Zoneomics Logo
search icon

Shady Cove City Zoning Code

TYPES OF

APPLICATIONS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES

§ 154.375 PURPOSE.

   The purpose of this section is to establish standard decision-making procedures that will enable the city, the applicant and the public to reasonably review applications and participate in the local decision-making process in a timely and effective way.
(Ord. 225, passed 10-20-1994, § 6.1)

§ 154.376 DESCRIPTION OF PERMIT PROCEDURES.

   All land use and development permit applications, except building permits, shall be decided by using the procedures contained in this section. General procedures for all permits are contained in § 154.381. Specific procedures for certain types of permits are contained in §§ 154.377 through 154.380. The procedure "type" assigned to each permit governs the decision-making process for that permit. There are four types of permit/decision-making procedures: Type I, II, III and IV. These procedures are described in divisions (A) through (D) below. In addition, § 154.382 lists all of the city's land use and development applications and their required permit procedure(s).
   (A)   Type I procedure (ministerial). Type I decisions are made by a city official, or someone he or she officially designates, without public notice and without a public hearing. The Type I procedure is used when there are clear and objective approval criteria, and applying city standards and criteria requires no use of discretion. These decisions may be processed under Type III procedure, as provided in § 154.377.
   (B)   Type II procedure (administrative). Type II decisions are made by a city official with public notice and an opportunity for a public hearing. The appeal of a Type II decision is heard by the Planning Commission. These decisions may be processed under Type III procedure, as provided in § 154.378.
   (C)   Type III procedure (quasi-judicial). Type III decisions are made by the Planning Commission after a public hearing, with appeals reviewed by the City Council. Type III decisions generally use discretionary approval criteria.
   (D)   Type IV procedure (legislative). Type IV procedures apply to legislative matters. Legislative matters involve the creation, revision or large-scale implementation of public policy (e.g., adoption of land use regulations, zone changes and comprehensive plan amendments which apply to entire districts). Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions made by the City Council.
(Ord. 225, passed 10-20-1994, § 6.2; Am. Ord. 260, passed 4-21-2011)

§ 154.377 TYPE I PROCEDURE (MINISTERIAL).

   (A)   Application requirements.
      (1)   Application forms. Type I applications shall be made on forms provided by the city.
      (2)   Application requirements. Type I applications shall:
         (a)   Include the information requested on the application form;
         (b)   Address the criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; and
         (c)   Be filed with the required fee.
   (B)   Administrative decision requirements. The city's decision shall address all of the approval criteria. Based on the criteria and the facts contained within the record, the city shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the requested permit or action. A written record of the decision shall be provided to the applicant and kept on file at City Hall.
   (C)   Final decision. The decision shall be final on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The decision is the final decision of the city. It cannot be appealed to city officials.
   (D)   Effective date. The decision is effective the day after it is final.
   (E)   At the City Administrator’s discretion, a Type I review may be referred directly to the Planning Commission for review and approval, using the Type III procedure as provided in § 154.379.
(Ord. 225, passed 10-20-1994, § 6.3; Am. Ord. 260, passed 4-21-2011)

§ 154.378 TYPE II PROCEDURE (ADMINISTRATIVE).

