Zoneomics Logo
search icon

Yakima County Unincorporated
City Zoning Code

Subtitle 19.3

PROCEDURES

§ 19.30.010 Legislative Intent.

The intent of this Chapter is to establish procedures for acting upon project permits authorized by this Title, including:
(1) 
Application submittal contents;
(2) 
Categories of application types;
(3) 
Authority for conducting review;
(4) 
Criteria for rendering decisions to approve, conditionally approve or deny applications; and
(5) 
A process for maintaining compliance with conditions or enforcing decisions, up to and including revocation of approvals where appropriate.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.020 Required Permits.

(1) 
Project Permits. Except as provided in Subsection (2) below, no use, development or modification to a use or development, as those terms are defined by this Title, may be established, placed, performed, constructed, made or implemented, in whole or in part without the issuance of a project permit by the Reviewing Official.
(2) 
Exceptions to Obtaining Project Permits under This Title. The following development, activities and modifications to development may require project permits under Yakima County Code.
(a) 
Normal structural repair and maintenance as defined in the codes adopted by YCC Title 13;
(b) 
Physical changes to conforming structures or uses other than structural alterations as that term is defined by this Title;
(c) 
Rehabilitation of dwelling units when such rehabilitation does not expand the number of dwelling units nor physically expand the structure;
(d) 
Accessory structures and uses listed under Section 19.18.020 that otherwise meet the specific development standards and requirements of this Title, when the principal use is already established;
(e) 
Alteration to land, including grading and leveling, paving, stockpiling, and excavation, the amount of which does not exceed 500 cubic yards;
(f) 
Required site improvements, including all construction of private or public roads, construction of sewer, electric, telecommunications, storm water, and water utilities under an approved and valid development authorization, subdivision or binding site plan regulating such improvements; and
(g) 
New uses for a legally established multiple occupancy building provided that the use:
(i) 
Is consistent with the conditions of the decision approving the multiple occupancy building;
(ii) 
Establishes a Type 1 or 2 use that is allowed within the zoning district;
(iii) 
Establishes a use that does not require drive-through facilities; and
(iv) 
Required structural changes would meet minimum development standards of the zone.
(3) 
Project Permit-Issuance in Conjunction with Another Permit. If the Reviewing Official is authorized to review and issue a project permit under any other County code or ordinance applicable to the development, he may require issuance of the project permit under this Title to be issued only in conjunction with said other project permit.
(4) 
Notice to Applicant and Future Owners of Proximity to Designated Resource Lands.
(a) 
All plats, short plats, development permits, and building permits issued for development activities on, or within 500 feet of, lands designated by the Comprehensive Plan as agricultural lands, forest lands, or mineral resource lands, shall contain a notice that the subject property is within or near designated agricultural lands, forest lands, or mineral resource lands on which a variety of commercial activities may occur that are not compatible with residential development for certain periods of limited duration. The notice for mineral resource lands shall also inform that an application might be made for mining-related activities, including mining, extraction, washing, crushing, stockpiling, blasting, transporting, and recycling of minerals (RCW 36.70A.060(1)(b)).
(b) 
The notice shall also state that agricultural, forest and mining activities performed in accordance with County, state and federal laws are not subject to legal action as public nuisances.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.030 Application and Use Categories.

Actions and uses under this Title are grouped into categories, each with a corresponding review process as defined in YCC Section 16B.03.030. If an application does not meet minimum approval criteria or standards for the zone and this Title, or cannot be adequately conditioned at a particular location, it shall be denied. A project permit, other than a nonconforming use permit, may not be granted for a classified use in a zoning district from which it is specifically prohibited. Applications are categorized as follows:
(1) 
Type 1 Applications.
(a) 
The Administrative Official reviews applications subject to Type 1 review under the procedures of Section 19.30.090 and YCC Chapter 16B.03 for compliance with this Title.
(b) 
Applications requiring Type 1 review include:
(i) 
Boundary line adjustments;
(ii) 
Segregations within an approved binding site plan for commercial and industrial development;
(iii) 
Administrative modifications to existing or approved uses where authorized by this Title; and
(iv) 
Type 1 Permitted Uses shown on the Allowable Land Use Table 19.14-1 in Chapter 19.14, except when required to undergo Type 2 review under Subsection (1)(c) below. The Reviewing Official shall use the procedures in YCC Subsection 16B.03.030(1)(a), Sections 19.30.080 and 19.30.090 to review Type 1 Permitted Uses and associated site improvements for compliance with the provisions and standards of the zoning district in which they are located.
(c) 
Type 1 Permitted Uses require Type 2 review when:
(i) 
All or part of the development, except for agricultural buildings, single-family dwellings and duplexes are in the 100-year floodplain or Greenway Overlay (GO);
(ii) 
All or part of a development that is in a Master Planned Development Overlay (MPDO) and is identified in a development agreement as requiring Type 2 approval;
(iii) 
The proposed use includes hazardous material, as defined in Section 19.01.070;
(iv) 
All or part of the development requires a modification to an existing development plan and/or master plan associated with a Master Planned Development Overlay;
(v) 
The Reviewing Official cannot determine from the application submitted that the use will meet the approval standards in Section 19.30.090; or
(vi) 
The permitted use could be approved subject to broader condition authority under Section 19.30.100.
(d) 
Type 1 Uses generally not subject to project review by the Administrative Official provided all applicable standards of this Title are met and/or when categorically exempt from environmental review under YCC Section 16.04.100, or for which environmental review has been completed in connection with other project permits, and when locating on an existing lot:
(i) 
Site-built or modular dwellings and two-family dwellings;
(ii) 
Manufactured home meeting requirements of Section 19.18.270;
(iii) 
Mobile or manufactured homes of any size in approved or existing mobile/manufactured home parks;
(iv) 
Multi-wide manufactured home in approved or existing manufactured home subdivisions;
(v) 
Single-wide manufactured home in approved or existing manufactured home subdivisions;
(vi) 
Single-wide manufactured home, on an individual lot meeting the criteria in Section 19.18.270;
(vii) 
Sales office within a residential or mixed-use project while units in the project are sold by the developer;
(viii) 
Garages and other accessory structures associated with (i) through (vii) above, but not including accessory dwelling units;
(ix) 
Forestry;
(x) 
Agriculture other than Animal Feeding Operations and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, slaughterhouses and rendering plants, and sprayfields;
(xi) 
Agricultural buildings;
(xii) 
Structures used for storage of fuel or agricultural products;
(xiii) 
Excavations;
(xiv) 
Irrigation distribution/drainage facilities, including impoundment of water, dams and frost ponds; and
(xv) 
Utility services (substations, reservoirs, etc.), when no building or series of buildings requires a building permit.
(2) 
Type 2 Applications.
(a) 
The Administrative Official (and the hearing examiner when such applications are referred by the Administrative Official under YCC § 19.14.010(2)) reviews applications subject to Type 2 review under the procedures of Section 19.30.100 and YCC Chapter 16B.03 for compliance with this Title as provided by YCC Subsection 16B.03.030(1)(b).
(b) 
Applications subject to Type 2 review include:
(i) 
Short plats and recorded short plat alterations/vacations that do not involve a public dedication [See Subsection 19.34.040(9)];
(ii) 
New binding site plans for commercial and industrial development;
(iii) 
Administrative adjustments to standards where authorized by this Title; and
(iv) 
Type 2 Administrative Uses shown on the Allowable Land Use Table 19.14-1 in Chapter 19.14 are generally allowed in the zoning district. The compatibility between a Type 2 Administrative Use and the surrounding environment cannot always be determined in advance. Therefore, a Type 2 Administrative Use may be conditioned to ensure compatibility and compliance with the provisions of the zoning district and the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
(3) 
Type 3 Applications.
(a) 
The Hearing Examiner reviews applications subject to Type 3 review under the procedures of Section 19.30.100 and YCC Subsection 16B.03.030(1)(c).
(b) 
Applications subject to Type 3 review include:
(i) 
Variances;
(ii) 
Non-conforming use expansions or alterations, other than residential structures and specified mining operations;
(iii) 
Plat vacations or alterations under Chapter 58.17 RCW;
(iv) 
Major modifications to a Master Development Plan;
(v) 
Type 3 review required for Type 2 Administrative Uses referred by the Administrative Official for Type 3 review and for other specific reviews established by this Title. Such referred reviews are subject to the criteria of 19.30.020(2)(b)(iv) for Type 2 uses; and
(vi) 
Uses shown on the Allowable Land Use Table 19.14-1 in Chapter 19.14, Type 3 Conditional Uses are not generally appropriate throughout the zoning district.
(4) 
Type 4 Quasi-Judicial Applications. Long Plat Applications, new or expanded Master Planned Developments in Urban Growth Areas, Master Planned Resorts (MPRs) in rural or resource areas, Minor Rezones or any other Type 4 use or development listed in the Allowable Land Use Table 19.14-1 found in Chapter 19.14 are subject to Type 4 review. The process for review of Type 4 applications shall be as set forth in YCC Subsection 16B.03.030(1)(d) and Section 19.30.080 and the process for Minor Rezone applications shall be as set forth in Section 19.36.030.
(5) 
Accessory Uses. Accessory uses may be permitted when a principal use has been established. Accessory uses are customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use of a structure or site. Refer to Section 19.18.020 for regulations governing accessory uses.
(6) 
Existing Uses. Within the zoning districts established by this Title, or zoning district amendments that may later be adopted, there may exist uses that were legally established prior to the effective date of this Title or applicable amendment that are classified as a Type 1, 2, 3 or 4 use in a particular zoning district. Such uses shall be considered Existing Type 1, 2, 3 or 4 uses, and subject to the review standards pertaining thereto under current code. Previously approved uses may continue according to their conditions of approval, whether classified as existing or nonconforming. A change in classification as existing or nonconforming will be reviewed under its new classification at such time the use is altered, amended, modified or expanded.
(7) 
Prohibited Uses Production, Processing and Retailing of Marijuana Prohibited. Production, processing and retail sales of marijuana and marijuana-infused products, all as defined in Initiative Measure No. 502, as codified in the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 69.50, and implementing regulations in Chapter 314-55 of the Washington Administrative Code, are each prohibited and not allowed in any zone within the unincorporated areas of Yakima County.
(8) 
Development Permits for Master Planned Resorts. The Resort Development Plan authorized in conjunction with the rezone to MPR is the guide for development of the resort. Establishment of the uses identified in the Resort Development Plan shall be subject to Type 1 review, in order to conduct site-specific review of the individual uses.
(a) 
Establishment of land uses and any division of land by subdivision or condominium must be consistent with:
(i) 
The authorized RDP;
(ii) 
Any specific conditions or required mitigation measures;
(iii) 
SEPA review, including an environmental checklist; and
(iv) 
All necessary construction authorization permits.
(b) 
Components or phases of the authorized RDP may be submitted with other required approvals as a master application.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 2-2022 § 3 (Exh. 1), 2022)

§ 19.30.040 Pre-application Conference.

(1) 
Pre-application conferences are mandatory for:
(a) 
Agricultural Tourist Operations;
(b) 
Subdivisions (long plats);
(c) 
Linear Transmission Facilities;
(d) 
Mining Site Operations;
(e) 
Master Planned Development applications;
(f) 
Master Planned Resorts;
(g) 
Development located within the FEMA 100-year floodplain; and
(h) 
Other projects where required by the Administrative Official under YCC Section 16B.04.010.
(2) 
Prior to applying, the applicant may arrange a conference with the Planning Division to review the proposed action, to become familiar with the policies, plans and the development requirements and to coordinate all necessary permits and procedures.
(3) 
Any information or opinions expressed by the Planning Division staff shall not be binding on the Reviewing Official or constitute approval of the project. Refer to YCC Section 16B.04.010 for procedural details concerning a pre-application conference.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.060 Application Requirements.

All of the following documents and elements must be submitted as requirements for a fully completed application for project permits where specified in the particular application form or as determined necessary by the Administrative Official due to applicability of the specific requirement to the proposal:
(1) 
General Information. The items required under YCC Section 16B.04.020.
(2) 
Site Plan. A site plan, in conformance with Section 19.30.070.
(3) 
Optional Consolidated Permit Review. Under YCC Section 16B.03.060, two or more project permits relating to a proposed project action may be processed collectively under the highest numbered category of project permit required for any part of the proposal or processed individually under each of the procedures identified by the code. The applicable fee for each application will be required.
(4) 
Contents. Individual chapters of this Title and YCC Title 16B contain additional information required for a particular type of application review process.
(a) 
Design modifications, administrative adjustments, variances, minor rezones, modifications to approved, existing, and nonconforming uses, lots and structures, and other specified applications shall submit documents and elements in conformance with this Chapter and the specific requirements of Chapters 19.33 through 19.36.
(b) 
All applications shall include the following information:
(i) 
Yakima County taxation parcel number and, for land divisions, a legal description;
(ii) 
Description of proposed action;
(iii) 
Size of subject property;
(iv) 
Explanation of any administrative adjustment or design modification sought from the standards of this ordinance; and
(v) 
Draft of any proposed covenants, restrictions and easements.
(c) 
All necessary documents, narratives, detailed project development schedule or special studies identified at the time of pre-application conference must be included with the site plan at the time of submittal;
(d) 
A comprehensive sign plan meeting the requirements of Section 19.35.020(7), if an administrative adjustment or variance to the sign standards is requested;
(e) 
Special studies, such as soil and geological analyses as determined necessary by the Administrative Official to address specific site constraints; and
(f) 
Any other information specified by the Administrative Official, such as:
(i) 
Existing ownership pattern;
(ii) 
Operation and maintenance proposals (i.e. homeowner's association, condominium, co-op or other);
(iii) 
Solid waste disposal facilities;
(iv) 
Lighting;
(v) 
Water supply and fire hydrants;
(vi) 
Public transportation;
(vii) 
Community facilities;
(viii) 
Flood proofing or other measures to protect against flooding; or
(ix) 
Information on design methods to conserve energy.
(5) 
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. A copy of any existing covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) or deed restrictions pertaining to or affecting the property.
(6) 
Boundary Line Adjustments. Additional items required for a boundary line adjustments under Section 19.34.020 include:
(a) 
Boundary Line Adjustments.
(i) 
Legal Descriptions. New legal descriptions prepared by a licensed surveyor for all new lots affected by the boundary line adjustment before they are submitted to the Planning Division. Existing legal descriptions may be submitted with the Owners' Commitment or Subdivision Guarantee.
(ii) 
Record of Survey. A record of survey shall be submitted with the boundary line adjustment application in compliance with RCW 58.09. The record of survey shall include on the face or be attached to a declarative covenant with a statement of intent of the altered boundary lines, signed and notarized by all current owners of the properties. The document shall be titled "Record of Survey." Every survey filed for record must contain or be attached to a declarative covenant or deeds giving a full and correct description of the lands divided as they appear, including a statement in substantially the following form:
LANGUAGE FOR DECLARATION OF CORRECTED BOUNDARY LINES: This boundary line adjustment has been made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the owner or owners. No fractional part of contiguous lots merged in this action may hereafter be sold, leased, transferred or developed through building permit or other development permit as a division separate or distinct from the land into which it is merged without prior approval under Yakima County Code Title 19.
(iii) 
Owner's Commitment or Subdivision Guarantee. To establish the ownership of lots proposed for adjustment, the application shall be accompanied by a current Owner's Commitment or Subdivision Guarantee as provided under Subsection 19.30.060(8).
(iv) 
Yakima Health District Approval. Applications for boundary line adjustments where individual on-site sewage systems are proposed on lots under two acres, or if located on Type 1 soil identified by WAC Chapter 246-272A, on lots under two and one-half acres shall be accompanied by a written verification from the Yakima Health District that the lots can accommodate an on-site sewage system, or that the proposed adjustment does not affect the on-site sewage system, as applicable under Subsection 19.34.060(5).
(7) 
Stormwater Site Plan. A stormwater site plan, if required by YCC Chapter 12.10.
(8) 
Owner's Commitment or Subdivision Guarantee. A boundary line adjustment, binding site plan, or preliminary plat application shall include a current Owner's Commitment or Subdivision Guarantee showing all parties having any interest in the "land" subdivided to establish the ownership of lots. The title company report shall be current within 60 days of submitting a complete application and address the following:
(a) 
The existing legal description of each parcel involved in the proposal;
(b) 
Those individuals or corporations holding an ownership interest and any security interest (such as deeds of trust or mortgages) or any other encumbrances affecting the title of said parcels.
(c) 
Any lands to be dedicated shall be confirmed as owned in fee title by the owner(s) signing the dedication certificate; and
(d) 
Any easements or restrictions affecting the properties being adjusted with a description of purpose and referenced by the auditor's file number and/or recording number.
(9) 
SEPA Environmental Checklist. Any application not exempt under YCC Section 16.04.110, WAC 197-11-800(6) or Chapter 43.21C RCW, State Environmental Policy Act, shall include an environmental checklist unless the SEPA Responsible Official determines one is not needed.
(10) 
Written Narrative and Other Information.
(a) 
A written narrative shall be submitted that addresses the following:
(i) 
Project description including project phases and timeframes from project authorization to project completion;
(ii) 
How the application meets or exceeds each of the applicable approval criteria and standards;
(iii) 
How the issues identified in the pre-application conference have been addressed, and generally, how services will be provided to the site; and
(iv) 
Whether any development standards are proposed to be modified from the underlying zoning district requirements.
(b) 
Applications for binding site plans shall include a narrative describing the provisions for long term maintenance with adequate financing for areas and facilities under common ownership.
(c) 
Applications for Master Planned Resorts shall include:
(i) 
A narrative demonstrating compliance with the approval criteria of Section 19.36.050;
(ii) 
Information in addition to the items of this Section and Subsection 19.30.070(7) required to review the unique MPR proposal;
(iii) 
Evidence of financial and other resources available to develop the project;
(iv) 
Tables showing total numbers of acres, distribution of area by use, percent designated for each use; and
(v) 
Approach to the strategies shown on the site plan and identified in Subsection 19.30.070(7) below.
(11) 
Cluster Development. Applications for cluster developments under Section 19.34.035 shall include the items required in that Section and items required for a boundary line adjustment, short subdivision or subdivision, depending on the type of process required for the proposed cluster development.
(12) 
Master Planned Development Overlay.
(a) 
Application. A proposed master concept plan may include properties both within and outside the jurisdictional boundaries of the cities, provided all areas are located within the UGA. Applications for Master Planned Development Overlays that transcend jurisdictional boundaries shall complete one of the following prior to acceptance of the application for processing:
(i) 
Annexation of the remainder of the property lying outside of city limits; or
(ii) 
Submit a petition for annexation to the City Council for the above mentioned property, and attain and submit an Early Transfer of Jurisdiction letter to the city releasing the proposed land use application to be processed by the city.
(b) 
Development Plan – Submission Requirements. An application for Master Planned Development shall include the following information:
(c) 
Planning History. A summary of all previous known land use decisions affecting the applicant's property and a list of all outstanding conditions of approval regarding such prior land use decisions.
(d) 
Existing Property Information. An application for a Master Plan Development shall contain the following information on and adjacent to the site, presented in narrative, tabular and/or graphic formats:
(i) 
Vicinity map that identifies surrounding uses within 500 feet of the site boundary;
(ii) 
Legal description for the proposed Master Planned Development with a title report disclosing all lien holders and owners of record;
(iii) 
Zoning map that identifies base and overlay zoning designations for the site and surrounding property uses within 500 feet of the site boundary; and
(iv) 
Site description including the following information provided in narrative, tabular and/or graphic formats:
(A) 
Topography and natural resources including 100-year floodplain; wetlands, rivers, streams or other critical areas; and natural hazards such as steep slopes greater than 15%, and unstable, impermeable or weak soils;
(B) 
Inventory of cultural, historic and/or archaeological resources on the site, if any;
(C) 
Existing buildings, if any, including use, location, size and date of construction;
(D) 
Existing on-site transportation systems including streets, sidewalks and bike paths, if any;
(E) 
Location and size of existing public and private utilities on the site including water, sanitary sewer, storm water retention/treatment facilities and electrical, telephone and data transmission lines;
(F) 
Location of public and private easements;
(G) 
A description of the type, design and characteristics of the surrounding properties to assess the proposed Master Planned Development effects;
(H) 
Conceptual grading, drainage, and landscaping plans; and,
(I) 
Proposed development areas including building footprints, conceptual elevations or illustrative photos of similar development, identification of types, the number of dwelling units in each residential type and the number of square feet in each commercial type.
(e) 
Technical Studies. Technical Studies may be required by the Administrative Official when potential adverse impacts are identified and may include:
(i) 
A Traffic Impact Analysis sufficient to assess access to the site and within the site, on-street parking impacts and limitations and necessary traffic-related improvements;
(ii) 
Drainage Study;
(iii) 
Geotechnical Analysis;
(iv) 
Noise Analysis;
(v) 
Visual Composite; and
(vi) 
Other analysis of potentially significant issues as identified during the SEPA environmental checklist review.
(f) 
Site Plan. The application shall include a concept site plan consistent with Section 19.30.070 that includes the following elements:
(i) 
The proposed circulation system of arterial and collector streets, including if known, the approximate general location of local streets, private streets, off-street parking, service and loading areas, and major points of access to public rights-of-way, with notations of proposed public or private ownership;
(ii) 
A Master Planned Development incorporating commercial or industrial facilities must provide a buffer or site design along the perimeter of the Master Planned Development, which shall reasonably transition the Master Planned Development to any adjacent properties zoned or used for residential purposes. If automobile parking, driveways, or machinery operation is within 100 feet of a Master Planned Development boundary, site screening shall be in accordance with Chapter 19.21;
(iii) 
Aesthetic considerations related to building bulk, architectural compatibility, light and glare, urban design, solar access and shadow impacts;
(iv) 
Proposed pedestrian and vehicular circulation pattern and proposed types of circulation facilities;
(v) 
Proposed location and dimension of all common open spaces;
(vi) 
Site features to mitigate traffic, environmental, geotechnical and other impacts as identified in technical studies required by this Chapter; and
(vii) 
Shoreline and Critical Areas where applicable.
(g) 
A preliminary development plan consisting of a written statement for development setting out detailed information concerning the following subjects as they may be involved in the development, including, but not limited to the following items:
(i) 
Market analysis of proposed use;
(ii) 
Proposed ownership method;
(iii) 
Proposed operation and maintenance of development and landscaping;
(iv) 
Provisions to assure permanence and maintenance of common open spaces through homeowner association formation, condominium development, or other means acceptable to the County;
(v) 
General timetable for development, including future phases;
(vi) 
Impact on community facilities and services including but not limited to streets, schools, parks, medical, fire, police, water, sewer, storm drainage, solid waste and public transportation;
(vii) 
Compatibility with surrounding land uses; and,
(viii) 
An assessment of how the project is consistent with the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan and base zone, as well as MPDO criteria, and where the project differs from existing standards for similar uses or facilities outside without the MPDO.
(h) 
Development Agreement. The application should also include a Draft Development Agreement including the following elements:
(i) 
Narrative Description of Project and Objectives;
(ii) 
Summary of Development Standards;
(iii) 
Site Plan Elements;
(iv) 
Development Phasing, including times of performance to preserve vesting;
(v) 
Public Meeting Summaries;
(vi) 
Performance Standards and Conditions addressing items "a" through "e" above;
(vii) 
Criteria for Determining Major vs. Minor Modifications and amendments; and
(viii) 
Signatures by each owner of the property within the Master Development Plan area acknowledging that all owners will be bound by conditions of approval, including use, design and layout, and development standards contained with an approved Plan and Development Agreement.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 9-2019 (Exh. 4) (part), 2019)

§ 19.30.070 Site Plans for Project Permits – Form and Contents.

