3 Applications and Permits
A. When uncertainty exists, the director of the appropriate department, or designee, as identified below, shall be authorized to make all interpretations concerning the provisions of this Ordinance. In making these interpretations, all provisions shall be:
1. Considered as minimum requirements;
2. Liberally construed in favor of the governing body;
3. Deemed neither to limit nor repeal any powers granted under State statutes; and
4. Require application of the more stringent provisions wherever the provisions of this ordinance appear to impose conflicting provisions that cannot otherwise be reconciled.
The Planning Director, or Assistant Director in matters involving a conflict of interest, shall make all interpretations of this Ordinance, but shall not make interpretations regarding the following sections:
1. Sec. 3.8, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, and Sec. 15.5, Sedimentation and Erosion Control Enforcement and Penalties, the County Engineer, or designee, shall be authorized to make all interpretations concerning the provisions of these sections.
2. Sec. 8.4, Floodplain and Flood Damage Protection Standards, the Inspections Director, acting as the Floodplain Administrator
, or designee, in consultation with the Planning Director, shall be authorized to make all interpretations related to this section.
3. Paragraph 12.3.1, Street Layout, the Public Works Director or City Transportation Director or designee, as applicable, shall be authorized to make all interpretations concerning the provisions of this section.
4. Sec. 12.8, Stormwater Management, the Public Works Director or County Engineer or designees, as appropriate, shall be authorized to make all interpretations concerning the provisions of this section.
5. All interpretations of matters relating to the North Carolina Building
Code shall be made by the Inspections Director or designee.
6. The Planning Director may defer interpretations of this Ordinance to appropriate City and/or County officials.
C. Other than official interpretations of this Ordinance issued by the authority indicated in paragraph 3.1.1B, Interpretation Authority, and permit and application approvals, the Planning Department does not issue interlocutory determinations or interpretations.
A request for interpretation shall be submitted in writing.
A. The Planning Director shall:
1. Review and evaluate the request in light of the text of this UDO, the Official Zoning Map, the Comprehensive Plan
and any other relevant information;
2. Consult with the Inspections Director or designee and coordinate with other staff, including the City or County Attorney, as necessary; and
3. Render an opinion.
B. The interpretation shall be provided to the applicant in writing.
The Planning Director or designee shall maintain an official record of all interpretations. The record of interpretations shall be available for public inspection during normal business hours.
Pursuant to NCGS § 160D-403(b), an applicant seeking an interpretation shall take the steps to provide constructive notice of the interpretation on the subject property as follows:
1. A sign
visible from each street frontage
shall be posted on the property for at least 10 days.
2. The signs
shall contain the words “Official Interpretation” in letters at least 6 inches high and shall identify the means to contact a local government staff member for information about the interpretation.
Verification of the posting in compliance with these requirements shall be provided to the staff member responsible for the interpretation.
Final action on an official interpretation of this Ordinance by the Planning Director or designee may be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
The review procedures described below apply to the types of applications listed below, as may be limited by the individual subsections that follow.
A. Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
B. Zoning Map Change
C. Subdivision
, including Conservation Subdivision![]()
D. Site Plan![]()
E. Special Use
Permit
F. Sign
Permit
G. Temporary Use
Permit
H. Home Occupation
Permit
I. Variance![]()
J. Appeal
of Administrative Decision
K. Historic District/Landmark Designation
L. Certificate of Appropriateness
M. UDO Text Amendment
N. Vested Rights
Determination
O. Floodplain Development Permit![]()
P. Architectural Review
Q. Reasonable Accommodation
R. Street Closing/Withdrawal
S. Street Renaming
T. Annexation
U. Statutory Development
Agreement
A. Before submitting an application for development
approval that does not require a pre-submittal conference, it is recommended that a pre-application conference be scheduled with the Planning Director or designee to discuss the procedures, standards and regulations required for development
approval in accordance with of this Ordinance.
B. A mandatory pre-application conference with the Planning Director or designee shall be required for the following development
reviews:
1. Comprehensive Plan
amendments (text or map) not initiated by the City or County;
2. Zoning map changes and UDO text amendments, including petitions to initiate a neighborhood protection overlay, not initiated by the City or County;
3. Site plan
or preliminary plat
applications for property zoned or in the process to be zoned:
a. Design District; or
b. With a development plan
.
4. Conservation subdivision
(after preparation of site analysis map);
5. Minor or major special use permit;
6. Variance
;
7. Reasonable accommodation;
8. Landmark designation;
9. Major works certificate of appropriateness;
10. Annexation
11. Street Closing
12. Street Renaming; and
13. Statutory Development
Agreement
C. A mandatory pre-application conference with the City Transportation Director or designee shall be required for the following development
reviews:
1. Traffic impact analysis; and
2. Transportation special use permit.
If an application is not submitted within six months of the date of the pre-application conference, a new pre-application conference is required.
A. At least one neighborhood meeting shall be held according to the Planning Department procedures for any application indicated as requiring a neighborhood meeting as specified per this Ordinance.
B. The purpose of the neighborhood meeting shall be to begin engagement with the neighborhood about the nature of the proposed land use and development
features, explain the site plan
if any, solicit comments, and establish an engagement plan with the neighborhood to be undertaken
throughout the application submittal and review process. This requirement shall not mean that all residents and stakeholders are required to attend such a meeting.
The applicant shall provide notice to each owner
of record of any land located within 600 feet of the subject property by first class mail at least 10 days prior to the date of the neighborhood meeting.
Commentary: It is also recommended that the same notice, either by email or first class mail, be provided to any applicable neighborhood organization, homeowners’ association, or similar neighborhood community organization.
D. The neighborhood meeting notice shall include at a minimum the following:
1. The applicant’s name and telephone number;
2. The street address of the site with an identification map;
3. A clear explanation of what the applicant is proposing; and
4. The date, time, and location of the meeting.
E. The Planning Director or designee may develop
administrative regulations setting forth guidelines pertaining to any additional requirements for the conduct of the meeting. Such guidelines shall be subject to review by the Joint City-County Planning Committee.
The following requirements shall apply to all applications for development
approval identified in paragraph 3.2.1, Applicability.
Applications required under this Ordinance shall be submitted on forms and in such numbers as required by the appropriate department. All forms shall include, at a minimum, the following information:
1. Contact information for the individual or firm submitting the application.
2. Contact information for the individual or firm on whose behalf the application is being submitted.
3. Identification of the property affected by the application, such as a legal description, address, or REID as may be appropriate.
4. Any other information required by the director of the appropriate department, or designee, or the provisions of this Ordinance.
1. All applications and associated fees shall be filed with the appropriate department.
2. Filing fees shall be established from time to time to defray the actual cost of processing the application.
3. An applicant who has paid the appropriate fee pursuant to the submission of an application, but who chooses to withdraw such application prior to its distribution for review shall be entitled to a refund of the total amount paid, less ten percent for administrative costs, upon written request to the appropriate department. Once review has begun, no refund shall be available, except that unused notice surcharges shall be refunded less ten percent for administrative purposes. No refund of technology surcharges shall be provided.
1. Applications shall include all required fees, and contain all required information as described on forms available from each department involved in the review process, unless modified by the department, in writing, pursuant to 2, below. Incomplete applications may be reviewed in extraordinary circumstance.
2. The presumption shall be that all of the information required in the application forms is necessary to satisfy the requirements of this section. However, it shall be recognized that each application is unique, and therefore more or less information may be required according to the needs of the particular case. The applicant may rely on the recommendations of the appropriate department as to whether more or less information should be submitted.
3. Once the application has been determined sufficient for processing, copies of the application shall be referred by the appropriate department to the appropriate reviewing entities.
4. The director of the appropriate department, or designee, may require an applicant to present evidence of the authority to submit an application.
5. An application shall be considered to have been accepted for review only after it has been determined to be complete as provided above, not upon submission to the appropriate department.
Applications sufficient for processing shall be submitted to the director of the appropriate department, or designee, in accordance with the established schedule. Schedules indicating submittal dates shall be developed
each year and made available to the public.
1. Upon receipt of an application sufficient for processing, the director of the appropriate department, or designee, shall review the application and confer with the applicant to ensure an understanding of the applicable requirements of this Ordinance; that the applicant has submitted all of the information they intend to submit; and that the application represents precisely and completely what the applicant proposes to do.
2. Once the applicant indicates that the application is as complete as the applicant intends to make it, the application shall be placed before the appropriate approving authority in accordance with standard procedures. However, if the director of the appropriate department, or designee, believes the application is incomplete, a recommendation to deny the application on that basis shall be provided to the appropriate approving authority.
1. Related applications necessary for development
approvals may be filed and reviewed simultaneously, at the option of the applicant. Any application that also requires a variance
, special use permit, or certificate of appropriateness shall not be eligible for final approval until the variance
, special use permit, or certificate of appropriateness has been granted.
2. Related applications submitted simultaneously are subject to approval of all other related applications; denial or disapproval of any concurrently submitted application shall stop consideration of any related applications until the denied or disapproved application is resolved.
1. Requests for additional information, corrections, or other modifications for all applications, unless otherwise indicated in this Ordinance, shall be returned to the Planning Director or designee within six months from the date comments on the application are officially issued. Failure to meet this deadline shall result in the application being considered withdrawn and voided, thus requiring a new application, including all requirements associated with a new application.
2. Requests for additional information, corrections, or other modifications for applications submitted to address a notice of violation
shall be returned to the Planning Director or designee within 30 days from the date comments on the application are officially issued. Failure to meet this deadline shall result in the application being considered withdrawn and voided, thus requiring a new application, including all requirements associated with a new application.
1. Notice shall be required for applications for development
approval as shown in the table below.
Procedure | Published | Mailed | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive Plan | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Zoning Map Change, including an initial zoning map change | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| ✔ |
| |
Minor Special Use |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Major or Transportation Special Use |
| ✔ | ✔ |
| ✔ | ✔ | |
Appeal |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Major Works Certificate of Appropriateness |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Historic District Designation | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Historic Landmark Designation | ✔ | ✔ |
|
Historic Properties Local Review Criteria Text Amendment | ✔ |
|
|
Historic District Preservation Plan Text Amendment | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| UDO or Comprehensive Plan | ✔ |
|
|
Vested Rights | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Rectification Report | ✔ |
|
|
Reasonable Accommodation |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Street Closing | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Street Renaming | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Annexation | ✔ |
|
|
Statutory Development | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
2. Exceptions to the table above are as follows:
a. Mailed notice
for site plans
shall be required only for major site plans
pursuant to paragraph 3.7.3B, Major Site Plans
.
b. Posting and mailing for Comprehensive Plan
amendments shall be required only for amendments that change a Tier designation or Place Type Map designation without an associated zoning map change.
c. For Appeal
of Administrative Decision, posting is not required when the appeal
is not site specific.
An advertisement shall be placed by the Planning Department in a local newspaper of general circulation once a week for two successive calendar weeks, the first notice being published not less than ten days nor more than 25 days before the date fixed for the public hearing.
The director of the appropriate department or designee shall provide notification as indicated in the notification table below:
| Procedure | Mailing Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Subject Property, if applicable | Distance of Property from Subject Property2 (ft.) | |
Comprehensive Plan | ✔ | 1,000 |
Zoning Map Change, including an Initial Zoning Map Change | ✔ | 1,000 |
✔ | 600 | |
Board of Adjustment | ✔ | 600 |
Governing Body Quasi-Judicial Hearings | ✔ | 1,000 |
Historic District Designation; Neighborhood Protection Overlay | ✔ | 100 |
Historic Landmark Designation and Certificate of Appropriateness (Major Works) | ✔ | All adjacent |
Historic District Preservation Plan Text Amendment | ✔ | All adjacent |
Vested Rights | ✔ | All adjacent |
Annexation | ✔ | 600 |
Street Closing |
| All adjacent |
Street Renaming |
| All adjacent |
Statutory Development | ✔ | 1,000 |
1 Mailed Notice 2 When the extent of the buffer included for notification. 3 Properties are “adjacent 4 Mailed notices | ||
(1) All mailed notifications shall be performed through first class mail utilizing the County property tax listings for property ownership.
(2) Where the tax records reflect a different mailing address for an owner
of the property and the actual property address, then notification shall also be mailed to the address of the property itself in addition to the property owner
address, unless the property is vacant.
(3) If accurate individual mailing addresses of the residents of multifamily
properties are not readily available, then the property shall be posted with a resident notice sign
in the right‐of‐way immediately adjacent
to the multifamily
property. The resident notice sign
shall be posted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5B.3.
(4) The notice shall be mailed at least 14 but not more than 25 days prior the date of the public hearing.
(5) Mailed notice
under this section shall not be required if a zoning map change directly affects more than 500 properties owned by a total of at least 500 different property owners
, and the Planning Director or designee elects to use the following expanded published notice requirements:
(6) An advertisement of not less than one-half page may be placed in a local newspaper of general circulation once a week for two successive calendar weeks, the first notice being published not less than 10 days nor more than 25 days before the date fixed for the public hearing.
(7) In addition to the published notice, the Planning Director or designee shall post one or more signs
on or immediately adjacent
to the subject area reasonably calculated to give public notice of the proposed change in accordance with paragraph 4.c., Posted Notice, below rather than the notice required pursuant to subsection 3, Posted Notice (Sign
), below.
(8) Mailed notice
shall be provided by first class mail to property owners
who reside outside of the newspaper’s circulation area.
A sign
noticing the public hearing shall be prominently posted by the director of the appropriate department, or designee, not less than 14 days prior to the public hearing at which the application shall be reviewed. The sign
shall be posted on the property or at a point visible from the nearest improved street. Where a site fronts along multiple improved public streets, one sign
is required for each street frontage
, unless such street frontage
has limited access and poses unsafe conditions for posting such as, but not limited to, freeways
and expressways
. In the case of multiple parcels
, sufficient signs
shall be posted to provide reasonable notice to interested persons
.
Except for applications in paragraph b below a published or mailed notice
shall provide at least the following:
(1) A general description or address of the location of the land that is the subject of the application and, for mailed notice
, a location map;
(2) A description of the action requested;
(3) Where a zoning map change or a Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use
Map amendment is proposed, the current and proposed designations;
(4) The time, date and location of the public hearing;
(5) A phone number to contact the Planning Director or designee;
(6) A statement that interested parties may appear at the public hearing; and
(7) A statement that substantial changes
to the proposed action may be made following the public hearing.
A published notice shall include the following specific information:
(1) A summary description of the proposed change;
(2) The time, date and location of the public hearing;
(3) A phone number to contact the Planning Director or designee;
(4) A statement that interested parties may appear at the public hearing; and
(5) A statement that substantial changes
to the proposed action may be made following the public hearing.
Required posted notices shall indicate the following:
(1) A case number;
(2) Type of action; and
(3) A phone number to contact the Planning Director, or designee.
Minor defects in notice shall not impair the notice or invalidate proceedings pursuant to the notice if a bona fide attempt has been made to comply with applicable notice requirements. For instances where notice was not executed per the Durham Unified Development
Ordinance but meets the requirement set forth in the North Carolina General Statutes, notice will be deemed legally sufficient.
Any organization or individual may register with the Planning Department to receive, at a minimum, a monthly electronic notification.
1. The notification shall contain the scheduled public hearings for the procedures listed in paragraph 3.2.5A, Summary of Notice Required, and major site plans
.
2. To be eligible for registration, the applicant must provide the notification information required by the Planning Department.
3. Each organization or individual is responsible for providing updated information to the Planning Department in order to continue receiving notice.
4. The information provided shall be consistent with paragraph 3.2.5B.4, Content of Notice, as applicable for the specific application.
1. A legislative public hearing or a quasi-judicial hearing shall be required for development
review as shown in the table below.
Applications for Approval | Historic Preservation Commission | Board of Adjustment | Planning Commission | Governing Body |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Transportation Special Use |
|
|
| ✔1 |
Comprehensive Plan |
|
| ✔ | ✔ |
Zoning Map Change |
|
| ✔ | ✔ |
Minor Use |
| ✔1 |
|
|
Major Special Use |
|
|
| ✔1 |
| ✔1 |
|
| |
Appeal |
| ✔1 |
|
|
Historic District Designation | ✔ |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Historic Landmark Designation | ✔ |
|
| ✔ |
Certificate of Appropriateness (Major Works) | ✔1 |
|
|
|
UDO Text Amendment |
|
| ✔ | ✔ |
Historic District Preservation Plan Text Amendment | ✔ |
| ✔2 | ✔ |
Historic Preservation Local Review Criteria Text Amendment | ✔ |
|
| ✔ |
Site-Specific Vested Rights |
|
|
| ✔ |
Reasonable Accommodation |
| ✔1 |
|
|
Annexation |
|
|
| ✔ |
Street Closing |
|
|
| ✔ |
Street Renaming |
|
|
| ✔ |
Statutory Development |
|
| ✔3 | ✔ |
1 Requires a quasi-judicial hearing. 2 Required only if associated with adding or removing a local historic district designation. 3 Only if associated with a zoning map change or modifies an Ordinance standard, per Sec. 3.26, Statutory Development Agreement. | ||||
2. The day of the public hearing shall be considered the day the hearing is originally advertised for, unless a deferral is granted by the governing body upon a request that follows the procedures set forth in this Ordinance regarding timely submission of requests for deferrals.
After a request for annexation into the city has been submitted and accepted as complete, an application per paragraph 3.2.1, Applicability, may be received and reviewed under the receiving jurisdictional regulations pursuant to NCGS § 160D-204. No final action shall be made until the change in jurisdiction is official.
A copy of a decision regarding an application shall be provided to the applicant and filed in the appropriate department to be available for public inspection during regular office
hours.
Unless exempted below, a traffic impact analysis (TIA) shall be required for changes of use to determine if roadway improvements will be required, zoning map changes utilizing a development plan
, site plans
, and preliminary plats
that can be anticipated to generate at least 150 vehicle
trips at the peak hour (as determined by Institute of Transportation Engineers Standards). Trips generated by separate developments
meeting the criteria of paragraph 3.3.3, TIA Submission for Projects with Cumulative Impacts, shall be considered cumulatively.
The following projects shall not be required to submit a TIA:
A. Projects located within the Downtown Tier.
B. Developments
that submitted a TIA in conjunction with a zoning map change or previously approved site plan
, special use permit, or other plan, where the TIA remains valid, consistent with the provisions of paragraph 3.3.6, Period of Validity.
C. Redevelopment of any site on which the increase in traffic at peak hour represents an increase of less than 150 trips from the previous development
, if the redevelopment is initiated within 12 months of the cessation of use of the previous development
so long as no access road
that leads directly to the site is operating at a level of service
worse than the jurisdiction’s adopted level of service
.
An applicant shall be required to submit a TIA, or obtain a transportation special use permit (TSUP) pursuant to Sec. 3.9, Special Use Permit, for a development plan
, site plan
, preliminary plat
, special use permit, or other similar plan that does not otherwise meet the thresholds for submission of a TIA or for obtaining a TSUP if the development
approval is for a project that:
1. Shares features such as site access or other roadways, design elements, or other infrastructure with nearby unbuilt, but pending developments
evidenced by valid, approved site plans
or preliminary plats
, or active site plan
or preliminary plat
submittals; and,
2. When complete, will function in conjunction with such nearby developments
as a single project, the impact on the infrastructure of which would exceed the thresholds for preparation of a TIA.
The City Transportation Director, or designee shall determine whether a development
application meets the criteria in paragraph A, above, and shall determine whether one TIA shall be required for all of the aggregated development
, or whether multiple TIAs may be employed for separate phases of the development
.
The applicant shall schedule a pre-application meeting with the City Transportation Director or designee to discuss procedures, standards, and regulations required for TIA submittal and approval.
The City Transportation Director or designee shall set forth specific guidelines for preparation of TIAs. A TIA shall, at a minimum, provide the following information:
1. An estimate of the traffic generated as a result of the proposed development
;
2. An analysis of the existing street system serving the proposed development
; and
3. An assessment of the improvements needed to the existing street system in order to support the traffic anticipated to be generated by the proposed development
.
A TIA shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer with experience in traffic engineering.
Estimates of vehicle
trips shall be calculated based on trip generation rates from the most recent edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, unless an alternative source of information is approved by the City Transportation Director or the NCDOT.
A TIA shall be valid for a specific site for no more than eight years, so long as no significant modifications to the development
proposed for the site that substantially increase the traffic impact are made. A TIA submitted in connection with a project that is accessed by a road
that is operating at a level of service
lower than the jurisdiction’s adopted level of service
shall be valid for no more than five years, however.
Transportation mitigation measures may be required to address issues raised by a TIA, or as part of the approval of a Transportation Special Use
Permit (TSUP.) Such measures may include, but not be limited to, onsite and offsite improvements related to reduction of traffic impact on the surrounding road
system, bicycle facilities, pedestrian movement, and the environment. These measures shall be conditions of development
approval. Deletion or modification of these conditions shall require the same approval process that was required for the original project, unless the approved mitigation measure is deemed to conflict with NCDOT or City Transportation Department requirements, in which case they shall be modified to resolve the conflicts through submittal of a revised site plan
or preliminary plat
, as applicable.
Projects that require a TIA may also require a TSUP pursuant to Sec. 3.9, Special Use Permit.
A. The governing bodies shall consider adoption of or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
, as may be required from time to time.
B. Adoption of or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
shall only apply to the jurisdiction in which the subject property is located unless the property is the subject of an annexation petition, or the amendment is pursuant to paragraph 3.4.10, Evaluation and Assessment Report.
C. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
can take the form of text and/or map amendments.
No separate application shall be required to amend a Place Type map designation that is inconsistent with a zoning map change request. In accordance with State statute, if the zoning map change is approved, the Place Type map shall be considered amended to the applicable place type designation. A recommendation on the land use designation shall be provided by the Planning Director or designee.
When a zoning map change request requires an amendment to a Tier boundary, an application for amending the Tier shall be submitted concurrently with the zoning map change application. The public hearings for both applications may be heard at the same time; however, decisions shall be rendered with separate motions.
No separate application shall be required to amend the Urban Growth Boundary location that is inconsistent with a zoning map change request. In accordance with State statute, if the annexation is approved, the Urban Growth Boundary map shall be considered amended to the applicable location. A recommendation on the new location of the Urban Growth Boundary shall be provided by the Planning Director or designee. Requested changes to the Urban Growth Boundary not associated with a Zoning Map Change request shall submit an application in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
No separate application shall be required to amend a Future Growth Area adopted in the Comprehensive Plan
. If the zoning map change is approved and the infrastructure for future growth as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan
have been met, then all or a portion of the Future Growth Area designation shall be modified as recommended by the Planning Director or designee. Requested changes to a Future Growth Area not associated with a Zoning Map Change request shall submit an application in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
Applicants applying for a plan amendment shall schedule a pre-application conference with the Planning Director or designee in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
All applicants applying for a plan amendment shall hold a neighborhood meeting in accordance with paragraph 3.2.3, Neighborhood Meeting, except for the following:
A. Changes made pursuant to paragraph 3.4.10, Evaluation and Assessment Report; or
B. Amendments that are solely text amendments not specific to a particular site.
An application for a plan amendment shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
A. Before making any recommendation on a plan amendment, the Planning Commission shall consider any recommendations from the Planning Director or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing.
B. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
C. It is expected that the applicant or a representative of the applicant will appear at the meetings to explain why the Comprehensive Plan
should be changed.
D. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation on the application to the governing body.
E. The Planning Commission shall make its recommendation within three consecutive regular Commission cycles (approximately 90 days total) of its initial public hearing on the amendment.
The recommendations of the staff and Planning Commission to the governing body shall show that the following criteria were considered regarding a proposed change to the Place Type Map of the Durham Comprehensive Plan
:
A. Adequate public utilities
, emergency services, transportation services, and public schools are available to accommodate the request, and,
B. Durham’s ability to achieve the goals of the Comprehensive Plan
will be increased,
C. And, either:
1. Significant changes have occurred since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan
and necessitate the proposed amendment; Or,
2. Inconsistencies in land use or other plan policies exist in the adopted Comprehensive Plan
that affect Durham’s orderly growth and development
.
D. In addition, Decisions on Place Type Map amendments shall include these additional considerations: For changes to a Place Type designation that changes the intensity of development
envisioned for an area, whether the proposal has demonstrated benefits to affordable housing production, environmental goals, and approaches to equitable engagement and outcomes.
Where a plan amendment involves modification of the Tiers established in the Comprehensive Plan
, the following criteria shall be considered.
A. The site is contiguous to the proposed Tier;
B. The site is not in the drainage basin for Lake Michie or Little River or in the one-mile critical area around Jordan or Falls Reservoirs;
C. The extension does not violate
any agreements with neighboring jurisdictions; and
D. If the proposal is to expand the Suburban Tier, extending utilities to serve the site is determined to be technically feasible by the Public Works Director or designee and will not result in inordinate cost to the City.
A. Where a plan amendment involves modification of the Urban growth Boundary established in the Comprehensive Plan
, all the following criteria shall be considered:
1. The change does not expand the UGB further into a Critical Watershed
;
2. The change does not significantly increase long-term infrastructure maintenance costs for the City or County; and
3. The change would address a clear need for the community based on the adopted Comprehensive Plan
policies.
B. Notwithstanding the above criteria, the Governing Body shall consider whether those parcels
were previously included in the 2005 Comprehensive Plan
’s Suburban Development
Tier.
A. Before taking action on a plan amendment, the governing body shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Planning Director, and shall conduct a public hearing.
B. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
C. It is expected that the applicant or a representative of the applicant will appear at the meetings to explain why the plan should be changed.
D. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the amendment, deny the amendment, or send the amendment back to the Planning Commission for additional consideration.
E. An approval shall be by written resolution. The approval may be contingent upon conditions specified by the governing body. The effective date may be immediate or may be a date otherwise specified in the approval.
A. Every two years, the Planning staff will prepare an evaluation and assessment report for review and approval by the governing bodies. The report will include a rectification of any differences between the adopted Place Type Map of the City and County.
B. The governing bodies shall hold public hearings for the approval of the report. Notification of the public hearings shall be pursuant to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
Applications submitted by a private individual or entity shall first be considered for appropriateness and priority by the Joint City-County Planning Committee (JCCPC) on an annual basis.
1. Staff shall provide the JCCPC with a preliminary analysis for each application;
2. Staff shall set annual deadlines for application submittals.
3. Fees shall be paid upon application submittal. Notification fees can be refunded upon request of the applicant if the applicant withdraws the application within two weeks from the date the JCCPC has provided final comment on the application.
The following criteria, as applicable, shall be addressed by the applicant:
1. The proposed amendment corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition, trend or fact;
2. The proposed amendment is in response to changes in state law;
3. The proposed amendment constitutes a substantial benefit to Durham as a whole and is not solely for the good or benefit of a particular landowner or owners
at a particular point in time;
4. The proposed amendment is consistent with other identified Plan policies and adopted area plans; and
5. The impact of the proposed amendment with regard to:
a. Established property or proposed development
in the vicinity of the proposed amendment;
b. Existing or future land use patterns;
c. Existing or planned public services and facilities;
d. Existing or planned roadways;
e. The natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater
management, wildlife and vegetation; and
f. Other policies of the Comprehensive Plan
.
The purpose of a zoning map is to amend the zoning district boundaries of the Official Zoning Map.
A zoning map change may be initiated by the governing body, the Planning Commission, the Board of Adjustment, the Planning Director or designee, a citizen or the property owner
or their agent, except as follows:
1. A petition for a zoning map change with a development plan
may only be initiated by the property owner
or their agent.
2. A petition for a zoning map change that is considered a “down-zoning,” as defined per NCGS §160D-601(d), as applicable, shall only be initiated by the applicable governing body, unless written consent is provided by all owners
of property subject to the zoning request.
The development plan
shall become a part of the zoning map change petition and shall be reviewed concurrently with the zoning map change petition. Subsequent site plans
or plats
shall not deviate from the plan, unless otherwise allowed, or required under this Ordinance. Deviation may require a zoning map change, as established in paragraph 3.5.12, Deviations from Approved Development Plans. Unless a development plan
also functions as a site plan
, it is not a site specific vesting plan pursuant to Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights. The right to develop
pursuant to a development plan
, whether approved under this Ordinance or any previous ordinance, accrues only for any portion of the plan for which a site plan
or preliminary plat
is approved, and then only for the period of validity specified in this Ordinance, or where a vested right
is established pursuant to Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights.
The development plan
may be used by the petitioner in any zoning district; however, the development plan
shall be required as follows:
1. Rezoning to the PDR, CC, MU, and IP districts;
2. Additions to the UC District after the initial zoning map change
establishing the District on each campus; and
3. As otherwise required in this Ordinance.
A traffic impact analysis may be required if the proposed zoning map change meets the threshold requirements established in Sec. 3.3, Traffic Impact Analysis.
Pursuant to paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference, a pre-application conference is required prior to the submittal of a zoning map change application.
An applicant petitioning for a zoning map change, including an initial zoning due to annexation, shall hold neighborhood meeting(s) as set forth in paragraph 3.2.3, Neighborhood Meeting.
A. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
shall be considered with all petitions for a zoning map change.
B. If a zoning map change request is approved, but determined inconsistent with the Place Type Map of the Comprehensive Plan
, the Place Type Map shall be considered amended to the applicable land use designation. A recommendation on the land use designation shall be provided by the Planning Director or designee.
C. When a zoning map change request requires an amendment to a Tier boundary, an application for amending the Tier boundary shall be submitted concurrently with the zoning map change application. The public hearings for both applications may be heard at the same time; however, decisions shall be rendered with separate motions.
A. An application for zoning map change shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
B. Zoning map changes should correspond with the boundary lines of existing platted
lots or tracts
. If the boundaries of a zoning map change request stop short of an exterior property line, that portion of the property outside the proposed zoning map change boundary shall be capable of being subdivided and developed
in accordance with the existing zoning and other requirements of this Ordinance.
C. All zoning requirements shall be met within the boundaries of the area being proposed for change, unless the area being changed is utilizing a development plan
and is an addition to an existing area zoned with a development plan
. If all of the requirements cannot be met on the site being changed, the zoning map change shall be expanded to include necessary property being used to meet zoning requirements. Projects utilizing a development plan
may be expanded without meeting this criterion if, considering the original development plan
area, the requirement can be met without violating
any committed elements
. Projects utilizing this provision shall provide graphics and/or a chart demonstrating how the requirements are met.
D. (County Only) If the boundaries of a zoning map change request in process are modified so as to 1) remove property from the request, and 2) have the effect of separating other adjoining properties from the boundaries of the modified request, that change shall be considered a substantial change
from the original request and shall result in the modified request being considered a new zoning map change request and requiring resubmittal with a new application and applicable fees.
A development plan
provides additional information with a zoning map change petition and establishes the level of development
that will be allowed on the property. A development plan
is also intended to identify proffered commitments
that are greater than Ordinance requirements.
When a proposed zoning map change includes a development plan
, the letter “D” shall follow the proposed zoning district designation. If approved, the letter “D” shall remain as a part of the zoning designation of the property. The proffered elements submitted as part of the development plan
, called "commitments
" must be enforced by staff. Approved commitments
are binding on the property and establish the level of permitted development
. "Commitments
" may also be referred to as "committed elements
" throughout this Ordinance.
Commentary: The Planning Department will require a mechanism to ensure compliance with commitments
. Depending upon the nature of the commitment, a written compliance document may be required.
The Planning Director is authorized to:
1. Delegate authority under this section to a designee;
2. Determine whether modification of an unapproved development plan
or deviation from an approved development plan
is significant/substantial or minor, or more or less stringent, if not specified in this section;
3. Determine whether a conflict exists between commitments
. Any conflict between commitments
, including design commitments
, shall be resolved in favor of the most stringent;
4. Determine whether an element is a commitment if it is not specified as such in this section; and
5. Determine whether additional staff review time is necessary following addition of commitments
at hearings through proffers or illustrative graphic depictions.
6. When an element not listed needs to be determined to be allowed on a textual development plan
, or requires a graphic development plan
, the Planning Director shall have the authority to determine whether the commitment is allowed.
A development plan
shall comply with all applicable laws and guidelines. Requirements under this section shall consist of the following, which may be supplemented by guidelines of the Planning Department.
Parcels
within a development plan
(graphic or textual) must be contiguous. Parcels
directly across from each other, and separated by intervening existing or proposed right-of-way
, are considered contiguous for the purposes of this section. Non-contiguous parcels
that don’t meet this criteria must be submitted as separate applications.
This section permits two types of development
plans in association with a zoning map change request, a textual development plan
and a graphic development plan
. A graphic or textual development plan
describes or depicts aspects of development
that exceed regulatory requirements. Districts that require a development plan
, including the PDR district, may have the requirement met through either a textual or graphic development plan
if all requirements of the district can be met.
A textual development plan
is one where only text is used to describe the commitments
. Descriptive information shall be denoted within a textual description. These commitments
will become the zoning standards in which development
within the district must comply with.
(1) A textual development plan
shall, at a minimum, proffer a commitment that specifies, limits, and/or prohibits uses within the zoning district requested pursuant to Sec. 5.1, Use Table.
(2) If the Planning Director determines a committed element cannot be clearly described through a textual development plan
, the applicant must submit a graphic development plan
.
A graphic development plan
describes and depicts commitments
in graphic form. Commitments
in an approved development plan
are standards that apply to any subsequent land use applications for the property. At a minimum, a proposed graphic development plan
shall include the following information:
(1) References to adopted plans, including transportation plans, open space
plans, parks and trails plans, that apply to the site;
(2) Existing and proposed Zoning districts and overlays on the site;
(3) Existing and proposed Intensity/density
for each zoning district or overlay (square feet if non-residential, units if residential);
(4) A chart or table including the minimum ordinance requirements and proposed amounts of the following:
(b) Project boundary buffers;
(c) Maximum impervious area for the site and for each separately zoned portion of the site, indicated numerically for the overall site and each portion;
(d) Tree preservation and/or replacement; and
(e) Open space
.
(5) Graphic development
plans shall also include the following information depicted in graphic form:
(a) General location of external access points and connections to existing roads
;
(b) Dedications
or reservations
made for consistency with adopted plans, including transportation plans, or as otherwise required by this Ordinance or other law;
(c) Railroad corridors as required under Sec. 12.6, Railroad Corridors;
(d) Any proposed private streets pursuant to paragraph 12.2.2A.1, Private Streets and Roads.
(e) Areas committed for preservation, including but not limited to steep slopes; stream buffers
; wetland
buffers; Inventory
sites; sites on maps or lists maintained by the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO), including but not limited to maps for sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the Study List for potential designation, determination of eligibility sites, and surveyed sites; sites identified in the Durham Architectural and Historic Inventory
and applicable local historic preservation plans; and sites identified in the Durham County Archaeological Inventory
and other identified archaeological sites, including cemeteries
and burial grounds;
(f) Tree preservation areas and tree replacement areas.
Commitments
can consist of, but are not limited to, the following within either a graphic or textual development plan
:
a. Description of number, type, or range of uses and/or housing types;
b. General location of on- or off-site road
improvements, including pedestrian and bicycle improvements;
c. Depiction or description of the location and area of open space
, recreation areas, trails and greenways, tree preservation areas, or buffers other than project boundary or stream buffers
;
d. additional buffer
width or opacity
;
e. Specific landscaping features or vegetation types and opacity
;
f. Building
specifications such as number, location, maximum floor area
, or maximum height;
g. Stormwater
control measures;
h. Sustainability measures, including solar and electric vehicle
commitments
;
i. Depiction or description of areas where mass grading
will not occur (only if being described by acreage or volume);
j. Other building
or site design elements, such as distinctive architectural features or specific materials; and
k. Affordable housing commitments
;
m. Financial proffers;
n. Transit improvements;
o. Erosion
and sediment
control measures.
A graphic or textual development plan
shall include improvements or measures required to address any deficiencies identified by a Traffic Impact Analysis. If required, such measures shall be in text or graphic form, as appropriate. Such improvements shall be development
requirements, unless otherwise modified as allowed per 3.5.12.
An application that does not include a development plan
can changed to include a development plan
at any time during the application review process. This allowance shall not supersede any authority granted to the Planning Director or designee, or Governing Bodies. In addition, the following procedures apply to textual and graphic development
plans:
1. Text commitment(s) will be incorporated into the ordinance adopting the zoning designation.
2. A graphic or textual development plan
shall include a signed
acknowledgement from each property owner
. A signature from an owner
’s representative cannot serve as a substitute for the owner
's signature unless a document establishing legal authority to act as the owner
’s representative is provided.
3. Modifications to a development plan
that are proffered at a public hearing before the governing body shall be incorporated into the approved commitments
upon approval of the zoning by the governing body. Verbal commitments
approved at a governing body public hearing are considered binding commitments
and must be added to the graphic or text-only development plan
. The property owners
must sign
the development plan
with the complete set of commitments
prior to an approved development plan
being stamped by Planning staff. (Proffers that prove to be illegal or less stringent than existing commitments
shall be referred to the Planning Commission or governing body for an additional hearing.
4. Modifications that are made to a development plan
after the Planning Commission recommendation, but before the governing body hearing, shall be referred to the Planning Commission for an additional hearing as required under paragraph 3.5.9B, Changed Application, (when determined by the Planning Director).
5. A graphic development plan
shall be signed
and sealed by a Professional Engineer, Registered Architect, or Registered Landscape Architect. All graphic depictions shall be accurately scaled, and separate or additional sheets may be required by the Planning Department.
A statutory development
agreement, pursuant to Sec. 3.26, Statutory Development Agreements, proposed in association with the zoning map change application shall be a commitment of the development plan
.
1. A phasing plan may be provided with any graphic development plan
but shall be required in the Mixed-Use
District. The phasing plan shall ensure that residential and non-residential components are constructed to satisfy the intent and requirements of the Ordinance.
2. The phasing plan shall be in graphic form as appropriate and included in the graphic development plan
. It shall identify the sequence and timing of the development
phases and include utility improvements, land use categories, and areas in square feet or acres. Phasing plan elements shall become committed development
requirements.
No minor or major special use permit is required for uses that otherwise need such a permit pursuant to paragraph 5.1.2, Use Table; Sec 5.3, Limited Use Standards; or for standards specified elsewhere within the Ordinance, if:
1. The use or standard is specified on the approved development plan
; and
2. The location, access, building
height, and size, as applicable, for the proposed use or standard is specified on the development plan![]()
1. Deferrals shall be granted by the Planning Director, or designee, under the following criteria:
a. The applicant or an opponent may each seek not more than one deferral for each zoning map change requested. No more than two deferrals (one each from the applicant and an opponent) shall be allowed per proposed zoning map change;
b. Each deferral request shall be for a maximum of one month. Any deferral request shall be made in writing, citing reasons for requesting the deferral; and
c. If the request for deferral is received by the Planning Director or designee and the reasons for the request are made in writing prior to notification being performed for the first Planning Commission or governing body meeting where the item would otherwise be considered.
2. Any other deferrals which do not meet the above criteria shall be treated as a continuance.
3. If the Planning Commission or governing body, as applicable, grants a deferral then new notification and associated fees shall be required.
4. The above procedures are not applicable to proposed zoning map changes that have been designated as “expedited” by a governing body.
1. The applicant petitioning for a zoning map change may withdraw the application provided that a written request stating the reason for the withdrawal is received by the Planning Director, or designee, at least ten days prior to the public hearing.
2. The request shall be accompanied by mailing labels imprinted with the names and addresses of the previously notified property owners
and a fee sufficient to cover the postage for renotification of surrounding property owners
if the withdrawal occurs after the Planning Commission hearing.
3. The applicant petitioning for a zoning map change with a development plan
may withdraw the application at any time prior to the opening of the public hearing before the governing body by withdrawing consent to the development plan
being imposed on the applicant’s property.
4. The governing body may vote to allow the applicant to withdraw an application for a zoning map change at any time.
The Planning Director or designee may consider applications withdrawn and voided due to the failure of the applicant to submit required information within 90 days of a request for such information.
Except in the case of an application where the applicant withdrew consent to a development plan
, no application that was previously withdrawn or voided may be resubmitted until at least six months have elapsed since the date of withdrawal. In the case of applications withdrawn or voided as a result of the withdrawal of consent to a development plan
after publication of a notice of a public hearing, no new application may be resubmitted until at least 12 months have elapsed since the date of withdrawal. The Planning Director or designee may waive this waiting period if the application has been substantially modified or if there has been a significant change in facts or circumstances since the application was withdrawn.
A. The Planning Director or designee shall prepare a staff report that reviews the zoning map change request in light of any applicable plans and the general requirements of this Ordinance.
The staff report shall consider the entire range of permitted uses in the requested classification regardless of any representations made that the use will be limited, unless a development plan
is submitted that restricts the permitted range of uses to specific uses. The staff report shall include an evaluation of the consistency of the requested classification with adopted plans and the impact of the requested classification on public infrastructure, as well as any specific requirements of the requested classification.
B. The Planning Director or designee shall forward completed zoning map change requests and any related materials to the Planning Commission for a hearing and recommendation at the first regularly scheduled meeting following completion of the technical reviews by staff.
C. The Planning Director or designee shall forward completed zoning map change requests and any related materials, including the Planning Commission recommendation, to the governing body for a public hearing and decision prior to the first regularly scheduled meeting after the Planning Commission hearing.
1. Before making any recommendation on a petition for zoning map change, the Planning Commission shall consider any recommendations from the Planning Director and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. Except in the case of expedited hearings pursuant to paragraph 3.5.9C, Expedited Hearings, the Commission shall make its recommendation within three consecutive regular Commission cycles (approximately 90 days total) of its initial public hearing. The time period for a recommendation may be altered, as in the case of significant modifications, in which case three additional consecutive regular cycles shall be granted before the case shall go to the governing body.
4. When a recommendation is not made within the time periods established in this section, the governing body may process the request without a Commission recommendation.
5. A zoning map change proposed as a County case shall not require rehearing by the Planning Commission if the property subject to the proposed change is annexed into the City before the Board of Commissioners has acted on the case and the annexation is within 12 months of the original Planning Commission recommendation on the zoning map change, unless the applicant has made a significant modification to the application.
If the applicant makes a significant modification to an application for a zoning map change after the Commission has made its recommendation, the Planning Director shall refer the modified request back to the Commission for an additional public hearing. In such case, the Commission shall make a recommendation to the governing body within 90 days of the public hearing on the modified application. If a recommendation is not made within this time frame, the governing body may hear the application without a recommendation from the Planning Commission.
1. If the governing body has set an expedited hearing concerning a request, in accordance with paragraph 3.5.11B, Expedited Hearing, a public hearing before the Planning Commission shall be held at the first available hearing date or prior to the hearing before the governing body.
2. The Commission shall make a recommendation at this hearing based on the Review Criteria in paragraph 3.5.10, Written Recommendation, Review Criteria, below. The Planning Commission shall not continue a request for which an expedited hearing has been set, nor shall any deferrals be granted for such a request.
The Planning Commission shall provide a written recommendation regarding whether each proposed map change is consistent with the comprehensive plan and other applicable adopted plans. The recommendation shall be based on the reasons articulated by Commission members voting in the majority, and the recommendation shall be developed
as determined in the Commission’s Rules of Procedure. In addition to plan consistency, Commissioners may also consider other matters deemed appropriate by the Commission, which may include but are not limited to:
A. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood;
B. Suitability of the subject property for uses permitted by the current versus the proposed district;
C. Whether the proposed change tends to improve the balance of uses, or meets a specific demand in the City and County; and
D. The availability of adequate school, road
, parks, wastewater treatment, water supply and stormwater
drainage facilities for the proposed use.
1. Before taking action on a zoning map change request, the governing body shall consider any recommendations of the Planning Commission, Planning Director or designee, and of staff agencies
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. Continuances may be granted before action on the request.
4. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the request, deny the request, or send the request back to the Planning Commission for additional consideration.
