General provisions
The following regulations shall apply to all "customary home occupations" irrespective of the underlying general zoning district.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Satellite dishes having a diameter of greater than 39.37 inches which are located in a residential (R) zoning district shall be located in the rear yard only and shall maintain a five-foot setback from all side and rear lot lines. The zoning administrator may allow the dish to be located on a roof; within the side or front yard; or within five (5) feet of a lot line in the rear yard, if he first determines that:
If the zoning administrator allows the placement of a satellite dish in a front or side yard, landscaping will be required along the antenna's nonreception window axes. Such treatments along the nonreception window axes shall consist of evergreen plantings designed to create an opaque screen within five (5) years.
(Ord. No. 25-827, § 2, 3-4-25)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Except as otherwise noted, fences or walls (NOTE: A boundary structure (as herein defined) shall not be considered a wall and shall be governed per Section 9.3 above) are permitted in the various districts subject to the following regulations:
(Ord. No. 21-735, § 6, 3-16-21; Ord. No. 25-827, § 1, 3-4-25)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
(Ord. No. 25-845, § 6, 12-16-25)
Effective on: 12/16/2025
* Note: See Section 8.1.11 for standards related to the Revised Residential Development District.
| Figure 9.7-1 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.7-1 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.7-1 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.7-1 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.7-2 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.7-2 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.7-2 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.7-2 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.7-3 |
|---|
![]() |
| Note: The above illustrations show the typical application of sight triangles for a standard right of way. The City Traffic Engineer shall make a determination for non-typical right of ways and equivalent sight distance may be required. |
| Figure 9.7-3 |
|---|
![]() |
| Note: The above illustrations show the typical application of sight triangles for a standard right of way. The City Traffic Engineer shall make a determination for non-typical right of ways and equivalent sight distance may be required. |
| Figure 9.7-3 |
|---|
![]() |
| Note: The above illustrations show the typical application of sight triangles for a standard right of way. The City Traffic Engineer shall make a determination for non-typical right of ways and equivalent sight distance may be required. |
| Figure 9.7-3 |
|---|
![]() |
| Note: The above illustrations show the typical application of sight triangles for a standard right of way. The City Traffic Engineer shall make a determination for non-typical right of ways and equivalent sight distance may be required. |

(Ord. No. 14-632, § 12, 8-19-14; Ord. No. 21-748, § 3, 10-19-21; Ord. No. 25-845, § 7, 12-16-25)
Effective on: 12/16/2025
On through lots, the required front and rear yard setbacks shall each equal or exceed the greater required front or rear yard setback that would normally be applied in that zoning district. For example, if a through lot were located in a zoning district which normally required a 30-foot front setback and a 35-foot rear setback, both front and rear setbacks would each have to be a minimum of thirty-five (35) feet. Accessory structures may generally only be placed on through lots in the rear yard. The front yard shall be determined based on the architectural front of the proposed structure and other structures on the same block and side of the street. On through lots within commercial zoning districts, the required front and rear yard setbacks may be reduced by ten (10) feet. For example, if a through lot were located in a commercial zoning district which normally required a 30-foot front setback and a 20-foot rear setback, both front and rear setbacks on a through lot may be reduced to a minimum of twenty (20) feet. Where setback relief is granted opposing a residential lot, street trees shall be installed along said property boundary according to Section 11.4. Notwithstanding the above, the setback provisions within the TH thoroughfare overlay districts shall remain unchanged.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
On any lot having an area of between one to three (3) acres, the cumulative area of all accessory structures (except outdoor swimming pools and structures with less than three (3) sides) shall not exceed one-half (½) the heated ground floor area of the principal structure or one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet, whichever is greater.
On any lot containing an area of over three (3) acres, the cumulative area of all accessory structures (except outdoor swimming pools, structures with less than three (3) sides, barns, stables and accessory dwelling unit (ADU)) shall not exceed four (4) percent of the total lot acreage.
Any structure which exceeds five hundred (500) square feet in gross floor area shall be finished externally with materials that are similar in nature to the external materials found upon the principal structure. (However, nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed so as to require a masonry accessory structure for a masonry principal residence.)
(Ord. No. 14-632, § 13, 8-19-14; Ord. No. 21-739, § 1, 6-15-21; Ord. No. 24-812, § 1, 8-20-24; Ord. No. 25-845, § 8, 12-16-25)
Effective on: 12/16/2025
Accessory dwelling units shall be permitted as an accessory use to any single-family detached dwelling unit (excluding manufactured homes) in accordance with the following requirements:
(Ord. No. 20-733, § 2, 1-19-21; Ord. No. 25-845, § 9, 12-16-25)
Effective on: 12/16/2025
The front yard setbacks for other single- and two-family dwellings shall be determined on all other lots located on the same block, facing the same street, within the same zoning district, and which lie within two hundred (200) linear feet from the lot in question. The average of these existing front setbacks shall be computed (measurements from at least two (2) qualifying lots shall be required to make this computation). The required front yard setback may be reduced anywhere between said average and the front yard setback required for the zone.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Outdoor lighting shall be located so as to not endanger motorists traveling on any street. The reflectivity of any structure constructed after the effective date of this Ordinance shall in no way hamper or cause endangerment to motorists traveling on any street.