(1) 
Form. All site plans for project permits shall be drawn to scale and be legibly drawn, prepared, or printed on paper. The paper size shall be 8 ½" x 11" or 11" x 17" to show required improvement at an appropriate scale that can be read and reproduced. The County may also accept electronic submittals, as appropriate. The scale of the drawing shall be a standard engineering scale as further defined for each application type, unless a different scale is authorized by the Administrative Official, and shall reasonably utilize the paper size. Site plans must include the items listed in Subsections (2) through (7) below for the specific application. The site plan may be on several sheets accompanied by an index sheet showing the entire site.
(2) 
Contents. The Administrative Official may require the following site plan contents in Table 19.30.070-1 as necessary to review applications for project permits. The contents in Table 19.30.070-1 are intentionally broad and inclusive in order to comply with RCW 36.70B.080 and disclose all submittal requirements. This Title is implemented through use of forms tailored to submittal information related to specific application or case types under consideration.
Table 19.30.070-1. Site Plan Submittal Requirements
(a)
General Information.
(i)
The project boundaries of the site and of each affected lot, tract, or parcel, with all Assessor's tax parcel numbers for the subject property. (solid lines for existing lots, broken lines for proposed lots);
(ii)
Engineer Scale, north arrow, legend and date;
(b)
Existing Conditions.
(i)
All major physiographic features, such as, critical areas and shorelines, on or abutting the site;
(ii)
When ground slopes exceed ten percent, the site plan shall depict existing topographic contours at intervals of not more than five feet, extending one hundred feet beyond the boundaries of the site;
(c)
Existing and Proposed Development.
(i)
The location, shape, size, gross floor area, height and types of all existing and proposed structures, structures to be removed, minimum building setbacks, lot coverage, lot area, and the boundary lines of all proposed and existing lots, tracts, and easements;
(ii)
Proposed location and dimension of community and other open space;
(iii)
The location and dimensions of any existing and proposed utilities, streets, railroads, irrigation and drainage canals, easements and dedication of property within the subject property or adjacent to any affected lots;
(iv)
The location, right-of-way widths, pavement widths, curbs, gutters, culverts and names of all existing or platted streets or roads, whether public or private, and other public ways within the subject property or adjacent to any affected lots;
(v)
Location, dimension and design of off-street parking facilities, showing points of ingress to and egress from the site;
(vi)
Existing and proposed land uses, including primary and accessory;
(vii)
Existing and proposed pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns, and where specified, sidewalks, trails and bicycle paths;
(viii)
Existing and proposed landscaping, sitescreening and street trees, where required;
(ix)
The proposed contours and grading as they affect lot layout, streets, and drainageways as set forth in YCC § 12.10, 16C and 16D;
(x)
Existing and proposed public and private utility infrastructure including sewer or other waste disposal facilities, water mains, irrigation, fire protection systems and other underground utilities;
(xi)
The existing on-site sewage system components and reserve areas and the proposed location for on-site sewage systems and soil test pits for all affected lots not served by an on-site sewage system or other approved wastewater treatment system. The location of structures on the adjoining lots when within 100 feet of a well or on-site sewage disposal system;
(xii)
The location of all existing and proposed storm drainage facilities;
(d)
Floodplain Development.
A site plan for development in the 100-year floodplain shall also include the following information:
(i)
Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of the proposed development.
(ii)
The boundaries of the 100-year floodplain, the boundaries of floodways where floodways have been established, and the 100-year base flood elevations where base flood elevations have been established.
(iii)
The boundaries of the 10 and 25-year floodplain using the flood risk maps provided by Yakima County as part the mandatory pre-application conference.
(iv)
Other information as may be required by YCC Titles 13, 16C or 16D.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 10-2019 (Exh. 1) (part), 2019)

§ 19.30.071 Site Plans for Project Permits – Boundary Line Adjustments.

In addition to the requirements listed in Subsections 19.30.070(1) and (2) above, a boundary line adjustment shall show the location and dimensions of all structures/improvements existing upon the affected lots and the distance between each such structure/improvement when they are located within 100 linear feet of all existing and proposed boundary lines.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.072 Site Plans for Project Permits – Preliminary Short Plats.

(1) 
Preliminary Short Plats. In addition to the requirements listed in Subsection 19.30.070(1) and (2) above a preliminary short plat application shall show the following items where applicable:
(a) 
Location of the subdivision in range, township and section;
(b) 
Existing and Proposed Conditions:
(i) 
Approximate location of all natural features including, but not limited to areas covered by water and the location, width, name and direction of flow of all watercourses; and
(ii) 
For projects with more than four lots, the location, name, right-of-way width, approximate radii of curves and approximate grades of all proposed streets, alleys or roads within or on the boundary of the proposed subdivision;
(iii) 
The location, size and use of all contemplated and existing public areas within the proposed short subdivision. Areas for public use, approved by the Reviewing Official, shall be dedicated for such use and indicated on the final plat before recording;
(iv) 
Minimum building setback lines according to applicable development regulations, including buffers adjacent to critical areas and designated resource lands. A "typical lot" may show setbacks for all regular shaped interior lots. All setback lines must be shown on irregular shaped and corner lots.
(2) 
Final Short Plat. The final short plat meeting the requirements outlined in Section 19.34.070 must be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and be submitted using forms provided by the Administrative Official and accompanied with the required fee.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.073 Site Plans for Project Permits – Preliminary Plats.

(1) 
Preliminary Plats. In addition to the relevant requirements listed in Subsections 19.30.070(1) and (2) above, including all items required for preliminary short plat applications, preliminary plats shall show the following items where applicable:
(a) 
Scale. The scale of the drawing shall be a standard engineering scale at least one inch equals 200 feet and shall reasonably utilize the paper size, unless the Administrative Official requests or authorizes a different scale. Where necessary, the plan may be on several sheets accompanied by an index sheet showing the entire site.
(b) 
General information.
(i) 
Proposed name of the subdivision; this name shall duplicate no name used on a recorded plat or subdivision in Yakima County, including municipalities of the county;
(ii) 
Names and addresses of the owners, subdivider, designer of the subdivision and the surveyor; and
(iii) 
A full and correct legal description of the entire lot, tract, parcel, site or division constituting the applicant's land.
(c) 
Proposed subdivision plat.
(i) 
Approximate dimensions of all lots with proposed lot and block numbers. Lot sizes and dimensions shall comply with Section 19.10.050; and
(ii) 
If the subdivider desires to develop the plat in phases, the phases shall be shown on the preliminary plat.
(d) 
A vicinity map showing all roads or road reservations, streams, and any other pertinent information that will assist in the consideration of the proposed subdivision, including the names of adjacent subdivisions. The vicinity map shall extend at least 800 feet from the proposed subdivision.
(2) 
Final Plats. The final plat meeting the requirements outlined in Section 19.34.070 must be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and be submitted using forms provided by the Administrative Official and accompanied with the required fee.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.074 Site Plans for Project Permits – Binding Site Plans.

(1) 
Binding Site Plans. In addition to the requirements listed in Subsections 19.30.070(1) and (2) above all binding site plans shall show the following items where applicable:
(a) 
Scale. The scale of the drawing shall be a standard engineering scale at least one inch equals 200 feet and shall reasonably utilize the paper size, unless the Administrator requests or authorizes a different scale. Where necessary, the plan may be on several sheets accompanied by an index sheet showing the entire site.
(b) 
General Preliminary Binding Site Plan Requirements. Binding Site Plans shall show the location, description and proposed phasing of the following facilities proposed to serve the development, such as:
(i) 
Interior and exterior roadway network;
(ii) 
Water and sewerage facilities;
(iii) 
Stormwater drainage facilities;
(iv) 
Sidewalks and streetlights;
(v) 
Fire protection systems with sufficient water storage and flows;
(vi) 
Facilities to address compatibility with adjacent dissimilar land uses; and
(vii) 
For commercial and industrial uses, any lot(s) to be created as a part of the original Binding Site Plan.
(c) 
Site Plan Requirements for Manufactured/Mobile Home Parks. All proposals for manufactured/mobile home parks shall include a site plan based upon a land survey. The site plan shall be drawn by a licensed architect, engineer or surveyor and shall include the items listed in subsection (1) above and the following information:
(i) 
All spaces clearly delineated on the site plan and dimensions and square footage for each space;
(ii) 
A building area within each space;
(iii) 
Unit setbacks for each space;
(iv) 
The location of required off street parking for each unit;
(v) 
Signage for the park and directional signage;
(vi) 
The location of all solid waste containers and screening of containers; and
(vii) 
All facilities, utilities, improvements and amenities, including pathways, sidewalks, and recreational facilities.
(d) 
Site Plan Requirements for Campgrounds and Recreational Vehicle Parks. Site plan requirements for campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks allowed under 19.18.130 shall include the items listed in subsection (1) above and the following campground-specific information:
(i) 
The proposed location, configuration and size of each camping space;
(ii) 
Amenities such as picnic areas, playgrounds, landscaped areas and buffers, restrooms, showers, dump stations and swimming areas;
(iii) 
The location of the campground or recreational vehicle park management office or owner/manager's residence, all existing buildings and structures on site and buildings, structures, and uses proposed to be developed in the campground or recreational vehicle park; and
(iv) 
The acreage and proposed site density of the campground and/or recreational vehicle park.
(2) 
Final Binding Site Plan. The final binding site plan meeting the requirements outlined in Section 19.34.081 must be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and be submitted using forms provided by the Administrative Official and accompanied with the required fee.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.075 Site Plans for Project Permits – Master Planned Resorts (MPR).

In addition to the site plan requirements listed in Subsections 19.30.070(1) and (2) above all MPR Development Plans shall provide the following where applicable:
(1) 
Narrative and graphics (e.g., building elevations, concept plans) describing a detailed unifying theme consistent with the natural setting of the Master Planned Resort;
(2) 
Narrative and graphics describing all planned uses and their rationale consistent with the resort theme, the Resort Development Plan and definition of Master Planned Resort;
(3) 
Demonstration that residential uses will generally be of a nature and ownership that are clearly for short-term visitor accommodation. Other residential uses may be included only if such uses are integrated into and support the on-site recreational nature of the resort;
(4) 
Narrative and graphics describing the development phasing of the resort;
(5) 
Narrative and graphics describing the following aspects of the resort at a conceptual level of detail: Strategies for:
(a) 
Supplying water to the resort, showing: (i) approximate service line locations; (ii) water sources; (iii) needed volumes; (iv) available volumes; (v) water rights to support the resort; (vi) water storage and facility locations; (vii) designation of Satellite Management Agency; (viii) other necessary information identified by Administrative Official.
(b) 
Sewage disposal, showing: (i) approximate sewer line locations; (ii) approximate drainfield areas and locations; (iii) estimated sewage volumes generated; (iv) designation of Satellite Management Agency; (v) treatment facility locations; (vi) lagoon and spray field areas and locations; (vii) other information determined necessary by the Administrative Official.
(c) 
Vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic flow, showing: (i) approximate road and path locations; (ii) methods of dealing with hills and steep slopes; (iii) methods of stormwater control; (iv) necessary upgrades to existing systems; (v) anticipated typical street sections; (vi) other necessary information identified by Administrative Official.
(d) 
Grading, showing: (i) how grading and resort design works with natural topography of site; (ii) areas needing minor surface grading; (iii) areas needing major excavation or filling along with their anticipated depth; (iv) conceptual cross-sections to depict land form changes throughout resort; (v) approximate slopes planned throughout the resort; (vi) other information determined necessary by the Administrative Official.
(e) 
Providing electric and communication utilities to the resort, showing: (i) approximate line locations; (ii) necessary upgrades to existing systems; (iii) substations and facility locations; (iv) other information determined necessary by the Administrative Official.
(f) 
Providing emergency and other services, showing: (i) necessary upgrades to existing facilities; (ii) station and facility locations; (iii) other information determined necessary by the Administrative Official.
(g) 
Providing a consistent architecture, landscape and open space character, showing: (i) design consistent with theme; (ii) typical or sample elevations depicting architectural character; (iii) landscaping and open space plans; (iv) other information determined necessary by the Administrative Official.
(h) 
Treatment and modification of critical areas, showing: (i) stream, floodplain and wetland modification; (ii) restoration work; (iii) buffer modifications; (iv) stream and wetland crossings; (v) methods for dealing with other critical areas (if applicable such as Geological Hazards, Wildlife Habitat and Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas; (vi) other information determined necessary by the Administrative Official.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.080 Application Review Procedures.

Applications shall be submitted and considered in the manner established by YCC Chapter 16B.04, Application Process and as follows:
(1) 
Applications. Applications shall include information necessary to review the proposal for conformance with this Title, as set forth in Section 19.30.060.
(2) 
Completeness Review. The procedures for determining whether an application is complete for review are established in YCC Sections 16B.04.030 through 16B.04.070.
(3) 
Violations and Penalties. As provided in YCC Sections 16B.11.040 and 16B.11.050, and this Title, an application may be rejected by the Administrative Official where a violation of this or other County ordinances or state law is found to exist on the property until such time as the violation is remedied or the application itself is intended to remedy the violation or the Administrative Official determines the proposal has no bearing on the existing violation. Such violations may also be considered sufficient grounds for denial of an application by the County if the proposed application cannot and does not remedy the violation.
(4) 
Additional Information. The Reviewing Official may request additional or more detailed information as provided in YCC Section 16B.04.040.
(5) 
Public Notice.
(a) 
Notice shall be given for Type 2, 3 and 4 reviews as provided for in YCC Chapter 16B.05.
(b) 
The Reviewing Official may also solicit comments from any other person or public agency he feels may be affected by the proposal.
(6) 
Administrative Adjustments at Public Hearings. In order to address site plan modifications resulting from the public hearing process, the Hearing Examiner and Board may grant administrative adjustments under the criteria of Chapter 19.35 without additional notice. Road Design Modifications may be authorized by the appropriate Reviewing Official only for those adjustable standards indicated in Section 19.35.040 under Table 19.35.040-1.
(7) 
Decision Criteria. Decision criteria for Type 1 permits are listed below in Section 19.30.090. For all Type 2, 3 and 4 reviews, the Reviewing Official shall prepare written findings and conclusions stating the specific reasons, upon which the decision or recommendation to approve, approve with conditions or deny the application is based. The findings shall, at a minimum, address the following criteria:
(a) 
The present and future needs of the community will be adequately served by the proposed development and that the community as a whole will be benefited rather than injured;
(b) 
The proposed use is compatible with neighborhood land uses, the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and the legislative intent of the zoning district;
(c) 
The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use;
(d) 
All setbacks, spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading, sitescreening, landscaping, and other features required by this Title;
(e) 
The proposed use complies with other development and performance standards of the zoning district and this Title;
(f) 
The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use;
(g) 
The proposed use will have no substantial adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof;
(h) 
In the case of residential uses, the housing density of the development is consistent with the existing zoning densities, or the Comprehensive Plan, and that all other aspects of the development are consistent with the public health, safety, and general welfare for the development and for adjacent properties; and
(i) 
The development complies with all criteria in Chapter 19.18 applicable to the proposed use, unless otherwise administratively adjusted.
(8) 
Reviewing Official's Decision. After considering the matters in the record and any comments in response to notice where required, the Reviewing Official shall take one or more of the following actions as authorized under YCC Title 16B:
(a) 
Approve the application;
(b) 
Establish conditions for approval or require changes in the proposed site plan, provided that conditioning authority for Permitted Uses subject to Type 1 review is limited to that specified in Section 19.30.090;
(c) 
Request additional or more detailed information per YCC Section 16B.07.030. The Reviewing Official may continue an open record public hearing to allow requested additional information to be provided;
(d) 
Refer any Type 2 Administrative Use application to the Hearing Examiner for the purpose of holding a public hearing and rendering a decision on the proposal under Type 2 review procedures and criteria;
(e) 
Deny the application; and
(f) 
As provided in YCC Chapter 16B.09, the Board may also remand a Type 2 Administrative, Type 3 Conditional or Type 4 Quasi-judicial application to the Hearing Examiner before making a decision on the record if the Board finds that the Hearing Examiner's decision or recommendation needs clarification or further findings on specific points, consistency with this Title, or the Comprehensive Plan.
The Reviewing Official's final decision shall be issued in accordance with the requirements of YCC Chapter 16B.07.
(9) 
Limitations. Applications approved by the Reviewing Official authorize only the use, arrangement and construction set forth in the approved site plans, plats and applications, and no other use, arrangement or construction unless otherwise permitted and not prohibited by condition. Use, arrangement or construction substantially at variance with that authorized is a violation of this Title and punishable as provided by YCC Chapter 16B.11.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.090 Type 1 Application Approval Criteria and Conditions.

(1) 
In granting a project permit application subject to Type 1 review, the Administrative Official shall review the submitted materials and all other necessary information to determine that:
(a) 
The proposed development complies with the standards and provisions of the zoning district in which it is located, the development standards and all other applicable sections of this Title, except when an Administrative Adjustment is granted or the proposed development is otherwise modified according to the provisions of this Title.
(b) 
Adequate water, sewer, roads, and other infrastructure improvements exist, or will be provided, to serve the project consistent with the purpose of the zoning district.
(c) 
When located within an Urban Growth Area, the Reviewing Official may solicit and consider comments from the affected city in making this determination.
(d) 
When necessary to meet current development standards or to serve the proposed use, conditions may be required relating to:
(i) 
The number and location of vehicular access points (subject to approval by the reviewing authority with jurisdiction to issue approach or access permits);
(ii) 
The dedication of additional right-of way and or public use easements for access, utilities or other purposes;
(iii) 
Increased building setbacks to provide for future road improvements for classified roads;
(iv) 
Flood hazard mitigation under YCC Chapters 16C.05 or 16D.05;
(v) 
Storm drainage facilities as required in YCC Title 12.10;
(vi) 
Other infrastructure improvements; or
(vii) 
Other mitigation measures required under the SEPA.
(2) 
When the proposed Type 1 project permit application does not meet one or more requirements of Subsection (1) above, it shall either be subject to conditions to correct the deficiency, or if it cannot be adequately conditioned to comply with this Title, it shall be denied.
(3) 
When a Type 1 project permit application is denied, the Administrative Official shall state the specific reasons.
(4) 
When a proposed Type 1 project permit application is conditioned or denied, the applicant and/or property owner may appeal the determination to the Hearing Examiner under YCC Chapter 16B.09.
(5) 
The Reviewing Official shall prescribe a time limit within which the action authorized shall be commenced, completed, or both. The time frame for boundary line adjustments shall not exceed one year, and for all other Type 1 permits, the time frame shall not exceed three years from the date of final decision, except as may be allowed by YCC Subsection 16B.07.050(2)(a) or such longer time as allowed by State law.
(6) 
Violation of conditions and safeguards, when made part of the terms under which the project permit is granted, shall be considered a violation of this Title and subject to the remedies set forth in Section 19.30.120, YCC Chapter 16B.11 and YCC Title 13.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 10-2019 (Exh. 1) (part), 2019)

§ 19.30.100 Conditions for Approval of Type 2, 3 and 4 Applications.

(1) 
The Reviewing Official is authorized by development standards of this Title and other applicable Titles of County code to require conditions for approval of Type 2 Administrative, Type 3 Conditional or Type 4 Quasi-judicial Uses or Actions. The Reviewing Official may impose additional or greater requirements as conditions of approval on any use, development or modification being reviewed to ensure that the proposal meets the standards and criteria for approval.
(2) 
Except, as otherwise expressly provided, a Reviewing Official may impose conditions to:
(a) 
Comply with any development standard or criteria for approval set forth in this Title or other relevant provisions of Yakima County Code;
(b) 
Mitigate material impacts of the development, whether environmental or otherwise;
(c) 
Ensure compatibility of the development with existing neighboring land uses; assure consistency with the intent and character of the zoning district involved;
(d) 
Ensure that the structures and areas proposed are surfaced, arranged and screened in such a manner that they are compatible with and not detrimental to existing or reasonable expected future development of the neighborhood, or resource uses, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and
(e) 
Achieve and further the intent, goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and this Title.
(3) 
This Title grants broad authority to impose special conditions and safeguards to achieve and further the objectives listed above, consistent with the limitations imposed by County code. These conditions and safeguards may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) 
Increasing or limiting the required lot size, setback or yard dimensions, consistent with development regulations;
(b) 
Limiting or increasing the height of buildings or structures, consistent with development regulations;
(c) 
Controlling the number and location of vehicular access points (subject to approval by the reviewing authority with jurisdiction to issue approach or access permits);
(d) 
Requiring the dedication or reservation of additional rights-of-way or easements for future road or street improvements;
(e) 
Requiring the designation of public use easements or drainage easements and recording of same;
(f) 
Increasing or decreasing the number of required off-street parking and/or loading spaces as well as designating the location, screening, drainage, surfacing or other improvement of a parking area;
(g) 
Limiting the number, size, height, shape, location and lighting of signs;
(h) 
Requiring view-obscuring fencing, landscaping or other facilities to protect adjacent or nearby properties;
(i) 
Designating sites for and/or the size of open space or recreational areas;
(j) 
Requiring site reclamation upon discontinuance of use and/or expiration or revocation of the project permit;
(k) 
Limiting hours and size of operation;
(l) 
Controlling the siting of the use and/or structures on the property;
(m) 
Requiring that public facilities are adequate to serve the proposed use;
(n) 
Requiring improvements to public or private roads, bridges, stormwater facilities and drainageways, water systems or sewage systems; and
(o) 
Requiring mitigation measures to effectively reduce the potential for land use conflicts and separate Especially Sensitive Land Uses, as defined in Chapter 19.01, from active agricultural, forest, or mineral operations, such as: landscape buffers; special setbacks; screening; site design using physical features such as rock outcrops, ravines, roads, irrigation canals or critical areas.
(4) 
The Reviewing Official shall prescribe a time limit within which the action authorized shall be commenced, completed, or both. The time frame shall not exceed three years from the date of final action.
(a) 
The Reviewing Official may approve a longer time frame to cover subsequent phases of the project permit or action where a specific detailed development schedule and sufficient information has been provided by the applicant to allow evaluation of the full scope of the proposal including all phases at the time of review.
(b) 
Such time frame shall be consistent with state statute where specifically provided or such longer time as allowed by State law or by other requirements of this or other County Titles
(c) 
As provided in YCC Section 16B.07.050, failure to meet the time limit set shall void the approval; except that the Administrative Official may authorize a onetime extension of either or both dates upon request, provided such extension request is filed in writing prior to the required commencement or completion date as authorized in YCC Section 16B.07.050. Such extension request shall define the circumstances that prohibited the commencement or completion, or both, of the use authorized. The length of such time extension, if authorized, shall not exceed 12 additional months from the date the extension decision becomes final.
(5) 
Violation of such conditions and safeguards, when made part of the terms under which the project permit is granted, shall be considered a violation of this Title and subject to the remedies set forth in Section 19.30.120, YCC Chapter 16B.11 and YCC Title 13.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.110 Final Decisions.

