[Amended 4-15-1999 by L.L. No. 15-1999]
Except as provided hereafter in §
170-101, any building, structure or actual bona fide use, involving a substantial monetary investment, in buildings or other structures affixed to and made part of the real estate, which shall have existed as of July 16, 1945, and since said date shall not have been abandoned, may be continued, even though such building, structure or use shall not conform with the provisions of this chapter for the district in which it is located, provided that such existing building, structure or use shall have been constructed, altered or used in conformity with law and shall be in conformity with other existing law. No change, extension or enlargement of said use, however, shall be made in any building, land or premises or part thereof unless such change in use shall be in conformity with the provisions of this chapter and any other applicable ordinance or laws, whichever shall be the more restrictive. Similarly, whenever a district shall be changed hereafter, the provisions of this chapter with regard to any building or uses lawfully existing at the time of the passage of this chapter shall apply, subject to the conditions set forth in this section, to any building or use lawfully existing in such changed district at the time of the passage of such amendment. A beach or parking lot owned and operated by a duly incorporated community association as of the effective date of this chapter shall be deemed a nonconforming use. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter to the contrary, any legally established residential lot which is made nonconforming with respect to lot area or lot dimensions as a result of a change in residential district classification adopted after September 1, 1998, shall continue to be governed by the dimensional standards of the residential zoning district in which it was located prior to the change in classification and shall continue to be considered a legally conforming lot for all zoning purposes. This provision shall be deemed to supersede the uniformity requirement of Town Law § 262 in its application to the Town of Somers, pursuant to Municipal Home Rule Law § 10(1)(ii)(d)(3), to the extent necessary to grant this provision its full meaning in accordance with its intent.