There is adopted, as provided herein, a zoning ordinance for the city of Visalia, state of California, said ordinance being a precise and detailed plan for the use of land of said city. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7200)
17.02.020 Purpose.
This title is enacted to preserve and promote the public health, safety and welfare of the city, and of the public generally and to facilitate growth and expansion of the municipality in a precise and orderly manner. More specifically, the zoning ordinance is adopted in order to achieve the following objectives:
A. Foster a workable relationship among land uses;
B. Promote the stability of existing land uses that conform to the district in which they occur;
C. Ensure that public and private lands ultimately are used for purposes that are appropriate and most beneficial for the city;
D. Prevent excessive population densities;
E. Avoid a concentration of structures adjoining each other or juxtaposed too closely together in close proximity to each other;
F. Promote a safe, effective traffic circulation system;
G. Require adequate off-street parking and truck loading facilities;
H. Facilitate the appropriate location of community facilities and institutions;
I. Coordinate land use policies and regulations of the city in order to facilitate the transition of land areas from county to municipal jurisdiction and to protect agricultural producers in areas planned for urban expansion;
J. Implement the goals, policies and map of the general plan. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7201)
17.02.030 Components.
This title shall consist of a zoning map and it will determine districts, control land uses, restrain population densities, specify uses and locations of structures, designate appropriate landscaping of certain structural uses, determine areas and dimensions of sites, provide for off-street parking and loading facilities, and prescribe other regulations in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the city. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7202)
17.02.040 Application and interpretation.
In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this title shall be held to be minimum requirements. This title shall apply to all property whether owned by private persons, firms, corporations or organizations; by the United States of America or any of its agencies; by the state of California or any of its agencies or political subdivisions; by any city or county, including the city or any of its agencies; or by any authority or district organized under the laws of the state of California, all subject to the following exceptions:
A. Public streets and alleys;
B. Underground utility lines and facilities;
C. Underground communications lines;
D. Overhead communications lines;
E. Overhead electric distribution lines, not including transmission and distribution substations;
Except as otherwise expressly provided pursuant to other provisions of this title, if ambiguity arises concerning the appropriate classification of a particular use within the meaning and intent of this title, or with respect to height, yard requirements, area requirements or zone boundaries, as set forth herein and as they may pertain to unforeseen circumstances, including technological changes in processing of materials, it shall be the duty of the planning commission to ascertain all pertinent facts and by resolution, set forth its findings and interpretations, and thereafter such interpretations shall govern unless appealed to the city council pursuant to section 17.02.145. Upon review, such interpretation may be approved, disapproved or modified by the city council. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: Ord. 2010-02 § 2, 2010: Ord. 2006-18 § 4, 2007: prior code § 7204)
17.02.060 Permitted uses only.
No structure or part thereof shall be erected, altered or enlarged, nor shall any site or structure be used, designated or intended for use other than the uses hereinafter listed as permitted or conditional in the zone in which such structure, land or premises is located. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7205)
17.02.070 Height limits.
No structure shall be erected, reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed in height the limit hereinafter designated for the zones in which such structure is located. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7206)
17.02.080 Open space - Encroachment.
No structure shall be erected, nor shall any existing structure be altered, enlarged, rebuilt or moved into any zone, nor shall any open space be encroached upon or reduced in any manner, except in conformity to the yard, site area and building location regulations hereinafter designated for the zone in which such structure or open space is located. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7207)
17.02.090 Open space - Other buildings.
No yard or other open space provided about any structure for the purpose of complying with provisions of this title shall be considered as providing a yard or open space for any other structure, and no yard or other open space on one site shall be considered as providing a yard or open space for a structure on any other site. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7208)