5. In adopting or rejecting a zoning map change, the governing body shall adopt a statement describing whether its action is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
, and why the action is reasonable and in the public interest. The governing body may adopt the statement furnished by staff or agencies
, including but not limited to the Planning Director or the Planning Commission, or it may formulate its own statement.
6. The map change request approved by the governing body may include changes from the request presented. Changes to a development plan
may be made upon the proffer by the applicant of such changes.
7. Approval of a petition gives the applicant the ability to proceed with any additional required approvals.
1. The governing body, in situations in which it determines certain standards have been met, may expedite the hearing process on a proposed zoning map change.
2. The governing body may consider a written request from a potential applicant, or from staff, requesting an expedited hearing process. The request shall identify and support the reasons for such expedited consideration.
3. In order to grant the request, the governing body shall find that at least one of the criteria below have been met:
a. Deadlines set by the local, State, or Federal government for receipt of applications for needed funding, designation, or other regulations concerning the property make expedited consideration necessary;
b. The prospective zoning map change request results from an emergency beyond the control of the applicant, such as response to a disaster;
c. The prospective zoning map change request addresses an urgent matter of public health or safety; or
d. There are special circumstances that will have a substantial negative impact on the development
which could not have reasonably been anticipated and which make expedited consideration necessary.
4. In no event may the governing body hearing occur less than 30 days after the item was granted expedited status.
The following deviations from an approved development plan
require a zoning map change or an amendment to the development plan
, as indicated below.
1. A decrease by more than 20% in total density
of the residential development
, except in a Design District zoning district;
2. A decrease by more than five percent in total density
in residential projects located within a Design District zoning district, unless that decrease results from the application of UDO requirements relating to size or design.
3. In a nonresidential or mixed-use development
on a site adjacent
to a residential district
, a cumulative expansion by more than five percent of total building
floor area
or 4,000 square feet, whichever is greater, or a cumulative decrease of more than 20% of total building
floor area
.
4. Changes to the proposed phasing of the project where phasing plans are required or commitments
.
5. Changes to the use category (for example, residential to office
, office
to commercial, commercial to industrial, as described in Article 5, Use Regulations), if limitations on the number, range, or types of uses were proposed with the development plan
and the governing body limited its consideration of uses to those uses;
6. A change to the number, location, and/or type (i.e. full versus limited movements) of access points along the same right-of-way
or cardinal direction
of the development
that does not provide equal or improved safety, circulation, and connectivity.
7. A change in the location of a building
for sites adjacent
to a property with a residential district
or use .
8. An increase of more than three percent in impervious surface
area.
9. A change to an environmental protection, including tree coverage, that exceeds current ordinance requirements.
10. Any graphic or text commitments
or committed elements
not identified as qualifying as an amendment, below.
11. Any other change to a development plan
depiction, unless such depiction is clearly identified as "conceptual" or "illustrative", and not identified as qualifying as an amendment below.
The purpose of this paragraph is to allow for a limited range of changes (referred to as “amendments”) to an existing development plan
that would not require a new zoning map change. If the proposed amendment would require a new or revised TIA, then it shall require a new zoning map change.
1. The process for amendments shall follow the same adoption process for a zoning map change, but does not change the zoning designation.
2. A petition to change a development plan
must include the previously approved development plan
documents in their entirety with elements proposed for change clearly delineated (graphically and in text format). Previously approved documentation will be supplemented or replaced in its entirety with the modified development plan
.
3. The following qualify as amendments. Proposals utilizing more than two of the categories listed below shall require a zoning map change.
a. Changes to architectural or other building
design or layout commitments
, guidelines, or depictions, including specific limits on height.
b. A change to the requirement on the plan using definitive terms such as, but not limited to, “shall”, “must”, or “will”.
c. Additional, or the removal of, depicted internal access points or connectivity between sections of the development
.
d. An increase in allowed density
through the use of a density
bonus other than an affordable housing bonus.
e. A change in housing type(s) or proportion of housing type mix.
f. A change to identified building
or parking envelopes.
If a zoning map change request seeks to rezone a portion of a site under an existing development plan
, it shall be demonstrated that the remaining site under the existing development plan
can meet all ordinance requirements including committed elements
of the development plan
. Otherwise, the entire site under the existing development plan
shall require a zoning map change.
Where a change is proposed to a development plan
and a portion of the development
has been transferred to residential owner
(s), owner
acknowledgment from those owner
(s) is not required if the proposed zoning map change or amendment requires no development
improvements on those properties.
Notwithstanding the other requirements of this section and except as stated below, a site plan
or preliminary plat
shall deviate from an approved development plan
to conform to the requirements of a new ordinance or other law adopted after development plan
approval, and a zoning map change shall not be required. Exceptions are:
1. Where the development plan
is vested pursuant to the vested rights
procedure; and
2. As authorized under paragraph 1.10.3A, Approved Site Plans, Plats, and Permits and Completed Applications.
3. Under such exceptions, the site plan
or preliminary plat
shall conform to the approved development plan
.
Amendments to an existing development plan
, or a new zoning map change approval, are not required in order to utilize and comply with the requirements of the affordable housing bonuses within this Ordinance, as applicable.
1. Except for development
projects that will utilize the affordable housing bonus of this Ordinance, a new zoning map change is required for any proposal that exceeds the peak hour trip generation of the TIA that was performed with the original zoning map change by more than three percent. If a TIA was not required for the development plan
, but the proposed development
requires it, then a zoning map change is required.
a. Road
improvements that were committed as recommended by the TIA performed with the original zoning map change are exempted at the time of full build-out through a new TIA that demonstrates the intensity of the full build-out of the overall development
no longer warrants the improvement.
b. The City Transportation Department, and NCDOT, as applicable, shall review the new TIA to verify the accuracy of the analysis, and that the previously recommended and committed improvements are no longer warranted. However, if the new TIA indicates that additional improvements are needed, then those new improvements shall be required of the development
.
A petition in opposition to a zoning map change shall be considered a "valid protest petition" if the petition meets the requirements of applicable state law.
Commentary: Session Law SL2015-160 repealed the protest petition process for municipalities, effective upon zoning map change applications submitted after August 1, 2015. This law did not repeal Session Law SL2010-80, which allows protest petitions for zoning map change applications within Durham County’s jurisdiction.
1. The petition must meet the substantive requirements of Session Law 2010-80, and in particular must be signed
by the owners
of either:
a. 20% or more of the area included in the proposed change or
b. Five percent of the area of a 100-foot wide buffer
extending along the entire boundary of each discrete or separate area proposed to be rezoned. In evaluating the sufficiency of a protest under this provision:
(1) A discrete or separate area shall be calculated for any noncontiguous part of an area proposed for zoning map change that is physically separated from other areas proposed for change by property (not including right of way) that is not part of the requested zoning map change;
(2) A street right of way shall not be considered in computing the 100 foot buffer
area as long as the street right of way is 100 feet wide or less.
(3) When less than an entire parcel
of land is being rezoned, the 100 foot buffer
shall be measured from the property line of the entire parcel
.

Property ownership shall be determined based on available recorded property records. In the event of records that are incomplete or in conflict, County tax listings may be used to determine ownership.
The petition shall contain all information required on the form supplied by the Planning Director or designee, or the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners.
1. A form for a protest petition shall be available from the Planning Director or designee, or the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners.
2. Completed petitions shall be submitted to the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners at least four working days
prior to the day of the public hearing.
3. The Planning Director, or designee, in consultation with the County Attorney, shall determine if the petition meets the criteria for classification of "valid protest petition". The Clerk shall inform the governing body that a petition has been filed and indicate the determination by the Planning Director - or designee - whether the petition is valid or invalid. The Planning Director, or designee, shall notify the petitioner as to the validity of the protest petition.
4. Where a substantial modification to a zoning map change application that requires resubmission to the Planning Commission has been submitted, the Planning Director, or designee, shall notify the petitioner, in writing, that a new protest petition is required.
5. Petitions for zoning map change for which a protest petition has been determined to be valid shall require a ¾ vote of the governing body for approval rather than a simple majority. Vacant positions and members who have been excused from voting because of a conflict of interest shall not be considered in computing governing body membership.
Persons
or entities who have signed
protest petitions may withdraw their signatures at any time prior to the vote on the proposed map change. Any withdrawal must meet standards established for such withdrawals by the Planning Department. Withdrawals submitted less than two working days
prior to the public hearing may result in a continuance of the hearing if the effect of the withdrawal on the validity of the protest cannot be determined prior to the public hearing.
The foregoing provisions concerning protest petitions shall not be applicable to any zoning map change that establishes the County’s zoning designation on property that has been relinquished from the City’s jurisdiction, except as provided by general or local law.
Approval of a zoning map change with a development plan
shall enable the owner
or an authorized agent of the owner
to prepare a site plan
in conformance with the zoning map change and development plan
for the property. The site plan
may be prepared for the entire property or phases of the development
project in accordance with Sec. 3.7, Site Plan Review.
A. When the governing body has denied a zoning map change, no new application may be filed for a similar zoning map change on the subject site until at least 12 months have elapsed since the date of the previous action. The Planning Director - or designee - may waive this requirement if the application has been significantly modified or there has been a significant change in the facts or circumstances since the previous request.
B. When the governing body has denied an annexation petition, the concurrent zoning map change shall be administratively withdrawn.
A. Subdivision
approval shall be required except as specified in paragraph 3.6.2, Actions Exempt from Subdivision Requirements (Exempt Plats
).
B. All requirements imposed through a plat
shall run with the land and shall apply against any owner
, subsequent owner
, or occupant.
A. The following shall not be considered “subdivision
” and are exempt from the provisions of this section:
1. The combination or recombination of lots, or portions of lots, previously created and recorded, if the total number of lots is not increased and the resultant lots are equal to or exceed the standards of this Ordinance;
2. The division of land into parcels
greater than ten acres if no street right-of-way
dedication
is involved;
3. The public acquisition by purchase of strips of land for widening or opening streets or for public transportation system corridors;
4. The division of a tract
in single ownership of which the entire area is no greater than two acres into not more than three lots, if no street right-of-way
dedication
is involved and if the resultant lots are equal to or exceed the standards of this Ordinance; and
5. The division of a tract
into parcels
in accordance with the terms of a probated will or in accordance with intestate succession under Chapter 29 of the General Statutes.
B. The Planning Director - or designee - certification of exempt status is required. Exempt plats
shall be stamped by the Planning Director or designee, noting their exemption, and signed
so that they can be recorded by the Office
of the Register of Deeds.
C. Exempt plats
shall only be required to conform to applicable lot dimensional requirements within Article 6, District Intensity Standards; Article 7, Design Standards; and any other section in this Ordinance where lot dimensional standards are regulated. Exempt plats
shall also conform to applicable nonconformity requirements within Article 14, Nonconformities.
D. The subdivider shall have 180 days after the certification of exempt status is granted to file and record the approved plat
with the Office
of the Register of Deeds before the exemption status becomes void.
A. No subdivision
of land within the jurisdiction of either the City or County may be filed or recorded with the Office
of the Register of Deeds until it has been submitted to and approved by the Planning Director or designee, and until the approval is entered on the face of the plat
.
B. Any person
who, being the owner
or the agent of the owner
of any land located within the jurisdiction of this Ordinance, subdivides land in violation
of this Ordinance, or transfers, or sells land by reference to, exhibition of, or any other use of a plat
showing a subdivision
of the land before the plat
has been properly approved under this Ordinance, and recorded in the Office
of the Register of Deeds, shall be punishable pursuant to state and local law.
C. The description by metes and bounds in the instrument of transfer, or other document used in the process of selling or transferring land, does not exempt the transaction from penalties. The City or County, as appropriate, may bring an action for injunction of any illegal subdivision
, transfer, conveyance, or sale of land, and the court shall, upon appropriate findings, issue an injunction and order for compliance.
All applicants considering petitioning for a conservation subdivision
or any other preliminary plat
pursuant to paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference, shall schedule a pre-application conference with the Planning Director, or designee to discuss the procedures, standards, and regulations required for subdivision
approval in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance.
The applicant shall hold a neighborhood meeting as set forth in paragraph 3.2.3, Neighborhood Meeting, prior to application submittal.
It is recommended, but not required, that the applicant applying for subdivision
approval submit a sketch/concept plan for review by the Planning Director or designee. This plan should, in simple sketch form, show the proposed layout of streets, lots and other features in relation to existing conditions
.
An application for preliminary plat
review shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements. Preliminary plat
documents showing the proposed subdivision
of the land into lots shall contain, as a minimum, the information listed below unless the Planning Director, or designee, makes the determination that less detailed information is required for adequate review. No processing or review of a preliminary plat
will proceed without the required information. Detailed standards and specifications for design and construction are available from City, County and State agencies
, as applicable.
1. Title Block
– Name of project, labeled Preliminary Plat
; submittal and revision dates; sheet size (36 inches by 48 inches maximum) with index map and match lines if multiple sheets are required; graphic scale (not smaller than one inch to 200 feet on a standard engineering scale); north point; property identification number; vicinity map clearly establishing the location of the proposed project, with readily recognizable landmarks, stream buffers
, flood plain boundaries, property zoning districts and any overlay zones.
2. Name, address and telephone number of owner
, applicant and agent; name, address and telephone number of surveyor, engineer, landscape architect, or other designer, with seal.
3. In addition, State or Federal regulations may require that additional information be supplied to the Planning Department as a part of a submittal.
1. Boundary of the property, using metes and bounds with angle of departure of adjacent
properties; site size and amount to be developed
; lot lines; building
foot prints and square footage; improvements, such as loading areas
, parking areas, driveways
, alleys
, streets, sidewalks, etc.; any septic tanks, drain fields and wells; culverts and other subsurface features; all utility easements
, above and below ground, including information on type, size, and elevation; railroads; cemeteries
; setback
requirements; zoning of the site and adjacent
zoning, including any overlay zones; land use of the site and adjacent
land uses including major improvements within 50 feet of the subject property; adjacent
property owners
; adjacent
streets, including name and right of way width. Existing features shall be clearly distinguishable from proposed development
.
2. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals for all property within 100 feet of a proposed development
area and topographic contours at five-foot contour intervals for the remainder of the property including a source reference; locations and names of water features including shorelines, water bodies, intermittent and perennial streams
; a major specimen tree survey; locations of drainage ways, stream buffers
, floodways
, floodway
fringes, wetlands
and wetland
buffers; locations of vegetation, rock outcrops, steep slope areas, Durham Natural Inventory
sites and Durham Historic Inventory
Sites.
3. A list of any conditions applied to the property as part of any previous approvals.
1. Street Improvements (Public and Private): location of improvements or widenings, names, widths of rights of way and pavement, design criteria including sight triangles and a typical cross section; Traffic Impact Analysis, if required.
2. Pedestrian Circulation: location of sidewalks and other pedestrian ways including dimensions and surfacing, along streets and other locations; provision of crosswalks.
3. Landscaping: location of all plant materials and other landscaping features, including calculations of amount required and the amount provided; the number, size, and description of plant materials, fences, walls and berms; provisions for screening
specialized features, such as storage areas; calculations of the amount of tree coverage required and the amount and percentage of tree coverage provided by tree preservation and tree replacement; calculation of the amount of street trees and the amount provided by tree preservation and tree installation; a land disturbance tree survey; and the location and a description of all proposed and required tree protection measures.
4. Grading
: location of vegetation to be retained including approximate sizes and protection measures to be used; a depiction of contours at two foot intervals, supplemented with spot elevations when necessary, including location, description, and size of any retaining walls; dimensions of stream buffers
.
5. Utilities: location and width of all easements
and rights of way for water, sewer, storm sewers, gas, electric, communication facilities, or any other utility facility.
6. Storm Drainage: location and description of temporary and permanent storm drainage pipes and swales; amount of impervious surface
; provisions for erosion
and sedimentation
controls, including retention and detention facilities; mechanisms for complying with paragraph 8.5.5, Diffuse Flow Requirements; as well as professionally sealed engineering calculations used in the design.
7. Water and Sewer: location and description of public and private water and sanitary sewer improvements including connections to existing facilities and maintenance provisions.
8. Property Dedications
/Reservations
: location and description of dedicated
or reserved
properties under public or private ownership including the boundaries, size, purpose, future ownership and maintenance provisions for the property. This category includes but is not limited to rights-of-way, rail corridors, greenways, recreation facilities, open space
and common areas.
9. Specific performance standards as required by other Articles of the UDO.
10. Within Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas: demonstration that the subdivision
will minimize flood damage through the location and construction of all public utilities
and facilities, including water and sewer systems; adequate drainage in accordance with adopted standards to reduce exposure to flood hazards.
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) pursuant to Sec. 3.3, Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) may be required.
1. A preliminary plat
shall be required for all subdivision
of land within the jurisdiction of this Ordinance for developments
of more than six lots. A preliminary plat
is required for development
of six lots or less unless there is no public dedication
of land, no streets, no utility extensions, no required diffuse flow mechanisms, and no required stormwater
management facilities.
2. Subdivision
approval requires the submission of both preliminary and final plats
and full interagency review for conformity with the requirements of this Ordinance and other development-related ordinances.
3. Where site plans
, as required by this Ordinance, serve as preliminary plats
for subdivisions
, they shall satisfy these submission requirements in addition to those required for zoning compliance.
Any preliminary plat
application that involves criteria pursuant to paragraph 3.7.3B, Major Site Plans, shall be noticed pursuant to 3.2.5D, Public Notification Service.
Staff review agencies
shall complete review and transmit comments back to the Planning Director or designee.
The preliminary plat
shall be approved by the approving authority if it meets the following criteria:
1. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of applicable adopted plans, including but not limited to the Comprehensive Plan
, historic preservation plans, open space
plans, greenways plans, transportation plans, gateway plans, corridor plans, collector street
plans, and bicycle plans;
2. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of this Ordinance; and
3. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of other applicable ordinances not included in this Ordinance.
This section does not apply to the reservation
of lands for public streets and roads
.
1. The review of preliminary plats
may be delayed by no more than 45 calendar days if the proposed subdivision
contains sites which appear in an adopted plan or policy documents as a future site for a public school or other public facility
, recreation area, park, greenway or other open space
. During preliminary plat
review, the appropriate entity responsible for future site acquisition shall be given 45 calendar days from date of plat
submission to decide if it wishes to reserve
the site.
2. If the site is not to be reserved
, the subdivision
shall be processed in the normal fashion. If the agency
wishes to reserve
the site and specifies such intent in writing to the Planning Director or designee, the subdivision
shall not be approved without the reservation
.
3. Public school authorities shall have 18 months from the date of preliminary plat
approval to acquire the site by purchase, by receipt of dedication
, or by initiating condemnation proceedings. If, at the end of the 18-month period, none of the above actions has occurred, the subdivider may consider the land free from reservation
and apply for revised preliminary plat
approval for its use.
Commentary: See NCGS §160D-804(f).
4. Public agencies
other than schools shall have 120 calendar days from the date of preliminary plat
approval to arrange for site acquisition for public facilities
by option to purchase, by purchase, by receipt of dedication
, or by initiating condemnation proceedings. If, at the end of the 120-day period, none of the above actions has occurred the subdivider may consider the land free from reservation
and apply for revised preliminary plat
approval for private use of the property.
1. Upon preliminary plat
approval, the applicant may apply for the required permits to begin site work and the installation of improvements.
2. All site work shall be performed in compliance with the requirements of this section and other applicable regulations of the City, County, and State.
3. No required permit may be issued until the required preliminary plat
is approved.
1. Minor revisions to approved preliminary plats
, which reflect the same basic street and lot configuration as used for the original approval, may be approved by the Planning Director or designee.
2. Significant changes to an approved preliminary plat
, as determined by the Planning Director or designee, shall be resubmitted for review and approval as if it is a new application.
1. An approved preliminary plat
shall retain its validity for four years, if:
a. A permit to begin development
pursuant to the plat
, such as a land disturbance permit, a building permit
, or an improvement permit has been issued and has remained continuously valid thereafter; and,
b. Building
or land disturbing activity
has begun on the property.
2. The issuance of a building permit
or a certificate of compliance
within a phase of a project shall not extend the validity of the preliminary plat
for the unbuilt portions of that phase or any future phases of the project for which building
permits have not been issued.
3. Preliminary plat
amendments shall not extend the validity of the original approved preliminary plat
.
4. Validity may be extended if vesting is determined per Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights
.
1. A final plat
shall be required for all subdivision
of land within the jurisdiction of this Ordinance except as allowed under North Carolina General Statute.
A minor plat
is a final plat
for subdivision
that does not qualify as an exempt plat
or require a preliminary plat
approval pursuant to paragraph 3.6.7, Preliminary Plat Approval. In addition to the applicable requirements pursuant to paragraph 3.6.8E, Action by the Planning Director, the following shall apply:
a. No part of the tract
or parcel
to be divided has been divided 10 years prior to the application.
b. A stormwater
impact analysis shall be submitted that documents and supports how the project foregoes any stormwater
control measure(s).
c. The subdivision
shall comply with all applicable City and/or County utility requirements.
1. The final plat
shall conform to the approved preliminary plat
, if any.
2. The final plat
may constitute only that portion of the preliminary plat
which is proposed for recordation.
1. When the installation of required site improvements is nearing completion, the subdivider shall submit a final plat
for review and approval.
2. An application for final plat
approval shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
3. The final plat
shall be drawn in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 47-30, Plats
and Subdivisions-Mapping Requirements; standard land surveying and mapping practices; and city/county engineering standards.
The following certificates shall be placed upon all final plats
:
1. Certificate of accuracy and mapping signed
by a registered surveyor;
2. Certificate of ownership and dedication
signed
and notarized, including all individuals, partnerships, and corporations, and lenders with financial security interests;
3. Attorney’s certification of ownership for any final plat
involving a right-of-way
dedication
signed
and notarized; and
4. Review officer
’s certification.
Staff review agencies
shall complete review and transmit comments back to the Planning Director, or designee. The Planning Director or designee shall approve the plat
as is, defer action for additional information and corrections, or disapprove it. If the final plat
is disapproved or deferred, the Planning Director or designee shall notify the applicant of the reasons for such disapproval or deferral. The final plat
shall be approved by the Planning Director or designee if it meets the following criteria:
1. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of applicable adopted plans, including but not limited to the Comprehensive Plan
, historic preservation plans, open space
plans, greenways plans, transportation plans, gateway plans, corridor plans, collector plans, and bicycle plans;
2. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of this Ordinance;
3. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of other applicable ordinances not included in this ordinance;
4. Conforms with the preliminary plat
, if any;
5. Conforms with completed and approved construction drawings for public infrastructure, where such construction drawings are required by this Ordinance or other applicable ordinance; and
6. Is accompanied by a performance guarantee deemed adequate by the requesting department, if required infrastructure, including but not limited to stormwater
, street, or water and sewer improvements, has not been completed in accordance with approved construction drawings, and if the department responsible for such infrastructure has consented to final plat
approval pending its completion.
The subdivider shall have 180 days after approval to file and record the final plat
with the Office
of the Register of Deeds before the approval becomes void.
For purposes of financing or refinancing development
, it is sometimes necessary to subdivide a previously approved development
complex (including but not limited to a shopping center
, an office
or industrial park, or a housing complex) originally located on a single parcel
into two or more lots, where a subdivision
would vary dimensional, parking, or landscaping requirements of this Ordinance. The Planning Director or designee is authorized to permit such subdivision
to occur subject to the following criteria:
A. A valid, approved site plan
exists for the overall complex;
B. The complex, in its entirety, satisfies all Ordinance requirements; and
C. Each final plat
created contains a note stating that the owners
acknowledge that the individual parcel
is a part of the named development
complex, and that deeds of easement
, restrictive covenants, and/or other legal documents necessary for the perpetual functioning of the development
complex shall be executed and recorded with the final plat
.
Site plan
review, when applicable, shall verify that proposed development
:
A. Complies with all applicable Ordinance requirements, including any applicable development plan
;
B. Complies with all previously approved applicable plans, including open space
and trails plans, and bicycle and pedestrian plans;
C. Provides for trash handling, recycling, grease bins, and other waste
related facilities employed in the normal operation of the use;
D. Provides adequate locations of parking areas, and pedestrian and vehicular access points and circulation;
E. Provides adequate design of traffic patterns, traffic control measures, and street pavement areas, with provisions for maintaining traffic flows and reducing unfavorable effects of traffic on nearby properties;
F. Provides adequate stormwater
facilities, water supply, sanitary sewer service, and fire protection, as evidenced by conformance with department standards, specifications, and guidelines;
G. Complies with requirements for easements
and dedications
;
H. Where a TIA has been submitted, accommodation for the traffic generated by the development
with the existing or funded transportation system, or adequate traffic mitigation measures, are provided.
All proposed development
or changes of use, except as indicated below, shall be subject to the site plan
review process. Development
that is part of a Common Plan of Development
as defined in the City of Durham Code of Ordinances shall be subject to regulations and requirements therein. The following are exempt from site plan
review:
A. Single-family
and two-family
development
on existing single lots of record
.
B. Townhouse
or detached rowhouse development
consisting of 10 units or fewer where each unit has a maximum footprint of 1,000 square feet. Additionally, land disturbance shall be less than 1 acre in the Jordan Reservoir Watershed
, 12,000 square feet in the Falls Reservoir Watershed
, and 0.5 acre in the Neuse River Basin.
C. Accessory dwelling unit
development
where the primary use is civic, consisting of 20 units or fewer where each unit has a maximum footprint of 1,000 square feet. Additionally, land disturbance shall be less than 1 acre in the Jordan Reservoir Watershed
, 12,000 square feet in the Falls Reservoir Watershed
, and 0.5 acre in the Neuse River Basin.
D. Development
of lots 20,000 square feet or less located in the CI District or utilizing the CI District dimensional standards. For residential uses, CI District density
standards shall apply to any project utilizing the CI district dimensional standards. Additionally, land disturbance shall be less than 12,000 square feet in the Falls Reservoir Watershed
.
E. Development
that does not require review by any City or County department for conformance with the standards of this Ordinance; or does not require a permit such as but not limited to fences or flagpoles. In instances where these types of development
require a certificate of appropriateness (COA) or a special use permit, a site plan
will not be required.
F. Change of use where no additions to buildings or structures, or exterior land improvements, are proposed and the change of use:
1. Does not require additional parking or stacking.
2. Does not require additional landscaping.
3. Does not require a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) or no improvements are required as a result of a TIA analysis.
4. Only requires Architectural Review per Sec. 3.22, Architectural Review.
Development
projects consisting only of public utility
improvements within the public right-of-way
, improvements to the public right-of-way
(repairing, surfacing, striping, widening, stabilizing, landscaping), or other improvements in the right-of-way
where the Planning Director, or designee, determines another City or County approval process verifies conformance to this Ordinance. Exceptions are as follows:
1. In Design Districts, a separate site plan
application can be filed or site plan
review can occur through another technical review by the City or County for that development
project.
2. In local historic districts, a separate site plan
application can be filed or site plan
review can occur through review of the required COA application.
The approving authority is the Planning Director or designee.
1. The approving authority is the Governing Body.
2. Criteria:
a. The request is for approval pursuant to a standard established in the Ordinance that requires Governing Body approval; or
b. Involves the requirement of a major or transportation special use permit; or
c. Is located in a Watershed
Protection Overlay Critical Area (A), as defined in Sec. 4.11, Watershed Protection Overlay, with impervious surface
that exceeds the maximum permitted by the Low Density Option
under Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards.
1. The Planning Director, or designee, is authorized to approve minor changes to the approved site plan
, resulting from field conditions and which result in an equivalent or better performance.
2. Significant changes to the approved site plan
, such as but not limited to a change in access points, relocation of buildings or parking areas, relocation of stormwater
facilities, and changes of use that require different development
standards, shall be resubmitted for site plan
approval as a new site plan
application.
3. Changes to an approved, valid site plan
required as a result of an update to the applicable Flood Insurance
Rate Map(s) (FIRM) or other detailed flood data pursuant to paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, shall be submitted as a site plan
amendment.
4. A site plan
amendment request shall clearly identify the elements for which approval is sought in both text and graphic form. Only those elements so identified shall be reviewed and considered for approval. If any element of an approved plan is changed but not identified, the amendment request shall be denied in its entirety or, if already approved, the amendment shall be deemed null and void in its entirety.
5. Site plan
amendments to plans approved under the 1994 Merged Zoning Ordinance, as amended, shall follow approval procedures of this paragraph 3.7.3C, Site Plan Amendments.
A site plan
shall conform to an approved development plan
except as required under paragraph 3.5.12E, Changes Required by Ordinance or Other Law, or as authorized under paragraph 3.5.12, Deviations from Approved Development Plans, and paragraph 3.5.6C, Authority of the Planning Director.
A. A pre-application conference shall be required pursuant to paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
B. An application for site plan
review shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
C. Site plans
shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable Ordinance requirements, including any variance
obtained pursuant to Sec. 3.14, Variance, and any other applicable development
requirements. Site plan
documents shall contain the information required within the site plan
checklists maintained by the Planning Department unless expressly exempted by another provision of this Ordinance, or unless the Planning Director or designee makes the determination that less detailed information is adequate for review.
D. No processing or review of a site plan
will proceed without the required information.
E. Site plan
applications shall utilize applicable forms maintained by the applicable City, County, or State department or agency
.
F. A site plan
shall conform to an approved development plan
except as required under paragraph 3.5.12D, Changes Required by Ordinance or Other Law, or as authorized under paragraph 3.5.12, Deviations from Approved Development Plans, and paragraph 3.5.6C, Authority of the Planning Director.
G. All requirements imposed through a site plan
shall run with the land and shall apply against any owner
, subsequent owner
, or occupant.
A. Site plans
can be considered for final approval only after all comments have been satisfied as determined by the applicable reviewing department or agency
.
B. Approved plans shall be stamped, signed
, and dated by the approving authority or designee.
After an approved copy of the site plan
is received by the Inspections Director or designee, building
permits may be issued for the project. No building permit
may be issued until the required site plan
is approved.
Inspections of site improvements shall be made by the entity responsible for such improvements as required to certify compliance with approved site plans
. No improvements shall be accepted for maintenance by the governing jurisdiction unless and until the requirements regarding public improvements have been met.
Improvements specified in the approved plan shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of compliance
unless an extension of compliance has been prepared and approved in conformance with the requirements of this Ordinance.
Applications for major special use permits may be submitted concurrently with a site plan
.
However, decisions shall be rendered with a separate motion.
Construction drawings shall be approved in accordance with the approved site plan
.
A. An approved site plan
shall retain its validity for four years, and shall remain valid if:
1. A permit to begin development
pursuant to the site plan
, such as a land disturbance permit, a building permit
, or an improvement permit, has been issued and has remained continuously valid thereafter; and,
2. Building
or land disturbing activity
has begun on the property.
B. The issuance of a building permit
or a certificate of compliance
within a phase of a project shall not extend the validity of the site plan
for the unbuilt portions of that phase or any future phases of the project for which building
permits have not been issued.
C. Requests for extensions of validity for site plans
approved under the previous 1994 Merged Zoning Ordinance, as amended, shall comply with the review criteria specified within that ordinance. The approving authority, however, shall be the Planning Director or designee, utilizing the same findings specified in that Ordinance.
D. Site plan
amendments shall not extend the validity of the original, approved site plan
.
E. Validity may be extended if vesting is determined per Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights.
A. If required under Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, an approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
and/or a land-disturbing permit shall be obtained before commencing land-disturbing activity.
B. Pursuant to Sec. 113A-57(4) of the North Carolina Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act of 1973, no person
shall initiate any land-disturbing activity that will disturb more than one acre or requires a sedimentation
and erosion control plan
under Sec. 12.10 unless, 30 or more days prior to initiating the activity, an erosion
and sedimentation
control plan for the activity is filed with and approved by the County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
.
1. A sedimentation
and erosion control plan
shall be filed with the County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
by either hard copy or digitally. A digital copy of approved construction drawings and approved site plan
, where applicable, shall also be provided upon their approval.
2. A sedimentation
and erosion control plan
shall contain site drawings, vicinity maps, assumptions, calculations, narrative statements, and a construction sequence as needed to adequately describe the proposed development
and the measures proposed to comply with the requirements of this Article.
3. A sedimentation
and erosion control plan
shall be prepared by, and bear the seal and signature of, a registered professional engineer, registered landscape architect, registered architect, registered land surveyor, or certified professional in erosion
and sediment
control. The County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee may, however, deem such a seal and signature not necessary due to site simplicity (as the absence of sensitive geographical features and receiving watercourses
) and the limited nature of the sedimentation
and erosion
control measures required. In the case of a single-family
lot in a common plan of development
where the developer
and builder are different, such a seal and signature is not required unless there is a design feature requiring such under federal or State law or regulation.
4. The approval of sedimentation
and erosion control plan
is conditioned on the applicant’s compliance with Federal, State and local water quality laws, regulations, and rules.
5. An approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
shall be kept on file at the job site.
1. A land-disturbing permit may be obtained by submitting the following:
a. Applicable fee;
b. Verification of an approved site plan
or written approval issued by the Durham City-County Planning Department;
c. Completed Durham County Financial Responsibility/Ownership Form With Landowner Consent Form (FRO);
d. Approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
, if required;
e. Improvement security, if required;
f. Certification that tree protection fencing has been installed, if required; and
g. Approval of the proposed project by the City or County as applicable.
2. No permit shall be issued until such time as the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee is assured that the proposed land-disturbing activity will be carried out in accordance with this section and Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, and the approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
, if required. A land-disturbing permit application may be disapproved for the same reasons that a sedimentation
and erosion control plan
may be disapproved, as set forth in paragraph 3.8.7, Disapproval of Plan, of this Ordinance.
3. The Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee shall require security to assure performance of the conditions of the permit whenever a land-disturbing activity is in excess of five acres or whenever the Officer
or designee determines that the activity may result in significant off-site damage. The applicant shall file with the Officer
or designee an improvement security in the form of a performance bond or letter of credit. The amount shall be that which the Officer
or designee deems sufficient to cover all costs of protection or other improvements required for conformity with standards specified in this section and Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control. The security may be adjusted or released as the amount of disturbed area changes. The security shall be released when the Officer
or designee has certified that all of the requirements of such sections have been met. Forfeiture of the improvement security shall not release the person
conducting the land disturbing activity
of their obligation to install and maintain necessary erosion
control measures, to stabilize the site, or any other obligation of this section or Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control, or any rule or order promulgated in furtherance thereof.
4. Prior to initiating land-disturbing activity, the permitee shall notify the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
of the date that such activity will begin.
5. A land-disturbing permit issued shall be prominently displayed at the job site until all construction is completed, all permanent sedimentation
and erosion
control measures are removed, and the site has been stabilized as required.
The fees charged for the administration and enforcement of this Article shall be as prescribed by the Board of Commissioners.
A. The County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee shall review each complete sedimentation
and erosion control plan
submitted and within 30 days of receipt shall notify the person
submitting the plan that it has been approved, approved with modifications, or disapproved. Failure to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a complete plan within 30 days of receipt shall be deemed approval. Failure to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a revised plan within 15 days of receipt shall be deemed approval. Disapproval of a plan must specifically state in writing the reasons for disapproval.
B. If, following commencement of a land-disturbing activity pursuant to an approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
, the County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee determines that the plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of this section or Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, the Officer
or designee may require such revisions as it deems necessary to comply with such sections. Failure to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a revised plan within 15 days of receipt shall be deemed approval. Pending approval of a revised plan, work shall cease or shall continue only as authorized by the Officer
or designee.
C. The County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee shall review each permit application that does not require an approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
and within 14 calendar days of receipt shall notify the person
submitting the application that it has been issued or denied.
When deemed necessary by the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
, or designee, a preconstruction conference may be required.
The landowner, the financially responsible party, or the landowner’s or the financially responsible party’s agent of all permit holders, except for individual residential lots smaller than 1 acre, shall perform an inspection of the area covered by the plan after each phase of the plan has been completed and after establishment of temporary ground cover
in accordance with Sec. 12.10. The person
who performs the inspection shall maintain and make available a record of the inspection at the site of the land-disturbing activity. The record shall set out any significant deviation from the approved erosion control plan
, identify any measures that may be required to correct the deviation, and document the completion of those measures. The record shall be maintained until permanent ground cover
has been established as required by the approved erosion
and sedimentation
control plan. The inspections required by this subsection shall be in addition to inspections conducted by the Durham County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
.
A. An erosion control plan
may be disapproved upon a finding that an applicant, or a parent
, subsidiary
or other affiliate
of the applicant:
1. Is conducting or has conducted land-disturbing activity without an approved plan;
2. Has received notice of violation
of a plan previously approved by the North Carolina Sedimentation
Control Commission or a local government pursuant to the North Carolina Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act of 1973, as amended, and all rules and orders adopted pursuant to it (the Act) or local ordinance adopted pursuant to the Act, and has not or had not complied with the notice within the time specified in the notice;
3. Has failed to pay a civil penalty assessed pursuant to the Act or a local ordinance adopted pursuant to the Act by the time the payment is due; or
4. Has failed to substantially comply with State rules or local ordinances and regulations adopted pursuant to the Act.
B. For purposes of this subsection, an applicant’s record may be considered for only the two years prior to the application date.
C. Any person
engaged in land-disturbing activity who fails to file a plan in accordance with this Article, or who conducts a land-disturbing activity except in accordance with provisions of an approved plan, shall be deemed in violation
of this Article.
Applications for amendment of an erosion control plan
in written and/or graphic form may be made at any time under the same conditions as described in this section for a new application. Until such time as such amendment is approved by the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee, the land-disturbing activity shall not proceed except in accordance with the erosion control plan
as originally approved.
A. Except as provided in paragraph B. of this subsection, the appeal
of a disapproval or approval with modifications of a plan shall be governed by the following provisions:
1. The disapproval or modification of any proposed erosion control plan
or the refusal to issue a land-disturbing permit by the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee shall entitle the person
submitting the plan, or applying for the permit, to a hearing if such person
submits written demand to the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for a hearing within 15 days after receipt of written notice of disapproval or modifications. The written demand must specify, with particularity, the factual and/or legal basis for the appeal
. No grounds, other than those so specified, may be argued;
2. Hearings held pursuant to this section shall be conducted by the Board of Commissioners within 15 days after the date of the appeal
or request for a hearing, or at the next regularly scheduled meeting, whichever is later; and
3. If the Board of Commissioners upholds the disapproval or modification of a proposed erosion control plan
or refusal to issue a permit following the public hearing, the person
submitting the plan or permit application shall then be entitled to appeal
the Board of Commissioners’ decision to the State Sedimentation
Control Commission as provided in NCGS § 113A-61(c) and Title 15 NCAC 4B.0018(d).
In the event that an erosion control plan
is disapproved pursuant to paragraph 3.8.7, Disapproval of Plan, the County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
shall notify the Director of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (within the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality [DEQ]) of such disapproval within ten days. The Office
shall advise the applicant and the Director in writing as to the specific reasons that the plan was disapproved. The applicant may appeal
the Office
’s disapproval of the plan pursuant to paragraph 3.8.7, Disapproval of Plan, directly to the State Sedimentation
Control Commission.
A. A land-disturbing permit shall expire at the end of:
1. One year from the date of issuance if no land-disturbing activity has been undertaken
in that period. No land-disturbing activity may take place following expiration until the person
responsible has applied for, and received, a new land-disturbing permit. The fee for the new permit shall be 100% of the current applicable fee; or
2. A two-year period, unless it is extended by the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee upon written request of the permit holder. The request for extension shall include reasons for incompletion of the work. After review of the original plan and an on-site inspection of the completed work, the permit may be extended effective for a period not to exceed six months from the date of expiration of the original permit. The fee for the extended permit shall be 25% of the current applicable fee. If work cannot be completed and the site permanently stabilized prior to expiration of the permit extension, then a new land-disturbing permit must be applied for and obtained as described in this section.
B. An approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
for which no permit has been issued shall expire one year from the approval date. If a plan has been disapproved, a revised plan must be submitted within one year from the disapproval date or the file will be closed.
Land disturbance permits may be transferred from one financially responsible party to another within the permit term. Transfer of a permit does not extend the permit term.
1. In order to transfer a land disturbance permit from one financially responsible party to another, the following documents must be submitted under the name of the new financially responsible party:
a. Completed Durham County Financial Responsibility/Ownership Form with Landowner Consent Form (FRO);
b. Improvement security, if required.
2. Transfer of permit shall include entirety of original permitted area, unless approved in writing by the Durham County Erosion
Control Office
.
For land-disturbing activities on a single-family
residential lot involving new construction
with land disturbance of less than one acre where the builder or developer
is the owner
of the lot being developed
and the person
financially responsible for the land-disturbing activity, the financial responsibility for land-disturbing activity on that lot transfers to the new owner
upon the builder's or developer
's conveyance of the lot to the new owner
, recording of the deed in the office
of the register of deeds, and notification to the Durham County Erosion
control Office
.
A. Special uses within the zoning districts are considered to be uses which are appropriate in a particular zoning district but because of their potential for incompatibility with surrounding uses require individual review.
B. A minor special use permit shall be required for all minor special uses as set forth in the use table in Sec. 5.1, Use Table, and as may be specified elsewhere in this Ordinance. Minor special use permits require approval by the Board of Adjustment, except pursuant to paragraph 3.9.1E, below.
C. A major special use permit shall be required for all major special uses as set forth in the use table in Sec. 5.1, Use Table; for spray irrigation in a conservation subdivision
pursuant to paragraph 6.2.4, Conservation Subdivision; and as specified elsewhere in this Ordinance. Major special use permits require approval by the appropriate governing body.
D. A transportation special use permit shall be required for development
projects with corresponding site plans
and preliminary plats
pursuant to paragraph 3.9.10, Transportation Special Use Permit. Transportation special use permits require approval by the appropriate governing body.
E. Projects that require not only a major and/or transportation special use permit, but also a minor special use permit, may have the use permits consolidated into a single hearing before the appropriate governing body so long as all required findings for each special use permit are made. Separate orders for each special use permit shall be issued.
All applicants applying for a special use permit shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
All applications for special use permits shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
Once the application has been determined complete, the Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give public notice as set forth in paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
The Planning Director or designee shall prepare a report that reviews the special use permit in light of any requirements of this Ordinance. A copy shall be provided to the Board of Adjustment or the governing body, as appropriate, and the applicant.
A. Prior to scheduling the public hearing on the minor special use permit, the corresponding site plan
or architectural review application, as applicable, shall be ready for action by the approving authority.
B. The applicant seeking the special use permit shall have the burden of presenting evidence sufficient to allow the approving authority to reach the conclusions set forth below, as well as the burden of persuasion on those issues.
C. After conducting the public hearing and hearing the recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, the Board of Adjustment shall:
1. Approve the request;
2. Approve the request with conditions.
3. Deny the request; or
4. Continue the hearing.
D. Conditions may be incorporated as part of the approval of the special use permit to assure that adequate mitigation measures are associated with the use or design pursuant to NCGS §160D-705(c), as applicable. The conditions shall become a part of the minor special use permit approval. Violations
of any of the conditions shall be treated in the same manner as other violations
of this Ordinance.
A. Prior to scheduling the public hearing on the major or transportation special use permit, the corresponding site plan
shall be ready for action by the approving authority.
B. After conducting the public hearing and hearing the recommendations of the Planning Director, Transportation Director, or their designee as appropriate, the governing body shall:
1. Approve the request;
2. Approve the request with conditions.
3. Deny the request; or
4. Continue the hearing.
C. The governing body may place conditions on the use as part of the approval to assure that adequate mitigation measures are associated with the use. The conditions shall become a part of the major special use permit approval. Violations
of any of the conditions shall be treated in the same manner as other violations
of this Ordinance.
