Zoneomics Logo
search icon

Jefferson City Zoning Code

CHAPTER 12

72 APPLICATION REVIEW, HEARING AND APPEAL PROCEDURES

Note: Former Ch. 12.72, Hearing and Appeal Procedures, derived from DC §§ 2.010; 2.015; 2.020; 2.030; 2.040; 2.100; 4.010; 4.015; 4.020; 4.025; 4.030; 4.040; 4.050; 4.100; 4.110; 4.120; 4.130; 4.140; 4.150; 4.151; 4.160; 4.170; 4.180; 4.190; 4.200 and Ord. 536 ; Ord. 642; Ord. 643; Ord. 668; Ord. 672; Ord. 688; Ord. 719; Ord. 721; Ord. 723; Ord. 728; Ord. 736; and Ord. 737, was superseded by Ord. 738, 2/12/2026.

§ 12.72.010 Application review procedures designated.

Eight procedure types to review and decide land use applications are designated. They vary in the decision authority, provision of public notice and review process. They shall be known as Ministerial Zoning Review, Type I-A, Type I-B, Type I-C, Type II-A, Type II-B, Type III, and Type IV.
When an applicant applies for more than one type of land use application for the same one or more contiguous parcels of land, the proceedings shall be consolidated for review and decision. When proceedings are consolidated, required notices may be consolidated, provided the notice identifies each application to be decided. Multiple applications involving different procedure types shall be reviewed and decided using the higher procedure type. For example, an application for a subdivision (Type II-A) with an associated minor variance (Type I-B) shall be reviewed and decided using the Type II-A process. When more than one application is reviewed, separate findings and decisions shall be made on each application.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.020 Application submission.

All applications, including the notice appeal for a decision to the Planning Commission or City Council, shall be made on forms provided by the City. Completed applications and appropriate fees shall be submitted to the City Recorder.
A. 
Application Fees. Fees are for the purpose of defraying administrative costs.
1. 
Fees shall be payable at the time of application and shall be as set forth by resolution of the City Council. There shall be no fee required for an application initiated by City staff, the Planning Commission, the Landmarks Advisory Commission or the City Council.
2. 
The failure to submit the required fee with an application, including return of checks unpaid or other failure of consideration, shall be a jurisdictional defect.
B. 
Approval or denial of the application shall be based upon the standards and criteria that were applicable at the time the application was first submitted. With the following exception:
1. 
For an application relating to the development of housing an applicant may make a request in writing to the City Recorder that approval or denial of the application be based on the standards and criteria which are applicable at the time of the request subject to the following limitations:
a. 
If the request is granted, the applicable timelines for completeness review or issuance of a final decision as established in Section 12.72.030 of this title are reset beginning on the date the request is received by the City Recorder.
(Example: if an application has not been deemed complete then the completeness period will reset beginning on the day the request is received, if an application has been deemed complete then the final action period will reset beginning on the day the request is received.)
b. 
The City Recorder may deny the applicant's request under the following circumstances:
i. 
The City has issued a public notice of the application; or
ii. 
The applicant has made a previous request in writing to the City Recorder regarding the same application that approval or denial be based on the standards and criteria which are applicable at the time of the request.
2. 
The City may adopt no fee for a request that approval or denial of an application related to housing be based on the standards and criteria which are applicable at the time of the request, except for the recovery of any additional costs incurred by the City to accommodate the request.
3. 
The City may not require the applicant to submit a new application or redundant information as part of a request that approval or denial of an application related to housing be based on the standards and criteria which are applicable at the time of the request.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.021 Ministerial Zoning Review.

Ministerial Zoning Reviews are nondiscretionary ministerial reviews made by the development official or designee without notice, hearing, or opportunity for appeal. Ministerial Zoning Reviews are generally processed in conjunction with obtaining a building permit, however some activities which require Ministerial Zoning Review may not require issuance of a building permit.
A. 
Method of Review. Where a building permit is required, Ministerial Zoning Review shall be conducted during building permit review without public notice and without a public hearing. Where a building permit is not required a written decision shall be provided to an applicant by the development official or designee, without public notice and without a public hearing.
1. 
Procedure for specific Ministerial Zoning Review applications may be modified by adopted and published City policies or by City Council resolution.
B. 
Ministerial Zoning Review Application Requirements.
1. 
The applicant has the responsibility to obtain the property owner's permission for the request where necessary.
2. 
When necessary, applicants must submit information showing that a proposal complies with all applicable requirements of Title 12 of the Jefferson Municipal Code and with the adopted City of Jefferson Public Works Design Standards.
C. 
Criteria and Decision. The development official or designee's evaluation of an application for Ministerial Zoning Review will determine whether minimum Code requirements are met and whether any other land use permit or approval is required prior to issuance of additional permits.
1. 
Ministerial Zoning Review decisions are based on the information submitted. If the information relied upon to grant the approval is incorrect, the approval may be voided.
2. 
The development official or designee may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for Ministerial Zoning Review. Conditions placed on an approval must be provided to an applicant in writing and shall ensure compliance with clear and objective development standards found in Title 12 of the Jefferson Municipal Code or the adopted City of Jefferson Public Works Design Standards.
D. 
Effective Date and Appeal. Ministerial Zoning Review decisions made by the development official, or their designee, are final. A Ministerial Zoning Review decision is final on the date it is signed or initialed by the development official or designee. There is no opportunity for further local appeal.
E. 
Expiration of Approval.
1. 
Where a building permit is required a Ministerial Zoning Review approval shall expire within two years of the date of the final decision. The decision shall be considered exercised upon the issuance of a building permit for all structures described in the application.
2. 
Where no building permit is required a Ministerial Zoning Review approval shall expire within five years of the date of the final decision. The decision shall be considered exercised if the use or activity which was approved or reviewed is in operation within the allotted time period.
3. 
Ministerial Zoning Reviews may not receive an extension to the approval period.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.023 Expiration of approval generally.

