Procedures And Processes
The Planned Unit Development review and approval process shall be followed for all proposed new planned unit developments.
The optional district review and approval process shall be followed for all conceptual master plans used to determine the site configuration and/or subdivisions within an optional district.
Special exceptions shall include any building, sign, accessory structure, or site feature associated with the use that is being altered or built and is not permitted by right in a zoning district. Special exceptions shall follow the additional design standards associated with a use that shall be adhered to as a part of the approval unless specifically removed as part of approval. A special exception shall also include any request to deviate from the Use Standards, Development Standards, Subdivision Standards, or Base Dimensional Standards that are non-dimensional in nature.
The purpose and intent of this article is to ensure that special exceptions shall only be permitted on sites where the proposed building, sign, accessory structure, or site associated with the use may be adequately accommodated, without generating adverse impacts in the area of the proposed special exception. The determination of need for a special exception shall be made by the City Planner. A special exception shall be permitted only upon a finding by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of Alderman in compliance with the procedures and criteria set forth below:
Use exceptions shall include uses that do not significantly modify or alter any building, sign, accessory structure, or site associated with the use. Use exceptions have additional design standards associated with a use that shall be adhered to as a part of the approval unless specifically removed as part of approval.
The purpose and intent of this article is to ensure that use exceptions shall only be permitted on sites where the proposed use may be adequately accommodated, without generating adverse impacts in the area of the use. The determination of need for a use exception shall be made by the City Planner. If a proposed use triggers the site plan review process, it will be required to go through the process for a special exception. A use exception shall be permitted only upon a finding by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of Aldermen in compliance with the procedures and criteria set forth below:
An administrative adjustment is any minor deviation from the required dimensional, numerical amount, or percentage as required in a zoning district, use standards, or development standards that still meets the intent of this code. During the site plan and/or architecture review process, the City Planner is authorized to approve an administrative adjustment at the request of the applicant.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet the burden of clearly demonstrating the reason for the requested administrative adjustment and to provide sufficient documentation to illustrate how the adjustment is related to a site constraint and/or how the modification would equal or exceed the existing standard in terms of achieving the intent of this code.
A variance shall include any dimensional departure from the requirement in the use standards, development requirements, subdivision standards, or base dimensional standards such as but not limited to: building setbacks, sign setbacks, sign dimensions, lot area, parking lot dimensions, building height requirements (unless requiring a special exception), building design standards, etc. A variance shall also include any dimensional or non-dimensional deviation from sidewalk, parking layout, and stormwater requirements.
The purpose and intent of this article is to ensure that variances granted are not contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Code would result in unnecessary hardship. Examples of hardship include exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of property at the time of the original adoption of this ordinance, by reason of the location of trees, natural drainage course, lakes, or other desirable or attractive features, which condition is not generally prevalent in the neighborhood. Hardships do not include deviation(s) from an approved site and/or building plan, adjustments to allow for maximum permitted density of the lot, etc.
An administrative appeal is any appeal from administrative interpretations on all matters pertaining to the adopted codes of the City that does not require a variance, waiver, use exception, or special exception. Administrative Appeals of the interpretation of the adopted Technical Codes or any issue related to stormwater requirements shall be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Administrative Appeals of the interpretation and enforcement of the Rental Housing Code shall be reviewed by the Board of Aldermen. Administrative appeals of denial or revocation of transient vendor license shall be reviewed by the Board of Aldermen. All other Administrative Appeals shall be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Landscape Advisory Board may recommend a waiver from the landscape and buffer requirements of the code only if it is determined that the waiver is not contrary to the intent of the code and that the literal enforcement of the provisions of the code would result in unnecessary hardship. Economic or financial hardship alone shall not be used as the basis for a landscape waiver request.
The City may establish landmarks, landmark sites, and historic districts within the area of its jurisdiction. Such landmarks, landmark sites, or historic districts shall be designated following the criteria as specified in this article.
The purpose and intent of this article is that no exterior feature of any historic resource within a locally designated historic district shall be altered, relocated, or demolished until after an application for a certificate of appropriateness of such work has been reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and approved by the Board of Aldermen. Likewise, no construction that affects a historic resource shall be undertaken without a certificate of appropriateness unless the project's scope consists only of routine maintenance (i.e.: repainting, replacing asphalt shingle roofs with like materials, repairing existing materials with like kind materials, etc.) executed in conformance with the Secretary of the Interiors Standards or the work consists solely of interior modifications or repairs. The City Planner shall determine if a proposed repair is classified as routine maintenance or will require a Certificate of Appropriateness. Sections 4 - 11 of the Standards for Starkville's Historic Districts (Preziosi 2012) may be used by the Historic Preservation Commission for guidance during a review for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
.
Any parcel of land, use, building, structure, or feature lawfully existing on the date of enactment of this Code, brought into the City by annexation, or on the date of a zoning map change that does not conform to the requirements of the district in which it is located may be continued and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code. Nonconformities may continue as prescribed, but the provisions of this section are designed to curtail substantial investment in nonconformities and to bring about their eventual conformity or elimination. Existing commercial and/or residential multi-dwelling unit developments within the TN-E zoning districts that lawfully exist on the date of enactment of this Code shall not be considered nonconforming unless the commercial and/or residential multi-dwelling unit use ceases for any reason for a duration of more than twelve (12) months. Any expansion of an existing building and/or the addition of new habitable structures and/or dwelling units on a lot with an existing commercial and/or residential multi-dwelling unit development within the TN-E zoning district shall require approval as a special exception. Nonconformities shall be further defined according to one of the types of nonconformities listed below, or combination thereof, for the purpose of regulation.
