Zoneomics Logo
search icon

Covington City Zoning Code

ARTICLE 158

07 Development Review Procedures

Division 21 Administrative Applications

 

 

Division 22 Legislative Applications

 

Division 23 Quasi-Judicial Applications

 

Sec. 07.20.1 Purpose and Applicability

  • Purpose. The purpose of this Article is to consolidate and standardize the City's development review procedures.
  • Applicability. The Sections of this Article apply to all development activity that requires a recommendation or final decision from City staff or a Commission or Board denoted in Table 07.20.2, Summary of Procedure. 
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.2 Summary of Procedures

  • A.
    Generally. Procedures for obtaining development review approval pursuant to this NDC are summarized in this Section.
  • B.
    Applications and Procedures. Each application required by this NDC is spelled out in Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures, below.
  • Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures
    Development Application (Reference)Submittal TimingExpiration1Review ResponsibilitiesPublic Notice2Applicable Standards3
    RecommendationFinal Action
    ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions in which City staff apply the standards in this NDC. Administrative applications typically require objective analysis by City staff and may involve the exercise of very limited discretion.

    Administrative Adjustment

    (Sec. 07.21.1)

    In order to make a limited modification to any numerical standard on an application that has already been approved but that has not received a Certificate of Occupancy Same as application being adjustedAdministratorN/A--

    Building Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.4)

    Prior to a building or other structure being erected, moved, added to, or structurally altered

     150 days 

    Chief Building Inspector

    N/A--

    Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff)

    (Sec. 07.21.3)

    Prior to the alteration of the exterior appearance or demolition of any existing structure, or construction of a new structure or portions thereof, or installation of signs within the boundaries of a Historic Preservation Overlay District or KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Area where design guidelines are adopted.

    1 yearHistoric Preservation Officer  N/AAppendix A, 
    Historic Covington Design Guidelines
    , and any applicable Ch. 99 Development Plan Area guidelines

    Certificate of Occupancy

    (Sec. 07.21.4)

    Prior to land being used and prior to a building or addition being occupied, converted, enlarged, or structurally altered, wholly or partly

    None

    Chief Building InspectorN/A--

    Floodplain Development Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.5)

    Prior to any construction or other development begins within any special flood hazard area established in Sec. 04.14.2, General ProvisionsNoneFloodplain Administrator N/ADivision 14Environment

    Limited Use Authorization

    (Sec. 07.21.6)

    Prior to the established of a limited use as denoted in Sec. 03.06.3, Permitted Uses by District Table.180 daysAdministratorN/ADivision 07Use-Specific Standards

    Sign Plan and Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.7

    Prior to installing or substantially modifying a sign1 yearAdministratorN/ADivision 13Signs

    Temporary Use Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.8)

    Prior to the operation of any temporary structure or use30 daysAdministratorN/ASec. 03.07.8, Temporary Uses, and Sec. 04.08.5Temporary Structures

    Zoning Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.9)

    Prior to: a building, or structure being erected, moved or added to, structurally altered, or demolished; a use changing from one permitted use to another; land being used; or grading taking place on any lot or parcel 1 yearAdministratorN/A--
    LEGISLATIVE APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions that establish or change the way the use, design, or development of land will occur on a site-specific, City-wide, or intermediate scale. Elected and appointed administrative bodies make final decisions based on general considerations of fostering and preserving the public health, safety, and general welfare, including the City's fiscal well-being. Such final decisions are characterized by the exercise of broad discretion.

    Landmark and Historic Overlay Designation

    (Sec. 07.22.1)

    Prior to a structure, area, or site being designated as a Landmark or part of a Historic Preservation Overlay Zone.

     

    None1st: BOARD
    2nd: PC
    CC 

    Pu: 15

    M: 15

    Po: 15

    --

    Master Development Plan

    (Sec. 07.22.2)

    Prior to any other development activity for a project taking place within a cluster, planned, or tiny house neighborhood type.180 daysPDS Staff in consultation with the AdministratorPCN/ASec. 04.08.2Cluster, Planned, and Tiny House Neighborhoods
    NDC Text Amendment
    (Sec. 07.22.3)
     N/ANone1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CCPu: 7/214--
    District Map Amendment
    (Sec. 07.22.4)
    Prior to establishing or expanding a building type or use prohibited in the current character district None1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CC5

    Pu: 7/214

    M: 147

    Po: 14

    --

    Development Plan 
    (Sec. 07.22.5)

    Accompanying all applications for a character map amendment to the SU, AUC, SO, or Industrial character districts, except for single- or two-unit dwellings180 days1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CC5

    Pu: 7/214

    M: 147

    Po: 14

    --
    QUASI-JUDICIAL APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions that establish the way design or development will occur on specific sites in manners that either vary from the standards of this NDC or that are contested by an aggrieved party. Such final decisions are characterized by exercise of discretion.
    Appeal of
    Administrative Decision
    (Sec. 07.23.1)
    Within 30 days after an appellant or their agent received notice or the action of the official that is the subject of the appealN/AAdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Conditional Use Permit

    (Sec. 07.23.2)

    Prior to the operation of any land use that is designated as a conditional use or to change a minor nonconforming use to a conforming use. 12 months if not exercised6 AdministratorBOARDM: 7

    Nonconforming Uses: Sec. 05.16.1Uses.

    Minor Nonconformities: Division 17

    Written Interpretation

    (Sec. 07.23.3)

    N/ANoneAdministratorN/A--

    Variance

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Site Development Plan, Building Permit, or Sign PermitNoneAdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Variance, Floodplain

    (Sec. 07.23.5)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Floodplain Development Permit NoneFloodplain AdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Design Waiver

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Site Development Plan or Building Permit which includes requests for waivers or modifications to applicable standards as identified in the District regulations.

     

    1 yearHistoric Preservation OfficerBOARD8Po: 7Sec. 04.08.3Housing and Building TypesSec. 04.08.6Frontage Types, and Sec. 04.08.7Civic and Open Space Types; and Sec. 04.10.4, Exterior Material Standards 

    Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD)

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to the alteration of the exterior appearance or demolition of any existing structure, or construction of a new structure or portions thereof, or installation of signs within the boundaries of a Historic Preservation Overlay District or KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Area where design guidelines are adopted and where such development is not subject to review per Sec. 07.21.3, Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff).

     

    1 yearHistoric Preservation OfficerBOARD8

    M: 7

    Po: 7

    Appendix A, 
    Historic Covington Design Guidelines
    , and any applicable Ch. 99 Development Plan Area guidelines

    TABLE NOTES:   

    PC=Planning Commission (County)   CC= City Commission, BOARD = Board of Architectural Review and Development, CUP = Conditional Use Permit, COA = Certificate of Appropriateness 

    Pu#= Published in newspaper with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing 

    Po#= Sign posted on property with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing

    M#= Mailed notification to adjoining property owners with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing​

    Measured from the date of the issued approval. Expiration occurs if the applicant does not commence the work prior to the expiration, or does not diligently pursue completion of the project or the subsequent required approval. See Sec. 07.20.13,  Inactive and Expired Applications

    For complete notice requirements see Sec. 07.20.8, Notice​​​​​​.

    Aside from the standards of the character district for the subject property, as established in Article 158.02Character Districts.  

    Not less than 7 days nor more than 21 days before the hearing. 

    In accordance with KRS 100.2111 the recommendation of the Planning Commission shall constitute the final decision except as set forth in Sec. 07.22.4, District Map Amendment

    "Exercised" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in KRS 100.237

    30 days if the Planning Commission or City Commission proposes the character map amendment. 

    8 Subject to appeal to the City Commission, in which case the City Commission decision shall constitute the final action subject to appeal in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 07.20.11.

    Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures
    Development Application (Reference)Submittal TimingExpiration1Review ResponsibilitiesPublic Notice2Applicable Standards3
    RecommendationFinal Action
    ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions in which City staff apply the standards in this NDC. Administrative applications typically require objective analysis by City staff and may involve the exercise of very limited discretion.

    Administrative Adjustment

    (Sec. 07.21.1)

    In order to make a limited modification to any numerical standard on an application that has already been approved but that has not received a Certificate of Occupancy Same as application being adjustedAdministratorN/A--

    Building Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.4)

    Prior to a building or other structure being erected, moved, added to, or structurally altered

     150 days 

    Chief Building Inspector

    N/A--

    Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff)

    (Sec. 07.21.3)

    Prior to the alteration of the exterior appearance or demolition of any existing structure, or construction of a new structure or portions thereof, or installation of signs within the boundaries of a Historic Preservation Overlay District or KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Area where design guidelines are adopted.

    1 yearHistoric Preservation Officer  N/AAppendix A, 
    Historic Covington Design Guidelines
    , and any applicable Ch. 99 Development Plan Area guidelines

    Certificate of Occupancy

    (Sec. 07.21.4)

    Prior to land being used and prior to a building or addition being occupied, converted, enlarged, or structurally altered, wholly or partly

    None

    Chief Building InspectorN/A--

    Floodplain Development Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.5)

    Prior to any construction or other development begins within any special flood hazard area established in Sec. 04.14.2, General ProvisionsNoneFloodplain Administrator N/ADivision 14Environment

    Limited Use Authorization

    (Sec. 07.21.6)

    Prior to the established of a limited use as denoted in Sec. 03.06.3, Permitted Uses by District Table.180 daysAdministratorN/ADivision 07Use-Specific Standards

    Sign Plan and Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.7

    Prior to installing or substantially modifying a sign1 yearAdministratorN/ADivision 13Signs

    Temporary Use Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.8)

    Prior to the operation of any temporary structure or use30 daysAdministratorN/ASec. 03.07.8, Temporary Uses, and Sec. 04.08.5Temporary Structures

    Zoning Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.9)

    Prior to: a building, or structure being erected, moved or added to, structurally altered, or demolished; a use changing from one permitted use to another; land being used; or grading taking place on any lot or parcel 1 yearAdministratorN/A--
    LEGISLATIVE APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions that establish or change the way the use, design, or development of land will occur on a site-specific, City-wide, or intermediate scale. Elected and appointed administrative bodies make final decisions based on general considerations of fostering and preserving the public health, safety, and general welfare, including the City's fiscal well-being. Such final decisions are characterized by the exercise of broad discretion.

    Landmark and Historic Overlay Designation

    (Sec. 07.22.1)

    Prior to a structure, area, or site being designated as a Landmark or part of a Historic Preservation Overlay Zone.

     

    None1st: BOARD
    2nd: PC
    CC 

    Pu: 15

    M: 15

    Po: 15

    --

    Master Development Plan

    (Sec. 07.22.2)

    Prior to any other development activity for a project taking place within a cluster, planned, or tiny house neighborhood type.180 daysPDS Staff in consultation with the AdministratorPCN/ASec. 04.08.2Cluster, Planned, and Tiny House Neighborhoods
    NDC Text Amendment
    (Sec. 07.22.3)
     N/ANone1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CCPu: 7/214--
    District Map Amendment
    (Sec. 07.22.4)
    Prior to establishing or expanding a building type or use prohibited in the current character district None1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CC5

    Pu: 7/214

    M: 147

    Po: 14

    --

    Development Plan 
    (Sec. 07.22.5)

    Accompanying all applications for a character map amendment to the SU, AUC, SO, or Industrial character districts, except for single- or two-unit dwellings180 days1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CC5

    Pu: 7/214

    M: 147

    Po: 14

    --
    QUASI-JUDICIAL APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions that establish the way design or development will occur on specific sites in manners that either vary from the standards of this NDC or that are contested by an aggrieved party. Such final decisions are characterized by exercise of discretion.
    Appeal of
    Administrative Decision
    (Sec. 07.23.1)
    Within 30 days after an appellant or their agent received notice or the action of the official that is the subject of the appealN/AAdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Conditional Use Permit

    (Sec. 07.23.2)

    Prior to the operation of any land use that is designated as a conditional use or to change a minor nonconforming use to a conforming use. 12 months if not exercised6 AdministratorBOARDM: 7

    Nonconforming Uses: Sec. 05.16.1Uses.

    Minor Nonconformities: Division 17

    Written Interpretation

    (Sec. 07.23.3)

    N/ANoneAdministratorN/A--

    Variance

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Site Development Plan, Building Permit, or Sign PermitNoneAdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Variance, Floodplain

    (Sec. 07.23.5)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Floodplain Development Permit NoneFloodplain AdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Design Waiver

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Site Development Plan or Building Permit which includes requests for waivers or modifications to applicable standards as identified in the District regulations.

     

    1 yearHistoric Preservation OfficerBOARD8Po: 7Sec. 04.08.3Housing and Building TypesSec. 04.08.6Frontage Types, and Sec. 04.08.7Civic and Open Space Types; and Sec. 04.10.4, Exterior Material Standards 

    Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD)

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to the alteration of the exterior appearance or demolition of any existing structure, or construction of a new structure or portions thereof, or installation of signs within the boundaries of a Historic Preservation Overlay District or KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Area where design guidelines are adopted and where such development is not subject to review per Sec. 07.21.3, Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff).

     

    1 yearHistoric Preservation OfficerBOARD8

    M: 7

    Po: 7

    Appendix A, 
    Historic Covington Design Guidelines
    , and any applicable Ch. 99 Development Plan Area guidelines

    TABLE NOTES:   

    PC=Planning Commission (County)   CC= City Commission, BOARD = Board of Architectural Review and Development, CUP = Conditional Use Permit, COA = Certificate of Appropriateness 

    Pu#= Published in newspaper with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing 

    Po#= Sign posted on property with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing

    M#= Mailed notification to adjoining property owners with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing​

    Measured from the date of the issued approval. Expiration occurs if the applicant does not commence the work prior to the expiration, or does not diligently pursue completion of the project or the subsequent required approval. See Sec. 07.20.13,  Inactive and Expired Applications

    For complete notice requirements see Sec. 07.20.8, Notice​​​​​​.

    Aside from the standards of the character district for the subject property, as established in Article 158.02Character Districts.  

    Not less than 7 days nor more than 21 days before the hearing. 

    In accordance with KRS 100.2111 the recommendation of the Planning Commission shall constitute the final decision except as set forth in Sec. 07.22.4, District Map Amendment

    "Exercised" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in KRS 100.237

    30 days if the Planning Commission or City Commission proposes the character map amendment. 

    8 Subject to appeal to the City Commission, in which case the City Commission decision shall constitute the final action subject to appeal in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 07.20.11.

    Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures
    Development Application (Reference)Submittal TimingExpiration1Review ResponsibilitiesPublic Notice2Applicable Standards3
    RecommendationFinal Action
    ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions in which City staff apply the standards in this NDC. Administrative applications typically require objective analysis by City staff and may involve the exercise of very limited discretion.

    Administrative Adjustment

    (Sec. 07.21.1)

    In order to make a limited modification to any numerical standard on an application that has already been approved but that has not received a Certificate of Occupancy Same as application being adjustedAdministratorN/A--

    Building Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.4)

    Prior to a building or other structure being erected, moved, added to, or structurally altered

     150 days 

    Chief Building Inspector

    N/A--

    Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff)

    (Sec. 07.21.3)

    Prior to the alteration of the exterior appearance or demolition of any existing structure, or construction of a new structure or portions thereof, or installation of signs within the boundaries of a Historic Preservation Overlay District or KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Area where design guidelines are adopted.

