricultural activities and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures including but not limited to head gates, pumping facilities and irrigation channels; provided, that a feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a commercial nature, alteration of the contour of wetlands or streams by leveling or filling other than that which results from normal cultivation shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities;

(4)

Construction of one single-family residence and normal appurtenances necessarily connected to the use and enjoyment of a single-family residence and may include a garage; deck; driveway; utilities; fences; grading less than one acre in area; and home occupations pursuant to the City of Port Orchard Unified Development Code, as now or hereafter amended;

(5)

Construction of a dock, designed for pleasure craft only, for the private noncommercial use of the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence;

(6)

Operation and maintenance of any system of dikes, ditches, drains, or other facilities which legally existed prior to the date of adoption of the critical areas ordinance, and which were created, developed, or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system;

(7)

Development authorized by POMC § 20.162.036, Exemptions, and/or by POMC § 20.162.042, Nonconforming – Existing structures.

"Mitigation"

means avoiding, minimizing or compensating for adverse critical area impacts. Mitigation includes the following specific categories:

(1)

Mitigation, compensatory: replacing project-induced critical area losses or impacts, including, but not limited to, restoration, creation, or enhancement.

(2)

Mitigation, creation: mitigation performed to intentionally establish a critical area (e.g., wetland) at a site where it does not currently exist.

(3)

Mitigation, enhancement: mitigation performed to improve the condition of existing degraded critical areas (e.g., wetlands) so that the functions they provide are of a higher quality.

(4)

Mitigation, restoration: mitigation performed to reestablish a critical area (e.g., wetland), or its functional characteristics and processes, which have been lost by alterations, activities or catastrophic events within an area which no longer meets the definition of a critical area.

All mitigation shall be consistent with POMC § 20.162.026.

"Native vegetation"

means vegetation indigenous to the Puget Sound coastal lowlands.

"Nonconforming use or structure"

means a use of land or structure which was lawfully established or built and which has been lawfully continued but which does not conform to the current regulations of the zone in which it is located as established by the City of Port Orchard Unified Development Code relating to repair of damaged structures, this chapter, or amendments thereto.

"Normal maintenance"

includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse or cessation from a lawfully established condition. Normal maintenance includes removing debris from and cutting or manual removal of vegetation in crossing and bridge areas. Normal maintenance does not include:

(1)

Use of fertilizer or pesticide application in wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, or their buffers;

(2)

Redigging ditches in wetlands or their buffers to expand the depth and width beyond the original ditch dimensions;

(3)

Redigging existing drainage ditches in order to drain wetlands on lands not classified as existing and ongoing agriculture under POMC 20.162.036, Exemptions.

"Open space"

is land used for outdoor recreation, critical area or resource land protection, amenity, safety or buffer, including structures incidental to these open space uses, but excluding yards required by this chapter and land occupied by dwellings or impervious surfaces not related to the open space uses.

"Ordinary high water mark"

means that mark that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the department; provided, that in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water.

"Organic debris"

includes, but is not limited to, stumps, logs, branches, leaves and other organic materials.

"Out-of-kind compensation"

means to replace a critical area (e.g., wetland) with a substitute critical area (e.g., wetland) whose characteristics do not closely approximate those destroyed or degraded by a regulated activity. It does not refer to replacement "out-of-category," such as replacement of wetland loss with new stream segments.

"Park"

means a site designed or developed for recreational use by the public, including but not limited to: indoor facilities, such as gymnasiums, swimming pools, or activity centers; and outdoor facilities, such as playfields, swimming pools, courts, playgrounds, fishing and boating access areas, or picnicking and other group activity areas, and areas and trails for hikers, equestrians, or bicyclists. Also see POMC §§ 20.39.315 and 20.39.340.

"Permit"

means any development, variance, conditional use permit, or revision authorized under Chapter 90.58 RCW or city regulations.

"Piped stream"

means those sections of streams as defined in this chapter that have been legally piped during past land use activities. Piped streams do not include those sections of piped infrastructure that conveys water from irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water runoff devices or other artificial watercourses unless they are used by fish or used to convey streams naturally occurring prior to construction.

"Planned residential development (PRD)"

means development specifically approved by the City and characterized by comprehensive planning of the total project, though it may contain a variety of individual lots and/or uses. This type of project may include clustering of structures and preservation of open space with a number of flexible and customized design features specific to the natural features of the property and the uses sought to be implemented. Specific lot area and setback requirements are reduced or deleted in order to allow maximization of open space, critical areas and other components of the project.

"Practicable alternative"

means an alternative that is available and capable of being carried out after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes, and having less impacts to critical areas. It may include an area not owned by the applicant, which could reasonably have been or be obtained, utilized, expanded, or managed in order to fulfill the basic purpose of the proposed activity.

"Priority habitat"

means a seasonal range or habitat element with which a given species has a primary association, and which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will maintain and reproduce over the long term. These might include areas of high relative density or species richness; breeding, nesting, feeding, foraging, and migratory habitat; winter range, movement corridors; and/or habitats that are of limited availability or high vulnerability to alteration. Priority habitats are established by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife within their priority habitats and species database. Where possible, priority habitats and other wetland and fish and wildlife habitat areas should be connected with wildlife corridors. Priority habitats shall be confirmed by a qualified biologist in a special report in accordance with Article VIII of this chapter.

"Priority species"

include those which are state listed endangered, threatened, sensitive, candidate and monitored species as well as priority game and nongame species. Priority species are established, in part, by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife within their priority habitats and species database.

"Public facilities"

means facilities which are owned, operated and maintained by a public agency.

"Public project of significant importance"

means a project funded by a public agency, department or jurisdiction which is found to be in the best interests of the citizens of the city of Port Orchard and is so declared by the Port Orchard city council.

"Public utility"

means a business or service, either governmental or having appropriate approval from the state, which is engaged in regularly supplying the public with some commodity or service which is of public consequence and need, such as electricity, gas, sewer and/or wastewater, water, transportation or communications.

"Ravine"

means a v-shaped landform generally having little to no floodplain and normally containing steep slopes, which is deeper than 10 vertical feet as measured from the centerline of the ravine to the top of the slope. Ravines are typically created by the wearing action of streams.

"Reasonable alternative"

means an activity that could feasibly attain or approximate a proposal's objectives, but at a lower environmental cost or decreased level of environmental degradation.

Reasonable Use.

A property is deprived of all "reasonable use" when the owner can realize no reasonable return on the property or make any productive use of the property. "Reasonable return" does not mean a reduction in value of the land, or a lack of a profit on the purchase and sale of the property, but rather, where there can be no beneficial use of the property; and which is attributable to the implementation of the critical areas ordinance.

"Reasonable use exception"

means the process by which the city determines allowable use of a property which cannot conform to the requirements set forth in this chapter, including the variance criteria. See POMC § 20.162.038 for reasonable use exception procedures.

"Refuse"

means material placed in a critical area or its buffer without permission from any legal authority. Refuse includes, but is not limited to, stumps, wood and other organic debris, as well as tires, automobiles, construction and household refuse. This does not include large woody debris used with an approved enhancement plan.

"Regulated use or activity"

means any development proposal which includes or directly affects a critical area or its buffer or occurs within 300 feet of a critical area.

"Rehabilitation"

means the manipulation of the physical, chemical or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of repairing natural or historical functions and processes of a degraded wetland. Activities could involve breaching a dike to reconnect wetlands to a floodplain, restoring tidal influence to a wetland, or breaking drain tiles and plugging drainage ditches.

"Restoration"

means the return of a critical area (e.g., stream or wetland) to a state in which its functions and values approach its unaltered state as closely as possible.

"Right-of-way" or "ROW"

means a strip of land platted, dedicated, condemned or established by prescription, or otherwise legally established, for the use of pedestrians, vehicles or utilities.

"Riparian management zone"

means the designated buffer area contiguous or adjacent to a stream that is required for the continued maintenance, function, and structural stability of the stream. Functions of the buffer include shading, uptake of nutrients, stabilization of banks, protection from intrusion, large wood delivery, pollution removal, or maintenance of wildlife. These generally occur adjacent to water bodies where specific measures are needed to protect fish and wildlife habitat needs and watershed functions.

"Salmonid"

means a member of the fish family Salmonidae. This family includes chinook, coho, chum, sockeye and pink salmon; rainbow, steelhead, cutthroat, brook and brown trout; and Dolly Varden char, kokanee, and whitefish.

"Sensitive species (state listed)"

means a species, native to the state of Washington, that is vulnerable or declining and is likely to become endangered or threatened in a significant portion of its range within the state without cooperative management or the removal of threats. Sensitive species are legally designated in WAC 232-12-011.[3]

"Single-family dwelling"

means a building or structure which is intended or designed to be used, rented, leased, let or hired out to be occupied for living purposes by one family and including accessory structures and improvements.

"Special flood hazard areas"

means the area adjoining the floodway which is subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any year, as determined by engineering studies acceptable to the city of Port Orchard. The coastal high hazard areas are included within special flood hazard areas.

"Species of concern"

means species that have been classified as endangered, threatened, sensitive, candidate, or monitored by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife.

"State Environmental Policy Act" or "SEPA"

means the state environmental law (Chapter 43.21C RCW) and rules (Chapter 197-11 WAC) as implemented by the city of Port Orchard.

"Streams"

means those areas in the City of Port Orchard where the surface water flow is sufficient to produce a defined channel or bed. A defined channel or bed is an area which demonstrates clear evidence of the passage of water and includes but is not limited to bedrock channels, gravel beds, sand and silt beds and defined channel swales. The channel or bed need not contain water year-round. This definition is not meant to include irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water runoff devices or other artificial watercourses unless they are used by fish or used to convey streams naturally occurring prior to construction.

"Susceptibility (groundwater)"

means the potential an aquifer has for groundwater contamination, based on factors which include but are not limited to depth of aquifer, soil permeability, topography, hydraulic gradient and conductivity, and precipitation.

"Swale"

means a shallow drainage conveyance with relatively gentle side slopes, generally with flow depths less than one foot.

"Threatened species (state listed)"

means a species, native to the state of Washington, that is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future throughout a significant portion of its range within the state without cooperative management or the removal of threats. Threatened species are legally designated in WAC 232-12-011.[4]

"Toe of slope"

means a distinct topographic break in a slope. Where no distinct break exists, this point shall be the lowermost limit of the landslide hazard area as defined and classified in this section.

"Top of slope"

means a distinct topographic break in a slope. Where no distinct break in a slope exists, this point shall be the uppermost limit of the geologically hazardous area as defined and classified in this section.

"Unavoidable and necessary impacts"

means impacts to a critical area that remain after an applicant proposing to alter such an area has demonstrated that no alternative exists for the proposed project.

"Utilities"

means facilities and/or structures which produce or carry electric power, gas, sewage, water, communications, oil, publicly maintained stormwater facilities, etc.

"Utility corridor"

means areas identified in the comprehensive plan for utility lines, including electric, gas, sewer, water lines; and public right-of-way and other dedicated utility right-of-way on which one or more utility lines are currently located. The term "other dedicated utility right-of-way" means ownership, easements, permits, licenses or other authorizations affording utilities the right to operate and maintain utility facilities on private property.

"Vulnerability (groundwater)"

means the likelihood that an aquifer could be contaminated, based on both susceptibility and land use. High vulnerability generally means an aquifer, which has high susceptibility to contamination, and is located in a land use area conducive to contamination, such as industrial or residential. High vulnerability includes high potential areas for overdrafting and/or saltwater intrusion.

"Wetland determination"

means an on-site determination as to whether a wetland exists on a specific parcel, conditioned by either a wetland specialist as defined in this Chapter, or the department. A wetland determination does not require a formal delineation.

"Wetland edge"

means the line delineating the outer edge of a wetland established in Article III of this chapter.

"Wetland"

means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, estuaries, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands.

"Wetlands of regional significance"

means those regulated wetlands determined by the department, or otherwise determined by the State or another governing body with jurisdiction, to have characteristics of exceptional resource value which should be afforded the highest levels of protection.

"Wetlands report"

means a wetland delineation, characterization, rating and analysis of potential impacts to wetlands consistent with applicable provisions of Article III of this chapter.

"Wetlands specialist"

means a person who has earned a bachelor's degree in biological sciences with specific course work concerning the functions and values of wetlands from an accredited college or university with a minimum of two years of related work experience; or a qualified consultant or professional person who has equivalent education and training or with equivalent experience acceptable to the department.

"Wetlands, isolated"

means a wetland that is based on its geographic isolation, ecological isolation, or hydrologic isolation. Isolated wetlands are defined by a very specific type of hydrologic isolation – they do not have a surface outlet by which water leaves the wetland, even seasonally, to another water body. Isolated wetlands can also be sloped wetlands where surface water, if present, reenters the shallow groundwater zone at the base of the wetland and is not linked via surface flows to a downstream water body. Any project involving filling or altering a wetland that meets this definition of isolated wetland is subject to regulation by the State Department of Ecology under the Water Pollution Control Act (Chapter 90.48 RCW), in addition to the provisions in this chapter. An isolated wetland may also be regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act. Dredge or fill of a federally regulated wetland is regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act and altering a federally regulated wetland may require federal review.

"Wetpond"

means an artificial water body constructed as a part of a surface water management system.

"Wildlife biologist"

means a person who has earned a minimum of a bachelor's degree in wildlife biology or related field of study and has a minimum of five years of field experience in wildlife biology and habitat evaluation.

"Wildlife corridor"

means a relatively undisturbed, vegetated corridor at least 100 feet wide, protected through a conservation easement or other legal instrument, that connects a protected wetland or fish and wildlife habitat area with a priority habitat as defined in this section.

"Wildlife nesting structure"

means a structure erected for the sole purpose of providing a wildlife nesting site.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

[1]

Editor's Note: WAC 232-12-297 was amended and decodified by WSR 17-05-112 (Order 17-04), filed 2/15/17, effective 3/18/17. See now WAC 220-610-110.

[2]

Editor's Note: WAC 232-12-014 was decodified by WSR 17-05-112 (Order 17-04), filed 2/15/17, effective 3/18/17. See now WAC 220-610-010.

[3]

Editor's Note: WAC 232-12-011 was decodified by WSR 17-05-112 (Order 17-04), filed 2/15/17, effective 3/18/17. See now WAC 220-200-100.

[4]

Editor's Note: WAC 232-12-011 was decodified by WSR 17-05-112 (Order 17-04), filed 2/15/17, effective 3/18/17. See now WAC 220-200-100.

§ 20.162.050 Purpose.

This article applies to all regulated uses within or adjacent to areas designated as wetlands, as categorized below. The intent of this article is to:

(1)

Achieve no net loss and increase the quality and function of wetland acreage, functions and values within the city;

(2)

Provide mitigation measures where necessary, as conditions of permits, that have a reasonable expectation of success;

(3)

Protect valued public resources that could arise from improper wetland uses and activities;

(4)

Preserve natural flood control, stormwater storage and drainage or wetland hydrology patterns; and

(5)

Prevent turbidity and pollution of wetlands, and fish or shellfish bearing waters to maintain the wildlife habitat.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.052 Determination of wetland boundaries.

(1)

The determination of the wetland edge or boundary shall be done in accordance with the delineation methodology specified in the approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplements. All areas within the city meeting the wetland designation criteria as determined by that procedure are designated as critical areas and are subject to the provisions and regulations of this chapter. Wetland delineations are valid for five years.

(2)

The applicant shall be responsible for hiring a qualified wetland specialist to determine the wetland boundaries through a field survey. This specialist shall stake or flag the wetland boundary. For all new development, as required by the department, this line shall be surveyed by a professional land surveyor licensed in the state of Washington. The regulated wetland boundary and regulated wetland buffer shall be identified on all grading, landscaping, site, on-site septic system designs (BSAs), utility or other development plans submitted in support of the project.