After the approval of a site plan by the Development Review Committee and the approval of building design plan by the Architecture Review Committee or the determination by the Planning Department that the site and building plan approval are not required, a building permit may be issued by the Building Department. All applications for building permits shall be processed and reviewed in accordance with Section 17.3.
This Code, including the zoning map, is based on the Starkville Comprehensive Plan and is intended to carry out its objectives of sound, stable, and desirable development. This Code may be amended in accordance with Mississippi law only when one or more of the following conditions prevail:
The burden of proof is on the applicant to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the requested amendment is justified.
Amendments to this zoning map may be initiated by the City of Starkville, by the Planning and Zoning Commission, or by any person, firm, or corporation.
All applications for proposed planned unit developments shall be in the form required and provided by the City Planner. Completed application packages are due by 5:00 p.m. on the deadline date as set forth by the approved Planning and Zoning Commission schedule. Such applications shall be submitted to the City Planner together with the fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. Along with the application form and the applicable fee, a master plan, and all supplemental information necessary to render determinations related to the proposed planned unit development request shall be required for a “complete application”.
The procedure for amending the zoning district for a planned unit development shall follow the application procedures for a rezoning as stated in this code.
Any application for a rezoning to a planned unit development district shall include a master plan. The master plan will be approved as part of the rezoning and shall be used to regulate all future applications for site plan review, infrastructure plan review, preliminary plat review, and final plat review. A master plan shall include the following:
All planned unit developments shall obtain an approved site plan prior to the issuance of building permits. Site plan review and approval shall follow the procedures for site plan review as stated in this code based on the approved master plan.
If the subdivision of land is required as part of a planned unit development, preliminary plat approval shall be required. Preliminary plat review and approval shall follow the procedures for preliminary plat approval as stated in this code based on the approved master plan.
If the subdivision of land is required as part of a planned unit development, infrastructure plan approval shall be required after preliminary plat approval. Infrastructure plan review and approval shall follow the procedures for infrastructure plan approval as stated in this code based on the approved master plan.
After the completion and acceptance of all required infrastructure, final plat approval shall be required. Final plat review and approval shall follow the procedures for final plat approval as stated in this code based on the approved master plan.
The following is the sequence of approvals for planned unit developments:
Parties aggrieved by the final decision of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen, may appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to state statute.
Approval of a planned unit development shall establish the basic uses, densities, and intensities for the planned unit development in conformity with the master plan as approved by the Board of Aldermen, which shall be recorded by the Planning Department as an integral component of the planned unit development district regulations. Any approved site plan within the planned unit development shall also be recorded by the Planning Department as part of the planned unit development.
Reapplication for the same piece of property requesting the same type planned unit development cannot be made within one (1) year from the date the application was originally denied by the Board of Aldermen.
If construction of the planned unit development is not started within two (2) years of the date of approval, the Board of Aldermen may consider rezoning the site to its previous classification. The applicant, by showing good cause why he cannot adhere to the proposed timetable described in the master plan, may seek an extension of not more than one (1) year at a time. A request for extension shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Department and approved by the Board of Aldermen.
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen may attach conditions in accordance with the approval. Conditions attached to the approval of a Planned Unit Development shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the applicants, their heirs, and/or successors.
All applications for a use category and/or subdivision in an optional district shall be in the form required and provided by the City Planner. Completed application packages are due by 5:00 p.m. on the deadline date as set forth by the approved Planning and Zoning Commission schedule. Such applications shall be submitted to the City Planner together with the fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. Along with the application form and the applicable fee, a conceptual master plan, and all supplemental information necessary to render determinations shall be required for a “complete application”.
In considering and acting upon applications for a conceptual master plan, the following procedures shall be observed:
Any application for a use category and/or subdivision in an optional district shall include a conceptual master plan. The conceptual master plan will be used to determine the use categories of the property and the location of future right-of-way for connectivity. Parcels may have multiple use categories depending on the size parcels and the base dimensional standards of the requested use category. A conceptual master plan shall be the regulating plan used for the determination and application of the following:
The following shall be included in a conceptual master plan:
The subdivision of the property is not required at the time of approval of the conceptual master plan, but a conceptual master plan is required for any subdivision regulated by this Unified Development Code. The procedure for subdividing any property in an optional district shall follow the procedures for a subdivision as stated in section 3.12.
The following is the sequence of approvals for conceptual master plan approval in an optional district:
The conceptual master plan approval shall be valid for two (2) years unless an approved and active site plan for the property has been issued or a final plat has been approved. An expired conceptual master plan may be reapproved at the discretion of the Board of Aldermen.
Reapplication for the same piece of property requesting the same conceptual master plan approval cannot be made within one (1) year from the date the application was originally denied by the Board of Aldermen.
Due to the large size of the majority of the existing parcels within the optional district, phasing the buildout of the entire parcel may be needed. The conceptual master plan shall be used as the regulator document for approval of all future subdivision requests for the entire parcel. An amendment of the conceptual master plan during the buildout of the parcel shall be allowed in accordance with section 3.3.10.
Any parcel zoned Optional District may subdivide as a single dwelling residential subdivision without requiring rezoning if the subdivision meets the base dimensional standards of Section 6.3 for an RN zoning district. The subdivision procedures of Section 3.12 shall be followed.
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen may attach conditions in accordance with the approval. Conditions attached to the approval of a Conceptual Master Plan in Optional District shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the applicants, their heirs, and/or successors.