    1 yearHistoric Preservation Officer  N/AAppendix A, 
    Historic Covington Design Guidelines
    , and any applicable Ch. 99 Development Plan Area guidelines

    Certificate of Occupancy

    (Sec. 07.21.4)

    Prior to land being used and prior to a building or addition being occupied, converted, enlarged, or structurally altered, wholly or partly

    None

    Chief Building InspectorN/A--

    Floodplain Development Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.5)

    Prior to any construction or other development begins within any special flood hazard area established in Sec. 04.14.2, General ProvisionsNoneFloodplain Administrator N/ADivision 14Environment

    Limited Use Authorization

    (Sec. 07.21.6)

    Prior to the established of a limited use as denoted in Sec. 03.06.3, Permitted Uses by District Table.180 daysAdministratorN/ADivision 07Use-Specific Standards

    Sign Plan and Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.7

    Prior to installing or substantially modifying a sign1 yearAdministratorN/ADivision 13Signs

    Temporary Use Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.8)

    Prior to the operation of any temporary structure or use30 daysAdministratorN/ASec. 03.07.8, Temporary Uses, and Sec. 04.08.5Temporary Structures

    Zoning Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.9)

    Prior to: a building, or structure being erected, moved or added to, structurally altered, or demolished; a use changing from one permitted use to another; land being used; or grading taking place on any lot or parcel 1 yearAdministratorN/A--
    LEGISLATIVE APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions that establish or change the way the use, design, or development of land will occur on a site-specific, City-wide, or intermediate scale. Elected and appointed administrative bodies make final decisions based on general considerations of fostering and preserving the public health, safety, and general welfare, including the City's fiscal well-being. Such final decisions are characterized by the exercise of broad discretion.

    Landmark and Historic Overlay Designation

    (Sec. 07.22.1)

    Prior to a structure, area, or site being designated as a Landmark or part of a Historic Preservation Overlay Zone.

     

    None1st: BOARD
    2nd: PC
    CC 

    Pu: 15

    M: 15

    Po: 15

    --

    Master Development Plan

    (Sec. 07.22.2)

    Prior to any other development activity for a project taking place within a cluster, planned, or tiny house neighborhood type.180 daysPDS Staff in consultation with the AdministratorPCN/ASec. 04.08.2Cluster, Planned, and Tiny House Neighborhoods
    NDC Text Amendment
    (Sec. 07.22.3)
     N/ANone1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CCPu: 7/214--
    District Map Amendment
    (Sec. 07.22.4)
    Prior to establishing or expanding a building type or use prohibited in the current character district None1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CC5

    Pu: 7/214

    M: 147

    Po: 14

    --

    Development Plan 
    (Sec. 07.22.5)

    Accompanying all applications for a character map amendment to the SU, AUC, SO, or Industrial character districts, except for single- or two-unit dwellings180 days1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CC5

    Pu: 7/214

    M: 147

    Po: 14

    --
    QUASI-JUDICIAL APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions that establish the way design or development will occur on specific sites in manners that either vary from the standards of this NDC or that are contested by an aggrieved party. Such final decisions are characterized by exercise of discretion.
    Appeal of
    Administrative Decision
    (Sec. 07.23.1)
    Within 30 days after an appellant or their agent received notice or the action of the official that is the subject of the appealN/AAdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Conditional Use Permit

    (Sec. 07.23.2)

    Prior to the operation of any land use that is designated as a conditional use or to change a minor nonconforming use to a conforming use. 12 months if not exercised6 AdministratorBOARDM: 7

    Nonconforming Uses: Sec. 05.16.1Uses.

    Minor Nonconformities: Division 17

    Written Interpretation

    (Sec. 07.23.3)

    N/ANoneAdministratorN/A--

    Variance

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Site Development Plan, Building Permit, or Sign PermitNoneAdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Variance, Floodplain

    (Sec. 07.23.5)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Floodplain Development Permit NoneFloodplain AdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Design Waiver

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Site Development Plan or Building Permit which includes requests for waivers or modifications to applicable standards as identified in the District regulations.

     

    1 yearHistoric Preservation OfficerBOARD8Po: 7Sec. 04.08.3Housing and Building TypesSec. 04.08.6Frontage Types, and Sec. 04.08.7Civic and Open Space Types; and Sec. 04.10.4, Exterior Material Standards 

    Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD)

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to the alteration of the exterior appearance or demolition of any existing structure, or construction of a new structure or portions thereof, or installation of signs within the boundaries of a Historic Preservation Overlay District or KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Area where design guidelines are adopted and where such development is not subject to review per Sec. 07.21.3, Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff).

     

    1 yearHistoric Preservation OfficerBOARD8

    M: 7

    Po: 7

    Appendix A, 
    Historic Covington Design Guidelines
    , and any applicable Ch. 99 Development Plan Area guidelines

    TABLE NOTES:   

    PC=Planning Commission (County)   CC= City Commission, BOARD = Board of Architectural Review and Development, CUP = Conditional Use Permit, COA = Certificate of Appropriateness 

    Pu#= Published in newspaper with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing 

    Po#= Sign posted on property with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing

    M#= Mailed notification to adjoining property owners with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing​

    Measured from the date of the issued approval. Expiration occurs if the applicant does not commence the work prior to the expiration, or does not diligently pursue completion of the project or the subsequent required approval. See Sec. 07.20.13,  Inactive and Expired Applications

    For complete notice requirements see Sec. 07.20.8, Notice​​​​​​.

    Aside from the standards of the character district for the subject property, as established in Article 158.02Character Districts.  

    Not less than 7 days nor more than 21 days before the hearing. 

    In accordance with KRS 100.2111 the recommendation of the Planning Commission shall constitute the final decision except as set forth in Sec. 07.22.4, District Map Amendment

    "Exercised" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in KRS 100.237

    30 days if the Planning Commission or City Commission proposes the character map amendment. 

    8 Subject to appeal to the City Commission, in which case the City Commission decision shall constitute the final action subject to appeal in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 07.20.11.

    Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures
    Development Application (Reference)Submittal TimingExpiration1Review ResponsibilitiesPublic Notice2Applicable Standards3
    RecommendationFinal Action
    ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions in which City staff apply the standards in this NDC. Administrative applications typically require objective analysis by City staff and may involve the exercise of very limited discretion.

    Administrative Adjustment

    (Sec. 07.21.1)

    In order to make a limited modification to any numerical standard on an application that has already been approved but that has not received a Certificate of Occupancy Same as application being adjustedAdministratorN/A--

    Building Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.4)

    Prior to a building or other structure being erected, moved, added to, or structurally altered

     150 days 

    Chief Building Inspector

    N/A--

    Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff)

    (Sec. 07.21.3)

    Prior to the alteration of the exterior appearance or demolition of any existing structure, or construction of a new structure or portions thereof, or installation of signs within the boundaries of a Historic Preservation Overlay District or KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Area where design guidelines are adopted.

    1 yearHistoric Preservation Officer  N/AAppendix A, 
    Historic Covington Design Guidelines
    , and any applicable Ch. 99 Development Plan Area guidelines

    Certificate of Occupancy

    (Sec. 07.21.4)

    Prior to land being used and prior to a building or addition being occupied, converted, enlarged, or structurally altered, wholly or partly

    None

    Chief Building InspectorN/A--

    Floodplain Development Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.5)

    Prior to any construction or other development begins within any special flood hazard area established in Sec. 04.14.2, General ProvisionsNoneFloodplain Administrator N/ADivision 14Environment

    Limited Use Authorization

    (Sec. 07.21.6)

    Prior to the established of a limited use as denoted in Sec. 03.06.3, Permitted Uses by District Table.180 daysAdministratorN/ADivision 07Use-Specific Standards

    Sign Plan and Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.7

    Prior to installing or substantially modifying a sign1 yearAdministratorN/ADivision 13Signs

    Temporary Use Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.8)

    Prior to the operation of any temporary structure or use30 daysAdministratorN/ASec. 03.07.8, Temporary Uses, and Sec. 04.08.5Temporary Structures

    Zoning Permit

    (Sec. 07.21.9)

    Prior to: a building, or structure being erected, moved or added to, structurally altered, or demolished; a use changing from one permitted use to another; land being used; or grading taking place on any lot or parcel 1 yearAdministratorN/A--
    LEGISLATIVE APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions that establish or change the way the use, design, or development of land will occur on a site-specific, City-wide, or intermediate scale. Elected and appointed administrative bodies make final decisions based on general considerations of fostering and preserving the public health, safety, and general welfare, including the City's fiscal well-being. Such final decisions are characterized by the exercise of broad discretion.

    Landmark and Historic Overlay Designation

    (Sec. 07.22.1)

    Prior to a structure, area, or site being designated as a Landmark or part of a Historic Preservation Overlay Zone.

     

    None1st: BOARD
    2nd: PC
    CC 

    Pu: 15

    M: 15

    Po: 15

    --

    Master Development Plan

    (Sec. 07.22.2)

    Prior to any other development activity for a project taking place within a cluster, planned, or tiny house neighborhood type.180 daysPDS Staff in consultation with the AdministratorPCN/ASec. 04.08.2Cluster, Planned, and Tiny House Neighborhoods
    NDC Text Amendment
    (Sec. 07.22.3)
     N/ANone1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CCPu: 7/214--
    District Map Amendment
    (Sec. 07.22.4)
    Prior to establishing or expanding a building type or use prohibited in the current character district None1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CC5

    Pu: 7/214

    M: 147

    Po: 14

    --

    Development Plan 
    (Sec. 07.22.5)

    Accompanying all applications for a character map amendment to the SU, AUC, SO, or Industrial character districts, except for single- or two-unit dwellings180 days1st: Administrator
    2nd: PC
    CC5

    Pu: 7/214

    M: 147

    Po: 14

    --
    QUASI-JUDICIAL APPLICATIONS: Require final decisions that establish the way design or development will occur on specific sites in manners that either vary from the standards of this NDC or that are contested by an aggrieved party. Such final decisions are characterized by exercise of discretion.
    Appeal of
    Administrative Decision
    (Sec. 07.23.1)
    Within 30 days after an appellant or their agent received notice or the action of the official that is the subject of the appealN/AAdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Conditional Use Permit

    (Sec. 07.23.2)

    Prior to the operation of any land use that is designated as a conditional use or to change a minor nonconforming use to a conforming use. 12 months if not exercised6 AdministratorBOARDM: 7

    Nonconforming Uses: Sec. 05.16.1Uses.

    Minor Nonconformities: Division 17

    Written Interpretation

    (Sec. 07.23.3)

    N/ANoneAdministratorN/A--

    Variance

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Site Development Plan, Building Permit, or Sign PermitNoneAdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Variance, Floodplain

    (Sec. 07.23.5)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Floodplain Development Permit NoneFloodplain AdministratorBOARDPu: 7
    M: 7
    --

    Design Waiver

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to or concurrent with submittal of a Site Development Plan or Building Permit which includes requests for waivers or modifications to applicable standards as identified in the District regulations.

     

    1 yearHistoric Preservation OfficerBOARD8Po: 7Sec. 04.08.3Housing and Building TypesSec. 04.08.6Frontage Types, and Sec. 04.08.7Civic and Open Space Types; and Sec. 04.10.4, Exterior Material Standards 

    Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD)

    (Sec. 07.23.4)

    Prior to the alteration of the exterior appearance or demolition of any existing structure, or construction of a new structure or portions thereof, or installation of signs within the boundaries of a Historic Preservation Overlay District or KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Area where design guidelines are adopted and where such development is not subject to review per Sec. 07.21.3, Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff).

     

    1 yearHistoric Preservation OfficerBOARD8

    M: 7

    Po: 7

    Appendix A, 
    Historic Covington Design Guidelines
    , and any applicable Ch. 99 Development Plan Area guidelines

    TABLE NOTES:   

    PC=Planning Commission (County)   CC= City Commission, BOARD = Board of Architectural Review and Development, CUP = Conditional Use Permit, COA = Certificate of Appropriateness 

    Pu#= Published in newspaper with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing 

    Po#= Sign posted on property with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing

    M#= Mailed notification to adjoining property owners with number indicating how many calendar days prior to hearing​

    Measured from the date of the issued approval. Expiration occurs if the applicant does not commence the work prior to the expiration, or does not diligently pursue completion of the project or the subsequent required approval. See Sec. 07.20.13,  Inactive and Expired Applications

    For complete notice requirements see Sec. 07.20.8, Notice​​​​​​.

    Aside from the standards of the character district for the subject property, as established in Article 158.02Character Districts.  

    Not less than 7 days nor more than 21 days before the hearing. 

    In accordance with KRS 100.2111 the recommendation of the Planning Commission shall constitute the final decision except as set forth in Sec. 07.22.4, District Map Amendment

    "Exercised" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in KRS 100.237

    30 days if the Planning Commission or City Commission proposes the character map amendment. 

    8 Subject to appeal to the City Commission, in which case the City Commission decision shall constitute the final action subject to appeal in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 07.20.11.

    1. C.
      General Requirements. This article applies to the use and development of land. Any person proposing a land use or development shall comply with the procedures of this article. The City or County will not issue a permit for any building, structure, construction or use unless it conforms with all provisions of this NDC, and other applicable ordinances.
    2. D.
      Review Steps. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, summarizes the procedures, agencies and public bodies involved in the development proposal process. Detailed information about general procedures and applications are further discussed in this article. 
      Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps
      General Review Procedures (Section Reference)Administrative ApplicationsLegislativeQuasi-Judicial
       NDC Text AmendmentAll OtherDesign Waiver Written InterpretationCOA, CUPAll Other
      Pre-Application Conference (07.20.3)----------
      Applications and Fees (07.20.4)----
      Completeness (07.20.5)----
      Staff Review (07.20.6)
      Basic Review Criteria (07.20.7)
      Notice (07.20.8)------
      Public Meetings and Hearings (07.20.9)------
      Continuance and Withdrawal (07.20.10)------
      Appeals of Legislative and Quasi-Judicial Decisions (07.20.11)--
      Successive Applications (07.20.12)------
      Inactive or Expired Applications (07.20.13)----
      Approval Extension (07.20.14)----
      KEY:

      • = General Review Procedure Required;    -- = General Review Procedure Not Required;    COA = Certificate of Appropriateness;    CUP = Conditional Use Permit

    (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 4/8/2025

    Sec. 07.20.3 Pre-Application Conference

  • Purpose. The purpose of a pre-application conference is to familiarize the applicant with the submittal requirements and review procedures, including all applicable standards and any known constraints, hazards, or special conditions associated with the subject property.
  • Procedures Requiring a Pre-Application Conference. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures that require a pre-application conference.
    1. Sketch Plan. The applicant may submit a sketch plan as a basis for discussion prior to or at the pre-application conference. The sketch plan shall be of sufficient detail to accurately convey the concept, character, location, parcel size, and the size and scale of the proposed development. The applicant may submit additional materials at his or her discretion.
    2. Requested Submittals. At or following the pre-application conference, City staff may request that the applicant provide additional materials at the time of application submittal as may be necessary to permit the informed exercise of judgment under the decision criteria for the application. 
    3. Disclaimer. Outcomes of the pre-application conference shall not imply, in whole or in part, any final decision on the application.
    4. Continuing Review Process. After the pre-application conference has occurred, applications that require such conference may subsequently undergo the processes established in Sec. 07.20.4, Application and Fees.

    Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.4 Applications and Fees

  • Authorization to Initiate Application. Table 07.20.4-1, Application Authorization, denotes those who are authorized to initiate each of the application types.
  •    Table 07.20.4, Application Authorization
     Application TypeProperty Owner or Property Owner's Authorized AgentPlanning Commission or City Commission                     Other                                      
    Administrative Applications
    All Administrative Applications except as follows  
    Certificate of Occupancy  ♦1
    Quasi-Judicial Applications
    All Quasi-Judicial Applications except as follows  
    Appeal of Administrative Decision  2
    Written Interpretation   ♦3
    Legislative Applications
    Landmark and Historic Overlay Designation4
    Master Plan Development  
    NDC Text Amendment  
    District Map Amendment 

    TABLE NOTES: 

    ♦Entity may initiate application

    1Including lessee of the subject property.

    2Including any person, entity, or authorized agent claiming to be injuriously affected by an official action, order, requirement, interpretation, grant, refusal, or decision of any official charged with enforcing this NDC.

    3Any interested party, including an administrative body, may request a Written Interpretation. 

    4Including by persons from any organization, including the City, by the general public, or by the Board of Architectural Review and Development.