   (A)   Pre-application conference. A pre-application conference is required for Type II applications. Pre-application conference requirements and procedures are in § 154.381. In addition, the applicant may be required to present his or her development proposal to a city-recognized neighborhood association or group before the city accepts the application as complete. At the City Administrator’s discretion, a Type II review may be referred directly to the Planning Commission for review and approval, using the Type III procedure as provided in § 154.379.
   (B)   Application requirements.
      (1)   Application forms. Type II applications shall be made on forms provided by the city.
      (2)   Submittal information. The application shall:
         (a)   Include the information requested on the application form;
         (b)   Be filed with copies of a narrative statement that explains how the application satisfies each and all of the relevant criteria and standards in sufficient detail for review and decision-making;
         (c)   Be accompanied by the required fee;
         (d)   Include one set of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all real property owners of record who will receive a notice of the application as required in division (C) below. The records of the County Department of Assessment and Taxation are the official records for determining ownership. The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment records have been used to produce the notice list. [Alternatively, the applicant may pay a fee for the city to prepare the public notice mailing.]; and
         (e)   Include an impact study for all land division applications. The impact study shall quantify/assess the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet city standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems and affected private property users. In situations where this chapter requires the dedication of real property to the city, the applicant shall either specifically agree to the dedication requirement or provide evidence that shows that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
   (C)   Notice of application for Type II administrative decision.
      (1)   Before making a Type II administrative decision, the city shall mail notice to:
         (a)   All owners of record of real property within 200 feet of the subject site;
         (b)   All city-recognized neighborhood groups or associations whose boundaries include the site;
         (c)   Any person who submits a written request to receive a notice; and
         (d)   Any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the city. The city may notify other affected agencies, as appropriate, for review of the application.
      (2)   The purpose of the notice is to give nearby property owners and other interested people the opportunity to submit written comments about the application, before the Type II decision is made. The goal of this notice is to invite people to participate early in the decision-making process;
      (3)   Notice of a pending Type II administrative decision shall:
         (a)   Provide a 14-day period for submitting written comments before a decision is made on the permit;
         (b)   List the relevant approval criteria by name and number of ordinance sections;
         (c)   State the place, date and time the comments are due, and the person to whom the comments should be addressed;
         (d)   Include the name and telephone number of a contact person regarding the administrative decision;
         (e)   Identify the specific permits or approvals requested;
         (f)   Describe the street address or other easily understandable reference to the location of the site;
         (g)   State that if any person fails to address the relevant approval criteria with enough detail, they may not be able to appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Only comments on the relevant approval criteria are considered relevant evidence;
         (h)   State that all evidence relied upon by the city to make this decision is in the public record, available for public review. Copies of this evidence can be obtained at a reasonable cost from the city;
         (i)   State that after the comment period closes, City Planner shall issue a Type II administrative decision. The decision shall be mailed to the applicant and to anyone else who submitted written comments or who is otherwise legally entitled to notice;
         (j)   Contain the following notice:
            "Notice to mortgagee, lien holder, vendor, or seller: The Shady Cove Zoning Ordinance requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser."
   (D)   Administrative decision requirements. The City Planner shall make Type II written decisions addressing all of the relevant approval criteria and standards. Based upon the criteria and standards, and the facts contained within the record, the city shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the requested permit or action.
   (E)   Notice of decision.
      (1)   Within five days after the city signs the decision, a notice of decision shall be posted on the property and sent by mail to:
         (a)   Any person who submits a written request to receive notice or provides comments during the application review period;
         (b)   The applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site which is the subject of the application;
         (c)   Any city-recognized neighborhood group or association whose boundaries include the site; and
         (d)   Any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the city, and other agencies which were notified or provided comments during the application review period.
      (2)   The city shall cause an affidavit of mailing and posting of the notice to be prepared and made a part of the file. The affidavit shall show the date the notice was mailed and posted and shall demonstrate that the notice was mailed to the people and within the time required by law.
      (3)   The Type II notice of decision shall contain:
         (a)   A description of the applicant's proposal and the city's decision on the proposal (i.e., may be a summary);
         (b)   The address or other geographic description of the property proposed for development, including a map of the property in relation to the surrounding area, where applicable;
         (c)   A statement of where the city's decision can be obtained;
         (d)   The date the decision shall become final, unless a request for public hearing is filed;
         (e)   A statement that all persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision may request a public hearing; and
         (f)   A statement briefly explaining how a request can be filed, the deadline for filing a request for public hearing and where further information can be obtained concerning the hearing process.
   (F)   Final decision and effective date. A Type II administrative decision is effective on the day after the request for hearing expires. If a request for hearing is filed, the Planning Commission decision is effective when the appeal period expires.
   (G)   Request for public hearing. A Type II administrative decision may be referred to the Planning Commission as follows:
      (1)   Who may request a hearing. The following people with standing may request a public hearing:
         (a)   The applicant;
         (b)   Any person who was mailed written notice of the Type II administrative decision; and/or
         (c)   Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments.
      (2)   Request for hearing procedure. Any person with standing may, as provided in division (G)(1) above, request a hearing according to the following procedures;
         (a)   Time for filing. A request for hearing shall be filed with the city within 14 days of the date the notice of decision was mailed;
         (b)   A request for hearing shall contain:
            1.   An identification of the decision that has been made, including the date of the decision; and
            2.   A statement demonstrating the person filing request for hearing has standing to request a hearing.
         (c)   Request for hearing procedures. Type III notice and hearing procedures shall be used for all Type II administrative appeals, as provided in § 154.379;
   (H)   Appeal to City Council. The decision of the Planning Commission regarding a request for hearing of a Type II administrative decision is the final decision of the city unless appealed to City Council. A request to City Council shall follow the same notification and hearing procedures as for the Planning Commission officer.
(Ord. 225, passed 10-20-1994, § 6.4; Am. Ord. 260, passed 4-21-2011)

§ 154.379 TYPE III PROCEDURE (QUASI-JUDICIAL).

