Development Review and Approval Procedures
The “common provisions” of this section (Sec. 12.100) apply to all procedures in this article unless otherwise expressly stated.
The following table summarizes the review and approval procedures of this article. In the event of conflict between this summary table and the detailed procedures contained elsewhere in this article, the detailed procedures govern.
| Table 12-1: Review and Decision-making Authority Summary Table | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure | City Planner | Historic Preservation Commission | Planning Commission | Board of Adjustment | City Council |
| Development Code Text Amendment | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Zoning District Map Amendment | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Planned Developments | |||||
| Concept plan | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Development plan | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| PD Site Plan | DM | – | – | – | – |
| Historic Preservation Overlay Map Amendment | R | R | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Certificate of Appropriateness | R | DM | – | – | – |
| Minor plat | DM | – | – | – | – |
| Major Subdivision | |||||
| Preliminary Plan | R | – | DM | – | – |
| Final Plat | R | – | DM | – | – |
| Conditional Use | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Variance | R | – | – | <DM> | – |
| Appeals of Administrative Decisions | R | – | – | <DM> | – |
| Master Development Plan | R | – | DM | – | – |
| R = Review/Recommendation DM = Decision-Maker < > = Public Hearing Required | |||||
| Table 12-1: Review and Decision-making Authority Summary Table | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure | City Planner | Historic Preservation Commission | Planning Commission | Board of Adjustment | City Council |
| Development Code Text Amendment | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Zoning District Map Amendment | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Planned Developments | |||||
| Concept plan | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Development plan | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| PD Site Plan | DM | – | – | – | – |
| Historic Preservation Overlay Map Amendment | R | R | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Certificate of Appropriateness | R | DM | – | – | – |
| Minor plat | DM | – | – | – | – |
| Major Subdivision | |||||
| Preliminary Plan | R | – | DM | – | – |
| Final Plat | R | – | DM | – | – |
| Conditional Use | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Variance | R | – | – | <DM> | – |
| Appeals of Administrative Decisions | R | – | – | <DM> | – |
| Master Development Plan | R | – | DM | – | – |
| R = Review/Recommendation DM = Decision-Maker < > = Public Hearing Required | |||||
Preapplication meetings provide an early opportunity for City staff and applicants to discuss the procedures, standards and regulations required for development approval under this Development Code.
Preapplication meetings are required whenever the provisions of this Development Code expressly state that they are required. They are encouraged in all cases.
Preapplication meetings must be scheduled with planning division staff.
The City Planner may establish guidelines for preapplication meetings, including information that should be provided and any available alternatives to face-to-face meetings, such as telephone conversations and email correspondence.
Applications required under this Development Code must be submitted in a form and in such numbers as required by the City Planner. Applications must include materials and information as may be required by the City Planner to establish that the proposed activity complies with all applicable requirements of this Development Code.
All applications must be accompanied by the fee amount that has been established by City Council.
For the purposes of calculating any time frames required, pursuant to this Development Code or state law, for processing applications, the date of application filing is deemed to be the date on which an application is deemed complete by the City Planner. An application will be considered vested on the date it is deemed complete by the City Planner.
The City Planner, after consulting with review and decision-making bodies, is authorized to promulgate reasonable cycles and timelines for processing applications, including filing deadlines for receipt of complete applications.
The public hearing notice requirements described in this article are in addition to the general requirements of the Texas Open Meetings Act.
Except as otherwise expressly stated, when the procedures of this Development Code require that mailed notice be provided, the notice must be mailed to all owners of land within 300 feet of the lot lines of the land that is the subject of the application. Ownership information must be taken from the most recent City property tax records, except that when land is owned by a condominium association, notice must be given to the condominium association. Notice will be deemed to have been mailed on the date that it is deposited in United States Postal Service mail, properly addressed with postage prepaid. The failure of a property owner to receive notice is not cause for renotification or hearing postponement and does not invalidate any action taken on the application if a good faith attempt was made to comply with the notice requirements of this section.
Commentary: As a matter of practice, the City may provide additional forms of public hearing notice or otherwise exceed the minimum notice requirements prescribed by law.
When the procedures of this Development Code require that published notice be provided, the notice must be published in the City’s official newspaper, as designated by the City Council.
When the procedures of this Development Code require that posted (sign) notice be provided, at least one official public notice sign must be posted on the subject property for each 500 feet of street frontage or fraction thereof. Required notice signs must be posted in locations that are plainly visible from abutting streets.
Public hearing notices required by this Development Code must include at least the following information:
The following table provides a summary of the notice requirements for public hearings required under the procedures of this article. In the event of conflict between this summary table and the detailed procedures contained elsewhere in this article, the detailed procedures govern.
| Table 12-2: Public Hearing Notice Summary Table | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure | Planning Commission Hearing | Board of Adjustment Hearing | City Council Hearing |
| Development Code Text Amendment | None | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Zoning District Map Amendment (including Overlay Districts) | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Planned Developments | |||
| Concept plan | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Development plan | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| PD Site Plan | None | NA | NA |
| Major Subdivision | |||
| Preliminary Plan | None | NA | NA |
| Final Plan | None[1] | NA | NA |
| Conditional Use | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Variance | NA | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA |
| Appeals of Administrative Decisions | NA | Mailed 11 days before[2] | NA |
| [1] Some residential replats require hearing and public notice. See § 12.710.C. [2] Mailed notice required only to the subject property owner, individuals who request such notice in writing and other parties in interest. | |||
| Table 12-2: Public Hearing Notice Summary Table | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure | Planning Commission Hearing | Board of Adjustment Hearing | City Council Hearing |
| Development Code Text Amendment | None | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Zoning District Map Amendment (including Overlay Districts) | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Planned Developments | |||
| Concept plan | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Development plan | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| PD Site Plan | None | NA | NA |
| Major Subdivision | |||
| Preliminary Plan | None | NA | NA |
| Final Plan | None[1] | NA | NA |
| Conditional Use | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Variance | NA | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA |
| Appeals of Administrative Decisions | NA | Mailed 11 days before[2] | NA |
| [1] Some residential replats require hearing and public notice. See § 12.710.C. [2] Mailed notice required only to the subject property owner, individuals who request such notice in writing and other parties in interest. | |||
Review and decision-making bodies may take any action that is consistent with:
When a decision-making body approves an application with conditions, the conditions must relate to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed use or development and must be roughly proportional to the impacts of the use or development.
