Zoneomics Logo
search icon

Tigard City Zoning Code

PART 18

700 LAND USE APPLICATIONS AND REVIEW TYPES

§ 18.710.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to establish a standard review procedure for land use applications. This chapter is intended to make the land use review process clear and understandable, to facilitate timely review by the city, and to enable the public to participate in the local land use decision-making process.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.020 Summary of Land Use Applications.

Table 18.710.1
Summary of Land Use Applications
Abbreviation
Land Use Application Type
Applicable Section
Review Type
MIS
Adequate Public Facilities Exception (inside River Terrace)
18.640
II
ADJ
Adjustment
II
- Inside River Terrace Plan District
18.640
- Inside Downtown Tigard Plan District
18.650
- Inside TMU zone
18.660
- Citywide
18.715
ZCA
Annexation
18.720
III-Modified, Legislative
(N/A)
Appeal
18.710
III-various
CPA
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
18.790
III-Modified, Legislative
CPA
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment
18.790
Legislative
CUP
Conditional Use
18.740
III-HO
DCA
Development Code Text Amendment
18.790
Legislative
DIR
Director Determination
18.730
I
DDR
Development Design Review
18.650
I, II
(N/A)
Extension
18.745
I, II
FDC
Food Cart
18.750
II
POD
Food Cart Pod
18.750
II
MIS
Historic Resource Designation or Alteration
18.755
II, III-PC
HOP
Home Occupation Permit
18.760
I, II
MLP
Land Partition
18.820
II
LLA
Lot Line Adjustment or Lot Consolidation
18.810
I
MAR
Marijuana Facility Permit
18.430
I
MMD
Modification
18.765
- Minor
I
- Major
II
PDR
Planned Development
18.770
II, III-PC
SLR
Sensitive Lands Review
18.510
I, II, III-HO
SGN
Sign Permit
18.435
I
SDR
Site Development Review
18.780
I, II
SUB
Subdivision
18.830
II
SBP
Sublot Plat
18.840
II-Modified
TUP
Temporary Use Permit
18.440
I
MIS
Transportation Mitigation (inside TMU zone)
18.660
II
UFR
Urban Forestry Plan Modification or Discretionary Review
18.420
I, III-HO, III-PC
ZON
Zoning Map Amendment
- Quasi-Judicial (site specific)
18.790
III-PC,
- Legislative (citywide)
III-Modified, Legislative
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 17-25 §3; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2; Ord. 22-10 §2; Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.710.030 General Provisions.

A. 
Pre-application conferences. A pre-application conference is required for all Type II and Type III applications, except for Home Occupations, Extensions, Food Carts, and Complex Tree Removals. The Director may waive the requirement for a pre-application conference. Legislative actions are exempt from a pre-application conference.
1. 
To request a pre-application conference, a prospective applicant must submit a pre-application request form, a brief description of the proposed uses, and a site plan.
2. 
When a pre-application conference is required, the prospective applicant must meet with the city for the purpose of identifying policies and regulations that relate to the proposed development, providing technical data and assistance that will aid the applicant, and identifying other opportunities or constraints that relate to the proposed development.
3. 
Failure of the Director to provide any of the information required by this chapter does not constitute a waiver of the standards, criteria, or requirements of the applications.
4. 
Due to possible changes in applicable law, the facts and circumstances of the property, and the information developed during the review process and other factors, information provided by the city during the pre-application conference is not binding. Applicants are solely responsible for demonstrating compliance with all applicable standards.
5. 
The prospective applicant has one year from the date of the pre-application conference to submit a land use application for the proposed development.
B. 
Neighborhood meetings. A prospective applicant must hold a neighborhood meeting prior to filing the following applications: comprehensive plan map amendment (quasi-judicial), conditional use, major modifications, planned development review, sensitive lands review (Type II and III), site development review (Type II), subdivision, and zoning map amendment (quasi-judicial).
1. 
The location of the meeting must be open to the public and accessible in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. The facility must be located as close to the proposed development site as possible.
2. 
The meeting must be held in the evening on a Monday through Thursday.
3. 
The prospective applicant must provide a written and posted notice for the meeting.
a. 
A written notice to the city's interested parties list and property owners within 500 feet of the proposed development site must be mailed not less than two weeks but no more than four weeks from the date of the meeting. The notice must include:
i. 
Description and location of the proposal;
ii. 
Applicant contact information;
iii. 
Date, time and location of the meeting; and
iv. 
A vicinity map that clearly identifies the property or properties included in the proposal.
b. 
A notice must be posted at the proposed development site, not less than two weeks but not more than four weeks from the meeting date, in a location where the notice is visible from each street frontage. The notice must include:
i. 
Description and location of the proposal;
ii. 
Applicant contact information;
iii. 
Date, time and location of the meeting; and
iv. 
A vicinity map that clearly identifies the development site included in the proposal.
c. 
The prospective applicant must complete an affidavit of mailing and posting of the notice.
4. 
At the meeting, the prospective applicant must:
a. 
Read the "Statement of Purpose" letter provided by the city to the attendees;
b. 
Present the proposal, including at least a site plan;
c. 
Provide a handout with a contact name and phone number; and
d. 
Provide a sign in sheet to document the names and addresses of all individuals who attend the meeting and take meeting minutes of all comments, concerns, and issues raised at the meeting.
5. 
The affidavits, meeting minutes, and other meeting materials must be submitted to the city with the application.
C. 
Application submittal.
1. 
Applications may be initiated by:
a. 
All of the property owners, contract purchasers of the subject property, or any agent authorized to represent the property owners or contract purchasers. Easement holders are not considered owners for this section. If the subject property was divided without a partitioning or subdivision approval required by law at the time of the division, an application for approval of the land division may be filed by the owner, contract purchaser, or representative of one of the units of land created by the division;
b. 
The Director;
c. 
Tigard City Council;
d. 
Tigard Planning Commission; or
e. 
A public entity that has the right of eminent domain for projects the entity has the authority to construct.
2. 
Multiple applications for a single proposed development will be consolidated unless the applicant specifies otherwise in the application. A concurrent application review consolidates the review of multiple applications into a single review process. The applications will be processed using the highest review type required for any part of the proposed development.
3. 
The application must include, at a minimum, the following items. The Director may waive items listed if they are not applicable to the proposed application.
a. 
Application form, including signature of the property owner or public agency initiating the application.
b. 
Deed, title report, or other proof of ownership.
c. 
Detailed and comprehensive description of existing site conditions and all existing and proposed uses and structures, including a summary of all information contained in any site plans.
d. 
Narrative that demonstrates how the proposal meets all applicable approval criteria, regulations, and development standards.
e. 
Site plans, landscape plans, grading plans, elevation drawings, preliminary plat, final plat, or similar to scale.
f. 
Any other materials required by a specific land use application.
g. 
Any required service provider letters, including, but not limited to, clean water services, waste disposal company, or other entity.
h. 
Any required studies or reports, including, but not limited to, a traffic impact analysis, wetland delineation report, or geotechnical report.
i. 
Copy of any existing and proposed restrictions or covenants.
j. 
Payment of all fees, based on the fee schedule in effect at time of submittal, as adopted by City Council.
k. 
Copy of the pre-application conference notes, if applicable.
l. 
Copy of the mailed neighborhood meeting letter, the mailing list, affidavits of mailing and posting, copy of the meeting sign-in sheets, meeting minutes, and any handouts provided at the meeting, including the site plan, if applicable.
D. 
Application completeness.
1. 
When the application is accepted, the Director will review the application for completeness. If the application is incomplete, the Director will notify the applicant of exactly what information is missing within 30 days of receipt of the application and allow the applicant to submit the missing information.
2. 
The application will be deemed complete upon the receipt of:
a. 
All of the missing information;
b. 
Some of the missing information and a written notice from the applicant that no other information will be provided; or
c. 
Written notice from the applicant that none of the missing information will be provided.
3. 
If the applicant does not submit the missing information or provide written notice that no additional information will be provided, the application will be deemed void on the 181st day after submittal.
E. 
Modifications of applications. A modification of application means the applicant's submittal of new information after an application has been deemed complete and prior to close of the record on a pending application that would modify a development proposal by changing one or more of the following components: proposed uses, operating characteristics, intensity, scale, or site layout, in a manner that requires the application of new criteria to the proposal or that would require a substantial change to the findings of fact. It does not mean a submittal of new evidence that merely clarifies or supports the pending application.
1. 
A Type I or Type II application may be modified up until the decision is issued. A Type II application that is appealed or Type III application may be modified up until the close of the record.
2. 
The approval authority will not consider any evidence submitted by the applicant that would constitute a modification of an application, as defined above, unless a new application is submitted for the modification. The modification constitutes a new application and restarts the 120-day clock for the application being modified.
3. 
Prior to the first public hearing or if a hearing is not required, the Director will have sole authority to determine whether an applicant's submittal constitutes a modification. After such a time, the hearing authority will make such determination. The determination on whether a submittal constitutes a modification is appealable only to the Land Use Board of Appeals and only after a final decision on the application is issued.
F. 
Amended decision process.
1. 
The purpose of an amended decision is to provide the Director the ability to correct typographical errors, rectify inadvertent omissions, or make other minor changes that do not materially alter the decision.
2. 
The approval authority may issue an amended decision after the notice of final decision has been issued but before the appeal period has expired.
3. 
The notice of an amended decision is the same as that which applies to a Type II procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.060.
G. 
Withdrawal of an application. An application may be withdrawn prior to issuance of a decision.
H. 
Re-submittal of application following denial. Applications that have been denied, excluding applications denied solely on procedural grounds, may not be resubmitted for the same or a substantially similar proposal unless one or more of the following are met:
1. 
Twelve months has passed since the denial became final;
2. 
Substantial changes are made to the application that resolve all findings for denial of the application; or
3. 
Standards and criteria relative to the findings of the original denial have changed.
I. 
Receipt of submittals. Any submittals for which a deadline is provided for in this chapter must be addressed to the recipient department designated in the notice and actually and physically received by the designated recipient department on or before the close of business on the due date, except that if the due date falls on a state or federal holiday, a regular weekday that the Community Development Department, or its successor, is not open for business, or a weekend, will be extended to the close of business on the next day that the department is open for business. Emails are considered received at the time shown on the city's email system. Submittals received after the deadline will not be considered or effective.
J. 
Conformance with application. Unless provided otherwise in the decision, development must conform in all material respects to the approved application and submittals in support of the application.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2; Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.710.040 Types of Reviews.