   (A)   Pre-application conference. A pre-application conference may be required for all Type III applications. The requirements and procedures for a pre-application conference are described in § 154.382.
   (B)   Application requirements.
      (1)   Application forms. Type III applications shall be made on forms provided by the city; and
      (2)   Content. Type III applications shall:
         (a)   Include the information requested on the application form;
         (b)   Be filed with a narrative statement that explains how the application satisfies each and all of the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action;
         (c)   Be accompanied by the required fee; and
         (d)   Include an impact study for all Type III applications. The impact study shall quantify/assess the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including pedestrian ways and bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet city standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems and affected private property users. In situations where this chapter requires the dedication of real property to the city, the applicant shall either specifically agree to the dedication requirement, or provide evidence that shows that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
   (C)   Notice of hearing.
      (1)   Mailed notice. Notice of a Type III application hearing or Type II request for hearing shall be given by the city in the following manner:
         (a)   At least 20 days before the hearing date, notice shall be mailed to:
            1.   The applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the property which is the subject of the application;
            2.   All property owners of record within 200 feet of the site;
            3.   Any governmental agency which has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the city which includes provision for the notice, or who is otherwise entitled to the notice. Owners of airports shall be notified of a proposed zone change in accordance with O.R.S. 227.175.
            4.   Any neighborhood or community organization recognized by the City Council and whose boundaries include the property proposed for development;
            5.   Any person who submits a written request to receive notice;
            6.   For request for hearing, the party requesting a hearing and all persons who provided testimony; and
            7.   For a land use district change affecting a manufactured home or mobile home park, all mailing addresses within the park, in accordance with O.R.S. 227.175.
         (b)   The city shall have an affidavit of notice be prepared and made a part of the file. The affidavit shall state the date that the notice was posted on the property and mailed to the persons who must receive notice;
         (c)   At least ten to 20 business days before the hearing, notice of the hearing shall be printed in a newspaper of general circulation in the city. The newspaper's affidavit of publication of the notice shall be made part of the administrative record;
         (d)   At least ten to 20 business days before the hearing, the applicant shall post notice of the hearing on the property per division (C)(2) below. The applicant shall prepare and submit an affidavit of posting of the notice which shall be made part of the administrative record.
      (2)   Content of notice. Notice of appeal of a Type II Administrative hearing or a Type III hearing to be mailed, posted and published per division (C)(1) above shall contain the following information:
         (a)   The nature of the application and the proposed land use or uses which could be authorized for the property;
         (b)   The applicable criteria and standards from the development code(s) that apply to the application;
         (c)   The street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
         (d)   The date, time and location of the public hearing;
         (e)   A statement that the failure to raise an issue in person, or by letter at the hearing, or failure to provide statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, means that an appeal based on that issue cannot be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals;
         (f)   The name of a city representative to contact and the telephone number where additional information on the application may be obtained;
         (g)   A statement that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or for the applicant, and the applicable criteria and standards can be reviewed at City Hall at no cost and that copies shall be provided at a reasonable cost;
         (h)   A statement that a copy of the city's staff report and recommendation to the hearings body shall be available for review at no cost at least seven days before the hearing, and that a copy shall be provided on request at a reasonable cost;
         (i)   A general explanation of the requirements to submit testimony, and the procedure for conducting public hearings; and
         (j)   The following notice:
"Notice to mortgagee, lien holder, vendor, or seller: The Shady Cove Zoning Ordinance requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser."
   (D)   Conduct of the public hearing.
      (1)   At the commencement of the hearing, the hearings body shall state to those in attendance that:
         (a)   The applicable approval criteria and standards that apply to the application or appeal;
         (b)   A statement that testimony and evidence shall concern the approval criteria described in the staff report or other criteria in the comprehensive plan or land use regulations which the person testifying believes to apply to the decision;
         (c)   A statement that failure to raise an issue with sufficient detail to give the hearings body and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue, means that no appeal may be made to the State Land Use Board of Appeals on that issue; and
         (d)   Before the conclusion of the initial evidentiary hearing, any participant may ask the hearings body for an opportunity to present additional relevant evidence or testimony that is within the scope of the hearing. The hearings body shall grant the request by scheduling a date to finish the hearing (a "continuance") per division (D)(2) below, or by leaving the record open for additional written evidence or testimony per division (D)(3) below.
      (2)   If the hearings body grants a continuance, the completion of the hearing shall be continued to a date, time and place at least seven days after the date of the first evidentiary hearing. An opportunity shall be provided at the second hearing for persons to present and respond to new written evidence and oral testimony. If new written evidence is submitted at the second hearing, any person may request, before the conclusion of the second hearing, that the record be left open for at least seven days, so that they can submit additional written evidence or testimony in response to the new written evidence.
      (3)   If the hearings body leaves the record open for additional written evidence or testimony, the record shall be left open for at least seven days after the hearing. Any participant may ask the city in writing for an opportunity to respond to new evidence submitted during the period the record was left open. If a request is filed, the hearings body shall reopen the record per division (E) below;
         (a)   When the Planning Commission or hearings officer re-opens the record to admit new evidence or testimony, any person may raise new issues which relates to that new evidence or testimony;
