A. Applicability. All towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities shall be subject to the requirements of this section except those used solely for transmissions and receipt by a single user and not otherwise restricted within the applicable zoning district, such as amateur radio and devices necessary for a subscription to a commercial wireless provider service.
a. Towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or (subject to any applicable standards of the FAA) be painted to reduce visual obtrusiveness and blend with the surroundings.
b. Antennas and related electrical and mechanical equipment attached to alternative tower structures must be of a color compatible with the color of the supporting structures to make the antennas and related equipment visually unobtrusive.
c. Improvements comprising a wireless telecommunications facility shall, to the extent possible, use a mix of materials, colors, textures, screening, and landscaping that blend the appearance of the improvements into the natural setting.
d. Towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities shall not be artificially lit, except to the extent required by the FAA or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the application shall contain a list of optional lighting devices and the applicant’s reasons for choosing the selected light device over each of the other options. Economy and serviceability are among acceptable criteria for selection.
e. All towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities shall meet or exceed the standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other agency of the state or federal government with the authority to regulate them or their components. If the standards and regulations are changed, the owners of the towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities shall bring their facilities into compliance within six months of the effective date of the updated standards, unless a different compliance schedule is mandated by controlling law.
f. No signs shall be placed or allowed to be placed on any tower, antenna, or wireless telecommunications facility except required safety and warning signs.
g. Towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities shall not be placed in a direct line of sight with historic or scenic view corridors as designated by the Town or by any state or federal law or agency.
h. Accessory structures used in direct support of a tower, antenna, or wireless telecommunications facility are permitted but may not be used for offices, vehicle storage, or other outdoor storage. Mobile or immobile equipment not used in direct support of the facilities shall not be stored or parked on site.
2. Security. All towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities shall be equipped with an appropriate anti-climbing device or other similar protective device to prevent unauthorized access.
3. Collocation. The Town encourages collocation of telecommunications facilities.
a. Preference: An applicant who certifies in writing that the tower, antenna, or wireless telecommunications facility constructed will be suitable for collocating multiple providers and, as a condition of zoning, executes a written agreement (collocation agreement) with the Town consenting to application of the terms of this provision shall, unless waived by the applicant, receive preferential treatment for either a final approval or rejection of an application for a special use permit, or favorable terms for a lease agreement with the Town. Any such preferential treatment or favorable terms can only be given after the Town receives a complete and correct application (either for a special use permit or a lease agreement), all fees, and required forms and documents.
b. Collocation agreement: The collocation agreement shall provide for at least the following:
(1) The applicant shall accept for collocation any FCC licensed wireless telecommunications provider (additional user) who uses any compatible technology, on commercially reasonable terms considering all of the factors a reasonable leasing company would deem relevant in entering into a collocation agreement.
(2) Any additional user seeking collocation shall submit specifications for its equipment and use to the applicant and the applicant shall respond to the additional user in writing within 30 days, furnishing all technical requirements that must be resolved before collocation.
(3) The applicant and the additional user shall attempt in good faith to resolve any outstanding technical or business terms. If technical or business terms are not worked out 30 days or more after the applicant’s response, the additional user may submit a written request to the applicant for arbitration, and the applicant shall cooperate with the additional user to arrange for the American Arbitration Association to designate a person knowledgeable in collocation of wireless telecommunications providers to act as arbitrator and to decide all issues between the parties. The arbitration shall be held within 30 days after the request for arbitration. Upon the written agreement of both parties, a different procedure for binding dispute resolution may be used. The result of the arbitration or other resolution method agreed to by the parties shall be binding and non-appealable.
(4) If the applicant has failed to comply with the decision of the arbitrator within 15 days after the arbitrator’s decision, then either the special use permit or the lease agreement with the Town related to the tower, antenna, or wireless telecommunications facility shall be terminated and the facility shall be removed within 30 days of the date of the arbitrator’s certificate. If the applicant fails to remove the facility within the specified time, the Town shall have all remedies available to it for elimination of a use in violation of the Town Code.
(5) The additional user becomes a third-party beneficiary to the collocation agreement upon submitting the request seeking collocation.
(6) The Town shall not be a party to any contract between the applicant and the additional user, and shall not be made a party to any dispute or arbitration between them. Applicant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Town from and against any cost, including reasonable attorneys fees, associated with any dispute or arbitration between the applicant and the additional user.
(7) A lease or other agreement containing the business terms proposed by the applicant for collocation shall be attached as an exhibit to the collocation agreement.
4. Modification of structures. No existing tower, antenna or wireless telecommunications facility may be changed or modified except as follows:
a. The change or modification is required by a change in user or technology;
b. The change does not increase the height of the tallest component above the height approved in this Chapter, in a special use permit, in a lease agreement, or (in the case of an existing facility) above its current height (except as allowed under 47 United States Code Section 1455);
c. At the conclusion of the change or modification, the structure complies with all requirements of the building department; and
d. Each of the documents and certifications required for a special use permit are provided.