(3)

Where the applicant has provided a delineation of a wetland boundary, the department or its consultant may verify the wetland boundary at the cost of the applicant and may request that adjustments to the boundary be made by a wetland specialist.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.054 Wetland categories.

The City uses the Department of Ecology's Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update-Version 2 (Ecology Publication No. 23-06-009), or as amended hereafter to categorize wetlands for the purposes of establishing wetland buffer widths, wetland uses and replacement ratios for wetlands. This system consists of four wetland categories (see Article XIII of this chapter, Attachment A, for wetland categories).

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.056 Exempt wetlands.

(1)

All wetlands within the City meeting the definition in POMC § 20.162.048 are regulated. The following wetlands may be exempt from the avoidance and minimization requirements of mitigation sequencing, and they may be filled if the impacts are fully mitigated based on the requirements of this chapter. If available, impacts should be mitigated through the purchase of credits from an in-lieu fee program or mitigation bank, consistent with the terms and conditions of the program or bank.

The following wetlands meeting the criteria defined below may be exempt from the standard wetland buffer requirements defined in this chapter. A building or impervious surface setback of 15 feet is required from the edge of any wetland meeting the criteria defined below.

In order to verify the following conditions, a critical area report for wetlands meeting the requirements of this chapter must be submitted.

(a)

All isolated Category IV wetlands less than 4,000 square feet that:

(i)

Are not associated with riparian areas or their buffers.

(ii)

Are not associated with shorelines of the state or their associated buffers.

(iii)

Are not part of a wetland mosaic.

(iv)

Do not score five or more points for habitat function based on the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update-Version 2 (Ecology Publication No. 23-06-009, or as revised as approved by Ecology).

(v)

Do not contain a priority habitat or a priority area for a priority species identified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, do not contain federally listed species or their critical habitat, or species of local importance.

(b)

Wetlands less than 1,000 square feet that meet the above criteria and do not contain federally listed species or their critical habitat are exempt from the buffer provisions contained in this chapter.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.058 Wetland development standards.

For the purpose of the provisions of the critical areas ordinance, a regulated wetland and its buffer is a critical area.

(1)

Unless specifically exempt under POMC § 20.162.036, all regulated uses and activities in a wetland and/or its buffer shall be regulated pursuant to the requirements of this chapter.

(2)

Wetland Buffers. The buffer shall be measured perpendicular from the wetland edge as delineated and marked using the approved federal delineation manual and applicable regional supplement. Buffers shall consist of native vegetation adequate to provide the necessary protection. Where required and conditioned as part of permit approval, the City may require those buffer areas that do not contain a well-vegetated native plant community to be enhanced.

(3)

Buffer Widths. All regulated wetlands shall be surrounded by a buffer zone as follows based on the category of wetland and the habitat score as determined by a qualified wetland professional using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update-Version 2 (Ecology Publication No. 23-06-009 or as amended):

(a)

For wetlands that score six points or more for habitat function, the buffers in Table 1 can be used if both of the following criteria are met:

(i)

A relatively undisturbed, vegetated corridor at least 100 feet wide is protected between the wetland and any other priority habitats as defined by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. The corridor must be protected for the entire distance between the wetland and the priority habitat by some type of legal protection such as a conservation easement. Presence or absence of a nearby habitat must be confirmed by a qualified biologist. If no option for providing a corridor is available, Table 1 may be used with the required measures in Table 2 alone.

(ii)

The measures in Table 2 are implemented, where applicable, to minimize the impacts of the adjacent land uses.

(b)

For wetlands that score three to five habitat points, only the measures in Table 2 are required for the use of Table 1.

(c)

If an applicant chooses not to apply the mitigation measures in Table 2, or is unable to provide a protected corridor where available, then Table 3 must be used.

(d)

The buffer widths in Table 1 and Table 3 assume that the buffer is vegetated with a native plant community appropriate for the ecoregion. If the existing buffer is unvegetated, sparsely vegetated, or vegetated with invasive species that do not perform needed functions, the buffer should either be planted to create the appropriate plant community or the buffer should be widened to ensure that adequate functions of the buffer are provided.

(e)

Reduced buffer widths associated with Table 1 shall not be used in conjunction with other reductions or variances outlined in this chapter.

(4)

Interrupted Buffer. Where a legally established developed roadway or permanent substantial improvement transects a wetland buffer, the director may approve a modification of the minimum required buffer to the edge of the roadway or substantial improvement. The permanent substantial development must serve to eliminate or greatly reduce buffer function.

(5)

Tables of Wetland Development Standards.

Table 1 — Wetland Buffer Requirements If Table 2 Is Implemented and a Wildlife Corridor Is Provided
Wetland Category	Buffer width (in feet) based on habitat score			Buffer width based on special characteristics
Wetland Category	Score 3 – 5	Score 6 – 7	Score 8 – 9	Buffer width based on special characteristics
Category I: Based on total score	75	110	225	N/A
Category I: Bogs and wetlands of high conservation value	N/A		225	190
Category I: Estuarine and wetlands in coastal lagoons	N/A			150
Category I: Interdunal	N/A		225	N/A
Category I: Forested	75	110	225	N/A
Category II: Based on score	75	110	225	N/A
Category II: Interdunal wetlands	N/A		110	110
Category II: Estuarine and wetlands in coastal lagoons	N/A			110
Category III (all)	60	110	225	N/A
Category IV (all)	40

Table 2 – Required Measures to Minimize Impacts to Wetlands
Disturbance	Required Measures to Minimize Impacts
Lights	• Direct lights away from wetland
Noise	• Locate activity that generates noise away from wetland • If warranted, enhance existing buffer with native vegetation plantings adjacent to noise source • For activities that generate relatively continuous, potentially disruptive noise, such as certain heavy industry or mining, establish an additional 10 feet heavily vegetated buffer strip immediately adjacent to the outer wetland buffer
Toxic runoff	• Route all new, untreated runoff away from wetland while ensuring wetland is not dewatered • Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 150 feet of wetland • Apply integrated pest management
Stormwater runoff	• Retrofit stormwater detention and treatment for roads and existing adjacent development • Prevent channelized flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer • Use low intensity development techniques (for more information refer to the drainage ordinance and manual)
Change in water regime	• Infiltrate or treat, detain, and disperse into buffer new runoff from impervious surfaces and new lawns
Pets and human disturbance	• Use privacy fencing or plant dense vegetation to delineate buffer edge and to discourage disturbance using vegetation appropriate for the ecoregion • Place wetland and its buffer in a separate tract or protect with a conservation easement
Dust	• Use best management practices to control dust

Table 3 – Wetland Buffer Requirements If Table 2 Is Not Implemented or a Wildlife Corridor Is Not Provided
Wetland Category	Buffer width (in feet) based on habitat score			Buffer width based on special characteristics
Wetland Category	Score 3 – 5	Score 6 – 7	Score 8 – 9	Buffer width based on special characteristics
Category I: Based on total score	100	150	300	N/A
Category I: Bogs and wetlands of high conservation value	N/A		300	250
Category I: Estuarine and wetlands in coastal lagoons	N/A			200
Category I: Interdunal	N/A		300	N/A
Category I: Forested	100	150	300	N/A
Category II: Based on score	100	150	300	N/A
Category II: Interdunal wetlands	N/A			150
Category II: Estuarine and wetlands in coastal lagoons	N/A			150
Category III (all)	80	150	300	N/A
Category IV (all)	50			N/A

(6)

Wetland Buffer Alterations. A quantitative alteration, in which the boundaries of the wetland buffer area are altered, can occur through buffer averaging or through a buffer reduction. Buffer averaging shall not be used in conjunction with a buffer reduction.

The buffers defined in Table 1 are considered an administrative buffer reduction and shall not be used in conjunction with a proposed wetland buffer alteration.

(a)

Wetland Buffer Averaging. Standard buffer widths may be modified by averaging buffer widths. The total area contained within the buffer after averaging shall be no less than that contained within the standard buffer prior to averaging. The buffer shall not be reduced by more than 25 percent of the standard buffer width at any point. The department may allow wetland buffer averaging where it can be demonstrated that such averaging can clearly provide equivalent or greater functions and values as would be provided under the standard buffer requirement.

Prior to approval of buffer averaging, a critical areas report for wetland(s) meeting the requirements in this chapter must be submitted and reviewed for consistency with the requirements of this Chapter. Averaging of buffer widths may be allowed where the applicant demonstrates the following:

(i)

The buffer is increased adjacent to higher functioning areas of or more sensitive portions of the wetland and decreased adjacent to the lower function or less sensitive portions; and

(ii)

Averaging is necessary to avoid an extraordinary hardship to the applicant caused by circumstances peculiar to the property and the applicant has demonstrated all avoidance and minimization measures have been considered.

(b)

Wetland Buffer Reduction. Buffer width reductions shall be considered on a case-by-case basis when an applicant demonstrates to the department that the mitigation measures outlined in Table 2 are not applicable to utilize the reduced buffer widths defined in Table 1 and the proposed reduction would not adversely affect the wetland in question. A buffer reduction may not be reduced to less than 75 percent of the standard buffer width.

Decision Criteria. Prior to approval, an applicant shall demonstrate that a buffer reduction proposal meets all of the decision criteria listed below.

(i)

Demonstrate all avoidance and minimization efforts have been considered for compliance with POMC § 20.162.026;

(ii)

It will not adversely impact the wetland(s) in question;

(iii)

It will not lead to adverse water quality protection, unstable earth conditions, or create an erosion hazard;

(iv)

As part of the buffer reduction request, an applicant shall submit a buffer enhancement plan consistent with Article VIII of this Chapter.

(7)

Increased Wetland Buffer Provisions. The department may increase buffer zone widths for a development project on a case-by-case basis when a larger buffer is necessary to protect wetland functions and values. Such determination shall be based on site-specific and project related conditions, which include, but are not limited to:

(a)

Wetland sites with known locations of endangered or threatened species for which a habitat management plan indicates a larger buffer is necessary to protect habitat values for such species;

(b)

The adjacent land is susceptible to severe erosion and erosion control measures alone will not effectively prevent adverse wetland impacts;

(c)

The adjacent land on the development proposal site has minimal vegetative cover or slopes greater than 30 percent; or

(8)

Wetland Fencing and Signs. This subsection applies to those wetlands and their buffers that are within 300 feet of regulated development activities.

(a)

Wetland buffers shall be temporarily fenced or otherwise suitably marked, as required by the department, between the area where the construction activity occurs and the buffer. Fences shall be made of a durable protective barrier and shall be highly visible. Silt fences and plastic construction fences may be used to prevent encroachment on wetlands or their buffers by construction. Temporary fencing shall be removed after the site work has been completed and the site is fully stabilized per city approval.

(b)

The department shall require permanent signs and/or split-rail fencing to be placed on the common boundary between a wetland buffer and the adjacent land. Signs must be posted at an interval of one per lot if the lot is less than 50 feet wide, or every 50 feet, whichever is less, and must be maintained by the property owner in perpetuity. The signs shall be worded as follows or with alternative language approved by the department:

Protected Wetland Area

Do Not Disturb

Contact City of Port Orchard

Regarding Uses, Restrictions, and Opportunities for Stewardship

The department may approve an alternate method of wetland and buffer identification, if the alternative method provides adequate protection to the wetland and buffer.

(9)

Building or Hard Surface Setback Lines. A building or hard surface setback line of 15 feet is required from the edge of any wetland buffer. Minor structural or hard surface intrusions into the areas of the setback may be permitted if the department determines that such intrusions will not adversely impact the wetland. The setback shall be identified on a site plan and filed as an attachment to the notice to title as required by POMC § 20.162.034, Notice to title.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.060 Additional development standards for regulated uses.

In addition to meeting the development standards in this article, those regulated uses identified below shall also comply with the standards of this section and other applicable state, federal and local ordinances.

(1)

Agricultural Restrictions. In all development proposals which would permit introduction of agricultural uses, damage to regulated wetlands shall be avoided. Wetlands shall be avoided by one of the following methods:

(a)

Implementation of a farm conservation plan agreed upon by the conservation district and the applicant to protect and enhance the water quality of the wetland; and/or

(b)

Fencing located not closer than the outer buffer edge.

(2)

Land Divisions and Land Use Permits. All proposed divisions of land and land uses (including but not limited to the following: boundary or lot line adjustments, short plats, large lot subdivisions, master planned resorts, planned residential developments, conditional use permits, site plan reviews, binding site plans) which include regulated wetlands shall comply with the following procedures and development standards:

(a)

Regulated wetlands, except the area with permanent open water, and wetland buffers may be included in the calculation of minimum lot area for proposed lots; provided, that other standards, including subsection (3)(c) of this section, are met.

(b)

Land division approvals shall be conditioned to require that regulated wetlands and regulated wetland buffers be dedicated as open space tracts, or an easement or covenant encumbering the lot with the wetland and wetland buffer. Such dedication, easement or covenant shall be recorded together with the land division and represented on the final plat, short plat or binding site plan, and title.

(c)

After preliminary approval and prior to final land division approval, the department shall require the common boundary between a regulated wetland or associated buffer and the adjacent land be identified using permanent signs and/or fencing. In lieu of signs and/or fencing, alternative methods of wetland and buffer identification may be approved when such methods are determined by the department to provide adequate protection to the wetland and buffer.

(3)

Stormwater Management Facilities. A wetland or its buffer can be physically or hydrologically altered to meet the requirements of an LID, runoff treatment or flow control BMP if all of the following criteria are met:

(a)

The wetland is classified as a Category IV or a Category III wetland with a habitat score of 3 to 5 points; and

(b)

There will be "no net loss" of functions and values of the wetland; and

(c)

The wetland does not contain a breeding population of any native amphibian species; and

(d)

The hydrologic functions of the wetland can be improved as outlined in questions 3, 4, 5 of Chart 4 and questions 2, 3, 4 of Chart 5 in the Department of Ecology's "Guide for Selecting Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach"; or the wetland is part of a priority restoration plan that achieves restoration goals identified in a shoreline master program or other local or regional watershed plan; and

(e)

The wetland lies in the natural routing of the runoff, and the discharge follows the natural routing; and

(f)

All regulations regarding stormwater and wetland management are followed, including but not limited to local and state wetland and stormwater codes, manuals, and permits; and

(g)

Modifications that alter the structure of a wetland or its soils will require permits. Existing functions and values that are lost would have to be compensated/replaced.

Stormwater LID BMPs required as part of new and redevelopment projects can be considered within wetlands and their buffers. A site-specific characterization is required to determine if an LID BMP is feasible at the project site.

A wetland hydrology monitoring plan prepared by a qualified wetland specialist shall be required when a wetland is physically or hydrologically altered. The plan shall provide an analysis to demonstrate the baseline hydrologic conditions within the wetland, provide monitoring methods, provide a monitoring program to evaluate the hydrologic conditions post construction, and provide a reporting schedule for submitting monitoring reports to the city. The wetland hydrology monitoring plan shall be verified through City review.

(4)

Trails and Trail-Related Facilities. Construction of public and private trails and trail-related facilities, such as benches and viewing platforms, may be allowed in wetlands or wetland buffers pursuant to the following guidelines:

(a)

Trails and related facilities shall, to the extent feasible, be placed on existing road grades, utility corridors, or any other previously disturbed areas.

(b)

Trails and related facilities shall be planned to minimize removal of trees, soil disturbance and existing hydrological characteristics, shrubs, snags and important wildlife habitat.