         (b)   An extension of the hearing or record granted pursuant hereto is subject to the limitations of O.R.S. 227.178 ("120-day rule"), unless the continuance or extension is requested or agreed to by the applicant;
         (c)   If requested by the applicant, the city shall allow the applicant at least seven days after the record is closed to all other persons to submit final written arguments in support of the application, unless the applicant expressly waives this right. The applicant's final submittal shall be part of the record, but shall not include any new evidence.
      (4)   The record.
         (a)   The record shall contain all testimony and evidence that is submitted to the city and the hearings body and not rejected.
         (b)   The hearings body may take official notice of judicially cognizable facts under the applicable law. If the review authority takes official notice, it must announce its intention and allow persons participating in the hearing to present evidence concerning the noticed facts; and
         (c)   The review authority shall retain custody of the record until the city issues a final decision.
      (5)   Participants in the appeal of a Type II administrative decision or a Type III hearing are entitled to an impartial review authority as free from potential conflicts of interest and pre-hearing ex partè contacts (see division (D)(6) below) as reasonably possible. However, the public has a countervailing right of free access to public officials. Therefore:
         (a)   At the beginning of the public hearing, hearings body members shall disclose the substance of any pre-hearing ex partè contacts (as defined in division (D)(6) below) concerning the application or appeal. He or she shall state whether the contact has impaired his or her impartiality or his or her ability to vote on the matter and shall participate or abstain accordingly;
         (b)   A member of the hearings body shall not participate in any proceeding in which he or she, or any of the following, has a direct or substantial financial interest: his or her spouse, brother, sister, child, parent, father-in-law, mother-in-law, partner, any business in which they are then serving or have served within the previous two years or any business with which they are negotiating for or have an arrangement or understanding concerning prospective partnership or employment. Any actual or potential interest shall be disclosed at the hearing where the action is being taken;
         (c)   Disqualification of a member of the hearings body due to contact or conflict may be ordered by a majority of the members present and voting. The person who is the subject of the motion may not vote on the motion to disqualify; and
         (d)   Any member of the public may raise conflict of interest issues prior to or during the hearing, to which the member of the hearings body shall reply in accordance with this section.
      (6)   Ex partè communications.
         (a)   Members of the hearings body shall not:
            1.   Communicate, directly or indirectly, with any applicant, appellant, other party to the proceedings or representative of a party about any issue involved in a hearing, except upon giving notice, per division (D)(5) above; and
            2.   Take official notice of any communication, report or other materials outside the record prepared by the proponents or opponents in connection with the particular case, unless all participants are given the opportunity to respond to the noticed materials.
         (b)   No decision or action of the hearings body shall be invalid due to ex partè contacts or bias resulting from ex partè contacts, if the person receiving contact:
            1.   Places in the record the substance of any written or oral ex partè communications concerning the decision or action; and
            2.   Makes a public announcement of the content of the communication and of all participants' right to dispute the substance of the communication made. This announcement shall be made at the first hearing following the communication during which action shall be considered or taken on the subject of the communication.
         (c)   A communication between city staff and the hearings body is not considered an ex partè contact.
      (7)   Presenting and receiving evidence.
         (a)   The hearings body may set reasonable time limits for oral presentations and may limit or exclude cumulative, repetitious, irrelevant or personally derogatory or evidence;
         (b)   No oral testimony shall be accepted after the close of the public hearing. Written testimony may be received after the close of the public hearing, only as provided herein;
         (c)   Members of the hearings body may visit the property and the surrounding area and may use information obtained during the site visit to support their decision, if the information relied upon is disclosed at the hearing and an opportunity is provided to dispute the evidence. In the alternative, a member of the hearings body may visit the property to familiarize himself or herself with the site and surrounding area, but not to independently gather evidence. In the second situation, at the beginning of the hearing, he or she shall disclose the circumstances of the site visit and shall allow all participants to ask about the site visit.
   (E)   The decision process.
      (1)   Basis for decision. Approval or denial shall be based on standards and criteria in the Development Code. The standards and criteria shall relate approval or denial of a discretionary development permit application to the development regulations and, when appropriate, to the comprehensive plan for the area in which the development would occur and to the development regulations and comprehensive plan for the city as a whole;
      (2)   Findings and conclusions. Approval or denial shall be based upon the criteria and standards considered relevant to the decision. The written decision shall explain the relevant criteria and standards, state the facts relied upon in rendering the decision, and justify the decision according to the criteria, standards and facts;
      (3)   Form of decision. The hearings body shall issue a final written order containing the findings and conclusions stated in division (E)(2) above, which either approves, denies or approves with specific conditions. The hearings body may also issue appropriate intermediate rulings when more than one permit or decision is required; and
      (4)   Decision-making time limits. A final decision order for any Type II administrative appeal or Type III action shall be filed with the city within ten business days after the close of the deliberation.
   (F)   Notice of decision. Written notice of a Type II administrative appeal decision or a Type III decision shall be mailed to the applicant and to all participants of record within five business days after the hearings body decision. Failure of any person to receive mailed notice shall not invalidate the decision; provided that, a good faith attempt was made to mail the notice.
   (G)   Final decision and effective date. The decision of the hearings body on any Type II appeal or any Type III application is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed by the city. The decision is effective on the day after the appeal period expires. If an appeal is filed, the decision becomes effective on the day after the appeal is decided by the City Council. The notification and hearings procedures for Type III applications on appeal to the City Council shall be the same as for the initial hearing.
(Ord. 225, passed 10-20-1994, § 6.5)

