Permit Procedures
This Article 6 establishes the overall structure for the application, review, and action on city-required permit and project review applications and identifies and describes those discretionary permits and other approvals required by these zoning regulations. (Ord. 1705 § 55, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Director’s Actions. Except when combined with legislative actions or other nonadministrative actions defined in this article, the director, also defined in these zoning regulations as the designee of the director, is the designated review authority for the following quasi-judicial permits and actions, which are generally limited to interpretation of policy or relatively minor adjustments of zoning regulations standards. Additionally, the director has primary administrative authority over certain activities which require the determination of compliance with applicable zoning regulations provisions. The director, at the director’s sole discretion, may elevate the level of review to a higher review process and/or authority.
1. Affordable Housing Incentives. An action authorizing a residential density bonus that includes an alternative or additional incentive in compliance with Chapter 17.140 (Affordable Housing Incentives).
2. Development Review—Minor. An administrative action providing for the review of and action on certain development applications identified in Chapter 17.106 (Development Review).
3. Director’s Action on Exceptions. An administrative action granting exception (modification or deletion) to certain specified development standards of these zoning regulations in cases where strict compliance would result in a hardship, as specified in and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.108 (Director’s Action).
4. Home Occupation Permits. An administrative permit authorizing the operation of a specified home-based occupation in a particular location in compliance with the provisions of these zoning regulations and in compliance with procedures specified in Article 4, Section 17.86.140 (Home Occupations).
5. Reasonable Accommodation. An administrative permit authorizing limited modifications to properties to accommodate a person with physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activities in compliance with specific criteria and performance standards and in compliance with procedures specified in Chapter 17.112 (Reasonable Accommodation).
6. Temporary Use Permits. An administrative permit authorizing specific limited term uses in compliance with specified conditions and performance criteria specified in Article 4, Section 17.86.260 (Temporary and Intermittent Uses).
7. Zoning Regulations Interpretations. An administrative interpretation of certain provisions of these zoning regulations in an effort to resolve conflict or ambiguity in the regulations and to ensure their consistent application in compliance with Chapter 17.04 (Interpretation of the Zoning Regulations).
B. Director’s Hearing. Except when combined with legislative actions, the director, via a public hearing process, is the designated review authority for the following quasi-judicial permits and actions. A public hearing is required for the following quasi-judicial actions in compliance with Chapter 17.109 (Director’s Hearing).
1. Development Review—Moderate. An administrative action providing for the review of and action on certain development applications identified in Chapter 17.106 (Development Review).
2. Director’s Hearing on Exceptions. An administrative action granting exception (modification or deletion) to certain specified development standards of these zoning regulations in cases where strict compliance would result in a hardship, as specified in and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.109 (Director’s Hearing), and other than those exceptions cited in Chapter 17.108 (Director’s Action).
3. Director’s Hearing on Various Permits. A quasi-judicial action authorizing the construction or alteration of specific development projects and as otherwise called for in these zoning regulations for projects subject to a director’s hearing. A public hearing is required in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
4. Minor Use Permits. A permit authorizing the operation of a specific use of land or a structure in a particular location in compliance with the provisions of these zoning regulations and in compliance with procedures specified in Chapter 17.110 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits).
5. Revocation of Director’s Hearing Actions and Minor Use Permits. A judicial process providing for the review of potential violations of conditions of approval for an authorized use or structure, and for the revocation of such approval based upon findings set forth in Chapters 17.108 and 17.109.
6. Variances. An action granting exception to the development standards of these zoning regulations in cases where strict compliance would result in a unique hardship in compliance with Chapter 17.114 (Variances).
C. Planning Commission Permits and Actions. Except when combined with legislative actions, the planning commission is the designated review authority for the following quasi-judicial permits and actions. Additionally, the planning commission may review administrative permits and actions referred by the director. A public hearing is required for the following quasi-judicial actions in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
1. Adjustments to Standards in the Downtown-Commercial (C-D) Zone. A process for making adjustments, on a project-specific basis, to the development standards applicable to development in the C-D zone, as specified in Chapter 17.32 (Downtown-Commercial (C-D) Zone).
2. Building Setback Lines. A process for adoption of official building setback lines, as specified in Chapter 17.80 (Street Regulations).
3. Conditional Use Permits. A permit authorizing the operation of a specific use of land or a structure in a particular location in compliance with the provisions of these zoning regulations and the procedures specified in Chapter 17.110 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits).
4. Development Review—Major. A process providing for the review of and action on certain development applications identified in Chapter 17.106 (Development Review).
5. PD Overlay Zone—Amendments to Final Development Plan. A process for reviewing proposed amendments to an adopted Planned Development Overlay (PD) Zone or final development plan as specified in Chapter 17.48 (Planned Development (PD) Overlay Zone).
6. Planning Commission Hearing on Various Exceptions and Special Development Projects. A quasi-judicial action authorizing an exception (modification or deletion) to certain specified development standards of these zoning regulations and for the construction or alteration of specific development projects and as otherwise called for in these zoning regulations. A public hearing is required in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
7. Revocation of Conditional Use Permits. A judicial process providing for the review of potential violations of conditions of approval for an authorized use or structure, and for the revocation of such approval based upon findings set forth in Chapter 17.110.
D. Legislative Actions. The designated review authority for all legislative actions is the city council, based on recommendations provided by the planning commission. A public hearing is required for the following legislative actions in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings):
1. Development Agreements and Amendments. An agreement between the city and a party with legal or equitable interest in the real property relating to the development of property in compliance with Chapter 17.128 (Development Agreements).
2. General Plan Text/Map Amendments. An action authorizing either a text amendment to the general plan or a map amendment changing the general plan land use designation of particular property in compliance with Chapter 17.130 (General Plan Amendments).
3. Specific Plan and Amendments. A regulatory document prepared in compliance with Government Code Section 65450 et seq. for the systematic implementation of the general plan for a particular area as specified in Chapter 17.50 (Specific Plan Overlay Zone).
4. Zoning Regulations Text/Zoning Map Amendments. An action authorizing either a text amendment to these zoning regulations or a map amendment changing the zoning designation of particular property in compliance with Chapter 17.124 (Amendments—Zoning Regulations and Zoning Map).
E. Multiple Permit Applications.
1. Concurrent Filing. An applicant for a development project that requires the filing of more than one application (e.g., conditional use permit, tentative map, etc.) shall file all related applications concurrently, together with all required application fees, unless these requirements for concurrent filing are waived by the director.
2. Concurrent Processing. Multiple applications for the same project shall be processed concurrently and shall be reviewed and acted upon by the highest review authority designated by these zoning regulations for any of the applications. For example, a project for which applications for moderate development review project and a conditional use permit are filed shall have both applications decided by the planning commission, instead of the director being the final decision-making authority for the moderate development review project. (Ord. 1705 §§ 56—60, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. A land use on property that complies with the permit requirement or exemption provisions of these zoning regulations shall also comply with the permit requirements of other municipal code provisions and any permit requirements of other agencies before construction or use of the property is commenced. All necessary permits shall be obtained before starting work or establishing a new use, with the exception that a demolition permit may be obtained and demolition work carried out prior to starting work or establishing a new use. Nothing in these zoning regulations shall eliminate the need to obtain any permits required by:
1. Any other municipal code provisions, including building, grading, or other construction permits; a business license in compliance with Title 5 (Licenses, Permits, and Regulations), if required, or subdivision approval if required by Title 16 (Subdivisions); or
2. Any applicable county, regional, state, or federal regulations.
B. Grading shall not be commenced, and no structure shall be altered, enlarged, erected, moved, or rebuilt subject to the provisions of this section, except in compliance with the approved permit and the conditions imposed. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Burden of Proof. The burden of proof to establish the evidence in support of the required finding(s) for any permit or approval in compliance with these zoning regulations is the responsibility of the applicant.
B. Precedence.
1. Each permit or approval shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
2. The granting of a prior permit or approval, or the denial of a permit, either on the subject property or any other property within the city does not create a precedent and is not justification for the granting or denial of a new permit under current review. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. This chapter provides procedures and requirements for the preparation, filing, and initial processing of the land use permit applications and legislative actions required by the city and specified in these zoning regulations.
B. The architectural review commission has the authority to review and make recommendations to either the director or the planning commission, depending upon the type of project application, regarding compliance with applicable design guidelines. Section 2.48.050 (Projects subject to architectural review) establishes the types of projects subject to architectural review. (Ord. 1705 § 61, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Application shall be made to the community development department in the form prescribed by the director, including, as may be necessary, site plans, written descriptions of activities to be conducted, technical studies of site characteristics, and any other materials set forth on the application form or otherwise prescribed by city policy. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The council may, by resolution, establish fees for applications and procedures required by these regulations, to the extent such fees have a reasonable relationship to the costs incurred in processing the applications and providing public notice. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Applicant Agreement.
1. At the time of submitting an application for a discretionary land use approval, the applicant shall agree as part of the application to defend (with legal counsel of city’s selection), indemnify, and hold harmless the city and its agents, attorneys, employees, and officers from any action, claim, or proceeding brought against the city or its agents, employees, and officers to annul, attack, set aside, or void a discretionary land use approval of the city.
2. The required indemnification shall include damages awarded against the city, if any, costs of suit, attorney’s fees, and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the action.
B. City Notification of Applicant. In the event that an action, claim, or proceeding referred to in subsection A of this section is brought, the city shall promptly notify the applicant of the existence of the action, claim, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense of the action, claim, or proceeding.
C. City Participation in Defense. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the city from participating in the defense of any action, claim, or proceeding if the city elects to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs and defends the action in good faith. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Review for Completeness.
1. Criteria for Review. The director shall review each application for completeness and accuracy before it is accepted as being complete and officially filed. The director’s determination of completeness shall be based on the city’s list of required application contents and related additional written instructions provided to the applicant in any preapplication conference and/or during the initial application review period.