17.02.100 Addition of permitted/conditional uses.
A. Upon application or on its own initiative, the city planning commission may add to the list of permitted or conditional uses, if the commission makes the following findings:
1. That any addition to the list of permitted or conditional uses will be in accordance with the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed;
2. That the use will be an appropriate addition to the list of permitted or conditional uses because the use has the same basic characteristics as the uses permitted in the zone;
3. That the use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare;
4. That the use will not adversely affect the character of zone in which it is to be permitted;
5. That the use will not create more odor, dust, dirt, smoke, noise, vibration, illumination, glare, unsightliness or be more objectionable than the uses permitted in the zone;
6. That the use will not create any greater hazard of fire or explosion than the hazards normally associated with the uses permitted in the zone;
7. That the use is within conformance with the purpose, intent and policies of the general plan.
B. Additions may be made to the list of permitted or conditional uses by resolution of the planning commission, subject to ratification by the city council. The planning commission and city council may, at their discretion, hold a public hearing on a proposed addition. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7209)
17.02.110 Similar uses permitted or conditional.
A. When a use is not specifically listed in the zoning ordinance and does not appear to be covered by a general category, the city planner may make the finding that the use is permitted or allowed subject to the granting of a conditional use permit if the use is similar in nature and intensity to other uses listed.
B. It is further recognized that every conceivable use cannot be identified in this title, and anticipating that new uses will evolve over time, this establishes the city planner's authority to compare a proposed use and measure it against those listed in this title that are similar in nature and intensity in order to make a determination that the use is "similar" and may be permitted or allowed subject to the granting of a conditional use permit.
C. In determining "similarity" the city planner shall make all of the following findings:
1. The proposed use shall meet the intent of and be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the general plan;
2. The proposed use shall meet the stated purpose and general intent of the zone in which the use is proposed to be located;
3. The proposed use shall not adversely impact the public health, safety and general welfare of the city's residents; and
4. The proposed use shall share characteristics common with, and not be of greater intensity, density or generate more environmental impact, than those uses listed in the land use zone in which it is to be located. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: Ord. 9605 § 30 (part), 1996: prior code § 7209.1)
17.02.120 Use of nonconforming site.
Except as otherwise provided in this title a site having an area, frontage, width or depth less than the minimum prescribed for the zone in which the site is located, as depicted on a duly approved and recorded subdivision map, or a site for which a deed or valid contract of sale was recorded prior to the adoption of this title, and that had a legal area, frontage, width and depth at the time that the subdivision map, deed or contract of sale was recorded, such sites may be used for any permitted use, but shall be subject to all other regulations for the zone in which the site is located. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7210)
17.02.130 Yard requirements - Measurement.
A. Required yards shall be measured as the minimum horizontal distance from the property line of the site or street line to a line parallel on the site; provided, that where a precise street plan has been adopted by the city council, required yards shall be measured from the plan line, and no provision of this title shall be construed to permit a structure or use to extend beyond such line; and provided further, that where a site abuts on a street having only a portion of its required width dedicated or reserved for street purposes, required yards shall be measured from a line drawn on the boundary of the additional width required for street purposes abutting the site.
B. On a site that is not rectangular or approximately rectangular in shape, required yards shall be measured in the manner prescribed by the city planner in accordance with adopted codes and ordinances. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: Ord. 9605 § 30, 1996: prior code § 7211)
17.02.140 Coverage - Measurement.
Percentage of a site area covered by structures shall be measured by dividing the number of square feet of horizontal area covered by structures, open or enclosed, by the total horizontal area within the property line of the site. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7212)
17.02.145 Appeal to city council.
Where the planning commission is authorized to make any decision pursuant to the provisions of Title 17 of the Visalia Municipal Code and that decision is to be subject to appeal to the city council, the following procedure shall apply.
A. The subdivider or any interested person adversely affected may, upon payment of an appeal fee as may be established by resolution of the Council, appeal any decision, determination or requirement of the planning commission by filing a notice thereof in writing with the city clerk, setting forth in detail the action and the grounds upon which the appeal is based within ten (10) days after the action that is the subject of the appeal. Such notice shall state specifically where it is claimed there was an error or abuse of discretion by the planning commission.
B. Upon the filing of an appeal, the city council shall set the matter for hearing. Such hearings shall be held within thirty (30) days after the date of filing the appeal or receipt of council member requests. The city clerk shall give notice of the hearing according to the procedure required for the initial action by the Planning Commission, except that the timing of such notice shall be not less than 10 days before the hearing.