(c)

Viewing platforms and benches, and access to them, shall be designed and located to minimize disturbance of wildlife habitat and/or critical characteristics of the affected wetland.

(d)

Trails and related facilities shall generally be located outside required buffers. Where trails are permitted within buffers they shall be located in the outer 25 percent of the buffer and a minimum of 25 feet from the wetland edge, except where wetland crossings or viewing areas have been approved.

(e)

Trails shall generally be limited to pedestrian use and pervious surfaces, such as loose gravel or bark chip, and are no more than five feet in width, unless other more intensive uses, such as bike or horse trails, have been specifically allowed and mitigation has been provided.

(f)

Circular (loop) trails are discouraged, as they have the potential to encircle critical areas and cut off habitat connectivity for smaller species.

(5)

Utilities in Wetlands or Wetland Buffers.

(a)

Construction of new utilities outside the road right-of-way or existing utility corridors may be permitted in wetlands or wetland buffers, only when no reasonable alternative location is available and the utility corridor meets the requirements for installation, replacement of vegetation and maintenance outlined below, and as required in the filing and approval of applicable permits and special reports required by this chapter.

(b)

Sewer or On-Site Sewage Utility. Construction of sewer lines or on-site sewage systems may be permitted in regulated wetland buffers only when:

(i)

The applicant demonstrates it is necessary to meet state and/or local health code minimum design standards (not requiring a variance for either horizontal setback or vertical separation); and/or

(ii)

The applicant sufficiently demonstrates the mitigation sequencing requirements defined in this Chapter show all avoidance and minimization measures have been considered. Joint use of the sewer utility corridor by other utilities may be allowed.

(c)

New utility corridors shall not be allowed when the regulated wetland or buffer has known locations of federal or state listed endangered, threatened or sensitive species, heron rookeries or nesting sites of raptors which are listed as state candidate or state monitor, except in those circumstances where an approved habitat management plan indicates that the utility corridor will not significantly impact the wetland or wetland buffer.

(d)

New utility corridor construction and maintenance shall protect the regulated wetland and buffer environment by utilizing the following methods:

(i)

New utility corridors shall be aligned when possible, to avoid cutting trees greater than 12 inches in diameter at breast height (four and one-half feet), measured on the uphill side.

(ii)

New utility corridors shall be revegetated with appropriate native vegetation at preconstruction densities or greater, immediately upon completion of construction, or as soon thereafter as possible, if due to seasonal growing constraints. The utility shall ensure that such vegetation survives.

(iii)

Any additional utility corridor access for maintenance shall be provided as much as possible at specific points, rather than by parallel roads. If parallel roads are necessary, they shall be of a minimum width but no greater than 15 feet; and shall be contiguous to the location of the utility corridor on the side away from the wetland. Mitigation will be required for any additional access through restoration of vegetation in disturbed areas.

(iv)

The department may require other additional mitigation measures.

(e)

Utility corridor maintenance shall include the following measures to protect the regulated wetland and buffer environment:

(i)

Where feasible, painting of utility equipment such as power towers shall not be sprayed or sandblasted, nor should lead-based paints be used.

(ii)

No pesticides, herbicides or fertilizers may be used in wetland areas or their buffers except those approved by the EPA and Ecology. Where approved, herbicides must be applied by a licensed applicator in accordance with the safe application practices on the label. Within wetlands, the applicator must be licensed to use aquatic herbicides.

(f)

For utility work in wetlands or in-water, it shall be the applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary state and federal approvals before beginning work.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.062 Wetland mitigation requirements.

(1)

Mitigation Sequence. Projects permitted under this article will be reviewed in accordance with the mitigation sequencing requirement in POMC § 20.162.026.

(2)

Mitigation Plan Requirements. Any applicant required to perform compensatory wetland mitigation as a condition of approval for a development project or under an enforcement action shall submit a wetlands mitigation plan to the department in accordance with POMC §§ 20.162.028 and 20.162.096. Compensatory mitigation plans shall be consistent with Wetland Mitigation in Washington State – Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans – Version 1 (Ecology Publication No. 06-06-011b or as revised), and Selecting Wetland Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach (Western Washington) (Ecology Publication No. 09-06-32), and with amended Appendix 8-C to Wetlands in Washington State Volume 2 – Protecting and Managing Wetlands (Ecology Publication 05-06-008 or as revised).

(3)

Wetland Replacement Ratios. The following ratios, as well as consideration of the factors listed in this section, and Table 4, shall be used to determine the appropriate amounts of restored, rehabilitated, created, or enhanced wetland that will be required to replace impacted wetlands. The first number specifies the amount of wetland area requiring replacement and the second specifies the amount of wetland area altered.

Table 4 – Wetland Replacement Ratios
Category and Type of Impact Wetland	Restoration or Creation	Rehabilitation	Enhancement Only
Category I: Bog, natural heritage site	Not considered possible	Case-by-case	Case-by-case
Category I: Mature forested	6:1	12:1	24:1
Category I: (All others)	4:1	8:1	16:1
Category II	3:1	6:1	12:1
Category III	2:1	4:1	8:1
Category IV	1.5:1	3:1	6:1

(a)

Open water may be enhanced by replacing structures that may have been removed in the past (large woody material, rocks, reefs, etc.).

(b)

The department may increase the ratios based on one or more of the following:

(i)

The probable success of the proposed restoration or enhancement;

(ii)

The period of time between destruction and replication of wetland functions;

(iii)

Projected losses in functions and value;

(iv)

Replacement as a result of an illegal action.

(4)

Alternative Mitigation Ratios. The department may approve different mitigation ratios when the applicant proposes a combination of wetland creation, restoration, rehabilitation, and/or enhancement; provided, that federal and state resource agencies approve the mitigation plan and the plan achieves no net loss of wetland functions and values. Mitigation requirements may also be determined using the credit/debit tool described in Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington: Final Report (Ecology Publication No. 10-06-011, or as revised) if approved by the director.

(5)

Type and Location of Mitigation. Applicants have two options for meeting compensatory wetland mitigation requirements defined in this chapter. The options generally fall into two categories: programmatic approaches and permittee- responsible approaches. Programmatic approaches refer to compensatory mitigation done by a third- party sponsor. The two programmatic approaches currently being used in Washington are wetland mitigation banking and in-lieu fee mitigation. Permittee-responsible mitigation is an approach where the applicant retains full responsibility to successfully compensate for unavoidable impacts. The order of preference for the type of mitigation approaches is a programmatic approach followed by a permittee-responsible approach.

(a)

Wetland Mitigation Banks. Credits from a wetland mitigation bank may be approved for use as compensation for unavoidable impacts to wetlands when:

(i)

The bank is certified under state and/or federal rule;

(ii)

The director determines that the wetland mitigation bank provides appropriate compensation for the authorized impacts;

(iii)

The proposed use of credits shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of the mitigation bank's certification;

(iv)

Replacement ratios for project using bank credits shall be consistent with the replacement ratios specified in the mitigation bank's certification; and

(v)

Credits from a certified wetland mitigation bank may be used to compensate for impacts located within the service area specified in the wetland bank's certification. In some cases, the service area of the bank may include portions of more than adjacent drainage basin for specific wetland functions.

(b)

In-Lieu Fee. Credits from an approved in-lieu fee program may be used when all of the following apply:

(i)

The approval authority determines that the use of the program would provide environmentally appropriate compensation for the proposed impacts;

(ii)

The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and conditions of the approved in- lieu fee program instrument;

(iii)

(iv)

The impacts are located within the service area specified in the approved in-lieu fee program instrument.

(c)

Mitigation under the watershed approach. When it is demonstrated that a programmatic approach is not available to compensate for unavoidable impacts to wetlands, compensatory wetland mitigation shall use the water shed approach using the guidance defined in the Department of Ecology's Selecting Wetland Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach (Western Washington) (Ecology Publication No. 09-06-32), or as amended.

(d)

Alternative Mitigation. The department may approve an alternative mitigation plan based on best available science and if it is demonstrated that a high level of ecological function would result from an in-kind and on-site or in-kind and off-site compensatory wetland mitigation approach. Alternative mitigation proposals shall use the guidance in the Department of Ecology's Wetland Mitigation in Washington State — Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans — Version 1 (Ecology Publication No. 06-06-011b), or as revised.

(e)

Innovative Mitigation. The Director may approve innovative mitigation projects that are based on best available science including but not limited to activities such as advance mitigation and preferred environmental alternatives. Innovative mitigation proposals must offer an equivalent or better level of protection of critical area functions and values than would be provided by the strict application of this chapter. Such mitigation proposals must demonstrate special consideration for conservation and protection measures for anadromous fisheries. The Director shall consider the following for approval of an innovative mitigation proposal:

(i)

Creation or enhancement of a larger system of natural areas and open space is preferable to the preservation of many individual habitat areas;

(ii)

The applicant demonstrates that long-term protection and management of the habitat area will be provided;

(iii)

There is clear potential for success of the proposed mitigation at the proposed mitigation site;

(iv)

Mitigation according to subsections (5)(a) through (5)(d) of this section is not feasible due to site constraints such as parcel size, stream type, wetland category, or excessive costs;

(v)

A wetland of a different type is justified based on regional needs or functions and values;

(vi)

The replacement ratios are not reduced or eliminated; unless the reduction results in a preferred environmental alternative; and

(vii)

Public entity cooperative preservation agreements such as conservation easements are applied.

(6)

Monitoring Requirements. The city shall require monitoring reports on an annual basis for a minimum of five years, or until the department determines that the mitigation project has achieved success. Certain types of wetland communities, such as scrub-shrub or forested wetland, require additional time for establishment and may require monitoring for 10 or more years depending on the site-specific circumstances and the scope of the mitigation project. The wetlands mitigation plan shall provide specific criteria for monitoring the mitigation project. Criteria shall be project-specific and a scientifically acceptable means to aid the department in evaluating whether or not the project has achieved success according to the wetland mitigation performance standards in this chapter.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.064 Incentives for wetlands protection.

The City of Port Orchard recognizes that property owners wish to gain economic benefits from their land. The City encourages such mechanisms as the open space tax program, conservation easements and donations to land trusts, in order to provide taxation relief upon compliance with the regulations in the provisions of the critical areas ordinance.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.068 Purpose.

This article applies to all regulated uses included in the critical areas ordinance, or uses within 300 feet of areas designated as fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, as categorized in POMC § 20.162.070. The intent of this article is to:

(1)

Preserve natural flood control, stormwater storage and drainage or stream flow patterns;

(2)

Control siltation, protect nutrient reserves and maintain stream flows and stream quality for fish, wildlife, and marine shellfish;

(3)

Prevent turbidity and pollution of streams and fish or shellfish bearing waters;

(4)

Preserve and protect habitat adequate to support viable populations of native wildlife in both the city and Kitsap County; and

(5)

Encourage nonregulatory methods of habitat retention whenever practical, through education and the open space tax program.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.070 Fish and wildlife habitat conservation area categories classification.

The following categories shall be used in classifying fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas that are located within the city's shoreline jurisdiction according to the city's shoreline master program are regulated through the provisions of this chapter.

(1)

Streams. All streams which meet the criteria for Type F, Np, Ns waters as set forth in the DNR water rating system as defined in WAC 222-16-030 (see Table 5).

(2)

Lakes Less Than 20 Acres in Surface Area. Those lakes which meet the criteria for waters as set forth in WAC 222-16-030, as now or hereafter amended. This includes lakes and ponds less than 20 acres in surface area and their submerged aquatic beds, and lakes and ponds planted with game fish by a governmental or tribal authority.

(3)

Habitats recognized by federal or state agencies for federal and/or state listed endangered, threatened and sensitive species documented in maps or databases available to Kitsap County and which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will maintain and reproduce over the long term.

(4)

Areas targeted for preservation by the federal, state and/or local government which provide fish and wildlife habitat benefits, such as important waterfowl areas identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

(5)

Areas that contain priority habitats or priority species.

(6)

Areas that contain habitats and species of local importance.

(7)

Habitats for state listed candidate and monitored species documented in maps or databases available to Kitsap County and its citizens, and which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will maintain and reproduce over the long term.

(8)

Habitats which include attributes such as comparatively high wildlife density; high wildlife species richness; significant wildlife breeding habitat, seasonal ranges, wildlife corridors, or movement corridors of limited availability and/or high vulnerability. These habitats may include caves, cliffs, islands, meadows, old-growth/mature forest, snag-rich areas, talus slopes, and urban natural open space.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.072 Development standards.

Those regulated uses identified below within designated fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas shall comply with the performance standards outlined in this section.

(1)

Habitat Assessment Report and Management Plan. For all regulated uses and activity proposed on a site which contains or is within 300 feet of fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, a habitat assessment shall be prepared by a qualified wildlife biologist. The habitat assessment shall identify of all fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and its buffer, an analysis of species or habitats known or suspected, and assessment of project impact or effect on the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or its riparian management zone. If it is determined that a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or its riparian management zone does not occur on or within 300 feet of the site, or if it is demonstrated that the project will comply with the standard riparian management zone width and building setback requirements, the project may proceed without any additional requirements under this section. If it is determined that a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area does occur on or within 300 feet of the site, and there will be potential temporary or permanent impacts to a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or a modification to the riparian management zone width and/or building setback is proposed, a habitat management plan according to Article VIII of this chapter shall be prepared.

(2)

Riparian Management Zones and Building Setback Requirements. Riparian management zones (RMZ) and setbacks shall be maintained along the perimeter of fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, as listed in Table 5. Distances shall be measured from the edge of the channel migration zone (CMZ), where identified, or the ordinary high water mark (OHWM), whichever is greater. Riparian management zones shall be retained in their natural condition except where the buffer can be enhanced to improve its functional attributes. Riparian management zones do not apply to those segments of stream that are piped.

(a)

The riparian management zone width shall be increased to include streamside wetlands which provide overflow storage for stormwaters, feed water back to the stream during low flows or provide shelter and food for fish. In braided channels, the OHWM or top of bank shall be defined so as to include the entire stream feature. Refuse shall not be placed in a riparian management zone.

(b)

Where a legally established substantial improvement or development transects a riparian management zone, the director may approve a modification of the minimum required RMZ to the edge of the substantial improvement or development if the part of the riparian management zone on the other side of said feature does not provide any buffer functions to protect the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area in question.

(c)

An additional building setback of 15 feet is required from the edge of all fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas.

(i)

Minor structural impervious surface intrusions into the building setback may be permitted on a case-by-case basis when an applicant demonstrates to the department that the proposed intrusion would not adversely affect buffer function.

(d)

Standard buffers and building setbacks for fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas shall be required for all regulated uses and activities as per Table 5 of this Article.

(e)

If the riparian management zone includes a geologically hazardous area(s), the standard riparian management zone width is greater than the extent of the geologically hazardous area or the riparian management zone extends to the top of slope of the geologically hazardous areas, the applicable riparian management zone will be whichever width is greater.

(3)

Riparian Management Zone Interruptions. Where a legally established developed roadway or permanent substantial improvement transects a critical fish and wildlife habitat conservation area riparian management zone, the director may approve a modification of the minimum required riparian management zone to the edge of the roadway or substantial improvement. The permanent substantial development must serve to eliminate or greatly reduce function of the riparian management zone.

