(A) Intent and Purpose. The design review process consists of a review of a proposed development by the approval authority of either the Design Review Board or Planning Commission as specified herein. The Director of Community Development is the approval authority for Administrative Design Review as specified in Section
25.05.040(B)(3). The design review process is intended to achieve the following goals:
(1) That development projects comply with the applicable standards and design guidelines and criteria;
(2) That development projects focus on quality designs, within a neighborhood context that results in creative design solutions for the City;
(3) That development occurs with an orderly and harmonious appearance, including associated facilities, such as signs, landscaping and parking areas;
(4) That the development review process minimizes contentiousness;
(5) That the development review process considers public and private views;
(6) That public health, safety and general welfare throughout the City is paramount;
(7) That there is effective implementation of the applicable general and specific plan policies, which encourage the preservation and enhancement of the particular character and unique assets of the city; and
(8) That development projects comply with the policies of the certified Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan, including, but not limited to, the shoreline access, open space, environmentally sensitive habitat, hillside protection and visual resource policies.
(B) Development Subject to Design Review. Development subject to Design Review, Administrative Design Review, or exempt from Design Review may still require Coastal Development Permits pursuant to the provisions of Chapter
25.07.
(1) All new buildings, structures and physical improvements and relocations, additions, extensions and exterior changes of or to existing buildings, structural and non-structural improvements, including landscaping and grading, shall be subject to design review, except as otherwise provided in Section
25.05.040(B)(2) and
25.05.040(B)(3). Examples of physical improvements and site developments subject to a design review hearing with the Design Review Board or Planning Commission include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Commercial or industrial parking and loading areas;
(b) New vehicular access to streets or alleys;
(c) Retaining walls in excess of five feet in exposed height;
(d) Signs, as specified in Chapter
25.54 ("Sign Regulations");
(e) Permanent chain link or similar type of woven metal fences, and vinyl fences that do not simulate natural material;
(f) Telecommunication facilities subject to the provisions of Chapters
11.06 and
25.55;
(g) Trash enclosures associated with a commercial use;
(h) Public street and sidewalk improvements;
(i) Above-ground utility structures;
(j) Total aggregate additions that are 50% or more of the original gross floor area of the existing building or structure, additions that create a new upper story, and additions that exceed a height of 15 feet above the adjacent ground elevation;
(k) Shore protective devices;
(l) All buildings, structures and physical improvements in environmentally sensitive areas and on lots with a slope greater than 30%, except as otherwise provided in Section
25.05.040(B)(2)(a)(iv);
(m) Grading in excess of 20 cubic yards outside the building footprint, except as specified in Section
22.10.010(e);
(n) Clearing of native vegetation on undeveloped parcels and undeveloped portions of developed parcels, and native vegetation restoration plans, except for City required annual weed abatement;
(o) Fuel modification programs subject to the provisions of sections
25.05.040(C)(3) and
(4); provided, that once a program has received approval, subsequent approval for maintenance of the fuel modification will be granted by the Director of Community Development, if that maintenance is in conformance with the intent and objectives of the originally approved program;
(p) Landscaping review for new development or additions that are 50% or more of the original gross floor area, additions that create a new upper story or additions that exceed a height of 15 feet above the adjacent ground elevation, and for structural improvements within environmentally sensitive habitat areas;
(q) Modifications of previously approved design review plans, including approved landscape plans, except as otherwise provided in Sections
25.05.040(B)(2) and
25.05.040(B)(3);
(r) Swimming pools, permanent spas (unless eligible for administrative design review) and their associated pool or spa equipment;
(s) Outlining of the outside of buildings or portions thereof with lights. (If such outlining with lights is proposed on a building listed on the register, then the Heritage Committee shall make a recommendation to the approval authority prior to its design review); and
(t) A hedge or hedges located within front, side and/or rear yards that is/are proposed to exceed the maximum allowable fence height, as set forth in Chapter
25.50.
(2) Exceptions. The following improvements shall be exempt from the design review process. The Director of Community Development has the discretion to refer applications to the appropriate design review authority for consideration and final action. The City Council may, by resolution, require that certain project types normally eligible for an exception be referred to either the design review or administrative design review process. Exceptions shall be reviewed through the plan check process to ensure compliance with zoning standards.