(1) 
Notification of a final decision shall be issued as required under YCC Chapter 16B.07.
(2) 
Notice shall specify whether the final decision may be appealed as allowed under YCC Chapter 16B.09.
(3) 
If the effect of the decision is a recommendation, it shall be transmitted to the Board as provided in YCC Section 16B.09.050.
(4) 
Once the Board has taken action a copy of the decision will be provided by the Planning Division to the applicant and parties of record who participated in the hearing.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.120 Compliance with Conditions, Safeguards and Mitigation Required – Revocation of Project Permits.

(1) 
A Project Permit shall complete all required permit conditions within the timeframe and any extension as provided in YCC Section 16B.07.050(3)(a). The project shall maintain full compliance with the requirements of the project permit decision.
(2) 
The Reviewing Official may revoke a project permit issued under this Title if it is ascertained:
(a) 
The application included any false information material to the project permit approval; or
(b) 
The project permit, previously found to be in compliance with conditions and safeguards, subsequently fails to maintain compliance with the conditions, safeguards and/or mitigation requirements made a part of the terms under which the approval was granted.
(3) 
This action to revoke the project permit may be undertaken along with any other remedies available to Yakima County to enforce conditions of a decision, remedy violations or abate public nuisances under this Title, YCC Title 13 and YCC Chapter 16B.11 Violations and Enforcement. Nothing shall obligate the Reviewing Official to revoke a project permit as a remedy for any violation of this Title or for any project not maintaining full compliance with the requirements of a project permit decision.
(4) 
If the Reviewing Official finds that any conditions, safeguards and/or mitigation required by the project permit are not being maintained, the Reviewing Official shall prescribe a time for correction, and if corrections are not made within the time limit, revocation of the project permit shall become effective five days after the time previously specified.
(5) 
The applicant or property owner may request a public hearing on the revocation subject to payment of a fee. An open record public hearing shall be held before the Hearing Examiner under the procedures of YCC Title 16B, in order to show cause why such Permit approval should not be revoked. Adjoining property owners and parties of record in the project permit approval process shall have standing to participate in the appeal.
(6) 
A new application for a project permit previously revoked under this Section cannot be made within one year after revocation.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.30.130 Performance Assurance.

(1) 
Legislative Intent. The intent of this Section is to:
(a) 
Ensure that public and private improvements required of a project permit are constructed;
(b) 
Provide for Latecomers Agreements and Road Improvement Districts to assist with financing required public improvements over time;
(c) 
Allow individuals developing property options for financing public and private improvements required by this Title to provide performance assurance in lieu of construction through acceptance of:
(i) 
Surety Bonds;
(ii) 
Cash Escrow;
(iii) 
Cash Security Deposits; and
(iv) 
Maintenance Bonds;
(d) 
Provide a remedy and financing mechanism to ensure construction of required public and private improvements when the applicant fails to perform; and
(e) 
Protect public property.
(2) 
Applicability. This Section applies to the construction and maintenance of public and private infrastructure improvements required under this Title and YCC Section 12.10.310 related to stormwater.
(3) 
Latecomers' Agreements. The County may join in the financing of improvement projects and may be reimbursed in the same manner as the owners of real estate who participate in the projects under this Section as an alternative to financing projects solely by owners of real estate. The applicant or proponent for a latecomers' agreement must propose an assessment reimbursement area. They shall be responsible for a financing bond and for the cost to the County of setting up the agreement.
(4) 
Road Improvement Districts. The developer may participate in the formation of a road improvement district (RID) to improve the dedicated right-of-way to minimum County standards as specified in Chapter 19.23. The County Engineer may require a road corridor study to determine the most suitable location for the dedicated right-of-way. The cost for such a study shall be borne by the developer.
(5) 
Financing in Lieu of Construction.
(a) 
As a condition of approval of any project permit decision under this Title, the Reviewing Official may require security for the performance, completion and maintenance of any proposed or required public or private improvement or any other term or condition of approval pertaining to a public or private improvement. The estimate of the performance and completion of any proposed or required improvement or any other term or condition of approval pertaining to an improvement will be reviewed and/or calculated by the County Engineer or a designee. When such security is required, it shall be made under this Section and must be made and approved prior to issuing the development permit. The quality, sufficiency, amount and exact form of the security are subject to the approval and satisfaction of Reviewing Official, typically the County Engineer for Public infrastructure, and Administrative Official for private infrastructure, or the Public Services Director where stormwater facilities are involved.
(b) 
Whenever security is provided by an applicant it shall state directly or by reference all the following provisions:
(i) 
What improvements or performance are secured;
(ii) 
A date or dates of required completion of improvements;
(iii) 
The amount of the security;
(iv) 
That the security is payable to Yakima County; and
(v) 
That the applicant shall maintain the security in force until completion of all required conditions or improvements, for which the security was provided or for improvement maintenance warranty period.
(c) 
The applicant may provide security in either of the following:
(i) 
Surety Bond (For Improvements Costing More than $50,000.00). RCW 58.17.130 provides for the acceptance of a surety bond by Yakima County in lieu of the actual construction of any required public or private improvement prior to the final approval of a development.
(A) 
The Reviewing Official may accept a bond, in an amount and with surety and conditions satisfactory to the Reviewing Official, providing for and securing to Yakima County the actual construction and installation of all improvements within two years of the acceptance of the bond.
(B) 
The amount of the surety shall be the estimated construction cost as determined by a registered engineer, plus 25% for the administration of the contract. The bond shall continue in full force until the affirmative release by the Reviewing Official.
(C) 
If at the end of the two-year period the improvements are not completed the Reviewing Official may take action against the bond to complete the improvements.
(ii) 
Cash Escrow (For Improvements Costing Less than $50,000.00).
(A) 
As a condition of approval of any project permit decision under this Title, the Reviewing Official may require cash escrow security for the performance, completion and maintenance of any proposed or required public or private improvement or any other term or condition of approval pertaining to a public or private improvement that cost less than $50,000.00. The maximum length of the escrow shall not exceed two years.
(B) 
If the applicant posts a cash escrow as security for the required improvements, the escrow instructions shall provide:
1. 
That the applicant will have no right to a return of any of the funds, except as provided herein.
2. 
That the escrow agent shall have a legal duty to deliver the funds to the County whenever the Reviewing Official presents an affidavit to the agent attesting to the County's right to receive funds whether or not the applicant protests that right. If and when the County accepts the offer of dedication for the last completed required improvement, the County shall execute a waiver of its right to receive all but 25% of the funds represented by the cash escrow if the applicant is not in breach of the improvement agreement. The residual funds shall be security for the applicant's covenant to maintain the required improvements, if public, and its warranty that the improvements are free from defect.
(iii) 
Cash Security Deposit (For Improvements Costing Less than $5,000.00).
(A) 
Cash deposits may be made to Yakima County for public or private improvements costing less than $5,000.00. The amount of the deposit shall be determined by an estimate of the estimated cost of completion of the required improvement prepared by a professional engineer plus 25% for project administration. Partial release of funds shall not be allowed. The maximum length of the deposit shall not exceed six months.
(B) 
When a security deposit is made under this Section a written improvement agreement pertaining to performance of required improvements shall be made and signed by the applicant and the appropriate Reviewing Official for the County. The cost of the account shall be provided for by the applicant or may be deducted from the security deposit.
(iv) 
Maximum length of Cash Escrow or Surety Bond. The maximum length of the Cash Escrow or Surety Bond may be extended by the Administrative Official when determined to be in the public interest to do so.
(v) 
Maintenance Bond. A maintenance bond or other security is required for infrastructure improvements to ensure the successful operation of the improvements for not less than two years after acceptance of the construction of the improvements. The amount of the maintenance bond shall be 25% of a professional engineers' estimate of the construction cost of the improvements or $5,000.00, whichever is greater. The maintenance bond shall be in place prior to the Reviewing Official's final acceptance of constructing the infrastructure improvements and full compliance with permit conditions, or the release of the bond or surety placed in lieu of construction.
(6) 
Performance Failure. If the improvements or performances secured by the deposit are not timely completed, the appropriate Reviewing Official shall notify the applicant in writing stating:
(a) 
The nature of the noncompliance and the action necessary to correct the same;
(b) 
The time in which the applicant must take corrective action; and
(c) 
That if corrective action is not completed within the time specified, the County will apply the funds in the security deposit or bond to effect compliance. If the corrective action is not taken by the applicant or permit holder within the time specified in the notice given by the Reviewing Official, the County shall, through its representatives, take whatever action that the County deems necessary to ensure the improvements are made. The County shall cause the performance or completion of the items covered by the security deposit or bond and shall apply funds held to the cost of such completion or performance. Any excess or surplus funds shall be refunded to the applicant after the performance maintenance warranty period has expired.
(7) 
Partial or Full Release of Security.
(a) 
Partial Release. An applicant may request a partial release of any security under this Section based on partial completion or compliance with the events secured. If the Reviewing Official determines partial release is warranted he may cause a partial release of security in an amount deemed by him to be appropriate. A cash escrow shall not be reduced below 25% of the principal amount. At the end of the maintenance and warranty periods, all escrowed funds, if any, shall be released to the applicant.
(b) 
Full Release. The County will not accept dedication of required improvements, nor release nor reduce any security posted by the applicant until the Reviewing Official has determined all required improvements have been satisfactorily completed and until:
(i) 
The applicant's engineer or surveyor has certified to the Reviewing Official, through submission of detailed "as-built" plan or survey indicating location, dimensions, materials, and other information required by the Reviewing Official that the layout of the line and grade of all public improvements is under construction plans for the development; or
(ii) 
A title insurance policy has been furnished to and approved by the Reviewing Official indicating the improvements have been completed, are ready for dedication to the County, and are free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances. Upon such approval and recommendation by the Reviewing Official, the County shall accept the improvements for dedication in accordance the established procedure.
(8) 
Applicant and Permit Holder Responsible for Deficiencies. The applicant and/or permit holder is responsible for all costs incurred by the County in causing completion of the events secured by any security provided for under this Section. If after fully applying the security a deficiency remains, the applicant and/or permit holder shall be jointly and severally liable for such deficiency and for reasonable attorney's fees necessary to collect the same.
(9) 
Administration. The Administrative Official, County Engineer or Public Services Director as determined by the performance requirement may sign documents and otherwise administer securities under the provision of this Section.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.31.010 Legislative Intent.

The intent of this Chapter defines the responsibilities, rules and procedures for clarifying the text of this Title, the zoning map which it incorporates and the rules and regulations adopted under it.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.31.020 Written Request for Interpretation.

A written request for interpretation of any provision of this Title, similar use, the zoning map as provided in Section 19.10.030, or any rule or regulation adopted under this Title shall be submitted to the Administrative Official. Each request shall set forth the specific provision or provisions to be interpreted and the facts of the specific situation establishing the request for an interpretation under YCC Section 16B.03.070.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.31.025 Interpretation Decisions.

(1) 
All questions of interpretation shall be first presented to the Administrative Official, and such questions shall be presented to the Hearing Examiner only by referral from the Administrative Official or on appeal from the decision of the Administrative Official.
(2) 
As per YCC Section 16B.03.070, the Reviewing Official shall state the analysis and reasons upon which any interpretation is based and if the interpretation is a use interpretation, how the interpretation is also consistent with the specific conditions established in Section 19.31.030.
(3) 
The Administrative Official shall maintain a written record of interpretations and rulings issued in writing by him or the Hearing Examiner on file and available for inspection in the Planning Division.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.31.030 Similar Use Interpretations.

(1) 
Similar Uses. When a proposed unclassified use appears to be similar in character and consistent with the purpose of the zoning district, the Reviewing Official will determine whether the use is similar to a use listed as a Type 1, 2, 3 or 4 use for the zoning district. If the Reviewing Official finds that the proposed use is similar and meets the provisions in Subsection (2) below, the proposed use shall be processed as the similar Type 1, 2, 3, or a Type 4 use according to Chapter 19.30. The Administrative Official's similar use interpretation may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner as provided in Section 19.31.070 and YCC Title 16B.
(2) 
Use Interpretation Criteria. The following criteria shall govern the Reviewing Official in issuing all use interpretations:
(a) 
No use interpretation shall vary the location or review requirements of any use listed in this Title.
(b) 
No use interpretation shall permit any use in any zoning district unless evidence is presented that demonstrates it will comply with the purpose, intent, goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan, and the intent and development standards established for the particular district.
(3) 
Prohibited Uses. This Section does not apply to prohibited uses listed under Subsection 19.30.030(7).
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.31.040 Interpretation of District Boundaries.

When there is uncertainty regarding the zoning district boundaries on the official zoning map, the Administrative Official shall use the following rules to interpret the precise location of any zoning boundary:
(1) 
Boundaries shown as following or approximately following the city limits, platted lot lines, or section lines, half-section lines, or quarter section lines shall be construed as following such lines.
(2) 
Boundaries shown as following or approximately following streets shall be construed to follow the centerlines of such streets, except where it is necessary to use the right-of-way boundary because a corporate or Urban Growth Area boundary explicitly includes the road.
(3) 
Boundaries shown as following or approximately following railroad lines shall be construed to lie midway between the main tracks of such railroad lines.
(4) 
Boundaries shown as following or approximately following floodways, flood prone areas, shorelines of lakes, rivers and streams shall be construed to follow the floodway, floodplain and shoreline; and in the event of natural changes in the shoreline, shall be construed as moving with the actual floodway, floodplain and shoreline.
(5) 
Boundaries shown as following or approximately following the centerline of streams, rivers, lakes or canals shall be construed as following such centerlines. If a natural change occurs of such streams, rivers, or other water courses, the zoning boundary shall be construed as moving with the channel centerline.
(6) 
Where a public right-of-way is vacated, the vacated area shall have the zoning district classification of the property to which it accrues, and all of the area in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the extended districts.
(7) 
Boundaries indicated as parallel to or extension of features in Subsections (1) through (6) above shall be so construed. Distances not indicated on the official map shall be determined by the scale of the map.
(8) 
Where physical or cultural features existing on the ground conflict with those shown on the official zoning map, or in other circumstances not covered by Subsections (1) through (7) above, the Administrative Official shall interpret the zoning district boundaries. The interpretation of the Administrative Official may be appealed under YCC Title 16B.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.31.050 Appeals.

The Reviewing Official's decision on an interpretation shall be final and conclusive unless appealed by an aggrieved party under YCC Title 16B and RCW 36.70C within the timeframes and procedures specified.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.33.010 Legislative Intent.

Lots, uses, and structures exist which were lawful when established but whose establishment would be restricted or prohibited under current zoning regulations. This Chapter is intended to protect only those uses, structures and lots that were legally established prior to a change in regulation, and have not been abandoned or discontinued. However, a range of regulatory strategies provided herein allows nonconforming uses to continue so long as they are benign or compatible with neighboring properties. Nonconforming uses with incompatible attributes, as defined, may be injurious to neighboring properties or cause nuisances to the detriment of the community and therefore should not be reestablished when substantially damaged or destroyed.
The intent of this Chapter, under certain circumstances and controls, is to allow modifications to nonconforming lots, uses and structures consistent with the objectives of maintaining the economic viability of such lots, uses and structures, while protecting the rights of surrounding property owners to use and enjoy their properties. This Chapter is intended to provide a compatibility determination for evaluating the proposals for modification, expansion, and/or the restoration of damaged or destroyed nonconforming uses of structures because the effect of approving such applications could result in continuation of the nonconforming use for decades.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.33.020 Applicability.

All nonconforming lots, uses and structures shall be subject to provisions of this Chapter.
(1) 
If a lot, use or structure deemed legally nonconforming under past zoning regulations is brought into compliance with current standards, it shall be considered conforming.
(2) 
The provisions in this Chapter do not supersede or relieve a property owner from compliance with building, fire, health or other life safety requirements of Yakima County Code.
(3) 
Additional review requirements are provided within the jurisdictions of the Shoreline Master Program and the Critical Areas Ordinances for nonconforming uses or structures as defined in YCC Titles 16C or 16D.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 10-2019 (Exh. 1) (part), 2019)

§ 19.33.030 Nonconforming Status.

(1) 
Any lot, use, or structure which, in whole or part, is not in conformance with current zoning requirements shall be considered as follows:
(a) 
Legal Nonconforming. Lots, uses and structures legally created or lawfully established prior to subdivision or zoning requirements, under prior zoning codes and/or County subdivision regulations are legally nonconforming and may be maintained or altered subject to provisions of this Chapter.
(b) 
Illegal Lots, Structures and Uses. Structures, lots, required site improvements, uses and/or developments not legally established or existing as of the effective date of this Title retain their illegal status and must be abated or comply with this Title under actions directed as a result of enforcement proceedings and/or the necessary permit applications.
(2) 
It shall be the burden of a property owner or proponent to demonstrate the legal nonconformity of a lot, use, and structure. The legal nonconformity of a lot may be demonstrated by a deed or development permit executed prior to the change in code. Structural nonconformities may be demonstrated through development permits, historical photos, and affidavits from persons knowledgeable of the historic configuration of the structure. A list of items to establish the nonconforming status of a land use is provided below in Subsection 19.33.060(1).
(3) 
If the Administrative Official cannot conclusively determine that the nonconformity was lawfully established and in continuous use or operation based on Subsection (2) above, then the matter may be referred to the Hearing Examiner for Type 2 hearing review. The Hearing Examiner shall be authorized to render a decision as to whether the nonconforming use or structure was lawfully established and in continuous operation, and review it for compliance with this Chapter.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.33.040 Legal Nonconforming Lots.

A nonconforming lot, as defined in Section 19.01.070 and created as a building site, which does not conform to minimum lot area, width or depth requirements of the zoning district in which it is situated may be developed, subject to the following:
(1) 
Establishment of Land Uses and Structures on Nonconforming Lots.
(a) 
A permitted use or structure shall meet all existing development standards of the zoning district within which it is located including, but not limited to, required yards/setbacks, lot coverage, density (units per parcel), parking, landscaping, storm drainage, signage, and road standards, subject to Subsections (1)(b) and (c) below. Adjustments to these standards shall be subject to Chapter 19.35.
(b) 
The following uses established on a nonconforming lot shall additionally require at least 20 feet of frontage on, or a minimum 20 foot wide access easement to, a public or private road:
(i) 
Detached, single-family dwellings;
(ii) 
Zero lot line, common wall or duplex development in the R-2, R-3 and B-1 districts;
(iii) 
Multifamily development in the R-2, R-3, B-1 and GC districts; and
(iv) 
Any permitted use or structure in the industrial (M-1, M-2) and commercial (SCC, LCC, GC) districts.
(c) 
The 20 foot-wide access standard shall not be adjustable below minimum fire safety standards established under YCC Title 13.
(2) 
Boundary Changes to Nonconforming Lots.
(a) 
A legal nonconforming lot may be increased in size to bring it into closer conformance with area, yard or depth requirements of the zone in which it is located. Reduction to a nonconforming lot's size is permitted only under Subsection 19.34.020(5)(d).
(b) 
A legal nonconforming lot combined with other land to eliminate the nonconformity with any or all lot requirements of its zoning district shall thereafter remain in compliance.
(c) 
A separate unit of "land" containing a building site reduced through governmental action or adverse possession below, or further below the required minimum size of the zoning district that it is located, shall be deemed a legal nonconforming lot. Any such action shall be reviewed under Chapter 19.34.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 8-2015 § 2 (Exh. 4) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.33.050 Legal Nonconforming Buildings or Structures.

A legally established building or structure may continue to be used or occupied by a use permitted in the zoning district in which it is located even though it does not comply with present development standards (e.g., setbacks, lot coverage, density, height, etc.) of said zone. The legal nonconforming building or structure may be maintained as follows:
(1) 
Maintenance, Repair, Expansion or Structural Alteration. A legal nonconforming building or structure may be maintained, remodeled, repaired, expanded, enlarged, or structurally altered upon approval by the Building Official, as provided in this Subsection.
(a) 
Building Permit Required. When any enlargement meets applicable development standards for the zoning district and this Title, such as building height, lot coverage, or setbacks, a building permit will be required for the structural enlargement.
(b) 
Administrative Adjustment or Variance. When the enlargement does not meet the development standards of this Title, such as building height, lot coverage, or setbacks, relief may be requested in an administrative adjustment or variance under Chapter 19.35 and a demonstration of compliance with this Subsection prior to issuance of a building permit.
(i) 
The Reviewing Official must find the following factors present. Any proposed change or arrangement:
(A) 
Will not change or modify any permit condition previously imposed under Type 2, 3 or 4 reviews;
(B) 
Will not reduce the amount of required landscaping or the amount or location of required sitescreening;
(C) 
Will not create or materially increase any adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the project, in the Reviewing Official's determination; and
(D) 
Will comply with the applicable criteria of Chapter 19.35.
(ii) 
Any such request that does not meet all the requirements of this Subsection shall be denied.
19.33.050.tif
Figure 19.33.050-1. Additions to a nonconforming structure.
(2) 
Restoration of Damaged Building or Structure.
(a) 
Damaged or Destroyed Structure. A legal nonconforming building or structure damaged or destroyed by fire, flood, explosion, wind, earthquake, war, riot, calamity or other catastrophic event may be restored or repaired under this Subsection.
(b) 
Documentation. The property owner shall provide the information necessary under Subsection 19.33.030(2) to reasonably assure the Reviewing Official that a requested restoration or repair complies with this Section. Acceptable documentation may include:
(i) 
A basic site plan containing the information defined in Section 19.01.070 showing the actual dimensions of the nonconforming structure, its height, and its exact placement on the lot prior to being damaged; and
(ii) 
A written narrative describing the use or uses that existed immediately prior to damage; and
(iii) 
An affidavit or certificate from an insurance company or other entity with knowledge of the situation that the narrative and site plan accurately represents the nonconforming structure and its use or uses as they were immediately prior to damage or destruction.
(c) 
Natural Hazards – Additional Requirements. Nonconforming structures damaged or destroyed by flooding or other natural hazards shall additionally be subject to the requirements of YCC Titles 16C or 16D.
(d) 
Reconstruction Not Involving Expansion or Nonconforming Use. The Administrative Official may, through a Type 1 review process, approve reconstruction in conformance with the site plan or to be more conforming with the provisions and standards of the zoning district in which it is located. If it is determined that the requested reconstruction amounts to any expansion of the nonconforming structure's original bulk or dimension, the proposal shall be reviewed under Subsection (1) above. If it is determined the requested reconstruction involves a nonconforming use, the proposal shall also be reviewed under Section 19.33.060 Legal Nonconforming Uses.
(e) 
Reconstruction of Structures. The building or structure, not expanding and not containing a nonconforming use, may be reconstructed to the footprint existing immediately before damage or destruction, provided:
(i) 
A building permit for said restoration shall be applied for within 18 months of the date of damage or disaster.
(ii) 
Restoration/reconstruction shall be completed within two years of the date of damage or disaster.
(iii) 
Upon receiving a written request, the Reviewing Official may, through a Type 1 review process, extend the above time limitations, provided the property owner submits documentation demonstrating there was no intent to discontinue the structure and building permits are obtained prior to the expiration of the extension. Documentation may include, but is not limited to, the following:
(A) 
Requests for approvals necessary to re-establish the structure submitted to appropriate county, state and federal agencies within 18 months after the structure was damaged or destroyed;
(B) 
The property or structure has been involved in litigation; and
(C) 
Disputes in insurance settlements in the case of fire or casualty.
(iv) 
A statement from the property owner merely stating there is no intent to abandon is not sufficient documentation without showing additional actions taken by the property owner to re-establish the structure.
(3) 
Relocation. A legal nonconforming building or structure shall not be relocated on the same lot unless said move results in bringing the building or structure into closer compliance with requirements of the zoning district in which it is situated.
(4) 
Signs. Any sign lawfully existing under all codes and ordinances in effect when this Title is enacted or amended may continue to be maintained and operated as a legal nonconforming sign, subject to Subsection (4)(b) below, so long as it remains otherwise lawful; provided that:
(a) 
No sign shall be changed in any manner that increases its noncompliance with this Title;
(b) 
If the sign is structurally altered or moved, its legal nonconforming status shall be voided, and the sign and any replacement will be required to conform to Chapter 19.20. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to restrict normal structural repair and maintenance; and
(c) 
The sign is not a hazardous sign or abandoned sign.
(d) 
The sign is not a portable sign, temporary sign or an illegal sign.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 9-2019 (Exh. 3) (part), 2019; Ord. 10-2019 (Exh. 1) (part), 2019)

§ 19.33.060 Legal Nonconforming Uses.