    1. Procedures Requiring an Application and Fee. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures that require an application and fee.
    2. Forms. Every application required by this NDC shall be submitted in a format and in numbers established by the Administrator, the Historic Preservation Officer, or Kenton County Planning and Development Services (PDS) , as applicable. Applications that require Planning Commission review or final action may be submitted to either the Administrator or the Historic Preservation Officer or to the PDS . All other applications shall be submitted to the Administrator or the Historic Preservation Officer. 
    3. Fees.
      1. Generally. Applications shall be accompanied by the fee amount that has been established by the City Commission and staff as applicable.
      2. Refunds. Fees for a rejected, denied, expired, voided, or revoked application are not refundable.
    4. Application Deadlines.
      1. Applicability. Application deadlines apply to Legislative Applications and Quasi-Judicial Applications as identified in Table 07.20.2-1.
      2. Adopted Deadlines. Application deadlines are adopted by appropriate administrative bodies identified in Division 19, Administrative Bodies, and are generally posted in City Hall, available on the City website, or available upon request from City staff. A deadline is considered close of business of City Hall on an identified day unless otherwise stated in adopted deadlines.
      3. Application Completeness and Public Hearings. Where a deadline applies, a City staff shall receive a complete application as identified in Sec. 07.20.5, Completeness, before Staff may place the application on the agenda for the next related public meeting or public hearing.
    5. Continuing Review Process. After the application submittal, applications shall subsequently undergo the processes established in Sec. 07.20.5, Completeness.

    Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.5 Completeness

  • Generally. Within three business days after an application is submitted, the Administrator or Historic Preservation Officer, as appropriate, shall review the application to verify that it is complete.
  • Procedures Requiring Completeness Review. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures that require completeness review.
  • Meaning of  Completeness.  The Administrator or Historic Preservation Officer shall deem an application complete when it contains:
    1. All of the submittal information required in the application form;
    2. Documents or drawings that are prepared and certified by qualified professionals (where such certifications are required);
    3. The application fee (where applicable); and
    4. Any additional information that is necessary to demonstrate compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this NDC.
  • Incomplete Applications.
    1. Explanation. City staff shall return incomplete applications to the applicant with a written explanation that describes in general terms the materials that shall be submitted in order to complete the application.
    2. Period for Application Revisions. If the missing or incomplete items are not submitted within a five-day period after notice of an incomplete application, then the application shall not be accepted for filing for the current review cycle.  
    3. Incomplete or Rejected Application. Incomplete or rejected applications are not considered "filed​​​​​​" or "submitted".
    4. Application Deadlines. Where an application deadline applies per Sec. 07.20.4, Application and Fees, the applicant shall complete the incomplete application and submit it to City staff before the applicable deadline to be placed on the agenda for the next related public meeting or public hearing.
  • Completeness Does Not Equate to Approval. A determination of completeness does not mean that:
    1. The contents of the submittal are accurate or that they comply with the standards of this NDC;

    2. The application will receive a positive recommendation or final decision from the applicable administrative body; or

    3. During review, additional clarification or information will not be needed.

  • Continuing Review Process. Complete applications shall subsequently undergo the processes established in Sec. 07.20.6, Staff Review

  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.6 Staff Review

  • Generally. Upon determination that an application is complete, the Administrator or Historic Preservation Officer shall, according to the review responsibilities of Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures:

    1. Review and Comment. Review the application and provide comments to the applicant, which may include required revisions;

    2. Review and Decide. Review and make a final decision on the application; or

    3. Distribute. Distribute the application to the appropriate administrative body or outside agency for recommendation or final decision.

  • Procedures Requiring Staff Review. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures that require staff review.
  • Required Revisions.
    1. Comments. During application review, the Administrator or Historic Preservation Officer may provide comments from public agencies or administrative bodies, where applicable, to the applicant. The applicant shall revise and resubmit the application with requested changes.
    2. Resubmittal. Upon receipt of the resubmittal, the Administrator or Historic Preservation Officer may refer the application to agencies or administrative bodies again if the changes substantially affect the interests of the agency or body in ways not anticipated by the original comments.
  • Administrative Recommendation or Decision. Promptly after submittal of a complete application that addresses the comments provided pursuant to Paragraph B., Required Revisions, above (or, after finding that no revisions are required), the below processes will follow.

    1. Administrative Applications. For administrative applications, the City staff member denoted in Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures, shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application, as appropriate. 

    2. Legislative and Quasi-Judicial Applications. If, according to Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures, the application requires a public meeting or public hearing prior to a final decision, then the applicable City staff member shall create a staff report including a recommendation to the next administrative body who will consider it for further recommendation or final decision

  • Common Decision Criteria. In addition to all other applicable provisions of this NDC, administrative bodies shall consider the provisions of Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria, when making a recommendation or a final decision. 
  • Continuing Review Process. Applications requiring a public meeting or hearing shall subsequently undergo the processes established in Sec. 07.20.8, Notice.
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.7 Basic Review Criteria

  • Generally. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions or modifications, or deny an application, the applicable review bodies shall consider the basic review criteria denoted in Table 07.20.7-1, Basic Review Criteria Applicability. Additional review criteria may apply and are enumerated in the specific review procedures of this Article.
  • Table 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria Applicability

     Basic Review CriteriaAll Applications1

    Legislative Applications

     Quasi-Judicial Applications1
    The request complies with the applicable standards of this NDC and the City Code, and the applicant has provided proof of compliance with any preceding and applicable county, state, or federal requirements.  
    The request substantially conforms to any associated prior approval for the development, including, but not limited to, a Conditional Use Permit, Master Plan Development, or Site Development Plan.  
    The request promotes the purposes of this NDC as established in Sec. 01.01.3 Purposes, and in other applicable purpose statements in this NDC.  
    The administrative body has considered the recommendation of Staff in the public meeting or hearing.  
    The request is consistent with applicable policies of the most recently adopted Kenton County comprehensive plan and applicable utility plans and capital improvements plans; or, if it addresses a topic that is not contained or not fully developed in the comprehensive plan, the request does not impair the implementation of the comprehensive plan. 
    Adequate facilities, including public or private utilities, solid waste service, roads, drainage, and other improvements are present or are planned to be provided. 23
    The request demonstrates compatibility with surrounding conforming and permitted land uses and structures and with the essential character of the general vicinity of design, façade treatment, setbacks, building materials, and reasonably anticipated negative impacts. 2
    TABLE NOTES:
    ♦ = Basic review criteria applies
    1 Excluding Appeals of Administrative Decisions
    2 Excluding NDC Text Amendments
    3 Excluding Variances
    1. Procedures With Basic Review Criteria. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures that have basic review criteria.
    2. Written Findings. Required findings for a legislative or quasi-judicial decision, based on basic and specific review criteria for an application, shall be in writing and shall be recorded in the minutes and records of the Planning Commission, Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD), or the City Commission, as applicable.
    3.  Burden of Proof or Persuasion. In all cases, the burden is on the applicant to show that an application complies with applicable review criteria.

    Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.8 Notice

  • Generally. Public notice of public hearings required in this NDC shall be provided as required by Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures.
  • Procedures Requiring Notice. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures that require notice.
  • Published. The PDS Director for the Planning Commission hearing and the City Clerk for the City Commission hearing shall arrange for notice of a required public hearing to be published in one issue of an official newspaper of general circulation in the City in accordance with KRS Chapter 424.  
  • Posted. Notice of all required public hearings shall be posted conspicuously on the subject property. The posting shall consist of one or more signs, constructed of durable material and clearly depicting the following information:
    1. The type of application in three-inch high lettering; (eg. "District Map Amendment")
    2. For District Map Amendment applications, the existing and proposed character districts of the property in three-inch high lettering;
    3. The date, place, and time of the public hearing in one-inch high lettering; and
    4. The address, including telephone number, of the Planning Commission, Administrator, or Historic Preservation Officer, as appropriate, where additional information regarding the hearing may be obtained.
  • Mailed. The required mailings as denoted in Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures, shall meet the following standards:
    1. The City staff member denoted in Table 07.20.2-1 shall send by United States Postal Service certified mail, return receipt requested, written notice to all owners of property adjacent to the subject property, except that for a Conditional Use Permit application, the staff member shall mail notice to owners of property located within 150 feet of the subject property. The list of recipients of the notice shall be based on addresses listed on the City or County tax roll, as applicable.   
    2. The applicant shall furnish the names and addresses of the owners of all adjoining property to the Planning Commission the names and addresses of the owners of all adjoining property; and
    3. Records maintained by the Property Valuation Administrator may be relied upon conclusively to determine the identity and address of said owner. 
  • Constructive Notice. Failure of a surrounding property owner to receive notice of a hearing shall not affect the validity of the final decision. For example, a mailed notice returned to the sender shall not prevent an administrative body from holding a public hearing nor shall it prevent the body from making a recommendation or final decision for a given application.
  • Continuing Review Process. Applications with required notice provided shall subsequently undergo the processes established in Sec. 07.20.9, Public Meetings and Hearings.
  • (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 10/6/2021

    Sec. 07.20.9 Public Meetings and Hearings

  • Generally.
    1. Meetings and Hearings. All public meetings and hearings related to applications in the NDC shall be open to the public. However, not all decisions require public hearings. Therefore, recommendations and decisions that are authorized by this NDC are classified as requiring a "public meeting" or "public hearing."
    2. Votes. A vote shall be conducted in such manner that the public may know the vote of each person entitled to vote.
  • Procedures Requiring Public Meetings and Hearings. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures that require public meetings and hearings.
  • Public Meetings.
    1. Public Meeting Required. Any legislative or quasi-judicial application that does not require a public hearing prior to a recommendation or final decision requires a recommendation or final decision to be made at a public meeting. 
    2. Consent Agenda. Any appointed or elected administrative body may establish a consent agenda. The consent agenda may consist of all matters brought before the body for final decision that do not require a public hearing. All items on the consent agenda may be approved simultaneously by motion without comment or debate. An item may be removed from the consent agenda prior to the approval at the request of any member of the administrative body present at the meeting, or by the Administrator. Items removed from the consent agenda shall be considered on the regular agenda.
  • Public Hearings.
    1. Generally. All meetings of the City Commission, Planning Commission, and the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall be open to the public except as otherwise provided in KRS 61.810. 
    2. Procedures. Elected and appointed administrative bodies may adopt rules of procedure for the conduct of public hearings. The adopted rules of procedure shall reflect the following general procedures:
      1. The Chairperson may impose a reasonable time limit on speakers and may limit testimony that is irrelevant or redundant.
      2. Citizens, applicants, and the City have the right to present expert witnesses.
      3. Persons appearing at a public hearing shall identify themselves and state their address and similar information about any organization they represent.
      4. If a speaker represents an organization, the body conducting the hearing may request written evidence of that person's authority to speak on behalf of the group in regard to the matter under consideration.
      5. Any person may appear at a public hearing, submit evidence, and be heard.
    3. Attendance by Applicant at Public Hearing. An applicant or representative is not required to attend the public hearing at which the subject application is to be considered; however, failure on the part of the applicant or representative to appear at a properly noticed public hearing may constitute grounds for a continuance of the hearing to a certain new date or closing of the public hearing with public re-notification required. 
  • Final Action. An administrative body with authority to take final action on an application according to Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures, may approve, approve with modifications (in the case of an NDC Text Amendment), approve with conditions (in the case of all other applications), or disapprove an application. 
  • Conditional Approval.
    1. Ability. ​​​​​​At a public meeting or hearing, an administrative body may attach special conditions to any decision it is authorized to make in order to ensure that the intent of the NDC will be carried out.
    2. Requirements. Conditional approval requires that the specific conditions and the reasons be stated in writing and be agreed to by the applicant. Such conditions are binding upon the applicant.
  • Continuing Review Process.
    1. No Final Decision. Applications not decided upon at a public meeting or hearing may be subject to Sec. 07.20.10, Continuance and Withdrawal
    2. Final Decision. Applications decided upon at a public meeting or hearing may be subject to Sec. 07.20.11, Appeals of Legislative and Quasi-Judicial Decisions, through Sec. 07.20.14, Approval Extension
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.10 Contiuance and Withdrawal

  • Generally. An applicant may request, and the administrative body holding the hearing may approve, a continuance of a public hearing. The continuance may be to a later date without providing additional notice as long as the administrative body sets the continuance for a specified date and time and announces such date and time at the hearing. Additionally, the administrative body may require a continuance without the request of the applicant, under the same rules of this Subsection. 
  • Procedures Eligible for Continuances and Withdrawal. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures with continuance and withdrawal provisions.
  • Continuance for More Than Three Months. If a public hearing is tabled or deferred for an indefinite period of time or postponed more than three months from the date of the originally scheduled public hearing, new public notice shall be given (in accordance with the notice requirements of the respective procedure) before the rescheduled public hearing.
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.11 Appeals of Legislative and Quasi-Judicial Decisions

  • A.
    Generally. Table 07.20.2-2, Summary of Procedures Table, denotes the development review applications that are subject to appeal.
  • B.
    Procedures Subject to Non-Administrative Appeal. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures that are eligible for non-administrative appeal.
  • C.
    Appeal of City Commission or Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) Decision.
    1. 1.
      Generally. Any party aggrieved by or alleging an error in a final decision of the City Commission or Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) may appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction. Such a petition shall be presented to the court within 30 days after the vote is taken to approve or disapprove the matter pending before the body, in accordance with KRS 100.347.
    2. 2.
      Specific Procedures. Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) decisions on certain quasi-judicial applications must be appealed to the City Commission and the decision of the City Commission shall be the action appealable to a court of competent jurisdiction.  Refer to the specific review procedures in Sec. 07.23.6, Design Waiver, and Sec. 07.23.7, Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD).
  • D.
    Appeal of Planning Commission Decision. Except for decisions and appeals described in Sec. 07.22.4.E, Alternative Review Procedure, any party aggrieved by or alleging an error in a final decision of the Planning Commission may appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 calendar days of the Planning Commission's decision in accordance with KRS 100.413.
  • E.
    Appeal of Administrative Decision.
    1. 1.
      Generally. Any party aggrieved by or alleging error in a final decision of an administrative official on a matter addressed in this NDC may appeal in accordance with Sec. 07.23.1, Appeal of Administrative Decisions
    2. 2.
      Specific Procedures. Decisions on certain administrative applications may be appealed to the City Commission. Refer to the specific review procedures in Division 21, Administrative Applications.
  • Effective on: 4/8/2025

    Sec. 07.20.12 Successive Applications

  • Generally. It is the policy of the City not to hear successive applications for the same proposal after an application is denied or disapproved. The limitations of this Section prevent the consideration of successive applications.
  • Procedures for Successive Applications. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures with successive application provisions.
  • Time Required Between Substantially Similar Applications. The City shall not accept any application that is substantially similar to an application that was denied within the previous 360 days.
  • Appeal and Waiver of Restrictions.
    1. Appeal. The Zoning Administrator's determination that an application is substantially similar to a denied application is subject to administrative appeal (see Sec. 07.23.1, Appeal of Administrative Decision).
    2. Waiver. In the alternative to an appeal, the applicant may seek a waiver of the successive application rules from the City Commission, which may grant the waiver for good cause shown.  
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.13 Inactive or Expired Applications

  • GenerallyApplicants shall diligently pursue completion of development projects. Accordingly, this Section voids approved Administrative or Quasi-Judicial applications that become inactive due to inaction by the applicant.  
  • Procedures With Inactive or Expired Approval Provisions. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures with inactive or expired application provisions.
  • Reference. Refer to Table 07.20.2-1, Summary of Procedures, for the expiration times for approved applications that may expire due to inactivity of the applicant. 
  • Void. Approved applications automatically become null, void, and expired without further notice if the Administrator or Historic Preservation Officer finds that the applicant has failed to pursue completion of an approval and has not requested an extension on or before the date that the approval expired.
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.20.14 Approval Extension

  • Request of Extension. Prior to the expiration of an approved application, the applicant may request in writing an extension of the expiration date of up to six months. An applicant may only request an extension if the project has not changed in any manner; otherwise, the applicant shall submit a new application. 
  • Procedures With Approval Extension Provisions. Table 07.20.2-2, Review Steps, denotes the development review procedures with approval extension provisions.
  • Expiration of Extension. The extension lapses after six months if the Administrator or Historic Preservation Officer determines that the applicant is not actively pursuing action to complete the development or address comments.
     
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.21.1 Administrative Adjustment

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Administrative Adjustments.