C. In holding the hearing on the matter, the Council may receive any and all information pertinent to the matter, regardless of whether such information was first presented to the planning commission. In the case of decisions by the planning commission that followed a public hearing, the city council shall hold a new public hearing on the matter. Upon the close of the hearing, the Council shall vote to either confirm the decision of the planning commission, overturn the decision, or confirm the decision with modifications, and the Council may continue the item to the next meeting if necessary to direct staff to prepare a conforming resolution with findings, which shall be considered by the Council at the next scheduled Council meeting. In the case of a tie vote, the planning commission decision shall stand, and shall be considered final as of the date of the Council vote. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: Ord. 2006-18 § 3, 2007)
17.02.150 Purpose.
The purpose of an administrative adjustment is to provide action on projects that are routine in nature but may require an interpretation of established policies and standards set forth in the zoning ordinance. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: prior code § 7213.1)
17.02.160 Scope of authority.
A. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter 17.42, the city planner or his/her designee shall have the authority to grant administrative adjustments to development standards contained within this title.
B. Upon written request, the city planner may approve, conditionally approve or deny without notice minor adjustments to the following development standards; building and landscaping setbacks, site area, lot width, building height, parking.
C. Any administrative adjustment shall be limited to no more than twenty percent of a required development standard. In making the adjustment, the city planner shall make a finding that the adjustment is consistent with the criteria listed in Section 17.02.170. With respect to adjustments to building setbacks and building height, the adjustment shall also be approved by the fire chief and chief building official or his/her designee prior to granting said administrative adjustment. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: Ord. 2011-09 §§ 3, 4, 2011: Ord. 9605 § 30 (part), 1996: prior code § 7213.2)
17.02.170 Adjustment criteria.
The city planner shall record the decision in writing and shall recite therein the basis for same. The city planner may approve and/or modify an application in whole or in part, with or without conditions, only if all the following criteria are met:
A. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, creating a practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship;
B. That granting of the administrative adjustment is necessary to provide consistency with properties in the same vicinity and land use designation or development standards within which the administrative adjustment is sought;
C. That granting the administrative adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and land use designation or development standards in which the property is located;
D. That granting the administrative adjustment will not be inconsistent with the goals and policies of the general plan. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: Ord. 9605 § 30, 1996: prior code § 7213.3)
17.02.180 Report to planning commission.
No later than January 31st, the city planner shall report to the planning commission a summary of the administrative adjustment applications that have been processed and approved during the proceeding calendar year. (Ord. 2017-01 (part), 2017: Ord. 9605 § 30 (part), 1996: prior code § 7213.4)
17.02.190 Purpose.
The California Legislature has found and declared that there is a statewide need to ensure clear understanding of the specific requirements which must be met in connection with the approval of development projects and to expedite decisions on such projects.
It is the purpose of this article to specify that discretionary actions pursuant to Visalia Municipal Code Title 17 ("Zoning") shall comply with Government Code §§ 65920, et seq. (Permit Streamlining Act) and timing requirements associated with Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. (California Environmental Quality Act). (Ord. 2024-17 (part), 2025)
17.02.200 Definitions.
The definitions found in the Permit Streamlining Act and the California Environmental Quality Act shall apply to the terms contained in this article.
(Ord. 2024-17 (part), 2025)
17.02.210 Applicability.
A. Discretionary actions pursuant to the zoning code shall comply with Government Code §§ 65920, et seq. (Permit Streamlining Act) as administered by and as amended from time to time by the California Legislature.
B. Legislative actions taken pursuant to the zoning code are not subject to the Permit Streamlining Act.
C. The Permit Streamlining Act applies to all discretionary development projects that are quasi-adjudicatory actions such as approvals of use permits, tentative subdivision maps, and variances. The Permit Streamlining Act does not apply to ministerial projects such as building permits, or to legislative or quasi-legislative projects such as rezoning requests, and general plan amendments. Ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by the city are exempt from this article.