External lighting for any nonresidential use shall be directed in a manner so as to not shine on nor be directed towards lots in a residential (R) zoning district.
The following are prohibited:
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
| Setback Distance from Nearest Thoroughfare Right-of-Way Line (linear feet) | Maximum Height of Lattice Tower (feet) |
|---|---|
| 0—200 | 35 |
| 201—300 | 100 |
| 301—400 | 120 |
| 401—500 | 140 |
| 501—600 | 160 |
| 601—700 | 180 |
| 701+ | 200 |
An example of this is as follows:
A communication tower (of lattice construction) is proposed to be located in the I-1 district. The tower, meeting all other conditions of this Ordinance, is to be located three hundred fifty (350) linear feet (as measured using the straightest short line distance) from the nearest thoroughfare right-of-way. The tower may therefore be no greater than one hundred twenty (120) feet in height.
If said tower were of monopole construction, the tower could be placed elsewhere on the lot, subject to it meeting all other applicable regulations of this Ordinance.
Maximum height. Maximum tower height of lattice towers is discussed in Section 9-15B2. There are no maximum height restrictions for monopole towers, except for two-way local communication radio towers (as discussed in Section 9-15B3.
If the communication tower is placed on top of an existing structure it may extend above the height of that structure by no greater than twenty (20) feet in all residential zones (except R-A) and fifty (50) feet in all other zoning districts.
A type D buffer shall be required when a freestanding communication tower is placed in a residential, except RLD, office, C-1, CBD, and TMU zoning district. A type C buffer shall be required for freestanding communication towers in all other zoning districts.
Irrespective of all minimum screening requirements, towers shall be screened with trees so as to minimize the sight impact from surrounding residences. All towers shall not be obtrusive in the neighborhoods in which they are located and shall be constructed of materials so as to have an external finish which renders them compatible with surrounding neighborhoods.
The planning director, or Planning Commission or City Council (through the issuance of a special use permit) may waive any or all of these screening requirements upon a finding that the existing topography or existing screening materials on site screen the property as effectively as the screening which ordinarily would be required; or that the installation of new screening materials would be impractical or would serve no useful purpose (such waiver may also include situations when the type of nonresidential adjoining use would not warrant screening); provided, however, that the spirit and intent of this section is preserved. This shall not be construed to relieve the requirement of establishing screening for towers to be located adjacent to vacant properties or along any public street.
The term "architecturally compatible," as herein used, shall mean "adequately disguised by the structure on which the antenna is located so as to disguise or camouflage the tower in such manner so that the structure housing the tower takes on the appearance of a structure other than a communication tower." In addition, "the design and materials used on the structure and its exterior materials blend harmoniously with the buildings and use of the host sight."
In no case shall the height of said communication tower exceed one hundred fifty (150) feet.
Accordingly, the following performance criteria are placed on combined communication towers:
(Ord. No. 13-628, § 16, 11-19-13; Ord. No. 21-739, § 1, 6-15-21)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Hours of operations for all office/commercial services/retail uses located in a residential zoning district shall be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. with the exception of automobile service stations which may have hours of operation outside of these limitations. If a use seeks to operate outside of these hours of operations, a special use permit shall first need to be granted by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 5.11.
(Ord. No. 25-827, § 2, 3-4-25)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
All uses with outdoor speakers shall locate the speaker and associated menu board, drive through window, and stacking lane, if applicable, fifty (50) or more feet from the edge of a lot located in a Residential zoning district. Staging spaces may be required per Chapter 10.
(Ord. No. 23-787, § 5, 6-20-23)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Every use of land shall be operated in such a way that regularly recurring noises are not disturbing or unreasonably loud and do not cause injury, detriment, or nuisance to any person of ordinary sensitivities. Every nonresidential use in an Office, Commercial, or Industrial District which adjoins a Residential District must be operated in such a way that any noise which may be detected by the human senses without instruments at the district boundary line is no louder than the noise which could be expected from uses permitted in those Residential Districts.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Maximum Number of Curb Cuts
Minimum Distance Between Curb Cuts
| Figure 9.23-1 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.23-1 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.23-1 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.23-1 |
|---|
![]() |
| TABLE 9.23-1 Minimum Distance Separation Between Curb Cut and Street Intersection | |
|---|---|
| Major Thoroughfare | 125 feet |
| Minor Thoroughfare | 100 feet |
| All Other Roads | 75 feet |
| TABLE 9.23-1 Minimum Distance Separation Between Curb Cut and Street Intersection | |
|---|---|
| Major Thoroughfare | 125 feet |
| Minor Thoroughfare | 100 feet |
| All Other Roads | 75 feet |
| TABLE 9.23-1 Minimum Distance Separation Between Curb Cut and Street Intersection | |
|---|---|
| Major Thoroughfare | 125 feet |
| Minor Thoroughfare | 100 feet |
| All Other Roads | 75 feet |
| TABLE 9.23-1 Minimum Distance Separation Between Curb Cut and Street Intersection | |
|---|---|
| Major Thoroughfare | 125 feet |
| Minor Thoroughfare | 100 feet |
| All Other Roads | 75 feet |
| Figure 9.23-2 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.23-2 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.23-2 |
|---|
![]() |
| Figure 9.23-2 |
|---|
![]() |
The Administrator, or appropriate approval body in the case of a special use permit or conditional zoning request, may modify any requirement of this Section upon making a determination that such modification will serve to promote the safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, and/or motorists accessing the lot(s) in question and nearby lots. Factors to be used in making this determination shall include (but not be limited to): (1) the nature of the proposed development; (2) the location of the proposed curb cut on the lot; (3) road classification; (4) adjacent land uses; and (5) crash data on the road that the lot accesses.