  • Purpose.  Administrative adjustments are minor specified deviations from otherwise applicable quantitative standards as specified below. 

  • Applicability.

    1. Adjustment. The Administrator shall have authority to authorize an adjustment of up to 10 percent of a numerical standard in this NDC, subject to the following standards:

      1. Such adjustment shall not increase the degree of any nonconformity.

      2. No adjustment shall be allowed for work that originally occurred without the appropriate permits.

    2. Variance. Any adjustment greater than those listed below shall be reviewed as provided in Sec. 07.23.4, Variance.
    3. Design Waiver. A request to develop a housing or building type, frontage type, or open space type that is not normally permitted in association with a character district or building type shall be reviewed as provided in Sec. 07.23.6, Design Waiver

  • Application. A request for an Administrative Adjustment shall be submitted along with a primary application and shall include an explanation of the reason for the requested adjustment, the specific adjustment requested, and any other material necessary to ensure conformance with the criteria in Paragraph C, above.
  • Affidavit Required. Where a proposed administrative adjustment is for a rear or side yard setback along a property line that abuts another parcel or alley, the applicant shall submit an affidavit from the owner of any abutting property expressing whether such owner consents to or opposes the proposed adjustment.  If consent is not given, the proposed setback adjustment shall be denied and the applicant will, therefore, require the request of a variance that will be reviewed as provided in Sec. 07.23.4, Variance
  • Specific Review CriteriaIn determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny an Administrative Adjustment, the review body shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria, and the following: 

    1. Minimum Necessary. The adjustment requested will be the minimum adjustment necessary for reasonable use of the property; 

    2. Compatibility. Granting the administrative adjustment will not have an adverse impact on land use compatibility; and

    3. Character. Granting the administrative adjustment will not materially and adversely affect adjacent land uses and the physical character of uses in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development because of inadequate buffering, screening, setbacks and other land use considerations.
  •   Decision. The Administrator shall review the application in conjunction with the primary application and approve, approve with conditions, deny, or refer the application to the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).
  • Effect. Upon Administrative Adjustment and Building Permit issuance, construction may proceed. Failure to diligently pursue completion may subject the permit to the provisions of Sec. 07.20.13, Inactive or Expired Applications

  • Further Relief. The decision of the Administrator is final.  However, if the applicant is aggrieved by the decision, then in lieu of applying for another administrative adjustment, the applicant may apply for a variance as provided in Sec. 07.23.4, Variance. If a variance is sought, then any relief that may have been provided by the administrative adjustment shall not be a factor in the consideration of the variance.

  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.21.2 Building Permit (County)

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Building Permits. Procedures shall be according to those set out in the applicable Kenton County Building Code.

  • Purpose. The purpose of a Building Permit is to ensure that applicable structures are built in conformance with this NDC, the approved Site Development Plan, and the Kenton County Building Code

  • Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Building Permit, the administrative body shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria.

  • Effect. Upon permit issuance, construction may proceed. Failure to diligently pursue completion may subject the permit to the provisions of Sec. 07.20.13, Inactive and Expired Applications.
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.21.3 Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff)

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Certificates of Appropriateness (Staff). 
  • Purpose. The intent of the staff-review applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness ("COA") is to ensure that the integrity and character of Covington's historic areas are maintained through alterations and new development.
  • Applicability. Within the boundaries of a Historic Preservation Overlay or a Chapter 99 Development Plan Area that calls for the application of design guidelines, the following actions may not take place until a Certificate of Appropriateness has been issued: 
      1. Alteration of the exterior appearance or demolition of any existing structure; 
      2. Construction of a new structure, or portions thereof; or
      3. Installation or alteration of fencing; or
      4. Installation or alteration of signage; or
      5. Alterations to hardscaping of a site. 
    1. Exemption.  A Certificate of Appropriateness is not required for:
      1. Ordinary maintenance and repair where the purpose of the work is to correct deterioration to the structure or where no change is made to the exterior appearance of a building or site. Ordinary maintenance and repair, as it relates to Certificates of Appropriateness, includes:
        1. Repair of existing street or yard lighting;
        2. Replacement of gutters and downspouts as long as the color and shape matches the existing;
        3. Replacement of small amounts of missing or deteriorated original or existing siding, trim, roof coverings, porch flooring, steps, and the like, as long as replacement materials match the original or existing materials in detail and color;
        4. Replacing exterior light fixtures in kind;
        5. Repairs to walks, patios, decks, fences, and driveways, provided that replacement materials match the original or existing materials in detail and color;
        6. Caulking and weather-stripping;
        7. Replacement of window glass (but not the style or type of windows);
        8. Repainting a building in the same color(s); and
        9. Repaving existing parking areas;
      2. Installation of house numbers, mailboxes, and flag brackets;
      3. Removal, planting, or pruning of trees, vegetable and flower gardens, shrubs, and similar plants where alterations to buildings are not required;
      4. Removal of aluminum awnings, aluminum storm windows, and aluminum storm doors;
      5. Erection of temporary signs;
      6. Erection of temporary construction fences that are not mounted into the ground;
      7. Any alteration or demolition undertaken by the City, or any alteration or demolition that is necessary to correct or abate a condition that has been declared unsafe by the Fire Department or the Code Enforcement Department after notification to the Historic Preservation Officer and where emergency measures have been declared necessary by such departments;
      8. Any construction, alteration, or demolition duly approved prior to October 15, 2020; and
      9. Any construction, alteration, or demolition that only affects the interior of the structure.
    2. Pre-Application and Contents.
      1. Generally. In addition to the standards and stipulations in Sec. 07.20.3, Pre-Application Conference, the following shall apply.
      2. Optional Pre-Application Conference. Prior to either the preparation of working drawings and specifications or calling for proposals or bids from contractors, applicants are encouraged to prepare preliminary scale drawings and outline specifications, including color samples, for review and informal discussion with the Historic Preservation Officer. The purpose of this review is to identify any inconsistencies between the proposed work and the Historic Covington Design Guidelines and any applicable Chapter 99 Development Plan guidelines, and allow for discussion of alternative treatments.
    3. Application Completeness.
      1. In addition to the provisions in Sec. 07.20.5, Completeness, the following shall apply to Certificate of Appropriateness applications to be considered complete and ready for final action by City staff.
      2. Every application for alterations or additions to existing structures, sites, and signs, or the erection of any new structure, site, or sign within an applicable area shall be accompanied by drawings of the proposed exterior alterations, additions, or changes.  For new construction, all buildings and other site improvements on the subject property shall be indicated on the drawings. For demolition, all proposed changes to any remaining structures and any site improvements shall be indicated on the drawings.
      3. As used in this Section, "drawings" mean site plans, elevations, and/or perspectives drawn at a scale with sufficient detail to show the location of improvements on the site (if applicable) and the architectural design and exterior appearance of buildings and structures on the site.  These drawings shall include the following information (unless waived by the Historic Preservation Officer):
        1. Existing and proposed principal and accessory buildings, including location, dimensions, and height;
        2. Access points and off-street parking spaces;
        3. Driveways, sidewalks, walkways, terraces, and other paved surfaces;
        4. Accessory structures, including walls, fences, porches, lighting, signs, and other site improvements;
        5. Proposed materials, textures, and colors, including samples of materials or color samples; and
        6. All properties immediately adjacent to the site shall also be included in the site plan; a site section and/or site elevations, including any adjacent properties, may be required for new construction.
    1.  Final Action by City Staff.
      1. Where the Historic Preservation Officer is not authorized to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness, such an application shall be reviewed per the provisions in Sec. 07.23.7Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD).
      2. The Historic Preservation Officer may issue Certificates of Appropriateness without review by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) under the following circumstances:
        1. The application is determined by the Historic Preservation Officer to be consistent with the Historic Covington Design Guidelines (Appendix A) and/or any applicable Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) Chapter 99 Development Plan guidelines, including the 12th Street Design Guidelines (Appendix B); and

        2. The application is not for demolition of a principal structure, new construction of a principal structure, or new construction of an addition which adds over 250 square feet of enclosed occupiable space.

      3. The Historic Preservation Officer may issue Certificates of Appropriateness without further review by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) for final designs in an application that was approved in concept by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).

      4. The Historic Preservation Officer is hereby authorized to disapprove an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness without review by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) under the following circumstances:

        1. The application is determined by the Historic Preservation Officer to be inconsistent with the Historic Covington Design Guidelines and/or any applicable KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Guidelines; and

        2. The applicant is unwilling to amend their application to the meet the guidelines; and

        3. The application is not for demolition, new construction of a principal structure, or new construction of an addition which adds over 250 square feet of enclosed occupiable space.

      5. Upon issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness or notice of disapproval by the Historic Preservation Officer, all other provisions of this section shall be followed and the Historic Preservation Officer shall notify the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) of such action at their next regular meeting.

      6. The Historic Preservation Officer may refer any application or portion of an application to the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) in accordance with Sec. 07.23.7, upon which it may otherwise act, due to the complexity of the project or uncertainty as to its consistency with the Historic Covington Design Guidelines and/or any applicable KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan guidelines.

    2. Appeal of Historic Preservation Officer Decision

      1. Applicability. A decision of the Historic Preservation Officer may be appealed to the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).

      2. Application. An application for an appeal from a decision by the Historic Preservation Officer shall be made in writing and shall be filed with the Historic Preservation Officer within 30 days after the Historic Preservation Officer takes final action on an application.

      3. Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) Action

        1. The Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall be notified of the appeal and it shall be placed on the agenda for a regular or special meeting of the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).

        2. In reviewing an appeal, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall review the record of the Historic Preservation Officer regarding the issue appealed and determine whether the procedures and criteria established in this Section have been followed and/or whether the decision of the Historic Preservation Officer was arbitrary, based on the record.

        3. If the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) finds that an error has been made, the Board has the authority to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness per the specific review criteria in Sec. 07.23.7Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD).

        4. If the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) finds no cause of action, it shall uphold the decision of the Historic Preservation Officer.

    3. Expiration of Certificate of Appropriateness. A Certificate of Appropriateness expires per Sec. 07.23.7Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD).
    4. Work Performed Without a Certificate of Appropriateness.
      1. Application Fee.
        1. The property owner shall pay an increased application fee of $50.00 to cover administrative costs of reviewing work commenced or completed without an approved Certificate of Appropriateness.
        2. Any work commenced or completed without a Certificate of Appropriateness that cannot be approved by the Historic Preservation Officer shall be reviewed by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) and the owner shall pay an increased application fee of $100.00 to cover administrative costs thereof​​​.
      2. License Revocation. The City Manager has the right to revoke the occupational license of any person performing work without a required Certificate of Appropriateness.
      3. Violations. Any violation of provisions within this article is subject to the provisions of Article 158.08, Enforcement, Penalties, and Remedies.

    (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 10/6/2021

    Sec. 07.21.4 Certificate of Occupancy

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Certificates of Occupancy.

  • Purpose. The purpose of a Certificate of Occupancy is to certify that a completed project complies with the provisions of this NDC, the Building Code, approval conditions, the Site Development Plan and Building Permit, and all other pertinent ordinances. It is unlawful to occupy any building or structure unless the Chief Building Inspector has issued a full, partial, or temporary certificate of occupancy.
  • Applicability. No land is to be used and no building may be occupied, converted, enlarged, or structurally altered, wholly or partly, without a certificate of occupancy, which shall be part of the building permit issued by the Chief Building Inspector. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued except upon a determination by the Chief Building Inspector that the land, building, and use of the property conform with the provisions of this NDC. 
  • Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Certificate of Occupancy, the review body shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria.
  • Zoning Permit.  It is unlawful to issue a certificate of occupancy or building permit to build, create, erect, change, alter, convert, or occupy any building or structure hereafter unless a Zoning Permit has been issued in compliance with this NDC.

  • EffectUpon approval of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant may occupy the building.

  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.21.5 Floodplain Development Permit

  • Floodplain Development Permit Established.  A Floodplain Development Permit shall be obtained before any construction or other development begins within any special flood hazard area established in Sec. 04.14.2, General Provisions
  • Floodplain Development Permit Application.  An application for a Development Permit shall be made on forms furnished by Floodplain Administrator prior to any development activities, and may include, but not be limited to, the following:  
    1. Plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the area in question;
    2. Existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities; and
    3. The location of the foregoing.  
  • Endorsement.  Endorsement of the floodplain administrator is required before a state floodplain construction permit can be processed. Specifically, the following information is required
    1. Application Stage.
      1. ​​​​Proposed elevation in relation to Mean Sea Level (MSL) of the proposed lowest floor (including basement) of all structures in Zone A and elevation of highest adjacent grade; or Proposed elevation in relation to Mean Sea Level to which any non-residential structure will be flood-proofed;
      2. All appropriate certifications from a registered professional engineer or architect that the non-residential flood-proofed structure will meet the flood-proofing criteria in Sec. 04.14.3, Flood Hazard Reduction; and
      3. Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development
    2. Construction Stage.
      1. Upon placement of the lowest floor, and before construction continues, or flood proofing by whatever construction means, it shall be the duty of the permit holder to submit to the Floodplain Administrator and to the State a certification of the elevation of the lowest floor or flood-proofed elevation, as built, in relation to Mean Sea Level.  
      2. In AE, A1-30, AH, and A zones where the Community has adopted a regulatory Base Flood Elevation, said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a registered land surveyor or professional engineer and certified by same.
      3. When flood proofing is utilized for a particular structure, said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a certified professional engineer or architect.  Any continued work undertaken prior to the submission of the certification shall be at the permit holder’s risk.   The Floodplain Administrator shall review the lowest floor and flood proofing elevation survey data submitted.  Deficiencies detected by such review shall be corrected by the permit holder immediately and prior to further progressive work being permitted to proceed. Failure to submit the survey or failure to make said corrections required hereby, shall be cause to issue a stop-work order for the project.
  • Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Floodplain Development Permit, the review body shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria.
  • Expiration of Floodplain Construction Permit. A floodplain development permit, and all provisions contained therein, shall expire if the “start of construction” has not occurred within 180 calendar days from the date of its issuance.
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.21.6 Limited Use Authorization

  • Generally. Limited Use Authorization is an administrative procedure whereby the Administrator verifies that a limited use, as denoted in each zoning district in Sec. 03.06.3, Permitted Uses by District Table, complies with the requirements of this NDC, particularly the requirements of Division 07, Use-Specific StandardsA Limited Use Authorization may be issued simultaneously with Building Permits or other required permits. 
  • Purpose. The purpose of a Limited Use Authorization is to ensure that a use which is generally compatible with permitted uses in a given character district but limited by operating or physical characteristics, can be considered for approval with certain conditions placed on the use as denoted in Division 07, Use-Specific Standards.
  • Applicability. An application is required for the establishment of a new limited use, a change to a limited use, or the expansion of a limited use that has not been approved.
  • Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Limited Use Authorization, the Administrator shall consider the provisions of Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria, together with a determination from the Administrator that the use complies with its associated specific standard in Division 07, Use-Specific Standards.
  • Effect. Upon Limited Use Authorization and Building Permit issuance, construction may proceed. Failure to diligently pursue completion may subject the permit to the provisions of Sec. 07.20.13, Inactive or Expired Applications
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.21.7 Sign Plan and Permit