2. Notification of Applicant. As required by Government Code Section 65943, within thirty calendar days of application filing, the applicant shall be informed, in writing, either that the application is complete and has been accepted for processing, or that the application is incomplete and that additional information, specified in the director’s letter, shall be provided. This requirement shall not apply to any legislative actions.
3. Submittal of Additional Information.
a. When the director determines that an application is incomplete, the time used by the applicant to submit the required additional information shall not be considered part of the time within which the determination of completeness shall occur.
b. The additional specified information shall be submitted in writing or electronically, as required by the director.
c. The director’s review of any information resubmitted by the applicant shall be accomplished in compliance with subsection (A)(1) of this section, along with another thirty-day period of review for completeness for each resubmittal necessary.
4. Environmental Information. Upon review of an initial application or after an application has been accepted as complete, the director may require the applicant to submit additional information needed for the environmental review of the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA guidelines.
B. Referral of Application. At the discretion of the director, or where otherwise required by these development regulations or state or federal law, an application may be referred to any public agency that may be affected by or have an interest in the proposed project.
C. Multi-Unit Residential and Mixed-Use Developments. Where a multi-unit residential development or mixed-use development in which at least two-thirds of the square footage consists of residential use, and where such developments qualify for streamlined processing pursuant to Government Code Section 65400 et seq., the provisions of Government Code Section 65400 et seq. shall apply.
D. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. The provisions of subsections A and B of this section shall not apply to wireless telecommunications facilities. The review for completeness and the processing of such applications shall comply with applicable Federal Communication Commission regulations. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
An application will be classified as “inactive” when the applicant has not responded within one hundred eighty days to submit items required by staff for further processing as provided in an incomplete letter. The applicant shall have the ability to otherwise demonstrate to the satisfaction of the director that progress is being made toward compliance. The director shall determine when an application is in an “inactive status” and deemed to be withdrawn. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
If building permits are not issued for site development authorized by a discretionary permit within one year of the date of approval or such longer time as may be stipulated as a condition of approval, the permit shall expire with the building permit application. Upon written request received prior to expiration, the director may grant renewals of an approval for successive periods of not more than one year each, up to a total of three years. Requests beyond three years are subject to review by the planning commission. Approvals of such renewals shall be in writing and for a specific period. Renewals may be approved with new or modified conditions upon a finding that the circumstances under which the permit was originally approved have substantially changed. Renewal of a permit shall not require public notice or hearing, unless the renewal is subject to new or modified conditions. In order to approve a renewal, the director, or planning commission as applicable, must make the findings required for initial approval. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The purpose of this chapter is to provide a process for the appropriate review of development projects to ensure that all approved site and structural development:
A. Is compatible with the physical and environmental characteristics of the site and surrounding properties to minimize conflicts;
B. Provides for safe and convenient access and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles;
C. Exemplifies the best professional high-quality design practices;
D. Allows for and encourages individual identity for specific uses and structures;
E. Encourages the maintenance of a distinct neighborhood and/or community identity;
F. Minimizes or eliminates negative or undesirable visual impacts;
G. Provides for the adequate dedication of land for public purposes and the provision of public infrastructure associated with the subject development; and
H. Implements general plan policies, applicable design guidelines, and any other applicable city planning-related documents. (Ord. 1705 § 62, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Development Review Required. No one shall construct any structure, or relocate, rebuild, or significantly enlarge or modify any existing structure or site until development review has been completed and approved in compliance with this chapter.
1. Cultural Heritage Committee Review. Notwithstanding subsection C of this section and Section 17.106.030 (Levels of development review) certain projects may require review by the cultural heritage committee in accordance with Chapter 14.01 (Historic Preservation Ordinance).
B. Enlargements and Modifications. For the purposes of this chapter, the term “significantly enlarge or modify” shall be measured from the increase in gross floor area of the original approval and be defined as follows:
1. Residential Enlargement or Modification. Residential enlargements or modifications larger than one thousand square feet or twenty-five percent of the existing gross floor area before the addition, whichever is less.
2. Nonresidential Enlargement or Modification. Nonresidential enlargement, modification, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or remodel resulting in an increase in gross floor area equal to or exceeding twenty-five percent of the existing gross floor area of the structure or more than two thousand five hundred square feet, whichever is less, before the construction.
3. Mixed-Use Development. Mixed-use development enlargement, modification, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or remodel resulting in increase in gross floor area equal to or exceeding twenty-five percent of the existing gross floor area of the structure or more than two thousand five hundred square feet, whichever is less, before the construction.
C. Exceptions. The following types of projects are exempt from the levels of development review:
1. Accessory structures as defined in Section 17.70.010 (Accessory structures);
2. Accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, and guest quarters as defined in Section 17.86.020 (Accessory dwelling units, and junior accessory dwelling units, and guest quarters);
3. Housing development projects which qualify under Chapter 17.69 (Objective Design Standards for Qualifying Residential Projects);
4. Single-unit dwellings as defined in Section 17.156.038 (S Definitions) and minor or significant additions or modifications to existing single-unit dwellings, except as identified in Section 17.106.030(B)(1);
5. Small residential development projects that consist of the construction, minor or significant additions, rehabilitation or remodel of less than five dwellings, where the gross floor area of each individual dwelling does not exceed one thousand two hundred square feet, except as identified in Section 17.106.030(B)(1);
6. Aesthetically insignificant projects which include modifications, additions, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or remodel of existing structures or other site features, that are not defined as a significant enlargement or modification, and have no potential for conflict with the objectives of development review as identified in Section 17.106.010 (Purpose and intent). (Ord. 1705 § 63, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Three Levels. Three levels of development review are hereby established, and the thresholds set forth below shall apply to development review.
B. Minor. Minor development review is a staff-level review process with public notice provided, with no public hearing required. The following projects shall be subject to minor development review, including but not limited to:
1. New single-unit residence and significant additions to an existing single-unit residence as described in Section 17.106.020 (enlargements and modifications), or small residential development projects where:
a. Architectural review is required as a condition of a subdivision approval, use permit, or other discretionary entitlement;
b. The director determines that the site is a “sensitive site” as set forth in the architectural review commission’s procedures manual;
c. The project site is within or along a creek or waterway, as identified in the city’s general plan open space element;
d. The project site is located on a parcel having an average natural slope gradient of sixteen percent or more;
2. Projects that include a public or private rooftop deck, or upper-level balconies or open space on a third floor or above;
3. Multi-unit residential/mixed-use developments ten units or less, which are not defined to be a “small residential development project”;
4. Nonresidential/mixed-use development with less than two thousand five hundred gross square feet of new construction;
5. Minor or incidental building addition or remodel, which is not considered exempt under Section 17.106.020(C) and is not considered a significant enlargement or modification to a previously approved project, as described in Section 17.106.020 (enlargements and modifications).
C. Moderate. Moderate development review is a discretionary director-level review process that includes public notice with a public hearing before the architectural review commission, including but not limited to:
1. Multi-unit residential/mixed-use developments between eleven and forty-nine units;
2. New single-unit developments between eleven and forty-nine units;
3. Nonresidential/mixed-use development with two thousand five hundred to ten thousand gross square feet of new construction;
4. Building addition or remodel, that is not considered minor or incidental or is considered a significant enlargement or modification to a previously approved project, as described in Section 17.106.020 (enlargements and modifications).
D. Major. Major development review is a discretionary planning commission review process that includes a recommendation from the architectural review commission and public notice with a public hearing conducted as is required for all planning commission actions.
1. Multi-unit residential/mixed-use developments with fifty units or more;
2. New single-unit developments with fifty units or more;
3. Nonresidential/mixed-use development with more than ten thousand gross square feet of new construction;
4. Significant additions and new construction of principal buildings in the C-D zone;
5. Any development project for which an environmental impact report is required. (Ord. 1705 § 64, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. For each level of development review, an advisory body may provide a recommendation to the review authority as applicable or required. In particular, review of an application subject to the architectural review commission as set forth in Section 2.48.090 (Architectural Review Procedures) shall occur:
1. For moderate development review, the architectural review commission shall conduct a public hearing and forward its recommendations to the director. The director shall consider the recommendations but shall not be bound by them in taking final action on the application.
2. For major development review, the architectural review commission shall conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to the planning commission by forwarding its recommendation through the director. The director shall have the authority to either:
a. Incorporate the architectural review commission’s recommendation into the staff report prepared for the public hearing by the planning commission; or
b. Modify the architectural review commission’s recommendation and forward that modified recommendation, together with the original recommendation, in the staff report prepared for the public hearing by the planning commission. (Ord. 1705 § 65, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Each application for development review shall be reviewed to ensure that the application is consistent with the purpose of this chapter, applicable development standards and regulations of these zoning regulations, and adopted design guidelines and policies that may apply.
B. The following criteria shall be considered during the review of a development review application, including but not limited to:
1. Compliance with these zoning regulations and all other applicable city regulations and policies;
2. Efficient site layout and design;
3. Applicable environmental review;
4. Compatibility with neighboring properties and developments with regard to setbacks, building heights, massing, location of parking facilities, and similar site design and building design features that shape how a property appears within a broader, definable neighborhood or zone context;
5. Efficiency and safety of public access and parking and loading facilities;
6. The compatibility in scale and aesthetic treatment of proposed structures with public areas;
7. The adequacy of proposed driveways, landscaping, parking spaces, on-site and off-site parking, pedestrian improvements;
8. The placement and use of private open spaces;
9. The use of design techniques such as façade articulation, use of varied building finishes and materials, varied rooflines, and stepped-back stories to break up building massing;
10. Privacy considerations with regard to the placement and orientation of balconies and windows;
11. Appropriate open space and use of water-efficient landscaping both to enhance overall site design and to provide privacy screening;
12. Consistency with the general plan and any applicable specific plan; and
13. Consistency with any adopted design guidelines, policies, and standards applicable to the property.
C. On-Site Inspection. An application for development review may require that the director perform an on-site inspection of the subject parcel before confirming that the request complies with all of the applicable criteria and provisions. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Project Conditions. In approving a development review application, the review authority may impose conditions deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the approval would be in compliance with this section and the required findings.