§ 154.380 TYPE IV PROCEDURE (LEGISLATIVE).

   (A)   Pre-application conference. A pre-application conference may be required for all Type IV applications. The requirements and procedures for a pre-application conference are described in § 154.381.
   (B)   Application requirements.
      (1)   Application forms. Type IV applications shall be made on forms provided by the city.
      (2)   Submittal information. The application shall contain:
         (a)   The information requested on the application form;
         (b)   A map and/or plan addressing the appropriate criteria and standards in sufficient detail for review and decision (as applicable);
         (c)   The required fee; and
         (d)   Copies of a letter or narrative statement that explains how the application satisfies all of the relevant approval criteria and standards.
   (C)   Notice of hearing.
      (1)   Required hearings. A minimum of two hearings, one before the Planning Commission and one before the City Council, are required for all Type IV applications, except annexations where only a hearing by the City Council is required.
      (2)   Notification requirements. Notice of public hearings for the request shall be given by the city in the following manner:
         (a)   At least 20 days, but not more than 40 days, before the date of the first hearing on an ordinance that proposes to amend the comprehensive plan or any element thereof, or to adopt an ordinance that proposes to rezone property, a notice shall be prepared in conformance with O.R.S. 227.175 and mailed to:
            1.   Each owner whose property would be rezoned in order to implement the chapter (i.e., owners of property subject to a comprehensive plan amendment shall be notified if a zone change would be required to implement the proposed comprehensive plan amendment);
            2.   Any affected governmental agency;
            3.   Recognized neighborhood groups or associations affected by the chapter;
            4.   Any person who requests notice in writing;
            5.   For a zone change affecting a manufactured home or mobile home park, all mailing addresses within the park, in accordance with O.R.S. 227.175; and
            6.   Owners of airports shall be notified of a proposed zone change in accordance with O.R.S. 227.175.
         (b)   At least ten days before the scheduled Planning Commission public hearing date and ten days before the City Council hearing date, notice shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city.
         (c)   The city shall:
            1.   For each mailing of notice, file an affidavit of mailing in the record as provided hereby; and
            2.   For each published notice, file in the record the affidavit of publication in a newspaper that is required herein.
         (d)   The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) shall be notified in writing of proposed comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance amendments at least 45 days before the first public hearing at which public testimony or new evidence will be received.
         (e)   Notifications for annexation shall follow the provisions of this chapter, except as required for local government boundary commissions (O.R.S. 199).
      (3)   Content of notices. The mailed and published notices shall include the following information:
         (a)   The number and title of the file containing the application, and the address and telephone number of the city office where additional information about the application can be obtained;
         (b)   A description of the location of the proposal reasonably calculated to give notice of the location of the geographic area;
         (c)   A description of the proposal in enough detail for people to determine that a change is proposed, and the place where all relevant materials and information may be obtained or reviewed;
         (d)   The time(s), place(s) and date(s) of the public hearing(s); a statement that public oral or written testimony is invited; and a statement that the hearing will be held under this title and rules of procedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall (see division (C)(3)(e) below);
         (e)   Each mailed notice required by division (C)(3)(d) above shall contain the following statement:
"Notice to mortgagee, lien holder, vendor, or seller: The Shady Cove Zoning Ordinance requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser."
      (4)   Failure to receive notice. The failure of any person to receive notice shall not invalidate the action; providing:
         (a)   Personal notice is deemed given where the notice is deposited with the United States Postal Service; and
         (b)   Published notice is deemed given on the date it is published.
   (D)   Hearing process and procedure.
      (1)   Unless otherwise provided in the rules of procedure adopted by the City Council:
         (a)   The presiding officer of the Planning Commission and of the City Council shall have the authority to:
            1.   Regulate the course, sequence and decorum of the hearing;
            2.   Direct procedural requirements or similar matters; and
            3.   Impose reasonable time limits for oral presentations.
         (b)   No person shall address the Commission or the Council without:
            1.   Receiving recognition from the presiding officer; and
            2.   Stating his or her full name and residence address.