Table 5
CATEGORY	RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT ZONE WIDTH STANDARD
Streams
Water Type
F	150 feet
Np	100 feet
Ns	100 feet
Lakes – Less Than 20 Acres (Non-Type 1 Waters of the State)
Zoning Designation
Community Facilities 50 feet
Commercial, Mixed Use	50 feet
Employment	50 feet
Greenbelt, Residential	35 feet

(4)

Specific Riparian Management Zone Development Standards. Riparian management zones are a critical area and have the potential to provide ecosystem functions for bank stability, shade, pollution removal, recruitment of large woody debris, and wildlife habitat. Development is prohibited in the RMZ, except as follows:

(a)

Mitigation sequencing is demonstrated as defined in Article I of this Chapter and included an approved habitat management plan;

(b)

Any permanent impacts occur in the outer 25 percent of the RMZ;

(c)

It will result in no net loss of the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or riparian management zone in question;

(d)

It will not adversely affect water quality, lead to unstable earth conditions, or create an erosion hazard;

(e)

Meets the exemptions or exception requirements defined under Article I of this Chapter;

(f)

As part of any proposal, an applicant shall submit a buffer enhancement plan consistent with Article VIII of this Chapter.

(5)

Stream Crossings. Any private or public road expansion or construction which is allowed and must cross streams classified within this chapter shall comply with the following minimum development standards:

(a)

Bridges or bottomless culverts shall be required for all streams which support fish life, unless a habitat management plan is submitted which demonstrates that other alternatives would not result in significant impacts to the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area and as determined appropriate through the Hydraulic Project Approval process administered by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife;

(b)

Crossings shall not occur in salmonid spawning areas unless no other feasible crossing site exists. For new development proposals, if existing crossings are determined to adversely impact salmon spawning or passage areas, new or upgraded crossings shall be located as determined necessary through coordination with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife;

(c)

Bridge piers or abutments shall not be placed in either the floodway or between the ordinary high water marks unless no other feasible alternative placement exists;

(d)

Crossings shall not diminish flood-carrying capacity;

(e)

Crossings shall serve multiple properties whenever possible;

(f)

Publicly owned or maintained road or street crossing shall provide for other purposes, such as utility crossing, pedestrian or bicycle easements, viewing points, whenever possible;

(g)

Where there is no reasonable alternative to providing a conventional culvert, the culvert shall be the minimum length necessary to accommodate the permitted activity. If located on a stream containing fish and wildlife habitat per WAC 222-16-030, the culvert shall be designed in accordance with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's 2013 Water Crossing Guidelines (or as amended).

(6)

Stream Relocations. Stream relocations for the purpose of flood protection and/or fisheries restoration shall only be permitted when adhering to the following minimum performance standards and when consistent with Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife's Hydraulic Project Approval, and any other local, state or federal permits:

(a)

The channel, bank and buffer should be replanted with native vegetation that replicates a natural, undisturbed riparian condition;

(b)

For those shorelands and waters prone to flooding, a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington shall provide information demonstrating that the equivalent base flood storage volume and function will be maintained;

(c)

Relocated stream channels shall be designed to meet or exceed the functions and values of the stream to be relocated; and

(d)

Relocation proposal shall include an evaluation report addressing potential downstream impacts to public and private properties, critical areas and listed species; changes to hydroperiod, water quality, flooding frequency or severity; and any necessary downstream stormwater facility improvements associated with the relocation.

(7)

Incentives for Stream Restoration. The City of Port Orchard encourages efforts to daylight a piped segment of a naturally occurring stream to restore historical functions and values those features provided. In support of daylighting a stream the city recognizes this type of restoration effort will require a project to establish a stream buffer. The City will allow for a 75 percent buffer reduction of the applicable stream buffer as defined in Table 5. Pending approval, an applicant shall demonstrate that a proposed daylighting proposal meets all of the decision criteria listed below.

(a)

The proposed restoration is not associated with compensatory mitigation of a specific development project;

(b)

Any proposed stream restoration shall prepare a habitat management plan consistent with the requirements defined in Article VIII of this Chapter;

(c)

No Net Loss. An analysis shall be prepared to demonstrate how the proposed stream restoration will improve riparian habitat and demonstrate how buffer functions of the reduced buffer will provide functions similar to the standard buffer to ensure no net loss of ecological functions and processes;

(d)

Stream bed shall consist of a suitable substrate material consistent with WDFW's guidelines;

(e)

The stream buffer shall be planted with an assortment of native vegetation and shall comply with the applicable mitigation reporting monitoring requirements defined in POMC §§ 20.162.096 and 20.162.068 of this chapter;

(f)

The applicant shall demonstrate to the city that all other applicable state and federal permits have been obtained.

(8)

Streambank stabilization to protect structures from future channel migration is achieved through bioengineering, soft armoring, or recommended techniques in accordance with an approved habitat management plan and the guidance of WDFW's Washington State Integrated Streambank Protection Guidance (2002, as amended).

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.074 Purpose.

This chapter applies to all regulated uses included in the critical areas ordinance within 300 feet of areas designated as geologically hazardous areas, as categorized in POMC § 20.162.076. The intent of this chapter is to:

(1)

Provide standards to protect human life and property from potential risks;

(2)

Control erosion, siltation, and water quality to protect fish and marine shellfish;

(3)

Provide controls to minimize erosion caused by human activity;

(4)

Use innovative site planning by placing geologically hazardous areas and buffers in open space.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.076 Geologically hazardous area categories.

The following categories shall be used in classifying geologically hazardous areas:

(1)

Geologically Hazardous Areas.

(a)

Areas with slopes greater than 30 percent and mapped by the Coastal Zone Atlas or spatial GIS data provided by the Washington Geologic Information Portal[1] as unstable (U), unstable old land slides (UOS) or unstable recent slides (URS).

[1]

The Washington Geologic Information Portal is available online at https://www.dnr.wa.gov/geologyportal.

(b)

Areas with slopes greater than 30 percent in grade and deemed by a qualified geologist or geotechnical engineer to meet the criteria of U, UOS, or URS.

(2)

Areas of Geologic Concern.

(a)

Areas designated U, UOS, or URS in the Coastal Zone Atlas or spatial GIS data provided by the Washington Geologic Information, with slopes less than 30 percent; or areas found by a qualified geologist to meet the criteria for U, URS, and UOS with slopes less than 30 percent; or

(b)

Slopes identified as intermediate (I) in the Coastal Zone Atlas or spatial GIS data provided by the Washington Geologic Information, or areas found by a qualified geologist to meet the criteria of I; or

(c)

Slopes 15 percent or greater, not classified as I, U, UOS, or URS, with soils classified by the Natural Resources Conservation Service as "highly erodible" or "potentially highly erodible"; or

(d)

Slopes of 15 percent or greater with springs or groundwater seepage not identified in subsection (2)(a), (b), or (c) of this section; or

(e)

Seismic areas subject to liquefaction from earthquakes (seismic hazard areas) such as hydric soils as identified by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and areas that have been filled to make a site more suitable. Seismic areas may include former wetlands, which have been covered with fill; or

(f)

Areas with any indications of earth movement such as debris slides, earthflows, slumps and rock falls; or

(g)

Areas with artificial oversteepened or unengineered slopes, i.e., cuts or fills; or

(h)

Areas oversteepened or otherwise unstable as a result of stream incision, stream bank erosion, and undercutting by wave action.

(3)

Site-Specific Determination – Geological and Geotechnical Report Provisions. Should the applicant question the information the city must rely on to determine whether a location contains a geologically hazardous area or area of geologic concern, the city may ask the applicant to submit the appropriate geotechnical or geologic report to confirm or modify the existing information known about the area. The requirements for these reports are contained in Article VIII of this chapter.

The intent of this provision is to allow obviously nongeologically hazardous sites to be determined as such. Where there is any ambiguity about the potential for geologic hazards whatsoever, the department will require a geotechnical or geological report, rather than make a nongeologically hazardous determination.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.078 Development standards.

This chapter applies to all regulated uses in this chapter or within 300 feet of areas designated as geologically hazardous or areas of concern. Permit applications include submittals for clearing, grading and building on property containing geologically hazardous areas. Submittal documents prepared by a licensed engineer may also be required by the department, pursuant to the city's stormwater regulations and building codes.

(1)

Geologically Hazardous Areas and Areas of Geologic Concern.

(a)

Approval. Where applicable the department will approve, approve with conditions or deny the development proposal based on the department's evaluation of specific site conditions. The department will also consider any proposed mitigation measures included in a geotechnical report, if one is submitted.

(b)

Public Works Requirements. The applicant shall submit a land disturbing activity permit application to the department. The application and supporting documents shall be completed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington. The submittal documents shall be determined on a site-specific basis and may be waived by the City Engineer. The documents may include any combination of, but not be limited to, construction plans, details and specifications for clearing, grading, erosion and sedimentation control, and stormwater drainage and detailed hydrological, geotechnical, soils, and drainage reports and analyses.

(c)

Minimum Buffer Requirement. The buffer for all geologically hazardous areas and areas of geologic concern shall include native vegetation from the toe of the slope to 25 feet beyond the top of the slope unless otherwise supported through a geological report or a site-specific determination and designed accordingly.

(d)

Building/Impervious Surface Setback Requirements.

(i)

Geologically Hazardous Areas. The minimum building and impervious surface setback from the top of slope shall be equal to the height of the slope (1:1 horizontal to vertical) plus the greater of one-third of the vertical slope height or 25 feet.

(ii)

Areas of Geologic Concern. A minimum 40-foot building and impervious surface setback shall be maintained from the top of slope. As required in subsection (1)(c) of this section, the 25 feet adjacent to the top of the slope shall be retained as a native vegetation buffer, with an additional minimum 15-foot building and impervious surface setback. The department may decrease the setback when such a setback would result in a greater than 1:1 slope setback or as may be supported through a geological report or a site-specific determination.

(iii)

Toe of Slope Building Setback. A geotechnical report may be required for any new construction within 300 feet of a geologically hazardous area. The department will make a determination based on slope height and stability indicators. Where slope hazard indicators are not identified, the requirements of the International Building Code will apply.

(e)

Buffer and Building Setback Modifications – Report Recommendations. The minimum native vegetation buffer and/or building setback requirement may be decreased if a geotechnical report demonstrates that a lesser distance, through design and engineering solutions, will adequately protect both the proposed development and the erosion hazard and/or landslide hazard area (see Article VIII of this chapter for geological and geotechnical report requirements). Should the geotechnical report indicate that a greater buffer and/or building setback is required than specified in this section, the greater buffer and/or building setback shall be required. The department may determine through a site visit, a special report or mapping, that an increased buffer and/or building setback is required from the critical area.

(f)

Time Limitations. For major new development, and where required for minor new development, clearing, and grading, shall be limited to the period between May 1st to October 1st, unless the applicant provides an erosion and sedimentation control plan prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington that specifically and realistically identifies methods of erosion control for wet weather conditions.

(g)

Field Marking Requirements. For major new development, the proposed clearing for the project and all critical area buffers shall be marked in the field for inspection and approval by the department prior to beginning work. Field marking requirements for minor new development will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the department. The field marking of all buffers shall remain in place until construction is completed and final approval is granted by the department. Permanent marking may be required as determined necessary to protect critical areas or their buffers.

(h)

Cut and Fill Slopes. The faces of all cut and fill slopes shall be protected to prevent erosion as required by the engineered erosion and sedimentation control plan.

(i)

Development Impact Standards. All discharge of runoff from the development site shall be of like quality, flow rate, and velocity as that which flowed from the site prior to development. In addition, all stormwater flows shall be accepted onto, and shall be discharged from, the development site at the natural or otherwise legally existing locations. The proposed development shall not decrease the slope stability of any area within 300 feet of the property boundary.

(j)

Development Risk Standard. In cases where a special report indicates a significant risk to public health, safety and welfare, the department shall deny or require revision of the site development proposal.

(k)

Additional Clearing Standards.

(i)

Only the clearing necessary to install temporary erosion control measures will be allowed prior to the clearing for roads and utilities construction.

(ii)

Clearing for roads and utilities shall be the minimum necessary and shall remain within marked construction limits.

(iii)

Clearing for overhead power lines shall be the minimum necessary for construction and will provide the required minimum clearances of the serving utility.

(l)

Existing Logging Roads. Where existing logging roads occur in geologically hazardous areas or areas of geologic concern, a geological or geotechnical report may be required prior to use as a temporary haul road or permanent access road under a conversion or COHP forest practices application.

(m)

Vegetation Enhancement. The department may require enhancement of buffer vegetation to increase protection to geologically hazardous areas or areas of geologic concern.

(n)

Seismic Hazard Area Development Standards.

(i)

Proposed new development within a seismic hazard area shall be in accordance with Building Code.

(ii)

Applicants for public and commercial building proposals within seismic hazard areas shall submit a geotechnical report addressing any fill or grading that has occurred on the subject parcel. Any fill placed for such development shall have documented construction monitoring as required by the Building Code.

(iii)

All major new development in seismic hazard areas shall require a geotechnical report. Minor new development may also require a geotechnical report, as determined by the department.

(iv)

The development proposal may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on the department's evaluation of the proposed mitigation measures to reduce seismic risk.

(2)

Prohibitions.

(a)

Critical facilities, as defined in Article II of this chapter, are prohibited in geologically hazardous areas.

(b)

In geologically hazardous areas with slopes greater than 80 percent, no development will be allowed either on or within the defined buffer area, unless approved by the department after review of a geotechnical report. The defined buffer zone for geologically hazardous areas is defined in subsection (1)(d) of this section.

(c)

On-site sewage disposal should be avoided in geologically hazardous areas and their buffers. In cases where such areas cannot be avoided, review by a geologist or a geotechnical engineer licensed in the state of Washington will be required in coordination with the Bremerton-Kitsap County health district.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.080 Purpose and requirements.

The purpose of this article is to protect the public health, safety and welfare from harm caused by flooding. It is also the intent to prevent damage and/or loss to both public and private property. Pursuant to this purpose, the city uses Chapter 20.170 POMC, Flood Damage Prevention, adopted by reference, which designates special flood hazard areas and establishes permit requirements for these areas.

In addition, the Kitsap County GIS database for critical drainage areas of the stormwater management regulations will be included for areas of review under frequently flooded areas.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.082 Purpose.

The intent of this article is to provide water quality protection associated with aquifer recharge areas through the regulation of land use activities that pose a potential contaminant threat or could increase the vulnerability of the aquifer. It is the policy of the city to accomplish the following:

(1)

Identify, preserve and protect aquifer recharge areas and prevent degradation of the quality of potable groundwater;

(2)

Recognize the relationship between surface and groundwater resources; and

(3)

Balance competing needs for water while preserving essential natural functions/processes.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.084 Critical aquifer recharge area categories.

A critical aquifer recharge area is a geographical area which provides the recharge to an aquifer(s) which is a current or potential potable water source and, due to its geological properties, is highly susceptible to the introduction of pollutants, or because of special circumstances, has been designated as a critical aquifer recharge area in accordance with WAC 365-190-080 by the city. Critical aquifer recharge areas under this chapter may be established based on general criteria or specifically designated due to special circumstances.

(1)

Category I – Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas. The following general criterion is established to designate critical aquifer recharge areas: wellhead protection zones around Group A water system supply wells:

(a)

Areas inside the one-year time of travel zone for Group A water system wells, calculated in accordance with the Washington State Well Head Protection Program.

(b)

Five-year time of travel zones in wellhead protection areas are included as critical aquifer recharge areas under the following condition: The five-year time of travel zone is included when the well draws its water from an aquifer that is at or above sea level and is overlain by permeable soils listed in subsection (2)(a) of this section without an underlying protective impermeable layer (see below).

(2)

Category II – Aquifer Recharge Areas of Concern. Areas which provide recharge to aquifers that provide current or potential potable water supplies and are vulnerable to contamination, and meet any one of the following general criteria:

(a)

Highly Permeable Soils – Locations Where Surface Soil Layers Are Highly Permeable. Soils that have relatively high permeability and high infiltration potential may provide for groundwater recharge, but also may enhance transfer of contaminants from the surface to groundwater. For these reasons the locations where surface soils are highly permeable are considered aquifer recharge areas of concern.