Any proposed structure or use not specifically prohibited by this Code shall be reviewed as a special exception application.
Only the following requirements and the amounts stated are to be considered for administrative adjustments:
In addition to the criteria stated above, the following criteria shall also be used to review variances in any form-based district.
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen may attach conditions in accordance with the approval. Conditions attached to the approval of a variance shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the applicants, their heirs, and/or successors.
The review and approval of all variance request from Section 16.9 stormwater management shall be based only on the following criteria:
An application for an appeal shall be submitted along with any supporting information to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of the written denial of an application by the Building Department, City Planner, Development Review Committee, and/or City Engineer.
Upon receipt of an application for an administrative appeal, the City Planner shall examine, or cause to be examined, the application and shall make such investigation into the proposed administrative appeal as is necessary. If the application is determined to be complete, the City Planner shall place the item on the agenda for either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. The appeal shall be placed on the next regularly scheduled meeting of either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustments and Appeals in accordance with the submittal schedule for non-advertised agenda items.
At the meeting, the applicant seeking the administrative appeal and any other party desiring to be heard upon the application may appear in person, by agent or by attorney. The applicant shall be entitled to make a presentation and at the conclusion of presentations or statements by all other parties, shall be entitled to offer a statement in rebuttal if desired. The chairman of either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall, at the commencement of the meeting upon each application or at any time during such meeting, require that parties desiring to make a presentation identify themselves and may specify the time to be allowed each such party within which to make such a presentation.
The decision recommended by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustments and Appeals and any specific conditions for approval shall be forwarded to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen for their binding decision. A super majority vote by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall be necessary to modify or reverse any order, requirement, decision, or determination of the Building Official, City Planner, Development Review Committee, and/or City Engineer. The Mayor and Board of Aldermen shall proceed to review the recommendation by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. At the meeting, the decision of either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall either be affirmed, modified, or reversed by the Board of Aldermen by majority vote.
Parties aggrieved by the final decision of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen, may appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to state statute.
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen may attach conditions in accordance with the approval. Conditions attached to the approval of an administrative appeal shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the applicants, their heirs, and/or successors.
The intent of site plan review is to ensure that development within the City of Starkville is consistent with all applicable development standards. The approval of such development will be based upon the provisions of this code and availability of adequate public facilities and services. It should take into account the potential impact and compatibility of the development with existing and anticipated developments within the immediate area and the City as a whole.
After reviewing a site and/or infrastructure plan and finding that the proposed plan meets the minimum requirements, the Development Review Committee will approve the site plan and/or infrastructure plan. If the site plan and/or infrastructure plan includes any requests for waiver, variance, special exception, use exception, preliminary plat, or final plat approval, the Development Review Committee will approve the site plan only after approval from the Board of Aldermen.
The intent of architecture review is to ensure that development within the City of Starkville is consistent with all applicable development standards. The approval of such development will be based upon the provisions of this code, the contextual surroundings of the development, potential visual impacts, compatibility with existing developments, and compatibility with anticipated developments within the immediate area and the City as a whole.
After reviewing the building design plan and finding that the proposed plan meets the minimum requirements, the Architecture Review Committee will approve the building design plan. If the building design plan includes any requests for waiver, variance, or exception, the Architecture Review Committee will approve the building design plan only after approval from the Board of Aldermen. Approval of a building design plan is required prior to building permit approval.
It shall be unlawful for any individual being the owner, agent, or person having control of any land within the incorporated area of Starkville, Mississippi, to subdivide or layout such land in lots unless by a plat, in accordance with the regulations contained herein. No lots shall be sold nor any plat recorded until such plat has been approved as herein provided. The division of land and buildings that is classified by State statute as a condominium shall not be deemed a subdivision. Condominium projects shall comply with the requirements of a condominium plat in this code. All applications shall be submitted to the City Planner together with the fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen
Whenever any subdivision of land is proposed, before any recording of deeds, and before any permit for the erection of a structure in such proposed subdivision shall be granted, the owner or his authorized agent, shall apply for and secure approval of such proposed subdivision in accordance with the following procedure:
All costs associated with a subdivision application shall be paid by the applicant together with the application fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. The applicant shall also be required to reimburse the City for costs associated with addressing for the subdivision. Costs which exceed that paid at time of application shall be billed and paid by the applicant prior to execute a certificate of final plat approval.
The following are the procedural steps for a major subdivision:
The following are the procedural steps for a minor subdivision:
A condominium plat consisting of any property divided or to be divided into condominiums shall comply with the Unified Development Code and the Mississippi Condominium Law. Condominium plat applications shall be submitted to the City Planner together with the fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. Prior to recording a condominium plat in the office of the Chancery Clerk in Oktibbeha County and prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy, the requirements of this section and section 14.15 shall be followed. All recorded condominium plat shall include the following:
The requirements of this section shall apply to any condominium. Existing structures shall not be converted into condominiums unless the building and site meet all current development standards, use standards, and building codes. The burden of demonstrating compliance shall be placed on the applicant.
The following are the procedural steps for a condominium plat approval:
The Historic Preservation Commission shall initiate a continuing and thorough investigation of the archaeological, architectural, cultural, and historic significance of the city's resources. The findings shall be collected in a cohesive format, made a matter of public record, and made available for public inspection. The Commission shall work toward providing complete documentation for locally designated historic districts, which would include:
The Historic Preservation Commission shall advise the City on the designation of historic districts, landmarks, or landmark sites and provide appropriate assistance on ordinances that will be considered by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen.
