- APPEALS
Unless internally appealed as set forth otherwise below, all appeals from final actions taken by the City Council, Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and the Zoning and Development Administrator shall be taken to the Circuit Court of Washington County.
(Code 1965, App. A., Art. 9(6); Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; Ord. No. 2323, 4-5-77; Ord. No. 2538, 7-3-79; Code 1991, §160.175; Ord. No. 3925, §7, 10-3-95; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4652, 12-07-04); Ord. No. 6867, §1, 5-6-25)
For appeals to the City Council, Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment or Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals, the following requirements shall must be met:
(A)
Form. All appeals must be submitted in writing (which may include by email) and which should reference the applicable UDC sections and set forth the reasons the applicant contends the decision was in error and how the applicant is adversely impacted.
(B)
Time.
(1)
Appeals. Appeals shall be submitted within ten (10) working days from the date of the final action taken.
(2)
Hearings. The entity hearing the appeal shall fix a reasonable time for hearing an appeal.
(C)
Place. Appeals shall be filed with the following:
(1)
City Clerk. Appeals made to the City Council shall be filed with the City Clerk.
(2)
Zoning and Development Administrator. Appeals made to the Planning Commission or Board of Adjustment shall be filed with the Zoning and Development Administrator.
(3)
Building Safety Division Director. Appeals made to the Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall be filed with the Building Safety Division Director.
(Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4652, 12-07-04; Ord. No. 6773, §§ 1, 2, 7-16-24; Ord. No. 6867, §2, 5-6-25)
(A)
An appeal shall stay all city proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from unless the person in charge of administration of the chapter certifies that a stay would in their opinion cause imminent peril to life or property.
(B)
An appeal against the amount, legality or constitutionality of the application and assessment of the stormwater management utility fee to the City Engineer and City Council shall stay the enforcement and collection of the stormwater management utility fee (all other fees are unaffected) until the final decision by the City Engineer, or if appealed by the City Council. No late fees or interest may be assessed unless and until the final administrative decision of the city when any stayed amount not reduced or eliminated by the appeal becomes due and payable with the next regular utility billing cycle.
(Code 1965, App. A., Art. 13(3); Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; Code 1991, §160.173; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 6840, §2, 2-4-25)
A Council Member may bring an appeal on behalf of any resident of the city to the City Council of a decision by the Planning Commission to approve subdivision requests (plats, lot splits), and development requests (large scale developments and large or small site improvement plans). Variances, compliance with applicable design standards, tree preservation plans and conditions of approval for any development shall be appealed as part of the approval or denial of a development proposal. Variances, compliance with applicable design standards, tree preservation plans and conditions of approval for any development not requiring approval by the Planning Commission or administrative approval by the Planning Division may be appealed independently.
(Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 5296, 12-15-09; Ord. No. 6342, §1, 8-4-20; Ord. No. 6773, § 3, 7-16-24; Ord. No. 6867, §3, 5-6-25)
(A)
Appeals to City Council
(1)
Owners of record of the property being considered may appeal a decision by the Planning Commission to deny the following requests in accordance with the procedure set forth in §155.02:
(a)
Annexation;
(b)
Rezoning;
(c)
Required dedication and improvements of §155.06(C);
(d)
Subdivision (plats, lot splits, lot line adjustments);
(e)
Development (large scale development, large and small site improvement plans);
(f)
Vacations of street right-of-way.
(2)
Conditions of Approval/Variances, etc. An owner of record may appeal the conditions of approval determined by the Planning Commission and any adverse decision by the Planning Commission concerning applicable design standards, tree preservation requirements, streamside protection requirements and variance requests as part of the conditions of an approved development request or the denial of such development request. Variances, compliance with applicable design standards, tree preservation plans and conditions of approval for any development not requiring approval by the Planning Commission or administrative approval by the Planning Division may be appealed independently.
(3)
Conditional Use Request. Three Council Members may in unison appeal a decision of the Planning Commission approving or denying a conditional use request.
(Code 1965, §13A-40, App. C., Art. II, Art. V., §B; Ord. No. 1509, 8-8-66; Ord. No. 1750, 7-6-70; Code 1991, §§156.017, 159.12, 159.54(F)(1), (2), 159.66; Ord. No. 3781, §1, 4-19-94; Ord. No. 3925, §6, 10-3-95; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4334, 9-4-01; Ord. No. 4340, 10-2-01; Ord. No. 6342, §2, 8-4-20; Ord. No. 6773, § 4, 7-16-24)
(A)
Appeals to City Council.