  • GenerallyA sign permit is required for all permitted signs set out in Sec. 04.13.4, Permanent Signs, and Sec. 04.13.5Temporary Signs, other than those that are exempt in Sec. 04.13.1, Applicability, and prohibited in Sec. 04.13.3, Prohibited Signs.
  • Purpose. The purpose of a Sign Permit is to ensure that a sign is built in conformance with this NDC.
  • Applicability. This Section shall apply to all signs erected, placed, painted, installed or otherwise made visible on private or public property in the City of Covington, except as otherwise provided in Division 13, Signs
  • Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a sign permit, the review bodies shall consider the provisions of Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria, and the following:
    1. Wall Signs. The materials and design of all wall signs shall follow one design scheme;
    2. Freestanding Signs.
      1. The materials and design of freestanding signs shall follow one design scheme, which may or may not be the same as the design scheme for wall signs;
      2. The design scheme for freestanding signs shall use building materials, colors and, where applicable, architectural design features consistent with the materials, colors and architectural design features of the principal building on the site.
    3. Consistency.
      1. Each design scheme shall require consistency among signs for at least three of the following criteria: lighting design; color schemes; materials; shape; and/or proportion; and
      2. If the design schemes for the wall signs and freestanding signs are different, they shall have in common at least two of the following criteria: lighting design; color schemes; materials; proportion.
    4. Special Criteria for Projecting Signs in Mixed-Use Districts. 
      1. The Administrator is authorized to approve an administrative adjustment, permitting a second projecting sign to business establishments located in an existing building, provided that the Administrator finds that:
        1. The business establishment has a ground floor entrance;
        2. The business establishment is located on a corner lot;
        3. The placement of a single projecting sign at the corner of the building pursuant to the standards and limitation is provided under Sec. 04.13.4Permanent Signs would interfere with or impact a significant architectural feature of the building. For the purposes of this section, significant architectural feature shall include, but not limited to, transom windows, awnings, ornamentation, and light fixtures; and
        4. That relief in the form of a variance to increase the maximum height of the top of a projecting sign above the sidewalk would be incompatible with the placement of other projecting signs found within the district.
        1. Should the Administrator make the findings necessary to approve an administrative adjustment as provided under Sec. 04.13.4.F, Projecting Signs, then the business establishment shall be allowed two (2) projecting signs, one to be placed on each street frontage, subject to the standards set forth in Sec. 04.13.4, Permanent Signs, with the exception that each projecting sign may be no more than 18 square feet in area or the maximum area possible in conformance with the other standards in this section, whichever is smaller; measurement is for one face, but sign may have two equal faces.
    1. Emergencies. In an emergency situation, a property owner may initiate work without first applying for a Sign Permit. However, the owner shall apply for a Sign Permit within 24 hours after the first working day.
    2. Master Sign Plan Application Requirements.
      1. Generally. A master sign plan application shall set out a master plan for signage for an entire parcel or parcels proposed for development. For example, a mixed use center master sign plans shall include all tenants and out parcels; and office or industrial parks shall include all types of signs for way-finding and tenants or uses within the development.
      2. Purpose. It is the purpose of the City of Covington to require owners, lessees, and managers of sites containing multiple signs requiring permits to plan and design signs that are compatible with the buildings on the site, thus enhancing the appearance of the site and of the streetscape that includes it. Although the City of Covington has provided a remedy of appeal for an applicant aggrieved by an action on a proposed master sign plan, it is the intent of the City of Covington that the primary remedy for such an applicant is the erection and installation of all of the signs allowed by right. It is thus the intent of the City, that, to the extent that it can guide the scope of review of a court considering an appeal, a court considering an appeal under this Section reverse or remand the decision of the Administrator only if it finds that such action is arbitrary and capricious.
      3. Applicability. The owner of any site that includes more than one tenant or occupant shall apply for approval of a master sign plan before applying for a sign permit for any detached sign.
      4. Application Contents. The application for approval of a master sign plan shall contain at least the following information. Where the application is submitted simultaneously with an application for a Development Plan approval, the master sign plan may refer to portions of the Development Plan application or approved Stage I Development Plan for related requirements:
        1. If the site has not been improved, all information required for a Development Plan;
        2. If the site has been improved, as-built conditions, showing all buildings and other improvements and all parking areas and vehicle entrances;
        3. A proposed design plan showing signage design at a scale of ½” = 1 ft.
        4. Computation of the maximum area for all signs, the height of signs and the number of detached signs allowed on the development site(s) included in the plan under this Article, including incentives authorized below;
        5. For properties with multiple tenants or multiple occupants entitled to signs, an allocation of the allowed signage
          among the eligible tenants or users;
        6. An accurate indication on the plot plan of the current or proposed location of each present and future sign of any
          type, whether requiring a permit or not, except that signs not requiring permits need not be shown;
        7. The color schemes and design features (excluding specific messages) for proposed signs; and
        8. The signatures of all owners or their authorized agents in such form as the legislative body may require.
    3. Amendments. A master sign plan may be amended by filing a new master sign plan that conforms to all requirements of this Section in effect at the time of submittal.
    4. Provisions For Nonconforming Signs. A master sign plan for a property already containing signs on the date of submission of the application shall include a schedule for bringing all signs on the development site into conformance with the master sign plan by a specified date. The conformance schedule included in such master sign plan shall be considered a condition of approval of the Master Signage Plan.
    5. Effect. After approval of a master sign plan, no permit shall be issued for a sign on the site(s) subject to the master sign plan except in accordance with such plan, and no sign shall be erected, placed, painted, or maintained, except in accordance with such plan, and such plan may be enforced in the same way as any provision of this Article. In case of any conflict between a provision of a master sign plan and one or more provisions of this Article, this Article shall prevail.
    6. Special Severability Provisions. The severability provisions of Sec. 04.13.2, E.11, Severability, are limited by this subsection. If any procedural aspect of this Section is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, it is the intent of the City of Covington that this entire Section, but only this Section, should be stricken as unconstitutional, but that any plans previously approved under it should remain in effect, allowing the signs shown on such plans as lawful nonconforming signs, regardless of whether such signs have been erected on the date of such decision. If any substantive part of the standards and criteria for approval of this Section is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional it is the intent of the City of Covington that such part be stricken and that the rest of this Section remain in full force and effect, in accordance with the principles set out in more detail in Sec. 04.13.2, E.11, Severability.

    Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.21.8 Temporary Use Permit

  • Generally. A temporary use is of limited duration or involves minimal investment in structures and which, if discontinued, would permit rapid and inexpensive conversion to another use. Refer to Sec. 03.07.8, Temporary Uses, and Sec. 04.08.5, Temporary Structures.
  • Applicability. An application for a temporary use or structure may be filed by the owner, or other person having a contractual interest in the subject property.
  • Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a temporary use permit, the review bodies shall consider the provisions of Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria, and the following: 
    1. A permit for a temporary use may only be granted if evidence establishes that the proposed use:
      1. Does not involve the erection of a permanent building or improvements;

      2. Is not unsightly nor does it interfere with the enjoyment or use of neighboring properties; and

      3. Complies with the applicable provisions of the district in which the use is proposed to be located.

    2. The temporary use will not adversely affect surrounding properties by means of increased traffic or nuisances such as, but not limited to, odor, noise, dust, or light spillover;

    3. Adequate off-street parking is provided on-site;

    4. The temporary use abides by all requirements of the City Code of Ordinances and state or federal regulations; and

    5. All necessary permits and licenses are obtained and adhered to.

  • Limitations. Permit issuance does not authorize establishment or an extension of any use nor construction, reconstruction, alteration, or moving of any building or structure, but shall merely authorize the use subject to applicable terms and conditions.
  • Effect. Upon approval, an applicant may proceed in filing other applicable applications or permits, or may proceed with the temporary use setup and operation in accordance with the permit terms.
  • (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 10/6/2021

    Sec. 07.21.9 Zoning Permit

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Zoning Permits.
  • Purpose. The purpose of a Zoning Permit is to verify that an application for development approval of a permitted use, or a building or structure that is permitted without Development Plan approval, complies with the requirements of this NDC. Zoning Permits may be issued simultaneously with building permits or other required permits.
  • Applicability.
    1. Except as provided in Paragraph D., Exemptions, below, no land may be used and no building or other structure may be erected, moved, added to, structurally altered, or changed from one permitted use to another, nor may any grading take place on any lot or parcel of ground without a permit issued by the Administrator.
    2. A Zoning Permit is also required before the demolition of any structure or part of a structure. .
    3. A Certificate of Appropriateness per Sec. 07.21.3 is required prior to the issuance of a Zoning Permit for development and demolition within a Historic Preservation (HP) secondary district, the 12th Street (TS) secondary district (which is a KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan area), or other KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan areas.
    4. Review of plans by the Covington Urban Forester and City Civil Engineer is required prior to the issuance of a Zoning Permit for development within a Hillside Stability (HS) overlay district per Sec. 02.05.3.
  • Exemptions. Signs are reviewed under the criteria in Division 13Signs. A Zoning Permit is not required for the creation, alteration, or removal of the following structures or for accomplishing the following types of improvements:
    1. Accessory structures that are 200 square feet or less and are not on a permanent foundation.
    2. Air conditioning units;
    3. Antennas;
    4. Children's play equipment for exclusive use by a household (not common area), including aboveground pools that have 200 square feet or less in water surface area, or are 18 inches or less deep;
    5. Enclosure of a portion of a residential building that already lawfully has a foundation and a roof;
    6. Incidental accessory structures;
    7. Landscaping that does not involve regrading or altering the grade of a development site;
    8. Ordinary maintenance and repair
    9. Pergolas;
    10. Pools that are completely enclosed within a building;
    11. Raised planting beds;
    12. Repairs or alterations that do not change the height, size or lateral bulk of the structure;
    13. Residential awnings with a projection of 48 inches or less;
    14. Sign face replacement that does not change the size, bulk, or materials outside of a sign;
    15. Solar panels;
    16. Temporary uses and structures (refer to Sec. 07.21.8, Temporary Use Permit); 
    17. Walkways on private property out of the public right-of-way;
    18. Waste receptacles, recycling containers, and associated screening; and
    19. Wheelchair ramps.
  • Administrator Action. The Administrator shall either approve or disapprove the Zoning Permit application by the following conditions:
    1. If disapproved, one copy of the submitted plans shall be returned to the applicant marked "disapproved" with a description of the reasons for such disapproval. The other copy, similarly marked, shall be retained by the Administrator.
    2. If approved, one copy of the submitted plans shall be returned to the applicant marked "approved." The other copy similarly marked, shall be retained by the Administrator. Once approved, the Administrator shall issue a Zoning Permit to the applicant and retain a duplicate copy for his or her records.
    3. No Zoning Permit may be issued except in conformity with the provisions of this zoning ordinance, except after written orders from the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD). In the case of demolitions, no Zoning Permit may be issued unless the proposed use of the site after demolition is in conformity with the provisions of this zoning ordinance, except after written orders from the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).
  • Expiration of Zoning Permit.  The issuance of the Zoning Permit shall be conditioned on the applicant obtaining and retaining a Kenton County Occupational License for the use represented by the Zoning Permit. 

  • (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 10/6/2021

    Sec. 07.22.1 Landmark and Historic Overlay Designation

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Historic Landmark or Historic Overlay Designation.  
  • Purpose. The procedures of this section are used for the petition of any persons from any organization or the general public to designate historic property or districts as Historic Preservation Overlay (HP) districts to be regulated by the standards in Sec. 02.05.2, Historic Preservation (HP) (Overlay). 
  •  Applicability.  The Board of Architectural Review and Development shall conduct ongoing surveys of structures, areas, or sites within the city to determine whether their historic or architectural merit warrants their designation as a Landmark or Historic Preservation Overlay District. 
  • Historic Designation Report.

    1. A study of the structures, areas, or sites proposed to be designated either a Historic Landmark or a Historic Preservation Overlay zone shall be compiled in a report ("Historic Designation Report"). The report shall establish and define the Historic Landmark or Historic Preservation Overlay zone boundaries as well as the historic or architectural significance of the buildings, structures, or sites to be protected, and describe present trends, conditions, and desirable public objectives for preservation. For Historic Preservation Overlay Districts, a list of which structures, areas, or sites within the boundaries are determined to be contributing and which are determined to be non-contributing shall be included in the report.

    2. In addition, such report shall include the following elements:

      1. A survey of existing structures by period of construction, architectural style, condition, and other matters relating to planning or regulating future development, such as location on lots, location of yards and other open spaces, access to the interior of lots, and off-street parking provided. In addition to general analysis, two specific detailed descriptions shall be entered:

        1. A description of existing contributing structures and premises of substantial public interest, with maps, photographs, and other data indicating the public importance of their preservation and the particular features it is desirable to preserve; and

        2. A description of existing non-contributing structures, premises, and uses likely to have an adverse effect on the desired character of the district, including those near and visually related to the district with maps, photographs, and other data indicating the reasons for such an effect.

      2. An analysis of lands not occupied by structures, including lands near and visually related to the zone. For public lands, ownership, use, and location shall be indicated. For private lands, the assessed valuation shall be added as well as existing character district and planned land use.

      3. Recommendations concerning detailed regulations to be applied in the district, to supplement or modify general regulations set forth herein, may include the following:

        1. Permitted and prohibited principal and accessory uses and structures;

        2. Minimum lot and setback requirements;

        3. Maximum lot coverage by all buildings;

        4. Maximum height of structures;

        5. Off-street parking and loading requirements;

        6. Control of signs and exterior illumination;

        7. Control of exterior character of buildings and sites when visible from a public way only, and

        8. Recommended character district amendments, closing of public rights-of-way, creation of pedestrian walkways or common areas and control of additions to or removal of existing buildings where the controls and regulations are only for the express purpose of preventing changes which are architecturally incompatible with the buildings, structures, or sites to be preserved.

    3. A review of the survey or study shall be completed every five years or earlier if necessary.

    4.  Once the Historic Designation Report is compiled, the Board of Architectural Review and Development shall propose to the City Commission that the findings be available to the general public by a printed copy available at the public library and an accessible version hosted on a City website. 
    5. Historic area boundaries may not be extended beyond 100 feet of the historic area.

    6. Historic areas may be defined by specific boundaries. Both sides of the street may be included when desirable.

  •  Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a Landmark or Historic Overlay Designation, the review body shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria, and the following:
    1. Its value as a reminder of the cultural or archeological heritage of the city, state, or nation;

    2. Its location as a site of a significant local, state, or national event;

    3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation;

    4. Its identification as the work of a master builder, designer, or architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the city, state, or nation;

    5. Its value as a building that is recognized for the quality of its architecture, and that retains sufficient elements showing architectural significance;

    6. Its value as a strong representation of an architectural style;

    7. Its identification as a contributing resource within a Historic Designation Report or within a National Register of Historic Places district;

    8. Its character as a geographically definable area possessing a significant concentration of sites, buildings, objects or structures united by architectural style, by a plan, or by physical development; and

    9. Its character as an established and geographically definable neighborhood united by culture or past events.

  • Amendments or Rescission. The amendment or rescission of any historic designation shall be made in accordance with the procedure required by this section for the original designation.

  • (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 10/6/2021

    Sec. 07.22.2 Master Development Plan

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Master Development Plan.
  • Purpose. The purpose of a Master Development Plan is to provide a site layout for property developed as a cluster or planned neighborhood type in accordance with Sec. 04.08.2, Cluster, Planned, and Tiny House Neighborhoods. Review of the Master Development Plan shall occur concurrently with the District Map Amendment to an applicable character district if such an Amendment is necessary. If such an Amendment is not necessary, then review shall occur prior to any other development activity for the project taking place. 
  • Binding Characteristics. Approval of the Master Development Plan establishes:

    1. Context, Transitioning, and Buffering. The context of the proposed development relative to adjoining and adjacent development and the proposal for transitioning and buffering such uses;

    2. Uses, Scale, and Compatibility. The locations and types of residential, nonresidential, and public or institutional land uses; their scale and design relationships; and methods to ensure compatibility between the various uses and adjacent properties;

    3. Density. Minimum and maximum gross densities, block sizes, lot patterns, and heights of residential uses;

    4. Bulk. Maximum gross square footages, building coverage, and heights of nonresidential uses;

    5. Parking and CirculationThe proposed parking and circulation plans;

    6. Transportation. The patterns, functional classifications, and cross-sections of streets within and adjacent to the development, along with the network of pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit improvements;

    7. Open Space. General locations, means of continuity and connectivity, and the extent of open space to be dedicated for public or private purposes;

    8. Environmental Features. Areas of environmental sensitivity to be protected and preserved, including floodplains and riparian areas, wetlands and water bodies, steep slopes, forested areas, and other such areas; and

    9. Phases. Phases of development.

  • Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Master Development Plan, the review bodies shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Sec. 07.20.2 and the following:
    1. Phasing. The development is phased in a manner that assures an adequate mixture of residential and nonresidential land uses and allows for the transition from the early phases to completion, relating to the intensity of uses and parking.
    2. Undeveloped Space. Together with the developed areas, the undeveloped spaces devoted to natural resource preservation, buffering of uses, and for passive and active use are connected and continuous throughout the development.