         (c)   Disruptive conduct such as applause, cheering or display of signs shall be cause for expulsion of a person or persons from the hearing, termination or continuation of the hearing, or other appropriate action determined by the presiding officer.
      (2)   Unless otherwise provided in the rules of procedures adopted by the Council, the presiding officer of the Commission and of the Council shall conduct the hearing as follows:
         (a)   The presiding officer shall begin the hearing with a statement of the nature of the matter before the body, a general summary of the procedures, a summary of the standards for decision-making and whether the decision which will be made is a recommendation to the City Council or the final decision of the Council;
         (b)   The staff reports shall be presented;
         (c)   The public shall be invited to testify;
         (d)   The public hearing may be continued to allow additional testimony or it may be closed; and
         (e)   The body's deliberation may include questions to the staff, comments from the staff and inquiries directed to any person present.
   (E)   Continuation of the public hearing. The Planning Commission or the City Council may continue any hearing, and no additional notice of hearing shall be required if the matter is continued to a specified place, date and time.
   (F)   Decision-making considerations. The recommendation by the Planning Commission and the decision by the City Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors:
      (1)   The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under O.R.S. Ch. 197 (for comprehensive plan amendments only);
      (2)   Comments from any applicable federal or state agencies regarding applicable statutes or regulations;
      (3)   Any applicable intergovernmental agreements; and
      (4)   Any applicable comprehensive plan policies and provisions of this chapter that implement the comprehensive plan. Compliance with § 154.381 shall be required for Comprehensive Plan amendments and land use district map and text amendments.
   (G)   Approval process and authority.
      (1)   The Planning Commission shall:
         (a)   After notice and a public hearing, vote on and prepare a recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with modifications, approve with conditions, deny the proposed change or adopt an alternative; and
         (b)   Within ten business days of determining a recommendation, the presiding officer shall sign the written recommendation, and it shall be filed with the city.
      (2)   If the Planning Commission fails to adopt a recommendation to approve, approve with modifications, approve with conditions, deny the proposed change or adopt an alternative proposal, within 60 days of its first public hearing on the proposed change, the city shall:
         (a)   Report the failure together with the proposed change to the City Council; and
         (b)   Provide notice and put the matter on the City Council's agenda, a public hearing to be held, and a decision to be made by the Council. No further action shall be taken by the Commission.
      (3)   The City Council shall:
         (a)   Approve, approve with modifications, approve with conditions, deny or adopt an alternative to an application for legislative change or remand the application to the Planning Commission for rehearing and reconsideration on all or part of the application;
         (b)   Consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission; however, it is not bound by the Commission's recommendation; and
         (c)   Act by ordinance, which shall be signed by the Mayor after the Council's adoption of the ordinance.
   (H)   Vote required for a legislative change.
      (1)   A vote by a majority of the qualified voting members of the Planning Commission present is required for a recommendation for approval, approval with modifications, approval with conditions, denial or adoption of an alternative.
      (2)   A vote by a majority of the qualified members of the City Council present is required to decide any motion made on the proposal.
   (I)   Notice of decision. Notice of a Type IV decision shall be mailed to the applicant, all participants of record, and the Department of Land Conservation and Development, within five business days after the City Council decision is filed with the city. The city shall also provide notice to all persons as required by other applicable laws.
   (J)   Final decision and effective date. A Type IV decision, if approved, shall take effect and shall become final as specified in the enacting ordinance, or if not approved, upon mailing of the notice of decision to the applicant.
   (K)   Record of the public hearing.
      (1)   A verbatim record of the proceeding shall be made by stenographic, mechanical or electronic means. It is not necessary to transcribe an electronic record. The minutes and other evidence presented as a part of the hearing shall be part of the record.
      (2)   All exhibits received and displayed shall be marked to provide identification and shall be part of the record.
      (3)   The official record shall include:
         (a)   All materials considered by the hearings body;
         (b)   All materials submitted by the city to the hearings body regarding the application;
         (c)   The verbatim record made by the stenographic, mechanical or electronic means; the minutes of the hearing; and other documents considered;
         (d)   The final ordinance;
         (e)   All correspondence; and
         (f)   A copy of the notices which were given as required by this section.
(Ord. 225, passed 10-20-1994, § 6.6)