A. 
General. This section defines the review types and establishes the approval and appeal authority for each.
B. 
Review types defined. There are four review procedure types: Type I, Type II, Type III, and Legislative. Table 18.710.1 contains the city's land use application types and associated review types. The review types are defined as follows:
1. 
Type I procedures apply to land use applications that are governed by clear and objective approval criteria or development standards that may require the exercise of professional judgment about technical issues only. Type I actions are decided by the Director without public notice and without a public hearing.
2. 
Type II procedures apply to land use applications that are governed by subjective approval criteria or development standards that may require the exercise of limited discretion. Type II actions are decided by the Director with public notice. If any party with standing appeals a Type II decision, the appeal of such decision will be heard by the Hearings Officer.
3. 
Type III procedures apply to land use applications that are governed by approval criteria that require the exercise of discretion and judgment and about which there may be broad public interest. Type III applications are decided by the Hearings Officer (Type III-HO) or the Planning Commission (Type III-PC) with appeals to the City Council. Type III-Modified are decided by the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission.
4. 
Legislative actions involve the establishment and modification of land use plans, policies, and regulations. The Legislative procedure includes two public hearings; the first by the Planning Commission and then by the City Council. The hearings provide opportunities for public comment and input on actions that may affect large areas of the city.
C. 
Approval and appeal authorities. The approval and appeal authorities for each review type are provided in Table 18.710.2. The decision of the appeal authority is the city's final decision. Parties with standing may appeal the city's final decision to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
Table 18.710.2
Review Types and City Appeal Authorities
Review Type
Approval Authority
Appeal Authority
Type I
Community Development Director
None/Land Use Board of Appeals
Type II
Community Development Director
Hearings Officer
Type II-Modified
Community Development Director
Hearings Officer [1]
Type III-HO
Hearings Officer
City Council
Type III-PC
Planning Commission
City Council
Type III-Modified
City Council, with initial hearing and recommendation by Planning Commission
None/Land Use Board of Appeals
Legislative
City Council, with initial hearing and recommendation by Planning Commission
None/Land Use Board of Appeals
Notes:
[1]
Appeal procedures are subject to the provisions of ORS 197.375 in addition to the procedures of this chapter.
D. 
Determination. The Director will determine the most appropriate review type for land use applications or actions requested. The Director determination is the final local decision and will favor the review type that provides the most appropriate public notice and opportunity for public comment.
E. 
Notice.
1. 
A failure of any person to receive actual notice that was mailed does not invalidate the decision or action. In all other cases, failure to receive notice or irregularities in providing notice is grounds for invalidation only if the party demonstrates substantial prejudice. The city may require re-notification, grant a continuance, or take other actions to avoid prejudice without requiring that a new application be filed.
2. 
The city may provide notice in excess of the minimum requirement.
3. 
Public notices required by this section will be sent to the names and addresses of owners as shown on the current Washington County property tax records. The boundary of the subject property includes all contiguous property under the same ownership of as the subject property. All notices will be deemed delivered on the date the notice is deposited in the U.S. Mail or personally delivered, whichever first occurs.
F. 
Burden of proof and procedural error.
1. 
Unless expressly provided otherwise in this title or by law, the applicant has the burden of proof to demonstrate compliance with all applicable criteria and standards, including on appeal.
2. 
Unless expressly identified as jurisdictional, failure to comply with a provision of this chapter invalidates an action only if the person alleging the error demonstrates that the error occurred and that person's substantial rights have been prejudiced.
G. 
Remanded and withdrawn decisions. The approval authority for a remanded or withdrawn decision will be the approval authority from which the appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals was taken, except that in voluntary or stipulated remands, the City Council may decide that it will hear the case on remand.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.050 Type I Procedure.

A. 
Decision requirements. The Director will approve, approve with conditions, or deny the requested application or action based on the applicable approval criteria and development standards.
B. 
Final decision. The Director's decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The Director's decision is not appealable locally and is the final decision of the city.
C. 
Effective date. The Director's decision is effective on the day after it is final.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.060 Type II Procedure.

A. 
Notice of application. The purpose of such notice is to provide nearby property owners and other interested parties with an opportunity to submit written comments concerning the application, prior to issuance of the decision. The goal of this notice is to invite parties of interest to participate early in the review process.
1. 
Prior to making a decision, a notice of application must be mailed to:
a. 
All owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development site;
b. 
City's interested parties who have requested to receive notice of all land use notices;
c. 
Any city-recognized neighborhood group or community organization whose boundaries include the proposed development site; and
d. 
Any governmental agency that is entitled to notice.
2. 
The Director will prepare an affidavit of mailing such notice that indicates the date that the notice was mailed to the necessary parties. The affidavit will be made part of the record.
3. 
A notice of application must include:
a. 
An explanation of the application, including case number and the proposed use or uses that could be authorized;
b. 
A description of the proposed development site, including street address, map and tax lot number, or other easily understood geographical reference to the proposed development site and zoning designation;
c. 
List of criteria and development standards applicable to the application;
d. 
Include the name and telephone number of the city contact person to obtain additional information;
e. 
A statement that the city will consider written comments submitted prior to the issuance of the decision and the place, date, and time that comments are due;
f. 
Indicate that all evidence relied upon by the approval authority to make this decision is contained within the record and is available for public review. Copies of this evidence may be obtained from the Director;
g. 
Indicate that after the comment period closes, the approval authority will issue a decision; and
h. 
Contain the following notice: "Notice to mortgagee, lienholder, vendor, or seller: The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser."
B. 
Decision requirements. The approval authority will approve, approve with conditions, or deny the requested application based on the applicable approval criteria and development standards.
C. 
Notice of decision.
1. 
Notice of decision must be mailed to the applicant and to all parties of record within seven days after the decision is signed by the approval authority.
2. 
The Director will prepare an affidavit of mailing such notice that indicates the date that the notice was mailed to the necessary parties. The affidavit will be made part of the record.
3. 
A notice of decision must include:
a. 
An explanation of the decision, including case number;
b. 
A description of the proposed development site, including street address, map and tax lot number, or other easily understood geographical reference to the proposed development site and zoning designation;
c. 
A statement that the complete case file is available for review, including when and where the case file is available and the name and telephone number of the city contact person to obtain additional information;
d. 
The date the decision will become final, unless appealed;
e. 
A statement that any person entitled to notice or who are adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision may appeal the decision; and
f. 
A statement briefly explaining how an appeal may be filed, the deadline for filing an appeal, and a reference to where further information about filing an appeal can be obtained.
D. 
Final decision and effective date. A Type II decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date the notice is mailed. A Type II decision becomes effective on the day after the appeal period expires, unless an appeal is filed.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.070 Type II-Modified Procedure.

All applications subject to the Type II-Modified review will follow the procedures provided in Section 18.710.060, Type II Procedure, modified as provided in ORS 197.360 through 197.380 and as follows:
A. 
Pre-application conferences are recommended, but the pre-application conference requirements of Subsection 18.710.030.A do not apply.
B. 
The neighborhood meeting requirements of Subsection 18.710.030.B do not apply.
(Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.080 Type III Procedure.

A. 
Notice of hearing.
1. 
A notice of hearing must be provided as follows:
a. 
At least 20 days prior to the hearing date, a notice of hearing must be mailed to:
i. 
The applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the proposed development site;
ii. 
All property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development site;
iii. 
City's interested parties who have requested to receive notice of all land use notices;
iv. 
Any city-recognized neighborhood group and community organizations whose boundaries include the proposed development site;
v. 
Any affected governmental agency that is entitled to such notice; and
vi. 
In actions involving appeals, the appellant and all parties to the appeal.
b. 
The Director will prepare an affidavit of mailing such notice that indicates the date that the notice was mailed to the necessary parties. The affidavit will be made part of the record.
c. 
At least 14 days prior to the hearing date, a notice of the hearing must be posted on the proposed development site by the applicant. An affidavit of posting such notice must be prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the record.
2. 
A mailed notice of hearing must include:
a. 
An explanation of the application, including case number and the proposed use or uses that could be authorized;
b. 
A description of the proposed development site, including street address, map and tax lot number, or other easily understood geographical reference to the proposed development site and zoning designation;
c. 
List of criteria and development standards applicable to the application;
d. 
Include the name and the telephone number of the city contact person to obtain additional information;
e. 
State the date, time, and location of the hearing;
f. 
State the failure to raise an issue at the hearing, in person, or by letter, or failure to provide statements or evidence sufficient to afford the approval authority an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue;
g. 
State that a copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and that copies may be provided at a reasonable cost;
h. 
State that a copy of the staff report will be available for inspection at no cost at least seven days prior to the hearing, and that a copy may be provided at a reasonable cost;
i. 
Include a general explanation of the requirements for submittal of testimony and the procedure for conducting hearings; and
j. 
Contain the following notice: "Notice to mortgagee, lienholder, vendor, or seller: The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser."
3. 
A posted notice of hearing must include:
a. 
An explanation of the application, including case number and the proposed use or uses that could be authorized;
b. 
A description of the proposed development site, including street address, map and tax lot number, or other easily understood geographical reference to the proposed development site and zoning designation;
c. 
List of criteria and development standards applicable to the application;
d. 
Include the name and the telephone number of the city contact person to obtain additional information;
e. 
State the date, time, and location of the hearing;
f. 
State that a copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and that copies may be provided at a reasonable cost; and
g. 
State that a copy of the staff report will be available for inspection at no cost at least seven days prior to the hearing, and that a copy may be provided at a reasonable cost.
B. 
Hearing requirements. Hearings before the appropriate approval authority, as provided in Table 18.710.2, will be conducted in compliance with the quasi-judicial hearing requirements in Section 18.710.110.
C. 
Decision requirements. The approval authority will approve, approve with conditions, or deny the requested application based on the applicable approval criteria and development standards.
D. 
Notice of decision. Notice of decision must be mailed to the applicant and to all parties of record within seven days after the decision is filed by the approval authority with the Director. The notice must be provided in compliance with Paragraphs 18.710.060.C.2 and 3.
E. 
Final decision and effective date. The decision of a Type III application is final for purposes of appeal on the date the notice of decision is mailed. The decision is effective on the day after the appeal period expires, unless an appeal is filed.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.090 Type III-Modified Procedure.

All applications subject to the Type III-Modified review will follow the procedures provided in Section 18.710.080, except that the approval authority may remand the decision to the recommending body.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.100 Appeals.

A. 
Filing an appeal. A Type II or III decision may be appealed as follows:
1. 
The following parties have standing to appeal a decision:
a. 
The applicant;
b. 
For appeals of a Type II decision, any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved or who was entitled to written notice of the Type II decision; and
c. 
Any party, who demonstrates that the person participated in the proceeding through the submittal of written or verbal testimony.
2. 
An appeal must be filed with the Director within 15 days of the date the notice of decision was mailed.
3. 
An appeal must include:
a. 
The date and case file number of the decision being appealed;
b. 
Documentation that the person filing the appeal has standing to appeal;
c. 
A detailed statement describing the basis of appeal; and
d. 
Payment of the required fee, based on the fee schedule in effect at time of submittal, as adopted by City Council. The fee is established by the Director. The maximum fee for an appeal hearing is the cost to the local government for preparing and for conducting the hearing, or the statutory maximum, whichever is less. Failure to timely pay the required fee is a jurisdictional defect.
B. 
Procedure for Type II and III appeals.
1. 
All appeals must provide notice of hearing in compliance with Type III notice requirements, as provided in Subsection 18.710.080.A.
2. 
Appeal hearings before the appropriate appeal authority, as provided in Table 18.710.2, will be conducted in compliance with the quasi-judicial hearing requirements in Section 18.710.110.
3. 
Appeal hearings are de novo. A de novo hearing allows for the presentation of new evidence, testimony, and argument by any party. The appeal authority will consider all relevant evidence, testimony, and argument that are provided at the hearing by the appellant or any party. The scope of the hearing is not limited to the issues that were raised on appeal.
4. 
The decision of the appeal authority is the final local decision and is final and effective on the date the decision is mailed.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.110 Quasi-Judicial Hearings.

A. 
Procedures. The following procedures apply to all quasi-judicial hearings:
1. 
At the commencement of the hearing, a statement will be made to those in attendance that:
a. 
Lists the applicable substantive criteria;
b. 
States that testimony and evidence must be directed toward the relevant approval criteria described in the staff report, or other criteria in the plan or land use regulation that the person testifying believes to apply to the decision; and
c. 
States that failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the approval authority and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals on that issue and that failure of the applicant to object to a condition of approval may preclude an action for damages in circuit court.
2. 
Parties to a quasi-judicial hearing are entitled to an impartial hearing authority as free from potential conflicts of interest and pre-hearing ex parte contacts as reasonably possible. It is recognized, however, that the public has a countervailing right of free access to public officials; therefore:
a. 
Hearing authority members must disclose the substance of any pre-hearing ex parte contacts with regard to the matter at the commencement of the public hearing on the matter. The member must state whether the contact has impaired the impartiality or ability of the member to vote on the matter and provide the parties the right to rebut the substance of the communication. The member will participate or abstain accordingly.
b. 
Any member of the hearing authority may not participate in any proceeding or action in which any of the following has a direct or substantial financial interest: the member or member's spouse, brother, sister, child, parent, father-in-law, mother-in-law, or partner; any business in which the member is then serving or has served within the previous two years; or any business with which the member is negotiating for or has an arrangement or understanding concerning prospective partnership or employment. Any actual or potential interest must be disclosed at the meeting of the hearing authority where the action is being taken.
c. 
Disqualification of a hearing authority member due to contacts or conflict may be ordered by a majority of the members present and voting. The person who is the subject of the motion may not vote.
d. 
If all members abstain or are disqualified, the administrative rule of necessity will apply. All members present who declare their reasons for abstention or disqualification will thereby be re-qualified to act.
e. 
In cases involving the disqualification or recusal of a Hearings Officer, the city will provide a substitute Hearings Officer in a timely manner subject to the above impartiality rules.
3. 
Prior to the conclusion of the initial evidentiary hearing, any participant may request an opportunity to present additional relevant evidence or testimony. The local hearing authority may grant such request by continuing the public hearing in compliance with Subparagraph 18.710.110.A.4.a or by leaving the record open for additional written evidence or testimony as provided in Subparagraph 18.710.110.A.4.b.
4. 
If the hearing authority grants a continuance, the hearing will be continued to a date, time, and place certain at least seven days from the date of the initial evidentiary hearing. An opportunity will be provided at the continued hearing for persons to present and rebut new evidence and testimony. If new written evidence is submitted at the continued hearing, any person may request, prior to the conclusion of the continued hearing, that the record be left open for at least seven days, to submit additional written evidence or testimony for the purpose of responding to the new written evidence.
5. 
If the hearing authority leaves the record open for additional written evidence or testimony, the record must be left open for at least seven days. Any participant may file a written request with the city for an opportunity to respond to new evidence submitted during the period the record was left open. If such a request is filed, the hearing authority must reopen the record in compliance with Paragraph 18.710.110.A.5.
a. 
A continuance or extension granted is subject to the limitations of ORS 227.178, unless the continuance or extension is requested or agreed to by the applicant;
b. 
Unless waived by the applicant, the city will allow the applicant at least seven days after the record is closed to all other parties to submit final written arguments in support of the application period. The applicant's final submittal will be considered part of the record but may not include any new evidence.
B. 
The record.
1. 
The record contains all testimony and evidence that is submitted and not rejected.
2. 
The hearing authority may take official notice of judicially cognizable facts in compliance with the applicable law. If the hearing authority takes official notice, it must announce its intention and allow the parties to the hearing to present evidence concerning the fact.
3. 
The hearing authority must retain custody of the record as appropriate, until a final decision is rendered.
4. 
When a hearing authority re-opens a record to admit new evidence, arguments, or testimony, any person may raise new issues that relate to the new evidence, arguments, or testimony, or criteria that apply to the matter at issue.
C. 
Ex parte communications.
1. 
Members of the hearing authority may not:
a. 
Communicate, directly or indirectly, with any party or representative of a party in connection with any issue involved in a hearing, except upon giving notice, and an opportunity for all parties to rebut the substance of the communication; or
b. 
Take notice of any communication, report, or other materials outside the record prepared by the proponents or opponents in connection with the particular case unless the parties are afforded an opportunity to contest the materials so noticed.
2. 
No decision or action of the hearing authority will be invalid due to ex parte contacts or bias resulting from ex parte contacts with a member of the approval authority if the member of the approval authority receiving contact:
a. 
Places on the record the substance of any written or oral ex parte communications concerning the decision or action; and
b. 
Makes a public announcement of the content of the communication and of the parties' right to rebut the substance of the communication made at the first hearing following the communication where action will be considered or taken on the subject to which the communication is related.
3. 
Members of the hearing authority are subject to the provisions of ORS 244 and the provisions of this section.
4. 
A communication between city staff and the hearing authority is not considered an ex parte contact.
D. 
Presenting and receiving evidence.
1. 
The hearing authority may set reasonable time limits for oral presentations and may limit or exclude cumulative, repetitious, irrelevant, or personally derogatory testimony.
2. 
Oral testimony will not be accepted after the close of the public hearing. Written testimony may be received after the close of the public hearing, but only in compliance with the schedule and procedure announced by the hearing authority prior to the close of the public hearing, or as otherwise provided by this section.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.120 Legislative Procedure.

Legislative actions typically involve adoption of an ordinance. In addition to any requirements imposed by the city charter, the following procedures apply. In the event of a conflict, the charter governs.
A. 
Notice of hearing.
1. 
All Legislative applications require two hearings, one before the Planning Commission and one before the City Council.
2. 
A notice of hearing will be provided as required by state law, and an affidavit of mailing will be included in the record that identifies the mailing date and the names and addresses of the mailing recipients.
B. 
Hearing process and procedure. Unless otherwise provided in the rules of procedure adopted by the City Council, the presiding officer of the Planning Commission and of the City Council have the authority to:
1. 
Regulate the course, sequence, and decorum of the hearing;
2. 
Dispose of procedural requirements or similar matters; and
3. 
Impose reasonable time limits for oral presentations.
C. 
Continuation of the public hearing. The Planning Commission or the City Council may continue any hearing and no additional notice is required if the matter is continued to a date, time and location certain.
D. 
Adoption process and authority.
1. 
The Planning Commission may:
a. 
After the public hearing, formulate a recommendation to the City Council to adopt, adopt with modifications, adopt an alternative, or deny the Legislative application; and
b. 
Within 14 days of determining a recommendation, the written recommendation must be signed by the presiding officer of the Planning Commission and filed with the Director.
2. 
The City Council may:
a. 
Adopt, adopt with modifications, adopt an alternative, deny, or remand to the Planning Commission for rehearing and reconsideration on all or part of the Legislative application;
b. 
Consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission, however, it is not bound by the Planning Commission's recommendation; and
c. 
Act by ordinance, which must be signed by the Mayor after the City Council's adoption of the ordinance.
E. 
Vote.
1. 
A vote by a majority of the qualified voting members of the Planning Commission present is required for a recommendation for adoption, adoption with modifications, adoption of an alternative, or denial.
2. 
The concurrence of a majority of the members of the City Council present and voting, when a quorum is present, is necessary to decide and question before the City Council.
F. 
Notice of decision. Notice of decision must be mailed within seven days after the decision is filed with the Director to all persons who testified orally or in writing.
G. 
Final decision and effective date. The decision of a Legislative application is final and effective on the date specified in the enacting ordinance.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.710.130 Special Procedures.

A. 
Expedited land divisions. The expedited land division (ELD) procedure provides an alternative to the standard procedures for some land divisions. The applicant may choose to use the ELD process if the land division request meets all of the elements specified in ORS 197.360. The steps of this procedure are in ORS 197.365 through 197.375. The application submittal requirements are provided in Section 18.710.030.
B. 
Limited land use decisions. A limited land use decision (LLD) is defined and may be used in the manner set forth in ORS 197.015(12).
1. 
An applicant who wishes to use an LLD procedure instead of the regular procedure type assigned to it, must request the use of the LLD at the time the application is filed, or forfeit their right to use it;
2. 
An LLD will be reviewed in compliance with ORS 197.195. The city will follow the city's Type II procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.060, except to the extent otherwise required by applicable state law.
C. 
Affordable housing developments. Applications for affordable housing developments qualify for a reduced review time of 100 days from the date the application is deemed complete, provided the following are met:
1. 
The application is for apartment or rowhouse development containing five or more dwelling units;
2. 
At least 50% of the dwelling units included in the development will be sold or rented as affordable to households with incomes equal to or less than 60% of the median family income for Washington County, or for the state, whichever is greater; and
3. 
The development is conditioned on the recording of a covenant appurtenant, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, that prohibits the sale or rental of any affordable dwelling unit used to meet the standard of Paragraph 18.710.130.C.2, except as housing that meets that standard, for a period of 60 years from the date of the certificate of occupancy.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.715.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an appropriate and efficient review process for granting relief from the specific requirements of this title to allow reasonable development or restricted uses or prevent undue hardship. Adjustments are intended to provide limited flexibility for development to address the requirements of this title through alternative or innovative means.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.715.020 Applicability.

A. 
Applicability. This chapter applies to all proposals to adjust an existing requirement of this title. All requirements, such as development or design standards, may be adjusted except as provided in Subsection 18.715.020.B or where specifically provided for elsewhere in this title, such as in Chapter 18.660, Tigard Triangle Plan District.
B. 
Prohibited adjustments. Adjustments are prohibited in the following situations:
1. 
To allow a primary or accessory use that is prohibited;
2. 
To change or eliminate a regulation that contains an express prohibition;
3. 
To change or eliminate a threshold for a review;
4. 
To change or eliminate any part of an approval process, including approval periods;
5. 
To change a definition, a method of measurement, or the description of a use category;
6. 
To change or eliminate any regulations in Chapter 18.510, Sensitive Lands; or
7. 
To change the required density for a housing type in a residential zone.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.715.030 General Provisions.

A. 
An applicant may seek relief from the specific requirements of this title through one of three types of adjustments. An applicant may either demonstrate that a proposed adjustment meets the criteria for adjustments to development standards or use restrictions; or that a hardship exists and a proposed adjustment is necessary to not preclude all reasonable economic use of the property.
B. 
Some plan districts contain specific adjustment processes and approval criteria, which are evaluated separately from this chapter, as provided in Chapter 18.650, Tigard Downtown Plan District, and Chapter 18.660, Tigard Triangle Plan District.
C. 
Multiple adjustment proposals will be processed concurrently.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.715.040 Approval Process.

An adjustment application is processed through a Type II procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1)

§ 18.715.050 Approval Criteria.

The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions an adjustment application when all of the criteria in Subsection 18.715.050.A, B, or C are met.
A. 
Criteria for adjustments to development standards.
1. 
The proposed adjustment results in development that is generally consistent with the purpose of the development standard to be adjusted and meets one of the following:
a. 
Has only minor impacts on surrounding properties or public facilities,
b. 
Addresses a site constraint or unusual situation, or
c. 
Utilizes innovative design or results in sustainable development;
2. 
The proposed adjustment does not have a greater impact on city-designated sensitive lands than would otherwise occur if the adjustment was not approved;
3. 
If the proposed adjustment addresses a site constraint or unusual situation, utilizes innovative design, or results in sustainable development, any impacts from the proposed adjustment are mitigated to the extent practicable; and
4. 
If more than one adjustment is proposed, the cumulative effect of all the adjustments results in development that has only minor impacts on surrounding properties or public facilities.
B. 
Criteria for adjustments to use restrictions.
1. 
The proposed adjustment is generally consistent with the purpose of the base zone where the restricted use is located;
2. 
The proposal includes public benefits. Public benefits may include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. 
Energy Trust Path to Net Zero certification, as demonstrated by an approved EUI number.
b. 
On-site generation and storage of renewable power.
c. 
Off-site improvements to active transportation facilities.
d. 
Other similar item as determined by the director;
3. 
Any impacts resulting from the adjustment are mitigated to the maximum extent practicable;
4. 
The proposed adjustment does not have a greater impact on city-designated sensitive lands than would otherwise occur if the adjustment was not approved; and
5. 
If more than one adjustment is proposed, the cumulative effect of all the adjustments and associated mitigations results in development and activity that has only minor impacts on surrounding properties or public facilities.
C. 
Criteria for demonstrating hardship.
1. 
Application of the development standard proposed for adjustment would preclude all reasonable economic use of the property;
2. 
The need for the proposed adjustment is the result of conditions or circumstances outside the control of the applicant or property owner;
3. 
The proposed adjustment results in development that equally or better meets the purpose of the development standard to be modified; and
4. 
Any impacts from the proposed adjustment are mitigated to the extent practicable.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.720.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to establish procedures and criteria for annexations, under the provisions of Metro Code Chapter 3.09 and Oregon Revised Statutes including, but not limited to, ORS Chapter 222. The provisions of this chapter are intended to achieve the orderly and efficient annexation of lands to the city that will result in providing a complete range of urban services and consistency with the comprehensive plan.
(Ord. 17-22 §2)

§ 18.720.020 Approval Process.

A. 
A quasi-judicial annexation application is processed through a Type III-Modified procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.090. Quasi-judicial annexations are decided by the City Council with a recommendation by Planning Commission.
B. 
A legislative annexation application is processed through the Legislative procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.120.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.720.030 Approval Criteria.

A. 
Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with modification an annexation application when all of the following are met:
1. 
The annexation complies with Metro Code 3.09; and
2. 
The annexation is in the city's best interest.
B. 
Assignment of comprehensive plan and zoning designations. The comprehensive plan designation and the zoning designation placed on the property is the city's base zone that most closely implements the city's or county's comprehensive plan map designation. The assignment of these designations occurs automatically and concurrently with the annexation. In the case of land that carries county designations, the city will convert the county's comprehensive plan map and zoning designations to the city designations that are the most similar. A zone change is required if the applicant requests a comprehensive plan map or zoning map designation other than the existing designations. A request for a zone change may be processed concurrently with an annexation application or after the annexation has been approved. Within the Washington Square Regional Center, the assignment of city comprehensive plan and zoning designations will be as provided in Chapter 18.670, Washington Square Regional Center Plan District.
C. 
Conversion table. Table 18.720.1 summarizes the conversion of the county's plan and zoning designations to city designations that are most similar.
Table 18.720.1
Conversion Table for County and City Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations
Washington County Land Use Districts/Plan Designation
City of Tigard Zoning
City of Tigard Zone Name
R-5 Res. 5 units per acre
RES-B
Residential-B
R-6 Res. 6 units per acre
RES-C
Residential-C
R-9 Res. 9 units per acre
RES-D
Residential-D
R-15 Res. 15 units per acre
RES-E
Residential-E
R-24 Res. 24 units per acre
RES-E
Residential-E
Office Commercial (OC)
MUE
Mixed-Use Employment
Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
MUR
Mixed-Use Residential
General Commercial (GC)
COM
Commercial
Industrial (IND)
IND
Industrial
Institutional (INST)
Equivalent to adjacent County base zone
Equivalent to adjacent County base zone
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.725.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to ensure specific areas of the city utilize site and building design techniques that prioritize the well-being of people and promote carbon responsible transportation options, including transit. Design review facilitates creative site and building designs that result in high quality buildings, public spaces, and active transportation facilities.
(Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.725.020 Applicability.

This chapter applies to all new development, substantial redevelopment, or modifications to development or land use approvals where development design review is either proposed or required as provided in Subsection 18.670.040.B.
(Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.725.030 General provisions.

A. 
If a proposal includes a change to a use restriction provided in Subsection 18.670.050.B, the proposed change is reviewed through the development design review process.
B. 
Where development design review is proposed or required:
1. 
Site development review is not required.
2. 
Planned development review may not be requested.
3. 
Conditional use applications must be processed concurrently with the design development review.
(Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.725.040 Review process.

A development design review application is processed through a Type II procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060, using the approval criteria in Section 18.725.050.
(Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.725.050 Approval criteria.

The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a development design review application when all of following criteria are met:
A. 
Scale. The proposed development is thoughtfully integrated with its surroundings, at an urban scale that addresses pedestrian needs and comfort within the context of the area to be developed. Single story buildings are limited to buildings with a maximum 5,000 square-foot footprint and where promoting incremental development. The proposed development provides pedestrian-scaled places with strong relationships among buildings, open spaces, and pedestrian pathways;
B. 
Pedestrian comfort. The proposed development is designed to support pedestrian access, safety, and comfort on and adjacent to the site. The proposed development bridges or removes any pedestrian barriers and implements pedestrian-friendly designs and block lengths;
C. 
Building design. All building facades or fences that face active transportation facilities and are intended for regular public access are visually appealing and provide design elements including facade variation and windows. Buildings incorporate exterior design and building materials that exhibit permanence and quality;
D. 
Parking. Pedestrian paths providing access to parking areas are designed so that a visitor only needs to park once to easily and comfortably access multiple destinations on site. Development also complies with the maximum parking standards provided in Chapter 18.410, Off-Street Parking and Loading;
E. 
Common space. The proposed development includes publicly accessible common space that is designed to encourage public gathering through the integration of features such as broad steps or benches that serve as permanent seating, stoops, fountains, or plazas. Common space is located to easily serve the site and public, and is designed to provide safety and comfort for users while promoting vibrancy and livability.
F. 
Active transportation facilities. Active transportation facilities are designed to be comfortable and desirable facilities to use and are visually prioritized over facilities intended for use by motor vehicles.
G. 
Transit. The proposed development appropriately accommodates transit to or through the site in ways that best serve the public and proposed users of the development. The applicant provides documentation that TriMet has reviewed and approved any changes or impacts to transit routes or facilities.
H. 
Stormwater facilities. Stormwater facilities provide community benefits in addition to stormwater management. Stormwater facilities are vegetated and thoughtfully integrated into the development site through the inclusion of features such as seating, sculptural elements, and pedestrian paths. Stormwater facilities may be used to meet minimum common open space requirements when designed to facilitate public access.
I. 
Sustainability and resiliency. The development incorporates sustainable and resilient site and building designs that reduce GHG emissions and operating costs, improve livability, and reduce impacts from natural hazards and disasters.
J. 
Streets and access. The city engineer has determined that any changes to streets or access points do not result in unsafe conditions. All private streets are located within tracts and public access easements. All transportation improvements are consistent with Map 18.670.B.
K. 
Trees. The proposed development uses trees and landscaping to create a sense of place, provide protection from the elements, and mitigate the heat island effect of urban development. Development also complies with parking lot canopy requirements as provided in Subsection 18.410.030.M.
L. 
Flexibility request. If the proposal includes a change to a use restriction, the change results in development that is appropriately located, designed, and scaled to preserve and promote pedestrian-scaled urban development.
(Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.725.060 Conditions of approval.

The approval authority may impose conditions of approval that are suitable and necessary to ensure that the proposal is consistent with the purpose of this chapter as embodied by the approval criteria. Conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following:
A. 
Requiring more or higher quality pedestrian-oriented architectural elements;
B. 
Requiring more or higher quality public spaces or community amenities;
C. 
Requiring higher quality active transportation facilities or a more robust active transportation network;
D. 
Requiring modifications to building height, size, location, or materials;
E. 
Requiring modifications to parking lot size or location;
F. 
Requiring separation or screening of uses, buildings, parking lots, or service areas from public spaces or adjacent uses;
G. 
Requiring separation or screening of private residential spaces, such as balconies, from public spaces or adjacent uses;
H. 
Limiting or otherwise designating the size, number, or location of vehicle access points; or
I. 
Limiting or otherwise designating the location, intensity, and shielding of outdoor lighting.
(Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.730.010 Purpose.

The purpose of director determinations is to resolve situations where terms or phrases within this title are ambiguous or subject to two or more reasonable meanings as applied to a specific property or use, or where this title contains a specific provision for a director determination.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.730.020 Applicability.

Director determinations may be issued for the following:
A. 
An interpretation of any term or phrase in this title.
B. 
A determination of a nonconforming use, an unlisted use, modification of certain conditions of approval, reasonable accommodation, zone boundary, or as otherwise provided in this title.
(Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.730.030 General Provisions.

A. 
Director's authority to initiate. The director may initiate a Director determination on behalf of the city, either specific or not specific to a particular property or circumstance. The Director may also initiate a Director determination when there is a reasonable dispute or lack of clarity regarding allowed uses on a property. If initiated by the director, no application form or payment are required.
B. 
Director's authority to decline an application. The Director may decline to issue a Director determination. If an application for a Director determination is declined, the Director will respond within 14 days following the date of the request. The Director's decision to decline an application is final when the decision is mailed to the party requesting the determination. The decision to decline to issue a director determination is the city's final local decision.
(Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.730.040 Approval Process.

A Director determination application is processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050.
(Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1)

§ 18.730.050 Approval Criteria.

A Director determination has no specific approval criteria, except in the following cases:
A. 
The criteria for determination of a nonconforming use are provided in Section 18.50.030.
B. 
The criteria for determination of an unlisted use are provided in Subsection 18.60.030.C.
C. 
The criteria for modification of an original condition of approval are provided in Paragraph 18.20.050.E.4.
D. 
The criteria for determination of a zone boundary are provided in Subsection 18.10.050.C.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.740.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an appropriate review process for evaluating and establishing conditional uses to ensure that they are appropriately located within the community, reasonably compatible with surrounding uses, and advancing the community's vision to become a walkable, healthy, and inclusive city.
Conditional uses are not allowed by right. Although they may serve important public and private interests, conditional uses are subject to conditional use review because their size, operation, or characteristics require case-by-case evaluation to identify and mitigate impacts to surrounding properties, public facilities, or the environment. A conditional use approval does not constitute a zone change and is subject to any modifications, conditions, or restrictions deemed appropriate by the approval authority.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.740.020 Applicability.

This chapter applies to all new or existing uses identified in this title as conditional uses.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.740.030 General Provisions.

A. 
Conditional use approval is required to establish a new conditional use or to substantially redevelop an existing conditional use.
B. 
Conditional use approvals do not expire once utilized, except through discontinuation as described in Section 18.740.080.
C. 
Conditional use approvals or existing conditional uses may be modified as allowed by Chapter 18.765, Modifications.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.740.040 Approval Process.

A conditional use application is processed through a Type III-HO procedure as provided in Section 18.710.080.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.740.050 Approval Criteria.

The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a conditional use application when all of the following criteria are met:
A. 
The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed development or use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features;
B. 
The operating characteristics of the proposed use are reasonably compatible with surrounding properties, public facilities, or sensitive lands with regard to noise, vibration, air quality, glare, odor, and dust;
C. 
The physical characteristics of the proposed development are reasonably compatible with surrounding properties, public facilities, or sensitive lands with regard to building height, location, and orientation;
D. 
Any adverse impacts from the proposed development or use are mitigated to the extent practicable;
E. 
The proposed development is located and designed to support pedestrian access, safety, and comfort on and adjacent to the site where practicable;
F. 
The proposed development complies with all applicable standards and requirements of this title, except where an adjustment has been approved or the approval authority has determined that a more restrictive development or design standard is necessary to address issues of compatibility or walkability; and
G. 
Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development or use at the time of occupancy.
H. 
If the proposed development is located in an industrial zone, it provides public benefits consistent with the purpose of the base zone where the restricted use is located. Potential benefits include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. 
Energy Trust Path to Net Zero certification, as demonstrated by an approved EUI number,
2. 
On-site generation and storage of renewable power,
3. 
Off-site improvements to active transportation facilities,
4. 
Documentation that the appropriate Jobs and Economic Development Fee has been paid, as determined by the Economic Development Manager or designee, or
5. 
Other similar item as determined by the Director.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1;Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.740.060 Conditions of Approval.

The approval authority may impose conditions of approval on the proposed development or use that are suitable and necessary to meet the approval criteria and to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties, protect the public from adverse impacts, or advance the community's vision to become a walkable, healthy, and inclusive city. Conditions may include but are not limited to the following:
A. 
Limiting the hours, days, place, and manner of operation;
B. 
Requiring design features that minimize adverse operational impacts such as those caused by noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor, and dust;
C. 
Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, vegetation, land forms, and habitat areas or limiting lot coverage;
D. 
Requiring pedestrian access or improvements within the development or between the development and the surrounding community;
E. 
Requiring additional landscaping or screening of structures, off-street parking, or service areas;
F. 
Requiring or limiting the location, intensity, and shielding of outdoor lighting; or
G. 
Requiring or limiting the size, height, location, and materials of fences.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1)

§ 18.740.070 Pre-Existing Conditional Uses.

A. 
A pre-existing conditional use is any established use currently identified in this title as a conditional use where the use was not initially subject to city regulations when established, but became subject to city regulations through annexation or incorporation. A pre-existing conditional use is the same as an approved conditional use for purposes of this chapter.
B. 
A pre-existing conditional use is not a nonconforming use and is therefore not subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.50, Nonconforming Circumstances. However, any nonconforming development associated with a pre-existing conditional use is subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.50, Nonconforming Circumstances.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.740.080 Discontinuation of Existing Conditional Uses.

A conditional use automatically loses its conditional use status when either of the following occurs:
A. 
The property owner replaces the conditional use with a use allowed by right or obtains approval to establish a different conditional use; or
B. 
The conditional use is discontinued for more than one year. Calculation of the one-year period begins on the earliest date that any of the following events occurs:
1. 
The conditional use physically vacates the location where it was approved to operate;
2. 
The conditional use ceases to provide the service or activity that was the subject of the conditional use approval;
3. 
The lease or contract allowing the conditional use to operate at the approved location is terminated; or
4. 
A final reading of the water or power meter serving the conditional use is made by the applicable utility provider.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.745.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an appropriate and efficient review process for extending the time period during which land use approvals are valid and may be utilized.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.745.020 Applicability.

A. 
This chapter applies to all approved land use applications that are subject to expiration as described in Subsection 18.20.050.G but have not yet expired.
B. 
This chapter does not apply to approved land use applications that are expired or where an extension is prohibited or otherwise provided for in another chapter of this title.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.745.030 General Provisions.

A. 
An approved land use application is eligible for one extension.
B. 
A complete extension application must be submitted prior to the expiration date of the original approval, but no earlier than 6 months in advance of the expiration date.
C. 
An extension application may not include a proposal to modify the original application or any conditions of approval.
D. 
If an extension is approved, the expiration date for the original approval is extended an additional 2 years from the effective date of the original approval.
E. 
If the original approval included multiple applications, a single extension application may include all applications associated with the original approval.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.745.040 Approval Process.

A. 
If the original approval was processed through a Type I procedure, an extension application is processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050.
B. 
If the original approval was processed through a Type II or Type III procedure, an extension application is processed through a Type II procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.060.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1)

§ 18.745.050 Approval Criteria.

The approval authority will approve an extension application when all of the following criteria are met:
A. 
A good faith effort was made to utilize the approval within the specified time period and the need for the extension is the result of conditions or circumstances outside the control of the applicant or property owner; and
B. 
If the original application included a transportation impact study or a sensitive lands report, an updated report was provided with the extension application that showed no significant changes on or near the development site. A letter from a recognized professional satisfies this criterion if it states that conditions have not changed since the approval of the original application and no new analysis is warranted.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.750.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an approval process and standards for food carts and food cart pods as a means to:
A. 
Provide entrepreneurial opportunities;
B. 
Encourage a variety of eating and drinking establishments to serve the Tigard community;
C. 
Activate neighborhoods and street frontages with pedestrian-friendly amenities;
D. 
Encourage the use of underutilized parking areas;
E. 
Ensure proper design and installation to protect public infrastructure; and
F. 
Protect public health, safety, and welfare.
(Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.750.020 Applicability.

A. 
Applicability. The provisions of this chapter apply to existing food carts and food cart pods, the siting of new food carts on private property, and the development of new food cart pods.
B. 
Nonconforming circumstances.
1. 
A food cart that was established prior to January 31, 2025 may continue to operate provided it meets all of the following:
a. 
Indoor Sales and Service uses are allowed in the base zone where the food cart is located and operating;
b. 
The food cart is located on a paved surface;
c. 
The food cart is not connected to permanent utilities;
d. 
The food cart has not moved from the site where it was legally established; and
e. 
The food cart has an adequate means of collecting and containing fats, oils, and grease prior to wastewater discharge.
2. 
A food cart pod that was established prior to January 31, 2025 may continue to operate provided it meets all of the following:
a. 
Indoor Sales and Service uses are allowed in the base zone where the food cart pod is located and operating;
b. 
All food carts included in the food cart pod are located on paved surfaces;
c. 
The food cart pod has not increased the total number of carts or cart stalls after January 31, 2025;
d. 
The food cart pod has been in continuous operation with no interruption of operations of more than 30 days; and
e. 
The food cart pod has an adequate means of collecting and containing fats, oils, and grease prior to wastewater discharge.
C. 
Exemptions. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to temporary food truck uses.
(Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.750.030 General Provisions.

A. 
Food carts and food cart pods must maintain an active Tigard business license.
B. 
Food carts must be inspected and licensed by the Washington County Environmental Health department.
C. 
Waste containers must be provided and be maintained in sanitary condition.
D. 
All cords, hoses, pipes, cables, and similar items serving food carts must be located and protected in a manner that does not create a tripping hazard. Where these items must be located in pedestrian areas, they must be adequately protected and marked.
E. 
Each new food cart on a property is required to obtain an approval under the provisions of this chapter prior to operation except that food carts located within an approved food cart pod are exempt from individual approvals.
F. 
Drive-through services are prohibited for food carts and food cart pods.
(Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.750.040 Approval Process.

A. 
Food cart. A food cart application is processed through a Type II procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060.
B. 
Food cart pod. A food cart pod application is processed through a Type II procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060.
C. 
Modifications. Modifications to approved food carts and food cart pods require a new approval under the provisions of this chapter, except that the changing of food carts in approved food carts pods are allowed provided the carts are located in an approved and marked stall.
(Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.750.050 Approval Criteria.

A. 
The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a food cart application when all of the standards of Section 18.750.060 are met.
B. 
The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a food cart pod application when all of the standards of Section 18.750.070 are met.
(Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.750.060 Food Cart Standards.

A. 
The addition of the food cart must not result in more than three food carts being present on the subject property.
B. 
The food cart must be located on a property with an existing legal nonresidential use.
C. 
The entire footprint of the food cart must be located on a paved surface.
D. 
The food cart must meet a minimum six-foot setback from any street property line.
E. 
The food cart must meet the minimum setback standards along all other property lines that apply to a new nonresidential building in the base zone in which it is located. Where a property is adjacent a residential zone, the food cart must meet a minimum 20-foot setback.
F. 
The food cart must be separated from any other food cart or building on the property by a minimum of five feet.
G. 
The food cart must not obstruct or otherwise make unsafe any areas designed for pedestrian or vehicle movement to, from, or through the property on which the food cart is located.
H. 
The food cart must not be located within any public access or utility easement.
I. 
The food cart service window must be oriented such that customer queueing areas do not extend into vehicle maneuvering areas, pedestrian paths, or public rights-of-way.
J. 
The food cart must have wheels and the wheels must remain permanently attached and functional.
K. 
If there are permanent utilities located on the property, hardwired connections between the food cart and the utilities are prohibited. Any connection to utilities must be temporary and capable of being easily and safely disconnected.
L. 
The food cart must include adequate means for the collection and removal of fats, oils, and grease.
M. 
Any canopies, awnings, or other attachments to the food cart must maintain a minimum of seven feet of vertical clearance, be entirely supported by the cart, and must be fully collapsed when the food cart is not in operation.
N. 
Food carts are prohibited in any required vision clearance area, as provided in Chapter 18.930 Vision Clearance Areas.
O. 
Any associated signs must meet the regulations for the base zone as provided in Chapter 18.435, Signs.
(Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.750.070 Food Cart Pod Standards.

A. 
The food cart pod must be located in a base zone that allows Indoor Sales and Services uses.
B. 
The food cart pod must include at least one permanent building on the property that provides public restrooms.
C. 
Any new building of more than 800 square feet must meet the minimum and maximum setback standards for the base zone.
D. 
The food cart pod must not include more than 20 food cart stalls.
E. 
Each food cart stall must be a maximum of 375 square feet and contain no more than one food cart.
F. 
All food cart stalls must be located on paved areas and all stall locations must be demarcated on the pavement in a permanent manner.
G. 
All food cart stalls must meet a minimum six-foot setback along all street property lines.
H. 
All food cart stalls must meet the minimum setback standards along all other property lines that apply to a new nonresidential building in the base zone in which it is located. Where a property is adjacent to a residential zone, the food cart stall must meet a minimum 20-foot setback.
I. 
All food cart stalls must be separated from other stalls by a minimum of five feet.
J. 
The food cart pod must include centralized on-site facilities for the collection and removal of fats, oils, and grease, as approved by the city engineer.
K. 
Utility connections, including electricity, potable water, and water disposal must be provided at each stall in the form of temporary connection assemblies, such as those used in recreational vehicle parks. Permanent utility connections to carts are not allowed. Water disposal connections must be connected to the required centralized fats, oils, and grease management system.
L. 
The site must be arranged and demarcated in a manner to ensure that food cart stalls do not obstruct or otherwise make unsafe any areas designed for pedestrian or vehicle movement to, from, or through the property.
M. 
All food cart stalls and any associated temporary or permanent structures must not be located within any public access or utility easement.
N. 
All food cart service windows must be oriented such that customer queueing areas do not extend into vehicle maneuvering areas, pedestrian paths, or public rights-of-way.
O. 
Any canopies, awnings, or other attachments to any food cart must maintain a minimum of seven feet of vertical clearance and be entirely supported by the cart.
P. 
Temporary awnings or membranes may be used for weather protection over seating areas, provided they are:
1. 
200 square feet or less in area,
2. 
15 feet in height or less, as measured to the highest point, and
3. 
Adequately anchored to prevent windthrow.
Q. 
Accessory structures such as covered seating areas must meet the minimum setback standards that apply to a new nonresidential building in the base zone in which it is located.
R. 
Temporary storage containers are prohibited on the property. All storage must be located in permanent buildings and structures.
S. 
Any associated signs must meet the regulations for the base zone as provided in Chapter 18.435, Signs.
T. 
Off-street parking areas must meet the applicable provisions of Chapter 18.410, Off-Street Parking and Loading.
U. 
The food cart pod must meet all other applicable standards of this title.
(Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.755.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to:
A. 
Facilitate the protection, enhancement, and perpetuation of historic resources that represent or reflect elements of the city's cultural, social, economic, political, and architectural history;
B. 
Enhance any registered historic or cultural resources designated in the city;
C. 
Stabilize and improve property values;
D. 
Strengthen the economy of the city;
E. 
Promote the use of historic resources for the education, pleasure, energy conservation, housing, and public welfare of the city; and
F. 
Implement the applicable provisions of Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Goal 5 and the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.755.020 Applicability.

A. 
Designated areas. The Historic Resource Overlay zone applies to the following sites and areas:
1. 
Historic sites and areas;
2. 
Cultural sites and areas; and
3. 
Landmarks.
B. 
Designated activities. The provisions of this chapter apply to:
1. 
The designation of Historic Resource Overlay zones,
2. 
The removal of Historic Resource Overlay zones,
3. 
The demolition of structures within a Historic Resource Overlay zone, and
4. 
The exterior alteration of structures or new construction within a Historic Resource Overlay zone.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.755.030 General Provisions.

A. 
Approval of exterior alterations. Exterior alterations of any structure in a Historic Resource Overlay zone or construction of any new structure in a Historic Resource Overlay zone without approval is prohibited, except as provided in Subsections 18.755.040.C and D, respectively.
B. 
Approval of demolition. Demolition of a structure located within a Historic Resource Overlay zone without approval under the provisions of this chapter is prohibited.
C. 
Exemptions.
1. 
Exterior remodeling, as governed by this chapter, includes any change or alteration in design or other exterior treatment excluding painting;
2. 
Nothing in this chapter prevents the ordinary maintenance or repair of any architectural features that does not involve a change in design, material, or the outward appearance of such feature, which the building official must certify is required for the public safety because of its unsafe or dangerous condition.
D. 
Condition of approval. If any alteration or demolition of a historic resource is approved through the provisions of this chapter, a condition of approval must be applied that allows the Washington County Museum to obtain:
1. 
A pictorial and graphic history of the resource; and
2. 
Artifacts from the resource it deems worthy of preservation.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.755.040 Approval Process and Approval Criteria.

A. 
Criteria for Historic Resource Overlay zone designation.
1. 
An application for a Historic Resource Overlay zone designation is processed through a Type III-PC procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.080. The approval authority will approve the application when any of the following are met:
a. 
The proposed site or area would serve the purpose of the Historic Resource Overlay zone as stated in Section 18.755.010;
b. 
The site or area proposed for the designation reflects the broad cultural or natural history of the community, state, or nation;
c. 
The site or area is identified with historic personages, or with important events in national, state, or local history;
d. 
The site or area proposed for the designation embodies the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural specimen inherently valuable for a study of a period, style, or method of construction; or
e. 
The proposed site or area is a notable work of a master builder, designer, or architect.
2. 
The age of a specific building is not sufficient in itself to warrant designation as historic.
B. 
Criteria for removal of Historic Resource Overlay zone designation. An application for removal of a Historic Resource Overlay zone designation is processed through a Type III-PC procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.080. The approval authority will approve the application when any of the following are met:
1. 
The original Historic Resource Overlay zone designation was placed on the site in error;
2. 
The resource designated with the Historic Resource Overlay zone designation has ceased to exist;
3. 
The resource designated with the Historic Resource Overlay zone designation is no longer of significance to the public; or
4. 
The Historic Resource Overlay zone designation is causing the property owner to bear an unfair economic burden to maintain the property as a historic or cultural resource.
C. 
Criteria for exterior alterations. An application for exterior alterations of structures in a Historic Resource Overlay zone is processed through a Type II procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.060. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions the application when all of the following are met:
1. 
The purpose of the Historic Resource Overlay zone provided in Section 18.755.010;
2. 
The economic use of the structure in a Historic Resource Overlay zone and the reasonableness of the proposed alteration and their relationship to the public interest in the structure's or landmark's preservation or renovation;
3. 
The value and significance of the structure or landmark in a Historic Resource Overlay zone;
4. 
The physical condition of the structure or landmark in a Historic Resource Overlay zone; and
5. 
The general compatibility of exterior design, arrangement, proportion, detail, scale, color, texture, and materials proposed to be used with an existing structure in a Historic Resource Overlay zone.
D. 
Criteria for construction of new structures. An application for construction of new structures in a Historic Resource Overlay zone is processed through a Type II procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.060. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions the application when all of the following are met:
1. 
The purpose of the Historic Resource Overlay zone as provided in Section 18.755.010;
2. 
The economic effect of the new structure on the historic value of the Historic Resource Overlay zone;
3. 
The visual effect of the proposed new structure on the architectural character of the Historic Resource Overlay zone; and
4. 
The general compatibility of the exterior design, arrangement, proportion, detail, scale, color, texture and materials proposed to be used in the construction of the new structure.
E. 
Criteria for demolition. An application for demolition of structures in a Historic Resource Overlay zone is processed through a Type II procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.060. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions the application when all of the following are met:
1. 
The purpose of the Historic Resource Overlay zone as provided in Section 18.755.010;
2. 
The criteria used in the original designation of the Historic Resource Overlay zone in which the property under consideration is situated;
3. 
The historical and architectural style, the general design, arrangement, materials of the structure in question, or its appurtenant fixtures; the relationship of such features to similar features of the other buildings within the Historic Resource Overlay zone; and the position of the building or structure in relation to public rights-of-way, and to other buildings and structures in the area;
4. 
The effects of the proposed work upon the protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of the Historic Resource Overlay zone that cause it to possess a special character or special historical or aesthetic interest or value; and
5. 
Whether denial of the permit will subject the city to potential liability, involve substantial hardship to the applicant, and whether issuance of the permit would act to the substantial detriment of the public welfare and would be contrary to the intent and purposes of this title.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2; Ord. 25-01, 1/28/2025)

§ 18.760.010 Purpose.

It is the purpose of this chapter to:
A. 
Allow residents an opportunity to use their homes to engage in small-scale business ventures that could not be sustained if it were necessary to lease commercial quarters, or because the nature of the activity would make it impractical to expand to a full-scale enterprise; and
B. 
Establish approval standards to ensure that home occupations are conducted as lawful uses that are subordinate to the residential use of the property and are conducted in a manner that is not detrimental or disruptive in terms of appearance or operation to neighboring properties and residents.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2)

§ 18.760.020 Applicability.

A. 
Applicability. The provisions of this chapter apply to any accessory commercial use associated with a primary Household Living use.
B. 
Exemptions. The following activities and uses are exempt from the provisions of this chapter:
1. 
Garage sales;
2. 
For-profit production of produce or other food products grown on the premises. This may include temporary or seasonal sale of produce or other food products;
3. 
Family day care uses;
4. 
Hobbies that do not result in payment to those engaged in such activity; and
5. 
Legal nonconforming home occupations as provided in Section 18.760.090.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1; Ord. 22-09 §2)

§ 18.760.030 Approval Process.

A. 
Type I home occupations. A Type I home occupation application is processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050.
B. 
Type II home occupation permit. A Type II home occupation application is processed through a Type II procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.060.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1)

§ 18.760.040 Approval Criteria.

The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a home occupation application when all of the applicable general provisions in Section 18.760.050 and approval standards in Section 18.760.060 are met.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 19-09 §1)

§ 18.760.050 General Provisions.

All home occupations except legal nonconforming home occupations must comply with all of the following in addition to the approval standards for Type I and Type II home occupations provided in Section 18.760.060.
A. 
Home occupations may be undertaken only by a principal occupant of a dwelling unit.
B. 
Deliveries to the residence by suppliers are limited to 3 per week.
C. 
The home occupation must comply with all provisions of Title 6 of the Tigard Municipal Code.
D. 
The home occupation must be operated entirely within the dwelling unit or a conforming accessory structure. The maximum square footage used for the home occupation and associated storage of materials and products is 25 percent of the combined residence and accessory structure floor area or 528 square feet, whichever is smaller. All indoor storage of materials or products must meet the provisions of the building, fire, health, and housing codes.
E. 
A home occupation may not necessitate a change in the state building code use classification of a dwelling unit. Any accessory building that is used must meet building code requirements.
F. 
A dwelling unit may have more than one home occupation, provided that the combined floor area used for the home occupations does not exceed the square footage limitation imposed in Subsection 18.760.040.D. Each home occupation must apply for a separate home occupation permit, if required by this chapter.
G. 
The following activities are prohibited as part of a home occupation:
1. 
Storage or distribution of toxic, flammable, or explosive materials, and
2. 
Spray painting or spray finishing operations that involve toxic or flammable materials that in the judgment of the fire marshal pose a dangerous risk to the residence, its occupants, or surrounding properties.
H. 
Additional parking is not required for home occupations.
I. 
The following activities are not allowed as home occupations:
1. 
Motor vehicle repair and painting;
2. 
Mechanical repair conducted outside of an entirely-enclosed building;
3. 
Junk and salvage operations; and
4. 
Storage or sale of fireworks.
J. 
Exterior storage of commercial vehicles, as defined in the Oregon Vehicle Code, is prohibited, except that 1 commercially licensed vehicle of not more than 0.75 ton gross vehicle weight (GVW) may be parked outside of a structure.
(Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1)

§ 18.760.060 Approval Standards.

A. 
Type I home occupations. Type I home occupations must comply with the following:
1. 
Outside volunteers or employees are prohibited on the premises. Only members of the household may be engaged in the business activity;
2. 
Exterior signs that identify the property as a business location are prohibited;
3. 
Clients or customers are prohibited from visiting the premises for any reason; and
4. 
Exterior storage of materials is prohibited.
B. 
Type II home occupations. Type II home occupations must comply with the following:
1. 
One non-illuminated sign not exceeding 1.5 square feet is allowed. The sign may be attached to the residence or an accessory structure, or be placed in a window;
2. 
Only 1 outside volunteer or employee who is not a member of the household is allowed on the premises;
3. 
Type II home occupations are not allowed on lots with cottage cluster, courtyard unit, or quad development, or on a lot with more than one accessory dwelling unit.
4. 
Up to 6 daily customers or clients are allowed. Customers and clients are prohibited from visiting the business between the hours of 10 p.m. and 8 a.m.; and
5. 
Storage areas for materials, goods, and equipment must be screened entirely from view by a solid fence. Storage must not exceed 5 percent of the total lot area and is prohibited within front or side setbacks.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 19-09 §1)

§ 18.760.070 Conditions of Approval.

The approval authority may impose conditions upon the approval of a Type II home occupation permit to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter. These conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following:
A. 
Further limiting the hours, days, place, and manner of operation;
B. 
Requiring site and building design features that minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor, and dust;
C. 
Requiring additional building setbacks, or increased lot area, depth, or width;
D. 
Further limiting the building area and outdoor storage used by the home occupation and restricting the location of the use on the site in relationship to adjoining uses;
E. 
Designating the size, number, location, and design of vehicle access points;
F. 
Requiring street right-of-way to be free at all times of vehicles parked in association with the home occupation;
G. 
Requiring landscaping, buffering, or screening of the home occupation from adjoining uses and establishing standards for the continued maintenance of these improvements;
H. 
Requiring storm drainage improvements and surfacing of parking and loading areas;
I. 
Limiting the extent and type of interior or exterior building remodeling necessary to accommodate the home occupation;
J. 
Limiting or setting standards for the location and intensity of outdoor lighting;
K. 
Requiring and designating the size, height, and location of fences and materials used for their construction;
L. 
Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, vegetation, watercourses, slopes, wildlife habitat areas, and drainage areas;
M. 
Limiting the type and number of vehicles or equipment to be parked or stored on the site; or
N. 
Any other limitations that the approval authority considers to be necessary or desirable to make the use comply with the purposes of this chapter and the underlying base zone.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 19-09 §1)

§ 18.760.080 Revocation of Home Occupation Permits.

A. 
Grounds for revocation. The Director may:
1. 
Revoke a home occupation approval if the conditions of approval have not been or are not being complied with and the home occupation is otherwise being conducted in a manner contrary to this chapter.
2. 
The Director may approve the use as it exists, revoke the home occupation permit, or compel measures to be taken to ensure compatibility with the neighborhood and conformance with this chapter after reviewing a complaint. Complaints may be originated by the City of Tigard or the public. Complaints from the public must clearly state the objection to the home occupation, such as:
a. 
Generation of excessive traffic;
b. 
Exclusive use of on-street parking spaces; or
c. 
Other offensive activities not compatible with a residential neighborhood.
B. 
Cessation of home occupation pending review. If it is determined by the Director in exercise of reasonable discretion, that the home occupation in question will affect public health and safety, the use may be ordered to cease pending hearings officer review or exhaustion of all appeals.
C. 
Waiting period for re-application. When a home occupation permit has been revoked due to violation of these standards, the permittee must wait a minimum period of one year before another application for a home occupation on the subject lot will be considered.
D. 
Invalidation of permit. A home occupation permit is valid only for the property designated on the application and is voided if the applicant moves from the residence.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1)

§ 18.760.090 Nonconforming Home Occupations.

A. 
Nonconforming home occupations. Ongoing home occupations may be granted nonconforming status provided that they were:
1. 
Allowed under county authority prior to annexation to the city and have been in continuous operation since initial approval; or
2. 
Allowed under city authority prior to 1983 and have since been in continuous operation.
B. 
Governing regulations. Nonconforming home occupations will be regulated as a nonconforming circumstance.
1. 
A nonconforming circumstance is further regulated by Chapter 18.50, Nonconforming Circumstances. Such use may continue until the use is expanded or altered so as to increase the level of noncompliance with this title.
2. 
The burden of proving a home occupation's nonconforming status rests with the property owner or tenant.
C. 
Violations. Home occupations without city or county approval that cannot prove nonconforming status will be considered in violation of this chapter and must cease until the appropriate approvals have been obtained.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 19-09 §1)

§ 18.765.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an appropriate and efficient review process for evaluating modifications to existing developments or land use approvals.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.765.020 Applicability.

A. 
This chapter applies to all proposals to modify an existing or proposed use, structure, site improvement, or condition of approval—for existing developments or land use approvals—when initially approved through one of the land use applications listed below:
1. 
Conditional uses,
2. 
Planned developments,
3. 
Site development reviews, or
4. 
Subdivisions and land partitions.
B. 
This chapter also applies to all proposals to modify an existing development that was not subject to city approval when developed but would be subject to city approval, through one of the land use applications listed in Paragraph 18.765.020.A.1 through 4, if proposed for development under current city regulations.
C. 
This chapter does not apply to proposals to modify a condition of approval where the modification is subject to the provisions of Paragraph 18.20.050.E.4.
D. 
This chapter does not apply to proposals to modify an urban forestry plan where the modification is subject to the provisions of Subsection 18.420.060.F.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.765.030 Review Type Determination.

A. 
The Director will determine the most appropriate review type for the proposed modification. In addition to Subsection 18.710.040.D, the Director's determination will consider whether the proposed modification involves any of the following:
1. 
Application of clear and objective standards or approval criteria;
2. 
Application of discretionary standards or approval criteria;
3. 
Exercise of professional judgment about technical issues; or
4. 
Exercise of limited discretion.
B. 
Allowed modifications involve the application of clear and objective standards that do not require the exercise of professional judgment about technical issues. These modifications do not require land use review.
C. 
Minor modifications involve the exercise of professional judgment about technical issues as they relate to the application of clear and objective or discretionary standards or approval criteria. These modifications require Type I land use review.
D. 
Major modifications involve the exercise of limited discretion as they relate to the application of clear and objective or discretionary standards or approval criteria. These modifications require Type II land use review.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.765.040 General Provisions.

A. 
A minor or major modification land use review is limited in scope to an evaluation of the modification's compliance with applicable standards and the degree of impact, if any, on surrounding properties, sensitive lands, or public facilities.
B. 
A proposed modification involving a nonconforming use or development is subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.50, Nonconforming Circumstances, in addition to the provisions of this chapter.
C. 
A proposed modification that constitutes substantial redevelopment, as determined by the director, requires submittal of a new land use application rather than a modification application.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.765.050 Allowed Modifications.

A. 
Definition. An allowed modification has the following characteristics:
1. 
It has negligible impacts on surrounding properties, sensitive lands, or public facilities;
2. 
It does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard or further out of conformance if already nonconforming, except where an adjustment has been approved; and
3. 
It does not alter or contravene any condition of approval.
B. 
Examples. Examples of allowed modifications include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. 
Increase in open space or landscaping.
2. 
Interior building modification or change of use that does not require the application of a higher parking quantity requirement.
3. 
Exterior building facade modification that does not require the application of any design standard.
4. 
Installation of mechanical equipment that does not involve the removal of any parking spaces or landscaping and where screening standards are met as provided in the applicable development standards chapter in 18.200 Residential Development Standards or 18.300 Nonresidential Development Standards.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.765.060 Minor Modifications.

A. 
Definition. A minor modification has the following characteristics:
1. 
It has minimal impacts on surrounding properties, sensitive lands, or public facilities;
2. 
It does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard or further out of conformance if already nonconforming, except where an adjustment has been approved; and
3. 
It does not require a technical study, such as a full transportation impact analysis, although it may require minor technical memos such as stormwater analysis.
B. 
Examples. Examples of minor modifications may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. 
Exterior building facade modification that requires the application of a design standard.
2. 
Change of use.
3. 
A minor change to screening, open space, or landscaping.
C. 
Approval process. A minor modification application is processed through a Type I procedure as provided in Section 18.710.050.
D. 
Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a minor modification application when all of the following criteria are met:
1. 
The proposed modification qualifies as a minor modification as defined in Subsection 18.765.060.A;
2. 
If the proposal involves the modification of a condition of approval, at least one of the following criteria is met:
a. 
The condition cannot be implemented for reasons outside the control of the applicant or property owner;
b. 
The condition is no longer needed or warranted because circumstances have changed; or
c. 
A new or modified condition better accomplishes the purpose of the original condition.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 22-10 §2; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.765.070 Major Modifications.

A. 
Definition. A major modification has the following characteristics:
1. 
It has more than minimal impacts on surrounding properties, sensitive lands, or public facilities but does not qualify as substantial redevelopment;
2. 
It does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard or further out of conformance if already nonconforming, except where an adjustment has been approved; and.
3. 
It may require a technical study, such as a full transportation impact analysis.
B. 
Examples. Examples of major modifications include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. 
A change to activities associated with a conditional use.
2. 
A change in housing type.
3. 
A change to screening, open space, or landscaping.
C. 
Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a major modification application when all of the following are met:
1. 
The proposed modification qualifies as a major modification as defined in Subsection 18.765.070.A;
2. 
The operating and physical characteristics of the modified development are reasonably compatible with surrounding properties, sensitive lands, or public facilities;
3. 
Any impacts from the proposed modification are mitigated to the extent practicable;
4. 
If the proposed modification involves development that has nonconforming structures or site improvements and exceeds the project valuation threshold listed in the city's Master Fees and Charges Schedule, the development will be improved as required by Subsection 18.765.070.E; and
5. 
If the proposal involves the modification of a condition of approval, at least one of the following criteria is met:
a. 
The condition cannot be implemented for reasons outside the control of the applicant or property owner;
b. 
The condition is no longer needed or warranted because circumstances have changed; or
c. 
A new or modified condition better accomplishes the purpose of the original condition.
D. 
Modifications to nonconforming development. The purpose of these provisions is to require existing development with nonconforming structures or site improvements to come into conformance with city standards gradually as structures or site improvements are modified over time. These provisions also give applicants the choice of making improvements that support pedestrians—in lieu of making improvements to come into conformance—in order to advance Tigard's vision to become a walkable, healthy, and inclusive city.
1. 
Development with nonconforming structures or site improvements is required to come closer or fully into conformance with all applicable development standards when the total project valuation of all proposed modifications equals or exceeds the amount listed in the city's Master Fees and Charges Schedule. The method for calculating total project valuation is as follows:
a. 
The total project valuation is based on the entire project and not individual development permits; and
b. 
The following modifications do not count toward the total project valuation:
i. 
Modifications to comply with fire and life safety requirements.
ii. 
Modifications to comply with applicable federal and state accessibility requirements.
iii. 
Modifications to improve seismic resiliency in conformance with state building codes.
iv. 
Modifications to improve or enlarge on-site stormwater management facilities in conformance with Clean Water Services and City of Tigard standards.
v. 
Modifications related to the installation of solar panels.
vi. 
Modifications to remove or remediate hazardous substances.
2. 
The applicant must demonstrate that a minimum of 10 percent of the total project valuation is being used to bring the development closer into conformance with all applicable development standards, except where:
a. 
The expenditure of a lesser amount brings the development fully into conformance with all applicable development standards;
b. 
No further improvements are practicable as determined by the Director; or
c. 
The cost to complete all required improvements exceeds 10 percent of the total project valuation, in which case the applicant must demonstrate that a minimum of 10 percent of the total project valuation is being used to bring the development closer into conformance with one or more development standards of the applicant's choosing.
3. 
The applicant must complete the improvements required by Paragraph 18.765.070.E.2 prior to final inspection or certificate of occupancy.
4. 
The applicant may choose to satisfy the requirements of Paragraph 18.765.070.E.2 by providing improvements that support pedestrians in lieu of bringing the development closer into conformance with all applicable development standards.
a. 
Pedestrian improvements may be to existing structures, site improvements, or public rights-of-way;
b. 
Pedestrian improvements must provide a new site or building element or enhance an existing site or building element. Improvements involving maintenance or repair of existing site improvements or structures do not satisfy this provision; and
c. 
Pedestrian improvements must be located in the public right-of-way or within 20 feet of a street property line. Improvements must not contravene any applicable standard and must fall into one of the following categories:
i. 
Pedestrian access and safety. Examples of access and safety improvements include:
(A) 
Building entrances that face a public sidewalk and provide direct pedestrian access to a public sidewalk;
(B) 
Paths that connect building entrances to public sidewalks using the shortest practicable route;
(C) 
Directional signage and lighting along paths that connect building entrances to public sidewalks;
(D) 
Wider sidewalks to further separate pedestrians from vehicle travel lanes; and
(E) 
Landscape strips or street trees to buffer pedestrians from vehicle travel lanes.
ii. 
Pedestrian comfort. Examples of comfort improvements include:
(A) 
Awnings over building entrances or windows for weather protection;
(B) 
Furnishings such as decorative trash cans or benches; and
(C) 
Installation of approved trees in the right-of-way or along the street property line to further separate pedestrians from parking areas or vehicle travel lanes and to provide weather protection.
iii. 
Visual interest. Examples of improvements that provide visual interest include:
(A) 
More or larger building windows that face a public sidewalk and provide building transparency for pedestrians;
(B) 
Pedestrian-scale architectural features such as window trim, awnings, wall trellises, or any permanent feature that reduces the visual impact of blank, flat, or long building walls; and
(C) 
Screening of parking or service areas with vegetation or decorative fencing or walls.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.770.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an appropriate review process for evaluating and establishing planned developments. Planned developments are typically large-scale developments or smaller developments on constrained sites that desire or need more flexibility than available through the adjustment process. The benefits of flexibility to a planned development may take many forms, including but not limited to the transfer of density across internal zone boundaries, greater diversity of housing types and uses, increased building height, or increased density.
The planned development review process provides an opportunity for innovative, creative, and well-designed developments that may be more intense than otherwise allowed by this title in exchange for developments that are thoughtfully integrated into the surrounding community and include features that benefit the public above and beyond what is generally required by this title. The benefits to the public from a planned development may take many forms, including but not limited to enhanced walkability or accessibility, increased housing options, increased open space, protection of significant tree groves, enhanced sensitive lands protection or restoration, enhanced outdoor recreational opportunities, enhanced public spaces or furnishings, pedestrian-scale architectural features, affordable housing, or sustainable features.
A planned development approval does not constitute a zone change and is subject to any modifications, conditions, or restrictions deemed appropriate by the approval authority.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.770.020 Applicability.

This chapter applies to all proposed or existing planned developments.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.770.030 General Provisions.

A. 
Planned development review is a voluntary process.
B. 
Planned development approval is required to establish a new planned development or to substantially redevelop an existing planned development.
C. 
An applicant may choose to submit a single consolidated planned development application or two consecutive planned development applications consisting of a concept plan application and a detailed plan application.
D. 
The proposed development must comply with all applicable development standards and requirements of this title, except as specifically adjusted through the planned development approval process. Planned development review satisfies the requirements for site development or conditional use review and a separate site development, conditional use, or adjustment application is not required.
E. 
If the proposed development includes both residential and nonresidential buildings:
1. 
Residential buildings, except for mixed-use buildings, are subject to the applicable standards for the housing type as provided in Part 18.200, Residential Development Standards.
2. 
Nonresidential or mixed-use buildings are subject to the applicable standards as provided in Part 18.300, Nonresidential Development Standards.
F. 
If sensitive lands review is required, a sensitive lands application must be submitted concurrently with a consolidated or detailed plan application. A sensitive lands application may not be submitted concurrently with a concept plan application.
G. 
If land division is proposed, a subdivision or land partition application must be submitted concurrently with a consolidated or detailed plan application. A subdivision or land partition application may not be submitted concurrently with a concept plan application.
H. 
If the proposed development has more than one base zone designation, density and floor area standards are calculated for each base zone as provided by this title.
I. 
Density and floor area allocations and increases allowed with planned development approval are as follows:
1. 
Minimum density and floor area may be allocated anywhere on the site regardless of the underlying base zone designation.
2. 
Maximum density and floor area may be increased subject to the limitation of Subparagraph 18.770.060.B.10.b.
J. 
Uses and housing types allowed with planned development approval are based on the underlying zoning as follows:
1. 
Residential zones. All housing types and civic uses are allowed. Commercial uses not allowed by the underlying base zone may be allowed where appropriately located, designed, and scaled.
2. 
Commercial zones. Apartments and civic uses not allowed by the underlying base zone may be allowed where appropriately located, designed, and scaled.
3. 
Industrial zones. No additional uses are allowed beyond what is allowed in the applicable base zone.
K. 
The following development standards may not be adjusted with planned development approval:
1. 
Minimum density or minimum floor area ratio.
2. 
Maximum parking ratio.
3. 
Any development standard that contains an express prohibition.
L. 
Planned development approvals may not adjust the items listed in Paragraph 18.715.020.B.2 through 6.
M. 
Planned development approvals may be modified as allowed by Chapter 18.765, Modifications.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.770.040 Required Analysis.

In addition to the submittal requirements in Paragraph 18.710.030.C.3, a consolidated or concept plan application must include the information listed below. The graphic illustrations must adequately demonstrate the required information. Examples of graphic illustrations include, but are not limited to, the following: maps, site plans, massing studies, elevation drawings, photo simulations, and digitally created 3-dimensional drawings. Manually created artistic renderings are usually not adequate on their own to illustrate the required information.
A. 
Proposal summary. A written description and graphic illustration of the planned development proposal with enough specificity to convey the overall land use pattern, development scale, circulation network, and housing types and densities. The description must include a statement about the planning objectives to be achieved by the proposal and why the applicant believes the public benefits from the proposal are sufficient to warrant the type and amount of flexibility requested.
B. 
Flexibility request. A detailed written description of all proposed adjustments to development standards and the reason for each proposed adjustment. The description must be accompanied by professional studies or analyses as needed to adequately support the reason for each proposed adjustment. The description must also include a table that lists each applicable development standard and the associated proposed standard in a side-by-side column format.
C. 
Public benefits proposal. A detailed written description of all proposed public benefits. The description must be accompanied by drawings, plans, or details as needed to convey the location, size, and overall nature of each public benefit. Public benefits include features, amenities, or protections that in some way exceed the minimum standards of this title to the benefit of the general public or planned development users.
D. 
Environmental analysis. A written description and graphic illustration of the relationship between the planned development proposal and any existing natural features on the site. The description and illustration must explain how the proposal addresses any existing sensitive lands, significant tree groves, land forms, or other natural features on the site.
E. 
Compatibility analysis. A written description and graphic illustration of the relationship between the planned development proposal and the surrounding community. The description and illustration must explain how the proposal integrates with and responds to existing development patterns through a discussion about the arrangement, location, and massing of all proposed buildings, uses, and site improvements, including streets and paths.
F. 
Land use analysis. A detailed written description that demonstrates the need for or benefit of any civic or commercial uses proposed in a residential zone or civic or residential uses proposed in a commercial zone where not allowed in the underlying base zone. The description must be accompanied by professional studies or analyses as needed to adequately support the proposed land uses. The description must also include a table that lists each proposed land use category by location.
G. 
Impact identification. A detailed written description of the impacts of the planned development proposal on adjacent properties or the surrounding community that would not occur if the site developed without a planned development approval. If impacts exist, the description must include a detailed mitigation proposal where practicable.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.770.050 Approval Process.

A. 
A consolidated planned development application is processed through a Type III-PC procedure as provided in Section 18.710.080.
B. 
A consecutive planned development submittal involves two separate applications.
1. 
A concept plan application is processed through a Type III-PC procedure as provided in Section 18.710.080. A concept plan approval must be effective prior to the submittal of a detailed plan application.
2. 
A detailed plan application is processed through a Type II procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060, unless the concept plan approval authority specifies a different review procedure as a condition of concept plan approval.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.770.060 Approval Criteria.

A. 
Consolidated planned development. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a consolidated planned development application when all of the following criteria are met:
1. 
All concept plan approval criteria listed in Subsection 18.770.060.B are met; and
2. 
Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development at the time of occupancy.
B. 
Concept plan. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a concept plan application when all of the following criteria are met:
1. 
The information and analysis required by Section 18.770.040 is sufficiently detailed and of high enough quality to effectively evaluate the proposed development;
2. 
The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed development considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features;
3. 
The proposed development is reasonably compatible with and thoughtfully integrated into the surrounding community;
4. 
The proposed development includes features, amenities, or protections that exceed the minimum standards of this title to the benefit of the general public or planned development users, and the proposed benefits are sufficient to warrant the type and amount of development flexibility requested;
5. 
The streets, buildings, and site improvements of the proposed development are designed and located to preserve existing, healthy, and noninvasive trees and tree groves to the greatest extent possible;
6. 
The streets, buildings, and site improvements of the proposed development are designed and located to preserve all natural drainages to the greatest extent possible, except where the applicant has demonstrated that modifying a natural drainage results in the same or better environmental function as the existing drainage;
7. 
Any impacts from the proposed development are mitigated to the extent practicable;
8. 
The city engineer has determined that any adjustments to street or access standards do not result in unsafe conditions;
9. 
The proposed development complies with all applicable development standards and requirements of this title, except as adjusted through this approval process; and
10. 
The proposed development is within the following limits:
a. 
Maximum building height may be increased by up to 50 percent,
b. 
Maximum density or floor area may be increased by up to 30 percent, and
c. 
Minimum landscape area may be reduced down to 10 percent.
C. 
Detailed plan. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a detailed plan application when all of the following criteria are met:
1. 
The proposed detailed plan is substantially consistent with the approved concept plan;
2. 
The proposed detailed plan complies with all applicable development standards and requirements of this title, except as adjusted or conditioned through the concept plan approval process; and
3. 
Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development at the time of occupancy.
(Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.770.070 Conditions of Approval.

The approval authority may impose conditions of approval that are suitable and necessary to ensure that the consolidated or concept plan proposal is consistent with the purpose of this chapter as embodied by the approval criteria listed in Subsections 18.770.060.A and B. Conditions may include but are not limited to the following:
A. 
Requiring design features that minimize environmental impacts;
B. 
Limiting building height, size, or location;
C. 
Requiring higher quality materials or building design;
D. 
Requiring open space, public spaces, or community amenities;
E. 
Requiring separation or screening of uses, buildings, off-street parking areas, or service areas from public spaces or adjacent uses;
F. 
Requiring separation or screening of private residential spaces from public spaces or adjacent uses;
G. 
Requiring pedestrian access within the development and between the development and the surrounding community;
H. 
Requiring pedestrian-oriented design features such as building awnings, first-story windows and entries, or street-facing facades;
I. 
Limiting or otherwise designating the size, number, or location of vehicle access points; or
J. 
Limiting or otherwise designating the location, intensity, and shielding of outdoor lighting.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1)

§ 18.780.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an appropriate and efficient review process for ensuring compliance with the standards and provisions of this title that effectively coordinates the city's land use and development review functions.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.780.020 Applicability.

A. 
This chapter applies to development that requires site development review, except as provided in Subsections 18.780.020.B and C below.
B. 
This chapter does not apply to development that is specifically exempted from site development review by another chapter of this title.
C. 
This chapter does not apply to development that requires or proposes review through the conditional use or planned development review process.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.780.030 General Provisions.

A. 
Site development approval is required to develop a vacant site or to substantially redevelop an existing developed site.
B. 
Site development approvals may be modified as allowed by Chapter 18.765, Modifications.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2; Ord. No. 24-05, 4/23/2024)

§ 18.780.040 Approval Process.

A. 
The following types of development require a site development review application that is processed through a Type I procedure as provided in Section 18.710.050:
1. 
Apartments, and
2. 
Mobile home parks.
B. 
The following types of development require a site development review application that is processed through a Type II procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060:
1. 
Cottage cluster development that meets the alternative standards of Section 18.240.060,
2. 
Courtyard unit development that meets the alternative standards of Section 18.250.060,
3. 
Nonresidential development,
4. 
Mixed-use development, and
5. 
Wireless communication facilities subject to the standards of Section 18.450.040.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.780.050 Approval Criteria.

The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a site development review application when all of the criteria listed below are met. These criteria broadly reference all chapters in this title that contain standards that may apply to the development. The city will identify which standards are applicable through the land use review process and evaluate the proposed development accordingly.
A. 
The proposed development complies with all applicable base zone standards;
B. 
The proposed development complies with all applicable residential and nonresidential development standards;
C. 
The proposed development complies with all applicable supplemental development standards, including but not limited to off-street parking and landscaping standards;
D. 
The proposed development complies with all applicable special designation standards, including but not limited to sensitive lands protection;
E. 
The proposed development complies with all applicable plan district standards and requirements; and
F. 
The proposed development complies with all applicable street and utility standards and requirements.
(Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.790.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to establish procedures for legislative and quasi-judicial amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, this title, the comprehensive plan map and the official zoning map.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1)

§ 18.790.020 Legislative Amendments.

A. 
Approval process. A legislative amendment application is processed through a Legislative procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.120.
B. 
Approval considerations. A recommendation or a decision for a legislative amendment application may be based on consideration of the applicable legal requirements. They may, but do not necessarily include: Oregon Revised Statutes, Oregon Administrative Rules, one or more Statewide Planning Goals, Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan and any other regional plans.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)

§ 18.790.030 Quasi-Judicial Amendments.

A. 
Approval process.
1. 
A quasi-judicial zoning map amendment application that does not require a comprehensive plan map amendment is processed through a Type III-PC procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.080.
2. 
A quasi-judicial comprehensive plan map amendment application is processed through a Type III-Modified procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.090, which is decided by the City Council with a recommendation by Planning Commission.
3. 
A quasi-judicial zoning map amendment application that requires a comprehensive map plan amendment is processed through a Type III-Modified procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.090, which is decided by the City Council with a recommendation by Planning Commission.
B. 
Approval criteria. A recommendation or decision for a quasi-judicial zoning map amendment or quasi-judicial comprehensive plan amendment will be based on the following:
1. 
Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations; and
2. 
Demonstration that adequate public services exist to serve the property at the intensity of proposed zoning. Factors to consider include the projected service demands of the property, the ability of the existing and proposed public services to accommodate the future use, and the characteristics of the property and development proposal, if any.
(Ord. 17-22 §2; Ord. 18-23 §2; Ord. 18-28 §1; Ord. 19-09 §1; Ord. 20-01 §1; Ord. 22-06 §2)