A resource or resources may be nominated for designation upon motion of three members of the Historic Preservation Commission or by an owner of the property. A nomination shall contain information as specified by the Commission. The Commission must reach a decision on whether to recommend a proposed nomination to the city within six (6) months in the case of a historic district and two (2) months in the case of either a landmark or landmark site.
If the Historic Preservation Commission votes to recommend to the City the designation of a proposed resource, it promptly forwards to the City its recommendation, in writing, together with an accompanying file.
The Historic Preservation Commission's recommendations to the City for the designation of a historic district shall be accompanied by:
After the nomination of a resource to the City for possible local designation, the resource shall be fully protected by the provisions of this article for a period of six (6) months, as if it were already designated.
Any property designated under a previous city ordinance shall remain designated.
No historic district or districts shall be designated until the Mississippi Department of Archives and History has been notified by certified letter by the City and invited to make recommendations concerning the proposed district boundaries. The Mississippi Department of Archives and History may comment by letter, email, or other written communication. The City shall provide to the Mississippi Department of Archives and History the dates of the next two (2) public meetings at which action on the designation of such a district might be taken so that the Mississippi Department of Archives and History may comment in a timely manner. Failure of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History to comment by the date of the second such meeting shall relieve the City of any responsibility for awaiting and responding to such analysis, and the City may at any time thereafter take any necessary action to create the proposed historic district.
If a proposed ordinance is to designate a landmark or landmark site, the Mississippi Department of Archives and History need not be consulted.
The City shall conduct a public hearing, after notice, to discuss the proposed designation and boundaries thereof. A notice of the hearing shall be published once a week for at least three (3) consecutive weeks in at least one (1) newspaper published in the City. The first publication of such notice shall be made not less than twenty-one (21) days prior to the date fixed in the resolution for the public hearing and the last publication shall be made not more than seven (7) days prior to such date.
Within sixty (60) calendar days after the public hearing held in connection herewith, the City shall adopt the ordinance as proposed, reject it entirely, or adopt the ordinance with modifications.
Furthermore, the Historic Preservation Commission shall notify, as soon as is reasonably possible, the appropriate state, county, and municipal agencies of the official designation of all landmarks, landmark sites, and historic districts. An updated list and map shall be maintained by such agencies and made available to the public.
The Historic Preservation Commission and the Board of Aldermen shall use the following criteria in approving or denying a certificate of appropriateness:
No building permit shall be issued by the Building Department that affects a historic resource without a certificate of appropriateness. In the event that a building permit is not required for a building, structure, or object to be erected within a historic district or on a landmark or landmark site, a certificate of appropriateness is still required before such building, structure, or object may be erected. Thereafter, such application shall be reviewed in accordance with the following procedure:
A legal nonconforming lot is a lot existing legally at the time of the passage of this Code, or the time of annexation into the City’s jurisdiction, which does not by reason of design or dimensions conform to the regulations of the district in which it is located. A lot established after the passage of this Code, which does not conform to regulations of the district in which it is located, shall be considered an illegal nonconforming lot and is a violation of this Code. Legal nonconforming lots may continue only in accordance with the following provisions.
A legal nonconforming use is a use existing legally at the time of the passage of this Code, or the time of annexation into the City’s jurisdiction, which does not by reason of use conform to the regulations of the district in which it is located. A use established after the passage of this Code which does not conform to regulations of the district in which it is located shall be considered an illegal nonconforming use and is a violation of this Code. Legal nonconforming uses of land or structures may continue only in accordance with all of the following provisions:
A legal nonconforming structure is a building or structure existing legally at the time of the passage of this Code, or the time of annexation into the City’s jurisdiction, which does not by reason of location, design, or dimensions conform to the regulations of the district in which it is situated. A structure established after the passage of this Ordinance which does not conform to regulations of the district in which it is situated shall be considered an illegal nonconforming structure and is a violation of this Code. Legal nonconforming structures may continue only in accordance with all of the following provisions:
A legal nonconforming feature is a physical site feature existing legally at the time of the passage of this Code, or the time of annexation into the City’s jurisdiction, which does not because of design or dimension conform to the use or development standards for the district in which it is situated. Nonconforming features include, but are not limited to: driveway widths, fence height, parking lot layout, parking lot paving, number of required parking spaces, loading areas, buffer areas, landscaping, sidewalks, ADA requirements, etc. A site feature added, changed, repaired, or modified after the passage of this Code which does not conform to the regulations of the district in which it is situated shall be considered an illegal nonconforming feature and is a violation of this Code. Legal nonconforming features may be continued subject to the following limitations:
No nonconforming accessory use or accessory structure shall continue after the principal use or principal structure is terminated by abandonment, discontinuance, damage, or destruction unless such accessory use or accessory structure after that is made to conform to the standards for a principal structure for the zoning district in which it is located.
There may be a change in tenancy or ownership of an existing nonconforming structure provided there is no change in the nature or character of such nonconforming structure except as permitted in this Section.
The requirements of this section shall not apply to signs. Nonconforming signs shall meet the provisions for nonconformity under the development standards for signs.
The requirements of this section shall not apply to signs that are classified as class I outdoor advertising (billboard) signs.
Whenever a violation of the Unified Development Code is found, the Code Enforcement Officer(s), Building Official, City Engineer, City Planner, and/or their designee(s) shall follow the process and procedures for issuance of a code violation.
The provisions of this Code shall be enforced by the Code Enforcement Officer(s), Building Official, City Engineer, City Planner, and/or their designee(s).