B. Requirements for Dedication and Infrastructure. The conditions may include requirements for the offers of adequate dedication of land for public purposes and the provision of public infrastructure to the extent necessitated by the development. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The purpose of this chapter is to authorize the director to act on certain applications on an administrative basis, without a public hearing, due to the minor nature of a proposed improvement, use of land, or allowed deviation from specified development standards and as further described in this chapter. Notwithstanding these provisions, the director shall have the authority to refer any application subject to this chapter to a director’s hearing or to the planning commission for consideration. (Ord. 1705 § 66, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Repealed by Ord. 1705. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Application Filing. An application for a director’s action shall be filed and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.104 (Permit Application Filing and Processing). The application shall include the information and materials specified in the department handout for director’s action applications, together with the required fee. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide evidence in support of the findings required by Section 17.108.040 (Required Findings).
B. Application Review. Each application for a director’s action shall be reviewed to ensure that the application is consistent with the purpose of this chapter and applicable development standards and regulations of these zoning regulations, and any adopted design guidelines and policies that may apply.
1. A director’s action is initiated when the department receives a complete application package, including the required information and materials specified in the department handout and any additional information required to conduct a thorough review of the proposed project or request.
2. Upon receipt of a complete application, the director shall review the location, design, configuration, and the effect of the proposed project or action on adjacent properties, streets, and alleys by comparing the application materials to applicable standards in these zoning regulations and determining whether the findings required in Section 17.108.040 (Required Findings) can be made.
3. Within thirty days after the director’s action application has been deemed complete, the director shall either approve or deny the application and, if approved, may impose conditions deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare and ensure compliance with this chapter and all applicable city regulations and policies.
C. On-Site Inspection. An application for a director’s action may require that the director perform an on-site inspection of the subject parcel before confirming that the request complies with all of the applicable criteria and provisions identified in this chapter. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Required Findings. The director may approve a director’s action application only after first making all of the following findings. The proposed interpretation, determination, or modification to standards:
1. Is consistent with the intent of these zoning regulations and applicable general plan policies;
2. Is consistent with or an improvement to the character of the neighborhood or zone;
3. Provides adequate consideration of and measures to address any potential adverse effects on surrounding properties such as, but not limited to, traffic, vehicular and pedestrian safety, noise, visual and scale, and lighting.
With regard to cases of granting exceptions to the strict application of development standards, the following additional finding shall be made:
4. While site characteristics or existing improvements make strict adherence to the zoning regulations impractical or infeasible, or the project nonetheless conforms with the intent of these regulations.
B. Failure to Make Findings. The director shall deny the application if any one or more of the required findings cannot be made. (Ord. 1705 § 68, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
In approving a director’s action application, the director may impose conditions deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the approval would be in compliance with the findings required by Section 17.108.040 (Required Findings). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The purpose of this chapter is to authorize the director to act on certain applications via a public hearing as described in this chapter. Notwithstanding these provisions, the director shall have the authority to refer any application subject to this chapter to the planning commission for consideration. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Repealed by Ord. 1705. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Application Filing. An application for a director’s hearing shall be filed and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.104 (Permit Application Filing and Processing). The application shall include the information and materials specified in the department handout for director’s hearing applications, together with the required fee. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide evidence in support of the findings required by Section 17.109.040 (Required Findings).
B. Application Review. Each application for a director’s hearing shall be reviewed to ensure that the application is consistent with the purpose of this chapter and applicable development standards and regulations of these zoning regulations, and any adopted design guidelines and policies that may apply.
1. A director’s hearing shall be scheduled when the department receives a complete application package, including the required information and materials specified in the department handout and related additional information required to conduct a thorough review of the proposed project or request.
2. Upon receipt of a complete application, the director shall review the location, design, configuration, and the effect of the proposed project or action on adjacent properties, streets, and alleys by comparing the application materials to applicable standards in these zoning regulations and determining whether the findings required in Section 17.109.040 (Required Findings) can be made.
C. On-Site Inspection. An application for a director’s hearing may require that the director perform an on-site inspection of the subject parcel before confirming that the request complies with all of the applicable criteria and provisions identified in this chapter.
D. Public Hearing.
1. Before acting on any director’s hearing application, the director shall hold a hearing at which information and arguments may be presented. Notice of the time, date, place, and purpose of the hearing shall be given in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
2. Decisions of the director shall be rendered in writing within ten days of the final hearing at which action is taken. The decision shall state the conditions of approval, if any, or the reasons for denial. The director’s decision shall be final unless appealed. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Required Findings. The director may approve a director’s hearing application only after first making all of the following findings. The proposed application and project:
1. Are consistent with the intent of these zoning regulations and applicable general plan policies;
2. Are consistent with or an improvement to the character of the neighborhood or zone;
3. Provide adequate consideration of and measures to address any potential adverse effects on surrounding properties such as, but not limited to, traffic, vehicular and pedestrian safety, noise, visual and scale, and lighting.
B. Failure to Make Findings. The director shall deny the application if any one or more of the required findings cannot be made. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
In approving a director’s hearing application, the director may impose conditions deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the approval would be in compliance with the findings required by Section 17.109.040 (Required Findings). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The purpose of this chapter is to provide two distinct procedures for reviewing land uses that may be appropriate in the applicable zone, but whose effects on a site and its surroundings cannot be determined without discretionary review and consideration of the site context. Use permits allow flexibility in providing for, regulating, or preventing particular uses so they will be compatible with existing or desired conditions in their neighborhoods or zones. Use permit approval is required for certain uses so that their detrimental effects can be reduced or avoided and potential conflicts in land use can be prevented.
Where the term “use permit” is used in this chapter, it shall mean and encompass minor use permit and conditional use permit. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
An application for a minor use permit or conditional use permit shall be filed and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.104 (Permit Application Filing and Processing). It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide evidence in support of the findings required by Section 17.110.070 (Required Findings). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Hearing, Decision, and Referral.
1. Before acting on any minor use permit application, the director shall hold a hearing at which information and arguments may be presented. Notice of the time, date, place, and purpose of the hearing shall be given in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
2. Decisions of the director shall be rendered in writing within ten days of the final hearing at which action is taken. The decision shall state the conditions of approval, if any, or the reasons for denial. The director’s decision shall be final unless appealed.
3. At his or her discretion, the director may refer a minor use permit to the planning commission when he/she determines the application involves a major policy issue or public controversy that would be resolved more suitably by the planning commission. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Hearing and Decision.
1. Before acting on any use permit application, the planning commission shall hold a public hearing conducted according to its procedure. Notice of the time, date, place, and purpose of the hearing shall be given in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
2. Decisions of the planning commission shall be rendered in writing within ten days of the final hearing at which action is taken. The decision shall state the conditions of approval, if any, or the reasons for denial. The planning commission’s decision shall be final unless appealed.
3. When a conditional use permit is before the planning commission, the planning commission may act to impose additional or relax any property development standards capable of being so altered under relevant sections of these regulations. The intent of this provision is to enable the planning commission to deal with various aspects of project design in a comprehensive way, without postponement of action on a project for separate hearings. Conditional use permit findings and procedures shall apply as provided in relevant sections of these regulations. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Conditions Allowed. Conditions imposed by the director, planning commission, or council may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Modification or limitation to activities, including times and types of operations;
2. Special yards or open spaces;
3. Fences, walls, or landscape screens;
4. Provision and arrangement of parking and vehicular and pedestrian circulation;
5. On-site or off-site street, sidewalk or utility improvements, and maintenance agreements;
6. Noise generation and attenuation;
7. Dedication of right-of-way or easements or access rights;
8. Arrangement of buildings and use areas on the site;
9. Special hazard reduction measures, such as slope planting;
10. Minimum site area;
11. Other conditions which may be found necessary to address unusual site conditions;
12. Establishment of an expiration date, after which the use must cease at that site;
13. Recycling and solid waste plans.
B. Limitation. Conditions may not be imposed that restrict the use to a specific person or group. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
In deciding whether a proposal is acceptable at a given location, the director, planning commission, and council shall consider whether the proposal could be established and maintained without jeopardy to persons or property within or adjacent to the proposed site and without damage to the resources of the site and its surroundings. Appropriate criteria may be found in the following sources, without limitation:
A. General plan elements (such as land use, circulation, housing, noise, seismic safety, public safety, open space and conservation);
B. Specific plans and special studies;
C. Community design guidelines;
D. Compliance with applicable environmental mitigation measures; and
E. Standards and recommendations of agencies commenting on environmental documents for the proposal or for similar projects. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. In order to grant a minor use permit or conditional use permit, the director or planning commission, or on appeal, the council, shall be required to make the following findings:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan;
2. The proposed use is allowed or conditionally allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of these zoning regulations and the municipal code;
3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity;
4. The site is physically suitable in terms of:
a. Its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use;
b. Traffic generation and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access;
c. Public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.); and
d. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.).
5. The establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use.
B. The director, planning commission, or council may deny the proposal or attach conditions as deemed necessary to secure the purposes of these regulations. Actions on minor use permits and conditional use permits shall be justified by written findings, based on substantial evidence in view of the whole record. (Ord. 1705 § 70, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. The modification or addition to a use requiring use permit approval shall itself be subject to use permit approval. The director shall determine when such an addition or change is of such a minor or incidental nature that the intent of these regulations can be met without further use permit control.