(a) Additions to single-family residences with no prior design review plans that:
(i) Result in aggregate additions that are less than 50% of the original gross floor area of an existing building or structure;
(ii) Do not create a new upper story and do not exceed a height of 15 feet above the adjacent ground elevation;
(iii) Are in conformance with the zoning regulations; and
(iv) Are not within an environmentally sensitive area or where a licensed professional has determined, subject to peer review, that the proposed improvements do not impact the environmentally sensitive area.
(b) Minor modifications to approved design review plans, including, but not limited to:
(i) Hardscape reconfigurations that do not reduce the existing open space and landscape open space;
(ii) Landscape plans with no increased height, width, and spacing of vegetation; and
(iii) Additions or relocations of windows and glass doors with adjacent neighbor consent;
(c) Interior modifications to existing structures or approved plans, including those structures and plans approved by the approval authority, except interior alterations to historic structures as outlined in Chapter
25.45 ("Historic Preservation");
(d) Exterior modifications to less than 50% area of any street facing façade of a building in a residential zone that do not result in a style change of the building;
(e) Repainting existing structures in residential zones provided that the paint color was not required to specifically address a design-related issue such as consistency with the architectural style and surrounding neighborhood;
(f) Re-roofing buildings and structures with Class A roofing that is consistent with the architectural style and surrounding neighborhood, provided there are no changes to the dimensions, square footage, or roof pitch;
(g) Retaining walls five feet or less in exposed height;
(h) Slabs and patios at or below natural grade;
(i) Modifications to existing driveways or other hardscape that does not increase impervious surfaces and complies with all other applicable provisions of this chapter;
(j) Fences, walls and hedges that comply with the zoning regulations, except permanent chain link or similar type of woven metal fences. In residential areas, other decorative fences and walls, including but not limited to wood, vinyl simulating natural materials, fiberglass, steel, wrought iron, etc., which are determined to be compatible with the neighborhood and consistent with Section
25.50.012 ("Fences, walls, hedges, lattice work and screens") are permitted;
(k) Window or exterior door replacements or insignificant changes in final design, such as moldings and windowpane material;
(l) Elevated decks three feet or less above adjacent existing grade;
(n) Skylights with operable automatic night shades;
(o) Conversion of existing landscaping to drought tolerant landscaping up to six feet at mature growth height and provided that the existing landscaping was not required to specifically address a design-related issue such as view equity or privacy;
(p) Artwork approved through the procedures outlined in Chapter
1.09 ("Art in Public Places");
(q) Signs, in conformance with an approved sign program subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development;
(r) Temporary on-grade removable accessory structures used as play sets, swing sets, other similar unenclosed recreation equipment, and storage sheds provided that: (i) the structure does not exceed 120 square feet in size, (ii) the height is less than 12 feet above adjacent ground elevation, and (iii) minimum required setbacks of the underlying zone are met unless it receives administrative design review approval;
(s) Accessory dwelling units, only as set forth in Chapter
25.17;
(t) Grading of 20 cubic yards or less outside the building footprint, except as specified in Section
22.10.010(e);
(u) Fuel Modification. Plans consisting solely of a new or modified fuel modification shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development or designee to evaluate landscape design, and by the Fire Chief or designee for compliance with fuel modification regulations. Such plans may qualify as development requiring a coastal development permit that is subject to the provisions of Chapter
25.07, including instances when such a plan constitutes development that is not exempt pursuant to Section
25.07.008 because it would impact environmentally sensitive habitat areas;
(v) Trash storage within the side yard when screened from public view by a wall or fence at least four feet in height and does not impact required access for the property;
(w) Exterior wildfire resistant construction materials and methods in accordance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, including, but not limited to, replacement of natural wood siding with fire resistant materials that simulate the appearance of wood, enclosing of roof eaves and wrapping of decks; and
(x) Seismic upgrades that do not affect the exterior appearance of the structure are eligible for an exception to design review.
(3) Administrative Design Review Process. An administrative design review hearing may be conducted by the Director of Community Development or designee for development projects that: are considered to be minor or incidental as specified below, require neighbor notification including, but not limited to, those listed below.
