Formal rules of evidence or procedure required for the conduct of judicial proceedings shall not be required for the conduct of proceedings under this title.
No decision, inaction or recommendation regarding any zoning matter by the City Council, the Planning Commission, or the Director or his/her designee shall be held void or invalid on the ground of the improper admission or rejection of evidence, or by reason of any irregularity, informality, neglect or omission (hereinafter called "error") as to any matter pertaining to petitions, applications, notices, findings, records, hearings, reports, recommendations, appeals or any matter of procedure whatever, including, but not limited to, those included in this chapter unless after an examination of the entire case, including the evidence, the court shall be of the opinion that the error complained of was prejudicial and that by reason of such error the party complaining sustained or suffered substantial injury, and that a different result would have been probable if such error had not occurred or existed. There shall be no presumption that error is prejudicial, or that injury was done by the mere showing of error.
(Ord. 55.112-73 § 5, 1973; Ord. 492-96 § 3, 1996; Ord. 670-06 § 3, 2006)