B. Any conditions established pursuant to these regulations shall be met before the use is established, except that the director, planning commission or, on appeal, the council, may establish a schedule for certain conditions to be met after establishment of the use. Continuance of the use shall then be contingent on complying with the schedule for meeting applicable conditions. (Ord. 1705 § 71, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A minor use permit or conditional use permit approved in compliance with the provisions of this chapter shall run with the land and continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the business, parcel, service, structure, or use that was the subject of the permit application in the same area, configuration, and manner as it was originally approved in compliance with this chapter. If the operation of the use for which the use permit was issued ceases for a continuous period of one year, the provisions of this section shall not apply, and a new application shall be required for any new owner or operator. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The reasonable accommodation provisions allow for flexibility in the application of regulations and procedures to ensure equal access to housing. The provisions set forth in this chapter provide a procedure under which a disabled person may request a reasonable accommodation in the application of zoning requirements. This chapter is based on requirements of the federal and state fair housing laws and is designed to eliminate barriers to housing opportunities. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Request. A request for reasonable accommodation in the application of land use and zoning regulations may be made by a disabled person, his or her representative, or a developer or provider of housing for individuals with disabilities. A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the siting, development, and use of housing or housing related facilities that would eliminate regulatory barriers. A reasonable accommodation cannot waive a requirement for a minor use permit or conditional use permit when otherwise required or result in approval of uses otherwise prohibited by the city’s land use and zoning regulations.
B. Assistance. If an applicant needs assistance in making the request, the planning division will endeavor to provide the assistance necessary to ensure that the process is available to the applicant.
C. Balancing Rights and Requirements. The city will attempt to balance the privacy rights and reasonable request of an applicant for confidentiality with the land use requirements for notice and public hearing, factual findings, and rights to appeal in the city’s request for information, considering an application, preparing written findings, and maintaining records for a request for reasonable accommodation. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Whenever a request for reasonable accommodation is submitted for consideration, as a part of the application, sufficient information shall be submitted to the community development department to determine whether the reasonable accommodation request complies with the provisions of this chapter. In addition to the required director’s action application checklist items, the application shall include the following:
A. The basis for the claim that the individual is considered disabled under the fair housing laws. Identification and description of the disability which is the basis for the request for accommodation, including current, written medical certification, and description of disability and its effects on the person’s medical, physical, or mental limitations.
B. The rule, policy, practice, and/or procedure of the city for which the request for accommodation is being made, including the zoning code regulation from which reasonable accommodation is being requested.
C. Type of accommodation sought.
D. The reason(s) why the accommodation is reasonable and necessary for the needs of the disabled person(s). Where appropriate, include a summary of any potential means and alternatives considered in evaluating the need for the accommodation. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Director’s Action. Requests for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the director if no approval is sought other than the request for reasonable accommodation. The director may refer the matter to any advisory commission or committee, as appropriate and authorized by these zoning regulations.
B. Other Review Authority. Requests for reasonable accommodation submitted for concurrent review with another discretionary land use application shall be reviewed by the authority responsible for reviewing the other application. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Conditions imposed by the director or other review authority may include, but are not limited to, the following:
A. Inspection of the property periodically, as specified, to verify compliance with this chapter and any conditions of approval.
B. Removal of the improvements, where removal would not constitute an unreasonable financial burden, when the need for which the accommodation was granted no longer exists.
C. Time limits and/or expiration of the approval if the need for which the accommodation was granted no longer exists.
D. Recordation of a deed restriction requiring removal of the accommodating feature once the need for it no longer exists.
E. Measures to reduce the impact on surrounding uses.
F. Measures in consideration of the physical attributes of the property and structures.
G. Other reasonable accommodations that may provide an equivalent level of benefit and/or that will not result in an encroachment into required setbacks, exceedance of maximum height, lot coverage, or floor area ratio requirements specified for the zone.
H. Other conditions necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The approval of a reasonable accommodation shall require that the director or other review authority first find that:
A. The housing will be used by a disabled person;
B. The requested accommodation is necessary to make housing available to a disabled person;
C. The requested accommodation would not pose an undue financial or administrative burden on the city; and
D. The requested accommodation would not require a fundamental alteration in the nature of a city program or law, including but not limited to land use and zoning. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A modification approved under this chapter is considered a personal accommodation for the individual applicant and does not run with the land. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The director shall administer and interpret these requirements, subject to the applicable codes and city procedures. Decisions of the director or other review authority are appealable subject to the zoning regulations appeal provisions (Chapter 17.126). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to allow for those short-term and intermittent activities set forth in Section 17.86.260 (Temporary and Intermittent Uses) that would be compatible with adjacent and surrounding uses when conducted in compliance with this chapter.
B. Applicability. Those uses identified in Section 17.86.260 (Temporary and Intermittent Uses) shall require a temporary use permit pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. The following temporary uses are exempt from the requirement for a temporary use permit:
1. On-site contractor’s construction/storage uses in conjunction with an approved construction project on the same site.
2. Emergency public health and safety facilities and uses, as determined by the director.
3. Garage and yard sales involving the sale of personal property conducted in a residential zone consistent with Section 17.86.190(C) (Garage and Yard Sales). (Ord. 1705 § 72, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. An application shall be in the form prescribed by the director, shall state the precise nature of proposed temporary or intermittent use, and shall be accompanied by any required fees.
B. The application shall be filed with the department at least thirty days before the date that the proposed temporary use is scheduled to take place.
C. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to establish evidence in support of the findings required by Section 17.113.030 (Findings).
D. Following receipt of a completed application, the director shall investigate the facts necessary for action consistent with the purpose of this chapter.
E. The director, through a director’s action, may approve a temporary use permit, deny the application, or defer action and refer to the application to the planning commission for review and final decision.
F. Given the abbreviated time frame between the action of the director on an application for conducting a proposed temporary or intermittent use and the date for such use, the action by the director may be appealed to the city manager. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The director may approve a temporary use permit application, with or without conditions, only if he/she first makes all of the following findings:
A. The operation of the requested temporary use at the location proposed, within the time period specified, and subject to appropriate conditions will not jeopardize, endanger, or otherwise constitute a menace to the public convenience, health, safety, or general welfare;
B. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the temporary use without material detriment to the use and enjoyment of other properties located adjacent to and in the vicinity of the site;
C. The proposed site is adequately served by streets or highways having sufficient width and improvements to accommodate the kind and quantity of traffic that the temporary use will or could reasonably be expected to generate;
D. Adequate temporary parking to accommodate vehicular traffic to be generated by the temporary use will be available either on site or at alternate locations acceptable to the director;
E. The location for the proposed temporary use would not adversely interfere with existing uses on the subject property, and would not impede or adversely impact pedestrian access ways and/or vehicular circulation patterns; and
F. The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions imposed in the approval of the temporary use permit. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. May Impose Conditions. In approving a temporary use permit application, the director may impose conditions that are deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the permit would be in compliance with this chapter, Section 17.86.260 (Temporary and Intermittent Uses), and the findings required by Section 17.113.030 (Findings).
B. Appropriate Conditions. The conditions may address any pertinent factors affecting the operation of the temporary activity or use, and may include the following:
1. Fixed Period of Time. Unless otherwise stated in the permit, a provision for a fixed period of time.
2. Operating Hours and Days. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the temporary use.
3. Temporary Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation. Provision for adequate temporary pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking facilities (including vehicular ingress and egress), and public transportation, if applicable.
4. Regulation of Nuisance Factors. Regulation of nuisance factors including prevention of glare or direct illumination on adjacent parcels, dirt, dust, gases, heat, noise, odors, smoke, trash, and vibration.
5. Regulation of Temporary Structures. Regulation of temporary structures and facilities, including their number, placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards.
6. Sanitary and Medical Facilities. Provision for sanitary and medical facilities, as appropriate.
7. Waste Collection, Recycling, and/or Disposal. Provision for solid, hazardous, and toxic waste collection, recycling, and/or disposal.
8. Police/Security and Safety Measures. Provision for police/security and safety measures, as appropriate.
9. Outdoor Lighting. Regulation of outdoor lighting.
10. Special Sales. If special sales are proposed, limitations on the location where sales may occur, the number of vendors, and the scope of goods to be sold.
11. Food Sales. If food sales are involved, obtainment of all appropriate health permits.
12. Performance Bond. Submission of a performance bond or other security measures satisfactory to the director to ensure that any temporary structures and facilities used will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the activity and that the property will be restored to its former condition, or better, as determined by the director.
13. Other Conditions. Other conditions that would ensure the operation of the proposed temporary use in an orderly and efficient manner, and in full compliance with the purpose of this section. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Purpose. The variance procedure is intended to allow minor relaxation of certain standards by the director that would otherwise prevent a property from being used in the same manner as other, similar property, where the intent of these regulations is not compromised by such minor relaxation.
B. Applicability. Yards, height limits, lot coverage, floor area ratio, and parking space requirements may be relaxed. No variance to land use regulations or density standards may be granted. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. An application shall be in the form prescribed by the director, shall state the precise nature of the grounds for the variance sought, and shall be accompanied by any required fees.
B. Notification requirements and actions of the director shall be as provided for minor use permits in Section 17.110.030 (Procedure—Minor Use Permit). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide evidence in support of the findings required in Section 17.114.040 (Required Findings). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
In order to approve a variance, the director or, on appeal, the planning commission or council, must make each of the following findings:
A. That there are circumstances applying to the site, such as size, shape, or topography, which do not apply generally to land in the vicinity with the same zoning;
B. That the variance will not be in conflict with the purpose and intent of these zoning regulations, the general plan, or any applicable specific plan;
C. That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege—an entitlement inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning; and
D. That the variance will not adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working on the site or in the vicinity. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Permit Procedures
This Article 6 establishes the overall structure for the application, review, and action on city-required permit and project review applications and identifies and describes those discretionary permits and other approvals required by these zoning regulations. (Ord. 1705 § 55, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Director’s Actions. Except when combined with legislative actions or other nonadministrative actions defined in this article, the director, also defined in these zoning regulations as the designee of the director, is the designated review authority for the following quasi-judicial permits and actions, which are generally limited to interpretation of policy or relatively minor adjustments of zoning regulations standards. Additionally, the director has primary administrative authority over certain activities which require the determination of compliance with applicable zoning regulations provisions. The director, at the director’s sole discretion, may elevate the level of review to a higher review process and/or authority.