(1)
The City Engineer's decision to issue a violation notice or stop work order may be appealed to the City Council by an owner of record of the property in question or a council member on behalf of a resident of the city.
(2)
The Zoning and Development Administrator's decision to deny a vacation of any public easement (whether constructed or not) or portion thereof may be appealed by the owner of record of the property.
(3)
Stormwater Management Utility Fee Decision. If an appealing property owner or customer disagrees with the City Engineer's decision regarding their appeal concerning the application, assessment, legality, or constitutionality of the stormwater management utility fee to their property, that property owner or customer may appeal the City Engineer's decision to the City Council.
(B)
Appeals to the Board of Adjustment. The following interpretations and decisions may be appealed by an owner of record of the property in question or a council member on behalf of a resident of the city to the Board of Adjustment:
(1)
Zoning and Development Administrator. An interpretation or decision regarding zoning matters.
(2)
Building Safety Officer—Airport Zone. Any person aggrieved, or any taxpayer affected by any decision of the Building Safety Officer, made in the administration of Airport Zone, Chapter 165.
(C)
Appeals to the Planning Commission.
(1)
Zoning and Development Administrator's Required Dedications and Improvements.
(a)
An owner or developer who is aggrieved by the requirements of the Unified Development Code for land, right-of-way or easement dedications, construction of on-site or off-site improvements, or payments in lieu of any dedication or improvement, which are in excess of the "rough proportionality" of the impact of the development upon the city's infrastructure or services may appeal such requirement to the Planning Commission as a part of the submission of the preliminary plat, large scale development, subdivision, building permit, lot split, grading permit, floodplain development permit, or otherwise within ten (10) days of notification of such development requirements. The appeal must be presented to the Planning Division in writing and state the grounds, or reasons for the appeal.
(b)
The Planning Commission shall determine after public hearing whether the required dedications, improvements, and fees meet the "rough proportionality" of the impact of the development on city infrastructure and services. If the requirements are in excess of the "rough proportionality," the Planning Commission is empowered to modify or reduce such requirements to achieve "rough proportionality."
(c)
Any potential reduction of impact fees must be approved by the City Council.
(2)
Administrative Approvals and Interpretations by Zoning and Development Administrator.
(a)
A resident of the city or an owner/developer who is aggrieved by a decision of the Zoning and Development Administrator regarding development matters that are approved administratively pursuant to §166.02(C), §172.05 or otherwise may appeal the final development approval decision affected by this matter to the Planning Commission. The appeal shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Division within ten (10) working days of the final decision. The Planning Commission may consider the following factors and issues:
(i)
The development plan is not submitted in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 166 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code.
(ii)
The proposed development would violate a city ordinance, a state statute, or a federal statute.
(iii)
The developer refuses to dedicate the street right-of-way, utility easements or drainage easements required by Chapter 166 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code.
(iv)
The proposed development would create or compound a dangerous traffic condition. For the purpose of this section, a dangerous traffic condition shall be construed to mean a traffic condition in which the risk of accidents involving motor vehicles is significant due to factors such as, but not limited to, high traffic volume, topography, or the nature of the traffic pattern.
(v)
City water and sewer is not readily available to the property within the large scale development or preliminary plat and the developer has made no provision for extending such service to the development.
(vi)
The developer refused to comply with UDC Ch. 166 pertaining to required on-site and off-site improvements.
(b)
The appellant should include in the letter of appeal the specific code section with which the development application does not comply.
(c)
The Planning Commission shall determine after public hearing whether the interpretation or discretionary decision should be upheld or modified in part or in whole.
(d)
Any staff recommendation to approve or deny some or all of a requested street right-of-way vacation shall be considered by the Planning commission with recommendations to the City Council.
(3)
City Engineer and Flood Plain Administrator.
(a)
Development Matters. An interpretation or decision of the City Engineer or Floodplain Administrator regarding development matters, including grading, drainage, water and sanitary sewer systems, and storm drainage systems.