Any lawfully established nonconforming use or development may be continued at the same gross floor area or land coverage occupied on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Title, or any amendment thereto, that made the use no longer permissible. Use of these buildings and land is subject to the following:
(1) 
Establishment of Legal Nonconforming Status.
(a) 
Any person may request a determination by the Administrative Official through a Type 1 process regarding legal status of a nonconforming use.
(b) 
Evidence submitted by the applicant shall demonstrate the specific use was lawfully created or established under the zoning regulations in existence at the time and that said use has been maintained and operated continuously, without alteration to the use outside of approval under applicable code, since the time zoning regulations governing the land changed. Acceptable documentation may consist of, but is not limited to, such items as:
(i) 
Dated business receipts showing types of service or goods provided;
(ii) 
Statements or records from utilities, such as power, water or gas, that indicate the date and type of use and demonstrate that the use was conducted over time;
(iii) 
Operating licenses issued by government agencies;
(iv) 
Property rental invoices or receipts;
(v) 
Income tax records;
(vi) 
Dated listings in telephone, business or Polk directories;
(vii) 
Records of the County Assessor;
(viii) 
Building, land-use or development permits;
(ix) 
Dated photographs, newspaper clippings and other relevant documentation; or
(x) 
Notarized affidavits from neighbors or persons who have observed the nonconforming use over required period of time may assist in substantiating its presence.
(c) 
If the Administrative Official cannot conclusively determine that the nonconformity was lawfully established and in continuous use or operation based on Subsection (b) above, then the matter may be referred to the Hearing Examiner for Type 2 hearing review. The Hearing Examiner shall be authorized to render a decision as to whether the nonconforming use or structure was lawfully established and in continuous operation, and review it for compliance with this Chapter.
(2) 
Change of Ownership, Tenancy, or Management. The legal nonconforming status of a use runs with the land, and is not dependent upon ownership, tenancy, or management, provided the nature, character, intensity or occupancy classification of the use does not change.
(3) 
Maintenance and Repair. Ordinary repairs and incidental alterations to correct deterioration or wear may be made to buildings containing a legal nonconforming use, provided:
(a) 
The required maintenance and repair activities are for the purpose of continuing the nonconforming use at or below the lawful nonconforming use level, except as permitted through the nonconforming use alteration review process under Subsection (4) below; and
(b) 
The value of work and materials in any 12 month period does not exceed 25% of the assessed valuation of such building or structure as established by the most current County Assessor's tax roll. Minor maintenance and repair includes such activities as painting, roof repair and replacement, plumbing, wiring, mechanical equipment replacement, and weatherization. Incidental alterations may include construction of nonbearing walls or partitions. Repair and alteration exceeding the 25% valuation shall require approval under the nonconforming use alteration review process of Subsection 19.33.060(4) below.
(4) 
Expansions or Alterations of Uses.
(a) 
When Authorized. No existing nonconforming use of a structure or land shall be altered, enlarged, expanded, extended or replaced except as authorized under this Section. Replacement or restoration of nonconforming uses due to damage or destruction shall be reviewed under Subsection (6) below, with criteria that may also apply in this Subsection.
(b) 
Definition. For this Section, the terms "alter, enlarge, expand, or extend" shall include, but not be limited to:
(i) 
Increased hours of operation;
(ii) 
Increased services or programs;
(iii) 
Increased number of dwellings;
(iv) 
Interior renovations or structural additions that increase the occupant load of the structure dedicated to the nonconforming use;
(v) 
Any new structures accessory to the nonconforming use;
(vi) 
Expansion of the structure, portions thereof, or portions of the site dedicated to the nonconforming use;
(vii) 
Anything beyond regular maintenance and minor repairs described under Subsection (3) above; or
(viii) 
Establishing a new sign.
(c) 
Nonconforming Dwellings. Any alteration or expansion of a nonconforming dwelling shall not exceed an increase of 50% of the gross floor area (including attached structures) when the dwelling became nonconforming. New detached, private garages and other structures accessory to the dwelling may be established, but new accessory housing units shall not be established on a lot containing a nonconforming dwelling. Expansions to nonconforming dwellings, not exceeding 50% of the gross floor area, and new detached structures accessory to the dwelling, other than accessory housing units, may be allowed under Type 1 review by the Administrative Official, who may attach conditions and limit the size and number of proposed accessory structures, provided the proposal:
(i) 
Will not change or modify any permit condition previously imposed;
(ii) 
Will not reduce the amount of required landscaping or the amount or location of required sitescreening; and
(iii) 
Will not create or materially increase any adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the project, in the Administrative Official's determination.
(d) 
Process to Alter, Enlarge, Expand or Extending Nonconforming Uses or Structures. The Hearing Examiner may consider applications under Type 3 review to alter, enlarge, expand, extend or reconstruct a legal nonconforming use, other than residential structures and mining sites described in Subsections (4)(c) above and (e) below, in the same location or to include a portion of a structure, site or adjoining lot it did not previously occupy on the date said use became nonconforming. The alteration, enlargement, expansion, extension or reconstruction requested shall be denied if the Hearing Examiner finds that one or more provisions in Subsection (i) below of this Subsection are not met.
(i) 
Approval Criteria. The Hearing Examiner may grant the relief requested if he finds all of the following:
(A) 
That the alteration or expansion requested would not be contrary to the public health, safety or welfare;
(B) 
That the alteration or expansion is compatible with the character of the neighborhood; and does not significantly jeopardize future development of the area in compliance with the provisions and the intent of the zoning district;
(C) 
That the use or structure was lawful at the time of its inception;
(D) 
That the value of nearby properties will not be significantly depressed by approving the requested alteration or expansion;
(E) 
That the nonconforming structure shall comply with all development standards and codes to the extent feasible;
(F) 
That the use or structure will not cause, increase or expand detrimental attributes for the area in which it is located due to: use of hazardous materials; generation of noise, odors or electronic interference; introduction of incompatible uses; or generation of large numbers of vehicle trips; change in hours of operation; and emissions of light or glare; and
(G) 
That the proposed alteration or expansion requested will not create negative health or safety impacts and need not be excluded to protect the public from harm.
(ii) 
Findings and Conclusions. The Hearing Examiner shall prepare written findings and conclusions stating the specific reasons for his decision to approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. The findings shall include the Hearing Examiner's determination regarding compliance of the proposed alteration or expansion with the criteria established in Subsection (4)(d)(i) above.
(iii) 
Conditional Approval. When approving alteration or expansion of a nonconforming use, the Hearing Examiner may attach conditions to the proposed alteration or expansion or any other part of the development to assure the development is improved, arranged and screened to be compatible with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plans, this Title, and neighboring land uses.
(e) 
Nonconforming Mining Site/Operation. Enlargement or expansion of a nonconforming mining site/operation that does not have a current permit from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) may be allowed when the site is within an area plan designated mineral resource overlay, subject to the respective listed required level of review (1, 2, 3 or 4), rather than the nonconforming use expansion procedure of this Section. Those without current DNR permits shall be required to comply with this Title by applying for and receiving approvals for designation and operation of the site.
(5) 
Change of Use. The legal nonconforming use of a building, structure, or land may be changed, subject to the following:
(a) 
Change to an Allowed Use in the Zone. Applications to convert from a nonconforming use to a use allowed in the zone shall be made under Type 1, 2, 3 or 4 review, depending on the designated level of review for the new use as a Type 1 Permitted, Type 2 Administrative or Type 3 or 4 Conditional Use. Once converted to a permitted use, the nonconforming use shall not be re-established.
(b) 
Change to Another Non-Allowed Use. A legal nonconforming use may be changed to another non-allowed use, subject to a Type 2 review, only if all of the following conditions are met:
(i) 
The proposed new use must have equal or lesser overall adverse impacts to the surrounding area considering such factors as traffic, required on-site parking, hours of operation, noise, glare, dust, odor, and vibration.
(ii) 
The proposed use will not introduce hazardous materials, compromise wells, otherwise cause detrimental health hazards, or interfere with development potential of nearby properties under current zoning regulations.
(iii) 
The change in use will not result in an increase in the amount or area devoted to outdoor storage of goods and/or materials, nor will it cause a reduction in existing or required landscaping and sitescreening.
(iv) 
The proposed new use will not enlarge the structure or building space.
(v) 
The proposed change in use will involve minimal structural alteration.
(vi) 
The Reviewing Official may impose conditions to ensure compliance with Subsections (5)(b)(i) and (ii) of this Section.
(c) 
Required site improvements, parking and signage shall be subject to the specific provisions of this Title.
(6) 
Restoration of Damaged Building or Structure. A building or structure containing a legal nonconforming use damaged by fire, flood, explosion, wind, earthquake, war, riot, calamity or other catastrophic event may be restored or repaired, and its nonconforming use may be resumed or continued, as follows:
(a) 
Substantial or Partial Destruction of a Residential Structure. When a lot contains one or more legal, nonconforming, habitable dwellings, as defined in YCC Title 13, a dwelling with gross square footage not to exceed an increase of 50% of the building at the point it became nonconforming may be reconstructed through Type 1 review. Nonconforming mobile homes may only be replaced with a site-built dwelling, modular home or a manufactured home conforming to siting requirements of Section 19.18.290. The replaced or restored dwelling must be constructed according to building, health, and life safety codes within the time frame of Subsections (6)(d) and (e) below. New detached, private garages, carports and other residential accessory structures may be established without regard to a time frame under Subsection (4)(c) above.
(b) 
Partial Destruction of a Non-Residential Structure. If the extent of either damage or repair cost does not exceed 50% of either the square footage or assessed value, as established by the most current County Assessor's tax roll, of a building or structure containing a nonconforming use, other than a dwelling or accessory residential structure, the building or structure may be reconstructed to the footprint existing immediately before partial destruction, subject to the time frames of Subsections (6)(d) and (e) below. Any expansion is subject to the review process of Subsection (4) above.
(c) 
Substantial Destruction of a Non-Residential Structure. If the extent of either damage or repair cost exceeds 50% of either the square footage or assessed value of such building or structure as established by the most current County Assessor's tax roll, the building or structure shall only be reestablished when approved as an alteration under Subsection (4) above.
(d) 
A building permit application for said restoration shall be filed for within 18 months of the date of the damage, disaster or destruction.
(e) 
Restoration/reconstruction shall be completed within two years from the date of the issuance of the permit.
(f) 
Upon receiving a written request submitted prior to the expiration of 18 months following destruction, the Administrative Official may through a Type 1 review process extend the above time limitations for special circumstances beyond the control of the owner of said building or structure. A lapse of more than 18 months shall be considered a discontinuation under Subsection (7) below.
(7) 
Discontinuation of Legal Nonconforming Use. If a legal nonconforming use of land is discontinued or terminated, it shall not be re-established. Any subsequent use of the building or land shall conform to requirements of the zoning district in which it is located.
(a) 
A use is discontinued when:
(i) 
It is succeeded by an allowed land use listed for the zoning district;
(ii) 
It is succeeded by another non-allowed use under Subsection (5) above;
(iii) 
The structure in which the use was located was damaged or destroyed and an application for rebuilding or replacement is not made within 18 months of the damage or destruction, or the application for the replacement of the nonconforming structure is denied through the Type 3 review process under Subsection (4) above; or
(iv) 
The use has ceased for a period of 18 months or more, or the terms of the permit allows for a longer period of time. Barring an express provision in the terms of the permit, use cessation by abandonment for such a period shall create a presumption of intent to abandon.
(b) 
The Administrative Official may, through a Type 1 process, grant an extension to the timeframe identified above, provided the property owner submits documentation demonstrating there was no intent to abandon the use and other applicable permits are obtained prior to the expiration of the extension. Documentation may include, but is not limited to, the following:
(i) 
Requests for approvals necessary to re-establish the use or structure submitted to appropriate county, state and federal agencies within 18 months after the use was discontinued;
(ii) 
The property or structure has been involved in litigation;
(iii) 
Disputes in insurance settlements in the case of fire or casualty;
(iv) 
Delay in transferring title due to probate proceedings; or
(v) 
Attempts to sell or lease the site are ongoing due to:
(A) 
The time involved for marketing the premises; or
(B) 
The structure is a specialized type of building requiring a specialized type of use due to equipment, processes or configuration.
(c) 
A statement from the property owner merely stating there is no intent to abandon is not sufficient documentation without showing additional actions taken by the property owner to re-establish the use or structure.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 8-2015 § 2 (Exh. 4) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 9-2019 (Exh. 3) (part), 2019)

§ 19.34.010 Legislative Intent.

It is the intent of this Chapter to implement those purposes set forth in RCW 58.17.010, by:
(1) 
Regulating the division of land within the unincorporated areas of the County;
(2) 
Promoting the public health, safety and general welfare;
(3) 
Promoting safe and convenient travel by the public on roads, streets and highways;
(4) 
Facilitating adequate provision for water, sewerage, drainage, parks and recreation areas, sites for schools and school grounds, and other public requirements;
(5) 
Providing for proper ingress and egress;
(6) 
Insuring the general tax-paying public is not burdened with those development costs that are more appropriately the responsibility of the original developer;
(7) 
Preventing overcrowding of land by providing adequate open spaces;
(8) 
Requiring uniform monumentation of land subdivisions and conveyance by accurate legal description;
(9) 
Furthering the goals, policies and objectives of:
(a) 
The Growth Management Act;
(b) 
The Shoreline Management Act;
(c) 
The Yakima County Comprehensive Plan, the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, subarea plans and all related elements; and
(d) 
Adopted Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plans.
(10) 
Establishing criteria pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 58.17 RCW;
(11) 
Promoting public safety by reviewing divisions for compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program by implementing YCC Titles 13, 16C, 16D and this Title;
(12) 
Recognizing that small lots, clustered lots and parcels reconfigured from existing parcels as authorized by Yakima County pursuant to applications submitted after May 20, 1997 renders the resulting parcel(s) undersized rather than nonconforming in status.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 10-2019 (Exh. 1) (part), 2019)

§ 19.34.012 Applicability.

(1) 
Jurisdiction. All boundary line adjustments and divisions of land within the unincorporated territory of Yakima County, Washington, shall be made in full compliance with this Title, other relevant requirements of Yakima County Code and RCW Chapter 58.17, as it now exists or is amended.
(2) 
Non-Reviewed Actions under RCW 58.17.040. RCW 58.17.040 authorizes the divisions identified in this Subsection without review under this Chapter, and subject to review under all other applicable County land use regulations:
(a) 
Cemeteries and burial plots while used for that purpose.
(b) 
Division of land into lots or tracts not containing a dedication, in which the smallest lot created by the division is 40 acres in area, or more, or that which is defined in the instrument of division as one-quarter of a quarter section of land, or greater area where the zoning district specifies a greater minimum; provided, that to compute the size of any lot under this Subsection the lot size shall be expanded to include that area which would be bounded by the centerline of the adjacent public street or road right-of-way.
(c) 
Divisions of land made by testamentary provisions, or the laws of descent;
(d) 
Divisions for lease when no residential structures other than mobile homes, manufactured homes, park models or travel trailers may be placed upon the land when the Reviewing Official has approved a binding site plan for the use of the land under Section 19.34.082.
(e) 
Divisions of land created under RCW Chapter 64.32 or Chapter 64.34 (the Horizontal Property Regimes Act and Condominium Act).
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.34.020 Boundary Line Adjustments.

(1) 
Purpose and Applicability. The purpose of this chapter is to allow for adjustment to boundary lines of existing lots where no new lot is created pursuant to the definition of Boundary Line Adjustment under Section 19.01.070, except those created under 19.34.090. This chapter applies to all boundary line adjustment (BLA) applications.
(2) 
Application Submittal Requirements. A boundary line adjustment application submitted must conform to all of the requirements of Sections 19.30.060, 19.30.070 and 19.30.071.
(3) 
Review Procedures. Boundary line adjustments are Type 1 project permits that are subject to review by the Administrative Official under Type 1 review requirements of Subsection 19.30.030(1).
(4) 
Concurrent Subdivision Applications. When there is a concurrent subdivision application associated with the boundary line adjustment, the finalization of the boundary line adjustment must be completed prior to the associated final subdivision.
(5) 
Review Criteria. The Reviewing Official's review of boundary line adjustments (BLA) shall use the following criteria for approval:
(a) 
All lots involved in the BLA application shall be contiguous and legally created as described in Subsection 19.01.070;
(b) 
Will not create additional lots, tracts, parcels, or divisions;
(c) 
Vacated rights-of-way or utility sites or easements parcels must remain in their configuration or be consolidated with adjoining lots;
(d) 
Will not render a conforming structure or lot as substandard with respect to minimum setbacks, width and area, nor increase the nonconforming aspects of an existing nonconforming structure;
(e) 
Will not compromise or render impractical any existing easement, designated building area, building envelope or easement reservation so it is unable to serve its intended purpose, unless acceptable provisions are made to replace or fully compensate for said purposes;
(f) 
Will not alter boundaries to create intervening in-fee ownership separating the property;
(g) 
Ensure accessory dwelling units as set forth in 19.18.020(1) remain with the primary use of the property;
(h) 
Is consistent with applicable development restrictions and the requirements of this title, including but not limited to the general development standards of Chapter 19.10 and any conditions deriving from prior subdivision or short subdivision actions;
(i) 
Will not cause boundary lines to cross a UGA boundary, jurisdictional boundaries, split zoned lots, cross on-site sewage disposal systems, prevent adequate access to water supplies, or obstruct fire lanes;
(j) 
Will correct split zoned or designated lots with two or more zoning designations;
(k) 
Will not detrimentally affect access, access design, or other public safety and welfare concerns. The evaluation of detrimental effects may include review by the health district, the County Engineer, or any other agency or department with expertise;
(l) 
Will not create new access which is unsafe or detrimental to the existing road system because of sight distance, grade, road geometry, or other safety concerns as set forth in Chapter 19.23 and as determined by the County Engineer;
(m) 
A BLA involving more than four lots must comply with the provisions set forth in Chapter 19.25;
(n) 
The proposed BLA will not cause any lot that conforms with lot area or lot width requirements to become substandard;
(o) 
The proposed BLA may adjust the size and dimension of undersized or nonconforming lots; provided, that the adjustment does not increase the divisibility of any of the final lots. Additionally, proposals for BLA changes in the AG and FW zoning district must be shown to benefit existing long-term commercial resource use;
(p) 
Proposals for a BLA within the AG zoning district resulting in one vacant 1 to 3 acre lot and 1 remainder lot will require the recording of a declarative covenant to be placed on the large remaining lot immediately upon any future BLA or subdivision creating a 1 to 3 acre residential lot. The declarative covenant will indicate the large remaining lot cannot be further subdivided for 15 years while designated Agriculture by the Yakima County Comprehensive Plan.
(6) 
Decision. The Administrative Official's written decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the boundary line adjustment shall constitute a final determination on the project permit application as provided by YCC § 16B.03.030(1)(a), based on the record and the criteria of Subsection (5) above. A final conditions compliance check is required within one year of the decision.
(7) 
Recording. To finalize an approved boundary line adjustment for recording with the County Auditor all of the following must be met:
(a) 
Record of Survey. A record of survey shall be submitted as a condition of approval of the adjustment application in compliance with Chapter 58.09 RCW and YCC § 19.30.071. The document shall be titled "Record of Survey" and shall contain the full and detailed proposed legal descriptions.
(b) 
Payment of Taxes Prior to Recording. In accordance with RCW 84.56.345, the applicant shall present a certificate of payment from the Yakima County Treasurer that all required taxes and all other assessments are paid prior to recording.
(c) 
Owners' Signatures Required. All owners within the boundary line adjustment application shall sign the final recording document in the presence of a notary public.
Applications by Single Ownership. If applicable, boundary line adjustments within single ownership shall be conveyed through declaration of reconfiguration, declaration of easement or other conveyance recognized by the State of Washington.
(d) 
Disclaimer. Approval of a boundary line adjustment does not represent or warrant that any lot so altered by an approved boundary line adjustment is suitable for development. All boundary line adjustments filed with the auditor shall contain the following on the recorded survey:
Disclaimer: Approval of this Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee a buildable site within said parcel(s). Such determination depends on approvals of water, septic, bulk and dimensional setbacks, and critical area/shoreline requirements.
(e) 
Other Recorded Documents. The deeds or other appropriate conveyances recognized by the State of Washington shall be filed for record concurrently with all other required documents, including any applicable disclosures.
(8) 
Expiration by Time Limitation and Reinstatement. Failure to record and complete all conditions within one year of the Administrative Official's approval means the boundary line adjustment application is expired. An extension request must be submitted for review and approval prior to the expiration date of the original decision as per YCC Subsection 16B.07.050(2).
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.34.035 Cluster Developments.