(Ord. No. 2024-20, 09/03/2024)
Effective on: 9/13/2024
The procedures of this section apply to all text amendments to the regulations of this Development Code.
An amendment to the text of this Development Code may be initiated by the City Council, the Planning Commission or the City Planner.
The City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation on the proposed Development Code text amendment. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the proposed amendment.
Notice of the City Council’s required public hearing on a Development Code text amendment must be published in the newspaper in accordance with §12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the date of the public hearing.
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed text amendment. Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed text amendment be approved, approved with modifications, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
In lieu of separate hearings, the City Council and Planning Commission are authorized to conduct a single, joint public hearing to consider Development Code text amendments. In such cases, applicable notice requirements for Planning Commission and City Council public hearings must be met.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The procedures of this section apply to all amendments to the zoning district map.
Amendments to the zoning district map may be initiated only by the City Council, the Planning Commission, or the owner of the property that is the subject of the proposed zoning district map amendment or by the subject property owner’s authorized agent.
Upon receipt of a complete zoning district map amendment application, the City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation on the proposed zoning district map amendment. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the proposed map amendment.
Notice of the Planning Commission’s required public hearing on a zoning district map amendment must be mailed to all affected property owners and posted, in accordance with § 12.106.A and § 12.106.C. Required notices must be mailed and posted at least 11 days before the Planning Commission public hearing.
Commentary: As a matter of practice, the City will also publish newspaper notice of the Planning Commission hearing on proposed zoning district map amendments.
Notice of the City Council’s required public hearing on a zoning district map amendment must be mailed to all affected property owners and published in accordance with § 12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the City Council public hearing.
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed map amendment. Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed amendment be approved, approved with modifications, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
The decision to amend the zoning district map is a matter of legislative discretion that is not controlled by any single standard. In making recommendations and decisions about zoning district map amendments, review and decision-making bodies must consider at least the following factors:
In lieu of separate hearings, the City Council and Planning Commission are authorized to conduct a single, joint public hearing to consider zoning district map amendments. In such cases, applicable notice requirements for Planning Commission and City Council public hearings must be met.
To help ensure the stability of land use and to promote and protect the quality of life for its citizens with respect to the use and enjoyment of their property, neither the City Council nor the Planning Commission may accept a reapplication for a zoning district map amendment for a period of 12 months following the date of the City Council's denial of the previous application. The City Council is authorized to waive this required 12-month waiting period requirement and accept a reapplication if the City Council determines that conditions have substantially and materially changed since the initial submission of the application and upon further evidence that such changes justify a rehearing and new amendment application.
(Ord. No. 2024-20, 09/03/2024)
Effective on: 9/13/2024
Planned development (PD) districts are established through the approval of a zoning district map amendment in accordance with Sec. 12.300. The PD approval process also requires either a two-step or three-step plan approval procedure. The three-step plan approval process entails (1) approval of an initial generalized “concept plan,” (2) approval of a more detailed “development plan,” and (3) staff approval of PD site plans. At the property owner’s option, the PD plan approval process may be consolidated into two steps, involving (1) review and approval of a “development plan” that includes all of the information otherwise required in the concept plan and development plan and (2) staff review and approval of PD site plans. This section sets forth the required review and approval procedures for approval of planned developments.
The first step of the PD approval process is approval of the zoning district map amendment establishing the PD district. A PD concept plan must be processed concurrently with a PD map amendment unless the applicant elects instead to forgo the concept plan stage and process a development plan concurrently with the PD map amendment.
PD concept plan (or development plan) applications may be filed only by the subject landowner or the subject landowner’s authorized agent.
Complete applications for concept plan (or development plan) approval must be filed with the City Planner at the same time that the PD zoning district map amendment application is filed.
Following receipt of a complete application for concept plan (or development plan) approval, the City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation that evaluates the proposed planned zoning district and concept plan (or development plan) in light of applicable PD district provisions of Article 2 and the criteria of §12.402.G. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the proposed PD map amendment and concept plan (or development plan).
Public hearing notice must be provided in accordance with the zoning district amendment notice procedures (see Sec. 12.304).
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed PD map amendment and concept plan (or development plan). Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed map amendment and concept plan (or development plan) be approved, approved with modifications, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
The developer may submit a development plan in lieu of a concept plan in accordance with Sec. 12.402.
If a PD district is established based upon a concept plan, review and approval of a development in accordance with this subsection (12.403) is required before any PD site plans are approved and before any development or construction is allowed within the PD district.
If the landowner fails to file an application for development plan approval within 2 years of the date of the PD district amendment and concept plan approval, the plan approval will be deemed to have lapsed and no development plan may be accepted for processing. In the event of lapse of approval, the City Council may institute proceedings to determine whether the land should be classified in another zoning district. In such case, the Planning Commission must deliver its recommendation, with a copy to the owner of the affected land, to the City Council, who must conduct a public hearing on the matter and determine what action is to be taken with respect to the PD district and whether to revoke or reinstate the developer's authorization to submit a development plan.
PD development plan applications may be filed only by the subject landowner or the subject landowner’s authorized agent.
Complete applications for development plan approval must be filed with the City Planner.
Following receipt of a complete application for development plan approval, the City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation that evaluates the PD development plan in light of the approved concept plan and the approval criteria of §12.403.I. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the proposed PD development plan.