(a) Examples of administrative design review development projects may include but are not limited to:
(i) Those projects normally exempt under subsection
(B)(2) that are determined by the Director of Community Development or designee to pose potential impacts to neighboring properties;
(ii) Elevated decks more than three feet above adjacent existing grade and structural additions within existing residential rooflines;
(iii) Portable and in-ground spas not exceeding a maximum of 600 gallons, and water features;
(iv) Pedestrian entry features that are outside the public right of way and do no impact line of sight and are in conformance with Section
25.50.012(B)(6);
(v) Mechanical equipment, including, but not limited to, air conditioners and pool/spa equipment that do not meet the requirements of Section 7.25.130(C);
(vi) City public works projects which are limited to replacement-in-kind or maintenance and which are not located in environmentally sensitive or open space areas, the Downtown Specific Plan Area, oceanfront properties or public buildings or parks;
(vii) Extensions of time as specified in Section 25.05.040(J)(3);
(ix) Decorative features such as fence posts, brick or stone columns may extend up to twelve inches above the maximum allowable height within the front yard;
(x) Revocable Encroachment Permits when not associated with a project requiring a Design Review Board or Planning Commission decision; and
(xi) Modifications to single- and multi-family structures in residential zones. The Director of Community Development has the discretion to refer any application to the Design Review Board and shall do so when the proposed modifications to a prior design review approval conflict with conditions of approval or a decision made by the Design Review Board. The following modifications shall be allowed through administrative design review:
(1) Architectural modifications that are consistent with the Residential Design Guidelines;
(2) Minor roof alterations that do not adversely impact view equity;
(3) New or relocated windows and doors that do not obtain adjacent neighbor consent;
(4) Additions to single-family residences with prior design review approved plans that:
(a) Result in additions that are less than 50% of the prior design review approved floor area when not a major remodel;
(b) Do not create a new upper story or do not exceed a height of 15 feet above the adjacent ground elevation;
(c) Are not within an environmentally sensitive area or where a licensed professional has determined that the proposed improvements do not impact the environmentally sensitive area subject to peer review;
(d) Are not within 5 years from the date of prior project approval or while the project is under construction if the aggregate additions are larger than 50 square feet; and
(e) Additions are not allowed through the administrative design review process in combination with an application for an accessory dwelling unit or on sites with an existing accessory dwelling unit.
(b) Public Notice for Administrative Design Review. Public notice shall be subject to the provisions of Section
25.05.065, except that if a Coastal Development Permit is required pursuant to Chapter
25.07, noticing for that type of permit shall instead be carried out through the public notice provisions of Section
25.07.014.
(c) Staking Requirements for Administrative Design Review. All floor area additions and roof alterations shall be staked. If the Director of Community Development or his or her designee determines that the minor project should be staked, the staking requirements of subsections
(C)(2)(a) and
(b) of this section shall be followed, except that the construction and certification of the staking shall be completed at least 14 calendar days prior to the public hearing.
(d) Deliberation and Action on Administrative Design Review Applications. The Director of Community Development or his or her designee shall conduct a public hearing for designated administrative design review projects. After consideration of all testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing and the Design Review Criteria specified in subsection H of this section, the Director of Community Development or his or her designee shall either approve, conditionally approve or deny the application in writing. An appeal of a decision on an administrative design review application is subject to the provisions of Section
25.05.070, and Section
25.07.016 when a coastal development permit is required.
(e) Approval Authority Referral. Prior to deliberation and action on an administrative design review application, the Director of Community Development or his or her designee may (at his or her discretion) refer the project application to the approval authority for hearing and consideration in accordance with subsections E and F. The City Council may, by resolution, require that certain project types normally eligible for administrative design review be referred to a design review hearing with either the Design Review Board or Planning Commission.
(C) Application. Application for design review shall be made by a property owner or authorized agent. Applications shall contain such information as prescribed by the Director of Community Development.
(1) Early Neighbor Communication. The applicant shall communicate with owners of property within 300 feet of the applicant's property notifying them of the proposed project. Such communication should take place prior to deciding on a final design to help resolve potential conflicts. Communication efforts shall include notification mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the applicant's property. The noticing must be prepared and mailed by a professional listing service. Certification to the accuracy, completeness of the list, and date the notice was mailed is required to be provided by the company, along with a copy of the materials sent. Early neighbor communication must be completed prior to being scheduled for a hearing date. The following information shall be included in the early neighbor notification notice:
(a) Applicant contact information.
(b) Location of the proposed project.
(c) A description of the proposed project.
(d) Information on how to participate in the design review process.
(2) Staking Requirements.
