Alternative tower structure means manmade trees, clock or water towers, bell steeples, light poles, buildings, utility poles, farm silos, or similar alternative design mounting structures that conceal where technically feasible the presence of wireless communication facilities ("WCFs") to make them architecturally compatible with the surrounding area pursuant to this chapter. A stand-alone pole in the right-of-way that accommodates small cell facilities is considered an alternative tower structure provided it meets the concealment standards of this chapter. Alternative tower structures are not considered towers, for the purposes of this chapter.

Antenna means any device used to transmit and/or receive radio or electromagnetic waves such as, but not limited to panel antennas, reflecting discs, microwave dishes, whip antennas, directional and non-directional antennas consisting of one or more elements, multiple antenna configurations, or other similar devices and configurations.

Antennas, panel means an array of antennas, rectangular in shape and omni-directional.

Antenna, whip means a single antenna that is cylindrical in shape and omni-directional.

Base station means a structure or equipment at a fixed location that enables Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") licensed or authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a communications network. The definition of base station does not include or encompass a tower as defined herein or any equipment associated with a tower. Base station includes, without limitation:

(1)

Equipment associated with wireless communications services such as private broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul that, at the time the relevant application is filed with the city pursuant to this chapter has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, or under another state or local regulatory review process, even if the structure was not built for the sole or primary purpose of providing such support; and

(2)

Radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplied, and comparable equipment, regardless of technological configuration (including distributed antenna systems and small-cell networks) that, at the time the relevant application is filed with the city pursuant to title 18 of the Code has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, or under another state or local regulatory review process, even if the structure was not built for the sole or primary purpose of providing such support.

The definition of base station does not include any structure that, at the time the application is filed with the city under this chapter, does not support or house equipment described herein in subparagraphs (1) and (2) of this definition.

Camouflage or camouflage design techniques means measures used in the design and siting of WCFs with the intent to minimize or eliminate the visual impact of such facilities to surrounding uses. A WCF site utilizes camouflage design techniques when it (i) is attached and partially concealed on an existing structure such as a building rooftop, or (ii) is attached to an outdoor fixture such as a ballfield backstop or the outside of a flagpole, while still appearing to some extent as a WCF. This definition does not include the use of concealment design elements so that a facility looks like something other than a wireless tower or base station.

Collocation means:

A.

For the purposes of eligible facilities requests, means the mounting or installation of transmission equipment on an eligible support structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communications purposes.

B.

For the purposes of facilities that are not eligible facilities requests and are subject to shot clocks promulgated by the FCC under 47 U.S.C. Sec. 332, means attachment of facilities to existing structures, regardless of whether the structure or location has previously been zoned for wireless facilities.

Concealment means the utilization of elements of stealth design in a facility so that the facility looks like something other than a tower or base station. Language such as "stealth," "camouflage," or similar in any permit or other document required by the City Code is included in this definition to the extent such permit or other document reflects an intent at the time of approval to condition the site's approval on a design that looks like something else. Concealment can further include a design which mimics and is consistent with the nearby natural, or architectural features (such as an artificial tree), or is incorporated into (including without limitation, being attached to the exterior of such facility and painted to match it) or replaces existing permitted facilities (including without limitation, stop signs or other traffic signs or freestanding light standards) so that the presence of the WCF is not apparent. This definition does not include conditions that merely minimize visual impact but do not incorporate concealment design elements so that the facility looks like something other than a wireless tower or base station.

Director means the city's planner or such person as designated by the city manager.

Eligible facilities request means any request for modification of an existing tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station involving: (i) collocation of new transmission equipment, (ii) removal of transmission equipment, or (iii) replacement of transmission equipment. A request for modification of an existing tower or base station that does not comply with the generally applicable building, structural, electrical, and safety codes or with other laws codifying objective standards reasonably related to health and safety, or does not comply with any relevant federal requirements, is not an eligible facilities request.

Eligible support structure means any tower or base station as defined in this section, provided that it is existing at the time the relevant application is filed with the city under this chapter.

Equipment cabinet means cabinet or building used to house equipment used by telecommunication providers at a WCF. This definition does not include relatively small electronic components, such as remote radio units, radio transceivers, amplifiers, or other devices mounted behind antennas, if they are not used as physical containers for smaller, distinct devices.