Unless otherwise specified in this Ordinance, applications for major or minor special use permits shall be approved only if the approving authority finds that the use as proposed, or the use as proposed with conditions, is:
1. In harmony with the area and not substantially injurious to the value of properties in the general vicinity;
2. In conformance with all special requirements applicable to the use;
3. Will not adversely affect the health or safety of the public; and
4. Will adequately address the review factors identified below.
The applicant shall demonstrate that the review factors listed below have been adequately addressed. If an application is denied, the approving authority shall specify which of these review factors, if any, were not adequately addressed.
Number and location of access points to the property and the proposed structures and uses, with particular reference to automotive, bicycle, mass transit and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
Location of off-street parking and loading areas
.
Locations of refuse and service areas
with particular reference to ingress and egress of service vehicles
.
Locations of exterior lighting with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility with other property in the area.
Appropriateness of signs
considering location, color, height, size, and design within the context of other property in the area.
Location and availability of utilities.
Location of required yards
and other open spaces
and preservation of existing trees and other natural features.
Preservation of tree cover, Durham Inventory
Sites, floodplain, stream buffers
, wetlands
, steep slopes, open space
and other natural features, and protection of water quality.
Installation of screening
, buffering, fencing and landscaping where necessary to protect adjacent
property.
Effects of the proposed use on nearby properties, including, but not limited to, the effects of noise, odor, lighting, and traffic.
The level of general compatibility with nearby properties and impacted neighborhoods, including but not limited to the appropriateness of the scale, design, and use in relationship to other properties.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
and applicable development
tier guidelines, overlay purposes, and zoning district intent statements in Article 4, Zoning Districts.
Any other review factors which the approving authority considers to be appropriate to the property in question.
The applicant for a minor special use permit under this section shall demonstrate that the additional review factors listed below have been adequately addressed. If the application is denied, the Board of Adjustment shall specify which of these review factors, if any, were not adequately addressed.
1. Susceptibility of the proposed facility, structure
, or other development
and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual property owner
and others as a result of flood damage;
2. Importance of the services provided by the proposed facility, structure
, or other development
to the community;
3. Necessity to the facility, structure
, or other development
of a waterfront location, where applicable;
4. Compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development
;
5. Safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles
;
6. Expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment
transport of the flood waters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site;
7. Costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions including maintenance and repair of public utilities
and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems, and streets and bridges;
8. Relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for that area;
9. The proposed fill or development
provides for a better balance between overall efficiency of the site design and improved conservation elsewhere on the site than would be possible without intrusion into the floodway fringe
, non-encroachment area fringe
, Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas, or Areas of Shallow Flooding Zone
e AO);
10. The proposed fill or development
represents the minimum amount of floodway fringe
, non-encroachment area fringe
, Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas, or Areas of Shallow Flooding Zone
e AO) intrusion to achieve this better balance; and
11. Any other relevant factors, technical evaluations, or standards specified in other sections of this Ordinance.
A transportation special use permit shall be required for development
projects that are expected to generate:
1. 600 or more vehicle
trips at peak hour; or
2. 300 or more vehicle
trips at peak hour, if any road
serving the project is operating at a level of service
lower than the jurisdiction’s adopted level of service
.
The following projects shall be exempt from the requirement of a transportation special use permit, even if they meet or exceed the thresholds specified above.
1. Projects that do not require a TIA per Sec. 3.3, Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
2. Projects within the UC, UC-2, or SRP zoning districts.
3. Projects outside of the City jurisdiction.
4. Projects which have submitted a TIA in connection with a zoning map change with a development plan
, and which are developing
consistent with the approved development plan
, if the TIA is valid pursuant to paragraph 3.3.6, Period of Validity.
5. Schools as defined in NCGS §160A-307.1.
Applications for a transportation special use permit shall be approved only if the governing body makes the following findings:
1. The traffic generated by the development
and associated improvements to the street system will not have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding area. Significant adverse impact shall include:
a. Substantial increases in traffic on local residential streets
such that the majority of the traffic is not associated with the residential properties which front on the street; or
b. The need to widen local residential streets
, which would detract significantly from the character or basic function of the nearby streets.
2. Adequate provisions have been made for safe and efficient vehicular circulation, parking and loading, and pedestrian access.
3. The traffic generated by the proposed development
and any proposed improvements to the street system will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Significant adverse impacts shall include but not be limited to undue concentration of air pollutants, or excessive noise or vibrations.
4. The traffic generated by the development
can be accommodated by the existing or funded transportation system, or adequate traffic mitigation measures have been proposed as part of the development
application. Proposed mitigation measures shall become conditions of the special use permit. The adopted level of service
for the adjacent
roadways may be considered in making this determination but shall not be the sole factor considered by the governing body.
An application for a special use permit may be reviewed concurrently with a zoning map change application. However, decisions shall be rendered with separate motions.
An application for a special use permit which has been denied may be resubmitted if there has been a change in circumstances, as determined by the Planning Director or designee.
A special use permit shall become null and void in any of the following cases:
A. If a site plan
or architectural review, as applicable, is not approved within 12 months of the date of permit approval.
B. If an approved site plan
, architectural review application, or building permit
expires.
C. If a building permit
is not issued within two years of the date of approval
, in cases where a corresponding site plan
or architectural review is not required.
D. If a substantial violation
of the conditions of the permit, as determined by the Planning Director or designee occurs. The addition of language to the special use permit regarding such voiding shall not be required.
E. Validity may be extended if vesting is determined per Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights.
Appeal
from final action can be taken by filing a petition for certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
A. Certain signs
shall be allowed without sign
permits (as set forth in Article 11, Signs). Signs
requiring permits shall be allowed in accordance with the following procedures.
Commentary: A common signage plan
may be required before a sign
permit can be issued (see Sec. 3.11, Common and Way-Finding Signage Plans).
B. Internally oriented
signs
not legible from the public right-of-way
shall not require a sign
permit; however, electrical or other permits may be required.
A. Except as provided in Article 11, Signs, no sign
may be erected, moved, enlarged, or altered except in accordance with this Ordinance and pursuant to the issuance of a sign
permit.
B. A sign
permit application shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
A. Upon review of the application, the Planning Director or designee shall approve the sign
permit provided the sign
meets all requirements of this Ordinance, and all other applicable electrical and North Carolina Building
Code requirements.
B. Signs
shall be installed in accordance with the approved sign
permit within one year of the date of official permit approval or the permit shall expire and require a new sign
permit application and approval. The Planning Director or designee may extend the validity of the sign
permit with documentation that a good faith effort is being made to install and receive final approval of the subject sign
(s).
A. The applicant shall request an inspection after installation of the signs
.
B. If the signs
are found to be in compliance, the applicant shall receive a permanent seal which identifies the sign
. The applicant shall attach the identification in a conspicuous location which is accessible to the Planning Director or designee. It is recommended that businesses place the permit in a lower corner of the front door of the business in those cases where the seal is not affixed to the sign
.
C. The sign
permit shall be null and void if sign
installation is not completed within six months or the signs
are not in conformance with the approved application.
D. Valid sign
permits may be assigned to a successor as holder of a business license for the same premises.
A temporary sign
permit shall be issued in accordance with Article 11, Signs. A common signage plan
pursuant to Sec. 3.11, Common and Way-Finding Signage Plans, shall not be required for applications for temporary sign
permits.
Final action on a sign
permit can be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
A. A common signage plan
is required for all signs
for one or more buildings or businesses within a unified development
complex, as demonstrated through a development plan
or approved site plan
(s), even if the property is subdivided and has various owners
.
1. Approval of a common signage plan
is required prior to the issuance of a sign
permit.
2. Internally-oriented signs
not visible from the public right-of-way
shall not be required to be included in a common signage plan
.
3. Applications for temporary sign
permits shall not be required to submit an approved common signage plan
.
4. Common signage plans
are not required in UC, UC-2, and Design districts and in a local Historic Districts Overlay. (County Only) Common signage plans
are not required in the SRP-C District.
B. A way-finding signage plan
is required to allow signs
pursuant to paragraph 11.6.2A.9, Way-Finding Signs.
1. Approval of a way-finding signage plan
is required prior to the issuance of a sign
permit.
2. A way-finding signage plan
can be approved separately, or as part of, a common signage plan
.
3. Internally-oriented signs
not visible from the public right-of-way
shall not be required to be included in a way-finding signage plan
.
4. (County Only) Way-finding signage plans
are not required in the SRP-C District.
A. The elements of common and way-finding signage plans
shall be in accordance with Sec. 11.8, Elements of Common and Way-Finding Signage Plans.
B. Common and way-finding signage plan
applications shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
C. Additional requirements are listed in Sec. 11.7, Landmark Signs.
A. The Planning Director, or designee, is the approving authority for common and way-finding signage plans
.
B. The Planning Director, or designee, may allow modifications to the lettering style of a common signage plan
to accommodate state and federally registered trademarks (logos) if the Planning Director, or designee, determines that the intent of the common signage plan
requirements shall be maintained. In allowing the modifications, the Planning Director, or designee, may limit the logo size.
C. Minor alterations in sign
locations resulting from unexpected conditions on the site may be approved by the Planning Director, or designee.
A. Revisions or amendments to a common signage plan
shall require documentation of notification to all owners
and tenants on the property prior to approval. The notification shall indicate the proposed changes and shall be mailed between 10 to 25 days prior to application submittal.
B. Signs
erected after September 1, 1989, and subsequently made nonconforming because of an amendment to a common signage plan
shall be brought into compliance with the amended plan within six months of approval of the amended plan.
Final action on a common or way-finding signage plan
can be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
A. Temporary uses occurring on property outside of the public right-of-way
shall be allowed upon the issuance of a temporary use permit, except as set forth in, Sec. 5.5, Temporary Uses.
Commentary: Standards for specific uses are included in Sec. 5.5, Temporary Uses.
B. The provisions of this section shall not apply to temporary uses occurring within the public right-of-way
.
Commentary: For further details on temporary uses occurring within the public right-of-way
see the applicable City or County Code.
A temporary use permit application shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
A. After receiving the application, the Planning Director or designee shall have up to 30 days to review the application.
B. Upon hearing recommendations from all appropriate departments, the Planning Director or designee shall approve the issuance of a temporary use permit subject to the following:
1. No lighting or electrical service shall be provided without an electrical permit;
2. No temporary use structure
shall be erected without a building permit
;
3. No temporary use structure
shall block
fire lanes or pedestrian or vehicular access;
4. The site of the temporary use shall be cleared of all debris at the end of the temporary use. All temporary structures shall be cleared from the site within five days after the use is terminated;
5. Written permission of the property owner
for the temporary use shall be provided;
6. Adequate parking shall be provided, considering both the required parking for other uses and the parking for the proposed temporary use;
7. Adequate traffic control measures shall be provided;
8. Required landscaped and vegetated areas remain undisturbed;
9. Adequate provisions for trash disposal
and sanitary facilities shall be provided; and
10. When appropriate, adequate provisions for crowd control shall be provided.
C. Temporary use permits may be renewed one time by the Planning Director or designee, unless other renewal standards are specified in Sec. 5.5, Temporary Uses, or in other provisions of this section.
A temporary use permit shall be revoked if the Planning Director or designee finds that the terms of the permit have been violated
or that there is a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare.
Final action on a temporary use permit can be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
A home occupation
(see paragraph 5.4.4) shall require a permit, as set forth below.
A home occupation
application shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
Upon review of the application, the Planning Director, or designee, shall approve the home occupation
permit, provided the home occupation
meets all requirements of this Ordinance.
The home occupation
permit shall be revoked if the home occupation
is found to be in violation
of the requirements of this Ordinance.
Final action on a home occupation
permit can be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
A. The Board of Adjustment may vary certain requirements of this Ordinance, in harmony with the general purpose of these regulations, where unnecessary hardships would result from carrying out the strict letter of the Ordinance.
B. Despite the above and pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0233 and 15A NCAC 02B .0267, a “major variance
” from the requirements of Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, including where incorporated by reference, shall be granted only by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. A “minor variance
” may be granted by the approval authority in accordance with paragraph 8.5.12, Variances.
C. No variance
shall be granted that would have the effect of allowing a use not permitted in the use table in Sec. 5.1, Use Table, by Sec. 8.4, Floodplain and Flood Damage Protection Standards, or elsewhere within this Ordinance.
Commentary: Variances
may be granted for, among other things, height, structure
size, lot dimensions, and setbacks
.
An application for a variance
shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
Once the application has been determined complete, the Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give public notice as forth in paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
The applicant seeking the variance
shall have the burden of presenting evidence sufficient to allow the Board of Adjustment to reach the conclusions set forth below, as well as the burden of persuasion on those issues.
The Planning Director, or designee, shall provide the Board of Adjustment with a copy of the application and all relevant materials pertaining to the request prior to the public hearing.
A. Each decision shall be accompanied by a finding of fact by the Board of Adjustment which specifies the reasons for the decision.
B. The Board of Adjustment may approve the request, deny the request, or continue the request. In approving the variance
, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe reasonable and appropriate conditions provided that the conditions are reasonably related to the variance
.
In granting any variance
, the Board of Adjustment shall make the following findings:
A. Unnecessary hardship would result from the strict application of the Ordinance. It shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the variance
, no reasonable use can be made of the property.
B. The hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the property, such as location, size, or topography. Hardships resulting from personal
circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from conditions that are common to the neighborhood or the general public, may not be the basis for granting a variance
.
C. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the applicant or the property owner
. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that circumstances exist that may justify granting a variance
shall not be regarded as a self-created hardship.
D. The requested variance
is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the Ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved.
A. A request for a variance
from any requirement of Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards, that violates
any provision in Title 15 NCAC 2B, Sections .0100, .0200, and .0300, as amended, shall be first heard by the Board of Adjustment in accordance with this section and after notification of the appropriate governing body, except that a request for a variance
from the requirements of Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, as referenced by paragraph 8.7.2E, Riparian Buffers, shall proceed under paragraph 8.5.12, Variances. A recommendation from the Board of Adjustment for a variance
shall constitute a request by the local government for a variance
from the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. Such variances
shall be considered “major variances
” in accordance with Title 15A NCAC .0104(r).
B. For all variance
requests from Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards, except those from Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, as referenced therein, the local government with jurisdiction shall notify and allow reasonable comment period for all local governments having jurisdiction within the watershed
area of the water supply source and the entity using the water supply for consumption.
C. The Planning Director, or designee, shall keep a record of variances
to Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards. This record of variances
, not including those from Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, as referenced in Sec. 8.7, shall be submitted to the Division of Water Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality by January 1st of each year. The record shall provide a description of each project receiving a variance
and the reasons for granting a variance
. The record of variances
from Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards shall be included in the annual report to the North Carolina Division of Water Resources summarizing activities implementing the requirements of that section.
A variance
shall become null and void in any of the following cases:
A. If a site plan
, preliminary plat
, or architectural review is not approved within 12 months of the date of approval
of the variance
.
B. If an approved site plan
, preliminary plat
, architectural review, or building permit
expires.
C. In cases when a site plan
, preliminary plat
, or architectural review is not required:
1. If a building permit
is not issued within two years of the date of approval
.
2. If the Ordinance standard subject to the variance
has been amended prior to the issuance of a building permit
.
D. If a substantial violation
of the conditions of the variance
approval is determined by the Planning Director or designee.
A. A written notice of appeal
of an administrative decision shall be filed as an application specifying the grounds for the appeal
, and in accordance with other applicable provisions of paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
B. The appeal
shall be considered filed when the complete application is delivered to the Durham City-County Planning Director. The date and time of filing shall be entered on the notice application.
A. A person
or party with standing shall have 30 days from receipt of the written determination to file an appeal
, or 30 days from receipt from any source of actual or constructive notice of the determination, pursuant to NCGS § 160D-405(d).
B. The official who made the decision shall provide it in writing to the owner
of the property that is the subject of the decision and to the party who sought the decision, if different than the owner
. The written decision shall be delivered by personal
delivery, electronic mail, or by first class mail.
Once the application has been submitted, the Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing at the first available Board of Adjustment meeting and give public notice pursuant to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
A. The Planning Director or designee shall transmit to the Board of Adjustment all the documents and exhibits constituting the record upon which the action appealed
from is taken.
B. The Planning Director or designee shall provide a copy of the record to the appellant and to the owner
of the property that is subject to the appeal
, if different than the appellant.
The Board of Adjustment may reverse or affirm (wholly or partly) or may modify the decision appealed
from and shall make any order, requirement, decision, or determination that ought to be made in the case before it. To this end, the Board of Adjustment shall have all the powers of the official from whom the appeal
is taken.
A. An appeal
of a notice of violation
or other enforcement order stays enforcement of the action appealed
from, including any accumulation of fines, during the pendency of the appeal
to the Board of Adjustment and any subsequent appeal
in accordance with NCGS §160D-1402, or during pendency of any civil proceeding authorized by law, including NCGS §160D-1403.1, or appeals
therefrom, unless the official who made the decision certifies to the Board of Adjustment after notice of appeal
has been filed that because of the facts stated in an affidavit, a stay would cause imminent peril to life or property; or because the violation
is transitory in nature, a stay would seriously interfere with enforcement of the Ordinance. In that case, enforcement proceedings shall not be stayed except by a restraining order, which may be granted by a court.
B. If enforcement proceedings are not stayed, the appellant may file a request for an expedited hearing of the appeal
, and the Board of adjustment shall meet to hear the appeal
within 15 days after such a request is filed.
C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, appeals
of decisions granting a development
approval or otherwise affirming that a proposed use of property is consistent with the Ordinance shall not stay the further review of an application for permits or permissions to use such property; in these situations, the appellant may request and the Board may grant a stay of a final decision of permit applications or building
permits affected by the issue being appealed
.
Appeal
from the Board of Adjustment action can be taken by filing a petition in the nature of certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
A. The City Council and the Board of Commissioners, as applicable, may designate an area as an historic district or a property as an historic landmark, or amend or remove a local historic district designation or landmark designation.
B. A property owner or owners
may request an area to be designated as an historic district or that a property be designated as an historic landmark, or to amend or remove a local historic district designation or landmark designation.
Petitions to initiate the establishment of a local historic district are granted or denied by the applicable governing body, depending upon jurisdiction. Petitions shall first be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC), which shall make a recommendation to the governing body as to whether the governing body should or should not initiate the request. If the governing body initiates the request, staff will proceed as directed with the designation of a local historic district zoning overlay (-H), including development
of the required Historic District Preservation Plan.
Commentary: As noted below, the HPC must consider findings before sending the request to the governing body. The governing body will consider information provided by the applicant, the HPC, and staff. Information provided by the applicant will include a percent of property owner
support for the designation, which may factor in the governing body’s decision to initiate the establishment of the proposed historic district designation.
a. Requests to establish a local historic district shall be submitted to the Planning Department, which shall in turn send the request to the HPC for its recommendation to the governing body.
b. The Planning Department shall give notice in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, that a request has been filed and shall be considered by the HPC at a specified date and time.
The HPC shall conduct a preliminary consideration of the request and, at this time, shall make a recommendation to the governing body based upon the following findings:
a. That the area is of special significance in terms of its prehistorical, historical, architectural or cultural importance; and
b. That the area possesses integrity of design, setting, materials, feeling and association.
Upon reviewing information provided by the applicant and staff, and the findings and recommendation from the HPC, the governing body shall determine whether to initiate a formal designation process of the proposed local historic district, including development
of the Historic District Preservation Plan. If the governing body determines a local historic district designation process shall proceed, it shall also determine when staff and the HPC should begin work based upon departmental staffing and work program priorities.
1. An Historic District Preservation Plan shall include an investigation and report describing the significance of the buildings, structures, features, sites, or surroundings included in the proposed historic district and a description of the boundaries of the proposed historic district, in accordance with NCGS §160D-944; principles and design review criteria (guidelines) for certificates of appropriateness as required in NCGS §160D-947; and a preservation strategy tailored to the individual needs of the specific area.
The Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, shall be the adopted principles and design review criteria applicable to all local historic districts, and shall be specifically referenced within the Historic District Preservation Plan.
In accordance with NCGS §160D-944, the NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources shall make an analysis of and recommendations concerning the investigation and report contained in the Historic District Preservation Plan. Failure of the NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources to submit its written analysis and recommendations within 30 days after a written request for such analysis has been received by the Department shall relieve the governing body of any responsibility for awaiting such analysis, and the governing body may at any time thereafter take action on the proposed historic district and Historic District Preservation Plan.
1. The HPC shall conduct a public hearing and give notice in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, on the proposed historic district designation and the Historic District Preservation Plan, prior to making a recommendation for approval or denial to the appropriate governing body.
2. The HPC shall review the proposed historic district designation and the Historic District Preservation Plan and shall recommend to the appropriate governing body denial of the request or designation of the area.
3. The HPC shall forward its recommendation on historic district designation to the Planning Commission and to the governing body with a recommended Historic District Preservation Plan. Consideration of the Historic District Preservation Plan shall be part of the consideration of the historic district designation.
1. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing and give notice in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, on the proposed historic district designation and the Historic District Preservation Plan.
2. The Planning Commission shall review the proposed historic district designation and the Historic District Preservation Plan and shall recommend denial or designation of the area.
1. The governing body shall set a public hearing and shall notify property owners
within the proposed historic district of the public hearing in accordance with the public hearing and notification provisions of paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
2. The governing body, shall hold a public hearing to consider the request to designate the historic district and the adoption of the Historic District Preservation Plan. The protest petition procedures as established for a petition for zoning map change in paragraph 3.5.13, Valid Protest Petition, may apply to the designation or amendment of an historic district.
3. If the governing body denies a request for designating an historic district, property owners
may not initiate a new request to designate an historic district for the same area until at least one year after the governing body’s action to deny the request.
4. When the governing body designates an area as an historic district, the Historic District Preservation Plan for the particular historic district shall become City or County policy and all appropriate public bodies or administrative officials cited as having implementation responsibilities shall be directed to use their best efforts to ensure the effective implementation of the Plan as it is written.
1. An application for an historic landmark designation shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
2. Requests for designation shall include the specific elements of the property for which historic landmark designation is proposed.
1. In accordance with NCGS §160D-946, the HPC shall make or cause to be made an investigation and report on the prehistorical, historical, architectural, educational or cultural significance of each building
, structure
, site area
a or object proposed for designation or acquisition. The investigation and report shall be forwarded to the Office
of Archives and History, North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources.
1. A building
, structure
, site area
a or object may be considered for designation as an historic landmark only if all of the following three criteria are met:
a. The property must not currently be undergoing renovation unless it has been approved for state or federal tax credits in accordance with the Secretary of Interior Standards;
b. The HPC must deem and find that the building
, structure
, site area
a, or object meets at least one of the three following criteria:
(1) Individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places or on the Study List;
(2) Statewide Significance status granted by the State Historic Preservation Office
;
(3) Integrity of location, design, setting, materials, and workmanship, feeling and association on the whole, and:
(a) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local, regional, or national history; or
(b) Is associated with the lives of persons
significant in local, regional, national history; or
(c) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represents the work of a master; possesses high artistic values (i.e., the architecture alone is significant in its own right); or
(d) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to Durham’s history or prehistory.
c. The governing body must deem and find that the property possesses distinction within the context or period of significance.
Commentary: A building
, structure
, site area
a or object whose components lack individual distinction may still be considered a landmark if the whole is significant.
2. A property shall be designated as a historic landmark only with the consent of the property owner or owners
.
1. In accordance with NCGS §160D-946, the HPC shall make or cause to be made an investigation and report on the prehistorical, historical, architectural, educational or cultural significance of each building
, structure
, site area
a or object proposed for designation or acquisition. The investigation and report shall be forwarded to the Division of Archives and History, North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources.
2. The HPC shall hold a public hearing and give notice in accordance to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, on the proposed ordinance of designation. It shall recommend to the governing body, denial of designation or approval of designation of the proposed historic landmark.
In accordance with NCGS §160D-946, the NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources shall make an analysis of and recommendations concerning the investigation and report. Failure of the NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources to submit its written analysis and recommendations within 30 days after a written request for such analysis has been received by the Department shall relieve the governing body of any responsibility for awaiting such analysis, and the governing body may at any time thereafter take action.
1. The governing body, after ensuring that the other governing body has been notified, shall hold a public hearing and give notice in accordance paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, on the proposed ordinance of designation.
2. Following the public hearing, the governing body may adopt the ordinance of designation as proposed, adopt the ordinance of designation with any amendments it deems necessary, or reject the proposal.
Upon compliance with the required procedures of this section, the governing body may, for its respective jurisdiction, adopt and from time to time amend or repeal an ordinance designating one or more historic landmarks. The ordinance shall include the following information:
1. A legal description of each property designated by the ordinance, including the tax identification number for the property. The ordinance shall clearly indicate what elements of the property are designated as an historic landmark. Examples of those elements are a building
’s interior, its exterior, any specific or all outbuildings, other site elements or the entire site;
2. The name or names of the owner
or owners
of the property;
3. A description of those elements of the landmark that are integral to its educational, cultural, historical, architectural or prehistorical value;
4. The land area of the property;
5. A note that structural and site improvements shall require approval of a certificate of appropriateness pursuant to Sec. 3.17, Certificate of Appropriateness, if applicable; and that, for each building
, structure
, site area
a or object, the waiting period set forth in paragraph 3.17.6, COA for Demolition, Destruction and Relocation of this Ordinance shall be observed prior to its demolition; and
6. Any other information the HPC deems necessary.
The ordinance designating the landmark may also provide for suitable markers on the property noting that the landmark has been so designated, including but not limited to signs
, plaques or other appropriate indicators. If the owner
consents, the sign
shall be placed upon the property. If the owner
objects, the sign
shall be placed on a nearby public right-of-way
.
Upon adoption of the ordinance of designation, the following provisions shall apply:
1. The owners
and occupants of each designated historic landmark shall be given written notification of such designation by the Planning Director, or designee, insofar as reasonable diligence permits.
2. One copy of the ordinance and each amendment thereto shall be filed by Planning Director, or designee, in the Office
of the Register of Deeds of Durham County. Each historic landmark designated in the ordinance shall be indexed according to the name of the owner
of the property in the grantee and grantor indexes in the Office
of the Register of Deeds.
3. One copy of the ordinance and each amendment thereto shall be given to the Inspections Director, or designee.
4. For historic landmarks, one copy of the ordinance and each amendment thereto shall be kept on file in the Office
of the City or County Clerk, as appropriate, and made available for public inspection at any reasonable time.
5. The fact that a building
, structure
, site area
a or object has been designated as an historic landmark shall be clearly indicated on all maps maintained by Durham County for tax purposes for such period as the designation remains in effect.
6. The Planning Director, or designee, shall give notice of the adoption of an ordinance of designation and any amendment thereof to the Durham County Tax Supervisor. The designation and any recorded restriction upon the property limiting its use for preservation purposes shall be considered by the Tax Supervisor in appraising it for tax purposes.
1. Designation shall remain applicable to all properties subdivided from the originally designated property.
2. When designated property is recombined with non-designated property, the designation shall remain applicable only to the improvements and portion of property originally designated, and shall not extend to improvements and the portions of the recombined property not originally designated.
The following procedure shall be used to designate signs
as Landmark Signs
. No sign
shall be considered a Landmark Sign
unless it has received that designation through this process.
1. An application for a landmark sign
designation shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
2. The Planning Director, or designee, shall forward the application and all supporting material to the Historic Preservation Commission.
3. The applications shall be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission. The Commission shall review the application and may designate the sign
as a Landmark Sign
, deny the designation, or request additional information in order to make a decision. A sign
which is denied a designation shall be considered a nonconforming sign
which shall be removed.
4. If the sign
is designated as a Landmark Sign
, a copy of the application shall be submitted to the Inspections Department.
5. The Planning Department shall issue a sign
permit for the sign
if the sign
is found to be structurally safe. Landmark Signs
shall conform to all other provisions of this section not in conflict with the privileges of the landmark designation.
6. Landmark signs
shall be subject to the privileges and regulations of Sec. 11.7, Landmark Signs, but Article 11, Sign Standards, shall otherwise not apply.
1. The Historic Preservation Commission may establish a schedule to review applications for Landmark Sign
designations.
2. To qualify as a Landmark Sign
, the sign
shall meet all of the following criteria:
a. Be recognized as important to the culture or history of the jurisdiction, or possess unique characteristics, or incorporate materials or craftsmanship not commonly found in newer signs
.
b. Bear a close resemblance to its appearance when it was installed.
c. The current state of the sign
is determined to be structurally sound, and it does not pose a safety hazard due to its location relative to street intersections or by extension into the public right-of-way
.
d. The HPC may impose conditions on the approval of a designation to address safety issues, required maintenance, or required preservation of the sign
.
A. A petition to remove a local historic district overlay designation on property, along with revision to the applicable preservation plan, shall follow the same procedures for a zoning map change, and shall also require the following prior a public hearing with the Planning Commission:
1. The petition shall be sent to the State Historic Preservation Office
for a review consistent with paragraph 3.16.2C, Action by the NC Department of Cultural Resources.
2. A public hearing for review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Commission consistent with paragraph 3.16.2D, Action by the Historic Preservation Commission.
B. The governing body may repeal an ordinance designating an historic district or an historic landmark. The repeal process shall be consistent with the adoption process prescribed within NCGS §160D-946. The governing body’s action to repeal an ordinance of designation shall include the reasons for the repeal and a review by the State Historic Preservation Office
.
C. When such repeal occurs, the Planning Director, or designee, shall notify the HPC and the property owner or owners
. When such repeal occurs of an historic landmark designation, the Planning Director, or designee, shall also notify the Register of Deeds for Durham County and the Durham County Tax Supervisor.
A.
From and after the designation of an historic district or historic landmark, no exterior feature or designated portion of any building
or other site work (including masonry walls, fences, light fixtures, steps, pavement, above-ground utility and mechanical equipment, signs
, landscaping, and other appurtenant features) shall be erected, altered, restored, moved or demolished within a historic district or on such historic landmark until after an application for a certificate of appropriateness (COA) as to the exterior feature or designated portion has been submitted to and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC).
B. Work done by the City and County and by public utility
companies shall be subject to the provisions of this section.
C. For the purposes of this section, the term "exterior feature" shall include the architectural style, general design, and general arrangement of the exterior of a building
or other structure
, including the kind and texture of the building
material, the size and scale of the building
, and the type and style of all windows, doors, light fixtures, signs
and other appurtenant features. In the case of outdoor advertising signs
, the term "exterior features" shall be construed to mean the style, material, size and location of all such signs
. These "exterior features" may include historic signs
and significant landscape, archaeological and natural features of the area.
D. For the purposes of this section, the term "designated portion" shall mean any portion of an historic landmark that was included in the ordinance designating the landmark, including the main structure
or structures, the interior or portions of the interior, any outbuildings or secondary structures, site elements and landscaping.
E. A COA shall be required whether or not another permit is required.
1. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior feature in the historic district or on an historic landmark which does not involve a substantial change
in the design, material, or outer appearance thereof, as described in the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended.
2. Nor shall this Ordinance be construed to prevent the construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration or demolition of any such feature which is determined to be a threat to the public safety. The Inspections Director, or designee, shall certify in writing to the approving authority that such action is required for the public safety because of an unsafe or dangerous condition.
3. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent a property owner
from making any use of his or her property not prohibited by other statutes, ordinances or regulations.
4. No certificate of appropriateness shall be required for interior changes. However, this does not excuse the property owner
from obtaining required building
permits for interior work.
The City or the County shall not grant any building permit
or other permit for the purposes of constructing, altering, moving or demolishing any structure
within or on an historic district or historic landmark for which a COA has not been approved.
A. An application for a COA shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
B. An applicant may file with the application any additional relevant information bearing on the application.
A. Pursuant to the HPC rules of procedure, the Planning Director, or designee, may approve or amend COAs for the following activities, or may refer them to the HPC for a decision:
1. Activities expressly authorized by the HPC;
2. Minor design changes to projects for which a COA has been issued by the HPC; or
3. Anything not specifically covered by this section that the Planning Director or designee determines is not so significant as to impair or affect historic, architectural, or aesthetic character.
B. A public hearing or public notice shall not be required unless the application is referred to the HPC for a major works COA.
C. Conformance to the applicable design review criteria within the adopted Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, shall be required in order to approve or amend a COA.
D. Conditions may be placed upon a COA as part of the approval in order to facilitate compliance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended. A violation
of any conditions shall be considered a violation
of the COA.
The HPC shall be the approving authority for any improvement to property within a local historic district or with a local historic landmark designation that requires a COA, but does not qualify as a minor COA.
The Planning Director, or designee, shall notify the members of the HPC at least seven calendar days before its regularly scheduled meeting of any pending applications scheduled for the public hearing.
1. The HPC shall hold a public hearing for a major works COA. Public notice of applications shall be provided pursuant to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
2. As part of its review procedure, the HPC may view the premises and seek the advice of the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources or other expert advice as it may deem necessary under the circumstances.
3. The HPC shall approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or disapprove an application for a major works COA.
4. Prior to final action on an application for a certificate of appropriateness in an historic district, the HPC, using the applicable design review criteria adopted within the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, shall make findings of fact indicating the extent to which the application is or is not consistent with the historic character and qualities of the historic district.
5. Prior to final action on an application for a certificate of appropriateness for an historic landmark, the HPC, using the and applicable design review criteria adopted within the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, shall make findings of fact indicating the extent to which the application is or is not consistent with the historic character and qualities of the historic landmark property.
6. The HPC may not deny a certificate of appropriateness for demolition except as specified in paragraph 3.17.6, COA for Demolition, Destruction and Relocation.
1. For historic districts, the intent of these regulations is to ensure, insofar as possible, that buildings or structures in the historic district shall be in harmony with other building
or structures located therein. However, it is not the intention of these regulations to require the reconstruction or restoration of individual or original buildings or to prohibit the demolition or removal of such buildings or to impose architectural styles from particular historic periods. In considering new construction
, the HPC shall encourage contemporary design which is harmonious with the character of the historic district.
2. In granting a COA, the HPC shall take into account, in accordance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended:
a. The historic or architectural significance of the structure
under consideration in relation to the historic value of the district;
b. The exterior form and appearance of any proposed additions or modifications to that structure
; and
c. The effect of such additions or modifications upon other structures in the vicinity.
3. The HPC may place conditions upon a COA as part of the approval in order to facilitate compliance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended. A violation
of any condition shall be considered a violation
of the COA.
1. In granting a COA, the HPC shall take into account in accordance with the principles and design review criteria adopted for historic landmarks, namely the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended:
a. The historic or architectural significance of the structure
, site or setting under consideration; and
b. The exterior form and appearance of any proposed additions or modifications to the structure
, site or setting.
2. The intent of these regulations is to ensure, insofar as possible, that changes to buildings or structures designated as historic landmarks shall be in harmony with the historic character that was cited as the reasons for designation.
3. The HPC may place conditions upon a COA as part of the approval in order to facilitate compliance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended. A violation
of any condition shall be considered a violation
of the COA.
1. An applicant for a COA may request that the HPC’s consideration of the application be deferred to a specific date.
2. Upon such request, the Planning Director, or designee, shall have the authority to grant the deferral.
3. A request for deferral shall be made in writing to the Planning Director, or designee, at least ten days prior to the scheduled consideration of the application and shall indicate the date to which the deferral is requested and the reasons for the deferral. Only one deferral shall be permitted for each application.
1. Final action shall be taken upon any application for a COA within 180 days after the complete application is submitted to the Planning Director or designee. Such 180-day time period shall include any continuance or deferred consideration by the HPC or deferral granted as requested by the applicant under paragraph 3.17.5E, Deferral of Application. If final action is not taken within such 180-day time period, the application shall be deemed approved.
2. A master COA shall expire four years after the effective date, and all other COAs shall expire two years after the effective date, if:
a. A building permit
or other development
permit has not been issued;
b. A building
or other development
permit has expired; or
c. If work not requiring a permit has not been initiated.
A. An application for a certificate of appropriateness authorizing the demolition, destruction or relocation of a structure
in a designated historic district or of a designated historic landmark shall not be denied. However, the effective date of such a certificate of appropriateness may be delayed for a period of up to 365 days from the date of approval
. This maximum period of delay shall be reduced by the HPC when it finds that the owner
would suffer extreme hardship or be permanently deprived of all beneficial use of or return from such structure
or landmark by virtue of the delay. During such period, the HPC may negotiate with the owner
and with any other parties in an effort to find a means of preserving the structure
or landmark.
B. If the HPC finds that the structure
has no particular significance or value toward maintaining the character of an historic district, it shall waive all or part of such period and authorize earlier demolition or removal.
C. If the HPC finds that the structure
has no particular significance or value toward maintaining the character of an historic district, it shall waive all or part of such period and authorize earlier demolition or removal. An application for demolition, destruction and relocation of a building
, site or structure
determined by the State Historic Preservation Officer
as having statewide significance as defined in the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places may be denied except where the HPC finds that the owner
would suffer extreme hardship or be permanently deprived of all beneficial use or return from such structure
or landmark by virtue of the denial.
A. Rather than obtaining individual COA for each proposed project in an historic district, the City and County and public utility
companies may instead obtain a master COA from the HPC.
B. The provisions of this section that apply to COAs shall also apply to master COAs.
C. In addition to acquiring a master COA, the City and County and any public utility
companies shall notify the City Manager or County Manager, as appropriate, prior to performing any work within any historic district. In emergency situations, as determined by the Inspections Director, or designee, notification by the next work day
is acceptable. Such work shall be done in accordance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, adopted for the historic district as part of the Historic District Preservation Plan. The City Manager or County Manager, as appropriate, may inspect all work done pursuant to a master COA.
If the HPC denies an application for a COA, a new application affecting the same property may be submitted only if substantial changes
are made in plans for the proposed construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration, moving or demolition, or if conditions related to the historic district or historic landmark or surrounding uses have changed substantially.
The HPC shall use all reasonable efforts to expedite any concurrent process with the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources if such a process is desired by the applicant for the purpose of securing both a certificate of appropriateness and a Federal historic preservation tax credit.
A. Compliance with the terms of a COA shall be enforced by the Inspections Director, or designee. Construction or other work which fails to comply with a COA shall be a violation
of this Ordinance and subject to Article 15, Enforcement. The discontinuance of work for a period of six months shall be considered a failure to comply with a COA.
B. Nothing contained in this section shall prohibit, impair or limit in any way the power of the City or County to prevent the construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration or removal of buildings, structures, appurtenant fixtures or outdoor signs
in the historic district in violation
of the provisions of this Ordinance. The enforcement of any remedy provided herein shall not prevent the enforcement of any other remedy or remedies provided herein or in other ordinances or laws.
C. Failure to obtain a required COA prior to commencing work shall be subject to Article 15, Enforcement.
An appeal
of a decision of the Commission in granting or denying any certificate of appropriateness is taken by filing a petition for certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
Owners
of certain historic properties are required to maintain their properties and not allow them to fall into disrepair. The requirements of this subsection are applicable only to certain properties, termed "historic properties" in this subsection. That term as used in this subsection is defined to include designated historic landmarks and properties identified as "contributing" or "pivotal" in designated historic districts.
Owners
shall maintain or cause to be maintained the exterior and structural features of their historic properties and not allow conditions of neglect to occur on such properties. Conditions of neglect are as defined below. It shall be a violation
of this Ordinance to not remedy a condition of neglect within the period of time set by a final administrative determination, as described in subsequent subsections of this Ordinance. Conditions of neglect include the following:
1. Deterioration of exterior walls, foundations, or other vertical support that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing, or buckling.
2. Deterioration of flooring or floor supports, roofs, or other horizontal members that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing, or buckling.
3. Deterioration of external chimneys that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing, or buckling.
4. Deterioration or crumbling of exterior plasters or mortars.
5. Ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, and foundations, including broken windows or doors.
6. Defective protection or lack of weather protection for exterior wall and roof coverings, including lack of paint, or weathering due to lack of paint or other protective covering
.
7. Rotting, holes, and other forms of decay.
8. Deterioration of exterior stairs, porches, handrails, window and door frames, cornices, entablatures, wall facings, and architectural details that causes delamination, instability, loss of shape and form, or crumbling.
9. Heaving, subsidence, or cracking of sidewalks, steps, or pathways.
10. Deterioration of fences, gates, and accessory structures.
11. Deterioration that has a detrimental effect on the surrounding historic district, or on the special character of the historic landmark.
12. Deterioration that contributes to a hazardous or unsafe condition.
The initial determination that there is a condition of neglect shall be made by the Planning Director, or designee, after an investigation that is initiated by a petition from any person
who is familiar with the subject property, which may include but not be limited to a City employee.
On receipt of a petition, the Director, or designee, shall notify the owners
in writing of the allegation and the process for making a decision regarding the petition, including any applicable deadlines. Among other things, the notice shall offer the owner
the opportunity to meet in person
with the Director, or designee, and to present any relevant information. Notice shall be delivered by personal
service, or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. If certified mail is refused or unclaimed, notice may be delivered by first class mail, and shall be considered effective if such mail is not returned by the post office
within 15 days of mailing. In the case of notice by first class mail notice
e shall also be posted on the property. Notice of the investigation may also be given to the owners
of nearby or adjacent
properties or neighborhood associations.
The Planning Director or designee shall:
a. Investigate the allegation that a condition of neglect exists;
b. Hold one or more meetings at a time to be set by the Director, or designee, in which the owner
, other persons
who have received notice, or other interested persons
may give information;
c. Issue a written determination, supported by findings of fact, regarding the allegation within 45 days of the owner
’s receipt of notice;
d. Include within the determination a time period for correcting the condition of neglect, if a condition of neglect has been found;
e. Retain all information presented by the owner
or other persons
;
f. Deliver the written determination through any of the means for delivery of notice, as described above;
g. Designate the written determination as a final administrative determination with the right of appeal
to the HPC; and
h. Include information regarding rights to a de novo hearing before the HPC.
The above process may be suspended in the event the owner
agrees in writing to correct the alleged condition of neglect within a time period determined to be reasonable by the Director, or designee. If the condition is not corrected within that time period, the process shall continue where it was suspended.
1. If the property owner
disagrees with the Director’s determination, the owner
can appeal
and may request a de novo hearing before the HPC.
2. The request shall be delivered to the Planning Department, in writing, within 30 days of receipt of the Director’s determination.
3. The HPC shall hold a quasi-judicial hearing on the issue of whether demolition by neglect is occurring on the property. Procedures that would be followed by the Board of Adjustment (BOA) in a quasi-judicial proceeding shall be used. The Director’s determination shall be considered an administrative determination, which has been appealed
to the HPC as allowed pursuant to paragraph 2.5.4B, Demolition by Neglect.
4. The HPC’s determination to overturn the administrative determination shall be passed by the standards established in paragraph 2.4.6.
a. The HPC’s written decision shall include findings of fact and conclusions regarding demolition by neglect consistent with this subsection.
b. It shall be delivered to the appealing
party by certified mail, return receipt requested.
5. Appeal
from the determination can be taken by filing a petition in the nature of certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court. If the decision is not appealed
it shall be considered a final decision subject to enforcement with no rights of appeal
.
The property owner
is entitled to make a claim of undue economic hardship if the owner
is unable to make needed repairs to the property because it is economically unfeasible.
In the event that the owner
and/or other parties in interest do not wish to contest the determination regarding the condition of neglect, but do wish to petition for a claim of undue economic hardship, the Director’s order shall be stayed until after the HPC’s determination regarding the claim.
If a claim of undue economic hardship is made, the Planning Director or designee shall receive all information from the property owners
that the HPC is entitled to receive pursuant to this Ordinance, make a determination regarding whether there is undue economic hardship, and develop
a plan for dealing with such hardship, if it is found to exist. The recommendation and plan shall be sent to the owner
, by certified mail, return receipt requested, with notice of the owner
’s rights to appeal
to the HPC within 30 days of receipt. If the owner
disagrees with the recommendation and plan, the owner
may request a hearing before the HPC. In the event of such a request, the hearing shall be a quasi-judicial hearing, in the nature of a BOA hearing and the decision shall be in writing, supported by findings and conclusions. The Planning Director’s determination as to economic hardship and the plan for dealing with that hardship shall be considered a final administrative determination, and any HPC decision altering such recommendation or plan shall be passed by the standards established in paragraph 2.4.6, Decisions.