(a) A staking plan shall be prepared as specified on the most current zoning and design review submittal checklist. Staking poles and connecting ribbons, which accurately represent the full extent of the proposed structure, including decks and eaves, shall be constructed at least 21 calendar days prior to the first public hearing. At least 21 calendar days prior to the first public hearing, the location and height of the staking poles must be certified as accurate by a registered land surveyor or registered civil engineer licensed to conduct land surveys in the State of California. If complete and certified project staking is not in place at least 21 calendar days prior to the first Design Review Board public hearing date or 14 calendar days prior to the administrative design review public hearing, the project shall be continued to a later date. Neither the applicant, a relative of the applicant, nor any other person possessing a financial interest in the property or the project may certify the location and height accuracy of the staking poles. If the project is modified during the design review process because of a view consideration, privacy or other concerns that the Board determines is necessary to restake, the project shall be re-staked and re-certified at least 14 calendar days prior to any subsequent public hearing,
(b) A deposit for the removal of staking poles, in an amount approved by the City Council shall be made prior to the time the project is scheduled for public hearing. Staking poles shall be removed by the applicant within 20 calendar days after the final project decision. Upon timely removal of the staking poles, the deposit shall be returned to the applicant. The applicant's failure to remove the staking poles within the prescribed time period shall result in the automatic forfeiture of the deposit, and the City shall remove the poles from the site.
(3) Biological Report Requirements. Prior to deliberation and action on a design review application, the applicant shall submit a biological report that is prepared by a professional in the fields of wildlife biology or botany for any proposal to clear native vegetation on undeveloped parcels that are located within or adjacent to areas designated high or very high value on the city's biological values maps and any other areas that contain environmentally sensitive habitat resources except for annual weed abatement and approved fuel modification programs.
(4) Fire Department Review and Approval. Prior to deliberation and action on a design review application for new construction and alterations involving 50% or more of an existing structure, the Fire Department shall review and approve or conditionally approve applications, including proposed fuel modification programs. Fuel modification programs or Alternative Materials and Methods (AM&Ms) requests, when determined necessary by the Fire Department, are required for any parcel having an "FM"—Fuel Modification designation or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone on the City's Geographic Information Mapping system. The Cal Fire-designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is an overlay zone, and does not change the underlying zoning of Title
25. The Fire Department conditions of approval relating to public safety may not subsequently be modified by the approval authority without the Fire Department's review and approval.
(D) Filing Fee. Prior to accepting an application, the Department of Community Development shall charge and collect a filing fee as determined by resolution of the City Council.
(E) Public Notice. Public notice shall be subject to the provisions of Section
25.05.065, except that if a Coastal Development Permit is required pursuant to Chapter
25.07, noticing for that type of permit shall instead be carried out through the public notice provisions of Section
25.07.014.
(F) Deliberation and Action on Applications.
(1) The authorities responsible for reviewing and making decisions on design review applications are as follows:
(a) The design review board shall conduct a noticed public hearing on design review applications for all single-family or two-family developments, including associated public right-of-way improvements.
(b) The planning commission shall conduct a noticed public hearing on all other design review applications, including but not limited to: residential development of three-families or more, all projects located in the downtown specific plan area, all non-residential development, all public works projects including Capital Improvements Projects (CIP) and development in the right-of-way, and projects for which the planning commission is the primary discretionary review authority, such as approval of a conditional use permit.
(2) Upon the conclusion of the public hearing on a design review application, and the consideration of all testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing, the approval authority shall approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. Determinations of design review applications shall be by majority vote of the voting members of the approval authority present.
(3) The approval, conditional approval, or denial of design review applications by the approval authority shall be based upon the design review criteria set forth in subsection H of this section. Additional review criteria are specified in Section
25.07.012(F) when an associated Coastal Development Permit is required. Additional review criteria contained in specific plans and/or zoning overlays shall apply to projects located in areas covered by any such specific plans and/or zoning overlays.
(4) The approval, conditional approval or denial of design review applications by the approval authority shall be accompanied by findings correlated with the design review criteria set forth in subsection
H. Section
25.07.012(G) requires written findings to be made when approving or conditionally approving an associated Coastal Development Permit.
(5) Design review hearings on a proposed residential development project shall usually be limited to a maximum of two hearings. A third hearing may be permitted if the approval authority makes a finding that the applicant followed the authority's direction(s) from the initial hearing in good faith and further design work on the project is in the best interest of the community. The approval authority may allow up to two continuances of hearings at which no substantive discussion of the application occurs. Concept review hearings for residential dwelling units of three units or less are not allowed, except where required by current City ordinance. If required, concept review shall be limited to one hearing and shall count as one of the above limited hearings.