(Ord. 2024-17 (part), 2025)
17.02.220 Determination of project completeness.
A. After an application has been filed and appropriate fees have been paid, the application shall be examined by staff of the planning division and other appropriate city departments, to determine whether it contains all of the required information and is complete for the purposes of complying with § 65943 of the Government Code. No later than thirty (30) days following the submittal of the application, the applicant shall be notified in writing whether the application is deemed by staff to be complete or incomplete. If the application is determined to be incomplete, the applicant shall be notified in writing of the reasons therefor and informed of the information still needed to make the application complete.
B. Upon written notification to the applicant, processing of an incomplete application may be terminated if no reasonable effort has been made by the applicant to complete the application for a period of six (6) months from the date of notification of incompleteness. All unused fees shall be refunded to the applicant. The city planner on written request by the applicant showing good cause may grant an extension of this six (6) month period.
C. All discretionary projects shall be reviewed for consistency with the citywide general plan text and land use maps. A project application not determined to be consistent with the general plan shall be considered incomplete.
(Ord. 2024-17 (part), 2025)
17.02.230 Determination of level of environmental review.
A. After acceptance of a complete application, the planning division shall review the application in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and any adopted city CEQA guidelines.
B. The city shall determine the required level of environmental review (e.g., exemption, negative declaration) within the timeframe required by CEQA.
C. One (1) or more technical studies, paid for in advance by the applicant, may be required to supplement the city's CEQA compliance review.
D. The determination of the level of environmental review shall be made within thirty (30) days from the date on which an application for a project has been received and accepted as complete by the city. This period may be extended fifteen (15) days upon the consent of the city and the project applicant.
E. If the city determines that the project is not exempt from CEQA, then the city shall approve or disapprove the project within the periods specified by Government Code §§ 65950, et seq.
F. If the city determines that the project is exempt from CEQA, then the city shall approve or disapprove the project within sixty (60) days from the determination by the lead agency that the project is exempt from CEQA, as specified by Government Code §§ 65950, et seq.
(Ord. 2024-17 (part), 2025)
17.02.240 Interpretation.
If any portion of this article conflicts with the Permit Streamlining Act or other applicable state law, state law shall supersede this chapter. Any ambiguities in this article shall be interpreted as consistent with the Permit Streamlining Act.
(Ord. 2024-17 (part), 2025)
17.02.250 Purpose.
The purpose of this article is to provide a procedure for individuals with disabilities to request reasonable accommodations in seeking equal access to housing under the federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (hereafter "Acts") in the application of zoning laws and other land use regulations, policies, practices, and procedures. This provision also establishes the criteria to be used when considering requests for reasonable accommodations.
(Ord. 2025-13 § 1 (part), 2025)
17.02.260 Applicability.
A. A request for reasonable accommodation may be made by any individual with a disability, his/her/their representative, or a developer or provider of housing for individuals with disabilities, when a requirement of this zoning code or other city requirement, regulation, policy, or practice acts as a barrier to fair housing opportunities. This article is intended to apply to individuals with disabilities as "disability" is defined under the Acts.
B. A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the rules, standards, practices and procedures for the siting, development, use of housing or housing-related facilities, and any other land use requirements that would eliminate regulatory barriers and provide an individual with a disability equal opportunity to housing of his/her/their choice.
C. A reasonable accommodation is granted only to the household that needs the accommodation and does not apply to successors in interest to the site.
D. A reasonable accommodation shall be a ministerial grant in compliance with this article without the need for the approval of a variance, conditional use permit, special use permit or other exception process.
(Ord. 2025-13 § 1 (part), 2025)
17.02.270 Procedure.
A. A request for reasonable accommodation shall be submitted on an application form provided by the planning and community preservation department or in the form of a letter to the director of the planning and community preservation department. Any information identified by an applicant as confidential shall be retained in a manner so as to respect the privacy rights of the applicant and shall not be made available for public inspection. The request for reasonable accommodation shall contain the following information:
1. The applicant's name, address, and telephone number;
2. Address of the property for which the request is being made;
3. The current use of the property;
4. The basis for the claim that the individual is considered disabled under the Acts or that the housing which is the subject of the request will be used by an individual with a disability (protected health information including a specific diagnosis is not required to verify disability status);
5. The zoning code or land use provision, regulation, policy or procedure for which reasonable accommodation is being requested; and
6. Why the reasonable accommodation is necessary to make the specific property accessible to the individual.
B. If the project for which the request for reasonable accommodation is being made requires some other discretionary approval (including use permit, design review, etc.), then the applicant shall file the information required by Subsection A. of this section for concurrent review with the application for discretionary approval.