The general location and characteristics of soils in Kitsap County and the city is given in the Soil Survey of Kitsap County by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (SCS). The soil survey information is available on the Kitsap County geographic information system (GIS). The following soil types are considered to have relatively high permeability and are aquifer recharge areas of concern.

The following soils have relatively high infiltration:

SCS Soil Name	SCS Soil Map Units
Grove	11, 12, 13
Indianola	18, 19, 20, 21
Neilton	34, 35, 36
Norma	37, 38
Poulsbo/Ragnar	41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47

(b)

Areas Above Shallow Principal Aquifers. Surface areas above shallow principal aquifer(s) which are not separated from the underlying aquifers by an impermeable layer that provides adequate protections to preclude the proposed land use from contaminating the shallow aquifer(s) below are considered aquifer recharge areas of concern. This generally includes principal aquifers in subsurface hydrogeologic units Og1, Og1a, Og2 and portions of Og3 that are within 300 feet of the ground surface.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.086 Development standards.

Standards for development shall be in accordance with the provisions below and the requirements of the underlying zoning:

(1)

A hydrogeological report will be required on sites that have been identified as having characteristics with high infiltration rates, or having a high aquifer recharge or infiltration potential for land uses identified in Table 20.162.086, unless determined unnecessary upon coordination with agencies with jurisdiction (Bremerton-Kitsap County health district and/or affected water purveyors). This evaluation shall apply to impacts on both groundwater and surface water, as it relates to recharge areas (see requirements in Article VIII of this chapter, Special Reports).

(2)

Affected water purveyors will be notified and requested to comment during the preliminary phases of the city's review process on the proposed land use and potential impacts. The purveyor may recommend appropriate mitigation to reduce potential impacts. The department will consider these recommendations to develop appropriate permit conditions.

(3)

This section shall not affect any right to use or appropriate water as allowed under state or federal law. In addition, these requirements do not apply to those activities which have potential contaminant sources below threshold amounts as set forth in applicable state RCWs or local regulations.

In addition to the general standards above, the following will apply:

(a)

Category I – Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas. Land uses identified in Table 20.162.086 are prohibited in critical aquifer recharge areas. Requests for waivers shall include a hydrogeological report, which includes a detailed risk-benefit analysis that considers credible, worst-case scenarios. The waiver will be evaluated and treated as a special use review, similar to the review process in Article VIII of this chapter, Special Reports, by the review department, the health district, and the affected water purveyors.

(b)

Category II – Aquifer Recharge Areas of Concern. Applicants proposing operations that pose a potential threat to groundwater as defined in Table 20.162.086 in aquifer recharge areas of concern may be required to submit a hydrogeological report. The scope of the report shall be based on site- specific conditions. The need for additional information will be determined by the department, the health district and the affected water purveyor. Based on the results of the report, controls, mitigation, and/or other requirements will be established as a prerequisite for the development proposal being approved.

(c)

The department will also notify the health district and affected water purveyors through the environmental review process when those development activities listed in Table 20.162.086 are proposed outside the areas designated critical aquifer recharge areas and aquifer recharge areas of concern.

Table 20.162.086: Operations with Potential Threat to Groundwater
A.	Above and below ground storage tanks
	1.	Hazardous and industrial waste treatment
	2.	Hazardous and industrial waste storage
	3.	Hazardous material storage
B.	Animal feedlots
C.	Commercial operations
	*1.	Gas stations/service stations/truck terminals
	2.	Petroleum distributors/storage
	*3.	Auto body repair shops/rust proofers
	4.	Auto chemical supply stores/retailers
	*5.	Truck, automobile, and combustion engine repair shops
	*6.	Dry cleaners
	*7.	Photo processors
	*8.	Auto washes
	*9.	Laundromats
	*10.	Beauty salons
	11.	Research or chemical testing laboratories which handle significant quantities of hazardous materials
	12.	Food processors/meat packers/slaughter houses
	13.	Airport-maintenance/fueling operation areas
	14.	Junk and salvage yards
	15.	Storing or processing manure, feed, or other agriculture by-products by commercially permitted businesses
	*16.	Large scale storage or use of pesticides, insecticides, herbicides, or fertilizer by commercial or agricultural operations
D.	Deep injection wells
	1.	Wastewater disposal wells
	2.	Oil and gas activity disposal wells
	3.	Mineral extraction disposal wells
E.	De-icing salts storage piles
F.	Industrial operations
	*1.	Furniture strippers/painters/finishers
	2.	Concrete/asphalt/tar/coal companies
	3.	Industrial manufacturers: chemicals, pesticides/herbicides, paper, leather products, textiles, rubber, plastic/fiberglass, silicone/glass, pharmaceuticals, electrical equipment
	4.	Metal platers/heat treaters/smelters/ annealers/descalers
	5.	Wood preserves
	6.	Chemical reclamation facilities
	*7.	Boat refinishers
G.	Land application
	1.	Wastewater application (spray irrigation)
	2.	Wastewater byproduct (sludge) application
	3.	Petroleum refining waste application
	4.	Hazardous waste applications
H.	Landfills
	1.	Industrial hazardous and nonhazardous landfill
	2.	Municipal sanitary landfill
I.	Material transfer operations
	1.	Hazardous and industrial waste transfers
	2.	Hazardous material transfers
J.	Materials stockpiles
K.	Mining and mine drainage
L.	On-site septic systems (LOSS category) of greater than 14,500 G.P.D. capacity without pretreatment
M.	Pipelines
	1.	Hazardous and industrial waste transfer
	2.	Hazardous material transfer
N.	Radioactive disposal sites
O.	Sand and gravel mining operations
*P.	Marina
*If not on a sewer system with a treatment plant.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.088 Purpose.

The following special reports may be required to provide environmental information and to present proposed strategies for maintaining, protecting and/or mitigating critical areas:

(1)

Wetland report;

(2)

Mitigation plan;

(3)

Habitat management plan;

(4)

Buffer enhancement plan;

(5)

Geotechnical report/geological report;

(6)

Hydrogeological report.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.090 When required.

Special reports shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the department for regulated uses when required by the Director, pursuant to this Title, and for the protection of a critical area.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.092 Special reports – Responsibility for completion.

The applicant shall pay for or reimburse the city for the costs incurred in the preparation of special reports or tests and for the costs incurred by the city to engage technical consultants or staff for review and interpretation of data and findings submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. The applicant shall pay permit fees or technical assistance fees as required by the city. In such circumstances where a conflict in the findings of a special report and the findings of the city in review of the special report exists, the applicant or affected party may appeal such decisions of the city pursuant to the appeal procedures as provided in this title.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.094 Qualifications of professionals.

Any special report prepared by a professional as described in this article shall include his or her resume, or other list of qualifications, to aid the department in assessing these qualifications.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.096 Wetland report.

(1)

Wetland Delineation Report. A wetland report shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:

(a)

Vicinity map;

(b)

When available, a copy of a National Wetland Inventory Map (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) and/or a wetland inventory map, as approved by the city, identifying the wetlands on or within 300 feet of the site;

(c)

A site map setting forth all of the following:

(i)

Surveyed wetland boundaries based upon delineation by a wetland specialist;

(ii)

Site boundary property lines and roads;

(iii)

Internal property lines, right-of-way, easements, etc.;

(iv)

Existing physical features of the site including buildings, fences, and other structures, roads, parking lots, utilities, water bodies, etc.;

(v)

Contours at the smallest readily available intervals, preferably at two-foot intervals;

(vi)

Hydrologic mapping showing patterns of surface water movement and known subsurface water movement into, through, and out of the site area;

(vii)

Location of all test holes and vegetation sample sites, numbered to correspond with flagging in the field and field data sheets;

(viii)

The department may require an air photo with overlays displaying the site boundaries and wetland delineation;

(d)

A report which includes the following:

(i)

Location information (legal description, parcel number and address);

(ii)

Delineation report. The wetland boundaries on the site established by the delineation shall be staked and flagged in the field. If the wetland extends outside the site, the delineation report shall discuss all wetland areas within 300 feet of the site, but need only delineate those wetland boundaries within the site;

(iii)

General site conditions including topography, acreage, and surface areas of all wetlands identified in the Kitsap County wetland atlas and water bodies within one-quarter mile of the subject wetland(s);

(iv)

Hydrological analysis, including topography, of existing surface and known significant subsurface flows into and out of the subject wetland(s);

(v)

Analysis of functional values of existing wetlands, including vegetative, fauna, and hydrologic conditions;

(e)

A summary of proposed activity and potential impacts to the wetland(s);

(f)

Recommended wetland category, including rationale for the recommendation;

(g)

Recommended buffer boundaries, including rationale for boundary locations;

(h)

Site plan of proposed activity, including location of all parcels, tracts, easements, roads, structures, and other modifications to the existing site. The location of all wetlands and buffers shall be identified on the site plan.

(2)

Administrative Wetland Boundary and Ranking Evaluation.

(a)

An informal determination of the regulated wetland boundary and an evaluation of any unranked regulated wetland may be completed by the department for any minor new development project listed in Article II of this chapter, unless the applicant wishes to employ a qualified wetland biologist at the applicant's expense, or if such a report is required by the department. Fees may be collected for this determination and evaluation.

(b)

Methodology for delineation of the regulated wetland boundary shall be the plant community assessment procedure, which is described in the approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplements.

(c)

The wetland boundary shall be field staked and this line shall be depicted on the building site plan application.

(d)

The regulated wetland boundary and regulated wetland buffer shall be identified on all grading, building site, utility or other development plans submitted on the project.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.098 Mitigation plan.

(1)

Whenever the department has determined that losses of regulated critical areas are necessary and unavoidable, or a review of a regulated critical area or its buffer is proposed, or an exception to uses is allowed or a variance to standards is granted, a mitigation plan shall be prepared which is considered in the following order of preference and for consistency with POMC § 20.162.026:

(a)

Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of actions. This may be accomplished by selecting a reasonable alternative that does not involve critical area or critical area impacts, applying reasonable mitigation measures, such as drainage and erosion control, alternative site planning, and/or using best available technology. In reviewing development proposals required to submit a mitigation plan, the department shall first determine if the impact can be avoided (e.g., impacts cannot be avoided if denial of the development proposal or parts thereof or mitigation measures would result in an extraordinary hardship and denial of reasonable use of property).

(b)

Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts. This may be accomplished by selecting a reasonable alternative that avoids most critical area impacts, applying reasonable mitigation measures, such as drainage and erosion control, alternative site planning, and/or using best available technology. In reviewing development proposals required to submit a mitigation plan, the department shall determine if the impact can be first avoided and secondly minimized. Impacts cannot be avoided or minimized if denial of the development proposal or parts thereof or mitigation measures would result in an extraordinary hardship and denial of reasonable use of property.

(c)

Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment. This may be done by reestablishing critical area and critical area buffer characteristics on a site which have been lost by alterations or activities. Rectifying shall be accomplished in accordance with a mitigation plan, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements in subsection (4) of this section and has been approved by the department. In reviewing development proposals required to submit a mitigation plan, the department shall determine if the impact should be rectified. Impacts can be rectified if mitigation measures would not result in an extraordinary hardship and denial of reasonable use of the property.

(d)

Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments. Unless required elsewhere by this chapter, compensation shall occur on-site and be in- kind. When it is adequately demonstrated that there is no feasible opportunity for on-site compensation the director may approve an offsite compensatory approach. This may be done by improving existing critical areas and buffers at another location, or otherwise providing a substitute critical area resource at another location as compensation for any unavoidable adverse impacts. Compensating shall be accomplished in accordance with a mitigation plan, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements in subsection (4) of this section and has been approved by the department. In reviewing development proposals required to submit a mitigation plan, the department shall determine if the impact should be compensated. Impacts can be compensated if compensation and mitigation measures would not result in an extraordinary hardship and denial of reasonable use of property. Compensation of critical area impacts may be waived by the department for development authorized by POMC § 20.162.038, Exceptions.

(2)

The overall goal of any mitigation plan shall be no net loss of regulated critical area functions and acreage.

(3)

Those persons proposing compensatory mitigation projects shall show that the compensation project is associated with an activity or development otherwise permitted and that the restored, created, or enhanced critical area will be as persistent as the feature it replaces by accomplishing the following:

(a)

Demonstrate sufficient scientific expertise, supervisory capability, and financial resources to carry out the project; and

(b)

Demonstrate the capability for monitoring the site and for making corrections during this period, if the project fails to meet projected goals; and

(c)

Protect and manage or provide for the protection and management of the compensation area to avoid further development or degradation.

(4)

Mitigation plans shall be implemented by the project applicant, and include the following components:

(a)

Baseline Information. A written assessment and accompanying maps of the impacted critical area shall be produced by the applicant or applicant's consultant and shall include, at a minimum: existing critical area acreage; critical area functions; vegetative, faunal and hydrologic characteristics; habitat conditions; and topographic elevations.

(b)

If the compensation site is off site from the impacted critical area site, baseline information about it, in addition to the above information about the impacted critical area, shall be provided by the applicant and shall include all those items listed in subsection (4)(a) of this section and as well as: the relationship of the compensation site within the watershed and to existing water bodies; existing and proposed existing compensation site conditions; buffers; and ownership.

(c)

Environmental Goals and Objectives. The report shall identify goals and objectives and include:

(i)

The purposes of the compensation measures including a description of site selection criteria, identification of compensation goals, identification of target evaluation species and resource functions, dates for beginning and completion of compensation measures, and a complete description of the structure and functional relationships sought at the mitigation site. The goals and objectives shall be related to the functions of the original critical area or, if out-of- kind, the type of critical area to be emulated; and

(ii)

A review of the available literature and/or experience to date in restoring or creating the type of habitat proposed shall be provided. An analysis of the likelihood of success of the compensation project at duplicating the original critical area shall be provided based on the experiences of comparable projects, if any. An analysis of the likelihood of persistence of the created, restored, or enhanced critical area shall be provided based on such factors as: habitat conditions; dynamics of ecosystem; presence of invasive flora or fauna; potential human or animal disturbance; and previous comparable projects, if any.

(d)

Performance Standards. Specific criteria shall be provided for evaluating whether or not the goals and objectives of the mitigation plan are being achieved at various stages in the project and for beginning remedial action or contingency measures. Such criteria may include water quality standards, survival rates of planted vegetation, species abundance and diversity targets, habitat diversity indices, or other ecological, geological or hydrological criteria.

(e)

Detailed Construction Plans. Written specifications and descriptions of compensation techniques shall be provided including the proposed construction sequence, grading and excavation details, erosion, sediment and stormwater recharge control features needed for site construction and long-term survival, a planting plan specifying plant species, quantities, locations, size, spacing, and density; the source of plant materials, propagules, or seeds; water and nutrient requirements for planting; where appropriate, measures to protect plants from predation; specification of substrate stockpiling techniques and planting instructions; descriptions of water control structures and water-level maintenance practices needed to achieve the necessary hydrocycle/hydroperiod characteristics; sufficient information to address anticipated sea level rise when applicable; etc. These written specifications shall be accompanied by detailed site diagrams, scaled cross-sectional drawings, topographic maps showing slope percentage and final grade elevations, and any other drawings appropriate to show construction techniques or anticipated final outcome. The plan shall provide for elevations which are appropriate for the desired habitat type(s) and which provide sufficient tidal prism and circulation data.

