Zoneomics Logo
search icon

West Palm Beach City Zoning Code

ARTICLE II

- ORGANIZATION, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT

F

Footnotes:

--- (2) ---

Cross reference— Administration, ch. 2.

Sec. 94-31. - Decision-making and administrative authorities.

  • a.
    City commission. The city commission shall have the following duties and powers:
    1. 1.
      To consider and enact zoning code regulations;
    2. 2.
      To consider and enact, enact with modifications, repeal, partially repeal, or reject amendments to these regulations, provided that the city commission has first obtained the recommendation of the planning board;
    3. 3.
      To establish fees, charges, and expenses imposed by these zoning code regulations;
    4. 4.
      To enforce the zoning code regulations, provisions, and restrictions by appropriate administrative and legal action; and
    5. 5.
      To consider and approve or disapprove applications for Class A special use permits.
  • b.
    Planning board.
    1. 1.
      Establishment, composition, and terms. The planning board shall consist of seven members and one alternate, who shall be electors of the city and shall serve without compensation. The mayor shall appoint each for a term of three years. The alternate shall act only in the absence, disability, or disqualification of a member. Each member and the alternate shall hold office for the term for which appointed. If a vacancy occurs in the membership of the planning board, the mayor within 20 days may fill the vacancy for the unexpired term. The resulting vacancy in the position of alternate shall be filled as provided in this section. Any member or alternate may be removed from office by the mayor in accordance with section 3.01 of the Charter.
    2. 2.
      Authority. The planning board shall abide by all applicable provisions of the Charter, as amended.
    3. 3.
      Functions and powers. The functions and powers of the planning board shall include:
      1. a.
        To recommend to the city commission principles and policies for guiding action in the physical development of the city;
      2. b.
        To advise and consult with the planning and zoning administrator in the preparation of a comprehensive plan; to consider it and amendments formulated, as well as proposed ordinances and regulations designed to promote orderly development consistent with the plan;
      3. c.
        To recommend whether or not specific proposed developments conform to the principles and requirements of the comprehensive plan as to growth and improvement;
      4. d.
        To keep the city commission and the general public informed and advised as to the physical development of the city;
      5. e.
        To conduct such public hearings as may be required to gather information necessary for the preparation, establishment, and maintenance of the comprehensive plan, as well as all other public hearing required by these regulations or required by the city commission;
      6. f.
        To consider all general plans for major landscaping proposed by the city or to be located on city property and to make recommendations with each plan;
      7. g.
        To consider all major plats which subdivide lands and recommend acceptance, modification, or rejection of them, and to recommend regulations for the subdivision and plating of land;
      8. h.
        To consider all questions involving the location, removal, or alteration in any works of art belonging to the city, including monuments, memorials, and statuary, that are not kept indoors or assigned hereby or by ordinance of the jurisdiction of another agency; and prior to the acceptance or rejection of any proposed gift to the city in the form of a monument or memorial, to approve or recommend modification or rejection of a sketch or plan thereof and the proposed location thereof;
      9. i.
        To prepare in conjunction with the planning and zoning administrator, the city engineer, and the director of finance a list of capital improvements recommended for construction during the next fiscal year and the succeeding four fiscal years. This list shall show recommended order of priority, the year recommended for beginning and completing construction, and the estimated costs for each recommended improvement;
      10. j.
        To advise and recommend on the preparation and adoption of a comprehensive plan for the city pursuant the Charter, as amended, and by F.S. § 163.3161;
      11. k.
        To provide advice and recommendations to the city commission on each application for a Class A special use permit;
      12. l.
        To provide advice and recommendations to the city commission on each application for a change to the official zoning map;
      13. m.
        To provide continual examination and analysis of the adequacy and sufficiency of the text of the zoning code;
      14. n.
        To provide advice and recommendations to the city commission on each application for a zoning code text amendment;
      15. o.
        To review and discuss all proposed abandonments within newly proposed planned development districts;
      16. p.
        Approve, with or without conditions or deny applications for proposed developments subject to special review within a mixed-use district;
      17. q.
        Approve, with or without conditions or deny applications for a Class B special use permits for properties located within a mixed-use district;
      18. r.
        Approve, with or without conditions, or deny applications for variances and waivers for properties located within a mixed-use district; and
      19. s.
        Make recommendations to the city commission on request for abandonment of city owned rights-of-way or alleys located within a mixed-use district.
    4. 4.
      Review of zoning amendments by planning and zoning administrator. No zoning change shall be authorized until the impact and extent thereof have been studied by the planning and zoning administrator, who shall make a written report recommending approval, modification, or disapproval of the amendment and the reasons for such recommendations to the planning board and the city commission.
    5. 5.
      Procedures. The planning board shall establish rules of procedures, subject to any limitations prescribed by the Charter, these regulations, or ordinances. It shall select a chair, secretary, and other officers and shall prescribe their duties and powers. The mayor, the city administrator and the planning and zoning administrator shall be ex officio members of the planning board and may attend any of its meetings or hearings and participate in its discussions, but they shall have no vote. Four members or three members and the alternate shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, but a lesser number may adjourn from time to time. The planning board shall keep minutes of these proceedings, record the vote on each question, and keep records of its discussion, findings, recommendations, and other official actions. All records or other accounts of meetings shall be public record and available from the planning department.
  • c.
    Zoning board of appeals.
    1. 1.
      Establishment, composition, and terms.
      1. a.
        The zoning board of appeals shall consist of five members and two alternate members to be appointed by the mayor, each for a term of three years. Members of the zoning board of appeals may be removed from office by the mayor. A vacancy shall be filled by the mayor for the remainder of the unexpired term. All members of the zoning board of appeals shall be residents of the city and shall serve without compensation.
      2. b.
        The members of the zoning board of appeals shall continue in office until their respective terms expire and their successors are appointed and duly qualified by law. Alternate members of the zoning board of appeals may attend all meetings of the zoning board of appeals but shall act only in the absence, disability, or disqualification of a regular member.
      3. c.
        When an alternate member acts in any meeting, the minutes of the zoning board of appeals shall reflect the name of the absent, disabled, or disqualified member in whose place the alternate is acting. The absence of a member or the alternate member, for three consecutive meetings without an excuse approved by the chair of the zoning board of appeals and noted in the minutes, shall be deemed cause for removal by the mayor. If a vacancy occurs in the membership of the zoning board of appeals, the mayor within 20 days shall fill the vacancy for the unexpired term. If the mayor appoints the alternate as a member, the resulting vacancy in the position of alternate shall be filled as provided in this section.
    2. 2.
      Authority. The zoning board of appeals shall abide by all the applicable provisions of the Charter, as amended.
    3. 3.
      Functions and powers. The functions and powers of the zoning board of appeals shall include all properties within the city limits, with the exception of the downtown overlay zone or the downtown master plan affected areas:
      1. a.
        To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is an error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by the zoning officer in the enforcement of this chapter;
      2. b.
        To reverse or affirm, in whole or in part, or modify the appeal from any order, requirement, decision, or determination of the administrative officer;
      3. c.
        To interpret the provisions of these regulations in such a way as to carry out the intent and purpose of the zoning map and comprehensive plan;
      4. d.
        To grant variances;
      5. e.
        To compel the attendance of witnesses at hearings or meetings and to administer oaths;
      6. f.
        To consider, and approve or disapprove, applications for Class B special use permits; and
      7. g.
        To hear and decide appeals from any order, requirement, decision or determination made by the plans and plats review committee.
      8. h.
        Approve, with or without conditions, or deny applications for demolition of existing buildings within the Coleman Park overly district, when such demolition is being requested prior to the issuance of a building permit which affects the vertical construction of a new structure in its place.
    4. 4.
      Procedures. The zoning board of appeals shall adopt rules necessary for the conduct of its affairs and in keeping with the provisions of this article. Meetings shall be held at the call of the chairman and at such other times as the zoning board of appeals may determine. All meetings shall be open to the public. The zoning board of appeals shall keep minutes of its proceedings, record the vote of each member upon each question, keep records of its examinations and other official actions. All records and minutes shall be public records and be filed in the office of the zoning officer.
  • d.
    Plans and plats review committee. The plans and plats review committee shall review all site plans. The plans and plats review committee shall be composed of the planning and zoning administrator, one other member of the planning department to be designated by the planning and zoning administrator, and the director or a designated representative of each of the following departments: engineering and public works, building, fire, police, leisure services, city attorney, city administration, mayor's office and utilities. The plans and plats review committee shall be chaired by the planning and zoning administrator or the planning department's designated representative. The plans and plats review committee shall establish bylaws, including administrative rules of procedure to govern its review process. The plans and plats review committee shall review all required site plans to ensure that all proposed improvements meet adopted site plan, engineering, utility, public safety, transportation and related standard building codes, and Code of Ordinances, and that they conform to other applicable codes and regulations contained in the comprehensive plan of the city, this zoning code, and the Code of Ordinances.
  • e.
    Historic preservation board.
    1. 1.
      Establishment, composition and terms. The West Palm Beach Historic Preservation Board shall consist of seven members and two alternate members who shall be appointed by the mayor. Members shall reside or have a principal place of business in the city. Two members of the full board shall have professional degrees in architecture, at least one of whom shall be a regular member. A minimum of two members shall be chosen from among the disciplines of architecture, history, architectural history, archaeology, landscape architecture or planning. A minimum of two additional members of the board shall be experienced in the areas of commercial development or real estate, banking or law. Three other members, including the two alternate members, shall be from any of the foregoing professions. Two members shall be citizen members at large. All members shall have demonstrated a special interest, experience or knowledge in historic preservation or related disciplines. Members of the board shall serve three-year terms. Of the initial appointments, four members shall be appointed for a term of three years and three members shall be appointed for a term of two years. Vacancies on the board, including expired terms, shall be filled within 60 days by the mayor. Members shall be deemed to continue to hold office until a successor has been appointed.
    2. 2.
      Procedures and quorum.
      1. a.
        The board shall establish rules of procedures, subject to any limitations prescribed by law. Five members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
      2. b.
        The board shall select a chairman and other officers and shall prescribe their duties and powers. The historic preservation planner or designee shall act as secretary of the board and shall attend and keep minutes of all meetings, acting in an advisory capacity and participating fully in board discussions, but having no right to vote. A planner in the historic preservation division may serve as the historic preservation planner's designee.
      3. c.
        A city attorney shall attend all meetings, acting in an advisory capacity and participating fully in board discussions, but having no right to vote. The mayor, city administrator and the planning director shall be ex officio members of the board and may attend any of its meetings or hearings and participate in its discussions, but shall have no right to vote.
      4. d.
        The board shall keep minutes of its proceedings, record the vote on each question, and keep records of its discussions, recommendations and other official actions.
    3. 3.
      Removal. Any member of the board may be removed by the mayor pursuant to section 3.01 of the Charter.
    4. 4.
      Powers and duties. The board shall have the following powers and duties:
      1. a.
        To recommend to the city commission the following:
        1. 1.
          Adoption, modification, or replacement of the Design Guidelines Handbook;
        2. 2.
          Nomination of properties and districts to the National Register of Historic Places, as a required duty of being a certified local government;
        3. 3.
          Nominations of properties and districts to the West Palm Beach Register of Historic Places.
      2. b.
        To hold public hearings and to approve or deny applications for certificates of appropriateness or certificates of economic hardship affecting proposed or designated properties or properties within districts;
      3. c.
        To advise and assist owners of properties on physical and financial aspects of preservation, renovation, rehabilitation and reuse, and on procedures for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places;
      4. d.
        To call upon available city staff members and the preservation planners as well as other experts for assistance and/or technical advice;
      5. e.
        To testify before all boards and commissions on any matter affecting historically, culturally and architecturally significant properties;
      6. f.
        To confer recognition upon the owners of properties and districts by means of certificates, plaques or markers;
      7. g.
        To recommend amendments or changes to the historic preservation provisions of this chapter or to the historic preservation element of the city's comprehensive plan;
      8. h.
        To inform and educate the citizens of the city concerning the historic, cultural and architectural heritage of the city; and
      9. i.
        To undertake any other action or activity necessary or appropriate to the implementation of its powers and duties or to implementation of the purpose of the historic preservation provisions of this chapter.
      10. j.
        Approve, with or without conditions, or deny applications for variances, special exceptions and class B special use permits. Any persons aggrieved by a decision of the historic preservation board for a variance, special exception or class B special use permit may appeal by common law writ of certiorari to a court of competent jurisdiction for judicial relief within 30 days after a decision by the historic preservation board. The election of remedies shall lie with the appellant.
  • f.
    Downtown Action Committee (DAC).
    1. 1.
      Establishment, composition and terms.
      1. a.
        Statement of purpose. The DAC is established to oversee the development of the area governed by the Downtown Master Plan (DMP).
      2. b.
        Composition. The DAC shall consist of seven members and two alternate members who shall serve without compensation and who shall be appointed by the mayor as follows:
        1. 1.
          Five design or planning professionals, who may include registered architects, landscape architects, certified urban planners or urban designers. At least two different disciplines shall be appointed from this group at all times; only one member from this group may serve as an alternate member;
        2. 2.
          One downtown business owner, developer, real estate agent, or builder;
        3. 3.
          One downtown residential property owner;
        4. 4.
          One downtown nonresidential property owner;
        5. 5.
          A ninth member who may fit any of the requirements above or a city resident-at-large.

        Alternate members shall act only in the absence, disability or abstention of a member.

      3. c.
        Quorum. Four members shall constitute a quorum to conduct the business of the committee. A minimum of four votes is required for the approval or denial of variances, extension of variances, class B special use permits, and administrative appeals.
      4. d.
        Terms of office. The mayor shall appoint each member for a term of three years. Each member shall hold office for the term for which they are appointed and until their successor is appointed, unless such member is removed or resigns. Any member of the board may be removed by the mayor. If a vacancy occurs in the membership of the DAC, the mayor may fill the vacancy for the unexpired term.
      5. e.
        Officers and their duties. The officers shall consist of a chairperson and a vice chairperson. A minimum of four votes is required to select the chairperson and vice-chairperson. The recording secretary shall be designated by the planning director. The chairperson, or the vice-chairperson in the chairperson's absence, shall conduct the meetings. In the absence of a chairperson and a vice-chairperson, the remaining members of the board may elect a temporary chairperson.
    2. 2.
      Authority. The DAC shall abide by all the applicable provisions of the Charter, as amended, the comprehensive plan, Florida Statutes and this Code.
    3. 3.
      Functions and powers. The DAC shall have authority over the DMP area and shall be authorized to:
      1. a.
        Approve, with or without conditions, or deny applications for proposed developments subject to special review.
      2. b.
        Approve, with or without conditions, or deny applications for variances and class B special use permits.
      3. c.
        Hear and decide administrative appeals where it is alleged there is an error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by the planning director in the enforcement of the urban regulations, the comprehensive plan, or Florida Statutes.
      4. d.
        Approve, with or without conditions, or deny applications for demolition of existing buildings.
      5. e.
        Approve or deny applications for the transfer of development rights.
      6. f.
        Make recommendations to the city commission on amendments to the DMP element of the comprehensive plan, the DMP urban regulations, and the DMP zoning atlas. Any amendments to the DMP urban regulations or the DMP zoning atlas shall be evaluated pursuant to the standards contained in subsection 94-32(a).
      7. g.
        Make recommendations to the city commission on any proposed improvements to public rights-of-way and urban open spaces.
      8. h.
        Make recommendations to the city commission on requests for abandonment of city owned rights-of-way or alleys.
      9. i.
        Compel the attendance of witnesses at hearings and administer oaths.
      10. j.
        Waivers shall not be authorized by the board, unless expressly allowed by this article.
    4. 4.
      Conduct of business. The DAC may adopt rules and by-laws necessary for the conduct of its affairs and in keeping with the provisions of this article. All hearings shall be open to the public and follow the public hearing requirements of section 94-39 of this article.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-11; Ord. No. 3554-02, art. II, 7-22-2002; Ord. No. 3612-02, § 2, 10-15-2002; Ord. No. 3773-04, § 2, 8-16-2004; Ord. No. 4213-09, § 4, 6-29-2009; Ord. No. 4265-10, § 5, 5-17-2010; Ord. No. 5002-22, § 3, 07-11-2022; Ord. No. 5008-22, § 3, 07-25-2022)

    Sec. 94-32. - Amendments and rezonings.

  • a.
    Standards. In reviewing a proposed amendment to the text or map of this chapter, the city commission and the planning board shall consider all of the following:
    1. 1.
      Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the city comprehensive plan;
    2. 2.
      Whether there exist changed conditions which require an amendment;
    3. 3.
      Whether the proposed amendment is in conformance with all applicable portions of the city development code;
    4. 4.
      Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is inconsistent with existing and proposed land uses;
    5. 5.
      Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of public facilities, including but not limited to transportation, sewerage, water supply, parks, fire, police, drainage, schools, and emergency medical facilities;
    6. 6.
      Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment;
    7. 7.
      Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would adversely affect property values in the area; and
    8. 8.
      Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern, and the specific identification of any negative effects on such pattern.
  • b.
    Procedures.
    1. 1.
      Application form. Requests for amendments to the text or map of this zoning code shall be made only on application forms approved by the planning department. Applications shall contain all information required by this zoning code and other city regulations, and shall be reviewed for completeness and consistency with the comprehensive plan pursuant to section 94-33.
    2. 2.
      Completeness review.
      1. a.
        Within ten working days following the submission of a zoning code amendment application and required fees, the planning and zoning administrator shall determine whether or not the application contains sufficient information for substantive reviews. The application shall be notified if any deficiencies exist and the nature of the information necessary before review of the application will commence.
      2. b.
        Following the planning and zoning administrator's determination that there is sufficient information to permit appropriate consideration of an application to amend the text or map of this zoning code, the application and related information shall be reviewed, and a written recommendation shall be prepared regarding the amendment.
      3. c.
        In the event the planning and zoning administrator determines that additional information is necessary to complete substantive review of a zoning code amendment application, the applicant shall be notified of the nature of the information necessary to complete the review, and the applicant shall have 60 days to furnish such additional information.
    3. 3.
      Planning board public hearing. Following completion of the planning and zoning administrator's written recommendation, applications to change the official zoning map or for special use approval shall be placed on the agenda of a regular planning board meeting for a public hearing in accordance with applicable public notice requirements.
    4. 4.
      Planning board recommendation. The planning board shall review the proposed amendment application and make a recommendation to the city commission within 60 days after the close of the public hearing held by the planning board. The planning board shall recommend that the city commission do one of the following:
      1. a.
        Grant the application in full;
      2. b.
        Deny the application in full;
      3. c.
        Grant the application in part;
      4. d.
        Grant a modification of the application in such form as deemed proper. However, if such modification involves rezoning of a greater area of land or involves rezoning of land to allow a more intensive use than designated in the advertisement for the public hearing, the planning board then shall hold an additional public hearing on its recommended modification of the proposed amendment;
      5. e.
        Return the application to the planning and zoning administrator with specific instruction as to additional information, evidence, or testimony desired in order to make a decision consistent with the comprehensive plan and the public health, safety, and welfare;
      6. f.
        Authorize withdrawal of the application without prejudice; and
      7. g.
        Authorize further consideration of the application, to occur within 60 days of the close of the public hearing.
    5. 5.
      City commission public hearing. Following action on an application by the planning board or code review committee, the city commission shall advertise and hold a public hearing. The city administrator and planning and zoning administrator shall schedule a date and time for the public hearing, subject to change by the city commission.
    6. 6.
      City commission decision. The city commission shall review the application, the findings, and the recommendations of the planning board, and within 60 days after the close of its public hearing shall take action pursuant to the provisions of subsection (a) of this section. Failure to take action within the 60-day period shall constitute approval of this application.
  • c.
    Change to applications for zoning ordinance amendments. Changes to applications to amend the zoning code shall be administered pursuant to subsection 94-39(d).
  • d.
    Withdrawal of applications for zoning ordinance amendments. Withdrawal of applications to amend this zoning code shall be administered pursuant to subsection 94-39(d).
  • e.
    Protest provisions. When a zoning district boundary change or zoning code text change is opposed by a petition containing the signatures of property owners controlling 20 percent of the land area affected by the proposed amendment, approval of the change requires the affirmative vote of four-fifths of the city commission.
  • f.
    Resubmittals. A rezoning request for the same parcel of land shall be controlled by the provisions of subsection 94-39(d).
  • (Code 1979, § 33-12)

    Sec. 94-33. - Comprehensive plan consistency and amendments.