Notice of the City Council’s required public hearing on a PD development plan must be published in accordance with §12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the City Council public hearing.
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed PD development plan. Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed development plan be approved, approved with conditions, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
In order to approve a PD development plan, the City Council must make all of the following determinations:
The ordinance approving the development plan, whether approved as part of the PD map amendment or after the PD map amendment and concept is approved, must include at a minimum the following information. The development plan must be incorporated as an exhibit to the ordinance:
Approval of PD site plans for development on individual building lots, parcels or tracts within the project is the final step of the PD approval process. Such reviews are intended to help ensure that all construction and development are consistent with the approved development plan and standards for the PD district.
A PD site plan must be submitted for approval within 2 years of the date that the development plan was approved. If a PD site plan is not submitted within such period, the development plan approval will be deemed to have lapsed and no PD site plan may be accepted for processing. In the event of lapse of approval, the City Council may institute proceedings to determine whether the development plan for the property should be modified or the property subject to the development plan should be reclassified in another zoning district, and whether to revoke or reinstate the developer's authorization to submit a site plan.
Approval of PD site plans must occur before a building permit may be issued for the subject property.
If the City Council finds that conditions imposed on development of the planned development project have not been timely fulfilled, or for any other reasons related to reasonable exercise of the powers conferred by Texas Local Government Code Chapter 211, that the zoning district classification of the PD district should be reexamined, the City Council may initiate review of the PD district in order to determine whether the authorized uses, standards and conditions applicable to development within the district should be changed for part or all of the undeveloped land within the district. If the City Council makes such determination, it must refer the matter to the Planning Commission for its recommendation and thereafter take appropriate action to modify the uses, standards or conditions applicable to development within the district in accordance with procedures applicable to zoning district amendments.
Effective on: 2/22/2023
The Historic Preservation (HPO) Overlay district map amendment procedures of this section govern the establishment, amendment or repeal of any HP Overlay district (see Sec. 3.400).
HP Overlay map amendments may be initiated by the City Council, Historic Preservation Commission or the owner of the real property that is the subject of the proposed map amendment or by the subject property owner’s authorized agent. Any request initiated by the City Council or Historic Preservation Commission is subject to the approval of the property owner before its consideration.
At a minimum, the zoning district map amendment procedures of Sec. 12.300 apply and must be followed for all HP Overlay map amendments, including all requirements for public notice and hearings and the rights of property owners to protest the amendment.
Effective on: 2/22/2023
Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness may be filed only by the subject property owner or by the subject property owner’s authorized agent.
Complete applications must be filed with the Historic Preservation Officer in a form established by the City. The application must include at least the following information:
In considering an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the Historic Preservation Commission must be guided by any adopted design guidelines, and where applicable, by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings. Any adopted design guidelines and Secretary of the Interior’s standards must be made available to the property owners of historic landmarks or property located within historic districts. The following items, as appropriate, must be considered in the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness:
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The subdivision review and approval procedures of this section are intended to help:
Except as otherwise expressly exempted, subdivisions of property within the City limits or the City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction are required to be approved in accordance with state law and the applicable plat approval procedures of this article before any of the following occurs:
All of the following are expressly exempt from the subdivision plat approval procedures of this section (Sec. 12.700):
Except as otherwise expressly stated in this section (Sec. 12.700), the subdivision plat approval process requires preliminary plan approval and final plat approval. Prior to the submission of a preliminary plan application required by this Development Code, applicants are encouraged to schedule and attend an optional preapplication meeting (see Sec. 12.103).
The City Planner is authorized to approve the following in accordance with the minor plat approval procedures of this section:
Commentary: The 30-day requirement for plat approval is imposed by state law. The City’s typical practice is to act on minor plats within 10 days.
After approval by the City Planner or Planning Commission, and when all requirements and conditions have been met, the approved plat must be recorded in the office of the Walker County clerk.
Major subdivisions are those that do not meet the minor plat applicability provisions of §12.706.A. Review and approval of a preliminary plan is required for all major subdivisions, except as otherwise expressly stated or unless the Planning Commission approves a consolidated preliminary and final plat.
The purpose of preliminary plan review and approval is to allow the Planning Commission to evaluate the proposed subdivision for compliance with applicable regulations of this Development Code and to evaluate construction plans for public improvements or to provide adequate security for construction of public improvements.
Complete applications for preliminary plan approval must be filed with the City Planner.
The City Planner must review the preliminary plan and recommend approval, approval with conditions or disapproval based on the plan’s compliance with the following:
Approval of a preliminary plan shall mean the following:
Minor amendments of an approved preliminary plan may be incorporated in an application for approval of a final plat without the necessity of filing a new application for approval of a preliminary plan. Authorized minor amendments include adjustment in street or alley alignments and lengths, adjustment in lot lines that do not result in creation of additional developable lots, or adjustments to utility or access easements. Minor amendments must comply with all applicable regulations of this Development Code and may not increase the extent of any previously approved waiver.
All proposed amendments to an approved preliminary plan that do not constitute a minor amendment are considered a major amendments and require approval of a new preliminary plan application. Examples of major amendments include any increase in the number of developable lots, additions or rerouting of streets and modification of parkland.
The applicant must provide a written description of proposed amendments to an approved preliminary plan. The City Planner is authorized to determine whether the proposed amendments are deemed minor or major amendments. At the discretion of the City Planner, a new preliminary plan application that proposes major amendments may be processed simultaneously with a final plat application.
If the proposed major amendments are not approved or if the applicant is unwilling to accept the terms and conditions required by the Planning Commission, the applicant may withdraw the proposed preliminary plan amendments by written request and retain the previously approved preliminary plan.
Final plat review is required for all major subdivisions and is the procedure used for approval of minor plats (See Sec. 12.706).
The purpose of a final plat is to record the subdivision of property including an accurate description of blocks, rights-of-way, easements, building lines and street names.
Complete applications for final plat approval must be filed with the City Planner.
Vacating plats, as described in Section 212.013 of the Texas Local Government Code require review and approval in accordance with the same procedures used for approval of final plats (see Sec. 12.708). Once recorded, a vacating plat has the effect of returning the property to its previous (platted or unplatted) condition.
Except as otherwise expressly stated in this article, replats of any portion of an already approved final plat, other than to amend or vacate the plat, require review and approval in accordance with the same procedures used for approval of final plats (see Sec. 12.708).
A replat of a final plat or portion of a final plat may be recorded and is controlling over the preceding plat without vacating that plat if the replat:
Pursuant to Section 212.015 of the Texas Local Government Act, the additional residential replat requirements of this subsection apply whenever:
Residential replats require public notice hearing before the Planning Commission. Notice of the Planning Commission’s public hearing must be published in accordance with §12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the public hearing.
Notice of the hearing must also be mailed, in accordance with §12.106.A, to the owners of lots that are in the original subdivision and that are within 300 feet of the lots to be replatted. Required notices must be mailed at least 16 days before the Planning Commission’s public hearing.
The Planning Commission is authorized to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove modifications and waivers of the infrastructure and public improvement standards of Article 10. Such waivers and modifications must be reviewed as approved in conjunction with review and approval of the preliminary subdivision plan. In order to approve a waiver or modification, the Planning Commission must find that:
Effective on: 2/22/2023
The conditional use approval procedure of this section is intended to provide a transparent, public review process for land uses that, because of their widely varying design and operational characteristics, require case-by-case review in order to determine whether they will be compatible with surrounding uses and development patterns.
All uses listed as conditional uses in Sec. 4.100 require review and approval in accordance with the procedures of this section.
Conditional use applications may be initiated only by the owner of the subject property or by the subject property owner’s authorized agent.
Upon receipt of a complete conditional use application, the City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation on the proposed conditional use. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the conditional use matter.
Notice of the City Council’s required public hearing on a conditional use application must be published in accordance with §12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the City Council public hearing.
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed conditional use. Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed conditional use be approved, approved with conditions, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
No conditional use may be recommended for approval or approved unless the respective review or decision-making body determines that evidence has been submitted to support each of the following conclusions:
Conditional use approval runs with the land and is not affected by changes of tenancy, ownership, or management.
Amendments to approved conditional uses may be approved in accordance with the following requirements. The conditional use amendment procedures may not be used to vary or modify Development Code requirements.
Effective on: 2/22/2023
A variance is a grant of relief to a property owner from strict compliance with the regulations of this Development Code. The intent of a variance is not to simply remove an inconvenience or financial burden that may result from compliance with applicable Development Code requirements. Variances are intended to help alleviate an undue hardship that would be caused by the literal enforcement of the subject ordinance requirements. They are intended to provide relief when the requirements of this Development Code render construction or placement of improvements impractical or impossible because of some unique or special characteristic of the subject property itself.
The Board of Adjustment is authorized to grant a variance to any regulation in this Development Code in accordance with the variance procedures of this section, except that the variance procedures may not be used to do any of the following:
Variance applications may be filed by the subject property owner or by the property owner’s authorized agent.
12.904.A A Pre-Application Meeting is required before an application may be filed.
12.904.B Complete applications for variances must be filed with the City Planner.
Notice of the Board of Adjustment’s required public hearing on a variance request must be mailed and posted, in accordance with §12.106.A and §12.106.C. Notice must also be mailed to any individuals who have, in writing, requested such notification. Required notices must be mailed and posted at least 11 days before the public hearing.
Approved variances run with the land and are not affected by changes of tenancy, ownership, or management.
A request for changes in the specific nature of the approved variance or changes to any conditions attached to an approved variance must be processed as a new variance application, including all requirements for fees, notices and public hearings.
Any person aggrieved by a variance decision of the Board of Adjustment may appeal the decision to district court. Appeals must be filed with district court of Walker County within 10 days of the date that the Board of Adjustment’s decision is filed in the office of the City Planner.
(Ord. No. 2024-20, 09/03/2024)
Effective on: 9/13/2024
The Board of Adjustment is authorized to hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there has been an error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by the City Planner or any other administrative official in the administration, interpretation or enforcement of this Development Code.
Appeals of administrative decisions may be filed by any person aggrieved by the City Planner’s or other administrative official’s decision or action. The Board of Adjustment is authorized to make determinations about whether individuals filing appeals are “aggrieved” by the decision or action.
The filing of a complete notice of appeal stays all proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed, unless the City Planner certifies to the Board of Adjustment, after the appeal is filed, that, because of facts stated in the certification, a stay would cause immediate peril to life or property, in which case the proceedings will not be stayed unless by a restraining order, may be granted by the Board of Appeals or by a court of record based on due cause shown.
Upon receipt of a complete application of appeal, the City Planner or other administrative official whose decision is being appealed must transmit to the Board of Adjustment all papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed is taken.
Notice of the Board of Adjustment’s required public hearing on an appeal of an administrative opinion must be mailed to the applicant, any individuals who have, in writing, requested such notification and any other parties in interest. Required notices must be mailed at least 11 days before the public hearing.
An appeal may be sustained only if the Board of Adjustment finds that the City Planner or other administrative official erred.
Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Adjustment may appeal the decision to the District Court. Appeals must be filed with the District Court of Walker County within 10 days of the date that the Board of Adjustment’s decision is filed in the office of the City Planner.
(Ord. No. 2024-20, 09/03/2024)
Effective on: 9/13/2024
Development Review and Approval Procedures
The “common provisions” of this section (Sec. 12.100) apply to all procedures in this article unless otherwise expressly stated.
