X NONCONFORMING USES AND NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS
Cross reference— Buildings and building regulations, ch. 6.
State Law reference— Nonconforming uses and structures, MCL 125.583a.
Any lawful use of land or buildings existing at the date of passage of the ordinance from which this chapter is derived or amendment thereto and located in a district in which it would not be permitted as a new use under the regulations of this chapter is hereby declared to be a "nonconforming use"; and any building which does not meet the provisions of this chapter as to setbacks, height, or other requirements is hereby declared to be a "nonconforming building"; and such uses and buildings shall not be considered in violation of this chapter. However, all nonconforming uses and buildings shall not constitute a nuisance and shall be subject to and the owner shall comply with the regulations in this article. It is the intent of this chapter to permit nonconformities to continue until they are removed, but not to encourage their survival. It is further the intent of this chapter that nonconformities shall not be enlarged, expanded or extended nor be used as grounds for adding other structures or uses prohibited elsewhere in the same district.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.00, 7-17-2000)
The nonconforming use of land, where no building or structure is involved, which exists when the ordinance from which this chapter is derived becomes effective or amendments thereto, may be continued, provided that:
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.01, 7-17-2000)
A nonconforming use may be changed to another nonconforming use of the same or greater restriction, provided no structural changes are made in the building and provided that the zoning board of appeals shall determine that the proposed new use is equally appropriate or more appropriate to the particular district than the existing nonconforming use. Whenever a nonconforming use has been changed to a conforming use or to a use permitted in a district of greater restriction, it shall not thereafter be changed back to a nonconforming use. For the purpose of this chapter, the R1 district shall be considered the most restrictive district, followed in turn by the order of districts as listed in division 1 of article III of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.02, 7-17-2000)
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.03, 7-17-2000)
No building in which a nonconforming use exists may be moved to any other part of a parcel of land upon which the building was located at the time of the adoption of the ordinance from which this chapter is derived. No nonconforming building shall be moved for any reason unless it shall then conform to the regulations for the zoning district in which it is located after the move.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.04, 7-17-2000)
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.05, 7-17-2000)
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.06, 7-17-2000)
Any nonconforming use or nonconforming building which has been destroyed or damaged by fire, by explosion, by act of God, or by public enemy to the extent of 50 percent of current replacement cost of the building or structure, exclusive of the foundation at the time such damage occurred, shall, if reconstructed, conform with the provisions of this chapter. Where such destruction or damage has occurred, removal of the nonconforming use of a building also shall eliminate the nonconforming use status of the land on which the building is located. If such damage is less than 50 percent of the current replacement cost of the building or structure before the damage occurred, exclusive of the foundation, such structure may be restored to the same nonconforming use or nonconforming building as existed before such damage.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.07, 7-17-2000)
Any nonconforming use shall be considered abandoned, and such nonconforming use may not be resumed thereafter if any of the following conditions apply:
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.08, 7-17-2000)
There may be a change in tenancy, ownership or management of an existing nonconforming use or structure, provided there is no change in the nature or character of such nonconforming use or structure, except to bring such into greater conformity.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.09, 7-17-2000)
Any use for which a special land use approval is required is permitted as provided in this chapter and shall not be deemed a nonconforming use, but shall without further action be deemed a conforming use in such district. Such use shall remain subject to all of the approval provisions of article IX of this chapter pertaining to special land uses.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.10, 7-17-2000)
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.11, 7-17-2000)
X NONCONFORMING USES AND NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS
Cross reference— Buildings and building regulations, ch. 6.
State Law reference— Nonconforming uses and structures, MCL 125.583a.
Any lawful use of land or buildings existing at the date of passage of the ordinance from which this chapter is derived or amendment thereto and located in a district in which it would not be permitted as a new use under the regulations of this chapter is hereby declared to be a "nonconforming use"; and any building which does not meet the provisions of this chapter as to setbacks, height, or other requirements is hereby declared to be a "nonconforming building"; and such uses and buildings shall not be considered in violation of this chapter. However, all nonconforming uses and buildings shall not constitute a nuisance and shall be subject to and the owner shall comply with the regulations in this article. It is the intent of this chapter to permit nonconformities to continue until they are removed, but not to encourage their survival. It is further the intent of this chapter that nonconformities shall not be enlarged, expanded or extended nor be used as grounds for adding other structures or uses prohibited elsewhere in the same district.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.00, 7-17-2000)
The nonconforming use of land, where no building or structure is involved, which exists when the ordinance from which this chapter is derived becomes effective or amendments thereto, may be continued, provided that:
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.01, 7-17-2000)
A nonconforming use may be changed to another nonconforming use of the same or greater restriction, provided no structural changes are made in the building and provided that the zoning board of appeals shall determine that the proposed new use is equally appropriate or more appropriate to the particular district than the existing nonconforming use. Whenever a nonconforming use has been changed to a conforming use or to a use permitted in a district of greater restriction, it shall not thereafter be changed back to a nonconforming use. For the purpose of this chapter, the R1 district shall be considered the most restrictive district, followed in turn by the order of districts as listed in division 1 of article III of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.02, 7-17-2000)
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.03, 7-17-2000)
No building in which a nonconforming use exists may be moved to any other part of a parcel of land upon which the building was located at the time of the adoption of the ordinance from which this chapter is derived. No nonconforming building shall be moved for any reason unless it shall then conform to the regulations for the zoning district in which it is located after the move.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.04, 7-17-2000)
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.05, 7-17-2000)
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.06, 7-17-2000)
Any nonconforming use or nonconforming building which has been destroyed or damaged by fire, by explosion, by act of God, or by public enemy to the extent of 50 percent of current replacement cost of the building or structure, exclusive of the foundation at the time such damage occurred, shall, if reconstructed, conform with the provisions of this chapter. Where such destruction or damage has occurred, removal of the nonconforming use of a building also shall eliminate the nonconforming use status of the land on which the building is located. If such damage is less than 50 percent of the current replacement cost of the building or structure before the damage occurred, exclusive of the foundation, such structure may be restored to the same nonconforming use or nonconforming building as existed before such damage.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.07, 7-17-2000)
Any nonconforming use shall be considered abandoned, and such nonconforming use may not be resumed thereafter if any of the following conditions apply:
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.08, 7-17-2000)
There may be a change in tenancy, ownership or management of an existing nonconforming use or structure, provided there is no change in the nature or character of such nonconforming use or structure, except to bring such into greater conformity.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.09, 7-17-2000)
Any use for which a special land use approval is required is permitted as provided in this chapter and shall not be deemed a nonconforming use, but shall without further action be deemed a conforming use in such district. Such use shall remain subject to all of the approval provisions of article IX of this chapter pertaining to special land uses.
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.10, 7-17-2000)
(Ord. No. 482, § 17.11, 7-17-2000)