(b)
Floodplain Regulations. The decision of the Floodplain Administrator, provided that the Planning Commission shall hear and decide an appeal only when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the Floodplain Administrator in the enforcement or administration of Chapter 168.
(c)
Streamside Protection Zones. An interpretation or decision of the City Engineer concerning the regulated uses, structures and activities, streamside boundary location or land use exemptions.
(4)
Zoning and Development Administrator's Interpretation or Decision of Other Development Matters. An interpretation or decision of the Zoning and Development Administrator regarding development matters including subdivisions, large scale developments, parking and loading, outdoor lighting, compliance with applicable design standards, or any other development matters.
(5)
Urban Forester—Landscape and Tree Preservation and Protection requirements. Decisions of the Urban Forester related to landscape and tree preservation and protection requirements.
(D)
Appeals to the Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals. When the administrative authority under Chapter 173 shall disapprove an application, or the applicant is aggrieved by the interpretation of the administrative authority, the applicant may appeal the decision to the Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals.
(Code 1965, §17B-11.2(d), (e), App. A., Art. 10(6), 19(2), App. B, §III, App. C., Art. 10(6), 19(2), App. B, §III, App. C., Art. V, §A; Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; Ord. No. 1750, 7-6-70; Ord. No. 2109, 6-375; Ord. No. 2252, 7-6-76; Ord. No. 2538, 7-3-79; Ord. No. 2585, 12-4-79; Ord. No. 2697, 1-20-81; Ord. No. 3153, 11-19-85; Ord. No. 3340, 3-14-88; Code 1991, §§150.03, 158.67(B), 158.68(A), (B), 159.65, 160.048, 160.172, 160.176(A), (B), 161.11, 162.03(B), (C), 163.10(D); Ord. No. 3551, 6-4-91; Ord. No.3587, §1, 1-7-92; Ord. No. 3699, §3, 4-20-93; Ord. No. 3716, §2, 6-15-93, Ord. No. 3806, §1, 6-28-94;Ord. No. 3895, §1, 6-20-95; Ord. No. 3901, §1, 7-5-95; Ord. No. 3901, §1, 7-5-95; Ord. No. 3925, §7, 10-3-95; Ord. No. 3963, §9, 4-16-96; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Exh. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4368, §2, 2-5-02; Ord. No. 4377, §§1, 2, 3-5-02; Ord. No. 4652, 12-07-04; Ord. No. 5206, 12-16-08; Ord. No. 5296, 12-15-09; Ord. 5390, 3-1-11; Ord. No. 6343, §1(Exh. A), 8-4-20; Ord. No. 6446, §5, 6-15-21; Ord. No. 6773, §§ 5—10, 7-16-24; Ord. No. 6840, §1, 2-4-25; Ord. No. 6867, §§4, 5, 5-6-25)
(A)
Permit Denied. Any person whose application for a permit under Chapter 175 has been denied may request and shall be granted a hearing on the matter before the Housing Board.
(B)
Permit Suspended. Any person whose permit has been suspended, or who has received notice from the enforcement officer that his permit will be suspended unless certain conditions or practices at the mobile home park are corrected, may request and be granted a hearing on the matter before the Housing Board.
(C)
Petition Deadline. When no petition for hearing shall have been filed within ten (10) days following the day on which notice of suspension was served, such permit shall be deemed to have been automatically revoked at the expiration of such ten (10) days.
(Code 1965, §17B11.2(e); Ord. No. 2109, 6-3-75; Ord. No. 2583, 12-4-79; Ord. No. 3152, 11-19-85; Ord. No. 3153, 11-19-85; Ord. No. 3153, 11-19-85; Ord. No. 3340, 3-15-88; Code 1991, §158.67; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Exh. A), 6-16-98)
(Code 1965, §§13A-40, 13A-43; Ord. No. 1509, 8-8-66; Code 1991, §§156.017, 156.029; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Exh. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4652, 12-07-04).
If the Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals refuses to extend a building permit pursuant to §173.02 (B)(8) or to issue a new building permit for property for which a building permit has expired pursuant to §173.02 (B)(8), the owner may appeal to the City Council.
(Ord. No. 5019, 5-15-07)
Final decisions by the Board of Adjustment may be appealed to the City Council by an owner of record of the property in question or by a City Council member on behalf of any resident of the city.