Existing means a constructed tower or base station that was reviewed, approved, and lawfully constructed in accordance with all requirements of applicable law as of the time of an eligible facilities request, provided that a tower that exists as a legal, nonconforming use and was lawfully constructed is existing for purposes of this definition.

OTARD means over-the-air reception device.

OTARD antenna means (i) an antenna that is designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service, including direct-to-home satellite services, that is one meter or less in diameter; or (ii) an antenna that is designed to receive video programming services via multipoint distribution services, including multichannel multipoint distribution services, instruction television fixed services, and local multipoint distribution services, and that is one meter or less in diameter or diagonal measurement; or (iii) an antenna that is designed to receive television broadcast signals.

OTARD antenna structure means any pole, tower, or other structure designed and intended to support an OTARD antenna.

Related accessory equipment means the transmission equipment customarily used with, and incidental to WCF antennas, including by way of example, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supply and remote radio units.

Right-of-way, as used within this chapter, means any public street or road that is dedicated to public use for vehicular traffic except for those rights-of-way owned by the Colorado Department of Transportation within city limits.

Site, in the context of this chapter for towers and eligible support structures, means the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the tower or eligible support structure and any access or utility easements currently related to the site. For alternative tower structures, base stations and small cell facilities in the right-of-way, a site is further restricted to that area comprising the base of the structure and to other related accessory equipment already installed on the ground.

Small cell facility means a WCF where each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than three cubic feet in volume or, in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements, the antenna and all of its exposed elements could fit within an imaginary enclosure of no more than three cubic feet; and primary equipment enclosures are no larger than 17 cubic feet in volume. The following associated equipment may be located outside of the primary equipment enclosure and, if so located, is not included in the calculation of equipment volume: Electric meter, concealment, telecommunications demarcation box, ground-based enclosure, back-up power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switch and cut-off switch.

Substantial change means a modification that substantially changes the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure, if after the modification, the structure meets any of the following criteria:

(1)

For towers other than alternative tower structures, it increases the height of the tower by more than ten percent or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed 20 feet, whichever is greater, as measured from the top of an existing antenna to the bottom of a proposed new antenna; for other eligible support structures, it increases the height of the structure by more than ten percent or more than ten feet, whichever is greater, as measured from the top of an existing antenna to the bottom of a proposed new antenna;

(2)

For towers, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than 20 feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater; for eligible support structures, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure by more than six feet;

(3)

For any eligible support structure, it involves installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, as determined on a case-by-case basis based on the location of the eligible support structure but not to exceed four cabinets per application; or for base stations, it involves installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if there are no pre-existing ground cabinets associated with the structure, or else involves installation of ground cabinets that are more than ten percent larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets associated with the structure;

(4)

For any eligible support structure, it entails any excavation or deployment outside the current site;

(5)

For any eligible support structure, it would defeat the concealment elements of the eligible support structure by causing a reasonable person to view the structure's intended stealth design as no longer effective;

(6)

For any eligible support structure, it does not comply with record evidence of conditions associated with the siting approval of the construction or modification of the eligible support structure or base station equipment, unless the noncompliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width, addition of cabinets, or new excavation that would not exceed the thresholds identified in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this definition.

Tower means any structure that is designed and constructed primarily built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting one or more any Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") licensed or authorized antennas and their associated facilities, including structures that are constructed for wireless communications services including, but not limited to, private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul, and the associated site. The term includes self-supporting lattice towers, guy towers or monopole towers. The term also includes radio and television transmission towers, microwave towers, common carrier towers, cellular telephone towers, and such other similar structures. alternative tower structures and small cell facilities in the rights-of-way are not towers.

Transmission equipment means equipment that facilitates transmission for any FCC licensed or authorized wireless communication service, including, but not limited to, radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, and regular and backup power supply. The term includes equipment associated with wireless communications services including, but not limited to, private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul.

Wireless communications facility or WCF means a facility used to provide personal wireless services as defined at 47 U.S.C. Section 332(c)(7)(C); or wireless information services provided to the public or to such classes of users as to be effectively available directly to the public via licensed or unlicensed frequencies; or wireless utility monitoring and control services. A WCF does not include a facility entirely enclosed within a permitted building where the installation does not require a modification of the exterior of the building; nor does it include a device attached to a building, used for serving that building only and that is otherwise permitted under other provisions of the Code. A WCF includes an antenna or antennas, including without limitation, directions, omni-directional and parabolic antennas, base stations, support equipment, alternative tower structures, and towers. It does not include the support structure to which the WCF or its components are attached if the use of such structures for WCFs is not the primary use. The term does not include mobile transmitting devices used by wireless service subscribers, such as vehicle or hand-held radios/telephones and their associated transmitting antennas, nor does it include other facilities specifically excluded from the coverage of this chapter.

