Edison City Zoning Code
§ 37-54.8
Review Standards and Regulations.
[1999 Code § 17.86.080]
a.
In preparing a recommendation regarding a regulated activity pursuant to this section, the Historic Preservation Commission shall consider whether the proposed activity is reasonable and appropriate and is not in conflict with the intent and purpose of the provisions related to historic sites as exemplified by the following standards and regulations.
1.
Regulated Activities Other than Demolitions and Removals. In regard to an application involving any regulated activity other than demolition or removal, the following matters shall be considered:
(a)
The extent to which the proposed use of any building or structure involved may have a negative impact on the continued viability of the historic landmark.
(b)
The extent to which the proposed activity will adversely affect the public's view of an historic structure.
(c)
The extent to which the proposed change will detract from the architectural or historic character of the historic landmark or from the criteria which were the basis of the designation of the historic structure.
(d)
The extent to which the proposed change will result in the loss of old, unusual or uncommon design, craftsmanship, textures or materials that cannot be reproduced or can be reproduced only with great difficulty.
(e)
The landmark's importance to the Township and the extent to which its historic or architectural interest would be adversely affected to the detriment of the public interest by the proposed activity.
b.
Demolitions. In regard to an application to demolish an historic landmark, the following matters shall be considered.
1.
Its historic, architectural, cultural and scenic significance in relation to the criteria established in section I of this section.
2.
Its potential for use for those purposes currently permitted by the zoning ordinance.
3.
Its structural condition and the economic feasibility of alternatives to the proposal.
4.
Its importance to the municipality and the extent to which its historical or architectural value is such that its removal would be detrimental to the public interest.
5.
The extent to which it is of such old, unusual or uncommon design, craftsmanship, texture or material that it could not be reproduced or could be reproduced only with great difficulty and expense.
6.
The extent to which its retention would promote the general welfare by maintaining and increasing the real estate values, generating business, attracting tourists, attracting new residents, stimulating interest and study in architecture and design, or making the municipality an attractive and desirable place in which to live.
c.
Relocation. In regard to an application to move an historic structure to a new location, the following matters shall be considered:
1.
The historic loss to the site of original location;
2.
The reasons for not retaining the historic structure at its present site.
3.
The compatibility, nature and character of the current and of the proposed surrounding areas as they relate to the protection of interest and values referred to in this section.
4.
If the proposed new location is within a district, visual compatibility factors as set forth in this section.
5.
The probability of significant damage to the landmark or structure itself.
6.
If it is to be removed from the Township, the proximity of the proposed new location to the Township, including the accessibility to the residents of the Township and other citizens.