(Ord. No. 6867, §6, 5-6-25)
- APPEALS
Unless internally appealed as set forth otherwise below, all appeals from final actions taken by the City Council, Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and the Zoning and Development Administrator shall be taken to the Circuit Court of Washington County.
(Code 1965, App. A., Art. 9(6); Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; Ord. No. 2323, 4-5-77; Ord. No. 2538, 7-3-79; Code 1991, §160.175; Ord. No. 3925, §7, 10-3-95; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4652, 12-07-04); Ord. No. 6867, §1, 5-6-25)
For appeals to the City Council, Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment or Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals, the following requirements shall must be met:
(A)
Form. All appeals must be submitted in writing (which may include by email) and which should reference the applicable UDC sections and set forth the reasons the applicant contends the decision was in error and how the applicant is adversely impacted.
(B)
Time.
(1)
Appeals. Appeals shall be submitted within ten (10) working days from the date of the final action taken.
(2)
Hearings. The entity hearing the appeal shall fix a reasonable time for hearing an appeal.
(C)
Place. Appeals shall be filed with the following:
(1)
City Clerk. Appeals made to the City Council shall be filed with the City Clerk.
(2)
Zoning and Development Administrator. Appeals made to the Planning Commission or Board of Adjustment shall be filed with the Zoning and Development Administrator.
(3)
Building Safety Division Director. Appeals made to the Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall be filed with the Building Safety Division Director.
(Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4652, 12-07-04; Ord. No. 6773, §§ 1, 2, 7-16-24; Ord. No. 6867, §2, 5-6-25)
(A)
An appeal shall stay all city proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from unless the person in charge of administration of the chapter certifies that a stay would in their opinion cause imminent peril to life or property.
(B)
An appeal against the amount, legality or constitutionality of the application and assessment of the stormwater management utility fee to the City Engineer and City Council shall stay the enforcement and collection of the stormwater management utility fee (all other fees are unaffected) until the final decision by the City Engineer, or if appealed by the City Council. No late fees or interest may be assessed unless and until the final administrative decision of the city when any stayed amount not reduced or eliminated by the appeal becomes due and payable with the next regular utility billing cycle.
(Code 1965, App. A., Art. 13(3); Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; Code 1991, §160.173; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 6840, §2, 2-4-25)
A Council Member may bring an appeal on behalf of any resident of the city to the City Council of a decision by the Planning Commission to approve subdivision requests (plats, lot splits), and development requests (large scale developments and large or small site improvement plans). Variances, compliance with applicable design standards, tree preservation plans and conditions of approval for any development shall be appealed as part of the approval or denial of a development proposal. Variances, compliance with applicable design standards, tree preservation plans and conditions of approval for any development not requiring approval by the Planning Commission or administrative approval by the Planning Division may be appealed independently.
(Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 5296, 12-15-09; Ord. No. 6342, §1, 8-4-20; Ord. No. 6773, § 3, 7-16-24; Ord. No. 6867, §3, 5-6-25)
(A)
Appeals to City Council
(1)
Owners of record of the property being considered may appeal a decision by the Planning Commission to deny the following requests in accordance with the procedure set forth in §155.02:
(a)
Annexation;
(b)
Rezoning;
(c)
Required dedication and improvements of §155.06(C);
(d)
Subdivision (plats, lot splits, lot line adjustments);
(e)
Development (large scale development, large and small site improvement plans);
(f)
Vacations of street right-of-way.
(2)
Conditions of Approval/Variances, etc. An owner of record may appeal the conditions of approval determined by the Planning Commission and any adverse decision by the Planning Commission concerning applicable design standards, tree preservation requirements, streamside protection requirements and variance requests as part of the conditions of an approved development request or the denial of such development request. Variances, compliance with applicable design standards, tree preservation plans and conditions of approval for any development not requiring approval by the Planning Commission or administrative approval by the Planning Division may be appealed independently.
(3)
Conditional Use Request. Three Council Members may in unison appeal a decision of the Planning Commission approving or denying a conditional use request.
(Code 1965, §13A-40, App. C., Art. II, Art. V., §B; Ord. No. 1509, 8-8-66; Ord. No. 1750, 7-6-70; Code 1991, §§156.017, 159.12, 159.54(F)(1), (2), 159.66; Ord. No. 3781, §1, 4-19-94; Ord. No. 3925, §6, 10-3-95; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4334, 9-4-01; Ord. No. 4340, 10-2-01; Ord. No. 6342, §2, 8-4-20; Ord. No. 6773, § 4, 7-16-24)
(A)
Appeals to City Council.
