68 Amendments
The Sangamon County Board may from time to time, in the interest of promoting the public health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare, conserving the values of property throughout the county, and avoiding or lessening congestion in the public streets and highways, amend the regulations and the districts created in the manner set forth in this chapter. With respect to amendments relating to the agricultural district, the Sangamon County Board shall utilize the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment System (LESA) set out in Section 17.68.091 to this Chapter 17.68.
(Res. 12 §5(part), May 8, 2001; Res. 1-1 §7(G) (1), November 16, 1982)
A petition for an amendment may be filed by an interested property owner, contract purchaser, county board member or the executive director of the Springfield-Sangamon County regional planning commission. In cases where a contract purchaser is the petitioner, the contract purchaser shall provide a letter from the owner, which states that the owner is aware of the petition and the request(s) contained therein, that the petitioner is indeed a contract purchaser, and that the owner approves of the action. Such petitions for amendments shall be filed in writing and shall contain such information as the zoning board of appeals may require by rule.
(Res. 1-1 §7(G) (2), November 16, 1982)
A petition for an amendment shall be filed with the zoning administrator at least twenty (20) days prior to the date of the hearing. The zoning administrator shall forward such petition to the Sangamon County zoning board of appeals in accordance with the applicable statutes of the state of Illinois and forward a copy of the petition to the Springfield-Sangamon County regional planning commission. The petition shall include a list of adjacent property owners, including owners across the street and across the alley, as well as their mailing address. A map shall also be submitted which shows the boundaries of the property, the location of existing and/or proposed structures in relation to lot lines and adjacent land uses.
(Res. 1-1 §7(G)(3), November 16, 1982)
(Res. 7 §7(part), April 14, 1987; Res. 16a §14(part), November 19, 1985; Res. 1-1 §7(G) (4), November 16, 1982)
Prior to a public hearing to be held before the Zoning Board of Appeals on each and every proposed amendment to the regulations and the districts created by this title, the staff of the Regional Planning Commission shall study the proposed amendment and transmit to the Zoning Board of Appeals a written report setting forth pertinent planning facts and summary statements of the anticipated effect the proposed amendment may have on the particular locality and the region. The report will be of an advisory nature and may suggest any one of the following conclusions:
(Res. 9 Exh. A (part), July 8, 2008; Res. 1-1 § 7(G)(5), November 16, 1982)
(Res. 1-1 § 7(G)(6), November 16, 1982)
The Sangamon County board shall act on a proposed amendment only when it has received a written report and recommendation from the zoning board of appeals on the proposed amendment. In the event that such report does not recommend passage of the proposed amendment, such amendment shall not be passed except by the favorable vote of a majority of all the members of the county board.
(Res. 1-1 § 7(G)(7)(a), November 16, 1982)
After any application for an amendment has been acted upon by the county board, another application requesting the same relief shall not be accepted or considered by the county board for a period of six (6) months after such action, unless the application shows that there has been a substantial change in circumstances as determined by the zoning board of appeals, since such action.
(Res. 1-1 §7(G)(7)(b), November 16, 1982; Res. 9, February 13, 1973)
In case of written protest filed with the county clerk against any proposed amendment, signed and acknowledged by the owners of twenty (20) percent of the frontage proposed to be altered, or by the owners of twenty (20) percent of the frontage immediately adjoining or across an alley therefrom, or by the owners of twenty (20) percent of the frontage directly opposite the frontage proposed to be altered, or by resolution of the corporate authorities of a zoned municipality where the land affected, either by map amendment or text amendment, lies within one and one-half miles of the limits of the municipality, such amendment shall not be passed except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (¾) of all members of the county board. In such cases, a copy of the written protest or resolution shall be served by the protestor or protestors on the applicant for the proposed amendment and a copy upon the applicant's attorney, if any, by certified mail at the address of such applicant and attorney shown in the application for the proposed amendment. In order to perfect its protest, the protestor(s) or municipality shall file its protest or resolution with the Sangamon County clerk and the Sangamon County zoning administrator at least twenty-four (24) hours before the county board meeting.