§ 154.381 GENERAL PROVISIONS.

   (A)   One hundred twenty-day rule. The city shall take final action on permit applications which are subject to this section, including resolution of all appeals, within 120 days from the date the application is deemed as complete. Any exceptions to this rule shall conform to the provisions of O.R.S. 227.178. (The 120-day rule does not apply to Type IV legislative decisions - plan and code amendments - under O.R.S. 227.178.)
   (B)   Time computation. In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this chapter, the day of the act or event from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday or legal holiday, including Sunday, in which event, the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday or legal holiday.
   (C)   Pre-application conferences.
      (1)   Participants. When a pre-application conference is required, the applicant shall meet with the city representatives;
      (2)   Information provided. At the conference, the city shall:
         (a)   Cite the comprehensive plan policies and map designations applicable to the proposal;
         (b)   Cite the ordinance provisions, including substantive and procedural requirements applicable to the proposal;
         (c)   Provide available technical data and assistance which will aid the applicant;
         (d)   Identify other governmental policies and regulations that relate to the application; and
         (e)   Reasonably identify other opportunities or constraints concerning the application.
      (3)   Disclaimer. Failure of the city or his or her designee to provide any of the information required by this division (C) shall not constitute a waiver of any of the standards, criteria or requirements for the application; and
      (4)   Changes in the law. Due to possible changes in federal, state, regional and local law, the applicant is responsible for ensuring that the application complies with all applicable laws on the day the application is deemed complete.
   (D)   Applications.
      (1)   Initiation of applications.
         (a)   Applications for approval under this chapter may be initiated by:
            1.   Order of City Council;
            2.   Resolution of the Planning Commission;
            3.   The City Administrator; and
            4.   A record owner of property owner(s) whose name is on the most recently-recorded deed or contract purchaser with written permission from the record owner.
         (b)   Any person authorized to submit an application for approval may be represented by an agent authorized in writing to make the application on his or her behalf.
      (2)   Check for acceptance and completeness. In reviewing an application for completeness, the following procedure shall be used:
         (a)   Acceptance. When an application is received, the city shall immediately determine whether the following essential items are present. If the following items are not present, the application shall not be accepted and shall be immediately returned to the applicant;
            1.   The required form;
            2.   The required fee; and
            3.   The signature of the applicant on the required form, and signed written authorization of the property owner of record if the applicant is not the owner.
         (b)   Completeness.
            1.   Review and notification. After the application is accepted, the city shall review the application for completeness. If the application is incomplete, the city shall notify the applicant in writing of exactly what information is missing within 30 days of receipt of the application and allow the applicant 180 days to submit the missing information.
            2.   When application deemed complete for review. In accordance with the application submittal requirements of this chapter, the application shall be deemed complete upon the receipt by the city of all required information. The applicant shall have the option of withdrawing the application, or refusing to submit the requested information in division (D)(2)(b)1. above. For the refusal to be valid, the refusal shall be made in writing and received by the city no later than 14 days after the date on the city official's letter of incompleteness. If the applicant refuses in writing to submit the missing information, the application shall be deemed complete on thirty-first day after the city first accepted the application.
            3.   Standards and criteria that apply to the application. Approval or denial of the application shall be based upon the standards and criteria that were applicable at the time the application was first accepted.
      (3)   Changes or additions to the application during the review period. Once an application is deemed complete:
         (a)   All documents and other evidence relied upon by the applicant shall be submitted to the city at least seven days before the notice of action or hearing is mailed, if possible. Documents or other evidence submitted after that date shall be received by city and transmitted to the hearings body, but may be too late to include with the staff report and evaluation;
         (b)   When documents or other evidence are submitted by the applicant during the review period, but after the application is deemed complete, the assigned review person or body shall determine whether or not the new documents or other evidence submitted by the applicant significantly change the application;
         (c)   If the assigned reviewer determines that the new documents or other evidence significantly change the application, the reviewer shall include a written determination that a significant change in the application has occurred as part of the decision. In the alternate, the reviewer may inform the applicant either in writing, or orally at a public hearing, that such changes may constitute a significant change (see division (D)(3)(d) below), and allow the applicant to withdraw the new materials submitted, in order to avoid a determination of significant change;
         (d)   If the applicant's new materials are determined to constitute a significant change in an application that was previously deemed complete, the city shall take one of the following actions, at the choice of the applicant:
            1.   Suspend the existing application and allow the applicant to submit a new application with the proposed significant changes. Before the existing application can be suspended, the applicant must consent in writing to waive the 120-day rule (division (A) above) on the existing application. If the applicant does not consent, the city shall not select this option;
            2.   Reject the new documents or other evidence that has been determined to constitute a significant change, and continue to process the existing application without considering the materials that would constitute a significant change. The city will complete its decision-making process without considering the new evidence; and
         (e)   If a new application is submitted by the applicant, that application shall be subject to a separate check for acceptance and completeness and will be subject to the standards and criteria in effect at the time the new application is accepted.
   (E)   City's duties. The city shall:
      (1)   Prepare application forms based on the criteria and standards in applicable state law, the city's comprehensive plan and implementing chapter provisions;
      (2)   Accept all development applications which comply with § 154.381;
      (3)   Prepare a staff report that summarizes the application(s) and applicable decision criteria, and provides findings of conformance and/or nonconformance with the criteria. The staff report should also provide a recommended decision of: approval; denial; or approval with specific conditions that ensure conformance with the approval criteria;
      (4)   Prepare a notice of the proposal decision:
         (a)   In the case of an application subject to a Type I or II review process, the city shall make the staff report and all case-file materials available at the time that the notice of the decision is issued; and
         (b)   In the case of an application subject to a hearing (Type III or IV process), the city shall make the staff report available to the public at least seven days prior to the scheduled hearing date, and make the case-file materials available when notice of the hearing is mailed, as provided by §§ 154.378, 154.379 or 154.380.
      (5)   Administer the hearings process;
      (6)   File notice of the final decision in the city's records and mail a copy of the notice of the final decision to the applicant, all persons who provided comments or testimony, persons who requested copies of the notice, and any other persons entitled to notice by law;
      (7)   Maintain and preserve the file for each application for the time period required by law. The file shall include, as applicable, a list of persons required to be given notice and a copy of the notice given; the affidavits of notice; the application and all supporting information; the staff report; the final decision including the findings, conclusions and conditions, if any; all correspondence; minutes of any meeting at which the application was considered; and any other exhibit, information or documentation which was considered by the decision-maker(s) on the application; and
      (8)   Administer the appeals and review process.
   (F)   Amended decision process.
      (1)   The purpose of an amended decision process is to allow the city to correct typographical errors, rectify inadvertent omissions and/or make other minor changes which do not materially alter the decision.
      (2)   The city may issue an amended decision after the notice of final decision has been issued, but before the appeal period has expired. If a decision is amended, the decision shall be issued within ten business days after the original decision would have become final, but in no event beyond the 120-day period required by state law. A new ten-day appeal period shall begin on the day the amended decision is issued.
      (3)   Notice of an amended decision shall be given using the same mailing and distribution list as for the original decision notice.
      (4)   Modifications to approved plans or conditions of approval requested by the applicant shall follow the procedures contained in § 154.380. All other requested changes to decisions that do not qualify as minor or major modifications shall follow the appeal process.
   (G)   Re-submittal of application following denial. An application which has been denied, or an application which was denied and which on appeal or review has not been reversed by a higher authority, including the Land Use Board of Appeals, the Land Conservation and Development Commission or the courts may not be resubmitted as the same or a substantially similar proposal for the same land for a period of at least 12 months from the date the final city action is made denying the application, unless there is substantial change in the facts or a change in city policy which would change the outcome, as determined by the city.
(Ord. 225, passed 10-20-1994, § 6.7)