    3. Complete Streets and Parking. The streets are designed for multi-modal purposes, including as access and transit ways, for on-street parking, and safe use of pedestrians and bicyclists, and the parking is well-distributed and designed to preserve an urban streetscape.

    4. Walkability. The connections within and between buildings, civic spaces, parking areas, and to the surrounding development; the presence of amenities and other pedestrian improvements; and the proximity of origins and destinations both internal and external to the development are such that walking and bicycling are safe and viable modes of transportation.

    5. Quality Design. The design of buildings and hardscape and landscape areas help to establish visual interest, aesthetic appeal, and a unique identity for the development, including as key considerations human-scale amenities, integration of civic spaces for public interaction, and protection from the environmental elements.

    6. Building Form and Massing. The placement, arrangement, size, and relationships of buildings relative to streets, pedestrian and civic spaces, and one another create an urban environment.

    7. Site Layout. The subject property is laid out in an efficient manner relative to the natural and built environments and designed to achieve the aims of a compact, highly walkable environment.

    8. Mix of Housing Types and Uses. The development contains at least three different housing types.

    9. Hillside Stability Plan. Any portions of the development that are subject to the provisions in Sec. 02.05.3Hillside Stability, are included in a plan approved by the Covington Urban Forester and the City Civil Engineer.

    10. Tree Preservation. Any portions of the development that are subject to the provisions in Sec. 04.12.3Tree Preservation, are included a plan approved by the Covington Urban Forester.

  • Decision. During a public meeting, the Planning Commission may approve, conditionally approve, or deny a Master Development Plan.
  • Effect. Upon approval, all subsequent plats, plans, and permits shall clearly demonstrate consistency and conformance with the adopted plan. 
  • (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 10/6/2021

    Sec. 07.22.3 NDC Text Amendment

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to NDC Text Amendments.
  • Purpose. The purpose of a NDC Text Amendment is to change the text of this NDC.  
  • Planning Commission Hearing/ Action.
    1. The Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed text amendments.
    2. Following the Planning Commission's public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation, by simple majority vote, as to the text of the amendment and whether the amendment is approved or disapproved and shall state the reasons for its recommendation. The Planning Commission action shall be based on the review and approval criteria detailed in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria.
    3. When text amendments have been initiated by the City Commission, the Planning Commission shall take action on the proposed amendments within 60 days of receipt of the proposed amendment.
  • City Commission Action. The City Commission shall take final action on the proposed text amendment by a simple majority vote.
  • Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with modifications, or deny an NDC Text Amendment, the review bodies shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria and the following:
    1. Errors. The amendment is necessary to correct an error or inconsistency in the NDC; or
    2. Changing Condition. The amendment is necessary to meet the challenge of a changing condition that was not anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan
  • Notice to PDS.  Pursuant to KRS 147.705, the City Commission shall, within 60 days after adoption of any NDC Text Amendment, furnish a copy of the adopted amendment to Planning and Development Services of Kenton County.
  • No Retroactive Cure of Violations. The amendment of the text of this NDC may transform a legally nonconforming situation into a conforming one. However, no text amendment shall be proposed for the sole purpose of curing a violation of any part of this NDC.
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.22.4 District Map Amendment

  • A.
    Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to District Map Amendments.
  • B.
    Purpose. The purpose of a District Map Amendment is to change the character district of a property on the official district map from one character district to another.
  • C.
    Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a District Map Amendment, the review bodies shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria and the following: 
    1. 1.
      Compatibility. The range of uses and the character of development that is allowed by the proposed character district will be compatible with the properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. 
    2. 2.
      Property Dimensions. The subject property has sufficient dimensions to accommodate reasonable development that complies with the requirements of this NDC, including parking and buffering requirements.
    3. 3.
      Need. The pace of development and the amount of vacant land currently mapped and designated for comparable development in the vicinity of the subject property or properties suggests a need for the proposed character district amendment in order to: 
      1. a.
        Ensure an appropriate inventory of land to maintain a competitive land market that promotes economic development; or
      2. b.
        Support the transitioning of a surrounding area's character due to the impact of factors such as a change in traffic patterns, civic or institutional uses, adjoining uses, or environmental issues;
    4. 4.
      Mitigate Arbitrary Designations. The amendment, if approved, would be compatible with the surrounding area and would not constitute an unequal or arbitrary distribution of small and limited ownership and use.
  • D.
    Additional Conditions. A request for a District Map Amendment may be conditioned upon adherence to an applicant's Development Plan, which may limit the uses on or design of the site. The Development Plan may be processed concurrently with the District Map Amendment request and may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied in accordance with Sec. 07.22.5, Development Plan Review.
  • E.
    Alternative Review Procedure.
    1. 1.
      Recommendation and Final Action. In accordance with KRS 100.2111, the recommendation of the Planning Commission shall have the effect of final action of a District Map Amendment. 
    2. 2.
      Protest. The Planning Commission's recommendation shall not become the final action on a District Map Amendment if, within 21 days after the final action by the Planning Commission:
      1. a.
        Any aggrieved person files a written request with the Planning Commission that the final decision shall be made by the City Commission; or
      2. b.
        The City Commission files a notice with the Planning Commission that the City Commission shall take final action on the request. 
    3. 3.
      Majority Vote. It shall take a majority of the entire City Commission to override the recommendation of the Planning Commission
  • F.

    Minimum Area. No district map amendment application may be accepted if the proposed amendment would create a free-standing zone that does not meet the following minimum area standards of Table 07.22.4-1,  Minimum Area Standard per Character District.

  • Table 07.22.4, Minimum Area Standard per Character District
    District NameDesignationMinimum Area 
    Primary Districts
    Residential
    Rural ResidentialRR10 acres
    Suburban ResidentialSR5 acres
    Semi-UrbanSU10,000 sq. ft.
    Commercial and Office
    Auto-Urban CommercialAUC10,000 sq.ft.
    Suburban OfficeSO1 acre
    Mixed-Use
    Central Riverfront Mixed-UseCRM37 acres
    Traditional Urban ResidentialTUR20,000 sq. ft.
    Traditional Urban Mixed-Use2TUMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Commercial Mixed-UseCMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Urban Mixed-UseUMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Downtown CoreDTC10,000 sq.ft.
    Downtown RiverfrontDTR10,000 sq.ft.
    Industrial
    Suburban IndustrialSI1 acre
    Limited IndustrialLI1 acre
    General IndustrialGI1 acre
    Special Purpose
    Resource ProtectionRP1 acre
    RecreationREC1 acre
    Secondary Districts (Overlays)
    Historic PreservationHPNo minimum
    Hillside StabilityHSNo minimum
    Table 07.22.4, Minimum Area Standard per Character District
    District NameDesignationMinimum Area 
    Primary Districts
    Residential
    Rural ResidentialRR10 acres
    Suburban ResidentialSR5 acres
    Semi-UrbanSU10,000 sq. ft.
    Commercial and Office
    Auto-Urban CommercialAUC10,000 sq.ft.
    Suburban OfficeSO1 acre
    Mixed-Use
    Central Riverfront Mixed-UseCRM37 acres
    Traditional Urban ResidentialTUR20,000 sq. ft.
    Traditional Urban Mixed-Use2TUMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Commercial Mixed-UseCMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Urban Mixed-UseUMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Downtown CoreDTC10,000 sq.ft.
    Downtown RiverfrontDTR10,000 sq.ft.
    Industrial
    Suburban IndustrialSI1 acre
    Limited IndustrialLI1 acre
    General IndustrialGI1 acre
    Special Purpose
    Resource ProtectionRP1 acre
    RecreationREC1 acre
    Secondary Districts (Overlays)
    Historic PreservationHPNo minimum
    Hillside StabilityHSNo minimum
    Table 07.22.4, Minimum Area Standard per Character District
    District NameDesignationMinimum Area 
    Primary Districts
    Residential
    Rural ResidentialRR10 acres
    Suburban ResidentialSR5 acres
    Semi-UrbanSU10,000 sq. ft.
    Commercial and Office
    Auto-Urban CommercialAUC10,000 sq.ft.
    Suburban OfficeSO1 acre
    Mixed-Use
    Central Riverfront Mixed-UseCRM37 acres
    Traditional Urban ResidentialTUR20,000 sq. ft.
    Traditional Urban Mixed-Use2TUMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Commercial Mixed-UseCMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Urban Mixed-UseUMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Downtown CoreDTC10,000 sq.ft.
    Downtown RiverfrontDTR10,000 sq.ft.
    Industrial
    Suburban IndustrialSI1 acre
    Limited IndustrialLI1 acre
    General IndustrialGI1 acre
    Special Purpose
    Resource ProtectionRP1 acre
    RecreationREC1 acre
    Secondary Districts (Overlays)
    Historic PreservationHPNo minimum
    Hillside StabilityHSNo minimum
    Table 07.22.4, Minimum Area Standard per Character District
    District NameDesignationMinimum Area 
    Primary Districts
    Residential
    Rural ResidentialRR10 acres
    Suburban ResidentialSR5 acres
    Semi-UrbanSU10,000 sq. ft.
    Commercial and Office
    Auto-Urban CommercialAUC10,000 sq.ft.
    Suburban OfficeSO1 acre
    Mixed-Use
    Central Riverfront Mixed-UseCRM37 acres
    Traditional Urban ResidentialTUR20,000 sq. ft.
    Traditional Urban Mixed-Use2TUMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Commercial Mixed-UseCMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Urban Mixed-UseUMU10,000 sq.ft.
    Downtown CoreDTC10,000 sq.ft.
    Downtown RiverfrontDTR10,000 sq.ft.
    Industrial
    Suburban IndustrialSI1 acre
    Limited IndustrialLI1 acre
    General IndustrialGI1 acre
    Special Purpose
    Resource ProtectionRP1 acre
    RecreationREC1 acre
    Secondary Districts (Overlays)
    Historic PreservationHPNo minimum
    Hillside StabilityHSNo minimum
    1. F.

      Notice to PDS.  Pursuant to KRS 147.705, the City Commission shall, within 60 days after adoption of any character district ordinance or district map amendment, furnish a copy of the adopted amendment to Planning and Development Services of Kenton County.

    2. G.

      Changes/Amendments to Development Plans.

      1. 1.

        Minor Changes.

        1. a.

          If the submittal of detailed engineering data was waived by the Administrator in the initial submission of the development plan, then such data shall be submitted for review in accordance with the building permit procedures of Sec. 07.21.2, Building Permit, before a permit may be issued for construction.

        2. b.

          The Administrator, in reviewing the Stage I development plan, may authorize minor changes from the approved development plan, provided that the adjustments do not significantly affect the spatial relationship of structures, significantly change land uses, increase overall density, significantly alter circulation patterns (vehicular and pedestrian), decrease the amount or usability of open space or recreation areas, or permit activities that do not comply with this NDC.

      2. 2.
        Amendments.  Any amendments to approved Stage I development plans, except for those minor adjustments which are permitted by the Administrator as noted in Paragraph 1.b above, shall be resubmitted as new character district map applications.

    Effective on: 3/12/2024

    Sec. 07.22.5 Development Plan

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Development Plans.
  • Purpose. The purpose of a Development Plan is to ensure that applicable developments comply with all development and design standards of this NDC and, if applicable, with the approved Master Development Plan or Conditional Use Permit for the subject property. 
  • Applicability. A development plan shall accompany all applications for character map amendments in the SU, AUC, SO, or Industrial character districts, except for single- or two-unit dwellings.

  • Application.  The Development Plan shall be drawn to a scale not smaller than one inch equals 100 feet and include on the plan or in accompanying documentation the following information:

    1. The total area in the project;

    2. The character district of the subject property and all adjacent properties;

    3. All public and private rights-of-way and easement lines located on or adjacent to the subject property that are proposed to be continued, created, enlarged, relocated, or abandoned;

    4. Existing topography and approximate delineation of any topographical changes shown by contour with intervals not to exceed five feet;

    5. Delineation of all existing and proposed residential areas in the project with a statement indicating net density of the total project:

      1. Detached housing.  Location and approximate number of lots, including typical sections identifying approximate lot sizes and dimensions, and setback and height of buildings; and

      2. Attached housing.  Location and description of the various housing types (such as a townhouse, fourplex, or garden apartment) including approximate heights of typical structures and the approximate number of units by housing type.

    6. Delineation of all existing and proposed nonresidential uses in the project:

      1. Commercial uses.  Location and type of all uses including approximate number of acres, gross floor area, and heights of buildings.

      2. Open space-recreation.  The approximate amount of area proposed for common open space, including the location of recreational facilities and identification of unique natural features to be retained.

      3. Other public and semi-public uses.  Location and type of all uses, including approximate number of acreage and height of buildings.

      4. Location of proposed pedestrian walkways, identifying approximate dimensions;

      5. Location of proposed streets, identifying approximate dimensions of pavement, right-of-way widths, and grades;

      6. Location of all existing and proposed water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage lines, indicating approximate pipe sizes. Indication should also be given regarding the provision of electric and telephone service;

      7. Certification from appropriate water and sewer agencies that services will be available;

      8. Identification of the soil types and geologic formations on the subject property, including anticipated problems and proposed methods of handling those problems;

      9. Other information that may be determined necessary for description or to insure proper integration of the proposed project in the area;

      10. A schedule of development, including the staging and phasing of:

        1. Residential area, in order of priority, by type of dwelling unit;

        2. Streets, utilities, and other public facility improvements, in order of priority;

        3. Dedication of land to public use or set aside for common ownership; and

        4. Nonresidential buildings and uses, in order of priority.

    7. The aforementioned required information may be combined in any suitable and convenient manner so long as the data required is clearly indicated. A separate plan of drawing for each element is not necessary, but may be provided at the option of the applicant.

    1. Specific Review CriteriaIn determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a development plan, the review body shall consider the applicable common decision criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria.

