No action, inaction or recommendation regarding any development by the Planning Commission shall be held void or invalid or be set aside by any court by reason or error or omission pertaining to the notices, including the failure to give any notice required by this section, unless the court after an examination of the entire case shall be of the opinion that the error or omission complained of was prejudicial, and that by reason of such error or omission the party complaining or appealing sustained and suffered substantial injury, and that a different result would have been probably if such error or omission had not occurred or existed. There shall be no presumption that the error or omission is prejudicial or that injury was done if error or omission is shown.
(O2003-12)