A. 
Expiration of Approval by Type. Unless otherwise specifically stated, approvals of all Type I-A, Type I-B, Type I-C, Type II-A and Type II-B applications shall be valid for three years following the effective date of the approval. The approval shall be exercised, as defined under subsection C, within the three-year time period.
B. 
Extension Application. Where an extension application and fee have been timely received by the City Recorder, one extension may be granted in accordance with the Type I-B process. Only one extension shall be allowed, and it shall be for no more than an 18-month period.
1. 
An application and fee for an extension to an approval period shall be received by the City Recorder prior to the expiration of the approval period, or the initial decision shall lapse.
a. 
The application shall explain why an extension is requested and shall provide evidence showing the applicant will exercise the rights granted by the initial approval if the approval period is extended.
b. 
Receipt of the application by the City Recorder shall stay the initial approval period until the day following the date of the 12-day appeal period of the decision on the extension.
c. 
Where a written appeal of the extension decision is received by the City Recorder within the 12-day appeal period, the approval of the extension shall be stayed until the date following the expiration of the 12-day appeal period for the decision on the appeal of the extension.
C. 
Exercise of Land Use Approval Generally. Unless otherwise specifically stated, exercising a land use approval shall be subject to the following regulations:
1. 
Building Permit. When a building permit is required as part of an approved decision, the decision shall be considered exercised with the first placement or permanent construction of a structure on a site. This may include the pouring of slabs or footings, any work beyond the stage of excavation, including the first permanent framing or assembly of the structure or any part thereof on its piling or foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; the installation of streets, driveways or walkways; the excavation for a basement, footings, piers or foundations or the erection of temporary forms; the construction of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not used as part of the main structure.
2. 
Specific Use. If the approval does not require a building permit, the decision shall be considered exercised if the use or activity which was approved is in operation within the allotted time period.
3. 
Property Line Adjustment. An approval of a property line adjustment is exercised when a change to the legal description, survey, or plat is recorded by Marion County.
4. 
Partition or Subdivision. A preliminary approval of a partition or subdivision plat is considered exercised when a final plat is recorded by Marion County.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.025 Type I-A procedures.

Type I-A actions are ministerial actions decided by the development official or designee. Like ministerial zoning review Type I-A actions are non-discretionary reviews. Unlike ministerial zoning review the applicant is afforded an opportunity to appeal the decision made by the development official or designee. Public notice or a public hearing is not provided.
A. 
Criteria and Decision. The development official or designee's evaluation of an application for Type I-A approval will determine whether minimum Code requirements are met. After reviewing the application, relevant decision criteria, and relevant Code provisions, the development official or designee shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application.
1. 
The development official or designee may attach conditions in granting an approval if the development official or designee determines the conditions are necessary for the approval criteria to be met.
B. 
Notice of Action and Appeal Rights. The development official or designee shall mail a copy of the decision and a notice of action to the applicant. The decision and notice of action shall state the applicant is provided a 12-day appeal period, and any appeal shall be in writing and must be received by the City Recorder within the 12-day appeal period.
1. 
A notice of action shall also be provided to the Marion County Building Department and Jefferson Fire District for any change of use decisions. These agencies will not be afforded an opportunity to appeal the decision of the development official or designee.
C. 
Effective Date and Appeal. The decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission by the applicant by submitting a written appeal to the City Recorder within 12 days from when the written notice of decision was mailed beginning with the day after the notice was mailed. If no appeal is filed within the 12-day appeal period, the decision becomes effective on the 13th day.
D. 
An appeal of a Type I-A decision shall be processed as a Type II-B decision.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.030 Final action on land use decisions.

Following the procedures described below for Type I-B, Type I-C, Type II-A, Type II-B and Type III decisions, the established decision authority shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application; or if a decision is in the nature of an appeal, either affirm, modify, reverse, or remand the decision that is on appeal. The decision shall also be subject to the following time constraints:
A. 
The City shall take final action on an application, including the resolution of all appeals within the shortest applicable period of the following periods, all of which begin on the date that the application is deemed complete:
1. 
120 days;
2. 
100 days for an application for the development of housing that is affordable to households with incomes equal to or less than 60% of the median family income for Marion County or for the State, whichever is greater, that is subject to an affordable housing covenant, as provided in ORS, that maintains the affordability for a period of not less than 60 years from the date of the certificate of occupancy; or
3. 
63 days for a Type I-C application.
B. 
Upon receipt of an application for a Type I-B, Type I-C, Type II-A, Type II-B, or Type III application and within the shortest applicable period of the following periods, the development official, or their designee shall notify the applicant of if the application contains sufficient information and is complete as of the date of submittal:
1. 
30 days; or
2. 
23 days for a Type I-C application.
C. 
If the development official or their designee determines that the application is incomplete, the development official or their designee shall advise the applicant in writing of the necessary missing information. The City shall begin review of the application:
1. 
Upon receipt of all of the missing information requested by the City;
2. 
Upon a receipt of some of the missing information and a written statement from the applicant indicating that none of the other missing information will be provided; or
3. 
Upon receipt of a written statement from the applicant indicating that none of the missing information will be provided.
D. 
On the 181st day after being first submitted, the application will be void if the applicant has been notified of the missing information, notified of the options under which City review of the application shall begin established in subsections C.1 through 3 of this section, and has not complied with subsections C.1 through 3 of this section.
E. 
Upon the written request of the applicant submitted to the development official, the time periods established in Section 12.72.050A of this chapter may be extended to a date certain, but in no case may the total period exceed 245 days.
F. 
If the City does not take final action on the application on a Type I-B, Type I-C, Type II-A, Type II-B, or Type III application within the applicable period established in Section 12.72.050A of this chapter, the applicant may proceed with remedies in accordance with ORS 227.179.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.035 Type I-B procedures.