(1) 
Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide regulations and standards for lot clustering in urban and rural areas. It does this by boundary line adjustment or subdivision for developing residential property, whereby landowners and developers are given incentives to cluster lots on the most buildable and least environmentally sensitive portions of sites, while retaining a substantial portion of each site, including most resource lands and environmentally sensitive areas, in open space tracts. In order to take advantage of these incentives, landowners and developers are required to meet specific requirements called forth in this Title.
(2) 
Applicability. Cluster development may be permitted by boundary line adjustment under Subsection 19.34.020 or division of land under Sections 19.34.040 and 19.34.050. Cluster development is allowed in the following areas and situations:
(a) 
In the AG and FW districts, provided that the number of buildable lots, defined in Section 19.01.070, may not be increased through the cluster development provisions of this Section in these districts;
(b) 
Ten or more total acres in areas of the Rural-10/5 district that meet the criteria of Subsection 19.11.030(3);
(c) 
Four or more total acres in the RT district;
(d) 
Five or more total acres in the SR, R-1 and R-2 districts where a community on-site sewage disposal system or regional sewer system is also provided for the new lots.
(e) 
Outside Urban Growth Areas where a public water system, defined in Section 19.01.070, is provided;
(f) 
Within Urban Growth Areas where both a public water system and a community on-site sewage disposal or regional sewer system are provided; and
(g) 
Cluster development is not allowed in the MIN, R/ELDP-40, RS, HTC, R-3, B-1, B-2, SCC, LCC, GC, M-1 and M-2 zoning districts;
(3) 
Development Standards. Cluster developments of existing lots or creating additional lots shall be conditioned appropriately to meet the development standards of this Title.
(a) 
Maximum Density. Cluster developments involving new lots in rural and Urban Growth Areas are allowed to the applicable minimum lot size requirements of Chapters 19.11 through 19.13. A density bonus of 115% of the gross area of the site may be used when clustering new lots.
(b) 
Cluster Lots.
(i) 
Clusters within or Adjacent to Rural and Resource Lands. To the maximum extent possible, site design shall use the following methods to separate residential development from existing and potential agricultural, forest, and mineral resource uses on adjacent land and the remainder lot:
(A) 
Use of physical features to separate the cluster lots from farm, mining or forest operations. Examples of such physical features are rock outcrops, ravines or deep draws, irrigation canals, and critical areas;
(B) 
In the AG zone only:
1. 
Location of the cluster development on predominantly nonagricultural soils and in non-irrigable areas of the property if evidence is provided documenting that the proposed cluster location reduces adverse impacts to agriculture.
2. 
A covenant shall be recorded in a form acceptable to the Administrative Official that documents that any lot allowed to be greater than three acres in size shall be considered a small lot and is not capable of being further subdivided or residentially developed while zoned AG.
(ii) 
Cluster Development in All Areas.
(A) 
Clustering of 2 to 4 lots shall be subject to road standards in Chapter 19.23.
(B) 
Clustering of more than 4 lots shall be subject to the development standards of this Title as they pertain to common access, internal roadways and sewer and water systems,
(C) 
Cluster developments that create new lots with critical areas present or within shoreline jurisdiction must adhere to the requirements of the critical areas ordinances and shoreline master program and this Title.
(D) 
When creating a cluster development of existing platted lots that require the relocation of easements, the plat alteration or vacation process set forth in this Chapter must be used.
(c) 
Remainder Parcel.
(i) 
Development on Remainder Parcel and Density. The maximum density allowed within the project application site shall be calculated when cluster development is proposed described as follows:
(A) 
Density Bonus. The remainder parcel will be designated for use only as open space. The creation of cluster lots shall equal the maximum allowed density, with the remainder open space parcel as the bonus lot as shown in Figure 19.34.035-1. A restrictive covenant or plat note shall be recorded in a form acceptable to the Administrative Official that states:
Lot [insert lot or parcel number] shall remain in open space until such time as the comprehensive plan designation is changed to allow increased development density.
Figure 19.34.035-1 Bonus Cluster Development
Subject site total area = 20 acre parcel
Min. Density = 1 lot per 5 acres
20 acres/5 acres per lot = 4 lots total density plus open space bonus lot.
1934035_1.tif
(B) 
Standard Cluster. When the remainder parcel is designated for development with a permitted use, it must exceed the open space size requirements set forth in Table 19.34.035-1 to provide an adequate buildable area as defined under Section 19.01.070(2), which will be noted on the final plat or recorded drawing. The area of the remainder lot outside of the buildable area shall be maintained as open space as shown in Figure 19.34.035-2. This buildable area must be located outside of any critical areas and any associated buffers.
Figure 19.34.035-2 Standard Cluster Development
Subject site total area = 20 acre parcel
Min. Density = 1 lot per 5 acres
20 acres/5 acres per lot = 4 lots total density
1934035_2.tif
(ii) 
Lot Size and Density Calculations within the R10/5 and RT Zoning Districts. The lot size and density calculations shall be based on the size of the lot as it existed on May 21, 1997. All lots of any subsequent division of land shall be included in the calculation.
(iii) 
Declarative Covenant or Plat Note.
(A) 
A plat note shall be recorded in a form acceptable to the Administrative Official that documents that the cluster lots resulting from a boundary line adjustment or by division of land under this Title are not subject to special setbacks for especially sensitive land uses from remainder parcels and other property zoned for commercial agriculture, forestry or surface mining uses, described in Section 19.18.205.
(B) 
The declarative covenant or plat note of Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(A) above shall document the unavailability of further divisions beyond the density to which the lot, in its configuration as it existed on May 21, 1997 within the R10/5 and RT Zoning Districts, is entitled, until the remainder lot is served with both regional sewer and area-wide water system, and, if applicable, included within an Urban Growth Area or if a comprehensive plan designation changes the allowable density.
(C) 
Notice of Resource Activities. Where otherwise undevelopable cluster remainder parcels are designated for commercial timber or agricultural activities the following notice shall be recorded as a plat note to serve as notification to each parcel within the cluster:
The property is adjacent to commercial agricultural or forest lands on which a variety of commercial activities may occur that are not compatible with residential development. Potential impacts or inconvenience may include, but are not limited to: Noise, odors, fumes, dust, smoke, insects, operation of machinery (including aircraft) during any 24 hour period, storage and disposal of manure, and the application by spraying or otherwise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendments, herbicides and pesticides.
(d) 
Lot Requirements. New lots subject to this Section shall comply with the applicable lot size standards for clustered lots in the following Table 19.34.035-1.
Table 19.34.035-1 Lot Requirements – Cluster Development
Zoning District
Site Density
Lot Type
Minimum Lot Area
Maximum Lot Area
AG
FW
Maintain existing density
Cluster Lot
1.0 acre(1)
3.0 acres unless the Reviewing Official grants a larger lot size in accordance with Section 19.11.010(3)(d).
Remainder Parcel
Determined by area of cluster lot(s)
None
Rural-10/5
Maximum of one unit per 5.0 acres
Cluster Lot
1.0 acre(1)
3.0 acres
Remainder Parcel
Determined by area of cluster lot(s)
None
RT
Maximum of one unit per 2.0 acres
Cluster Lot
0.33 acre(1),(2) if served by community sewer system
3.0 acres or less as determined by area of remainder parcel
1.0 acre if not served by community sewer system
Remainder Parcel
3.0 acres or half the total project site, whichever is greater
None
SR
R-1
4.0 to 7.0 units per acre within the developed portion
Cluster Lot
7,000 sq. ft.(2)
Determined by area of remainder parcel
Remainder Parcel
Minimum Necessary for SMA(3)
None
R-2
7.0 to 11.0 units per acre within the developed portion
Cluster Lot
8,000 sq. ft.(2)
Determined by area of remainder parcel
Remainder Parcel
Minimum Necessary for SMA(3)
None
Notes:
(1)
Unless a greater area is required by YCC Title 13 for fire separation.
(2)
Unless a larger size is required by the Yakima Health District or Washington Departments of Health or Ecology. Cluster lots may use right-of-way to meet the minimum lot size as permitted by Subsection 19.10.030(3)(a).
(3)
Remainder parcels designated for residential development must accommodate a building area in addition to the minimum area necessary for an approved Satellite Management Agency (SMA) to operate the community water and sewer system. See Subsection (3)(c)(iii)(B) above.
(4) 
Review Criteria for Cluster Developments.
(a) 
In reviewing a proposal for cluster development through boundary line adjustment, the Reviewing Official shall determine whether:
(i) 
The site plan satisfies the requirements of Section 19.30.070 and this Section; and
(ii) 
The proposal meets the development standards of Subsection (3) above.
(b) 
The Reviewing Official may apply such special conditions or stipulations to approving a cluster development as required to maintain compatibility with neighboring uses and to promote the objectives and purposes of the Comprehensive Plan and this Title.
(c) 
If the Reviewing Official finds that the requirements of this Section are satisfied, they shall approve the cluster development, subject to any special conditions or stipulations under this Section, any necessary reduction to special setbacks provided by Section 19.18.205, and any necessary enlargement to lot size under Section 19.11.010(3)(d).
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.34.040 Short Subdivisions.

(1) 
Administration. The Administrative Official shall administer and interpret the short subdivision provisions of this Chapter.
(2) 
Pre-application Review for a Preliminary Short Subdivision. Whenever a short subdivision requires use of a substandard adjacent road for access or use of an interior road that will serve more than four units or lots, a preliminary short subdivision shall require a pre-application conference under YCC Section 16B.04.010 unless waived in writing as permitted by that section. An applicant for pre-application review of a preliminary short subdivision shall submit a completed pre-application review form, and the information in YCC Section 16B.04.010.
(3) 
Preliminary Short Subdivision Application.
(a) 
Application. An applicant for a preliminary short subdivision shall submit the requisite fee, a completed application review form and the information in Section 19.30.060.
(b) 
Process. Review of the application shall be conducted as a Type 2 process under Chapter 19.30 and YCC Title 16B.
(4) 
Decision Criteria and Review.
(a) 
The Administrative Official shall approve a preliminary short plat if the applicant has demonstrated the application complies with the approval criteria in Subsection 19.34.050(5)(a) or that the application can meet those criteria by complying with conditions of approval.
(b) 
Preliminary short subdivision approval shall be considered the basis upon which the applicant may proceed with development of the short subdivision and preparation of the final short plat subject to all conditions of the preliminary short subdivision approval.
(5) 
Amendments to Preliminary Short Subdivisions.
(a) 
Applications to amend a preliminary short subdivision approval shall be processed through Type 2 review subject to additional notice and fees provided that the short subdivision application has not expired. The Administrative Official may amend conditions of the preliminary short subdivision approval as necessary to address the proposed amendment request; however, this process is not intended to remove conditions of approval more appropriately addressed through the appeal process.
(b) 
Minor changes or correction of errors not involving an increase in the number of lots or the change of conditions may be made by the applicant or County through the Type 1 review process.
(6) 
Expiration of Preliminary Short Subdivision Approval. Approval of a preliminary short subdivision shall expire after five years. Extension of preliminary short subdivision approvals are determined under YCC Subsection 16B.07.050(2).
(7) 
Final Short Subdivision Application. An applicant for review of a final short subdivision shall submit the requisite fee, a completed application review form and copies of the information as required by Section 19.34.070. Review of a final short subdivision shall be conducted as a Type 1 process specified in Section 19.34.070.
(8) 
Recorded Short Plat Alteration or Vacation. Once a short plat has been recorded with the County Auditor it can be altered or vacated in whole or part in a manner not involving the re-subdivision into more than four lots from the original short subdivision outside an Urban Growth Area, or more than nine within Urban Growth Areas. When increasing the number of lots from the original approval, the Type 2 short subdivision application process will be required as outlined in YCC Title 19. When a proposed alteration or vacation involves a public dedication, the alteration or vacation shall be processed under Chapter 58.17 RCW. If the proposed alteration or vacation does not involve a public dedication, the altered or vacated short subdivision shall be processed under the following provisions:
(a) 
The altered or vacated short subdivision must comply with the procedures and requirements of this Chapter. A new plat will be required with a survey of any new lot lines created by the altered or vacated short subdivision. The title block of the recorded plat map shall state "Amended Short Plat."
(b) 
The altered or vacated short subdivision shall show all of the land on the original short plat and shall bear the signatures of the majority of those persons having an ownership interest of lots, tracts, parcels, sites, or divisions in the subject short subdivision or portion to be altered within the original short subdivision as described in RCW 58.17.212 and 58.17.215 as shown by a current (i.e., within 60 days) title certificate.
(c) 
Minor changes or correction of errors not involving a change in lot lines or conditions may be made by the surveyor through the Type 1 review process by recording an affidavit with the County Auditor referencing the short plat by number and the correction.
(d) 
When reducing the number of lots from the original approval and the proposed change does not affect any of the recorded plat requirements from the original approval, such as but not limited to easements, plat notes, access and/or utility locations, the boundary line adjustment process may be used as outlined in this Chapter.
(9) 
Further Divisions of Land in Short Subdivisions. Once property is subdivided under the short subdivision regulations of this Title no further division creating more than nine lots, tracts, parcels, sites or divisions in the Urban Growth Area, or more than four lots, tracts, parcels, sites or divisions outside the Urban Growth Area, shall be made for a period of five years from recording of the short plat, unless a final plat has been approved and filed for recording under the subdivision and final plat provisions of Sections 19.34.050 and 19.34.070. In the case of a proposed re-division of land within a short subdivision or a subdivision, either the short subdivision or subdivision provisions of this Title and RCW 58.17 shall be complied with dependent upon the number of divisions proposed within the "land" as defined by Section 19.01.070 of this Title and/or the period of time that has elapsed since recording a prior short plat.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.34.050 Subdivisions.

(1) 
Pre-application Conference. The applicant shall submit a pre-application conference form and site plan of the proposed development showing the proposed layout of streets, lots, and other features in relation to existing conditions. The Planning Division shall schedule a subdivision pre-application conference as provided in Section 19.30.040 and YCC Section 16B.04.010 and provide notice of the scheduled meeting to all federal, state and local agencies and public/private utility providers having a direct influence upon or who can provide general information on the proposed subdivision.
(2) 
Submission. The applicant shall submit an application for preliminary subdivision to the Yakima County Planning Division, consisting of:
(a) 
An application fee as specified in YCC Chapter 20.01;
(b) 
The preliminary plat; and
(c) 
Supplementary material as specified in Sections 19.30.060, 19.30.070, 19.30.072 and Subsection 19.34.050(1) shall be submitted to the Planning Division.
(3) 
Public Notice of a Proposed Subdivision and Hearing. When a complete preliminary subdivision has been submitted to the Planning Division, the Administrative Official shall establish the date and time for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The notice of public hearing and notice of application shall be as provided in YCC Chapter 16B.05 and RCW 58.17.090.
(4) 
Review Requirements. Review of the application shall be conducted as a Type 4 process under Chapter 19.30 and YCC Title 16B.
(a) 
Copies of the preliminary subdivision application, supplementary material, environmental documents and notice of public hearing shall be forwarded by the Planning Division to the agencies identified in RCW 58.17.080, RCW 58.17.150 and YCC Subsection 16B.05.030(3)(a) for their respective recommendations, if any.
(b) 
The Yakima Health District may require the applicant to provide information necessary to determine the feasibility of the contemplated sewage disposal and water supply for the proposed subdivision.
(c) 
Any recommendations of the aforesaid public agencies shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the close of the record under Subsection 19.34.050(5).
(5) 
Decision Criteria – Public Hearings – Written Findings.
(a) 
Decision Criteria. The Reviewing Official shall approve a preliminary subdivision if the applicant has demonstrated the application complies with the following approval criteria or that the application can meet these criteria by complying with conditions of approval:
(i) 
The preliminary subdivision is in the public interest.
(ii) 
Public and Private Facilities. The following facilities are adequate to serve the proposed subdivision before or concurrent with development of the preliminary subdivision:
(A) 
Public and private streets and roads;
(B) 
Open spaces, parks and recreation;
(C) 
Drainage;
(D) 
Access to mass transit where there is or will be such transit;
(E) 
Potable water supplies;
(F) 
Sanitary waste collection and treatment;
(G) 
Schools and educational services (if residential);
(H) 
Pedestrian facilities, particularly for students who walk to and from school;
(I) 
Fire prevention services; and
(J) 
Irrigation water supplies
(iii) 
Compliance with Standards. The application will conform to all adopted County and State rules and regulations as set forth in Section 19.01.020.
(iv) 
Phasing. If a phasing plan is proposed, the applicant must demonstrate that:
(A) 
The phasing plan includes all land within the preliminary subdivision. A master preliminary plat shall be required with the initial phase approval that shows the future plat phases on the same document to establish and delineate the general development parameters for future phases;
(B) 
Each phase is an independent planning unit with safe and convenient circulation and with facilities and utilities coordinated with requirements established for the entire subdivision;
(C) 
Prior to recording the final plat for each phase, all required improvements for that phase will be built, bonded or escrowed;
(D) 
Each phase is consistent with an overall site and drainage plan under YCC Chapter 12.10 approved for the entire development prior to the recording of the final plat of the first phase; and
(E) 
The sequencing of phasing may occur in any order provided that all conditions of each phase are met consistent with the approved phasing plan.
(v) 
Grading. Where the slope between the highest and lowest points on the site exceeds five percent, a final grading plan for the full development, consistent with the drainage plan, depicting the final grade shall be shown for the entire plat with topographic contours at intervals of not more than five feet.
(vi) 
Flood, Inundation or Swamp Conditions. A proposed subdivision may be denied because of flood, inundation or swamp conditions under RCW 58.17.120. Construction of protective improvements may be required as a condition of approval and such improvements shall be noted in the final subdivision or in the Hearing Examiner's recommendation.
(A) 
New lots established for building purposes partially in the 100-year floodplain shall have at least a 5,000 square-foot building envelope outside the floodplain; (16C)
(B) 
New lots established for building purposes that are entirely within the 100-year floodplain shall meet the subdivision standards set forth in YCC Titles 16C and 16D; and
(C) 
New lots established for water-dependent land uses, as defined by YCC Section 16D.06.12, shall meet the requirements of YCC Subsection 16D.03.27(3) of the Shoreline Master Program.
(b) 
Open Record Public Hearing Review.
(i) 
The Hearing Examiner shall consider:
(A) 
Agency reports, public testimony and all other relevant facts and consider the decision criteria of Subsection (5)(a) above;
(B) 
Whether the proposed subdivision and dedication makes appropriate provisions for public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary waste, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and
(C) 
Whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision and dedication.
(ii) 
If the Hearing Examiner finds that the proposed subdivision meets the decision criteria in Subsection (5)(a) above, then the Hearing Examiner shall recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). A recommendation for approval may state conditions for such approval.
(iii) 
If the Hearing Examiner finds that the proposed subdivision does not meet one or more decision criteria in Subsection (5)(a) above, the Hearing Examiner shall recommend disapproval of the preliminary subdivision.
(iv) 
The recommendation of approval or disapproval shall be made under YCC Section 16B.08.050. The recommendation of approval or disapproval shall be based upon the factors specified in this Section and RCW 58.17.110 and every such recommendation shall be in writing and shall include findings of fact and conclusions to support the recommendation.
(v) 
Recommended conditions to be fulfilled after approval of the preliminary subdivision shall be written on the face of the plat or incorporated in the Hearing Examiner's written recommendation.
(vi) 
Upon receipt of the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner, the Planning Division shall transmit a copy of the recommendation to the County Engineer, the Health District, the subdivider and the subdivider's surveyor.
(c) 
Closed Record Hearing Review.
(i) 
The Board of County Commissioners, upon receipt of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on any preliminary subdivision shall, at a public meeting, set the date for a closed record hearing to consider the matter under the procedures and standards of YCC Chapter 16B.09.
(ii) 
A record of the closed record public hearing shall be kept by the Board of County Commissioners and shall be open to public inspection.
(6) 
Decision – Notifications. A copy of the resolution, with findings and conclusions, indicating the action of the Board of County Commissioners shall be sent to the Planning Division, the County Engineer, the County Assessor, the Health District, the subdivider and the subdivider's surveyor.
(7) 
Approval – Limitations.
(a) 
Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall not constitute approval of the final plat for recording. Rather, it shall be a guide to preparing the final plat which shall be submitted for approval of the required officials within five years of preliminary subdivision approval, or as such time period is modified by RCW 58.17.140.
(b) 
An approved subdivision expires five years after the effective date of the preliminary subdivision approval (or as such time period is modified by RCW 58.17.140) unless a fully complete application for a final subdivision has been submitted. Extensions may be approved under Subsection (10) below.
(8) 
Final Decision and Appeal. The decision of the Board of County Commissioners on any subdivision application is final and conclusive unless appealed to the Superior Court under the Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW.
(9) 
Preliminary Subdivision Amendment. Following preliminary subdivision approval and before submission of a final plat, the applicant may request an amendment to the approved or conditionally approved preliminary subdivision. This Subsection provides for different procedures depending on whether the amendment is major or minor, but these procedures do not apply to incidental changes to the approved preliminary subdivision and any conditions or recommendations imposed by the Reviewing Official. An application for an amendment to a preliminary subdivision shall be considered either a minor or major amendment under the following criteria. The applicant must meet all of the criteria in Subsection (a) below.
(a) 
Criteria – Minor Amendments.
(i) 
A change to a condition of approval does not modify the intent of the original condition;
(ii) 
The perimeter boundaries of the original site are not extended;
(iii) 
The proposal does not increase the overall residential density of a site;
(iv) 
The proposal does not change or modify housing types;
(v) 
The proposal does not reduce the designated open space;
(vi) 
The proposal does not increase the overall impervious surface on the site by over five percent and the applicant complies with any additional stormwater requirements under YCC Chapter 12.10, including:
(A) 
Stormwater treatment requirements for increases of impervious surface area of more than five thousand square feet; and
(B) 
Stormwater flow control requirements for increases of impervious surface of more than ten thousand square feet.
(vii) 
Any request to divide the project into phases or to modify approved phases complies with the phasing plan criteria of Subsection (5)(a)(iv) above and will not have a material effect on conditions of subdivision approval or cause a delay in construction of planned amenities (community buildings, footpaths, etc.) approved with the original preliminary subdivision;
(viii) 
Any conditions or expansions approved through minor amendments that cumulatively exceed the requirements in this Section shall be reviewed as a major amendment; and
(ix) 
The extent of the minor modifications does not result in potentially significant adverse impacts that were not addressed during environmental review of the preliminary subdivision.
(b) 
Filing – Minor Amendments. The following procedures shall be required for all minor amendments:
(i) 
Application Type. Requests for minor amendments shall be a Type 1 process on forms provided by the Administrative Official.
(ii) 
Routing. Minor amendment applications may be routed to any County division and to any agency with jurisdiction at the Administrative Official's discretion.
(iii) 
Approval. The Administrative Official may approve an application for a minor amendment, approve with additional conditions, or require modification of the proposal to comply with specified requirements or determine that the application shall be processed as a major amendment.
(iv) 
Denial. The Administrative Official shall deny an application for minor amendment if the proposal does not meet or cannot be conditioned to meet Subsection (a) above. It may be possible to process the preliminary subdivision amendment under Subsection (c) below.
(v) 
Appeal. The Administrative Official's decision may be appealed as provided in YCC Chapter 16B.03.
(c) 
Major Amendments – Criteria.
(i) 
Amendments exceeding the provisions of Subsection (a) above shall be considered a major amendment and shall follow the same procedure required for a new application and fee.
(ii) 
Major amendments shall be subject to the most current County codes including density requirements.
(iii) 
Any public hearing on a proposed major amendment shall be limited to whether the proposed major amendment should or should not be approved. The Reviewing Official shall approve or disapprove any proposed major amendment and may make any modifications in the terms and conditions of preliminary subdivision approval reasonably related to the proposed amendment. If the applicant is unwilling to accept the proposed major amendment under the terms and conditions required by the Reviewing Official, the applicant may either withdraw the proposed major amendment or may appeal the determination as provided under law.
(10) 
Time Extensions. A written request may be filed with the Administrative Official for extension of the time for finalization of a preliminary subdivision. The request for extension must be submitted in writing to the Administrative Official at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the preliminary subdivision approval under Subsection (7) above. The Administrative Official shall circulate the time extension request to affected agencies for comments. Extension requests shall be processed as a Type 1 application as specified under YCC Chapter 16B.03. The expiration date of the preliminary subdivision shall be on hold until the Administrative Official issues a decision on the application and any subsequent appeals are resolved.
(a) 
Approval Criteria. The Administrative Official may approve the request after making findings that the final subdivision extension will not be contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and provided that one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply:
(i) 
Some portion of the existing preliminary subdivision has been finalized since the project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval and the phasing criteria of Subsection (5)(a)(iv) above.
(ii) 
The preliminary subdivision remains generally consistent with the original subdivision that was approved.
(iii) 
When preliminary subdivision approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public facilities, which are not yet available. This circumstance shall not apply to extensions which the project sponsor would normally fund.
(iv) 
Court records or judgments submitted demonstrate legal proceedings directly related to completing the plat have prevented the applicant from finalizing the preliminary subdivision within the original approval period.
(b) 
Submittal Requirements and Timeline. The request for the time extension shall be accompanied by the approved preliminary subdivision showing the location and size of any development or work already completed on the project, with a timeline that identifies when each of the conditions of the decision has or will be completed and details circumstances that prohibited the commencement or completion, or both, of the authorized subdivision.
(c) 
Extension Limitations and Additional Conditions. The Administrative Official may only grant one time extension, up to a period of five additional years from the original expiration date. RCW 58.17.140(4) authorizes the grant of extension to include additional or altered conditions and requirements recommended by affected agencies or found applicable by the Administrative Official if issues presented are substantially mitigated by revisions to the original approval or if changes in adjacent development or studies merit updates to required conditions.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.34.060 Requirements for Site Improvements, Reservations and Design.