(Ord. No. 21-739, § 1, 6-15-21)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to require any change in the plans, construction or designed use of any building or structure upon which a building permit was secured prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, so long as said building permit remains valid, or so long as a vested right was issued.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
No use in a nonresidential district may operate in such a fashion that recurring ground vibrations are felt or detected at the property line by human senses without the use of instruments.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
All development shall provide for stormwater detention in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 14, Article VI, Division 4, Management of Post Development stormwater runoff.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
(Ord. No. 12-608, § 4, 4-17-12; Ord. No. 12-617, § 3, 8-21-12)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Low-voltage electrified fencing with a maximum of twelve (12) volts DC, primary voltage, is allowed in any Industrial district or in the C-3 (General Commercial) district, provided that:
(Ord. No. 14-632, § 11, 8-19-14; Ord. No. 22-757, § 1, 1-18-22)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
There shall be no maximum height for any fence located within the required setback of any correctional facility or for any public utility structure.
Effective on: 1/1/1901
It is not the purpose or intent of this section to prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting wireless communications services; unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent wireless communication services; regulate the placement, construction or modification of wireless communications facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions where it is demonstrated that the small wireless facility does or will comply with applicable FCC regulations; or prohibit or effectively prohibit collocations or modification that the City must approve under state or federal law. The provisions of this section are in addition to, and do not replace, any obligations an applicant may have under any franchises, licenses, encroachment agreements, pole attachment agreements or other permits issued by the City.
Any such facilities or structures shall be placed using the least intrusive means and shall not be placed in a less desirable location unless the owner or operator can demonstrate evidence that a more desirable location cannot feasibly serve the intended area. Provided, however, that the Planning Director may authorize a less desirable location to avoid unwanted aesthetic impacts. For purposes of this section, least intrusive means is defined as the method of designing potential wireless support structures or other wireless facilities to minimize visual and aesthetic impacts, including stealth elements and that are comparable and compatible with the location, visual environment and surrounding uses and structures.
In the event a wireless support structure, pole supporting a wireless facility or wireless facility of any type located within a City right of way threatens the public safety or welfare of the community or is in violation of this section and the violation is not corrected within the time period specified in any notice of violation, the City's Planning Director may require the removal of such structure or facility and the restoration of the right of way to its preexisting condition. Should the owner fail to remove such structure or facility the City may cause the removal thereof at the owner's expense, including any legal fees incurred as a result of such removal by the City.
After written notice to the owner, the City may require the relocation, at the owner's expense, of any wireless facility, the associated support structure or utility pole and accessory equipment, located within a City right of way, as necessary for maintenance or reconfiguration of the right of way or for other public projects, or take any other action or combination of actions necessary to protect the health and welfare of the City.
Any damage caused to a City right of way by the installation, operation or maintenance of any wireless support structure, pole, wireless facility and accessory equipment shall be repaired by the owner or operator of such structure, pole or facility so as to return the right of way to its functional equivalence before the damage occurred. Any such repairs shall be made within thirty (30) days after notice from the City. In the event the owner or operator of the facility fails to make repairs, the City shall undertake those repairs and charge the costs thereof to said owner or operator.
Nothing in this section is intended to authorize a person to place, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a privately owned utility pole or wireless support structure or to collocate wireless facilities of any type on a privately owned utility pole, a privately owned wireless support structure, a city owned pole located on private property or other private property without the consent of the property owner. A written consent or easement from the private property owner must be submitted with any application submitted to the City pursuant to this section.
(Ord. No. 18-678A, § 3, 9-18-18; Ord. No. 21-739, § 1, 6-15-21)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Where indicated on the Gastonia Greenway Plan, the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and/or the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP), a multi-use path shall be constructed in place of a required sidewalk. See Section 9.18.3.
(Ord. No. 21-748, § 4, 10-19-21; Ord. No. 22-763, § 5, 5-17-22)
Effective on: 1/1/1901
Effective on: 1/1/1901
(Ord. No. 21-748, § 4, 10-19-21; Ord. No. 23-799, § 1, 11-21-23)
Effective on: 1/1/1901