5. Abandonment of facilities.
a. Any tower, antenna, or wireless telecommunications facility not operated for a continuous period of 12 months due to some conduct within the control of and attributable to the property owner shall be considered abandoned, despite the owner or operator’s future intentions for the facility. The owner of a telecommunications facility and the owner of the real property where the facility is located are jointly responsible for removing the abandoned facility. If the facility is not removed within 60 days after the owner and operator receive notice of abandonment from the Town, the Town may remove the facility and place a lien upon the property for the costs of removal. The Town may pursue all legal remedies available to it to ensure that abandoned telecommunications facilities are removed. The Town’s delay in acting shall not waive the Town’s right to act. The Town may seek to have the telecommunications facility removed regardless of the owner’s or operator’s intent to operate the facility and regardless of any permits, federal, state or otherwise, which may have been granted.
b. If the owner of an abandoned telecommunications facility wishes to use the abandoned facility, the owner must first apply for and receive all applicable permits and meet all of the conditions of this Chapter as if the facility were new.
6. Removal of facilities.
a. All towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities shall be maintained in compliance with standards contained in applicable state or local building and technical codes, as well as the applicable health and safety standards established by the FCC or other bodies having jurisdiction, to ensure their structural integrity. If any telecommunications facility is determined not to comply with the Code standards or to constitute a danger to persons or property, the owner of the facility and the owner of the real property shall have 30 days after notice from the Town to bring the facility into compliance. If the telecommunications facility is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Town may provide notice to the owners requiring the telecommunications facility to be removed. If the telecommunications facility is not removed within 30 days of receipt of the Town’s notice of removal, the Town may remove the facility and place a lien upon the property for the removal costs. The Town’s delay in acting shall not waive the Town’s right to act. The Town may pursue all available legal remedies to ensure that telecommunications facilities not in compliance with the Code standards or which constitute a danger to persons or property are brought into compliance or removed. The Town may seek to have the telecommunications facility removed regardless of the owner’s or operator’s intent to operate the facility and regardless of any permits, federal, state, or otherwise, which may have been granted.
b. Upon removal of the wireless telecommunication facility, the site shall be returned to its natural state and topography, and vegetated consistent with the natural surroundings.
7. Zoning compliance. For purposes of determining whether the installation of a tower, antenna, or wireless telecommunications facility complies with zoning district development regulations, including but not limited to setback requirements, lot-coverage requirements, and similar requirements, the dimensions of the entire lot shall control even if the tower, antenna, or wireless telecommunications facility is located on a separately leased portion of the lot. Setback and separation distances shall be calculated and applied irrespective of municipal and county jurisdictional boundaries.
8. Setbacks. The following setback requirements apply to all towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities in zoning districts other than PL for which a special use permit is required. Standard setback requirements may be decreased because of a design safety certification under subparagraph
13-07-090 B. 5 above, or as a condition imposed by the Board of Adjustment or the Council if the goals of this Chapter would be better served by them:
a. Towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities must be set back from any lot line a distance equal to at least 100% of the height of the structure unless the zoning district where the facility is located requires a greater setback.
b. Guys and accessory structures must satisfy the minimum zoning district setback requirements.
C. Real property owners in the PL (Public Lands) zone may require owners of towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities to enter into lease agreements as pre-requisites to exercising the permitted use for towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities in the PL (Public Lands) zone. Real property owners shall be guided by the current Wireless Telecommunications Plan for Central Yavapai County, as adopted by the Town from time to time in conjunction with other local jurisdictions, in determining whether to enter into such lease agreements. The decision to enter into lease agreements is at the sole discretion of the real property owners, bearing in mind any prior contractual obligations and the option of tower, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities owners to seek special use permits to locate the facilities in other zoning districts if sites in the PL (Public Lands) zone are unavailable. Prior to entering into lease agreements, real property owners and potential lessees shall conduct at least one informational meeting for owners of real property located within 300 feet of the proposed facilities.
D. Towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities that do not qualify as accessory buildings, structures, or uses, but that otherwise comply with the requirements of this Chapter, may be located on lots containing other principal buildings, structures, or uses in accordance with the requirements of this section.
E. For towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities other than those used solely for transmissions and receipt by a single use (such as amateur radio and devices necessary for use of a subscription to a commercial wireless provider service), zoning district height limitations for buildings:
1. Shall not apply in the PL (Public Lands) zone.
2. Shall apply in all other zoning districts.
3. Except as otherwise provided for as a condition of a special use permit issued pursuant to this section.
F. For purposes of determining whether the installation of a tower, antenna, or wireless telecommunications facility complies with zoning district development regulations, including (but not limited to) setback requirements:
1. Lot-coverage requirements, and similar requirements, the dimensions of the entire lot shall control even though the tower, antenna or wireless telecommunications facility may be located on a separately leased portion of the lot.
2. Setback and separation distances shall be calculated and applied irrespective of municipal and county jurisdictional boundaries.