§ 154.382 SPECIAL PROCEDURES.

   (A)   An expedited land division ("ELD") shall be defined and may be used as in O.R.S. 197.360 which is expressly adopted and incorporated by reference here.
      (1)   Selection. An applicant who wishes to use an ELD procedure for a partition, subdivision or planned development instead of the regular procedure type assigned to it, must request the use of the ELD in writing at the time the application is filed, or forfeit his or her right to use it;
      (2)   Review procedure. An ELD shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures in O.R.S. 197.365; and
      (3)   Appeal procedure. An appeal of an ELD shall be in accordance with the procedures in O.R.S. 197.375.
Summary of Development Decisions/Permit by Type of Decision-Making Procedure
Summary of Development Decisions/Permit by Type of Decision-Making Procedure
Access permit (public street)
Type I
Annexation
Type III/IV
Chapter 152 and city/county intergovernmental agreement(s), as applicable
Building permit
N/A
Building Code
Code interpretation
Type II
Code amendment
Type IV
§§ 154.435 through 154.441
Comprehensive plan amendment
Type IV
§§ 154.435 through 154.441
Conditional use permit
Type III
§§ 154.395 through 154.404
Flood plain development permit
Type II
Home occupation permit
Type I
§§ 154.290 through 154.295
Planned unit development
Type III
§§ 154.170 through 154.187
LAND USE DISTRICT MAP CHANGE
   Development review
Type I
§§ 154.375 through 154.382
   Legislative (plan amendment required)
Type IV
§§ 154.435 through 154.441
   Nonconforming use or development confirmation
Type I
§§ 154.270 through 154.276
   Partition
Type I/II/III
   Property line adjustment
Type I
   Quasi-judicial (no plan amendment required)
Type III
§§ 154.435 through 154.441
   Sign permit
Type I
§§ 154.350 through 154.362
SITE PLAN REVIEW
   Subdivision
Type II/III
   Type II
Type II
§§ 154.310 through 154.317
   Type III
Type III
§§ 154.310 through 154.317
VARIANCE
   Class A
Type I
§§ 154.415 through 154.420
   Class B
Type II
§§ 154.415 through 154.420
   Class C
Type III
§§ 154.415 through 154.420
 
(Ord. 225, passed 10-20-1994, § 6.8; Ord. 253, passed 1-21-2010)