(1)
The City Engineer's decision to issue a violation notice or stop work order may be appealed to the City Council by an owner of record of the property in question or a council member on behalf of a resident of the city.
(2)
The Zoning and Development Administrator's decision to deny a vacation of any public easement (whether constructed or not) or portion thereof may be appealed by the owner of record of the property.
(3)
Stormwater Management Utility Fee Decision. If an appealing property owner or customer disagrees with the City Engineer's decision regarding their appeal concerning the application, assessment, legality, or constitutionality of the stormwater management utility fee to their property, that property owner or customer may appeal the City Engineer's decision to the City Council.
(B)
Appeals to the Board of Adjustment. The following interpretations and decisions may be appealed by an owner of record of the property in question or a council member on behalf of a resident of the city to the Board of Adjustment:
(1)
Zoning and Development Administrator. An interpretation or decision regarding zoning matters.
(2)
Building Safety Officer—Airport Zone. Any person aggrieved, or any taxpayer affected by any decision of the Building Safety Officer, made in the administration of Airport Zone, Chapter 165.
(C)
Appeals to the Planning Commission.
(1)
Zoning and Development Administrator's Required Dedications and Improvements.
(a)
An owner or developer who is aggrieved by the requirements of the Unified Development Code for land, right-of-way or easement dedications, construction of on-site or off-site improvements, or payments in lieu of any dedication or improvement, which are in excess of the "rough proportionality" of the impact of the development upon the city's infrastructure or services may appeal such requirement to the Planning Commission as a part of the submission of the preliminary plat, large scale development, subdivision, building permit, lot split, grading permit, floodplain development permit, or otherwise within ten (10) days of notification of such development requirements. The appeal must be presented to the Planning Division in writing and state the grounds, or reasons for the appeal.
(b)
The Planning Commission shall determine after public hearing whether the required dedications, improvements, and fees meet the "rough proportionality" of the impact of the development on city infrastructure and services. If the requirements are in excess of the "rough proportionality," the Planning Commission is empowered to modify or reduce such requirements to achieve "rough proportionality."
(c)
Any potential reduction of impact fees must be approved by the City Council.
(2)
Administrative Approvals and Interpretations by Zoning and Development Administrator.
(a)
A resident of the city or an owner/developer who is aggrieved by a decision of the Zoning and Development Administrator regarding development matters that are approved administratively pursuant to §166.02(C), §172.05 or otherwise may appeal the final development approval decision affected by this matter to the Planning Commission. The appeal shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Division within ten (10) working days of the final decision. The Planning Commission may consider the following factors and issues:
(i)
The development plan is not submitted in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 166 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code.
(ii)
The proposed development would violate a city ordinance, a state statute, or a federal statute.
(iii)
The developer refuses to dedicate the street right-of-way, utility easements or drainage easements required by Chapter 166 of the Fayetteville Unified Development Code.
(iv)
The proposed development would create or compound a dangerous traffic condition. For the purpose of this section, a dangerous traffic condition shall be construed to mean a traffic condition in which the risk of accidents involving motor vehicles is significant due to factors such as, but not limited to, high traffic volume, topography, or the nature of the traffic pattern.
(v)
City water and sewer is not readily available to the property within the large scale development or preliminary plat and the developer has made no provision for extending such service to the development.
(vi)
The developer refused to comply with UDC Ch. 166 pertaining to required on-site and off-site improvements.
(b)
The appellant should include in the letter of appeal the specific code section with which the development application does not comply.
(c)
The Planning Commission shall determine after public hearing whether the interpretation or discretionary decision should be upheld or modified in part or in whole.
(d)
Any staff recommendation to approve or deny some or all of a requested street right-of-way vacation shall be considered by the Planning commission with recommendations to the City Council.
(3)
City Engineer and Flood Plain Administrator.
(a)
Development Matters. An interpretation or decision of the City Engineer or Floodplain Administrator regarding development matters, including grading, drainage, water and sanitary sewer systems, and storm drainage systems.