When a claim of undue economic hardship is made owing to the effects of this Article, the owner
and/or parties in interest shall, where reasonably possible, provide the evidence below, describing the circumstances of hardship, and any additional evidence requested by the Director, or designee, or HPC or evidence the owner
considers relevant.
a. Nature of ownership (individual, business, or nonprofit) or legal possession, custody, and control.
b. Financial resources of the owner
and/or parties in interest.
c. Cost of repairs.
d. Assessed value of the land and improvements.
e. Real estate taxes for the previous two years.
f. Amount paid for the property, date of purchase, and party from whom purchased, including a description of the relationship between the owner
and the person
from whom the property was purchased, or other means of acquisition of title, such as by gift or inheritance.
g. Annual debt service, if any, for previous two years.
h. Any listing of the property for sale or rent, price asked, and offers received, if any.
i. Annual gross income, if any, from the property for the previous two years.
j. Itemized operating and maintenance expenses for the previous two years, including proof that adequate and competent management procedures were followed.
k. Annual cash flow, if any, for the previous two years.
A recommended plan to relieve the economic hardship shall include, but is not limited to, property tax relief as may be allowed under North Carolina law, loans or grants from the City, the County, or other public, private, or nonprofit sources, acquisition by purchase or eminent domain, changes in applicable zoning regulations, or relaxation of the provisions of this Article sufficient to mitigate the undue economic hardship. The Director, or designee, shall issue an order regarding the time period during which the property should be repaired, taking into account the provisions of the recommended plan.
Nothing contained within this Article shall diminish the City’s power to declare a building
unsafe or in violation
of the minimum housing code or any other applicable statute or code. In addition, the procedures described herein are mandatory only for determinations being made solely under the authority of this section. Where other sections of the City Code apply, the City may, in its discretion, choose to process any action regarding the property under such other provisions alone, or under such provisions along with these provisions concurrently, or solely under these provisions. The City may also suspend the procedures of this section at any time if an action has been initiated under other applicable law.
Enforcement of this Article shall be by any one or more of the following methods, and the institution of any action under any of these methods shall not relieve any party from any other civil or criminal proceeding prescribed for violations
and prohibitions.
The City may apply for any appropriate equitable remedy to enforce the provisions of this Article.
The City can apply for and the court may enter an order of abatement. An order of abatement may direct that improvements or repairs be made, or that any other action be taken that is necessary to bring the property into compliance with this Article. Whenever the party is cited for contempt by the court and the City has executed the order of abatement, the City shall have a lien on the property for the cost of executing the order of abatement.
Civil penalties can be assessed for failure to comply with a final administrative determination or an un-appealed HPC decision under the provisions and guidelines for assessing such penalties for zoning code violations
. Prior to imposing a civil penalty, the City-County Planning Department shall deliver a written notice by personal
service or by registered mail or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the person
responsible for the violation
indicating the nature of the violation
and ordering corrective action. Where the violation
is the failure to remedy a condition of neglect within the time periods provided by the Director, or designee, or the HPC no additional time period for compliance need be given. The notice shall include information regarding the possible assessment of civil penalties and other possible enforcement actions. If this notice is appealed
to the Board of Adjustment, the Board shall not rehear any issue that was heard by the HPC or could have been so heard had an appeal
to the HPC been made. Rather, the Board of Adjustment shall limit the scope of its review to whether there has been compliance with the Director’s determination or the HPC’s determination, as applicable.
A. The governing bodies are the approving authority for amendments to the text of this Ordinance.
B. Amendments to the text of this Ordinance shall be made in accordance with the provisions of this section.
C. A request to amend the text of this Ordinance may be initiated by the governing body, the Board of Adjustment, the Planning Commission, the City Manager, the County Manager, the Planning Director, or designee, or a citizen.
Pursuant to paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference, a pre-application conference is required prior to the submittal of a text amendment application.
A. The Planning Director, or designee, shall be responsible for review and recommendation regarding amendments to the text of this Ordinance that affect only City or County jurisdictions.
B. When a text amendment is initiated, the Planning Director, or designee, shall draft an appropriate ordinance and present that ordinance to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation at a public hearing.
C. A request to amend the text of this Ordinance may be initiated by the governing body, the Board of Adjustment, the Planning Commission, the City Manager, the County Manager, the Planning Director, or designee, or a citizen.
The Planning Director or designee may consider applications withdrawn and voided due to the failure of the applicant to submit required information within 90 days of a request for such information.
The JCCPC shall be responsible for review and direction regarding amendments to the text of this Ordinance that affect both the City and County jurisdictions prior to review by the Planning Commission. This responsibility does not create a legal obligation for review of text amendments. Among other instances, review may not occur in the event that the City and County Managers, after consultation with the chair and vice-chair of the JCCPC, determine that delay is not in the public interest.
1. Before making any recommendation on a text amendment, the Planning Commission shall consider any recommendations from the Planning Director, or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. The Commission shall make its recommendation within 90 days of its initial public hearing unless the text amendment is granted expedited status.
4. When a recommendation is not made within the time periods established in this section, the governing body may process the request without a Commission recommendation.
If the applicant makes significant changes to the application for a text amendment after the Commission has made its recommendation, the Planning Director, or designee, may refer the modified request back to the Commission for an additional public hearing.
1. If the governing body has set an expedited hearing concerning a request, in accordance with paragraph 3.19.5B, Expedited Hearing, a public hearing before the Commission shall be held at the first available hearing date or prior to the hearing before the governing body.
2. The Planning Commission may not continue, nor may a deferral be granted for, a request that is subject to an expedited public hearing.
1. Before taking action on a text amendment, the governing body shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Planning Director, or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing.
2. Except for an emergency moratorium or a short term moratorium of 60 or fewer days (which shall comply with the provisions of paragraph 3.19.6, Development Moratoria), notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the amendment, deny the amendment, or send the amendment back to the Planning Commission or a committee of the governing body for additional consideration.
4. Text amendments, if approved, shall only have applicability within the jurisdiction of the governing body that approved the change.
1. The governing body, in situations in which it determines certain standards have been met, may expedite the hearing process on a proposed or prospective amendment.
2. The governing body may consider a written request requesting an expedited hearing process. The request shall identify and support the reasons for such expedited consideration.
3. In order to grant the request, the governing body shall find that at least one of the criteria below has been met:
a. Deadlines set by the local, State or Federal government for receipt of application for needed funding, designation or other regulations concerning the property make expedited consideration necessary;
b. The prospective text amendment results from an emergency beyond the control of the applicant, such as response to a disaster;
c. The prospective text amendment addresses an urgent matter of public health or safety; or
d. The prospective text amendment addresses issues raised in threatened, actual, or potential litigation against the jurisdiction that made expedited consideration necessary.
4. A hearing before the governing body may occur upon the receipt of a Planning Commission recommendation, or the expiration of a 30-day period, whichever comes earlier.
Development
moratoria, if necessary, shall be considered and processed in accordance with the special notice provisions, required statements, and other requirements of NCGS §160D-107.
A public hearing to impose either a moratorium of 60 or fewer days (hereafter a “short-term moratorium”) or a lengthier moratorium of 61 days to a year may be initiated by a governing body for that body’s jurisdiction upon passage of a resolution, including appropriate supportive findings, that calls for a public hearing. Passage of such a resolution shall be considered a “call for public hearing” under the above-cited statutes and shall allow the jurisdiction to stop acceptance, review, and approval of applications for development
approvals described in the above-cited statutes or such other similar development
approvals created under this Ordinance or other development
ordinances.
If the call is for a short-term moratorium, Planning Commission review shall not be required, and one published notice not less than seven days prior to the hearing shall be given, as allowed under the above-cited statutes, in lieu of other notices required by statute or this Ordinance. If the call is for a lengthier moratorium, the procedure followed shall be as set forth in the provisions for expedited hearings for text amendments above. The need for a moratorium shall be considered “an urgent matter of public health or safety” as required for approval of an expedited hearing. Emergency moratoria shall not require compliance with any procedures set forth in this Ordinance, other than an unadvertised public hearing, and an ordinance making the findings required below.
The duration of any moratorium shall be reasonable in light of the specific conditions that warrant imposition of the moratorium and may not exceed the period of time necessary to correct, modify, or resolve such conditions. Any ordinance establishing a lengthier moratorium shall include a provision that allows for termination of the moratorium by resolution of the governing body prior to the express expiration date if the conditions requiring the moratorium have been adequately addressed so that the moratorium is no longer necessary.
An ordinance establishing a moratorium shall contain all the required findings set forth in NCGS §160D-107, including but not limited to the conditions that necessitate the moratorium, alternatives, development
approvals subject to the moratorium, termination date, and reasonableness of the moratorium period.
A moratorium shall only be extended upon compliance with NCGS §160D-107 and the existence of new facts and conditions warranting an extension.
In the event that there is an imminent and substantial threat to public health or safety, an ordinance imposing an emergency moratorium can be considered by a governing body without prior resolution or public notice of the hearing on such moratorium.
A. This section establishes a procedure for obtaining a statutory vested right
in conformance with NCGS §160D-108 and 160D-108.1.
B. New or amended zoning regulations shall not apply to a property with an established vested right
until the vested right
expires or is terminated.
Pursuant to NCGS §160D-108, the following are the types of statutory vested rights
that may be claimed:
1. Development
or subdivision
permit approvals in accordance with NCGS §143-755;
2. A site-specific vesting plan;
3. A multi-phased development
pursuant to NCGS §160D-108(f); or
4. A development
agreement pursuant to NCGS §160D, Chapter 10.
A. An application for a common law or statutory vested rights
determination shall be submitted to the Planning director or designee in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss, or as allowed per NCGS 160D-108. Appeal
may be taken in accordance with NCGS 160D-108(h).
B. Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information in addition to the standard information required pursuant to paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss:
1. Information on the proposed uses of the property that the applicant wishes to vest;
2. The length of time for which vesting is requested; and
3. A listing of those provisions of this Ordinance from which vesting is requested.
A. Vesting shall remain valid so long as the development
permit remains valid, or as otherwise allowed per this Ordinance. Development
permits shall be valid for one year unless otherwise indicated for a longer duration in this Ordinance.
B. Except where a longer vesting period is provided by statute or local regulation, the statutory vesting granted by this section, once established, expires for an uncompleted development
project if development
work is intentionally and voluntarily discontinued for a period of not less than 24 consecutive months, and the statutory vesting period granted by this section for a nonconforming use of property expires if the use is intentionally and voluntarily discontinued for a period of not less than 24 consecutive months. The 24-month discontinuance period is automatically tolled pursuant to 160D-108(d).
C. A vested right
shall run with the land in accordance with NCGS 160D-108(i).
The following is in accordance with NCGS 160D-108.1, and such statute shall apply where there are conflicts.
1. In order to qualify as a "site specific vesting plan," a plan shall be a development plan
approved as a site plan
or preliminary plat
in accordance with Sec. 3.5, Zoning Map Changes; a plat
approved in accordance with Sec. 3.6, Subdivision Review; or a site plan
approved in accordance with Sec. 3.7, Site Plan Review.
2. Landowners seeking vested rights
on plats
, special use permit applications, or other plans that would not normally receive site plan
approval, can apply for vested rights
protection through submittal of an application which contains the identical information, fee, and plans required for a complete site plan
application and an additional fee for a vested rights
public hearing.
Once the application has been determined complete, the Planning Director, or designee, shall schedule a public hearing, give public notice as set forth in paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, and forward a copy of the application with all related materials to the appropriate governing body.
1. The governing body shall hold a public hearing as required pursuant to NCGS § 160D-108.1.
2. Approval by the governing body shall confer upon the owner
of the property a "vested right
" as defined in NCGS §160D-108.1(b), effective on the date of approval
. The governing body may condition the approval upon terms and conditions reasonably necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
1. Following approval of a site specific vesting plan, nothing in this section shall exempt such a plan from subsequent reviews and approvals to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the original approval, provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with the original approval.
2. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the revocation of the original approval or other remedies for failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions of the approval or with this Ordinance.
3. The establishment of a vested right
shall not preclude the application of new laws or regulations as is allowed under NCGS §160D-108. In addition, it shall not preclude overlay zoning that imposes additional requirements, but does not affect the allowable type or intensity of use, or ordinances or regulations that are general in nature and are applicable to all property subject to land use regulation by the City or County. Otherwise applicable new or amended regulations shall become effective with respect to property that is subject to a site specific vesting plan upon the expiration or termination of the vested right
in accordance with this section.
4. A vested right
is not a personal
right, but shall be attached to and run with the applicable property. After approval of a site specific vesting plan, all successors to the original landowner shall be entitled to exercise such right while applicable.
1. A vested right
for a site-specific vesting plan shall remain vested for the period specified by the governing body, which shall be a minimum of two years but no more than five years from the date of the vested rights
determination. The expiration and validity of site plans
and plats
issued pursuant to the vested rights
determination that extend beyond the vesting period shall be governed by the provisions of this ordinance. Substantial amendments and modifications to an approved site specific vesting plan shall not be accorded "vested rights
" unless such changes are processed as a new "site specific vesting plan." Each approved site specific vesting plan shall contain the following notation: "Approval of this plan establishes a vested right
under NCGS §160D-108.1. Unless terminated at an earlier date, the zoning vested rights
shall be valid until (Insert date)."
2. A building permit
shall not expire or be revoked because of the passage of time while a zoning vested right
under this section is outstanding.
3. A right which has been vested as provided in this section shall terminate at the end of the applicable vesting period with respect to portions of the development
that do not have approved and continuously valid site plans
and preliminary plats
, or buildings and uses for which no valid building permit
applications have been filed.
A vested right
as provided in this section shall terminate when any one of the following circumstances apply:
1. At the end of the applicable vesting period;
2. With the written consent of the affected landowner;
3. Upon findings by the governing body by ordinance and after public hearing, that natural or man-made hazards on or in the immediate vicinity of the property, if uncorrected, would pose a serious threat to the public health, safety, and welfare if the project were to proceed as contemplated in the site specific vesting plan;
4. Upon payment of compensation to the affected owner
for all costs, expenses, and other losses incurred by the landowner together with interest;
5. Upon findings by the governing body by ordinance and after public hearing, that the landowner or the landowner’s representative intentionally supplied inaccurate information or made material misrepresentations which made a difference in the approval by the governing body of the site specific vesting plan; or
6. Upon the enactment of a State or Federal law or regulation or local ordinances enacted in compliance with such laws or regulations that preclude development
as contemplated in the site specific development plan
.
A. Property that is annexed shall retain any vested rights
throughout the original vesting period subject to the limitations of paragraph B below.
B. A property owner
petitioning for annexation shall submit a signed
statement declaring any existing vested right
with respect to the properties subject to annexation, if the owner
wishes to maintain the vested right
. The failure to sign
such a statement shall terminate any such vested right
.
Nothing in this section shall be deemed to create any vested rights
other than those established under NCGS §160D-108 and 108.1. In the event that NCGS §160D-108 is repealed, the provisions of this section are no longer effective.
A floodplain development permit
shall be required in conformance with the provisions of this ordinance prior to the commencement of any development
activities within Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas.
The Planning Director, or designee, shall serve as the Floodplain Administrator
. For this purpose, the Planning Director, or designee, shall receive training and certification from the Association of Floodplain Managers.
Duties of the Floodplain Administrator
shall include, but not be limited to:
1. Review all floodplain development
applications and issue permits for all proposed development
with in Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas to assure that the requirements of this ordinance have been satisfied;
2. Advise permittees that additional Federal or State permits (i.e., Wetlands
, Erosion
and Sedimentation
Control, Riparian Buffers, Mining
, etc.) may be required, and if specific Federal or State permits are known, require that copies of such permits be provided and maintained on file with the floodplain development permit
;
3. Notify adjacent
communities and the North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Division of Emergency Management, State Coordinator for the National Flood Insurance
Program prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse
, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
;
4. Assure that maintenance is provided within the altered or relocated portion of said watercourse
so that the flood-carrying capacity is not diminished;
5. Prevent encroachments
within floodways
and non-encroachment areas
unless the certification and flood hazard reduction provisions of 8.4.3E, Floodway
and Non-Encroachment Areas
, are met;
6. Obtain actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level
) of the reference level
(including basement
) of all attendant utilities of all new or substantially improved
structures, in accordance with the certification requirements in Sec. 3.21, Floodplain Development Permit
;
7. Obtain the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level
) to which the new or substantially improved
structures and all utilities have been floodproofed, in accordance with the certification requirements in Sec. 3.21, Floodplain Development Permit
;
8. Obtain actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level
) of all public utilities
, in accordance with the certification requirements in Sec. 3.21, Floodplain Development Permit
;
9. When floodproofing
is utilized for a particular structure
, obtain certifications from a registered professional engineer or architect in accordance with the certification requirements in Sec. 3.21, Floodplain Development Permit
and paragraph 8.4.3, Standards;
10. Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of boundaries of the Special Flood Hazard Areas or Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas (for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions), make the necessary interpretation. The person
contesting the location of the boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to appeal
the interpretation as provided in this Article;
11. When Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
data has not been provided in accordance with paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
data, along with floodway
data and/or non-encroachment area
data available from a Federal, State, or other source, including data developed
pursuant to paragraph 8.4.3.C, Floodplains without Base Flood
Elevations, in order to administer the provisions of this ordinance;
12. When Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
data is provided but no floodway
nor non-encroachment area
data has been provided in accordance with paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any floodway
data, and/or non-encroachment area
data available from a Federal, State, or other source in order to administer the provisions of this ordinance;
13. When the lowest ground elevation of a parcel
or structure
located within Zone AE is above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
, advise the property owner
of the option to apply for a Letter of Map Amendment LOMA
A) from FEMA. Maintain a copy of the Letter of Map Amendment LOMA
A) issued by FEMA in the floodplain development permit
file;
14. Permanently maintain all records that pertain to the administration of this ordinance and make these records available for public inspection, subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended;
15. Make on-site inspections of work in progress. As the work pursuant to a floodplain development permit
progresses, the Floodplain Administrator
shall make as many inspections of the work as may be necessary to ensure that the work is being done according to the provisions of the local ordinance and the terms of the permit. In exercising this power, the Floodplain Administrator
, or designee, has a right, upon presentation of proper credentials, to enter on any premises within the jurisdiction of the community at any reasonable hour for the purposes of inspection or other enforcement action;
16. Issue stop-work orders as required. Whenever a building
or part thereof is being constructed, reconstructed, altered, or repaired in violation
of this ordinance, the Floodplain Administrator
may order the work to be immediately stopped. The stop-work order shall be in writing and directed to the person
doing the work. The stop-work order shall state the specific work to be stopped, the specific reason(s) for the stoppage, and the condition(s) under which the work may be resumed;
17. Revoke floodplain development
permits as required. The Floodplain Administrator
may revoke and require the return of the floodplain development permit
by notifying the permit holder in writing stating the reason(s) for the revocation. Permits shall be revoked for any substantial departure from the approved application, plans, or specifications; for refusal or failure to comply with the requirements of State or local laws; or for false statements or misrepresentations made in securing the permit. Any floodplain development permit
mistakenly issued in violation
of an applicable State or local law may also be revoked;
18. Make periodic inspections throughout all Special Flood Hazard Areas within the jurisdiction of the community. The floodplain administrator
and each member of his or her inspections department shall have a right, upon presentation of proper credentials, to enter on any premises within the territorial jurisdiction of the department at any reasonable hour for the purposes of inspection or other enforcement action;
19. Maintain a current map repository to include, but not limited to, the FIS Report, FIRM and/or other official flood maps/studies adopted under paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, including any revisions thereto including Letters of Map Change, issued by the State and/or FEMA. Notify State and FEMA of mapping needs; and
20. Follow through with corrective procedures of Sec. 15.6, Floodplain and Flood Damage Protection Enforcement and Penalties.
21. Maintain records of all floodplain development
permits, actions by the Development
Review Board, and special use permits approving fill or development
in Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas and report on them to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
upon request.
Base flood
elevations shall be based upon the Flood Insurance
Rate studies described in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, when such studies define a base flood
elevation.
B. Development
, including the construction of structures that only require building
permits and land disturbing activity
within Special Flood Hazard Areas or Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas, as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
in the most current Flood Insurance
Rate Studies, which are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this section, shall be prohibited unless carried out pursuant to the general standards in paragraph 8.4.3, Standards, or expressly authorized pursuant to paragraph 8.4.4, Development
in Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas.
1. When base flood
elevations have not been determined, the Inspections Director, or designee, acting as the Floodplain Administrator
, may require FEMA accepted hydrologic and hydraulic engineering studies, or may obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any base flood
elevation data and floodway
or non-encroachment area
data available from a Federal, State, or other source in determining the appropriate base flood
elevation.
2. On small streams
where no base flood
data has been provided, no encroachments
, including fill, new construction
, substantial improvements
or new development
, shall be permitted within the setbacks
established in Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, or Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards, or 20 feet each side from top of bank, or five times the width of the stream
, whichever is greatest.
A. Application for a floodplain development permit
shall be made to the Floodplain Administrator
, or designee, prior to any development
activities proposed to be located within Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas. The following items/information shall be required as part of the application for a floodplain development permit
:
1. A plot plan drawn to scale which shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following specific details of the proposed floodplain development
:
a. the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the area of development
/disturbance; existing and proposed structures, the location of utility systems, proposed grading
/pavement areas, fill materials, storage areas, drainage facilities, and other proposed development
;
b. the boundary of the Special Flood Hazard Area or Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas as delineated on the FIRM or other flood map as determined in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, or a statement that the entire lot is within the Special Flood Hazard Area or Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas;
c. flood zone
(s) designation of the proposed development
area as determined on the FIRM or other flood map as determined in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability;
d. the boundary of the floodway
(s) or non-encroachment area
(s) as determined in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability;
e. the Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
or future conditions flood elevation
where provided as set forth in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability; paragraph 3.21.2B (11 and 12), Duties and Responsibilities; or paragraph 8.4.3, Standards;
f. the old and new location of any watercourse
that will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development
; and
g. preparation of the plot plan by or under the direct supervision of a registered land surveyor or professional engineer and certified by same.
2. Proposed elevation, and method thereof, of all development
within a Special Flood Hazard Area or Future Conditions Flood Hazard Area
including but not limited to:
a. elevation in relation to mean sea level
of the proposed reference level
(including basement
) of all structures;
b. elevation in relation to mean sea level
to which any non-residential structure
in Zone AE, A, AO, or X (Future) will be flood-proofed; and
c. elevation in relation to mean sea level
to which any proposed utility systems will be elevated or floodproofed.
3. If floodproofing
, a floodproofing
certificate and back-up plans from a registered professional engineer or architect certifying that the non-residential flood-proofed development
will meet the flood-proofing criteria in paragraph 8.4.3, Standards.
4. A Foundation Plan drawn to scale which shall include details of the proposed foundation system to ensure all provisions of this ordinance are met. These details include but are not limited to:
a. Proposed method of elevation, if applicable (i.e., fill, solid foundation perimeter wall, solid backfilled foundation, open foundation on columns/piers); and
b. Should solid foundation perimeter walls be used in Zones AE and Zone X (Future), details of sufficient openings to facilitate the unimpeded movements of floodwaters in accordance with paragraph 8.4.3, Standards.
5. Usage details of any enclosed space below the regulatory flood protection elevation;
6. Plans and/or details for the protection of public utilities
and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems to be located and constructed to minimize flood damage;
7. Copy of all other Local, State and Federal permits required prior to floodplain development permit
issuance (i.e. Wetlands
, Erosion
and Sedimentation
Control, Riparian Buffers, Mining
, etc.);
8. If floodplain development permit
is issued for placement of Recreational Vehicles
and/or Temporary Structures, documentation to ensure the recreational vehicle
and temporary structure
requirements of paragraph 8.4.3, Standards are met; and
9. If a watercourse
is proposed to be altered and/or relocated, a description of the extent of watercourse
alteration or relocation; an engineering report on the effects of the proposed project on the flood-carrying capacity of the watercourse
and the effects to properties located both upstream and downstream; and a map (if not shown on plot plan) showing the location of the proposed watercourse
alteration or relocation.
The following information shall be provided at a minimum on the floodplain development permit
to ensure compliance with this code:
A. A description of the development
to be permitted under the floodplain development permit
issuance;
B. The Special Flood Hazard Area or Future Conditions Flood Hazard Area
determination for the proposed development
per available data specified in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability;
C. The regulatory flood protection elevation required for the reference level
and all attendant utilities;
D. The regulatory flood protection elevation required for the protection of all public utilities
;
E. All certification submittal requirements with timelines;
F. State that no fill material shall encroach
into the floodway
or non-encroachment area
of any watercourse
, if applicable;
G. The flood openings requirements, if in Zone AE, A, O or X (Future).
A. An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 81-31) or Floodproofing
Certificate (FEMA Form 81-65) is required after the reference level
is completed. Within twenty-one (21) calendar days of establishment of the reference level
elevation, or floodproofing
, by whatever construction means, whichever is applicable, it shall be the duty of the permit holder to submit to the Floodplain Administrator
a certification of the elevation of the reference level
, or floodproofed elevation, whichever is applicable in relation to mean sea level
. Said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a registered land surveyor or professional engineer and certified by same. When floodproofing
is utilized, said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a professional engineer or architect and certified by same. Any work done within the twenty-one (21) day calendar period and prior to submission of the certification shall be at the permit holder’s risk. The Floodplain Administrator
shall review the certificate data submitted. Deficiencies detected by such review shall be corrected by the permit holder immediately and prior to further progressive work being permitted to proceed. Failure to submit the certification or failure to make said corrections required shall be cause to issue a stop-work order for the project.
B. A Final As-Built Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 81-31) or Floodproofing
Certificate (FEMA Form 81-65) is required after construction is completed and prior to Certificate of Compliance
/Occupancy issuance. It shall be the duty of the permit holder to submit to the Floodplain Administrator
a certification of final as-built construction of the elevation or floodproofed elevation of the reference level
and all attendant utilities. Said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a registered land surveyor or professional engineer and certified by same. When floodproofing
is utilized, said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a professional engineer or architect and certified by same. The Floodplain Administrator
shall review the certificate data submitted. Deficiencies detected by such review shall be corrected by the permit holder immediately and prior to Certificate of Compliance
/Occupancy issuance. In some instances, another certification may be required to certify corrected as-built construction. Failure to submit the certification or failure to make said corrections required shall be cause to withhold the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance
/Occupancy.
C. If a manufactured home is placed within Zone AE, A, AO, or X (Future) and the elevation of the chassis is above 36 inches in height, an engineered foundation certification is required per paragraph 8.4.3, Standards.
D. If a watercourse
is to be altered or relocated, a description of the extent of watercourse
alteration or relocation; an engineering report on the effects of the proposed project on the flood-carrying capacity of the watercourse
and the effects to properties located both upstream and downstream; and a map showing the location of the proposed watercourse
alteration or relocation shall all be submitted by the permit applicant prior to issuance of a floodplain development permit
.
The following structures, if located within Zone AE, A, AO, or X (Future), are exempt from the elevation/floodproofing
certification requirements specified in items 1 and 2 above:
1. Recreational Vehicles
meeting requirements of recreational vehicles
in paragraph 8.4.3, Standards;
2. Temporary Structures meeting the temporary structure
requirements of paragraph 8.4.3, Standards; and
3. Accessory Structures less than 150 square feet meeting accessory structure
requirements of paragraph 8.4.3, Standards.
The review procedures described below apply to changes to building
elevations where compliance with architectural standards is required, but no site plan
approval or certificate of appropriateness is otherwise required. The requirements of paragraph 3.22.2B below also apply where architectural drawings are required for site plan
approval.
A. An architectural review application shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss. Architectural review application documents shall contain, at a minimum, the information listed below unless expressly exempted by another provision of this Ordinance or if the Planning Director or designee makes the determination that less detailed information is required for adequate review. No processing or review of an architectural review application will proceed without the required information.
1. Title Block
– Name of project, type of review labeled. Architectural Review; submittal and revision dates; sheet size 36 inches by 48 inches maximum with index map and match lines if multiple sheets are required; graphic scale (not smaller than one inch to 32 feet on a standard architectural scale); property identification number.
2. Name, address and telephone number of owner
, applicant and agent; name, address and telephone number of architect or other designer.
3. Elevations of all building
façades, to scale, and labeled with materials, colors, finished floor elevations, glazing
calculations, and other details as necessary to demonstrate compliance with applicable standards.
Upon review of the application and subject to the requirements of paragraph 3.22.2, Application Requirements, the Planning Director or designee shall approve the architectural review application provided the design meets all applicable requirements of this Ordinance. An architectural review approval shall expire after four years unless a building permit
or other development
permit has been issued and remains continuously valid or if work not requiring a permit has been initiated, except that an architectural review application that proposes amending an approved site plan
shall be considered a site plan
amendment under paragraph 3.7.3C, Site Plan Amendments, and its approval shall expire at the same time as the approved site plan
as amended.
This section provides a procedure for making requests for reasonable accommodation to land use and zoning regulations, policies, practices, and procedures of the City and County of Durham to comply fully with the intent and purpose of Federal laws.
A. This section shall apply to those persons
who are defined as disabled or handicapped under Federal law. A person
recovering from substance abuse is considered a person
with a disability or handicap; however, a person
who is currently engaging in the illegal use of controlled substances is not.
B. A request for a reasonable accommodation may be made by any person
with a disability or handicap, his or her legal representative, or a provider of housing for persons
with disabilities or handicaps in the city’s and county’s land use and zoning regulations, when the application of such may act as a barrier to affording such person
(s) equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling in accordance with the law.
C. A request for a reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the rules, standards, and/or practices for the siting, development
, and use of housing or housing-related facilities in this ordinance, that would eliminate regulatory barriers and provide a person
with a disability or handicap an equal opportunity to a dwelling of his or her choice.
D. Nothing in this section requires persons
with disabilities or handicaps, or operators of family care homes
, or group homes
for persons
with disabilities, or handicaps acting or operating in accordance with applicable zoning, licensing or land use laws or practices, to seek reasonable accommodation under this section.
A reasonable accommodation shall not affect an individual’s obligations to comply with other applicable regulations not at issue in the requested accommodation.
If an individual needs assistance in making the request for reasonable accommodation, the Planning Department will provide assistance to ensure that the process is accessible. Applicants seeking reasonable accommodation may request a pre-application conference with the Planning Director or designee to discuss the procedures, standards, and regulations applicable for submittal of an application. Such requests shall be made at least 10 days prior to the date of submittal.
A. An application for reasonable accommodation shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss. In addition, the following information shall be provided by the applicant:
1. The current actual use of the property;
2. The basis for the claim that the applicant is considered disabled or handicapped under Federal law;
3. The UDO provision(s) or regulation(s) from which reasonable accommodation is being requested; and
4. An explanation of why the reasonable accommodation is necessary to make the specific property available for the individual.
B. An application for a reasonable accommodation under this section shall be submitted to the Planning Director or designee.
Once the application has been determined complete, the Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give notice as set forth in paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
The applicant seeking reasonable accommodation shall have the burden of presenting evidence sufficient to allow the Board of Adjustment to make the findings set forth below, as well as the burden of persuasion on those issues.
The Planning Director or designee shall provide the Board of Adjustment with a copy of the application and all relevant materials pertaining to the request prior to the public hearing.
A. Each decision shall be accompanied by a written finding of facts by the Board of Adjustment which specifies the reasons for the decision; and
B. The Board of Adjustment may prescribe whether the reasonable accommodation is granted to the applicant or shall be allowed to pass with transfer of property.
C. The Board of Adjustment may approve the request, deny the request, or continue the request. In approving the request, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe reasonable and appropriate conditions provided that the conditions are reasonably related to the request.
A. In granting a reasonable accommodation request, the Board of Adjustment shall find based on competent, material, and substantial evidence, that the proposed accommodation:
1. Will be used by an individual or individuals with a disability or handicap protected under Federal law;
2. Is "reasonable." An accommodation is reasonable if it will not undermine the legitimate purposes and effects of existing zoning regulations, and if it will not impose significant financial and administrative burdens upon the city or county and/or constitute a substantial or fundamental alteration of the ordinance provisions; and
3. Is "necessary." An accommodation is necessary if it will provide direct or meaningful therapeutic amelioration of the effects of the particular disability or handicap, and it will afford handicapped or disabled persons
equal opportunity to enjoy and use housing in residential districts
in the city or county.
B. The Board of Adjustment shall issue a written order on a request for reasonable accommodation within 60 days of the date of the quasi-judicial decision.
Appeal
from final action by the Board of Adjustment on a reasonable accommodation request can be taken by filing a petition in the nature of certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
1. For the purposes of this Ordinance, a “street closing” application shall be considered an application to permanently close a public right-of-way
in the City or County performed pursuant to NCGS §160A-299 or §153A-241, applicable NCDOT regulations, Sec. 51 of City of Durham Charter, Secs. 62-17 and -18 of the Durham City Code, and this Ordinance.
2. The governing bodies are the approving authority for the permanent closing of a public street or alley
, or other public right-of-way
.
3. A request to close a public right-of-way
may be initiated by any person
, entity, or organization.
The applicant(s) applying for a closing shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
1. A street closing application shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
2. A street closing application shall be submitted pursuant to paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss, and Secs. 62-17 of the City of Durham Code of Ordinances if within the city jurisdiction.
3. The following shall also be addressed by the applicant for a street closing application:
a. The closing does not cause a parcel
to lack frontage along a public right-of-way
.
b. How the parcels
are accessed other than from the closed right-of-way
, if applicable.
c. How the closing of the right-of-way
impacts current or potential connectivity within a development
or neighborhood.
d. The circumstances that warrant the closing if connectivity is negatively impacted.
e. A discussion of the public interest in closing the right-of-way
.
After receiving the application, the Planning Director or designee, along with other applicable agencies
, shall be responsible for review and recommendation regarding closing requests.
The Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give public notice as set forth in NCGS §160A-299 or §153A-241, Durham City Charter Secs. 51 and 62-18, and this section and paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, as applicable.
Pursuant to NCGS §160A-299, no street or alley
under the control of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) may be closed without the NCDOT consent.
Commentary: This action is needed for improved and maintained roads
within City jurisdiction. Approval by NCDOT removes the roads
from its list for maintenance.
(1) In order to request consent, a resolution from the City Council shall be sent to the NCDOT requesting removal of the right-of-way
from its maintenance list. Consent shall be obtained prior to setting a public hearing date.
(2) Once NCDOT has granted this request, City Council shall set a public hearing date in accordance with City Charter Secs. 51 and 62-18.
(3) Before taking action on a street closing, the governing body shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing.
For public right-of-way
not under NCDOT control:
(1) The City Council shall set a public hearing date in accordance with City Charter Secs. 51 and 62-18.
(2) The City Council shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Director, or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing prior to taking final action on the request.
Pursuant to NCGS §153A-241, closure of public right-of-way
shall require consent by NCDOT.
a. In order to request consent, a resolution from the Board of County Commissioners shall be sent to the NCDOT requesting removal of the right-of-way
from its maintenance list. Consent shall be obtained prior to setting a public hearing date.
Commentary: This action is needed for improved and maintained roads
within the County. Approval by NCDOT removes the roads
from its list for maintenance.
b. Once NCDOT has granted this request, the Board of County Commissioners shall set a public hearing date so that notice of such hearing shall be published once a week for four successive weeks prior to the hearing date.
c. The Board of County Commissioners shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing prior to taking final action on the request.
Appeal
from final action can be taken by filing a petition for certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
The approved order and plat
for a closing that has not been appealed
, or has survived appeal
, shall be recorded at the applicable Register of Deeds.
1. For the purposes of this Ordinance, a “right-of-way
withdrawal” application shall be considered an application to permanently withdraw a public right-of-way
in the City or County performed pursuant to NCGS §136-96, applicable NCDOT regulations, applicable charter provisions for the city of Durham, and this Ordinance.
2. If the right-of-way
does not qualify for withdrawal, then closing of the right-of-way
shall be performed through the street closing process pursuant to paragraph 3.24.1, Street Closing.
1. An application for withdrawal shall be submitted in accordance with paragraphs 3.2.4, Application Requirementss, and 3.6.8, Final Plat
Approval.
2. An application for withdrawal for right-of-way
under control of NCDOT shall also be processed and approved in accordance with the regulations established by NCDOT for such a request.
The Planning Director or designee shall review applications for withdrawal pursuant to the requirements of this section, NCGS §136-96, and Durham City Charter Sec. 51.2, as applicable.
The initial naming of a new right-of-way
or driveway
allowed by this Ordinance shall be approved pursuant to Sec. 12.3.2, Street Names.
For the purposes of this Ordinance, a “street renaming” application shall be considered an application to change the official name of a street, alley
, or private drive.
The applicant(s) applying for a street renaming shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
1. An application for renaming shall be submitted in accordance with paragraphs 3.2.4, Application Requirementss; 3.6.8, Final Plat
Approval; and 12.3.2, Street Names.
2. An application for the renaming of right-of-way
under control of NCDOT shall also be processed and approved in accordance with the regulations established by NCDOT for such a request.
a. After receiving the application, the Planning Director or designee, along with other applicable agencies
, shall be responsible for review and recommendation regarding renaming requests.
b. If the right-of-way
is under NCDOT control, approval from NCDOT is required prior to scheduling a hearing with the governing body.
Prior to the scheduling of the public hearing, at least one public meeting shall be scheduled by the Planning Director or designee regarding the renaming request. Owners
of all property fronting along the subject “street” shall be notified of the meeting.
The Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give public notice pursuant to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
The City Council or Board of County Commissioners, as applicable, shall be the approving authority for renaming right-of-way
, subject to approval by NCDOT if applicable, and hold a public hearing prior to taking final action on the request.
1. Before taking action on a street renaming request, the governing body shall consider any recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, and of staff agencies
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. The governing body may continue a public hearing prior to closing the hearing and taking action on the request.
3. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the request, deny the request, or send the request back to the administration for additional consideration.
A request that is approved by the applicable governing body shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds with an associated final plat
, along with any additional requirements by NCDOT as applicable.
Statutory development
agreements are intended to provide for community benefits within developments
that are difficult to accommodate within traditional zoning processes. Additionally, they can provide regulatory certainty, a schedule for development
, coordination for the provision of public facilities
, sustainable design, and improved management of environmentally sensitive lands, as applicable. This section provides a procedure for requests for statutory development
agreements pursuant to NCGS Chapter 160D, Article 10, Development
Agreements; and 160D-704, Incentives.
The city or county, with approval by the applicable governing body based upon jurisdiction, may enter into a statutory development
agreement pursuant to NCGS Chapter 160D, Article 10, Development
Agreements; 160D-704, Incentives; and the requirements of this Ordinance.
The applicant(s) applying for a development
agreement shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
The applicant(s) applying for a development
agreement shall hold one or more neighborhood meetings in accordance with paragraph 3.2.3, Neighborhood Meeting.
An application for a development
agreement shall be submitted in accordance with paragraphs 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
A development
agreement shall adhere to the requirements of NCGS Chapter 160D, Article 10, Development
Agreements.
A development
agreement may modify the standards of this Ordinance except:
1. The process for adoption and execution of a development
agreement shall not be modified.
2. A development
agreement shall not allow uses and/or housing types that are not allowed in the underlying zoning district of the subject property.
3. A development
agreement shall not reduce environmental requirements within Article 4, Zoning Districts; and Article 8, Environmental Protection, with the exception of Sec. 8.3 Tree Protection and Tree Coverage.
4. A development
agreement shall not reduce requirements within Article 12, Infrastructure and Other Public Improvements.
When a development
agreement request is associated with a zoning map change, the public hearings may be heard at the same time; however, decisions shall be rendered with separate motions.
1. Before making any recommendation on a petition for a statutory development
agreement, the Planning Commission shall consider any recommendations from the Planning Director and any other department or agency
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. Except in the case of expedited hearings pursuant to paragraph 3.26.10B, Expedited Hearing, the Commission shall make its recommendation within three consecutive regular Commission cycles (approximately 90 days total) of its initial public hearing. In case of significant modifications, the time period for a recommendation may be altered, in which case a maximum of three additional consecutive regular cycles may be granted before the case shall go to the governing body.
4. When a recommendation is not made within the time periods established in this section, the governing body may process the request without a Commission recommendation.
1. Before taking action on a development
agreement request, the governing body shall consider any recommendations of the Planning Commission, Planning Director or designee, and of staff agencies
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. The governing body may continue a public hearing prior to closing the hearing and taking action on the request.
4. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the request, deny the request, or send the request back to the Planning Commission for additional consideration.
5. The development
agreement request approved by the governing body may include changes from the request presented.
1. The governing body, in situations in which it determines certain standards have been met, may expedite the hearing process on a proposed development
agreement.
2. The governing body may consider a written request from a potential applicant, or from staff, requesting an expedited hearing process. The request shall identify and support the reasons for such expedited consideration.
3. In order to grant the request, the governing body shall find that at least one of the criteria below have been met:
a. Deadlines set by the local, State, or Federal government for receipt of applications for needed funding, designation, or other regulations concerning the property make expedited consideration necessary;
b. The prospective request results from an emergency beyond the control of the applicant, such as response to a disaster;
c. The prospective request addresses an urgent matter of public health or safety; or
d. There are special circumstances that will have a substantial negative impact on the development
which could not have reasonably been anticipated and which make expedited consideration necessary.
Pursuant to NCGS 160D-1011, an approved development
agreement shall be recorded with the Register of Deeds.
A. The approved development
agreement shall be recorded within 14 days from the date the city or county, as applicable, and the applicant execute the agreement approved by the governing body.
B. No development
approvals shall be issued until the development
agreement is recorded.
The purpose of this section is to establish the procedures by which a property owner
may request the City of Durham to annex property and thus establish the City’s jurisdiction onto the subject property, pursuant to the Durham City Code and applicable state statutes. This section does not override or nullify any other local or state law regarding annexation and applicable rules or laws resulting from the establishment of the City’s jurisdiction.
All applicants applying for annexation shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
A. An application for annexation shall be submitted in accordance with paragraphs 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
Unless incorporated into a concurrent approval by City Council, such as a zoning map change or statutory development
agreement, the applicable utility extension agreement shall be included with the annexation request.
An annexation application shall be submitted concurrently with any associated zoning map change application.
A. After receiving the application, the Planning Director or designee, and any other applicable department or agency
, shall be responsible for review and comment regarding the request.
The Planning Director or designee may consider applications withdrawn and voided due to the failure of the applicant to submit required information within 90 days of a request for such information.
1. Before taking action on an annexation request, the governing body shall consider any recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, and of staff agencies
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. The City Council may continue a public hearing prior to closing the hearing and taking action on the request.
4. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the request, deny the request, or refer the request back to the administration for additional consideration.
5. The annexation approved by the governing body may include changes from the request presented.
The City Council may consider concurrent requests for the subject site with the annexation request. However, separate motions for each requested action shall be required.
Pursuant to an initial zoning map change
as defined in Article 17, Definitions, the City Council may establish its zoning authority by adopting the current zoning designation, or by adopting a different designation.
The effective date of an annexation shall be a date determined by City Council.
3 Applications and Permits
A. When uncertainty exists, the director of the appropriate department, or designee, as identified below, shall be authorized to make all interpretations concerning the provisions of this Ordinance. In making these interpretations, all provisions shall be:
1. Considered as minimum requirements;
2. Liberally construed in favor of the governing body;
3. Deemed neither to limit nor repeal any powers granted under State statutes; and
4. Require application of the more stringent provisions wherever the provisions of this ordinance appear to impose conflicting provisions that cannot otherwise be reconciled.