(Ord. No. 2195, § 2, 10-11-2022)

In order to accommodate the communication needs of residents and businesses while protecting the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community, city council finds that these regulations are necessary to:

(1)

Provide for the managed development and installation, maintenance, modification, and removal of wireless communications infrastructure in the city with the goal of having the fewest number of wireless communication facilities ("WCF") required to complete a network without unreasonably discriminating against wireless communications providers of functionally equivalent services including all of those who install, maintain, operate, and remove WCFs;

(2)

Promote and protect the public health, safety, and welfare by reducing the visibility of WCFs to the fullest extent possible through techniques including, but not limited to, concealment design techniques and undergrounding of WCFs and the equipment associated therewith;

(3)

Encourage the deployment of smaller, less intrusive WCFs to supplement existing larger WCFs;

(4)

Encourage the use of wall mounted panel antennas;

(5)

Encourage roof mounted antennas only when wall mounted antennas will not provide adequate service or are not otherwise feasible;

(6)

Encourage the location of towers in non-residential areas, in a manner that minimizes the total number of towers needed throughout the community;

(7)

Encourage strongly the collocation of WCFs on new and existing sites;

(8)

Encourage owners and users of antennas and towers to locate them, to the extent possible, in areas where the adverse impact on the community is minimized;

(9)

Enhance the ability of wireless communications service providers to provide such services to the community quickly, effectively, and efficiently;

(10)

Effectively manage WCFs in the right-of-way;

(11)

Manage amateur radio facilities and over-the-air receiving devices in the city.

(Ord. No. 2195, § 2, 10-11-2022)

(a)

The requirements set forth in this chapter shall apply to all WCF applications for base stations, alternative tower structures, alternative tower structures in the right-of-way, and towers as defined elsewhere herein. The city shall have the authority to waive any requirement or standard set forth in this section, if the city makes a determination that the specific requirement or standard is preempted by federal or state law. Prior to applying the waiver to any pending application, the city shall, in consultation with the director and city attorney, make a written preemption determination which written determination shall identify the specific requirement or standard that is being waived and cite to the specific federal or state law provision that preempts the specific city requirement or standard set forth in this section. The requirements set forth in this chapter shall not apply to:

(1)

Amateur radio antennas. Amateur radio antennas that are owned and operated by a federally licensed amateur radio station operator or are used exclusively for receive-only antennas, provided that the height be no more than the distance from the base of the antenna to the property line.

(2)

Pre-existing WCFs. Any WCF for which a permit has been properly issued prior to August 31, 2017, shall not be required to meet the requirements of this chapter, other than the operational standards set forth in this chapter. Changes and additions to pre-existing WCFs (including trading out of antennas for an equal number of antennas) shall meet applicable operational standards set forth in this chapter.

(3)

Miscellaneous antennas. Antennas used for reception of television, multi-channel video programming and radio such as over the air reception devices ("OTARD") antennas, television broadcast band antennas, and broadcast radio antennas, provided that any requirements related to special uses contained in title 18 of this Code and the requirement that the height be no more than the distance from the base to the property line are met. The director or his/her designee has the authority to approve modifications to the height restriction related to OTARD antennas and OTARD antenna structures, if in the director's reasonable discretion, modifications are necessary to comply with federal law.

(Ord. No. 2195, § 2, 10-11-2022)

(a)

Federal requirements. All WCFs shall meet the current standards and regulations of the Federal Aviation Authority ("FAA"), the FCC and any other agency of the federal government with the authority to regulate WCFs. If such standards and regulations are amended, then the owners of the WCF governed by this chapter shall bring such facility into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within the time period mandated by the controlling federal agency. Failure to meet such revised standards and regulations shall constitute grounds for the removal of the WCF at the owner's expense.