(f)

Monitoring Program. A program outlining the approach for monitoring construction of the compensation project and for assessing a completed project shall be provided. Monitoring must include sufficient information to adequately assess the progress of a project. Monitoring may include, but is not limited to:

(i)

Establishing vegetation plots to track changes in plant species composition and density over time;

(ii)

Using photo stations to evaluate vegetation community response;

(iii)

Sampling surface and subsurface waters to determine pollutant loading and changes from the natural variability of background conditions (pH, nutrients, heavy metals);

(iv)

Measuring base flow rates and stormwater runoff to model and evaluate water quantity predictions by a licensed engineer in the state of Washington, where required;

(v)

Measuring sedimentation rates, if applicable; and

(vi)

Sampling fish and wildlife populations to determine habitat utilization, species abundance and diversity. A protocol shall be included outlining how the monitoring data will be evaluated by agencies that are tracking the progress of the compensation project. A monitoring report shall be submitted annually and, at a minimum, documenting milestones, successes, problems, and contingency actions of the compensation project. The compensation project shall be monitored for a period necessary to establish that performance standards have been met, but not for a period of less than five years.

(vii)

The city shall require monitoring reports on an annual basis for a minimum of five years. Certain types of habitat communities require additional time for establishment and may require monitoring for 10 or more years depending on the site-specific circumstances and the scope of the mitigation project.

(g)

Contingency Plan. Identification of potential courses of action, and any corrective measures to be taken when monitoring or evaluating indicates project performance standards are not being met.

(h)

Permit Conditions. Any compensation project prepared pursuant to this section and approved by the department shall become part of the application for the permit.

(5)

Performance Bonds and Demonstration of Competence. A demonstration of financial resources, administrative, supervisory, and technical competence and scientific expertise of sufficient standing to successfully execute the compensation project shall be provided. A compensation project manager shall be named, and the qualifications of each team member involved in preparing the mitigation plan and implementing and supervising the project shall be provided, including educational background and areas of expertise, training and experience with comparable projects. In addition, in certain conditions the City may permit bonds ensuring fulfillment of the compensation project, monitoring program, and any contingency measure to be posted in the amount of 150 percent of the expected cost of compensation and shall be effective for a period of no less than three years and no greater than 10 years after completion of the mitigation plan, at the discretion of the City.

(6)

Waiver. The department may waive portions of this report if, in his or her opinion, there is adequate information available on the site to determine its impacts and appropriate measures.

(7)

List of Qualified Consultants. The department shall establish a list of qualified consultants to prepare mitigation plans.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.100 Habitat management plan.

A habitat management plan is a report to provide an analysis and discussion on the project's effects on a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area and to address how the project impacts to fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas will be mitigated. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species Management Recommendations, and supplemental documents are advised to serve as guidance for this report. A habitat management plan shall contain, at a minimum, the following:

(1)

The habitat management plan shall contain a detailed site plan prepared at an easily readable scale, showing:

(a)

The location of the proposed development site;

(b)

The relationship of the site to surrounding topographic features, water features, and cultural features;

(c)

Proposed building locations and arrangements;

(d)

A legend which includes a complete legal description, acreage of the parcel, scale, north arrows, and date of map revision.

(2)

The habitat management plan shall also contain a report, which describes:

(a)

The nature and intensity of the proposed development;

(b)

An analysis of the effect of the proposed development, activity or land use change upon the wildlife species and habitat identified for protection; and

(3)

Mitigation Sequencing. When an alteration to a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or its buffer is proposed, such alteration shall be avoided, minimized, or compensated for in the following order of preference and for consistency with POMC § 20.162.026.

(a)

Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action.

(b)

Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts.

(c)

Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment.

(d)

Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations.

(e)

Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments.

(f)

Monitoring the required mitigation and taking remedial action where necessary. Monitoring shall occur for a minimum of five years. Certain types of habitat communities require additional time for establishment and may require monitoring for 10 or more years depending on the site-specific circumstances and the scope of the mitigation project.

(4)

A plan which identifies how the applicant proposes to mitigate any adverse impacts to wildlife habitats created by the proposed development. (See mitigation plan requirements, Article VIII of this chapter.)

(5)

Possible mitigation measures to be included in the report, or required by the department, could include, but are not limited to:

(a)

Establishment of buffer zones;

(b)

Preservation of critically important plants and trees;

(c)

Limitation of access to habitat areas;

(d)

Seasonal restriction of construction activities; and

(e)

Establishing phased development requirements and/or a timetable for periodic review of the plan.

(6)

This plan shall be prepared by a person who has been educated in this field and has professional experience as a fish or wildlife biologist. Where this plan is required for the protection of an eagle habitat, the eagle habitat management plan shall normally be prepared by the Department of Wildlife, as required under the bald eagle management rules.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.102 Buffer enhancement plan.

(1)

A buffer enhancement plan shall assess the habitat, water quality, storm water detention, ground water recharge, shoreline protection, and erosion protection functions of the buffer and assess the effects of the proposed modification on those functions. The buffer enhancement plan shall be prepared by a qualified specialist or biologist and provide the following:

(a)

A map locating the specific area of enhancement;

(b)

A planting plan that uses native plant species indigenous to this region including groundcover, shrubs, and trees;

(c)

A set of performance standards shall be provided for evaluating whether or not the goals and objectives of the plan are being achieved at various stages during the monitoring program. Such criteria may include survival rates of planted vegetation, species abundance and diversity targets, or other ecological, geological or hydrological criteria;

(d)

Provisions for monitoring and maintenance over the monitoring period. Monitoring shall occur for a minimum of five years. Certain types of enhancement may require additional time for establishment and may require monitoring for 10 or more years depending on the site-specific circumstances and the scope of the mitigation project.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.104 Geotechnical report.

(1)

A geotechnical report shall include a description of the site geology, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of geologic conditions on the proposed development, opinions and recommendations of the adequacy of the site to be developed, the effects of groundwater interception and infiltration, seepage, potential slip planes, and changes in soil bearing strength, and the impacts of the proposed development and appropriate mitigating measures. A geotechnical report may contain information obtained with subsurface investigative measures such as test pit digging, soil boring, water well installation or Dutch Cone Penetrometer investigations. Reports containing engineering design recommendations; i.e., recommendations for foundations (loading, sizing, depth, or settlement estimates), pile or pier design, retaining structures, or recommendations for construction on slopes steeper than 30 percent, must be prepared by or in conjunction with a licensed geotechnical engineer as defined in subsection (2) of this section.

A geological report shall include the above, with the exception of engineering design recommendations, and need not make use of subsurface investigative measures. As the report will not include engineering recommendations, a geological report may be prepared by a geologist or engineering geologist as defined in subsection (2) of this section.

(2)

Geotechnical reports shall be prepared by a geotechnical engineer (a civil engineer licensed by the state of Washington who is knowledgeable of regional geologic conditions and who has at least four years' professional experience in landslide and/or seismic hazard evaluation). Geological reports may be prepared by a geologist, engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer knowledgeable in regional geologic conditions and having at least four years' professional experience in site evaluation and development studies, and landslide and/or seismic hazard evaluation.

(3)

Report recommendations for siting structures in high risk areas shall be based on existing site conditions rather than measures that have not yet been successfully approved, designed or constructed (e.g., slope recontouring, slope retaining walls, vegetation improvements, bulkheads, etc.). Shoreline bulkheads and retaining walls may only be utilized as an engineering solution where it can be demonstrated that an existing residential structure cannot be safely maintained without such measures, and that the resulting retaining wall is the minimum necessary to provide a stable building area for the structure.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.106 Hydrogeological report.

A hydrogeological report shall be required for certain proposed operations based on a consultation with the appropriate local and state agencies. The report shall address the impact the proposed land use will have on both the quality and quantity of the water transmitted to the aquifer. The report shall also address the types of pesticides and herbicides and fertilizers that can safely be used for the care of landscaping proposed by the applicant.

(1)

The report shall be submitted to the reviewing authority and address, at a minimum, the following criteria:

(a)

Surficial soil type and geologic setting;

(b)

Location and identification of wells within 1,000 feet of the site;

(c)

Location and identification of surface water bodies and springs within 1,000 feet of the site with recharge potential;

(d)

Description of underlying aquifers and aquitards, including water level, gradients and flow direction;

(e)

Available surface water and groundwater quality data;

(f)

Effects of the proposed development on water quality;

(g)

Sampling schedules required to assure water quality;

(h)

Discussion of the effects of the proposed development on the groundwater resource;

(i)

Recommendations on appropriate BMPs (best management practices) or mitigation to assure no significant degradation of groundwater quality; and

(j)

Other information as required by the Bremerton-Kitsap County health district.

(2)

The hydrogeologic report shall be prepared by a professional geologist/hydrologist or by a soil scientist with a strong background in geology as demonstrated by course work from an accredited college or university and/or has a minimum of five years' experience.

(3)

Applications for development or operations with underground storage of petroleum products will be processed using the appropriate procedure as specified in existing state regulations and city ordinances.

(4)

Analysis for a specific parcel(s), using the criteria outlined below, will be employed to determine if the soils present require a recharge area designation. Data collection will include, at a minimum: six soil logs to a depth of 10 feet (or to a depth four feet below the lowest proposed excavation point whichever is greater) for each acre in the parcel(s) being evaluated. At least one well which is 300 feet or greater in depth with an adequate drilling report must be available within one mile. The associated data shall be analyzed and included in the hydrogeologic report to determine the presence of highly permeable soils with the recharge area designation.

For development proposals within aquifer recharge areas of concern, the hydrogeological report may be based on quarter-quarter section basis locations where the number of wells within a half-mile radius is 36 or more, and are designated aquifer recharge areas. To facilitate computer analysis, the evaluation may be done on a quarter-quarter section basis using the quarter-quarter section in which a parcel of interest is located and all the surrounding quarter-quarter sections, in place of the half-mile circle.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.162.108 Attachments.

The purpose of the attachments is to provide supporting documentation to assist in the implementation of this chapter:

(1)

Attachment A – Kitsap County's GIS Database of Critical Areas Information.

(2)

Attachment B – Site Development Figures.

(3)

Attachment C – Port Orchard Critical Area and Buffer Notice.

(4)

Attachment D – Kitsap County Shallow Principal Aquifer Listing.

(Ord. 018-25, 11/18/2025)

§ 20.170.010 Statutory authorization.

The Legislature of the state of Washington has in RCW Title 35 delegated the responsibility to local governmental units to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizenry. Therefore, the city council of the city does ordain as follows in this chapter.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.020 Findings of fact.

(1)

The flood hazard areas of the city are subject to periodic inundation which results in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare.

(2)

These flood losses are caused by the cumulative effect of obstructions in areas of special flood hazards which increase flood heights and velocities, and when inadequately anchored, damage uses in other areas. Uses that are inadequately floodproofed, elevated, or otherwise protected from flood damage also contribute to the flood loss.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.030 Statement of purpose.

It is the purpose of this chapter to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed:

(1)

To protect human life and health;

(2)

To minimize expenditure of public money and costly flood control projects;

(3)

To minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public;

(4)

To minimize prolonged business interruptions;

(5)

To minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains, electric, telephone and sewer lines, streets and bridges located in areas of special flood hazard;

(6)

To help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use and development of areas of special flood hazard so as to minimize future flood blight areas;

(7)

To ensure that potential buyers are notified that property is in an area of special flood hazard; and

(8)

To ensure that those who occupy the areas of special flood hazard assume responsibility for their actions.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.040 Methods of reducing flood losses.

In order to accomplish its purposes, this chapter includes methods and provisions for:

(1)

Restricting or prohibiting uses which are dangerous to health, safety, and property due to water or erosion hazards, or which result in damaging increases in erosion or in flood heights or velocities;

(2)

Requiring that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction;

(3)

Controlling the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers, which help accommodate or channel floodwaters;

(4)

Controlling filling, grading, dredging and other development which may increase flood damage; and

(5)

Preventing or regulating the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert floodwaters or may increase flood hazards in other areas.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.045 FIRM zones AE and A1-30 with base flood elevations but no floodways.

In areas with base flood elevations (but a regulatory floodway has not been designated), no new construction, substantial improvements, or other development (including fill) shall be permitted within zones A1-30 and AE on the community's FIRM, unless it is demonstrated that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point within the community.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.050 Lands to which this chapter applies.

This chapter shall apply to all areas of special flood hazards within the jurisdiction of the city.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.060 Basis for establishing the areas of special flood hazard.

The areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study for the Kitsap County, Washington and Incorporated Areas," dated February 3, 2017, and any revisions thereto, with accompanying flood insurance maps, are adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this chapter.

The best available information for flood hazard area identification as outlined in POMC § 20.170.170 shall be the basis for new regulation until a new FIRM is issued that incorporates data utilized under POMC § 20.170.170. The flood insurance study is on file at the city clerk's office: 216 Prospect Street, Port Orchard, WA 98366.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.065 Compliance.

All development within special flood hazard areas is subject to the terms of this chapter and other applicable regulations.

(Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.070 Penalties for noncompliance.

No structure or land shall hereafter be constructed, located, extended, converted or altered without full compliance with the terms of this chapter and other applicable regulations. Violation of the provisions of this chapter by failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with conditions) shall constitute a misdemeanor. Any person who violates this chapter or fails to comply with any of its requirements shall upon conviction thereof be fined not more than $500.00 or imprisoned for not more than 180 days, or both, for each violation, and in addition shall pay all costs and expenses involved in the case. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the city from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.080 Abrogation and greater restrictions.

This chapter is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this chapter and another ordinance, easement, covenant, or deed restriction conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more stringent restrictions shall prevail.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.090 Interpretation.

In the interpretation and application of this chapter, all provisions shall be:

(1)

Considered as minimum requirements;

(2)

Liberally construed in favor of the governing body; and

(3)

Deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under state statutes.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.100 Warning and disclaimer of liability.

The degree of flood protection required by this chapter is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations. Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by manmade or natural causes. This chapter does not imply that land outside the areas of special flood hazards or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damages. This chapter shall not create liability on the part of the city, any officer or employee thereof, or the Federal Insurance Administration, for any flood damages that result from reliance on this chapter, or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.105 Severability.

This chapter and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. Should any section of this chapter be declared by the courts to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any portion thereof other than the section so declared to be unconstitutional or invalid.

(Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.110 Definitions.

Unless specifically defined in this section, words or phrases used in this chapter shall be interpreted so as to give them the meanings they have in common usage and to give this chapter its most reasonable application.

(1)

"Alteration of watercourse"

means any action that will change the location of the channel occupied by water within the banks of any portion of a riverine water body.

(2)

"Appeal"

means a request for a review of the director's interpretation of any provision of this chapter or a request for a variance.

(3)

"Area of shallow flooding"

means a designated zone AO, AH, AR/AO or AR/AH (or VO) on a community's flood insurance rate map (FIRM) with a one percent or greater annual chance of flooding to an average depth of one to three feet where a clearly defined channel does not exist, where the path of flooding is unpredictable, and where velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow. Also referred to as the sheet flow area.

(4)

"Area of special flood hazard"

means the land in the floodplain within a community subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. It is shown on the flood insurance rate map (FIRM) as zone A, AO, AH, A1-30, AE, A99, AR (V, VO, V1-30, VE). "Special flood hazard area" is synonymous in meaning with the phrase "area of special flood hazard."

(5)

"ASCE 24"

means the most recently published version of ASCE 24, Flood Resistant Design and Construction, published by the American Society of Civil Engineers.

(6)

"Base flood"

means the flood having a one percent chance of being equated or exceeded in any given year. Also referred to as the "100-year flood." Designation on maps always includes the letter A or V.

(7)

"Base flood elevation (BFE)"

means the elevation to which floodwater is anticipated to rise during the base flood.

(8)

"Basement"

means any area of the building having its floor sub-grade (below ground level) on all sides.