(Res. 1-1 §7(G)(7)(c), November 16, 1982; Res. 9, February 13, 1973)
Agricultural Land Evaluation
| Soil # | Mapping Unit Description | Productivity Index | Capability Class | Prime/Important Farmland |
| Group #1 - Total Acres: 166,030 - Average Productivity Index: 159 | ||||
| 36A | Tama | 150 | 1 | Prime |
| 43 | Pave | 160 | 1 | Prime |
| 198 | Elburn | 155 | 1 | Prime |
| Group #2 - Total Acres: 131,695 - Average Productivity Index: 151 | ||||
| 36B | Tama | 148 | 2E | Prime |
| 73 | Ross | 145 | 1 | Prime |
| 77 | Huntsville | 146 | 1 | Prime* |
| 199A | Plano | 145 | 1 | Prime |
| 68 | Sable | 155 | 2W | Prime |
| 451 | Lawson | 155 | 2W | Prime* |
| Group #3 - Total Acres: 27,730 - Average Productivity Index: 143 | ||||
| 134A | Camden | 120 | 1 | Prime |
| 36C2 | Tama | 143 | 2E | Prime |
| 199B | Plano | 144 | 2E | Prime |
| 284 | Tice | 145 | 2W | Prime* |
| Group #4 - Total Acres: 88,440 - Average Productivity Index: 138 | ||||
| 50 | Virden | 135 | 2W | Prime |
| 67 | Harpster | 135 | 2W | Prime* |
| 74 | Radford | 140 | 2W | Prime* |
| 107 | Sawmill | 140 | 2W | Prime |
| 138 | Shiloh | 135 | 2W | Prime |
| 144 | Hartsburg | 140 | 2W | Prime |
| 684B | Broadwell | 139 | 2E | Prime |
| Group #5 - Total Acres: 63,995 - Average Productivity Index: 122 | ||||
| 17 | Keomah | 125 | 2W | Prime |
| 45 | Denny | 110 | 2W | Prime |
| 112 | Cowden | 120 | 2W | Prime |
| 134B | Camden | 119 | 2E | Prime |
| 242 | Kendall | 130 | 2W | Prime |
| 249 | Edinburg | 130 | 2W | Prime |
| 259C | Assumption | 123 | 2E | Prime |
| 280B | Fayette | 125 | 2E | Prime |
| 567C | Elkhart | 123 | 2E | Prime |
| 685B | Middletown | 104 | 2E | Prime |
| 131C | Alvin | 103 | 3E | Prime |
| 131D | Alvin | 101 | 3E | Prime |
| 208 | Sexton | 115 | 3W | Prime |
| 684C2 | Broadwell | 133 | 2E | Prime |
| Group #6 - Total Acres: 37,680 - Average Productivity Index: 114 | ||||
| 19C2 | Sylvan | 105 | 2E | Important |
| 134C2 | Camden | 115 | 2E | Important |
| 280C2 | Fayette | 119 | 2E | Important |
| 685C2 | Middletown | 105 | 2E | Important |
| 19D | Sylvan | 106 | 3E | Important |
| 36D2 | Tama | 140 | 3E | Important |
| 119D | Elco | 102 | 3E | Important |
| 250D2 | Assumption | 113 | 3E | Important |
| 80D2 | Fayette | 113 | 3E | Important |
| 567D2 | Elkhart | 113 | 3E | Important |
| Group #7 - Total Acres: 13,750 - Average Productivity Index: 88 | ||||
| 8D3 | Hickory | 64 | 4E | Important |
| 8E | Hickory | 71 | 4E | Important |
| 19D3 | Sylvan | 95 | 4E | Important |
| 119D3 | Elco | 95 | 4E | Important |
| 131E2 | Alvin | 84 | 4E | Important |
| 134D3 | Camden | 102 | 4E | Important |
| 212D3 | Thebes | 87 | 4E | Important |
| 280D3 | Fayette | 104 | 4E | Important |
| Group #8 - Total Acres: 9,865 - Average Productivity Index: 82 | ||||
| 8E3 | Hickory | 63 | 7E | Non-prime |
| 19E3 | Sylvan | 87 | 7E | Non-prime |
| 119E3 | Elco | 87 | 0 | Non-prime |
| Group #9 - Total Acres: 8,050 - Average Productivity Index: 0 | ||||
| 8F | Hickory | 0 | 7E | Non-prime |
| 551F | Gosport | 0 | 7E | Non-prime |
| 801 | Orthents | 0 | 0 | Non-prime |
| *Subject to flooding. | ||||
Relative Point Value for Soil Groups
| Group # | Relative Value |
| 1 | 100 |
| 2 | 95 |
| 3 | 90 |
| 4 | 87 |
| 5 | 77 |
| 6 | 72 |