(b)

Radio frequency standards. All WCFs shall comply with federal standards for radio frequency emissions. If concerns regarding compliance with radio frequency emissions standards for a WCF have been made to the city, the city may request that the owner or operator of the WCF provide information demonstrating compliance. If such information is not sufficient, in the reasonable discretion of the city, to demonstrate compliance, the city may request and the owner or operator of the WCF shall then submit a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site, and which compares the results with established federal standards. If, upon review, the city finds that the facility does not meet federal standards, the city may require corrective action within a reasonable period of time, and if not corrected, may require removal of the WCF pursuant to this section and subsection 18.90.040(f). Any reasonable costs incurred by the city, including reasonable consulting costs to verify compliance with these requirements, shall be paid by the owner or operator.

(c)

Signal interference. All WCFs shall be designed and sited, consistent with applicable federal regulations, so as not to cause interference with the normal operation of radio, television, telephone and other communication services utilized by adjacent residential and nonresidential properties; nor shall any such facilities interfere with any public safety communications. The applicant shall provide a written statement ("signal interference letter") from a professionally licensed radio frequency engineer, certifying that a technical evaluation of existing and proposed facilities indicates no potential interference problems and shall allow the city to monitor interference levels with public safety communications during this process.

(d)

Legal access. In all applications for WCFs outside of the right-of-way, an applicant must warrant and represent that it owns or has lease rights to the site.

(e)

Operation and maintenance. To ensure the structural integrity of WCFs, the owner of a WCF shall ensure that it is maintained in compliance with standards contained in applicable local building and safety codes. If upon inspection, the city concludes that a WCF fails to comply with such codes and constitutes a danger to persons or property, then, upon written notice being provided to the owner of the WCF, the owner shall have 30 days from the date of notice to bring such WCF into compliance. Upon good cause shown by the owner, the city's building official may extend such compliance period not to exceed 90 days from the date of said notice. If the owner fails to bring such WCF into compliance within said time period, the city may remove such WCF at the owner's expense.

(f)

Abandonment and removal. If a WCF has not been in use for a period of three months, the owner of the WCF shall notify the city of the non-use and shall indicate whether re-use is expected within the ensuing three months. Any WCF that is not operated for a continuous period of six months shall be considered abandoned. The city, in its sole discretion, may require an abandoned WCF to be removed. The owner of such WCF shall remove the same within 30 days of receipt of written notice from the city. If the WCF is not removed within said 30 days, the city may remove it at the owner's expense and any approved permits for the WCF shall be deemed to have expired.

(Ord. No. 2195, § 2, 10-11-2022)

(a)

The requirements set forth in this section shall apply to the location and design of all WCFs governed by this section as specified below, except for small cell facilities in the rights-of-way, where design standards are addressed in the master license agreement; provided, however, that the city may waive these requirements it if determines that the goals of this section are better served thereby. To that end, WCFs shall be designed and located to minimize the impact on the surrounding neighborhood and to maintain the character and appearance of the city, consistent with other provisions of the Code.

(1)

Camouflage/concealment. All WCFs and any transmission equipment shall, to the extent possible, be concealed, so that the WCF looks like something other than a wireless facility. Where concealment is not technically feasible, WCFs and any transmission equipment shall use camouflage design techniques including, but not limited to the use of materials, colors, textures, screening, undergrounding, landscaping, or other design options that will blend the WCF to the surrounding natural setting and built environment. Design, materials and colors of WCFs shall be compatible with the surrounding environment. Designs shall be compatible with structures and vegetation on the same parcel and adjacent parcels.

a.

Concealment and camouflage design techniques may be of heightened importance where findings of particular sensitivity are made (e.g. proximity to historic or aesthetically significant structures, views, and/or community features). In such instances where WCFs are located in areas of high visibility, they shall (where possible) be designed (e.g., placed underground, depressed, or located behind earth berms) to minimize their profile.

b.

The concealment design may include the use of alternative tower structures should the director determine that such design meets the intent of the Code and the community is better served thereby.

c.

All WCFs, such as antennas, vaults, equipment rooms, equipment enclosures, and tower structures shall be constructed out of non-reflective materials (visible exterior surfaces only).

(2)

Wall-mounted WCFs shall not extend above the roofline unless mounted to a penthouse.

(3)

Roof-mounted WCFs shall be approved only where an applicant demonstrates a wall-mounted WCF is inadequate to provide service and shall be evaluated for approval based upon the following criteria:

a.

Roof-mounted whip antennas shall extend no more than 12 feet above the parapet of any flat roof or ridge of a sloped roof or penthouse to which they are attached;

b.

Roof-mounted panel antennas shall extend no more than seven feet above the parapet of a flat roof or ridge of a sloped roof to which they are mounted; and

c.