       

    Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.23.1 Appeal of Administrative Decisions

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Appeals of Administrative Decisions.
    1. Eligible Applications. In accordance with KRS 100.257 through KRS 100.263, an Appeal of Administrative Decision provides a vehicle for the appeal of any final decision of the Administrator, Chief Building Inspector, Director of Public Works, or Floodplain Administrator on an application set out in Division 21Administrative Applications.
    2. Notice of Appeal. An appeal may be filed, in writing, by any person or entity or his/her authorized agent claiming to be injuriously affected by official action, order, requirement, interpretation, grant, refusal, or decision of any official charged with enforcing the NDC. The written notice of appeal shall specify the grounds for the appeal. An appeal shall be taken within 30 calendar days after the appellant or his agent receives notice of the action of the official that is the subject of the appeal.
    3. Transmission of Records. Upon receipt of a notice of appeal, the Administrator shall transmit to the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) all documents constituting the record on which the action appealed was taken and shall be treated as and be the respondent in such further proceedings.
  • Applicability. The following matters are not subject to Appeal of Administrative Decisions. 
    1. No Appeal to BOARD. Except as provided below, decisions on Appeals of Administrative Decisions are not subject to further appeal to the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) . Refer to Sec. 07.20.11Appeals of Legislative and Quasi-Judicial Decisions.
    2. Recommendations. Administrative recommendations to a development review body are not subject to Appeal of Administrative Decisions.
    3. Historic Preservation. For appeals of the Historic Preservation Officer, refer to Sec. 07.21.3, Certificate of Appropriateness (Staff).
  • Notice of Decision. Pursuant to KRS 147.705, within 60 days of the decision, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall furnish its decision on this administrative appeal to Planning and Development Services of Kenton County.
  • Specific Review Criteria. In determining whether to affirm or reverse, in whole or in part, or modify the appealed decision, the applicable review bodies shall consider, and the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall make findings on the following:
    1. Record and Evidence. The administrative decision was appropriate considering the written record of the case and the evidence presented. 
    2. NDC Requirements. The decision reflects the requirements contained in this NDC.
  •  Burden of Proof in Appeals. The Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall presume the appealed final decision to be valid. The appellant shall present sufficient evidence and have the burden to justify a reversal of the decision being appealed.
  •  Effect of Decision. In exercising its authority under this Section, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall have the final decision-making powers of the administrative official from whom the appeal is taken. 
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.23.2 Conditional Use Permit

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Conditional Use Permits (CUPs).
  • Purpose. The purpose of CUP review is to determine if conditional uses, as denoted in each character district in Division 04, Primary Districts, should be allowed on a property subject to standards and a public hearing. 
  • Specific Review Criteria.
    1. ​​​​​​Review and Decision. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a CUP, the review bodies shall consider the applicable basic review criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria and the following:
      1. The conditional use does not create an unwanted concentration of similar conditional uses that is likely to discourage permitted uses by making the vicinity less desirable for them.
      2. There is no practicable alternative location where the use is permitted by right within the general vicinity of the parcel proposed for development, or, if such a location exists, the proposed location is comparable or more favorable in terms of:
        1. Providing a needed community service;
        2. Providing a critical mass of related and mutually supportive land uses that promote quality economic development and opportunity;
        3. Providing a balance of land uses, ensuring that appropriate supporting activities, such as employment, housing, leisure-time, and retail centers are in close proximity to one another; and
        4. Making more efficient use of public infrastructure. 
      3. The proposed use at the particular location is convenient for the public or desirable to provide a service or facility that will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood or the community.
      4. Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity.
    2. Affirmative Findings. In order to approve a CUP, the final decision-making body shall make affirmative findings on all of the applicable decision criteria.
  • Conditions.
    1. Generally. The Administrator may recommend, and the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) may attach, conditions of approval to the CUP in order to mitigate its impacts such that it complies with the associated decision criteria. Conditions shall be roughly proportional to the impacts to which they are addressed.
    2. Agreed to by Applicant. Specific conditions and the reasons for them shall be stated in writing and be agreed to by the applicant.
    3. Binding. Such conditions are binding upon the applicant. 
    4. Noncompliance. The Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) is authorized to revoke CUPs for noncompliance with any imposed conditions. Furthermore, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) is authorized to compel offending structures or uses removed at the cost of the violator and may have judgment in person for the cost of removal.
  • (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 10/6/2021

    Sec. 07.23.3 Written Interpretation

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Written Interpretations.
  • Purpose. The purpose of a Written Interpretation is to provide any applicant with an official administrative interpretation of the terms, provisions, or requirements of this NDC if the application of the terms, provisions, or requirements are not obvious.
  • Standards for Interpretations. The Administrator may base the interpretation on:

    1. The materials or scenario posed by the applicant;

    2. The plain and ordinary meaning of the terms that are subject to the application for an interpretation as set out in a dictionary of common usage; 

    3. The purpose statement for the NDC section that is subject to interpretation;

    4. Any provision of this NDC, the Comprehensive Plan, Kentucky State law, or Federal law that are related to the same subject matter;

    5. Any technical meanings of words used in the provision subject to interpretation;

    6. Other interpretations rendered by the Administrator associated with the same or related provisions of this NDC;

    7. The legislative history of the provision subject to interpretation; or

    8. Sources outside of the NDC that provide additional information on the provision in question, such as technical or professional literature.

  • No Legal Advice. No written interpretation shall be construed as legal advice.

  • Final Decision. For purposes of appeal, a Written Interpretation is deemed a final decision. 

  • Recordkeeping. The Administrator shall keep records of interpretations made pursuant to this Section, which he or she may periodically present to the Planning Commission for formal adoption into this NDC in accordance with Sec. 07.22.3, NDC Text Amendment

  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.23.4 Variance

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Variances.
  • Purpose. The purpose of a Variance is to provide limited relief from the requirements of this NDC related to height, width, length, or location of structures, and the size of yards and open spaces, in those cases where strict application of a particular requirement will create an unnecessary hardship by preventing the use and development of land in a reasonable manner that is otherwise allowed under this NDC. 
  • Specific Findings and Review Criteria.
    1. Review and Decision. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Variance, the applicable review bodies must make findings and shall consider the factors included below, per KRS 100.243, in addition to the applicable basic review criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria.
    2. Affirmative Findings. Before a Variance is granted, the applicable review bodies must make the following four findings:
      1. The variance will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare;
      2. Will not alter the essential character of the general vicinity;
      3. Will not cause a hazard or a nuisance to the public; and
      4. Will not allow the unreasonable circumvention of the requirements of the zoning regulations.
    3.   Factors to Consider. In making the above findings, the applicable review bodies shall consider whether:
      1. The requested variance arises from special circumstances which do not generally apply to land in the general vicinity, or in the same zone;
      2. The strict application of the provisions of the regulation would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or would create an unnecessary hardship on the applicant; and
      3. The circumstances are the result of actions of the applicant taken subsequent to the adoption of the zoning regulations from which relief is sought.
    4. Denying a Variance. The applicable review bodies shall deny any request for a variance arising from circumstances that are the result of willful violations of the zoning regulation by the applicant subsequent to the adoption of the zoning regulation from which relief is sought.
  • Conditions.
    1. Generally. The Administrator may recommend, and the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) may attach, conditions of approval to the Variance approval in order to mitigate its impacts such that it complies with the associated decision criteria. Conditions shall be roughly proportional to the impacts to which they are addressed.
    2. Agreed to by Applicant. Specific conditions and the reasons for the, shall be stated in writing and be agreed to by the applicant.
    3. Binding. Such conditions are binding upon the applicant 
    4. Noncompliance. The Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) is authorized to revoke a Variance for noncompliance with any imposed conditions. Furthermore, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD)  is authorized to compel offending structures or uses removed at the cost of the violator and may have judgment in person for the cost of removal.
  • Coordination with Design Waiver. Where an application requires a Variance per this Section for certain aspects, and a Design Waiver per Sec. 07.23.6Design Waiver, for other aspects, a Variance shall only be granted in conjunction with a Design Waiver.
  • Variance Runs with Land. A variance applies to the property for which it is granted and not to the individual who applied for it. A variance also runs with the land and is transferable to any future owner of land, but it cannot be transferred by the applicant to a different site.
  • (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 10/6/2021

    Sec. 07.23.5 Variance, Floodplain

  • Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Floodplain Variances.
  • Purpose.  The purpose of this Section is to create a review procedure that protects its citizens from flooding.  This need is so compelling and the implications of the cost of insuring a structure built below flood level is so serious that variances from the flood elevation or from other requirements in the flood ordinance are quite rare. The long-term goal of preventing and reducing flood loss and damage can only be met if variances are strictly limited.  Therefore, the variance guidelines provided in this ordinance are more detailed and contain multiple provisions that shall be met before a variance can be properly granted.  The criteria are designed to screen out those situations in which alternatives other than a variance are more appropriate.
  • Flood Plain Construction Variance Procedures.  The Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall consider all technical evaluations, all relevant factors, all standards specified in other sections of this ordinance, and the following specific criteria: 
    1. Danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others;
    2. Danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage;
    3. Susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the existing individual owner and future owners of the property;
    4. Importance to the community of the services provided by the existing or proposed facility;
    5. Necessity that the facility be located on a waterfront, in the case of functionally dependent use;
    6. Availability of alternative locations, which are not subject to flooding or erosion damage;
    7. Compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development;
    8. Relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for that area;
    9. Safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles;
    10. Expected height, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site; and
    11. Costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, water systems, streets, and bridges and culverts.
  • Conditions for Variances.  Upon consideration of the factors listed above and the purposes of this Section, the BOA shall consider the following conditions during the review of variance applications:
    1. Mapped Floodway.  Variances shall not be issued within any mapped regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result.
    2. Minimum Relief Necessary.  Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the "minimum necessary" to afford relief considering the flood hazard.  "Minimum necessary" means to afford relief with a minimum of deviation from the requirements of this ordinance.  For example, in the case of variances to an elevation requirement, this means the City Commission need not grant permission for the applicant to build at grade, or even to whatever elevation the applicant proposes, but only to that elevation which the City Commission believes will both provide relief and preserve the integrity of the local ordinance.
  • Issuance of Floodplain Variances. Floodplain variance shall only be issued upon a:
    1. Showing of good and sufficient cause;
    2. Determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant; and 
    3. Determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood height, additional threats to public safety, cause extraordinary public expense, create nuisance (as defined in the definition section under "Public safety and nuisance"), cause fraud or victimization of the public (as defined in the definition section) or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances.
  • Variance New Construction or Substantial Improvement. Variances new construction or substantial improvement, or other proposed new development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use provided that the provisions of this Section are satisfied and that the structure or other development is protected by methods that minimize flood damages during the base flood and does not result in additional threats to public safety and does not create a public nuisance.
  • Written Notice.  Any applicant to whom a variance is granted shall be given written notice specifying the difference between the base flood elevation and the elevation to which the structure is to be built and stating that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the increased risk resulting from the lowest floor being situated below the base flood elevation.
  • Records and Reporting.  The Floodplain Administrator shall maintain a record of all variance actions, including:
    1. Justification for their issuance or denial; and
    2. A biennial report submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) stating all variances issued.
  • Variance Notification.  Any applicant to whom a variance is granted shall be given written notice over the signature of a community official that:
    1. The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood elevation will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as $25 for $100 of insurance coverage;
    2. Such construction below the base flood level increases risks to life and property.  A copy of the notice shall be recorded by the Floodplain Administrator in the Office of the  Covington Recorder and shall be recorded in a manner so that it appears in the chain of title of the affected parcel of land. 
  • Historic Structures.  Variances may be issued for the repair or rehabilitation of “historic structures” (see definition) upon determination that the proposed repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure’s continued designation as a historic structure and the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure.
  • Effective on: 10/15/2020

    Sec. 07.23.6 Design Waiver

  • A.
    Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to applications for a Design Waiver.
  • B.

    Applicability.

    1. 1.

      Design Waiver. Design Waiver procedures are applicable to requests to develop a housing or building type, frontage type, or civic and open space type, or to use exterior materials in a manner not otherwise permitted, or to develop a vehicular access point in a manner not otherwise permitted for the following Sections:

      1. a.

        Sec. 04.08.3, Housing and Building Types: All requirements with the exception of measurements pertaining to lot dimensions, building placement, and height as specified in the subsections of Sec. 04.08.3, Housing and Building Types;

      2. b.

        Sec. 04.08.6, Frontage Types;

      3. c.

        Sec. 04.08.7, Civic and Open Space Types;

      4. d.

        Sec. 04.10.4, Exterior Material Standards; or

      5. e.

        Subsec. 04.11.4.CDriveway Location and Width.

    2. 2.

      Administrative Adjustment. Refer to Sec. 07.21.1, Administrative Adjustment, for proposed adjustments of a certain extent from the numerical standards of this NDC.

  • C.

    Contents.

    1. 1.
      Every Design Waiver application shall be accompanied by drawings that contain sufficient information to enable the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) to determine whether the plans meet the review and decision-making criteria of Subsection F. below. These plans and drawings shall indicate all proposed buildings and other site improvements.
    2. 2.

      As used in this Section, “drawings” mean site plans, elevations, and/or perspectives drawn at a scale with sufficient detail to show the location of existing improvements on the site (if applicable) and the architectural design and exterior appearance of the proposed buildings and structures on the site. These drawings shall include the following information (unless waived by the Historic Preservation Officer):

      1. a.

        Existing and proposed principal and accessory buildings, including location, dimensions and height;

      2. b.

        Front building elevations (facing the street), including dimensions and locations of doors, windows, garages, porches, and other architectural features;

      3. c.

        Driveways, sidewalks, walkways, terraces, and other paved surfaces;

      4. d.

        Accessory structures, including walls, fences, lighting, signs, and other site improvements;

      5. e.

        All properties immediately adjacent to the site shall also be included in the site plan; a site section and/or site elevations, including any adjacent properties, may be required; and

      6. f.

        Access points and off-street parking spaces.

    3. 3.
      A Design Waiver application is not considered complete until all illustrative material necessary to adequately describe the proposed project has been submitted to City staff. 
  • D.
    Specific Review CriteriaIn determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application for a Design Waiver, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall consider the applicable basic review criteria in Sec. 07.20.7, Basic Review Criteria and the following, as applicable:
    1. 1.
      The proposal respects the character of the context, reinforcing its identity through design that is sympathetic to the architectural context of the surrounding area in terms of massing, form, materials, texture, scale, architectural treatment, and pedestrian- or auto-orientation;
    2. 2.
      The front building elevations facing the street(s) and the overall massing of the building emphasize human scale and the pedestrian environment;
    3. 3.

      The proposed building has been designed to form part of a larger composition of the surrounding area by being of similar scale, height, architectural treatment, and orientation;

    4. 4.

      Building silhouettes (scale and pitch of rooflines) are consistent with the context created by nearby buildings;

    5. 5.

      The proportion of windows, bays, and doorways is consistent with the context created by nearby buildings;

    6. 6.

      The proposed development uses lighting and related structures as an integrated element in architectural treatment and the pedestrian environment;

    7. 7.

      The location and design of parking, curb cuts, driveways, and/or drive-through facilities (as applicable) minimize potential negative impacts on the pedestrian environment, both physically and visually, and maintain, to the greatest degree possible, building massing and orientation toward street frontage(s); 

    8. 8.

      Ingress and egress (including vehicular access points) to parking, driveways, and/or drive-through facilities (as applicable) is designed and oriented to minimize potential negative impacts on the pedestrian environment, both physically and visually, and maintain, to the greatest degree possible, building massing and orientation toward street frontage(s); and

    9. 9.

      The proposed vehicular access point does not encourage auto-oriented development.

  • E.

    Coordination with Variance Application. Where an application requires a Design Waiver per this Section for certain aspects, and a Variance per Sec. 07.23.4 for other aspects, a Design Waiver may be approved conditionally upon the granting of a Variance.

  • F.
    Issuance of Final Action by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).
    1. 1.
      Deadline for Final Action. The Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall act within 75 days of receipt of a Design Waiver application that is considered complete per this Section and Sec. 07.20.5Completeness. The failure of the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove such an application within such time, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD), shall be deemed a disapproval of the application and the issue shall be considered resolved.
    2. 2.
      Approval. If the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) approves an application, the Historic Preservation Officer shall issue a Design Waiver on behalf of the Chairperson or acting Chairperson. The Design Waiver shall be attached to any documents that were approved by the Board. This document shall state the findings of the decision and be considered the final action for approval. The Historic Preservation Officer shall transfer the approval to the office of the Administrator and/or Building Inspector, as appropriate. Any changes from the approved application shall require additional review by City staff.
    3. 3.
      Approval with Conditions. If the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) approves an application with conditions, the Historic Preservation Officer shall issue a Design Waiver on behalf of the Chairperson or acting Chairperson. Where a condition specifically requires additional review by the Historic Preservation Officer of amended documents, the Design Waiver may be issued after such additional review is completed. Conditions are binding on an approval and have the effect of altering drawings and/or plans as described. This document shall state the findings of the decision and be considered the final action for approval with conditions. The Historic Preservation Officer shall transfer the approval with conditions to the office of the Administrator and/or Chief Building Inspector, as appropriate. Any changes from the approved application or required conditions shall require additional review by City staff.
    4. 4.
      Disapproval. If the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) disapproves an application, the Historic Preservation Officer shall issue a notice of disapproval on behalf of the Chairperson or acting Chairperson. This document shall state the findings of the decision and be considered the final action for disapproval. The Historic Preservation Officer shall transfer the disapproval to the office of the Administrator and/or Chief Building Inspector, as appropriate. No further action may be taken by the Administrator or the Chief Building Inspector on the application.
    5. 5.
      Additional Compliance Required. The issuance of a final action by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) does not exempt the application from any of the other requirements in this NDC or other regulations of the City.
  • G.
    Appeal of Final Action on Design Waiver by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).
    1. 1.
      ​​​​​​Appeal to City Commission.​ A decision by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) on an application for a Design Waiver shall first be appealed to the City Commission in accordance with the following review procedures.
      1. a.
        Application.  An application for appeal of a decision by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) on an application for a Design Waiver shall be made by the property owner or property owner's authorized agent in writing and filed with the Historic Preservation Officer within 30 days after the BOARD vote is taken to approve or disapprove the pending application before the BOARD.
      2. b.
        City Commission Action.
        1. 1.
           The City Commission shall be notified of the appeal and it shall be placed on the agenda for a regular or special meeting of the City Commission.
        2. 2.
          In reviewing an appeal, the City Commission shall review the record of the Board of Architectural Review and Development regarding the issue appealed and determine whether the procedures and criteria established in this section have been followed and/or whether the decision of the BOARD was arbitrary, based on the record.
          1. a.
            If the City Commission finds that an error has been made, it has the authority to order the issuance of a Design Waiver or may remand the issue to the BOARD for further consideration, stipulating certain facts.
          2. b.
            If the City Commission finds no cause of action, it shall uphold the decision of the BOARD.
    2. 2.
      Appeal to Circuit Court.  The final action by the City Commission on the Design Waiver may be appealed to a court of competent jurisdiction per the provisions in Sec. 07.20.11, Appeals of Legislative and Quasi-Judicial Decisions.
  • (Ord. No. O-13-21, 09/28/2021)

    Effective on: 4/8/2025

    Sec. 07.23.7 Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD)

  • A.