(9)

"Breakaway wall"

means a wall that is not part of the structural support of the building and is intended through its design and construction to collapse under specific lateral loading forces, without causing damage to the elevated portion of the building or supporting foundation structure.

(10)

"Coastal flood risk area"

means the area of flood hazard subject to inundation from the coastal waters of Sinclair Inlet. Coastal BFEs are calculated along transects extending from offshore to the limit of coastal flooding onshore.

(11)

"Critical facility"

means a facility for which even a slight chance of flooding might be too great. Critical facilities include, but are not limited to, schools, nursing homes, hospitals, police, fire and emergency response installations, and installations which produce, use or store hazardous materials or hazardous waste.

(12)

"Development"

means any manmade change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation, drilling operations or storage of equipment or materials located within the area of special flood hazard.

(13)

"Director"

means, for the purposes of this chapter, the city's community development director as provided in POMC § 2.08.060.

(14)

"Elevated building"

means, for insurance purposes, a nonbasement building that has its lowest elevated floor raised above ground level by foundation walls, shear walls, posts, piers, pilings, or columns.

(15)

"Elevation certificate"

means the official form (FEMA Form 81-31) used to track development, provide elevation information necessary to ensure compliance with community floodplain management ordinances, and determine the proper insurance premium rate with Section B completed by community officials.

(16)

"Existing manufactured home park or subdivision"

means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are affixed (including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed before the effective date of the adopted floodplain management regulations.

(17)

"Expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision"

means the preparation of additional sites by the construction of facilities for servicing lots on which manufactured homes are to be affixed (including the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either the final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads).

(18)

"Flood or flooding"

means:

(a)

A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from:

(i)

The overflow of inland or tidal waters.

(ii)

The unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source.

(iii)

Mudslides (i.e., mudflows) which are proximately caused by flooding as defined in subsection (18)(a)(ii) of this section and are akin to a river of liquid and flowing mud on the surfaces of normally dry land areas, as when earth is carried by a current of water and deposited along the path of the current.

(b)

The collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature, such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding as defined in subsection (18)(a)(i) of this section.

(19)

"Flood elevation study"

means an examination, evaluation and determination of flood hazards and, if appropriate, corresponding water surface elevations, or an examination, evaluation and determination of mudslide (i.e., mudflow) and/or flood-related erosion hazards. Also known as a flood insurance study (FIS).

(20)

"Flood insurance rate map (FIRM)"

means the official map on which the Federal Insurance Administrator has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. A FIRM that has been made available digitally is called a digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM).

(21)

"Floodplain administrator"

means the community official designated by title to administer and enforce the floodplain management regulations.

(22)

"Floodway"

(23)

"Functionally dependent use"

means a use which cannot perform its intended purpose unless it is located or carried out in close proximity to water. The term includes only docking facilities, port facilities that are necessary for the loading and unloading of cargo or passengers, and ship building and ship repair facilities, and does not include long-term storage or related manufacturing facilities.

(24)

"Floodproofing"

means any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes, or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate risk of flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures, and their contents. Floodproofed structures are those that have the structural integrity and design to be impervious to floodwater below the base flood elevation.

(25)

"Habitat assessment"

means a written document that describes a project, identifies and analyzes the project's impacts to habitat for species discussed in the "Endangered Species Act – Section 7 Consultation Final Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation for the Implementation of the National Flood Insurance Program in the State of Washington, Phase One Document – Puget Sound Region," and provides an effects determination.

(26)

"Highest adjacent grade"

means the highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure.

(27)

"Historic structure"

means any structure that is:

(a)

Listed individually in the National Register of Historic Places (a listing maintained by the Department of the Interior) or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as meeting the requirements for individual listing on the National Register;

(b)

Certified or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as contributing to the historical significance of a registered historic district or a district preliminarily determined by the Secretary to qualify as a registered historic district;

(c)

Individually listed on a state inventory of historic places in states with historic preservation programs which have been approved by the Secretary of the Interior; or

(d)

Individually listed on a local inventory of historic places in communities with historic preservation programs that have been certified either:

(i)

By an approved state program as determined by the Secretary of the Interior; or

(ii)

Directly by the Secretary of the Interior in states without approved programs.

(28)

"Increased cost of compliance"

means a flood insurance claim payment up to $30,000 directly to a property owner for the cost to comply with floodplain management regulations after a direct physical loss caused by a flood. Eligibility for an ICC claim can be through a single instance of "substantial damage" or as a result of "cumulative substantial damage."

(29)

"Lowest floor"

means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed areas (including basement). An unfinished or flood-resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage, in an area other than a basement area, is not considered a building's lowest floor; provided, that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable nonelevation design requirements of this chapter found in POMC § 20.170.330(2).

(30)

"Manufactured home"

means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. For floodplain management purposes, the term "manufactured home" also includes park trailers, travel trailers and other similar vehicles placed on site for greater than 180 consecutive days. For insurance purposes, the term "manufactured home" does not include park trailers, travel trailers and other similar vehicles.

(31)

"Manufactured home park or subdivision"

means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufactured home lots for rent or sale.

(32)

"Mean sea level"

means, for purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program, the vertical datum to which base flood elevations shown on a community's flood insurance rate map are referenced.

(33)

"New construction"

means structures for which the start of construction commenced on or after the effective date of an initial flood insurance rate map or after December 31, 1974, whichever is later, and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. For floodplain management purposes, "new construction" means structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures.

(34)

"Recreational vehicle"

means a vehicle:

(a)

Built on a single chassis;

(b)

Four hundred square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection;

(c)

Designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck; and

(d)

Designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use.

(35)

"Riverine flood risk area"

means the area of flood hazard subject to inundation from riverine sources. Riverine BFEs are determined using cross sections. Between cross sections, BFEs are interpolated using flood profiles as described in the flood insurance study.

(36)

"Start of construction"

includes substantial improvements, and means the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, placement, or other improvement was within 180 days of the permit date. The "actual start" means either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading, and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers or foundation or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the "actual start of construction" means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building.

(37)

"Structure"

means a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home.

(38)

"Substantial damage"

means damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred.

(39)

"Substantial improvement"

means any reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the "start of construction" of the improvement. This term includes structures which have incurred "substantial damage," regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either:

(a)

Any project for improvement of a structure to correct previously identified existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications that have been identified by the local code enforcement official and that are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions; or

(b)

Any alteration of a "historic structure"; provided, that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a "historic structure."

(40)

"Variance"

means a grant of relief from the requirements of this chapter which permits construction in a manner that would otherwise be prohibited by this chapter.

(41)

"Water-dependent"

means a structure for commerce or industry which cannot exist in any other location and is dependent on the water by reason of the intrinsic nature of its operations.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.120 Development permit required.

A development permit shall be obtained before construction or development begins within any area of special flood hazard established in POMC § 20.170.060. The permit shall be for all structures including manufactured homes, as set forth in POMC § 20.170.110, Definitions, and for all development including fill and other activities, also as set forth in POMC § 20.170.110.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.130 Application for development permit.

Application for a development permit shall be made on forms furnished by the director and may include but not be limited to plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities and the location of the foregoing. Specifically, the following information is required:

(1)

Elevation in relation to mean sea level of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures recorded on a current elevation certificate with Section B completed by the floodplain administrator;

(2)

Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure has been floodproofed;

(3)

Certification by a registered professional engineer or architect that the floodproofing methods for any nonresidential structure meet the floodproofing criteria in POMC § 20.170.340;

(4)

Description of the extent to which a watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development;

(5)

Where development is proposed in a floodway, an engineering analysis indicating no rise of the base flood elevation; and

(6)

Any other such information that may be reasonably required by the floodplain administrator in order to review the application.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.140 Designation of the floodplain administrator.

The director is appointed to administer and implement this chapter by granting or denying development permit applications in accordance with its provisions. The director may delegate authority to implement these provisions.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.150 Duties and responsibilities of the director.

Duties of the director or designee shall include but not be limited to those in POMC § 20.170.160 through § 20.170.230.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.160 Permit review.

The director shall:

(1)

Review all development permits to determine that the permit requirements of this chapter have been satisfied.

(2)

Review all development permits to determine that all necessary permits have been obtained from those federal, state or local governmental agencies from which prior approval is required.

(3)

Review all development permits to determine that the site is reasonably safe from flooding.

(4)

Review all development permits to determine if the proposed development is located in the floodway. If located in the floodway, assure that the provisions of POMC § 20.170.400 are met.

(5)

Notify FEMA when annexations occur in the special flood hazard area.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.170 Use of other base flood data.

When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with POMC § 20.170.060, Basis for establishing the areas of special flood hazard, the director shall obtain, review and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal, state or other source, in order to administer POMC § 20.170.290 through § 20.170.360, Specific standards, and 20.170.400, Floodways.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.180 Information to be obtained and maintained.

The director shall:

(1)

Where base flood elevation data is provided through the flood insurance study or required as in POMC § 20.170.170, obtain, and record the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new or substantially improved structures, and whether or not the structure contains a basement.

(2)

For all new or substantially improved floodproofed nonresidential structures where base flood elevation data is provided through the FIS, FIRM, or as required in POMC § 20.170.170:

(a)

Obtain and maintain a record of the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level); and

(b)

Maintain the floodproofing certifications required in POMC § 20.170.130(3).

(3)

Certification required by POMC § 20.170.400 (floodway encroachments).

(4)

Records of all variance actions, including justification for their issuance.

(5)

Improvement and damage calculations.

(6)

Maintain for public inspection all records pertaining to the provisions of this chapter.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.190 Alteration of watercourses.

The director shall:

(1)

Notify adjacent communities and the Department of Ecology prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Insurance Administration.

(2)

Require that maintenance is provided within that altered or relocated portion of said watercourse so that the flood-carrying capacity is not diminished.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.200 Interpretation of FIRM boundaries.

The director shall make interpretations where needed as to exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazard (for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions). The person contesting the location of the boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to appeal the interpretation as provided in Article IV of this chapter.

(Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.210 Review of building permits.

Where elevation data is not available either through the flood insurance study or from another authoritative source (POMC § 20.170.170), applications for building permits shall be reviewed to assure that proposed construction will be reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use of historical data, high water marks, photographs of past flooding, etc., where available. Failure to elevate at least two feet above grade in these zones may result in high insurance rates.

(Formerly 20.170.280; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.220 Changes to special flood hazard area.

If a project will alter the BFE or boundaries of the SFHA, then the project proponent shall provide the community with engineering documentation and analysis regarding the proposed change. If the change to the BFE or boundaries of the SFHA would normally require a letter of map change, then the project approval shall be conditioned accordingly.

(Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.230 Habitat assessment – When required.

A development permit application shall include a habitat assessment unless the project is, in its entirety, one of the following activities:

(1)

Normal maintenance, repairs, or remodeling of structures, such as re-roofing and replacing siding, provided such work is not a substantial improvement or a repair of substantial damage. To comply, such work must be less than 50 percent of the value of the structure(s).

(2)

Expansion or reconstruction of an existing structure that is no greater than 10 percent beyond its existing footprint. If the structure is in the floodway, there shall be no change in the structure's dimensions perpendicular to flow. All other federal and state requirements and restrictions relating to floodway development still apply.

(3)

Activities with the sole purpose of creating, restoring, or enhancing natural functions associated with floodplains, streams, lakes, estuaries, marine areas, habitat, and riparian areas that meet federal and state standards, provided the activities do not include structures, grading, fill, or impervious surfaces.

(4)

Development of open space and recreational facilities, such as parks, trails, and hunting grounds, that do not include structures, fill, impervious surfaces, or removal of more than five percent of the native vegetation on that portion of the property in the floodplain.

(5)

Repair to on-site septic systems, provided ground disturbance is the minimal necessary and best management practices (BMPs) to prevent stormwater runoff and soil erosion are used.

(6)

Projects that have already received concurrence under another permit or other consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service, either through Section 7, Section 4d, or Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that addresses the entirety of the project in the floodplain (such as an Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit or non-conversion forest practice activities including any interrelated and interdependent activities).

(7)

Repair of an existing, functional bulkhead in the same location and footprint with the same materials when the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) is still outside of the face of the bulkhead (i.e., if the work qualifies for a Corps exemption from Section 404 coverage).

(Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.235 Variances and appeals – Type III procedures.

Permits issued by the director under this chapter are appealable under POMC § 20.170.240. Applications for variances from the provisions in this chapter shall utilize the process and the criteria in POMC § 20.170.250 in lieu of the requirements of Chapter 20.28 POMC. Both appeals and variances hereunder shall be processed per the Type III procedures contained in POMC § 20.22.050. The director shall maintain the records of all appeal actions and report any variances to the Federal Insurance Administration upon request.

(Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.240 Appeal of permits under this chapter.

(1)

The hearing examiner shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the director in the enforcement or administration of this chapter.

(2)

In reviewing and considering such appeal, the hearing examiner shall consider all technical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards specified in other sections of this chapter, and:

(a)

The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others;

(b)

The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage;

(c)

The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner;

(d)

The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community;

(e)

The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable;

(f)

The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which are not subject to flooding or erosion damage;

(g)

The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development;

(h)

The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for that area;

(i)

The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles;

(j)

The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the floodwaters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site; and

(k)

The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems, and streets and bridges.

(3)

Upon consideration of the factors of subsection (2) of this section and the purposes of this chapter, the hearing examiner may attach such conditions to the granting of the permit as it deems necessary to further the purposes of this chapter.

(4)

A party of record that is aggrieved by the decision of the hearing examiner may appeal such decision to the superior court, as provided in Chapter 36.70C RCW.

(Formerly 20.170.210; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.250 Flood damage prevention variances – Conditions for approval.

(1)

Applications to modify the requirements of this chapter shall require a variance permit.

(2)

General. Variances shall only be issued upon a demonstration that the application meets all of the following criteria:

(a)

The variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and land use district of the subject property;

(b)

The variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the land use district of the subject property; and

(c)

The applicant has demonstrated good and sufficient cause;

(d)

Failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant;

(e)

The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to property or improvements in the immediate vicinity of the subject property;

(f)

Granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. In making this determination, the hearing examiner shall consider the items contained in POMC § 20.170.240(2)(a) through (2)(k);

(g)

The variance granted is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief; and

(h)

The variance is not inconsistent with the comprehensive plan.

(3)

Variance from Elevation Standard Limited. The only condition under which a variance from the elevation standard may be issued is for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, providing the items in POMC § 20.170.240(2)(a) through (2)(k) have been fully considered. As the lot size increases, the technical justification required for issuing the variance increases.

(4)

Historic Places. Variances may be issued for the reconstruction, rehabilitation, or restoration of structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the state inventory of historic places, without regard to the procedures set forth in this section.

(5)

Variances Within Designated Floodway. Variances shall not be issued within a designated floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result.

(6)

Interpretation. Variances as interpreted in the National Flood Insurance Program are based on the general zoning law principle that they pertain to a physical piece of property; they are not personal in nature and do not pertain to the structure, its inhabitants, economic or financial circumstances. They primarily address small lots in densely populated residential neighborhoods. As such, variances from the flood elevations should be quite rare.

(7)

Nonresidential Variances Limited. Variances may be issued for nonresidential buildings in very limited circumstances to allow a lesser degree of floodproofing than watertight or dry floodproofing, where it can be determined that such action will have low damage potential, complies with all other variance criteria except subsection (3) of this section, and otherwise complies with POMC § 20.170.240 and this section.

(8)

Any variance granted shall contain a written notice alerting the applicant that the structure will be permitted to be built with a lowest floor elevation below the base flood elevation and that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the increased risk resulting from the reduced lowest floor elevation.

