Zoneomics Logo
search icon

Compton City Zoning Code

§ 30-46.15

Co-Locations/Public Sites.

[Ord. #2121, § 1]
a. 
Tall Mounts Discouraged. Tall mounts are discouraged in the City of Compton and proliferation of short mounts is considered preferable to co-location.
b. 
Co-location Discouraged. Co-location is discouraged for all PWSF applications.
c. 
Worst-Case Review. The City of Compton shall review applications for co-locations on the basis of all positions on the mount, i.e., the cumulative, worse-case condition.
d. 
Co-locations Previously Approved. Applications for co-locations on mounts previously approved for co-location in the position applied for, require review of only the equipment to be added above and on the ground, including new contents of the equipment shelter or equipment cabinet, unless the previous approval will require changes other than required for the carrier to be co-located (e.g., a strengthened mount).
e. 
Co-locations Not Previously Approved. Applications for co-locations on mounts not previously approved for co-location in the position applied for require review of the existing mount as well as co-location under the requirements of this section.
f. 
Public Sites. The City of Compton shall work with carriers to facilitate the siting of PWSF on City-owned rights-of-way by negotiating the appropriate leasing procedures.