The following table summarizes the review and approval procedures of this article. In the event of conflict between this summary table and the detailed procedures contained elsewhere in this article, the detailed procedures govern.
| Table 12-1: Review and Decision-making Authority Summary Table | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure | City Planner | Historic Preservation Commission | Planning Commission | Board of Adjustment | City Council |
| Development Code Text Amendment | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Zoning District Map Amendment | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Planned Developments | |||||
| Concept plan | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Development plan | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| PD Site Plan | DM | – | – | – | – |
| Historic Preservation Overlay Map Amendment | R | R | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Certificate of Appropriateness | R | DM | – | – | – |
| Minor plat | DM | – | – | – | – |
| Major Subdivision | |||||
| Preliminary Plan | R | – | DM | – | – |
| Final Plat | R | – | DM | – | – |
| Conditional Use | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Variance | R | – | – | <DM> | – |
| Appeals of Administrative Decisions | R | – | – | <DM> | – |
| Master Development Plan | R | – | DM | – | – |
| R = Review/Recommendation DM = Decision-Maker < > = Public Hearing Required | |||||
| Table 12-1: Review and Decision-making Authority Summary Table | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure | City Planner | Historic Preservation Commission | Planning Commission | Board of Adjustment | City Council |
| Development Code Text Amendment | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Zoning District Map Amendment | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Planned Developments | |||||
| Concept plan | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Development plan | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| PD Site Plan | DM | – | – | – | – |
| Historic Preservation Overlay Map Amendment | R | R | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Certificate of Appropriateness | R | DM | – | – | – |
| Minor plat | DM | – | – | – | – |
| Major Subdivision | |||||
| Preliminary Plan | R | – | DM | – | – |
| Final Plat | R | – | DM | – | – |
| Conditional Use | R | – | <R> | – | <DM> |
| Variance | R | – | – | <DM> | – |
| Appeals of Administrative Decisions | R | – | – | <DM> | – |
| Master Development Plan | R | – | DM | – | – |
| R = Review/Recommendation DM = Decision-Maker < > = Public Hearing Required | |||||
Preapplication meetings provide an early opportunity for City staff and applicants to discuss the procedures, standards and regulations required for development approval under this Development Code.
Preapplication meetings are required whenever the provisions of this Development Code expressly state that they are required. They are encouraged in all cases.
Preapplication meetings must be scheduled with planning division staff.
The City Planner may establish guidelines for preapplication meetings, including information that should be provided and any available alternatives to face-to-face meetings, such as telephone conversations and email correspondence.
Applications required under this Development Code must be submitted in a form and in such numbers as required by the City Planner. Applications must include materials and information as may be required by the City Planner to establish that the proposed activity complies with all applicable requirements of this Development Code.
All applications must be accompanied by the fee amount that has been established by City Council.
For the purposes of calculating any time frames required, pursuant to this Development Code or state law, for processing applications, the date of application filing is deemed to be the date on which an application is deemed complete by the City Planner. An application will be considered vested on the date it is deemed complete by the City Planner.
The City Planner, after consulting with review and decision-making bodies, is authorized to promulgate reasonable cycles and timelines for processing applications, including filing deadlines for receipt of complete applications.
The public hearing notice requirements described in this article are in addition to the general requirements of the Texas Open Meetings Act.
Except as otherwise expressly stated, when the procedures of this Development Code require that mailed notice be provided, the notice must be mailed to all owners of land within 300 feet of the lot lines of the land that is the subject of the application. Ownership information must be taken from the most recent City property tax records, except that when land is owned by a condominium association, notice must be given to the condominium association. Notice will be deemed to have been mailed on the date that it is deposited in United States Postal Service mail, properly addressed with postage prepaid. The failure of a property owner to receive notice is not cause for renotification or hearing postponement and does not invalidate any action taken on the application if a good faith attempt was made to comply with the notice requirements of this section.
Commentary: As a matter of practice, the City may provide additional forms of public hearing notice or otherwise exceed the minimum notice requirements prescribed by law.
When the procedures of this Development Code require that published notice be provided, the notice must be published in the City’s official newspaper, as designated by the City Council.
When the procedures of this Development Code require that posted (sign) notice be provided, at least one official public notice sign must be posted on the subject property for each 500 feet of street frontage or fraction thereof. Required notice signs must be posted in locations that are plainly visible from abutting streets.
Public hearing notices required by this Development Code must include at least the following information:
The following table provides a summary of the notice requirements for public hearings required under the procedures of this article. In the event of conflict between this summary table and the detailed procedures contained elsewhere in this article, the detailed procedures govern.
| Table 12-2: Public Hearing Notice Summary Table | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure | Planning Commission Hearing | Board of Adjustment Hearing | City Council Hearing |
| Development Code Text Amendment | None | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Zoning District Map Amendment (including Overlay Districts) | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Planned Developments | |||
| Concept plan | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Development plan | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| PD Site Plan | None | NA | NA |
| Major Subdivision | |||
| Preliminary Plan | None | NA | NA |
| Final Plan | None[1] | NA | NA |
| Conditional Use | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Variance | NA | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA |
| Appeals of Administrative Decisions | NA | Mailed 11 days before[2] | NA |
| [1] Some residential replats require hearing and public notice. See § 12.710.C. [2] Mailed notice required only to the subject property owner, individuals who request such notice in writing and other parties in interest. | |||
| Table 12-2: Public Hearing Notice Summary Table | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure | Planning Commission Hearing | Board of Adjustment Hearing | City Council Hearing |
| Development Code Text Amendment | None | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Zoning District Map Amendment (including Overlay Districts) | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Planned Developments | |||
| Concept plan | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Development plan | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| PD Site Plan | None | NA | NA |
| Major Subdivision | |||
| Preliminary Plan | None | NA | NA |
| Final Plan | None[1] | NA | NA |
| Conditional Use | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA | Published 16 days before |
| Variance | NA | Mailed & Posted 11 days before | NA |
| Appeals of Administrative Decisions | NA | Mailed 11 days before[2] | NA |
| [1] Some residential replats require hearing and public notice. See § 12.710.C. [2] Mailed notice required only to the subject property owner, individuals who request such notice in writing and other parties in interest. | |||
Review and decision-making bodies may take any action that is consistent with:
When a decision-making body approves an application with conditions, the conditions must relate to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed use or development and must be roughly proportional to the impacts of the use or development.
(Ord. No. 2024-20, 09/03/2024)
Effective on: 9/13/2024
The procedures of this section apply to all text amendments to the regulations of this Development Code.
An amendment to the text of this Development Code may be initiated by the City Council, the Planning Commission or the City Planner.
The City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation on the proposed Development Code text amendment. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the proposed amendment.
Notice of the City Council’s required public hearing on a Development Code text amendment must be published in the newspaper in accordance with §12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the date of the public hearing.
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed text amendment. Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed text amendment be approved, approved with modifications, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
In lieu of separate hearings, the City Council and Planning Commission are authorized to conduct a single, joint public hearing to consider Development Code text amendments. In such cases, applicable notice requirements for Planning Commission and City Council public hearings must be met.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The procedures of this section apply to all amendments to the zoning district map.
Amendments to the zoning district map may be initiated only by the City Council, the Planning Commission, or the owner of the property that is the subject of the proposed zoning district map amendment or by the subject property owner’s authorized agent.
Upon receipt of a complete zoning district map amendment application, the City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation on the proposed zoning district map amendment. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the proposed map amendment.
Notice of the Planning Commission’s required public hearing on a zoning district map amendment must be mailed to all affected property owners and posted, in accordance with § 12.106.A and § 12.106.C. Required notices must be mailed and posted at least 11 days before the Planning Commission public hearing.
Commentary: As a matter of practice, the City will also publish newspaper notice of the Planning Commission hearing on proposed zoning district map amendments.
Notice of the City Council’s required public hearing on a zoning district map amendment must be mailed to all affected property owners and published in accordance with § 12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the City Council public hearing.
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed map amendment. Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed amendment be approved, approved with modifications, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
The decision to amend the zoning district map is a matter of legislative discretion that is not controlled by any single standard. In making recommendations and decisions about zoning district map amendments, review and decision-making bodies must consider at least the following factors:
In lieu of separate hearings, the City Council and Planning Commission are authorized to conduct a single, joint public hearing to consider zoning district map amendments. In such cases, applicable notice requirements for Planning Commission and City Council public hearings must be met.
To help ensure the stability of land use and to promote and protect the quality of life for its citizens with respect to the use and enjoyment of their property, neither the City Council nor the Planning Commission may accept a reapplication for a zoning district map amendment for a period of 12 months following the date of the City Council's denial of the previous application. The City Council is authorized to waive this required 12-month waiting period requirement and accept a reapplication if the City Council determines that conditions have substantially and materially changed since the initial submission of the application and upon further evidence that such changes justify a rehearing and new amendment application.
(Ord. No. 2024-20, 09/03/2024)
Effective on: 9/13/2024
Planned development (PD) districts are established through the approval of a zoning district map amendment in accordance with Sec. 12.300. The PD approval process also requires either a two-step or three-step plan approval procedure. The three-step plan approval process entails (1) approval of an initial generalized “concept plan,” (2) approval of a more detailed “development plan,” and (3) staff approval of PD site plans. At the property owner’s option, the PD plan approval process may be consolidated into two steps, involving (1) review and approval of a “development plan” that includes all of the information otherwise required in the concept plan and development plan and (2) staff review and approval of PD site plans. This section sets forth the required review and approval procedures for approval of planned developments.
The first step of the PD approval process is approval of the zoning district map amendment establishing the PD district. A PD concept plan must be processed concurrently with a PD map amendment unless the applicant elects instead to forgo the concept plan stage and process a development plan concurrently with the PD map amendment.
PD concept plan (or development plan) applications may be filed only by the subject landowner or the subject landowner’s authorized agent.
Complete applications for concept plan (or development plan) approval must be filed with the City Planner at the same time that the PD zoning district map amendment application is filed.
Following receipt of a complete application for concept plan (or development plan) approval, the City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation that evaluates the proposed planned zoning district and concept plan (or development plan) in light of applicable PD district provisions of Article 2 and the criteria of §12.402.G. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the proposed PD map amendment and concept plan (or development plan).
Public hearing notice must be provided in accordance with the zoning district amendment notice procedures (see Sec. 12.304).
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed PD map amendment and concept plan (or development plan). Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed map amendment and concept plan (or development plan) be approved, approved with modifications, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
The developer may submit a development plan in lieu of a concept plan in accordance with Sec. 12.402.
If a PD district is established based upon a concept plan, review and approval of a development in accordance with this subsection (12.403) is required before any PD site plans are approved and before any development or construction is allowed within the PD district.
If the landowner fails to file an application for development plan approval within 2 years of the date of the PD district amendment and concept plan approval, the plan approval will be deemed to have lapsed and no development plan may be accepted for processing. In the event of lapse of approval, the City Council may institute proceedings to determine whether the land should be classified in another zoning district. In such case, the Planning Commission must deliver its recommendation, with a copy to the owner of the affected land, to the City Council, who must conduct a public hearing on the matter and determine what action is to be taken with respect to the PD district and whether to revoke or reinstate the developer's authorization to submit a development plan.
PD development plan applications may be filed only by the subject landowner or the subject landowner’s authorized agent.
Complete applications for development plan approval must be filed with the City Planner.
Following receipt of a complete application for development plan approval, the City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation that evaluates the PD development plan in light of the approved concept plan and the approval criteria of §12.403.I. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the proposed PD development plan.
Notice of the City Council’s required public hearing on a PD development plan must be published in accordance with §12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the City Council public hearing.
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed PD development plan. Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed development plan be approved, approved with conditions, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
In order to approve a PD development plan, the City Council must make all of the following determinations:
The ordinance approving the development plan, whether approved as part of the PD map amendment or after the PD map amendment and concept is approved, must include at a minimum the following information. The development plan must be incorporated as an exhibit to the ordinance:
Approval of PD site plans for development on individual building lots, parcels or tracts within the project is the final step of the PD approval process. Such reviews are intended to help ensure that all construction and development are consistent with the approved development plan and standards for the PD district.
A PD site plan must be submitted for approval within 2 years of the date that the development plan was approved. If a PD site plan is not submitted within such period, the development plan approval will be deemed to have lapsed and no PD site plan may be accepted for processing. In the event of lapse of approval, the City Council may institute proceedings to determine whether the development plan for the property should be modified or the property subject to the development plan should be reclassified in another zoning district, and whether to revoke or reinstate the developer's authorization to submit a site plan.
Approval of PD site plans must occur before a building permit may be issued for the subject property.
If the City Council finds that conditions imposed on development of the planned development project have not been timely fulfilled, or for any other reasons related to reasonable exercise of the powers conferred by Texas Local Government Code Chapter 211, that the zoning district classification of the PD district should be reexamined, the City Council may initiate review of the PD district in order to determine whether the authorized uses, standards and conditions applicable to development within the district should be changed for part or all of the undeveloped land within the district. If the City Council makes such determination, it must refer the matter to the Planning Commission for its recommendation and thereafter take appropriate action to modify the uses, standards or conditions applicable to development within the district in accordance with procedures applicable to zoning district amendments.
Effective on: 2/22/2023
The Historic Preservation (HPO) Overlay district map amendment procedures of this section govern the establishment, amendment or repeal of any HP Overlay district (see Sec. 3.400).
HP Overlay map amendments may be initiated by the City Council, Historic Preservation Commission or the owner of the real property that is the subject of the proposed map amendment or by the subject property owner’s authorized agent. Any request initiated by the City Council or Historic Preservation Commission is subject to the approval of the property owner before its consideration.
At a minimum, the zoning district map amendment procedures of Sec. 12.300 apply and must be followed for all HP Overlay map amendments, including all requirements for public notice and hearings and the rights of property owners to protest the amendment.
Effective on: 2/22/2023
Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness may be filed only by the subject property owner or by the subject property owner’s authorized agent.
Complete applications must be filed with the Historic Preservation Officer in a form established by the City. The application must include at least the following information:
In considering an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the Historic Preservation Commission must be guided by any adopted design guidelines, and where applicable, by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings. Any adopted design guidelines and Secretary of the Interior’s standards must be made available to the property owners of historic landmarks or property located within historic districts. The following items, as appropriate, must be considered in the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness:
Effective on: 1/1/1901
The subdivision review and approval procedures of this section are intended to help:
Except as otherwise expressly exempted, subdivisions of property within the City limits or the City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction are required to be approved in accordance with state law and the applicable plat approval procedures of this article before any of the following occurs:
All of the following are expressly exempt from the subdivision plat approval procedures of this section (Sec. 12.700):
Except as otherwise expressly stated in this section (Sec. 12.700), the subdivision plat approval process requires preliminary plan approval and final plat approval. Prior to the submission of a preliminary plan application required by this Development Code, applicants are encouraged to schedule and attend an optional preapplication meeting (see Sec. 12.103).
The City Planner is authorized to approve the following in accordance with the minor plat approval procedures of this section:
Commentary: The 30-day requirement for plat approval is imposed by state law. The City’s typical practice is to act on minor plats within 10 days.
After approval by the City Planner or Planning Commission, and when all requirements and conditions have been met, the approved plat must be recorded in the office of the Walker County clerk.
Major subdivisions are those that do not meet the minor plat applicability provisions of §12.706.A. Review and approval of a preliminary plan is required for all major subdivisions, except as otherwise expressly stated or unless the Planning Commission approves a consolidated preliminary and final plat.
The purpose of preliminary plan review and approval is to allow the Planning Commission to evaluate the proposed subdivision for compliance with applicable regulations of this Development Code and to evaluate construction plans for public improvements or to provide adequate security for construction of public improvements.
Complete applications for preliminary plan approval must be filed with the City Planner.
The City Planner must review the preliminary plan and recommend approval, approval with conditions or disapproval based on the plan’s compliance with the following:
Approval of a preliminary plan shall mean the following:
Minor amendments of an approved preliminary plan may be incorporated in an application for approval of a final plat without the necessity of filing a new application for approval of a preliminary plan. Authorized minor amendments include adjustment in street or alley alignments and lengths, adjustment in lot lines that do not result in creation of additional developable lots, or adjustments to utility or access easements. Minor amendments must comply with all applicable regulations of this Development Code and may not increase the extent of any previously approved waiver.
All proposed amendments to an approved preliminary plan that do not constitute a minor amendment are considered a major amendments and require approval of a new preliminary plan application. Examples of major amendments include any increase in the number of developable lots, additions or rerouting of streets and modification of parkland.
The applicant must provide a written description of proposed amendments to an approved preliminary plan. The City Planner is authorized to determine whether the proposed amendments are deemed minor or major amendments. At the discretion of the City Planner, a new preliminary plan application that proposes major amendments may be processed simultaneously with a final plat application.
If the proposed major amendments are not approved or if the applicant is unwilling to accept the terms and conditions required by the Planning Commission, the applicant may withdraw the proposed preliminary plan amendments by written request and retain the previously approved preliminary plan.
Final plat review is required for all major subdivisions and is the procedure used for approval of minor plats (See Sec. 12.706).
The purpose of a final plat is to record the subdivision of property including an accurate description of blocks, rights-of-way, easements, building lines and street names.
Complete applications for final plat approval must be filed with the City Planner.
Vacating plats, as described in Section 212.013 of the Texas Local Government Code require review and approval in accordance with the same procedures used for approval of final plats (see Sec. 12.708). Once recorded, a vacating plat has the effect of returning the property to its previous (platted or unplatted) condition.
Except as otherwise expressly stated in this article, replats of any portion of an already approved final plat, other than to amend or vacate the plat, require review and approval in accordance with the same procedures used for approval of final plats (see Sec. 12.708).
A replat of a final plat or portion of a final plat may be recorded and is controlling over the preceding plat without vacating that plat if the replat:
Pursuant to Section 212.015 of the Texas Local Government Act, the additional residential replat requirements of this subsection apply whenever:
Residential replats require public notice hearing before the Planning Commission. Notice of the Planning Commission’s public hearing must be published in accordance with §12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the public hearing.
Notice of the hearing must also be mailed, in accordance with §12.106.A, to the owners of lots that are in the original subdivision and that are within 300 feet of the lots to be replatted. Required notices must be mailed at least 16 days before the Planning Commission’s public hearing.
The Planning Commission is authorized to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove modifications and waivers of the infrastructure and public improvement standards of Article 10. Such waivers and modifications must be reviewed as approved in conjunction with review and approval of the preliminary subdivision plan. In order to approve a waiver or modification, the Planning Commission must find that:
Effective on: 2/22/2023
The conditional use approval procedure of this section is intended to provide a transparent, public review process for land uses that, because of their widely varying design and operational characteristics, require case-by-case review in order to determine whether they will be compatible with surrounding uses and development patterns.
All uses listed as conditional uses in Sec. 4.100 require review and approval in accordance with the procedures of this section.
Conditional use applications may be initiated only by the owner of the subject property or by the subject property owner’s authorized agent.
Upon receipt of a complete conditional use application, the City Planner must prepare a report and recommendation on the proposed conditional use. The report must be transmitted to the Planning Commission before their public hearing on the conditional use matter.
Notice of the City Council’s required public hearing on a conditional use application must be published in accordance with §12.106.B. The notice must be published at least 16 days before the City Council public hearing.
The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed conditional use. Following the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must act by simple majority vote to recommend that the proposed conditional use be approved, approved with conditions, or denied and transmit its recommendations to the City Council.
No conditional use may be recommended for approval or approved unless the respective review or decision-making body determines that evidence has been submitted to support each of the following conclusions:
Conditional use approval runs with the land and is not affected by changes of tenancy, ownership, or management.
Amendments to approved conditional uses may be approved in accordance with the following requirements. The conditional use amendment procedures may not be used to vary or modify Development Code requirements.
Effective on: 2/22/2023
A variance is a grant of relief to a property owner from strict compliance with the regulations of this Development Code. The intent of a variance is not to simply remove an inconvenience or financial burden that may result from compliance with applicable Development Code requirements. Variances are intended to help alleviate an undue hardship that would be caused by the literal enforcement of the subject ordinance requirements. They are intended to provide relief when the requirements of this Development Code render construction or placement of improvements impractical or impossible because of some unique or special characteristic of the subject property itself.
The Board of Adjustment is authorized to grant a variance to any regulation in this Development Code in accordance with the variance procedures of this section, except that the variance procedures may not be used to do any of the following:
Variance applications may be filed by the subject property owner or by the property owner’s authorized agent.
12.904.A A Pre-Application Meeting is required before an application may be filed.
12.904.B Complete applications for variances must be filed with the City Planner.
Notice of the Board of Adjustment’s required public hearing on a variance request must be mailed and posted, in accordance with §12.106.A and §12.106.C. Notice must also be mailed to any individuals who have, in writing, requested such notification. Required notices must be mailed and posted at least 11 days before the public hearing.
Approved variances run with the land and are not affected by changes of tenancy, ownership, or management.
A request for changes in the specific nature of the approved variance or changes to any conditions attached to an approved variance must be processed as a new variance application, including all requirements for fees, notices and public hearings.
Any person aggrieved by a variance decision of the Board of Adjustment may appeal the decision to district court. Appeals must be filed with district court of Walker County within 10 days of the date that the Board of Adjustment’s decision is filed in the office of the City Planner.
(Ord. No. 2024-20, 09/03/2024)
Effective on: 9/13/2024
The Board of Adjustment is authorized to hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there has been an error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by the City Planner or any other administrative official in the administration, interpretation or enforcement of this Development Code.
Appeals of administrative decisions may be filed by any person aggrieved by the City Planner’s or other administrative official’s decision or action. The Board of Adjustment is authorized to make determinations about whether individuals filing appeals are “aggrieved” by the decision or action.
The filing of a complete notice of appeal stays all proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed, unless the City Planner certifies to the Board of Adjustment, after the appeal is filed, that, because of facts stated in the certification, a stay would cause immediate peril to life or property, in which case the proceedings will not be stayed unless by a restraining order, may be granted by the Board of Appeals or by a court of record based on due cause shown.
Upon receipt of a complete application of appeal, the City Planner or other administrative official whose decision is being appealed must transmit to the Board of Adjustment all papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed is taken.
Notice of the Board of Adjustment’s required public hearing on an appeal of an administrative opinion must be mailed to the applicant, any individuals who have, in writing, requested such notification and any other parties in interest. Required notices must be mailed at least 11 days before the public hearing.
An appeal may be sustained only if the Board of Adjustment finds that the City Planner or other administrative official erred.
Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Adjustment may appeal the decision to the District Court. Appeals must be filed with the District Court of Walker County within 10 days of the date that the Board of Adjustment’s decision is filed in the office of the City Planner.
(Ord. No. 2024-20, 09/03/2024)
Effective on: 9/13/2024