| 7 | 55 |
| 8 | 52 |
| 9 | 0 |
Parcel # _____________________ Zoning Case # _____________________
LAND EVALUATION AND SITE ASSESSMENT
Part 1: Site Assessment
| Available Points | Points | |
AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LAND WITHIN .5 MILE | 20 10 5 0 | |
CONTIGUOUS AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LAND | 20 10 5 0 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SITE AGRICULTURAL/RURAL | 10 5 0 | |
| COUNTY SECTOR Rural 0.5 mile from incorporated area Incorporated area | 20 10 0 | |
SOIL WITH SEVERE RESTRICTIONS FOR ON-SITE WASTE DISPOSAL | 20 10 5 0 | |
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED USE | 15 5 0 | |
| IMPACT ON UNIQUE HISTORICAL/CULTURAL FEATURES Negative impact No impact | 10 0 | |
| CONDITION OF ROAD unpaved, <40' ROW or <16' pavement 16'-18' pavement, 40' ROW 18'-20' pavement, 40' ROW >20' pavement, 40' ROW or County or State Highway | 20 15 10 0 | |
| AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SEWER Not available Sewer over 600'-1200' away Private central sewage system Sewer 600' or less away and available | 15 8 5 0 | |
| AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC WATER Not available 1,000-1,500' away Less than 1,000' away Public water available at site | 20 15 5 0 | |
| DISTANCE FROM RESPONDING FIREHOUSE Not in fire protection district More than 5 miles or fire protection by assignment 2.6-5 miles 0-2.5 miles | 20 10 5 0 | |
| DRIVING TIME TO HIGH SCHOOL Over 30 minutes 15-30 minutes Less than 15 minutes | 10 5 0 | |
| SITE ASSESSMENT TOTAL | 0 |
Part 2: Agricultural Land Evaluation (Based of Sangamon County Soil Survey)
| Soil | Name | Type | % | Relative Value | Points |
| 8D3 | Hickory | Important | 55 | ||
| 8E | Hickory | Important | 55 | ||
| 8E3 | Hickory | Non-prime | 52 | ||
| 8F | Hickory | Non-prime | 0 | ||
| 17 | Keomah | Prime | 77 | ||
| 19C2 | Slyvan | Important | 72 | ||
| 19D | Slyvan | Important | 72 | ||
| 19D3 | Slyvan | Important | 55 | ||
| 19E3 | Slyvan | Non-prime | 52 | ||
| 36A | Tama | Prime | 100 | ||
| 36B | Tama | Prime | 95 | ||
| 36C2 | Tama | Prime | 90 | ||
| 36D2 | Tama | Important | 72 | ||
| 43 | Ipava | Prime | 100 | ||
| 45 | Denny | Prime | 77 | ||
| 50 | Virden | Prime | 87 | ||
| 67 | Harpster | Prime | 87 | ||
| 68 | Sable | Prime | 95 | ||
| 73 | Ross | Prime | 95 | ||
| 74 | Radford | Prime* | 87 | ||
| 77 | Huntsville | Prime* | 95 | ||
| 107 | Sawmill | Prime* | 87 | ||
| 112 | Cowden | Prime | 77 | ||
| 119D | Elco | Important | 72 | ||
| 119D3 | Elco | Important | 52 | ||
| 119E3 | Elco | Non-prime | 52 | ||
| 131C | Alvin | Prime | 77 | ||
| 131D | Alvin | Prime | 77 | ||
| 131E2 | Alvin | Important | 55 | ||
| 134A | Camden | Prime | 90 | ||
| 134B | Camden | Prime | 77 | ||
| 134C2 | Camden | Important | 72 | ||
| 134D3 | Camden | Important | 55 | ||
| 138 | Shiloh | Prime | 87 | ||
| 198 | Elburn | Prime | 100 | ||
| 199A | Plano | Prime | 95 | ||
| 199B | Plano | Prime | 90 | ||
| 208 | Sexton | Prime | 77 | ||
| 212D3 | Thebes | Important | 55 | ||
| 242 | Kendall | Prime | 77 | ||
| 244 | Hartsburg | Prime | 87 | ||
| 249 | Edinburg | Prime | 77 | ||
| 259C | Assumption | Prime | 77 | ||
| 259D2 | Assumption | Important | 72 | ||