(9)

A party of record that is aggrieved by the decision of the hearing examiner on a variance application may appeal such decision to the superior court, as provided in Chapter 36.70C RCW.

(Formerly 20.170.220; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.260 General standards.

In all areas of special flood hazards, the standards in POMC § 20.170.270 through § 20.170.310 are required.

(Formerly 20.170.230; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.270 Anchoring.

(1)

All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure.

(2)

All manufactured homes must likewise be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement, and shall be installed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Anchoring methods may include, but are not limited to, use of over-the-top or frame ties to ground anchors (reference FEMA's "Manufactured Home Installation in Flood Hazard Areas" guidebook for additional techniques).

(Formerly 20.170.2400; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.280 Construction materials and methods.

(1)

All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage.

(2)

All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage.

(3)

Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding.

(Formerly 20.170.250; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.290 Storage of materials and equipment.

(1)

The storage or processing of materials that could be injurious to human, animal, or plant life if released due to damage from flooding is prohibited in special flood hazard areas.

(2)

Storage of other material or equipment may be allowed if not subject to damage by floods and if firmly anchored to prevent flotation, or if readily removable from the area within the time available after flood warning.

(Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.300 Utilities.

(1)

All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwaters into the system;

(2)

New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwaters into the systems and discharge from the systems into floodwaters;

(3)

On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding; and

(4)

Water wells shall be located on high ground that is not in a floodway.

(Formerly 20.170.260; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.310 Development and subdivision proposals.

All development, including subdivision proposals, shall:

(1)

Be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage;

(2)

Have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage;

(3)

Have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood damage; and

(4)

Where base flood elevation data has not been provided or is not available from another authoritative source, it shall be generated for subdivision proposals and other proposed developments which contain at least 50 lots or five acres (whichever is less).

(Formerly 20.170.270; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.320 Specific standards.

In all areas of special flood hazards where base flood elevation data has been provided as set forth in POMC § 20.170.060, Basis for establishing the areas of special flood hazard, or 20.170.170, Use of other base flood data, the provisions in POMC § 20.170.330 through § 20.170.360 are required.

(Formerly 20.170.290; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.330 Residential construction.

(1)

In riverine flood risk areas zoned AE or other A zoned areas where the BFE has been determined or can be reasonably obtained, new construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated one foot or more above the BFE. Mechanical equipment and utilities shall be waterproofed or elevated at least one foot above the BFE.

(2)

In coastal flood risk areas zoned AE where the BFE has been determined or can be reasonably obtained, new construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated two feet or more above the BFE. Mechanical equipment and utilities shall be waterproofed or elevated at least two feet above the BFE.

(3)

New construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure in an unnumbered A zone for which a BFE is not available and cannot be reasonably obtained shall be reasonably safe from flooding, but in all cases the lowest floor shall be at least two feet above the highest adjacent grade.

(4)

Fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding are prohibited, or shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. Designs must meet or exceed the following minimum criteria:

(a)

Have a minimum of two openings with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding.

(b)

The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade.

(c)

Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices; provided, that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwater.

(d)

A garage attached to a residential structure, constructed with the garage floor slab below the BFE, must be designed to allow for the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters.

Alternatively, a registered engineer or architect may design and certify engineered openings.

(Formerly 20.170.300; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.340 Nonresidential construction.

New construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other nonresidential structure shall meet the following requirements:

(1)

Meet the standards in POMC § 20.170.330; or

(2)

In riverine flood risk areas, if the requirements of POMC § 20.170.330 are not met, then new construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other nonresidential structure shall meet all of the following requirements:

(a)

Be dry floodproofed so that below one foot or more above the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water or dry floodproofed to the elevation required by ASCE 24, whichever is greater;

(b)

Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy;

(c)

Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the design and methods of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development and/or review of the structural design, specifications, and plans. Such certifications shall be provided to the official as set forth in POMC § 20.170.180(3);

(d)

Nonresidential structures that are elevated, not floodproofed, must meet the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described in POMC § 20.170.330;

(3)

In coastal flood risk areas, if the requirements of POMC § 20.170.330 are not met, then new construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial or other nonresidential structure shall meet all of the following requirements:

(a)

Be dry floodproofed so that below two feet or more above the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water or dry floodproofed to the elevation required by ASCE 24, whichever is greater;

(b)

Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy;

(c)

Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the design and methods of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development and/or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Such certifications shall be provided to the official as set forth in POMC § 20.170.180(3);

(d)

Nonresidential structures that are elevated, not floodproofed, must meet the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described in POMC § 20.170.330;

(Applicants who are floodproofing nonresidential buildings shall be notified that flood insurance premiums will be based on rates that are one foot below the floodproofed level (e.g., a building floodproofed to the base flood level will be rated as one foot below). Floodproofing the building an additional foot will reduce insurance premiums.)

(Formerly 20.170.310; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.350 Critical facility.

Construction of new critical facilities shall be, to the extent possible, located outside the limits of the base floodplain. Construction of new critical facilities shall be permissible within the base floodplain if no feasible alternative site is available. Critical facilities constructed within the base floodplain shall have the lowest floor elevated to three feet or more above the level of the base flood elevation at the site or to the height of the 500-year flood, whichever is higher. Access to and from the critical facility should also be protected to the height utilized above. Floodproofing and sealing measures must be taken to insure that toxic substances will not be displaced by or released into floodwaters. Access routes elevated to or above the level of the base floodplain shall be provided to all critical facilities to the extent possible.

(Formerly 20.170.320; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.360 Manufactured homes.

All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved within zones A1-30, AH and AE subject to riverine flooding shall be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is one foot or more above the base flood elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system in accordance with the provisions of POMC § 20.170.270(2).

All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved within the coastal flood risk area shall be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is two feet or more above the base flood elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system in accordance with the provisions of POMC § 20.170.270(2).

(Formerly 20.170.330; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.370 Recreational vehicles.

Recreational vehicles placed on sites are required to either:

(1)

Be on the site for fewer than 100 consecutive days;

(2)

Be fully licensed and ready for highway use, on wheels or jacking system, attached to the site only by quick-disconnect utilities and security devices, and have no permanently attached additions; or

(3)

Meet the requirements of POMC § 20.170.360 and the elevation and anchoring requirements for manufactured homes.

(Formerly 20.170.335; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.380 Enclosed area below the lowest floor.

If buildings or manufactured homes are constructed or substantially improved with fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor, the areas shall be used solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage.

(Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.390 Small accessory structures (detached garages and small storage structures).

(1)

In A, AE, A1-30, AH, and AO flood zones, small accessory structures (less than or equal to the size of a one-story, two-car garage) used solely for parking of vehicles or limited storage may be constructed such that the floor is below the BFE, provided the structure is designed and constructed in accordance with the following requirements:

(a)

Use of the small accessory structure must be limited to parking of vehicles or limited storage;

(b)

The portions of the small accessory structure located below the BFE must be built using flood resistant materials;

(c)

The small accessory structure must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, and lateral movement;

(d)

Any machinery or equipment servicing the small accessory structure must be elevated or floodproofed to or above the BFE;

(e)

If located in a floodway, then the small accessory structure must comply with floodway encroachment provisions in POMC § 20.170.400;

(f)

The small accessory structure must be designed to allow for the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters in accordance with POMC § 20.170.330(4).

(g)

The structure shall have low damage potential; and

(h)

If the structure is converted to another use, it must be brought into full compliance with the standards governing such use.

(i)

The structure shall not be used for human habitation.

(2)

Detached garages, storage structures, and other small accessory structures not meeting the above standards must be constructed in accordance with all applicable standards in POMC § 20.170.330.

(3)

Upon completion of the structure, certification that the requirements of this section have been satisfied shall be provided to the floodplain administrator for verification.

(Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.400 Floodways.

Located within areas of special flood hazard established in POMC § 20.170.060 are areas designated as floodways. Since the floodway is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of floodwaters which carry debris, potential projectiles and erosion potential, the provisions in this section apply.

(1)

No Rise Standard. Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other development, unless certification by a registered professional engineer or architect is provided demonstrating through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in accordance with standard engineering practice that encroachments shall not result in any increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood discharge.

(2)

Construction or reconstruction of residential structures is prohibited within designated floodways, except for:

(a)

Repairs, reconstruction, or improvements to a structure which do not increase the ground floor areas; and

(b)

Repairs, reconstruction, or improvements to a structure the cost of which does not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure either:

(i)

Before the repair, reconstruction or improvement is started; or

(ii)

If the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred.

Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions, or to structures identified as historic places, may be excluded in the 50 percent.

(3)

Substantially Damaged Residences in Floodway.

(a)

For all substantially damaged residential structures located in a designated floodway, the floodplain administrator may make a written request that the Department of Ecology assess the risk of harm to life and property posed by the specific conditions of the floodway. Based on analysis of depth, velocity, flood-related erosion, channel migration, debris load potential, and flood warning capability, the Department of Ecology may exercise best professional judgment in recommending to the local permitting authority repair, replacement, or relocation of a substantially damaged structure consistent with WAC 173-158-076. The property owner shall be responsible for submitting to the local government and the Department of Ecology any information necessary to complete the assessment. Without a favorable recommendation from the Department for the repair or replacement of a substantially damaged residential structure located in the regulatory floodway, no repair or replacement is allowed per WAC 173-158-070(1).

(b)

Before the repair, replacement, or reconstruction is started, all requirements of the NFIP, the state requirements adopted pursuant to Chapter 86.16 RCW, and all applicable local regulations must be satisfied. In addition, the following conditions must be met:

(i)

There is no potential safe building location for the replacement residential structure on the same property outside the regulatory floodway.

(ii)

A replacement residential structure is a residential structure built as a substitute for a legally existing residential structure of equivalent use and size.

(iii)

Repairs, reconstruction, or replacement of a residential structure shall not increase the total square footage of floodway encroachment.

(iv)

The elevation of the lowest floor of the substantially damaged or replacement residential structure is a minimum of one foot higher than the BFE.

(v)

New and replacement water supply systems are designed to eliminate or minimize infiltration of floodwater into the system.

(vi)

New and replacement sanitary sewerage systems are designed and located to eliminate or minimize infiltration of floodwater into the system and discharge from the system into the floodwaters.

(vii)

All other utilities and connections to public utilities are designed, constructed, and located to eliminate or minimize flood damage.

(4)

If subsection (1) of this section is satisfied, all new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of this article.

(Formerly 20.170.340; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.410 General requirements for other development.

All development, including manmade changes to improved or unimproved real estate for which specific provisions are not specified in this chapter or the state building codes with adopted amendments and any city of Port Orchard amendments, shall:

(1)

Be located and constructed to minimize flood damage;

(2)

Meet the encroachment limitations of this chapter if located in a regulatory floodway;

(3)

Be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement resulting from hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy, during conditions of the design flood;

(4)

Be constructed of flood damage-resistant materials;

(5)

Meet the flood opening requirements of POMC § 20.170.330(4); and

(6)

Have mechanical, plumbing, and electrical systems above the design flood elevation or meet the requirements of ASCE 24, except that minimum electric service required to address life safety and electric code requirements is permitted below the design flood elevation provided it conforms to the provisions of the electrical part of building code for wet locations.

(Ord. 055-21 § 2)

§ 20.170.420 Wetlands management.

To the maximum extent possible avoid the short and long term adverse impacts associated with the destruction or modification of wetlands, especially those activities which limit or disrupt the ability of the wetlands to alleviate flooding impacts. The following process should be implemented:

(1)

Review proposals for development within base floodplains for their possible impacts on wetlands located within the floodplain.

(2)

Ensure that development activities in or around wetlands do not negatively affect public safety, health, and welfare by disrupting the wetlands' ability to reduce flood and storm drainage.

(3)

Request technical assistance from the Department of Ecology in identifying wetland areas. Existing wetland map information from the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) can be used in conjunction with the community's FIRM to prepare an overlay zone indicating critical wetland areas deserving special attention.

(Formerly 20.170.350; Ord. 019-17 § 18 (Exh. 1); Ord. 055-21 § 2)

Port Orchard City Zoning Code

Subtitle VIII

§ 20.160.010 Authority.

§ 20.160.020 Definitions adopted by reference.

§ 20.160.030 Additional definitions.

§ 20.160.040 Process.

§ 20.160.050 Designation of responsible official.

§ 20.160.060 Lead agency determination and responsibilities.

§ 20.160.070 Transfer of lead agency status to a state agency.

§ 20.160.080 Categorical exemptions – Adoption by reference.

§ 20.160.090 Categorical exemptions – Determination.

§ 20.160.100 Integration of SEPA with project permits and land use decisions.

§ 20.160.110 Threshold determinations.

§ 20.160.120 Environmental checklist.

§ 20.160.130 Timing.

§ 20.160.140 Mitigated DNS.

§ 20.160.150 Environmental impact statement.

§ 20.160.160 Preparation of EIS – Additional considerations.

§ 20.160.170 Additional elements to be covered by EIS.

§ 20.160.180 Adoption by reference.

§ 20.160.190 Public notice.

§ 20.160.200 Designation of official to perform consulted agency responsibilities for the city.

§ 20.160.210 Using existing environmental documents.

§ 20.160.220 SEPA and agency decisions.

§ 20.160.230 Substantive authority.

§ 20.160.240 Appeals.

§ 20.160.250 Notice.

§ 20.160.260 Agency compliance.

§ 20.160.270 Fees.

§ 20.160.280 Adoption of forms by reference.

§ 20.164.010 Shoreline master program. [1]

§ 20.172.010 Lock boxes – Required.

§ 20.172.020 Lock boxes – Specifications – Location.

§ 20.172.030 Lock boxes – Security.

§ 20.172.040 Lock boxes – Contents.

§ 20.172.050 Lock boxes – Changes to contents.

§ 20.172.060 Enforcement.

§ 20.172.070 Violation – Penalties.

§ 20.162.010 Title.

§ 20.162.012 Purpose.

§ 20.162.014 Applicability.

§ 20.162.016 Relationship to other regulations.

§ 20.162.018 Inventory provisions.

§ 20.162.020 Administration.

§ 20.162.022 Critical areas review types.

§ 20.162.024 Application requirements.

§ 20.162.026 Application requirements – Mitigation sequencing.

§ 20.162.028 General mitigation requirements.

§ 20.162.030 Application requirements – Review criteria.

§ 20.162.032 Bonds.

§ 20.162.034 Notice to title.

§ 20.162.036 Exemptions.

§ 20.162.038 Exceptions.

§ 20.162.040 Critical areas variances.

§ 20.162.042 Nonconforming – Existing structures.

§ 20.162.044 Enforcement – Violation – Penalty.

§ 20.162.046 Liability.

§ 20.162.048 Definitions.

§ 20.162.050 Purpose.

§ 20.162.052 Determination of wetland boundaries.

§ 20.162.054 Wetland categories.

§ 20.162.056 Exempt wetlands.

§ 20.162.058 Wetland development standards.

§ 20.162.060 Additional development standards for regulated uses.

§ 20.162.062 Wetland mitigation requirements.

§ 20.162.064 Incentives for wetlands protection.

§ 20.162.068 Purpose.

§ 20.162.070 Fish and wildlife habitat conservation area categories classification.

§ 20.162.072 Development standards.

§ 20.162.074 Purpose.

§ 20.162.076 Geologically hazardous area categories.

§ 20.162.078 Development standards.

§ 20.162.080 Purpose and requirements.

§ 20.162.082 Purpose.

§ 20.162.084 Critical aquifer recharge area categories.

§ 20.162.086 Development standards.

§ 20.162.088 Purpose.

§ 20.162.090 When required.

§ 20.162.092 Special reports – Responsibility for completion.

§ 20.162.094 Qualifications of professionals.