Other roof-mounted related accessory equipment shall extend no more than seven feet above any parapet of a flat roof upon which they may be placed, and shall not be permitted on a sloped roof.

(4)

Hazardous materials. No hazardous materials shall be permitted in association with WCFs, except those necessary for the operations of the WCF and only in accordance with all applicable laws governing such materials.

(5)

Siting.

a.

No portion of any WCF may extend beyond the property line of the lot upon which it is located.

b.

Collocation. WCFs may be required to be designed and constructed to permit the facility to accommodate WCFs from at least two wireless service providers on the same WCF unless the city approves an alternative design. No WCF owner or operator shall unfairly exclude a competitor from using the same facility or location.

c.

WCFs shall be sited in a location that does not reduce the parking for the other principal uses on the parcel below Code standards.

(6)

Lighting. WCFs shall not be artificially lighted, unless required by the FAA or other applicable governmental authority, or the WCF is mounted on a light pole or other similar structure primarily used for lighting purposes. If lighting is required, the city may review the available lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding views. Lighting shall be shielded or directed to the greatest extent possible so as to minimize the amount of glare and light falling onto nearby properties, particularly residences.

(7)

Landscaping requirements.

a.

WCFs shall be sited in a manner that does not reduce the landscaped areas for the other principal uses on the parcel below Code standards.

b.

WCFs shall be landscaped with a buffer of plant materials that effectively screen the view of the WCF from adjacent residential property. The standard buffer shall consist of the front, side, and rear landscaped setback on the perimeter of the site.

c.

In locations where the visual impact of the WCF would be minimal, the landscaping requirement may be reduced or waived altogether by the director.

d.

Existing mature tree growth and natural landforms on the site shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. In some cases, such as WCFs sited on large, wooded lots, natural growth around the site perimeter may be a sufficient buffer.

e.

No trees larger than four inches in diameter measured at four and one-half feet high on the tree may be removed, unless authorized by the director. To obtain such authorization the applicant shall show that tree removal is necessary, the applicant's plan minimizes the number of trees to be removed and any trees removed are replaced at a ratio of two to one.

(8)

Noise. Noise generated on the site must not exceed the standards permitted in the Code, except that a WCF owner or operator shall be permitted to exceed Code noise standards for a reasonable period of time during repairs, not to exceed two hours without prior authorization from the city.

(9)

Additional design requirements shall be applicable to the various types of WCFs as specified below:

a.

Base stations. If an antenna is installed on a structure other than a tower, such as a base station (including, but not limited to the antennas and accessory equipment) it shall be of a neutral, non-reflective color that is identical to, or closely compatible with, the color of the supporting structure, or uses other camouflage/concealment design techniques so as to make the antenna and related facilities as visually unobtrusive as possible.

b.

Alternative tower structures.

1.

Shall be designed and constructed to look like a building, facility, or structure typically found in the area;

2.

Height or size of the proposed alternative tower structure should be minimized as much as possible and shall be subject to the maximum height restrictions of the zoning district in which they are located;

3.

Shall be sited in a manner that is least obtrusive to residential structures and residential district boundaries;

4.

Shall take into consideration the uses on adjacent and nearby properties and the compatibility of the facility to these uses;

5.

Shall be compatible with the surrounding topography, tree coverage, and foliage;

6.

Shall be designed utilizing design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness; and

7.

Visual impacts of the proposed ingress and egress shall be minimized.

c.

Towers.

1.

Towers shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish, or, subject to any applicable FAA standards, be painted a neutral color so as to reduce visual obtrusiveness as determined by the city;

2.

Tower structures should use existing land forms, vegetation, and structures to aid in screening the facility from view or blending in with the surrounding built and natural environment;

3.

Monopole support structures shall taper from the base to the tip;

4.

All towers shall be enclosed by security fencing or wall at least six feet in height. No security fencing or any portion thereof shall consist of barbed wire or chain link material;

5.

Towers shall be subject to the maximum height restrictions of the zoning district in which they are located;

6.

Towers should be sited in a manner that that is least obtrusive to residential structures and residential district boundaries where feasible;

7.

Towers should take into consideration the uses on adjacent and nearby properties and the compatibility of the tower to these uses;

8.

Towers should be designed utilizing design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness;

9.

Visual impacts of the proposed ingress and egress shall be minimized;

10.