Type I-B actions are administrative decisions which may include the limited application of subjective decision criteria. Type I-B actions are decided by the development official or designee. Public notice of the decision will be provided and there shall be an opportunity to appeal the decision. A public hearing is not required.
A. 
Notice Area. The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a public notice to the applicant and owners of all property within 100 feet of the subject property. Notice and request for comment shall also be provided to any agencies impacted by the decision which may include the City of Jefferson Public Works Department, the Jefferson Fire District, and the Jefferson School District.
B. 
Notice Contents. The mailed notice shall:
1. 
Provide a 14-day period for submission of written comments prior to the decision;
2. 
State that issues which may provide the basis for an appeal to the Planning Commission, City Council, or Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals shall be raised in writing prior to the expiration of the comment period. Issues shall be raised with sufficient specificity to enable the City to respond to the issue;
3. 
List, by commonly used citation, the applicable criteria for the decision;
4. 
Set forth the street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
5. 
State the place, date and time that comments are due;
6. 
State that copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for review, and that copies can be obtained at cost;
7. 
Include the name and phone number of a City contact person; and
8. 
Briefly summarize the local decision making process.
C. 
For purposes of appeal, subsection A, above, shall be deemed met when the City can provide an affidavit or other certification that such notice was given. The mailing list shall be obtained by the City from the current County Assessor's records.
D. 
Where a railroad-highway crossing provides or will provide the only access to land that is the subject of an application, the City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to the Oregon Department of Transportation, Rail Division, and the railroad company consistent with ORS 197.794.
E. 
Except where a land use application would allow a structure less than 35 feet in height and the property is located outside of the runway "approach surface" as defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation, the City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice of a land use application to the owner of an airport defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation as a "public use airport" in accordance with ORS 227.175(6).
F. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to the Oregon Department of Aviation consistent with ORS 197.183 when the land use application, if approved, would result in a water impoundment larger than one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet) within 10,000 feet of an airport identified in ORS 836.610(1).
G. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to transportation agencies, including the Oregon Department of Transportation, when the land use application, if approved, may impact facilities or services under their jurisdiction.
H. 
Criteria and Decision. The development official shall consider the application materials and the written comments submitted during the 14-day comment period. The development official or designee may attach conditions in granting an approval if the development official determines the conditions are necessary for the approval criteria to be met, or to mitigate detrimental effects. City staff shall prepare an order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The order shall include findings addressing the relevant criteria of the Development Code. The development official or designee shall sign the order.
I. 
Notice of Decision. The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a copy of the Type I-B-decision to the applicant, and a notice of the decision shall be mailed to the applicant, to parties that submitted written comments during the 14-day comment period, to parties that requested such notice, and, in accordance with ORS 227.175(10)(a)(A), to any person who submits a letter to the City Recorder that was received by the City Recorder before the notice of the decision was mailed stating they are adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision and the reasons therefor.
J. 
Notice of Decision Contents. The notice of the decision shall:
1. 
Explain the nature of the application and the proposed use or uses which could be authorized;
2. 
Set forth the street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
3. 
Include the name and telephone number of a City contact person;
4. 
State that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost;
5. 
State that any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved or who receives this written notice may appeal the decision to the Planning Commission;
6. 
State that a 12-day appeal period is provided and any appeal shall be in writing and shall be received by the City Recorder within the 12-day appeal period;
7. 
State that the decision will not become effective until the period for filing an appeal has expired; and
8. 
State that a person who is mailed written notice of the decision cannot appeal the decision directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals under ORS 197.830 to 197.845.
K. 
Appeals. The Type I-B decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission by a party that received a notice of the decision, or by any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision, by submitting a written appeal to the City Recorder within 12 days of the day the written notice of decision was mailed beginning with the day after the notice was mailed. If no appeal is filed within the 12-day appeal period, the decision becomes effective on the 13th day.
L. 
Where the development official decision is appealed, the effective date is stayed until the final determination on the appeal is rendered.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.036 Type I-C procedures.

Type I-C actions are expedited land use decisions which may include the limited application of subjective decision criteria. Type I-C actions are decided by the development official or designee. The applicant shall be afforded an opportunity to appeal the decision. Public notice of the decision and a public hearing is not required.
A. 
Notice. The City Recorder, or designee, shall provide a request for comments to other agencies impacted by the decision which may include the City of Jefferson Public Works Department, the Jefferson Fire District, and the Jefferson School District.
B. 
Where a railroad-highway crossing provides or will provide the only access to land that is the subject of an application, the City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to the Oregon Department of Transportation, Rail Division, and the railroad company consistent with ORS 197.794.
C. 
Except where a land use application would allow a structure less than 35 feet in height and the property is located outside of the runway "approach surface" as defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation, the City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice of a land use application to the owner of an airport defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation as a "public use airport" in accordance with ORS 227.175(6).
D. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to the Oregon Department of Aviation consistent with ORS 197.183 when the land use application, if approved, would result in a water impoundment larger than one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet) within 10,000 feet of an airport identified in ORS 836.610(1).
E. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to transportation agencies, including the Oregon Department of Transportation, when the land use application, if approved, may impact facilities or services under their jurisdiction.
F. 
Criteria and Decision. The development official shall consider the application materials and the written comments provided by impacted agencies. The development official or designee may attach conditions in granting an approval if the development official determines the conditions are necessary for the approval criteria to be met, or to mitigate detrimental effects. City staff shall prepare an order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application. The order shall include findings addressing the relevant criteria of the Development Code. The development official, or designee, shall sign the order.
G. 
Notice of Decision. The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a copy of the Type I-C decision to the applicant.
H. 
Notice of Decision Contents. The decision shall:
1. 
Explain the nature of the application and the proposed use or uses which could be authorized;
2. 
Set forth the street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
3. 
Include the name and telephone number of a City contact person;
4. 
State that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost;
5. 
State that a notice of intent to appeal the decision to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals shall be filed consistent with ORS 197.830 to 197.845 not later than 21 days after the decision becomes final;
6. 
State the criteria on which a decision may be appealed as established in Section 12.72.034I of this chapter and in ORS 197.830 through 197.860; and
7. 
State that the decision will not become effective until the period for filing an appeal has expired.
I. 
Appeals. The Type I-C decision may be appealed to the Land Use Board of Appeals by the applicant.
1. 
An appeal of a Type I-C decision shall be based solely on allegations;
a. 
Of violation of the substantive provisions of the applicable land use regulations;
b. 
Of unconstitutionality of the decision;
c. 
That the application is not eligible for review as either an expedited middle housing land division or expedited land division and should be reviewed as a land use decision or limited land use decision; or
d. 
That the parties' substantive rights have been substantially prejudiced by an error in procedure by the local government.
J. 
The Development Officials decision is final after the period for filing a notice of intent to appeal to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals has expired, provided an intent to appeal was not timely filed. Where the development official decision is appealed, the effective date is stayed until the final determination on the appeal is rendered.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.038 Type II-A procedures.