  • a.
    Intent. All development within the city, including all development orders; all building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical and paving permits; and public improvements shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. All amendments to the comprehensive plan shall be considered pursuant to the requirements of state law.
  • b.
    Consistency review by planning and zoning administrator. The planning and zoning administrator shall be responsible for the enforcement of this consistency requirement. The planning and zoning administrator shall initiate consistency reviews of development orders and requests for development orders as determined necessary, or as requested by the city commission, planning board, or the mayor.
  • c.
    Procedures for formal consistency review.
    1. 1.
      Notification of applicant. To initiate a formal consistency review, the planning and zoning administrator shall notify the applicant for a development order if there is a question regarding the application's consistency with the comprehensive plan.
    2. 2.
      Coordination with development order processing. In the event such a review is initiated, application requiring planning board or city commission review shall be processed concurrently with consistency review. No other applications shall be processed until a final determination is rendered as described in this chapter.
    3. 3.
      Finding by the planning and zoning administrator. Within ten working days of notice to the applicant, the planning and zoning administrator shall do all of the following:
      1. a.
        Make a written finding of the application as "consistent" or "not consistent" with the comprehensive plan, including the factual basis for the finding;
      2. b.
        Forward copies of this finding to the applicant, the planning board, and the city commission; and
      3. c.
        Attach a copy of the finding to the application.
    4. 4.
      Effect of planning and zoning administrator's finding. A finding of "consistent" may permit the continued processing of the application unless an appeal is filed pursuant to subsection 94-37(d). A finding of "not consistent" shall constitute a denial of the application unless an appeal is filed pursuant to subsection 94-37(d).
  • d.
    Procedures for comprehensive plan amendments. The following conditions shall apply to applications for amending the city's comprehensive plan:
    1. 1.
      The process for amending the comprehensive plan shall be guided by the provisions of F.S. chapter. 163, the Florida Administrative Code (FAC) rules implementing it, and in accordance with the provisions of the comprehensive plan.
    2. 2.
      Amendments to the text, tables, charts, and maps of the comprehensive plan shall be initiated only by the city or the local planning agency (planning board).
    3. 3.
      Amendments to the future land use map (FLUM) shall be initiated only by the owner of the parcel(s) or the city; and shall be proposed only as a result of one or more of the following factors:
      1. a.
        Changed projections. Changed projections (e.g., regarding public service needs) in the comprehensive plan, including but not limited to amendments that would ensure provision of public facilities;
      2. b.
        Changed assumptions. Changed assumptions (e.g., regarding demographic trends or land availability) in the comprehensive plan, including but not limited to the fact that growth in the area, in terms of the development of vacant land, new development, and the availability of public services, has altered the character of the area such that the proposed amendment is now reasonable and consistent with the land use characteristics;
      3. c.
        Data errors or updates. Data errors, including errors in mapping and natural features, or data updates of a significant nature in the comprehensive plan;
      4. d.
        New issues. New issues that have arisen since the adoption of the comprehensive plan; and
      5. e.
        Additional detail or comprehensiveness. Recognition of a need for additional detail or comprehensiveness in the comprehensive plan.
    4. 4.
      Compliance with state law. Amendments to the comprehensive plan shall be considered in strict accord with the requirements of F.S. § 163.3187.
    5. 5.
      Public hearings. To the extent not inconsistent with F.S. ch. 163, the provisions in section 94-39, relating to public hearings and related matters, shall apply.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-13; Ord. No. 4449-13, § 3, 3-19-2013)

    Sec. 94-34. - Code enforcement.

  • a.
    Zoning code administrator. The planning and zoning administrator shall administer and enforce this zoning code. The planning and zoning administrator shall serve as the coordinating and central intake agency for all applications, petitions, or administrative actions sought in pursuance of this zoning code. The planning and zoning administrator shall perform other zoning-related duties which are set forth in this chapter and which may be assigned by the mayor. The planning and zoning administrator shall interpret and apply the provisions of this chapter as minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, and welfare. This chapter is not intended to interfere with, abrogate, or annul any lawful easement, covenants, or other agreements between parties; provided, however, that where this chapter imposes a greater restriction, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail.
  • b.
    Violations and enforcement procedures.
    1. 1.
      Planning and zoning administrator investigations. The planning and zoning administrator or his designee shall have the authority to investigate alleged violations of this chapter by inspecting property, obtaining the signed statements of prospective witnesses, obtaining photographic documentation of violations, and performing such other activities as are lawful and necessary for the complete investigation of alleged zoning violations. Such designee shall be a planner employed by the city and shall be designated in writing by the planning and zoning administrator.
    2. 2.
      Violations. Where it is determined that a violation of this chapter exists, the planning and zoning administrator or his designee shall notify the violator in writing and order compliance. The planning and zoning administrator or his designee shall order discontinuance of an illegal use of land, buildings, or structures; removal of illegal buildings or structures, or additions, alterations, or structural changes thereof; or discontinuance of any illegal work being done. If a violation of these regulations continues, the planning and zoning administrator or his designee shall commence appropriate legal action.
    3. 3.
      Cease and desist orders. The planning and zoning administrator or his designee shall have the authority to issue cease and desist orders to the appropriate property owner or individual whenever a violation of this zoning code has been committed or exists.
  • c.
    Zoning compliance. Zoning compliance shall be determined by the planning and zoning administrator prior to issuance of a building permit to allow the construction, renovation, alteration, addition to, or moving of any building or structure. Zoning compliance shall be required to establish or change a use of an existing or proposed structure. The proposed construction of improvements and the proposed establishment or change of use necessitating a review for zoning compliance must conform to the requirements of this Code and must be consistent with the comprehensive plan.
  • d.
    Zoning compliance and certificate of occupancy required. (Note: Additional language to be drafted.)
  • (Code 1979, § 33-14)

    Sec. 94-35. - Site plan review.

  • a.
    Intent. The intent of these site plan review provisions is to establish site improvement standards for development and to provide review procedures which ensure compliance with these standards and other regulations of this chapter.
  • b.
    Scope and exemptions for site plan review. Site plan review and approval shall be required for the construction of all new structures or additions to existing structures, with the exception of the following:
    1. 1.
      Any modification of an existing structure that does not increase the total size of the structure or change the building footprint;
    2. 2.
      One-, two-, and three-family structures in single-family residential zoning districts;
    3. 3.
      Addition of awnings, canopies, or ornamental structures;
    4. 4.
      Redesign and relocation of existing surface parking facilities, drives, and driveways;
    5. 5.
      Pools, including redesign and relocation;
    6. 6.
      Other minor structural additions or alterations, including stairs, porches, terraces, fencing, etc.;
    7. 7.
      Garages and accessory structures in single-family residential districts;
    8. 8.
      New and accessory structures of fewer than 1,000 gross square feet in commercial and industrial zoning districts;
    9. 9.
      Attached or detached additions of fewer than 1,000 square feet to existing residential and nonresidential structures;
    10. 10.
      Additions to existing parking facilities not exceeding 25 percent of the existing number of spaces or 20 spaces, whichever is less;
    11. 11.
      All replacements of minor nonconforming structures of 1,000 gross square feet or less;
    12. 12.
      Occupancy of an existing structure; and
    13. 13.
      Expansion of an existing legal nonconforming use within an existing building.
  • c.
    Site design qualitative development standards.
    1. 1.
      Harmonious and efficient organization. All elements of a plan shall be organized harmoniously and efficiently in relation to topography, the size and type of the property affected, the character of adjoining property, and the type and size of buildings. The site will be developed in a manner that will not impede the normal and orderly development or improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in this chapter.
    2. 2.
      Preservation of natural conditions. The landscape shall be preserved in its natural state, to the degree practical, by minimizing tree and soil removal and by other appropriate site planning techniques. Terrain and vegetation shall not be disturbed in a manner likely to increase significantly either wind or water erosion within or adjacent to a development site.
    3. 3.
      Screening and buffering. Fences, walls, or vegetative screening shall be provided where needed to protect residents and users from undesirable views, lighting, noise or other adverse off-site effects and to protect residents and users of off-site development from on-site adverse effects.
    4. 4.
      Enhancement of residential privacy. The site plan shall provide reasonable visual and auditory privacy for all dwelling units located within and adjacent to the site. Fences, walks, barriers and vegetation shall be arranged to protect and enhance the property and to enhance the privacy of occupants.
    5. 5.
      Emergency access. Structures and other site features shall be arranged to permit access by emergency vehicle to all buildings.
    6. 6.
      Access to public ways. All buildings, dwelling units and other facilities shall have safe and convenient access to public rights-of-way and/or other areas dedicated to common use.
    7. 7.
      Pedestrian circulation. When residential uses are included, a pedestrian circulation system shall be provided that is separated to the extent possible from the vehicular circulation system and that at a minimum shall conform to sidewalk standards of the city.
    8. 8.
      Design of access and egress drives. The location, size, and numbers of access drives to a site will be arranged to minimize any negative impacts on public and private ways and on adjacent private property. Traffic improvements shall be provided where they will significantly improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians.
    9. 9.
      Coordination of on-site circulation with off-site circulation. The arrangement of public or common ways for vehicular and pedestrian circulation shall be coordinated with the pattern of existing or planned streets and pedestrian or bicycle pathways in the area.
    10. 10.
      Design of public rights-of-way. Public streets and rights-of-way within a site shall be designed for maximum efficiency. They shall occupy no more land than is required to provide access, nor shall they unnecessarily fragment development into small blocks. Large developments containing extensive public rights-of-way shall provide a road network with local streets which provide direct access to individual parcels and other streets which provide no or limited direct access to individual parcels.
    11. 11.
      Stormwater control. Appropriate measures shall be taken to ensure that removal of stormwater will not adversely affect neighboring properties or the public storm drainage system. Provisions shall be made for the construction of facilities, including grading, gutters, piping and the treatment of turf, to accommodate stormwater and to prevent erosion and the formation of silt.
    12. 12.
      Exterior lighting. Exterior lighting shall not interfere with the quiet enjoyment of adjacent properties or the safety of public rights-of-way.
    13. 13.
      Protection of property values. All elements of a site plan shall be arranged to have minimal negative impact on the property values of adjoining property.
    14. 14.
      Consideration of future development. Site plan reviews performed pursuant to this section shall consider existing and likely future development adjacent to the site.
  • d.
    Procedures.
    1. 1.
      Planning and zoning administrator determination if site plan review required. The planning and zoning administrator shall determine whether or not site plan review is required pursuant to the provision of this section. If site plan review is required, the applicant or applicant's agent may withdraw the request at any time. A request for withdrawal shall be provided in writing and shall be submitted to the planning and zoning administrator.
    2. 2.
      Application. An application for site plan review shall be made on forms provided for such purpose and shall be accompanied by such documentation as is necessary to determine compliance with this section. An environmental assessment shall be included as part of the site plan submittal, where appropriate, as determined by the planning and zoning administrator. For each site plan review application, a fee shall be charged, pursuant to section 94-41.
    3. 3.
      Application sufficiency. The planning and zoning administrator shall review the application to determine whether or not it contains sufficient information to commence processing.
    4. 4.
      Categories of site plan review applications. The following categories of site plans are established:
      1. a.
        Level I: Subject to informal site plan review; and
      2. b.
        Level II: Subject to formal site plan review.
    5. 5.
      Level I site plans. Level I site plans shall include all of the following:
      1. a.
        All multifamily residential dwelling units (four or more units);
      2. b.
        New commercial and industrial structures of 1,001 or more gross square feet;
      3. c.
        Accessory structures of more than 1,000 gross square feet in commercial and industrial zoning districts;
      4. d.
        Attached or detached additions of 1,000 or more gross square feet to an existing residential and nonresidential structures;
      5. e.
        All new surface parking facilities with 21 spaces or more;
      6. f.
        All additions greater than 25 percent to existing surface parking facilities with more than 21 spaces;
      7. g.
        All class B special use applications;
      8. h.
        All "permitted uses with extra conditions";
      9. i.
        All replacements of nonconforming structures in excess of 1,001 gross square feet;
      10. j.
      11. k.
        Other similar activities as determined by the planning and zoning administrator.
    6. 6.
      Level II site plans. Level II site plans shall include all of the following:
      1. a.
        All applications for planned unit development;
      2. b.
        All applications for planned communities;
      3. c.
        All plans affecting public parks and publicly owned lands;
      4. d.
        All applications for Class A special use;
      5. e.
        All applications for building permits in the special impact zone notation on the future land use map not included within level I;
      6. f.
        All applications for building permits in the commercial incentive district land use category;
    7. 7.
      Review of applications. Site plan review applications, unless postponed pending submission of additional information, shall be acted upon within 45 days following the receipt of completed applications. Failure to review a complete application within this period shall result in automatic approval.
    8. 8.
      Informal site plan review (level I). Level I site plans shall be reviewed on an informal basis. Within ten days after receipt of a complete level I site plan review application, the planning and zoning administrator shall circulate a copy of the site plan to all plans and plats review committee members. Within ten days after receipt, the committee members shall submit their comments to the planning and zoning administrator. The comments of each member including those of the planning department shall be compiled into a report by the planning and zoning administrator. Based upon this report, the planning and zoning administrator may approve, approve with conditions, disapprove, or postpone consideration of an application. The report shall include information to substantiate the planning and zoning administrator's decision. The report shall include information to substantiate the planning and zoning administrator's decision. The report of the planning and zoning administrator shall be transmitted to the applicant. In the event the planning and zoning administrator or two or more members of the plans and plats review committee request a formal meeting, the planning and zoning administrator shall convene a meeting within ten days. The applicant shall be provided written notice pursuant to subsection 94-39(h).
    9. 9.
      Formal site plan review (level II). Level II site plans shall be reviewed on a formal basis at a regularly scheduled meeting of the plans and plats review committee. The plans and plats review committee shall hold regularly scheduled monthly meetings. Applications for site plan review shall be circulated to all committee members at least ten days prior to a scheduled meeting. At a meeting, the committee may approve, approve with conditions, disapprove or postpone consideration of an application. The planning and zoning administrator shall prepare an individual report on each application, indicating action taken and information to substantiate the committee's decision. The report of the planning and zoning administrator may be transmitted to the applicant.
    10. 10.
      Appeals. Appeals from the decisions of the plans and plats review committee or planning and zoning administrator shall be submitted pursuant to section 94-37.
    11. 11.
      Review by individual committee members. Committee members shall review those aspects of the application significant to the responsibilities of their respective departments of city government.
    12. 12.
      Rules of procedure. The plans and plats review committee shall conduct its procedures in compliance with administrative rules of procedures which the committee shall adopt.
  • e.
    Status of site plan review applications.
    1. 1.
      Status if approved. Unless the decision of the plans and plats review committee or planning and zoning administrator is appealed, a zoning permit, zoning clearance permit or certificate of occupancy may be issued providing all other applicable requirements of the zoning code are fulfilled.
    2. 2.
      Status if denied. Unless the decision of the plans and plats review committee or the planning and zoning administrator is appealed, the application is denied. When an application is denied, zoning clearance or certificate of occupancy shall not be issued.
  • f.
    Review of special use of planned development district site plans. The recommendations of the plans and plats review committee or the planning and zoning administrator, concerning site plan applications for special use or planned development, shall be advisory.
  • g.
    Compliance required. When site plan review is required, review and approval are necessary prior to any of the following: issuance of a building permit, all construction, any use of land or water, or any change in use.
  • h.
    Site plan approval, expiration, and extension. Site plan approval shall terminate 12 months following the date of approval unless significant construction activity, as evidenced by the pouring and completion of footings, has occurred. A reasonable extension of time may be granted by the planning and zoning administrator provided there is no change to the approved site plan.
  • i.
    Violations. Failure to complete and maintain all approved elements of an approved site plan, including landscape, appearance, and other site development features, shall be a violation of this chapter subject to enforcement and penalty procedures of this zoning code.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-15; Ord. No. 3767-04, § 1, 6-21-2004; Ord. No. 3958-06, § 1, 6-5-2006; Ord. No. 4309-10, § 3, 12-13-2010; Ord. No. 4449-13, § 4, 3-19-2013; Ord. No. 4714-17, § 4, 9-14-2017)

    Sec. 94-36. - Special use review.