No new towers shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the city that no existing WCFs can accommodate the needs that the applicant proposes to address with its tower application. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing WCF can accommodate these needs may consist of the following:

(i)

No existing WCFs are of sufficient height and are located within the geographic area required to meet the applicant's engineering requirements;

(ii)

Existing WCFs do not have sufficient structural strength to support applicant's proposed WCF;

(iii)

The applicant's proposed WCFs would cause electromagnetic interference with the WCFs on the existing WCFs or the existing WCF would cause interference with the applicant's proposed WCF; and

(iv)

The applicant demonstrates that there are other limiting factors that render existing WCFs unsuitable for collocation.

11.

A tower shall meet the greater of the following minimum setbacks from all property lines:

(i)

The setback for a principal building within the applicable zoning;

(ii)

Twenty-five percent of the facility height, including WCFs and transmission equipment; or

(iii)

The tower height, including antennas, if the tower is in or adjacent to a residential district or residential zoned property.

(iv)

Towers over 40 feet in height shall not be located within one-quarter mile from any existing tower that is over 40 feet in height, unless the applicant has shown to the satisfaction of the city that there are no reasonably suitable alternative sites in the required geographic area which can meet the applicant's needs.

12.

Towers are prohibited in the rights-of-way.

d.

Related accessory equipment. Accessory equipment for all WCFs shall meet the following requirements:

1.

All buildings, shelter, cabinets, and other accessory components shall be grouped as closely as technically possible;

2.

The total footprint coverage area of the WCF's accessory equipment shall not exceed 350 square feet;

3.

No related accessory equipment or accessory structure shall exceed 12 feet in height;

4.

Accessory equipment, including, but not limited to, remote radio units, shall be located out of sight whenever possible by locating behind parapet walls or within equipment enclosures. Where such alternate locations are not available, the accessory equipment shall be camouflaged or concealed.

(Ord. No. 2195, § 2, 10-11-2022)

(a)

No new WCF shall be constructed and no collocation or modification to any WCF may occur except after a written request from an applicant, reviewed and approved by the city in accordance with this chapter. All WCFs, except eligible facilities requests, shall be reviewed pursuant to the following procedures:

(1)

Submittal requirements. Each applicant for a WCF shall be required to submit:

a.

A completed application form;

b.

Submittal fee as established by resolution of city council;

c.

Signal interference letter (subsection 18.90.040(c));

d.

Inventory of existing sites (subsection 18.90.060(a)(2));

e.

A scaled site plan, photo simulation, scaled elevation view and other supporting drawings, calculations, and other documentation, signed and sealed by appropriate qualified professionals, showing the location and dimension of all improvements, including information concerning topography, radio frequency coverage, tower height, setbacks, drives, parking, fencing, landscaping, adjacent uses, and drainage.

f.

Any other information deemed necessary by the city to determine compliance with this section.

(2)

Inventory of existing sites. Each applicant for a WCF shall provide to the director a narrative and map description of the applicant's existing or then currently proposed WCFs within the city, and outside of the city within one mile of its boundaries. In addition, the applicant shall inform the city generally of the areas of the city in which it believes WCFs may need to be located within the next three years. The inventory list should identify the site name, site address, and a general description of the facility (for example, rooftop antennas and ground mounted equipment). This provision is not intended to be a requirement that the applicant submit its business plan, proprietary information, or make commitments regarding locations of WCFs within the city. Rather, it is an attempt to provide a mechanism for the city and all applicants for WCFs to share general information, assist in the city's comprehensive planning process, and promote collocation by identifying areas in which WCFs might be appropriately constructed for multiple users.

The city may share such information with other applicants applying for administrative approvals or special use permits under this section or other organizations seeking to locate WCFs within the jurisdiction of the city, provided however, that the city is not, by sharing such information, in any way representing or warranting that such sites are available or suitable.

(3)

Applications for base stations, alternative tower structures, and alternative tower structures within right-of-way. In all zoning districts and planned unit developments, each application for a base station, alternative tower structure, or alternative tower structures within the right-of-way shall be reviewed and considered for approval by the city for conformance with this section and section 18.30.020 of the City Code. Except for WCFs in the right-of-way that meet all requirements of this chapter, the director may refer the application to planning and zoning commission for special use permit review if the director finds the proposed WCF to have a significant visual impact (e.g., proximity to historic or designated view corridors, or on significant community features), or otherwise is substantially incompatible with the structure on which the WCF will be installed, or it does not meet the clear intent of this chapter.