Type II-A actions are decided by the Planning Commission. Public notice of the decision will be provided and there shall be an opportunity to appeal the decision. A public hearing is not required.
A. 
Notice Area. The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a public notice of a public meeting where the application shall be discussed to the applicant and owners of all property within 100 feet of the subject property. Notice and request for comment shall also be provided to any agencies impacted by the decision which may include the City of Jefferson Public Works Department, the Jefferson Fire District, and the Jefferson School District.
B. 
Notice Contents. The mailed notice shall.
1. 
Provide a 14-day period for submission of written comments prior to the decision;
2. 
State that issues which may provide the basis for an appeal to the City Council or Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals shall be raised in writing prior to the expiration of the comment period. Issues shall be raised with sufficient specificity to enable the City to respond to the issue;
3. 
List, by commonly used citation, the applicable criteria for the decision;
4. 
Set forth the street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
5. 
State the place, date and time that comments are due;
6. 
State that copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for review, and that copies can be obtained at cost;
7. 
Include the name and phone number of a City contact person; and
8. 
Briefly summarize the local decision making process.
C. 
For purposes of appeal, subsection A, above, shall be deemed met when the City can provide an affidavit or other certification that such notice was given. The mailing list shall be obtained by the City from the current County Assessor's records.
D. 
Except where a land use application would allow a structure less than 35 feet in height and the property is located outside of the runway "approach surface" as defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation, the City Recorder, or designee, shall provide notice of a public hearing on a land use application to the owner of an airport defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation as a "public use airport" in accordance with ORS 227.175(6).
E. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall provide notice to the Oregon Department of Aviation consistent with ORS 197.183 when the land use application, if approved, would result in a water impoundment larger than one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet) within 10,000 feet of an airport identified in ORS 836.610(1).
F. 
Where a railroad-highway crossing provides or will provide the only access to land that is the subject of an application, the City Recorder, or designee, shall provide notice to the Oregon Department of Transportation, Rail Division, and the railroad company consistent with ORS 197.794.
G. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to transportation agencies, including the Oregon Department of Transportation, when the land use application, if approved, may impact facilities or services under their jurisdiction.
H. 
Criteria and Decision. The Planning Commission shall consider the application materials, staff report, and written comments provided in the 14-day comment period. No testimony or additional evidence may be provided during the public meeting except for testimony or additional evidence provided by the applicant at the request of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may attach conditions in granting an approval if the Planning Commission determines the conditions are necessary for the approval criteria to be met, or to mitigate detrimental effects to others. The Planning Commission shall pass an oral motion directing staff to prepare a Planning Commission order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The order shall include findings addressing the relevant criteria of the Development Code. The Planning Commission Chair or Vice-Chair shall sign the order.
I. 
Notice of Decision. The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a copy of the Type II-A decision to the applicant, and a notice of the decision shall be mailed to the applicant, to parties who submitted comments in writing during the 14-day comment period, to parties that requested such notice, and, in accordance with ORS 227.175(10)(a)(A), to any person who submits a letter to the City Recorder that was received by the City Recorder before the notice of the decision was mailed stating they are adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision and the reasons therefor.
J. 
Notice of Decision Contents. The notice of the decision shall:
1. 
Explain the nature of the application and the proposed use or uses which could be authorized;
2. 
Set forth the street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
3. 
Include the name and telephone number of a City contact person;
4. 
State that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost;
5. 
State that any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved or who receives this written notice may appeal the decision to the City Council;
6. 
State that a 12-day appeal period is provided and any appeal shall be in writing and shall be received by the City recorder within the 12-day appeal period;
7. 
State that the decision will not become effective until the period for filing an appeal has expired; and
8. 
State that a person who is mailed written notice of the decision cannot appeal the decision directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals under ORS 197.830 to 197.845.
K. 
Appeals. The Type II-A decision may be appealed to the City Council by a party that received a notice of the decision, or by any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision, by submitting a written appeal to the City Recorder within 12 days of the day the written notice of decision was mailed beginning with the day after the notice is mailed. If no appeal is filed within the 12-day appeal period, the decision becomes effective on the 13th day.
L. 
Where the Planning Commission decision is appealed, the effective date is stayed until the final determination on the appeal is rendered.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.040 Type II-B procedures.

Type II-B actions are decided by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission holds a public hearing pursuant to this chapter before the decision is made.
A. 
Notice Area. The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a public notice of the hearing to the applicant and owners of all property within 100 feet of the subject property at least 20 days before the evidentiary hearing. Notice and request for comment shall also be provided to any agencies impacted by the decision which may include the City of Jefferson Public Works Department, the Jefferson Fire District, and the Jefferson School District.
B. 
Notice Contents. The mailed notice shall:
1. 
Explain the nature of the application and the proposed use or uses which could be authorized;
2. 
List the applicable criteria that apply to the application at issue;
3. 
Set forth the street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
4. 
State the date, time and location of the hearing;
5. 
State that failure of an issue to be raised in a hearing, in person or by letter, or failure to provide statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue;
6. 
Include the name and phone number of a City contact person;
7. 
State that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost;
8. 
State that a copy of the staff report will be available for inspection at no cost at least seven days prior to the hearing and will be provided at reasonable cost;
9. 
Include a general explanation of the requirements for submission of testimony and the procedure for conduct of hearings;
10. 
State that all documents or evidence relied upon by the applicant is available to the public; and
11. 
State that prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any participant may request an opportunity to present additional evidence, arguments or testimony regarding the application.
C. 
For purposes of appeal, subsection A, above, shall be deemed met when the City can provide an affidavit or other certification that such notice was given. The mailing list shall be obtained by the City from the current County Assessor's records.
D. 
Except where a land use application would allow a structure less than 35 feet in height and the property is located outside of the runway "approach surface" as defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation, the City Recorder, or designee, shall provide notice of a public hearing on a land use application to the owner of an airport defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation as a "public use airport" in accordance with ORS 227.175(6).
E. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall provide notice to the Oregon Department of Aviation consistent with ORS 197.183 when the land use application, if approved, would result in a water impoundment larger than one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet) within 10,000 feet of an airport identified in ORS 836.610(1).
F. 
Where a railroad-highway crossing provides or will provide the only access to land that is the subject of an application, the City Recorder, or designee, shall provide notice to the Oregon Department of Transportation, Rail Division, and the railroad company consistent with ORS 197.794.
G. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to transportation agencies, including the Oregon Department of Transportation, when the land use application, if approved, may impact facilities or services under their jurisdiction.
H. 
Hearing and Decision. At the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall consider the application materials and staff report, and the applicant and interested persons may present testimony relevant to the criteria and standards pertinent to the proposal, giving reasons why the application should or should not be approved or proposing modifications that are necessary for approval. The Planning Commission may attach conditions in granting an approval if the Planning Commission determines the conditions are necessary for the approval criteria to be met, or to mitigate detrimental effects to others. The Planning Commission shall pass an oral motion directing staff to prepare a Planning Commission order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application. The order shall include findings addressing the relevant criteria of the Development Code. The Planning Commission Chair or Vice-Chair shall sign the order.
I. 
Notice of Decision. The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a copy of the Type II-B decision to the applicant, and a notice of the decision shall be mailed to the applicant, to parties who participated orally or in writing at the public hearing, to parties that requested such notice, and, in accordance with ORS 227.175(10)(a)(A), to any person who submits a letter to the City Recorder that was received by the City Recorder before the notice of the decision was mailed stating they are adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision and the reasons therefor.
J. 
Notice of Decision Contents. The notice of the decision shall:
1. 
Explain the nature of the application and the proposed use or uses which could be authorized;
2. 
Set forth the street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
3. 
Include the name and telephone number of a City contact person;
4. 
State that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost;
5. 
State that any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved or who receives this written notice may appeal the decision to the City Council;
6. 
State that a 12-day appeal period is provided and any appeal shall be in writing and shall be received by the City recorder within the 12-day appeal period, the appeals period may be extended beyond 12 days for applications involving relocation or demolition of historic resources;
7. 
State that the decision will not become effective until the period for filing an appeal has expired; and
8. 
State that a person who is mailed written notice of the decision cannot appeal the decision directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals under ORS 197.830 to 197.845.
K. 
Appeals. The Type II-B decision may be appealed to the City Council by a party that received a notice of the decision, or by any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision, by submitting a written appeal to the City Recorder within 12 days of the day the written notice of decision was mailed beginning with the day after the notice is mailed. If no appeal is filed within the 12-day appeal period, the decision becomes effective on the 13th day. The appeals period may be extended beyond 12 days for applications involving relocation or demolition of historic resources.
L. 
Where the Planning Commission decision is appealed, the effective date is stayed until the final determination on the appeal is rendered.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.050 Type III procedures.