G. The following setback requirements shall apply to all towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities in zoning districts other than PL for which a special use permit is required, unless the applicant provides certification that the structure has been specially designed to be safe from collapse and except as otherwise provided for as a condition of a special use permit issued pursuant to this section:
1. Towers, antennas, and wireless telecommunications facilities must be set back from any lot line a distance equal to at least 100% of the height of the structure unless a greater setback is required for the zoning district.
2. Guys and accessory structures must satisfy the minimum zoning district setback requirements.
H. Applications for special use permit to construct towers, antennas, or wireless telecommunications facilities shall be accompanied by the following additional information:
1. The zoning classification of the site;
2. A map of all properties within 300 feet of the proposed site, together with a mailing list of all property owners within 300 feet and stamped envelopes pre-addressed to each such property owner;
3. A map of adjacent roadways;
4. A drawing of proposed means of access;
5. Elevation drawings of the exterior of each element of the proposed wireless telecommunications facility;
6. A complete landscape plan stamped by a registered landscape architect;
7. The setback distance between the proposed wireless telecommunications facility and
a. the nearest residential unit,
b. all residentially zoned properties within 300 feet of the wireless telecommunications facility,
c. all schools within 300 feet of the wireless telecommunications facility, and
d. all hospitals within 300 feet of the wireless telecommunications facility;
8. The separation distance from other towers described in the inventory of existing sites, their type of construction, and the owners names and addresses;
9. The method of fencing;
14. Certification that the wireless telecommunications facility, as represented in the application, will comply with all FAA, FCC, and other applicable regulations;
15. A map of all locations owned, leased or operated by the applicant (and their coverages) within ten miles of the proposed site, or which are capable of communication with the proposed site by wireless means;
16. A map of all designated multiple-site locations within two miles of the proposed site;
17. An inventory of the location, height, and type of applicant’s existing and proposed towers, wireless telecommunications facilities, and alternative tower structures located in or within one mile of the Town;
18. Certification that all wireless telecommunications facilities within 25 miles of the proposed site which are owned, leased, or operated by any provider who will use the proposed site comply with all applicable FCC, FAA, and other applicable regulations;
19. Certification of whether the applicant is applying for collocation treatment;
20. Certification that police departments, fire departments, other public safety agencies, water departments, and local governments located within five miles of the proposed site have been notified of the application;
21. Copies of all federal and state wireless telecommunications licenses for providers who will use the proposed facility;
22. A list of all existing PL zoning district sites located within five miles of the proposed site, with an explanation why each site is not adequate for reasonable commercial coverage; and
23. A list of each wireless telecommunications facility with which the proposed site has the potential to interfere, including the name, address, and phone number of each owner. Within ten days following filing of the application, the applicant shall file a certificate that each of the listed persons have been given written notice of the application.
I. When considering a special use permit application for towers, antennas and wireless telecommunications facilities, the Commission and the Council shall consider such factors as the height proposed for facilities, proximity to other uses, proximity of historic sites, proximity of landmarks, vehicle traffic routes, proximity of medical facilities, air routes, topographical features, availability of public utilities, site access, and suitability of alternative sites. With regard to alternative sites, the Commission and the Council shall be guided by the most recently adopted Wireless Telecommunications Plan for Central Yavapai County which sets forth the priority of properties on which to place towers, antennas and wireless telecommunications facilities. In addition, the following performance criteria are deemed to be consistent with the health, safety and welfare of the community with regard to siting of towers, antennas and wireless telecommunications facilities:
1. Existing structures will be preferred over new structures;
2. New structures which appear to be structures commonly found within the zoning district are preferred over apparent wireless telecommunications facilities;
3. Wireless telecommunications facilities which cannot be readily observed from adjacent streets are preferred;
4. Heights which do not exceed the height limitations for the particular zoning district are preferred;
5. Collocation of multiple uses on a single wireless telecommunications facility has significant favorable weight in evaluating an application;
6. Network development plans which achieve the fewest number of wireless telecommunications facilities reasonably necessary for commercial coverage have significant favorable weight in evaluating an application;
7. Location in the least restrictive zoning districts is preferred;
8. New facilities should not be sited within 300 feet of any residences (including single- and multi-family residences and residential facilities such as community residences and nursing homes), schools (but not including secondary school and college athletic fields), or hospitals; and
9. Suitability of the location for collocation of governmental public service wireless communication facilities has significant favorable weight in evaluating an application.
J. When issuing a decision on a special use permit application for towers, antennas and wireless telecommunications facilities, a written decision shall be issued based on the evidence in the written record, and no decision shall attempt to regulate radiofrequency emissions (except to require that applicants meet FCC standards).
(Rewritten and re-codified by Ordinance No 2024-947, 12/11/2024. Previously codified at sections 13-03-080, 13-21-060(A), 13-21-110, 13-21-120(E) and (F), and 13-21-160. Prior history: Enacted by Ordinance No. 439, 06/25/1998)