1. Affordable Housing Incentives. An action authorizing a residential density bonus that includes an alternative or additional incentive in compliance with Chapter 17.140 (Affordable Housing Incentives).
2. Development Review—Minor. An administrative action providing for the review of and action on certain development applications identified in Chapter 17.106 (Development Review).
3. Director’s Action on Exceptions. An administrative action granting exception (modification or deletion) to certain specified development standards of these zoning regulations in cases where strict compliance would result in a hardship, as specified in and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.108 (Director’s Action).
4. Home Occupation Permits. An administrative permit authorizing the operation of a specified home-based occupation in a particular location in compliance with the provisions of these zoning regulations and in compliance with procedures specified in Article 4, Section 17.86.140 (Home Occupations).
5. Reasonable Accommodation. An administrative permit authorizing limited modifications to properties to accommodate a person with physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activities in compliance with specific criteria and performance standards and in compliance with procedures specified in Chapter 17.112 (Reasonable Accommodation).
6. Temporary Use Permits. An administrative permit authorizing specific limited term uses in compliance with specified conditions and performance criteria specified in Article 4, Section 17.86.260 (Temporary and Intermittent Uses).
7. Zoning Regulations Interpretations. An administrative interpretation of certain provisions of these zoning regulations in an effort to resolve conflict or ambiguity in the regulations and to ensure their consistent application in compliance with Chapter 17.04 (Interpretation of the Zoning Regulations).
B. Director’s Hearing. Except when combined with legislative actions, the director, via a public hearing process, is the designated review authority for the following quasi-judicial permits and actions. A public hearing is required for the following quasi-judicial actions in compliance with Chapter 17.109 (Director’s Hearing).
1. Development Review—Moderate. An administrative action providing for the review of and action on certain development applications identified in Chapter 17.106 (Development Review).
2. Director’s Hearing on Exceptions. An administrative action granting exception (modification or deletion) to certain specified development standards of these zoning regulations in cases where strict compliance would result in a hardship, as specified in and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.109 (Director’s Hearing), and other than those exceptions cited in Chapter 17.108 (Director’s Action).
3. Director’s Hearing on Various Permits. A quasi-judicial action authorizing the construction or alteration of specific development projects and as otherwise called for in these zoning regulations for projects subject to a director’s hearing. A public hearing is required in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
4. Minor Use Permits. A permit authorizing the operation of a specific use of land or a structure in a particular location in compliance with the provisions of these zoning regulations and in compliance with procedures specified in Chapter 17.110 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits).
5. Revocation of Director’s Hearing Actions and Minor Use Permits. A judicial process providing for the review of potential violations of conditions of approval for an authorized use or structure, and for the revocation of such approval based upon findings set forth in Chapters 17.108 and 17.109.
6. Variances. An action granting exception to the development standards of these zoning regulations in cases where strict compliance would result in a unique hardship in compliance with Chapter 17.114 (Variances).
C. Planning Commission Permits and Actions. Except when combined with legislative actions, the planning commission is the designated review authority for the following quasi-judicial permits and actions. Additionally, the planning commission may review administrative permits and actions referred by the director. A public hearing is required for the following quasi-judicial actions in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
1. Adjustments to Standards in the Downtown-Commercial (C-D) Zone. A process for making adjustments, on a project-specific basis, to the development standards applicable to development in the C-D zone, as specified in Chapter 17.32 (Downtown-Commercial (C-D) Zone).
2. Building Setback Lines. A process for adoption of official building setback lines, as specified in Chapter 17.80 (Street Regulations).
3. Conditional Use Permits. A permit authorizing the operation of a specific use of land or a structure in a particular location in compliance with the provisions of these zoning regulations and the procedures specified in Chapter 17.110 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits).
4. Development Review—Major. A process providing for the review of and action on certain development applications identified in Chapter 17.106 (Development Review).
5. PD Overlay Zone—Amendments to Final Development Plan. A process for reviewing proposed amendments to an adopted Planned Development Overlay (PD) Zone or final development plan as specified in Chapter 17.48 (Planned Development (PD) Overlay Zone).
6. Planning Commission Hearing on Various Exceptions and Special Development Projects. A quasi-judicial action authorizing an exception (modification or deletion) to certain specified development standards of these zoning regulations and for the construction or alteration of specific development projects and as otherwise called for in these zoning regulations. A public hearing is required in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
7. Revocation of Conditional Use Permits. A judicial process providing for the review of potential violations of conditions of approval for an authorized use or structure, and for the revocation of such approval based upon findings set forth in Chapter 17.110.
D. Legislative Actions. The designated review authority for all legislative actions is the city council, based on recommendations provided by the planning commission. A public hearing is required for the following legislative actions in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings):
1. Development Agreements and Amendments. An agreement between the city and a party with legal or equitable interest in the real property relating to the development of property in compliance with Chapter 17.128 (Development Agreements).
2. General Plan Text/Map Amendments. An action authorizing either a text amendment to the general plan or a map amendment changing the general plan land use designation of particular property in compliance with Chapter 17.130 (General Plan Amendments).
3. Specific Plan and Amendments. A regulatory document prepared in compliance with Government Code Section 65450 et seq. for the systematic implementation of the general plan for a particular area as specified in Chapter 17.50 (Specific Plan Overlay Zone).
4. Zoning Regulations Text/Zoning Map Amendments. An action authorizing either a text amendment to these zoning regulations or a map amendment changing the zoning designation of particular property in compliance with Chapter 17.124 (Amendments—Zoning Regulations and Zoning Map).
E. Multiple Permit Applications.
1. Concurrent Filing. An applicant for a development project that requires the filing of more than one application (e.g., conditional use permit, tentative map, etc.) shall file all related applications concurrently, together with all required application fees, unless these requirements for concurrent filing are waived by the director.
2. Concurrent Processing. Multiple applications for the same project shall be processed concurrently and shall be reviewed and acted upon by the highest review authority designated by these zoning regulations for any of the applications. For example, a project for which applications for moderate development review project and a conditional use permit are filed shall have both applications decided by the planning commission, instead of the director being the final decision-making authority for the moderate development review project. (Ord. 1705 §§ 56—60, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. A land use on property that complies with the permit requirement or exemption provisions of these zoning regulations shall also comply with the permit requirements of other municipal code provisions and any permit requirements of other agencies before construction or use of the property is commenced. All necessary permits shall be obtained before starting work or establishing a new use, with the exception that a demolition permit may be obtained and demolition work carried out prior to starting work or establishing a new use. Nothing in these zoning regulations shall eliminate the need to obtain any permits required by:
1. Any other municipal code provisions, including building, grading, or other construction permits; a business license in compliance with Title 5 (Licenses, Permits, and Regulations), if required, or subdivision approval if required by Title 16 (Subdivisions); or
2. Any applicable county, regional, state, or federal regulations.
B. Grading shall not be commenced, and no structure shall be altered, enlarged, erected, moved, or rebuilt subject to the provisions of this section, except in compliance with the approved permit and the conditions imposed. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Burden of Proof. The burden of proof to establish the evidence in support of the required finding(s) for any permit or approval in compliance with these zoning regulations is the responsibility of the applicant.
B. Precedence.
1. Each permit or approval shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
2. The granting of a prior permit or approval, or the denial of a permit, either on the subject property or any other property within the city does not create a precedent and is not justification for the granting or denial of a new permit under current review. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. This chapter provides procedures and requirements for the preparation, filing, and initial processing of the land use permit applications and legislative actions required by the city and specified in these zoning regulations.
B. The architectural review commission has the authority to review and make recommendations to either the director or the planning commission, depending upon the type of project application, regarding compliance with applicable design guidelines. Section 2.48.050 (Projects subject to architectural review) establishes the types of projects subject to architectural review. (Ord. 1705 § 61, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Application shall be made to the community development department in the form prescribed by the director, including, as may be necessary, site plans, written descriptions of activities to be conducted, technical studies of site characteristics, and any other materials set forth on the application form or otherwise prescribed by city policy. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The council may, by resolution, establish fees for applications and procedures required by these regulations, to the extent such fees have a reasonable relationship to the costs incurred in processing the applications and providing public notice. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Applicant Agreement.
1. At the time of submitting an application for a discretionary land use approval, the applicant shall agree as part of the application to defend (with legal counsel of city’s selection), indemnify, and hold harmless the city and its agents, attorneys, employees, and officers from any action, claim, or proceeding brought against the city or its agents, employees, and officers to annul, attack, set aside, or void a discretionary land use approval of the city.
2. The required indemnification shall include damages awarded against the city, if any, costs of suit, attorney’s fees, and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the action.
B. City Notification of Applicant. In the event that an action, claim, or proceeding referred to in subsection A of this section is brought, the city shall promptly notify the applicant of the existence of the action, claim, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense of the action, claim, or proceeding.
C. City Participation in Defense. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the city from participating in the defense of any action, claim, or proceeding if the city elects to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs and defends the action in good faith. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Review for Completeness.
1. Criteria for Review. The director shall review each application for completeness and accuracy before it is accepted as being complete and officially filed. The director’s determination of completeness shall be based on the city’s list of required application contents and related additional written instructions provided to the applicant in any preapplication conference and/or during the initial application review period.