C. A request for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the director of the planning and community preservation department or their designee, if no approval is sought other than the request for reasonable accommodation. The director of the planning and community preservation department or their designee shall make a written determination within thirty (30) days of the application being deemed complete and either grant, grant with modifications, or deny a request for reasonable accommodation.
D. A request for reasonable accommodation submitted for concurrent review with another discretionary land use application shall be reviewed by the planning commission. The written determination on whether to grant or deny the request for reasonable accommodation shall be made by the planning commission in compliance with the applicable review procedure for the discretionary review. (Ord. 2025-13 § 1 (part), 2025)
17.02.280 Approval findings.
The written decision to grant or deny a request for reasonable accommodation will be consistent with the Acts and shall be based on consideration of the following findings:
A. Whether the individual requesting the accommodation has a disability as defined under the Act or the housing which is the subject of the request will be used by an individual with a disability;
B. Whether the requested accommodation is necessary for the individual to have equal opportunity to use and enjoyment of the housing and housing-related services;
C. Whether the requested reasonable accommodation would impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the City of Visalia; and
D. Whether the requested reasonable accommodation would require a fundamental alteration in the nature of a city program or law, including but not limited to land use and zoning. (Ord. 2025-13 § 1 (part), 2025)
17.02.290 Iterative process.
Prior to denying a request for reasonable accommodation, the director shall offer to meet with the applicant to discuss whether there is an alternative accommodation that would meet the applicable findings. If a request for reasonable accommodation is heard by the planning commission instead of the director and the request is denied, then the director shall offer to meet with the applicant to discuss whether there is an alternative that could meet the applicable findings. After this meeting an applicant may decide to submit a revised request for reasonable accommodation. (Ord. 2025-13 § 1 (part), 2025)
17.02.300 Reviewing authority.
A. Requests for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the "reviewing authority," as stated in Section 17.02.270, using the criteria set forth in Section 17.02.310.
B. When the reviewing authority is the director, then the reviewing authority shall issue a written decision on a request for reasonable accommodation within thirty (30) days of the date of the application and may either grant, grant with modifications, or deny a request for reasonable accommodation in accordance with the required findings set forth in Section 17.02.310. When the reviewing authority is the planning commission, then the written decision on a request for reasonable accommodation shall be issued following completion of the hearing for the discretionary land use application.
C. If necessary to reach a determination on the request for reasonable accommodation, the reviewing authority may request further information from the applicant consistent with fair housing laws, specifying in detail the information that is required. In the event that a request for additional information is made, the thirty (30) day period to issue a decision is staved until the applicant responds to the request.
(Ord. 2025-13 § 1 (part), 2025)
17.02.310 Appeals.
A. Only an aggrieved applicant and abutting property owners who receive notice of the reasonable accommodation determination have a right to appeal the decision. An appeal to the planning commission must be filed within ten (10) calendar days after notification of the decision. An appeal shall be made in the same manner, and subject to the same fee as appeals under Section 17.28.050 for appeals to planning commission of decisions by the director, and in the same manner as appeals to city council under Section 17.02.145, of decisions by the planning commission. The appeal shall be in writing and shall specify the reasons for the appeal and the grounds asserted for relief. If an appeal is not filed within the time or in the manner prescribed in this section, the right to review the action against which the complaint is made shall be deemed to have been waived.
B. The planning commission or city council shall review de nova the entire proceeding or proceedings relating to the decision and may make any order it deems just and equitable, including the approval of the application. Any hearing may be continued from time to time.
C. At the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing body shall prepare a written decision which either grants or denies the appeal and contains findings of fact and conclusions. The written decision, including a copy thereof shall be provided to the appellant and the project applicant.