(1) 
Completion of Improvements – Performance Assurance. Before the "division of land" as defined in Section 19.01.070 is approved by the Reviewing Official, the applicants shall complete all required site improvements, reservations, and designs as identified in the decision to the satisfaction of the Reviewing Official and the County Engineer. All site improvements, as required by this Title and specified in the terms of preliminary division of land approval shall be dedicated free and clear of all encumbrances on the dedicated property and public and private improvements. In lieu of these improvements, Yakima County may accept a bond or other security under Section 19.30.130, as provided by RCW 58.17.130.
(2) 
Construction of Improvements. Where improvements are required, plans for such improvements shall be submitted to the County Engineer, who shall review them for conformance with conditions of preliminary subdivision approval and other adopted county standards as of preliminary division of land approval. Approval shall be given by the signature of the County Engineer on the improvement plans. Improvements shall be designed by or under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer where required by statute (Chapters 18.08, 18.43, and 18.96 RCW). The licensed engineer shall certify same by seal and signature. All construction plans shall comply with this Title and in addition to the above certification shall contain the following:
(a) 
Subdivision name;
(b) 
Name, mailing address, and telephone number of engineer preparing the plan; and
(c) 
Date (month and year).
(3) 
Monumentation. Permanent control monuments shall be set at all lot corners, block corners, angle points, points of curves in streets and centerlines of new right-of-way, points of intersection and under the requirements of Chapter 58.09 RCW, and at intermediate points as the County Engineer requires.
(4) 
Provision of Irrigation Distribution Facilities. Irrigation distribution facilities shall be provided as required under RCW 58.17.310 and as implemented by right-of-way preservation for irrigation system maintenance in Comprehensive Plan policy.
(5) 
On-Site Sewage Systems.
(a) 
Verification. The applicant shall provide written verification from the Yakima Health District to the Planning Division that the proposed lots are adequate to accommodate an on-site sewage system and reserve area outside of any water supply protection zone under WAC 246-272A-0320 when an individual, on-site sewage system is proposed:
(i) 
On lots under two acres in size; or
(ii) 
On lots under 2.5 acres in size located on Type 1 soils as identified by WAC Chapter 246-272A.
(b) 
Notice. Where the Yakima Health District waives the requirement to provide written verification that the lots can accommodate an on-site sewage system, but one or more resultant parcel is under 2.5 acres, the following notice shall be recorded on the final plat or document:
Notice to Public: The Yakima Health District has waived the requirement to provide written verification that lots herein can accommodate an on-site sewage system.
(c) 
Improvements Required. As a condition of approval the Reviewing Official may require sewer improvements as set forth under Subsection 19.25.045(1) for development within Urban Growth Areas.
(6) 
Public Water Systems. Where a public water system is required for divisions of land, water service lines and fire hydrants must be installed from a mainline to each lot within easements prior to final plat or short plat approval. Water service lines may be excluded only if all of the following conditions apply:
(a) 
Each lot has direct access to water from the mainline without the service line having to be installed on or across a separate lot from the lot to be served;
(b) 
Service lines would not need to cross roads or other utilities;
(c) 
Water service to other lots would not need to be interrupted to install the service lines in the future; and
(d) 
Where required, a covenant shall be recorded establishing a well control zone (sanitary control area) of sufficient diameter as determined by the Yakima Health District and/or the Washington State Department of Health.
(7) 
Recreation Areas. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.110 and related statutes, the County shall require subdivision five acres or larger within Urban Growth Areas and all plats three acres or larger in Rural Settlements to designate a portion of land area exclusive of streets as a recreation area. Recreation areas may include: private or public parks, pocket parks or mini-parks, playgrounds, trails and pathways.
(a) 
Standards and Review.
(i) 
Designation. The nature of the area shall be clearly indicated on the plat, "Reserved for Recreation Purposes."
(ii) 
Size, Topography and Location.
(A) 
The recreation area shall be of useable size, dimension, topography, and have adequate road access for the proposed recreational use;
(B) 
The recreation area shall be maintained in a singular contiguous tract, parcel or lot;
(C) 
When recreation areas are required for single-family and multi-family residential uses, the Reviewing Official shall determine the number of acres to be reserved based on the ratio of 1 acre/per 100 dwelling units, which equals 435.6 sq. ft. per dwelling unit; and
(D) 
Where the proposed recreation area is less than the percentage in Subsection (C) above, payment in lieu of recreation area under Subsection (b) below shall apply.
(iii) 
Recommendation. The Reviewing Official may refer such proposed recreation area to the local government official or department in charge of parks and recreation for recommendation.
(iv) 
Dedication. The developer shall dedicate all such recreation areas to the homeowners' association, or other responsible entity as a condition of final subdivision approval. Any acquisition of the land required for public parks or recreational areas, other than streets and alleys, shall be obtained by deed from the developer as a condition of final approval of the subdivision.
(v) 
Maintenance Agreements for Private Recreation Areas. Covenants shall provide perpetual maintenance of recreation areas dedicated to or operated by parties other than a local government. The covenants shall establish a fund for recreation area maintenance and require the owners in the development to pay annually into such fund. Covenants shall be approved by the County.
(b) 
Alternative to Dedication or Payment in Low-Density Neighborhoods. As an alternative to providing a recreation area under Subsection (7)(a) above within the SR and R-1 districts the applicant may choose to limit the entire development to a minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet or larger and a maximum lot coverage of 45%. A statement shall appear on the face of the plat that acknowledges these limitations and that the maximum lot coverage may not be adjusted to exceed 45%.
(8) 
Drainage Facilities. Where drainage facilities are required, approval of design, construction and drainage easements is required under YCC Chapter 12.10.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.34.070 Final Subdivisions and Short Subdivisions.

(1) 
Applicability. This Section applies to applications for finalizing both divisions of land following a formal preliminary approval. Any use of the term "subdivision or plat" in this Section shall include "short subdivision or short plat." Any reference to the Board of County Commissioners would not normally apply to short subdivisions, which are approved administratively, unless appealed.
(2) 
Requirements. The final subdivision shall:
(a) 
Conform substantially to the preliminary subdivision;
(b) 
Incorporate any conditions or recommendations imposed by the Reviewing Official;
(c) 
Include the following information, either on the face of the plat, if practicable, or, if not, on a separate attached statement. Any required signatures shall be in permanent black ink on the original document to be filed;
(i) 
A complete survey of the section or sections necessary to establish the corners of the quarter section or the corners of the quarter sections in which the plat is located or as much as may be necessary to properly orient the plat within such section or sections meeting State of Washington surveying practices as they exist in the Survey Recording Act at the time the field surveying work is completed. A lot closure report for each lot within the proposed subdivision must be submitted with a copy of the final plat;
(ii) 
Subdivision name (if any);
(iii) 
Legend, title, scale, north arrow and date;
(iv) 
Planning Division file number, located near the upper right-hand margin or within it;
(v) 
Tract boundary lines, property lines of residential lots and other sites, with accurate dimensions, bearing or deflection angles, and radii, arcs and central angles of all curves;
(vi) 
Name and right-of-way lines of streets, easements and other rights-of-way;
(vii) 
Location, dimensions and purpose of any easements;
(viii) 
Number to identify each lot or site and block;
(ix) 
Purpose for which sites, other than residential lots, are dedicated or reserved;
(x) 
Location and description of monuments existing or set;
(xi) 
Reference to recorded plats of adjoining platted land by recorded name, and Auditor's file number;
(xii) 
A certificate on the face of the plat signed by a registered land surveyor certifying the plat is a true and accurate representation of the lands surveyed;
(xiii) 
A certificate signed and acknowledged by all parties with any record title interest in the land subdivided, consenting to the preparation and recording of the plat; and
(xiv) 
If a lot is approved and will be served by an individual well for potable water supply and the well is not required to be installed prior to the recording of the final plat a statement shall appear on the face of the plat indicating the responsibility of future owners to provide the intended source of potable water, consistent with the type of water system intended in the approval and in compliance with all laws governing its installation and operation.
(d) 
Subdivisions within Irrigation Districts. Comply with the following provisions if the subdivision lies wholly or in part in an irrigation district:
(i) 
A statement shall appear on the face of the plat evidencing the subdivision lies within the boundaries of an irrigation district and that irrigation water rights-of-way may be imposed by said irrigation district under RCW 58.17.310.
(ii) 
Plats within irrigation districts or portions of irrigation districts shall contain irrigation easements no less than ten feet in width, nor more than 25 feet in width, unless otherwise approved by the irrigation district to indicate:
(A) 
Adequate provision has been made to serve with irrigation water all lots which are entitled to irrigation water under operating rules and regulations of the district, and
(B) 
Adequate provision has been made to transmit irrigation water through the plat to serve adjacent land that is entitled to irrigation water from the official forty-acre delivery point serving said land.
(iii) 
Plats wholly or in part within the boundaries of the Naches–Selah, Sunnyside Valley, Roza, or Yakima–Tieton Irrigation District, shall in addition to Subsection 19.34.070(2)(d)(i) contain the following acknowledgement:
The property described hereon is wholly or in part within the boundaries of the __________________________ Irrigation District. The irrigation easements and rights-of-way on this plat as required by Yakima County Code Title 19 (either currently existing irrigation easements or rights-of-way or newly created ones) are adequate to serve all lots located within this plat which are otherwise entitled to irrigation water under the operating rules and regulations of the district. The irrigation easements and rights-of-way are adequate to transmit irrigation water under the operating rules and regulations of the district. Lots _________________, in whole or in part, are not entitled to irrigation water under the operating rules and regulations of the district.
(iv) 
If one or more irrigation district within the subdivision serves as its own treasurer, a certificate of the authorized officer of the irrigation district is required evidencing that all special property assessments of such district on the property being divided are paid through a specific date. Such date shall be no more than thirty days from the date of submission of a subdivision to the Yakima County Planning Division for processing.
(e) 
Subdivisions within Floodplains. Comply with the following provisions if wholly or in part within an identified special flood hazard area:
(i) 
Delineate any 100-year floodplains and floodways on the face of the plat, or if the entire property is within the 100-year floodplain, contain a statement of that fact;
(ii) 
Identify on each lot partly within a special flood hazard area the minimum building area of 5,000 square feet outside of the 100-year floodplain, except public utility tracts, and public highway tracts; and
(iii) 
Include the following statement(s) on the face of the plat:
Portions of this divisions of land lie within the one-hundred-year floodplain of (appropriate watercourse name) as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as part of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) as per Flood Insurance Rate Map panel (number, date). Special flood hazard development standards will apply to that area of the lot lying within the 100-year floodplain subject to the NFIP as implemented by YCC Title 13 and YCC Chapters 16C.05, Critical Areas and/or 16D.05, Shoreline Master Program. This information is subject to change. Specific floodplain information may be obtained from the Yakima County Public Services Department.
(f) 
Subdivisions within Shoreline Jurisdiction. Include the following statement on the face of the plat, if wholly or in part within the jurisdictional boundary of the Yakima County Regional Shoreline Master Program:
The lots, or portions thereof, within this divisions of land are subject to the Yakima County Regional Shoreline Master Program (YCC Title 16D). Special development standards may apply and permits may be required for certain types of development. Shorelines management information may be obtained from the Yakima County Planning Division.
(g) 
Stormwater. Include a statement on the face of the plat that the owners and their grantees and assignees in interest agree to retain surface water generated by the (___-year, 24-hour) storm event (defined by the Reviewing Official) within the divisions of land. Any drainageways must not be altered or impeded; provided, this provision will not apply to divisions of land that have received written approval of a stormwater site plan to discharge surface water to a publicly owned or authorized storm water system.
(h) 
Individual Driveway Grades. Include the following statement on the face of the plat for properties with ground slopes exceeding ten percent, as depicted on the final grading plan:
The maximum grades for individual driveways that are 50 feet in length or less shall be 12%. The maximum grades for driveways 51 feet or greater shall be as identified for fire apparatus access roads in YCC Title 13. The grade shall be measured from the edge of road right-of-way or private access easement at the center of the driveway to the garage slab. If there is no garage then it shall be measured to the grade of the building as defined in the residential code of YCC Title 13.
(i) 
Addressing. Include the following statement on the face of the plat:
Yakima County has in place an urban and rural addressing system per YCC Chapter 13.26. Determination of street names and address numbers for developed residential and commercial lots within this plat are at the discretion of the Yakima County Public Services Department upon issuance of an eligible building permit.
(j) 
Dedications. Include dedication by owner of streets, rights-of-way, easements and any sites for private or public use.
(k) 
Acknowledgement of Subdivider. Include an acknowledgment by the person filing the plat before the Auditor of the County. A certificate of said acknowledgment shall be enclosed or annexed to such plat and recorded therewith.
(l) 
Payment of Taxes. Accompany a certificate of payment from the County Treasurer stating all taxes and delinquent assessments for which the property may be liable as of the date of certification by the Treasurer have been fully paid, satisfied or discharged.
(m) 
Approvals, Certificates, Affidavits, Covenants, Disclaimers and Endorsements. Include the following information, if practicable, or, if not, on a separate attached statement. Any required signatures shall be in permanent black ink on the original document to be filed.
(i) 
Approvals by Administrative Official for short subdivision, and upon receipt of a final plat for a subdivision meeting the requirements of YCC § 19.34.070, the Administrative Official shall review the final plat and shall approve the final plat if determined that the final plat conforms to the conditions of preliminary plat approval and applicable state laws and meets the requirements of YCC Title 19 as they existed when the preliminary plat was approved by the Board of County Commissioners;
(ii) 
Acknowledgement from the Yakima Health District, or other agency furnishing sewage disposal and/or supplying water, as to the adequacy of the proposed means of sewage disposal and water supply;
(iii) 
Statement of approval and certification by the County Engineer:
(A) 
As to the survey data, layout of streets, alleys and other rights-of-way, design of bridges, sewage or water systems, and other structures; and
(B) 
Certification that the subdivider has either:
1. 
Completed improvements under these regulations and with the action of the Board of County Commissioners giving approval of the preliminary subdivision, or
2. 
Submitted a bond or certified check in sufficient amount to assure completion of all required improvements at a future specified date;
(iv) 
Such other certificates, affidavits, covenants, disclaimers or endorsements as may be required by the Reviewing Official in the enforcement of these regulations.
(3) 
Drawings. The final plat shall be produced at a scale of at least one inch equals 100 feet, unless the Administrative Official requests or authorizes a smaller scale, to make a map eighteen inches wide by 24 inches long. The final plat shall be drawn with ink on 3-mil Mylar® film, equivalent material, paper or other form acceptable to the County Auditor. Where necessary, the plat may be on several sheets accompanied by an index sheet showing the entire subdivision.
(4) 
Submission. The original Mylar®, (or equivalent material, paper or other form acceptable to the County Auditor) and five copies of the final plat, and one copy of other exhibits required for approval as specified in Subsection (2) above shall be submitted to the Administrative Official and shall be accompanied by the final plat processing fee as specified in YCC Title 20. The applicant must submit all of the required documentation when the Mylar® is submitted. The final plat shall be submitted prior to the expiration of time specified in the preliminary subdivision approval.
(5) 
Approval.
(a) 
The Administrative Official, County Engineer and Yakima Health District shall review the final plat for conformance to conditions imposed on the approved preliminary subdivision. Approval of the planning agency shall be indicated by the signature of the Administrative Official on the original tracing.
(b) 
The final plat shall be submitted to the office of the County Engineer for final checking and inspection before ultimate approval is given. Office checking will be charged for at the prevailing wage rate for county engineers. A field check may be made of the boundaries of the plat. Approval of the County Engineer shall be indicated by the signature of the County Engineer on the original tracing.
(6) 
Time Limit for Review. Final plats and short plats shall be approved, disapproved, or returned to the applicant within thirty days from the date of filing thereof, unless the applicant consents to an extension of such time period.
(7) 
Final Plat Alteration/Vacation. Once a plat has been filed with the Auditor, it shall remain as the official plat covering the land. If a person proposes to alter or vacate the plat in whole or in part, the procedures in Chapter 58.17 RCW shall be followed, except short plat alterations and vacations that do not involve a public dedication shall be processed under Subsection 19.34.040(9).
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 6-2018 § 2(G)(i)(4) (Exh. 6(4)), 2018; Ord. 10-2019 (Exh. 1) (part), 2019)

§ 19.34.080 Binding Site Plans.

(1) 
Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide procedures for divisions of land by use of a binding site plan as an alternative to the subdivision process in commercial and industrial developments and in mobile or manufactured home parks, campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks.
(2) 
Applicability. The provisions of this Section are limited to two types of divisions:
(a) 
Divisions as provided in RCW 58.17.040(4) for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer of property zoned Small Convenience Center (SCC), Large Convenience Center (LCC), General Commercial (GC), Highway/Tourist Commercial (HTC), Light Industrial (M-1), and Heavy Industrial (M-2) under Subtitle 19.1; and
(b) 
Divisions of property for lease as provided for in RCW 58.17.040(5), when no residential structure other than mobile or manufactured homes or travel trailers are permitted to be placed upon the land when the County has approved a binding site plan for the use of the land under Sections 19.18.130 and 19.18.280.
(3) 
Commercially and Industrially Zoned Property.
(a) 
General Binding Site Plan.
(i) 
Pre-application Conference. To insure agency requirements are properly addressed, upon receipt of a request, the Planning Division shall schedule a pre-application conference and circulate a copy of the plan to all affected agencies with the time and date of the meeting.
(ii) 
Application. An applicant for review of the binding site plan shall submit the requisite fee, a completed application review form provided for that purpose by the Administrative Official, and the information listed in Section 19.30.060.
(iii) 
Review. Review of the application shall be conducted as a Type 2 process under Chapter 19.30 and YCC Title 16B.
(iv) 
Administrative Decision. The Administrative Official shall review the binding site plan for compliance with this Chapter and all other land use regulations in effect at the time of submission of a fully completed binding site plan application.
(A) 
Installation of Public Facilities. The conditions for approval of the project shall include installation of all public infrastructure prior to recording the general binding site plan. Public facilities required prior to recording the general binding site plan shall, at a minimum, include the following items that form a coherent and unified development:
1. 
Stormwater infrastructure;
2. 
Looped utilities and fire suppression systems;
3. 
A public road network with more than one connection to exterior roads; and
4. 
Non-motorized transportation infrastructure.
(B) 
Approvals. The applicant shall obtain written approvals by the applicable sewer and water providers, fire districts, County Engineer and Public Services Director for the various forms of public facilities required shall be obtained prior to recording the general binding site plan.
(C) 
Phasing. Any request for developing the proposal in phases shall comply with the phasing plan requirements for preliminary plats under Subsection 19.34.050(5)(a)(iv). A master general binding site plan shall be required with the initial phase approval that shows the future binding site plan phases on the same document to establish and delineate the general development parameters for future phases.
(D) 
Approval. If all requirements for approval are met, the Administrative Official shall provide written findings of facts supporting the approval of the preliminary binding site plan, and set forth all conditions for general binding site plan approval.
(v) 
Preliminary Approval – Limitations. The approval of a preliminary binding site plan by the Administrative Official authorizes the applicant to prepare the general binding site plan and develop the required improvements and facilities under conditions of approval. No sale, lease or transfer of any lot proposed by the site plan shall occur until a general binding site plan is approved and recorded with the Yakima County Auditor. The general binding site plan shall be submitted within five years of the date of preliminary approval.
(vi) 
General Binding Site Plan Approval and Recording. When all conditions of preliminary binding site plan approval are met, including construction, dedication and acceptance of all public facilities, or providing a bond under Section 19.30.130 in lieu of actual construction of any required public improvements, the developer shall submit the general binding site plan, with the fee in YCC Title 20, to the Planning Division for processing and recording. Any roads, structures, sewers, and water systems required for general binding site plan approval shall be designed and certified by or under the supervision of a registered engineer prior to the acceptance of such improvements. Once all the following requirements are met, the Planning Division shall file the general binding site plan with the County Auditor. The general binding site plan must include:
(A) 
A complete record of survey of the entire property and the initial lots to be created, if any, including the legal description;
(B) 
The acknowledged signatures of all parties having an ownership interest in the property;
(C) 
The signature of the County Engineer, the Administrative Official, and the County Treasurer;
(D) 
Auditor's certificate;
(E) 
Written documentation that all requirements for preliminary binding site plan approval are met, including the completion of all required infrastructure/improvements;
(F) 
An accompanying recommendation for approval or disapproval from the Yakima Health District or other agency furnishing sewage disposal and supplying water as to the adequacy of the proposed means of sewage disposal and water supply; and
(G) 
A note on the face of the binding site plan identifying the maximum density for the project area within the zoning district.
(b) 
Administrative Approval of Individual Lots. The creation of individual lots, other than lots established by the recorded general binding site plan, may be administratively approved through Type 1 review. Once a completed binding site plan division application is submitted with the fee in YCC Title 20, it will be reviewed by the Planning Division and all other divisions of the Public Services Department, and any other agency with jurisdiction, for compliance with this Chapter. An application shall not be accepted or approved unless:
(i) 
Required site improvements conform to the decision approving the general binding site plan;
(ii) 
Evidence that all infrastructures to serve the proposed lot(s) has been constructed to the standard outlined in the decision for the general binding site plan;
(iii) 
All improvements required for finalization of specific individual commercial or industrial lots were constructed and accepted prior to the time of application for the individual lots;
(iv) 
A registered land surveyor surveys the proposed lot(s) created and the legal description for the lot is prepared by the surveyor under the Survey Recording Act (RCW Chapter 58.09);
(v) 
All parties having an ownership interest in the lot(s) to be created under the current proposal sign the Type 1 application and the survey;
(vi) 
The survey containing the information listed above is recorded with the County Auditor's office following approval of the division application and prior to the sale, lease or transfer of any lot, with survey being titled "Amended Final Binding Site Plan."
(c) 
The lot(s) to be created meets the requirements set forth in the recorded general binding site plan;
(d) 
The lot(s) meets the minimum lot size in the zoning district.
(4) 
Vacation or Alteration of a Recorded Binding Site Plan. The vacation or alteration of a recorded binding site plan must follow the procedures in Subsections 19.34.070(3) through (5) above. This Subsection does not apply to the creation of lots under Subsection (3)(b) above. Lots already created within the general binding site plan may be merged or adjusted with adjacent lots under Section 19.34.020, but may not involve boundary line adjustments outside the perimeter of the general binding site plan. If the entire binding site plan is proposed for vacation, the owners of any existing developed lots in the binding site plan must sign a binding site plan vacation application or meet development standards through application for a subdivision or short subdivision.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.34.081 Campgrounds and Recreational Vehicle Parks.