  • a.
    Intent. This section sets forth procedures and applications for the zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board,  and the city commission review and approval, approval of such conditions, or disapproval of them. The procedures and standards of this section are instituted to provide an opportunity to utilize property for an activity that warrant consideration on a case-by-case basis to enable mitigation of potential detrimental effects on uses permitted as of right in the district. A special use may be permitted under circumstances particular to the proposed location and subject to conditions which provide protection to nearby but not necessarily adjoining land uses. The procedures and standards of this section are adopted to provide guidelines for the special use review authority to follow in arriving at any special land use decision.
  • b.
    Special use review and approval provisions. Special uses permitted in the zoning district are established by this chapter and are identified in ARTICLE IX of this chapter.
  • c.
    Establishment of Class A and Class B special uses and special use review authorities.
    1. 1.
      Class A special use review by city commission. Class A special land uses are identified in the Permitted Use Table set out in section 94-272. The review authority for Class A special use shall be the city commission. Prior to action by the city commission, the planning board shall review and make a recommendation for each special use application.
    2. 2.
      Class B special use review by zoning board of appeals, the planning board, and the historic preservation board. Class B special uses are identified in the Permitted Use Table set out in section 94-272, section 94-210 Table VII-9 and section 94-215 Table VII-9. The review authority for Class B special uses shall be the zoning board of appeals except for projects located in mixed-use districts which shall be reviewed by the planning board, and projects located in historic districts which shall be reviewed by the historic preservation board.
    3. 3.
      Preliminary determination of special uses. Prior to issuance of a permit or a certificate of occupancy as provided in this chapter, the planning and zoning administrator, or his designee, shall make a preliminary determination that the proposed use is a special use in the district where it is to be established and is subject to review and approval pursuant to the provisions of this section. The planning and zoning administrator's determination shall not ensure that the use is entitled to consideration as a special use in the district. The planning and zoning administrator shall notify the applicant of special use determination in writing.
    4. 4.
      Application by owner of interest in subject property. An application for the approval of special use shall be submitted to the planning and zoning administrator. The applicant shall indicate the nature or type of property ownership. Applications shall be accompanied by the necessary fees and documents.
    5. 5.
      Application forms and documentation. The application shall be made on forms approved by the planning and zoning administrator and shall be accompanied by the same documentation required for site plan review. Following an initial review of the application, the planning and zoning administrator may require the submission of additional information deemed necessary to complete the review.
    6. 6.
      Simultaneous zoning district change application permitted. The application for approval of a special use may be accompanied by an application for a zoning district change, where such a change is necessary to the consideration of the special use.
    7. 7.
      Simultaneous site plan review permitted. The application for approval of a special use shall be processed simultaneously with the site plan review of the proposal. The findings of the site plan review authority shall be advisory to the special use review authority. As proposals for special use are modified, the special use review authority may request that the site plan review authority review site plans.
    8. 8.
      Determination of eligibility of a special use. The planning and zoning administrator, at the written request of an applicant, shall determine whether or not a proposed use is an eligible special use in a zoning district and subject to review as provided in this chapter. This determination shall be preliminary; final determination of eligibility is the responsibility of the appropriate special use review authority. The zoning board of appeals shall hear appeals of the decision regarding determination of eligibility.
    9. 9.
      Determination of application sufficiency. If a proposed special use is determined to be eligible for further consideration, the planning and zoning administrator shall review the application to determine whether sufficient information is provided as required. The planning and zoning administrator shall provide to the applicant written notification of the sufficiency determination. If an application is determined to contain the sufficient information, the planning and zoning administrator shall initiate the review process and schedule a public hearing for consideration by the appropriate special use review authority.
    10. 10.
      Class A special use decisions. The city commission shall review each application for Class A special use and the findings and recommendations of the planning board, and within 60 days after the close of the public hearing shall do one of the following:
      1. a.
        Grant the application in full;
      2. b.
        Deny the application in full;
      3. c.
        Grant the application in part;
      4. d.
        Grant a modification of the application in such form as the city commission deems proper and consistent with the applicable standards for special use approval and the comprehensive plan;
      5. e.
        Return the application to the planning and zoning administrator with specific instruction as to additional information, evidence, or testimony desired in order to make a decision consistent with standards for special use approval and the comprehensive plan;
      6. f.
        Authorize withdrawal of the application without prejudice, allowing the application to be resubmitted prior to the 12-month time limitation;
      7. g.
        Continue the consideration of the application to a special date;
      8. h.
        Establish such conditions as the city commission deems necessary to ensure conformance with the special use requirements.
  • d.
    Changes in withdrawal and resubmission of applications. Applications for special use approval may be changed, withdrawn, or resubmitted.
  • e.
    Special use standards.
    1. 1.
      Interpretation of special use standards. Uses set forth in this chapter as special uses shall be deemed to be adverse to the public interest except in specific instances when the review authority finds that all ordinance standards for approval of such uses have been or will be met. In those instances when the review authority finds that all ordinance standards for approval of a particular special use at a specific location have been met, then the review authority shall approve the use.
    2. 2.
      Application and review. Applications to establish Class A or Class B special uses shall be processed and reviewed pursuant to subsection 94-36(c).
    3. 3.
      General special use standards relating to harmony with the zoning ordinance and protection of the public interest. Except for community residences (family and transitional) and for a recovery community whose standard of review is subject to the standards in Section 94-273(a)(3) and (4), prior to approval of each special use, the review authority will find each of the following based on competent and substantial evidence.
      1. a.
        Future uses. The use exactly as proposed at the location where proposed will be in harmony with the uses which, under zoning ordinance and land use plan, are most likely to occur in the immediate area where located.
      2. b.
        Surrounding uses. The use exactly as proposed at the location where proposed will be in harmony with existing uses in the immediate area where located.
      3. c.
        Public benefit. The use exactly as proposed at the location where proposed will not result in substantially less public benefit nor greater harm than would result from use of the site for some use permitted by right or by some other special use permitted on the site.
    4. 4.
      Specific standards for all special uses. Prior to approving each special use, the review authority will find on competent substantial evidence that the proposed special use shall be consistent with all of the following requirements:
      1. a.
        Traffic.
        1. 1.
          The proposed use will not generate traffic that will reduce the level of service on any road to a lower level than would result from a use permitted by right;
        2. 2.
          The proposed use will not require extension or enlargement or any other alteration of the street system in a manner resulting in higher net public cost or earlier expenditure of public cost than would result from a use permitted by right;
        3. 3.
          The property or structure for the proposed use will be located, designed, and constructed so that the access and egress standards of section 94-273 are satisfied for uses subject to those standards.
      2. b.
        Utility systems. The proposed use will be so located in relation to water lines, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, surface drainage systems, and other utility systems that neither extension nor enlargement nor any other alternation of such systems in a manner resulting in higher net public cost than would result from a use permitted by right will be required.
      3. c.
        Public safety. The proposed use will not place a demand on municipal police or fire protection services beyond the capacity of those services, a demand which does not exceed that likely to result from a use permitted by right.
    5. 5.
      Standards for special uses in residential districts. Prior to approving any nonresidential special use in any residential area and prior to approving any more intensive residential special use in a less intensive residential area, the review authority will find based on competent substantial evidence that the proposed special use shall be consistent with all the following requirements:
      1. a.
        Location. The location of the special use will not be hazardous to or inconvenient to the predominantly residential character of the area in which it is to be located or to the long-range development of the district for the residential purposes intended.
      2. b.
        Size and intensity. The size of the special use and the nature and intensity of the operations involved will not be hazardous or inconvenient to the residential character of the area in which it is to be located. The long-range development and maintenance of the district for residential purposes shall not be affected adversely.
      3. c.
        Contiguous residential uses. The location of the special use (exception) will not result in the isolation of a small existing or planned residential area from other residential developments by its being completely or largely surrounded by arterial streets or nonresidential land uses.
      4. d.
        Residential character. Building for special use in a residential district shall be designed and constructed in a manner similar to other neighborhood residential structures. Design factors shall include building mass, height, materials, window arrangement, yards, and similar considerations.
    6. 6.
      Conditions and safeguards for special use approval. Special uses may be approved subject to additional reasonable conditions or limitations upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance, or operation as may be necessary to protect the public interest.
      1. a.
        Compliance. Conditions and requirements stated as part of the approval of a special use shall be a continuing obligation of holders of approval. The planning and zoning administrator shall make periodic inspections of special uses to determine continuing compliance with all required conditions.
      2. b.
        Termination of special uses. Special use approval may be withheld upon a determination by the planning and zoning administrator of the following:
        1. 1.
          Failure to comply with conditions or requirements of the special use approval.
        2. 2.
          Failure to correct violations of conditions or requirements of special use approval within 30 days following issuance of a citation or notice of violation.
      3. c.
        Conditions for approval. All plans, specifications, and statements submitted with the applicant for a special use approval shall become, with any changes ordered by the special use review authority, a part of the conditions of any approval.
      4. d.
        Site plan review. All applications for special use approval will include a site plan prepared pursuant to section 94-35.
  • f.
    Developments of significant impact.
    1. 1.
      Applicable zoning district. Developments of significant impact (DSI) as regulated in this section shall be a Class A special use and shall be permitted in the following zoning districts: all commercial zoning districts, all industrial zoning districts, all residential zoning districts, and all other zoning districts, excluding the following: ROS and W.
      1. a.
        All of the following shall be considered development of significant impact:
        1. 1.
          Commercial, office, or industrial developments of 50,000 or more gross square feet of enclosed building area, including renovations of existing structures when a change to a more intensive use is anticipated.
        2. 2.
          Residential development of 100 or more dwelling units, including renovations of existing structures when a change to a more intensive use is anticipated.
        3. 3.
          Approved planned development districts not possessing a complete site plan, including the footprint of all proposed principal structures.
      2. b.
        The following shall be exempt from the provisions of this section: all approved planned development districts possessing an approved, completed site plan, including the foot print of all proposed principal structures, all applications for planned development district approval, all approved developments of regional impact, and all applications for development of regional impact approval.
    2. 2.
      Additional application requirements. Applications to establish development of significant impact shall provide the following information:
      1. a.
        A detailed site plan prepared pursuant to section 94-35.
      2. b.
        A detailed traffic impact analysis prepared pursuant to section 94-312.
      3. c.
        A statement of the proposed use of land within the development site, including the location and function of all areas proposed to be dedicated for community or public use.
      4. d.
        A survey and written legal description of the proposed development site.
      5. e.
        A statement, which may be in tabular form and included within the required site plan, containing the following information:
        1. 1.
          The total acreage of the project site.
        2. 2.
          The total gross square footage of floor area contained within all buildings and structures to be located on the development site.
        3. 3.
          The total square footage of gross floor area devoted to residential use, commercial use, and industrial use, respectively.
        4. 4.
          The number and type of dwelling units, if any, and the overall project density in dwelling units per gross acre of development site.
        5. 5.
          The total acreage of the project site devoted to coverage by buildings and structures, open space, on-site parking, and landscaping.
      6. f.
        A detailed stormwater drainage plan.
      7. g.
        A statement concerning the manner in which connections will be made to utility services, especially potable water and sanitary sewers.
    3. 3.
      Amendments to approved developments of significant impact.
      1. a.
        Major amendments to approved developments of significant impact shall only be determined by the city commission following the procedure set out in section 94-32. Major amendments shall include the following requests:
        1. 1.
          An increase in the total square footage of any building by more than ten percent; the number of structures, the number of residential dwelling units, or the densities as specified by the adopted site plan;
        2. 2.
          Any boundary change of the development of significant impact;
        3. 3.
          Any change in the conditions of approval;
        4. 4.
          Relocation of more than ten percent of the total square footage indicated as being covered by structures; or
        5. 5.
          Any increase in traffic in excess of either: (i) 3 percent of the average daily traffic (ADT), or (ii) 100 ADT trips, over the traffic impacts for the project as established in the original master plan approved by the city commission.
      2. b.
        Minor amendments to an approved development of significant impact shall be approved by the planning and zoning administrator. Such minor amendments shall include all amendment requests which do not meet any of the thresholds listed in subsection (f)(3)a. of this section.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-16; Ord. No. 3767-04, § 2, 6-21-2004; Ord. No. 3958-06, § 2, 6-5-2006; Ord. No. 4957-21, § 3, 11-15-2021; Ord. No. 5008-22, § 4, 07-25-2022; Ord. No. 5015-22, § 3, 08-22-2022; Ord. No. 5139-25, § 4, 09-02-2025)

    Sec. 94-37. - Administrative appeals.

  • a.
    Intent. Any person affected or aggrieved by interpretation, administration or enforcement of this zoning code by the plans and plats review committee or planning and zoning administrator may appeal. All appeals shall be directed to the zoning board of appeals. Written notice of the appeal, including justification for the action, shall be filed with the city clerk within 60 days after the disputed interpretation, administration, or enforcement.
  • b.
    Appeal proceedings. Within 60 days following the receipt of an appeal by the city clerk, the zoning board of appeals shall hold a public hearing to consider the appeal. Within 60 days after the public hearing, the zoning board of appeals shall act upon the appeal. At the public hearing, representation shall be limited to the affected or aggrieved person or a duly authorized attorney licensed to practice law in the state.
  • c.
    Zoning board of appeals. Any person aggrieved or affected by a decision of the zoning board of appeals may appeal by a common law writ of certiorari to a circuit court. Appeals shall be filed within 30 days from the date of the decision by the zoning board of appeals. Following an appeal, no further action affecting the matter appealed shall occur. In the event an immediate threat to life or property exists, the individual or body whose decision is disputed may certify to the zoning board of appeals that an emergency does exist and remedial action is necessary. In this event, the remedial actions may be undertaken if authorized by the zoning board of appeals or a court of competent jurisdiction.
  • d.
    Comprehensive plan appeals. Appeals from determinations by the planning and zoning administrator concerning consistency with the comprehensive plan shall be directed to the planning board. Appeals from such consistency determinations by the planning board shall be directed to the city commission. Appeals from such consistency determinations by the city commission may be filed in a court of competent jurisdiction.
  • e.
    Planning board appeals. Any person aggrieved or affected by a decision of the planning board may appeal to the city commission. Appeals shall be filed in writing with the planning and zoning administrator within ten days from the date of the decision by the planning board.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-17)

    Sec. 94-38. - Variances.

  • a.
    Purpose and intent. A variance is a departure from the dimensional or numerical requirements of this chapter where such variance will not be contrary to the public interest and where, owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not as a the result of the action of the applicant, a literal enforcement of the chapter would result in unnecessary and undue hardship. A variance is authorized only for height, area, and size of structure or size of yards, open spaces, or landscape requirements of this chapter. Establishment or expansion of a use otherwise prohibited shall not be allowed by variance, nor shall a variance be granted due to the presence of nonconformities in the zoning district or adjoining zoning districts.
  • b.
    Authorized variances. The zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board, and the city commission shall have the authority to grant the following variances:
    1. 1.
      A variance in the yard or area requirements of any district where there are unusual and practical difficulties in carrying out these provisions due to an irregular shape of the lot, topography, or other conditions. However, such variance shall not seriously affect any adjoining property or the general welfare.
    2. 2.
      A variance when an owner can demonstrate that a strict application of the terms of this chapter relating to the construction or alteration of buildings or structures, the use of or relating to the use of the land will impose unusual and impractical difficulties, but not reduced financial value alone.
  • c.
    Unauthorized variances.
    1. 1.
      Use variance. A variance shall not be granted which would permit the establishment or expansion of a use in a district in which such use is not permitted by this chapter, or permit any use in a district expressly or by implication prohibited by the provisions of this chapter.
    2. 2.
      Special uses. A variance shall not be granted which would permit the establishment or expansion of a special use in any zoning district; except with respect to projects that are subject to a special review located within the Northwood Mixed-use District (NMUD), the Currie Corridor Mixed-use District (CMUD), and the Broadway Mixed-use District (BMUD) application may be made to the planning board for variances and waivers of the applicable mixed-use district requirements following the criteria found in section 94-38 for variances and subsection 94-273(a)(2) for waivers.
    3. 3.
      Nonconforming and noncomplying uses. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a variance shall not be granted which relates in any way to a noncomplying or nonconforming use.
    4. 4.
      Definitions. A variance shall not be granted which modifies any definitions contained within this chapter.
    5. 5.
      Density. A variance shall not be granted which would result in an increase in density greater than that permitted in the applicable zoning district regulations.
    6. 6.
      Consistency with comprehensive plan. A variance shall not be granted which would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan.
    7. 7.
      Parking. A variance form the parking requirements of this chapter shall not be granted.
    8. 8.
      Planned developments. A variance from any requirement, condition of development approval or other stipulation affecting a planned development or planned unit development shall not be granted.
  • d.
    Procedures.
    1. 1.
      Applicant. Any property owner may apply for a variance.
    2. 2.
      Applications. The applicant must file an application for variance with the building and zoning department in a form approved by the planning and zoning administrator containing all the following information:
      1. a.
        Identification of the specific provisions of this chapter from which a variance is sought and the decision of the planning and zoning administrator which requires the application;
      2. b.
        The nature and extent of the variance requested and an explanation of why it is necessary; and
      3. c.
        The grounds relied upon to justify the proposed variance.
    3. 3.
      Administrative recommendation filed. In all variance proceedings held before the zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board, and the city commission, the planning and zoning administrator shall review each application and the planning and zoning administrator shall file a recommendation on each application. Such recommendations shall be received, heard and filed prior to final action on any item before the board and shall be part of the record of the application.
    4. 4.
      Public notice. Notice shall be required for a public hearing regarding a request for a variance.
    5. 5.
      Public hearing. After an application is deemed complete, the application shall be scheduled for the next available plans and plats review committee (PPRC) meeting agenda. After the comments from PPRC have been addressed, the application shall be scheduled for the next available zoning board of appeals, planning board, historic district, or city commission meeting agenda. At a public hearing, the zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board, and the city commission shall receive testimony regarding the application from the planning and zoning administrator, applicant, or any other person having an interest in the proceedings.
    6. 6.
      Criteria for granting variances. As provided in F.S. ch. 166, to authorize any variance from the provisions of this chapter, the zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board, and the city commission shall find all of the following:
      1. a.
        Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district;
      2. b.
        The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the action of the applicant;
      3. c.
        Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district;
      4. d.
        Literal interpretation of the provisions of the regulations of this chapter would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant;
      5. e.
        The variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure;
      6. f.
        The granting of a variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of these regulations and the comprehensive plan;
      7. g.
        The variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare;
      8. h.
        The property cannot be put to a reasonable use which fully complies with the requirements of this chapter;
      9. i.
        Nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district and the permitted use of lands, structures, or buildings in other zoning districts shall not be considered grounds for the authorization of a variance; and
      10. j.
        Financial hardship is not the only evidence of a hardship considered in the authorization of a variance.
  • e.
    Restrictions, stipulations, and safeguards. The zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board, and the city commission may make the authorization of a variance conditional upon such restrictions, stipulations and safeguards it deems necessary to ensure its compliance with the purpose and intent of this chapter and its consistency with the comprehensive plan of the city. Violation of such conditions, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this chapter. Such conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and safeguards may include but are not limited to a reasonable time limit within which the action for which the variance is sought shall be begun or completed or both, as well as provisions for extensions or renewals.
  • f.
    Decisions. The zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board, and the city commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, furnishing the applicant a written statement of the reasons for any denial. An affirmative vote of four members of the zoning board of appeals, five members of the planning board, five members of the historic preservation board, or three members of the city commission shall be necessary to reverse any order, requirements, decisions, or determination of the planning and zoning administrator. The same number of affirmative vote is required to decide in favor of an applicant on any matter upon which the board is required to act under the provisions of this section or to effect any variation in the application of this chapter.
  • g.
    Variance and waiver time limitation.
    1. 1.
      Not associated with a concurrent review. Variances or waivers not associated with a concurrent site plan review or special review within a mixed-use district and an overlay district shall become void 12 months following the date of the approval by the planning board unless a validly issued building permit has been issued and development has commenced, as defined in section 94-40. Prior to the expiration of this period, the applicant may request from the zoning board of appeals, in writing, a one-time six-month extension. Further extensions of time shall require a new application.
    2. 2.
      Associated with a concurrent review. Variances or waivers associated with a concurrent site plan review, or special review within a mixed-use district or an overlay district shall be valid for the same duration as the associated site plan review or special review approval, inclusive of any authorized extensions for such approvals. Such variances or waivers shall become void upon the expiration of the associated site plan or special review approval, pursuant to section 94-40. Once a variance or waiver has been approved by the zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board, or the city commission, the applicant shall obtain site plan review or special review approval within six months of the date of approval of the variance or waiver, or the variance or waiver shall become void. Prior to the expiration of the six-month period, the applicant may request, in writing, that the development services director grant a time extension not to exceed three months. Any such extension shall be based on a demonstration by the applicant that a good-faith effort has been made to secure site plan review or special review approval, but that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented it. Further extensions of time shall require a new application.
  • h.
    Appeals. Any persons aggrieved by a decision of the zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board, or the city commission in the exercise of authority granted in this section, may appeal by common law writ of certiorari to a court of competent jurisdiction for judicial relief within 30 days after a decision by the zoning board of appeals, the planning board, the historic preservation board, or the city commission. The election of remedies shall lie with the appellant.
  • i.
    Special provisions for variations and exceptions to the subdivisions requirements. Whenever the tract to be subdivided is of such unusual size or shape or is surrounded by such development or unusual conditions that the strict application of the requirements contained in ARTICLE XI of this chapter would result in real difficulties or substantial hardship or injustice, the city commission, after report by the planning board, may vary or modify such requirements so that the subdivider may develop his property in a reasonable manner, but so that, at the same time, the public welfare and interests of the city and surrounding area are protected and the general intent and spirit of this chapter is preserved.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-18; Ord. No. 4070-07, § 2, 7-30-2007; Ord. No. 4167-08, § 1, 9-22-2008; Ord. No. 5008-22, § 5, 07-25-2022; Ord. No. 5139-25, § 5, 09-02-2025)

    Sec. 94-39. - Public hearing.