2. Notification of Applicant. As required by Government Code Section 65943, within thirty calendar days of application filing, the applicant shall be informed, in writing, either that the application is complete and has been accepted for processing, or that the application is incomplete and that additional information, specified in the director’s letter, shall be provided. This requirement shall not apply to any legislative actions.
3. Submittal of Additional Information.
a. When the director determines that an application is incomplete, the time used by the applicant to submit the required additional information shall not be considered part of the time within which the determination of completeness shall occur.
b. The additional specified information shall be submitted in writing or electronically, as required by the director.
c. The director’s review of any information resubmitted by the applicant shall be accomplished in compliance with subsection (A)(1) of this section, along with another thirty-day period of review for completeness for each resubmittal necessary.
4. Environmental Information. Upon review of an initial application or after an application has been accepted as complete, the director may require the applicant to submit additional information needed for the environmental review of the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA guidelines.
B. Referral of Application. At the discretion of the director, or where otherwise required by these development regulations or state or federal law, an application may be referred to any public agency that may be affected by or have an interest in the proposed project.
C. Multi-Unit Residential and Mixed-Use Developments. Where a multi-unit residential development or mixed-use development in which at least two-thirds of the square footage consists of residential use, and where such developments qualify for streamlined processing pursuant to Government Code Section 65400 et seq., the provisions of Government Code Section 65400 et seq. shall apply.
D. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. The provisions of subsections A and B of this section shall not apply to wireless telecommunications facilities. The review for completeness and the processing of such applications shall comply with applicable Federal Communication Commission regulations. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
An application will be classified as “inactive” when the applicant has not responded within one hundred eighty days to submit items required by staff for further processing as provided in an incomplete letter. The applicant shall have the ability to otherwise demonstrate to the satisfaction of the director that progress is being made toward compliance. The director shall determine when an application is in an “inactive status” and deemed to be withdrawn. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
If building permits are not issued for site development authorized by a discretionary permit within one year of the date of approval or such longer time as may be stipulated as a condition of approval, the permit shall expire with the building permit application. Upon written request received prior to expiration, the director may grant renewals of an approval for successive periods of not more than one year each, up to a total of three years. Requests beyond three years are subject to review by the planning commission. Approvals of such renewals shall be in writing and for a specific period. Renewals may be approved with new or modified conditions upon a finding that the circumstances under which the permit was originally approved have substantially changed. Renewal of a permit shall not require public notice or hearing, unless the renewal is subject to new or modified conditions. In order to approve a renewal, the director, or planning commission as applicable, must make the findings required for initial approval. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The purpose of this chapter is to provide a process for the appropriate review of development projects to ensure that all approved site and structural development:
A. Is compatible with the physical and environmental characteristics of the site and surrounding properties to minimize conflicts;
B. Provides for safe and convenient access and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles;
C. Exemplifies the best professional high-quality design practices;
D. Allows for and encourages individual identity for specific uses and structures;
E. Encourages the maintenance of a distinct neighborhood and/or community identity;
F. Minimizes or eliminates negative or undesirable visual impacts;
G. Provides for the adequate dedication of land for public purposes and the provision of public infrastructure associated with the subject development; and
H. Implements general plan policies, applicable design guidelines, and any other applicable city planning-related documents. (Ord. 1705 § 62, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Development Review Required. No one shall construct any structure, or relocate, rebuild, or significantly enlarge or modify any existing structure or site until development review has been completed and approved in compliance with this chapter.
1. Cultural Heritage Committee Review. Notwithstanding subsection C of this section and Section 17.106.030 (Levels of development review) certain projects may require review by the cultural heritage committee in accordance with Chapter 14.01 (Historic Preservation Ordinance).
B. Enlargements and Modifications. For the purposes of this chapter, the term “significantly enlarge or modify” shall be measured from the increase in gross floor area of the original approval and be defined as follows:
1. Residential Enlargement or Modification. Residential enlargements or modifications larger than one thousand square feet or twenty-five percent of the existing gross floor area before the addition, whichever is less.
2. Nonresidential Enlargement or Modification. Nonresidential enlargement, modification, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or remodel resulting in an increase in gross floor area equal to or exceeding twenty-five percent of the existing gross floor area of the structure or more than two thousand five hundred square feet, whichever is less, before the construction.
3. Mixed-Use Development. Mixed-use development enlargement, modification, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or remodel resulting in increase in gross floor area equal to or exceeding twenty-five percent of the existing gross floor area of the structure or more than two thousand five hundred square feet, whichever is less, before the construction.
C. Exceptions. The following types of projects are exempt from the levels of development review:
1. Accessory structures as defined in Section 17.70.010 (Accessory structures);
2. Accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, and guest quarters as defined in Section 17.86.020 (Accessory dwelling units, and junior accessory dwelling units, and guest quarters);
3. Housing development projects which qualify under Chapter 17.69 (Objective Design Standards for Qualifying Residential Projects);
4. Single-unit dwellings as defined in Section 17.156.038 (S Definitions) and minor or significant additions or modifications to existing single-unit dwellings, except as identified in Section 17.106.030(B)(1);
5. Small residential development projects that consist of the construction, minor or significant additions, rehabilitation or remodel of less than five dwellings, where the gross floor area of each individual dwelling does not exceed one thousand two hundred square feet, except as identified in Section 17.106.030(B)(1);
6. Aesthetically insignificant projects which include modifications, additions, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or remodel of existing structures or other site features, that are not defined as a significant enlargement or modification, and have no potential for conflict with the objectives of development review as identified in Section 17.106.010 (Purpose and intent). (Ord. 1705 § 63, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Three Levels. Three levels of development review are hereby established, and the thresholds set forth below shall apply to development review.
B. Minor. Minor development review is a staff-level review process with public notice provided, with no public hearing required. The following projects shall be subject to minor development review, including but not limited to:
1. New single-unit residence and significant additions to an existing single-unit residence as described in Section 17.106.020 (enlargements and modifications), or small residential development projects where:
a. Architectural review is required as a condition of a subdivision approval, use permit, or other discretionary entitlement;
b. The director determines that the site is a “sensitive site” as set forth in the architectural review commission’s procedures manual;
c. The project site is within or along a creek or waterway, as identified in the city’s general plan open space element;
d. The project site is located on a parcel having an average natural slope gradient of sixteen percent or more;
2. Projects that include a public or private rooftop deck, or upper-level balconies or open space on a third floor or above;
3. Multi-unit residential/mixed-use developments ten units or less, which are not defined to be a “small residential development project”;
4. Nonresidential/mixed-use development with less than two thousand five hundred gross square feet of new construction;
5. Minor or incidental building addition or remodel, which is not considered exempt under Section 17.106.020(C) and is not considered a significant enlargement or modification to a previously approved project, as described in Section 17.106.020 (enlargements and modifications).
C. Moderate. Moderate development review is a discretionary director-level review process that includes public notice with a public hearing before the architectural review commission, including but not limited to:
1. Multi-unit residential/mixed-use developments between eleven and forty-nine units;
2. New single-unit developments between eleven and forty-nine units;
3. Nonresidential/mixed-use development with two thousand five hundred to ten thousand gross square feet of new construction;
4. Building addition or remodel, that is not considered minor or incidental or is considered a significant enlargement or modification to a previously approved project, as described in Section 17.106.020 (enlargements and modifications).
D. Major. Major development review is a discretionary planning commission review process that includes a recommendation from the architectural review commission and public notice with a public hearing conducted as is required for all planning commission actions.
1. Multi-unit residential/mixed-use developments with fifty units or more;
2. New single-unit developments with fifty units or more;
3. Nonresidential/mixed-use development with more than ten thousand gross square feet of new construction;
4. Significant additions and new construction of principal buildings in the C-D zone;
5. Any development project for which an environmental impact report is required. (Ord. 1705 § 64, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. For each level of development review, an advisory body may provide a recommendation to the review authority as applicable or required. In particular, review of an application subject to the architectural review commission as set forth in Section 2.48.090 (Architectural Review Procedures) shall occur:
1. For moderate development review, the architectural review commission shall conduct a public hearing and forward its recommendations to the director. The director shall consider the recommendations but shall not be bound by them in taking final action on the application.
2. For major development review, the architectural review commission shall conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to the planning commission by forwarding its recommendation through the director. The director shall have the authority to either:
a. Incorporate the architectural review commission’s recommendation into the staff report prepared for the public hearing by the planning commission; or
b. Modify the architectural review commission’s recommendation and forward that modified recommendation, together with the original recommendation, in the staff report prepared for the public hearing by the planning commission. (Ord. 1705 § 65, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Each application for development review shall be reviewed to ensure that the application is consistent with the purpose of this chapter, applicable development standards and regulations of these zoning regulations, and adopted design guidelines and policies that may apply.
B. The following criteria shall be considered during the review of a development review application, including but not limited to:
1. Compliance with these zoning regulations and all other applicable city regulations and policies;
2. Efficient site layout and design;
3. Applicable environmental review;
4. Compatibility with neighboring properties and developments with regard to setbacks, building heights, massing, location of parking facilities, and similar site design and building design features that shape how a property appears within a broader, definable neighborhood or zone context;
5. Efficiency and safety of public access and parking and loading facilities;
6. The compatibility in scale and aesthetic treatment of proposed structures with public areas;
7. The adequacy of proposed driveways, landscaping, parking spaces, on-site and off-site parking, pedestrian improvements;
8. The placement and use of private open spaces;
9. The use of design techniques such as façade articulation, use of varied building finishes and materials, varied rooflines, and stepped-back stories to break up building massing;
10. Privacy considerations with regard to the placement and orientation of balconies and windows;
11. Appropriate open space and use of water-efficient landscaping both to enhance overall site design and to provide privacy screening;
12. Consistency with the general plan and any applicable specific plan; and
13. Consistency with any adopted design guidelines, policies, and standards applicable to the property.
C. On-Site Inspection. An application for development review may require that the director perform an on-site inspection of the subject parcel before confirming that the request complies with all of the applicable criteria and provisions. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Project Conditions. In approving a development review application, the review authority may impose conditions deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the approval would be in compliance with this section and the required findings.