Type III actions are quasi-judicial and are decided by the City Council. The Planning Commission holds a public hearing pursuant to this chapter and then makes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council holds a public hearing pursuant to this chapter before the decision is made.
A. 
Notice Area. The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a public notice for each of the Planning Commission and City Council hearings to the applicant and owners of all property within 100 feet of the subject property at least 10 days before the Planning Commission hearing and 20 days before the City Council hearing. Notice and request for comment shall also be provided to any agencies impacted by the decision which may include the City of Jefferson Public Works Department, the Jefferson Fire District, and the Jefferson School District.
1. 
In the case that a property is subject to a Type III application but is outside the Jefferson Urban Growth Boundary, then the City Recorder or designee shall instead mail a public notice for each of the Planning Commission and City council hearings to the owners of all property owners within the shortest applicable radius identified below. All other notice requirements of subsection A above shall apply.
a. 
Within 500 feet of the subject property for properties with an exclusive farm or forest zoning designation; or
b. 
Within 250 feet of the subject property for all other properties outside of the Jefferson Urban Growth Boundary.
B. 
Notice Contents. The mailed notice shall:
1. 
Explain the nature of the application and the proposed use or uses which could be authorized;
2. 
List the applicable criteria that apply to the application at issue;
3. 
Set forth the street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
4. 
State the date, time and location of the hearing;
5. 
State that failure of an issue to be raised in a hearing, in person or by letter, or failure to provide statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue;
6. 
Include the name of a City representative to contact and the telephone number where additional information may be obtained;
7. 
State that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost;
8. 
State that a copy of the staff report will be available for inspection at no cost at least seven days prior to the hearing and will be provided at reasonable cost;
9. 
Include a general explanation of the requirements for submission of testimony and the procedure for conduct of hearings;
10. 
State that all documents or evidence relied upon by the applicant is available to the public; and
11. 
State that prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any participant may request an opportunity to present additional evidence, arguments or testimony regarding the application.
C. 
For purposes of appeal, subsection A, above, shall be deemed met when the City can provide an affidavit or other certification that such notice was given. The mailing list shall be obtained by the City from the current County Assessor's records.
D. 
For a rezoning of a manufactured home park or mobilehome park, the City Recorder, or designee, shall give written notice by first class mail to each existing mailing address for tenants of the manufactured home park or mobilehome park, as provided by the applicant, at least 20 days, but not more than 40 days before the date of the first hearing on the application consistent with ORS 227.175(8).
E. 
Where State statute for a proceeding, including, but not limited to, a right-of-way vacation or annexation, requires newspaper notice, the City Recorder, or designee, shall provide newspaper notice consistent with State Statute in addition to any required notice set forth in Section 12.72.050.
F. 
Except where a land use application would allow a structure less than 35 feet in height and the property is located outside of the runway "approach surface" as defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation, the City Recorder, or designee, shall provide notice of a public hearing on a land use application to the owner of an airport defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation as a "public use airport" in accordance with ORS 227.175(6).
G. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall provide notice to the Oregon Department of Aviation consistent with ORS 197.183 when the land use application, if approved, would result in a water impoundment larger than one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet) within 10,000 feet of an airport identified in ORS 836.610(1).
H. 
If a railroad-highway crossing provides or will provide the only access to land that is the subject of an application, the City Recorder, or designee, shall provide notice to the Oregon Department of Transportation, Rail Division, and the railroad company consistent with ORS 197.794.
I. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to transportation agencies, including the Oregon Department of Transportation, when the land use application, if approved, may impact facilities or services under their jurisdiction.
J. 
Planning Commission Hearing. At the public hearing, conducted in accordance with ORS 197.797, the Planning Commission shall consider the staff report, and the applicant and interested persons may present testimony relevant to the criteria and standards pertinent to the proposal, giving reasons why the application should or should not be approved or proposing modifications they believe are necessary for approval. The Planning Commission shall pass an oral motion directing staff to prepare a Planning Commission order recommending approval, approval with conditions or denial of the application. The order shall include findings addressing the relevant criteria of the Development Code. The Planning Commission Chair or Vice-Chair shall sign the order. The Planning Commission recommendation shall be included in the staff report to the City Council. The Planning Commission order may be provided, but is not required to be provided, to the applicant and those parties who participated orally or in writing at the public hearing.
K. 
The City Council shall conduct a public hearing within 60 days of the signing of the Planning Commission order.
L. 
City Council Hearing. At the public hearing, conducted in accordance with ORS 197.797, the City Council shall consider the staff report, and the applicant and interested persons may present testimony relevant to the criteria and standards pertinent to the proposal, giving reasons why the application should or should not be approved or proposing modifications they believe are necessary for approval. The City Council shall adopt findings addressing the relevant criteria of the Development Code and in doing so may adopt findings different than the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council may delete, add, or modify any of the provisions pertaining to the application, or attach conditions in granting an approval if the City Council determines the conditions are necessary for the approval criteria to be met or to mitigate detrimental effects.
M. 
Type III decisions shall be by passage of a resolution, or an ordinance for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan text or map or to the Development Code text.
N. 
Notice of Decision. The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a copy of a Type III decision to the applicant, and a notice of the decision shall be mailed to the applicant, to parties who participated orally or in writing at the public hearing, to parties that requested such notice in writing, and, in accordance with ORS 227.175(10)(a)(A), to any person who submits a letter to the City Recorder that was received by the City Recorder before the notice of the decision was mailed stating they are adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision and the reasons therefor.
O. 
Notice of Decision Contents. The notice of decision shall:
1. 
Explain the nature of the application and the proposed use or uses which could be authorized;
2. 
Set forth the street address or other easily understood geographical reference to the subject property;
3. 
Include the name and telephone number of a City contact person;
4. 
State that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost;
5. 
State that the decision may be appealed to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals;
6. 
State that a notice of intent to appeal the decision to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals shall be filed consistent with ORS 197.830 to 197.845 not later than 21 days after the decision becomes final; and
7. 
State that the decision will not become effective until the period for filing a notice of intent to appeal has expired, provided no intent to appeal was filed.
P. 
The City Council's decision is final when the resolution or ordinance is signed, and for a resolution it is effective on the day after the period for filing a notice of intent to appeal to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals has expired, provided an intent to appeal was not timely filed.
Q. 
The City Council's decision may be appealed in accordance with ORS 197.830 to 197.845.
R. 
Where the City Council decision is appealed, the effective date is stayed until the final determination on the appeal is rendered.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.055 Type IV procedures.