  • a.
    Scheduling the hearing. Upon determination by the planning director, or designee, that all applications for any action requiring a public hearing have been completed and filed, the appropriate reviewing authority shall be notified in order to schedule and provide appropriate notice of a public hearing in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
  • b.
    Public inspection of records. Applications submitted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter may be reviewed by the public or by any interested citizen, according to the provisions of F.S. Ch. 119.
  • c.
    Conduct of the hearing.
    1. 1.
      Rights of all persons. Any person may appear at a public hearing and submit documents, materials, and other written or oral testimony individually or as a representative of an organization. Persons who appear at a public hearing shall state their names, addresses, and the names and mailing addresses of any organizations they represent. The body conducting the public hearing may place reasonable time restrictions on the presentation of testimony and the submission of documents and other materials.
    2. 2.
      Oaths. All persons presenting evidence at a public hearing shall swear or attest that their statements are true. During a public hearing, all parties shall have all of the following rights:
      1. a.
        The right to be represented by a counsel or by an agent.
      2. b.
        The right to present witnesses.
      3. c.
        The right to cross-examine all witnesses.
      4. d.
        The right to cross-examine and reproduce any documents produced at the hearing. Such rights shall be subject to the discretion of the body conducting the hearing and may be limited if unwarranted or undue delay will result or where no new materials or testimony will be presented.
    3. 3.
      Failure to appear. An applicant's failure to appear or to be represented at a scheduled hearing shall be sufficient cause to deny the request.
  • d.
    Withdrawal, continuation or resubmittal of applications.
    1. 1.
      Withdrawal of applications.
      1. a.
        Any application for an amendment to the text of this chapter or the official zoning map, for a comprehensive plan consistency review, for a site plan review, an approval of a special use, for an appeal, or for a variance authorization may be withdrawn by an applicant or designated representative by giving written notice to the planning director, or designee. An application may be withdrawn at a public hearing at the request of the applicant or designated representative. After the conclusion of the public hearing concerning an application, it may be withdrawn only upon a majority affirmative vote of the review authority.
      2. b.
        An application for any approval required by this chapter may be amended prior to the publication of notice of public hearing. A written request for amendment to the application shall be made in writing, to the planning director, or designee. A request of this nature shall require an additional amendment processing fee. Such applications for change shall be considered new applications and shall be considered at the next appropriate public hearing.
    2. 2.
      Continuation of applications. Any application may be continued for a period not to exceed 60 days at the request of the city commission, planning board, zoning board of appeals, or planning director, or designee, if the authority requesting the continuation determines there is need for further study or information.
    3. 3.
      Resubmittals. When an application for an amendment to the text of this chapter or the official zoning map, for approval of a special use, or for a variance authorization is denied by the appropriate review authority, an application affecting the same property and requesting the same change shall not be resubmitted for a period of 12 months following the denial. The review authority may waive this provision if new circumstances or material changes affect the application.
  • e.
    Records of proceedings.
    1. 1.
      Records maintained by city. All records of any proceedings of the city commission, the planning board, the zoning board of appeals, the downtown action committee, and the plans and plats review committee shall be filed as a part of the public records of the city.
    2. 2.
      Official minutes maintained. Minutes of proceedings shall be kept, in which findings of fact, recommendations, and all determinations or decisions are to be recorded. These minutes shall be considered public records and maintained by the city.
    3. 3.
      Use of recording devices. All proceedings of the city commission, the planning board, the zoning board of appeals and the downtown action committee, shall be recorded electronically. Upon request and during normal business hours, any person may listen to the recordings of any proceedings. Transcriptions of proceedings may be obtained at the expense of the individual requesting such information.
    4. 4.
      Application records maintained. Application forms and all information submitted with each application shall be maintained by the planning and zoning department. Any transcript of testimony, the minutes of proceedings, all applications, exhibits, documents, materials, and papers submitted to a reviewing or decision-making body, written reports of any municipal employee or consultant, and the decision and report of the reviewing or decision-making body shall constitute the record. Person may examine the record during normal business hours and obtain copies at their expense.
  • f.
    Action by decision-making authority. All decision-making authorities shall render their decisions within a reasonable period as provided in this chapter. All actions of any reviewing or decision-making authority shall include the recommendation or decision and the reason for the action.
  • g.
    Notification. Notification of the final decision on an application shall be mailed to the applicant. A copy of the final decision shall be filed in the planning and zoning department.
  • h.
    Reconsideration of action.
    1. 1.
      City commission. An action may be reconsidered by the city commission under either of the following circumstances:
      1. a.
        If only four members vote on a decision and the vote is tied, a motion to reconsider may be made by any member of the city commission at the next meeting at which all five commissioners are present;
      2. b.
        On any decision other than that described in subsection (h)(1)(a) of this section, a motion to reconsider may be made only by a city commission member who voted on the prevailing side.
    2. 2.
      Planning board, zoning board of appeals and downtown action committee. An action may be reconsidered by the planning board, the zoning board of appeals, or the downtown action committee only upon a motion of a member of either body who voted on the prevailing side of the original vote. The motion must be made at the same or the next regular meeting. A motion to reconsider may be seconded by any member.
    3. 3.
      Notice. Action on a question pending reconsideration must follow the notice applicable to the public hearing at which the original decision was made.
  • i.
    General standards for notice required for public hearing. Unless otherwise required by subsection (k) of this section, notice for public hearings shall conform to the following general standards:
    1. 1.
      Content of notice. Notice of each public hearing shall include the date, time, and location of the hearing, a description of the substance of the subject matter that will be discussed, a description of the general location of the properties directly affected, the name of the body conducting the hearing, a brief statement of the action the body conducting the hearing is authorized to take, and a statement that the hearing may be continued from time to time as may be necessary. Written notices provided by mail shall include a map which indicates the location of the proposed action.
    2. 2.
      Newspaper advertisements. Advertising required by this section shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation. Applicants shall pay for costs incurred by the city to advertise the scheduled public hearing.
    3. 3.
      Written notices. The names and addresses of property owners to be provided written notice required by this section shall be obtained from the most current official ad valorem tax roll. The applicant shall provide, in a form determined by the city, a certified list of all property owners to be notified. The applicant also shall provide sufficient funds to defray the cost to mail the required notice. If the owner of a condominium is to be provided written notice, the condominium association must be provided notice.
    4. 4.
      Public inspection. A copy of the notice of public hearing shall be available in the planning and zoning department during regular business hours.
    5. 5.
      Posting of property. Property affected by an application that requires action by the planning board or the city commission shall be posted as provided below.
      1. a.
        Signs. Signs shall be provided by the applicant at a size generally at a minimum of three feet in width and four feet in length, with specific language provided by the planning department.
      2. b.
        Posting. The property shall be posted by the applicant no further than 15 feet from the frontage property line, or as specified by the planning department based on site constraints. The failure of any such posted notice to remain in place after it has been posted shall not be deemed a failure to comply with this requirement or be grounds to challenge the validity of any decision made by the approving authority.
      3. c.
        Installation. Signs shall be posted in a workmanlike manner, able to withstand normal weather events.
      4. d.
        Minimum posting requirements. Privately-initiated applications require that at least one sign be posted per 500 lineal feet of all property located along a public right-of-way, with a minimum of one sign per frontage, or as otherwise required by the planning and zoning administrator based on site constraints. In the event of unique circumstances affecting a property, additional signs shall be posted as required by the planning and zoning administrator. City-initiated applications require that one sign be posted per frontage along a public right-of-way at a size provided by the public works department.
      5. e.
        Deadline. Signs shall be posted at least 15 days prior to the first public hearing.
      6. f.
        Affidavit. An affidavit, including photographs, attesting to the date of installation and number of signs installed shall be provided by applicant to the planning department at least five days prior to the public hearing.
      7. g.
        Removal. The applicant shall remove the posting no more than 30 days after the final city commission decision on the subject application.
      8. h.
        Exceptions to posting. The posting requirement shall not apply to city-initiated future land use map amendments and re-zonings which will impact more than four parcels.
  • j.
    General procedures for notice of public hearings.
    1. 1.
      Planning board. Public notice shall be advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten days in advance of the public hearing. Written notice shall be provided by mail at least 14 days in advance of the public hearing to all affected property owners, all affected neighborhood and business organizations whose addresses are kept on file with the planning and zoning department and all persons who own real property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the proposed action and whose addresses are known by reference to the latest approved ad valorem tax roll.
    2. 2.
      City commission. Public notice shall be advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten days in advance of the public hearing for adoption of the action, except for the items listed in subsection 94-39(k), which shall follow the specific requirements of Florida Statues. Written notice shall be provided by mail at least 30 days in advance of the public hearing to all affected property owners, all affected neighborhood organizations whose addresses are kept on file with the planning and zoning department and to all persons who own real property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the proposed action and whose addresses are known by reference to the latest approved ad valorem tax roll.
    3. 3.
      Zoning board of appeals. Public notice shall be advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten days in advance of the public hearing. Written notice shall be provided by mail at least 14 days in advance of the public hearing to all affected property owners, all affected neighborhood organizations whose addresses are kept on file with the planning and zoning department and all persons who own real property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the proposed action and whose addresses are known by reference to the latest approved ad valorem tax roll.
    4. 4.
      Downtown action committee. Public notice shall be advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten days in advance of the public hearing. Written notice shall be provided by mail at least 14 days in advance of the public hearing to all affected property owners, all affected neighborhood and business organizations whose addresses are kept on file with the planning and zoning department and all persons who own real property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the proposed action and whose addresses are known by reference to the latest approved ad valorem tax roll.
  • k.
    Additional standards and procedures for notice of public hearing. Public hearing notification standards and procedures for the types of applications listed in this subsection shall conform to the following requirements:
    1. 1.
      Adoption of or amendments to the comprehensive plan and future land use map. Notification procedures shall conform to F.S. § 171.044, F.S. § 380.06, F.S. § 166.041, F.S. § 163.3184 or § 163.3187.
    2. 2.
      Ordinances that change the actual list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within a zoning category, or ordinances initiated by the city that change the actual zoning map designation of a parcel or parcels of land. Notification procedures shall conform to F.S. § 166.041.
    3. 3.
      Voluntary annexations. Notification procedures shall conform to F.S. § 171.044.
    4. 4.
      Involuntary annexations. Notification procedures shall conform to F.S. §§ 171.0413, 171.042 and 166.041.
    5. 5.
      Development agreements. Notification procedures shall conform to F.S. § 163.3225 and code subsection 94-43(b)(3).
    6. 6.
      Developments of regional impact. Notification procedures shall conform to F.S. § 380.06.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-19; Ord. No. 4094-07, § 1, 11-3-2007; Ord. No. 4357-11, § 1, 9-6-2011; Ord. No. 4449-13, § 5, 3-19-2013; Ord. No. 4613-16, § 1, 2-1-2016; Ord. No. 4633-16, § 1, 5-23-2016)

    Sec. 94-40. - Commencement of development.

  • a.
    Definitions. For the purposes of this section the following words and terms shall have the meanings respectively ascribed:
  • Sec. 94-41. - Applications.

  • a.
    Procedures for submitting and processing applications.
    1. 1.
      Forms provided by the city. When the submission of an application is required prior to review or action by the city, the applicant shall utilize forms provided, as applicable, by the planning department.
    2. 2.
      Determination of necessary permits and reviews required. When the planning department provides an applicant with the required application, the applicant shall be advised regarding the types of permits and review procedures necessary to proceed with the proposed amendment, development use, or activity. The applicant shall be advised to request a preapplication conference to become familiar with city review procedures.
    3. 3.
      Optional preapplication conference. The preapplication conference is suggested to the applicant to avoid unnecessary delays or confusion in the application and review processes. If requested, an informal meeting will be arranged among the applicant, planning department staff, building and zoning department staff, and other appropriate city staff to discuss the proposal and to review any preliminary plans the applicant may wish to present.
    4. 4.
      Applications. Before an amendment, development activity or use shall be considered, an application for approval shall be filed with the planning department or the building and zoning department, as applicable.
      1. a.
        Format. The application shall be in accordance with the form prescribed by the planning and zoning administrator and approved by the mayor, copies of which may be obtained from the appropriate department. 
      2. b.
        Filing. Applications shall be filed at such times as prescribed by the planning and zoning administrator.
      3. c.
        Fees. Fees for all applications required by this chapter shall be established and amended by resolution of the city commission. Fees shall be charged in an amount to compensate the city for costs incurred to process an application. Such costs include, but are not limited to, public notice advertisements; public notice postage; and planning, engineering, scientific, technical, and related professional and staff services necessary to process the application.
      4. d.
        Disclosure of ownership. Applications may be submitted by the property owner, a representative of the owner, or a prospective purchaser. Applications submitted by a representative of the property owner must be accompanied by a written power of attorney authorizing that person to submit the application. A potential purchaser of a property who has executed a purchase and sale agreement with the current property owner may submit an application with respect to the property provided, either a power of attorney from the current property owner or a copy of the purchase contract accompanies the application; however, any approvals granted shall be conditioned upon providing proof of transfer of title prior undertaking the development activity. All applications shall include a verified statement showing each person having a legal, equitable, or beneficial ownership interest in the property for which the application is submitted. However, corporations shall provide only the names and addresses of the corporation and principal executive officers.
      5. e.
        Submission of fee and application prior to action by city. Prior to action taken by a department or official body of the city concerning a specific amendment or development activity, an applicant must submit the proper fee and an official application to the planning and zoning administrator.
    5. 5.
      Preliminary review for completeness. The planning and zoning administrator, within ten working days following the submission of an application and fee, shall determine whether or not the application satisfies all requirements. If it is determined that there are deficiencies in the application, the applicant shall be notified of the deficient items. When one or more deficiencies exist, the department shall take no further action on the application until the applicant submits the required information.
    6. 6.
      Initiation of review. The planning and zoning administrator shall commence review of the application after a determination that the application is complete.
    7. 7.
      Review of appropriate standards and criteria. Subsequent to the submission of a completed application, the application shall be reviewed by the city based on the standards and criteria provided in this chapter.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-21; Ord. No. 5124-25, § 3, 03-03-2025)

    Sec. 94-42. - Developments of regional impact.

  • a.
    Intent. The intent of this section is to provide for the processing and consideration of application that are or may be considered developments of regional impact, including area-wide and downtown developments of regional impact.
  • b.
    Developments of regional impact determination. A developer shall be required to submit a request for and receive a determination from the department of community affairs as to whether or not such development is a development of regional impact as defined in F.S. § 380.06 under either of the following circumstances:
    1. 1.
      The development is at a presumptive numerical threshold or up to 20 percent above the numerical threshold as described in the guidelines and standards in F.S. ch. 380 or administrative rules promulgated thereunder;
    2. 2.
      The development is between a presumptive numerical threshold and 20 percent below the numerical threshold, and the city is in doubt as to whether the character or magnitude of the development at the proposed location creates a likelihood that the development will have a substantial effect on the health, safety, or welfare of the citizens of more than one county. If a development is between a presumptive numerical threshold and 20 percent below the numerical threshold, the developer shall submit a request in writing to the planning and zoning administrator for a determination as to whether or not the city will require that an application for a binding letter of interpretation will be required to be submitted, in regard to such development. The procedure for processing such requests shall be filed with any other applications as may be required by the city.
  • c.
    Binding letter. As to any development which is required by the provisions of subsection (b) of this section to submit a request for a binding letter of determination or for which the developer for any other reason has submitted a request for a binding letter of determination, the application for any of the following: comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, planned unit development approval, site plan approval, conditional use approval, or special exception, or for any court judgment which constitutes a final judgment entered as result of an appeal from a final order of the department of community affairs making a determination on the development of regional impact status of the project. The city shall not process any applications for development permits for any project or portion thereof for which a development permit is actually sought by the developer, until a final binding determination has been made as to the development of regional impact status of the project. Any application for a development permit for a project for which a final binding determination has been made in part or in whole based upon various commitments or limitations as to development made in the applicant's request for a binding letter, agreed to by the applicant, or otherwise imposed by the department of community affairs to restrict the development of regional impact, such commitment, limitations, or conditions may be included in the permit issued as conditions and are hereby incorporated as conditions into all development permits as if such conditions were fully set out in each development permit.
  • d.
    Concurrent processing required. If a project has been determined to be a development of regional impact or if the developer has waived the right to request a binding letter of determination or otherwise agreed to the development of regional impact status of a project, then for this project any application as to the first development permit sought from the city for such development shall be accompanied by a simultaneously filed application for development approval seeking development of regional impact review and approval as required in F.S. § 380.06. No final action will be taken on any development permit applications for a project for which development of regional impact approval is being sought, until the city can concurrently act upon the application for development approval.
  • e.
    Modifications to developments. In the event of proposed modification to a development for which a binding letter of determination has been received by the city indicating that the development was not a development of regional impact, the following shall apply:
    1. 1.
      If the modification increases the size or scope of the development so that when the proposed modification is aggregated with the prior approved development that was determined not to be a development of regional impact, and so that the aggregated development is at a presumptive numerical threshold or up to 20 percent above a numerical threshold as described in the guidelines and standards of F.S. ch. 380 or administrative rules promulgated thereunder, then the developer shall be required to submit an application for a binding letter of determination.
    2. 2.
      If the modification increases the size or scope of the development so that when the proposed modification is aggregated with the prior approved development that was determined not to be a development of regional impact, and so that the aggregated development is at a presumptive numerical threshold or 20 percent below the numerical threshold, then the provisions of subsection (b)(1) of this section shall apply.
    3. 3.
      The provisions of subsections (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section shall also apply in the event of a modification to a development which falls within the parameters of subsections (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-22)

    Sec. 94-43. - Developer agreements.

  • a.
    Definitions. The following definitions shall be used in the administration of the provision of this section.
  • Sec. 94-44. - Subdivision review.

  • a.
    Conference with mayor. Each subdivider of land should confer with the mayor, or his designee, before preparing a preliminary subdivision plan, in order to become thoroughly familiar with the subdivision requirements and with the proposals of the city plan affecting the territory in which the proposed subdivision lies.
  • b.
    Jurisdiction and procedures for approval of minor subdivisions.
    1. 1.
      Five copies of the plat, which shall be a scale drawing showing the development plan, shall be submitted to the department of community development and planning.
    2. 2.
      A survey of the entire property to be split or subdivided, showing the existing buildings on the land shall be submitted to the department of community development and planning. This survey may be waived by the approving authority when its knowledge and information of the property permits.
    3. 3.
      The planning and zoning administrator shall forward a copy of the plat to the city engineer and the building official.
    4. 4.
      The city engineer, building official and planning and zoning administrator shall check the plat in relation to this chapter and all other applicable ordinances, regulations and codes of the city, and when found in conformance with this chapter and all other applicable ordinances, regulations and codes of the city, the plat shall be granted approval by the planning and zoning administrator. If disapproved, the applicant may forward such plat to the city planning board for further action.
    5. 5.
      Upon approval of a plat of a minor subdivision, such plat shall be recorded by the applicant in the records of this county, and a copy of such record shall be forwarded to the building official, city engineer, city tax assessor and county tax assessor.
    6. 6.
      At the time of filing an application for a minor subdivision plat, the applicant shall pay a fee for each minor subdivision plat requested to cover any charge and expense of the city therefor, which fee shall be set by the city commission by resolution.
  • c.
    Jurisdiction and procedures for approval of major subdivisions.
    1. 1.
      It shall be unlawful for any owner, agent or person having control of any land within the city to subdivide or lay out such land into more than four lots, unless by a plat, in accordance with the regulations contained in this chapter. Such plat shall first be submitted to the city planning board for approval or disapproval. After report and recommendation of the planning board is made and filed, such plats shall be submitted to the city commission for its approval or disapproval. No plat shall be recorded and no lots shall be sold from such plat unless and until approved as provided in this section.
    2. 2.
      The design and layout of all major subdivisions shall conform with the requirements of ARTICLE XI of this chapter. The subdivider shall submit a preliminary plan in accordance with the specifications of subsection (d) of this section. Following approval of the preliminary plan, the subdivider shall install the minimum improvements or furnish a bond or provide for guaranteeing such installations in accordance with the requirements of subsection (e) of this section. Upon approval of improvement installations or arrangements therefor, the final plat shall be submitted in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of this section.
    3. 3.
      The city planning board is also authorized to approve major subdivision plats in any unincorporated area lying within three miles of the corporate limits of the city; provided that, the city planning board shall not consider any such plat until and unless a request for such consideration and action has been made to the board by an appropriate resolution adopted by the board of county commissioners of the county. Wherever a subdivision is located beyond the city limits, the board of county commissioners and the county highway engineer shall perform the appropriate functions of the city commission, the mayor and the city engineer required in this chapter.
    4. 4.
      At the time of filing an application for a major subdivision plat within the city, the applicant shall pay a fee to cover any charge and expense of the city planning board, as well as charges and expenses of all other departments and city personnel, including the approval or disapproval before the city commission, which fee shall be set by the city commission by resolution.
  • d.
    Data required on preliminary and final plans.
    1. 1.
      Preliminary plan. Whenever any person desires to subdivide land into building lots or to dedicate streets, alleys or land for public use, he shall submit three copies of the preliminary sketch plan conforming to the requirements of ARTICLE XI of this chapter to the planning board before submission of the final plan. Plats containing three lots or less may be exempted from the provisions of this section. The preliminary plan shall show:
      1. a.
        The location of present property and section lines, boundaries of incorporated areas, streets, buildings, lakes and watercourses.
      2. b.
        Any existing or proposed sanitary and storm sewers, water mains and culverts within the tract or immediately adjacent thereto. The location and size of the nearest water main and sewer or outlet are to be indicated in a general way upon the plat.
      3. c.
        The proposed location and width of streets, alleys, lots, building and setback lines and easements, and the proposed width and grade of street paving.
      4. d.
        The title under which the proposed subdivision is to be recorded and the name of the subdivider platting the tract.
      5. e.
        The names and adjoining boundaries of all adjoining subdivisions and the names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land.
      6. f.
        North point, scale and date.
      7. g.
        The contours of the land, based on the city datum.
    2. 2.
      Final plat. The final plat on tracing cloth and four prints thereof, together with copies of any deed restrictions, where such restrictions are too lengthy to be shown on the plat, shall be submitted to the city commission. The final plat is to be drawn at a scale of not more that 100 feet to the inch from an accurate survey. If more that two sheets are required, an index sheet of the same dimensions shall be filed showing the entire subdivision of one sheet and the areas shown on other sheets. The final plat shall show:
      1. a.
        The boundary lines of the area being subdivided, with accurate distances and bearings. The correct legal description of the property being subdivided shall be shown on the plat.
      2. b.
        The lines of all proposed streets and alleys with their width and names.
      3. c.
        The accurate outline of any portions of the property intended to be dedicated or granted for public use.
      4. d.
        The lines of adjoining streets and alleys with their width and names.
      5. e.
        All lot lines, together with an identification system for all lots and blocks.
      6. f.
        The location of all building lines and easements provided for public use, services or utilities.
      7. g.
        All dimensions, both linear and angular, necessary for locating the boundaries of the subdivision, lots, streets, alleys, easements, and any other areas for public or private use. Linear dimensions are to be given to the nearest one-hundredth of a foot.
      8. h.
        The radii, arcs, chords, points of tangency and central angles for all curvilinear streets and radii for rounded corners.
      9. i.
        The location of all survey monuments and bench marks, together with their descriptions.
      10. j.
        The name of the subdivision, the scale of the plat, points of the compass and the name of the owner or subdivider.
      11. k.
        The certificate of the surveyor, attesting to the accuracy of the survey and that permanent reference monuments have been established according to law.
      12. l.
        Private restrictions and trusteeships and their periods of existence. Should these restrictions or trusteeships be of such length as to make their lettering on the plat impracticable and thus necessitate the preparation of a separate instrument, reference to such instrument shall be made on the plat.
      13. m.
        Acknowledgment of the owner or owners to the plat and restrictions, including dedication to public use of all streets, alleys, parks or other open spaces shown thereon and the granting or dedicating or easements required.
  • e.
    Minimum improvements required for final plat approval.
    1. 1.
      Receipt of the signed copy of the approved preliminary plan is authorization for the subdivider to proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications for the following minimum improvements and with the preparation of the final plat. Prior to the construction of any improvements required or to the submission of a bond in lieu thereof, the subdivider shall furnish the city engineer all plans, information and data necessary to determine the character of such improvements. These plans shall be examined by the city engineer and will be approved if in accordance with the requirements of this section. Following this approval, construction can be started or the amount of bond determined.
    2. 2.
      No final or official plat of any subdivision shall be approved unless the improvements listed in the following subsections have been installed prior to such approval, or the subdivider shall file with the city commission a surety bond, cashier's check or a certified check upon a solvent local bank, conditioned to secure the construction of the improvements listed in the following subsections in a satisfactory manner and within a period specified by the city commission, such period not to exceed two years. No such bond or check shall be accepted unless it be enforceable by or payable to the city in a sum at least equal to the cost of constructing the improvements as estimated by the city engineer, and in form with surety and conditions approved by the city attorney.
      1. a.
        Street improvements. All streets and public ways shall be graded to their full width, including side slopes, and to the appropriate grade, and shall be surfaced in accordance with applicable standard specifications of the city or county. Such construction shall be subject to inspection and approval by the city engineer.
      2. b.
        Sidewalks. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along both sides of all streets; except, that it shall be within the discretion of the city commission, upon sufficient cause being shown, to waive the requirement of sidewalks on one side of the street in residential areas.
      3. c.
        Water lines.
        1. 1.
          Where an approved public water supply is reasonably accessible or procurable, each lot within the subdivision area shall be provided with a connection to such water supply. Fire hydrants shall also be installed in all subdivisions.
        2. 2.
          In areas outside the city limits, pending availability of a public water supply, the subdivider shall construct wells or a private water supply system in such a manner that an adequate supply of potable water will be available to every lot in the subdivision. The water supply system shall be constructed under supervision of the county health officer and shall comply with all regulations of the state board of health.
      4. d.
        Sanitary sewers.
        1. 1.
          Where an adequate public sanitary sewer is reasonably accessible, each lot within the subdivided area shall be provided with a connection to such sanitary sewer. All connections and the subdivision sewer system shall comply with regulations of the state department of health and shall be approved by the city engineer.
        2. 2.
          Where sewers are not accessible and no plans for sewers have been prepared, the subdivider shall install individual sewage disposal devices for each lot. All such individual sewage disposal systems shall be constructed in accordance with regulations and requirements of the state department of health, and under the supervision of and approval by the county health officer.
      5. e.
        Drainage. All necessary facilities, either underground pipe, canals or drainage ditches, shall be installed to provide adequate disposal of surface water and to maintain any natural watercourses.
      6. f.
        Street lights. Street lights shall be so located as to illuminate the area adequately during hours of darkness.
  • f.
    Approval of plats prior to recordation; approval of subdivisions and streets prior to installation of public improvements.
    1. 1.
      No plat of any subdivision shall be entitled to record in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of this county or have any validity until it shall have been approved in the manner prescribed in this chapter.
    2. 2.
      The city commission shall not permit any public improvements over which it has any control to be made or any money expended for improvements in any area that has been subdivided or upon any street that has been platted after February 9, 1953, unless such subdivision or street has been approved in accordance with the provisions contained in this chapter.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-24)