    Generally. In addition to the applicable required procedures in Sec. 07.20.2, Summary of Procedures, the following shall apply to Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD).

  • B.

    Purpose. The intent of review by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) for applications of a Certificate of Appropriateness is to ensure that the integrity and character of Covington's historic areas are maintained through alterations and new development.

  • C.
    Applicability. Applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness that do not qualify for staff review per Sec. 07.21.3 and are not otherwise exempted from review per Sec. 07.21.3 require review by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) and are subject to the provisions of this Section.
  • D.

    Pre-Application Conference.

    1. 1.
      Generally. In addition to the standards and stipulations in Sec. 07.20.3, Pre-Application Conference, the following shall apply.
    2. 2.
      Optional Pre-Application Conference. Prior to either the preparation of working drawings and specifications or calling for proposals or bids from contractors, applicants are encouraged to prepare preliminary scale drawings and outline specifications, including color samples, for review and informal discussion with the Historic Preservation Officer. The purpose of this review is to identify any inconsistencies between the proposed work and the Historic Covington Design Guidelines and/or any applicable Chapter 99 Development Plan guidelines, and allow for discussion of alternative treatments.
  • E.

    Application Contents and Completeness.

    1. 1.

      In addition to the provisions in Sec. 07.20.5Completeness, the following shall apply to Certificate of Appropriateness applications to be considered complete and ready for action by City staff and final action by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).

    2. 2.

      Every Certificate of Appropriateness application for alterations or additions to existing structures, sites, and signs, or the erection of any new structure, site, or sign shall be accompanied by photographs of the existing conditions and drawings of the proposed exterior alterations, additions, or changes. For new construction, all buildings and other site improvements shall be indicated on the drawings. For demolition, all proposed changes to any remaining structures and any site improvements shall be indicated on the drawings.

    3. 3.
       As used in this Section, “drawings” mean site plans, elevations, and/or perspectives drawn at a scale with sufficient detail to show the location of improvements on the site (if applicable) and the architectural design and exterior appearance of buildings and structures on the site. These drawings shall include the following information (unless waived by the Historic Preservation Officer):
      1. a.

        All properties immediately adjacent to the site shall also be included in the site plan; a site section and/or site elevations, including any adjacent properties, may be required for new construction.

      2. b.

        Proposed materials, textures, and colors, including samples of materials or color samples;

      3. c.

        Accessory structures, including walls, fences, porches, lighting, signs, and other site improvements;

      4. d.

        Driveways, sidewalks, walkways, terraces, and other paved surfaces;

      5. e.

        Existing and proposed principal and accessory buildings, including location, dimensions, and height;

      6. f.

        Access points and off-street parking spaces;

  • F.
    Specific Review Criteria for Non-Demolition Applications.
    1. 1.
      In addition to the provisions of Sec. 07.20.7Basic Review Criteria, the following provisions apply to non-demolition applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness subject to review by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).
    2. 2.
      Economic Hardship. Where an applicant proposes an exterior alteration to a resource that does not meet applicable guidelines based on an economic hardship, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall make a finding determining if at least one of the following criteria (a. or b.) is met:
      1. a.
        The applicant has presented, and the Board finds compelling, documentation stating:
        1. 1.
          The need for the alteration is the minimum or maximum work, as appropriate, required for the continued viability of the resource;  and
        2. 2.
          That the costs of repair or replacement that meets the minimum standard of the applicable guideline(s), as prepared by an expert in historic preservation and/or restoration trades, exceeds the costs of the proposed work by 50%; or
      2. b.
        The applicant has presented, and the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) finds compelling, documentation from experts in historic preservation, restoration trades, and appraisals which states:
        1. 1.
          The costs of completing the work to the minimum standard of the applicable guideline(s); and
        2. 2.
          That the costs exceed the projected market value of the resource post work that meets the guidelines.
      3. c.
        Evidence submitted as part of a review to determine economic hardship may include, but is not limited to:
        1. 1.
          Mortgage balance and debt service for the prior two years
        2. 2.
          Appraisals
        3. 3.
          Assess value
        4. 4.
          Real estate taxes
        5. 5.
          Form of ownership
        6. 6.
          Attempts to sell (listings or contracts)
        7. 7.
          Reasonableness of price or rent
        8. 8.
          Advertisements to sell or rent
        9. 9.
          Economically feasible alternatives to reuse the property
        10. 10.
          Structural reports
        11. 11.
          Estimated market value of the property
        12. 12.
          Evidence that a hardship was not self-created
        13. 13.
          Incentives available for rehabilitation
        14. 14.
          Financial analysis by an independent third party
        15. 15.
          Proposed plans for the property
        16. 16.
          Estimated mothballing costs
    3. 3.
      Approval. To approve all or part of a non-demolition application, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall make a finding that the application, in whole or in part, meets at least one of the following criteria:
      1. a.
        The application is consistent with specific sections of the Historic Covington Design Guidelines (Appendix A) and/or applicable specific sections of the 12th Street Design Guidelines (Appendix B), and/or specific applicable guidelines from other KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan Area guidelines; or
      2. b.
        The application meets a criterion of an economic hardship and the application establishes the minimum or maximum work, as appropriate, necessary to overcome the economic hardship and continue the viability of the resource.
    4. 4.
      Approval with Conditions. To approve all or part of a non-demolition application, and where the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) finds that a particular alteration or condition would cause an application, in whole or in part, to meet specific applicable guidelines in the Historic Covington Design Guidelines and/or KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan guidelines, and the applicant agrees to such alterations or conditions, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall:
      1. a.
        State the specific alterations or conditions, including any related timelines; and
      2. b.
        Make a finding that the condition establishes the minimum or maximum adjustment, as appropriate, necessary to make the application consistent with specific guidelines; and
      3. c.
        Make a finding that the application with adjustments stipulated in the conditions is consistent with specific Historic Covington Design Guidelines and/or any specific applicable KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan guidelines.
    5. 5.
      Disapproval. To disapprove all or part of a non-demolition application, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall make a finding that the application, in whole or in part, is not consistent with specific Historic Covington Design Guidelines and/or specific applicable KRS Chapter 99 Development Plan guidelines.
  • G.
    Specific Review Criteria for Demolition Applications.
    1. 1.
      In addition to the provisions of Sec. 07.20.7Basic Review Criteria, the following provisions apply to demolition applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness subject to review by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).
    2. 2.
      Contributing/Non-Contributing. For all applications for demolition subject to review by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD), the Board shall make a finding determining if an application involves a resource that is contributing or non-contributing to the character of its context based on one or more of the following criteria:
      1. a.
        Its value as a reminder of the cultural or archeological heritage of the city, state, or nation;
      2. b.
        Its location as a site of a significant local, state, or national event;
      3. c.
        Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation;
      4. d.
        Its identification as the work of a master builder, designer, or architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the city, state, or nation;
      5. e.
        Its value as a building that is recognized for the quality of its architecture and that retains sufficient elements showing architectural significance;
      6. f.
        Its value as a strong representation of an architectural style; or
      7. g.
        Its identification as a contributing resource within a Historic Designation Report or within a National Register of Historic Places district.
    3. 3.
      Economic Hardship. Where an applicant proposes demolition based on an economic hardship, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall make a finding determining if at least one of the following criteria (a. or b.) is met:
      1. a.
        The applicant has presented, and the Board finds compelling, documentation from experts and practitioners in historic preservation and restoration trades which state:
        1. 1.
          The resource cannot be adapted to modern use; and
        2. 2.
          The rationale for this determination; or
      2. b.
        The applicant has presented, and the Board finds compelling, financial information from experts and practitioners in historic preservation, restoration trades, and appraisals which states the costs of repairing a resource to a safely occupiable state along with evidence that these costs of repairing a resource (excluding acquisition costs) to a safely occupiable state exceed:
        1. 1.
          75% of the current market value of the resource as identified in a professionally certified appraisal; or
        2. 2.
          50% of the projected market value appraisal of the resource post repair work.
      3. c.
        Evidence submitted as part of a review to determine economic hardship may include, but is not limited to:
        1. 1.
          Mortgage balance and debt service for the prior two years
        2. 2.
          Appraisals
        3. 3.
          Assess value
        4. 4.
          Real estate taxes
        5. 5.
          Form of ownership
        6. 6.
          Attempts to sell (listings or contracts)
        7. 7.
          Reasonableness of price or rent
        8. 8.
          Advertisements to sell or rent
        9. 9.
          Economically feasible alternatives to reuse the property
        10. 10.
          Structural reports
        11. 11.
          Estimated market value of the property
        12. 12.
          Evidence that a hardship was not self-created
        13. 13.
          Incentives available for rehabilitation
        14. 14.
          Financial analysis by an independent third party
        15. 15.
          Proposed plans for the property
        16. 16.
          Estimated mothballing costs
    4. 4.
      Approval. To approve a demolition application, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall make a finding determining at least one of the following criteria is met:
      1. a.
        The application does not involve a contributing resource; or
      2. b.
        The extent of the demolition only involves non-contributing elements of a resource; or
      3. c.
        The demolition has been ordered by a responsible public official for reasons of public health and safety; or
      4. d.
        The demolition meets a criterion of an economic hardship; or
      5. e.
        The demolition is consistent with plans or policies adopted by the Mayor and the City Commission.
    5. 5.
      Disapproval. To disapprove a demolition application, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall make a finding that the application does not meet the specific criteria for approval of a demolition application.
    6. 6.
      Conditions. Where the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) approves a Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition per this subsection, the Board may require the applicant to perform mitigating actions including (1) preparing archival documentation of the resource, and (2) salvaging or re-using historic elements.
    7. 7.
      Alternative to Demolition. As an alternative to demolition, the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) may approve the relocation of an existing resource where:
      1. a.
        The historical and/or architectural character of the resource would be harmonious with the proposed new context; and
      2. b.
        The relocation would help preserve and extend the life of a resource of historical and/or architectural interest.
  • H.
    Issuance of Final Action by the Board of Architectural Review and Development.
    1. 1.
      Approval. If the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) approves an application, the Historic Preservation Officer shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness on behalf of the Chairperson or acting Chairperson. The Certificate of Appropriateness shall be attached to any documents that were approved by the Board. This document shall state the findings of the decision and be considered the final action for approval. The Historic Preservation Officer shall transfer the approval to the office of the Administrator and/or Chief Building Inspector, as appropriate. Any changes from the approved application shall require additional review by City staff.
    2. 2.
      Approval with Conditions. If the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) approves an application with conditions, the Historic Preservation Officer shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness on behalf of the Chairperson or acting Chairperson. Where a condition specifically requires additional review by the Historic Preservation Officer of amended  or additional documents, the Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued after such additional review is completed. Conditions are binding on an approval and have the effect of altering drawings and/or plans as described. This document shall state the findings of the decision and be considered the final action for approval with conditions. The Historic Preservation Officer shall transfer the approval with conditions to the office of the Administrator and/or Chief Building Inspector, as appropriate. Any changes from the approved application or required conditions shall require additional review by City staff.
    3. 3.
      Disapproval. If the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) disapproves an application, the Historic Preservation Officer shall issue a notice of disapproval on behalf of the Chairperson or acting Chairperson. This document shall state the findings of the decision and be considered the final action for disapproval. The Historic Preservation Officer shall transfer the disapproval to the office of the Administrator and/or Chief Building Inspector, as appropriate. No further action may be taken by the Administrator or the Chief Building Inspector on the application.
    4. 4.
      Additional Compliance. The issuance of a final action by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) does not exempt the application from any of the other requirements in this NDC or other regulations of the City.
  • I.
    Public Hearings.
    1. 1.
      In addition to the provisions of Sec. 07.20.9Public Meetings and Hearings, the following provisions apply to Certificate of Appropriateness applications subject to review by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD).
    2. 2.
      Action Required for Non-Demolition Applications. The Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall act within 75 days of receipt of a non-demolition application that is considered complete per this section and Sec. 07.20.5, Completeness. The failure of the Board to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove such an application within such time, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD), shall be deemed a dismissal of the application and the issue shall be considered resolved.
    3. 3.
      Action Required for Demolition Applications. The Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) shall act within 75 days of receipt of a demolition application that is considered completed per this section and Sec. 07.20.5Completeness. The failure of the Board to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove such an application within such time, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the applicant and t Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD), shall be deemed an approval of the application. The Historic Preservation Officer shall issue a final action for approval on behalf of the Chairperson or acting Chairperson and transfer the approval to the office of the Administrator and/or Chief Building Inspector, as appropriate. Any changes from the approved application shall require additional review by City staff.
  • J.
    Appeal of Final Action on Certificate of Appropriateness by the Board of Architectural Review and Development.
    1. 1.
      ​​​​​​Appeal to City Commission.​ A decision by the Board of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) on an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall first be appealed to the City Commission in accordance with the following review procedures.
      1. a.
        Application. An application for appeal of a decision by the BOARD of Architectural Review and Development (BOARD) on an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be made by the property owner or property owner's authorized agent in writing and filed with the Historic Preservation Officer within 30 days after the BOARD vote is taken to approve or disapprove the pending application before the BOARD.
      2. b.
        City Commission Action.
        1. 1.
           The City Commission shall be notified of the appeal and it shall be placed on the agenda for a regular or special meeting of the City Commission.
        2. 2.
          In reviewing an appeal, the City Commission shall review the record of the Board of Architectural Review and Development regarding the issue appealed and determine whether the procedures and criteria established in this section have been followed and/or whether the decision of the BOARD was arbitrary, based on the record.
          1. a.
            If the City Commission finds that an error has been made, it has the authority to order the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness or may remand the issue to the BOARD for further consideration, stipulating certain facts.
          2. b.
            If the City Commission finds no cause of action, it shall uphold the decision of the BOARD.
    2. 2.
      Appeal to Circuit Court. The final action by the City Commission on the Certificate of Appropriateness (BOARD) may be appealed to a court of competent jurisdiction per the provisions in Sec. 07.20.11, Appeals of Legislative and Quasi-Judicial Decisions.
  • K.
    Expiration of Certificate of Appropriateness. A Certificate of Appropriateness is valid for one year from the date of issuance. Work on the project shall commence within that time period, or the Certificate of Appropriateness will expire and be of no further effect. Once a Certificate of Appropriateness has expired, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Certificate of Appropriateness prior to initiating any work. Prior to the expiration of a Certificate of Appropriateness, the applicant may request an extension per Sec. 07.20.14Approval Extension.
  • L.
    Work Performed Without a Certificate of Appropriateness. Work performed without a Certificate of Appropriateness is subject to the provisions of Sec. 07.21.3.I, Work Performed Without a Certificate of Appropriateness.
  • (There are no ordinances associated with this section.)

    Effective on: 4/8/2025