(1) 
Pre-application Conference. Any person desiring to develop, expand, alter or modify a campground or recreational vehicle park shall request and attend a pre-application review conference with the Planning Division prior to submitting a campground or recreational vehicle park preliminary site plan application. Pre-application conference shall follow the requirements in YCC Title 16B.
(2) 
Application. An applicant for a campground or recreational vehicle park authorized under Section 19.18.130 shall submit the requisite fee, a completed application review form provided for that purpose by the Administrative Official, and the information listed in Section 19.30.060. The site plan shall be drawn to an engineering scale acceptable to the Reviewing Official and shall comply with Subsections 19.30.070(1) and (2) and Subsection 19.30.074(1)(d).
(3) 
Review. Review of the application shall be conducted in conjunction with the Type 2 or 3 review of an Administrative or Conditional Use, as indicated in allowed zoning districts, under Chapters 19.11, 19.12, 19.13, 19.18, 19.30 and YCC Title 16B. Notice of a proposed campground or recreational vehicle park shall be given as specified in YCC Chapter 16B.05. Appeals are permitted as provided in YCC Chapter 16B.09.
(4) 
Criteria for Decisions. In reviewing and deciding on applications for preliminary site plan approval for a campground or recreational vehicle park, the Reviewing Official's decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application shall be based on consideration of, the extent to which the proposed campground or recreational vehicle park is:
(a) 
Compatible with other existing uses within the general area;
(b) 
Consistent with goals, objectives, policies, and recommendations of Yakima County Comprehensive Plan(s) and if applicable, the Regional Shoreline Master program;
(c) 
In conformance with the uses allowed in the zoning classification within which the property is located;
(d) 
In compliance with and meets all requirements and standards of this Chapter and Section 19.18.130; and
(e) 
Consistent with land use requirements listed in YCC Title 13 Appendix G601 Recreational Vehicles, provided that recreational vehicle length of stay shall be limited to a period not to exceed 30 days, except for the camping vehicle occupied by the campground hosts.
(5) 
Duration of Preliminary Site Plan Approval.
(a) 
Preliminary site plan approval of a campground or recreational vehicle park, including all development phases, shall be effective for five years from the date of approval.
(b) 
If a final binding site plan is not approved and recorded within this five-year time period, preliminary site plan approval shall expire; however, as provided in YCC Section 16B.07.050, if the applicant completes and files all plans and specifications and substantially meets all conditions required as part of the preliminary approval, and further if the applicant requests an extension at least thirty days prior to the expiration date, the Administrative Official may grant one extension of preliminary application approval of a duration up to two years, during which all construction shall be completed or guaranteed.
(c) 
Failure to complete construction of required improvements or provide satisfactory assurance of completion in the manner provided in Subsection 19.30.130(5) within the two-year time extension period shall cause expiration of preliminary site plan approval, and it shall be necessary to resubmit an application for preliminary approval if the project is to continue. Any resubmitted application shall be subject to the regulations and fees in effect at the time of resubmission.
(6) 
Site Development.
(a) 
Following preliminary site plan approval, the applicant shall proceed with completion of engineering plans and specifications for roads, water, sewage disposal, drainage and stormwater treatment, power, cable, and other utility services.
(b) 
Following approval of the engineering plans and specifications, construction of the campground or recreational vehicle park may commence in conformance with the approved plans and specifications. Any deviation from the approved plans shall be subject to a modification to the approved use and written approval from the Reviewing Official.
(c) 
Following installation and construction of the required improvements, as-built plans for the water system, sewage disposal system, road construction, storm drainage, and other improvements shall be prepared and certified by a registered engineer. Two copies of the certified as-built plans shall be submitted with the final binding site plan.
(7) 
Final Binding Site Plan.
(a) 
Final binding site plan approval is an administrative process. The final binding site plan and three copies shall be prepared on 18 inch by 24 inch Mylar sheets, or other media acceptable to the County Auditor. The final binding site plan shall contain:
(i) 
A drawing at a scale of one inch equals 100 feet or other approved scale showing the location of all roads, camping spaces, pads, required parking spaces, external setbacks, natural and human-made drainage ways, ponds, detention and stormwater treatment areas, wetlands, easements for water and sewage disposal lines, septic tank location(s), and gray water disposal sites, fire hydrants and reservoirs, solid waste disposal site(s), fire pits, location and dimensions of any office, restrooms, showers, cabins, and other permanent buildings and other structures, and location of all survey monuments. An inset may be used to show a typical camping space and illustrate setbacks and space improvements in lieu of showing individual setbacks and improvements for each camping space;
(ii) 
The number and location of each camping space shall be shown on the site plan as light dashed lines;
(iii) 
Signature and date blocks for each of the following:
(A) 
Owner(s) of record of the subject property;
(B) 
Notary public, attesting to the authenticity of the owner's signature,
(C) 
Surveyor's signature(s) and seal;
(D) 
Planning Director, Yakima Health District, County Engineer, County Treasurer or Deputy, and County Auditor or Recording Deputy, or authorized designees; and
(E) 
Chairperson of the Board of Yakima County Commissioners, only if the site plan includes land or improvements dedicated to Yakima County;
(iv) 
Written description of the surveyed boundaries of the campground or recreational vehicle park property;
(v) 
Other information as required by the Reviewing Official;
(vi) 
The Treasurer shall sign to certify the taxes for the subject property are paid through the current year; and
(vii) 
The Reviewing Official shall signify final binding site plan approval by signing the final binding site plan Mylar. An incomplete final binding site plan shall be corrected before final approval and recording.
(b) 
One copy of the approved final binding site plan shall be recorded and filed in the Auditor's records. A campground or recreational vehicle park shall not be legal and approved until the approved final binding site plan has been recorded and filed with the County Auditor.
(c) 
The operator of a campground or recreational vehicle park shall establish rules and regulations for the management of the establishment and its guests and employees, and each guest or employee staying or employed in the establishment shall conform to and abide by such rules and regulations so long as the guest or employee remains in the park or campground. The submission of campground or recreational vehicle park management rules shall be required when an applicant files for final binding site plan approval.
(8) 
Compliance. An owner of a campground or recreational vehicle park and the manager are jointly responsible to operate a campground in compliance with this Chapter, and each is also responsible for guest compliance.
(9) 
Annual Operational Permit and Inspection Required. All recreational vehicle parks and campgrounds in unincorporated Yakima County are required, prior to the renewal or issuance of the annual operational permit, to have an inspection by Yakima County to ensure compliance with the approved binding site plan approved under this Chapter and the applicable building, fire safety and health regulations established under Yakima County Code Title 13.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.34.082 Manufactured or Mobile Home Parks.

(1) 
Application. An applicant for a manufactured/mobile home park shall submit the requisite fee, a completed application review form provided for that purpose by the Administrative Official, and the information listed in Section 19.30.060.
(2) 
Review and Notice. Review of the application shall be conducted in conjunction with the Type 2 or 3 review of an Administrative or Conditional Use, as indicated in allowed zoning districts, under Chapters 19.11, 19.12, 19.13, and 19.30, Section 19.18.280, and YCC Title 16B. Notice of a proposed mobile or manufactured home park shall be given as specified in YCC Chapter 16B.05. Appeals are permitted as provided in YCC Chapter 16B.09.
(3) 
Standards. All standards of Section 19.18.280 shall apply to expansion of existing manufactured/mobile home parks. The standards shall not apply to existing areas of a park not being expanded. The Reviewing Official may, at his or her discretion, reduce one or more standards of Section 19.18.280 for newly expanded areas of a park if expansion plans also include proportional improvements to the existing park area.
(4) 
Approval. Subject to findings of the proposal's conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of this Title, the Reviewing Official may grant preliminary approval of the project, enabling the applicant to meet State and County requirements for final binding site plan approval.
(a) 
A final binding site plan drawn by a licensed surveyor or engineer for the project shall be submitted verifying all required improvements have been completed or a surety bond has been posted in a form and amount acceptable to Yakima County for their completion. The final binding site plan shall be legibly drawn, printed or reproduced at a scale appropriate to show the necessary detail, which in no event shall be less than one inch to 100 feet, and containing at least:
(i) 
Delineation of all spaces and dimensions, square footage and unit setbacks for each space.
(ii) 
Designation of the areas and locations of all easements, streets, roads, location of off-street parking for each unit, other parking areas, improvements, signage, utilities, building envelopes within each space, and required open spaces and permanent irrigation system to maintain open space/recreational areas that would normally require irrigation.
(iii) 
The location of all solid waste containers and screening of containers, all facilities, utilities, improvements and amenities such as pathways, sidewalks, and recreational facilities.
(iv) 
An accurate legal description of the property.
(v) 
The parcel number, north arrow, and scale of the map.
(vi) 
Signature line for the reviewing official.
(vii) 
All property lines, their lengths and bearings.
(viii) 
The notarized signature of the property owner(s).
(ix) 
A statement signed by the local health officer that the plan meets the rules, regulations and standards of the Washington State Department of Health.
(x) 
Inscriptions or supplemental documents setting forth the limitations and conditions of the use of the land, or of approval, prescribed by the Reviewing Official.
(xi) 
The following statement: "The spaces contained in this park shall be for the purpose of lease of manufactured or mobile home sites only. The sale of lots without prior compliance with procedures governing the subdivision of land shall constitute a violation of state and/or local laws."
(xii) 
Designation of the details of a sitescreening buffer strip along property perimeters, under Subsections 19.18.280(3)(j) and 19.21.030(2).
(xiii) 
If a portion of the existing mobile or manufactured home park is located in a special flood hazard area, the final binding site plan shall delineate the flood hazard areas required by the subdivision standards under YCC Title 13. New or expanded mobile or manufactured home parks are not permitted under YCC Titles 16C and 16D.
(b) 
The final binding site plan shall be submitted to the Reviewing Official to be reviewed. Once approved, it shall be filed with the County Auditor within 14 days.
(c) 
Building permits for the manufactured or mobile homes shall not be granted until after the final binding site plan has been filed with the County Auditor.
(d) 
Development in conformity with the approved final binding site plan is binding. Deviation from any condition upon which approval was granted, or from any condition shown on the approved final binding site plan, shall constitute a violation of this Title punishable and enforceable in the manner provided for in YCC Section 16B.11.050.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 10-2019 (Exh. 1) (part), 2019)

§ 19.34.090 Utility Services Tracts.

The following divisions shall be processed by boundary line adjustment under Section 19.34.020.
(1) 
Bisected Parcels. Properties bisected by opened public rights-of-way, primary irrigation district canal or major sub-lateral or opened railroad rights-of-ways may be divided along the existing right-of-way without meeting minimum lot size, dimension or density standards of the zoning district.
(2) 
Public Highway and Utility Services Tracts. Tracts that are to be dedicated for future public use such as a public highways or public utility services, such as community water supply, may be created without meeting minimum zoning district's size, dimension or density standards. Such tracts shall not be created for future sale or lease.
(3) 
Personal Wireless Communication Tracts. Establishment of tracts for the purpose of leasing land for facilities providing "personal wireless services" may be created without meeting minimum zoning district's size, dimension or density standards. A notice shall be placed on the face of the survey map stating:
This personal wireless communication tract is created solely for purposes of wireless communication facilities. Any subsequent conveyance of this property for purposes other than the approved use shall comply with the provisions of this Title.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 8-2015 § 2 (Exh. 4) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.35.010 Legislative Intent.

This Chapter establishes procedures, review criteria and authority for:
(1) 
Administratively adjusting specific development standards of this Title in order to:
(a) 
Coordinate development with adjacent land uses and the physical features of the site;
(b) 
Permit flexibility in the design and placement of structures and other site improvements;
(c) 
Allow developments consistent with a respective city or neighborhood comprehensive plan; and
(d) 
Allow buildings to be sited to maximize solar access;
(2) 
Approval of modifications to previously approved uses;
(3) 
Approval of design modifications to certain road standards;
(4) 
Variances to the strict application of the requirements of this Title in limited circumstances. Provided, such variance would not be contrary to the public interest and the strict application of the regulation would cause peculiar, exceptional and undue hardship on the owner of the property. It is the intent of this Title that the variance be used only to overcome some exceptional physical condition of land that prevents any reasonable use of the property; and
(5) 
Reducing resource setbacks when the reduction will not adversely affect the natural resource operations or resource property owner or otherwise adversely affect non-resource occupants of especially sensitive land uses from the noise, spray drift and other potential impacts from such adjacent management practices.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.35.020 Administrative Adjustments.

(1) 
Review. The Reviewing Official may consider applications for administrative adjustments of certain development standards for Type 1, 2, 3 and 4 uses authorized by Type 2 review to provide flexibility in the administration of this Title. Applications for administrative adjustments will be processed under Type 2 review for administrative adjustments involving Type 3 uses as set forth in Chapter 19.30 and YCC Title 16B. Applications for administrative adjustments may be processed collectively with project permits under the Optional Consolidated Permit Review process as set forth in YCC Title 16B.
(2) 
Decision. The Reviewing Official may approve, modify, deny, or impose conditions of approval, as authorized by Chapter 19.30.
(3) 
Scope of Administrative Adjustments.
(a) 
Administrative adjustments to certain development standards under this Title may be approved, except as limited in Subsection (b) below, as follows:
(i) 
Setbacks, building height, and heights of fences, walls and recreational screens, contained in Section 19.10.040 General Development Regulations;
(ii) 
Setbacks, building height and lot coverage in Chapter 19.11 Rural and Resource Districts, Chapter 19.12 Urban Residential Districts, and Chapter 19.13 Business, Commercial and Industrial Districts;
(iii) 
Chapter 19.20 Signs;
(iv) 
Chapter 19.21 Sitescreening and Landscaping;
(v) 
Chapter 19.22 Parking and Loading;
(vi) 
As otherwise specified herein, such as for reductions to special resource setbacks.
(b) 
The Reviewing Official shall not have the authority through the administrative adjustment process to modify the requirements for:
(i) 
Density or minimum lot size or width;
(ii) 
Height of buildings or structures as limited in Section 19.17.010 Airport Safety Overlay District;
(iii) 
The number of signs or size of signs, or to allow any prohibited sign;
(iv) 
The siting of manufactured and mobile homes as set forth in Chapter 19.18 within Urban Growth Areas or the Rural Transitional and Rural Settlement zoning districts;
(v) 
Standards in Chapter 19.18, except adjustments to the siting of manufactured and mobile homes outside Urban Growth Areas or the Rural Transitional and Rural Settlement zoning districts, resource setbacks as specified in this Section and special events for bed and breakfasts in excess of 12 per year;
(vi) 
The requirements in other Titles of Yakima County Code, which may have their own adjustment processes outside the scope of this Title; or
(vii) 
Road standards which are subject to Road Design Modifications set forth in section 19.35.040.
(4) 
Use of Other Procedures. Other procedures for modifying standards may be available as specified in this Title or may be available through a variance. Where specific modification and variance procedures and criteria are provided in other sections in this Title, the Reviewing Official shall not accept an administrative adjustment application for processing.
(5) 
Findings Required to Approve Administrative Adjustments. A standard listed in Subsection (3)(a) above may be adjusted if the Reviewing Official finds that the administrative adjustment is consistent with:
(a) 
The purpose and intent of Comprehensive Plan policies that relate to the specific adjustment being proposed and this Title;
(b) 
The purpose and intent of the specific zoning district and the standard being adjusted;
(c) 
Maintaining the minimum administrative adjustment necessary to accommodate the proposed use;
(d) 
Balancing the flexibility of the administrative adjustment with the health, safety and general welfare of individual neighborhoods and the community; and
(e) 
The placement or design of structures will maximize solar access for the production of solar energy;
(6) 
Reductions to Special Setbacks for Especially Sensitive Land Uses (ESLUs).
(a) 
Legislative Intent. Special setbacks were adopted to protect the farmer or other resource property owner from nuisance complaints resulting from common, customary and accepted resource management practices, and to protect non-resource occupants of ESLUs from the noise, spray drift and other potential impacts from such adjacent management practices. Considerations in reducing the setback may include the dimensions of the parcel, historic use, natural features, physical barriers, crop type and location of structures on adjoining properties, proposed site design including location of the ESLU and the use of screening, berms, barriers and/or landscaping.
(b) 
Review Criteria. In lieu of the review criteria for other types of administrative adjustments in Subsection (5), resource setback reductions to the setbacks for ESLUs, under Subsection 19.18.205(2) may be granted, subject to Type 2 review and recording a declarative covenant as provided in Section 19.18.205(4), if an applicant can document on the required site plan and accompanying narrative that:
(i) 
The lot does not have sufficient buildable area as defined by this code to accommodate the space for the proposed ESLU outside the special setback;
(ii) 
An intervening physical barrier mitigates the effects of placing an ESLU closer to the agricultural, mineral or forest zoned lot or use; and
(iii) 
Based on a response, if any, from the adjoining resource operator, a reduction of the setback will not now, or in the future, adversely affect accepted agricultural, mineral or forest practices.
(c) 
Documentation. The documentation in Subsection (a) may include or be supported by the characteristics of adjoining and nearby land use and mitigation measures that effectively reduce the potential for land use conflicts and separate the site from active agricultural, forest or mineral operations, such as: use of landscape buffers or screening under Chapter 19.21 and site design using berms or other physical features. Where a setback reduction is justified by this specific subsection, the proposed ESLU must maintain the maximum practicable setback. Subsection (b) above shall not be used to reduce the setback by over fifty percent, except as provided under Subsection (d) below.
(d) 
Exceptions. The widths of the setbacks specified in Subsection 19.18.205(2)(a) may be modified under Type 1 review by the Building Official in consultation with the Administrative Official and recording a declarative covenant as provided in section 19.18.205(4), or as stipulated by conditions of previous permit approvals, where the applicant documents one or more of the following cases:
(i) 
The lot was legally created prior to adoption of this Title, or afterward in conformance with a formally approved administrative adjustment to the setback, and the lot cannot accommodate the special setback due to its insufficient area or dimension. In such situations, the maximum possible setback or approved setback from the adjoining agricultural, mineral or forest zoning district or use shall apply.
(ii) 
The new structure is an alteration, expansion or replacement of a dwelling or other especially sensitive land use lawfully existing prior to February 8, 2000 or was formally approved afterward, maintaining the maximum practicable setback from the nearby or adjoining resource-designated lot as demonstrated by the proposed floor plan.
(iii) 
The special setback would prohibit placement of the especially sensitive land use on an existing lot due to geologic hazard, flood hazard, critical area or other natural feature.
(iv) 
The special setback would cause the proposed ESLU to be located further from adjacent existing ESLUs and/or result in a greater impact to commercial agricultural operations on the subject property.
(v) 
The most recent plat or short plat containing the proposed especially sensitive land use specifies a different setback from the resource use, in which case the platted setback distance shall apply to the proposed especially sensitive land use, whether or not other conditions, such as current use, specified in the platted setback are present.
(vi) 
Part of a property line of the lot proposed to contain a new or expanded especially sensitive land use adjoins another parcel equal to or less than three acres in size and contains a lawfully established ESLU, in which case the resource setback shall not apply from the adjoining established ESLU lot.
(vii) 
The adjoining lot was approved as a special exception lot, under the small lot provision or a cluster development, in which case the resource setback shall not apply from the adjoining established special exception, small lot or clustered lot.
(viii) 
The lot was approved as a special exception lot, under the small lot provision or a cluster development, in which case the standard ESLU resource setback reduction under Subsection (c) above, may exceed 50 percent, provided that the ESLU setback not be less than 60 feet.
(e) 
Effect of Intervening Right-of-Way or Easement. If the property abuts a public or private right-of-way or easement that is precluded from being utilized for resource purposes (agricultural, mineral or forestry), because it contains limiting features such as, but not limited to, roadways, railroads, and irrigation canals, then the width of the right-of-way or easement may count towards the setback requirement.
(7) 
Administrative Adjustment of Sign Standards Allowed. Administrative adjustment of the sign height and setback standards in Chapter 19.20 may be authorized under the provisions of this Chapter when the administrative adjustment application meets the requirements for an adjustment and a comprehensive design plan is prepared that integrates the sign into the site plan of the project.
(a) 
Comprehensive Design Plan. A comprehensive design plan is required whenever adjustment of one or more sign standards of Chapter 19.20 is proposed or when required as part of the detailed sign plan. The comprehensive design plan shall include a narrative and site plan, including, but not limited to the following:
(i) 
The physical components of the sign including sign size, height, shape, color, location and associated landscaping;
(ii) 
A description of how the sign relates to the immediate surroundings, including existing and proposed structures, other signs, neighboring land uses and the character of the zoning districts;
(iii) 
For multiple-use complexes a description of how the available sign area will be allocated between tenants or leasable spaces; and,
(iv) 
An explanation of why the existing sign regulations are not adequate and require adjustment.
(b) 
Review Procedures and Criteria. The Reviewing Official shall use the criteria in this Subsection in lieu of Subsection (5) above and review the comprehensive design plan under this Chapter and may either approve or disapprove the plan. The Reviewing Official shall approve the comprehensive design plan and/or adjustments in the standards of Chapter 19.20 when such approval would:
(i) 
Be consistent with the character of the zoning district;
(ii) 
Be compatible with neighboring land uses; and
(iii) 
Create visual harmony between the sign, structure and the site where it is located.
(c) 
Conditions of Approval. The Reviewing Official may also attach conditions to this approval to accomplish the objectives of Chapter 19.20 and the legislative intent of this Chapter.
(8) 
Administrative Adjustment of Sitescreening and Landscaping Standards Allowed. In lieu of the review criteria for other types of administrative adjustments in Subsection (5), the Reviewing Official may adjust the sitescreening and landscaping standards in Chapter 19.21 by approving other sitescreening and landscaping plans under this Section, subject to Type 2 review, based on the following factors:
(a) 
No useable space for landscaping exists between the proposed new structure and existing structures on adjoining lots or alleys because of inadequate sunlight or inadequate width.
(b) 
The building setback provided in front of the new structure is less than six feet or is developed as a plaza with decorative paving/pavers, trees, planters, or other amenities.
(c) 
Xeriscape landscaping is utilized in designated stormwater control areas; provided, this factor shall not be used exclusively in reducing a sitescreening standard.
(d) 
When existing trees and other vegetation serves the same or similar function as the required landscaping, they may be substituted for the required landscaping if they are healthy and appropriate for the site at mature size. When existing trees are eight inches or more in diameter, they shall be equivalent to three required landscape trees. If necessary, supplemental landscaping shall be provided in areas where existing vegetation is utilized to accomplish the intent of this Chapter.
(e) 
Other adjustments to sitescreening requirements provided that they are able to comply with criteria in Subsection (5) above, as the Reviewing Official determines applicable.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 8-2015 § 2 (Exh. 4) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 9-2019 (Exh. 3) (part), 2019; Ord. 6-2023 (Exhs. 1(4), 2), 2023)

§ 19.35.030 Modification to Existing or Approved Uses Regulated.