Type IV actions are legislative and are decided by the City Council. The Planning Commission holds a public hearing pursuant to this chapter and then makes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council holds a public hearing pursuant to this chapter before the decision is made.
A. 
Nothing in this Code shall limit the authority of the City Council to make changes in the Comprehensive Plan or Development Code provisions and designations where such changes are legislative actions. The Planning Commission and City Council shall each hold a public hearing on any legislative matter.
B. 
Public Notice. The City Recorder, or designee, shall cause a public notice to be published in a newspaper of general circulation for the Planning Commission hearing and the City Council hearing at least 20 days before each hearing. The City Recorder, or designee, shall provide a copy of the newspaper notice for each of the Planning Commission and City Council hearings to the applicant at the time the notice is provided to the newspaper. Notice and request for comment shall also be provided to any agencies impacted by the decision which may include the City of Jefferson Public Works Department, the Jefferson Fire District, and the Jefferson School District.
1. 
The newspaper notice shall:
a. 
Explain the nature of the application;
b. 
List the applicable criteria that apply to the application;
c. 
Set forth a general geographical reference to the area affected;
d. 
State the date, time and location of the hearing;
e. 
Include the name and telephone number of a City representative; and
f. 
State that a copy of the staff report will be available for inspection at no cost at least seven days prior to the hearing and will be provided at reasonable cost.
2. 
Except where a legislative application would allow a structure less than 35 feet in height and the property is located outside of the runway "approach surface" as defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation, the City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a copy of the newspaper notice on a legislative application to the owner of an airport defined by the Oregon Department of Aviation as a "public use airport" in accordance with ORS 227.175(6).
3. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a copy of the newspaper notice on a legislative application to the Oregon Department of Aviation consistent with ORS 197.183 when the application, if approved, would result in a water impoundment larger than one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet) within 10,000 feet of an airport identified in ORS 836.610(1).
4. 
If a railroad-highway crossing provides or will provide the only access to land that is the subject of an application, the City Recorder, or designee, shall mail a copy of the newspaper notice on a legislative application to the Oregon Department of Transportation, Rail Division, and the railroad company consistent with ORS 197.794.
5. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall mail notice to transportation agencies, including the Oregon Department of Transportation, when the land use application, if approved, may impact facilities or services under their jurisdiction.
6. 
For purposes of appeal, this subsection B shall be deemed met when the City can provide an affidavit or other certification that such notice was given.
C. 
Planning Commission Hearing. At the public hearing, conducted in accordance with ORS 197.797, the Planning Commission shall consider the staff report, and the applicant and interested persons may present testimony relevant to the criteria and standards pertinent to the proposal, giving reasons why the application should or should not be approved or proposing modifications they believe are necessary for approval. The Planning Commission shall pass an oral motion directing staff to prepare a Planning Commission order recommending approval, approval with modifications or denial of the application. The order shall include findings addressing the relevant criteria of the Development Code, applicable Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies and the applicable Statewide Planning Goals. The Planning Commission Chair or Vice-Chair shall sign the order. The Planning Commission recommendation shall be included in the staff report to the City Council. The Planning Commission order may be provided, but is not required to be provided, to the applicant and those parties who participated orally or in writing at the public hearing.
D. 
City Council Hearing. At the public hearing, conducted in accordance with ORS 197.797, the City Council shall consider the staff report, and the applicant and interested persons may present testimony relevant to the criteria and standards pertinent to the proposal, giving reasons why the application should or should not be approved or proposing modifications they believe are necessary for approval. The City Council shall adopt findings addressing the relevant criteria of the Development Code, applicable Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies and the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, and in doing so may adopt findings different than the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council may delete, add, or modify any of the provisions pertaining to the application, or make modifications in granting an approval if the City Council determines the modifications are necessary for the approval criteria, Comprehensive Plan policies or goals, or the Statewide Planning Goals to be met, or to mitigate detrimental effects.
E. 
Consistent with ORS 227.186(2) a decision to approve a legislative application shall be by passage of an ordinance for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan text or map, or to the Development Code text or zoning districts.
F. 
The City Recorder, or designee, shall:
1. 
Provide a copy of the adopted decision to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) using the Department's Form.
2. 
On the same day that the decision and findings are mailed or delivered to DLCD, the local government shall mail or otherwise submit notice to persons who:
a. 
Participated in the proceedings leading to the adoption of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or land use regulation or the new land use regulation; or
b. 
Requested of the local government in writing that they be given such notice.
3. 
The notice shall:
a. 
Briefly describe the action taken by the local government;
b. 
State the date of the decision;
c. 
If delivered by mail, include a certificate of mailing containing a statement signed by the person mailing it indicating the date the notice was deposited in the mail;
d. 
List the place where and the time when the amendment to the acknowledged Comprehensive Plan or land use regulation or the new land use regulation, and findings, may be reviewed; and
e. 
Explain the requirements for appealing the action of the local government under ORS 197.830 to 197.845.
G. 
The City Council's decision approving the application is final when the ordinance is signed, or where the application is denied, when the resolution is signed.
H. 
The City Council's decision approving a legislative amendment may be appealed in accordance with ORS 197.830 to 197.845.
I. 
Consistent with ORS 197.620(1) a decision to not adopt a legislative amendment or a new land use regulation is not appealable, except where the amendment is necessary to address the requirements of a new or amended State Planning Goal, Oregon Administrative Rule or State Statute. Because a decision to deny a legislative application cannot, generally, be appealed, no ordinance or resolution must be passed, however, a resolution would provide better documentation compared to the meeting minutes.
J. 
Where the City Council decision is appealed, the effective date is stayed until the final determination on the appeal is rendered.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.060 Type of procedure by application.

