34 SPECIAL PURPOSE OVERLAY ZONES
Any newly proposed structure, other than a minor accessory structure or improvement, or a preemptive measure, which is proposed closer than 40 feet to the edge of the bluff shall be demonstrated to be behind the identified daylight line. Analysis methods alternate to a slope failure plane analysis which predict an equivalent level of safety may be proposed, and must be accepted in the City's review of the geotechnical report. |
Finally, each geotechnical report for a project including a proposed preemptive measure shall address those points specified in subsection C of this section as well as the following: |
a. | Maximum expected wave height, design wave height, design constraints and frequency of overtopping; |
b. | Normal and maximum tidal ranges; |
c. | Estimated erosion rate with and without the proposed preemptive measure; |
d. | Percent of beach quality sand within the bluff; |
e. | Effect of the proposed structure on adjoining properties; |
f. | Potential/effect of scouring at base of proposed structure; |
g. | Design life of structure/maintenance provisions; |
h. | Alternatives to the project design. Project alternatives shall include, but not be limited to, no project, relocation/removal of threatened portions of or the entire home and beach nourishment; |
i. | Construction area and technique of construction; |
j. | Certification that the structure is designed to withstand storms comparable to the winter storms of 1982-83. |
Percentage of Parcel in Slopes of Greater or Equal to 25% Grade | Maximum Encroachment in Areas of Slope Greater or Equal to 25% Grade |
|---|---|
75% or less | 10% |
76 - 80% | 12% |
81 - 85% | 14% |
86 - 90% | 16% |
91 - 95% | 18% |
96 - 100% | 20% |
34 SPECIAL PURPOSE OVERLAY ZONES
Any newly proposed structure, other than a minor accessory structure or improvement, or a preemptive measure, which is proposed closer than 40 feet to the edge of the bluff shall be demonstrated to be behind the identified daylight line. Analysis methods alternate to a slope failure plane analysis which predict an equivalent level of safety may be proposed, and must be accepted in the City's review of the geotechnical report. |
Finally, each geotechnical report for a project including a proposed preemptive measure shall address those points specified in subsection C of this section as well as the following: |
a. | Maximum expected wave height, design wave height, design constraints and frequency of overtopping; |
b. | Normal and maximum tidal ranges; |
c. | Estimated erosion rate with and without the proposed preemptive measure; |
d. | Percent of beach quality sand within the bluff; |
e. | Effect of the proposed structure on adjoining properties; |
f. | Potential/effect of scouring at base of proposed structure; |
g. | Design life of structure/maintenance provisions; |
h. | Alternatives to the project design. Project alternatives shall include, but not be limited to, no project, relocation/removal of threatened portions of or the entire home and beach nourishment; |
i. | Construction area and technique of construction; |
j. | Certification that the structure is designed to withstand storms comparable to the winter storms of 1982-83. |
Percentage of Parcel in Slopes of Greater or Equal to 25% Grade | Maximum Encroachment in Areas of Slope Greater or Equal to 25% Grade |
|---|---|
75% or less | 10% |
76 - 80% | 12% |
81 - 85% | 14% |
86 - 90% | 16% |
91 - 95% | 18% |
96 - 100% | 20% |