The Planning Director, or Assistant Director in matters involving a conflict of interest, shall make all interpretations of this Ordinance, but shall not make interpretations regarding the following sections:
1. Sec. 3.8, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, and Sec. 15.5, Sedimentation and Erosion Control Enforcement and Penalties, the County Engineer, or designee, shall be authorized to make all interpretations concerning the provisions of these sections.
2. Sec. 8.4, Floodplain and Flood Damage Protection Standards, the Inspections Director, acting as the Floodplain Administrator
, or designee, in consultation with the Planning Director, shall be authorized to make all interpretations related to this section.
3. Paragraph 12.3.1, Street Layout, the Public Works Director or City Transportation Director or designee, as applicable, shall be authorized to make all interpretations concerning the provisions of this section.
4. Sec. 12.8, Stormwater Management, the Public Works Director or County Engineer or designees, as appropriate, shall be authorized to make all interpretations concerning the provisions of this section.
5. All interpretations of matters relating to the North Carolina Building
Code shall be made by the Inspections Director or designee.
6. The Planning Director may defer interpretations of this Ordinance to appropriate City and/or County officials.
C. Other than official interpretations of this Ordinance issued by the authority indicated in paragraph 3.1.1B, Interpretation Authority, and permit and application approvals, the Planning Department does not issue interlocutory determinations or interpretations.
A request for interpretation shall be submitted in writing.
A. The Planning Director shall:
1. Review and evaluate the request in light of the text of this UDO, the Official Zoning Map, the Comprehensive Plan
and any other relevant information;
2. Consult with the Inspections Director or designee and coordinate with other staff, including the City or County Attorney, as necessary; and
3. Render an opinion.
B. The interpretation shall be provided to the applicant in writing.
The Planning Director or designee shall maintain an official record of all interpretations. The record of interpretations shall be available for public inspection during normal business hours.
Pursuant to NCGS § 160D-403(b), an applicant seeking an interpretation shall take the steps to provide constructive notice of the interpretation on the subject property as follows:
1. A sign
visible from each street frontage
shall be posted on the property for at least 10 days.
2. The signs
shall contain the words “Official Interpretation” in letters at least 6 inches high and shall identify the means to contact a local government staff member for information about the interpretation.
Verification of the posting in compliance with these requirements shall be provided to the staff member responsible for the interpretation.
Final action on an official interpretation of this Ordinance by the Planning Director or designee may be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
The review procedures described below apply to the types of applications listed below, as may be limited by the individual subsections that follow.
A. Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
B. Zoning Map Change
C. Subdivision
, including Conservation Subdivision![]()
D. Site Plan![]()
E. Special Use
Permit
F. Sign
Permit
G. Temporary Use
Permit
H. Home Occupation
Permit
I. Variance![]()
J. Appeal
of Administrative Decision
K. Historic District/Landmark Designation
L. Certificate of Appropriateness
M. UDO Text Amendment
N. Vested Rights
Determination
O. Floodplain Development Permit![]()
P. Architectural Review
Q. Reasonable Accommodation
R. Street Closing/Withdrawal
S. Street Renaming
T. Annexation
U. Statutory Development
Agreement
A. Before submitting an application for development
approval that does not require a pre-submittal conference, it is recommended that a pre-application conference be scheduled with the Planning Director or designee to discuss the procedures, standards and regulations required for development
approval in accordance with of this Ordinance.
B. A mandatory pre-application conference with the Planning Director or designee shall be required for the following development
reviews:
1. Comprehensive Plan
amendments (text or map) not initiated by the City or County;
2. Zoning map changes and UDO text amendments, including petitions to initiate a neighborhood protection overlay, not initiated by the City or County;
3. Site plan
or preliminary plat
applications for property zoned or in the process to be zoned:
a. Design District; or
b. With a development plan
.
4. Conservation subdivision
(after preparation of site analysis map);
5. Minor or major special use permit;
6. Variance
;
7. Reasonable accommodation;
8. Landmark designation;
9. Major works certificate of appropriateness;
10. Annexation
11. Street Closing
12. Street Renaming; and
13. Statutory Development
Agreement
C. A mandatory pre-application conference with the City Transportation Director or designee shall be required for the following development
reviews:
1. Traffic impact analysis; and
2. Transportation special use permit.
If an application is not submitted within six months of the date of the pre-application conference, a new pre-application conference is required.
A. At least one neighborhood meeting shall be held according to the Planning Department procedures for any application indicated as requiring a neighborhood meeting as specified per this Ordinance.
B. The purpose of the neighborhood meeting shall be to begin engagement with the neighborhood about the nature of the proposed land use and development
features, explain the site plan
if any, solicit comments, and establish an engagement plan with the neighborhood to be undertaken
throughout the application submittal and review process. This requirement shall not mean that all residents and stakeholders are required to attend such a meeting.
The applicant shall provide notice to each owner
of record of any land located within 600 feet of the subject property by first class mail at least 10 days prior to the date of the neighborhood meeting.
Commentary: It is also recommended that the same notice, either by email or first class mail, be provided to any applicable neighborhood organization, homeowners’ association, or similar neighborhood community organization.
D. The neighborhood meeting notice shall include at a minimum the following:
1. The applicant’s name and telephone number;
2. The street address of the site with an identification map;
3. A clear explanation of what the applicant is proposing; and
4. The date, time, and location of the meeting.
E. The Planning Director or designee may develop
administrative regulations setting forth guidelines pertaining to any additional requirements for the conduct of the meeting. Such guidelines shall be subject to review by the Joint City-County Planning Committee.
The following requirements shall apply to all applications for development
approval identified in paragraph 3.2.1, Applicability.
Applications required under this Ordinance shall be submitted on forms and in such numbers as required by the appropriate department. All forms shall include, at a minimum, the following information:
1. Contact information for the individual or firm submitting the application.
2. Contact information for the individual or firm on whose behalf the application is being submitted.
3. Identification of the property affected by the application, such as a legal description, address, or REID as may be appropriate.
4. Any other information required by the director of the appropriate department, or designee, or the provisions of this Ordinance.
1. All applications and associated fees shall be filed with the appropriate department.
2. Filing fees shall be established from time to time to defray the actual cost of processing the application.
3. An applicant who has paid the appropriate fee pursuant to the submission of an application, but who chooses to withdraw such application prior to its distribution for review shall be entitled to a refund of the total amount paid, less ten percent for administrative costs, upon written request to the appropriate department. Once review has begun, no refund shall be available, except that unused notice surcharges shall be refunded less ten percent for administrative purposes. No refund of technology surcharges shall be provided.
1. Applications shall include all required fees, and contain all required information as described on forms available from each department involved in the review process, unless modified by the department, in writing, pursuant to 2, below. Incomplete applications may be reviewed in extraordinary circumstance.
2. The presumption shall be that all of the information required in the application forms is necessary to satisfy the requirements of this section. However, it shall be recognized that each application is unique, and therefore more or less information may be required according to the needs of the particular case. The applicant may rely on the recommendations of the appropriate department as to whether more or less information should be submitted.
3. Once the application has been determined sufficient for processing, copies of the application shall be referred by the appropriate department to the appropriate reviewing entities.
4. The director of the appropriate department, or designee, may require an applicant to present evidence of the authority to submit an application.
5. An application shall be considered to have been accepted for review only after it has been determined to be complete as provided above, not upon submission to the appropriate department.
Applications sufficient for processing shall be submitted to the director of the appropriate department, or designee, in accordance with the established schedule. Schedules indicating submittal dates shall be developed
each year and made available to the public.
1. Upon receipt of an application sufficient for processing, the director of the appropriate department, or designee, shall review the application and confer with the applicant to ensure an understanding of the applicable requirements of this Ordinance; that the applicant has submitted all of the information they intend to submit; and that the application represents precisely and completely what the applicant proposes to do.
2. Once the applicant indicates that the application is as complete as the applicant intends to make it, the application shall be placed before the appropriate approving authority in accordance with standard procedures. However, if the director of the appropriate department, or designee, believes the application is incomplete, a recommendation to deny the application on that basis shall be provided to the appropriate approving authority.
1. Related applications necessary for development
approvals may be filed and reviewed simultaneously, at the option of the applicant. Any application that also requires a variance
, special use permit, or certificate of appropriateness shall not be eligible for final approval until the variance
, special use permit, or certificate of appropriateness has been granted.
2. Related applications submitted simultaneously are subject to approval of all other related applications; denial or disapproval of any concurrently submitted application shall stop consideration of any related applications until the denied or disapproved application is resolved.
1. Requests for additional information, corrections, or other modifications for all applications, unless otherwise indicated in this Ordinance, shall be returned to the Planning Director or designee within six months from the date comments on the application are officially issued. Failure to meet this deadline shall result in the application being considered withdrawn and voided, thus requiring a new application, including all requirements associated with a new application.
2. Requests for additional information, corrections, or other modifications for applications submitted to address a notice of violation
shall be returned to the Planning Director or designee within 30 days from the date comments on the application are officially issued. Failure to meet this deadline shall result in the application being considered withdrawn and voided, thus requiring a new application, including all requirements associated with a new application.
1. Notice shall be required for applications for development
approval as shown in the table below.
Procedure | Published | Mailed | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive Plan | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Zoning Map Change, including an initial zoning map change | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| ✔ |
| |
Minor Special Use |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Major or Transportation Special Use |
| ✔ | ✔ |
| ✔ | ✔ | |
Appeal |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Major Works Certificate of Appropriateness |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Historic District Designation | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Historic Landmark Designation | ✔ | ✔ |
|
Historic Properties Local Review Criteria Text Amendment | ✔ |
|
|
Historic District Preservation Plan Text Amendment | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| UDO or Comprehensive Plan | ✔ |
|
|
Vested Rights | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Rectification Report | ✔ |
|
|
Reasonable Accommodation |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Street Closing | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Street Renaming | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Annexation | ✔ |
|
|
Statutory Development | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
2. Exceptions to the table above are as follows:
a. Mailed notice
for site plans
shall be required only for major site plans
pursuant to paragraph 3.7.3B, Major Site Plans
.
b. Posting and mailing for Comprehensive Plan
amendments shall be required only for amendments that change a Tier designation or Place Type Map designation without an associated zoning map change.
c. For Appeal
of Administrative Decision, posting is not required when the appeal
is not site specific.
An advertisement shall be placed by the Planning Department in a local newspaper of general circulation once a week for two successive calendar weeks, the first notice being published not less than ten days nor more than 25 days before the date fixed for the public hearing.
The director of the appropriate department or designee shall provide notification as indicated in the notification table below:
| Procedure | Mailing Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Subject Property, if applicable | Distance of Property from Subject Property2 (ft.) | |
Comprehensive Plan | ✔ | 1,000 |
Zoning Map Change, including an Initial Zoning Map Change | ✔ | 1,000 |
✔ | 600 | |
Board of Adjustment | ✔ | 600 |
Governing Body Quasi-Judicial Hearings | ✔ | 1,000 |
Historic District Designation; Neighborhood Protection Overlay | ✔ | 100 |
Historic Landmark Designation and Certificate of Appropriateness (Major Works) | ✔ | All adjacent |
Historic District Preservation Plan Text Amendment | ✔ | All adjacent |
Vested Rights | ✔ | All adjacent |
Annexation | ✔ | 600 |
Street Closing |
| All adjacent |
Street Renaming |
| All adjacent |
Statutory Development | ✔ | 1,000 |
1 Mailed Notice 2 When the extent of the buffer included for notification. 3 Properties are “adjacent 4 Mailed notices | ||
(1) All mailed notifications shall be performed through first class mail utilizing the County property tax listings for property ownership.
(2) Where the tax records reflect a different mailing address for an owner
of the property and the actual property address, then notification shall also be mailed to the address of the property itself in addition to the property owner
address, unless the property is vacant.
(3) If accurate individual mailing addresses of the residents of multifamily
properties are not readily available, then the property shall be posted with a resident notice sign
in the right‐of‐way immediately adjacent
to the multifamily
property. The resident notice sign
shall be posted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5B.3.
(4) The notice shall be mailed at least 14 but not more than 25 days prior the date of the public hearing.
(5) Mailed notice
under this section shall not be required if a zoning map change directly affects more than 500 properties owned by a total of at least 500 different property owners
, and the Planning Director or designee elects to use the following expanded published notice requirements:
(6) An advertisement of not less than one-half page may be placed in a local newspaper of general circulation once a week for two successive calendar weeks, the first notice being published not less than 10 days nor more than 25 days before the date fixed for the public hearing.
(7) In addition to the published notice, the Planning Director or designee shall post one or more signs
on or immediately adjacent
to the subject area reasonably calculated to give public notice of the proposed change in accordance with paragraph 4.c., Posted Notice, below rather than the notice required pursuant to subsection 3, Posted Notice (Sign
), below.
(8) Mailed notice
shall be provided by first class mail to property owners
who reside outside of the newspaper’s circulation area.
A sign
noticing the public hearing shall be prominently posted by the director of the appropriate department, or designee, not less than 14 days prior to the public hearing at which the application shall be reviewed. The sign
shall be posted on the property or at a point visible from the nearest improved street. Where a site fronts along multiple improved public streets, one sign
is required for each street frontage
, unless such street frontage
has limited access and poses unsafe conditions for posting such as, but not limited to, freeways
and expressways
. In the case of multiple parcels
, sufficient signs
shall be posted to provide reasonable notice to interested persons
.
Except for applications in paragraph b below a published or mailed notice
shall provide at least the following:
(1) A general description or address of the location of the land that is the subject of the application and, for mailed notice
, a location map;
(2) A description of the action requested;
(3) Where a zoning map change or a Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use
Map amendment is proposed, the current and proposed designations;
(4) The time, date and location of the public hearing;
(5) A phone number to contact the Planning Director or designee;
(6) A statement that interested parties may appear at the public hearing; and
(7) A statement that substantial changes
to the proposed action may be made following the public hearing.
A published notice shall include the following specific information:
(1) A summary description of the proposed change;
(2) The time, date and location of the public hearing;
(3) A phone number to contact the Planning Director or designee;
(4) A statement that interested parties may appear at the public hearing; and
(5) A statement that substantial changes
to the proposed action may be made following the public hearing.
Required posted notices shall indicate the following:
(1) A case number;
(2) Type of action; and
(3) A phone number to contact the Planning Director, or designee.
Minor defects in notice shall not impair the notice or invalidate proceedings pursuant to the notice if a bona fide attempt has been made to comply with applicable notice requirements. For instances where notice was not executed per the Durham Unified Development
Ordinance but meets the requirement set forth in the North Carolina General Statutes, notice will be deemed legally sufficient.
Any organization or individual may register with the Planning Department to receive, at a minimum, a monthly electronic notification.
1. The notification shall contain the scheduled public hearings for the procedures listed in paragraph 3.2.5A, Summary of Notice Required, and major site plans
.
2. To be eligible for registration, the applicant must provide the notification information required by the Planning Department.
3. Each organization or individual is responsible for providing updated information to the Planning Department in order to continue receiving notice.
4. The information provided shall be consistent with paragraph 3.2.5B.4, Content of Notice, as applicable for the specific application.
1. A legislative public hearing or a quasi-judicial hearing shall be required for development
review as shown in the table below.
Applications for Approval | Historic Preservation Commission | Board of Adjustment | Planning Commission | Governing Body |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Transportation Special Use |
|
|
| ✔1 |
Comprehensive Plan |
|
| ✔ | ✔ |
Zoning Map Change |
|
| ✔ | ✔ |
Minor Use |
| ✔1 |
|
|
Major Special Use |
|
|
| ✔1 |
| ✔1 |
|
| |
Appeal |
| ✔1 |
|
|
Historic District Designation | ✔ |
| ✔ | ✔ |
Historic Landmark Designation | ✔ |
|
| ✔ |
Certificate of Appropriateness (Major Works) | ✔1 |
|
|
|
UDO Text Amendment |
|
| ✔ | ✔ |
Historic District Preservation Plan Text Amendment | ✔ |
| ✔2 | ✔ |
Historic Preservation Local Review Criteria Text Amendment | ✔ |
|
| ✔ |
Site-Specific Vested Rights |
|
|
| ✔ |
Reasonable Accommodation |
| ✔1 |
|
|
Annexation |
|
|
| ✔ |
Street Closing |
|
|
| ✔ |
Street Renaming |
|
|
| ✔ |
Statutory Development |
|
| ✔3 | ✔ |
1 Requires a quasi-judicial hearing. 2 Required only if associated with adding or removing a local historic district designation. 3 Only if associated with a zoning map change or modifies an Ordinance standard, per Sec. 3.26, Statutory Development Agreement. | ||||
2. The day of the public hearing shall be considered the day the hearing is originally advertised for, unless a deferral is granted by the governing body upon a request that follows the procedures set forth in this Ordinance regarding timely submission of requests for deferrals.
After a request for annexation into the city has been submitted and accepted as complete, an application per paragraph 3.2.1, Applicability, may be received and reviewed under the receiving jurisdictional regulations pursuant to NCGS § 160D-204. No final action shall be made until the change in jurisdiction is official.
A copy of a decision regarding an application shall be provided to the applicant and filed in the appropriate department to be available for public inspection during regular office
hours.
Unless exempted below, a traffic impact analysis (TIA) shall be required for changes of use to determine if roadway improvements will be required, zoning map changes utilizing a development plan
, site plans
, and preliminary plats
that can be anticipated to generate at least 150 vehicle
trips at the peak hour (as determined by Institute of Transportation Engineers Standards). Trips generated by separate developments
meeting the criteria of paragraph 3.3.3, TIA Submission for Projects with Cumulative Impacts, shall be considered cumulatively.
The following projects shall not be required to submit a TIA:
A. Projects located within the Downtown Tier.
B. Developments
that submitted a TIA in conjunction with a zoning map change or previously approved site plan
, special use permit, or other plan, where the TIA remains valid, consistent with the provisions of paragraph 3.3.6, Period of Validity.
C. Redevelopment of any site on which the increase in traffic at peak hour represents an increase of less than 150 trips from the previous development
, if the redevelopment is initiated within 12 months of the cessation of use of the previous development
so long as no access road
that leads directly to the site is operating at a level of service
worse than the jurisdiction’s adopted level of service
.
An applicant shall be required to submit a TIA, or obtain a transportation special use permit (TSUP) pursuant to Sec. 3.9, Special Use Permit, for a development plan
, site plan
, preliminary plat
, special use permit, or other similar plan that does not otherwise meet the thresholds for submission of a TIA or for obtaining a TSUP if the development
approval is for a project that:
1. Shares features such as site access or other roadways, design elements, or other infrastructure with nearby unbuilt, but pending developments
evidenced by valid, approved site plans
or preliminary plats
, or active site plan
or preliminary plat
submittals; and,
2. When complete, will function in conjunction with such nearby developments
as a single project, the impact on the infrastructure of which would exceed the thresholds for preparation of a TIA.
The City Transportation Director, or designee shall determine whether a development
application meets the criteria in paragraph A, above, and shall determine whether one TIA shall be required for all of the aggregated development
, or whether multiple TIAs may be employed for separate phases of the development
.
The applicant shall schedule a pre-application meeting with the City Transportation Director or designee to discuss procedures, standards, and regulations required for TIA submittal and approval.
The City Transportation Director or designee shall set forth specific guidelines for preparation of TIAs. A TIA shall, at a minimum, provide the following information:
1. An estimate of the traffic generated as a result of the proposed development
;
2. An analysis of the existing street system serving the proposed development
; and
3. An assessment of the improvements needed to the existing street system in order to support the traffic anticipated to be generated by the proposed development
.
A TIA shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer with experience in traffic engineering.
Estimates of vehicle
trips shall be calculated based on trip generation rates from the most recent edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, unless an alternative source of information is approved by the City Transportation Director or the NCDOT.
A TIA shall be valid for a specific site for no more than eight years, so long as no significant modifications to the development
proposed for the site that substantially increase the traffic impact are made. A TIA submitted in connection with a project that is accessed by a road
that is operating at a level of service
lower than the jurisdiction’s adopted level of service
shall be valid for no more than five years, however.
Transportation mitigation measures may be required to address issues raised by a TIA, or as part of the approval of a Transportation Special Use
Permit (TSUP.) Such measures may include, but not be limited to, onsite and offsite improvements related to reduction of traffic impact on the surrounding road
system, bicycle facilities, pedestrian movement, and the environment. These measures shall be conditions of development
approval. Deletion or modification of these conditions shall require the same approval process that was required for the original project, unless the approved mitigation measure is deemed to conflict with NCDOT or City Transportation Department requirements, in which case they shall be modified to resolve the conflicts through submittal of a revised site plan
or preliminary plat
, as applicable.
Projects that require a TIA may also require a TSUP pursuant to Sec. 3.9, Special Use Permit.
A. The governing bodies shall consider adoption of or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
, as may be required from time to time.
B. Adoption of or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
shall only apply to the jurisdiction in which the subject property is located unless the property is the subject of an annexation petition, or the amendment is pursuant to paragraph 3.4.10, Evaluation and Assessment Report.
C. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
can take the form of text and/or map amendments.
No separate application shall be required to amend a Place Type map designation that is inconsistent with a zoning map change request. In accordance with State statute, if the zoning map change is approved, the Place Type map shall be considered amended to the applicable place type designation. A recommendation on the land use designation shall be provided by the Planning Director or designee.
When a zoning map change request requires an amendment to a Tier boundary, an application for amending the Tier shall be submitted concurrently with the zoning map change application. The public hearings for both applications may be heard at the same time; however, decisions shall be rendered with separate motions.
No separate application shall be required to amend the Urban Growth Boundary location that is inconsistent with a zoning map change request. In accordance with State statute, if the annexation is approved, the Urban Growth Boundary map shall be considered amended to the applicable location. A recommendation on the new location of the Urban Growth Boundary shall be provided by the Planning Director or designee. Requested changes to the Urban Growth Boundary not associated with a Zoning Map Change request shall submit an application in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
No separate application shall be required to amend a Future Growth Area adopted in the Comprehensive Plan
. If the zoning map change is approved and the infrastructure for future growth as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan
have been met, then all or a portion of the Future Growth Area designation shall be modified as recommended by the Planning Director or designee. Requested changes to a Future Growth Area not associated with a Zoning Map Change request shall submit an application in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
Applicants applying for a plan amendment shall schedule a pre-application conference with the Planning Director or designee in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
All applicants applying for a plan amendment shall hold a neighborhood meeting in accordance with paragraph 3.2.3, Neighborhood Meeting, except for the following:
A. Changes made pursuant to paragraph 3.4.10, Evaluation and Assessment Report; or
B. Amendments that are solely text amendments not specific to a particular site.
An application for a plan amendment shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
A. Before making any recommendation on a plan amendment, the Planning Commission shall consider any recommendations from the Planning Director or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing.
B. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
C. It is expected that the applicant or a representative of the applicant will appear at the meetings to explain why the Comprehensive Plan
should be changed.
D. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation on the application to the governing body.
E. The Planning Commission shall make its recommendation within three consecutive regular Commission cycles (approximately 90 days total) of its initial public hearing on the amendment.
The recommendations of the staff and Planning Commission to the governing body shall show that the following criteria were considered regarding a proposed change to the Place Type Map of the Durham Comprehensive Plan
:
A. Adequate public utilities
, emergency services, transportation services, and public schools are available to accommodate the request, and,
B. Durham’s ability to achieve the goals of the Comprehensive Plan
will be increased,
C. And, either:
1. Significant changes have occurred since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan
and necessitate the proposed amendment; Or,
2. Inconsistencies in land use or other plan policies exist in the adopted Comprehensive Plan
that affect Durham’s orderly growth and development
.
D. In addition, Decisions on Place Type Map amendments shall include these additional considerations: For changes to a Place Type designation that changes the intensity of development
envisioned for an area, whether the proposal has demonstrated benefits to affordable housing production, environmental goals, and approaches to equitable engagement and outcomes.
Where a plan amendment involves modification of the Tiers established in the Comprehensive Plan
, the following criteria shall be considered.
A. The site is contiguous to the proposed Tier;
B. The site is not in the drainage basin for Lake Michie or Little River or in the one-mile critical area around Jordan or Falls Reservoirs;
C. The extension does not violate
any agreements with neighboring jurisdictions; and
D. If the proposal is to expand the Suburban Tier, extending utilities to serve the site is determined to be technically feasible by the Public Works Director or designee and will not result in inordinate cost to the City.
A. Where a plan amendment involves modification of the Urban growth Boundary established in the Comprehensive Plan
, all the following criteria shall be considered:
1. The change does not expand the UGB further into a Critical Watershed
;
2. The change does not significantly increase long-term infrastructure maintenance costs for the City or County; and
3. The change would address a clear need for the community based on the adopted Comprehensive Plan
policies.
B. Notwithstanding the above criteria, the Governing Body shall consider whether those parcels
were previously included in the 2005 Comprehensive Plan
’s Suburban Development
Tier.
A. Before taking action on a plan amendment, the governing body shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Planning Director, and shall conduct a public hearing.
B. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
C. It is expected that the applicant or a representative of the applicant will appear at the meetings to explain why the plan should be changed.
D. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the amendment, deny the amendment, or send the amendment back to the Planning Commission for additional consideration.
E. An approval shall be by written resolution. The approval may be contingent upon conditions specified by the governing body. The effective date may be immediate or may be a date otherwise specified in the approval.
A. Every two years, the Planning staff will prepare an evaluation and assessment report for review and approval by the governing bodies. The report will include a rectification of any differences between the adopted Place Type Map of the City and County.
B. The governing bodies shall hold public hearings for the approval of the report. Notification of the public hearings shall be pursuant to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
Applications submitted by a private individual or entity shall first be considered for appropriateness and priority by the Joint City-County Planning Committee (JCCPC) on an annual basis.
1. Staff shall provide the JCCPC with a preliminary analysis for each application;
2. Staff shall set annual deadlines for application submittals.
3. Fees shall be paid upon application submittal. Notification fees can be refunded upon request of the applicant if the applicant withdraws the application within two weeks from the date the JCCPC has provided final comment on the application.
The following criteria, as applicable, shall be addressed by the applicant:
1. The proposed amendment corrects an error or meets the challenge of some changing condition, trend or fact;
2. The proposed amendment is in response to changes in state law;
3. The proposed amendment constitutes a substantial benefit to Durham as a whole and is not solely for the good or benefit of a particular landowner or owners
at a particular point in time;
4. The proposed amendment is consistent with other identified Plan policies and adopted area plans; and
5. The impact of the proposed amendment with regard to:
a. Established property or proposed development
in the vicinity of the proposed amendment;
b. Existing or future land use patterns;
c. Existing or planned public services and facilities;
d. Existing or planned roadways;
e. The natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater
management, wildlife and vegetation; and
f. Other policies of the Comprehensive Plan
.
The purpose of a zoning map is to amend the zoning district boundaries of the Official Zoning Map.
A zoning map change may be initiated by the governing body, the Planning Commission, the Board of Adjustment, the Planning Director or designee, a citizen or the property owner
or their agent, except as follows:
1. A petition for a zoning map change with a development plan
may only be initiated by the property owner
or their agent.
2. A petition for a zoning map change that is considered a “down-zoning,” as defined per NCGS §160D-601(d), as applicable, shall only be initiated by the applicable governing body, unless written consent is provided by all owners
of property subject to the zoning request.
The development plan
shall become a part of the zoning map change petition and shall be reviewed concurrently with the zoning map change petition. Subsequent site plans
or plats
shall not deviate from the plan, unless otherwise allowed, or required under this Ordinance. Deviation may require a zoning map change, as established in paragraph 3.5.12, Deviations from Approved Development Plans. Unless a development plan
also functions as a site plan
, it is not a site specific vesting plan pursuant to Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights. The right to develop
pursuant to a development plan
, whether approved under this Ordinance or any previous ordinance, accrues only for any portion of the plan for which a site plan
or preliminary plat
is approved, and then only for the period of validity specified in this Ordinance, or where a vested right
is established pursuant to Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights.
The development plan
may be used by the petitioner in any zoning district; however, the development plan
shall be required as follows:
1. Rezoning to the PDR, CC, MU, and IP districts;
2. Additions to the UC District after the initial zoning map change
establishing the District on each campus; and
3. As otherwise required in this Ordinance.
A traffic impact analysis may be required if the proposed zoning map change meets the threshold requirements established in Sec. 3.3, Traffic Impact Analysis.
Pursuant to paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference, a pre-application conference is required prior to the submittal of a zoning map change application.
An applicant petitioning for a zoning map change, including an initial zoning due to annexation, shall hold neighborhood meeting(s) as set forth in paragraph 3.2.3, Neighborhood Meeting.
A. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
shall be considered with all petitions for a zoning map change.
B. If a zoning map change request is approved, but determined inconsistent with the Place Type Map of the Comprehensive Plan
, the Place Type Map shall be considered amended to the applicable land use designation. A recommendation on the land use designation shall be provided by the Planning Director or designee.
C. When a zoning map change request requires an amendment to a Tier boundary, an application for amending the Tier boundary shall be submitted concurrently with the zoning map change application. The public hearings for both applications may be heard at the same time; however, decisions shall be rendered with separate motions.
A. An application for zoning map change shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
B. Zoning map changes should correspond with the boundary lines of existing platted
lots or tracts
. If the boundaries of a zoning map change request stop short of an exterior property line, that portion of the property outside the proposed zoning map change boundary shall be capable of being subdivided and developed
in accordance with the existing zoning and other requirements of this Ordinance.
C. All zoning requirements shall be met within the boundaries of the area being proposed for change, unless the area being changed is utilizing a development plan
and is an addition to an existing area zoned with a development plan
. If all of the requirements cannot be met on the site being changed, the zoning map change shall be expanded to include necessary property being used to meet zoning requirements. Projects utilizing a development plan
may be expanded without meeting this criterion if, considering the original development plan
area, the requirement can be met without violating
any committed elements
. Projects utilizing this provision shall provide graphics and/or a chart demonstrating how the requirements are met.
D. (County Only) If the boundaries of a zoning map change request in process are modified so as to 1) remove property from the request, and 2) have the effect of separating other adjoining properties from the boundaries of the modified request, that change shall be considered a substantial change
from the original request and shall result in the modified request being considered a new zoning map change request and requiring resubmittal with a new application and applicable fees.
A development plan
provides additional information with a zoning map change petition and establishes the level of development
that will be allowed on the property. A development plan
is also intended to identify proffered commitments
that are greater than Ordinance requirements.
When a proposed zoning map change includes a development plan
, the letter “D” shall follow the proposed zoning district designation. If approved, the letter “D” shall remain as a part of the zoning designation of the property. The proffered elements submitted as part of the development plan
, called "commitments
" must be enforced by staff. Approved commitments
are binding on the property and establish the level of permitted development
. "Commitments
" may also be referred to as "committed elements
" throughout this Ordinance.
Commentary: The Planning Department will require a mechanism to ensure compliance with commitments
. Depending upon the nature of the commitment, a written compliance document may be required.
The Planning Director is authorized to:
1. Delegate authority under this section to a designee;
2. Determine whether modification of an unapproved development plan
or deviation from an approved development plan
is significant/substantial or minor, or more or less stringent, if not specified in this section;
3. Determine whether a conflict exists between commitments
. Any conflict between commitments
, including design commitments
, shall be resolved in favor of the most stringent;
4. Determine whether an element is a commitment if it is not specified as such in this section; and
5. Determine whether additional staff review time is necessary following addition of commitments
at hearings through proffers or illustrative graphic depictions.
6. When an element not listed needs to be determined to be allowed on a textual development plan
, or requires a graphic development plan
, the Planning Director shall have the authority to determine whether the commitment is allowed.
A development plan
shall comply with all applicable laws and guidelines. Requirements under this section shall consist of the following, which may be supplemented by guidelines of the Planning Department.
Parcels
within a development plan
(graphic or textual) must be contiguous. Parcels
directly across from each other, and separated by intervening existing or proposed right-of-way
, are considered contiguous for the purposes of this section. Non-contiguous parcels
that don’t meet this criteria must be submitted as separate applications.
This section permits two types of development
plans in association with a zoning map change request, a textual development plan
and a graphic development plan
. A graphic or textual development plan
describes or depicts aspects of development
that exceed regulatory requirements. Districts that require a development plan
, including the PDR district, may have the requirement met through either a textual or graphic development plan
if all requirements of the district can be met.
A textual development plan
is one where only text is used to describe the commitments
. Descriptive information shall be denoted within a textual description. These commitments
will become the zoning standards in which development
within the district must comply with.
(1) A textual development plan
shall, at a minimum, proffer a commitment that specifies, limits, and/or prohibits uses within the zoning district requested pursuant to Sec. 5.1, Use Table.
(2) If the Planning Director determines a committed element cannot be clearly described through a textual development plan
, the applicant must submit a graphic development plan
.
A graphic development plan
describes and depicts commitments
in graphic form. Commitments
in an approved development plan
are standards that apply to any subsequent land use applications for the property. At a minimum, a proposed graphic development plan
shall include the following information:
(1) References to adopted plans, including transportation plans, open space
plans, parks and trails plans, that apply to the site;
(2) Existing and proposed Zoning districts and overlays on the site;
(3) Existing and proposed Intensity/density
for each zoning district or overlay (square feet if non-residential, units if residential);
(4) A chart or table including the minimum ordinance requirements and proposed amounts of the following:
(b) Project boundary buffers;
(c) Maximum impervious area for the site and for each separately zoned portion of the site, indicated numerically for the overall site and each portion;
(d) Tree preservation and/or replacement; and
(e) Open space
.
(5) Graphic development
plans shall also include the following information depicted in graphic form:
(a) General location of external access points and connections to existing roads
;
(b) Dedications
or reservations
made for consistency with adopted plans, including transportation plans, or as otherwise required by this Ordinance or other law;
(c) Railroad corridors as required under Sec. 12.6, Railroad Corridors;
(d) Any proposed private streets pursuant to paragraph 12.2.2A.1, Private Streets and Roads.
(e) Areas committed for preservation, including but not limited to steep slopes; stream buffers
; wetland
buffers; Inventory
sites; sites on maps or lists maintained by the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO), including but not limited to maps for sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the Study List for potential designation, determination of eligibility sites, and surveyed sites; sites identified in the Durham Architectural and Historic Inventory
and applicable local historic preservation plans; and sites identified in the Durham County Archaeological Inventory
and other identified archaeological sites, including cemeteries
and burial grounds;
(f) Tree preservation areas and tree replacement areas.
Commitments
can consist of, but are not limited to, the following within either a graphic or textual development plan
:
a. Description of number, type, or range of uses and/or housing types;
b. General location of on- or off-site road
improvements, including pedestrian and bicycle improvements;
c. Depiction or description of the location and area of open space
, recreation areas, trails and greenways, tree preservation areas, or buffers other than project boundary or stream buffers
;
d. additional buffer
width or opacity
;
e. Specific landscaping features or vegetation types and opacity
;
f. Building
specifications such as number, location, maximum floor area
, or maximum height;
g. Stormwater
control measures;
h. Sustainability measures, including solar and electric vehicle
commitments
;
i. Depiction or description of areas where mass grading
will not occur (only if being described by acreage or volume);
j. Other building
or site design elements, such as distinctive architectural features or specific materials; and
k. Affordable housing commitments
;
m. Financial proffers;
n. Transit improvements;
o. Erosion
and sediment
control measures.
A graphic or textual development plan
shall include improvements or measures required to address any deficiencies identified by a Traffic Impact Analysis. If required, such measures shall be in text or graphic form, as appropriate. Such improvements shall be development
requirements, unless otherwise modified as allowed per 3.5.12.
An application that does not include a development plan
can changed to include a development plan
at any time during the application review process. This allowance shall not supersede any authority granted to the Planning Director or designee, or Governing Bodies. In addition, the following procedures apply to textual and graphic development
plans:
1. Text commitment(s) will be incorporated into the ordinance adopting the zoning designation.
2. A graphic or textual development plan
shall include a signed
acknowledgement from each property owner
. A signature from an owner
’s representative cannot serve as a substitute for the owner
's signature unless a document establishing legal authority to act as the owner
’s representative is provided.
3. Modifications to a development plan
that are proffered at a public hearing before the governing body shall be incorporated into the approved commitments
upon approval of the zoning by the governing body. Verbal commitments
approved at a governing body public hearing are considered binding commitments
and must be added to the graphic or text-only development plan
. The property owners
must sign
the development plan
with the complete set of commitments
prior to an approved development plan
being stamped by Planning staff. (Proffers that prove to be illegal or less stringent than existing commitments
shall be referred to the Planning Commission or governing body for an additional hearing.
4. Modifications that are made to a development plan
after the Planning Commission recommendation, but before the governing body hearing, shall be referred to the Planning Commission for an additional hearing as required under paragraph 3.5.9B, Changed Application, (when determined by the Planning Director).
5. A graphic development plan
shall be signed
and sealed by a Professional Engineer, Registered Architect, or Registered Landscape Architect. All graphic depictions shall be accurately scaled, and separate or additional sheets may be required by the Planning Department.
A statutory development
agreement, pursuant to Sec. 3.26, Statutory Development Agreements, proposed in association with the zoning map change application shall be a commitment of the development plan
.
1. A phasing plan may be provided with any graphic development plan
but shall be required in the Mixed-Use
District. The phasing plan shall ensure that residential and non-residential components are constructed to satisfy the intent and requirements of the Ordinance.
2. The phasing plan shall be in graphic form as appropriate and included in the graphic development plan
. It shall identify the sequence and timing of the development
phases and include utility improvements, land use categories, and areas in square feet or acres. Phasing plan elements shall become committed development
requirements.
No minor or major special use permit is required for uses that otherwise need such a permit pursuant to paragraph 5.1.2, Use Table; Sec 5.3, Limited Use Standards; or for standards specified elsewhere within the Ordinance, if:
1. The use or standard is specified on the approved development plan
; and
2. The location, access, building
height, and size, as applicable, for the proposed use or standard is specified on the development plan![]()
1. Deferrals shall be granted by the Planning Director, or designee, under the following criteria:
a. The applicant or an opponent may each seek not more than one deferral for each zoning map change requested. No more than two deferrals (one each from the applicant and an opponent) shall be allowed per proposed zoning map change;
b. Each deferral request shall be for a maximum of one month. Any deferral request shall be made in writing, citing reasons for requesting the deferral; and
c. If the request for deferral is received by the Planning Director or designee and the reasons for the request are made in writing prior to notification being performed for the first Planning Commission or governing body meeting where the item would otherwise be considered.
2. Any other deferrals which do not meet the above criteria shall be treated as a continuance.
3. If the Planning Commission or governing body, as applicable, grants a deferral then new notification and associated fees shall be required.
4. The above procedures are not applicable to proposed zoning map changes that have been designated as “expedited” by a governing body.
1. The applicant petitioning for a zoning map change may withdraw the application provided that a written request stating the reason for the withdrawal is received by the Planning Director, or designee, at least ten days prior to the public hearing.
2. The request shall be accompanied by mailing labels imprinted with the names and addresses of the previously notified property owners
and a fee sufficient to cover the postage for renotification of surrounding property owners
if the withdrawal occurs after the Planning Commission hearing.
3. The applicant petitioning for a zoning map change with a development plan
may withdraw the application at any time prior to the opening of the public hearing before the governing body by withdrawing consent to the development plan
being imposed on the applicant’s property.
4. The governing body may vote to allow the applicant to withdraw an application for a zoning map change at any time.
The Planning Director or designee may consider applications withdrawn and voided due to the failure of the applicant to submit required information within 90 days of a request for such information.
Except in the case of an application where the applicant withdrew consent to a development plan
, no application that was previously withdrawn or voided may be resubmitted until at least six months have elapsed since the date of withdrawal. In the case of applications withdrawn or voided as a result of the withdrawal of consent to a development plan
after publication of a notice of a public hearing, no new application may be resubmitted until at least 12 months have elapsed since the date of withdrawal. The Planning Director or designee may waive this waiting period if the application has been substantially modified or if there has been a significant change in facts or circumstances since the application was withdrawn.
A. The Planning Director or designee shall prepare a staff report that reviews the zoning map change request in light of any applicable plans and the general requirements of this Ordinance.
The staff report shall consider the entire range of permitted uses in the requested classification regardless of any representations made that the use will be limited, unless a development plan
is submitted that restricts the permitted range of uses to specific uses. The staff report shall include an evaluation of the consistency of the requested classification with adopted plans and the impact of the requested classification on public infrastructure, as well as any specific requirements of the requested classification.
B. The Planning Director or designee shall forward completed zoning map change requests and any related materials to the Planning Commission for a hearing and recommendation at the first regularly scheduled meeting following completion of the technical reviews by staff.
C. The Planning Director or designee shall forward completed zoning map change requests and any related materials, including the Planning Commission recommendation, to the governing body for a public hearing and decision prior to the first regularly scheduled meeting after the Planning Commission hearing.
1. Before making any recommendation on a petition for zoning map change, the Planning Commission shall consider any recommendations from the Planning Director and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. Except in the case of expedited hearings pursuant to paragraph 3.5.9C, Expedited Hearings, the Commission shall make its recommendation within three consecutive regular Commission cycles (approximately 90 days total) of its initial public hearing. The time period for a recommendation may be altered, as in the case of significant modifications, in which case three additional consecutive regular cycles shall be granted before the case shall go to the governing body.
4. When a recommendation is not made within the time periods established in this section, the governing body may process the request without a Commission recommendation.
5. A zoning map change proposed as a County case shall not require rehearing by the Planning Commission if the property subject to the proposed change is annexed into the City before the Board of Commissioners has acted on the case and the annexation is within 12 months of the original Planning Commission recommendation on the zoning map change, unless the applicant has made a significant modification to the application.
If the applicant makes a significant modification to an application for a zoning map change after the Commission has made its recommendation, the Planning Director shall refer the modified request back to the Commission for an additional public hearing. In such case, the Commission shall make a recommendation to the governing body within 90 days of the public hearing on the modified application. If a recommendation is not made within this time frame, the governing body may hear the application without a recommendation from the Planning Commission.
1. If the governing body has set an expedited hearing concerning a request, in accordance with paragraph 3.5.11B, Expedited Hearing, a public hearing before the Planning Commission shall be held at the first available hearing date or prior to the hearing before the governing body.
2. The Commission shall make a recommendation at this hearing based on the Review Criteria in paragraph 3.5.10, Written Recommendation, Review Criteria, below. The Planning Commission shall not continue a request for which an expedited hearing has been set, nor shall any deferrals be granted for such a request.
The Planning Commission shall provide a written recommendation regarding whether each proposed map change is consistent with the comprehensive plan and other applicable adopted plans. The recommendation shall be based on the reasons articulated by Commission members voting in the majority, and the recommendation shall be developed
as determined in the Commission’s Rules of Procedure. In addition to plan consistency, Commissioners may also consider other matters deemed appropriate by the Commission, which may include but are not limited to:
A. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood;
B. Suitability of the subject property for uses permitted by the current versus the proposed district;
C. Whether the proposed change tends to improve the balance of uses, or meets a specific demand in the City and County; and
D. The availability of adequate school, road
, parks, wastewater treatment, water supply and stormwater
drainage facilities for the proposed use.
1. Before taking action on a zoning map change request, the governing body shall consider any recommendations of the Planning Commission, Planning Director or designee, and of staff agencies
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. Continuances may be granted before action on the request.
4. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the request, deny the request, or send the request back to the Planning Commission for additional consideration.
5. In adopting or rejecting a zoning map change, the governing body shall adopt a statement describing whether its action is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
, and why the action is reasonable and in the public interest. The governing body may adopt the statement furnished by staff or agencies
, including but not limited to the Planning Director or the Planning Commission, or it may formulate its own statement.
6. The map change request approved by the governing body may include changes from the request presented. Changes to a development plan
may be made upon the proffer by the applicant of such changes.
7. Approval of a petition gives the applicant the ability to proceed with any additional required approvals.
1. The governing body, in situations in which it determines certain standards have been met, may expedite the hearing process on a proposed zoning map change.