(6) Written notice of the approval, conditional approval or denial of design review applications shall be mailed to the applicant or authorized agent within 14 calendar days of the date of the decision of the approval authority.
(7) Landscaping Conditions. The approval authority shall condition all landscaping approvals with mature growth height limits and maintenance schedules (type and frequency of pruning) for all vegetation that potentially impacts views. The landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plans. Thereafter, the landscaping shall be continuously maintained (including replanting, as necessary) in compliance with the approved landscaping plans, unless such plans are subsequently revised pursuant to subsection (B)(1)(v) of this section. Minor landscaping changes may be exempt from design review pursuant to subsection
(B)(2)(b) of this section.
(8) Applications for design review approval constitute applications for a "permit" as that term currently is used in California Government Code Section
65009(c)(1), and as hereafter may be amended.
(G) Design Guidelines. "Design Guidelines" is a publication that has been developed by the City to assist designers in understanding the Design Review criteria. These guidelines complement the zoning regulations provided for in this Title by providing conceptual examples of potential design solutions and design interpretations. The guidelines are general and may be utilized with flexibility in their application to specific projects.
(H) Design Review Criteria. Physical improvements and site developments subject to design review shall be designed and located in a manner which best satisfies the intent and purpose of design review, the City's village atmosphere and the design review criteria specified in this section. Village atmosphere shall be characterized by appropriately scaled development, diverse and unique architectural designs, pedestrian orientation and sensitivity to the natural conditions of the site. The property development standards as delineated in each zone are intended to provide the City with maximum flexibility and discretion in the decision making process, based upon the particular issues and circumstances in effect at the time development is proposed. These standards shall represent the maximum allowable building envelope for a given property. The actual development allowed after the application of the design review criteria will typically be less than the maximum designated by the general standards for the zone because of localized conditions identified during the design review process. A proposed development that has no variances from the Zoning Code does not have any presumptive development right or "entitlement." The design review criteria are as follows:
(1) Access. Conflicts between vehicles, pedestrians and other modes of transportation should be minimized by specifically providing for each applicable mode of transportation. Handicapped access shall be provided as required by applicable statutes.
(2) Design Articulation. Within the allowable building envelope, the appearance of building and retaining wall mass should be minimized. Articulation techniques including, but not limited to, separation, offsets, terracing and reducing the size of any one element in the structure may be used to reduce the appearance of mass.
(3) Design Integrity. Consistency with the applicant's chosen style of architecture should be achieved by the use of appropriate materials and details. Remodels should be harmonious with the remaining existing architecture.
(4) Environmental Context. Development should preserve and, where possible, enhance the City's scenic natural setting. Natural features, such as existing heritage trees, rock out-cropping, ridgelines and significant watercourses should be protected. Existing terrain should be utilized in the design and grading should be minimized.
(5) General Plan Compliance. The development shall comply with all applicable policies of the general plan, including all of its elements, applicable specific plans, and the certified local coastal program.
(6) Historic Preservation. Destruction or alteration to historic resources should be avoided whenever possible. See Chapter
25.45 for more information.
(7) Landscaping. Landscaping shall be incorporated as an integrated part of the structure's design and relate harmoniously to neighborhood and community landscaping themes. View equity shall be an important consideration in the landscape design. The relevant landscaping guidelines contained in the City's "Landscape and Scenic Highways Resource Document" should be incorporated, as appropriate, in the design and planned maintenance of proposed landscaping.
(8) Lighting and Glare. Adequate lighting for individual and public safety shall be provided in a manner which does not significantly impact neighboring properties. Reflective materials and appurtenances that cause glare or a negative visual impact (e.g. skylights, white rock roofs, high-gloss ceramic tile roofs, reflective glass, etc.) should be avoided or mitigated to a level of insignificance in those locations where those surfaces are visible from neighboring properties.
(9) Neighborhood Compatibility. Development shall be compatible with the existing development in the neighborhood and respect neighborhood character. Neighborhood character is the sum of the qualities that distinguish areas within the City, including historical patterns of development (e.g., structural heights, mass, scale or size), village atmosphere, landscaping themes and architectural styles.
(10) Pedestrian Orientation. Commercial development design shall enhance and encourage pedestrian uses. Incorporation of articulated building masses, compact open spaces and courtyards, mixed use developments, use of landscaping as part of design, and orientation to pedestrian access should be maximized.
