(B) Findings and rationale. Based on evidence of the adverse secondary effects of adult uses presented in hearings and in reports made available to the City Council, and on findings, interpretations, and narrowing constructions incorporated in the cases of City of Littleton v. Z.J. Gifts D-4, L.L.C., 541 U.S. 774 (2004); City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002); City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000); City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986); Young v. American Mini Theatres, 427 U.S. 50 (1976); Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991); California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109 (1972); and Fantasy Ranch, Inc. v. City of Arlington, No. 04-11337, 2006 WL 2147559 (5th Cir. 2006); N.W. Enters, v. City of Houston, 352 F.3d 162 (5th Cir. 2003); Baby Dolls Topless Saloons, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 295 F.3d 471 (5th Cir. 2002); BGHA, LLC v. City of Universal City, 210 F. Supp. 2d (W.D. Tex. 2002), ajf’d 340 F.3d 295 (5th Cir. 2003); LLEH, Inc. v. Wichita County, 289 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2002); Hang On, Inc. v. City of Arlington, 65 F.3d 1248 (5th Cir. 1995); Woodall v. City of El Paso, 49 F.3d 1120 (5th Cir. 1995); J&B Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Jackson, 152 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 1998); SDJ, Inc. v. City of Houston, 837 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir. 1988); TK’s Video, Inc. v. Denton County, 24 F.3d 705 (5th Cir. 1994); Heideman v. South Salt Lake City, 342 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 2003); Lady J. Lingerie, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 973 F. Supp. 1428 (M.D. Fla. 1997), ajf’d 176 F.3d 1358 (11th Cir. 1999); Ctr for Fair Public Policy v. Maricopa County, 336 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 2003); World Wide Video of Washington, Inc. v. City of Spokane, 368 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir. 2004); Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. City of Kennedale, Case No. 4:05-CV-166-A (N.D. Tex., May 16, 2005); Sensations, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids, 2006 WL 2504388 (W.D. Mich., Aug. 28, 2006); Gammoh v. City of La Habra, 395 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2005); Ben’s Bar, Inc. v. Village of Somerset, 316 F.3d 702 (7th Cir. 2003); And based upon reports concerning secondary effects occurring in and around sexually oriented businesses, including, but not limited to, Austin, Texas - 1986; Indianapolis, Indiana - 1984; Garden Cove, California -1991; Houston, Texas - 1983; Phoenix, Arizona - 1979, 1995-98; Chattanooga, Tennessee - 1999-2003; Minneapolis, Minnesota - 1980; Los Angeles, California -1977; Whittier, California - 1978; Spokane, Washington - 2001; St. Cloud, Minnesota - 1994; Littleton, Colorado - 2004; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma - 1986; Dallas, Texas - 1997, 2004; Greensboro, North Carolina - 2003; Kennedale, Texas - 2005; Effingham, Illinois - 2005; Amarillo, Texas - 1977; El Paso, Texas -1986; New York, New York Times Square - 1994; and the Report of the Attorney General’s Working Group on the Regulation of Sexually Oriented Businesses (June 6, 1989, State of Minnesota), the City Council finds:
(1) Sexually oriented businesses, as a category of commercial uses, are associated with a wide variety of adverse secondary effects including, but not limited to personal and property crimes, prostitution, potential spread of disease, lewdness, public indecency, obscenity, illicit drug use and drug trafficking, negative impacts on surrounding properties, urban blight, litter and sexual assault and exploitation.
(C) No such adult establishment shall be located less than 1,000 feet from a school zone, place of worship, library, day care center, civic building, park, historic district, dwelling, lot with residential districting, or other adult establishment as measured from front door to front door along the curb line of public streets providing access.