The following shall be the general process for issuance of a violation:
Procedures And Processes
The Planned Unit Development review and approval process shall be followed for all proposed new planned unit developments.
The optional district review and approval process shall be followed for all conceptual master plans used to determine the site configuration and/or subdivisions within an optional district.
Special exceptions shall include any building, sign, accessory structure, or site feature associated with the use that is being altered or built and is not permitted by right in a zoning district. Special exceptions shall follow the additional design standards associated with a use that shall be adhered to as a part of the approval unless specifically removed as part of approval. A special exception shall also include any request to deviate from the Use Standards, Development Standards, Subdivision Standards, or Base Dimensional Standards that are non-dimensional in nature.
The purpose and intent of this article is to ensure that special exceptions shall only be permitted on sites where the proposed building, sign, accessory structure, or site associated with the use may be adequately accommodated, without generating adverse impacts in the area of the proposed special exception. The determination of need for a special exception shall be made by the City Planner. A special exception shall be permitted only upon a finding by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of Alderman in compliance with the procedures and criteria set forth below:
Use exceptions shall include uses that do not significantly modify or alter any building, sign, accessory structure, or site associated with the use. Use exceptions have additional design standards associated with a use that shall be adhered to as a part of the approval unless specifically removed as part of approval.
The purpose and intent of this article is to ensure that use exceptions shall only be permitted on sites where the proposed use may be adequately accommodated, without generating adverse impacts in the area of the use. The determination of need for a use exception shall be made by the City Planner. If a proposed use triggers the site plan review process, it will be required to go through the process for a special exception. A use exception shall be permitted only upon a finding by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of Aldermen in compliance with the procedures and criteria set forth below:
An administrative adjustment is any minor deviation from the required dimensional, numerical amount, or percentage as required in a zoning district, use standards, or development standards that still meets the intent of this code. During the site plan and/or architecture review process, the City Planner is authorized to approve an administrative adjustment at the request of the applicant.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet the burden of clearly demonstrating the reason for the requested administrative adjustment and to provide sufficient documentation to illustrate how the adjustment is related to a site constraint and/or how the modification would equal or exceed the existing standard in terms of achieving the intent of this code.
A variance shall include any dimensional departure from the requirement in the use standards, development requirements, subdivision standards, or base dimensional standards such as but not limited to: building setbacks, sign setbacks, sign dimensions, lot area, parking lot dimensions, building height requirements (unless requiring a special exception), building design standards, etc. A variance shall also include any dimensional or non-dimensional deviation from sidewalk, parking layout, and stormwater requirements.
The purpose and intent of this article is to ensure that variances granted are not contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Code would result in unnecessary hardship. Examples of hardship include exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of property at the time of the original adoption of this ordinance, by reason of the location of trees, natural drainage course, lakes, or other desirable or attractive features, which condition is not generally prevalent in the neighborhood. Hardships do not include deviation(s) from an approved site and/or building plan, adjustments to allow for maximum permitted density of the lot, etc.
An administrative appeal is any appeal from administrative interpretations on all matters pertaining to the adopted codes of the City that does not require a variance, waiver, use exception, or special exception. Administrative Appeals of the interpretation of the adopted Technical Codes or any issue related to stormwater requirements shall be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Administrative Appeals of the interpretation and enforcement of the Rental Housing Code shall be reviewed by the Board of Aldermen. Administrative appeals of denial or revocation of transient vendor license shall be reviewed by the Board of Aldermen. All other Administrative Appeals shall be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Landscape Advisory Board may recommend a waiver from the landscape and buffer requirements of the code only if it is determined that the waiver is not contrary to the intent of the code and that the literal enforcement of the provisions of the code would result in unnecessary hardship. Economic or financial hardship alone shall not be used as the basis for a landscape waiver request.
The City may establish landmarks, landmark sites, and historic districts within the area of its jurisdiction. Such landmarks, landmark sites, or historic districts shall be designated following the criteria as specified in this article.
The purpose and intent of this article is that no exterior feature of any historic resource within a locally designated historic district shall be altered, relocated, or demolished until after an application for a certificate of appropriateness of such work has been reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and approved by the Board of Aldermen. Likewise, no construction that affects a historic resource shall be undertaken without a certificate of appropriateness unless the project's scope consists only of routine maintenance (i.e.: repainting, replacing asphalt shingle roofs with like materials, repairing existing materials with like kind materials, etc.) executed in conformance with the Secretary of the Interiors Standards or the work consists solely of interior modifications or repairs. The City Planner shall determine if a proposed repair is classified as routine maintenance or will require a Certificate of Appropriateness. Sections 4 - 11 of the Standards for Starkville's Historic Districts (Preziosi 2012) may be used by the Historic Preservation Commission for guidance during a review for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
.
Any parcel of land, use, building, structure, or feature lawfully existing on the date of enactment of this Code, brought into the City by annexation, or on the date of a zoning map change that does not conform to the requirements of the district in which it is located may be continued and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code. Nonconformities may continue as prescribed, but the provisions of this section are designed to curtail substantial investment in nonconformities and to bring about their eventual conformity or elimination. Existing commercial and/or residential multi-dwelling unit developments within the TN-E zoning districts that lawfully exist on the date of enactment of this Code shall not be considered nonconforming unless the commercial and/or residential multi-dwelling unit use ceases for any reason for a duration of more than twelve (12) months. Any expansion of an existing building and/or the addition of new habitable structures and/or dwelling units on a lot with an existing commercial and/or residential multi-dwelling unit development within the TN-E zoning district shall require approval as a special exception. Nonconformities shall be further defined according to one of the types of nonconformities listed below, or combination thereof, for the purpose of regulation.