(11) Privacy. The placement of activity areas (e.g., decks, picture windows and ceremonial or entertainment rooms) in locations that would result in a substantial invasion of privacy of neighboring properties should be minimized.
(12) Public Art. Public art is encouraged and shall be displayed where feasible or required by the Art in Public Places Ordinance.
(13) Sign Quality. Signs shall be incorporated into the architecture of the structure and shall be made of high quality materials, be simple in design and be visually compatible with the surrounding physical environment in terms of color, scale and size. Use of natural materials in the construction of signs is encouraged.
(14) Sustainability. New development should consider architecture and building practices which minimize environmental impacts and enhance energy efficiency by: (a) reducing energy needs of buildings by proper site and structural design; (b) increasing the building's ability to capture or generate energy; (c) using low-impact, sustainable and recycled building materials; (d) using the latest Best Management Practices regarding waste and water management; and (e) reducing site emissions.
(15) Swimming Pools, Spas and Water Features. Swimming pools, spas and water features shall be located, designed and constructed where:
(a) geology conditions allow;
(b) noise produced by circulatory mechanical pumps and equipment is mitigated; and
(c) any associated fencing or other site improvements are compatible with neighboring properties.
(16) View Equity. The development, including its landscaping, shall be designed to protect existing views from neighboring properties without denying the subject property the reasonable opportunity to develop as described and illustrated in the City's "Design Guidelines." The "Design Guidelines" are intended to balance preservation of views with the right to develop property.
(I) Design Review Findings. Physical improvements and site developments subject to Administrative or Design Review Board authority shall be designed and located in a manner in overall consistency with the design review criteria specified in Section
25.05.040(H), and all other applicable design guidelines and characterized by appropriately scaled development, diverse and unique architectural designs, pedestrian orientation, and sensitivity to the natural conditions of the site. Any deviations from the design review criteria and other applicable design guidelines must be considered minor and reasonably related to good design principles and specific site conditions.
(J) Appeals. Appeals of the design review authority are subject to the provisions of Section
25.05.070, and Section
25.07.016 when a Coastal Development Permit is required.
(K) Effective Date/Expiration Date.
(1) A Design Review decision shall become effective 14 calendar days after the date of the decision, unless appealed to the City Council.
(2) Design Review approval shall lapse and become void two years following the effective date if the privileges authorized by design review are not executed or utilized or, if construction work is involved, such work is not commenced within such two-year period and diligently pursued to completion.
(3) The Director of Community Development or his or her designee may grant approval, through the administrative design review process, a two-year extension of time and, after that initial extension of time, a final one-year extension of time. Such time extensions shall be requested in writing by the applicant or authorized agent prior to the expiration of the beginning two-year approval period or a subsequently approved extension of time.
(4) Extension of Time Findings. An extension of time of the beginning two-year approval period may be granted by through the administrative design review process, if each of the following findings can be made:
(a) The zoning codes or standards applicable to the circumstances of the originally approved design review have not materially changed; and
(b) The neighborhood character has not changed so as to be materially inconsistent with the findings made when design review was originally approved.
(L) Reapplication Waiting Period. After denial of a project, no application for a project located on the same parcel or building site may be filed or accepted for filing for two months.
(Ord. 1334 § 1, 1997; Ord. 1376 § 1, 2001; Ord. 1390 § 1, 2001; Ord. 1400 §§ 1, 2, 2002; Ord. 1403 §§ 1, 2, 2002; Ord. 1416 § 3, 2002; Ord. 1418 § 1, 2002; Ord. 1456 § 1, 2005; Ord. 1461 § 2, 2006; Ord. 1482 §§ 1, 2, 2008; Ord. 1487 §§ 2—5, 2008; Ord. 1515 §§ 3, 4, 2009; Ord. 1541 § 1, 2011; Ord. 1555 §§ 6, 7, 2011; Ord. 1577 §§ 6, 7, 2013; Ord. 1590 § 2, 2014; Ord. 1601 § 1, 2015; Ord. 1636 §§ 2—9, 2019; Ord. 1649 § 1, 2020; Ord. 1654 §§ 1, 2, 2021; Ord. 1659 § 6, 2021; Ord. 1665, 11/16/2021; Ord. 1672 § 2, 2022; Ord. 1677 § 6, 2022; Ord. 1678 §§ 1, 2, 2022; Ord. 1688, 7/11/2023)