The placement, use or modification of any wireless communication facility or communications tower is subject to the provisions of this section.
A. Permit Required: New towers are allowed by permit when in compliance with this article, following public hearing. Wireless communication facilities attached to utility poles, existing towers or facades attached to buildings and structures are permitted subject to the provisions of this article.
B. Preferred Locations And Facility Types:
1. Site Selection Criteria: A master development plan is to be created, prior to any wireless communication facility permit request, based upon engineering constraints (including frequency clashes) and desired areas of service. Wireless communication facilities shall be located on a master development plan and are preferred in the following priority order:
a. Collocation on an existing tower, structure or building, in compliance with this article. The applicant shall have the burden of proving that there are no feasible existing structures upon which to locate, which comply with the conditions of this article.
b. On the property within the city's communication zone.
c. The applicant shall provide proof of legal year round access to the facility site from a public road, at the time of application for any request to erect a new tower.
2. Priority Order: Facility types are preferred in the following priority order:
3. Collocation: Collocation is considered to be a visually unobtrusive installation method because the equipment is attached to an existing structure. Collocation of a wireless communication facility shall require notification to and administrative review by the city planning and zoning commission. A fee of two hundred dollars ($200.00) is required for the review. The city may change the fee to be charged by resolution of the city council.
4. New Towers: No new tower shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed wireless communication facility. Evidence submitted to demonstrate the unavailability of other towers or structures shall address all of the following:
a. Provide a statement on why collocation on an existing tower or structure will not be possible.
b. The fees, costs or contractual provisions required by the owner in order to share an existing tower or structure or to adapt an existing tower or structure for collocation are unreasonable.
5. Modification To Existing Towers: Modification to an existing tower, other than an increase in height, shall require notification to the city and administrative review by the city planning and zoning commission. A fee of two hundred dollars ($200.00) is required for the review. The city may change the fee to be charged by resolution of the city council. Any requested change in height shall require a special use permit.
C. Application Procedure: The city council shall be the initial granting authority for wireless communication facility collocating on existing structures or utility poles in accordance with the standards set forth herein. All other wireless communication facilities shall require a permit from the city of Challis. An application for a wireless communication facility shall contain the information set forth below, in addition to the standard application information required for all permits:
1. A site plan including location, type and height of the proposed wireless communication facility with setbacks, property lines, adjacent land uses, structures and zoning.
2. Elevation drawings or before and after photographs/drawings simulating and specifying the location and height of the antennas, support structures, equipment enclosures and other accessory uses.
3. The master development plan showing the location of all existing and proposed wireless communication facility sites of the applicant within the county and city, including the service area of each wireless communication facility. The master development plan shall be considered proprietary and trade secret material which is not a public record or otherwise available to the public through public records statutes or the freedom of information act.
4. Evidence demonstrating the unavailability of collocation, as set forth above.
5. Certification from the applicant's engineer that collocation of additional antennas for at least one additional provider is possible on the proposed structure and a signed and notarized statement by the applicant agreeing to accommodate collocation of additional antennas on the tower and that the applicant agrees to enter into leases with other providers allowing use of the tower at a monthly lease rate. If parties cannot agree to a collocation fee then the rate shall be set by the city council based on the average market rate in comparable areas.
6. A lease agreement with the landholder that allows for collocation on the tower.
a. Height: Roof mounted wireless communication facilities may extend above the highest portion of the roof, including parapet wall, by a distance equal to its distance to the nearest exterior wall.
b. Setback: Roof mounted wireless communication facilities shall be set back from the edge of the building at least the height of the antenna.
c. Lighting: Lighting of antennas or support structures shall be prohibited except as required by the FAA.
a. Height: Facade mounted wireless communication facilities may not exceed fifteen feet (15') above the facade to which it is attached.
b. Setback: Facade mounted wireless communication facilities may project a maximum of eighteen inches (18") from the facade, but may not encroach into any public right of way.
c. Attachment: The antenna and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment must be the same color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and related equipment as unobtrusive as possible.
a. Height: Towers shall not exceed one hundred fifty feet (150') in height as measured from the ground. If applicant believes that a greater height is necessary, applicant shall have the burden of proving same, including production of RF documentation to support the need for greater height. Any application for greater height shall be by request for a variance.
b. Setback: All new towers shall be in the city communication zone, therefore setbacks are not an issue. However, to the extent setback of the tower is an issue in the future, setbacks shall be measured from the base of the tower to the property line of the parcel on which located. Towers shall be set back from all residential and residentially zoned property at least one hundred twenty five percent (125%) of the tower height as measured from the ground.
c. Color: Freestanding towers shall be a neutral color, simulate a standard utility pole, or otherwise be camouflaged or disguised so as to make the tower as unobtrusive as possible. Lattice towers shall be a neutral color, camouflaged, or otherwise be designed and erected to make the tower as unobtrusive as possible.
d. Lighting: Lighting of antennas or support structures shall be prohibited, except as required by the FAA.
e. Maintenance: All facilities shall be properly maintained to avoid accumulations of materials and conditions which create unsightly appearances.
E. Abandonment/Bonding: Upon abandonment or discontinuation of use, the carrier shall physically remove the wireless communication facility within ninety (90) days of the date of abandonment or discontinuation of use, and restore the site to its original condition. The carrier shall provide to the city, prior to issuance of a permit, a performance bond in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) or a bond equal to a written estimate from a qualified tower removal contractor to guarantee that the facility will be removed when no longer in use. The city of Challis shall be named as an obligee in the bond and must approve the bonding company.
F. Construction Near Airports: Any erection or construction of wireless communications facilities within any airport clear zone, shall in addition to complying with the conditions of this article, follow all other local, state and federal regulations as to such erection or construction of such facilities. (Ord. 499, 4-16-2009)