    Sec. 94-45. - Incorporation by reference.

    The following documents are incorporated in and made a part of this chapter by reference:

    1.   
      1. 1.
        Rules and procedures of the historic preservation board.
      2. 2.
      3. 3.
      4. 4.
      5. 5.
      6. 6.
        Ad valorem tax exemption application.
      7. 7.
        Historic preservation board certificate of appropriateness approval matrix.
      8. 8.
      9. 9.

    (Ord. No. 3554-02, art. I, § 4, 7-22-2002; Ord. No. 4522-14, § 2, 8-4-2014)

    Sec. 94-46. - Historic preservation.

  • a.
    Statement of purpose.
    1. 1.
      The city recognizes its collection of historic properties and historic districts, which create a setting, sense of time and place, and ambience highly attractive to tourists, business development and residents.
    2. 2.
      The city declares that Ordinance No. 3554-02 (the historic preservation ordinance, codified as the historic preservation provisions in sections 94-45 through 94-53, subsection 94-31(e) and section 94-611) specifically implements the goals, objectives, and policies of the historic preservation element of the comprehensive plan and, further, embodies the city's commitment to preserving, protecting, restoring and fully utilizing its historical, cultural and architectural resources ("resources").
    3. 3.
      The historic preservation ordinance is designed to identify, protect, restore and encourage reuse of resources, all of which are essential to the city's health, safety, morals, and its economical, educational, cultural, and general welfare. These valid public purposes shall be fulfilled by the ordinance, to achieve the following goals:
      1. a.
        Preserve, protect, enhance and perpetuate resources which represent distinctive and significant elements of the city's historical, cultural, social, economical, political, archaeological, and architectural identity; and/or serve as visible reminders of the city's culture and heritage;
      2. b.
        Ensure the harmonious, orderly, and efficient growth, prosperity and development of the city through retention and reuse of its historic and cultural resources;
      3. c.
        Strengthen civic pride and cultural stability through neighborhood conservation;
      4. d.
        Contribute to the stabilization of the economy of the city through the continued use, preservation, conservation and revitalization of its resources;
      5. e.
        Protect and enhance the city's historic, cultural and architectural attractions to tourists and visitors and the support and stimulus to business and industry thereby provided;
      6. f.
        Promote the use of resources for the education, pleasure, and welfare of the people of the city;
      7. g.
        Provide a review process for the continued preservation and appropriate, compatible and sensitive development of new construction and additions within the city's historic districts and neighborhoods;
      8. h.
        Protect and enhance the scale, character and stability of existing neighborhoods, and protect against destruction of or encroachment upon areas which contribute to the character of the city;
      9. i.
        Facilitate the creation of a convenient, harmonious and attractive community, and protect the architectural beauty and special architectural features of the city;
      10. j.
        Avoid demolition, or other adverse effect on historic properties (properties) and districts, which would cause an irreparable loss to the city;
      11. k.
        Assist neighborhoods to achieve a positive neighborhood identity and sense of place.
    4. 4.
      In addition, the historic preservation ordinance is designed to implement, be consistent with, and assist in the achievement of the goals, objectives and policies, as specifically required by the city's comprehensive plan, with respect to historic, conservation, and neighborhood resources.
  • b.
    Historic preservation division. The historic preservation division of the planning department (the division) shall administer the historic preservation provisions of this chapter. The division shall employ planners with expertise in archeology, history, architectural history, historic preservation, preservation planning, or a closely related field (the preservation planners). The head of the division shall be the historic preservation planner.
  • c.
    Powers and duties of the historic preservation planners. The preservation planners shall have the following powers and duties:
    1. 1.
      To advise the board on applications that come before the board for designations, certificates of appropriateness, and certificates of economic hardship, and to assist in the preparation of complete applications for each;
    2. 2.
      To schedule meetings of the board, prepare agendas and ensure that proper notice is given;
    3. 3.
      To coordinate the city's preservation activities with local, state, federal, and national agencies and preservation organizations;
    4. 4.
      To recommend to the board properties or districts for historic designation;
    5. 5.
      To undertake and continue an ongoing comprehensive survey and inventory to identify properties and districts that have historic, community, or architectural value within the city;
    6. 6.
      To keep a record of all designated properties and districts in the West Palm Beach Register of Historic Places;
    7. 7.
      To accept and administer grants or gifts to the city, including easements, that may be appropriate for carrying out the purpose of the historic preservation provisions of this chapter;
    8. 8.
      To review all permit requests for demolition within the city;
    9. 9.
      To review rezoning applications, applications for special use permits or applications for zoning variances that affect designated properties or districts;
    10. 10.
      To issue notices of violation or to request the building official or other authorized employee to issue notices of violation for properties not in compliance with the historic preservation provisions of this chapter;
    11. 11.
      To recommend to the city commission the appropriate fees for administration of the historic preservation provisions of this chapter;
    12. 12.
      To periodically review the historic preservation provisions of this chapter and the other provisions of this chapter and to recommend changes to the planning director and city commission; and
    13. 13.
      To assist the board in carrying out any of its powers and duties.
  • (Ord. No. 3554-02, art. I, § 2, art. III, §§ 1, 2, 7-22-2002)

    Sec. 94-47. - Certified local government review.

    The city commission is a certified local government (CLG) approved by the state department of state, division of historical resources. The city commission as a CLG is required to participate in the state National Register of Historic Places nomination process, be involved in the section 106 process, and is eligible to receive grants from the certified local government section of the state department of state historical resources grants-in-aid program.

    (Ord. No. 3554-02, art. VIII, § 2, 7-22-2002)

    Sec. 94-48. - Designation of historic properties, districts and landmarks.

  • a.
    Guidelines for historic designation .
    1. 1.
      Historic property or district. To qualify as a property or a district, individual properties must have significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture and possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, and association. For districts, eligibility is based on the establishment of historic contexts or themes which describe the historical relationship of the properties within the district. The property or district shall be at least 50 years old (in the case of a district, at least 50 percent of the buildings shall be at least 50 years old), and shall be significant in one or more of the following areas:
      1. a.
        Association with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of the city's history; or
      2. b.
        Association with the lives of persons significant in the city's past; or
      3. c.
        Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
      4. d.
        Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
        1. 1.
          Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces or graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, buildings or structures that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings or structures, properties primarily commemorative in nature, and properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the West Palm Beach Register of Historic Places. However, such a property will qualify if it is an integral part of a district or if it meets any of the following descriptions:
          1. i.
            A religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; or
          2. ii.
            A building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the surviving resource most importantly associated with a historic person or event; or
          3. iii.
            A birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no appropriate site or building directly associated with such figure's productive life; or
          4. iv.
            A cemetery which derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features or from association with historic events; or
          5. v.
            A reconstructed building or structure when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived; or
          6. vi.
            A property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition or symbolic value has invested it with its own exceptional significance; or
          7. vii.
            A property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance.
    2. 2.
      Landmark. To qualify as a landmark property in the Downtown Master Plan area, the property shall have outstanding significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture and possess exceptional integrity of location, design, setting, vistas, materials, workmanship, and association. To qualify as a landmark district in the Downtown Master Plan area, eligibility shall be based on the historic context which describes the historical relationship of the properties within the district. The property or district shall be at least 50 years old and, in the case of a district, at least 50 percent of the buildings shall be at least 50 years old. Such property or district shall be exceptionally significant in one or more of the following areas:
      1. a.
        Association with events that have made a significant contribution to, and are identified with, or that outstandingly represent, the broad patterns of the city's history and from which an understanding and appreciation of those patterns may be gained; or
      2. b.
        Association with the important lives of persons significant in the city's past; or
      3. c.
        Properties that represent some great idea or ideal of the American people; or
      4. d.
        Embodies a high level of historic integrity of the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
      5. e.
        Properties that are composed of integral parts of the environment not sufficiently significant by reason of historical association or artistic merit to warrant individual recognition, but collectively compose an entity of exceptional historical or artistic significance, or outstandingly commemorate or illustrate a way of life or culture.
      6. f.
        Has yielded, or may be likely to yield information, of major scientific importance by revealing new cultures, or by shedding light upon periods of occupation over areas of the United States. Such sites are those which have yielded, or which may reasonably be expected to yield, data affecting theories, concepts and ideas to a major degree.
    3. 3.
      Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces or graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, buildings or structures that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings or structures, properties primarily commemorative in nature, and properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible as a landmark, unless such property is an integral part of a district, or if it meets any of the following descriptions:
      1. a.
        A religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; or
      2. b.
        A building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the surviving resource most importantly associated with a historic person or event; or
      3. c.
        A birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no appropriate site or building directly associated with such figure's productive life; or
      4. d.
        A cemetery which derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features or from association with historic events; or
      5. e.
        A reconstructed building or structure when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived; or
      6. f.
        A property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition or symbolic value has invested it with its own exceptional significance; or
      7. g.
        A property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance.
  • b.
    Procedures .
    1. 1.
      Eligible applicants.
      1. a.
        Applications for historic designation or landmark status may be initiated by only the following:
        1. 1.
          Historic preservation board.
        2. 2.
        3. 3.
          Preservation planners.
        4. 4.
          A property owner for designation of a site.
        5. 5.
          A majority of property owners (51 percent) for designation of a district.
      2. b.
        Only the board or the city commission may initiate designation of a property or district owned by the city, county or state or by an entity created by state law. For district designations, each property shall be allotted one vote. The identity of the property owners shall be determined by the most current county property tax rolls.
    2. 2.
      Application form. Nominations for historic designations shall be made only on application forms approved by the board. Properties seeking landmark designation shall submit a maintenance plan as part of the application.
    3. 3.
      Board agenda. Following the preservation planners' determination that an application for designation is complete, the application shall be scheduled for a public hearing by the board.
    4. 4.
      Board public hearing notice. The board shall advertise and hold a public hearing in accordance with F.S. § 166.041. Notice of the time, place and subject matter of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city, mailed to the applicant and mailed to any owner of real property within 400 feet of the property or district subject to potential designation, at least 30 calendar days prior to the date set for the public hearing.
    5. 5.
      No action permitted during pendency. During the period that a designation application is pending, no changes to the property or district shall be made unless first approved by the board. The application is considered pending until the final decision on the designation is made by the city commission.
    6. 6.
      Board recommendations. The board shall make a recommendation as to the proposed designation at the public hearing, based on findings of fact which support the recommendation. The board's recommendation shall be reduced to writing within 15 working days after the hearing date. If the board votes to recommend approval, it will forward the application with recommendations to the city commission. If the board recommends denial, no further action is required unless an applicant, or not less than two-thirds of the affected property owners (in the case of a district), appeals to the city commission. In such event the city commission may reconsider designation or require the board to do so.
    7. 7.
      City commission decision. Within 45 working days after the board hearing, a designation application with a board recommendation for approval shall be scheduled for hearing by the city commission. The city commission may approve or deny the designation application. Alternatively, the city commission may approve the designation with conditions or delay designation for up to one year. The city commission shall make written findings of fact on which its decision is based.
    8. 8.
      West Palm Beach Register of Historic Places. A property or district designated by the city commission as historic shall be listed in the West Palm Beach Register of Historic Places. All properties and districts designated under the previous city historic preservation ordinances are deemed designated under this chapter and shall be accorded all protection and be subject to all historic preservation regulations contained in this chapter. Properties listed in, or eligible for listing in the National Register or on the West Palm Beach Register of Historic Places, either as a property or as a contributing property within a district, shall be entitled to modified enforcement of the city's applicable building codes.
    9. 9.
      West Palm Beach Landmark. A property or district designated by the city commission as a landmark shall be listed in the West Palm Beach Register of Historic Places with a special annotation as landmark. Properties listed in, or eligible for listing in the National Register or on the West Palm Beach Register of Historic Places, either as a landmark property or as a contributing property within a landmark district, shall be entitled to modified enforcement of the city's applicable building codes. Landmark properties shall submit and adhere to a maintenance plan approved as part of the designation process and to be eligible for the TDR transfer.
    10. 10.
      Designation recorded. The historic or landmark designation ordinance shall be recorded in the official records of the county within ten working days of the designation decision. The designation shall be noted in the official records of the city's planning and construction services departments to ensure that all city actions taken in connection with the subject property or district are taken subject to the designation.
    11. 11.
      Historic district street signs. For districts, the city shall erect standardized street signs identifying the district within two years from the date of such designation, subject to economic feasibility. The design shall be first approved by the board.
  • c.
    Removal of designation. A designation may be removed by the city commission based upon the board's recommendation. Such recommendation shall be based upon new and compelling evidence and evaluation of work or natural cause producing an adverse effect to a property or district. The same guidelines and the same procedures established for designation shall be considered for a removal of designation.
  • d.
    Designation of county, state or other political subdivision properties. County, state or political subdivision entity-owned properties may be designated as a property or district if such designation is not prohibited or preempted by law, or otherwise provided for in the intergovernmental coordination element of the comprehensive plan. In the absence of prohibition, preemption, or other agreement, such other government may only avoid designation of its property by bearing the burden of proof that public interests, on balance, are best served by avoiding such designation. Such determination shall be established by the process as set forth in the historic preservation provisions of this chapter. Once designated, unless reversed upon appeal, such designated property or district shall comply with and be regulated by all regulations contained in the historic preservation provisions of this chapter.
  • e.
    Maintenance and repair of designated properties required. All designated properties or any portion thereof shall be preserved against decay and deterioration and kept free from structural defects.
  • f.
    [Rights granted.] All rights granted and procedures pertinent to properties listed on the West Palm Beach Register of Historic Places shall also be granted to properties listed therein with a landmark annotation.
  • (Ord. No. 4691-17, § 3, 2-13-2017)

    Editor's note— Ord. No. 4691-17, § 3, adopted Feb. 13, 2017, amended § 94-48 in its entirety to read as herein set out. Former § 94-48 pertained to designation of historic properties and districts, and derived from Ord. No. 3554-02, art. IV, adopted July 22, 2002; Ord. No. 4633-16, § 2, adopted May 23, 2016.

    Sec. 94-49. - Certificate of appropriateness procedures for review.

  • a.
    Review. The board or the preservation planners must review actions affecting the exterior of properties and all resources, including noncontributing properties, within districts.
  • b.
    Board approval required.
    1. 1.
      Approval. The board hears applications for certificates of appropriateness for alterations, new construction, demolitions, relocations, and certificates of economic hardship affecting proposed or designated properties or properties within districts.
    2. 2.
      Delegation of Review Authority. The board may delegate to the preservation planners the authority to administratively review and grant a certificate of appropriateness without formal action by the board. This delegation of review shall be depicted in a historic preservation board certificate of appropriateness approval matrix (the "matrix"). The matrix will contain a list of design features, such as roofing materials, window types, shutter types, etc. The matrix will indicate whether such features may be administratively reviewed or if board review is required. The board shall approve or amend the historic preservation board certificate of appropriateness approval matrix at its annual meeting, and at any other time as needed. This delegation of review may also be returned to the board at its discretion.

      If the division does not grant administrative approval of an application, the application will be referred to the board for review. Any applicant may request referral to the board rather than administrative review. An application referred by the division or an applicant will be considered in accordance with the application review schedule contained in this section.