(1) 
The Reviewing Official may consider applications for modifications of lawfully established Type 2 or Type 3 uses and developments approved under this Title, and existing Type 2 and 3 uses (see Chapter 19.30). The Reviewing Official may approve, condition, or deny the modification application. A site plan conforming to Chapter 19.30 shall accompany the application showing the location, size and type of modification proposed by the applicant.
(2) 
Applicability.
(a) 
Modifications to existing or approved Type 2 and 3 uses may be reviewed under this Section 19.35.030.
(b) 
All modifications to an existing or approved Type 1 Permitted Use or development shall be reviewed as a Type 1 Permitted Use rather than under these modification provisions.
(c) 
For a list of activities and modifications typically not subject to the modification review process of this Title, see Subsection 19.30.020(2).
(3) 
Modifications may be approved by the Reviewing Official under Type 1 review procedures, provided that the cumulative modifications of the approved use will not exceed the following limitations:
(a) 
The modification will not increase residential use by more than one unit, if allowed by the zoning district;
(b) 
The modification will not increase the required parking by more than 20% or 20 spaces (whichever is less), except that the parking for controlled-atmosphere and cold storage warehouses may be increased by up to twenty spaces. This limit shall be calculated cumulatively for all previous modifications;
(c) 
The proposed modification will not expand the total square footage of all structures and/or outdoor use areas, excluding parking, by more than 20%. This limit shall be calculated cumulatively for all previous modifications;
(d) 
The modification will not change or modify any condition imposed under any previous official review where it is specifically found by the applicable Reviewing Official for the approved use that a particular condition is no longer necessary due to changes in circumstances (in such cases, notice shall be provided to adjacent property owners identified in YCC Subsection 16B.05.030(3), in a manner similar to Type 2 applications);
(e) 
The modification will not significantly reduce the amount or location of required site screening;
(f) 
The modification will not expand an existing nonconforming use, or render a conforming use or structure substandard;
(g) 
The modification will not establish a new use;
(h) 
The modification will not expand a landfill, mining/site operation, mineral processing or mineral batching activity;
(i) 
In the determination of the Reviewing Official, the modification will not create or materially increase any adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the project, or cause the use or structure to become inconsistent with County adopted plans or the purpose of the zoning district;
(j) 
The modification will not increase the height of any structure;
(k) 
Any demolition of structures will not exceed 20% of the current area. This limit shall be calculated cumulatively for all previous modifications;
(l) 
The modification will not add a drive-through facility that abuts a residential zone; and
(m) 
The modification does not include hazardous materials (Chapter 70.105 RCW).
(4) 
All proposed uses, structures and site improvements (and modifications) shall comply with the development standards of this Title and previous conditions of approval not modified by this application, except as approved under the administrative adjustment or variance provisions of this Title.
(5) 
Any proposed modification that does not meet all the requirements of this Section shall be denied. Further consideration of the proposal shall be subject to the Type 2 or 3 review procedures according to Chapter 19.30.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.35.040 Road Design Modifications.

(1) 
Legislative Intent. Requirements of the road standards in Table 19.35.040-1 may be modified as provided in this Section where necessary to address unusual topographic conditions, nature of existing development, unique or innovative development design or similar factors. The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed design modification meets the Approval Criteria in Subsection 19.35.040(4). To ensure a consistent, objective evaluation of the proposed design modification, such proposals will be reviewed and processed using the procedures in this Section and elements adapted from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) local agency guidelines for road design standard deviation approvals.
(2) 
Applicability. The road standards of Chapter 19.23 of this Title may be modified as listed in Table 19.35.040-1 below. Such design modifications will be considered as part of the underlying decision on the proposed development following the required pre-application conference and standard decision time limits as set forth in YCC Title 16B. The official reviewing the design modification request may differ from the decision maker for the development.
Table 19.35.040-1 Road Standard Modification Table
Attributes
Modifiable Standard
Modifiable Standard(1)
Request Reviewed by
Roads Standard
Public Road
Private Road
Right-of-Way Width
Yes
Yes
County Engineer
19.23.040(6)
Surface Type
Yes
Yes
County Engineer
19.23.040(2) and 19.23.050(6)
Surface Width
Yes(2)
Yes
County Engineer
Tables 19.23.045-1, 19.23.045-2 and 19.23.050-1
Subsurface Materials
Yes
Yes
County Engineer
Bicycle Facilities
Yes
Yes
County Engineer
19.23.030(10)
Lighting
Yes
Yes
County Engineer/Admin. Official
Table 19.23.045-1
Note (4)(c)
Block Lengths
Yes
Yes
Admin. Official
19.23.040(10)
Half-Roads
Yes
Yes
County Engineer
19.23.040(7)
Non-Through Roads
Yes
Yes
Admin. Official
19.23.040(8)
Turnarounds
Yes
Yes
Fire Marshal
19.23.040(8)(c)
Alleys
No
No
N/A
19.23.040(12)
Driveway Location
Yes
Yes
County Engineer
19.23.060
Stormwater/Drainage
No
No
N/A
See YCC Title 12.09
Sidewalks
Yes
Yes
County Engineer/Admin. Official
Table 19.23.045-1
Note (4)(b)
Pathways
Yes
Yes
Admin. Official
Table 19.23.045-1
Note (4)(b)
Trail Connections
Yes
Yes
Admin. Official
Notes:
(1)
AASHTO guidelines provide flexibility to allow a range of options for road design.
(2)
Design of drainage facilities should occur concurrently with design of the traveled surface where sites with physical or legal constraints.
(3) 
Procedures.
(a) 
Design Modifications Requested Concurrently with a Project Permit Application. A pre-application meeting is required for all land use applications that include design modifications to the road standards in Chapter 19.23. Design modification requests must be presented to Yakima County during the pre-application meeting held for the associated permit application. Design modifications are reviewed and approved through the transportation review findings of the underlying land use application, based on additional information as required in Subsection (b) below. Design modifications must be requested at the time of the underlying land use application, or processed as an amendment to the permit, if available, as provided in Subsection (c) below.
(b) 
Submittal Requirements for Requested Design Modifications.
(i) 
Based on the pre-application materials provided, the Reviewing Official will inform the applicant what additional documentation is necessary to submit with the underlying land use application to demonstrate compliance with the Approval Criteria found in Subsection 19.35.040(4). Such documentation may include:
(A) 
Engineering, geotechnical and/or hydraulic analyses;
(B) 
Traffic and collision data;
(C) 
Aerial photos, contour, land use, quadrant and vicinity maps, cross sections and profiles, design file, environmental documents, plans, estimates, cost comparisons and existing as-built plans;
(D) 
An analysis of the public safety or other impacts associated with the requested design modification; and
(E) 
An analysis of how the requested design modification impacts public safety, shifting improvement obligations onto future developers or the County and material impacts on future development patterns.
(ii) 
The applicant shall document reasons the design standard cannot be achieved, citing the specific accepted engineering principles where appropriate.
(c) 
Design Modifications Requested after the Project Permit Decision.
(i) 
If a proposed design modification is requested after the decision has been issued, consideration of said request may only be reviewed under the applicable amendment process for the project permit, such as that set forth in Subsections 19.34.040(5) Amendments to Preliminary Short Subdivisions or 19.34.050(9) Preliminary Subdivision Amendments.
(ii) 
If there is no specified amendment or modification process, the request shall follow the same procedure required for a new application and fee. The scope of review shall be limited to the request presented and need not repeat a review of other elements in the application, provided that any time expiration is not affected unless an extension is requested under YCC Subsection 16B.07.050 or Subsection 19.34.050(10).
(4) 
Approval Criteria.
(a) 
Before any design modification to the standards in Chapter 19.23 or Table 19.35.050-1 may be granted, the Reviewing Official shall consider all of the following:
(i) 
Granting of such design modification request will provide compensating or comparable results, is in the public interest, and will fully meet the objectives of public safety, environmental protection, durability, cost of maintenance, function, and appearance;
(ii) 
Granting of such design modification request will violate no development related conditions imposed upon the project and is based upon accepted engineering practices and principles;
(iii) 
Granting of such design modification request will advance the goals of adopted comprehensive plans as a whole;
(iv) 
Special physical circumstances or conditions affecting the property can only be addressed by a design modification based on accepted engineering practices;
(v) 
Granting such design modification request will achieve the maximum possible compliance with the standard;
(vi) 
Where applicable, granting such design modification request provides potential benefits from implementing low impact development or innovative concepts;
(vii) 
The reason to grant a modification request is not based on self-imposed hardships or economic conditions; and
(viii) 
At least one of the following:
(A) 
Topography, right-of-way, existing construction or physical conditions, or other geographic conditions make compliance with standards unworkable for the circumstances;
(B) 
An alternative design is proposed that is functionally equivalent or superior to the standards;
(C) 
A change to a specification or standard must ensure consistency with existing infrastructure or facilities adjacent to or affected by the site that are not expected to change over time.
(b) 
In addition to Subsections (3)(a) and (b) above, in considering a road design modification request within Urban Growth Areas, the County will require sufficient right-of-way to be dedicated such that frontage and cross circulation roads will be substantially completed within the 20 year period provided in RCW 36.70A.110.
(5) 
Decision.
(a) 
When granting a design modification, the Reviewing Official may attach specific conditions that will accomplish the intent of standards, criteria, and established policies. These conditions will be incorporated into the project permit requirements. Examples of such conditions may include:
(i) 
Dedication of right-of-way for future road for any exterior or interior roads serving the property;
(ii) 
Covenants binding owners of the lots to participate in future public and/or private road improvements;
(iii) 
Formation of a road maintenance association comprising the owners of a majority of the parcels abutting the private road, with recorded bylaws, annual assessments, and an established road maintenance fund;
(iv) 
Restriction of further subdivision of the lots;
(v) 
Other requirements in Sections 19.23.030, 19.23.040, 19.23.050 and 19.23.060; and
(vi) 
Improvements to existing interior and/or exterior private roads proportional to the additional traffic the development places on the roadway.
(b) 
Requests for design modifications will receive a final decision with the project permit.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.35.050 Modifications to Existing Master Planned Resorts and Planned Developments.

Modifications may be considered to Master Planned Resorts (MPR) and/or Resort Development Plan (RDP) and Planned Developments (PD) previously established under Title 15, as described below.
(1) 
Minor Modifications. Minor modifications include minor shifting of the location of buildings, proposed streets, public or private ways, sewer or water facilities, parking areas, landscaping, parks, open space, or similar improvements. The process for minor modifications of a MPR, RDP and PD shall be a Type 1 Review.
(2) 
Major Modifications. All other modifications such as, but not limited to: changes to approved land uses, phasing, time limits and density within the MPR and PD, shall be considered as major modifications and shall be reviewed under the Type 4 Review process in Chapter 19.30 and YCC Chapter 16B.03.
(3) 
Expiration. Modifications approved under this section shall expire by time limitation, as set forth in Subsection 19.30.100(4) and YCC Chapter 16B.07 when the Reviewing Official determines that the modification has not been developed as approved within the time frame granted.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.35.055 Modification of an Approved Master Planned Development Overlay.

Implementation of the Master Development Plan shall be reviewed through the Type 1 review process. Modifications to the adopted Master Development Plan and/or Development Agreement may be requested. Minor modifications will undergo Type 2 review. Major modifications will undergo Type 3 review. The following criteria are established to assist this determination.
(1) 
Type 1 Review Projects or Actions. Type 1 review process shall apply to future projects or actions in compliance with an approved Master Development Plan and Development Agreement;
(2) 
Type 2 Review Projects or Actions. Type 2 review process shall be applied for minor modifications to an approved Master Development Plan. A change or amendment to the approved master plan shall be deemed a "minor modification" if, in the Reviewing Official's discretion, the following criteria are satisfied:
(a) 
The amendment does not increase the areas identified for any particular land use or increase the residential density approved in the master plan;
(b) 
The amendment does not increase the total floor area of nonresidential uses by more than five percent;
(c) 
The amendment does not materially change the type and character of approved uses;
(d) 
The amendment does not materially change parking or traffic circulation within the development;
(e) 
The amendment does not materially change setbacks, buffers, landscaping, shoreline, critical area or other mitigation measures;
(f) 
The amendment does not materially impact the overall design of the approved master plan; and
(g) 
Other similar changes minor nature proposed to be made to the configuration, design, layout or topography of the Master Planned Development deemed not to be material or significant in relation to the entire Master Planned Development and are determined not to have any significant adverse effect on adjacent or nearby lands or the public health, safety or welfare;
(3) 
Type 3 Review Projects or Actions. A major modification to the Master Development Plan shall be subject to a Type 3 review and shall be referred to the Hearing Examiner under YCC Title 16B and Chapter 19.31. A "major modification" shall be any modification to an approved Master Development Plan deemed to be more significant than a "minor modification" as described above;
(4) 
Amendments to Development Agreements. When a request for a modification to a development agreement is proposed, the public hearing shall be conducted by the hearing body indicated in 16B.03.080 Table 3-3; and
(5) 
Review Procedures. Type 2 and 3 review shall be conducted consistent with YCC Title 16B and Chapter 19.30, respectively. For any changes falling outside the scope of such review, the procedures in this Chapter for original Master Development Plan and Development Plan approval shall be followed.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 9-2019 (Exh. 4) (part), 2019)

§ 19.35.060 Variances.

(1) 
Variance Applications. The Hearing Examiner may consider applications for a variance from the terms of this Title under the Type 3 review provisions of Chapter 19.30 and the requirements of YCC Title 16B.
(a) 
Under no circumstances shall the Hearing Examiner grant a variance to allow a use not permissible under the terms of the Title in the zoning district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited in the zoning district by this Title.
(b) 
A variance application that would alter density or minimum lot size requirements shall not be accepted or granted.
(c) 
A variance application shall not be accepted if administrative adjustment or modification provisions apply and could provide the relief sought from the standards of this Title.
(d) 
The Hearing Examiner shall not have jurisdiction to grant a variance to standards or requirements under the Federal Emergency Management Agency's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) as implemented by YCC Title 13.
(2) 
Criteria for Variance Approval. The Hearing Examiner shall authorize such variance from this Title, as will not be contrary to the public interest and the comprehensive plan where literal enforcement of this Title would cause undue hardship, as measured by the criteria below. A variance shall not be granted unless the Hearing Examiner makes findings that the applicant has expressly demonstrated all of the following:
(a) 
Special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, exist;
(b) 
Due to such special circumstances, strict application of this Title would deprive the property of rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under identical zoning district classification;
(c) 
Granting the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district classification in which the property is situated;
(d) 
Special circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant;
(e) 
The variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure;
(f) 
Granting a variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Title, the specific zoning district and the Comprehensive Plan;
(g) 
Administrative adjustment or administrative modification provisions of this Chapter were not applicable or could not provide the relief sought from the standards of this Title;
(h) 
Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege denied by this Title to other lands in the same area; and
(i) 
Financial gain is not the ground or grounds for the variance.
(3) 
Additional Criteria for Variances in a Floodplain and/or Airport Safety Overlay District. When considering variance applications for property within a 100-Year Floodplain designated under YCC Titles 16C or 16D or within the Airport Safety Overlay District, the Hearing Examiner shall consider:
(a) 
The conditions in Section 19.17.030;
(b) 
All technical evaluations and standards that apply;
(c) 
The danger to life and property due to flooding or airport land use and safety conflicts;
(d) 
The importance of the services provided by the proposed use to the community;
(e) 
The necessity to the facility of a waterfront or airport location;
(f) 
The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use that is not subject to flooding or airport hazards;
(g) 
The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; and
(h) 
The relationship of the proposed use to the Airport Master Plan and floodplain requirements under the Federal Emergency Management Agency's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) as implemented by YCC Title 13.
(4) 
Action on a Variance Application.
(a) 
The Hearing Examiner shall file a written decision following closing of the public hearing in accordance with YCC Chapter 16B.09 that shall include the following considerations:
(i) 
The testimony at the public hearing;
(ii) 
The extent to which the proposed variance complies with the requirements of Subsection 19.35.070(2);
(iii) 
The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, or structure; and
(iv) 
The consistency of the variance with the general purpose and intent of this Title, the specific zoning district and the Comprehensive Plans.
(b) 
The Hearing Examiner may approve, modify, deny, or require conditions of approval in his or her judgment that will substantially secure the objectives of the standards or requirements so varied or modified.
(c) 
Violations of conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be considered a violation of this Title and is subject to remedies set forth in YCC Chapter 16B.11.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 10-2019 (Exh. 1) (part), 2019)

§ 19.35.070 Final Decisions.

(1) 
Notification of a final decision shall be issued as required under YCC Chapter 16B.07.
(2) 
Notice shall specify whether the final decision may be appealed as allowed under YCC Chapter 16B.09.
(3) 
If the effect of the decision is a recommendation, it shall be transmitted to the Board as provided in YCC Section 16B.09.050.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017)

§ 19.36.010 Legislative Intent.

It is the intent of this Chapter to establish the procedures to amend the text of this Title and/or its zoning map when the proposed change would be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plans (including adopted neighborhood plans), and the intent of this Title.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.36.020 Text Amendments.

(1) 
An amendment to the text, standards, procedures or other provisions of this Title may be proposed by any party under YCC Subsection 16B.10.040(6).
(2) 
Action by the Board. Any amendments to this Title shall be by action of the Board after a recommendation thereon from the Yakima County Planning Commission. Such action shall occur in accordance with the procedures set forth in RCW Chapters 36.70, 36.70A and YCC Section 16B.10.040.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015)

§ 19.36.030 Minor Rezone – Map Amendment.

Rezone applications consistent with Table 19.36-1 and not dependent upon a comprehensive plan or sub-area plan amendment shall be considered minor rezones. These quasi-judicial actions, when site-specific, may be processed at any time under Type 4 review pursuant to YCC Section 16B.03.030. The decision criteria for minor rezones are listed in Subsection (4) below.
(1) 
Initiation. An amendment to the zoning maps that are not contingent upon legislative approval of a comprehensive plan map amendment as set forth in Table 19.36-1 or sub-area plan map amendment may be initiated by:
(a) 
The Board;
(b) 
The Planning Commission; or
(c) 
A minor rezone application filed by the property owner(s).
(2) 
Application. All minor rezone applications shall be filed with the Planning Division, and shall be processed under the provisions of Chapter 19.30 and YCC Title 16B.
(3) 
Public Hearing by the Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of a complete application for a minor rezone, the Planning Division shall review the proposal using the decision criteria listed in Subsection (4) below and forward the application and a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner for an open record public hearing and review in conformance with YCC Sections 16B.08.010 and 16B.08.020. Provided, that rezone applications initiated by the County to implement a newly adopted or amended Comprehensive Plans, or which are of broad general applicability shall be heard by the Planning Commission under the provisions of RCW Chapter 36.70 and 36.70A. The public hearing shall be held after notice is provided under YCC Chapter 16B.08. The applicant shall personally appear or by agent or attorney. Other parties may personally appear or by agent or attorney, or may submit written comments.
(4) 
Decision Criteria. The Hearing Examiner shall issue a written recommendation to approve, approve with conditions or deny the proposed minor rezone. The recommendation shall include the following considerations:
(a) 
The testimony at the public hearing;
(b) 
The suitability of the property in question for uses permitted under the proposed zoning;
(c) 
The recommendation from interested agencies and departments;
(d) 
The extent to which the proposed amendments are in compliance with and/or deviate from the goals and policies as adopted in the Comprehensive Plans, adopted neighborhood plans and the intent of this Title;
(e) 
The adequacy and availability of public facilities, such as roads, sewer, water and other required public services;
(f) 
The compatibility of the proposed zone change and associated uses with neighboring land uses;
(g) 
The public need for the proposed change. Public need shall mean that a valid public purpose, for which the Comprehensive Plan and this Title have been adopted, is served by the proposed application. Findings that address public need shall, at a minimum, document:
(i) 
Whether additional land for a particular purpose is required in consideration of the amount already provided by the plan map designation or current zoning district within the area as appropriate; and,
(ii) 
Whether the timing is appropriate to provide additional land for a particular use; and,
(h) 
Whether substantial changes in circumstances exist to warrant an amendment to the current designation or zone.
(5) 
The decision of the Hearing Examiner on minor rezone applications shall constitute a recommendation to the Board.
(6) 
Action by the Board. Upon receipt of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on a proposed minor rezone, the Board shall conduct a closed record public hearing to affirm, modify, approve subject to a concomitant development agreement under YCC Section 16B.03.080, or reject the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner.
(7) 
Time Limit and Notification. Notification of a final decision on a proposed minor rezone by the Board shall be issued as required under YCC Chapter 16B.07.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 2-2022 § 3 (Exh. 1), 2022)

§ 19.36.040 Major Rezones.

Amendments to the zoning map that are contingent upon legislative approval of a comprehensive plan amendment are deemed to be legislative and shall be considered major rezones that are subject to the procedures outlined in YCC Chapter 16B.10.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 2-2022 § 3 (Exh. 1), 2022)

§ 19.36.050 Appeals.

The decision of the Board on a minor rezone shall be final and conclusive unless an aggrieved party files an appeal under RCW 36.70C within the timeframes and procedures specified therein.
The decision of the Board on a major rezone shall be final and conclusive unless an aggrieved party files an appeal under RCW 36.70A.280 et seq. within the timeframes and procedures specified therein.
Table 19.36-1 Zoning District potential consistency with Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Designations
ZONING →
Plan Designation ↓
AG
FW
R-10/5
RT
RS
R/ELDP-40
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HTC
SCC
LCC
GC
M-1
M-2
MIN
MPDO
ASO
GO
MPR
Unincorporated Rural and Resource Areas
Agricultural Resource
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
I
I
P
P
P
Forest Resource
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
I
I
P
P
P
Mineral Resource Overlay
P
P
P
P
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
P
P
P
I
P
P
P
Rural Settlement
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
P
Rural Transitional
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
P
P
I
I
P
P
P
Rural Self-Sufficient
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
P
P
I
I
P
P
P
Rural Remote/Extremely Limited Development Potential
P
P
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
I
I
P
P
P
(Urban Growth Areas)(2)
Urban Residential
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
P
P
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
P
I
Urban Commercial
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
P
P
P
P
P
P
I
I
I
P
P
P
I
Urban Industrial
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
P
P
P
P
I
Urban Public
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
I
Urban Parks and Open Space
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
I
Urban Tribal
I
I
I
I
I
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
I
KEY:  P = Potentially Consistent
 I = Inconsistent
Notes:
(1)
The Industrial zoning district may only be applied outside of urban growth areas when it meets state siting criteria (see plan policy ED 3.14).
(2)
The zones within Urban Growth Areas should also be consistent with the applicable city's comprehensive plan or neighborhood plan future land use maps.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 8-2015 § 2 (Exh. 4) (part), 2015; Ord. 6-2017 § 2(C) (Exh. 1) (part), 2017; Ord. 5-2020 § 2(F) (Exh. 5), 2020; Ord. 2-2022 § 3 (Exh. 1), 2022)