(b)
Floodplain Regulations. The decision of the Floodplain Administrator, provided that the Planning Commission shall hear and decide an appeal only when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the Floodplain Administrator in the enforcement or administration of Chapter 168.
(c)
Streamside Protection Zones. An interpretation or decision of the City Engineer concerning the regulated uses, structures and activities, streamside boundary location or land use exemptions.
(4)
Zoning and Development Administrator's Interpretation or Decision of Other Development Matters. An interpretation or decision of the Zoning and Development Administrator regarding development matters including subdivisions, large scale developments, parking and loading, outdoor lighting, compliance with applicable design standards, or any other development matters.
(5)
Urban Forester—Landscape and Tree Preservation and Protection requirements. Decisions of the Urban Forester related to landscape and tree preservation and protection requirements.
(D)
Appeals to the Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals. When the administrative authority under Chapter 173 shall disapprove an application, or the applicant is aggrieved by the interpretation of the administrative authority, the applicant may appeal the decision to the Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals.
(Code 1965, §17B-11.2(d), (e), App. A., Art. 10(6), 19(2), App. B, §III, App. C., Art. 10(6), 19(2), App. B, §III, App. C., Art. V, §A; Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; Ord. No. 1750, 7-6-70; Ord. No. 2109, 6-375; Ord. No. 2252, 7-6-76; Ord. No. 2538, 7-3-79; Ord. No. 2585, 12-4-79; Ord. No. 2697, 1-20-81; Ord. No. 3153, 11-19-85; Ord. No. 3340, 3-14-88; Code 1991, §§150.03, 158.67(B), 158.68(A), (B), 159.65, 160.048, 160.172, 160.176(A), (B), 161.11, 162.03(B), (C), 163.10(D); Ord. No. 3551, 6-4-91; Ord. No.3587, §1, 1-7-92; Ord. No. 3699, §3, 4-20-93; Ord. No. 3716, §2, 6-15-93, Ord. No. 3806, §1, 6-28-94;Ord. No. 3895, §1, 6-20-95; Ord. No. 3901, §1, 7-5-95; Ord. No. 3901, §1, 7-5-95; Ord. No. 3925, §7, 10-3-95; Ord. No. 3963, §9, 4-16-96; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Exh. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4368, §2, 2-5-02; Ord. No. 4377, §§1, 2, 3-5-02; Ord. No. 4652, 12-07-04; Ord. No. 5206, 12-16-08; Ord. No. 5296, 12-15-09; Ord. 5390, 3-1-11; Ord. No. 6343, §1(Exh. A), 8-4-20; Ord. No. 6446, §5, 6-15-21; Ord. No. 6773, §§ 5—10, 7-16-24; Ord. No. 6840, §1, 2-4-25; Ord. No. 6867, §§4, 5, 5-6-25)
(A)
Permit Denied. Any person whose application for a permit under Chapter 175 has been denied may request and shall be granted a hearing on the matter before the Housing Board.
(B)
Permit Suspended. Any person whose permit has been suspended, or who has received notice from the enforcement officer that his permit will be suspended unless certain conditions or practices at the mobile home park are corrected, may request and be granted a hearing on the matter before the Housing Board.
(C)
Petition Deadline. When no petition for hearing shall have been filed within ten (10) days following the day on which notice of suspension was served, such permit shall be deemed to have been automatically revoked at the expiration of such ten (10) days.
(Code 1965, §17B11.2(e); Ord. No. 2109, 6-3-75; Ord. No. 2583, 12-4-79; Ord. No. 3152, 11-19-85; Ord. No. 3153, 11-19-85; Ord. No. 3153, 11-19-85; Ord. No. 3340, 3-15-88; Code 1991, §158.67; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Exh. A), 6-16-98)
(Code 1965, §§13A-40, 13A-43; Ord. No. 1509, 8-8-66; Code 1991, §§156.017, 156.029; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Exh. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4652, 12-07-04).
If the Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals refuses to extend a building permit pursuant to §173.02 (B)(8) or to issue a new building permit for property for which a building permit has expired pursuant to §173.02 (B)(8), the owner may appeal to the City Council.
(Ord. No. 5019, 5-15-07)
Final decisions by the Board of Adjustment may be appealed to the City Council by an owner of record of the property in question or by a City Council member on behalf of any resident of the city.
(Ord. No. 6867, §6, 5-6-25)