  • c.
    Application procedure, fees and review.
    1. 1.
      Application and fees. Requests for certificates of appropriateness shall be made on application forms approved by the board. Submittal of the application must be made with the appropriate site plans, drawings, photographs, descriptions, and other documentation needed to provide the division and the board with a clear understanding of the proposed action. Application fees and other applicable charges shall be established by resolution adopted by the city commission.
    2. 2.
      Completeness review and board agenda. The preservation planners shall review all applications for certificates of appropriateness to determine whether an application is complete. If the application is incomplete, the preservation planners will notify the applicant of what additional information is necessary. An application will not be reviewed until the preservation planners determine that it is complete. All certificate of appropriateness applications eligible for administrative review will be reviewed within 15 working days. A written decision will be sent to the applicant. All certificate of appropriateness applications requiring board review will be scheduled for hearing by the board at the first available meeting approximately six weeks after receipt of the completed application. Notice of the time, place and subject matter of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city not less than seven days before the meeting. A sign stating that an application for demolition and new construction will be considered by the board shall be posted at the property not less than seven days before the meeting.
    3. 3.
      Secretary of the Interiors's standards for rehabilitation. In reviewing an application, the Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation (as may be amended from time to time) shall be applied. The current version is as follows:
      1. a.
        A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment.
      2. b.
        The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.
      3. c.
        Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken.
      4. d.
        Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved.
      5. e.
        Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved.
      6. f.
        Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.
      7. g.
        Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of buildings or structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.
      8. h.
        Significant archaeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
      9. i.
        New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.
      10. j.
        New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.
    4. 4.
      Additional criteria. The above standards for rehabilitation in subsection (c)(3) of this section shall be supplemented by the following criteria specific to certain types of requests:
      1. a.
        New construction and alterations. The following design elements and features should be visually compatible with resources in the surrounding buildings.
        1. 1.
          Setting, orientation and setbacks. The building should be situated approximately the same distance from the street as adjacent buildings, to create a continuous street edge. The orientation of the building should be consistent with that of the surrounding buildings. The setting should be designed with the overall environment in mind. It should take into account the compatibility of landscaping, parking, service areas, walkways and accessory structures.
        2. 2.
          Building height. The height of the building at street level should be visually compatible with the height of surrounding buildings.
        3. 3.
          Design styles. New buildings should take their design cues from the surrounding buildings. Traditional or contemporary design standards and elements should relate to the surrounding buildings.
        4. 4.
          Proportion of openings. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors should be visually compatible with the surrounding buildings.
        5. 5.
          Rhythm of solids to voids. The relationship between solids (walls) and voids (windows and doors) of a building should be visually compatible with the surrounding buildings.
        6. 6.
          Rhythm of spacing along the street. The relationship of buildings to the open space between them should be compatible with the other buildings on each side of the street in that block.
        7. 7.
          Relationship of materials and textures. The materials and textures of a building should be chosen with the predominant materials of the historic district in mind. Simplicity in such use is preferable.
        8. 8.
          Roof shapes. The roof shape of a building is a major distinguishing feature. The roof shape of a new building should be compatible with those of the buildings in the historic district.
        9. 9.
          Size, scale, bulk, mass and volume. The physical size, scale, bulk, mass and volume should be compatible with the surrounding buildings without overwhelming them.
      2. b.
        Demolition.
        1. 1.
          Certificate of appropriateness. No building or structure on a property or located within a district shall be demolished without first receiving a certificate of appropriateness for new construction. The applications for demolition and new construction shall be reviewed by the board simultaneously. The requirement of a certificate of appropriateness for new construction may be waived by the board upon a good cause showing that such requirement would be unduly harsh or would result in a substantial hardship to the property owner. A showing of good cause may include, but is not limited to, evidence that the property owner is unable to comply with the requirement for simultaneous new construction due to advanced age, infirmity, physical or other debilitating handicap, or financial hardship. Upon approval by the board of a certificate of appropriateness for demolition, the demolition permit shall not be issued until all demolition and new constructions plans for the property have received all other required governmental approvals.
          1. i.
            Any non-contributing primary structure that is 35 years old or older within a historic district that was surveyed, designated or redesignated more than five years ago must obtain an independent review of an historic preservation consultant (contracted through the city meeting the National Park Service Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Preservation) to determine if the structure would contribute to the district if the district was resurveyed.
        2. 2.
          Denial. The existence of one or more of the following conditions may be the basis for denial of a demolition application:
          1. i.
            The resource contributes significantly to the historic character of designated property or district.
          2. ii.
            The resource is listed on the National Register.
          3. iii.
            The resource is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the neighborhood or city.
          4. iv.
            The resource is capable of being repaired and reused in a practical and feasible manner.
          5. v.
            Retention of the resource would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture or heritage.
          6. vi.
            Granting a certificate of appropriateness for the demolition would result in an irreparable loss to the city of a significant resource.
          7. vii.
            The plans for the simultaneous new construction (if the demolition is granted) are not compatible with the property or district.
          8. viii.
            The report provided to the Historic Preservation Board by an Historic Preservation Professional meeting the National Park Service Qualification Standards for Historic Preservation indicates the property may be considered contributing.
        3. 3.
          Demolition delay period. The board may grant a certificate of appropriateness for demolition which may contain a delayed effective date. The effective date will be determined by the board based on the relative significance of the resource and the probable time required to arrange a possible alternative to demolition. The board may delay demolition for up to three months. During the demolition delay period, the board may take such steps as it deems necessary to preserve the resource. Such steps may include, but are not limited to: consultations with community groups, public agencies and interested citizens; recommendations for acquisition of the property by public or private bodies, or agencies; and exploration of the possibility of moving the resource.
        4. 4.
          Salvage and preservation of specific features. The city commission upon recommendation by the board may require the property owner, at city expense, to salvage and preserve specified classes of building materials, architectural details, ornaments, fixtures and the like.
        5. 5.
          Initiation of designation. If an undesignated property warrants it and it is otherwise authorized under the historic preservation provisions of this chapter, the preservation planners may initiate, or recommend that the board initiate, the designation application and review process. The preservation planners may further request that the board require that the issuance of a demolition permit be stayed pending the board's review of the application and the city commission's decision to designate or deny designation of the property. However, the maximum period during which the issuance of a demolition permit may be stayed pursuant to this subsection (c)(4)b.5. of this section is 120 days, unless extended by the city commission.
      3. c.
        Relocation. The existence of one or more of the following conditions may be the basis for denial of a relocation application:
        1. 1.
          The historic character or aesthetic interest of the resource contributes to its present setting in such a manner that relocation would result in a substantial loss to the setting or district.
        2. 2.
          There are no definite plans for the area to be vacated.
        3. 3.
          There are definite plans for the area to be vacated that may adversely affect the character of the district.
        4. 4.
          The resource cannot be moved without significant damage to its physical integrity.
        5. 5.
          The proposed relocation area is not compatible with the historic, cultural, and architectural character of the resource.
        6. 6.
          Little or no effort has been made to consider relocation within the same district or within another district with compatible historic, aesthetic, cultural, or design qualities with the relocated resource.
    5. 5.
      Decisions. Decisions regarding applications for certificates of appropriateness shall be based on the application, the application's compliance with the historic preservation provisions of this chapter, and the evidence and testimony presented in connection with the application. In reviewing an application, the division and the board shall be aware of the importance of finding a way to meet the current needs of the property owner. The division and the board shall also recognize the importance of recommending approval of plans that will be reasonable for the property owner to carry out. Any conditions or requirements imposed shall be reasonably related to the certificate of appropriateness sought by the applicant.
    6. 6.
      Notice of decision on application. The division shall notify the applicant in writing of any decision on the application within five working days from the date of the decision.
    7. 7.
      Changes in approved work. Any change in the proposed work following the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness shall be reviewed by the division. If the proposed change does not materially affect the historic character or the proposed change is in accordance with the board's decision, the division may administratively approve the change. If the proposed change is not in accordance with the board's decision, a new certificate of appropriateness application for such change must be submitted for review.
  • (Ord. No. 3554-02, art. V, 7-22-2002; Ord. No. 4022-07, § 2, 2-26-2007)

    Sec. 94-50. - Certificate of economic hardship and appeal of decisions.

  • a.
    Certificate of economic hardship. Prior to taking an appeal of a decision of the board on an application for certificate of appropriateness, an applicant may file an application for a certificate of economic hardship.
    1. 1.
      Application. A certificate of economic hardship application must be submitted within 30 days of the date of the hearing at which the board's decision on the application is announced.
    2. 2.
      Board agenda and notice. The board shall schedule a public hearing within 60 working days from the receipt of the application and shall provide notice of such hearing in the same manner as for the certificate of appropriateness application.
    3. 3.
      Negotiations prior to hearing. During the period between receipt of the certificate of economic hardship application and the board's public hearing, the applicant shall discuss the proposed action with the division, other city officials and local preservation organizations to consider alternatives that will avoid an economic hardship and have the least adverse effect to the property and the district. The division may request information from city departments and other agencies in order to negotiate an alternative resolution that is in the best interest of the applicant and the city. If negotiations are successful, the division shall make written recommendations to the board regarding such alternatives.
    4. 4.
      Determination. The applicant has the burden of proving by competent substantial evidence that the board's decision regarding the certificate of appropriateness application has caused or will cause an unreasonable economic hardship. The effect of denial of the application for certificate of economic hardship is that decision regarding the certificate of appropriateness is upheld. If the application for certificate of economic hardship is granted, the board may issue the certificate of economic hardship without conditions. Alternatively, the board may issue the certificate with conditions that will avoid the economic hardship and have the least adverse effect to the property and the district.

      Such conditions may include, but are not be limited to: ad valorem tax relief, loans or grants, requiring the owner to market and offer the property for sale for a fair market price with appropriate preservation protections for a period of time not to exceed six months, acquisition by a third party for a fair market value, taking by eminent domain and fair compensation, building and zoning code modifications, relaxation of the historic preservation provisions of this chapter, recommendation by the mayor that some or all of the applicable board fees be waived, or such other relief as appropriate.

  • b.
    Appeal of decisions. Any applicant may appeal a decision of the board to the city commission regarding an application for certificate of appropriateness and/or an application for certificate of economic hardship. The applicant shall file a written notice of the appeal with the historic preservation division within 30 days of the date of the hearing at which the board's decision on the application is announced. The city commission shall place the matter on the commission's agenda within 45 working days from the date of the written notice of appeal. The meeting at which the appeal is placed on the agenda shall be no later than 60 working days from the date of the written notice of appeal. Consideration of the appeal by the city commission shall be de novo review. The city commission shall be required to apply the applicable standards and criteria set forth in the historic preservation provisions of this chapter. A decision of the city commission may be appealed to a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 days after the hearing at which the decision is announced.
  • (Ord. No. 3554-02, arts. VI, VII, 7-22-2002)

    Sec. 94-51. - Historic preservation property tax exemption program.

  • a.
    [Exemption.] A property owner may apply for an exemption from ad valorem taxation of 100 percent of the assessed value of qualified improvements which result from the restoration, renovation or rehabilitation of eligible historic properties.
  • b.
    Eligible property. A property is eligible for an exemption if, at the time the exemption is granted, the property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, or is a contributing property to a national-register-listed district, or is designated as a historic property in the city's register of historic places, or is a contributing property to a city-designated historic district under the terms of the city's ordinances.
  • c.
    Improvements. Qualified physical improvements shall be those necessary to restore, renovate or rehabilitate an eligible property consistent with any city ordinance designating the property or district as historic. The improvements must comply with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and comply with Florida Department of State guidelines. Improvements may include additions, alterations and new construction.
  • d.
    Process.
    1. 1.
      Application for the tax exemption shall be written and submitted on the form prescribed by the state. Applications shall be submitted to the planning divisions accompanied by the fees established by resolution of the city commission. An application shall be submitted before the project is initiated.
    2. 2.
      Upon receipt of a complete application, the historic preservation planner shall, within 60 days, conduct a review to determine if the property is eligible and the improvements qualify for exemption. If the historic preservation planner finds that the property is eligible and the improvements are qualified, the application shall be approved. If the historic preservation planner determines that the planned improvements do not meet the requirements of statute or this section, the applicant shall be so advised in writing and the historic preservation planner shall make recommendations concerning changes to the proposed work to make it a qualifying improvement and bring it into compliance with the review standards.
    3. 3.
      All work shall be completed within two years of approval by the historic preservation planner, unless such time is extended by decision of the historic preservation board, and provided such extension does not conflict with the building permit or requirements of the city's building code.
    4. 4.
      Upon completion of the work, the applicant shall submit a final application/request for review of completed work, along with documentation of the total cost of the qualifying improvements. Upon receipt of a complete final application, the historic preservation planner shall, within 30 days, conduct a review to determine whether the completed improvements comply with the approved application and the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and comply with Florida Department of State guidelines. The city may inspect the work as part of such review. If the historic preservation planner finds that the property is eligible and the improvements are qualified, the historic preservation planner shall present such final request for review to the historic preservation board with a recommendation for approval. If the historic preservation planner determines that the planned improvements do not meet the requirements of statute or this section, the applicant shall be so advised in writing and the historic preservation planner shall make recommendations concerning changes to the proposed work to make it a qualifying improvement bring it into compliance with the review standards.
    5. 5.
      If the historic preservation planner recommends approval of the final request for review, the recommendation, and the reasons therefore, shall be provided in writing to the applicant and the historic preservation board at a public meeting. The historic preservation board shall review the application, final request for review and shall recommend that the city commission either grant or deny the exemption.
    6. 6.
      The final request for review, along with the recommendation of the historic preservation planner and the recommendation of the historic preservation board shall be presented to the city commission for consideration. The city commission shall make the determination to grant or deny the exemption.
    7. 7.
      The resolution of the city commission approving an exemption shall provide the name of the property owner, the property address, legal description and parcel control number, the period of time the exemption may be effective and the expiration date of the exemption, and shall further provide that such exemption shall not be effective unless the owner records the restrictive covenant in the public records of Palm Beach County, as required in this section.
  • e.
    Covenant. A historic tax exemption shall only be effective provided the property owner executes a covenant, in such form established by the state, committing that the historic character of the property and the qualifying improvements shall be maintained for the term of the tax exemption. The covenant shall be recorded in the public records of Palm Beach County and shall be binding on the property owners and all subsequent owners during the exemption term. Failure to record the covenant, or failure to maintain the qualifying improvements and historic character of the property may subject the property owner to pay the taxes which would have been paid had the property not received the exemption, plus interest, in accordance with statute.
  • f.
    Permits. The property owner shall remain responsible for obtaining a building permit and all other required permits and approvals. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued by the city until the city commission has approved the tax exemption and any appeal proceedings have been completed.
  • g.
    Term. Any historic tax exemption granted shall remain in effect for up to ten consecutive calendar years provided: (i) the historic character of the property and the improvements which qualified the property for exemption are maintained, and (ii) if the property is in a community redevelopment agency district, the city finance director has made an annual determination that there is sufficient debt service coverage for any outstanding agency bonds.
  • h.
    Fiscal analysis. During each year's budget process, the finance director shall perform an analysis of tax increment revenue and debt service coverage for any outstanding community redevelopment agency bonds for the next fiscal year. In the event that the historic tax exemptions in that agency district negatively impact debt service coverage, the finance director shall notify the property appraiser, prior to September 15 and certification of the tax rolls, that the historic tax exemption is suspended for the properties within that district for the next fiscal year. The tax exemption may be re-instituted for the next fiscal year provided there is sufficient debt coverage.
  • i.
    Revocation. The historic preservation planner or the historic preservation board may initiate proceedings to revoke the tax exemption in the event that the property owner fails to maintain the qualifying improvements and historic character of the property in accordance with the conditions of the restrictive covenant. The historic preservation board shall review the property's compliance and shall recommend that the city commission either maintain or revoke the tax exemption. The historic preservation planner shall provide the property owner with a least thirty days prior notice of the hearing before the historic preservation board. The city commission shall review the recommendation of the historic preservation board at a public hearing and make a determination as to whether the tax exemption shall be revoked. Should the city commission determine that a tax exemption shall be revoked, a written resolution revoking the exemption including a notice of penalties shall be provided to the owner the property appraiser and recorded in the public records of Palm Beach County.
  • (Ord. No. 4672-16, § 1, 11-7-2016)

    Editor's note— Ord. No. 4672-16, § 1, adopted Nov. 7, 2016, amended § 94-51 in its entirety to read as herein set out. Former § 94-51 pertained to similar material, and derived from Ord. No. 3554-02, art. VIII, § 1, adopted July 22, 2002.

    Sec. 94-52. - Enforcement and penalties.

  • a.
    Generally. It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to violate the historic preservation provisions of this chapter. Such violations shall be enforced and penalties imposed according to the provisions of chapter 26, articles II and III. In addition to all other employees authorized by the Code to enforce the Code, the historic preservation planners are hereby designated as employees who are duly authorized to issue notices of violations of the historic preservation provisions of this chapter.
  • b.
    Enforcement of maintenance and repair provisions. Should the historic preservation board or the historic preservation division determine that any property is endangered by lack of maintenance and repair, a request shall be made to the appropriate officials or agencies of the city to require correction of such deficiencies under authority of applicable laws and regulations.
  • (Ord. No. 3554-02, art. VIII, 7-22-2002)

    Sec. 94-53. - Unsafe buildings and structures.

    Should the building official determine that a historic property or a property within a historic district is unsafe pursuant to the city's building and housing code, the historic preservation division shall be notified of such findings. Where reasonably feasible, within applicable laws and regulations, the building official shall endeavor to have the resource repaired rather than demolished and shall take into account any comments and recommendations by the board. The board may take appropriate actions to effect and accomplish the preservation of the resource, including, but not limited to, negotiations with the owner and other interested parties, provided that such actions do not interfere with the city's building and housing code.

    (Ord. No. 3554-02, art. VIII, § 3, 7-22-2002)

    Sec. 94-54. - Downtown master plan (DMP) development approval process.

    The process and procedure to request approvals for any new construction, reconstruction, alteration, addition or improvement to an existing structure or appurtenance within the DMP area shall be as follows:

    1. a.
      Formal site plan review.
      1. 1.
        Application and review process. An application for a formal site plan review shall be submitted to the planning and zoning department on city approved forms. After an application is deemed complete by city staff, the application will be placed on the agenda for the next available plans and plat review committee (PPRC) meeting. At the meeting, the PPRC will review the project for compliance with governing ordinances and regulations.

        The applicant shall address any comments of the PPRC and submit a revised application within 60 days of the meeting. Failure to make the required submittals within the 60-day deadline will deem the application as withdrawn. At least 15 days prior to the expiration of the 60-day revision period, the applicant may request a 30-day extension. No further extension request is permitted. Comments relating to revised applications shall be addressed within 30 days of the date of such comments. As part of the PPRC review, staff shall identify any need for additional approvals such as DAC special review, variances, and class B special use permits as required by the DMP urban regulations. Such additional approvals shall be sought within the formal site plan review period, and shall be required prior to any site plan approval. A formal site plan application shall be considered withdrawn after 90 days of inactivity.

      2. 2.
        Exceptions. The following types of applications do not require formal site plan review, and may proceed directly to building permit application if other approvals such as variances, or class B special use permits are not required:
        1. a.
          Any modification of an existing structure that does not increase the total square footage of the structure or change the building footprint.
        2. b.
          One- and two-residential unit structures in residential districts.
        3. c.
          Outbuildings and accessory structures of fewer than 1,000 gross square feet.
        4. d.
          Additions of fewer than 1,000 gross square feet to existing residential and nonresidential structures.
        5. e.
          Addition of awnings, canopies, or decorative architectural elements.
        6. f.
          Redesign of existing surface parking facilities, drives, and driveways.
        7. g.
          Swimming pools, including redesign and relocation.
        8. h.
          Minor structural additions or alterations, such as porches, terraces, and fencing.
        9. i.
          Addition of parking spaces to existing surface parking facilities not exceeding 25 percent of the existing number of spaces or 20 spaces, whichever is less.
      3. 3.
        Formal site plan approval. After completion of the PPRC formal site plan review process, and after obtaining any additional approvals required, a formal site plan approval letter will be issued stating the terms and conditions of the approval. Proposed developments with formal site plan approvals shall commence construction within 24 months following the date of formal site plan approval. If commencement of construction does not occur during such 24-month period, the formal site plan approval shall automatically expire without further action by the city.

        Projects approved as phased development shall commence construction of the first phase within 24 months following the date of formal site plan approval. Following phases shall commence construction according to the timeframes established on the site plan approval. If construction of subsequent phases does not comply with the established timeframes, the formal site plan approval shall automatically expire without further action by the city.

        Formal site plan approvals involving the TDR program shall include a condition stating that the TDRs shall be approved by DAC and the certificate of transfer shall be obtained prior to the expiration of the site plan approval.

      4. 4.
        Formal site plan approval extensions. At least 30 days prior to the expiration of the 24-month period to commence construction, a developer may apply for a six-month formal site plan approval extension. No further extension may be requested.
    2. b.
      Special review by DAC.
      1. 1.
        The following proposed developments are subject to special review and approval by DAC as part of the formal site plan review process:
        1. a.
          Any proposed development within the boundaries of the Clematis waterfront conservation district (CWD-CD).
        2. b.
          Any proposed development fronting the proposed new roadway parallel to the FEC railroad right-of-way, the extension of Douglass Avenue, or the extension of Division Avenue, pursuant to Figure 4 of the DMP zoning atlas.
        3. c.
          Any modification to a site designated as urban open space on Figure 3 of the DMP zoning atlas.
        4. d.
          Any proposed development seeking to utilize any incentive program.
        5. e.
          Any proposed development requesting the abandonment by the city of any portion of an alley or right-of-way.
        6. f.
          Any proposed development with a lot area greater than 50,000 square feet.
        7. g.
          Any proposed development within the boundaries of the Flagler waterfront district (FWD).
      2. 2.
        Standards for special review. Proposed developments which are subject to special review shall be evaluated based on the following qualitative principles as well as the quantitative requirements of the urban regulations:
        1. a.
          Relationship of building to site and surroundings. The proposed development should be designed in consideration of a three dimensional context that includes surrounding private properties and public realm. The effects of the proposed building scale and form on adjacent streets, neighboring properties, and the overall development of the district in which it is located, shall be assessed to ensure any possible negative impacts are minimized.