After the approval of a site plan by the Development Review Committee and the approval of building design plan by the Architecture Review Committee or the determination by the Planning Department that the site and building plan approval are not required, a building permit may be issued by the Building Department. All applications for building permits shall be processed and reviewed in accordance with Section 17.3.
This Code, including the zoning map, is based on the Starkville Comprehensive Plan and is intended to carry out its objectives of sound, stable, and desirable development. This Code may be amended in accordance with Mississippi law only when one or more of the following conditions prevail:
The burden of proof is on the applicant to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the requested amendment is justified.
Amendments to this zoning map may be initiated by the City of Starkville, by the Planning and Zoning Commission, or by any person, firm, or corporation.
All applications for proposed planned unit developments shall be in the form required and provided by the City Planner. Completed application packages are due by 5:00 p.m. on the deadline date as set forth by the approved Planning and Zoning Commission schedule. Such applications shall be submitted to the City Planner together with the fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. Along with the application form and the applicable fee, a master plan, and all supplemental information necessary to render determinations related to the proposed planned unit development request shall be required for a “complete application”.
The procedure for amending the zoning district for a planned unit development shall follow the application procedures for a rezoning as stated in this code.
Any application for a rezoning to a planned unit development district shall include a master plan. The master plan will be approved as part of the rezoning and shall be used to regulate all future applications for site plan review, infrastructure plan review, preliminary plat review, and final plat review. A master plan shall include the following:
All planned unit developments shall obtain an approved site plan prior to the issuance of building permits. Site plan review and approval shall follow the procedures for site plan review as stated in this code based on the approved master plan.
If the subdivision of land is required as part of a planned unit development, preliminary plat approval shall be required. Preliminary plat review and approval shall follow the procedures for preliminary plat approval as stated in this code based on the approved master plan.
If the subdivision of land is required as part of a planned unit development, infrastructure plan approval shall be required after preliminary plat approval. Infrastructure plan review and approval shall follow the procedures for infrastructure plan approval as stated in this code based on the approved master plan.
After the completion and acceptance of all required infrastructure, final plat approval shall be required. Final plat review and approval shall follow the procedures for final plat approval as stated in this code based on the approved master plan.
The following is the sequence of approvals for planned unit developments:
Parties aggrieved by the final decision of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen, may appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to state statute.
Approval of a planned unit development shall establish the basic uses, densities, and intensities for the planned unit development in conformity with the master plan as approved by the Board of Aldermen, which shall be recorded by the Planning Department as an integral component of the planned unit development district regulations. Any approved site plan within the planned unit development shall also be recorded by the Planning Department as part of the planned unit development.
Reapplication for the same piece of property requesting the same type planned unit development cannot be made within one (1) year from the date the application was originally denied by the Board of Aldermen.
If construction of the planned unit development is not started within two (2) years of the date of approval, the Board of Aldermen may consider rezoning the site to its previous classification. The applicant, by showing good cause why he cannot adhere to the proposed timetable described in the master plan, may seek an extension of not more than one (1) year at a time. A request for extension shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Department and approved by the Board of Aldermen.
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen may attach conditions in accordance with the approval. Conditions attached to the approval of a Planned Unit Development shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the applicants, their heirs, and/or successors.
All applications for a use category and/or subdivision in an optional district shall be in the form required and provided by the City Planner. Completed application packages are due by 5:00 p.m. on the deadline date as set forth by the approved Planning and Zoning Commission schedule. Such applications shall be submitted to the City Planner together with the fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. Along with the application form and the applicable fee, a conceptual master plan, and all supplemental information necessary to render determinations shall be required for a “complete application”.
In considering and acting upon applications for a conceptual master plan, the following procedures shall be observed:
Any application for a use category and/or subdivision in an optional district shall include a conceptual master plan. The conceptual master plan will be used to determine the use categories of the property and the location of future right-of-way for connectivity. Parcels may have multiple use categories depending on the size parcels and the base dimensional standards of the requested use category. A conceptual master plan shall be the regulating plan used for the determination and application of the following:
The following shall be included in a conceptual master plan:
The subdivision of the property is not required at the time of approval of the conceptual master plan, but a conceptual master plan is required for any subdivision regulated by this Unified Development Code. The procedure for subdividing any property in an optional district shall follow the procedures for a subdivision as stated in section 3.12.
The following is the sequence of approvals for conceptual master plan approval in an optional district:
The conceptual master plan approval shall be valid for two (2) years unless an approved and active site plan for the property has been issued or a final plat has been approved. An expired conceptual master plan may be reapproved at the discretion of the Board of Aldermen.
Reapplication for the same piece of property requesting the same conceptual master plan approval cannot be made within one (1) year from the date the application was originally denied by the Board of Aldermen.
Due to the large size of the majority of the existing parcels within the optional district, phasing the buildout of the entire parcel may be needed. The conceptual master plan shall be used as the regulator document for approval of all future subdivision requests for the entire parcel. An amendment of the conceptual master plan during the buildout of the parcel shall be allowed in accordance with section 3.3.10.
Any parcel zoned Optional District may subdivide as a single dwelling residential subdivision without requiring rezoning if the subdivision meets the base dimensional standards of Section 6.3 for an RN zoning district. The subdivision procedures of Section 3.12 shall be followed.
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen may attach conditions in accordance with the approval. Conditions attached to the approval of a Conceptual Master Plan in Optional District shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the applicants, their heirs, and/or successors.