(4)

Applications for towers. In all zoning districts and planned unit developments, towers may be permitted only upon acquisition of a special use approved by the planning commission. Such towers shall be reviewed for conformance to this section using the special use permit review procedures set forth in section 18.30.020 of the City Code in conjunction with the applicable provisions of this section. All applications for towers shall demonstrate that other alternative design options such as base stations or alternative tower structures are not viable options.

(5)

Timeframes for review.

a.

All WCFs, other than those specified below in subsection (6), shall be reviewed according to the following timeframes:

1.

Review of an application to collocate a facility other than a small cell facility on an existing tower or base station: 90 days.

2.

Review of an application to deploy a small cell facility on a new structure: 90 days.

3.

Review of an application to deploy a WCF other than a small cell facility on a new structure: 150 days.

4.

Review of an application for a new tower, base station, or alternative tower structure [that does not qualify as a small cell facility]: 150 days.

b.

Tolling the timeframe for review. The relevant review timeframe begins to run when the application is filed with the city, and may be tolled only by mutual agreement or where the city determines that an application is incomplete.

1.

To toll the timeframe for incompleteness, the city shall provide written notice to the applicant within 30 calendar days of receipt of the application, specifically delineating all missing documents or information required in the application;

2.

Upon providing the notice of incompleteness to the applicant, the timeframe for review pauses. The timeframe for review begins running again when the applicant makes a supplemental written submission in response to the city's notice of incompleteness; and

3.

Following a supplemental submission, the city will notify the applicant within ten business days whether the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating missing information. The timeframe is tolled in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures identified in subparagraph b.1 of this subsection. In the case of a second or subsequent notice of incompleteness, the city may not specify missing documents or information that were not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness.

(6)

Review procedures for eligible facilities requests.

a.

Application. In all zoning districts and planned unit developments, eligible facilities requests for collocation on or modification of an existing tower or base station shall be considered a use by right subject to administrative review and determination by the director. The city shall prepare, and make publicly available, an application form which shall be limited to the information necessary for the city to consider whether an application is an eligible facilities request. Such information may include, without limitation, whether the request:

1.

Would result in a substantial change;

2.

Violate a generally applicable law, regulations, or other rule reasonably related to public health and safety.

The application may not require the applicant to demonstrate a need or business case for the proposed modification or collocation.

b.

Type of review. Upon receipt of an application for an eligible facilities request pursuant to this section, the director shall review such application to determine whether the application so qualifies.

c.

Timeframe for review. Subject to the tolling provisions of subparagraph d. Below, within 60 days of the date on which an applicant submits an application seeking approval under this section, the city shall approve the application unless it determines that the application is not covered by this subsection.

d.

Tolling of the timeframe for review. The 60-day review period begins to run when the application is filed, and may be tolled only by mutual agreement of the city and the applicant, or in cases where the director determines that the application is incomplete:

1.

To toll the timeframe for incompleteness, the city must provide written notice to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application, specifically delineating all missing documents or information required in the application;

2.

The timeframe for review begins running again when the applicant makes a supplemental written submission in response to the city's notice of incompleteness; and

3.

Following a supplemental submission, the city will notify the applicant within ten days that the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating missing information. The timeframe is tolled in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures identified in paragraph d.1. In the case of a second or subsequent notice of incompleteness, the city may not specify missing documents or information that were not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness.

e.

Failure to act. In the event the city fails to act on a request seeking approval for an eligible facilities request under this section within the timeframe for review (accounting for any tolling), the request shall be deemed granted. The deemed grant becomes effective when the applicant notifies the city in writing after the review period has expired (accounting for any tolling) that the application has been deemed granted.

f.

Interaction with Telecommunications Act, 47 U.S.C. Section 332(c)(7). If the city determines that the applicant's request is not an eligible facilities request as set forth in this section, the applicant shall be advised as to the relevant provisions of the City Code that govern the process to consider the request, and whether the Code requires any additional information to be submitted in order for the request to be considered complete. If the applicant subsequently indicates an intent for the proposal to be considered under the relevant section of the City Code and submits all required information, the presumptively reasonable timeframe under Section 332(c)(7) [of the Act], as set forth in applicable federal and state law will begin to run from submittal of the required information.