Applications submitted to the City shall be processed according to the procedure listed below.
A. 
The following changes or activities do not require any application to the City or review:
1. 
Change in Owner. Change in owner, tenant, or occupant without change in use;
2. 
Change in Use Within a Category of Use. Change in use within a category of use as listed in the relevant section of the Development Code; and
3. 
Child Day Care. Operation of a group child day care home as defined by ORS 418.805 or a residential home as defined by ORS 443.400 that does not require a building permit.
B. 
Ministerial Zoning Review. This procedure shall be used to process the following applications:
1. 
Construction or alteration of a conforming low density residential structure;
2. 
Construction or alteration of conforming accessory structures to permitted residential uses;
3. 
Building permit review of a use or structure permitted by site plan review, conditional use permit, or nonconforming use permit;
4. 
Sign permit;
5. 
Land Use Compatibility Statement or Letter of Zoning Confirmation; and
6. 
Final plat review.
C. 
Type I-A. This procedure shall be used to process the following applications:
1. 
Change of Use. Change of use of an existing building from one category of use to a different category of use permitted by right in the underlying zone;
2. 
Minor Site Plan Review;
3. 
Minor Floodplain Development Permit; and
4. 
Mandatory Adjustment as identified in State statute.
D. 
Type I-B. This procedure shall be used to process the following applications:
1. 
Major Site Plan Review;
2. 
Minor Variance;
3. 
Partitions;
4. 
Time extension for land use approval per Section 12.72.023 or for restoration of a nonconformity allowed in Section 12.92.030D;
5. 
Major Floodplain Development Permit;
6. 
Property Line Adjustment;
7. 
Middle Housing Land Division;
8. 
Nonconforming Use Permit. Permits for development on nonconforming lots, expansion or alteration to a nonconforming use, or expansion or alteration of nonconforming structures; and
9. 
Modification of Type I-A, Type I-B, or Type I-C decision.
E. 
Type I-C. This procedure shall be used to process the following applications:
1. 
Expedited Partition when requested by an applicant; and,
2. 
Expedited Middle Housing Land Division when requested by an applicant.
F. 
Type II-A. This procedure shall be used to process the following applications:
1. 
Subdivisions.
G. 
Type II-B. This procedure shall be used to process the following applications:
1. 
Conditional use permits;
2. 
Modification of Type II-A or Type II-B decision;
3. 
Major Variances;
4. 
Interpretation of the Comprehensive Plan or Development Code;
5. 
Appeal of a Type I-A staff decision; and
6. 
Historic Resource Applications listed in Chapter 12.90.
H. 
Type III. This procedure shall be used to process the following quasi-judicial applications:
1. 
Annexations;
2. 
Zone map change;
3. 
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Map designations; and
4. 
Vacations of rights-of-way.
I. 
Type IV. This procedure shall be used to process the following legislative applications:
1. 
Annexation;
2. 
Development Code text amendment;
3. 
Zone map change; and
4. 
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan text or the Comprehensive Plan Map designations.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.070 Responsibility for hearings.

The City Recorder, or designee, shall carry out the following duties pertaining to a hearing in accordance with other provisions of the Development Code and the following:
A. 
Schedule and assign the matter for review and hearing;
B. 
Conduct the correspondence of the hearing body;
C. 
Mail and cause to be published required notices of public hearings consistent with the requirements of Chapter 12.72; and
D. 
Provide notice of all hearings and written decisions to persons requesting the same and who are not entitled to such by this chapter, provided the request is in writing and is received by the City Recorder, and that such persons pay the actual cost for the service provided as established by the City (applicants excepted).
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.080 Planning Commission's responsibility for hearing.

City staff shall carry out the following duties pertaining to a hearing before the Planning Commission:
A. 
Record the meetings by tape recording, electronic or digital means and retain the recordings in accordance with applicable State statutes;
B. 
Prepare written meeting minutes to include postponements, continuances, decisions on the matters heard and a summary of the reasons given for the decision.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.100 Availability of documents and additional evidence.

A. 
All documents or evidence relied upon by the applicant shall be submitted to the City and the City shall make them available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost.
B. 
A land use decision staff report shall be available at least seven days prior to the meeting for a Type II-A action or hearing for a Type II-B, Type III, or Type IV action.
C. 
If additional documents or evidence are provided by any party, the City may allow a continuance or leave the record open to allow the parties a reasonable opportunity to respond. Any continuance or extension of the record requested by an applicant shall result in a corresponding extension of the time limitation commonly known as the "120-day Rule" set forth in ORS 227.178 and ORS 227.179.
D. 
Prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any participant may request an opportunity to present additional information regarding the application. The City shall grant such request as determined by the hearing body by continuing the public hearing or leaving the record open for additional written information.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.110 Procedure for mailed notice.

A. 
In addition to persons receiving notice as required by the matter under consideration, the City Recorder or designee, may provide notice to others believed to be affected, or otherwise represent an interest that may be affected by the proposed development.
B. 
Cost of notice mailings shall be included in the development application fee.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.120 Challenges to impartiality.

Except for legislative hearings, a party to a hearing may challenge the qualifications of a member of the hearing body to participate in the hearing and decision regarding the matter. The challenge shall state by affidavit the facts relied upon by the challenger relating to a person's bias, prejudgment, personal interest, or other facts from which the challenger has concluded that the member of the hearing body cannot participate in an impartial manner. A challenge shall be delivered by personal service to the City Recorder not less than 48 hours preceding the time set for public hearing. The City Recorder shall attempt to notify the person whose qualifications are challenged prior to the meeting. The challenge shall be incorporated into the record at the time of hearing. The challenge shall be decided by the hearing body.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.130 Disqualification.

No member of a hearing body shall participate in their official capacity as a Planning Commissioner or City Councilor in the public hearing phase or the deliberation phase of the decision-making process and shall not vote on the proposal when any of the following conditions exist:
A. 
A violation of the Oregon Revised Statutes or Oregon Administrative Rules regarding a conflict of interest exists;
B. 
If a quorum of a hearing body abstains or is disqualified, all members present after stating their reasons for abstention or disqualification shall, by so doing, be requalified and proceed to resolve the issues;
C. 
Except for legislative hearings, any members absent during the presentation of evidence in a hearing may not participate in the deliberations or final decision regarding the matter of the hearing unless the member has reviewed the evidence received and so states on the record.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.140 Burden and nature of proof.

The burden of proof is upon the applicant. The more significant the change or the greater the impact of the proposal, the greater is the burden upon the applicant. The proposal must be supported by proof that it conforms to the approval criteria listed in the Development Code, Comprehensive Plan or Statewide Planning Goals, as applicable.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.145 Written comments.

Interested persons may submit written recommendations and comments in advance of a hearing or during a designated written comment period and this information shall be available for public inspection. At a hearing, written recommendations and other information will be received and oral statements will be permitted.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.150 Order of proceeding.