| 280B | Fayette | Prime | 77 | ||
| 280C2 | Fayette | Important | 72 | ||
| 280D2 | Fayette | Important | 72 | ||
| 280D3 | Fayette | Important | 55 | ||
| 284 | Tice | Prime* | 90 | ||
| 451 | Lawson | Prime* | 95 | ||
| 551F | Gosport | Non-prime | 0 | ||
| 567C | Elkhart | Prime | 77 | ||
| 567D2 | Elkhart | Important | 72 | ||
| 684B | Broadwell | Prime | 87 | ||
| 684C2 | Broadwell | Prime | 77 | ||
| 685B | Middletown | Prime | 77 | ||
| 685C2 | Middletown | Important | 72 | ||
| 801 | Orthents | Non-prime | 0 | ||
| *subject to flooding | |||||
| AGRICULTURAL LAND EVALUATION TOTAL | |||||
| GRAND TOTAL | |||||
Fewer than 150 points shall be deemed acceptable for non-agricultural development.
From 150 - 175 points is considered marginal requiring mitigating factors for non-ag development.
Greater than 175 points shall be considered suitable for agricultural use only.
SUITABILITY
| Subdivision | Agriculture |
| 0 points | 300 Points |
For purposes of this evaluation for suitability of non-agricultural development:
(Res. 12, Exh. A, 11-12-2003; Res. 13 Exh. A (part), June 11, 2002; Res. 12-1 Ex. C § 8, May 8, 2001)
68 Amendments
The Sangamon County Board may from time to time, in the interest of promoting the public health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare, conserving the values of property throughout the county, and avoiding or lessening congestion in the public streets and highways, amend the regulations and the districts created in the manner set forth in this chapter. With respect to amendments relating to the agricultural district, the Sangamon County Board shall utilize the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment System (LESA) set out in Section 17.68.091 to this Chapter 17.68.
(Res. 12 §5(part), May 8, 2001; Res. 1-1 §7(G) (1), November 16, 1982)
A petition for an amendment may be filed by an interested property owner, contract purchaser, county board member or the executive director of the Springfield-Sangamon County regional planning commission. In cases where a contract purchaser is the petitioner, the contract purchaser shall provide a letter from the owner, which states that the owner is aware of the petition and the request(s) contained therein, that the petitioner is indeed a contract purchaser, and that the owner approves of the action. Such petitions for amendments shall be filed in writing and shall contain such information as the zoning board of appeals may require by rule.
(Res. 1-1 §7(G) (2), November 16, 1982)
A petition for an amendment shall be filed with the zoning administrator at least twenty (20) days prior to the date of the hearing. The zoning administrator shall forward such petition to the Sangamon County zoning board of appeals in accordance with the applicable statutes of the state of Illinois and forward a copy of the petition to the Springfield-Sangamon County regional planning commission. The petition shall include a list of adjacent property owners, including owners across the street and across the alley, as well as their mailing address. A map shall also be submitted which shows the boundaries of the property, the location of existing and/or proposed structures in relation to lot lines and adjacent land uses.