(7)

Abandonment and removal. Prior to approval, affidavits shall be required from the owner of the property and from the applicant acknowledging that each is responsible for the removal of a WCF, including related accessory equipment, that is abandoned or is unused for a period of six months.

(8)

Decision. Any decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a WCF shall be in writing and supported by substantial evidence in a written record, and shall be provided to the applicant within ten days the decision. If the approval is for a concealed WCF, the written decision shall specifically identify that the WCF is a concealed facility.

(9)

Compliance with applicable law. Notwithstanding the approval of an application for collocation as described herein, all work done pursuant to WCF applications must be completed in accordance with all applicable building and safety requirements as set forth in the City Code and any other applicable regulations. In addition, all WCF applications shall comply with the following:

a.

Comply with any permit or license issued by a local, state, or federal agency with jurisdiction of the WCF;

b.

Comply with easements, covenants, conditions and/or restrictions on or applicable to the underlying real property;

c.

Be maintained in good working condition and to the standards established at the time of application approval or as otherwise required by applicable law; and

d.

Remain free from trash, debris, litter, noxious weeds, graffiti, and other forms of vandalism. Any damage shall be repaired as soon as practicable, and in no instance more than ten calendar days from the time of notification by the city or after discovery by the owner or operator of the site.

(10)

Compliance report. Upon request by the city, the applicant shall provide a compliance report within 45 days after installation of a WCF, demonstrating that as installed and in operation, the WCF complies with all conditions of approval, all applicable city requirements and standard regulations.

(Ord. No. 2195, § 2, 10-11-2022)

(a)

Any WCF, including related accessory equipment, subject to acquisition of a special use permit shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedure set forth in section 18.30.020 of the Code subject to the following criteria:

(1)

Base stations.

a.

Such facilities shall be architecturally compatible with respect to attachments, and colored to match the building or structure to which they are attached;

b.

The maximum protrusion of such facilities from the building or structure face to which they are attached shall be six feet;

c.

Wall-mounted WCFs shall not extend above the roofline unless mounted to a penthouse; and

d.

Roof-mounted WCFs shall be approved only where an applicant demonstrates a wall mounted WCF is inadequate to provide service and evaluated for approval based upon the following criteria:

1.

Roof-mounted whip antennas shall extend no more than 12 feet above the parapet of any flat roof or ridge of a sloped roof or penthouse to which they are attached;

2.

Roof-mounted panel antennas shall extend no more than seven feet above the parapet of a flat roof or ridge of a sloped roof to which they are mounted; and

3.

Other roof-mounted transmission equipment shall extend no more than seven feet above any parapet of a flat roof upon which they may be placed, and shall not be permitted on a sloped roof.

(2)

Alternative tower structures.

a.

Such structures shall be architecturally compatible with the surrounding area;

b.

Height or size of the proposed alternative tower structure should be minimized as much as practically possible;

c.

WCFs shall be sited in a manner that evaluates the proximity of the facility to residential structures and residential district boundaries;

d.

WCFs shall take into consideration the uses on adjacent and nearby properties and the compatibility of the facility to these uses;

e.

Compatibility with the surrounding topography;

f.

Compatibility with the surrounding tree coverage and foliage;

g.

Compatibility of the design of the site, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness; and

h.

Impact on the surrounding area of the proposed ingress and egress, if any.

(3)

Towers. The city shall within the framework of the review criteria set forth in this chapter consider the following factors in determining whether to issue a special use permit, although the city may waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of one or more of these criteria if the city concludes that the goals of this chapter are better served thereby.

a.

Height or size of the proposed tower;

b.

Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries;

c.

Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties;

d.

Compatibility with the surrounding topography;

e.

Compatibility with the surrounding tree coverage and foliage;

f.

Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness;

g.

Proposed ingress and egress; and

h.

No new towers shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the city that no existing WCFs can accommodate the needs that the applicant proposes to address with its tower application. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing WCF can accommodate these needs may consist of the following:

1.

No existing WCFs with a suitable height are located within the geographic area required to meet the applicant's engineering requirements;

2.

Existing WCFs do not have sufficient structural strength to support applicant's proposed WCF;

3.

The applicant's proposed WCFs would cause electromagnetic interference with the WCFs on the existing WCFs or the existing WCF would cause interference with the applicant's proposed WCF; and

4.

The applicant demonstrates that there are other limiting factors that render existing WCFs unsuitable for collocation.

(Ord. No. 2195, § 2, 10-11-2022)