Any proposed structure or use not specifically prohibited by this Code shall be reviewed as a special exception application.
Only the following requirements and the amounts stated are to be considered for administrative adjustments:
In addition to the criteria stated above, the following criteria shall also be used to review variances in any form-based district.
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen may attach conditions in accordance with the approval. Conditions attached to the approval of a variance shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the applicants, their heirs, and/or successors.
The review and approval of all variance request from Section 16.9 stormwater management shall be based only on the following criteria:
An application for an appeal shall be submitted along with any supporting information to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of the written denial of an application by the Building Department, City Planner, Development Review Committee, and/or City Engineer.
Upon receipt of an application for an administrative appeal, the City Planner shall examine, or cause to be examined, the application and shall make such investigation into the proposed administrative appeal as is necessary. If the application is determined to be complete, the City Planner shall place the item on the agenda for either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. The appeal shall be placed on the next regularly scheduled meeting of either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustments and Appeals in accordance with the submittal schedule for non-advertised agenda items.
At the meeting, the applicant seeking the administrative appeal and any other party desiring to be heard upon the application may appear in person, by agent or by attorney. The applicant shall be entitled to make a presentation and at the conclusion of presentations or statements by all other parties, shall be entitled to offer a statement in rebuttal if desired. The chairman of either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall, at the commencement of the meeting upon each application or at any time during such meeting, require that parties desiring to make a presentation identify themselves and may specify the time to be allowed each such party within which to make such a presentation.
The decision recommended by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustments and Appeals and any specific conditions for approval shall be forwarded to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen for their binding decision. A super majority vote by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall be necessary to modify or reverse any order, requirement, decision, or determination of the Building Official, City Planner, Development Review Committee, and/or City Engineer. The Mayor and Board of Aldermen shall proceed to review the recommendation by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. At the meeting, the decision of either the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall either be affirmed, modified, or reversed by the Board of Aldermen by majority vote.
Parties aggrieved by the final decision of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen, may appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to state statute.
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen may attach conditions in accordance with the approval. Conditions attached to the approval of an administrative appeal shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the applicants, their heirs, and/or successors.
The intent of site plan review is to ensure that development within the City of Starkville is consistent with all applicable development standards. The approval of such development will be based upon the provisions of this code and availability of adequate public facilities and services. It should take into account the potential impact and compatibility of the development with existing and anticipated developments within the immediate area and the City as a whole.
After reviewing a site and/or infrastructure plan and finding that the proposed plan meets the minimum requirements, the Development Review Committee will approve the site plan and/or infrastructure plan. If the site plan and/or infrastructure plan includes any requests for waiver, variance, special exception, use exception, preliminary plat, or final plat approval, the Development Review Committee will approve the site plan only after approval from the Board of Aldermen.
The intent of architecture review is to ensure that development within the City of Starkville is consistent with all applicable development standards. The approval of such development will be based upon the provisions of this code, the contextual surroundings of the development, potential visual impacts, compatibility with existing developments, and compatibility with anticipated developments within the immediate area and the City as a whole.
After reviewing the building design plan and finding that the proposed plan meets the minimum requirements, the Architecture Review Committee will approve the building design plan. If the building design plan includes any requests for waiver, variance, or exception, the Architecture Review Committee will approve the building design plan only after approval from the Board of Aldermen. Approval of a building design plan is required prior to building permit approval.
It shall be unlawful for any individual being the owner, agent, or person having control of any land within the incorporated area of Starkville, Mississippi, to subdivide or layout such land in lots unless by a plat, in accordance with the regulations contained herein. No lots shall be sold nor any plat recorded until such plat has been approved as herein provided. The division of land and buildings that is classified by State statute as a condominium shall not be deemed a subdivision. Condominium projects shall comply with the requirements of a condominium plat in this code. All applications shall be submitted to the City Planner together with the fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen
Whenever any subdivision of land is proposed, before any recording of deeds, and before any permit for the erection of a structure in such proposed subdivision shall be granted, the owner or his authorized agent, shall apply for and secure approval of such proposed subdivision in accordance with the following procedure:
All costs associated with a subdivision application shall be paid by the applicant together with the application fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. The applicant shall also be required to reimburse the City for costs associated with addressing for the subdivision. Costs which exceed that paid at time of application shall be billed and paid by the applicant prior to execute a certificate of final plat approval.
The following are the procedural steps for a major subdivision:
The following are the procedural steps for a minor subdivision:
A condominium plat consisting of any property divided or to be divided into condominiums shall comply with the Unified Development Code and the Mississippi Condominium Law. Condominium plat applications shall be submitted to the City Planner together with the fee established by resolution of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. Prior to recording a condominium plat in the office of the Chancery Clerk in Oktibbeha County and prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy, the requirements of this section and section 14.15 shall be followed. All recorded condominium plat shall include the following:
The requirements of this section shall apply to any condominium. Existing structures shall not be converted into condominiums unless the building and site meet all current development standards, use standards, and building codes. The burden of demonstrating compliance shall be placed on the applicant.
The following are the procedural steps for a condominium plat approval:
The Historic Preservation Commission shall initiate a continuing and thorough investigation of the archaeological, architectural, cultural, and historic significance of the city's resources. The findings shall be collected in a cohesive format, made a matter of public record, and made available for public inspection. The Commission shall work toward providing complete documentation for locally designated historic districts, which would include:
The Historic Preservation Commission shall advise the City on the designation of historic districts, landmarks, or landmark sites and provide appropriate assistance on ordinances that will be considered by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen.