B. Requirements for Dedication and Infrastructure. The conditions may include requirements for the offers of adequate dedication of land for public purposes and the provision of public infrastructure to the extent necessitated by the development. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The purpose of this chapter is to authorize the director to act on certain applications on an administrative basis, without a public hearing, due to the minor nature of a proposed improvement, use of land, or allowed deviation from specified development standards and as further described in this chapter. Notwithstanding these provisions, the director shall have the authority to refer any application subject to this chapter to a director’s hearing or to the planning commission for consideration. (Ord. 1705 § 66, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Repealed by Ord. 1705. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Application Filing. An application for a director’s action shall be filed and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.104 (Permit Application Filing and Processing). The application shall include the information and materials specified in the department handout for director’s action applications, together with the required fee. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide evidence in support of the findings required by Section 17.108.040 (Required Findings).
B. Application Review. Each application for a director’s action shall be reviewed to ensure that the application is consistent with the purpose of this chapter and applicable development standards and regulations of these zoning regulations, and any adopted design guidelines and policies that may apply.
1. A director’s action is initiated when the department receives a complete application package, including the required information and materials specified in the department handout and any additional information required to conduct a thorough review of the proposed project or request.
2. Upon receipt of a complete application, the director shall review the location, design, configuration, and the effect of the proposed project or action on adjacent properties, streets, and alleys by comparing the application materials to applicable standards in these zoning regulations and determining whether the findings required in Section 17.108.040 (Required Findings) can be made.
3. Within thirty days after the director’s action application has been deemed complete, the director shall either approve or deny the application and, if approved, may impose conditions deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare and ensure compliance with this chapter and all applicable city regulations and policies.
C. On-Site Inspection. An application for a director’s action may require that the director perform an on-site inspection of the subject parcel before confirming that the request complies with all of the applicable criteria and provisions identified in this chapter. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Required Findings. The director may approve a director’s action application only after first making all of the following findings. The proposed interpretation, determination, or modification to standards:
1. Is consistent with the intent of these zoning regulations and applicable general plan policies;
2. Is consistent with or an improvement to the character of the neighborhood or zone;
3. Provides adequate consideration of and measures to address any potential adverse effects on surrounding properties such as, but not limited to, traffic, vehicular and pedestrian safety, noise, visual and scale, and lighting.
With regard to cases of granting exceptions to the strict application of development standards, the following additional finding shall be made:
4. While site characteristics or existing improvements make strict adherence to the zoning regulations impractical or infeasible, or the project nonetheless conforms with the intent of these regulations.
B. Failure to Make Findings. The director shall deny the application if any one or more of the required findings cannot be made. (Ord. 1705 § 68, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
In approving a director’s action application, the director may impose conditions deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the approval would be in compliance with the findings required by Section 17.108.040 (Required Findings). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The purpose of this chapter is to authorize the director to act on certain applications via a public hearing as described in this chapter. Notwithstanding these provisions, the director shall have the authority to refer any application subject to this chapter to the planning commission for consideration. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Repealed by Ord. 1705. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Application Filing. An application for a director’s hearing shall be filed and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.104 (Permit Application Filing and Processing). The application shall include the information and materials specified in the department handout for director’s hearing applications, together with the required fee. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide evidence in support of the findings required by Section 17.109.040 (Required Findings).
B. Application Review. Each application for a director’s hearing shall be reviewed to ensure that the application is consistent with the purpose of this chapter and applicable development standards and regulations of these zoning regulations, and any adopted design guidelines and policies that may apply.
1. A director’s hearing shall be scheduled when the department receives a complete application package, including the required information and materials specified in the department handout and related additional information required to conduct a thorough review of the proposed project or request.
2. Upon receipt of a complete application, the director shall review the location, design, configuration, and the effect of the proposed project or action on adjacent properties, streets, and alleys by comparing the application materials to applicable standards in these zoning regulations and determining whether the findings required in Section 17.109.040 (Required Findings) can be made.
C. On-Site Inspection. An application for a director’s hearing may require that the director perform an on-site inspection of the subject parcel before confirming that the request complies with all of the applicable criteria and provisions identified in this chapter.
D. Public Hearing.
1. Before acting on any director’s hearing application, the director shall hold a hearing at which information and arguments may be presented. Notice of the time, date, place, and purpose of the hearing shall be given in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
2. Decisions of the director shall be rendered in writing within ten days of the final hearing at which action is taken. The decision shall state the conditions of approval, if any, or the reasons for denial. The director’s decision shall be final unless appealed. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Required Findings. The director may approve a director’s hearing application only after first making all of the following findings. The proposed application and project:
1. Are consistent with the intent of these zoning regulations and applicable general plan policies;
2. Are consistent with or an improvement to the character of the neighborhood or zone;
3. Provide adequate consideration of and measures to address any potential adverse effects on surrounding properties such as, but not limited to, traffic, vehicular and pedestrian safety, noise, visual and scale, and lighting.
B. Failure to Make Findings. The director shall deny the application if any one or more of the required findings cannot be made. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
In approving a director’s hearing application, the director may impose conditions deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the approval would be in compliance with the findings required by Section 17.109.040 (Required Findings). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The purpose of this chapter is to provide two distinct procedures for reviewing land uses that may be appropriate in the applicable zone, but whose effects on a site and its surroundings cannot be determined without discretionary review and consideration of the site context. Use permits allow flexibility in providing for, regulating, or preventing particular uses so they will be compatible with existing or desired conditions in their neighborhoods or zones. Use permit approval is required for certain uses so that their detrimental effects can be reduced or avoided and potential conflicts in land use can be prevented.
Where the term “use permit” is used in this chapter, it shall mean and encompass minor use permit and conditional use permit. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
An application for a minor use permit or conditional use permit shall be filed and processed in compliance with Chapter 17.104 (Permit Application Filing and Processing). It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide evidence in support of the findings required by Section 17.110.070 (Required Findings). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Hearing, Decision, and Referral.
1. Before acting on any minor use permit application, the director shall hold a hearing at which information and arguments may be presented. Notice of the time, date, place, and purpose of the hearing shall be given in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
2. Decisions of the director shall be rendered in writing within ten days of the final hearing at which action is taken. The decision shall state the conditions of approval, if any, or the reasons for denial. The director’s decision shall be final unless appealed.
3. At his or her discretion, the director may refer a minor use permit to the planning commission when he/she determines the application involves a major policy issue or public controversy that would be resolved more suitably by the planning commission. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Hearing and Decision.
1. Before acting on any use permit application, the planning commission shall hold a public hearing conducted according to its procedure. Notice of the time, date, place, and purpose of the hearing shall be given in compliance with Chapter 17.122 (Public Notices and Hearings).
2. Decisions of the planning commission shall be rendered in writing within ten days of the final hearing at which action is taken. The decision shall state the conditions of approval, if any, or the reasons for denial. The planning commission’s decision shall be final unless appealed.
3. When a conditional use permit is before the planning commission, the planning commission may act to impose additional or relax any property development standards capable of being so altered under relevant sections of these regulations. The intent of this provision is to enable the planning commission to deal with various aspects of project design in a comprehensive way, without postponement of action on a project for separate hearings. Conditional use permit findings and procedures shall apply as provided in relevant sections of these regulations. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Conditions Allowed. Conditions imposed by the director, planning commission, or council may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Modification or limitation to activities, including times and types of operations;
2. Special yards or open spaces;
3. Fences, walls, or landscape screens;
4. Provision and arrangement of parking and vehicular and pedestrian circulation;
5. On-site or off-site street, sidewalk or utility improvements, and maintenance agreements;
6. Noise generation and attenuation;
7. Dedication of right-of-way or easements or access rights;
8. Arrangement of buildings and use areas on the site;
9. Special hazard reduction measures, such as slope planting;
10. Minimum site area;
11. Other conditions which may be found necessary to address unusual site conditions;
12. Establishment of an expiration date, after which the use must cease at that site;
13. Recycling and solid waste plans.
B. Limitation. Conditions may not be imposed that restrict the use to a specific person or group. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
In deciding whether a proposal is acceptable at a given location, the director, planning commission, and council shall consider whether the proposal could be established and maintained without jeopardy to persons or property within or adjacent to the proposed site and without damage to the resources of the site and its surroundings. Appropriate criteria may be found in the following sources, without limitation:
A. General plan elements (such as land use, circulation, housing, noise, seismic safety, public safety, open space and conservation);
B. Specific plans and special studies;
C. Community design guidelines;
D. Compliance with applicable environmental mitigation measures; and
E. Standards and recommendations of agencies commenting on environmental documents for the proposal or for similar projects. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. In order to grant a minor use permit or conditional use permit, the director or planning commission, or on appeal, the council, shall be required to make the following findings:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan;
2. The proposed use is allowed or conditionally allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of these zoning regulations and the municipal code;
3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity;
4. The site is physically suitable in terms of:
a. Its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use;
b. Traffic generation and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access;
c. Public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.); and
d. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.).
5. The establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use.
B. The director, planning commission, or council may deny the proposal or attach conditions as deemed necessary to secure the purposes of these regulations. Actions on minor use permits and conditional use permits shall be justified by written findings, based on substantial evidence in view of the whole record. (Ord. 1705 § 70, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. The modification or addition to a use requiring use permit approval shall itself be subject to use permit approval. The director shall determine when such an addition or change is of such a minor or incidental nature that the intent of these regulations can be met without further use permit control.
B. Any conditions established pursuant to these regulations shall be met before the use is established, except that the director, planning commission or, on appeal, the council, may establish a schedule for certain conditions to be met after establishment of the use. Continuance of the use shall then be contingent on complying with the schedule for meeting applicable conditions. (Ord. 1705 § 71, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A minor use permit or conditional use permit approved in compliance with the provisions of this chapter shall run with the land and continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the business, parcel, service, structure, or use that was the subject of the permit application in the same area, configuration, and manner as it was originally approved in compliance with this chapter. If the operation of the use for which the use permit was issued ceases for a continuous period of one year, the provisions of this section shall not apply, and a new application shall be required for any new owner or operator. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The reasonable accommodation provisions allow for flexibility in the application of regulations and procedures to ensure equal access to housing. The provisions set forth in this chapter provide a procedure under which a disabled person may request a reasonable accommodation in the application of zoning requirements. This chapter is based on requirements of the federal and state fair housing laws and is designed to eliminate barriers to housing opportunities. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Request. A request for reasonable accommodation in the application of land use and zoning regulations may be made by a disabled person, his or her representative, or a developer or provider of housing for individuals with disabilities. A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the siting, development, and use of housing or housing related facilities that would eliminate regulatory barriers. A reasonable accommodation cannot waive a requirement for a minor use permit or conditional use permit when otherwise required or result in approval of uses otherwise prohibited by the city’s land use and zoning regulations.
B. Assistance. If an applicant needs assistance in making the request, the planning division will endeavor to provide the assistance necessary to ensure that the process is available to the applicant.
C. Balancing Rights and Requirements. The city will attempt to balance the privacy rights and reasonable request of an applicant for confidentiality with the land use requirements for notice and public hearing, factual findings, and rights to appeal in the city’s request for information, considering an application, preparing written findings, and maintaining records for a request for reasonable accommodation. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Whenever a request for reasonable accommodation is submitted for consideration, as a part of the application, sufficient information shall be submitted to the community development department to determine whether the reasonable accommodation request complies with the provisions of this chapter. In addition to the required director’s action application checklist items, the application shall include the following:
A. The basis for the claim that the individual is considered disabled under the fair housing laws. Identification and description of the disability which is the basis for the request for accommodation, including current, written medical certification, and description of disability and its effects on the person’s medical, physical, or mental limitations.
B. The rule, policy, practice, and/or procedure of the city for which the request for accommodation is being made, including the zoning code regulation from which reasonable accommodation is being requested.
C. Type of accommodation sought.
D. The reason(s) why the accommodation is reasonable and necessary for the needs of the disabled person(s). Where appropriate, include a summary of any potential means and alternatives considered in evaluating the need for the accommodation. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Director’s Action. Requests for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the director if no approval is sought other than the request for reasonable accommodation. The director may refer the matter to any advisory commission or committee, as appropriate and authorized by these zoning regulations.
B. Other Review Authority. Requests for reasonable accommodation submitted for concurrent review with another discretionary land use application shall be reviewed by the authority responsible for reviewing the other application. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
Conditions imposed by the director or other review authority may include, but are not limited to, the following:
A. Inspection of the property periodically, as specified, to verify compliance with this chapter and any conditions of approval.
B. Removal of the improvements, where removal would not constitute an unreasonable financial burden, when the need for which the accommodation was granted no longer exists.
C. Time limits and/or expiration of the approval if the need for which the accommodation was granted no longer exists.
D. Recordation of a deed restriction requiring removal of the accommodating feature once the need for it no longer exists.
E. Measures to reduce the impact on surrounding uses.
F. Measures in consideration of the physical attributes of the property and structures.
G. Other reasonable accommodations that may provide an equivalent level of benefit and/or that will not result in an encroachment into required setbacks, exceedance of maximum height, lot coverage, or floor area ratio requirements specified for the zone.
H. Other conditions necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The approval of a reasonable accommodation shall require that the director or other review authority first find that:
A. The housing will be used by a disabled person;
B. The requested accommodation is necessary to make housing available to a disabled person;
C. The requested accommodation would not pose an undue financial or administrative burden on the city; and
D. The requested accommodation would not require a fundamental alteration in the nature of a city program or law, including but not limited to land use and zoning. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A modification approved under this chapter is considered a personal accommodation for the individual applicant and does not run with the land. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The director shall administer and interpret these requirements, subject to the applicable codes and city procedures. Decisions of the director or other review authority are appealable subject to the zoning regulations appeal provisions (Chapter 17.126). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to allow for those short-term and intermittent activities set forth in Section 17.86.260 (Temporary and Intermittent Uses) that would be compatible with adjacent and surrounding uses when conducted in compliance with this chapter.
B. Applicability. Those uses identified in Section 17.86.260 (Temporary and Intermittent Uses) shall require a temporary use permit pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. The following temporary uses are exempt from the requirement for a temporary use permit:
1. On-site contractor’s construction/storage uses in conjunction with an approved construction project on the same site.
2. Emergency public health and safety facilities and uses, as determined by the director.
3. Garage and yard sales involving the sale of personal property conducted in a residential zone consistent with Section 17.86.190(C) (Garage and Yard Sales). (Ord. 1705 § 72, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. An application shall be in the form prescribed by the director, shall state the precise nature of proposed temporary or intermittent use, and shall be accompanied by any required fees.
B. The application shall be filed with the department at least thirty days before the date that the proposed temporary use is scheduled to take place.
C. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to establish evidence in support of the findings required by Section 17.113.030 (Findings).
D. Following receipt of a completed application, the director shall investigate the facts necessary for action consistent with the purpose of this chapter.
E. The director, through a director’s action, may approve a temporary use permit, deny the application, or defer action and refer to the application to the planning commission for review and final decision.
F. Given the abbreviated time frame between the action of the director on an application for conducting a proposed temporary or intermittent use and the date for such use, the action by the director may be appealed to the city manager. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
The director may approve a temporary use permit application, with or without conditions, only if he/she first makes all of the following findings:
A. The operation of the requested temporary use at the location proposed, within the time period specified, and subject to appropriate conditions will not jeopardize, endanger, or otherwise constitute a menace to the public convenience, health, safety, or general welfare;
B. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the temporary use without material detriment to the use and enjoyment of other properties located adjacent to and in the vicinity of the site;
C. The proposed site is adequately served by streets or highways having sufficient width and improvements to accommodate the kind and quantity of traffic that the temporary use will or could reasonably be expected to generate;
D. Adequate temporary parking to accommodate vehicular traffic to be generated by the temporary use will be available either on site or at alternate locations acceptable to the director;
E. The location for the proposed temporary use would not adversely interfere with existing uses on the subject property, and would not impede or adversely impact pedestrian access ways and/or vehicular circulation patterns; and
F. The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions imposed in the approval of the temporary use permit. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. May Impose Conditions. In approving a temporary use permit application, the director may impose conditions that are deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the permit would be in compliance with this chapter, Section 17.86.260 (Temporary and Intermittent Uses), and the findings required by Section 17.113.030 (Findings).
B. Appropriate Conditions. The conditions may address any pertinent factors affecting the operation of the temporary activity or use, and may include the following:
1. Fixed Period of Time. Unless otherwise stated in the permit, a provision for a fixed period of time.
2. Operating Hours and Days. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the temporary use.
3. Temporary Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation. Provision for adequate temporary pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking facilities (including vehicular ingress and egress), and public transportation, if applicable.
4. Regulation of Nuisance Factors. Regulation of nuisance factors including prevention of glare or direct illumination on adjacent parcels, dirt, dust, gases, heat, noise, odors, smoke, trash, and vibration.
5. Regulation of Temporary Structures. Regulation of temporary structures and facilities, including their number, placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards.
6. Sanitary and Medical Facilities. Provision for sanitary and medical facilities, as appropriate.
7. Waste Collection, Recycling, and/or Disposal. Provision for solid, hazardous, and toxic waste collection, recycling, and/or disposal.
8. Police/Security and Safety Measures. Provision for police/security and safety measures, as appropriate.
9. Outdoor Lighting. Regulation of outdoor lighting.
10. Special Sales. If special sales are proposed, limitations on the location where sales may occur, the number of vendors, and the scope of goods to be sold.
11. Food Sales. If food sales are involved, obtainment of all appropriate health permits.
12. Performance Bond. Submission of a performance bond or other security measures satisfactory to the director to ensure that any temporary structures and facilities used will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the activity and that the property will be restored to its former condition, or better, as determined by the director.
13. Other Conditions. Other conditions that would ensure the operation of the proposed temporary use in an orderly and efficient manner, and in full compliance with the purpose of this section. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. Purpose. The variance procedure is intended to allow minor relaxation of certain standards by the director that would otherwise prevent a property from being used in the same manner as other, similar property, where the intent of these regulations is not compromised by such minor relaxation.
B. Applicability. Yards, height limits, lot coverage, floor area ratio, and parking space requirements may be relaxed. No variance to land use regulations or density standards may be granted. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
A. An application shall be in the form prescribed by the director, shall state the precise nature of the grounds for the variance sought, and shall be accompanied by any required fees.
B. Notification requirements and actions of the director shall be as provided for minor use permits in Section 17.110.030 (Procedure—Minor Use Permit). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide evidence in support of the findings required in Section 17.114.040 (Required Findings). (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)
In order to approve a variance, the director or, on appeal, the planning commission or council, must make each of the following findings:
A. That there are circumstances applying to the site, such as size, shape, or topography, which do not apply generally to land in the vicinity with the same zoning;
B. That the variance will not be in conflict with the purpose and intent of these zoning regulations, the general plan, or any applicable specific plan;
C. That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege—an entitlement inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning; and
D. That the variance will not adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working on the site or in the vicinity. (Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018)