2. The governing body may consider a written request from a potential applicant, or from staff, requesting an expedited hearing process. The request shall identify and support the reasons for such expedited consideration.
3. In order to grant the request, the governing body shall find that at least one of the criteria below have been met:
a. Deadlines set by the local, State, or Federal government for receipt of applications for needed funding, designation, or other regulations concerning the property make expedited consideration necessary;
b. The prospective zoning map change request results from an emergency beyond the control of the applicant, such as response to a disaster;
c. The prospective zoning map change request addresses an urgent matter of public health or safety; or
d. There are special circumstances that will have a substantial negative impact on the development
which could not have reasonably been anticipated and which make expedited consideration necessary.
4. In no event may the governing body hearing occur less than 30 days after the item was granted expedited status.
The following deviations from an approved development plan
require a zoning map change or an amendment to the development plan
, as indicated below.
1. A decrease by more than 20% in total density
of the residential development
, except in a Design District zoning district;
2. A decrease by more than five percent in total density
in residential projects located within a Design District zoning district, unless that decrease results from the application of UDO requirements relating to size or design.
3. In a nonresidential or mixed-use development
on a site adjacent
to a residential district
, a cumulative expansion by more than five percent of total building
floor area
or 4,000 square feet, whichever is greater, or a cumulative decrease of more than 20% of total building
floor area
.
4. Changes to the proposed phasing of the project where phasing plans are required or commitments
.
5. Changes to the use category (for example, residential to office
, office
to commercial, commercial to industrial, as described in Article 5, Use Regulations), if limitations on the number, range, or types of uses were proposed with the development plan
and the governing body limited its consideration of uses to those uses;
6. A change to the number, location, and/or type (i.e. full versus limited movements) of access points along the same right-of-way
or cardinal direction
of the development
that does not provide equal or improved safety, circulation, and connectivity.
7. A change in the location of a building
for sites adjacent
to a property with a residential district
or use .
8. An increase of more than three percent in impervious surface
area.
9. A change to an environmental protection, including tree coverage, that exceeds current ordinance requirements.
10. Any graphic or text commitments
or committed elements
not identified as qualifying as an amendment, below.
11. Any other change to a development plan
depiction, unless such depiction is clearly identified as "conceptual" or "illustrative", and not identified as qualifying as an amendment below.
The purpose of this paragraph is to allow for a limited range of changes (referred to as “amendments”) to an existing development plan
that would not require a new zoning map change. If the proposed amendment would require a new or revised TIA, then it shall require a new zoning map change.
1. The process for amendments shall follow the same adoption process for a zoning map change, but does not change the zoning designation.
2. A petition to change a development plan
must include the previously approved development plan
documents in their entirety with elements proposed for change clearly delineated (graphically and in text format). Previously approved documentation will be supplemented or replaced in its entirety with the modified development plan
.
3. The following qualify as amendments. Proposals utilizing more than two of the categories listed below shall require a zoning map change.
a. Changes to architectural or other building
design or layout commitments
, guidelines, or depictions, including specific limits on height.
b. A change to the requirement on the plan using definitive terms such as, but not limited to, “shall”, “must”, or “will”.
c. Additional, or the removal of, depicted internal access points or connectivity between sections of the development
.
d. An increase in allowed density
through the use of a density
bonus other than an affordable housing bonus.
e. A change in housing type(s) or proportion of housing type mix.
f. A change to identified building
or parking envelopes.
If a zoning map change request seeks to rezone a portion of a site under an existing development plan
, it shall be demonstrated that the remaining site under the existing development plan
can meet all ordinance requirements including committed elements
of the development plan
. Otherwise, the entire site under the existing development plan
shall require a zoning map change.
Where a change is proposed to a development plan
and a portion of the development
has been transferred to residential owner
(s), owner
acknowledgment from those owner
(s) is not required if the proposed zoning map change or amendment requires no development
improvements on those properties.
Notwithstanding the other requirements of this section and except as stated below, a site plan
or preliminary plat
shall deviate from an approved development plan
to conform to the requirements of a new ordinance or other law adopted after development plan
approval, and a zoning map change shall not be required. Exceptions are:
1. Where the development plan
is vested pursuant to the vested rights
procedure; and
2. As authorized under paragraph 1.10.3A, Approved Site Plans, Plats, and Permits and Completed Applications.
3. Under such exceptions, the site plan
or preliminary plat
shall conform to the approved development plan
.
Amendments to an existing development plan
, or a new zoning map change approval, are not required in order to utilize and comply with the requirements of the affordable housing bonuses within this Ordinance, as applicable.
1. Except for development
projects that will utilize the affordable housing bonus of this Ordinance, a new zoning map change is required for any proposal that exceeds the peak hour trip generation of the TIA that was performed with the original zoning map change by more than three percent. If a TIA was not required for the development plan
, but the proposed development
requires it, then a zoning map change is required.
a. Road
improvements that were committed as recommended by the TIA performed with the original zoning map change are exempted at the time of full build-out through a new TIA that demonstrates the intensity of the full build-out of the overall development
no longer warrants the improvement.
b. The City Transportation Department, and NCDOT, as applicable, shall review the new TIA to verify the accuracy of the analysis, and that the previously recommended and committed improvements are no longer warranted. However, if the new TIA indicates that additional improvements are needed, then those new improvements shall be required of the development
.
A petition in opposition to a zoning map change shall be considered a "valid protest petition" if the petition meets the requirements of applicable state law.
Commentary: Session Law SL2015-160 repealed the protest petition process for municipalities, effective upon zoning map change applications submitted after August 1, 2015. This law did not repeal Session Law SL2010-80, which allows protest petitions for zoning map change applications within Durham County’s jurisdiction.
1. The petition must meet the substantive requirements of Session Law 2010-80, and in particular must be signed
by the owners
of either:
a. 20% or more of the area included in the proposed change or
b. Five percent of the area of a 100-foot wide buffer
extending along the entire boundary of each discrete or separate area proposed to be rezoned. In evaluating the sufficiency of a protest under this provision:
(1) A discrete or separate area shall be calculated for any noncontiguous part of an area proposed for zoning map change that is physically separated from other areas proposed for change by property (not including right of way) that is not part of the requested zoning map change;
(2) A street right of way shall not be considered in computing the 100 foot buffer
area as long as the street right of way is 100 feet wide or less.
(3) When less than an entire parcel
of land is being rezoned, the 100 foot buffer
shall be measured from the property line of the entire parcel
.

Property ownership shall be determined based on available recorded property records. In the event of records that are incomplete or in conflict, County tax listings may be used to determine ownership.
The petition shall contain all information required on the form supplied by the Planning Director or designee, or the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners.
1. A form for a protest petition shall be available from the Planning Director or designee, or the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners.
2. Completed petitions shall be submitted to the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners at least four working days
prior to the day of the public hearing.
3. The Planning Director, or designee, in consultation with the County Attorney, shall determine if the petition meets the criteria for classification of "valid protest petition". The Clerk shall inform the governing body that a petition has been filed and indicate the determination by the Planning Director - or designee - whether the petition is valid or invalid. The Planning Director, or designee, shall notify the petitioner as to the validity of the protest petition.
4. Where a substantial modification to a zoning map change application that requires resubmission to the Planning Commission has been submitted, the Planning Director, or designee, shall notify the petitioner, in writing, that a new protest petition is required.
5. Petitions for zoning map change for which a protest petition has been determined to be valid shall require a ¾ vote of the governing body for approval rather than a simple majority. Vacant positions and members who have been excused from voting because of a conflict of interest shall not be considered in computing governing body membership.
Persons
or entities who have signed
protest petitions may withdraw their signatures at any time prior to the vote on the proposed map change. Any withdrawal must meet standards established for such withdrawals by the Planning Department. Withdrawals submitted less than two working days
prior to the public hearing may result in a continuance of the hearing if the effect of the withdrawal on the validity of the protest cannot be determined prior to the public hearing.
The foregoing provisions concerning protest petitions shall not be applicable to any zoning map change that establishes the County’s zoning designation on property that has been relinquished from the City’s jurisdiction, except as provided by general or local law.
Approval of a zoning map change with a development plan
shall enable the owner
or an authorized agent of the owner
to prepare a site plan
in conformance with the zoning map change and development plan
for the property. The site plan
may be prepared for the entire property or phases of the development
project in accordance with Sec. 3.7, Site Plan Review.
A. When the governing body has denied a zoning map change, no new application may be filed for a similar zoning map change on the subject site until at least 12 months have elapsed since the date of the previous action. The Planning Director - or designee - may waive this requirement if the application has been significantly modified or there has been a significant change in the facts or circumstances since the previous request.
B. When the governing body has denied an annexation petition, the concurrent zoning map change shall be administratively withdrawn.
A. Subdivision
approval shall be required except as specified in paragraph 3.6.2, Actions Exempt from Subdivision Requirements (Exempt Plats
).
B. All requirements imposed through a plat
shall run with the land and shall apply against any owner
, subsequent owner
, or occupant.
A. The following shall not be considered “subdivision
” and are exempt from the provisions of this section:
1. The combination or recombination of lots, or portions of lots, previously created and recorded, if the total number of lots is not increased and the resultant lots are equal to or exceed the standards of this Ordinance;
2. The division of land into parcels
greater than ten acres if no street right-of-way
dedication
is involved;
3. The public acquisition by purchase of strips of land for widening or opening streets or for public transportation system corridors;
4. The division of a tract
in single ownership of which the entire area is no greater than two acres into not more than three lots, if no street right-of-way
dedication
is involved and if the resultant lots are equal to or exceed the standards of this Ordinance; and
5. The division of a tract
into parcels
in accordance with the terms of a probated will or in accordance with intestate succession under Chapter 29 of the General Statutes.
B. The Planning Director - or designee - certification of exempt status is required. Exempt plats
shall be stamped by the Planning Director or designee, noting their exemption, and signed
so that they can be recorded by the Office
of the Register of Deeds.
C. Exempt plats
shall only be required to conform to applicable lot dimensional requirements within Article 6, District Intensity Standards; Article 7, Design Standards; and any other section in this Ordinance where lot dimensional standards are regulated. Exempt plats
shall also conform to applicable nonconformity requirements within Article 14, Nonconformities.
D. The subdivider shall have 180 days after the certification of exempt status is granted to file and record the approved plat
with the Office
of the Register of Deeds before the exemption status becomes void.
A. No subdivision
of land within the jurisdiction of either the City or County may be filed or recorded with the Office
of the Register of Deeds until it has been submitted to and approved by the Planning Director or designee, and until the approval is entered on the face of the plat
.
B. Any person
who, being the owner
or the agent of the owner
of any land located within the jurisdiction of this Ordinance, subdivides land in violation
of this Ordinance, or transfers, or sells land by reference to, exhibition of, or any other use of a plat
showing a subdivision
of the land before the plat
has been properly approved under this Ordinance, and recorded in the Office
of the Register of Deeds, shall be punishable pursuant to state and local law.
C. The description by metes and bounds in the instrument of transfer, or other document used in the process of selling or transferring land, does not exempt the transaction from penalties. The City or County, as appropriate, may bring an action for injunction of any illegal subdivision
, transfer, conveyance, or sale of land, and the court shall, upon appropriate findings, issue an injunction and order for compliance.
All applicants considering petitioning for a conservation subdivision
or any other preliminary plat
pursuant to paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference, shall schedule a pre-application conference with the Planning Director, or designee to discuss the procedures, standards, and regulations required for subdivision
approval in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance.
The applicant shall hold a neighborhood meeting as set forth in paragraph 3.2.3, Neighborhood Meeting, prior to application submittal.
It is recommended, but not required, that the applicant applying for subdivision
approval submit a sketch/concept plan for review by the Planning Director or designee. This plan should, in simple sketch form, show the proposed layout of streets, lots and other features in relation to existing conditions
.
An application for preliminary plat
review shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements. Preliminary plat
documents showing the proposed subdivision
of the land into lots shall contain, as a minimum, the information listed below unless the Planning Director, or designee, makes the determination that less detailed information is required for adequate review. No processing or review of a preliminary plat
will proceed without the required information. Detailed standards and specifications for design and construction are available from City, County and State agencies
, as applicable.
1. Title Block
– Name of project, labeled Preliminary Plat
; submittal and revision dates; sheet size (36 inches by 48 inches maximum) with index map and match lines if multiple sheets are required; graphic scale (not smaller than one inch to 200 feet on a standard engineering scale); north point; property identification number; vicinity map clearly establishing the location of the proposed project, with readily recognizable landmarks, stream buffers
, flood plain boundaries, property zoning districts and any overlay zones.
2. Name, address and telephone number of owner
, applicant and agent; name, address and telephone number of surveyor, engineer, landscape architect, or other designer, with seal.
3. In addition, State or Federal regulations may require that additional information be supplied to the Planning Department as a part of a submittal.
1. Boundary of the property, using metes and bounds with angle of departure of adjacent
properties; site size and amount to be developed
; lot lines; building
foot prints and square footage; improvements, such as loading areas
, parking areas, driveways
, alleys
, streets, sidewalks, etc.; any septic tanks, drain fields and wells; culverts and other subsurface features; all utility easements
, above and below ground, including information on type, size, and elevation; railroads; cemeteries
; setback
requirements; zoning of the site and adjacent
zoning, including any overlay zones; land use of the site and adjacent
land uses including major improvements within 50 feet of the subject property; adjacent
property owners
; adjacent
streets, including name and right of way width. Existing features shall be clearly distinguishable from proposed development
.
2. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals for all property within 100 feet of a proposed development
area and topographic contours at five-foot contour intervals for the remainder of the property including a source reference; locations and names of water features including shorelines, water bodies, intermittent and perennial streams
; a major specimen tree survey; locations of drainage ways, stream buffers
, floodways
, floodway
fringes, wetlands
and wetland
buffers; locations of vegetation, rock outcrops, steep slope areas, Durham Natural Inventory
sites and Durham Historic Inventory
Sites.
3. A list of any conditions applied to the property as part of any previous approvals.
1. Street Improvements (Public and Private): location of improvements or widenings, names, widths of rights of way and pavement, design criteria including sight triangles and a typical cross section; Traffic Impact Analysis, if required.
2. Pedestrian Circulation: location of sidewalks and other pedestrian ways including dimensions and surfacing, along streets and other locations; provision of crosswalks.
3. Landscaping: location of all plant materials and other landscaping features, including calculations of amount required and the amount provided; the number, size, and description of plant materials, fences, walls and berms; provisions for screening
specialized features, such as storage areas; calculations of the amount of tree coverage required and the amount and percentage of tree coverage provided by tree preservation and tree replacement; calculation of the amount of street trees and the amount provided by tree preservation and tree installation; a land disturbance tree survey; and the location and a description of all proposed and required tree protection measures.
4. Grading
: location of vegetation to be retained including approximate sizes and protection measures to be used; a depiction of contours at two foot intervals, supplemented with spot elevations when necessary, including location, description, and size of any retaining walls; dimensions of stream buffers
.
5. Utilities: location and width of all easements
and rights of way for water, sewer, storm sewers, gas, electric, communication facilities, or any other utility facility.
6. Storm Drainage: location and description of temporary and permanent storm drainage pipes and swales; amount of impervious surface
; provisions for erosion
and sedimentation
controls, including retention and detention facilities; mechanisms for complying with paragraph 8.5.5, Diffuse Flow Requirements; as well as professionally sealed engineering calculations used in the design.
7. Water and Sewer: location and description of public and private water and sanitary sewer improvements including connections to existing facilities and maintenance provisions.
8. Property Dedications
/Reservations
: location and description of dedicated
or reserved
properties under public or private ownership including the boundaries, size, purpose, future ownership and maintenance provisions for the property. This category includes but is not limited to rights-of-way, rail corridors, greenways, recreation facilities, open space
and common areas.
9. Specific performance standards as required by other Articles of the UDO.
10. Within Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas: demonstration that the subdivision
will minimize flood damage through the location and construction of all public utilities
and facilities, including water and sewer systems; adequate drainage in accordance with adopted standards to reduce exposure to flood hazards.
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) pursuant to Sec. 3.3, Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) may be required.
1. A preliminary plat
shall be required for all subdivision
of land within the jurisdiction of this Ordinance for developments
of more than six lots. A preliminary plat
is required for development
of six lots or less unless there is no public dedication
of land, no streets, no utility extensions, no required diffuse flow mechanisms, and no required stormwater
management facilities.
2. Subdivision
approval requires the submission of both preliminary and final plats
and full interagency review for conformity with the requirements of this Ordinance and other development-related ordinances.
3. Where site plans
, as required by this Ordinance, serve as preliminary plats
for subdivisions
, they shall satisfy these submission requirements in addition to those required for zoning compliance.
Any preliminary plat
application that involves criteria pursuant to paragraph 3.7.3B, Major Site Plans, shall be noticed pursuant to 3.2.5D, Public Notification Service.
Staff review agencies
shall complete review and transmit comments back to the Planning Director or designee.
The preliminary plat
shall be approved by the approving authority if it meets the following criteria:
1. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of applicable adopted plans, including but not limited to the Comprehensive Plan
, historic preservation plans, open space
plans, greenways plans, transportation plans, gateway plans, corridor plans, collector street
plans, and bicycle plans;
2. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of this Ordinance; and
3. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of other applicable ordinances not included in this Ordinance.
This section does not apply to the reservation
of lands for public streets and roads
.
1. The review of preliminary plats
may be delayed by no more than 45 calendar days if the proposed subdivision
contains sites which appear in an adopted plan or policy documents as a future site for a public school or other public facility
, recreation area, park, greenway or other open space
. During preliminary plat
review, the appropriate entity responsible for future site acquisition shall be given 45 calendar days from date of plat
submission to decide if it wishes to reserve
the site.
2. If the site is not to be reserved
, the subdivision
shall be processed in the normal fashion. If the agency
wishes to reserve
the site and specifies such intent in writing to the Planning Director or designee, the subdivision
shall not be approved without the reservation
.
3. Public school authorities shall have 18 months from the date of preliminary plat
approval to acquire the site by purchase, by receipt of dedication
, or by initiating condemnation proceedings. If, at the end of the 18-month period, none of the above actions has occurred, the subdivider may consider the land free from reservation
and apply for revised preliminary plat
approval for its use.
Commentary: See NCGS §160D-804(f).
4. Public agencies
other than schools shall have 120 calendar days from the date of preliminary plat
approval to arrange for site acquisition for public facilities
by option to purchase, by purchase, by receipt of dedication
, or by initiating condemnation proceedings. If, at the end of the 120-day period, none of the above actions has occurred the subdivider may consider the land free from reservation
and apply for revised preliminary plat
approval for private use of the property.
1. Upon preliminary plat
approval, the applicant may apply for the required permits to begin site work and the installation of improvements.
2. All site work shall be performed in compliance with the requirements of this section and other applicable regulations of the City, County, and State.
3. No required permit may be issued until the required preliminary plat
is approved.
1. Minor revisions to approved preliminary plats
, which reflect the same basic street and lot configuration as used for the original approval, may be approved by the Planning Director or designee.
2. Significant changes to an approved preliminary plat
, as determined by the Planning Director or designee, shall be resubmitted for review and approval as if it is a new application.
1. An approved preliminary plat
shall retain its validity for four years, if:
a. A permit to begin development
pursuant to the plat
, such as a land disturbance permit, a building permit
, or an improvement permit has been issued and has remained continuously valid thereafter; and,
b. Building
or land disturbing activity
has begun on the property.
2. The issuance of a building permit
or a certificate of compliance
within a phase of a project shall not extend the validity of the preliminary plat
for the unbuilt portions of that phase or any future phases of the project for which building
permits have not been issued.
3. Preliminary plat
amendments shall not extend the validity of the original approved preliminary plat
.
4. Validity may be extended if vesting is determined per Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights
.
1. A final plat
shall be required for all subdivision
of land within the jurisdiction of this Ordinance except as allowed under North Carolina General Statute.
A minor plat
is a final plat
for subdivision
that does not qualify as an exempt plat
or require a preliminary plat
approval pursuant to paragraph 3.6.7, Preliminary Plat Approval. In addition to the applicable requirements pursuant to paragraph 3.6.8E, Action by the Planning Director, the following shall apply:
a. No part of the tract
or parcel
to be divided has been divided 10 years prior to the application.
b. A stormwater
impact analysis shall be submitted that documents and supports how the project foregoes any stormwater
control measure(s).
c. The subdivision
shall comply with all applicable City and/or County utility requirements.
1. The final plat
shall conform to the approved preliminary plat
, if any.
2. The final plat
may constitute only that portion of the preliminary plat
which is proposed for recordation.
1. When the installation of required site improvements is nearing completion, the subdivider shall submit a final plat
for review and approval.
2. An application for final plat
approval shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
3. The final plat
shall be drawn in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 47-30, Plats
and Subdivisions-Mapping Requirements; standard land surveying and mapping practices; and city/county engineering standards.
The following certificates shall be placed upon all final plats
:
1. Certificate of accuracy and mapping signed
by a registered surveyor;
2. Certificate of ownership and dedication
signed
and notarized, including all individuals, partnerships, and corporations, and lenders with financial security interests;
3. Attorney’s certification of ownership for any final plat
involving a right-of-way
dedication
signed
and notarized; and
4. Review officer
’s certification.
Staff review agencies
shall complete review and transmit comments back to the Planning Director, or designee. The Planning Director or designee shall approve the plat
as is, defer action for additional information and corrections, or disapprove it. If the final plat
is disapproved or deferred, the Planning Director or designee shall notify the applicant of the reasons for such disapproval or deferral. The final plat
shall be approved by the Planning Director or designee if it meets the following criteria:
1. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of applicable adopted plans, including but not limited to the Comprehensive Plan
, historic preservation plans, open space
plans, greenways plans, transportation plans, gateway plans, corridor plans, collector plans, and bicycle plans;
2. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of this Ordinance;
3. Conforms with all the provisions and requirements of other applicable ordinances not included in this ordinance;
4. Conforms with the preliminary plat
, if any;
5. Conforms with completed and approved construction drawings for public infrastructure, where such construction drawings are required by this Ordinance or other applicable ordinance; and
6. Is accompanied by a performance guarantee deemed adequate by the requesting department, if required infrastructure, including but not limited to stormwater
, street, or water and sewer improvements, has not been completed in accordance with approved construction drawings, and if the department responsible for such infrastructure has consented to final plat
approval pending its completion.
The subdivider shall have 180 days after approval to file and record the final plat
with the Office
of the Register of Deeds before the approval becomes void.
For purposes of financing or refinancing development
, it is sometimes necessary to subdivide a previously approved development
complex (including but not limited to a shopping center
, an office
or industrial park, or a housing complex) originally located on a single parcel
into two or more lots, where a subdivision
would vary dimensional, parking, or landscaping requirements of this Ordinance. The Planning Director or designee is authorized to permit such subdivision
to occur subject to the following criteria:
A. A valid, approved site plan
exists for the overall complex;
B. The complex, in its entirety, satisfies all Ordinance requirements; and
C. Each final plat
created contains a note stating that the owners
acknowledge that the individual parcel
is a part of the named development
complex, and that deeds of easement
, restrictive covenants, and/or other legal documents necessary for the perpetual functioning of the development
complex shall be executed and recorded with the final plat
.
Site plan
review, when applicable, shall verify that proposed development
:
A. Complies with all applicable Ordinance requirements, including any applicable development plan
;
B. Complies with all previously approved applicable plans, including open space
and trails plans, and bicycle and pedestrian plans;
C. Provides for trash handling, recycling, grease bins, and other waste
related facilities employed in the normal operation of the use;
D. Provides adequate locations of parking areas, and pedestrian and vehicular access points and circulation;
E. Provides adequate design of traffic patterns, traffic control measures, and street pavement areas, with provisions for maintaining traffic flows and reducing unfavorable effects of traffic on nearby properties;
F. Provides adequate stormwater
facilities, water supply, sanitary sewer service, and fire protection, as evidenced by conformance with department standards, specifications, and guidelines;
G. Complies with requirements for easements
and dedications
;
H. Where a TIA has been submitted, accommodation for the traffic generated by the development
with the existing or funded transportation system, or adequate traffic mitigation measures, are provided.
All proposed development
or changes of use, except as indicated below, shall be subject to the site plan
review process. Development
that is part of a Common Plan of Development
as defined in the City of Durham Code of Ordinances shall be subject to regulations and requirements therein. The following are exempt from site plan
review:
A. Single-family
and two-family
development
on existing single lots of record
.
B. Townhouse
or detached rowhouse development
consisting of 10 units or fewer where each unit has a maximum footprint of 1,000 square feet. Additionally, land disturbance shall be less than 1 acre in the Jordan Reservoir Watershed
, 12,000 square feet in the Falls Reservoir Watershed
, and 0.5 acre in the Neuse River Basin.
C. Accessory dwelling unit
development
where the primary use is civic, consisting of 20 units or fewer where each unit has a maximum footprint of 1,000 square feet. Additionally, land disturbance shall be less than 1 acre in the Jordan Reservoir Watershed
, 12,000 square feet in the Falls Reservoir Watershed
, and 0.5 acre in the Neuse River Basin.
D. Development
of lots 20,000 square feet or less located in the CI District or utilizing the CI District dimensional standards. For residential uses, CI District density
standards shall apply to any project utilizing the CI district dimensional standards. Additionally, land disturbance shall be less than 12,000 square feet in the Falls Reservoir Watershed
.
E. Development
that does not require review by any City or County department for conformance with the standards of this Ordinance; or does not require a permit such as but not limited to fences or flagpoles. In instances where these types of development
require a certificate of appropriateness (COA) or a special use permit, a site plan
will not be required.
F. Change of use where no additions to buildings or structures, or exterior land improvements, are proposed and the change of use:
1. Does not require additional parking or stacking.
2. Does not require additional landscaping.
3. Does not require a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) or no improvements are required as a result of a TIA analysis.
4. Only requires Architectural Review per Sec. 3.22, Architectural Review.
Development
projects consisting only of public utility
improvements within the public right-of-way
, improvements to the public right-of-way
(repairing, surfacing, striping, widening, stabilizing, landscaping), or other improvements in the right-of-way
where the Planning Director, or designee, determines another City or County approval process verifies conformance to this Ordinance. Exceptions are as follows:
1. In Design Districts, a separate site plan
application can be filed or site plan
review can occur through another technical review by the City or County for that development
project.
2. In local historic districts, a separate site plan
application can be filed or site plan
review can occur through review of the required COA application.
The approving authority is the Planning Director or designee.
1. The approving authority is the Governing Body.
2. Criteria:
a. The request is for approval pursuant to a standard established in the Ordinance that requires Governing Body approval; or
b. Involves the requirement of a major or transportation special use permit; or
c. Is located in a Watershed
Protection Overlay Critical Area (A), as defined in Sec. 4.11, Watershed Protection Overlay, with impervious surface
that exceeds the maximum permitted by the Low Density Option
under Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards.
1. The Planning Director, or designee, is authorized to approve minor changes to the approved site plan
, resulting from field conditions and which result in an equivalent or better performance.
2. Significant changes to the approved site plan
, such as but not limited to a change in access points, relocation of buildings or parking areas, relocation of stormwater
facilities, and changes of use that require different development
standards, shall be resubmitted for site plan
approval as a new site plan
application.
3. Changes to an approved, valid site plan
required as a result of an update to the applicable Flood Insurance
Rate Map(s) (FIRM) or other detailed flood data pursuant to paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, shall be submitted as a site plan
amendment.
4. A site plan
amendment request shall clearly identify the elements for which approval is sought in both text and graphic form. Only those elements so identified shall be reviewed and considered for approval. If any element of an approved plan is changed but not identified, the amendment request shall be denied in its entirety or, if already approved, the amendment shall be deemed null and void in its entirety.
5. Site plan
amendments to plans approved under the 1994 Merged Zoning Ordinance, as amended, shall follow approval procedures of this paragraph 3.7.3C, Site Plan Amendments.
A site plan
shall conform to an approved development plan
except as required under paragraph 3.5.12E, Changes Required by Ordinance or Other Law, or as authorized under paragraph 3.5.12, Deviations from Approved Development Plans, and paragraph 3.5.6C, Authority of the Planning Director.
A. A pre-application conference shall be required pursuant to paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
B. An application for site plan
review shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
C. Site plans
shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable Ordinance requirements, including any variance
obtained pursuant to Sec. 3.14, Variance, and any other applicable development
requirements. Site plan
documents shall contain the information required within the site plan
checklists maintained by the Planning Department unless expressly exempted by another provision of this Ordinance, or unless the Planning Director or designee makes the determination that less detailed information is adequate for review.
D. No processing or review of a site plan
will proceed without the required information.
E. Site plan
applications shall utilize applicable forms maintained by the applicable City, County, or State department or agency
.
F. A site plan
shall conform to an approved development plan
except as required under paragraph 3.5.12D, Changes Required by Ordinance or Other Law, or as authorized under paragraph 3.5.12, Deviations from Approved Development Plans, and paragraph 3.5.6C, Authority of the Planning Director.
G. All requirements imposed through a site plan
shall run with the land and shall apply against any owner
, subsequent owner
, or occupant.
A. Site plans
can be considered for final approval only after all comments have been satisfied as determined by the applicable reviewing department or agency
.
B. Approved plans shall be stamped, signed
, and dated by the approving authority or designee.
After an approved copy of the site plan
is received by the Inspections Director or designee, building
permits may be issued for the project. No building permit
may be issued until the required site plan
is approved.
Inspections of site improvements shall be made by the entity responsible for such improvements as required to certify compliance with approved site plans
. No improvements shall be accepted for maintenance by the governing jurisdiction unless and until the requirements regarding public improvements have been met.
Improvements specified in the approved plan shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of compliance
unless an extension of compliance has been prepared and approved in conformance with the requirements of this Ordinance.
Applications for major special use permits may be submitted concurrently with a site plan
.
However, decisions shall be rendered with a separate motion.
Construction drawings shall be approved in accordance with the approved site plan
.
A. An approved site plan
shall retain its validity for four years, and shall remain valid if:
1. A permit to begin development
pursuant to the site plan
, such as a land disturbance permit, a building permit
, or an improvement permit, has been issued and has remained continuously valid thereafter; and,
2. Building
or land disturbing activity
has begun on the property.
B. The issuance of a building permit
or a certificate of compliance
within a phase of a project shall not extend the validity of the site plan
for the unbuilt portions of that phase or any future phases of the project for which building
permits have not been issued.
C. Requests for extensions of validity for site plans
approved under the previous 1994 Merged Zoning Ordinance, as amended, shall comply with the review criteria specified within that ordinance. The approving authority, however, shall be the Planning Director or designee, utilizing the same findings specified in that Ordinance.
D. Site plan
amendments shall not extend the validity of the original, approved site plan
.
E. Validity may be extended if vesting is determined per Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights.
A. If required under Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, an approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
and/or a land-disturbing permit shall be obtained before commencing land-disturbing activity.
B. Pursuant to Sec. 113A-57(4) of the North Carolina Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act of 1973, no person
shall initiate any land-disturbing activity that will disturb more than one acre or requires a sedimentation
and erosion control plan
under Sec. 12.10 unless, 30 or more days prior to initiating the activity, an erosion
and sedimentation
control plan for the activity is filed with and approved by the County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
.
1. A sedimentation
and erosion control plan
shall be filed with the County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
by either hard copy or digitally. A digital copy of approved construction drawings and approved site plan
, where applicable, shall also be provided upon their approval.
2. A sedimentation
and erosion control plan
shall contain site drawings, vicinity maps, assumptions, calculations, narrative statements, and a construction sequence as needed to adequately describe the proposed development
and the measures proposed to comply with the requirements of this Article.
3. A sedimentation
and erosion control plan
shall be prepared by, and bear the seal and signature of, a registered professional engineer, registered landscape architect, registered architect, registered land surveyor, or certified professional in erosion
and sediment
control. The County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee may, however, deem such a seal and signature not necessary due to site simplicity (as the absence of sensitive geographical features and receiving watercourses
) and the limited nature of the sedimentation
and erosion
control measures required. In the case of a single-family
lot in a common plan of development
where the developer
and builder are different, such a seal and signature is not required unless there is a design feature requiring such under federal or State law or regulation.
4. The approval of sedimentation
and erosion control plan
is conditioned on the applicant’s compliance with Federal, State and local water quality laws, regulations, and rules.
5. An approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
shall be kept on file at the job site.
1. A land-disturbing permit may be obtained by submitting the following:
a. Applicable fee;
b. Verification of an approved site plan
or written approval issued by the Durham City-County Planning Department;
c. Completed Durham County Financial Responsibility/Ownership Form With Landowner Consent Form (FRO);
d. Approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
, if required;
e. Improvement security, if required;
f. Certification that tree protection fencing has been installed, if required; and
g. Approval of the proposed project by the City or County as applicable.
2. No permit shall be issued until such time as the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee is assured that the proposed land-disturbing activity will be carried out in accordance with this section and Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, and the approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
, if required. A land-disturbing permit application may be disapproved for the same reasons that a sedimentation
and erosion control plan
may be disapproved, as set forth in paragraph 3.8.7, Disapproval of Plan, of this Ordinance.
3. The Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee shall require security to assure performance of the conditions of the permit whenever a land-disturbing activity is in excess of five acres or whenever the Officer
or designee determines that the activity may result in significant off-site damage. The applicant shall file with the Officer
or designee an improvement security in the form of a performance bond or letter of credit. The amount shall be that which the Officer
or designee deems sufficient to cover all costs of protection or other improvements required for conformity with standards specified in this section and Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control. The security may be adjusted or released as the amount of disturbed area changes. The security shall be released when the Officer
or designee has certified that all of the requirements of such sections have been met. Forfeiture of the improvement security shall not release the person
conducting the land disturbing activity
of their obligation to install and maintain necessary erosion
control measures, to stabilize the site, or any other obligation of this section or Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control, or any rule or order promulgated in furtherance thereof.
4. Prior to initiating land-disturbing activity, the permitee shall notify the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
of the date that such activity will begin.
5. A land-disturbing permit issued shall be prominently displayed at the job site until all construction is completed, all permanent sedimentation
and erosion
control measures are removed, and the site has been stabilized as required.
The fees charged for the administration and enforcement of this Article shall be as prescribed by the Board of Commissioners.
A. The County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee shall review each complete sedimentation
and erosion control plan
submitted and within 30 days of receipt shall notify the person
submitting the plan that it has been approved, approved with modifications, or disapproved. Failure to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a complete plan within 30 days of receipt shall be deemed approval. Failure to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a revised plan within 15 days of receipt shall be deemed approval. Disapproval of a plan must specifically state in writing the reasons for disapproval.
B. If, following commencement of a land-disturbing activity pursuant to an approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
, the County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee determines that the plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of this section or Sec. 12.10, Sedimentation and Erosion Control, the Officer
or designee may require such revisions as it deems necessary to comply with such sections. Failure to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a revised plan within 15 days of receipt shall be deemed approval. Pending approval of a revised plan, work shall cease or shall continue only as authorized by the Officer
or designee.
C. The County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee shall review each permit application that does not require an approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
and within 14 calendar days of receipt shall notify the person
submitting the application that it has been issued or denied.
When deemed necessary by the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
, or designee, a preconstruction conference may be required.
The landowner, the financially responsible party, or the landowner’s or the financially responsible party’s agent of all permit holders, except for individual residential lots smaller than 1 acre, shall perform an inspection of the area covered by the plan after each phase of the plan has been completed and after establishment of temporary ground cover
in accordance with Sec. 12.10. The person
who performs the inspection shall maintain and make available a record of the inspection at the site of the land-disturbing activity. The record shall set out any significant deviation from the approved erosion control plan
, identify any measures that may be required to correct the deviation, and document the completion of those measures. The record shall be maintained until permanent ground cover
has been established as required by the approved erosion
and sedimentation
control plan. The inspections required by this subsection shall be in addition to inspections conducted by the Durham County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
.
A. An erosion control plan
may be disapproved upon a finding that an applicant, or a parent
, subsidiary
or other affiliate
of the applicant:
1. Is conducting or has conducted land-disturbing activity without an approved plan;
2. Has received notice of violation
of a plan previously approved by the North Carolina Sedimentation
Control Commission or a local government pursuant to the North Carolina Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act of 1973, as amended, and all rules and orders adopted pursuant to it (the Act) or local ordinance adopted pursuant to the Act, and has not or had not complied with the notice within the time specified in the notice;
3. Has failed to pay a civil penalty assessed pursuant to the Act or a local ordinance adopted pursuant to the Act by the time the payment is due; or
4. Has failed to substantially comply with State rules or local ordinances and regulations adopted pursuant to the Act.
B. For purposes of this subsection, an applicant’s record may be considered for only the two years prior to the application date.
C. Any person
engaged in land-disturbing activity who fails to file a plan in accordance with this Article, or who conducts a land-disturbing activity except in accordance with provisions of an approved plan, shall be deemed in violation
of this Article.
Applications for amendment of an erosion control plan
in written and/or graphic form may be made at any time under the same conditions as described in this section for a new application. Until such time as such amendment is approved by the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee, the land-disturbing activity shall not proceed except in accordance with the erosion control plan
as originally approved.
A. Except as provided in paragraph B. of this subsection, the appeal
of a disapproval or approval with modifications of a plan shall be governed by the following provisions:
1. The disapproval or modification of any proposed erosion control plan
or the refusal to issue a land-disturbing permit by the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee shall entitle the person
submitting the plan, or applying for the permit, to a hearing if such person
submits written demand to the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for a hearing within 15 days after receipt of written notice of disapproval or modifications. The written demand must specify, with particularity, the factual and/or legal basis for the appeal
. No grounds, other than those so specified, may be argued;
2. Hearings held pursuant to this section shall be conducted by the Board of Commissioners within 15 days after the date of the appeal
or request for a hearing, or at the next regularly scheduled meeting, whichever is later; and
3. If the Board of Commissioners upholds the disapproval or modification of a proposed erosion control plan
or refusal to issue a permit following the public hearing, the person
submitting the plan or permit application shall then be entitled to appeal
the Board of Commissioners’ decision to the State Sedimentation
Control Commission as provided in NCGS § 113A-61(c) and Title 15 NCAC 4B.0018(d).
In the event that an erosion control plan
is disapproved pursuant to paragraph 3.8.7, Disapproval of Plan, the County Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Office
shall notify the Director of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (within the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality [DEQ]) of such disapproval within ten days. The Office
shall advise the applicant and the Director in writing as to the specific reasons that the plan was disapproved. The applicant may appeal
the Office
’s disapproval of the plan pursuant to paragraph 3.8.7, Disapproval of Plan, directly to the State Sedimentation
Control Commission.
A. A land-disturbing permit shall expire at the end of:
1. One year from the date of issuance if no land-disturbing activity has been undertaken
in that period. No land-disturbing activity may take place following expiration until the person
responsible has applied for, and received, a new land-disturbing permit. The fee for the new permit shall be 100% of the current applicable fee; or
2. A two-year period, unless it is extended by the Sedimentation
and Erosion
Control Officer
or designee upon written request of the permit holder. The request for extension shall include reasons for incompletion of the work. After review of the original plan and an on-site inspection of the completed work, the permit may be extended effective for a period not to exceed six months from the date of expiration of the original permit. The fee for the extended permit shall be 25% of the current applicable fee. If work cannot be completed and the site permanently stabilized prior to expiration of the permit extension, then a new land-disturbing permit must be applied for and obtained as described in this section.
B. An approved sedimentation
and erosion control plan
for which no permit has been issued shall expire one year from the approval date. If a plan has been disapproved, a revised plan must be submitted within one year from the disapproval date or the file will be closed.
Land disturbance permits may be transferred from one financially responsible party to another within the permit term. Transfer of a permit does not extend the permit term.
1. In order to transfer a land disturbance permit from one financially responsible party to another, the following documents must be submitted under the name of the new financially responsible party:
a. Completed Durham County Financial Responsibility/Ownership Form with Landowner Consent Form (FRO);
b. Improvement security, if required.
2. Transfer of permit shall include entirety of original permitted area, unless approved in writing by the Durham County Erosion
Control Office
.
For land-disturbing activities on a single-family
residential lot involving new construction
with land disturbance of less than one acre where the builder or developer
is the owner
of the lot being developed
and the person
financially responsible for the land-disturbing activity, the financial responsibility for land-disturbing activity on that lot transfers to the new owner
upon the builder's or developer
's conveyance of the lot to the new owner
, recording of the deed in the office
of the register of deeds, and notification to the Durham County Erosion
control Office
.
A. Special uses within the zoning districts are considered to be uses which are appropriate in a particular zoning district but because of their potential for incompatibility with surrounding uses require individual review.
B. A minor special use permit shall be required for all minor special uses as set forth in the use table in Sec. 5.1, Use Table, and as may be specified elsewhere in this Ordinance. Minor special use permits require approval by the Board of Adjustment, except pursuant to paragraph 3.9.1E, below.
C. A major special use permit shall be required for all major special uses as set forth in the use table in Sec. 5.1, Use Table; for spray irrigation in a conservation subdivision
pursuant to paragraph 6.2.4, Conservation Subdivision; and as specified elsewhere in this Ordinance. Major special use permits require approval by the appropriate governing body.
D. A transportation special use permit shall be required for development
projects with corresponding site plans
and preliminary plats
pursuant to paragraph 3.9.10, Transportation Special Use Permit. Transportation special use permits require approval by the appropriate governing body.
E. Projects that require not only a major and/or transportation special use permit, but also a minor special use permit, may have the use permits consolidated into a single hearing before the appropriate governing body so long as all required findings for each special use permit are made. Separate orders for each special use permit shall be issued.
All applicants applying for a special use permit shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
All applications for special use permits shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
Once the application has been determined complete, the Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give public notice as set forth in paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
The Planning Director or designee shall prepare a report that reviews the special use permit in light of any requirements of this Ordinance. A copy shall be provided to the Board of Adjustment or the governing body, as appropriate, and the applicant.
A. Prior to scheduling the public hearing on the minor special use permit, the corresponding site plan
or architectural review application, as applicable, shall be ready for action by the approving authority.
B. The applicant seeking the special use permit shall have the burden of presenting evidence sufficient to allow the approving authority to reach the conclusions set forth below, as well as the burden of persuasion on those issues.
C. After conducting the public hearing and hearing the recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, the Board of Adjustment shall:
1. Approve the request;
2. Approve the request with conditions.
3. Deny the request; or
4. Continue the hearing.
D. Conditions may be incorporated as part of the approval of the special use permit to assure that adequate mitigation measures are associated with the use or design pursuant to NCGS §160D-705(c), as applicable. The conditions shall become a part of the minor special use permit approval. Violations
of any of the conditions shall be treated in the same manner as other violations
of this Ordinance.
A. Prior to scheduling the public hearing on the major or transportation special use permit, the corresponding site plan
shall be ready for action by the approving authority.
B. After conducting the public hearing and hearing the recommendations of the Planning Director, Transportation Director, or their designee as appropriate, the governing body shall:
1. Approve the request;
2. Approve the request with conditions.
3. Deny the request; or
4. Continue the hearing.
C. The governing body may place conditions on the use as part of the approval to assure that adequate mitigation measures are associated with the use. The conditions shall become a part of the major special use permit approval. Violations
of any of the conditions shall be treated in the same manner as other violations
of this Ordinance.
Unless otherwise specified in this Ordinance, applications for major or minor special use permits shall be approved only if the approving authority finds that the use as proposed, or the use as proposed with conditions, is:
1. In harmony with the area and not substantially injurious to the value of properties in the general vicinity;
2. In conformance with all special requirements applicable to the use;
3. Will not adversely affect the health or safety of the public; and
4. Will adequately address the review factors identified below.
The applicant shall demonstrate that the review factors listed below have been adequately addressed. If an application is denied, the approving authority shall specify which of these review factors, if any, were not adequately addressed.
Number and location of access points to the property and the proposed structures and uses, with particular reference to automotive, bicycle, mass transit and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
Location of off-street parking and loading areas
.
Locations of refuse and service areas
with particular reference to ingress and egress of service vehicles
.
Locations of exterior lighting with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility with other property in the area.
Appropriateness of signs
considering location, color, height, size, and design within the context of other property in the area.
Location and availability of utilities.
Location of required yards
and other open spaces
and preservation of existing trees and other natural features.
Preservation of tree cover, Durham Inventory
Sites, floodplain, stream buffers
, wetlands
, steep slopes, open space
and other natural features, and protection of water quality.
Installation of screening
, buffering, fencing and landscaping where necessary to protect adjacent
property.
Effects of the proposed use on nearby properties, including, but not limited to, the effects of noise, odor, lighting, and traffic.
The level of general compatibility with nearby properties and impacted neighborhoods, including but not limited to the appropriateness of the scale, design, and use in relationship to other properties.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
and applicable development
tier guidelines, overlay purposes, and zoning district intent statements in Article 4, Zoning Districts.
Any other review factors which the approving authority considers to be appropriate to the property in question.
The applicant for a minor special use permit under this section shall demonstrate that the additional review factors listed below have been adequately addressed. If the application is denied, the Board of Adjustment shall specify which of these review factors, if any, were not adequately addressed.
1. Susceptibility of the proposed facility, structure
, or other development
and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual property owner
and others as a result of flood damage;
2. Importance of the services provided by the proposed facility, structure
, or other development
to the community;
3. Necessity to the facility, structure
, or other development
of a waterfront location, where applicable;
4. Compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development
;
5. Safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles
;
6. Expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment
transport of the flood waters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site;
7. Costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions including maintenance and repair of public utilities
and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems, and streets and bridges;
8. Relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for that area;
9. The proposed fill or development
provides for a better balance between overall efficiency of the site design and improved conservation elsewhere on the site than would be possible without intrusion into the floodway fringe
, non-encroachment area fringe
, Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas, or Areas of Shallow Flooding Zone
e AO);
10. The proposed fill or development
represents the minimum amount of floodway fringe
, non-encroachment area fringe
, Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas, or Areas of Shallow Flooding Zone
e AO) intrusion to achieve this better balance; and
11. Any other relevant factors, technical evaluations, or standards specified in other sections of this Ordinance.
A transportation special use permit shall be required for development
projects that are expected to generate:
1. 600 or more vehicle
trips at peak hour; or
2. 300 or more vehicle
trips at peak hour, if any road
serving the project is operating at a level of service
lower than the jurisdiction’s adopted level of service
.
The following projects shall be exempt from the requirement of a transportation special use permit, even if they meet or exceed the thresholds specified above.
1. Projects that do not require a TIA per Sec. 3.3, Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
2. Projects within the UC, UC-2, or SRP zoning districts.
3. Projects outside of the City jurisdiction.
4. Projects which have submitted a TIA in connection with a zoning map change with a development plan
, and which are developing
consistent with the approved development plan
, if the TIA is valid pursuant to paragraph 3.3.6, Period of Validity.
5. Schools as defined in NCGS §160A-307.1.
Applications for a transportation special use permit shall be approved only if the governing body makes the following findings:
1. The traffic generated by the development
and associated improvements to the street system will not have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding area. Significant adverse impact shall include:
a. Substantial increases in traffic on local residential streets
such that the majority of the traffic is not associated with the residential properties which front on the street; or
b. The need to widen local residential streets
, which would detract significantly from the character or basic function of the nearby streets.
2. Adequate provisions have been made for safe and efficient vehicular circulation, parking and loading, and pedestrian access.
3. The traffic generated by the proposed development
and any proposed improvements to the street system will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Significant adverse impacts shall include but not be limited to undue concentration of air pollutants, or excessive noise or vibrations.
4. The traffic generated by the development
can be accommodated by the existing or funded transportation system, or adequate traffic mitigation measures have been proposed as part of the development
application. Proposed mitigation measures shall become conditions of the special use permit. The adopted level of service
for the adjacent
roadways may be considered in making this determination but shall not be the sole factor considered by the governing body.
An application for a special use permit may be reviewed concurrently with a zoning map change application. However, decisions shall be rendered with separate motions.
An application for a special use permit which has been denied may be resubmitted if there has been a change in circumstances, as determined by the Planning Director or designee.
A special use permit shall become null and void in any of the following cases:
A. If a site plan
or architectural review, as applicable, is not approved within 12 months of the date of permit approval.
B. If an approved site plan
, architectural review application, or building permit
expires.
C. If a building permit
is not issued within two years of the date of approval
, in cases where a corresponding site plan
or architectural review is not required.
D. If a substantial violation
of the conditions of the permit, as determined by the Planning Director or designee occurs. The addition of language to the special use permit regarding such voiding shall not be required.
E. Validity may be extended if vesting is determined per Sec. 3.20, Vested Rights.
Appeal
from final action can be taken by filing a petition for certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
A. Certain signs
shall be allowed without sign
permits (as set forth in Article 11, Signs). Signs
requiring permits shall be allowed in accordance with the following procedures.
Commentary: A common signage plan
may be required before a sign
permit can be issued (see Sec. 3.11, Common and Way-Finding Signage Plans).
B. Internally oriented
signs
not legible from the public right-of-way
shall not require a sign
permit; however, electrical or other permits may be required.
A. Except as provided in Article 11, Signs, no sign
may be erected, moved, enlarged, or altered except in accordance with this Ordinance and pursuant to the issuance of a sign
permit.
B. A sign
permit application shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
A. Upon review of the application, the Planning Director or designee shall approve the sign
permit provided the sign
meets all requirements of this Ordinance, and all other applicable electrical and North Carolina Building
Code requirements.
B. Signs
shall be installed in accordance with the approved sign
permit within one year of the date of official permit approval or the permit shall expire and require a new sign
permit application and approval. The Planning Director or designee may extend the validity of the sign
permit with documentation that a good faith effort is being made to install and receive final approval of the subject sign
(s).
A. The applicant shall request an inspection after installation of the signs
.
B. If the signs
are found to be in compliance, the applicant shall receive a permanent seal which identifies the sign
. The applicant shall attach the identification in a conspicuous location which is accessible to the Planning Director or designee. It is recommended that businesses place the permit in a lower corner of the front door of the business in those cases where the seal is not affixed to the sign
.
C. The sign
permit shall be null and void if sign
installation is not completed within six months or the signs
are not in conformance with the approved application.
D. Valid sign
permits may be assigned to a successor as holder of a business license for the same premises.
A temporary sign
permit shall be issued in accordance with Article 11, Signs. A common signage plan
pursuant to Sec. 3.11, Common and Way-Finding Signage Plans, shall not be required for applications for temporary sign
permits.
Final action on a sign
permit can be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
A. A common signage plan
is required for all signs
for one or more buildings or businesses within a unified development
complex, as demonstrated through a development plan
or approved site plan
(s), even if the property is subdivided and has various owners
.
1. Approval of a common signage plan
is required prior to the issuance of a sign
permit.
2. Internally-oriented signs
not visible from the public right-of-way
shall not be required to be included in a common signage plan
.
3. Applications for temporary sign
permits shall not be required to submit an approved common signage plan
.
4. Common signage plans
are not required in UC, UC-2, and Design districts and in a local Historic Districts Overlay. (County Only) Common signage plans
are not required in the SRP-C District.
B. A way-finding signage plan
is required to allow signs
pursuant to paragraph 11.6.2A.9, Way-Finding Signs.
1. Approval of a way-finding signage plan
is required prior to the issuance of a sign
permit.
2. A way-finding signage plan
can be approved separately, or as part of, a common signage plan
.
3. Internally-oriented signs
not visible from the public right-of-way
shall not be required to be included in a way-finding signage plan
.
4. (County Only) Way-finding signage plans
are not required in the SRP-C District.
A. The elements of common and way-finding signage plans
shall be in accordance with Sec. 11.8, Elements of Common and Way-Finding Signage Plans.
B. Common and way-finding signage plan
applications shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
C. Additional requirements are listed in Sec. 11.7, Landmark Signs.
A. The Planning Director, or designee, is the approving authority for common and way-finding signage plans
.
B. The Planning Director, or designee, may allow modifications to the lettering style of a common signage plan
to accommodate state and federally registered trademarks (logos) if the Planning Director, or designee, determines that the intent of the common signage plan
requirements shall be maintained. In allowing the modifications, the Planning Director, or designee, may limit the logo size.
C. Minor alterations in sign
locations resulting from unexpected conditions on the site may be approved by the Planning Director, or designee.
A. Revisions or amendments to a common signage plan
shall require documentation of notification to all owners
and tenants on the property prior to approval. The notification shall indicate the proposed changes and shall be mailed between 10 to 25 days prior to application submittal.
B. Signs
erected after September 1, 1989, and subsequently made nonconforming because of an amendment to a common signage plan
shall be brought into compliance with the amended plan within six months of approval of the amended plan.
Final action on a common or way-finding signage plan
can be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
A. Temporary uses occurring on property outside of the public right-of-way
shall be allowed upon the issuance of a temporary use permit, except as set forth in, Sec. 5.5, Temporary Uses.
Commentary: Standards for specific uses are included in Sec. 5.5, Temporary Uses.
B. The provisions of this section shall not apply to temporary uses occurring within the public right-of-way
.
Commentary: For further details on temporary uses occurring within the public right-of-way
see the applicable City or County Code.
A temporary use permit application shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
A. After receiving the application, the Planning Director or designee shall have up to 30 days to review the application.
B. Upon hearing recommendations from all appropriate departments, the Planning Director or designee shall approve the issuance of a temporary use permit subject to the following:
1. No lighting or electrical service shall be provided without an electrical permit;
2. No temporary use structure
shall be erected without a building permit
;
3. No temporary use structure
shall block
fire lanes or pedestrian or vehicular access;
4. The site of the temporary use shall be cleared of all debris at the end of the temporary use. All temporary structures shall be cleared from the site within five days after the use is terminated;
5. Written permission of the property owner
for the temporary use shall be provided;
6. Adequate parking shall be provided, considering both the required parking for other uses and the parking for the proposed temporary use;
7. Adequate traffic control measures shall be provided;
8. Required landscaped and vegetated areas remain undisturbed;
9. Adequate provisions for trash disposal
and sanitary facilities shall be provided; and
10. When appropriate, adequate provisions for crowd control shall be provided.
C. Temporary use permits may be renewed one time by the Planning Director or designee, unless other renewal standards are specified in Sec. 5.5, Temporary Uses, or in other provisions of this section.
A temporary use permit shall be revoked if the Planning Director or designee finds that the terms of the permit have been violated
or that there is a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare.
Final action on a temporary use permit can be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
A home occupation
(see paragraph 5.4.4) shall require a permit, as set forth below.
A home occupation
application shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirements.
Upon review of the application, the Planning Director, or designee, shall approve the home occupation
permit, provided the home occupation
meets all requirements of this Ordinance.
The home occupation
permit shall be revoked if the home occupation
is found to be in violation
of the requirements of this Ordinance.
Final action on a home occupation
permit can be appealed
in accordance with Sec. 3.15, Appeal of Administrative Decision.
A. The Board of Adjustment may vary certain requirements of this Ordinance, in harmony with the general purpose of these regulations, where unnecessary hardships would result from carrying out the strict letter of the Ordinance.
B. Despite the above and pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0233 and 15A NCAC 02B .0267, a “major variance
” from the requirements of Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, including where incorporated by reference, shall be granted only by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. A “minor variance
” may be granted by the approval authority in accordance with paragraph 8.5.12, Variances.
C. No variance
shall be granted that would have the effect of allowing a use not permitted in the use table in Sec. 5.1, Use Table, by Sec. 8.4, Floodplain and Flood Damage Protection Standards, or elsewhere within this Ordinance.
Commentary: Variances
may be granted for, among other things, height, structure
size, lot dimensions, and setbacks
.
An application for a variance
shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
Once the application has been determined complete, the Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give public notice as forth in paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
The applicant seeking the variance
shall have the burden of presenting evidence sufficient to allow the Board of Adjustment to reach the conclusions set forth below, as well as the burden of persuasion on those issues.
The Planning Director, or designee, shall provide the Board of Adjustment with a copy of the application and all relevant materials pertaining to the request prior to the public hearing.
A. Each decision shall be accompanied by a finding of fact by the Board of Adjustment which specifies the reasons for the decision.
B. The Board of Adjustment may approve the request, deny the request, or continue the request. In approving the variance
, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe reasonable and appropriate conditions provided that the conditions are reasonably related to the variance
.
In granting any variance
, the Board of Adjustment shall make the following findings:
A. Unnecessary hardship would result from the strict application of the Ordinance. It shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the variance
, no reasonable use can be made of the property.
B. The hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the property, such as location, size, or topography. Hardships resulting from personal
circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from conditions that are common to the neighborhood or the general public, may not be the basis for granting a variance
.
C. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the applicant or the property owner
. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that circumstances exist that may justify granting a variance
shall not be regarded as a self-created hardship.
D. The requested variance
is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the Ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved.
A. A request for a variance
from any requirement of Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards, that violates
any provision in Title 15 NCAC 2B, Sections .0100, .0200, and .0300, as amended, shall be first heard by the Board of Adjustment in accordance with this section and after notification of the appropriate governing body, except that a request for a variance
from the requirements of Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, as referenced by paragraph 8.7.2E, Riparian Buffers, shall proceed under paragraph 8.5.12, Variances. A recommendation from the Board of Adjustment for a variance
shall constitute a request by the local government for a variance
from the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. Such variances
shall be considered “major variances
” in accordance with Title 15A NCAC .0104(r).
B. For all variance
requests from Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards, except those from Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, as referenced therein, the local government with jurisdiction shall notify and allow reasonable comment period for all local governments having jurisdiction within the watershed
area of the water supply source and the entity using the water supply for consumption.
C. The Planning Director, or designee, shall keep a record of variances
to Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards. This record of variances
, not including those from Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, as referenced in Sec. 8.7, shall be submitted to the Division of Water Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality by January 1st of each year. The record shall provide a description of each project receiving a variance
and the reasons for granting a variance
. The record of variances
from Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards shall be included in the annual report to the North Carolina Division of Water Resources summarizing activities implementing the requirements of that section.
A variance
shall become null and void in any of the following cases:
A. If a site plan
, preliminary plat
, or architectural review is not approved within 12 months of the date of approval
of the variance
.
B. If an approved site plan
, preliminary plat
, architectural review, or building permit
expires.
C. In cases when a site plan
, preliminary plat
, or architectural review is not required:
1. If a building permit
is not issued within two years of the date of approval
.
2. If the Ordinance standard subject to the variance
has been amended prior to the issuance of a building permit
.
D. If a substantial violation
of the conditions of the variance
approval is determined by the Planning Director or designee.
A. A written notice of appeal
of an administrative decision shall be filed as an application specifying the grounds for the appeal
, and in accordance with other applicable provisions of paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
B. The appeal
shall be considered filed when the complete application is delivered to the Durham City-County Planning Director. The date and time of filing shall be entered on the notice application.
A. A person
or party with standing shall have 30 days from receipt of the written determination to file an appeal
, or 30 days from receipt from any source of actual or constructive notice of the determination, pursuant to NCGS § 160D-405(d).
B. The official who made the decision shall provide it in writing to the owner
of the property that is the subject of the decision and to the party who sought the decision, if different than the owner
. The written decision shall be delivered by personal
delivery, electronic mail, or by first class mail.
Once the application has been submitted, the Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing at the first available Board of Adjustment meeting and give public notice pursuant to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
A. The Planning Director or designee shall transmit to the Board of Adjustment all the documents and exhibits constituting the record upon which the action appealed
from is taken.
B. The Planning Director or designee shall provide a copy of the record to the appellant and to the owner
of the property that is subject to the appeal
, if different than the appellant.
The Board of Adjustment may reverse or affirm (wholly or partly) or may modify the decision appealed
from and shall make any order, requirement, decision, or determination that ought to be made in the case before it. To this end, the Board of Adjustment shall have all the powers of the official from whom the appeal
is taken.
A. An appeal
of a notice of violation
or other enforcement order stays enforcement of the action appealed
from, including any accumulation of fines, during the pendency of the appeal
to the Board of Adjustment and any subsequent appeal
in accordance with NCGS §160D-1402, or during pendency of any civil proceeding authorized by law, including NCGS §160D-1403.1, or appeals
therefrom, unless the official who made the decision certifies to the Board of Adjustment after notice of appeal
has been filed that because of the facts stated in an affidavit, a stay would cause imminent peril to life or property; or because the violation
is transitory in nature, a stay would seriously interfere with enforcement of the Ordinance. In that case, enforcement proceedings shall not be stayed except by a restraining order, which may be granted by a court.
B. If enforcement proceedings are not stayed, the appellant may file a request for an expedited hearing of the appeal
, and the Board of adjustment shall meet to hear the appeal
within 15 days after such a request is filed.
C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, appeals
of decisions granting a development
approval or otherwise affirming that a proposed use of property is consistent with the Ordinance shall not stay the further review of an application for permits or permissions to use such property; in these situations, the appellant may request and the Board may grant a stay of a final decision of permit applications or building
permits affected by the issue being appealed
.
Appeal
from the Board of Adjustment action can be taken by filing a petition in the nature of certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
A. The City Council and the Board of Commissioners, as applicable, may designate an area as an historic district or a property as an historic landmark, or amend or remove a local historic district designation or landmark designation.
B. A property owner or owners
may request an area to be designated as an historic district or that a property be designated as an historic landmark, or to amend or remove a local historic district designation or landmark designation.
Petitions to initiate the establishment of a local historic district are granted or denied by the applicable governing body, depending upon jurisdiction. Petitions shall first be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC), which shall make a recommendation to the governing body as to whether the governing body should or should not initiate the request. If the governing body initiates the request, staff will proceed as directed with the designation of a local historic district zoning overlay (-H), including development
of the required Historic District Preservation Plan.
Commentary: As noted below, the HPC must consider findings before sending the request to the governing body. The governing body will consider information provided by the applicant, the HPC, and staff. Information provided by the applicant will include a percent of property owner
support for the designation, which may factor in the governing body’s decision to initiate the establishment of the proposed historic district designation.
a. Requests to establish a local historic district shall be submitted to the Planning Department, which shall in turn send the request to the HPC for its recommendation to the governing body.
b. The Planning Department shall give notice in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, that a request has been filed and shall be considered by the HPC at a specified date and time.
The HPC shall conduct a preliminary consideration of the request and, at this time, shall make a recommendation to the governing body based upon the following findings:
a. That the area is of special significance in terms of its prehistorical, historical, architectural or cultural importance; and
b. That the area possesses integrity of design, setting, materials, feeling and association.
Upon reviewing information provided by the applicant and staff, and the findings and recommendation from the HPC, the governing body shall determine whether to initiate a formal designation process of the proposed local historic district, including development
of the Historic District Preservation Plan. If the governing body determines a local historic district designation process shall proceed, it shall also determine when staff and the HPC should begin work based upon departmental staffing and work program priorities.
1. An Historic District Preservation Plan shall include an investigation and report describing the significance of the buildings, structures, features, sites, or surroundings included in the proposed historic district and a description of the boundaries of the proposed historic district, in accordance with NCGS §160D-944; principles and design review criteria (guidelines) for certificates of appropriateness as required in NCGS §160D-947; and a preservation strategy tailored to the individual needs of the specific area.
The Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, shall be the adopted principles and design review criteria applicable to all local historic districts, and shall be specifically referenced within the Historic District Preservation Plan.
In accordance with NCGS §160D-944, the NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources shall make an analysis of and recommendations concerning the investigation and report contained in the Historic District Preservation Plan. Failure of the NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources to submit its written analysis and recommendations within 30 days after a written request for such analysis has been received by the Department shall relieve the governing body of any responsibility for awaiting such analysis, and the governing body may at any time thereafter take action on the proposed historic district and Historic District Preservation Plan.
1. The HPC shall conduct a public hearing and give notice in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, on the proposed historic district designation and the Historic District Preservation Plan, prior to making a recommendation for approval or denial to the appropriate governing body.
2. The HPC shall review the proposed historic district designation and the Historic District Preservation Plan and shall recommend to the appropriate governing body denial of the request or designation of the area.
3. The HPC shall forward its recommendation on historic district designation to the Planning Commission and to the governing body with a recommended Historic District Preservation Plan. Consideration of the Historic District Preservation Plan shall be part of the consideration of the historic district designation.
1. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing and give notice in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, on the proposed historic district designation and the Historic District Preservation Plan.
2. The Planning Commission shall review the proposed historic district designation and the Historic District Preservation Plan and shall recommend denial or designation of the area.
1. The governing body shall set a public hearing and shall notify property owners
within the proposed historic district of the public hearing in accordance with the public hearing and notification provisions of paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
2. The governing body, shall hold a public hearing to consider the request to designate the historic district and the adoption of the Historic District Preservation Plan. The protest petition procedures as established for a petition for zoning map change in paragraph 3.5.13, Valid Protest Petition, may apply to the designation or amendment of an historic district.
3. If the governing body denies a request for designating an historic district, property owners
may not initiate a new request to designate an historic district for the same area until at least one year after the governing body’s action to deny the request.
4. When the governing body designates an area as an historic district, the Historic District Preservation Plan for the particular historic district shall become City or County policy and all appropriate public bodies or administrative officials cited as having implementation responsibilities shall be directed to use their best efforts to ensure the effective implementation of the Plan as it is written.
1. An application for an historic landmark designation shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
2. Requests for designation shall include the specific elements of the property for which historic landmark designation is proposed.
1. In accordance with NCGS §160D-946, the HPC shall make or cause to be made an investigation and report on the prehistorical, historical, architectural, educational or cultural significance of each building
, structure
, site area
a or object proposed for designation or acquisition. The investigation and report shall be forwarded to the Office
of Archives and History, North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources.
1. A building
, structure
, site area
a or object may be considered for designation as an historic landmark only if all of the following three criteria are met:
a. The property must not currently be undergoing renovation unless it has been approved for state or federal tax credits in accordance with the Secretary of Interior Standards;
b. The HPC must deem and find that the building
, structure
, site area
a, or object meets at least one of the three following criteria:
(1) Individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places or on the Study List;
(2) Statewide Significance status granted by the State Historic Preservation Office
;
(3) Integrity of location, design, setting, materials, and workmanship, feeling and association on the whole, and:
(a) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local, regional, or national history; or
(b) Is associated with the lives of persons
significant in local, regional, national history; or
(c) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represents the work of a master; possesses high artistic values (i.e., the architecture alone is significant in its own right); or
(d) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to Durham’s history or prehistory.
c. The governing body must deem and find that the property possesses distinction within the context or period of significance.
Commentary: A building
, structure
, site area
a or object whose components lack individual distinction may still be considered a landmark if the whole is significant.
2. A property shall be designated as a historic landmark only with the consent of the property owner or owners
.
1. In accordance with NCGS §160D-946, the HPC shall make or cause to be made an investigation and report on the prehistorical, historical, architectural, educational or cultural significance of each building
, structure
, site area
a or object proposed for designation or acquisition. The investigation and report shall be forwarded to the Division of Archives and History, North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources.
2. The HPC shall hold a public hearing and give notice in accordance to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, on the proposed ordinance of designation. It shall recommend to the governing body, denial of designation or approval of designation of the proposed historic landmark.
In accordance with NCGS §160D-946, the NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources shall make an analysis of and recommendations concerning the investigation and report. Failure of the NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources to submit its written analysis and recommendations within 30 days after a written request for such analysis has been received by the Department shall relieve the governing body of any responsibility for awaiting such analysis, and the governing body may at any time thereafter take action.
1. The governing body, after ensuring that the other governing body has been notified, shall hold a public hearing and give notice in accordance paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, on the proposed ordinance of designation.
2. Following the public hearing, the governing body may adopt the ordinance of designation as proposed, adopt the ordinance of designation with any amendments it deems necessary, or reject the proposal.
Upon compliance with the required procedures of this section, the governing body may, for its respective jurisdiction, adopt and from time to time amend or repeal an ordinance designating one or more historic landmarks. The ordinance shall include the following information:
1. A legal description of each property designated by the ordinance, including the tax identification number for the property. The ordinance shall clearly indicate what elements of the property are designated as an historic landmark. Examples of those elements are a building
’s interior, its exterior, any specific or all outbuildings, other site elements or the entire site;
2. The name or names of the owner
or owners
of the property;
3. A description of those elements of the landmark that are integral to its educational, cultural, historical, architectural or prehistorical value;
4. The land area of the property;
5. A note that structural and site improvements shall require approval of a certificate of appropriateness pursuant to Sec. 3.17, Certificate of Appropriateness, if applicable; and that, for each building
, structure
, site area
a or object, the waiting period set forth in paragraph 3.17.6, COA for Demolition, Destruction and Relocation of this Ordinance shall be observed prior to its demolition; and
6. Any other information the HPC deems necessary.
The ordinance designating the landmark may also provide for suitable markers on the property noting that the landmark has been so designated, including but not limited to signs
, plaques or other appropriate indicators. If the owner
consents, the sign
shall be placed upon the property. If the owner
objects, the sign
shall be placed on a nearby public right-of-way
.
Upon adoption of the ordinance of designation, the following provisions shall apply:
1. The owners
and occupants of each designated historic landmark shall be given written notification of such designation by the Planning Director, or designee, insofar as reasonable diligence permits.
2. One copy of the ordinance and each amendment thereto shall be filed by Planning Director, or designee, in the Office
of the Register of Deeds of Durham County. Each historic landmark designated in the ordinance shall be indexed according to the name of the owner
of the property in the grantee and grantor indexes in the Office
of the Register of Deeds.
3. One copy of the ordinance and each amendment thereto shall be given to the Inspections Director, or designee.
4. For historic landmarks, one copy of the ordinance and each amendment thereto shall be kept on file in the Office
of the City or County Clerk, as appropriate, and made available for public inspection at any reasonable time.
5. The fact that a building
, structure
, site area
a or object has been designated as an historic landmark shall be clearly indicated on all maps maintained by Durham County for tax purposes for such period as the designation remains in effect.
6. The Planning Director, or designee, shall give notice of the adoption of an ordinance of designation and any amendment thereof to the Durham County Tax Supervisor. The designation and any recorded restriction upon the property limiting its use for preservation purposes shall be considered by the Tax Supervisor in appraising it for tax purposes.
1. Designation shall remain applicable to all properties subdivided from the originally designated property.
2. When designated property is recombined with non-designated property, the designation shall remain applicable only to the improvements and portion of property originally designated, and shall not extend to improvements and the portions of the recombined property not originally designated.
The following procedure shall be used to designate signs
as Landmark Signs
. No sign
shall be considered a Landmark Sign
unless it has received that designation through this process.
1. An application for a landmark sign
designation shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
2. The Planning Director, or designee, shall forward the application and all supporting material to the Historic Preservation Commission.
3. The applications shall be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission. The Commission shall review the application and may designate the sign
as a Landmark Sign
, deny the designation, or request additional information in order to make a decision. A sign
which is denied a designation shall be considered a nonconforming sign
which shall be removed.
4. If the sign
is designated as a Landmark Sign
, a copy of the application shall be submitted to the Inspections Department.
5. The Planning Department shall issue a sign
permit for the sign
if the sign
is found to be structurally safe. Landmark Signs
shall conform to all other provisions of this section not in conflict with the privileges of the landmark designation.
6. Landmark signs
shall be subject to the privileges and regulations of Sec. 11.7, Landmark Signs, but Article 11, Sign Standards, shall otherwise not apply.
1. The Historic Preservation Commission may establish a schedule to review applications for Landmark Sign
designations.
2. To qualify as a Landmark Sign
, the sign
shall meet all of the following criteria:
a. Be recognized as important to the culture or history of the jurisdiction, or possess unique characteristics, or incorporate materials or craftsmanship not commonly found in newer signs
.
b. Bear a close resemblance to its appearance when it was installed.
c. The current state of the sign
is determined to be structurally sound, and it does not pose a safety hazard due to its location relative to street intersections or by extension into the public right-of-way
.
d. The HPC may impose conditions on the approval of a designation to address safety issues, required maintenance, or required preservation of the sign
.
A. A petition to remove a local historic district overlay designation on property, along with revision to the applicable preservation plan, shall follow the same procedures for a zoning map change, and shall also require the following prior a public hearing with the Planning Commission:
1. The petition shall be sent to the State Historic Preservation Office
for a review consistent with paragraph 3.16.2C, Action by the NC Department of Cultural Resources.
2. A public hearing for review and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Commission consistent with paragraph 3.16.2D, Action by the Historic Preservation Commission.
B. The governing body may repeal an ordinance designating an historic district or an historic landmark. The repeal process shall be consistent with the adoption process prescribed within NCGS §160D-946. The governing body’s action to repeal an ordinance of designation shall include the reasons for the repeal and a review by the State Historic Preservation Office
.
C. When such repeal occurs, the Planning Director, or designee, shall notify the HPC and the property owner or owners
. When such repeal occurs of an historic landmark designation, the Planning Director, or designee, shall also notify the Register of Deeds for Durham County and the Durham County Tax Supervisor.
A.
From and after the designation of an historic district or historic landmark, no exterior feature or designated portion of any building
or other site work (including masonry walls, fences, light fixtures, steps, pavement, above-ground utility and mechanical equipment, signs
, landscaping, and other appurtenant features) shall be erected, altered, restored, moved or demolished within a historic district or on such historic landmark until after an application for a certificate of appropriateness (COA) as to the exterior feature or designated portion has been submitted to and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC).
B. Work done by the City and County and by public utility
companies shall be subject to the provisions of this section.
C. For the purposes of this section, the term "exterior feature" shall include the architectural style, general design, and general arrangement of the exterior of a building
or other structure
, including the kind and texture of the building
material, the size and scale of the building
, and the type and style of all windows, doors, light fixtures, signs
and other appurtenant features. In the case of outdoor advertising signs
, the term "exterior features" shall be construed to mean the style, material, size and location of all such signs
. These "exterior features" may include historic signs
and significant landscape, archaeological and natural features of the area.
D. For the purposes of this section, the term "designated portion" shall mean any portion of an historic landmark that was included in the ordinance designating the landmark, including the main structure
or structures, the interior or portions of the interior, any outbuildings or secondary structures, site elements and landscaping.
E. A COA shall be required whether or not another permit is required.
1. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior feature in the historic district or on an historic landmark which does not involve a substantial change
in the design, material, or outer appearance thereof, as described in the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended.
2. Nor shall this Ordinance be construed to prevent the construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration or demolition of any such feature which is determined to be a threat to the public safety. The Inspections Director, or designee, shall certify in writing to the approving authority that such action is required for the public safety because of an unsafe or dangerous condition.
3. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent a property owner
from making any use of his or her property not prohibited by other statutes, ordinances or regulations.
4. No certificate of appropriateness shall be required for interior changes. However, this does not excuse the property owner
from obtaining required building
permits for interior work.
The City or the County shall not grant any building permit
or other permit for the purposes of constructing, altering, moving or demolishing any structure
within or on an historic district or historic landmark for which a COA has not been approved.
A. An application for a COA shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
B. An applicant may file with the application any additional relevant information bearing on the application.
A. Pursuant to the HPC rules of procedure, the Planning Director, or designee, may approve or amend COAs for the following activities, or may refer them to the HPC for a decision:
1. Activities expressly authorized by the HPC;
2. Minor design changes to projects for which a COA has been issued by the HPC; or
3. Anything not specifically covered by this section that the Planning Director or designee determines is not so significant as to impair or affect historic, architectural, or aesthetic character.
B. A public hearing or public notice shall not be required unless the application is referred to the HPC for a major works COA.
C. Conformance to the applicable design review criteria within the adopted Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, shall be required in order to approve or amend a COA.
D. Conditions may be placed upon a COA as part of the approval in order to facilitate compliance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended. A violation
of any conditions shall be considered a violation
of the COA.
The HPC shall be the approving authority for any improvement to property within a local historic district or with a local historic landmark designation that requires a COA, but does not qualify as a minor COA.
The Planning Director, or designee, shall notify the members of the HPC at least seven calendar days before its regularly scheduled meeting of any pending applications scheduled for the public hearing.
1. The HPC shall hold a public hearing for a major works COA. Public notice of applications shall be provided pursuant to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
2. As part of its review procedure, the HPC may view the premises and seek the advice of the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources or other expert advice as it may deem necessary under the circumstances.
3. The HPC shall approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or disapprove an application for a major works COA.
4. Prior to final action on an application for a certificate of appropriateness in an historic district, the HPC, using the applicable design review criteria adopted within the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, shall make findings of fact indicating the extent to which the application is or is not consistent with the historic character and qualities of the historic district.
5. Prior to final action on an application for a certificate of appropriateness for an historic landmark, the HPC, using the and applicable design review criteria adopted within the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, shall make findings of fact indicating the extent to which the application is or is not consistent with the historic character and qualities of the historic landmark property.
6. The HPC may not deny a certificate of appropriateness for demolition except as specified in paragraph 3.17.6, COA for Demolition, Destruction and Relocation.
1. For historic districts, the intent of these regulations is to ensure, insofar as possible, that buildings or structures in the historic district shall be in harmony with other building
or structures located therein. However, it is not the intention of these regulations to require the reconstruction or restoration of individual or original buildings or to prohibit the demolition or removal of such buildings or to impose architectural styles from particular historic periods. In considering new construction
, the HPC shall encourage contemporary design which is harmonious with the character of the historic district.
2. In granting a COA, the HPC shall take into account, in accordance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended:
a. The historic or architectural significance of the structure
under consideration in relation to the historic value of the district;
b. The exterior form and appearance of any proposed additions or modifications to that structure
; and
c. The effect of such additions or modifications upon other structures in the vicinity.
3. The HPC may place conditions upon a COA as part of the approval in order to facilitate compliance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended. A violation
of any condition shall be considered a violation
of the COA.
1. In granting a COA, the HPC shall take into account in accordance with the principles and design review criteria adopted for historic landmarks, namely the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended:
a. The historic or architectural significance of the structure
, site or setting under consideration; and
b. The exterior form and appearance of any proposed additions or modifications to the structure
, site or setting.
2. The intent of these regulations is to ensure, insofar as possible, that changes to buildings or structures designated as historic landmarks shall be in harmony with the historic character that was cited as the reasons for designation.
3. The HPC may place conditions upon a COA as part of the approval in order to facilitate compliance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended. A violation
of any condition shall be considered a violation
of the COA.
1. An applicant for a COA may request that the HPC’s consideration of the application be deferred to a specific date.
2. Upon such request, the Planning Director, or designee, shall have the authority to grant the deferral.
3. A request for deferral shall be made in writing to the Planning Director, or designee, at least ten days prior to the scheduled consideration of the application and shall indicate the date to which the deferral is requested and the reasons for the deferral. Only one deferral shall be permitted for each application.
1. Final action shall be taken upon any application for a COA within 180 days after the complete application is submitted to the Planning Director or designee. Such 180-day time period shall include any continuance or deferred consideration by the HPC or deferral granted as requested by the applicant under paragraph 3.17.5E, Deferral of Application. If final action is not taken within such 180-day time period, the application shall be deemed approved.
2. A master COA shall expire four years after the effective date, and all other COAs shall expire two years after the effective date, if:
a. A building permit
or other development
permit has not been issued;
b. A building
or other development
permit has expired; or
c. If work not requiring a permit has not been initiated.
A. An application for a certificate of appropriateness authorizing the demolition, destruction or relocation of a structure
in a designated historic district or of a designated historic landmark shall not be denied. However, the effective date of such a certificate of appropriateness may be delayed for a period of up to 365 days from the date of approval
. This maximum period of delay shall be reduced by the HPC when it finds that the owner
would suffer extreme hardship or be permanently deprived of all beneficial use of or return from such structure
or landmark by virtue of the delay. During such period, the HPC may negotiate with the owner
and with any other parties in an effort to find a means of preserving the structure
or landmark.
B. If the HPC finds that the structure
has no particular significance or value toward maintaining the character of an historic district, it shall waive all or part of such period and authorize earlier demolition or removal.
C. If the HPC finds that the structure
has no particular significance or value toward maintaining the character of an historic district, it shall waive all or part of such period and authorize earlier demolition or removal. An application for demolition, destruction and relocation of a building
, site or structure
determined by the State Historic Preservation Officer
as having statewide significance as defined in the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places may be denied except where the HPC finds that the owner
would suffer extreme hardship or be permanently deprived of all beneficial use or return from such structure
or landmark by virtue of the denial.
A. Rather than obtaining individual COA for each proposed project in an historic district, the City and County and public utility
companies may instead obtain a master COA from the HPC.
B. The provisions of this section that apply to COAs shall also apply to master COAs.
C. In addition to acquiring a master COA, the City and County and any public utility
companies shall notify the City Manager or County Manager, as appropriate, prior to performing any work within any historic district. In emergency situations, as determined by the Inspections Director, or designee, notification by the next work day
is acceptable. Such work shall be done in accordance with the Historic Properties Local Review Criteria, as amended, adopted for the historic district as part of the Historic District Preservation Plan. The City Manager or County Manager, as appropriate, may inspect all work done pursuant to a master COA.
If the HPC denies an application for a COA, a new application affecting the same property may be submitted only if substantial changes
are made in plans for the proposed construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration, moving or demolition, or if conditions related to the historic district or historic landmark or surrounding uses have changed substantially.
The HPC shall use all reasonable efforts to expedite any concurrent process with the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources if such a process is desired by the applicant for the purpose of securing both a certificate of appropriateness and a Federal historic preservation tax credit.
A. Compliance with the terms of a COA shall be enforced by the Inspections Director, or designee. Construction or other work which fails to comply with a COA shall be a violation
of this Ordinance and subject to Article 15, Enforcement. The discontinuance of work for a period of six months shall be considered a failure to comply with a COA.
B. Nothing contained in this section shall prohibit, impair or limit in any way the power of the City or County to prevent the construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration or removal of buildings, structures, appurtenant fixtures or outdoor signs
in the historic district in violation
of the provisions of this Ordinance. The enforcement of any remedy provided herein shall not prevent the enforcement of any other remedy or remedies provided herein or in other ordinances or laws.
C. Failure to obtain a required COA prior to commencing work shall be subject to Article 15, Enforcement.
An appeal
of a decision of the Commission in granting or denying any certificate of appropriateness is taken by filing a petition for certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
Owners
of certain historic properties are required to maintain their properties and not allow them to fall into disrepair. The requirements of this subsection are applicable only to certain properties, termed "historic properties" in this subsection. That term as used in this subsection is defined to include designated historic landmarks and properties identified as "contributing" or "pivotal" in designated historic districts.
Owners
shall maintain or cause to be maintained the exterior and structural features of their historic properties and not allow conditions of neglect to occur on such properties. Conditions of neglect are as defined below. It shall be a violation
of this Ordinance to not remedy a condition of neglect within the period of time set by a final administrative determination, as described in subsequent subsections of this Ordinance. Conditions of neglect include the following:
1. Deterioration of exterior walls, foundations, or other vertical support that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing, or buckling.
2. Deterioration of flooring or floor supports, roofs, or other horizontal members that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing, or buckling.
3. Deterioration of external chimneys that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing, or buckling.
4. Deterioration or crumbling of exterior plasters or mortars.
5. Ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, and foundations, including broken windows or doors.
6. Defective protection or lack of weather protection for exterior wall and roof coverings, including lack of paint, or weathering due to lack of paint or other protective covering
.
7. Rotting, holes, and other forms of decay.
8. Deterioration of exterior stairs, porches, handrails, window and door frames, cornices, entablatures, wall facings, and architectural details that causes delamination, instability, loss of shape and form, or crumbling.
9. Heaving, subsidence, or cracking of sidewalks, steps, or pathways.
10. Deterioration of fences, gates, and accessory structures.
11. Deterioration that has a detrimental effect on the surrounding historic district, or on the special character of the historic landmark.
12. Deterioration that contributes to a hazardous or unsafe condition.
The initial determination that there is a condition of neglect shall be made by the Planning Director, or designee, after an investigation that is initiated by a petition from any person
who is familiar with the subject property, which may include but not be limited to a City employee.
On receipt of a petition, the Director, or designee, shall notify the owners
in writing of the allegation and the process for making a decision regarding the petition, including any applicable deadlines. Among other things, the notice shall offer the owner
the opportunity to meet in person
with the Director, or designee, and to present any relevant information. Notice shall be delivered by personal
service, or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. If certified mail is refused or unclaimed, notice may be delivered by first class mail, and shall be considered effective if such mail is not returned by the post office
within 15 days of mailing. In the case of notice by first class mail notice
e shall also be posted on the property. Notice of the investigation may also be given to the owners
of nearby or adjacent
properties or neighborhood associations.
The Planning Director or designee shall:
a. Investigate the allegation that a condition of neglect exists;
b. Hold one or more meetings at a time to be set by the Director, or designee, in which the owner
, other persons
who have received notice, or other interested persons
may give information;
c. Issue a written determination, supported by findings of fact, regarding the allegation within 45 days of the owner
’s receipt of notice;
d. Include within the determination a time period for correcting the condition of neglect, if a condition of neglect has been found;
e. Retain all information presented by the owner
or other persons
;
f. Deliver the written determination through any of the means for delivery of notice, as described above;
g. Designate the written determination as a final administrative determination with the right of appeal
to the HPC; and
h. Include information regarding rights to a de novo hearing before the HPC.
The above process may be suspended in the event the owner
agrees in writing to correct the alleged condition of neglect within a time period determined to be reasonable by the Director, or designee. If the condition is not corrected within that time period, the process shall continue where it was suspended.
1. If the property owner
disagrees with the Director’s determination, the owner
can appeal
and may request a de novo hearing before the HPC.
2. The request shall be delivered to the Planning Department, in writing, within 30 days of receipt of the Director’s determination.
3. The HPC shall hold a quasi-judicial hearing on the issue of whether demolition by neglect is occurring on the property. Procedures that would be followed by the Board of Adjustment (BOA) in a quasi-judicial proceeding shall be used. The Director’s determination shall be considered an administrative determination, which has been appealed
to the HPC as allowed pursuant to paragraph 2.5.4B, Demolition by Neglect.
4. The HPC’s determination to overturn the administrative determination shall be passed by the standards established in paragraph 2.4.6.
a. The HPC’s written decision shall include findings of fact and conclusions regarding demolition by neglect consistent with this subsection.
b. It shall be delivered to the appealing
party by certified mail, return receipt requested.
5. Appeal
from the determination can be taken by filing a petition in the nature of certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court. If the decision is not appealed
it shall be considered a final decision subject to enforcement with no rights of appeal
.
The property owner
is entitled to make a claim of undue economic hardship if the owner
is unable to make needed repairs to the property because it is economically unfeasible.
In the event that the owner
and/or other parties in interest do not wish to contest the determination regarding the condition of neglect, but do wish to petition for a claim of undue economic hardship, the Director’s order shall be stayed until after the HPC’s determination regarding the claim.
If a claim of undue economic hardship is made, the Planning Director or designee shall receive all information from the property owners
that the HPC is entitled to receive pursuant to this Ordinance, make a determination regarding whether there is undue economic hardship, and develop
a plan for dealing with such hardship, if it is found to exist. The recommendation and plan shall be sent to the owner
, by certified mail, return receipt requested, with notice of the owner
’s rights to appeal
to the HPC within 30 days of receipt. If the owner
disagrees with the recommendation and plan, the owner
may request a hearing before the HPC. In the event of such a request, the hearing shall be a quasi-judicial hearing, in the nature of a BOA hearing and the decision shall be in writing, supported by findings and conclusions. The Planning Director’s determination as to economic hardship and the plan for dealing with that hardship shall be considered a final administrative determination, and any HPC decision altering such recommendation or plan shall be passed by the standards established in paragraph 2.4.6, Decisions.
When a claim of undue economic hardship is made owing to the effects of this Article, the owner
and/or parties in interest shall, where reasonably possible, provide the evidence below, describing the circumstances of hardship, and any additional evidence requested by the Director, or designee, or HPC or evidence the owner
considers relevant.
a. Nature of ownership (individual, business, or nonprofit) or legal possession, custody, and control.
b. Financial resources of the owner
and/or parties in interest.
c. Cost of repairs.
d. Assessed value of the land and improvements.
e. Real estate taxes for the previous two years.
f. Amount paid for the property, date of purchase, and party from whom purchased, including a description of the relationship between the owner
and the person
from whom the property was purchased, or other means of acquisition of title, such as by gift or inheritance.
g. Annual debt service, if any, for previous two years.
h. Any listing of the property for sale or rent, price asked, and offers received, if any.
i. Annual gross income, if any, from the property for the previous two years.
j. Itemized operating and maintenance expenses for the previous two years, including proof that adequate and competent management procedures were followed.
k. Annual cash flow, if any, for the previous two years.
A recommended plan to relieve the economic hardship shall include, but is not limited to, property tax relief as may be allowed under North Carolina law, loans or grants from the City, the County, or other public, private, or nonprofit sources, acquisition by purchase or eminent domain, changes in applicable zoning regulations, or relaxation of the provisions of this Article sufficient to mitigate the undue economic hardship. The Director, or designee, shall issue an order regarding the time period during which the property should be repaired, taking into account the provisions of the recommended plan.
Nothing contained within this Article shall diminish the City’s power to declare a building
unsafe or in violation
of the minimum housing code or any other applicable statute or code. In addition, the procedures described herein are mandatory only for determinations being made solely under the authority of this section. Where other sections of the City Code apply, the City may, in its discretion, choose to process any action regarding the property under such other provisions alone, or under such provisions along with these provisions concurrently, or solely under these provisions. The City may also suspend the procedures of this section at any time if an action has been initiated under other applicable law.
Enforcement of this Article shall be by any one or more of the following methods, and the institution of any action under any of these methods shall not relieve any party from any other civil or criminal proceeding prescribed for violations
and prohibitions.
The City may apply for any appropriate equitable remedy to enforce the provisions of this Article.
The City can apply for and the court may enter an order of abatement. An order of abatement may direct that improvements or repairs be made, or that any other action be taken that is necessary to bring the property into compliance with this Article. Whenever the party is cited for contempt by the court and the City has executed the order of abatement, the City shall have a lien on the property for the cost of executing the order of abatement.
Civil penalties can be assessed for failure to comply with a final administrative determination or an un-appealed HPC decision under the provisions and guidelines for assessing such penalties for zoning code violations
. Prior to imposing a civil penalty, the City-County Planning Department shall deliver a written notice by personal
service or by registered mail or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the person
responsible for the violation
indicating the nature of the violation
and ordering corrective action. Where the violation
is the failure to remedy a condition of neglect within the time periods provided by the Director, or designee, or the HPC no additional time period for compliance need be given. The notice shall include information regarding the possible assessment of civil penalties and other possible enforcement actions. If this notice is appealed
to the Board of Adjustment, the Board shall not rehear any issue that was heard by the HPC or could have been so heard had an appeal
to the HPC been made. Rather, the Board of Adjustment shall limit the scope of its review to whether there has been compliance with the Director’s determination or the HPC’s determination, as applicable.
A. The governing bodies are the approving authority for amendments to the text of this Ordinance.
B. Amendments to the text of this Ordinance shall be made in accordance with the provisions of this section.
C. A request to amend the text of this Ordinance may be initiated by the governing body, the Board of Adjustment, the Planning Commission, the City Manager, the County Manager, the Planning Director, or designee, or a citizen.
Pursuant to paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference, a pre-application conference is required prior to the submittal of a text amendment application.
A. The Planning Director, or designee, shall be responsible for review and recommendation regarding amendments to the text of this Ordinance that affect only City or County jurisdictions.
B. When a text amendment is initiated, the Planning Director, or designee, shall draft an appropriate ordinance and present that ordinance to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation at a public hearing.
C. A request to amend the text of this Ordinance may be initiated by the governing body, the Board of Adjustment, the Planning Commission, the City Manager, the County Manager, the Planning Director, or designee, or a citizen.
The Planning Director or designee may consider applications withdrawn and voided due to the failure of the applicant to submit required information within 90 days of a request for such information.
The JCCPC shall be responsible for review and direction regarding amendments to the text of this Ordinance that affect both the City and County jurisdictions prior to review by the Planning Commission. This responsibility does not create a legal obligation for review of text amendments. Among other instances, review may not occur in the event that the City and County Managers, after consultation with the chair and vice-chair of the JCCPC, determine that delay is not in the public interest.
1. Before making any recommendation on a text amendment, the Planning Commission shall consider any recommendations from the Planning Director, or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. The Commission shall make its recommendation within 90 days of its initial public hearing unless the text amendment is granted expedited status.
4. When a recommendation is not made within the time periods established in this section, the governing body may process the request without a Commission recommendation.
If the applicant makes significant changes to the application for a text amendment after the Commission has made its recommendation, the Planning Director, or designee, may refer the modified request back to the Commission for an additional public hearing.
1. If the governing body has set an expedited hearing concerning a request, in accordance with paragraph 3.19.5B, Expedited Hearing, a public hearing before the Commission shall be held at the first available hearing date or prior to the hearing before the governing body.
2. The Planning Commission may not continue, nor may a deferral be granted for, a request that is subject to an expedited public hearing.
1. Before taking action on a text amendment, the governing body shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Planning Director, or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing.
2. Except for an emergency moratorium or a short term moratorium of 60 or fewer days (which shall comply with the provisions of paragraph 3.19.6, Development Moratoria), notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the amendment, deny the amendment, or send the amendment back to the Planning Commission or a committee of the governing body for additional consideration.
4. Text amendments, if approved, shall only have applicability within the jurisdiction of the governing body that approved the change.
1. The governing body, in situations in which it determines certain standards have been met, may expedite the hearing process on a proposed or prospective amendment.
2. The governing body may consider a written request requesting an expedited hearing process. The request shall identify and support the reasons for such expedited consideration.
3. In order to grant the request, the governing body shall find that at least one of the criteria below has been met:
a. Deadlines set by the local, State or Federal government for receipt of application for needed funding, designation or other regulations concerning the property make expedited consideration necessary;
b. The prospective text amendment results from an emergency beyond the control of the applicant, such as response to a disaster;
c. The prospective text amendment addresses an urgent matter of public health or safety; or
d. The prospective text amendment addresses issues raised in threatened, actual, or potential litigation against the jurisdiction that made expedited consideration necessary.
4. A hearing before the governing body may occur upon the receipt of a Planning Commission recommendation, or the expiration of a 30-day period, whichever comes earlier.
Development
moratoria, if necessary, shall be considered and processed in accordance with the special notice provisions, required statements, and other requirements of NCGS §160D-107.
A public hearing to impose either a moratorium of 60 or fewer days (hereafter a “short-term moratorium”) or a lengthier moratorium of 61 days to a year may be initiated by a governing body for that body’s jurisdiction upon passage of a resolution, including appropriate supportive findings, that calls for a public hearing. Passage of such a resolution shall be considered a “call for public hearing” under the above-cited statutes and shall allow the jurisdiction to stop acceptance, review, and approval of applications for development
approvals described in the above-cited statutes or such other similar development
approvals created under this Ordinance or other development
ordinances.
If the call is for a short-term moratorium, Planning Commission review shall not be required, and one published notice not less than seven days prior to the hearing shall be given, as allowed under the above-cited statutes, in lieu of other notices required by statute or this Ordinance. If the call is for a lengthier moratorium, the procedure followed shall be as set forth in the provisions for expedited hearings for text amendments above. The need for a moratorium shall be considered “an urgent matter of public health or safety” as required for approval of an expedited hearing. Emergency moratoria shall not require compliance with any procedures set forth in this Ordinance, other than an unadvertised public hearing, and an ordinance making the findings required below.
The duration of any moratorium shall be reasonable in light of the specific conditions that warrant imposition of the moratorium and may not exceed the period of time necessary to correct, modify, or resolve such conditions. Any ordinance establishing a lengthier moratorium shall include a provision that allows for termination of the moratorium by resolution of the governing body prior to the express expiration date if the conditions requiring the moratorium have been adequately addressed so that the moratorium is no longer necessary.
An ordinance establishing a moratorium shall contain all the required findings set forth in NCGS §160D-107, including but not limited to the conditions that necessitate the moratorium, alternatives, development
approvals subject to the moratorium, termination date, and reasonableness of the moratorium period.
A moratorium shall only be extended upon compliance with NCGS §160D-107 and the existence of new facts and conditions warranting an extension.
In the event that there is an imminent and substantial threat to public health or safety, an ordinance imposing an emergency moratorium can be considered by a governing body without prior resolution or public notice of the hearing on such moratorium.
A. This section establishes a procedure for obtaining a statutory vested right
in conformance with NCGS §160D-108 and 160D-108.1.
B. New or amended zoning regulations shall not apply to a property with an established vested right
until the vested right
expires or is terminated.
Pursuant to NCGS §160D-108, the following are the types of statutory vested rights
that may be claimed:
1. Development
or subdivision
permit approvals in accordance with NCGS §143-755;
2. A site-specific vesting plan;
3. A multi-phased development
pursuant to NCGS §160D-108(f); or
4. A development
agreement pursuant to NCGS §160D, Chapter 10.
A. An application for a common law or statutory vested rights
determination shall be submitted to the Planning director or designee in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss, or as allowed per NCGS 160D-108. Appeal
may be taken in accordance with NCGS 160D-108(h).
B. Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information in addition to the standard information required pursuant to paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss:
1. Information on the proposed uses of the property that the applicant wishes to vest;
2. The length of time for which vesting is requested; and
3. A listing of those provisions of this Ordinance from which vesting is requested.
A. Vesting shall remain valid so long as the development
permit remains valid, or as otherwise allowed per this Ordinance. Development
permits shall be valid for one year unless otherwise indicated for a longer duration in this Ordinance.
B. Except where a longer vesting period is provided by statute or local regulation, the statutory vesting granted by this section, once established, expires for an uncompleted development
project if development
work is intentionally and voluntarily discontinued for a period of not less than 24 consecutive months, and the statutory vesting period granted by this section for a nonconforming use of property expires if the use is intentionally and voluntarily discontinued for a period of not less than 24 consecutive months. The 24-month discontinuance period is automatically tolled pursuant to 160D-108(d).
C. A vested right
shall run with the land in accordance with NCGS 160D-108(i).
The following is in accordance with NCGS 160D-108.1, and such statute shall apply where there are conflicts.
1. In order to qualify as a "site specific vesting plan," a plan shall be a development plan
approved as a site plan
or preliminary plat
in accordance with Sec. 3.5, Zoning Map Changes; a plat
approved in accordance with Sec. 3.6, Subdivision Review; or a site plan
approved in accordance with Sec. 3.7, Site Plan Review.
2. Landowners seeking vested rights
on plats
, special use permit applications, or other plans that would not normally receive site plan
approval, can apply for vested rights
protection through submittal of an application which contains the identical information, fee, and plans required for a complete site plan
application and an additional fee for a vested rights
public hearing.
Once the application has been determined complete, the Planning Director, or designee, shall schedule a public hearing, give public notice as set forth in paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, and forward a copy of the application with all related materials to the appropriate governing body.
1. The governing body shall hold a public hearing as required pursuant to NCGS § 160D-108.1.
2. Approval by the governing body shall confer upon the owner
of the property a "vested right
" as defined in NCGS §160D-108.1(b), effective on the date of approval
. The governing body may condition the approval upon terms and conditions reasonably necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
1. Following approval of a site specific vesting plan, nothing in this section shall exempt such a plan from subsequent reviews and approvals to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the original approval, provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with the original approval.
2. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the revocation of the original approval or other remedies for failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions of the approval or with this Ordinance.
3. The establishment of a vested right
shall not preclude the application of new laws or regulations as is allowed under NCGS §160D-108. In addition, it shall not preclude overlay zoning that imposes additional requirements, but does not affect the allowable type or intensity of use, or ordinances or regulations that are general in nature and are applicable to all property subject to land use regulation by the City or County. Otherwise applicable new or amended regulations shall become effective with respect to property that is subject to a site specific vesting plan upon the expiration or termination of the vested right
in accordance with this section.
4. A vested right
is not a personal
right, but shall be attached to and run with the applicable property. After approval of a site specific vesting plan, all successors to the original landowner shall be entitled to exercise such right while applicable.
1. A vested right
for a site-specific vesting plan shall remain vested for the period specified by the governing body, which shall be a minimum of two years but no more than five years from the date of the vested rights
determination. The expiration and validity of site plans
and plats
issued pursuant to the vested rights
determination that extend beyond the vesting period shall be governed by the provisions of this ordinance. Substantial amendments and modifications to an approved site specific vesting plan shall not be accorded "vested rights
" unless such changes are processed as a new "site specific vesting plan." Each approved site specific vesting plan shall contain the following notation: "Approval of this plan establishes a vested right
under NCGS §160D-108.1. Unless terminated at an earlier date, the zoning vested rights
shall be valid until (Insert date)."
2. A building permit
shall not expire or be revoked because of the passage of time while a zoning vested right
under this section is outstanding.
3. A right which has been vested as provided in this section shall terminate at the end of the applicable vesting period with respect to portions of the development
that do not have approved and continuously valid site plans
and preliminary plats
, or buildings and uses for which no valid building permit
applications have been filed.
A vested right
as provided in this section shall terminate when any one of the following circumstances apply:
1. At the end of the applicable vesting period;
2. With the written consent of the affected landowner;
3. Upon findings by the governing body by ordinance and after public hearing, that natural or man-made hazards on or in the immediate vicinity of the property, if uncorrected, would pose a serious threat to the public health, safety, and welfare if the project were to proceed as contemplated in the site specific vesting plan;
4. Upon payment of compensation to the affected owner
for all costs, expenses, and other losses incurred by the landowner together with interest;
5. Upon findings by the governing body by ordinance and after public hearing, that the landowner or the landowner’s representative intentionally supplied inaccurate information or made material misrepresentations which made a difference in the approval by the governing body of the site specific vesting plan; or
6. Upon the enactment of a State or Federal law or regulation or local ordinances enacted in compliance with such laws or regulations that preclude development
as contemplated in the site specific development plan
.
A. Property that is annexed shall retain any vested rights
throughout the original vesting period subject to the limitations of paragraph B below.
B. A property owner
petitioning for annexation shall submit a signed
statement declaring any existing vested right
with respect to the properties subject to annexation, if the owner
wishes to maintain the vested right
. The failure to sign
such a statement shall terminate any such vested right
.
Nothing in this section shall be deemed to create any vested rights
other than those established under NCGS §160D-108 and 108.1. In the event that NCGS §160D-108 is repealed, the provisions of this section are no longer effective.
A floodplain development permit
shall be required in conformance with the provisions of this ordinance prior to the commencement of any development
activities within Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas.
The Planning Director, or designee, shall serve as the Floodplain Administrator
. For this purpose, the Planning Director, or designee, shall receive training and certification from the Association of Floodplain Managers.
Duties of the Floodplain Administrator
shall include, but not be limited to:
1. Review all floodplain development
applications and issue permits for all proposed development
with in Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas to assure that the requirements of this ordinance have been satisfied;
2. Advise permittees that additional Federal or State permits (i.e., Wetlands
, Erosion
and Sedimentation
Control, Riparian Buffers, Mining
, etc.) may be required, and if specific Federal or State permits are known, require that copies of such permits be provided and maintained on file with the floodplain development permit
;
3. Notify adjacent
communities and the North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Division of Emergency Management, State Coordinator for the National Flood Insurance
Program prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse
, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
;
4. Assure that maintenance is provided within the altered or relocated portion of said watercourse
so that the flood-carrying capacity is not diminished;
5. Prevent encroachments
within floodways
and non-encroachment areas
unless the certification and flood hazard reduction provisions of 8.4.3E, Floodway
and Non-Encroachment Areas
, are met;
6. Obtain actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level
) of the reference level
(including basement
) of all attendant utilities of all new or substantially improved
structures, in accordance with the certification requirements in Sec. 3.21, Floodplain Development Permit
;
7. Obtain the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level
) to which the new or substantially improved
structures and all utilities have been floodproofed, in accordance with the certification requirements in Sec. 3.21, Floodplain Development Permit
;
8. Obtain actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level
) of all public utilities
, in accordance with the certification requirements in Sec. 3.21, Floodplain Development Permit
;
9. When floodproofing
is utilized for a particular structure
, obtain certifications from a registered professional engineer or architect in accordance with the certification requirements in Sec. 3.21, Floodplain Development Permit
and paragraph 8.4.3, Standards;
10. Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of boundaries of the Special Flood Hazard Areas or Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas (for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions), make the necessary interpretation. The person
contesting the location of the boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to appeal
the interpretation as provided in this Article;
11. When Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
data has not been provided in accordance with paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
data, along with floodway
data and/or non-encroachment area
data available from a Federal, State, or other source, including data developed
pursuant to paragraph 8.4.3.C, Floodplains without Base Flood
Elevations, in order to administer the provisions of this ordinance;
12. When Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
data is provided but no floodway
nor non-encroachment area
data has been provided in accordance with paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any floodway
data, and/or non-encroachment area
data available from a Federal, State, or other source in order to administer the provisions of this ordinance;
13. When the lowest ground elevation of a parcel
or structure
located within Zone AE is above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
, advise the property owner
of the option to apply for a Letter of Map Amendment LOMA
A) from FEMA. Maintain a copy of the Letter of Map Amendment LOMA
A) issued by FEMA in the floodplain development permit
file;
14. Permanently maintain all records that pertain to the administration of this ordinance and make these records available for public inspection, subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended;
15. Make on-site inspections of work in progress. As the work pursuant to a floodplain development permit
progresses, the Floodplain Administrator
shall make as many inspections of the work as may be necessary to ensure that the work is being done according to the provisions of the local ordinance and the terms of the permit. In exercising this power, the Floodplain Administrator
, or designee, has a right, upon presentation of proper credentials, to enter on any premises within the jurisdiction of the community at any reasonable hour for the purposes of inspection or other enforcement action;
16. Issue stop-work orders as required. Whenever a building
or part thereof is being constructed, reconstructed, altered, or repaired in violation
of this ordinance, the Floodplain Administrator
may order the work to be immediately stopped. The stop-work order shall be in writing and directed to the person
doing the work. The stop-work order shall state the specific work to be stopped, the specific reason(s) for the stoppage, and the condition(s) under which the work may be resumed;
17. Revoke floodplain development
permits as required. The Floodplain Administrator
may revoke and require the return of the floodplain development permit
by notifying the permit holder in writing stating the reason(s) for the revocation. Permits shall be revoked for any substantial departure from the approved application, plans, or specifications; for refusal or failure to comply with the requirements of State or local laws; or for false statements or misrepresentations made in securing the permit. Any floodplain development permit
mistakenly issued in violation
of an applicable State or local law may also be revoked;
18. Make periodic inspections throughout all Special Flood Hazard Areas within the jurisdiction of the community. The floodplain administrator
and each member of his or her inspections department shall have a right, upon presentation of proper credentials, to enter on any premises within the territorial jurisdiction of the department at any reasonable hour for the purposes of inspection or other enforcement action;
19. Maintain a current map repository to include, but not limited to, the FIS Report, FIRM and/or other official flood maps/studies adopted under paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, including any revisions thereto including Letters of Map Change, issued by the State and/or FEMA. Notify State and FEMA of mapping needs; and
20. Follow through with corrective procedures of Sec. 15.6, Floodplain and Flood Damage Protection Enforcement and Penalties.
21. Maintain records of all floodplain development
permits, actions by the Development
Review Board, and special use permits approving fill or development
in Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas and report on them to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
upon request.
Base flood
elevations shall be based upon the Flood Insurance
Rate studies described in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, when such studies define a base flood
elevation.
B. Development
, including the construction of structures that only require building
permits and land disturbing activity
within Special Flood Hazard Areas or Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas, as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
in the most current Flood Insurance
Rate Studies, which are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this section, shall be prohibited unless carried out pursuant to the general standards in paragraph 8.4.3, Standards, or expressly authorized pursuant to paragraph 8.4.4, Development
in Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas.
1. When base flood
elevations have not been determined, the Inspections Director, or designee, acting as the Floodplain Administrator
, may require FEMA accepted hydrologic and hydraulic engineering studies, or may obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any base flood
elevation data and floodway
or non-encroachment area
data available from a Federal, State, or other source in determining the appropriate base flood
elevation.
2. On small streams
where no base flood
data has been provided, no encroachments
, including fill, new construction
, substantial improvements
or new development
, shall be permitted within the setbacks
established in Sec. 8.5, Riparian Buffer Protection Standards, or Sec. 8.7, Watershed Protection Overlay Standards, or 20 feet each side from top of bank, or five times the width of the stream
, whichever is greatest.
A. Application for a floodplain development permit
shall be made to the Floodplain Administrator
, or designee, prior to any development
activities proposed to be located within Special Flood Hazard Areas and Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas. The following items/information shall be required as part of the application for a floodplain development permit
:
1. A plot plan drawn to scale which shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following specific details of the proposed floodplain development
:
a. the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the area of development
/disturbance; existing and proposed structures, the location of utility systems, proposed grading
/pavement areas, fill materials, storage areas, drainage facilities, and other proposed development
;
b. the boundary of the Special Flood Hazard Area or Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas as delineated on the FIRM or other flood map as determined in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability, or a statement that the entire lot is within the Special Flood Hazard Area or Future Conditions Flood
Hazard Areas;
c. flood zone
(s) designation of the proposed development
area as determined on the FIRM or other flood map as determined in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability;
d. the boundary of the floodway
(s) or non-encroachment area
(s) as determined in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability;
e. the Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
or future conditions flood elevation
where provided as set forth in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability; paragraph 3.21.2B (11 and 12), Duties and Responsibilities; or paragraph 8.4.3, Standards;
f. the old and new location of any watercourse
that will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development
; and
g. preparation of the plot plan by or under the direct supervision of a registered land surveyor or professional engineer and certified by same.
2. Proposed elevation, and method thereof, of all development
within a Special Flood Hazard Area or Future Conditions Flood Hazard Area
including but not limited to:
a. elevation in relation to mean sea level
of the proposed reference level
(including basement
) of all structures;
b. elevation in relation to mean sea level
to which any non-residential structure
in Zone AE, A, AO, or X (Future) will be flood-proofed; and
c. elevation in relation to mean sea level
to which any proposed utility systems will be elevated or floodproofed.
3. If floodproofing
, a floodproofing
certificate and back-up plans from a registered professional engineer or architect certifying that the non-residential flood-proofed development
will meet the flood-proofing criteria in paragraph 8.4.3, Standards.
4. A Foundation Plan drawn to scale which shall include details of the proposed foundation system to ensure all provisions of this ordinance are met. These details include but are not limited to:
a. Proposed method of elevation, if applicable (i.e., fill, solid foundation perimeter wall, solid backfilled foundation, open foundation on columns/piers); and
b. Should solid foundation perimeter walls be used in Zones AE and Zone X (Future), details of sufficient openings to facilitate the unimpeded movements of floodwaters in accordance with paragraph 8.4.3, Standards.
5. Usage details of any enclosed space below the regulatory flood protection elevation;
6. Plans and/or details for the protection of public utilities
and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems to be located and constructed to minimize flood damage;
7. Copy of all other Local, State and Federal permits required prior to floodplain development permit
issuance (i.e. Wetlands
, Erosion
and Sedimentation
Control, Riparian Buffers, Mining
, etc.);
8. If floodplain development permit
is issued for placement of Recreational Vehicles
and/or Temporary Structures, documentation to ensure the recreational vehicle
and temporary structure
requirements of paragraph 8.4.3, Standards are met; and
9. If a watercourse
is proposed to be altered and/or relocated, a description of the extent of watercourse
alteration or relocation; an engineering report on the effects of the proposed project on the flood-carrying capacity of the watercourse
and the effects to properties located both upstream and downstream; and a map (if not shown on plot plan) showing the location of the proposed watercourse
alteration or relocation.
The following information shall be provided at a minimum on the floodplain development permit
to ensure compliance with this code:
A. A description of the development
to be permitted under the floodplain development permit
issuance;
B. The Special Flood Hazard Area or Future Conditions Flood Hazard Area
determination for the proposed development
per available data specified in paragraph 8.4.2, Applicability;
C. The regulatory flood protection elevation required for the reference level
and all attendant utilities;
D. The regulatory flood protection elevation required for the protection of all public utilities
;
E. All certification submittal requirements with timelines;
F. State that no fill material shall encroach
into the floodway
or non-encroachment area
of any watercourse
, if applicable;
G. The flood openings requirements, if in Zone AE, A, O or X (Future).
A. An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 81-31) or Floodproofing
Certificate (FEMA Form 81-65) is required after the reference level
is completed. Within twenty-one (21) calendar days of establishment of the reference level
elevation, or floodproofing
, by whatever construction means, whichever is applicable, it shall be the duty of the permit holder to submit to the Floodplain Administrator
a certification of the elevation of the reference level
, or floodproofed elevation, whichever is applicable in relation to mean sea level
. Said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a registered land surveyor or professional engineer and certified by same. When floodproofing
is utilized, said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a professional engineer or architect and certified by same. Any work done within the twenty-one (21) day calendar period and prior to submission of the certification shall be at the permit holder’s risk. The Floodplain Administrator
shall review the certificate data submitted. Deficiencies detected by such review shall be corrected by the permit holder immediately and prior to further progressive work being permitted to proceed. Failure to submit the certification or failure to make said corrections required shall be cause to issue a stop-work order for the project.
B. A Final As-Built Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 81-31) or Floodproofing
Certificate (FEMA Form 81-65) is required after construction is completed and prior to Certificate of Compliance
/Occupancy issuance. It shall be the duty of the permit holder to submit to the Floodplain Administrator
a certification of final as-built construction of the elevation or floodproofed elevation of the reference level
and all attendant utilities. Said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a registered land surveyor or professional engineer and certified by same. When floodproofing
is utilized, said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a professional engineer or architect and certified by same. The Floodplain Administrator
shall review the certificate data submitted. Deficiencies detected by such review shall be corrected by the permit holder immediately and prior to Certificate of Compliance
/Occupancy issuance. In some instances, another certification may be required to certify corrected as-built construction. Failure to submit the certification or failure to make said corrections required shall be cause to withhold the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance
/Occupancy.
C. If a manufactured home is placed within Zone AE, A, AO, or X (Future) and the elevation of the chassis is above 36 inches in height, an engineered foundation certification is required per paragraph 8.4.3, Standards.
D. If a watercourse
is to be altered or relocated, a description of the extent of watercourse
alteration or relocation; an engineering report on the effects of the proposed project on the flood-carrying capacity of the watercourse
and the effects to properties located both upstream and downstream; and a map showing the location of the proposed watercourse
alteration or relocation shall all be submitted by the permit applicant prior to issuance of a floodplain development permit
.
The following structures, if located within Zone AE, A, AO, or X (Future), are exempt from the elevation/floodproofing
certification requirements specified in items 1 and 2 above:
1. Recreational Vehicles
meeting requirements of recreational vehicles
in paragraph 8.4.3, Standards;
2. Temporary Structures meeting the temporary structure
requirements of paragraph 8.4.3, Standards; and
3. Accessory Structures less than 150 square feet meeting accessory structure
requirements of paragraph 8.4.3, Standards.
The review procedures described below apply to changes to building
elevations where compliance with architectural standards is required, but no site plan
approval or certificate of appropriateness is otherwise required. The requirements of paragraph 3.22.2B below also apply where architectural drawings are required for site plan
approval.
A. An architectural review application shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss. Architectural review application documents shall contain, at a minimum, the information listed below unless expressly exempted by another provision of this Ordinance or if the Planning Director or designee makes the determination that less detailed information is required for adequate review. No processing or review of an architectural review application will proceed without the required information.
1. Title Block
– Name of project, type of review labeled. Architectural Review; submittal and revision dates; sheet size 36 inches by 48 inches maximum with index map and match lines if multiple sheets are required; graphic scale (not smaller than one inch to 32 feet on a standard architectural scale); property identification number.
2. Name, address and telephone number of owner
, applicant and agent; name, address and telephone number of architect or other designer.
3. Elevations of all building
façades, to scale, and labeled with materials, colors, finished floor elevations, glazing
calculations, and other details as necessary to demonstrate compliance with applicable standards.
Upon review of the application and subject to the requirements of paragraph 3.22.2, Application Requirements, the Planning Director or designee shall approve the architectural review application provided the design meets all applicable requirements of this Ordinance. An architectural review approval shall expire after four years unless a building permit
or other development
permit has been issued and remains continuously valid or if work not requiring a permit has been initiated, except that an architectural review application that proposes amending an approved site plan
shall be considered a site plan
amendment under paragraph 3.7.3C, Site Plan Amendments, and its approval shall expire at the same time as the approved site plan
as amended.
This section provides a procedure for making requests for reasonable accommodation to land use and zoning regulations, policies, practices, and procedures of the City and County of Durham to comply fully with the intent and purpose of Federal laws.
A. This section shall apply to those persons
who are defined as disabled or handicapped under Federal law. A person
recovering from substance abuse is considered a person
with a disability or handicap; however, a person
who is currently engaging in the illegal use of controlled substances is not.
B. A request for a reasonable accommodation may be made by any person
with a disability or handicap, his or her legal representative, or a provider of housing for persons
with disabilities or handicaps in the city’s and county’s land use and zoning regulations, when the application of such may act as a barrier to affording such person
(s) equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling in accordance with the law.
C. A request for a reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the rules, standards, and/or practices for the siting, development
, and use of housing or housing-related facilities in this ordinance, that would eliminate regulatory barriers and provide a person
with a disability or handicap an equal opportunity to a dwelling of his or her choice.
D. Nothing in this section requires persons
with disabilities or handicaps, or operators of family care homes
, or group homes
for persons
with disabilities, or handicaps acting or operating in accordance with applicable zoning, licensing or land use laws or practices, to seek reasonable accommodation under this section.
A reasonable accommodation shall not affect an individual’s obligations to comply with other applicable regulations not at issue in the requested accommodation.
If an individual needs assistance in making the request for reasonable accommodation, the Planning Department will provide assistance to ensure that the process is accessible. Applicants seeking reasonable accommodation may request a pre-application conference with the Planning Director or designee to discuss the procedures, standards, and regulations applicable for submittal of an application. Such requests shall be made at least 10 days prior to the date of submittal.
A. An application for reasonable accommodation shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss. In addition, the following information shall be provided by the applicant:
1. The current actual use of the property;
2. The basis for the claim that the applicant is considered disabled or handicapped under Federal law;
3. The UDO provision(s) or regulation(s) from which reasonable accommodation is being requested; and
4. An explanation of why the reasonable accommodation is necessary to make the specific property available for the individual.
B. An application for a reasonable accommodation under this section shall be submitted to the Planning Director or designee.
Once the application has been determined complete, the Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give notice as set forth in paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
The applicant seeking reasonable accommodation shall have the burden of presenting evidence sufficient to allow the Board of Adjustment to make the findings set forth below, as well as the burden of persuasion on those issues.
The Planning Director or designee shall provide the Board of Adjustment with a copy of the application and all relevant materials pertaining to the request prior to the public hearing.
A. Each decision shall be accompanied by a written finding of facts by the Board of Adjustment which specifies the reasons for the decision; and
B. The Board of Adjustment may prescribe whether the reasonable accommodation is granted to the applicant or shall be allowed to pass with transfer of property.
C. The Board of Adjustment may approve the request, deny the request, or continue the request. In approving the request, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe reasonable and appropriate conditions provided that the conditions are reasonably related to the request.
A. In granting a reasonable accommodation request, the Board of Adjustment shall find based on competent, material, and substantial evidence, that the proposed accommodation:
1. Will be used by an individual or individuals with a disability or handicap protected under Federal law;
2. Is "reasonable." An accommodation is reasonable if it will not undermine the legitimate purposes and effects of existing zoning regulations, and if it will not impose significant financial and administrative burdens upon the city or county and/or constitute a substantial or fundamental alteration of the ordinance provisions; and
3. Is "necessary." An accommodation is necessary if it will provide direct or meaningful therapeutic amelioration of the effects of the particular disability or handicap, and it will afford handicapped or disabled persons
equal opportunity to enjoy and use housing in residential districts
in the city or county.
B. The Board of Adjustment shall issue a written order on a request for reasonable accommodation within 60 days of the date of the quasi-judicial decision.
Appeal
from final action by the Board of Adjustment on a reasonable accommodation request can be taken by filing a petition in the nature of certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
1. For the purposes of this Ordinance, a “street closing” application shall be considered an application to permanently close a public right-of-way
in the City or County performed pursuant to NCGS §160A-299 or §153A-241, applicable NCDOT regulations, Sec. 51 of City of Durham Charter, Secs. 62-17 and -18 of the Durham City Code, and this Ordinance.
2. The governing bodies are the approving authority for the permanent closing of a public street or alley
, or other public right-of-way
.
3. A request to close a public right-of-way
may be initiated by any person
, entity, or organization.
The applicant(s) applying for a closing shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
1. A street closing application shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
2. A street closing application shall be submitted pursuant to paragraph 3.2.4, Application Requirementss, and Secs. 62-17 of the City of Durham Code of Ordinances if within the city jurisdiction.
3. The following shall also be addressed by the applicant for a street closing application:
a. The closing does not cause a parcel
to lack frontage along a public right-of-way
.
b. How the parcels
are accessed other than from the closed right-of-way
, if applicable.
c. How the closing of the right-of-way
impacts current or potential connectivity within a development
or neighborhood.
d. The circumstances that warrant the closing if connectivity is negatively impacted.
e. A discussion of the public interest in closing the right-of-way
.
After receiving the application, the Planning Director or designee, along with other applicable agencies
, shall be responsible for review and recommendation regarding closing requests.
The Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give public notice as set forth in NCGS §160A-299 or §153A-241, Durham City Charter Secs. 51 and 62-18, and this section and paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings, as applicable.
Pursuant to NCGS §160A-299, no street or alley
under the control of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) may be closed without the NCDOT consent.
Commentary: This action is needed for improved and maintained roads
within City jurisdiction. Approval by NCDOT removes the roads
from its list for maintenance.
(1) In order to request consent, a resolution from the City Council shall be sent to the NCDOT requesting removal of the right-of-way
from its maintenance list. Consent shall be obtained prior to setting a public hearing date.
(2) Once NCDOT has granted this request, City Council shall set a public hearing date in accordance with City Charter Secs. 51 and 62-18.
(3) Before taking action on a street closing, the governing body shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing.
For public right-of-way
not under NCDOT control:
(1) The City Council shall set a public hearing date in accordance with City Charter Secs. 51 and 62-18.
(2) The City Council shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Director, or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing prior to taking final action on the request.
Pursuant to NCGS §153A-241, closure of public right-of-way
shall require consent by NCDOT.
a. In order to request consent, a resolution from the Board of County Commissioners shall be sent to the NCDOT requesting removal of the right-of-way
from its maintenance list. Consent shall be obtained prior to setting a public hearing date.
Commentary: This action is needed for improved and maintained roads
within the County. Approval by NCDOT removes the roads
from its list for maintenance.
b. Once NCDOT has granted this request, the Board of County Commissioners shall set a public hearing date so that notice of such hearing shall be published once a week for four successive weeks prior to the hearing date.
c. The Board of County Commissioners shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, and shall conduct a public hearing prior to taking final action on the request.
Appeal
from final action can be taken by filing a petition for certiorari with the Durham County Superior Court.
The approved order and plat
for a closing that has not been appealed
, or has survived appeal
, shall be recorded at the applicable Register of Deeds.
1. For the purposes of this Ordinance, a “right-of-way
withdrawal” application shall be considered an application to permanently withdraw a public right-of-way
in the City or County performed pursuant to NCGS §136-96, applicable NCDOT regulations, applicable charter provisions for the city of Durham, and this Ordinance.
2. If the right-of-way
does not qualify for withdrawal, then closing of the right-of-way
shall be performed through the street closing process pursuant to paragraph 3.24.1, Street Closing.
1. An application for withdrawal shall be submitted in accordance with paragraphs 3.2.4, Application Requirementss, and 3.6.8, Final Plat
Approval.
2. An application for withdrawal for right-of-way
under control of NCDOT shall also be processed and approved in accordance with the regulations established by NCDOT for such a request.
The Planning Director or designee shall review applications for withdrawal pursuant to the requirements of this section, NCGS §136-96, and Durham City Charter Sec. 51.2, as applicable.
The initial naming of a new right-of-way
or driveway
allowed by this Ordinance shall be approved pursuant to Sec. 12.3.2, Street Names.
For the purposes of this Ordinance, a “street renaming” application shall be considered an application to change the official name of a street, alley
, or private drive.
The applicant(s) applying for a street renaming shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
1. An application for renaming shall be submitted in accordance with paragraphs 3.2.4, Application Requirementss; 3.6.8, Final Plat
Approval; and 12.3.2, Street Names.
2. An application for the renaming of right-of-way
under control of NCDOT shall also be processed and approved in accordance with the regulations established by NCDOT for such a request.
a. After receiving the application, the Planning Director or designee, along with other applicable agencies
, shall be responsible for review and recommendation regarding renaming requests.
b. If the right-of-way
is under NCDOT control, approval from NCDOT is required prior to scheduling a hearing with the governing body.
Prior to the scheduling of the public hearing, at least one public meeting shall be scheduled by the Planning Director or designee regarding the renaming request. Owners
of all property fronting along the subject “street” shall be notified of the meeting.
The Planning Director or designee shall schedule a public hearing and give public notice pursuant to paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
The City Council or Board of County Commissioners, as applicable, shall be the approving authority for renaming right-of-way
, subject to approval by NCDOT if applicable, and hold a public hearing prior to taking final action on the request.
1. Before taking action on a street renaming request, the governing body shall consider any recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, and of staff agencies
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. The governing body may continue a public hearing prior to closing the hearing and taking action on the request.
3. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the request, deny the request, or send the request back to the administration for additional consideration.
A request that is approved by the applicable governing body shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds with an associated final plat
, along with any additional requirements by NCDOT as applicable.
Statutory development
agreements are intended to provide for community benefits within developments
that are difficult to accommodate within traditional zoning processes. Additionally, they can provide regulatory certainty, a schedule for development
, coordination for the provision of public facilities
, sustainable design, and improved management of environmentally sensitive lands, as applicable. This section provides a procedure for requests for statutory development
agreements pursuant to NCGS Chapter 160D, Article 10, Development
Agreements; and 160D-704, Incentives.
The city or county, with approval by the applicable governing body based upon jurisdiction, may enter into a statutory development
agreement pursuant to NCGS Chapter 160D, Article 10, Development
Agreements; 160D-704, Incentives; and the requirements of this Ordinance.
The applicant(s) applying for a development
agreement shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
The applicant(s) applying for a development
agreement shall hold one or more neighborhood meetings in accordance with paragraph 3.2.3, Neighborhood Meeting.
An application for a development
agreement shall be submitted in accordance with paragraphs 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
A development
agreement shall adhere to the requirements of NCGS Chapter 160D, Article 10, Development
Agreements.
A development
agreement may modify the standards of this Ordinance except:
1. The process for adoption and execution of a development
agreement shall not be modified.
2. A development
agreement shall not allow uses and/or housing types that are not allowed in the underlying zoning district of the subject property.
3. A development
agreement shall not reduce environmental requirements within Article 4, Zoning Districts; and Article 8, Environmental Protection, with the exception of Sec. 8.3 Tree Protection and Tree Coverage.
4. A development
agreement shall not reduce requirements within Article 12, Infrastructure and Other Public Improvements.
When a development
agreement request is associated with a zoning map change, the public hearings may be heard at the same time; however, decisions shall be rendered with separate motions.
1. Before making any recommendation on a petition for a statutory development
agreement, the Planning Commission shall consider any recommendations from the Planning Director and any other department or agency
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. Except in the case of expedited hearings pursuant to paragraph 3.26.10B, Expedited Hearing, the Commission shall make its recommendation within three consecutive regular Commission cycles (approximately 90 days total) of its initial public hearing. In case of significant modifications, the time period for a recommendation may be altered, in which case a maximum of three additional consecutive regular cycles may be granted before the case shall go to the governing body.
4. When a recommendation is not made within the time periods established in this section, the governing body may process the request without a Commission recommendation.
1. Before taking action on a development
agreement request, the governing body shall consider any recommendations of the Planning Commission, Planning Director or designee, and of staff agencies
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. The governing body may continue a public hearing prior to closing the hearing and taking action on the request.
4. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the request, deny the request, or send the request back to the Planning Commission for additional consideration.
5. The development
agreement request approved by the governing body may include changes from the request presented.
1. The governing body, in situations in which it determines certain standards have been met, may expedite the hearing process on a proposed development
agreement.
2. The governing body may consider a written request from a potential applicant, or from staff, requesting an expedited hearing process. The request shall identify and support the reasons for such expedited consideration.
3. In order to grant the request, the governing body shall find that at least one of the criteria below have been met:
a. Deadlines set by the local, State, or Federal government for receipt of applications for needed funding, designation, or other regulations concerning the property make expedited consideration necessary;
b. The prospective request results from an emergency beyond the control of the applicant, such as response to a disaster;
c. The prospective request addresses an urgent matter of public health or safety; or
d. There are special circumstances that will have a substantial negative impact on the development
which could not have reasonably been anticipated and which make expedited consideration necessary.
Pursuant to NCGS 160D-1011, an approved development
agreement shall be recorded with the Register of Deeds.
A. The approved development
agreement shall be recorded within 14 days from the date the city or county, as applicable, and the applicant execute the agreement approved by the governing body.
B. No development
approvals shall be issued until the development
agreement is recorded.
The purpose of this section is to establish the procedures by which a property owner
may request the City of Durham to annex property and thus establish the City’s jurisdiction onto the subject property, pursuant to the Durham City Code and applicable state statutes. This section does not override or nullify any other local or state law regarding annexation and applicable rules or laws resulting from the establishment of the City’s jurisdiction.
All applicants applying for annexation shall schedule a pre-application conference in accordance with paragraph 3.2.2, Pre-Application Conference.
A. An application for annexation shall be submitted in accordance with paragraphs 3.2.4, Application Requirementss.
Unless incorporated into a concurrent approval by City Council, such as a zoning map change or statutory development
agreement, the applicable utility extension agreement shall be included with the annexation request.
An annexation application shall be submitted concurrently with any associated zoning map change application.
A. After receiving the application, the Planning Director or designee, and any other applicable department or agency
, shall be responsible for review and comment regarding the request.
The Planning Director or designee may consider applications withdrawn and voided due to the failure of the applicant to submit required information within 90 days of a request for such information.
1. Before taking action on an annexation request, the governing body shall consider any recommendations of the Planning Director or designee, and of staff agencies
, and shall conduct a public hearing where interested parties may be heard.
2. Notice and public hearing requirements shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.2.5, Notice and Public Hearings.
3. The City Council may continue a public hearing prior to closing the hearing and taking action on the request.
4. Following the public hearing, the governing body may approve the request, deny the request, or refer the request back to the administration for additional consideration.
5. The annexation approved by the governing body may include changes from the request presented.
The City Council may consider concurrent requests for the subject site with the annexation request. However, separate motions for each requested action shall be required.
Pursuant to an initial zoning map change
as defined in Article 17, Definitions, the City Council may establish its zoning authority by adopting the current zoning designation, or by adopting a different designation.
The effective date of an annexation shall be a date determined by City Council.