The order of proceedings for a hearing will depend, in part, on the nature of the hearing. The following shall be supplemented by administrative procedures as appropriate:
A. 
Statement of Law. At the commencement of the hearing, a statement must be made by the chairperson which:
1. 
Lists the applicable approval criteria;
2. 
States that testimony must be directed towards those criteria;
3. 
States that testimony must be raised with sufficient specificity.
B. 
Before receiving information on the issue, the following shall be determined:
1. 
Any objections on jurisdictional grounds shall be noted in the record and if there are objections, the person presiding has the discretion to proceed or terminate;
2. 
Any abstentions or disqualifications shall be determined.
C. 
The person presiding at the hearing may take official notice of known information related to the issued, such as the following:
1. 
Provisions of the City Charter or State law, or of an ordinance, resolution or rule, or an officially promulgated policy of the City;
2. 
Other public records and facts judicially noticeable by law.
D. 
Matters officially noticed need not be established by evidence and may be considered by the hearing body in the determination of the matters. Parties requesting notice shall do so on the record; provided, that the hearing body may take notice of matters listed in subsection B of this section if stated for the record. Any matter given official notice may be rebutted.
E. 
The hearing body may view the area in dispute with or without notification to the parties, but shall place the time, manner and circumstances of such view in the record.
F. 
Information shall be received from the staff and from proponents and opponents. The presiding officer may approve or deny a request to ask a question from a person attending the hearing. Unless the presiding officer specifies otherwise, if the request to ask a question is approved, the presiding officer will direct the question to the person submitting testimony.
G. 
When the hearing has ended, the hearing body shall openly discuss the issue and may further question a person submitting information or the staff if opportunity for rebuttal is provided.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.170 Findings.

The hearing body shall adopt findings based upon the applicant's report, staff report and/or testimony presented at the hearing. The staff report and findings shall include:
A. 
A statement of the applicable criteria and standards of the Development Code against which the proposal was tested, and what is required to achieve compliance with the criteria and standards;
B. 
A statement of the facts establishing compliance or noncompliance with each applicable criteria and assurance of compliance with applicable standards;
C. 
The reasons for a conclusion to approve or deny;
D. 
The decision or recommendation to deny or approve the proposed change with or without conditions.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.180 Record of proceedings.

When possible, the secretary to the hearing body will be present at each hearing and shall cause the proceedings to be recorded. Should it not be possible for the secretary to be present, proceedings will be recorded electronically and minutes will be taken from the tape.
A. 
Testimony shall be transcribed at the cost of the requesting party if required for judicial review.
B. 
The hearing body shall, where practicable, retain as part of the hearing record each item of physical or documentary evidence presented and shall have the items marked to show the identity of the person offering the same and whether presented on behalf of a proponent or opponent. Exhibits received into evidence shall be retained in the hearing file until after all appeal periods have expired, at which time the exhibits may be released to the person identified thereon or otherwise disposed of.
C. 
The staff report and decision shall be included in the record.
D. 
A person shall have access to the record of the proceedings at reasonable times, places and circumstances. A person shall be entitled to make copies of the record at the person's own expense.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.190 Appeals.

A. 
A Type I-A decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission by the applicant by filing a notice of appeal within 12 days of the decision. The notice of appeal shall indicate the decision that is being appealed.
B. 
An administrative staff decision (Type I-B decision) may be appealed to the Planning Commission by an affected party by filing a notice of appeal within 12 days of the decision. The notice of appeal shall indicate the decision that is being appealed.
C. 
A decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by an affected party by filing a notice of appeal within 12 days of the decision. The notice of appeal shall indicate the decision that is being appealed.
D. 
An applicant or appellant shall be required to raise any issue before the Planning Commission or the City Council with sufficient specificity so as to have afforded the commission or council, and the applicant if appropriate, an adequate opportunity to respond to and resolve each issue.
E. 
At its discretion, the Planning Commission or City Council may limit an appeal or review to a review of the record and a hearing for receipt of oral arguments regarding the record, or may accept new evidence and testimony. If new evidence is to be received, a hearing shall be conducted pursuant to this chapter after notice has been provided to the affected parties.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.210 Requirements of notice of appeal.

A notice of appeal shall be made on a form provided by the City and shall contain:
A. 
An identification of the decision sought to be reviewed, including the date of the decision;
B. 
A statement of the interest of the person seeking review and that they were a party to the initial proceedings;
C. 
The specific grounds relied upon for review;
D. 
If de novo review or review by additional testimony and other evidence is requested, a statement relating the request to the factors listed below.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.220 Scope of review.

The reviewing body shall in all appeal cases consider the record of the decision being appealed and shall provide that a hearing will be conducted to afford interested parties an opportunity to be heard.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.230 Review of the record.

A. 
Unless otherwise provided for by the reviewing body, review of the decision on appeal shall be confined to the record of the proceeding as specified in this section. The record shall include:
1. 
A factual report prepared by the City Recorder;
2. 
All exhibits, materials, pleadings, memoranda, stipulations and motions submitted by any party and received or considered in reaching the decision under review;
3. 
The minutes of the hearing including a detailed summary of the evidence.
B. 
The reviewing body shall make its decision based upon the record after first granting the right of argument, but not the introduction of additional evidence to any party who has filed a notice of appeal.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.240 Review consisting of additional evidence or de novo review.

A. 
The reviewing body may hear the entire matter de novo; or it may admit additional testimony and other evidence without holding a de novo hearing if it is satisfied that the additional testimony or other evidence could not reasonably have been presented at the prior hearing. The reviewing body shall consider all of the following in making such a decision:
1. 
Prejudice to the parties;
2. 
Convenience or availability of evidence at the time of the initial hearing;
3. 
Surprise to opposing parties;
4. 
The competency, relevancy and materiality of the proposed testimony or other evidence.
B. 
"De novo hearing" shall mean a hearing by the review body as if the action had not been previously heard and as if no decision had been rendered, except that all testimony of the previous consideration shall be included in the record of the review.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)

§ 12.72.250 Decision of the reviewing body.

A. 
Upon review, the reviewing body may affirm, reverse or modify in whole or part a determination or requirement of the decision that is under review. When the reviewing body modifies or renders a decision that reverses a decision of the hearing body, the review body shall set forth its findings and state its reasons for taking the action.
B. 
When the reviewing body elects to remand the matter back to the hearing body for such further consideration as the reviewing body deems necessary, it shall include a statement explaining the error found to have materially affected the outcome of the original decision and the action necessary to rectify such.
C. 
Action by the reviewing body shall be decided by a majority vote of its members present at the meeting at which review was made and shall be taken either at that or any subsequent meeting. The reviewing body shall render its decision no later than 90 days after the filing of the request for review.
(Ord. 738, 2/12/2026)