(Res. 1-1 §7(G)(3), November 16, 1982)
(Res. 7 §7(part), April 14, 1987; Res. 16a §14(part), November 19, 1985; Res. 1-1 §7(G) (4), November 16, 1982)
Prior to a public hearing to be held before the Zoning Board of Appeals on each and every proposed amendment to the regulations and the districts created by this title, the staff of the Regional Planning Commission shall study the proposed amendment and transmit to the Zoning Board of Appeals a written report setting forth pertinent planning facts and summary statements of the anticipated effect the proposed amendment may have on the particular locality and the region. The report will be of an advisory nature and may suggest any one of the following conclusions:
(Res. 9 Exh. A (part), July 8, 2008; Res. 1-1 § 7(G)(5), November 16, 1982)
(Res. 1-1 § 7(G)(6), November 16, 1982)
The Sangamon County board shall act on a proposed amendment only when it has received a written report and recommendation from the zoning board of appeals on the proposed amendment. In the event that such report does not recommend passage of the proposed amendment, such amendment shall not be passed except by the favorable vote of a majority of all the members of the county board.
(Res. 1-1 § 7(G)(7)(a), November 16, 1982)
After any application for an amendment has been acted upon by the county board, another application requesting the same relief shall not be accepted or considered by the county board for a period of six (6) months after such action, unless the application shows that there has been a substantial change in circumstances as determined by the zoning board of appeals, since such action.
(Res. 1-1 §7(G)(7)(b), November 16, 1982; Res. 9, February 13, 1973)
In case of written protest filed with the county clerk against any proposed amendment, signed and acknowledged by the owners of twenty (20) percent of the frontage proposed to be altered, or by the owners of twenty (20) percent of the frontage immediately adjoining or across an alley therefrom, or by the owners of twenty (20) percent of the frontage directly opposite the frontage proposed to be altered, or by resolution of the corporate authorities of a zoned municipality where the land affected, either by map amendment or text amendment, lies within one and one-half miles of the limits of the municipality, such amendment shall not be passed except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (¾) of all members of the county board. In such cases, a copy of the written protest or resolution shall be served by the protestor or protestors on the applicant for the proposed amendment and a copy upon the applicant's attorney, if any, by certified mail at the address of such applicant and attorney shown in the application for the proposed amendment. In order to perfect its protest, the protestor(s) or municipality shall file its protest or resolution with the Sangamon County clerk and the Sangamon County zoning administrator at least twenty-four (24) hours before the county board meeting.
(Res. 1-1 §7(G)(7)(c), November 16, 1982; Res. 9, February 13, 1973)
Agricultural Land Evaluation
| Soil # | Mapping Unit Description | Productivity Index | Capability Class | Prime/Important Farmland |
| Group #1 - Total Acres: 166,030 - Average Productivity Index: 159 | ||||
| 36A | Tama | 150 | 1 | Prime |
| 43 | Pave | 160 | 1 | Prime |
| 198 | Elburn | 155 | 1 | Prime |
| Group #2 - Total Acres: 131,695 - Average Productivity Index: 151 | ||||
| 36B | Tama | 148 | 2E | Prime |
| 73 | Ross | 145 | 1 | Prime |