          The form and scale of each building shall meet the requirements for each subdistrict, as defined in the corresponding building requirements table. Proposed developments shall submit floor plans, building elevations, building cross-sections and street-level three-dimensional renderings for the proposed development and all buildings on adjacent sites, public spaces and streets to illustrate how the new building relates to the surrounding area. All the quantitative requirements included in section 94-109 will be used as references to evaluate the relationship of building to site and surroundings.

        2. b.
          Circulation and traffic flow. The proposed development should promote pedestrian circulation by providing attractive, safe and comfortable paths of travel. Vehicular circulation should be efficient and limit impacts to pedestrian movement around and through the site. Vehicular circulation should not detract from the active uses occurring on-site or on adjacent sites.
        3. c.
          Building design. While architectural style should not be restricted, the proposed development should be evaluated based upon the quality and execution of the design, as well as its relationship to surrounding buildings. The architectural elements chosen should be consistent across the entire development. Consistency will be determined based upon mass, bulk, proportion, fenestration, and rhythm of building elements when reviewed together and as separate elements.
        4. d.
          Public realm. The proposed development should enhance the quality of the public realm. Enhancement may be determined based upon the provision of open space, public amenities, landscaping, or a building design with features which contribute to the viability and attractiveness of the public realm. The public realm space should be integrated with the building site plan in a way that not only fully incorporates surrounding pedestrian circulation at the ground level, but also allows visual interaction with the floors above the ground level.
      3. 3.
        Community meetings. As part of the special review process, and prior to a DAC public hearing, the planning director may require an applicant to conduct a community meeting to advise the surrounding neighborhood of the proposed development. If required, the application shall not be scheduled for DAC hearing until the community meeting is conducted.
    3. c.
      Class B special use permits. The following requirements and procedures govern the process to obtain a class B special use permit:
      1. 1.
        If a class B special use permit is required by the urban regulations, an application for approval of a class B special use permit by DAC shall be submitted to the department on city approved forms.
      2. 2.
        After an application is deemed complete, the application shall be placed on the next available PPRC meeting for review. After the comments from PPRC have been addressed, the application shall be placed on the next available DAC agenda.
      3. 3.
        Class B special use permit applications shall be evaluated by the DAC pursuant to the special use standards contained in subsection 94-36(e)(3), and (e)(4) of this chapter. In those cases where the special use is located within a residential enclave planning area, the application shall also be evaluated pursuant to special use standards contained in subsection 94-36(e)(5) of this chapter.
      4. 4.
        Class B special uses may be approved subject to additional conditions or limitations upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance, or operation of the use, as may be necessary to protect the public interest and welfare.
      5. 5.
        The class B special use permit runs with the property until the permit expires or it is revoked.
      6. 6.
        A class B special use permit may be revoked upon a determination by DAC that any of the following have occurred:
        1. a.
          Failure to comply with all conditions or requirements of the class B special use permit approval.
        2. b.
          Failure, without good cause, to correct violations of conditions or requirements of the class B special use permit within the time period contained in the notice of violation.
      7. 7.
        All plans, specifications, representations, drawings and statements submitted with the application for a class B special use permit or made part of the record of the DAC with respect to the application, shall become a part of the terms and conditions of any approval, except as revised by the DAC.
      8. 8.
        Time limitations. Class B special use permits shall expire if not exercised within 18 months of the date authorized. At least 30 days prior to expiration, an applicant may request in writing an additional six-month extension from DAC. If granted, no further extension may be requested.
    4. d.
      Variances. Applications for a variance from the urban regulations are subject to the following requirements and procedures:
      1. 1.
        If a variance is required from the urban regulations, an application for approval of a variance by DAC shall be submitted to the department on city approved forms.
      2. 2.
        After the application is deemed complete, the application shall be placed on the next available DAC agenda.
      3. 3.
        Variances shall be evaluated by the DAC pursuant to the variance standards contained in subsection 94-38(d)(6).
      4. 4.
        Unauthorized variances. The DAC is not authorized to grant variances for any of the following:
        1. a.
          Any action which would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan.
        2. b.
          An increase in building height above the maximum height allowed by the corresponding building requirement table.
        3. c.
          An increase in floor area ratio (FAR) above the maximum FAR allowed by the corresponding building requirement table.
        4. d.
          A decrease of more than five percent in required ground floor setbacks fronting a street designation for lots within all subdistricts, with the exception of NWD-R, BPD-R, PP-R, PPD-PO, and LD-R.
        5. e.
          An increase in maximum building footprint above the maximum footprint allowed by the urban regulations.
        6. f.
          An establishment or expansion of a use in a district in which such use is not permitted by this chapter.
        7. g.
          A decrease in open space requirements below the minimum size required by the corresponding building requirement table.
      5. 5.
        Variances may be approved subject to conditions deemed necessary by DAC to ensure compliance with this chapter.
      6. 6.
        Time limitations. Variances shall expire if not exercised within 18 months of the date authorized. At least 30 days prior to expiration, an applicant may request in writing an additional six-month extension from DAC. If granted, no further extensions may be requested. If the proposed development requesting the variance is required to obtain a formal site plan approval, variances for such developments shall be valid for the same period as the site plan approval. If a site plan approval has not been obtained within 18 months of the variance approval, the variance shall become void.
    5. e.
      Appeal process.
      1. 1.
        Appeals of decisions of the planning director in interpreting, administering or enforcing the urban regulations shall be directed to DAC, whose decision shall be final. Written notice of the appeal, including justification for the action, shall be filed with the department on city approved forms within 60 days after the disputed interpretation, administration, or enforcement.
      2. 2.
        Decisions of DAC regarding variances, special use permits and special review approvals may be appealed to a circuit court within 30 days from the date of the decision by DAC.
      3. 3.
        An appeal shall not operate as a stay of the decision unless a stay of the decision is ordered by the court having jurisdiction of the appeal.

    (Ord. 4213-09, § 5, 6-29-2009)

    Sec. 94-55. - Mixed-use districts (MUD) development approval process.

    The process and procedure to request approvals for any new construction, reconstruction, alteration, addition or improvement to an existing structure or appurtenance within the MUD area shall be as follows:

    1. a.
      Formal site plan review.
      1. 1.
        Application and review process. An application for a formal site plan review shall be submitted to the development services department, planning division, on city approved forms. After an application is deemed complete by city staff, the application will be placed on the agenda for the next available plans and plat review committee (PPRC) meeting. At the meeting, the PPRC will review the project for compliance with governing ordinances and regulations.

        The applicant shall address any comments of the PPRC and submit a revised application within 60 days of the meeting. Failure to make the required submittals within the 60-day deadline will deem the application as withdrawn. At least 15 days prior to the expiration of the 60-day revision period, the applicant may request a 30-day extension. No further extension request is permitted. Comments relating to revised applications shall be addressed within 30 days of the date of such comments. As part of the PPRC review, staff shall identify any need for additional approvals such as planning board special review, variances, and class B special use permits as required by the zoning and land development regulations. Such additional approvals shall be sought within the formal site plan review period and shall be required prior to any site plan approval. A formal site plan application shall be considered withdrawn after 90 days of inactivity.

      2. 2.

        Exceptions. The following types of applications do not require formal site plan review, and may proceed directly to building permit application if other approvals such as variances, waivers or class B special use permits are not required:

        1. a.

          Any modification of an existing structure that does not increase the total square footage of the structure or change the building footprint.

        2. b.

          One- and two-residential unit structures in residential districts.

        3. c.

          Outbuildings and accessory structures of fewer than 1,000 gross square feet.

        4. d.

          Additions of fewer than 1,000 gross square feet to existing residential and nonresidential structures.

        5. e.

          Addition of awnings, canopies, or decorative architectural elements.

        6. f.

          Redesign of existing surface parking facilities, drives, and driveways.

        7. g.

          Swimming pools, including redesign and relocation.

        8. h.

          Minor structural additions or alterations, such as porches, terraces, and fencing.

        9. i.

          Addition of parking spaces to existing surface parking facilities not exceeding 25 percent of the existing number of spaces or 20 spaces, whichever is less.

      3. 3.

        Formal site plan approval. After completion of the PPRC formal site plan review process, and after obtaining any additional approvals required, a formal site plan approval letter will be issued stating the terms and conditions of the approval. Proposed developments with formal site plan approvals shall commence construction within 24 months following the date of formal site plan approval. If commencement of construction does not occur during such 24-month period, the formal site plan approval shall automatically expire without further action by the city.

        Projects approved as phased development shall commence construction of the first phase within 24 months following the date of formal site plan approval. Following phases shall commence construction according to the timeframes established on the site plan approval. If construction of subsequent phases does not comply with the established timeframes, the formal site plan approval shall automatically expire without further action by the city.

      4. 4.

        Formal site plan approval extensions. At least 30 days prior to the expiration of the 24-month period to commence construction, a developer may apply for a six-month formal site plan approval extension. No further extension may be requested.

    2. b.

      Level III Special review by the Planning Board.

      1. 1.

        The following proposed developments are subject to special review and approval by the Planning Board as part of the formal site plan review process:

        1. a.

          Any proposed development within the boundaries of the Northwood Mixed-use district, the Currie Mixed-use district and the Broadway-mixed-use district.

        2. b.

          Any modification to a site designated as public urban open space or urban greenway within the districts.

        3. c.

          Any proposed development within the districts requesting the abandonment by the city of any portion of an alley or right-of-way.

        4. d.

          Any proposed development within the districts with a residential development of 99 or more dwelling units, including renovations of existing structures when a change to a more intensive use is anticipated. 

        5. e.

          Commercial or office developments of 50,000 or more gross square feet of enclosed building area, including renovations of existing structures when a change to a more intensive use is anticipated.

      2. 2.

        Standards for special review. Proposed developments which are subject to special review shall be evaluated based on the following qualitative principles as well as the quantitative requirements of the urban regulations:

        1. a.

          Relationship of building to site and surroundings. The proposed development should be designed in consideration of a three dimensional context that includes surrounding private properties and public realm. The effects of the proposed building scale and form on adjacent streets, neighboring properties, and the overall development of the district in which it is located, shall be assessed to ensure any possible negative impacts are minimized.

          The form and scale of each building shall meet the requirements for each subdistrict, as defined in the corresponding building requirements table. Proposed developments shall submit floor plans, building elevations, building cross-sections and street-level three-dimensional renderings for the proposed development and all buildings on adjacent sites, public spaces and streets to illustrate how the new building relates to the surrounding area.

        2. b.

          Circulation and traffic flow. The proposed development should promote pedestrian circulation by providing attractive, safe and comfortable paths of travel. Vehicular circulation should be efficient and limit impacts to pedestrian movement around and through the site. Vehicular circulation should not detract from the active uses occurring on-site or on adjacent sites.

        3. c.

          Building design. While architectural style should not be restricted, the proposed development should be evaluated based upon the quality and execution of the design, as well as its relationship to surrounding buildings. The architectural elements chosen should be consistent across the entire development. Consistency will be determined based upon mass, bulk, proportion, fenestration, and rhythm of building elements when reviewed together and as separate elements.

        4. d.

          Public realm. The proposed development should enhance the quality of the public realm. Enhancement may be determined based upon the provision of open space, public amenities, landscaping, or a building design with features which contribute to the viability and attractiveness of the public realm. The public realm space should be integrated with the building site plan in a way that not only fully incorporates surrounding pedestrian circulation at the ground level, but also allows visual interaction with the floors above the ground level.

      3. 3.

        Community meetings. As part of the special review process, and prior to a planning board public hearing, the planning and zoning administrator may require an applicant to conduct a community meeting to advise the surrounding neighborhood of the proposed development. If required, the application shall not be scheduled for a planning board hearing until the community meeting is conducted.

    3. c.

      Class B special use permits. For properties located within a mixed-use district the following requirements and procedures govern the process to obtain a class B special use permit:

      1. 1.

        If a class B special use permit is required by the zoning and land development regulations, an application for approval of a class B special use permit shall be submitted to the department on city approved forms.

      2. 2.

        After an application is deemed complete, the application shall be placed on the next available PPRC meeting for review. After the comments from PPRC have been addressed, the application shall be placed on the next available planning board agenda.

      3. 3.

        Class B special use permit applications shall be evaluated by the planning board pursuant to the special use standards contained in subsection 94-273 (e)(3), and (e)(4) of this chapter. In those cases where the special use is located within an edge subdistrict, the application shall also be evaluated pursuant to special use standards contained in subsection 94-36(e)(5) of this chapter.

      4. 4.

        Class B special uses may be approved subject to additional conditions or limitations upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance, or operation of the use, as may be necessary to protect the public interest and welfare.

      5. 5.

        The class B special use permit runs with the property until the permit expires or it is revoked.

      6. 6.

        A class B special use permit may be revoked upon a determination by the planning board that any of the following have occurred:

        1. a.

          Failure to comply with all conditions or requirements of the class B special use permit approval.

        2. b.

          Failure, without good cause, to correct violations of conditions or requirements of the class B special use permit within the time period contained in the notice of violation.

      7. 7.

        All plans, specifications, representations, drawings and statements submitted with the application for a class B special use permit or made part of the record of the planning board with respect to the application, shall become a part of the terms and conditions of any approval, except as revised by the planning board.

      8. 8.

        Time limitations. Class B special use permits shall expire if not exercised within 18 months of the date authorized. At least 30 days prior to expiration, an applicant may request in writing an additional six-month extension from the planning board. If granted, no further extension may be requested.

    4. d.

      Variances. For properties located within a mixed-use district applications for a variance from the urban regulations are subject to the following requirements and procedures:

      1. 1.

        If a variance is required from the urban regulations, an application for approval of a variance by the planning board shall be submitted to the department on city approved forms.

      2. 2.

        After the application is deemed complete, the application shall be placed on the next available planning board agenda.

      3. 3.

        Variances shall be evaluated by the planning board pursuant to the variance standards contained in subsection 94-38(d)(6).

      4. 4.

        Unauthorized variances. The planning board is not authorized to grant variances for any of the following:

        1. a.

          Any action which would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan.

        2. b.

          An increase in building height above the maximum height allowed by the corresponding building requirement table.

        3. c.

          A decrease of more than five percent in required ground floor setbacks fronting a street designation for lots within all subdistricts.

        4. d.

          An increase in maximum building footprint above the maximum footprint allowed by the zoning and land development regulations.

        5. e.

          An establishment or expansion of a use in a district in which such use is not permitted by this chapter.

        6. f.

          A decrease in open space requirements below the minimum size required.

      5. 5.

        Variances may be approved subject to conditions deemed necessary by the planning board to ensure compliance with this chapter.

      6. 6.

        Time limitations. Variances shall expire if not exercised within 18 months of the date authorized. At least 30 days prior to expiration, an applicant may request in writing an additional six-month extension from the planning board. If granted, no further extensions may be requested. If the proposed development requesting the variance is required to obtain a formal site plan approval, variances for such developments shall be valid for the same period as the site plan approval. If a site plan approval has not been obtained within 18 months of the variance approval, the variance shall become void.

    5. e.

      Waivers. Applications for a waiver from the mixed-use district regulations shall conform to all such additional standards contained in subsection 94-273 (a)(2)(d) unless the review authority shall reduce the standards upon a finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence of record that the proposed special use nevertheless: 

      1. 1.

        Will be consistent with the comprehensive plan of the city adopted by the city commission;

      2. 2.

        Will be in harmony with the general character of the neighborhood considering population density, design, scale and bulk of any proposed new structures, intensity and character of activity, traffic and parking conditions, and number of similar uses;

      3. 3.

        Will not be detrimental to the use, peaceful enjoyment, economic value, or development of surrounding properties or the general neighborhood; and will cause no objectionable noise, vibrations, fumes, odors, dust, glare or physical activity;

      4. 4.

        Will have no detrimental effect on vehicular or pedestrian within a district due to detrimental affects on permitted uses;

      5. 5.

        Will not adversely affect the health, safety, security, morals, or general welfare of residents, visitors, or workers in the area;

      6. 6.

        Will not, in conjunction with existing development in the area and development permitted under existing zoning, overburden existing public services and facilities, including schools, police and fire protection, water, sanitary sewer, public roads, storm drainage, and other public improvements;

      7. 7.

        Otherwise meets the definition standards set forth elsewhere in this chapter for such particular use; and

      8. 8.

        Will provide alternative measures consistent with the intent of the additional standards to provide protection to adjacent properties and preserve neighborhood character.

    6. f.

      Appeal process.

      1. 1.

        Appeals of decisions of the planning and zoning administrator in interpreting, administering or enforcing the urban regulations regarding properties located within a mixed-use district shall be directed to the planning board, whose decision shall be final. Written notice of the appeal, including justification for the action, shall be filed with the department on city approved forms within 60 days after the disputed interpretation, administration, or enforcement.

      2. 2.

        Decisions of the planning board regarding variances, special use permits, and special review approvals may be appealed to the circuit court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit within 30 days from the date of the decision by the planning board.

      3. 3.

        An appeal shall not operate as a stay of the decision unless a stay of the decision is ordered by the court having jurisdiction of the appeal.

    (Ord. No. 5008-22, § 6, 07-25-2022)

    Sec. 94-56. - Affordable and workforce housing application process.

    1) Intent. This section provides the expedited review processes applicable to applications for development of affordable           and workforce housing projects filed pursuant to Article XVII - affordable and workforce housing regulations.

    2) Review Authority.

    1. a.
      Administrative review. AWHO applications may be reviewed administratively as appropriate when:
      1. 1.
        the applicant does not seek to increase density from the currently permitted base density of the existing land use and zoning; and
      2. 2.
        has not been subject to a comprehensive plan land use change that increased density within the past 36 months
    2. b.
      Applications eligible for administrative review include:
      1. 1.
        Applications under the live local act pursuant to sec. 94-551;
      2. 2.
        Applications for AWHO tier one projects pursuant to sec. 94-552(d);
      3. 3.
        Applications for AWHO tier two project pursuant to sec . 94-552(d).
    3. c.
      The planning and zoning administrator reviews and may approve, approve with conditions, or deny applications and may grant waivers and variances as provided in sec. 94-552.
    4. d.
      Special Site Plan Review. The city commission shall review AWHO applications for mixed-use and residential developments submitted in accordance with this article.
      1. 1.
        Applications which require special site plan review include developments of affordable or workforce housing that:
        1. a.
          are not filed pursuant to the live local act, sec. 94-551, and do not meet standards for AWHO tier one or tier two projects pursuant to sec. 94-552(d); or 
        2. b.
          were denied administrative approval by the planning and zoning administrator, excluding an application filed pursuant to the live local act; or
        3. c.
          were determined to significantly impact infrastructure, the historic character or existing character of the neighborhood.
      2. 2.
        Subdivision and Final Plat Review. For projects reviewed by the city commission under its special site plan review authority, the city commission may approve applications for subdivision and plat approval without the recommendation of the planning board provided the standards found in section 94-44 of the code are met.
      3. 3.
        Public Hearings. The city commission shall conduct special site plan reviews as a public hearing as provided in section 94-39 and may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. Should the City commission need additional information, it may defer action for up to 60 days from the date of the public hearing to obtain additional information.

    3) Application Process.

    1. a.
      All applicants are required to request a mandatory pre-application conference, which shall include staff from the development services department and the department of housing and community development.
    2. b.
      Applications shall be submitted and processed as provided in section 94-41 of the code consistent with the provisions of ARTICLE XVII of the zoning and land development regulations for affordable and workforce housing, as applicable.
    3. c.
      The planning and zoning administrator shall determine whether the application meets the standards for administrative review or requires a special site plan review by the city commission, pursuant to subsection (2).
    4. d.
      All applications shall be detailed and complete with sufficient information needed to review the proposed development. Such information includes, but is not limited to:
      1. 1.
        Whether the project is applied for under the live local act requirements of sec. 94-551 or the AWHO requirements of sec. 94-552. If AWHO, identify the project tier pursuant to sec. 94-552(d).
      2. 2.
         Full project description including uses and total number of residential units. Include the number, type, and size of all housing units in the project.
      3. 3.
        The number, type, location, size and phasing of construction of all affordable/workforce units;
      4. 4.
        Identification of all incentives requested including density, height, FAR.
      5. 5.
        Site plans with requested waivers and or variances including the percentage of relief identified in the site data table;
      6. 6.
        Landscape plans with engineering reflected on the same plan;
      7. 7.
        Engineering plans;
      8. 8.
        Architectural plans, including, floor plans, building elevations, building cross-sections, and street-level three-dimensional renderings for the proposed development and all buildings on adjacent sites, public spaces and streets to illustrate how the new building relates to the surrounding are;
      9. 9.
        Justification statement with a summary of the development plan including the overall project and its contribution for workforce housing. Additionally, the statement must clearly define and justify any requested waivers or variances;
      10. 10.
        Traffic impact report. A detailed traffic report shall be required to determine the project impact on the level of service of adjacent streets and intersections. Transportation demand management strategies may be required where necessary to offset the traffic impacts. These strategies may include roadway improvements, and/or multi-modal amenities for such systems to expand the use of transportation alternatives in the area;
      11. 11.
        Infrastructure capacity demand report. An infrastructure capacity report describing how the project impacts existing water, wastewater and storm water systems shall be required. The applicant shall address any required system improvements through funding agreements acceptable to the city or throughout mitigation strategies necessary to prevent creating deficiencies in the existing systems. Such agreements may include provisions providing for reimbursement if and when any other developments are approved that benefit from such improvements, cost sharing of other planned area infrastructure improvements and/or alternative design strategies that may include but are not limited to low impact development techniques, green infrastructure, or other such efforts that promote less demands on the existing infrastructure through less water use, water reuse, or improved storm water capacity on-site;
      12. 12.
        An affordable/workforce housing distribution plan with a key to indicate the location of all required affordable/workforce units to demonstrate that the criteria for the dispersal of the affordable/workforce units in the development is met;
      13. 13.
        The breakdown of income levels being served by the affordable/workforce units;
      14. 14.
        The type of units to be provided;
      15. 15.
        Other information as may be required as needed to fully evaluate the application.


    4) Plats and Plans Review Committee. Upon a determination that the application is complete, the application shall be            scheduled for review by the plans and plat review committee (PPRC) at its next available scheduled meeting. The              PPRC review shall be conducted in accordance with sec. 94-31 and shall include the director of housing and                      community development. The PPRC shall review and discuss any issues identified in the review and identify any                issues which require the applicant to re-submit any plans or provide a comprehensive response to the identified issue.      The applicants shall submit a comprehensive response to the issues and comments identified by PPRC. Following            receipt of the applicant's comprehensive response which sufficiently addresses such issues and comments, the                  planning and zoning administrator shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny administrative site plan review. For        those projects which require special site plan review in accordance with ARTICLE XVII, the planning and zoning                      administrator shall make recommendations for approval, approval with conditions, or denial; and thereafter, the                  planning and zoning administrator shall schedule the application for hearing before the city commission.

    5) Appeal. Any applicant affected or aggrieved by the planning and zoning administrator's interpretation, administration or      enforcement of the code provisions may appeal to the zoning board of appeals as provided in section 94-37. Any                applicant affected or aggrieved by the city commission's special review may appeal to the circuit court of the fifteenth          judicial district within 30 days from the date the final decision is filed with the city clerk.

    Ord. No. 5103-24, § 1-3, 07-22-2024

    Sec. 94-57. - North Flagler Overlay District (NOFOD) Development Review Process.

    Refer to section 94-236 for the North Flagler Overlay District (NOFOD) development regulations. The process and procedure to request approvals for any new construction within the NOFOD shall be as follows:

    1. a.
      Level III special review.
      1. 1.
        The following proposed developments are subject to special review and approval by the city commission as part of the formal site plan review process:
        1. a.
          Any proposed development within the boundaries of the NOFOD.
        2. b.
          Any proposed development within the NOFOD requesting the abandonment by the city of any portion of a right-of-way.
      2. 2.
        Exemptions. The following proposed developments shall be exempt from the standards of this section and shall comply with the underlying zoning district standards:
        1. a.
        2. b.
        3. c.
          Buildings or structures accessory to single-family dwellings or two-family dwellings.
        4. d.
          Developments that comply with all the development regulations and standards of the underlying zoning district.
      3. 3.
        Standards for special review. Proposed developments which are subject to special review shall be evaluated based on the site design qualitative development standards contained in subsection 94-35(c) and the following qualitative principles as well as the quantitative requirements of the underlying zoning district and development regulations:
        1. a.
          Relationship of building to site and surroundings. The proposed development should be designed in consideration of a three dimensional context that includes surrounding private properties and public realm. The effects of the proposed building scale and form on adjacent streets, neighboring properties, and the overall development of the district in which it is located, shall be assessed to ensure any possible negative impacts are minimized. 
          The form and scale of each building shall meet the requirements for the district. Proposed developments shall submit floor plans, building elevations, building cross-sections and street-level three-dimensional renderings for the proposed development and all buildings on adjacent sites, public spaces and streets to illustrate how the new building relates to the surrounding area.
        2. b.
          Circulation and traffic flow. The proposed development should promote pedestrian circulation by providing attractive, safe and comfortable paths of travel. Vehicular circulation should be efficient and limit impacts to pedestrian movement around and through the site. Vehicular circulation should not detract from the active uses occurring on-site or on adjacent sites.
        3. c.
          Building design. While architectural style should not be restricted, the proposed development should be evaluated based upon the quality and execution of the design, as well as its relationship to surrounding buildings. The architectural elements chosen should be consistent across the entire development. Consistency will be determined based upon mass, bulk, proportion, fenestration, and rhythm of building elements when reviewed together and as separate elements.
        4. d.
          Public realm. The proposed development should enhance the quality of the public realm. Enhancement may be determined based upon the provision of open space, public amenities, landscaping, or a building design with features which contribute to the viability and attractiveness of the public realm. The public realm space should be integrated with the building site plan in a way that not only fully incorporates surrounding pedestrian circulation at the ground level, but also allows visual interaction with the floors above the ground level.
      4. 4.
        Community meetings. As part of the special review process, and prior to the planning board and city commission public hearings, the planning and zoning administrator may require an applicant to conduct a community meeting to advise the surrounding neighborhood of the proposed development. If required, the application shall not be scheduled for any planning board and city commission hearings until the community meeting is conducted.
    2. b.
      Class B special use permits. For properties located within the NOFOD the following requirements and procedures govern the process to obtain a class B special use permit:
      1. 1.
        If a class B special use permit is required by the zoning and land development regulations, an application for approval of a class B special use permit shall be submitted to the department on city approved forms.
      2. 2.
        After an application is deemed complete, the application shall be scheduled for the next available plans and plats review committee (PPRC) meeting agenda. After the comments from PPRC have been addressed, the application shall be scheduled for the next available zoning board of appeals meeting agenda.
      3. 3.
        Class B special use permit applications shall be evaluated by the zoning board of appeals pursuant to the special use standards contained in subsection 94-273(e)(3), and (e)(4) of this chapter.
      4. 4.
        Class B special uses may be approved subject to additional conditions or limitations upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance, or operation of the use, as may be necessary to protect the public interest and welfare.
      5. 5.
        The class B special use permit runs with the property until the permit expires or it is revoked.
      6. 6.
        A class B special use permit may be revoked upon a determination by the zoning board of appeals that any of the following have occurred:
        1. a.
          Failure to comply with all conditions or requirements of the class B special use permit approval.
        2. b.
          Failure, without good cause, to correct violations of conditions or requirements of the class B special use permit within the time period contained in the notice of violation.
      7. 7.
        All plans, specifications, representations, drawings and statements submitted with the application for a class B special use permit or made part of the record of the zoning board of appeals with respect to the application, shall become a part of the terms and conditions of any approval, except as revised by the zoning board of appeals.
      8. 8.
        Time limitations. Class B special use permits shall expire if not exercised within 36 months of the date authorized. At least 30 days prior to expiration, an applicant may request in writing an additional six-month extension from the zoning board of appeals. If granted, no further extension may be requested.
    3. c.
      Variances. For properties located within the NOFOD, applications for a variance from the development regulations are subject to the following requirements and procedures:
      1. 1.
        If a variance is required from the development regulations, an application for approval of a variance by the city commission shall be submitted to the department on city approved forms.
      2. 2.
        After the application is deemed complete, the application shall be scheduled for the next available PPRC meeting agenda. After the comments from PPRC have been addressed, the application shall be scheduled for the next available city commission meeting agenda.
      3. 3.
        Variances shall be evaluated by the city commission pursuant to the variance standards contained in subsection 94-38(d)(6).
      4. 4.
        Unauthorized variances. The city commission is not authorized to grant variances for any of the following:
        1. a.
          Any action which would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan.
        2. b.
          An establishment or expansion of a use in a district in which such use is not permitted by this chapter.
        3. c.
          A decrease in the building front and side setback requirements below the minimum setback required, except as otherwise provided in subsection 94-236(c).
        4. d.
          An increase in the building height above the maximum height allowed.
        5. e.
          An increase in the building floor area ratio above the maximum floor area ratio allowed.
      5. 5.
        Variances may be approved subject to conditions deemed necessary by the city commission to ensure compliance with this chapter.
      6. 6.
        Time limitations. Variances shall expire if not exercised within 12 months of the date authorized. At least 30 days prior to expiration, an applicant may request in writing an additional six-month extension from the city commission. If granted, no further extensions may be requested. If the proposed development requesting the variance is required to obtain a site plan review approval, variances for such developments shall be valid for the same period as the site plan review approval. Site plan review approval shall be obtained within six (6) months of the date of approval of the variance, or the variance shall become void. Prior to the expiration of the six-month period, the applicant may request, in writing, that the planning director grant a time extension not to exceed three (3) months. Any such extension shall be based on a demonstration by the applicant that a good-faith effort has been made to secure site plan review approval, but that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented it. Further extensions of time shall require a new application.
    4. d.
      Appeals.
      1. 1.
        Appeals of decisions of the planning and zoning administrator in interpreting, administering or enforcing the development regulations regarding properties located within the NOFOD shall be directed to the city commission, whose decision shall be final. Written notice of the appeal, including justification for the action, shall be filed with the department on city approved forms within 60 days after the disputed interpretation, administration, or enforcement.
      2. 2.
        Decisions of the city commission regarding variances, special use permits, and special review approvals may be appealed to the circuit court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit within 30 days from the date of the decision by the city commission.
      3. 3.
        An appeal shall not operate as a stay of the decision unless a stay of the decision is ordered by the court having jurisdiction of the appeal.

    Ord. No. 5139-25, § 6, 09-02-2025 

    Secs. 94-58—94-70. - Reserved.

     

    Commencement

    Commencement means receipt of a validly issued building permit and the initiation of site improvements not including soil preparation such as land clearing, land filling and soil compaction.

    Development

    Development means any proposed improvements to land which have been approved by the city through site plan review including planned community districts, planned development districts, developments of significant impact, Class B special uses and Class A special uses.

    b

  • b.
    Regulation. All development approved by the city pursuant to this chapter shall commence within 36 months of the date of the legislative or administrative approval necessary therefor. If commencement of the development does not occur during such 36-month period or during an extension thereof as provided in this section, such legislative or administrative development approval shall automatically expire without further action by the city and no development orders shall thereafter be issued by the city for the development.
  • c.
    Extension.
    1. 1.
      Prior to the expiration of the 36-month period for commencement, a developer may apply for an extension to commence development by filing a petition therefor with the administrator of community development and planning on forms provided by the city. Such petition shall be granted upon a determination by the administrator of community development and planning that the applicant has made a good faith effort to acquire a building permit and to commence the construction of site improvements but has been prevented from doing so for reasons beyond the control of the developer.
    2. 2.
      The administrator of community development and planning shall not grant more than one extension for commencement of a particular development. No extension shall exceed 24 months from the date of the expiration of the initial 36-month commencement period.
    3. 3.
      Notice of the decision of the administrator of community development and planning shall be provided to the applicant by regular mail within 15 days of the date of the application.
    4. 4.
      If a petition for an extension is denied by the administrator of community development and planning, the applicant may appeal such decision to the zoning board of appeals in accordance with the provisions contained in section 94-37.
    5. 5.
      Prior to the expiration of any extension granted by the planning director, a developer may apply for an extension to commence development by filing a petition with the planning and zoning division on forms provided by the city. The city commission may grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months after consideration of the following:
      1. a.
        All attempts by the applicant to comply with the approved planned development ordinance;
      2. b.
        The reliance by other parties on the timely performance of meeting the requirements of the planned development ordinance;
      3. c.
        Any changed circumstances which may have interfered with the ability of the applicant to meet the time-certain requirement;
      4. d.
        Actions of other parties that may have precluded compliance with the planned development ordinance;
      5. e.
        The existence of extraordinary mitigating factors;
      6. f.
        Consistency with the city comprehensive plan, zoning code and the countywide traffic performance standards ordinance;
      7. g.
        Furtherance of the city's goals for redevelopment; and
      8. h.
        Pending the zoning code revisions that may be inconsistent with the approved planned development ordinance, which may result in amendments to the approved planned development ordinance.
  • (Code 1979, § 33-20)

    Comprehensive plan

    Comprehensive plan means the comprehensive plan of the city adopted pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act.

    Developer

    Developer means any person, including a governmental agency, undertaking any development.

    Development

    Development means the carrying out of any building activity or mining operation, the making of any material change in the use or appearance of any structure or land, or the dividing of land into three or more parcels.

    1. 1.
      The following activities or uses shall be taken for the purposes of this section to involve development:
      1. a.
        A reconstruction, alteration of the size, or material change in the external appearance of a structure or on land.
      2. b.
        A change in the intensity of use of land, such as an increase in the number of dwelling units in a structure or on land or a material increase in the number of businesses, manufacturing establishments, offices or, dwelling units in a structure or on land.
      3. c.
        Alteration of a shore or bank of a seacoast, river, stream, lake, pond, or canal, including any coastal construction as defined in F.S. § 161.021.
      4. d.
        Commencement of drilling, except to obtain soil samples, mining, or excavation on a parcel of land.
      5. e.
        Demolition of a structure.
      6. f.
        Clearing of land as an adjunct of construction.
      7. g.
        Deposit of refuse, solid or liquid waste, or fill on a parcel of land.
    2. 2.
      The following operations or uses shall not be taken for the purpose of this act to involve development:
      1. a.
        Work by a highway or road agency or railroad company for the maintenance or improvement of a road or railroad track, if the work is carried out on land within the boundaries of the right-of-way.
      2. b.
        Work by any utility and other persons engaged in the distribution or transmission of gas or water, for the purpose of inspecting, repairing, renewing, or constructing on established rights-of-way any sewers, mains, pipes, cables, utility tunnels, power lines, towers, poles, tracks, or the like.
      3. c.
        Work for the maintenance, renewal, improvement, or alteration of any structure, if the work affects only the interior or the color of the structure or the decoration of the exterior of the structure.
      4. d.
        The use of any structure or land devoted to dwelling uses for any purpose customarily incidental to enjoyment of the dwelling.
      5. e.
        The use of any land for the purpose of growing plants, crops, trees, and other agricultural or forestry products; raising livestock; or for other agricultural purposes.
      6. f.
        A change in use of land or structure from a use within a class specified in an ordinance or rule to another use in the same class.
      7. g.
        A change in the ownership or form of ownership of any parcel or structure.
      8. h.
        The creation or termination of rights of access, riparian rights, easements, covenants concerning development of land, or other rights in land.
    3. 3.
      As designated in an ordinance, rule, or development permit, the term "development" includes all other activities customarily associated with it unless otherwise specified. When appropriate to the context, the term "development" refers to the act of developing or the result of development. Reference to any specific operation is not intended to mean that the operation or activity, when part of other operations or activities, is not development. Reference to particular operations is not intended to limit the generality of this subsection.

    Development permit

    Development permit means any building permit, zoning permit, suboval, rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any other official action of the city having the effect of permitting the development of land.

    Governing body

    Governing body means the city commission of the City of West Palm Beach.

    Land

    Land means the earth, water, and air, above, below, or on the surface, and includes any improvements or structures customarily regarded as land.

    Land development regulations

    Land development regulations means ordinances enacted by the governing body of the city for the regulation of any aspect of development and includes any zoning, rezoning, subdivision, building construction, or sign regulations controlling the development of land.

    Laws

    Laws means all ordinances, resolution, comprehensive plans, land development regulations, and rules adopted by the governing body affecting the development of land.

    Local government

    Local government means the city or any special district or other entity established pursuant to law which exercises regulatory authority over, and grants development permits for, land development.

    Local planning agency

    Local planning agency means the agency designated to prepare a comprehensive plan pursuant to the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act.

    Person

    Person means any individual, corporation, business or land trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, two or more persons having a joint or common interest, state agency, or any legal entity.

    Public facilities

    Public facilities means major capital improvements, including, but not limited to, transportation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, educational, parks and recreational, and health systems and facilities.

    S

    State land planning agency means the state department of community affairs.

    b

  • b.
    Procedures for consideration, approval, review and amendment.
    1. 1.
      Required provisions. All development agreements shall contain at least the following provisions:
      1. a.
        A legal description of the land subject to the agreement and the names of its legal and equitable owners;
      2. b.
        The duration of the agreement;
      3. c.
        The development uses permitted on the land, including population densities, and building intensities and height;
      4. d.
        A description of public facilities that will serve the development, including who shall provide such facilities; the date of any new facilities, if needed, will be constructed; and a schedule to assure public facilities are available concurrent with the impacts of the development;
      5. e.
        A description of any reservation or dedication of land for public purposes;
      6. f.
        A description of all local development permits approved or needed to be approved for the development of the land;
      7. g.
        A finding that the development permitted or proposed is consistent with the local government's comprehensive plan and land development regulations;
      8. h.
        A description of any conditions, terms, restrictions, or other requirements determined to be necessary by the local government for the public health, safety, or welfare of its citizens; and
      9. i.
        A statement indicating that the failure of the agreement to address a particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve the developer of the necessity of complying with the law governing such permitting requirements, conditions, terms, or restrictions.
    2. 2.
      Optional provisions. A development agreement may provide that the entire development or any phase thereof be commenced or completed within a specific period of time.
    3. 3.
      Public hearings.
      1. a.
        Before entering into, amending, or revoking a development agreement, at least two public hearings shall be conducted by the city. One of the public hearings may be held by the local planning agency, the other shall be held by the city commission.
        1. 1.
          Notice of intent to consider a development agreement shall be advertised approximately seven days before each public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation and readership in the county. Notice of intent to consider a development agreement shall also be mailed to all affected property owners before the first public hearing. The day, time, and place at which the second public hearing will be held shall be announced at the first public hearing.
        2. 2.
          The notice shall specify the location of the land subject to the development agreement, the development uses, proposed population densities, and the proposed building intensities and height and shall specify a place where a copy of the proposed agreement can be obtained.
    4. 4.
      Recording. Within 14 days after the city commission has approved a development agreement, the developer shall cause the agreement to be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court in the county. A copy of the recorded development agreement shall be submitted to the state land planning agency within 14 days after the agreement is recorded. The burdens of the development agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of the agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest or to the parties to the agreement.
    5. 5.
      Periodic review. The city shall review land subject to a development agreement at least once every 12 months to determine if there has been demonstrated good faith compliance with the terms of the development agreement. If the city finds, on the basis of substantial competent evidence, that there has been a failure to comply with the terms of the development agreement, the agreement may be revoked or modified by the city in accordance with the procedures for original adoption.
    6. 6.
      Amendment or cancellation of a development agreement. A development agreement may be amended or canceled by mutual consent of the parties to the agreement or by their successors in interest.
    1. c.
      Effect of approval.
      1. 1.
        The city's laws and policies governing the development of the land in effect at the time of the execution of the development agreement shall govern the development of the land for the duration of the development agreement.
      2. 2.
        The city may apply subsequently adopted laws and policies to the development that is subject to a development agreement only if the city has held a public hearing and determined:
        1. a.
          They are not in conflict with the laws and policies governing the development agreement and do not prevent development of the land uses, intensities, or densities in the development agreement;
        2. b.
          They are essential to the public health, safety, or welfare, and expressly state that they shall apply to a development that is subject to a development agreement;
        3. c.
          They are specifically anticipated and provided for in the development agreement;
        4. d.
          The local government demonstrates that substantial changes have occurred in pertinent conditions existing at the time of approval of the development agreement; or
        5. e.
          The development agreement is based on substantially inaccurate information supplied by the developer.
      3. 3.
        This section does not abrogate any rights that may vest pursuant to common law.
      4. 4.
        If state or federal laws are enacted after the execution of a development agreement which are applicable to an preclude the parties' compliance with the terms of a development agreement, such agreement shall be modified or revoked as is necessary to comply with the relevant state or federal laws.
    2. d.
      Duration of a development agreement. The duration of a development agreement shall not exceed five years. It may be extended by mutual consent of the city commission and the developer, subject to the procedures set forth in this section required for its original approval.
    3. e.
      Enforcement. Any party, any aggrieved or adversely affected person as defined in F.S. § 163.3215(2), or any state land planning agency may file an action for injunctive relief in the circuit court for the county to enforce the terms of a development agreement or to challenge compliance of the agreement with the provisions of F.S. §§ 163.3220 through 163.3243.

    (Code 1979, § 33-23)