Except where another individual or commission is empowered with authority to grant a variance, the hearing officer may grant variances from the requirements of this title pertaining to standards and from requirements of other titles of the municipal code where specifically authorized in such other titles in accordance with the findings of fact hereinafter prescribed. The planning commission may grant variances from the requirements of this title related to uses allowed in all zoning districts except the ROS Residential Open Space Zone, the R1R Restricted Residential Zone, and the R1 Low Density Residential Zone in accordance with the findings of fact hereinafter prescribed.
In cases where a variance has been granted on or before April 3, 2009 that is related to uses allowed in the ROS, R1R, or R1 zones, the planning commission may grant a new variance for the same use as previously approved. In these cases, the planning commission may also grant a new variance to allow expansion or modification of said previously-granted use, provided such expansion or modification does not include expansion of the boundaries of the subject property compared to the boundaries of the subject property at the time the original variance was granted. Variance applications to extend use variances in the ROS, R1R, and R1 zones shall be filed within 90 days of the expiration date of any variance case. Any variance application filed between 91 and 180 days after the expiration date of a variance case shall only be accepted for filing if the director of community development determines that the failure to file the application was due to a mistake or excusable neglect on the part of the applicant. If the director of community development rejects the application on the grounds that the reason given for the late filing does not constitute mistake or excusable neglect, the applicant may appeal the director of community development decision to the city council. Any variance application filed between 181 and 365 days after the expiration date of a variance, and variance applications denied by the director of community development pursuant the previous sentence, shall only be accepted for filing if the city council determines that the failure to file the application in a timely manner was due to a mistake or excusable neglect on the part of the applicant. The director of community development and city council shall only make the finding that a failure to timely file a use variance application as set forth in this section if the applicant demonstrates that there is a preponderance of evidence to support a finding of mistake or excusable neglect.
In cases involving variances related to any standard and also a use, the director of community development may authorize the variance requests to be considered by the planning commission rather than both the hearing officer and the planning commission. In granting any variance, the hearing officer and the planning commission may impose conditions to safeguard and protect the public health, safety and promote the general welfare, and to insure that the development so authorized is in accordance with approved plans and is consistent with the zoning ordinance objectives.