| 77 | Huntsville | 146 | 1 | Prime* |
| 199A | Plano | 145 | 1 | Prime |
| 68 | Sable | 155 | 2W | Prime |
| 451 | Lawson | 155 | 2W | Prime* |
| Group #3 - Total Acres: 27,730 - Average Productivity Index: 143 | ||||
| 134A | Camden | 120 | 1 | Prime |
| 36C2 | Tama | 143 | 2E | Prime |
| 199B | Plano | 144 | 2E | Prime |
| 284 | Tice | 145 | 2W | Prime* |
| Group #4 - Total Acres: 88,440 - Average Productivity Index: 138 | ||||
| 50 | Virden | 135 | 2W | Prime |
| 67 | Harpster | 135 | 2W | Prime* |
| 74 | Radford | 140 | 2W | Prime* |
| 107 | Sawmill | 140 | 2W | Prime |
| 138 | Shiloh | 135 | 2W | Prime |
| 144 | Hartsburg | 140 | 2W | Prime |
| 684B | Broadwell | 139 | 2E | Prime |
| Group #5 - Total Acres: 63,995 - Average Productivity Index: 122 | ||||
| 17 | Keomah | 125 | 2W | Prime |
| 45 | Denny | 110 | 2W | Prime |
| 112 | Cowden | 120 | 2W | Prime |
| 134B | Camden | 119 | 2E | Prime |
| 242 | Kendall | 130 | 2W | Prime |
| 249 | Edinburg | 130 | 2W | Prime |
| 259C | Assumption | 123 | 2E | Prime |
| 280B | Fayette | 125 | 2E | Prime |
| 567C | Elkhart | 123 | 2E | Prime |
| 685B | Middletown | 104 | 2E | Prime |
| 131C | Alvin | 103 | 3E | Prime |
| 131D | Alvin | 101 | 3E | Prime |
| 208 | Sexton | 115 | 3W | Prime |
| 684C2 | Broadwell | 133 | 2E | Prime |
| Group #6 - Total Acres: 37,680 - Average Productivity Index: 114 | ||||
| 19C2 | Sylvan | 105 | 2E | Important |
| 134C2 | Camden | 115 | 2E | Important |
| 280C2 | Fayette | 119 | 2E | Important |
| 685C2 | Middletown | 105 | 2E | Important |
| 19D | Sylvan | 106 | 3E | Important |
| 36D2 | Tama | 140 | 3E | Important |
| 119D | Elco | 102 | 3E | Important |
| 250D2 | Assumption | 113 | 3E | Important |
| 80D2 | Fayette | 113 | 3E | Important |
| 567D2 | Elkhart | 113 | 3E | Important |
| Group #7 - Total Acres: 13,750 - Average Productivity Index: 88 | ||||
| 8D3 | Hickory | 64 | 4E | Important |
| 8E | Hickory | 71 | 4E | Important |
| 19D3 | Sylvan | 95 | 4E | Important |
| 119D3 | Elco | 95 | 4E | Important |
| 131E2 | Alvin | 84 | 4E | Important |
| 134D3 | Camden | 102 | 4E | Important |
| 212D3 | Thebes | 87 | 4E | Important |
| 280D3 | Fayette | 104 | 4E | Important |
| Group #8 - Total Acres: 9,865 - Average Productivity Index: 82 | ||||
| 8E3 | Hickory | 63 | 7E | Non-prime |
| 19E3 | Sylvan | 87 | 7E | Non-prime |
| 119E3 | Elco | 87 | 0 | Non-prime |
| Group #9 - Total Acres: 8,050 - Average Productivity Index: 0 | ||||
| 8F | Hickory | 0 | 7E | Non-prime |
| 551F | Gosport | 0 | 7E | Non-prime |
| 801 | Orthents | 0 | 0 | Non-prime |
| *Subject to flooding. | ||||
Relative Point Value for Soil Groups
| Group # | Relative Value |
| 1 | 100 |
| 2 | 95 |
| 3 | 90 |
| 4 | 87 |
| 5 | 77 |
| 6 | 72 |
| 7 | 55 |
| 8 | 52 |
| 9 | 0 |
Parcel # _____________________ Zoning Case # _____________________
LAND EVALUATION AND SITE ASSESSMENT
Part 1: Site Assessment
| Available Points | Points | |
AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LAND WITHIN .5 MILE | 20 10 5 0 | |
CONTIGUOUS AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LAND | 20 10 5 0 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SITE AGRICULTURAL/RURAL | 10 5 0 | |
| COUNTY SECTOR Rural 0.5 mile from incorporated area Incorporated area | 20 10 0 | |
SOIL WITH SEVERE RESTRICTIONS FOR ON-SITE WASTE DISPOSAL | 20 10 5 0 | |
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED USE | 15 5 0 | |
| IMPACT ON UNIQUE HISTORICAL/CULTURAL FEATURES Negative impact No impact | 10 0 | |