A resource or resources may be nominated for designation upon motion of three members of the Historic Preservation Commission or by an owner of the property. A nomination shall contain information as specified by the Commission. The Commission must reach a decision on whether to recommend a proposed nomination to the city within six (6) months in the case of a historic district and two (2) months in the case of either a landmark or landmark site.
If the Historic Preservation Commission votes to recommend to the City the designation of a proposed resource, it promptly forwards to the City its recommendation, in writing, together with an accompanying file.
The Historic Preservation Commission's recommendations to the City for the designation of a historic district shall be accompanied by:
After the nomination of a resource to the City for possible local designation, the resource shall be fully protected by the provisions of this article for a period of six (6) months, as if it were already designated.
Any property designated under a previous city ordinance shall remain designated.
No historic district or districts shall be designated until the Mississippi Department of Archives and History has been notified by certified letter by the City and invited to make recommendations concerning the proposed district boundaries. The Mississippi Department of Archives and History may comment by letter, email, or other written communication. The City shall provide to the Mississippi Department of Archives and History the dates of the next two (2) public meetings at which action on the designation of such a district might be taken so that the Mississippi Department of Archives and History may comment in a timely manner. Failure of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History to comment by the date of the second such meeting shall relieve the City of any responsibility for awaiting and responding to such analysis, and the City may at any time thereafter take any necessary action to create the proposed historic district.
If a proposed ordinance is to designate a landmark or landmark site, the Mississippi Department of Archives and History need not be consulted.
The City shall conduct a public hearing, after notice, to discuss the proposed designation and boundaries thereof. A notice of the hearing shall be published once a week for at least three (3) consecutive weeks in at least one (1) newspaper published in the City. The first publication of such notice shall be made not less than twenty-one (21) days prior to the date fixed in the resolution for the public hearing and the last publication shall be made not more than seven (7) days prior to such date.
Within sixty (60) calendar days after the public hearing held in connection herewith, the City shall adopt the ordinance as proposed, reject it entirely, or adopt the ordinance with modifications.
Furthermore, the Historic Preservation Commission shall notify, as soon as is reasonably possible, the appropriate state, county, and municipal agencies of the official designation of all landmarks, landmark sites, and historic districts. An updated list and map shall be maintained by such agencies and made available to the public.
The Historic Preservation Commission and the Board of Aldermen shall use the following criteria in approving or denying a certificate of appropriateness:
No building permit shall be issued by the Building Department that affects a historic resource without a certificate of appropriateness. In the event that a building permit is not required for a building, structure, or object to be erected within a historic district or on a landmark or landmark site, a certificate of appropriateness is still required before such building, structure, or object may be erected. Thereafter, such application shall be reviewed in accordance with the following procedure:
A legal nonconforming lot is a lot existing legally at the time of the passage of this Code, or the time of annexation into the City’s jurisdiction, which does not by reason of design or dimensions conform to the regulations of the district in which it is located. A lot established after the passage of this Code, which does not conform to regulations of the district in which it is located, shall be considered an illegal nonconforming lot and is a violation of this Code. Legal nonconforming lots may continue only in accordance with the following provisions.
A legal nonconforming use is a use existing legally at the time of the passage of this Code, or the time of annexation into the City’s jurisdiction, which does not by reason of use conform to the regulations of the district in which it is located. A use established after the passage of this Code which does not conform to regulations of the district in which it is located shall be considered an illegal nonconforming use and is a violation of this Code. Legal nonconforming uses of land or structures may continue only in accordance with all of the following provisions:
A legal nonconforming structure is a building or structure existing legally at the time of the passage of this Code, or the time of annexation into the City’s jurisdiction, which does not by reason of location, design, or dimensions conform to the regulations of the district in which it is situated. A structure established after the passage of this Ordinance which does not conform to regulations of the district in which it is situated shall be considered an illegal nonconforming structure and is a violation of this Code. Legal nonconforming structures may continue only in accordance with all of the following provisions:
A legal nonconforming feature is a physical site feature existing legally at the time of the passage of this Code, or the time of annexation into the City’s jurisdiction, which does not because of design or dimension conform to the use or development standards for the district in which it is situated. Nonconforming features include, but are not limited to: driveway widths, fence height, parking lot layout, parking lot paving, number of required parking spaces, loading areas, buffer areas, landscaping, sidewalks, ADA requirements, etc. A site feature added, changed, repaired, or modified after the passage of this Code which does not conform to the regulations of the district in which it is situated shall be considered an illegal nonconforming feature and is a violation of this Code. Legal nonconforming features may be continued subject to the following limitations:
No nonconforming accessory use or accessory structure shall continue after the principal use or principal structure is terminated by abandonment, discontinuance, damage, or destruction unless such accessory use or accessory structure after that is made to conform to the standards for a principal structure for the zoning district in which it is located.
There may be a change in tenancy or ownership of an existing nonconforming structure provided there is no change in the nature or character of such nonconforming structure except as permitted in this Section.
The requirements of this section shall not apply to signs. Nonconforming signs shall meet the provisions for nonconformity under the development standards for signs.
The requirements of this section shall not apply to signs that are classified as class I outdoor advertising (billboard) signs.
Whenever a violation of the Unified Development Code is found, the Code Enforcement Officer(s), Building Official, City Engineer, City Planner, and/or their designee(s) shall follow the process and procedures for issuance of a code violation.
The provisions of this Code shall be enforced by the Code Enforcement Officer(s), Building Official, City Engineer, City Planner, and/or their designee(s).
The following shall be the general process for issuance of a violation: