Zoneomics Logo
search icon

Olathe City Zoning Code

18.60 Nonconformities

Vested Rights & Applications in Progress

18.60.010 Purpose

This chapter provides for the regulation of nonconforming buildings, structures, lots and components of uses, and to specify those circumstances and conditions under which those nonconforming buildings, structures, lots and components of uses shall be permitted to continue. The City finds that nonconforming buildings, structures, lots and components of use that adversely affect the orderly development and value of other property in the district should not continue unless restricted. Furthermore, this chapter does not authorize nonconforming status to special uses whose time limits have expired. (Ord. 02-54 § 2, 2002)

18.60.020 Generally

A. General Definitions

The definitions below apply to this entire chapter as well as this section:

Cost

The total cost of alteration or repair is the fair market value of the materials, services and labor necessary to accomplish the renovation, repair or restoration. No person may seek to avoid the intent of this chapter by doing the work incrementally.

Effective Date of This Ordinance

Whenever this chapter refers to the “effective date of this ordinance,” the reference includes the effective date of any amendments to the ordinance codified in this chapter if the amendment, rather than the ordinance codified in this chapter (as originally adopted), creates a nonconforming situation.

Nonconforming Situation

A situation that occurs when, on the effective date of this ordinance, an existing lot, structure or improvement, i.e., parking and landscaping, or the use of an existing lot, structure or improvement no longer conforms to one (1) or more of the regulations applicable to the zoning district in which the lot, structure or improvement is located.

Structural Value

The present-day cost of replacing the structure or improvement.

B. Continuation of Nonconforming Situations and Completion of Nonconforming Projects

1. Unless otherwise specifically provided in this chapter and subject to the restrictions and qualifications set forth in Sections 18.60.020 through 18.60.070, nonconforming situations that were otherwise lawful on the effective date of this ordinance may be continued.

2. Nonconforming projects may be completed only in accordance with Section 18.60.070.

3. The burden is on the landowner or developer to establish entitlement to continuation of nonconforming situations or completion of nonconforming projects.

C. Extension or Enlargement of Nonconforming Situations

1. No person may cause an increase in the extent of nonconformity of a nonconforming situation. In particular, physical alteration of structures or the placement of new structures on open land is unlawful if the activity results in:

a. An increase in the total amount of space or building area devoted to a nonconforming use; or

b. Greater nonconformity with respect to dimensional restrictions such as building setback requirements, height limitations or density requirements, or other requirements such as parking requirements.

2. The volume, intensity or frequency of use of property where a nonconforming situation exists may be one (1) time increased up to ten (10) percent and the equipment or processes used at a location where a nonconforming situation exists may be changed if:

a. These or similar changes amount only to changes in the degree of activity rather than changes in kind; and

b. No violations of other subsections of this section occur.

D. Repair, Maintenance and Alterations

Repairs, alterations and maintenance of structures and property where nonconforming situations exist are allowed if they conform to the applicable zoning district regulations.

Refer to Section 18.60.050 for repair, maintenance and alteration of nonconforming structures.

E. Abandonment and Discontinuance of Nonconforming Situations

1. For a nonconforming use, refer to Section 18.60.030.D.

2. If the principal activity on property where a nonconforming situation other than a nonconforming use exists is discontinued for a consecutive period of one hundred eighty (180) days, or discontinued for any period of time without a present intention of resuming that activity, then:

a. The property must conform to all of the regulations applicable to the preexisting use unless subsection E.2.b, below, applies.

b. The Planning Official may approve a nonconforming situation permit to allow the property to be used without correcting the nonconforming situations if it finds that:

(1) Eliminating the nonconformity is not reasonably possible (i.e., cannot be accomplished without adding additional land to the lot where the nonconforming situation is maintained, or without moving a substantial structure that is on a permanent foundation); and

(2) The permit specifies which nonconformities need not be corrected.

3. All of the buildings, activities, and operations maintained on a lot are generally to be considered as a whole. For example, the failure to rent one (1) apartment in a nonconforming apartment building for one hundred eighty (180) days does not result in a loss of the right to rent the apartment or space if the apartment building as a whole is continuously maintained. But if a nonconforming use is maintained in conjunction with a conforming use, discontinuance of a nonconforming use for the required period terminates the right to maintain it.

4. When a structure or operation made nonconforming by the ordinance codified in this chapter is vacant or discontinued on the effective date of this ordinance, the one hundred eighty (180) day period for purposes of this section begins to run on the effective date of this ordinance.

F. Applicability of Design Standards

1.  Buildings that do not conform to the building and site standards of the ordinance codified in this chapter may be granted exceptions to those standards upon approval of an administrative review application. The purpose of this section is to allow existing buildings to be expanded or enlarged in a manner that matches the existing building design and materials. The additions must be compatible with surrounding properties and are subject to major and minor change requirements in Section 18.40.120.A. The denial of an administrative review application may be appealed to the Planning Commission. (Ord. 19-64 § 21, 2019; Ord. 17-52 §§ 34, 41, 2017; Ord. 02-54 § 2, 2002)

18.60.030 Nonconforming uses

A. Applicability

This section applies to any nonconforming use. A "Nonconforming Use” is a situation that occurs when property is used legally for a purpose and then, in any manner, prohibited or made unlawful by the use regulations or development and performance standards applicable to the zoning district where the property is located. The term also refers to the activity that constitutes the use made of the property.

B. Generally

1. Subject to subsection 18.60.020.C.2, a nonconforming use may extend throughout any portion of a completed building that, when the use was made nonconforming by this ordinance, was designed or arranged to accommodate the use. However, except as otherwise provided in Section 18.60.070, a nonconforming use may not extend to additional buildings or to land outside the original building.

2. Except as otherwise provided in Section 18.60.070, a nonconforming use of open land may not extend to cover more land than was occupied by that use when it became nonconforming. However, a use that involves the removal of natural materials from the land may expand to other portions of the lot where the use was established at the time it became nonconforming if:

a. ninety (90) percent or more of the earth products had already been removed on the effective date of this ordinance, and

b. the development and performance standards otherwise applicable to the use were complied with.

C. Change of Nonconforming Use

1. A change in use of property (where a nonconforming situation exists) may not be made except in accordance with subsections 2 through 4 of this section. This requirement does not apply if only a sign permit is needed.

2. If the change in use is to a principal use that is permitted in the district where the property is located, and all of the other requirements of this title are complied with, the property owner must obtain permission from the Planning Official to make the change. After the property conforms to this Title, it may not revert to its nonconforming status.

3. If the change in use is to a principal use that is permitted in the district where the property is located and the site or development requirements cannot reasonably be complied with, the change is allowed with the approval of a nonconforming situation permit submitted through an administrative review application.

a. The non-conforming situation permit may be issued if the Planning Official finds, in addition to any other findings that are required by this title, that the change will not violate Section 18.60.060 and that all of the applicable requirements of this chapter will be complied with that are reasonably possible.

b. Compliance with a requirement of this chapter is not reasonably possible if compliance cannot be achieved without adding additional land to the lot where the nonconforming situation is maintained or without moving a substantial structure that is on a permanent foundation.

c. Mere financial hardship caused by the cost of meeting such requirements as paved parking does not constitute grounds for finding that compliance is not reasonably possible.

d. This subsection does not allow an applicant to construct a building or add to an existing building if that would create additional nonconformities.

D. Abandonment

If a nonconforming use is discontinued for a consecutive period of one hundred eighty (180) days, or discontinued for any period of time without a present intention of resuming that activity, then the property shall conform to all of the regulations applicable to the preexisting use.

(⇔ compare general rules for nonconforming situation in 18.60.020.E)

E. Single-Family Dwellings

Any structure used as a single-family dwelling and maintained as a nonconforming use may be enlarged or replaced with a similar structure of a larger size, if the enlargement or replacement:

1. does not create new nonconformities, and

2. does not increase the extent of the existing nonconformities with respect to the zoning district regulations or Chapter 18.30, and

3. complies with Section 18.60.040. (Ord. 02-54 § 2, 2002)

18.60.040 Nonconforming lots

A. Applicability

1. This section applies to any undeveloped nonconforming lot. A "Nonconforming Lot” is a platted lot existing on the effective date of this ordinance that does not meet the minimum width or area requirement of the zoning district in which the lot is located.

2. A lot is undeveloped if it has no substantial structures upon it. A substantial structure includes any structure in excess of eight hundred (800) square feet in floor area which was constructed for a principal use permitted in the zoning district at the time of construction.

3. A change in use of a developed nonconforming lot may be accomplished only in accordance with Section 18.60.030.C.

B. Lot Area or Dimensions

Where a nonconforming lot does not conform to the lot area or dimensions applicable to that zoning district, said lot may be used for any permitted use in that specific zoning district provided all other requirements and regulations are met.

C. Setback Nonconformity

When the use proposed for a nonconforming lot is one that is conforming in all other respects but the applicable setback requirements cannot be complied with, then the Planning Official may modify the applicable setback requirements if it finds that all of the following apply:

1. Development of the property is not reasonably possible for the use proposed without the modification. Development in compliance with the applicable building setback requirements is not reasonably possible if a building that serves the minimal needs of the use proposed for the nonconforming lot cannot practicably be constructed and located on the lot in conformity with the setback requirements. However, mere financial hardship does not constitute grounds for finding that compliance is not reasonably possible; and

2. The modification is necessitated by the size or shape of the nonconforming lot; and

3. The property can be developed as proposed without any significant adverse impact on surrounding properties or the public health or safety.

D. Lot Merger

The intent of this subsection is to require nonconforming lots to be combined with other undeveloped lots to create conforming lots under the circumstances specified herein, but not to require the combination when that is out of character with the neighborhood that is already developed.

1. If, on the date this ordinance becomes effective, an undeveloped nonconforming lot adjoins and has continuous frontage with one (1) or more other undeveloped lots under the same ownership, then neither the owner of the nonconforming lot nor his or her successors in interest may take advantage of the provisions of this section.

2. This subsection does not apply to a nonconforming lot if a majority of the developed lots located on either side of the street where the lot is located and within five hundred (500) feet of the lot are also nonconforming.

E. Creation of Nonconforming Lots Prohibited

The subdivision of any land, lot or parcel which creates a lot area or dimension that does not meet the minimum standards of the applicable zoning district is prohibited. (Ord. 02-54 § 2, 2002)

18.60.050 Nonconforming structures

A. Applicability

1. This section applies to any nonconforming structure. A nonconforming structure is a structure with a dimensional nonconformity that was legally created before the effective date of this ordinance.

2. A "Dimensional Nonconformity” is a nonconforming situation that occurs when the height, size or minimum floor area of a structure, or the relationship between an existing building or buildings and the other buildings or lot lines, does not conform to the regulations applicable to the zoning district where the property is located.

3. No structural alterations to a nonconforming structure are permitted unless:

a. the alterations are required or authorized by a non-zoning law or ordinance, or

b. the alteration accommodates a conforming use and does not increase a dimensional nonconformity.

Commentary: examples of non-zoning structural requirements include modifications that are required by new building codes or the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

B. Repair, Maintenance and Alterations

1. Repairs and alterations estimated to cost more than fifty (50) percent of the structural value of the structure to be renovated, are not allowed. The structure shall be removed

2. If a structure located on a lot where a nonconforming situation exists is damaged by fire, explosion, act of God, or the public enemy to an extent that the costs of repair or restoration would not exceed fifty (50) percent of its structural value, then the damaged structure may be repaired or restored only in accordance with a nonconforming situation permit issued by the Planning Commission (see section 18.60.060). The applicant shall submit information that the cost of the proposed repairs or alterations would not exceed fifty (50) percent of the structural value of the structure. (Ord. 02-54 § 2, 2002)

18.60.060 Nonconforming site improvements

A. Applicability

1. This section applies to any nonconforming site improvement

A "Nonconforming Site Improvement" is a situation that occurs when, on the effective date of this ordinance, an existing site improvement on a lot, including but not limited to parking areas, storm drainage facilities, sidewalks and landscaping, no longer conforms to one (1) or more of the regulations of this ordinance applicable to the property.

2. This section does not apply to minor repairs and renovations (less than ten [10] percent of the structural value of a structure or site improvements), or repairs or alterations to a structure pursuant to Section 18.60.020.D or 18.60.050.B.

B. Generally

On lots with nonconforming site improvements, no additions to, or repairs or alterations of any structure or site improvement are allowed unless:

1. the nonconforming site improvements are brought into complete conformity with the regulations applicable to the zoning district, or

2. the activity is authorized by a nonconforming situation permit approved with an administrative review application.

C. Nonconforming Site Permit

When an addition to, or repairs or alterations to, any structure or site improvement is proposed on a lot with a nonconforming site improvement, the Planning Official may approve a nonconforming situation permit allowing the addition or repairs or renovation if it finds that all of the following criteria are true:

1. The nonconforming site improvement(s) is the only nonconforming situation pertaining to the property, unless the Planning Official refers the application for special use permit review (see subsection 2 below).

2. Compliance with the site improvement requirements applicable to the zoning district in which the property is located is not reasonably possible. Mere financial hardship does not constitute grounds for finding that compliance with the site improvement requirements are not reasonably possible.

3. The property can be developed as proposed without any significant adverse impact on surrounding properties or the public health or safety.

4. The owner has committed to other site design measures to reduce the negative impacts associated with the nonconformity. (Ord. 02-54 § 2, 2002)

18.60.070 Applications and Projects in Progress

A. Applicability

1. This section applies to any Nonconforming Project. A "Nonconforming Project" is any structure, development or undertaking that is incomplete on the effective date of this ordinance, and would be inconsistent with one (1) or more of the regulations applicable to the zoning district in which it is located if completed as proposed or planned.

2. This section implements KSA 12-764 and the common law on vested rights. To the extent that the caselaw or the version of KSA 12-764 in effect on the date of any application, construction or development activity is inconsistent with this section, the provisions of the caselaw or KSA 12-764 apply.

B. Generally

1. All nonconforming projects (except as provided in subsections H and G of this section) on which construction was begun, may be completed in accordance with the terms of their permits if:

a. The nonconforming project –

(1) Is authorized by a building permit that was issued at least one hundred eighty (180) days before the effective date of this ordinance, or

(2) the nonconforming projects is at least ten (10) percent completed in terms of the total expected cost of the project on the effective date of this ordinance, and

b. the permits under which the nonconforming project is proceeding were:

(1) validly issued and

(2) remain unrevoked and unexpired, and

c. The Planning Official issues a vested rights permit.

2. If a development is designed to be completed in stages, this subsection shall apply only to the particular phase under construction.

C. Vested Rights Permit

1. Except as provided in subsection H, all work on any nonconforming projects shall cease on the effective date of this ordinance, and all permits previously issued for work on nonconforming projects may begin or may be continued only pursuant to a vested rights permit issued in accordance with this section by the Planning Official.

2. The Planning Official shall approve a vested rights permit if it finds that the applicant has in good faith made substantial expenditures or incurred substantial binding obligations or otherwise changed his or her position in some substantial way in reasonable reliance on the development regulations as they existed before the effective date of this ordinance and thereby would be unreasonably prejudiced if not allowed to complete its project as proposed. In considering whether these findings may be made, the Planning Official shall be guided by the following, as well as other relevant considerations:

a. All expenditures made to obtain a validly issued and unrevoked building, land use or sign permit shall be considered as evidence of reasonable reliance on the development regulations that existed before the effective date of this ordinance.

b. Except as otherwise provided in subsection “a.” above, no expenditures made more than one hundred eighty (180) days before the effective date of this ordinance may be considered as evidence of reasonable reliance on the development regulations that existed before the effective date of this ordinance. An expenditure is made at the time a person incurs a binding obligation to make that expenditure.

c. To the extent that expenditures are recoverable with a reasonable effort, a person shall not be considered prejudiced by having made those expenditures. For example, a person shall not be considered prejudiced by having made some expenditure to acquire a potential development site if the property obtained is approximately as valuable under the new classification as it was under the old, for the expenditure can be recovered by a resale of the property.

d. To the extent that a nonconforming project can be made conforming and that expenditures made or obligations incurred can be effectively utilized in the completion of a conforming project, a person shall not be considered prejudiced by having made such expenditures.

e. An expenditure is considered “substantial” if it is significant in dollar amount in terms of the total estimated cost of the proposed project and the ordinary business practices of the developer.

f. A person is considered to have acted in “good faith” if actual knowledge of a proposed change in the development regulations affecting the proposed development site could not be attributed to such person.

(1) Even though a person had actual knowledge of a proposed change in the development regulations affecting a development site, the Planning Official may still find that the person acted in good faith if the person did not proceed with his plans in a deliberate attempt to circumvent the effects of the proposed ordinance.

(2) For example, the Planning Official may find that the developer did not proceed in an attempt to undermine the proposed ordinance if it determines that at the time the expenditures were made, either there was considerable doubt about whether any ordinance would ultimately be passed, or it was not clear that the proposed ordinance would prohibit the intended development, and the developer had legitimate business reasons for making expenditures.

D. Phasing

When it appears from the developer's plans or otherwise that a project was intended to be or reasonably could be completed in phases, stages, segments or other discrete units, the developer may complete only those phases or segments with respect to which the developer can make the showing required under subsection C. In addition to the matters and subject to the guidelines set forth in subsection B.2, the Planning Official shall, in determining whether a developer would be unreasonably prejudiced if not allowed to complete phases or segments of a nonconforming project, consider the following in addition to other relevant factors:

1. Whether any plans prepared or approved regarding uncompleted phases constitute conceptual plans only or construction drawings based upon detailed surveying, architectural or engineering work.

2. Whether any improvements, such as streets or utilities, have been installed in phases not yet completed.

3. Whether utilities and other facilities installed in completed phases have been constructed in such a manner or location or to such a scale, in anticipation of connection to or interrelationship with approved but uncompleted phases, that the investment in such utilities or other facilities cannot be recouped if such approved but uncompleted phases are constructed in conformity with existing regulations.

E. Timing of Vested Rights Permit

1. The Planning Official shall not consider any application for a vested rights permit authorized by subsection B that is submitted more than sixty (60) days after the effective date of this ordinance.

2. The Planning Official may waive this requirement for good cause shown, but in no case may it extend the application deadline beyond one (1) year from the effective date of this ordinance.

F. Abandonment

1. For development rights that vest on or after July 1, 2009 (except for residential development subject to subsection H, below), if substantial amounts of the work are not completed within 10 years of the issuance of the permits that established the development rights, the development rights shall expire.

2. For development rights that vested before July 1, 2009, abandonment occurs in accordance with the provisions of the Olathe Unified Development Ordinance, Kansas Statutes and caselaw, and all development permits and conditions of those permits in effect when the development rights vested.

G. Expedited Procedures

The Planning Official shall establish expedited procedures for hearing applications for permits under this section.

H. Residential Development

1. If a final plat is duly recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Johnson County for a Single-Family Residential Development before July 1, 2009 –

a. This section does not prevent the developer from developing in accordance with the terms of the final plat.

b. If construction is not commenced on any such land within five (5) years of the recording of the plat, the development rights shall expire.

c. If construction has commenced on any such project but is thereafter abandoned for a period in excess of five (5) years, the project may only be completed in accordance with a vested rights permit issued under this section.

2. If a final plat is duly recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Johnson County for a Residential development (including single family housing; multiple family housing such as apartments, duplexes, townhomes and similar configurations; condominiums; and manufactured and modular homes) on or after July 1, 2009 –

a. This section does not prevent the developer from developing in accordance with the terms of the final plat.

b. If construction is not commenced on any such land within ten (10) years of the recording of the plat, the development rights shall expire.

c. If construction has commenced on any such project but is thereafter abandoned for a period in excess of five (5) years, the project may only be completed in accordance with a vested rights permit issued under this section.

I. Planned Development

1. All PUDs or Planned Development applications that were approved and are still current may continue to be developed in accordance with the stipulations, waivers, special conditions, uses, etc., if they are comply with time requirements, and other requirements.

2. Final PUD plans shall follow the procedures for final developments for planned districts. (Ord. 02-54 § 2, 2002)

18.60.080 Legacy Provisions for Existing Projects

A. Annexation Agreements

Annexation agreements approved before the effective date of this Title continue in effect. Nothing in this Title –

1. terminates, repeals, or amends an annexation agreement that exists on the effective date of this Title, or

2. impairs the right of the parties to the annexation agreement to amend or terminate the agreement.

B. Parking Requirements for Eating Places

1. The revised parking requirement for Eating Places (of all types) do not apply to any preliminary site development plan approved in a planned district prior to August 1, 2005, if a final site development plan is approved complying with the pre-existing parking requirements and a building permit is issued prior to August 1, 2006.

2. The revised parking requirement for Eating Places (of all types) shall not apply to any final site development plan approved in a planned district prior to August 1, 2005 or to any site development plan approved in a conventional district prior to August 1, 2005, provided that the approved plan complied with the pre-existing parking requirement. (Ord. 09-37 § 12; Ord. 05-101 § 2)

18.60.090 Procedures

A. Applicability

This section applies to any claim by an applicant or a property owner that a property, use, building or structure is exempt from a provision of this Title due to:

1. Nonconformities, or

2. Vested rights.

B. Initiation

1. The nonconformity or vested rights claim shall be presented in the application for development approval.

2. If the application is part of a series of permits (such as a rezoning followed by site development plans and building permits), the nonconformity or vested rights claim must be asserted in the original permit in the series of permits.

Example: if the applicant files a rezoning with a preliminary site development plan, is successful in seeking the rezoning and then proceeds to final site development plan and building permit approval, the applicant cannot wait until the final site development plan or building permit applications are filed to assert a nonconformity or vested rights claim.

C. Completeness Review

D. Decision

1. The Planning Official shall consider nonconforming situations permits and vested development rights permits as part of the underlying application for development approval.

2. The Planning Official may, in its discretion, elect to conduct a public hearing, following publication notice and/or notice to surrounding property owners as provided by Section 18.40.050, prior to consideration of any permit or decision.

3. If the Approving Authority denies or conditionally approves the nonconformity or vested rights claim, and the underlying application does not require review by the Governing Body, the applicant may appeal the decision in accordance with 18.40.220.

E. Approval Criteria

1. The Planning Official shall consider the nonconformity or vested rights claim in accordance with Chapter 18.60 (Nonconformities & Vested Rights).

2. In its decision approving any nonconformity or vested rights claim, the Planning Official shall provide findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any stipulations with the applicant as to:

a. The facts that support the claim of a nonconformity or vested right, and

b. All aspects of the development that are protected as a nonconformity or vested right, and

c. The time period for which the nonconformity or vested right will continue to exist, after which the applicant must conform to land use or development regulations in effect. If no time period is specified in the decision, the period is 10 years.

3. In lieu of or after considering evidence of the existence and scope of a nonconformity or vested right, the Planning Official and the applicant may enter into binding stipulations as to the existence, scope, and time period of a vested rights claim. Before any stipulation is approved, the Planning Official shall provide notice to surrounding property owners (see Section 18.40.050) and, if requested by the applicant or an aggrieved party, conduct a public hearing before approving the stipulation.

F. Subsequent Applications

A decision by the Planning Official as to the existence and scope of nonconformity or vested rights claim is final. The applicant may not reassert the claim in a subsequent application, even if subsequent applications are otherwise allowed.

G. Scope of Approval

A nonconformity or vested rights claim allows the property, building or structure subject to the nonconformity or vested rights claim to be developed or used consistent with Kansas law and the decision approving the claim.

H. Recordkeeping

The Planning Official will maintain a record of approved nonconformity/vested rights determination. The applicant must maintain a copy of the approved nonconformity/vested rights determination, including any attachments.