| CONDITION OF ROAD unpaved, <40' ROW or <16' pavement 16'-18' pavement, 40' ROW 18'-20' pavement, 40' ROW >20' pavement, 40' ROW or County or State Highway | 20 15 10 0 | |
| AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SEWER Not available Sewer over 600'-1200' away Private central sewage system Sewer 600' or less away and available | 15 8 5 0 | |
| AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC WATER Not available 1,000-1,500' away Less than 1,000' away Public water available at site | 20 15 5 0 | |
| DISTANCE FROM RESPONDING FIREHOUSE Not in fire protection district More than 5 miles or fire protection by assignment 2.6-5 miles 0-2.5 miles | 20 10 5 0 | |
| DRIVING TIME TO HIGH SCHOOL Over 30 minutes 15-30 minutes Less than 15 minutes | 10 5 0 | |
| SITE ASSESSMENT TOTAL | 0 |
Part 2: Agricultural Land Evaluation (Based of Sangamon County Soil Survey)
| Soil | Name | Type | % | Relative Value | Points |
| 8D3 | Hickory | Important | 55 | ||
| 8E | Hickory | Important | 55 | ||
| 8E3 | Hickory | Non-prime | 52 | ||
| 8F | Hickory | Non-prime | 0 | ||
| 17 | Keomah | Prime | 77 | ||
| 19C2 | Slyvan | Important | 72 | ||
| 19D | Slyvan | Important | 72 | ||
| 19D3 | Slyvan | Important | 55 | ||
| 19E3 | Slyvan | Non-prime | 52 | ||
| 36A | Tama | Prime | 100 | ||
| 36B | Tama | Prime | 95 | ||
| 36C2 | Tama | Prime | 90 | ||
| 36D2 | Tama | Important | 72 | ||
| 43 | Ipava | Prime | 100 | ||
| 45 | Denny | Prime | 77 | ||
| 50 | Virden | Prime | 87 | ||
| 67 | Harpster | Prime | 87 | ||
| 68 | Sable | Prime | 95 | ||
| 73 | Ross | Prime | 95 | ||
| 74 | Radford | Prime* | 87 | ||
| 77 | Huntsville | Prime* | 95 | ||
| 107 | Sawmill | Prime* | 87 | ||
| 112 | Cowden | Prime | 77 | ||
| 119D | Elco | Important | 72 | ||
| 119D3 | Elco | Important | 52 | ||
| 119E3 | Elco | Non-prime | 52 | ||
| 131C | Alvin | Prime | 77 | ||
| 131D | Alvin | Prime | 77 | ||
| 131E2 | Alvin | Important | 55 | ||
| 134A | Camden | Prime | 90 | ||
| 134B | Camden | Prime | 77 | ||
| 134C2 | Camden | Important | 72 | ||
| 134D3 | Camden | Important | 55 | ||
| 138 | Shiloh | Prime | 87 | ||
| 198 | Elburn | Prime | 100 | ||
| 199A | Plano | Prime | 95 | ||
| 199B | Plano | Prime | 90 | ||
| 208 | Sexton | Prime | 77 | ||
| 212D3 | Thebes | Important | 55 | ||
| 242 | Kendall | Prime | 77 | ||
| 244 | Hartsburg | Prime | 87 | ||
| 249 | Edinburg | Prime | 77 | ||
| 259C | Assumption | Prime | 77 | ||
| 259D2 | Assumption | Important | 72 | ||
| 280B | Fayette | Prime | 77 | ||
| 280C2 | Fayette | Important | 72 | ||
| 280D2 | Fayette | Important | 72 | ||
| 280D3 | Fayette | Important | 55 | ||
| 284 | Tice | Prime* | 90 | ||
| 451 | Lawson | Prime* | 95 | ||
| 551F | Gosport | Non-prime | 0 | ||
| 567C | Elkhart | Prime | 77 | ||
| 567D2 | Elkhart | Important | 72 | ||
| 684B | Broadwell | Prime | 87 | ||
| 684C2 | Broadwell | Prime | 77 | ||
| 685B | Middletown | Prime | 77 | ||
| 685C2 | Middletown | Important | 72 | ||
| 801 | Orthents | Non-prime | 0 | ||
| *subject to flooding | |||||
| AGRICULTURAL LAND EVALUATION TOTAL | |||||
| GRAND TOTAL | |||||
Fewer than 150 points shall be deemed acceptable for non-agricultural development.
From 150 - 175 points is considered marginal requiring mitigating factors for non-ag development.
Greater than 175 points shall be considered suitable for agricultural use only.
SUITABILITY
| Subdivision | Agriculture |
| 0 points | 300 Points |
For purposes of this evaluation for suitability of non-agricultural development:
(Res. 12, Exh. A, 11-12-2003; Res. 13 Exh. A (part), June 11, 2002; Res. 12-1 Ex. C § 8, May 8, 2001)